User talk:Keilana/Archive4

4689:(cur) (last) 19:08, 1 February 2008 Keilana (Talk | contribs) m (Unprotected Palestinian people: Per Sandstein, User talk:Keilana#Your protection of Palestinian people) (undo) (cur) (last) 19:07, 1 February 2008 Keilana (Talk | contribs) (82,946 bytes) (unprotecting) (undo) (cur) (last) 18:40, 1 February 2008 Sandstein (Talk | contribs) (82,961 bytes) (Per talk request, add ) (undo) (cur) (last) 18:19, 1 February 2008 Keilana (Talk | contribs) m (Protected Palestinian people: Edit warring seems to have started again. Per WP:RFPP ) (undo) (cur) (last) 17:26, 1 February 2008 Ed Gies (Talk | contribs) (82,946 bytes) (→DNA clues - restore sensible previous version, instead of adnanmuf's inventions - are you prepared to vouch for this person's work? Read his writing on the talk page before deciding) (undo) what happened between time 19:07 and 19:08 to make you unprotect and then return back the protection. Is there is a way to reverse your last edit? 4674:

all what he did not like ( without referencing his action on the article itself or in the discussion page) He violated the Wiki laws that no grave cut should be made without discussion detailed of each ref etc. My understanding is that he is the edit warrior because he re undid what another editor did by undoing his grave removal of my greatly refernced work ( I been working on it for 1 year ) Nothing in my contribution/s is a (Creckpot theory) or Theory . Every thing I added is cut-past to the letter from other Researchers on Dienekes Anthropology web Blog and Rootsweb forum by scientists older and more experienced that new researchers( Dienekes been doing DNA studies in early 90's, etc). I am so confused by your referal to a page to contest your action ( protection) I really don't have time for this. Could you assign somebody to help me in my request including your help sincerely06:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

4994:

followed you there. Looking at his contributions, he started editing prolifically last month (January) and started stalking you January 19. He is calling your edits vandalism, which is not prudent. As he's reverted most of what you've done since then - even removing your comments from the talk - I am inclined to block him for a short while for harassment and stalking. That said, he and his meat/sockpuppet are tag-team reverting you and harassing you, which makes me inclined to block both of them indefinitely. For now, I am blocking both of them for 24 hours for stalking, tag-team reverting, and possible meatpuppeting. Hopefully this helps, and stops the situation. They are both clearly in violation of policy, and you've had stalkers after you for awhile now. Please tell me if they continue after the block.

4010:

thing to consider is that articles should not be on hold for longer than about one week. Although there is no hard and fast time limit for this, most editors would probably agree that five to seven days is enough time to address any GA-related issues with the article to get it to pass. Some editors have extended this a few days in the past, due to other extenuating circumstances, such as an article's primary editor being very busy with school or work, so they have asked for extra time. But as a general rule, a GA nominee that is placed on hold should meet enough of the criteria to be able to be passed within five to seven days. Some examples of articles that might be placed on hold would be:

2583:. Oh, the drama. I would support you removing yourself from CAT:AOR until CAT:AOR means the same thing with the same criteria for everyone in it. IMHO, CAT:AOR shouldn't have separate criteria for everyone in it, each to reinvent their own wheel as for what/who/when/why/how to be recalled. In 3 months, I believe that CAT:AOR will either be concrete and consistent or it will be recalled itself (as in community rejected). Until then, maybe just don't be in it? If you really screw up (you haven't yet and I don't foresee it happening ever), there are other avenues for taking your keys away. "Recall" isn't doing anything above distraction. 710:

which led to a heated back-and-forth between us. The e-book was no longer available for purchase at that point, and those of us who tried to bring the article into like with policy had to take her word that her transcriptions were accurate. Our disagreement was eventually settled, and I don't want to reignite it, so would you mind looking over the article, and giving your honest third opinion as to whether it merits the {{self-published}} tag? Clark's book is cited as the second source listed under References, and then three other times after that, with footnote links to the relevant passages. Thanks.

4890:

pattern of following me around for basically over a year. i don't think it is coincidence that one or the other happened upon a number of those talk pages and were surprised to see that I had already posted. These users seem to exist only to push a POV, stalk and disrupt/revert. What can be done? I can't see it stopping. It started almost a year and a half ago and the user has been disputing over and over, and then objecting to reversions of edits which were stalking in the first place, etc, etc. See this page for links and more info, this was brought to attention long ago:

4679:

actually you protected the page after it was violated by Ed Geis by his grave removal of referenced research, what is going on here?, Again you claim you unprotected it while you actually re-protected it ( protected the attack by Ed Geis) What I did was restoring the page to earlier version when the references ( 100--104) were next to J1 being semitic, and also added more clarifying info that the palestinians don't resemble israelis but differ completely ( is that anti-semitic) as being referenced on all levels of DNA (autosomal, male and female lineages)

297:. I don't think you'll need to vigorously defend it, but a lot of people are requesting an overturn purely because you haven't explained yourself. As an admin, being communicative is part of your duty. In a large, hotly contested debate like this, many people in the community feel upset and contentious, and an explanation of your decision will do a lot to help the rift heal afterwards. After such a contentious debate it would be absolutely terrible if the decision was overturned simply because you don't explain yourself. 2249:

dispute over the reliability of sources, and I protected the article to cool the dispute. Protection isn't an endorsement of the current version, I have no ulterior motive. (see here for protection policy/information). In general, an admin doesn't need consensus to protect a page when a dispute is ongoing. Is there a problem with my administrative actions? Thanks for expressing your concerns, feel free to ask on my talk page if you have other questions or need something. Best, Keilana|Parlez ici 06:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

5647: 1919: 397: 157: 4484: 3214: 3250: 3238: 2707:(Edit conflict.) I don't think recall is necessary at all: if an admin misbehaves, doubtless an RFC will begin (checks RFC: Keilana isn't there), and if it's serious, ARBCOM will get involved. I don't see any reason for the nitpicky, optional, gameable process that is recall. It should be tagged as historical and left alone... but that likely won't happen for a while; in the meantime, I 3401: 1255: 186:, with no edit summary except "fnord". This page is for furtherance of the Knowledge's goals and not your own personal web page. Archiving or removal of vandalism or other inappropriate material is one thing; removal of legitimate communications with no reply is rude. If you feel you can't bear to see such things, you shouldn't be closing difficult AfD's with no rationale. 2634:

you've abused the tools. If there's a consensus that you've misbehaved, then you can step down. If there's not, there's no reason to step down, regardless of how many editors vote for it. When RFA produces a wrong result, it's usually because it's too vote-like. We cannot correct this problem with a vote-like recall procedure.

731: 5559: 5155: 656: 1731: 5461: 5280:

Actually, I was thinking against the unblock, but I usually patrol CAT:UNBLOCK and I saw him up. I always contact the blocking admins of all people who show up there (except for the anons who claim their "little brother" was playing with their computer... fuck them) and seek further input regardless

5028:

Thank you, Keilana (and BoL), for your help. There is a cascading effect of stalkers, I've had about three in the past two or so years and they seem to follow closely after the others. Like personalities, I suppose, pick up on similar issues which is why editing royalty articles can be contentious at

4685:

Please reverse this unjustice and let the discussion continue dialogue as it is supposed to do!Ed Geis and other did not present any scientific reference against my references at all just plain talk like ( it is obviously this and that ) "It is obviously" is not a scientific evidence Hi Keilana: I am

2930:

Thanks for your opinion, Mercury. I believe in keeping my word, hence the RfA I went through a couple of weeks ago. Until this editor brought it to my attention, I hadn't thought much about it after making my criteria, honestly. I think that if I were abusive enough to actually have a recall succeed,

90:

K, I suggest that you leave the thread regarding your closure of the AfD which you archived here on this page for a while longer. Several editors are upset that no reason has been given, and it's likely that you will continue to receive questions over the next day or two about it. It'll be easier for

5856:

But I'd like to have more specifications concerning what I'm supposed to do now it is confirmed: 1. Should I make a request to inform some properly concerned administrators so they can block the range of IPs... or 2. you guys will take care of it and so I don't have to do anything else. If so, is it

5497:

Why did you decide to reduce his block? The agreement when Daniel unblocked him last time was that the next block would be for two weeks. He edited outside his restrictions and should have to deal with it. He's becoming a better user, sure, but that doesn't mean we should be giving him leeway now

4673:

Dear Kailana: Your final edit was to protect the article? don't you say you removed the protection? Sandstein and others wanted you to unprotect i!, However you actually re-protect it now, this way you actually blocked me from restoring my edits. As you know Ed Geis did one edit and that was cutting

4009:

So how to you know when an article fails outright, or fails initially, but meets "enough" of the criteria to be placed on hold? The answer to this question probably varies by about the same amount as there are reviewers of Good Articles! Everybody treats this slightly differently. The most important

2633:

Yes.. recall becomes more dysfunctional, the closer it becomes to a vote. In my view the simplest way to do it is to have anyone wanting recall start an RFC-like discussion (waive the certification requirement if you wish). This should help make it clear whether there's any plausible argument that

2248:

Hello, Sorry I couldn't attend to your concerns earlier. I semi-protected the page (here) because of the reasons stated there. As it is election season in the United States, articles about prominent political figures such as Mrs. Clinton are particularly vulnerable, hence the protection. There was a

2234:

Thank you Dear MBisanz, thank you so much for responding to those concerns on my talk page. I've posted on the person's talk, if s/he wants my admin actions looked at s/he can always seek input at AN or (God forbid) through recall. You've been a great help recently, and when you're ready for RfA I'd

2148:

Keilana, can you please explain why you have semi protected the page Huma Abedin ? You have stated vandalism which is clearly not the case! Please see Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard where the matter is being dealt with ! Can you explain your actions ? I understand I am new here but it was

1719:

article. I just had to say thank you - I wouldn't have wanted to close that AfD myself, but someone had to do it, and as far as I can see you made entirely the right decision. It seems you did face some criticism for it, but I just hope that won't put you off making similar tough, controversial, but

270:

Hi, I see you speedy deleted this article. Can you please restore it to my userspace. Though I was not a contributor to the article I do recall briefly skimming over it once or twice, and I'm pretty sure it did assert his significance. If not, this can easily be rectified if it is restored as he has

102:

being that "the 'delete' votes held more weight". AfD decisions should be primarily based upon policy rather than a vote of how many users desire to keep or delete, even if that vote is weighted. I may have misunderstood what you meant by that statement, so elaborating upon your rationale would help

5846:

Hi, Its seems like you're french speaking, I'm not sure if I can speak french to you, so I will speak in english. I recently made a request for checkuser concerning the case of the account Mark7532222 who's been trolling, vandalizing and harassing people for months with different socketpuppets and

4889:

What disturbs me is how long this has continued and persisted. Is there anything that can be done about these two? If you look at both of their contribution histories, they start first by reverting me and then if anyone else reverts them, they'll revert them as well, but there has been a consistent

3013:

in order to prevent an ongoing edit war. Per the dispute resolution process, I have called for two third opinions on the dispute at hand, both of which support the position that the article in question is in dire need of further work and should be tagged accordingly. I therefore request that you,

2797:

Wow. Here's my two cents on this recall business. I really appreciate the kind words, and your support means the world to me. However, I strongly believe that adminship is no big deal. If enough people think I suck as an admin, I'll give up the tools. It's not good, to have a position of trust when

2600:

I really think that accepting the recall request of a brand new user is a bit much. I think the recall process creates needless drama, and needless recalls doubly so. I find it increasingly difficult to support recall RfAs that were willingly entered into due to baseless concerns. I really think it

2544:

My case is the following: Yahel Guhan has stalked me over to "Battle of the Trench", an article he/she has never edited before. I asked Yahel to stop this on his/her talk page, but the user deleted my comment. In the light that I was blocked for 72-hours for similar behavior, I ask that Yahel Guhan

2262:

Who bought the information to the protect board ? Should not the fact it was brought to the board have been added to the talk page so people could provide information as to why it shouldnt be protected ? I was again note you claimed your reason for protecting the page was vandelism which it clearly

4726:

You helped me a few weeks ago with a vandal/stalker and now I am asking your help again. There is an editor who posts on and off who has a very, very long history of stalking and disruptive edits. He also is an admitted meatpuppet, as his wife is an editor as well who does the same things (this is

4551:

I am a new user in this grand society. Today I tried to post some information regarding my college(page "Janta Vedic College") and it was deleted by u on basis of copy right infringmint. May I know that how are we supposed to put the mission and vision statement of a public domain institute in our

2493:

I have note all the information on my page and intend to lodge a compliant against you and request recall. You yourslef have stated "He seems bent on my protection rationale - not the best," He is a she FYI. Had you read the information on the Biographies_of_living_persons you would see the person

709:

article, and remembered that a year ago, a user used Clark's own published e-book as the basis for a number of passages in that article. This user's goal was to rewrite the article to remove anything she perceived as negative, and place positive POV material in it, without regard for WP policies,

5234:

I've also posted a message similar to this to Coppertwig. Keilana, I respect your judegement when it comes to matters regarding me in the past few weeks. You're an excellently-clued administrator and you've always inspired me to go that bit further at CSD. Your support proved invaluable. Regards,

1536:

I was really upset and erased all of my contributions to the article but admin Utcursch reverted them back and told me he will also keep an eye on things as well, Utcursch has cleaed up the article and has really done a great job with all the work I put into gathering the information, I really am

4993:

Thanks, BoL, I appreciate the explanation, and I will not be online as much for the next couple of days, but I'll see what I can do. Charles, this is a really complicated situation. First, on the Grand Dukes of Luxembourg thing, you did edit the page first, and it definitely seems like Tfoxworth

4930:

I was on IRC a few weeks ago asking about the case Keilana dealt with and was cautioned by an admin that most of the admins are wholly uninterested in cases where it seems to be one user against the other, even if one user (in this case, two, but essentially one due to sock- or meatpuppetry) is

4692:

and who is Ed Gies? in red ( unknown-unreachable)? is he one of the administrators helpers or one of the secret government of Wiki or just plainly the owner of Wiki and all its information and rights???? It is obviously that you are working en tandom with Ed!? why did you just put pp:dispute as

1537:

grateful for his/her effort. I appreciate Admins getting involved because others people like myself can do very little except to add legitimate information, try to put together a neutral academic piece, but their is only so much abuse one can take from religious fanatics with political agendas.

94:

While we're on it, I also strongly suggest that you rethink your decision to not provide any rationale for your decision. For starters, it was a hotly debated discussion, so providing an explanation is common courtesy. It also will help answer the inevitable arguments at WP:DRV and clarify what

4678:

Dear Keilana: here is what you did ( 19:08, 1 February 2008 Keilana (Talk | contribs) m (Unprotected Palestinian people: Per Sandstein, User talk:Keilana#Your protection of Palestinian people) You say per Sandstein. Sandstein is actually requesting to unprotect the page just like my request (

2905:

I want to first applaud you for your courage in your willingness yo stand by your word, something I had not done in the past with my recall. I've seen your last two brushes with recall. Don't you find CAT:AOR distracting? I would support you removing youself from that category to prevent

2189:

I intend on asking someone to examine your actions. You clearly statd vandalism as your reason for the protection i would not you made no contibution to the talk page and sort no concensus from you action! I will also ask you to explain you relastionship to those who have sort to remove the

3354:

The top five categories with the largest backlogs are: Sports and recreation (57 articles), Theatre film and drama (34 articles), Music (19 articles), Transport (17 articles), Politics and government (16 articles), World history (13 articles), and Meteorology and atmospheric sciences (13

1532:

article as another Admin also has and others too recently. I am going to take a break since I have had enough personal insults and racial slurs thrown at me that it has left a really bad taste in my mouth. Please make sure the article is not hijacked and taken over for a poltical agenda.

704:

Hi, I have a question. Over the course of the past year, I've learned more about how sources about living persons should be those other than self-published ones, particularly in regards to material in the article that may be self-serving. Today I had cause to make some edits to the

3094:

At this point, we have a situation where there is one lone voice refusing to go along with the consensus, which is that this article contains notability and verfication issues. How many supporting third opinions do I need to elicit until this "dispute" is considered "resolved"?

2190:

information ? I would also like to know why you have changed you id ? thanks I will be adding this information to the talk page and any were else i find help ! I also note you did not add the fact the matter was being listed to protection page to the talk page of the article ?

2579:$ .02: Please don't take this the wrong way, I mean this in good faith - I think you should completely remove yourself from the "recallable" admins scategory for 3 months. It is after all voluntary. You are a great admin, a dedicated editor, a valuable....you get it. But the 1775:

anyone can remove a prod to contest it. But as it became clear that his deprods were simply vandalism, and he was now blocked for doing it, I undid all those deprods (those articles all do deserve a prod). Just wanted to clear up any confusion in your talk page history. --

2982:

Mercury's view of the category may be a bit biased, but he has a point. You really should give some consideration to your criteria around who can request a recall and how many people it will take for the petition to succeed... You don't have to go crazy like Majorly did...

57:

Hi, I merely added a simple adjective, edible. Swans ARE edible. I've eaten them myself. I thought the article should reflect that. I wasn't aware that I had to have approval to edit an article or that I had to discuss my edit before hand with others, smacks of 1984 to me!

2914:

without resorting to CAT:AOR to pull the tools from you. If you are a stand up person, I see no reason to believe that you would not relinquish the tools if you felt the community no longer trusts you. I believe your would, and would without the need for AOR. Regards,

5126:

How do you make those reverts and warnings so quickly? Well, I can see that you're an admin, and it's possible that it could be using rollback. I'm just wondering because on the recent changes, you made two user warnings really quickly. How do you do that?

2601:

is getting close to feeding the trolls when some new user can just request this drama and get it. Both your first recall, and this one seem to be without basis. If you keep going through recall you will lose eventually, even if you never did anything wrong.

5447:

Hello - I added the Times Link on the tomato page to back up the other change I made (adding the quote from John Gerard - to show proof he had said it was poisonous) - both changes were to back up the claims a previous Wiki editor had made. Thanks.

2798:

the community does not trust you. I also hate drama, and hopefully the criteria I've set out for desysopping me (i.e. having a small number of editors review the request) will limit the drama but still allow me to be highly accountable. Thanks,

940:

Me? Edit science fiction articles? Wow, that's new. :P I think you meant to say you read the part on my userpage where I say I'm a sci-fi geek. ;) Sure, I'll help you copyedit the article, and as soon as I read the book, expand it as well. ·

4112:... that the English Knowledge has the most Good Articles, the German Knowledge has the second most (at over 2000), followed by the Spanish Knowledge (at over 800), the Chinese Knowledge (at over 400), and the French Knowledge (at over 200)? 2735:

Keilana, a strong recommendation for you in the future, quietly get some more eyes to look over a recall request before you start a discussion on it's merits, just so you don't get trolled again. I find it disgusting that someone would

4623:

My recommendation would be to lift the protection, remove the protection tag, warn the editor(s) that caused the protection request about what they are doing wrong (probably edit-warring), and block then in the event of noncompliance.

314:

I really do urge you to offer an explanation - I fail to understand your closure without it, as do many people at the DRV. I see you've been online since many requests, and it's disapointing that so far you've declined to comment.

4653:

Lack of consensus is not a problem per se, but edit warring and disruption associated with it is. If that happens, any identifiable offenders should be warned and sanctioned first, with page protection being the last resort.

4638:

I disagree. the problem at that page is edit-warring by several editors, not one individual doing disruptive edit-warring. the individual doing it was not treated as or considered a violator by most editors of that article.

2494:

making claim clearly has no case and is clutching at straws! I dont understand how stating that something was printed has turned into this ? I dont get why you would get together with people to ban me for fake reasons ?

3996:

Second Opinion – Similar to the on hold option, except an editor is either inexperienced or not knowledgeable enough about a given topic and asks another reviewer to offer another opinion before passing or failing; add

2181:

And by waiting for five days is by just waiting and you'll be able to edit the semi-d pages. Don't worry, give Keilana some time! She's offline right now, and so am I. —BoL 05:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC) Retrieved from

5533:

If the vandalism cases we get are random, then it looks like you're getting all the bad ones - three indef blocks in less than 10 minutes! I am impressed with your skill and grace in wielding the mighty banhammer.

163:

What on earth are you thinking? (1) Cutting swaths of text out of Knowledge pages with no edit summary is plain vandalism. (2) Talk about a busher move. If you can't take the heat, stay out of the freaken kitchen.

2294:

Did you talk to this person on IRC ? Secondly you continue to fail to address the fact that there was no Vandalism as defined and the terms of Vandalism. How can you protect a page for a reason that is not true ?

1629:. While I am not opposed to improving the article in question, I would argue that the warning templates at issue should remain until such time as the article has been improved. Thank you for your consideration. 1325:

It is not a randon acronym, I did not make it up and it is very well known, even having been used in an episode of the simpsons by proffessor Frink. it is very old, as old as me perhaps. I am 45(thats old!!!)

4831:

Now, literally as I am speaking this, his meatpuppet wife has just logged on and is reverting more of my edits (some of which have been discussed by others as a compromise to otherwise POV text). The wife is

5857:

possible to be informed when this IP will be blocked, because for the moment I'm preventing myself to edit any articles where he's still active, because I know he will make a mess again. Thanks in advance

3392:

During January, 57 Good Articles were reviewed. Including those articles that were under GAR or on hold, 35 were kept as GA, 20 delisted, 9 currently on hold or at GAR, and 3 were exempted as they are now

5612:

is requesting unblocking. I am inclined to unblock them, under the stipulation that they NOT try to recreate the same article again. If they DO recreate it, they will be reblocked. Sound reasonable?

3004: 798:

I apologize, dear, but I have reverted an attack on your talk page because he refactored some comments and gave you an attack. Normally I would have the same rules, but that didn't go very well. Cheers,

5513:

I take great offence at his calling of me a Communist on one prior occasion, and to see that he has again repeated the slur against another administrator makes me concerned about this block reduction.

1853:(and reverted their edit) following their deleting a PROD tag with an explanatory edit summary ("LSEGP is a highly influential political grouping within national student politics") as is encouraged by 3419:

on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Ealdgyth, known in real life as Victoria Short, hails from Central Illinois, and has been editing Knowledge since

4701:

Given the various controversies over admin recall, its become sort of a defacto question in all RfAs, so I've worked up a draft of what my recall criteria would be, if I were to become an admin at

1762: 921:, but not an Academy Award. By undoing my edit, you're also saying that SIX actresses were nominated in that category for that year. Uh... no. It's been 5 for the past 70 years (give or take). 4605: 2160:. Its common practice during an edit dispute such as this for an uninvolved admin such as Keilana to semi-protect the page to reduce the intensity of the dispute. In any case, from the tone of 4705:

for your review. I do wish there was some standard process though, all these hundreds of changing permutations among admins is probably the least effective way to handle this sort of thing.

4261: 2178:

I would question how uninolved you actally are give these messges left on my talk page: And don't worry! You'll be able to edit that page in 5 days! Enjoy! —BoL 04:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

2161: 2157: 4455: 5865: 4405: 2152:

Having now had the rules for vandalism explained to me I believe you have abused your power as my contib. clearly dosent fit any of the terms ? I ask you to reaccess your actions.

95:

policy (or policies) was violated, so similar problems will be avoided in the future. It also goes a long ways towards building good faith, and trust in admins and the AfD process.

134:

Well, if the admin would have included a detailed--or even a perfunctory--policy-based rationale along with her decision, then we wouldn't be guessing what she "meant," would we?--

4423: 1993: 290: 183: 5062:

I'd guess that all of your stalkers are socks of each other, or have some other connection IRL. Just a guess, please do contact me if they start up again, I'll indef-block them.

5861: 2610:

All that aside, I think you are a fine admin who simply needs to create some clear criteria as to what justifies grounds for recall, because any old thing is not a good policy.

749:

for being my co-nominator. I'm sure that I can live up to the community's expectations as an administrator, and not totally mess everything up. Thanks again for your support!

5038:

You're welcome. And Keilana: Good luck, on your finals (that is, if you go to high school) or high school apps (that is, if you are currently in the 8th grade) Just a guess...

4796:

Further stalking edits from a while ago (I had a different user name then), all of which were the very first, and in some cases only, edits the user ever made to the articles:

2545:

be told by an admin to stop his/her incorrect actions and self-revert any stalking. Note I'm not calling for a block, even though Yahel Guhan is on a special sort of probation.

4451: 3023: 2654:, should never be used to troll or harass other editors. This attempt at recall was an attempt at Wikidrama, and we don't really want that do we?? Look at the amount of times 5883: 5374:

has requested an unblock. I have to say, I see no vandalism in its edit history. What are the specific edits that concern you? Is there an issue I am not aware of? Regards

271:

been featured in the media numerous times at the very least (just simply from those that I'm aware of). Anyway, I'd like to look over the past form of the article. Thanks.

5281:

of my opinion. His unblock request was rather weak, but I couldn't see much to go on, so I contacted you... I was leaning the way you were... Good deal. A bientot... --

4333: 5748: 4604:

Hi, coming here from an editprotect request. Was the indefinite full protection really necessary? An alternative would be to warn the one edit-warrior, slap him with an

4474: 3241: 2044: 493: 4431: 5760: 5220: 4573:

but didn't get there in time. I am going to confer with the deleting admin and probably send to AfD. Just wanted to let you know. (I also replied on his talk page.) -

4369: 2301:

You continue to fail to address the fact that there was no Vandalism as defined and the terms of Vandalism. How can you protect a page for a reason that is not true ?

2056: 2032: 1792: 5755: 3245: 2051: 1666:

Thank you very much for catching the vandalism on Mr. Faris' profile. Very much appreciated. Have a good day. PS How do I alter my ID name? Thank you again :)

498: 4297: 2193:

I did not create the name of the page in regards to gossip mag tittle had you read the info you would understand Hillary Clinton was interviewed for the article.

5404: 4435: 2517: 2231:

I would like to know how the article was brought to your attention I would also advise you that i have posted this information on the talk page of the article.

2198: 1980: 469: 3455:

business, and owns three horses. She likes to read science fiction, history, and geneology books. Congratulations to our GAN Reviewer of the Month for January!

143: 5724: 5707: 5389:

No problem, slips can happen, accidental clicking of IPs in edit historys! Lets hope the IP understands. Thanks for responding quickly and unblocking. Regards

4459: 4419: 3923:– determining what the appropriate course of action to take when reviewing an article. Currently, there are four options to decide what to do with an article: 2164:

it seems that semi-protection was the right call to stablize the article while discussion continued there and on the talk page of the reliability of sources.

2015: 1988: 1457: 889: 481: 462: 457: 5421: 5309: 4931:

violating policy, believe it or not. That is how I eventually came to post at Keilana's talk page (she was not the admin who cautioned me again ANI though).

4891: 4427: 2984: 2501: 2383: 2315: 2270: 3029:

The first opinion was not on the tags at all, and the second opinion was about the notability tag. I disagree with Groupthink's request for unprotection.

1173:

It does seem like a occasion that could happen, but I wasn't too sure. I reverted just and in case and decided to seek a second opinion. Thanks in advance.

5712: 4538: 1750: 1012:, and he knows who I am. If you have in fact removed my message to him, I would appreciate it if you would restore it. Nothing sinister is happening here. 5882:

I figured this might be a good time to ask for advice from an admin. Since you seem to be completely uninvolved, would you be willing to take a look? See

5731: 4151: 2954: 2920: 2910:

Administrators need to be accountable yes, and need to be able to make the tough calls. There needs to be a balance. I don't see why an editor can't use

2336: 2020: 862:

He is a convicted child pornographer. You might object on editorial grounds, but it is factually accurate and substantiated within the article itself.

486: 4772: 5743: 5609: 5503: 5405: 4439: 2039: 2003: 4875: 339: 5850: 5790: 5719: 5603: 2841: 2086: 2008: 1716: 1478: 1453: 1222: 528: 474: 5435: 5215:

I thought it would be a cool thing for wikipedians to see if they were so interested. Perhaps I should have put the edit in the Anaconda page? --

5892: 5736: 5634: 2027: 1906: 384: 5629: 4590: 3185: 349: 2889: 2655: 1746: 5475:

Awarded to you for an awesome comment on the help desk, and generally being good humoured and light hearted when dealing with other wikipedians.

4894:. Can the users be banned once and for all, for the peace of all of us? I am not asking because of a disagreement but because of this stalking. 4804: 1196: 253: 231: 213: 5835: 4617: 4469: 3334: 3310: 2950: 2916: 2622: 2442: 2134: 1824: 1804: 1098: 573: 5055: 4999: 4988: 4966: 4957: 4935: 4925: 4693:

Sandstein request? Can we just say that the wiki encyclopedia is the ownership of wiki administroters et al Helpers and the unknowns like Ed?

2675: 1614: 1491: 849: 827: 129: 5499: 5498:

and allowing him to create pointless talk pages of images with just the word "Cute". He needs to learn what is productive and what is not.

5236: 4878: 4860: 4797: 4596: 3318: 3306: 3122: 3104: 3040: 1667: 1187:

Indeed you are correct, I have reverted myself and noted that I should be more careful in my edit summary. Many thanks for the speedy reply!

746: 264: 4785: 4782: 4633: 2595: 1365: 1351: 1335: 1182: 1148: 1122: 1036: 5869: 4801: 3342: 3169: 2803: 2475: 1108: 738: 5297: 3050: 2863: 2784: 2485: 1562: 1303: 917:

definitely wasn't nominated for Best Actress in 2006 (for the year 2005). She was nominated for a globe and a SAG for her performance in

689: 5887: 5820: 5326: 4663: 4648: 2400: 2119: 558: 5067: 5033: 4870: 3163: 2972: 2958: 2936: 2641: 2223: 1836: 4463: 2149:

one of the first pieces of information i have cont. to wikipedia there has been no decision made, I can not understand your actions !

5522: 5274: 3322: 2694: 1513: 646: 5794: 4500: 4446: 3722: 3536: 3089: 2941:

No, they are coherent. Makes sense to me that someone might not *realize* they are abusing or misusing the tools. But... you don't

2353: 2090: 1656: 1638: 930: 532: 294: 139: 5897: 5398: 4855: 4790: 995: 5484: 4819: 4816: 3073: 3010: 2868:

I have to agree, you may mess up some time, but you're good sysop no matter what. If any trolls come in any sysop's way, give me a

1644: 1626: 1603: 877: 5249: 4865: 4752: 3314: 1879: 5874: 5224: 3338: 909: 1414: 985:. He has been evading blocks all the time, and I think it should be the time to stop him now. Can you hardblock his IP address? 308: 31:

why am I blocked, if I delete an old link? the link I deleted is no longer available. why is deleting it considered vandalism?

4579: 4129:) was promoted to GA just only about one month after the shooting incident, but took more than seven months to reach FA status? 3660:

There are now 176 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 15 new members that joined during the month of January:

2202: 1436: 5099: 2725: 2259:

The information was added to keep record for a complaint add so people reading the page understand why it is copy protected!

816: 5786: 5782: 4748: 4546: 4238: 2775:

in the process. The recall is a pointless thing, and only serves to increase drama. Triona, your points are very relevant. --

2327: 2291:

IP blocked for 3RR. Eventually. I had to go on IRC and whine a bit first. Relata refero (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

2282: 2082: 2078: 1696: 524: 520: 5244: 1021: 379: 5344: 5320: 4807: 3330: 3326: 2509: 2394: 2323: 2278: 1816: 674:, with the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your heroic efforts in restoring (multiple times!) the correct version of the 135: 68: 38: 5140: 3078:

The source is OR? As long as it's a reliable source, it should be no problem unless the Knowledge article itself is OR.

2949:

recall to tell you that. ;). Continue doing good things, you are a good admin. Think about my recommendation. Regards,

1005:

Hi Keilana, I just saw your note posted to my talk page about my note to Dinesh. I was answering the question he asked me

5451: 5413: 5047: 4980: 4949: 4917: 4414: 4207: 3786: 3552: 3520: 3488: 3223: 3195: 2881: 2531: 1595: 1170: 841: 808: 621: 198: 173: 115: 5116: 2458: 46: 5690: 5540: 4713: 4508: 4226: 2651: 2347: 2235:

really like to nominate you, if you've got some space for me. :) Best, Keilana|Parlez ici 06:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

2213: 2172: 1962: 1874: 1704: 1620: 1496: 719: 440: 5544: 5507: 1317: 5383: 4850: 4496: 3802: 3632: 1188: 1174: 1140: 1114: 1075: 869: 362: 4035:

is missing several topic categories, or there are several sections which are very short (1-3 sentences per section).

3152: 1754: 1288: 76: 4799: 4763: 4232: 4109:... that in Chinese Knowledge, articles need to have at least six net support votes before they are promoted to GA? 3818: 3706: 3600: 3472: 3142: 2859: 1551: 1484: 1465: 1461: 1427:

Sorry about accidentally reverting your edit as vandalism, I ment to revert the vandal's edit, not yours... Whoops

1240: 617: 301: 5229: 4770: 4382: 2201:. To ask for Keilana to be examined(?) I'd wait for her to respond here, and if your not satisfied, there is the 1675: 1083: 1059: 357: 275: 99: 5841: 4884: 4738: 4492: 3770: 3738: 3568: 3158:

Thanks, I'll take care of it. I do have it watched, but I wouldn't have seen it as soon without your message. :)

2987:'s criteria are ridiculously high (because he's not serious about them) but yours... are too low. IMHO anyway. ++ 2573: 2554: 1244: 901: 857: 955: 5624: 5592: 5292: 5269: 5205: 5085: 4898: 3754: 3674: 3648: 3504: 2924: 2424: 960: 760: 5368: 4813: 4803:(here, there are very obvious mistakes even restored just to show he was reverting just because I had edited), 4741:) literally stalks my edits or makes a point of undoing my edits, sometimes also labelling them as vandalism. 969:, and he has so far produced numerous reincarnations after being blocked for making a teacher attack article: 592: 4825: 4821:. This shows that this has been a very long and ongoing problem. Thank you, I look forward to your thoughts. 4810: 4247: 3898: 3882: 3850: 3834: 3716: 3690: 3616: 3584: 3530: 2834: 2753: 2412: 1901: 1842: 1583: 1568: 641: 280: 5332: 3141:

Since you might not watch sub-talk pages, I figured I'd let you respond to this very very misplaced comment

2377: 1006: 5777: 5362: 5241: 5039: 4972: 4941: 4909: 4843: 3866: 2999: 2873: 2418: 2073: 1715:

I just discovered that you're the person who finally deleted the longstanding mess/POV magnet that was the

1587: 833: 800: 788: 515: 4391: 2365: 1394: 1340: 4504: 3985:

On Hold – The article meets most of the criteria, but might fall short in a few areas; keep it listed at

2711:

suggest you remove yourself from the said category. Unless, of course, you enjoy being a drama magnet. ·

2680:

Just a note Solumerias, recall is supposed to be a discussion... and people say RFA is broken. *sighs* ·

1797: 1422: 1217:

I just thought I would tell you that my started working again with 0.6.1 when I copied the configuration

1009: 5183: 4962:

I will send her a quick email in the morning, I'm about to go to bed. Thank you though, and good night!

4512: 4376: 3909:

as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!

2931:

I wouldn't be able to recognize my abusiveness. Just my thoughts, tell me if they are incoherent. Best,

5646: 5210: 4758: 2505: 2406: 2371: 1918: 1000: 918: 396: 1892:

Google Project Chanology and click the second link because the website is blacklisted on Knowledge. --

5258:

is requesting an unblock. Since you originally blocked, I thought it prudent to seek your input. --

2996: 2158:

Knowledge:Requests_for_page_protection#Huma_Abedin_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29

1700: 1411: 1391: 5090:

how did you know when i made that last edit? seriously get a life rather than stupid RC patrolling

4777: 5314: 4038:

contains numerous sections which are just lists of information, as opposed to written out as prose.

3712: 3526: 2388: 2359: 2319: 2274: 793: 72: 42: 1767:

Hello, just wanted to let you know, I'd originally deprodded a number of articles that the vandal

935: 5492: 5417: 5303: 5255: 5135: 5042: 4975: 4944: 4912: 4696: 4542: 4533: 4213: 3966: 3939: 3780: 3546: 3514: 3482: 3181: 2876: 2143: 1590: 993: 836: 803: 776: 675: 316: 111: 5338: 1008:, which was posted directly above your note to me. I worked extensively with Dinesh recently on 5114: 4574: 4122: 2341: 1869: 1280: 597: 1275:

for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative

779:, i don't want to comite vandalism, on the contrary, i try to delete a useless template, Thnx 4727:

what they claim, they could be sockpuppets but are meatpuppets at the very least). The user,

4556: 4055: 3796: 3626: 1843: 1432: 1299: 1218: 1192: 1178: 1118: 1079: 873: 755: 715: 249: 227: 222:

Thank you for your forgiviness. I guess you really did step into a snakepit. That was brave.

209: 194: 169: 151: 4319: 2564:

I don't think you need to go through admin recall, you're a great admin as it is. Thanks, --

1890: 5875: 5121: 4310: 3812: 3700: 3594: 3466: 3136: 3118: 3100: 3019: 2850: 2780: 2671: 2611: 2569: 2550: 2497: 2311: 2266: 1768: 1692: 1652: 1634: 1449: 1249: 1231: 1094: 865: 684: 613: 605: 64: 34: 1071: 121:

I think she meant more weight in terms of policy not numbers. Thats how I use the phrase.

8: 5826:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 5216: 5105: 4857:

Edit against form to push POV (we use different lines of succession for different claims)

4732: 4702: 4659: 4629: 4613: 4355: 3764: 3732: 3562: 3110: 3083: 3034: 2765: 2525: 2469: 2125:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 1850: 1710: 1661: 1547: 1361: 1347: 1331: 1313: 1032: 1017: 978: 772: 742: 697: 564:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 263: 85: 5350: 4106:, 1,548 good articles that have not been categorized at all were categorized in 15 days? 2664:

Recall should not be a vote-like system, but rather a full and frank discussion instead.

2162:

Knowledge:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Gossip_magazines_as_reliable_sources

189:

Sorry to be so harsh. I'm concerned lest the close be overthrown for lack of rationale.

5800: 5618: 5430: 5286: 5263: 5128: 5050: 4983: 4952: 4920: 4598: 4168: 4139: 4065: 3776: 3748: 3668: 3642: 3542: 3510: 3498: 3478: 3381:

could review just one article in the next week, the backlog would be almost eliminated!

3177: 2884: 2590: 2454: 2438: 2096: 1598: 1042: 986: 897: 844: 811: 784: 775:

page, because already exists one template asigned for the same band, and is the follow

538: 107: 4283: 3919:

This month, I thought I'd focus on a less technical and more of a procedural issue at

5535: 5528: 5481: 5191: 5111: 5030: 4963: 4932: 4895: 4822: 4346: 3976: 3892: 3876: 3844: 3828: 3684: 3610: 3578: 3432: 1860: 1686: 1577: 1523: 1276: 1272: 1057: 589: 179: 125: 26: 17: 4606:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles#Discretionary_sanctions

5831: 5584: 5549: 5518: 4837: 4644: 4174: 4082: 3860: 3792: 3622: 2827: 2749: 2638: 2130: 1671: 1441: 1428: 982: 970: 883: 751: 711: 637: 569: 372: 245: 223: 205: 190: 165: 3055:

Interesting article, but not sure why we have an article based on a source that's

1540:

Again Thank you for stopping by and I hope you continue to keep an eye on things.

475:

WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"

5394: 5379: 5201: 4567: 4304: 3928: 3808: 3696: 3590: 3462: 3114: 3096: 3045:

Apparently, the dispute is not resolved, thus, I will not unprotect the article.

3015: 2897: 2869: 2776: 2737: 2667: 2659: 2565: 2546: 2430: 2335:

While you're trying to sort this mess out, you may want to factor in that the IP

1897: 1884: 1789: 1680: 1648: 1630: 1090: 974: 966: 926: 679: 609: 298: 5196:

If you want to keep a vandalism count, I just rolled one back on your userpage.

4791:

An example of POV, which the user knows is not supported at all in real practice

4142:. However, I decided to continue writing this section until I ran out of ideas. 4005:

below the article's listing and add {{GA2ndoptalk}} to the article's talk page.

5804: 4728: 4655: 4625: 4609: 4274: 4138:

Originally, I wasn't planning to do "Did you know" other than as a fill-in for

4072: 4041:

there's entire sections of text that have no references, or there are a lot of

3760: 3728: 3558: 3415:

is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for January, based on the assessments made by

3079: 3030: 2772: 2740:

in this way, as you are obviously a great admin, but apparently there are some

2559: 2536: 2521: 2465: 2100: 1854: 1802:

I saw your name on the list and thought you might be a good coach. Interested?

1543: 1377: 1357: 1343: 1327: 1309: 1295: 1212: 1065: 1028: 1013: 892:

You undid my edits as vandalism, then reverted back to them without comment...

627: 579: 542: 244:

No hard feelings on my part, no. I look forward to working with you in future.

182:, specifically the removal of questions from people unhappy with your close of 3958:

Failing it – it does not meet the criteria; remove the article's listing from

3176:

The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready!

5614: 5282: 5259: 5170: 5145: 4905: 4718: 4557: 4018: 4014:

the article is mostly complete, but might be missing one topic (subcategory).

4002: 3986: 3959: 3920: 3744: 3664: 3638: 3494: 3436: 3412: 3378: 3365: 3295: 3279: 3170: 3060: 2992: 2964: 2712: 2681: 2584: 2450: 2434: 1500: 1407: 1387: 942: 893: 780: 52: 3458:

Other outstanding reviewers recognized during the month of January include:

5476: 5095: 5063: 4995: 4707: 4586: 4340: 4126: 3932: 3906: 3888: 3872: 3840: 3824: 3680: 3606: 3574: 3428: 3416: 3394: 3270: 3159: 3146: 3056: 3046: 2968: 2932: 2911: 2799: 2481: 2219: 2207: 2205:. I leave the personal inquiries for Keilana to answer is she desires to. 2166: 1610: 1573: 1558: 1284: 1144: 1104: 1049: 823: 671: 585: 204:

You're welcome. Sorry, really. I'm I guess a bit overwrought by the thing.

122: 3113:. I disagree with your decision, but I thank you for your consideration. 2304:

this will be the last time i ask ! I have grown tired : ( Retrieved from "

1723:

Anyway, I don't normally like these things, but I think you deserve this:

730: 5827: 5578: 5558: 5514: 5154: 4833: 4640: 4045: 3949: 3856: 3452: 3440: 2816: 2745: 2635: 2126: 1356:

Funny, I found it through a google search, try googling "acronym finder"

724: 706: 698: 655: 633: 565: 365: 272: 2449:

Scratch that; I must have looked at the wrong tab in my browser. Sorry!

2199:

Knowledge:Requests_for_page_protection#Current_requests_for_unprotection

1730: 156: 5680: 5390: 5375: 5197: 1952: 1893: 1778: 1341:

http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?Acronym=nerd&string=exact

922: 914: 766: 430: 5460: 4552:

own words. The page was deleted inspite of my contesting the deletion.

4118:... that "Sport and games people" category has the most Good Articles? 3213: 4268: 4187: 4027:

a couple of images need to be tagged with appropriate copyright tags.

2906:

distraction and disruption. It is far to risky and prone to trolling.

2741: 1647:

as protected, which you forgot to do when you protected it. Thanks.

5847:

IP's. It has been confirmed and you apparently dealt with the case.

5029:

times. I will let you know if anything else happens. Again, thanks.

3005:

Interpretations of 2001: A Space Odyssey -- request for unprotection

2016:

News and notes: Estonian Knowledge, Picture of the Year, milestones

4940:

She's usually offline right now. Give her some time or e-mail her.

2988: 2253: 2183: 1403: 1383: 745:

for being my nominator and admin coach. I would also like to thank

5819:

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

3993:

below the listing and add {{GAonhold}} to the article's talk page.

3427:. In this short time, she has made significant contributions to 9 3249: 2118:

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

557:

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

4099: 3444: 3282:

is 206 unreviewed articles. Out of 251 total nominations, 37 are

3237: 1763:

Recent deprods I made to reprods you made (does that make sense?)

291:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Adult-child sex (2nd nomination)

184:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Adult-child sex (2nd nomination)

4024:

mostly well sourced, but missing maybe a handful of references.

3448: 3420: 1271:

has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the

178:

I'm talking about your removal of text from the Knowledge page

1254: 1027:

Thanks. No harm done. Don't give it another thought. My best.

4784:

Removal of my comments, happened twice. A third-party editor

4768: 2662:

went up at deletion review, for the sake of drama. Not good.

1529: 1263: 5703: 3298:

and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!

3109:

Actually, I think at this point I will take this request to

1975: 1625:

I have requested an edit to a page that you full-protected,

453: 5767: 5744:

Dispatches: New methods to find Featured Article candidates

5683: 5665: 5641: 4150:

Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue

4103: 3424: 3400: 2305: 2239: 2063: 1955: 1937: 1913: 1268: 505: 433: 415: 391: 4115:... that Simple English Knowledge has zero Good Articles? 3014:

as the protecting admin, unprotect the page. Thank you.

5356: 5110:

Thank you. I will be sure to use it only for vandalism.

4682:

but m in your final edit is the sign for protection!!!!

1074:

please? Something simple like "A" will be fine. Thanks.

5169:

Ah well, you beat me to 20K edits... race to 30K? :) ·

2040:

Knowledge Dispatches: Banner year for Featured articles

741:

which passed 43/0/1. I would like to especially thank

4751:

I edited here first, as seen in the page history, and

4031:

On the other hand, an article should be failed if it:

4892:

Category:Suspected Knowledge sockpuppets of Tfoxworth

4764:

Blanking of sockpuppet tags reverted by someone else

4760:

For some POV edits, reverted by more than one person

4744:

Here are a few differences to illustrate the point:

2963:

Thanks. I will continue to work under the spirit of

2872:

and, yeah, they'll never come back here ever again.

2761:

I just tagged the admin open to recall processes as

1685:

1) Darragh IS of Scottish origin, not Irish origin (

3439:. Her interests in editing are in the areas of the 2840:You are a good admin. there is no reason to recall 5713:Tensions in journalistic use of Knowledge explored 2033:WikiProject Report: Molecular and Cellular Biology 1687:http://www.surnamedb.com/surname.aspx?name=Darragh 1139:No problem. I'd suggest that you make an account, 482:News and notes: Freely-licensed music, milestones 470:Commons Picture of the Year contest in final round 5851:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mark7532222 4017:minor copyediting is required (needs a few minor 2263:is not! How do I request a recall ? Thanks : ) 2254:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:100%25freehuman 2184:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:100%25freehuman 3451:. Outside of Knowledge, she is starting her own 3368:currently stands at 8 articles up for re-review. 737:Keilana/Archive4, Thank you for your support in 5429:I agree. that was not fair, he is a new user.-- 3059:... Oh well, the AFD closed as keep. *sighs* · 1497:Now, who can tell me why the smiley is a frown? 632:Thanks for catching vandalism to my talk page! 1889:Yes i do have the proof. it's in these links: 5412:Yeah he wants his block reviewed, thanks. --- 4779:Him and his alleged wife with POV reversions. 4686:really bewildered and baffled by your edits: 5756:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 3269:There are now 3,485 Good Articles listed at 2480:Wow this was a mess. Hopefully it's sorted. 2052:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 2028:Tutorial: Reporting and dealing with vandals 1771:had removed the prod tag on before, because 499:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 2218:Responded on the editor's talk, thanks MB. 1169:Hi again, do you think I was wrong to undo 4177:(GA Sweeps and Did You Know correspondent) 2908:, especially with your loose requirements. 1849:Just wondering why you warned this IP for 5556: 5458: 5152: 4867:Consistently inserted, removed by others. 4608:warning and then block him if necessary. 2306:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Keilana 2240:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:MBisanz 1728: 1645:Interpretations of 2001: A Space Odyssey 1627:Interpretations of 2001: A Space Odyssey 1294:I disagree, I believe it is constructive 653: 5697: 5408:want his block reviewed yeah baaabbyy!!! 4088:or other warning tags in various places. 3143:User talk:Keilana/Recall#unfair deletion 3011:Interpretations of 2001: A Space Odyssey 2197:To request unprotection, please go here 1978: 1969: 1070:Hi Keilana, could you do me a favor and 463:New parser preprocessor to be introduced 447: 293:the way you did, either here or at the 14: 5720:Best of WikiWorld: "Calvin and Hobbes" 5254:Ok, my french is rusty, but this guy: 4881:Admission of meatpuppetry at the least 4872:Attack, user never edited here before. 4563:The user in question attempted to use 4585:Alright, thanks for letting me know. 4202:WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks 3335:Slovenian presidential election, 2007 2203:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 1689:) 2) Mark Darragh DOES exist. Fact. 4470:WikiProject Good articles newsletter 3999:#: {{GA2ndopinion|ArticleName}} ~~~~ 3305:The oldest unreviewed articles are: 3171:WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter 98:I admit that I'm concerned that you 4862:POV again, still the subject of a . 4211:identifies, organizes and improves 3196:Knowledge:WikiProject Good articles 23: 5645: 5600:It's true. Nothing wrong with it. 4904:If you want, you can take this to 3927:Passing – it meets all six of the 3399: 3212: 2945:recall to tell you that. I don't 2652:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration 2288:I would draw to your attention: 2004:New parser preprocessor introduced 1917: 1745:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar 1253: 729: 602:Please help me with this page!!! 395: 155: 24: 5908: 5567:The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar 5163:The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar 4815:, the next two are also attacks: 4190:one article at a time since 2005! 4021:, spelling, or grammatical fixes. 3915:On Hold versus Failing an Article 2382:was blocked for 24 hours and now 1989:Special: 2007 in Review, Part III 1739:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar 1528:I am glad to see you came by the 1089:Now it's got a bit of flavor. :D 771:Hi, please help me to delete the 664:The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar 348:Its on the talkpage of the DRV. 289:state your rationale for closing 5761:The Report on Lengthy Litigation 5708:Special: 2007 in Review, Part IV 5557: 5459: 5153: 4755:. See the page history for more. 4482: 4233:Frank Butler (American football) 3991:#: {{GAOnHold|ArticleName}} ~~~~ 3248: 3236: 3230:Volume I, No. 4 - February 2008 2057:The Report on Lengthy Litigation 1729: 1446:stop beating me to reverts! :D 1279:. You may also wish to read the 654: 458:Special: 2007 in Review, Part II 91:them to find if it's left here. 5638:updated for February 4th, 2008. 5604:une autre "unblock", peut-etre? 3339:San Francisco Municipal Railway 2009:Best of WikiWorld: "Truthiness" 1910:updated for January 28th, 2008. 910:Academy Awards for Best Actress 647:You fight with the best of 'em! 388:updated for January 21st, 2008. 136:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 2967:until I royally screw up. :P. 1720:correct decisions in future. 1048::-) (oops, silly Wiki-coding) 13: 1: 5250:Qu'est ce que pensez-vous ca? 5898:01:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC) 5870:16:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 5836:08:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 5678: 5630:03:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 5593:02:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 5545:02:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 5523:11:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 5508:01:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 5485:01:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 5436:03:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 5422:23:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 5399:23:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 5384:23:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 5298:03:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 5275:22:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 5245:17:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 5225:04:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 5206:03:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 5184:03:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 5141:23:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 5117:23:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 5100:04:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 5068:03:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC) 5056:20:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 5034:19:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 5000:14:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 4989:05:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 4967:05:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 4958:05:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 4936:05:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 4926:05:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 4899:05:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 4883:, followed by double voting 4826:05:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 4714:04:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 4664:19:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 4649:19:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 4634:19:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 4618:18:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 4591:18:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 4580:18:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 4547:04:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 3186:05:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 3164:15:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 3153:04:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 3123:04:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 3105:04:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 3090:02:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 3074:02:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 3051:01:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 3041:01:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 3024:01:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 3000:23:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 2973:00:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 2959:00:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 2937:00:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 2925:22:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2890:04:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 2864:03:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 2835:02:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 2813:You are a fine admin. DFTT. 2804:23:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2785:18:55, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2754:18:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2726:18:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2695:18:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2676:18:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2642:17:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2623:17:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2596:16:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2574:12:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2555:07:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2532:08:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2486:07:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2476:07:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2459:07:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2443:07:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2328:07:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2283:06:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2224:06:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2214:06:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2173:05:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 2135:03:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 1981:From the editor: New feature 1950: 1902:22:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1880:20:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1837:21:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1817:07:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1793:00:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1755:00:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1705:22:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 1676:07:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 1657:23:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1639:03:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 1615:02:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1604:02:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1563:02:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1552:02:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1514:02:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1492:23:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1466:23:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1437:21:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1415:04:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1395:21:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1382:That thing's wicked fast. ++ 1366:23:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1352:21:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1336:21:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1318:21:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1304:21:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1289:21:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1245:19:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1197:00:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1183:00:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1149:17:46, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1123:17:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1113:Much thanks to you both. :) 1109:17:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1099:17:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1084:17:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1060:17:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1037:16:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 1022:16:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 996:15:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 956:12:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 931:06:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 902:03:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 878:02:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 850:01:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 828:01:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 817:00:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 789:05:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 761:17:19, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 720:02:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 690:05:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 642:03:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 622:01:25, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 593:02:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 574:23:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 428: 380:21:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 350:04:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 340:04:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 309:17:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 276:07:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 254:03:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 232:03:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 214:03:11, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 199:18:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 174:05:23, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 144:04:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 130:03:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 116:03:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 77:03:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 47:00:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 7: 5798: 5725:News and notes: Milestones 5688: 5608:Ok, enough crappy french. 5469:The Barnstar of Good Humour 5452:The Barnstar of Good Humour 3982:to the article's talk page. 3955:to the article's talk page. 2094: 1960: 1010:Western Chalukya literature 536: 438: 10: 5913: 5775: 5737:Tutorial: Adding citations 5673: 4846:). See these differences: 4424:Ottawa Senators (original) 4171:(Lead Editor, Distributor) 4163:Contributors to this Issue 4064:has evidence of an active 3905:This WikiProject, and the 2071: 1945: 1621:Request for protected edit 1609:Thanks, I'll take a look. 513: 423: 61:Fr33kman (not logged in) 5811: 5770: 5759: 5754: 5747: 5742: 5735: 5730: 5723: 5718: 5711: 5706: 5668: 5577:anti-vandalism work. :) — 5563: 5465: 5159: 4523: 4490: 4200: 4196: 4183: 3379:WikiProject Good Articles 3366:Good Article Reassessment 3224:WikiProject Good Articles 3207: 3009:Thank you for protecting 2156:The decision was made at 2107: 2066: 2055: 2050: 2043: 2038: 2031: 2026: 2019: 2014: 2007: 2002: 1997:interview: John Broughton 1992: 1987: 1940: 1735: 1643:Additionally, please tag 1221:to my configuration page 822:No problem, thanks dear. 660: 584:Do I change my username? 549: 508: 497: 492: 485: 480: 473: 468: 461: 456: 418: 4377:Aérospatiale SA 330 Puma 3377:If every participant of 3280:Good Article Nominations 100:expressed your rationale 5842:The case of Mark7532222 5256:User talk:Styrofoam1994 4068:in the article history. 1557:No problem. Good luck. 1281:introduction to editing 858:How was that vandalism? 777:Template:The Distillers 676:DuPage County, Illinois 103:clear that up as well. 5651: 5650:The Knowledge Signpost 5086:stop stalking ppl dude 4123:Virginia Tech massacre 3404: 3323:Paleolithic-style diet 3217: 2433:about 19 hours later. 1923: 1922:The Knowledge Signpost 1258: 961:Help about sockpuppets 734: 401: 400:The Knowledge Signpost 160: 5732:Knowledge in the News 5649: 5230:A passer's by comment 4493:Good article criteria 3929:good article criteria 3408:Reviewer of the Month 3403: 3290:, and 1 is seeking a 3216: 2245:and your atual post: 2021:Knowledge in the News 1921: 1844:User talk:78.86.13.53 1569:Copyvio spammer alert 1257: 888:What's the deal with 733: 487:Knowledge in the News 399: 358:I hope you don't mind 281:AFD closure rationale 159: 5876:Talk:Arsenicum album 5483:Have a nice day :) 4852:POV reversion, again 4753:he followed me there 3907:Good Article program 1822:Sounds like a plan. 670:I hereby award you, 295:deletion review page 5862:Frédérick Duhautpas 5749:Features and admins 4703:User:MBisanz/Recall 4597:Your protection of 3713:Dihydrogen Monoxide 3527:Dihydrogen Monoxide 2429:is making the same 2045:Features and admins 1798:Admin coach request 1423:Shane Diesel mix up 979:User:nku pyrodragon 919:Memoirs of a Geisha 773:Template:Distillers 494:Features and admins 5691:About the Signpost 5652: 5211:snake eating tapir 4599:Palestinian people 4460:GAN Backlog Drives 4432:Siege of Szigetvár 3405: 3218: 2912:dispute resolution 2516:Here Keilana, use 1963:About the Signpost 1924: 1864:Llywelyn Griffith 1259: 1072:create my userpage 1001:My reply to Dinesh 991: 981:, and his latest, 735: 441:About the Signpost 402: 378: 161: 5838: 5816: 5815: 5807: 5766: 5765: 5702: 5701: 5675:Volume 4, Issue 6 5661: 5660: 5627: 5621: 5598: 5597: 5543: 5490: 5489: 5295: 5289: 5272: 5266: 5189: 5188: 5094:I am omniscient. 4576:Revolving Bugbear 4531: 4530: 4527: 4526: 4519: 4518: 4436:Battle of Plataea 3433:Baldwin of Exeter 3395:Featured Articles 3343:Marcela Agoncillo 3315:J. Michael Bailey 3257: 3256: 3088: 3039: 2620: 2530: 2513: 2500:comment added by 2474: 2330: 2314:comment added by 2285: 2269:comment added by 2137: 2115: 2114: 2103: 2062: 2061: 1974: 1973: 1947:Volume 4, Issue 5 1933: 1932: 1760: 1759: 1707: 1695:comment added by 1468: 1452:comment added by 1402:and dangerous. ++ 987: 880: 868:comment added by 695: 694: 624: 608:comment added by 576: 554: 553: 545: 504: 503: 452: 451: 425:Volume 4, Issue 4 411: 410: 377: 364: 180:User talk:Keilana 127: 79: 67:comment added by 49: 37:comment added by 18:User talk:Keilana 5904: 5818: 5799: 5795:Single-Page View 5768: 5704: 5666: 5657: 5642: 5625: 5619: 5610:User talk:Jro201 5561: 5554: 5553: 5539: 5479: 5463: 5456: 5455: 5433: 5373: 5372: 5327:deleted contribs 5293: 5287: 5270: 5264: 5239: 5181: 5157: 5150: 5149: 5138: 5133: 5053: 5045: 4986: 4978: 4955: 4947: 4923: 4915: 4786:warned Tfoxworth 4710: 4577: 4572: 4566: 4509:Nominations list 4486: 4485: 4420:Wicked (musical) 4408: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4397: 4396: 4388: 4387: 4372: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4361: 4360: 4352: 4351: 4336: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4325: 4324: 4316: 4315: 4300: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4289: 4288: 4280: 4279: 4264: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4253: 4252: 4244: 4243: 4198: 4197: 4134:From the Editors 4127:featured article 4125:(which is now a 4087: 4081: 4060: 4054: 4050: 4044: 3981: 3975: 3971: 3965: 3954: 3948: 3944: 3938: 3388:GA Sweeps Update 3331:Natalee Holloway 3252: 3240: 3209: 3208: 3205: 3204: 3190: 3189: 3149: 3086: 3082: 3071: 3037: 3033: 2887: 2879: 2856: 2847: 2833: 2830: 2824: 2770: 2764: 2723: 2692: 2618: 2612: 2593: 2587: 2528: 2524: 2495: 2472: 2468: 2428: 2401:deleted contribs 2381: 2354:deleted contribs 2309: 2298:Once again !!!! 2264: 2252:Retrieved from " 2238:Retrieved from " 2210: 2169: 2117: 2095: 2091:Single-Page View 2064: 1976: 1938: 1929: 1914: 1835: 1833: 1815: 1813: 1787: 1784: 1781: 1733: 1726: 1725: 1690: 1601: 1593: 1511: 1490: 1447: 1266: 1237: 1228: 1055: 1052: 990: 983:User:Rws killer6 971:User:Rws killer2 953: 863: 847: 839: 832:You're welcome. 814: 806: 794:Talk page revert 763: 687: 682: 658: 651: 650: 603: 556: 537: 533:Single-Page View 506: 454: 416: 407: 392: 375: 370: 368: 336: 334: 332: 330: 328: 306: 126: 62: 32: 5912: 5911: 5907: 5906: 5905: 5903: 5902: 5901: 5880: 5844: 5655:Weekly Delivery 5653: 5640: 5606: 5552: 5531: 5495: 5493:Gp75motorsports 5477: 5454: 5431: 5410: 5312: 5308: 5306: 5304:Unblock request 5252: 5237: 5232: 5213: 5194: 5171: 5148: 5136: 5129: 5124: 5108: 5088: 5051: 5043: 4984: 4976: 4953: 4945: 4921: 4913: 4721: 4708: 4699: 4697:Recall criteria 4683: 4602: 4575: 4570: 4564: 4561: 4536: 4534:unfair deletion 4515: 4483: 4452:Project quality 4428:British Airways 4404: 4394: 4392: 4385: 4383: 4380: 4379: 4375: 4368: 4358: 4356: 4349: 4347: 4344: 4343: 4339: 4332: 4322: 4320: 4313: 4311: 4308: 4307: 4305:Wuert Engelmann 4303: 4296: 4286: 4284: 4277: 4275: 4272: 4271: 4267: 4260: 4250: 4248: 4241: 4239: 4236: 4235: 4231: 4218: 4093:Did You Know... 4085: 4079: 4058: 4052: 4048: 4042: 4019:manual of style 3979: 3973: 3969: 3963: 3952: 3946: 3942: 3936: 3364:The backlog at 3327:Alan Dershowitz 3294:. Please go to 3278:The backlog at 3228: 3174: 3147: 3139: 3084: 3061: 3035: 3007: 2900: 2885: 2877: 2852: 2843: 2828: 2817: 2814: 2768: 2762: 2713: 2682: 2660:The Game (game) 2619: 2614: 2591: 2585: 2562: 2539: 2526: 2470: 2386: 2339: 2208: 2167: 2146: 2144:Page protection 1927:Weekly Delivery 1925: 1912: 1887: 1877: 1872: 1847: 1825: 1823: 1805: 1803: 1800: 1785: 1782: 1779: 1765: 1717:adult-child sex 1713: 1697:131.111.139.100 1683: 1664: 1623: 1599: 1591: 1571: 1526: 1501: 1488: 1475: 1444: 1425: 1380: 1262: 1252: 1233: 1224: 1215: 1068: 1053: 1050: 1045: 1003: 988: 975:User:Umm killer 967:User:Rws killer 965:There is a guy 963: 943: 938: 912: 886: 860: 845: 837: 812: 804: 796: 769: 764: 736: 727: 702: 685: 680: 649: 630: 600: 582: 405:Weekly Delivery 403: 390: 373: 366: 360: 326: 324: 322: 320: 318: 302: 283: 268: 154: 88: 55: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5910: 5886:for details. — 5879: 5873: 5843: 5840: 5814: 5813: 5812: 5809: 5808: 5797: 5773: 5772: 5771: 5764: 5763: 5758: 5752: 5751: 5746: 5740: 5739: 5734: 5728: 5727: 5722: 5716: 5715: 5710: 5700: 5699: 5698: 5695: 5694: 5687: 5677: 5671: 5670: 5669: 5663: 5659: 5658: 5639: 5633: 5605: 5602: 5596: 5595: 5570: 5569: 5564: 5562: 5551: 5548: 5530: 5527: 5526: 5525: 5494: 5491: 5488: 5487: 5472: 5471: 5466: 5464: 5453: 5450: 5446: 5443: 5441: 5440: 5439: 5438: 5409: 5403: 5402: 5401: 5310:157.228.99.211 5305: 5302: 5301: 5300: 5251: 5248: 5231: 5228: 5217:Escapedlunatic 5212: 5209: 5193: 5190: 5187: 5186: 5166: 5165: 5160: 5158: 5147: 5144: 5123: 5120: 5107: 5104: 5103: 5102: 5087: 5084: 5083: 5082: 5081: 5080: 5079: 5078: 5077: 5076: 5075: 5074: 5073: 5072: 5071: 5070: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5013: 5012: 5011: 5010: 5009: 5008: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5004: 5003: 5002: 4887: 4886: 4873: 4868: 4863: 4858: 4853: 4829: 4828: 4794: 4788: 4780: 4775: 4766: 4761: 4756: 4720: 4717: 4698: 4695: 4681: 4677: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4601: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4560: 4555: 4553: 4550: 4535: 4532: 4529: 4528: 4525: 4524: 4521: 4520: 4517: 4516: 4507: 4491: 4488: 4487: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4473:(last updated 4466: 4443: 4411: 4220: 4219: 4205: 4204: 4194: 4193: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4172: 4165: 4164: 4160: 4159: 4148: 4147: 4136: 4135: 4131: 4130: 4119: 4116: 4113: 4110: 4107: 4095: 4094: 4090: 4089: 4076: 4069: 4062: 4039: 4036: 4029: 4028: 4025: 4022: 4015: 4007: 4006: 3994: 3983: 3967:ArticleHistory 3956: 3940:ArticleHistory 3917: 3916: 3911: 3903: 3902: 3886: 3870: 3854: 3838: 3822: 3806: 3790: 3774: 3758: 3742: 3726: 3710: 3694: 3678: 3658: 3657: 3653: 3652: 3636: 3620: 3604: 3588: 3572: 3556: 3540: 3524: 3508: 3492: 3476: 3410: 3409: 3390: 3389: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3319:Greg Skrepenak 3300: 3299: 3292:second opinion 3275: 3274: 3266: 3265: 3259: 3258: 3255: 3254: 3233: 3231: 3229: 3220: 3201: 3200: 3173: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3138: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3107: 3006: 3003: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2899: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2738:misuse process 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2613: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2561: 2558: 2538: 2535: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2447: 2446: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2176: 2175: 2145: 2142: 2140: 2113: 2112: 2110: 2108: 2105: 2104: 2093: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2060: 2059: 2054: 2048: 2047: 2042: 2036: 2035: 2030: 2024: 2023: 2018: 2012: 2011: 2006: 2000: 1999: 1991: 1985: 1984: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1967: 1966: 1959: 1949: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1935: 1931: 1930: 1911: 1905: 1886: 1883: 1875: 1870: 1846: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1799: 1796: 1764: 1761: 1758: 1757: 1742: 1741: 1736: 1734: 1712: 1709: 1682: 1679: 1663: 1660: 1622: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1482: 1443: 1440: 1424: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1307: 1306: 1251: 1248: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1067: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1044: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1002: 999: 989:STYROFOAM☭1994 962: 959: 937: 934: 911: 908: 906: 885: 882: 859: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 795: 792: 768: 765: 743:Bibliomaniac15 728: 726: 723: 701: 696: 693: 692: 667: 666: 661: 659: 648: 645: 629: 626: 599: 598:Animal Cruelty 596: 581: 578: 552: 551: 550: 547: 546: 535: 511: 510: 509: 502: 501: 496: 490: 489: 484: 478: 477: 472: 466: 465: 460: 450: 449: 448: 445: 444: 437: 427: 421: 420: 419: 413: 409: 408: 389: 383: 359: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 343: 342: 282: 279: 267: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 237: 236: 235: 234: 217: 216: 153: 150: 149: 148: 147: 146: 87: 84: 82: 69:90.198.138.160 54: 51: 39:89.244.191.138 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5909: 5900: 5899: 5895: 5894: 5889: 5885: 5877: 5872: 5871: 5867: 5863: 5858: 5854: 5852: 5848: 5839: 5837: 5833: 5829: 5825: 5823: 5810: 5806: 5802: 5796: 5792: 5788: 5784: 5780: 5779: 5774: 5769: 5762: 5757: 5753: 5750: 5745: 5741: 5738: 5733: 5729: 5726: 5721: 5717: 5714: 5709: 5705: 5696: 5693: 5692: 5686: 5685: 5682: 5676: 5672: 5667: 5664: 5656: 5648: 5644: 5643: 5637: 5632: 5631: 5628: 5622: 5616: 5611: 5601: 5594: 5591: 5588: 5587: 5583: 5580: 5576: 5572: 5571: 5568: 5565: 5560: 5555: 5547: 5546: 5542: 5537: 5524: 5520: 5516: 5512: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5505: 5501: 5486: 5482: 5480: 5474: 5473: 5470: 5467: 5462: 5457: 5449: 5444: 5437: 5434: 5432:Antonio Lopez 5428: 5427: 5426: 5425: 5424: 5423: 5419: 5415: 5414:96.229.184.69 5407: 5400: 5396: 5392: 5388: 5387: 5386: 5385: 5381: 5377: 5370: 5367: 5364: 5361: 5358: 5355: 5352: 5349: 5346: 5343: 5340: 5337: 5334: 5331: 5328: 5325: 5322: 5319: 5316: 5311: 5299: 5296: 5290: 5284: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5276: 5273: 5267: 5261: 5257: 5247: 5246: 5243: 5240: 5227: 5226: 5222: 5218: 5208: 5207: 5203: 5199: 5185: 5182: 5180: 5177: 5174: 5168: 5167: 5164: 5161: 5156: 5151: 5143: 5142: 5139: 5134: 5132: 5119: 5118: 5115: 5113: 5101: 5097: 5093: 5092: 5091: 5069: 5065: 5061: 5057: 5054: 5049: 5046: 5041: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5032: 5027: 5026: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5020: 5019: 5018: 5017: 5016: 5015: 5014: 5001: 4997: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4987: 4982: 4979: 4974: 4970: 4969: 4968: 4965: 4961: 4960: 4959: 4956: 4951: 4948: 4943: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4934: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4924: 4919: 4916: 4911: 4907: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4897: 4893: 4885: 4882: 4879: 4876: 4874: 4871: 4869: 4866: 4864: 4861: 4859: 4856: 4854: 4851: 4849: 4848: 4847: 4845: 4842: 4839: 4835: 4827: 4824: 4820: 4817: 4814: 4811: 4808: 4805: 4802: 4800: 4798: 4795: 4792: 4789: 4787: 4783: 4781: 4778: 4776: 4773: 4771: 4769: 4767: 4765: 4762: 4759: 4757: 4754: 4750: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4742: 4740: 4737: 4734: 4730: 4724: 4716: 4715: 4712: 4711: 4704: 4694: 4690: 4687: 4680: 4675: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4652: 4651: 4650: 4646: 4642: 4641:Steve, Sm8900 4637: 4636: 4635: 4631: 4627: 4622: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4615: 4611: 4607: 4600: 4592: 4588: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4578: 4569: 4559: 4558:User talk:NHM 4554: 4548: 4544: 4540: 4539:Vipin23 tomar 4522: 4514: 4510: 4506: 4502: 4498: 4494: 4489: 4481: 4476: 4472: 4471: 4467: 4465: 4461: 4457: 4453: 4450: 4448: 4444: 4441: 4437: 4433: 4429: 4425: 4421: 4418: 4416: 4412: 4409: 4407: 4398: 4389: 4378: 4373: 4371: 4362: 4353: 4342: 4337: 4335: 4326: 4317: 4306: 4301: 4299: 4290: 4281: 4270: 4265: 4263: 4254: 4245: 4234: 4230: 4228: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4217:on Knowledge. 4216: 4215: 4214:good articles 4210: 4209: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4192: 4191: 4189: 4182: 4176: 4173: 4170: 4167: 4166: 4162: 4161: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4153: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4141: 4133: 4132: 4128: 4124: 4120: 4117: 4114: 4111: 4108: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4096: 4092: 4091: 4084: 4077: 4074: 4070: 4067: 4063: 4057: 4047: 4040: 4037: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4026: 4023: 4020: 4016: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4004: 4000: 3995: 3992: 3988: 3984: 3978: 3968: 3961: 3957: 3951: 3941: 3934: 3930: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3922: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3910: 3908: 3900: 3897: 3894: 3890: 3887: 3884: 3881: 3878: 3874: 3871: 3868: 3865: 3862: 3858: 3855: 3852: 3849: 3846: 3842: 3839: 3836: 3833: 3830: 3826: 3823: 3820: 3817: 3814: 3810: 3807: 3804: 3801: 3798: 3794: 3791: 3788: 3785: 3782: 3778: 3777:Hamiltonstone 3775: 3772: 3769: 3766: 3762: 3759: 3756: 3753: 3750: 3746: 3743: 3740: 3737: 3734: 3730: 3727: 3724: 3721: 3718: 3714: 3711: 3708: 3705: 3702: 3698: 3695: 3692: 3689: 3686: 3682: 3679: 3676: 3673: 3670: 3666: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3655: 3654: 3650: 3647: 3644: 3640: 3637: 3634: 3631: 3628: 3624: 3621: 3618: 3615: 3612: 3608: 3605: 3602: 3599: 3596: 3592: 3589: 3586: 3583: 3580: 3576: 3573: 3570: 3567: 3564: 3560: 3557: 3554: 3551: 3548: 3544: 3543:Drewcifer3000 3541: 3538: 3535: 3532: 3528: 3525: 3522: 3519: 3516: 3512: 3511:Derek.cashman 3509: 3506: 3503: 3500: 3496: 3493: 3490: 3487: 3484: 3480: 3479:Canadian Paul 3477: 3474: 3471: 3468: 3464: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3456: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3437:Hubert Walter 3434: 3430: 3429:Good Articles 3426: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3407: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3396: 3387: 3386: 3380: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3367: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3344: 3340: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3307:Johan Derksen 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3267: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3253: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3242:January issue 3239: 3234: 3232: 3227: 3225: 3215: 3211: 3210: 3206: 3203: 3202: 3199: 3197: 3192: 3191: 3188: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3172: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3151: 3150: 3144: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3087: 3081: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3072: 3070: 3067: 3064: 3058: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3038: 3032: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3012: 3002: 3001: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2934: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2913: 2909: 2903: 2891: 2888: 2883: 2880: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2862: 2861: 2858: 2857: 2855: 2849: 2848: 2846: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2831: 2825: 2823: 2821: 2805: 2801: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2767: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2744:around here. 2743: 2739: 2727: 2724: 2722: 2719: 2716: 2710: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2696: 2693: 2691: 2688: 2685: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2656:Brian Peppers 2653: 2650:Recall, like 2649: 2648: 2643: 2640: 2637: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2624: 2621: 2617: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2594: 2588: 2582: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2557: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2542: 2534: 2533: 2529: 2523: 2519: 2514: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2502:100%freehuman 2499: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2473: 2467: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2445: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2426: 2423: 2420: 2417: 2414: 2411: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2399: 2396: 2393: 2390: 2385: 2384:100%freehuman 2379: 2376: 2373: 2370: 2367: 2364: 2361: 2358: 2355: 2352: 2349: 2346: 2343: 2338: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2316:100%freehuman 2313: 2307: 2302: 2299: 2296: 2292: 2289: 2286: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2271:100%freehuman 2268: 2260: 2257: 2255: 2250: 2246: 2243: 2241: 2236: 2232: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2212: 2211: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2191: 2187: 2185: 2179: 2174: 2171: 2170: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2150: 2141: 2138: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2122: 2111: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2075: 2070: 2065: 2058: 2053: 2049: 2046: 2041: 2037: 2034: 2029: 2025: 2022: 2017: 2013: 2010: 2005: 2001: 1998: 1996: 1990: 1986: 1983: 1982: 1977: 1968: 1965: 1964: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1948: 1944: 1939: 1936: 1928: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1909: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1882: 1881: 1878: 1873: 1868: 1867: 1863: 1858: 1856: 1852: 1845: 1838: 1834: 1832: 1830: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1812: 1810: 1795: 1794: 1791: 1790: 1788: 1774: 1770: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1732: 1727: 1724: 1721: 1718: 1708: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1688: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1659: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1602: 1597: 1594: 1589: 1585: 1582: 1579: 1575: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1538: 1534: 1531: 1515: 1512: 1510: 1507: 1504: 1498: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1486: 1481: 1480: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1416: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1265: 1256: 1247: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1239: 1238: 1236: 1230: 1229: 1227: 1220: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1047: 1046: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 998: 997: 994: 992: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 958: 957: 954: 952: 949: 946: 936:Ender's Game. 933: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 907: 904: 903: 899: 895: 891: 881: 879: 875: 871: 867: 851: 848: 843: 840: 835: 831: 830: 829: 825: 821: 820: 819: 818: 815: 810: 807: 802: 791: 790: 786: 782: 778: 774: 762: 759: 757: 753: 748: 744: 740: 732: 722: 721: 717: 713: 708: 700: 691: 688: 683: 677: 673: 669: 668: 665: 662: 657: 652: 644: 643: 639: 635: 625: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 595: 594: 591: 587: 577: 575: 571: 567: 563: 561: 548: 544: 540: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 517: 512: 507: 500: 495: 491: 488: 483: 479: 476: 471: 467: 464: 459: 455: 446: 443: 442: 436: 435: 432: 426: 422: 417: 414: 406: 398: 394: 393: 387: 382: 381: 376: 369: 363: 351: 347: 346: 345: 344: 341: 338: 337: 313: 312: 311: 310: 307: 305: 300: 296: 292: 288: 278: 277: 274: 266: 255: 251: 247: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 233: 229: 225: 221: 220: 219: 218: 215: 211: 207: 203: 202: 201: 200: 196: 192: 187: 185: 181: 176: 175: 171: 167: 158: 152:What the heck 145: 141: 137: 133: 132: 131: 128: 124: 120: 119: 118: 117: 113: 109: 108:Tijuana Brass 104: 101: 96: 92: 83: 80: 78: 74: 70: 66: 59: 50: 48: 44: 40: 36: 19: 5891: 5881: 5859: 5855: 5849: 5845: 5821: 5817: 5776: 5689: 5679: 5674: 5662: 5654: 5635: 5607: 5599: 5589: 5585: 5581: 5574: 5566: 5536:UltraExactZZ 5532: 5496: 5468: 5445: 5442: 5411: 5365: 5359: 5353: 5347: 5341: 5335: 5329: 5323: 5317: 5307: 5253: 5233: 5214: 5195: 5178: 5175: 5172: 5162: 5130: 5125: 5122:Fast editing 5112:Juliancolton 5109: 5089: 4888: 4880: 4840: 4830: 4749:"rv stalker" 4743: 4735: 4725: 4723:Hi Keilana; 4722: 4706: 4700: 4691: 4688: 4684: 4676: 4672: 4603: 4562: 4537: 4475:January 2013 4468: 4445: 4440:Key Biscayne 4415:Reassessment 4413: 4406:start review 4403: 4370:start review 4367: 4341:Zud Schammel 4334:start review 4331: 4298:start review 4295: 4262:start review 4259: 4225: 4212: 4208:This project 4206: 4201: 4185: 4184: 4149: 4137: 4098:... that on 4056:unreferenced 4030: 4008: 3998: 3990: 3931:; add it to 3918: 3904: 3895: 3879: 3863: 3847: 3831: 3815: 3799: 3783: 3767: 3751: 3735: 3719: 3703: 3687: 3671: 3659: 3645: 3629: 3613: 3597: 3581: 3565: 3549: 3533: 3517: 3501: 3485: 3469: 3457: 3431:, including 3411: 3391: 3291: 3288:under review 3287: 3283: 3264:Project News 3235: 3221: 3219: 3193: 3175: 3145: 3140: 3137:Bizarre post 3111:wp:unprotect 3068: 3065: 3062: 3008: 2981: 2946: 2942: 2907: 2904: 2901: 2860: 2853: 2851: 2844: 2842: 2819: 2818: 2812: 2734: 2720: 2717: 2714: 2708: 2689: 2686: 2683: 2663: 2615: 2580: 2563: 2543: 2540: 2515: 2496:— Preceding 2492: 2448: 2421: 2415: 2409: 2403: 2397: 2391: 2374: 2368: 2362: 2356: 2350: 2344: 2337:121.220.6.59 2334: 2303: 2300: 2297: 2293: 2290: 2287: 2261: 2258: 2251: 2247: 2244: 2237: 2233: 2230: 2206: 2192: 2188: 2180: 2177: 2165: 2151: 2147: 2139: 2120: 2116: 2109: 2072: 1994: 1979: 1961: 1951: 1946: 1934: 1926: 1907: 1888: 1865: 1861: 1859: 1848: 1828: 1826: 1808: 1806: 1801: 1777: 1772: 1766: 1738: 1722: 1714: 1684: 1665: 1642: 1624: 1580: 1572: 1542: 1539: 1535: 1527: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1477: 1476: 1445: 1426: 1381: 1308: 1277:edit summary 1267:you made to 1260: 1250:January 2008 1241: 1234: 1232: 1225: 1223: 1216: 1093: 1069: 1004: 964: 950: 947: 944: 939: 913: 905: 887: 861: 797: 770: 750: 703: 663: 631: 601: 586:Asta Lavista 583: 559: 555: 514: 439: 429: 424: 412: 404: 385: 361: 317: 303: 286: 284: 269: 188: 177: 162: 105: 97: 93: 89: 81: 60: 56: 30: 5106:Re:Rollback 4549:Hi Keilana, 4505:Changes log 4447:Task forces 4227:Nominations 4175:OhanaUnited 4146:OhanaUnited 3793:jackturner3 3656:Member News 3623:Nehrams2020 3453:photography 3441:Middle Ages 3246:March issue 2464:Whups! :) 2310:—Preceding 2265:—Preceding 1773:technically 1691:—Preceding 1662:Muy Gracias 1479:Compwhiz II 1474:Good...:) 1448:—Preceding 1429:CrazyRob926 1283:. Thanks. 1264:recent edit 1189:74.133.9.95 1175:74.133.9.95 1115:74.133.9.95 1103:Indeed. :P 1076:74.133.9.95 870:75.100.84.9 864:—Preceding 752:Malinaccier 712:Nightscream 707:Corey Clark 699:Corey Clark 604:—Preceding 265:Vin DiCarlo 246:Herostratus 224:Herostratus 206:Herostratus 191:Herostratus 166:Herostratus 86:AfD closure 63:—Preceding 33:—Preceding 5878:disruption 5681:4 February 5586:discussion 5363:block user 5333:filter log 4774:And again. 4501:GAN Report 4497:Statistics 4186:Improving 4073:neutrality 4071:has major 3809:Kbthompson 3697:Cyclonenim 3591:M3tal H3ad 3463:AnonEMouse 3355:articles). 3226:Newsletter 3198:Newsletter 3115:Groupthink 3097:Groupthink 3016:Groupthink 2777:Solumeiras 2766:historical 2742:real dicks 2668:Solumeiras 2566:Solumeiras 2547:Bless sins 2419:block user 2413:filter log 2372:block user 2366:filter log 1953:28 January 1769:Lumberjake 1649:Groupthink 1631:Groupthink 1454:Compwhizii 1171:this edit? 1141:here's why 1043:Thank you! 915:Ziyi Zhang 610:Tippydog10 431:21 January 5860:Greetings 5573:For your 5529:Banhammer 5369:block log 5192:Vandalism 4971:You too. 4729:Tfoxworth 4656:Sandstein 4626:Sandstein 4610:Sandstein 4269:Hal Hinte 4188:Knowledge 4121:... that 3761:FamicomJL 3729:Ddstretch 3559:Jackyd101 3080:Dreadstar 3031:Dreadstar 2870:pitchfork 2522:Dreadstar 2466:Dreadstar 2425:block log 2378:block log 1866:Blakesley 1851:vandalism 1711:Thank you 1524:Thank you 1358:Wonderpet 1344:Wonderpet 1328:Wonderpet 1310:Wonderpet 1296:Wonderpet 1029:Finetooth 1014:Finetooth 890:Mandingo? 285:Keilana, 27:From Anon 5824:spamlist 5822:Signpost 5801:Shortcut 5791:Tip Line 5787:Newsroom 5783:Archives 5636:Signpost 5626:contribs 5615:Jayron32 5550:barnstar 5541:Evidence 5321:contribs 5294:contribs 5283:Jayron32 5271:contribs 5260:Jayron32 5131:Schfifty 4844:contribs 4739:contribs 4169:Dr. Cash 4158:Dr. Cash 4140:Dr. Cash 4078:has any 4066:edit war 3977:failedGA 3962:and add 3935:and add 3899:contribs 3883:contribs 3867:contribs 3851:contribs 3835:contribs 3819:contribs 3803:contribs 3787:contribs 3771:contribs 3755:contribs 3745:Ealdgyth 3739:contribs 3723:contribs 3707:contribs 3691:contribs 3675:contribs 3665:Atlantik 3649:contribs 3639:VanTucky 3633:contribs 3617:contribs 3601:contribs 3585:contribs 3569:contribs 3553:contribs 3537:contribs 3521:contribs 3505:contribs 3495:Casliber 3489:contribs 3473:contribs 3413:Ealdgyth 3311:Trafford 3286:, 7 are 3178:Dr. Cash 2771:, being 2709:strongly 2616:(1 == 2) 2510:contribs 2498:unsigned 2451:Pairadox 2435:Pairadox 2395:contribs 2348:contribs 2324:contribs 2312:unsigned 2279:contribs 2267:unsigned 2123:spamlist 2121:Signpost 2097:Shortcut 2087:Tip Line 2083:Newsroom 2079:Archives 1995:Signpost 1908:Signpost 1747:Terraxos 1693:unsigned 1584:contribs 1544:Gorkhali 1485:Contribs 1462:contribs 1450:unsigned 1442:Hey YOU! 1261:Hi, the 894:Reyemile 884:Mandingo 866:unsigned 781:Maul day 618:contribs 606:unsigned 562:spamlist 560:Signpost 539:Shortcut 529:Tip Line 525:Newsroom 521:Archives 386:Signpost 106:Thanks. 65:unsigned 35:unsigned 5805:WP:POST 5478:Kerotan 5096:Keilana 5064:Keilana 5031:Charles 4996:Keilana 4964:Charles 4933:Charles 4896:Charles 4823:Charles 4709:MBisanz 4587:Keilana 4100:July 19 4083:cleanup 4075:issues. 3889:Snowolf 3873:Skeeker 3841:Miranda 3825:Keilana 3681:Auawise 3607:Miranda 3575:Johnfos 3445:History 3417:Epbr123 3284:on hold 3160:Keilana 3148:MBisanz 3047:Keilana 2985:Majorly 2969:Keilana 2951:Mercury 2933:Keilana 2917:Mercury 2902:Hello, 2898:CAT:AOR 2800:Keilana 2482:Keilana 2220:Keilana 2209:MBisanz 2168:MBisanz 2101:WP:POST 1885:Request 1876:contrib 1855:WP:PROD 1829:BQZip01 1809:BQZip01 1681:Darragh 1611:Keilana 1574:Stoprev 1559:Keilana 1285:Keilana 1273:sandbox 1145:Keilana 1105:Keilana 824:Keilana 672:Keilana 543:WP:POST 123:Viridae 5828:Ralbot 5579:αἰτίας 5515:Daniel 5500:Metros 5406:Jro201 5238:Rudget 5176:ndonic 4906:WP:ANI 4834:I vonH 4568:hangon 4464:GA Cup 4456:Sweeps 4395:istory 4359:istory 4323:istory 4287:istory 4251:istory 4003:WP:GAN 3989:, add 3987:WP:GAN 3960:WP:GAN 3921:WP:GAN 3857:pcbene 3449:horses 3447:, and 3421:May 26 3341:, and 3296:WP:GAN 3066:ndonic 2965:WP:IAR 2746:Triona 2718:ndonic 2687:ndonic 2639:(talk) 2636:Friday 2586:Keeper 2560:Recall 2537:WP:ANI 2127:Ralbot 1894:Party! 1668:Mc2006 1506:ndonic 1378:Huggle 1213:huugle 1066:Favor? 948:ndonic 747:Rudget 739:my RFA 686:Vitale 678:page! 634:Triona 628:Thanks 580:How... 566:Ralbot 367:henrik 287:please 273:Mathmo 5575:great 5391:Woody 5376:Woody 5339:WHOIS 5198:KC109 5146:Damn. 5137:Three 4719:Again 4374:) • 4338:) • 4302:) • 4266:) • 4061:tags. 3933:WP:GA 3271:WP:GA 2854:fusco 2822:levse 2581:drama 2431:point 1530:Singh 1235:fusco 1143:. :) 1095:Cobra 1091:Glass 923:Edhed 590:Baby! 304:juice 299:Mango 53:Swans 16:< 5893:talk 5888:Whig 5884:here 5866:talk 5832:talk 5778:Home 5684:2008 5620:talk 5519:talk 5504:talk 5418:talk 5395:talk 5380:talk 5357:http 5351:RBLs 5345:RDNS 5315:talk 5288:talk 5265:talk 5221:talk 5202:talk 4838:talk 4733:talk 4660:talk 4645:talk 4630:talk 4614:talk 4543:talk 4513:edit 4152:here 4104:2007 3893:talk 3877:talk 3861:talk 3845:talk 3829:talk 3813:talk 3797:talk 3781:talk 3765:talk 3749:talk 3733:talk 3717:talk 3701:talk 3685:talk 3669:talk 3643:talk 3627:talk 3611:talk 3595:talk 3579:talk 3563:talk 3547:talk 3531:talk 3515:talk 3499:talk 3483:talk 3467:talk 3435:and 3425:2007 3222:The 3194:The 3182:talk 3119:talk 3101:talk 3020:talk 2955:talk 2947:need 2943:need 2921:talk 2845:Alex 2829:Talk 2781:talk 2773:bold 2750:talk 2672:talk 2570:talk 2551:talk 2541:HI, 2518:mine 2506:talk 2455:talk 2439:talk 2407:logs 2389:talk 2360:logs 2342:talk 2320:talk 2275:talk 2131:talk 2074:Home 1956:2008 1898:talk 1871:talk 1751:talk 1701:talk 1672:talk 1653:talk 1635:talk 1578:talk 1548:talk 1458:talk 1433:talk 1362:talk 1348:talk 1332:talk 1314:talk 1300:talk 1269:Nerd 1226:Alex 1219:here 1193:talk 1179:talk 1119:talk 1080:talk 1051:Scar 1033:talk 1018:talk 927:talk 898:talk 874:talk 785:talk 756:talk 716:talk 681:Mike 638:talk 614:talk 570:talk 516:Home 434:2008 374:talk 250:talk 228:talk 210:talk 195:talk 170:talk 140:talk 112:talk 73:talk 43:talk 5793:| 5789:| 5785:| 5781:| 4410:) 4386:alk 4350:alk 4314:alk 4278:alk 4242:alk 4051:or 4001:to 3972:or 3945:or 2989:Lar 2658:or 2589:| 2520:. 2308:" 2186:" 2089:| 2085:| 2081:| 2077:| 1862:Joe 1404:Lar 1384:Lar 1054:ian 725:RFA 531:| 527:| 523:| 519:| 5896:) 5868:) 5853:. 5834:) 5803:: 5613:-- 5521:) 5506:) 5420:) 5397:) 5382:) 5223:) 5204:) 5098:| 5066:| 4998:| 4908:. 4662:) 4647:) 4639:-- 4632:) 4616:) 4589:| 4571:}} 4565:{{ 4545:) 4511:| 4503:| 4495:| 4477:) 4462:• 4458:• 4454:• 4442:• 4438:• 4434:• 4430:• 4426:• 4422:• 4402:| 4390:| 4366:| 4354:| 4330:| 4318:| 4294:| 4282:| 4258:| 4246:| 4154:. 4102:, 4086:}} 4080:{{ 4059:}} 4053:{{ 4049:}} 4046:cn 4043:{{ 3980:}} 3974:{{ 3970:}} 3964:{{ 3953:}} 3950:GA 3947:{{ 3943:}} 3937:{{ 3443:, 3423:, 3397:. 3337:, 3333:, 3329:, 3325:, 3321:, 3317:, 3313:, 3309:, 3244:| 3184:) 3162:| 3121:) 3103:) 3057:OR 3049:| 3022:) 2991:: 2971:| 2957:) 2935:| 2923:) 2832:• 2826:• 2815:— 2802:| 2783:) 2769:}} 2763:{{ 2752:) 2674:) 2666:-- 2592:76 2572:) 2553:) 2512:) 2508:• 2484:| 2457:) 2441:) 2326:) 2322:• 2281:) 2277:• 2256:" 2242:" 2222:| 2133:) 2099:: 1900:) 1857:. 1827:— 1807:— 1783:am 1780:At 1753:) 1703:) 1674:) 1655:) 1637:) 1613:| 1586:) 1561:| 1550:) 1499:· 1464:) 1460:• 1435:) 1406:: 1386:: 1364:) 1350:) 1334:) 1316:) 1302:) 1287:| 1195:) 1181:) 1147:| 1121:) 1107:| 1082:) 1035:) 1020:) 977:, 973:, 929:) 900:) 876:) 826:| 787:) 767:Hi 718:) 640:) 620:) 616:• 588:, 572:) 541:: 335:te 333:ai 331:hw 329:et 327:tl 325:os 321:an 319:Ry 252:) 230:) 212:) 197:) 172:) 142:) 114:) 75:) 45:) 5890:( 5864:( 5830:( 5623:. 5617:. 5590:• 5582:• 5538:~ 5517:( 5502:( 5416:( 5393:( 5378:( 5371:) 5366:· 5360:· 5354:· 5348:· 5342:· 5336:· 5330:· 5324:· 5318:· 5313:( 5291:. 5285:. 5268:. 5262:. 5242:. 5219:( 5200:( 5179:O 5173:A 5052:L 5048:o 5044:B 5040:— 4985:L 4981:o 4977:B 4973:— 4954:L 4950:o 4946:B 4942:— 4922:L 4918:o 4914:B 4910:— 4877:, 4841:· 4836:( 4818:, 4812:, 4809:, 4806:, 4793:. 4736:· 4731:( 4658:( 4643:( 4628:( 4612:( 4541:( 4499:| 4449:: 4417:: 4393:h 4384:t 4381:( 4357:h 4348:t 4345:( 4321:h 4312:t 4309:( 4285:h 4276:t 4273:( 4249:h 4240:t 4237:( 4229:: 3901:) 3896:· 3891:( 3885:) 3880:· 3875:( 3869:) 3864:· 3859:( 3853:) 3848:· 3843:( 3837:) 3832:· 3827:( 3821:) 3816:· 3811:( 3805:) 3800:· 3795:( 3789:) 3784:· 3779:( 3773:) 3768:· 3763:( 3757:) 3752:· 3747:( 3741:) 3736:· 3731:( 3725:) 3720:· 3715:( 3709:) 3704:· 3699:( 3693:) 3688:· 3683:( 3677:) 3672:· 3667:( 3651:) 3646:· 3641:( 3635:) 3630:· 3625:( 3619:) 3614:· 3609:( 3603:) 3598:· 3593:( 3587:) 3582:· 3577:( 3571:) 3566:· 3561:( 3555:) 3550:· 3545:( 3539:) 3534:· 3529:( 3523:) 3518:· 3513:( 3507:) 3502:· 3497:( 3491:) 3486:· 3481:( 3475:) 3470:· 3465:( 3345:. 3273:. 3180:( 3117:( 3099:( 3085:† 3069:O 3063:A 3036:† 3018:( 2997:c 2995:/ 2993:t 2953:( 2919:( 2886:L 2882:o 2878:B 2874:— 2820:R 2779:( 2748:( 2721:O 2715:A 2690:O 2684:A 2670:( 2568:( 2549:( 2527:† 2504:( 2471:† 2453:( 2437:( 2427:) 2422:· 2416:· 2410:· 2404:· 2398:· 2392:· 2387:( 2380:) 2375:· 2369:· 2363:· 2357:· 2351:· 2345:· 2340:( 2318:( 2273:( 2182:" 2129:( 1896:( 1831:— 1811:— 1786:a 1749:( 1699:( 1670:( 1651:( 1633:( 1600:L 1596:o 1592:B 1588:— 1581:· 1576:( 1546:( 1509:O 1503:A 1487:) 1483:( 1456:( 1431:( 1412:c 1410:/ 1408:t 1392:c 1390:/ 1388:t 1360:( 1346:( 1330:( 1312:( 1298:( 1191:( 1177:( 1117:( 1078:( 1031:( 1016:( 951:O 945:A 925:( 896:( 872:( 846:L 842:o 838:B 834:— 813:L 809:o 805:B 801:— 783:( 758:) 754:( 714:( 636:( 612:( 568:( 371:• 323:P 248:( 226:( 208:( 193:( 168:( 138:( 110:( 71:( 41:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index