1088:. My brain death is not my own fault and you should not be making light of it. As to my own biases they are in favor of Daniel Faulkner and his family. I believe Jamal recieved a fair trial and the fact that he has not been put to death is a travesty of justice. That being said, keeping a NPOV in this article refrains me from adding things such as the quote from the T-shirt I own that states, " Officer Danny Faulkner was murdered by Mumia Abu Jamal who shouldn't be in a 8 x 10 foot cell. He should be 6 feet closer to hell." I firmly believe it but realize it may be a "bit" biased. Just as your comments on him not recieving a fair trial and the Philly D.A.'s office using illegal and unethical tactics are biased. Especially based on the fact that there is no research to back them up. This leads to the last point. While I am sure that the "informational flyer published by the Western Pennsylvania Committee to Free Mumia Abu-Jamal" is a fascinating read it probably is not the most reliable of sources. I guessing from the name of this group that they may have a particular bias in one direction. You should probably read the Knowledge policy on reliable sources
1125:. The copy is actually listed on the USMC helicopter association's website. Did you email them your force protection concerns as well? Also, the fact that certain units are going to Iraq is not classified. The exact dates they are leaving/arriving and where they are going might be but not the fact that they are leaving. Finally, don't ever lecture me about force protection or ever infer that anything I have ever written on this website has endangered any Marines. 99% of all the USMC info I had is from if you have problems contact them. Thank you--
594:, I uploaded from www.military-graphics.com. The site has a copyright on their images (as I'm sure other .com badge sites), but any use is allowed if image is attributed. I've been reading Wiki info on licensing and am not sure whether being required to attribute is too restrictive. Do you know? I've referenced the site on the upload info and on the MAG-39 references. The site is the best I've found for high resolution badges, etc. But, I'm going to hold off uploading anymore until I'm sure that it is ok.
1703:
1411:
877:
115:
be no need in sub cats, buth then it would equal thousands of articl in singal categories, and or the possibility of unlimited categorites of on an article. IE you could see Mayors in
Baltimore, Mayors in Maryland, Mayors in the United States, Mayors in North America, Mayors being listed on the article instead of Mayors of Baltimore, with that category being part of the heirachary of Mayors categories. --
1064:
persuasive to the person doing the sorting. There is no way that you or anyone can perform this process “objectively,” and you are kidding yourself if you think otherwise. You are also allowing your own biases to get in the way of the free flow of information that, I suspect, you are opposed to because you fear how other people might react to it. If that’s the case, you’re also a coward.
1197:
955:
1765:
Sound pretty good. That is going to be a fairly lengthy project. I was also thinking that sometimes when I am doing articles on the same thing over and over again the mind goes numb. How about two concurrent projects? Medal of Honor winners and finish up all the active units down to the battalion
1501:
I added a page on the 10th
Marines, a unit in which I assigned for almost 4 years as a young lt and Forward observer (FO). The USMC Historical Center, a number of years back begain publishing regimental histories. Accordingly, I got a PDF file called "A Brief History of the 10th Marines." from this
586:
On the graphics ... to this point, the emblems/insignias that I've uploaded and used have been directly from USMC sites. The resolution of the graphics has varied from unit to unit. My concern has been image licensing. The USMC pages are covered ... by {{PD-USGov-Military-Badge}} -- public domain
114:
No really you want the most relevant as possible. The more specific the category the better, thats why i droped the the categories that i did, being aslo that those categories are subcategories of the categories that were droped. If we went with the they way you said, then reasticlay then their would
42:
It hasn't quite gotten to that, yet, but it is getting kind of close... But the strangest thing is that the entire school's IP address has been blocked from editing any page. So this has stopped rapid changes from going on at the school itself, so it's a war at home, per se. I think we may have to
1063:
Look, EVERYTHING that you write is biased, and can hardly be otherwise. Because human beings can only convey and understand information in limited quantities, they are constantly sorting, selecting, and discarding information in an effort to ferret out that which appears to be the most relevant or
732:
replies to your message: "I believe dominant is the right word for this one. If you go to the Links section of their website and see who they distribute to it is safe to consider them tops. If you want to change it maybe "preeminent" might be a better word? My opinion--Looper5920 15:11, 31 December
1732:
Swatyester's statement is ok, but notice that i didn't know the "Knowledge:WikiProject
Military history/Military unit infobox" and your endaeavors of standardizing all the unit's info-boxes. Actually I must admit, that the new design is better now, because it's shortened and easier to read and the
1121:
If you looked at the reference in the section you deleted you would have seen that it linked to a copy of a newspaper article about their upcoming deployment. The unit was not so concerned about "force protection" when they decided to mention their deployment to the local militay writer. Here it
1356:
OK, so I'm supposed to be on a break (RL has increased its demands recently), but it's hard not to be drawn in. The portal provides a quick look at things to do, which is nice. I like the idea of a "Famous
Battles" article ... that could be in addition to a "Significant Battles in USMC History"
1141:
Regarding the HMH-363 information, I will say that just because some dumb ass runs his suck doesn't mean that the information is not sensitive and allowable for dissemination. In retrospect, you are probably right about the information being vague enough to not be an issue. Still, I think it is
1079:
Sir, I stepped back and took a deep breath before I replied to the wonderful piece of prose you placed on my talk page. First let me say thank you for the promotion. You addressed me as Maj. Doofus when in fact I am only a
Captain. Maybe someday?? I can imagine your surprise when you realized you
1071:
The paragraph you are trying to censor is lifted straight from an informational flyer published by the
Western Pennsylvania Committee to Free Mumia Abu-Jamal (now apparently defunct), in 1998. I will send a scanned copy to anyone who requests it. In the meantime, kindly spare us your imperious
349:
Thanks for the words of encouragement regarding our good friend Bob, I am near my boiling point with this guy. He just doesn't get it. For some reason I think he has confused
Knowledge and LiveJournal. Anyway, thanks for the support with this guy. Hopefully he gives in before we are forced to
1629:
Hi and thanks for your message. I'm not shure wheter I can be a help for your project, but may be you (as an "MARINE") can give me an information I need. What is the correct and official name of the Marine Corp's component of the SOCOM? Please watch the MARSOC's discussion side. Bye and thanks
1770:.... Sorry, got a head of myself there. Before we start any of this though, we need a really good list of both to use for reference. There is one for the Battalions that needs to have units added but we will need one for the MOH winners. Rambled a bit but interested to hear your thoughts.--
1092:
prior to making anymore edits. I apologize if you were bothered by my "imperious meddling", however I will restate, that if you continue to try and add that paragrapgh I will revert it evert time. If you feel this is unfair than I highly encourage you to read the policy for resolving disputes
1113:
Do you really think it's a good idea to list unit deployments before they happen? As a rule of thumb, those are considered confidential. Obviously spouses and friends find out before but that doesn't mean it's okay to broadcast it to the whole world. Let's think a little more about force
1825:
Originally I was thinking once a week but that seems a bit long. I think 3 or 4 days is a bit more appropriate. If you have a good one then go ahead and throw it in there. If you want to make any changes with the Portal please go ahead. I just started it but it can sure use alot of
1502:
guy who sells them for pennies plus shipping. I'll begin revising the article ASAP. I was a history major and enjoy the work. Also, I've contributed stuff to the articles on
Theodore Roosevelt and his large family and emailed his great-great-great grandson on some fact finding. S/F
211:
Haha, well, you certainly seem to have the general hang of it, judging by the advanced decoration of your userpage :) You have more edits to your name than me as well... Anyway, if you're interested in helping fight vandalism, you might be interested in joining our very own
579:. Putting graphics on the page was something that I have debated a bit. As you can see, I put them in the VMGR section - but, for the most part as a place holder for the graphics until the pages were created. I spent some time trying to find the best graphics, etc.
1067:
The question is not whether you or I are biased, it’s whether the viewpoints that you or I are espousing are relevant to the purposes of the encyclopedia, which include informing readers of as much evidence as possible, and leaving them to draw their own conclusions.
502:
I found two categories appropriate for the Marine squadrons (though I think they deserve their own category) and added them to HMM-262 and HMLA-367. (Categories: Units of the U.S. Marine Corps | U.S. Marine Corps aviation). I also made some minor copyedits.
1909:
is really intended for the general type of building (e.g. "Military base") rather than the branch using it. That information is pretty clear from the name; but if you really want it in there, you should probably use the "Controlled by" field for it instead.
1684:
Please help monitor this article? the user there Mark S. has apparently decided he owns this article, reverted your infobox migration, as well as other controversial edits involving the unit. Would you mind re-migrating the infobox? Thanks.
1783:
You are on a roll with the active units, which I'll leave to you. I know the mind-numbing feeling, so will probably take a breather before jumping in on any more biographies. There are some good sources for Marine Corps MOH recipients:
647:
and don't find any citations of where they got their material. Are all their graphics from USCM, or are some from other sites? The resolution on most of the USMC sites today is often lower, i.e. MAG-36. Not clear where they got their
31:
Thanks a lot for keeping things in NPOV on the site. There's been a big stir up at the school about it, and people are a little mad. I think the whole thing that should go under the "Knowledge does not support censorship." Thanks.
1248:
Hello,Looper5920. I see your last warning for me. I feel unable to explain and grievance, I never do any unconstructive edits, why said I did it, please explain. May be some user IP address as same as my IP address, please verify.
482:
It's great that you created the MAW pages. I'm glad you like the changes to 1MAW. There is still a lot of work to do on history. Will you be putting in WW II history and post-Vietnam history? Time permitting, I'll take a look at
1142:
better to err on the side of caution and there is plenty to write about without giving information on future deployments. If you are firm in your position to leave this information in the article, I will not delete it again.
805:
Great ongoing work on all the USMC articles. Just my opinion, but I would like to see you remove the "not necessarily proud of" disclaimer on your User page. (It is right next to the USMC subheading and your new barnstar.)
653:
Do you know of any USMC site that has all of the graphics? I read that the Army is the keeper of the badges, but they are just getting started getting high-quality graphics. Didn't find any USMC aircraft squadron images.
736:
My hesitation with "dominant" or even "preeminent" is that
Amoroso's specializes in products such as sandwich rolls, rather than, say, sliced bread like Stroehmann's. But if you disagree, I'm not going to argue.
216::) In general if the scenario you described were to happen, you'd get a page telling you there was an edit conflict. Dunno what happened there, but oh well, no harm done. Yep, speedy delete nomination is done by
582:
Since your note, I've been re-thinking it again. Given the length of the list, I think it would become quite cumbersome to put all the emblems for each squadron on the page. Most "list" pages are just lists.
1277:, it passed with a final tally of 68/0/0 so I'm now an administrator. If there's anything I can do to help, you feel I've done something wrong, or there's just something you want to tell, don't hesitate to use
1080:
were lucky enough to be arguing with a brain dead person. I am sure that was right after you read
Knowledge's policies, especially those related to editing articles such as maintaining a neutral point of view
1340:. I started the article, debating a bit on organization — whether by Division, or alphabetical. Couldn't decide what would be more useful... what do you think? (It still needs work, but it's a start.) —
1857:
Sounds good on the changing times. I figured you had a few quotes lined up, especially after looking at so many bios. If I could, I'd like to throw my two cents in for the Archibald Henderson quote of
1060:
That has to be the stupidest rationale I've heard for censoring an idea in a long time. Wow, could it be that I'm actually getting to communicate with a BRAIN DEAD person? Aren’t I the lucky one?
1328:
1329:
597:
We might want to coordinate the upload and use of emblems/insignia/badges. If all you mark all your uploads with ], then it will make it easier to find what has already been uploaded.
561:
I thought of that, since I seem to remember that from school. That "penis" nonsense shed some doubt. I'll restore it and get rid of the nonsense. Thanks for checking that for me. -
1459:
article could use some information about Recruit training ceremony and any editing you deem appropriate. The current article is from the USMC site and could use a bit of editing.
1135:
I didn't see this comment when I deleted the information the second time. I wasn't trying to be a dick and I would have responded to your comment without repeating my action.
1914:
1234:
In the future, when you remove vandalism it is generally a good idea to check the history to see if the vandal also removed any useful information from the article. Thank you.
62:
1032:
Hello! you gave me quite a surprise! I only use my user page for quick links to the various things I'm working on. I tend to forget anyone else can see it! Thanks anyway -
1345:
1667:. I appreciated the comments and will endeavor to improve with my new sysop status. If there's ever anything I can do to help, please don't hesitate to contact me. --
864:
288:
284:
764:
Hello again, just checking to see if you will comment on Bob's RfC. If you don't verify your involvement in the next 8 or so hours then the complaint gets deleted.
1378:
Thank you for informing me about the Portal. For me it would be an honor to contribute to such a project which represents the best of my beloved Corps. Sempre Fi,
1612:
Awesome job on all of the Commandants. I tried to keep up with you but you took that one by yourself and ran with it. Got any idea for another area to tackle??--
1315:. You use the Philadelphia Userbox, and we thought you might be interested in participating in our WikiProject. If you are, please add your name to the list at
1054:
Re: You can continue to try and add that paragraph and I will delete it every time. It is clearly biased and unsourced.--Looper5920 04:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1444:
430:
142:.... but I'm also cleaning up a terrible article about ethnic stereotypes, which has me editing and creating articles about all sorts of extremely bad movies.
1296:
Thank you for voting in my request for adminship. Though your vote opposed me, it was still very helpful. Thank you for not being rude in your vote, as well.
768:
759:
1530:
913:
852:
Yeah, I've been to Pat's. That was an experience! What is the deal with Pat's and the Geno's place? Oh a work exchange thing? What do you think of ol' newy?
576:
175:
409:
I think your afd of this article may have been orphaned (either that or I didn't look hard enough). In any case, I made on entry for it in the Dec 30 page.
1259:
740:
471:
464:
337:
299:
278:
1211:
passed with a final result of 78/2/0. Hopefully I will live up to everyone's expectations. Please ask if I can ever help out with anything in the future.
890:
1435:
1932:
1733:
main opposite arguments (it contained too much information better reseved for the main article) are know obsolete in my oppinion. By the way I didn't
372:
1151:
Compromise - believe this might be suitable for both? Check out latest change to 363 page--Looper5920 10:07, 18 February 2006 (UTC) Retrieved from "
1715:
1423:
978:
368:
350:
take it to RfC. Always nice to meet a fellow Irishman from the good side of the country, Knowledge needs more Irishmen. Merry Christmas to you.
1382:
334:
47:
36:
496:
1884:
1866:
1830:
1774:
1738:
1649:
1616:
1566:
1554:
546:
1337:
999:
527:
360:
1850:
1816:
1488:
1367:
1262:
1046:
I am just sick and tired of seeing mr/ms "smartypants" doing their POV against what is an obvious new and authentic find regarding lincoln!
659:
622:
508:
752:
741:
477:
888:
is currently holding elections for project coordinators. Any member of the project may nominate themselves and all are encouraged to vote
795:
1949:
1323:
833:
729:
716:
385:
985:
1664:
146:
1757:
1162:
1158:
I'd say that's perfect -- that's what I should have asked for to start with. Sorry again, I didn't mean to come across like a jerk.
1146:
811:
565:
1922:
1767:
1722:
1373:
1206:
1741:
861:
Haha yeah I know what you mean about the council... maybe they'll learn someday, lol. And thanks, I'll remember that about Pat's.
1506:
1475:
1129:
433:
778:
413:
354:
86:
1766:
level. I really want to get all of the grunt work out of the way (units and individuals) so that we can create the granddaddy
1602:
Per WikiHistory response, I've updated all of the Commandant articles to have actual years of service versus number of years. —
1591:
1574:
1274:
884:
865:
703:
319:
1981:
1640:
816:
773:
605:
339:
1607:
104:
1014:
379:
131:
26:
1903:
1596:
1182:
451:
442:
388:
708:
463:
The POV you removed was there to make the article NPOV. The article in the state you reverted it to is highly onesided.
244:
206:
123:
1792:
1747:
1316:
1312:
1243:
1036:
939:
800:
1671:
1238:
856:
847:
723:
article to correct the name from "Amoroso..." to "Amoroso's...". Thanks for your initiative in creating the article.
1430:
76:
1285:
1138:
Your USMC contributions look great and I didn’t mean to suggest you were trying to endanger the lives of Marines.
1706:
1414:
1302:
1219:
934:
556:
1652:
137:
1676:
1517:
1463:
927:
1393:
Whoa! You're my hero man! Great job on the military unit entries, and the portal. Keep up the excellent work!
1511:
1449:
962:
940:
1752:
What do you think about an effort to create articles on Marines who have been awarded the Medal of Honor? —
1496:
540:
Thnx, I'll finish those off later, hopefully. After the weekend I'll be around to help you with more. :)
287:- it's generally discouraged to create pages directly in the User: namespace - I'd recommend moving it to
1586:'s article has formatting issues. On my computer, the tables overlap the info box. New format needed. —
617:. Seems that they are protecting online use of their graphics. Offline use allowed with limitations. —
1894:
1108:
1291:
973:, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be
291:(user subpages are commonly used by people to store stuff that they don't want on their main page). —
1624:
1177:
974:
751:
and associated pages. I would appreciate it if you would certify your involvement in the dispute at
720:
570:
67:
Thank you for enforcing Knowledge's Neutral Point of View Policy and removing bias from articles! --
398:
I apologise for having behaved in a silly way, I shall not 'edit' entries while drinking in future.
1456:
1123:
1003:
591:
359:
324:
296:
275:
241:
203:
55:
404:
134:
says (in reference to new category:Pennsylvania Main Line: Good point re: dropping the counties.
1938:
876:
644:
344:
91:
470:
Hi Looper, I have now put in sources to the changes and tried to even out what you criticized
1953:
1441:
1351:
P.S. I'm actually on a WikiBreak ... but did check back in yesterday and found your message.
1308:
993:
948:
418:
73:
44:
33:
1845:. How about weekends and Wednesdays for changing the quote? I've got a couple lined up. —
1976:
1961:
1691:
1399:
1174:
1159:
1143:
310:
17:
1641:
http://www.usmc.mil/genbios2.nsf/biographies/AAB57A104EB0177D85256A300050F20E?opendocument
178:- may I ask why? Also it's usually best to mark objectionable articles for deletion using
8:
1919:
1911:
788:
784:
643:
retains its original copyright, as indicated on the respective page." I revisted their [
521:. If you'd like I'll help out, but I don't have any references for histories and such.
447:
Don't let that stop you building on it you! I read your message! The more the merrier. --
292:
271:
237:
199:
120:
101:
79:
1362:
Thanks so much for the Barnstar. As RL permits, I'll keep working on USMC articles. —
1336:
Nice work on the Portal! What work needs to be done? I did notice the redlink on the
1267:
765:
756:
351:
316:
109:
1524:) with infoboxes, including missing portraits, and portal links. Taking a break now. —
1440:
And also the portal, Please keep me in mind for future articles. I'd be glad to help.
1521:
1379:
1320:
1229:
1027:
726:
713:
410:
128:
1658:
143:
68:
333:
and thus it's not speedable. It's better off to AFD the article instead. Thanks --
1967:
1929:
1879:
That's a very good one. I'll make the change this weekend ... probably Sunday. —
1863:
1827:
1771:
1686:
1613:
1563:
1394:
1278:
1126:
931:
853:
844:
838:
1862:
quote. I'll change the selected article in a few hours when I get the chance.--
967:
There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them.
517:
hey, I've seen ya'll working on the USMC aviation articles, good job. I was in
1668:
1388:
1187:
1081:
1033:
1011:
982:
562:
457:
116:
97:
614:
1583:
1503:
1235:
1213:
1167:
1085:
1007:
825:
818:
792:
698:
541:
522:
426:
419:
213:
151:
1960:. If you ever need any help, or if I mess something up as an admin, please
1880:
1846:
1812:
1753:
1603:
1587:
1550:
1525:
1484:
1471:
1363:
1341:
1297:
1094:
1089:
921:
829:
807:
655:
618:
601:
504:
492:
448:
439:
1678:
1562:
Let me check with the Wikihistory project people and see what they say.--
1097:
and move from there. Sincerely--Looper5920 07:57, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
376:
264:
230:
192:
1049:
1282:
910:
692:
254:
220:
182:
168:
155:
1542:
Order for commands - from Commandant to first, or first to Commandant?
1041:
456:
1808:
BTW - how often are you planning to change the "Quote" on the portal?
1255:
This is my work in chinese edition, you can see I am not a destroyer.
687:
1842:
1006:. For articles you create by mistake, you can us the {{db-author}}
518:
488:
283:
By the way, looking around your userpage I see that you've created
1702:
1410:
484:
96:
N/P should have been listed in the article in the first place. --
1483:
BTW, I believe all of the Commandant articles are created now. —
1798:
1787:
1010:
tag so that's removed. I've tagged it for deletion. Thanks! --
1152:
61:
1466:
could use some more information about their current mission.
1196:
954:
843:
Hi, That's interesting. Why are you currently in Newcastle?
250:
Oh, forgot to mention - I noticed your trouble with putting
1710:
1418:
748:
1928:
Sounds good Thanks for the info. I'll make the changes--
1256:
373:
Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RR#User:Sly100100
1545:
Order for medals - chronological or highest honor down?
425:
It seems like there will be a lot of conflict edits in
1100:
1582:! Commandants all have infoboxes completed. General
577:
List of United States Marine Corps aircraft squadrons
1948:
Thanks for your support and kind words on my recent
1105:
really thanks for watching and please keep helping.
393:
1634:According to this official reference it is called
1072:meddling and let people make up their own minds.
1636:US Marine Corps Force Special Operations Command
1084:and of course refraining from personal attacks
981:and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. .
438:Sorry the above was mine. Forgot to sign in! --
1172:Thanks. I should get to them all eventually!
1019:
1338:List of United States Marine Corps battalions
1307:Hi, I am writing you in regards to a current
1153:http://en.wikipedia.org/User:IndiciumMaximus
753:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Robertjkoenig
747:I have started an RfC about Bobs conduct on
742:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Robertjkoenig
1002:. Blanking pages is generally considered a
639:and graphics on this site are protected....
1516:I've checked and updated 1st through 11th
1436:Barnstar & Great article on Col Ripley
1768:History of the United States Marine Corps
783:FYI, the NHL team in Philadelphia is the
236:placed at the top of the article text. —
1899:Just a minor point: the "Type" field in
1122:is, since you missed it the first time
1118:My response posted on user's talk page:
1076:My reply as posted on user's talk page:
14:
1538:for Commmandant info boxes questions:
613:I checked out the copyright notice on
1692:
1400:
1252:My English not good, please forgive.
43:lock the page if it gets much worse.
1956:to say passed with a final tally of
478:USMC , updates to HMM-262; HMLA-367.
828:has been nominated for deletion. —
23:
1799:Marines Awarded the Medal of Honor
1531:Consistency of infobox information
953:
575:I checked out the HMLA section of
24:
1996:
1860:I'll be back when the war is over
1696:
1404:
1374:Portal:United States Marine Corps
1330:Portal:United States Marine Corps
947:+ This message is in relation to
1942:
1701:
1409:
1195:
926:Thanks for helping clean up the
875:
60:
1332:- nice - what needs to be done?
699:
542:
523:
1464:6th Engineer Support Battalion
1292:Requests for Adminship/Steveo2
928:Iraq War Veterans Organization
635:The blur of fine print. "All
260:on my talk page - that's what
13:
1:
1915:
1737:anything. hope, you answer. (
1693:
1630:(15:02, 15 March 2006 (UTC))
1401:
1263:17:54, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
1239:19:04, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
1220:09:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
1183:12:21, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1163:10:13, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1147:10:04, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
1130:09:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
897:The elections will run until
824:You might be interested ...
774:Knowledge:Userboxes/US Sports
717:14:59, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
704:02:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
660:01:25, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
623:00:07, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
606:23:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
566:23:57, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
547:22:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
528:21:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
509:21:04, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
497:16:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
452:14:26, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
443:11:39, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
434:11:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
414:03:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
389:01:27, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
380:18:15, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
355:15:33, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
340:05:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
320:21:45, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
315:I've a feeling this is real--
300:06:49, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
279:06:43, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
245:06:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
207:06:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
147:11:10, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
124:07:54, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
105:06:24, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
87:09:12, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
1841:Updated quote with one from
1663:Thank you for commenting on
1037:15:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
1015:01:44, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
986:22:48, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
935:22:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
914:04:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
885:Military history WikiProject
866:WikiProject Military history
857:03:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
848:03:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
329:It's that the article claim
48:03:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
37:03:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
27:La Salle College High School
7:
1793:Marine Corps Medal of Honor
1687:
1395:
834:16:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
812:12:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
796:04:44, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
769:14:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
760:19:42, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
730:02:58, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
587:for work of US Government.
132:12:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
10:
2001:
1982:06:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
1933:01:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
1923:00:34, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
1904:Infobox Military Structure
1885:22:11, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
1867:05:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
1851:04:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
1831:03:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
1817:03:23, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
1775:02:47, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
1758:02:24, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
1748:Next Marine Corps articles
1742:10:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
1723:20:04, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
1672:15:09, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
1653:16:02, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
1617:06:13, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
1608:05:20, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
1592:01:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
1567:00:20, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
1555:00:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
1507:23:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
1489:07:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
1476:07:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
1445:04:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
1431:01:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
1383:19:59, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
1368:00:23, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
1346:14:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
1244:About unconstructive edits
801:USMC articles - great work
641:Content from other sources
1324:04:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
1286:10:37, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
289:User:Looper5920/Watchlist
285:User:Looper5920_Watchlist
1470:I'm off for the night. —
1457:Eagle, Globe, and Anchor
1317:WikiProject Philadelphia
1313:WikiProject Philadelphia
1303:WikiProject Philadelphia
1273:Thank you for voting on
1194:
721:Amoroso's Baking Company
709:Amoroso's Baking Company
998:On 23-Jan, you blanked
977:for disruption. Please
961:Please see Knowledge's
868:: Coordinator elections
138:I am a bit mad, yes....
1795:- by name or campaign.
1114:protection next time.
958:
214:Counter Vandalism Unit
1512:Commandant info boxes
1450:USMC work for tonight
1208:request for adminship
957:
949:User talk:24.43.21.76
367:I have reported user
1497:Marine SimonATL Work
1203:Thanks for your vote
18:User talk:Looper5920
1575:Infoboxes completed
1311:I am working with:
963:no personal attacks
941:No personal attacks
789:Philadelphia Eagles
785:Philadelphia Flyers
688:army mainly i think
176:Joseph Clayton Carr
1895:Marine Corps bases
1109:HMH-363 deployment
959:
903:
719:says: I moved the
615:globalsecurity.org
1988:
1987:
1801:, those with bios
1720:
1713:
1708:
1522:William P. Biddle
1428:
1421:
1416:
1227:
1226:
907:
906:
895:
637:editorial content
571:USMC emblems, etc
1992:
1979:
1974:
1943:
1917:
1908:
1902:
1788:MedalofHonor.com
1716:
1711:
1707:
1705:
1699:
1698:
1695:
1689:
1597:Years of Service
1442:Joaquin Murietta
1424:
1419:
1415:
1413:
1407:
1406:
1403:
1397:
1216:
1209:
1199:
1192:
1191:
879:
872:
871:
817:AfD listing for
701:
544:
525:
325:Stephane Zavala.
269:
263:
259:
253:
235:
229:
225:
219:
197:
191:
187:
181:
173:
167:
160:
154:
64:
56:White phosphorus
2000:
1999:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1977:
1968:
1941:
1906:
1900:
1897:
1750:
1719:
1682:
1661:
1627:
1599:
1577:
1533:
1514:
1499:
1452:
1438:
1427:
1391:
1380:Tony the Marine
1376:
1334:
1305:
1294:
1289:
1270:
1246:
1232:
1214:
1207:
1204:
1190:
1170:
1160:IndiciumMaximus
1144:IndiciumMaximus
1111:
1103:
1052:
1050:Mumia Abu-Jamal
1044:
1030:
1022:
1008:speedy deletion
996:
945:
924:
870:
841:
822:
803:
779:What you did...
776:
755:. Thank you.
745:
711:
573:
559:
480:
461:
431:172.200.118.234
423:
407:
405:Khurshid Marwat
396:
365:
347:
327:
313:
267:
261:
257:
251:
233:
227:
223:
217:
195:
189:
185:
179:
171:
165:
164:You removed my
162:
158:
152:
140:
112:
94:
58:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1998:
1986:
1985:
1965:
1946:
1940:
1939:Successful RfA
1937:
1936:
1935:
1896:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1854:
1853:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1820:
1819:
1809:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1796:
1790:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1749:
1746:
1730:
1729:
1728:HI Looper5920!
1717:
1681:
1675:
1660:
1657:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1626:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1598:
1595:
1576:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1532:
1529:
1513:
1510:
1498:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1468:
1467:
1460:
1451:
1448:
1437:
1434:
1425:
1390:
1387:
1386:
1375:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1359:
1358:
1353:
1352:
1333:
1327:
1304:
1301:
1293:
1290:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1245:
1242:
1231:
1228:
1225:
1224:
1212:
1202:
1200:
1189:
1186:
1169:
1166:
1134:
1120:
1110:
1107:
1102:
1099:
1078:
1057:Maj. Doofus:
1051:
1048:
1043:
1042:no attack made
1040:
1029:
1026:
1021:
1018:
995:
992:
990:
944:
938:
923:
920:
918:
905:
904:
880:
869:
863:
840:
837:
821:
815:
802:
799:
775:
772:
744:
739:
710:
707:
696:
695:
690:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
650:
649:
628:
627:
626:
625:
572:
569:
558:
557:"Penis" vandal
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
533:
532:
531:
530:
512:
511:
479:
476:
475:
474:
460:
458:Oriana Fallaci
455:
422:
417:
406:
403:
401:
395:
392:
364:
358:
346:
345:Our Friend Bob
343:
326:
323:
312:
309:
307:
305:
304:
303:
302:
293:flamingspinach
272:flamingspinach
238:flamingspinach
200:flamingspinach
161:
150:
139:
136:
111:
108:
93:
92:Comcast Center
90:
57:
54:
52:
41:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1997:
1984:
1983:
1980:
1975:
1972:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1952:, which I am
1951:
1947:
1945:
1944:
1934:
1931:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1921:
1918:
1913:
1905:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1868:
1865:
1861:
1856:
1855:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1832:
1829:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1807:
1806:
1800:
1797:
1794:
1791:
1789:
1786:
1785:
1782:
1781:
1776:
1773:
1769:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1755:
1745:
1743:
1740:
1736:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1721:
1714:
1709:
1704:
1700:
1690:
1680:
1674:
1673:
1670:
1666:
1656:
1654:
1651:
1642:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1618:
1615:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1600:
1594:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1584:Michael Hagee
1581:
1568:
1565:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1552:
1544:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1537:
1528:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1509:
1508:
1505:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1473:
1465:
1461:
1458:
1454:
1453:
1447:
1446:
1443:
1433:
1432:
1429:
1422:
1417:
1412:
1408:
1398:
1385:
1384:
1381:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1360:
1355:
1354:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1331:
1326:
1325:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1300:
1299:
1288:
1287:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1265:
1264:
1261:
1260:219.78.35.133
1257:
1253:
1250:
1241:
1240:
1237:
1223:
1221:
1217:
1210:
1201:
1198:
1193:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1179:
1176:
1165:
1164:
1161:
1156:
1154:
1149:
1148:
1145:
1139:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1128:
1124:
1119:
1115:
1106:
1098:
1096:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1058:
1055:
1047:
1039:
1038:
1035:
1025:
1017:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
994:Page Blanking
991:
988:
987:
984:
980:
976:
972:
968:
964:
956:
952:
950:
942:
937:
936:
933:
929:
919:
916:
915:
912:
902:
900:
893:
892:
887:
886:
881:
878:
874:
873:
867:
862:
859:
858:
855:
850:
849:
846:
836:
835:
831:
827:
826:Former Marine
820:
819:Former Marine
814:
813:
809:
798:
797:
794:
790:
786:
781:
780:
771:
770:
767:
766:Movementarian
762:
761:
758:
757:Movementarian
754:
750:
743:
738:
734:
731:
728:
724:
722:
718:
715:
706:
705:
702:
694:
691:
689:
686:
685:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
661:
657:
652:
651:
646:
642:
638:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
624:
620:
616:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
603:
598:
595:
593:
588:
584:
580:
578:
568:
567:
564:
548:
545:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
529:
526:
520:
516:
515:
514:
513:
510:
506:
501:
500:
499:
498:
494:
490:
486:
473:
472:83.135.82.165
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:83.135.82.165
459:
454:
453:
450:
445:
444:
441:
436:
435:
432:
428:
427:Roger Bushell
421:
420:Roger Bushell
416:
415:
412:
402:
399:
391:
390:
387:
382:
381:
378:
374:
370:
362:
357:
356:
353:
352:Movementarian
342:
341:
338:
336:
332:
322:
321:
318:
308:
301:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
281:
280:
277:
273:
266:
256:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
239:
232:
222:
215:
209:
208:
205:
201:
194:
184:
177:
170:
157:
149:
148:
145:
135:
133:
130:
126:
125:
122:
118:
107:
106:
103:
99:
89:
88:
85:
83:
78:
75:
72:
71:
65:
63:
53:
50:
49:
46:
39:
38:
35:
19:
1970:
1966:
1957:
1898:
1859:
1751:
1734:
1731:
1683:
1662:
1647:
1635:
1628:
1579:
1578:
1548:
1535:
1534:
1515:
1500:
1469:
1439:
1392:
1377:
1335:
1321:South Philly
1306:
1295:
1281:. Thanks. -
1279:my talk page
1272:
1254:
1251:
1247:
1233:
1222:
1173:
1171:
1157:
1150:
1140:
1137:
1133:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1104:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1059:
1056:
1053:
1045:
1031:
1023:
997:
989:
970:
966:
960:
946:
925:
917:
908:
898:
896:
889:
883:
860:
851:
842:
823:
804:
782:
777:
763:
746:
735:
733:2005 (UTC)"
727:Spikebrennan
725:
714:Spikebrennan
712:
697:
640:
636:
599:
596:
589:
585:
581:
574:
560:
481:
462:
446:
437:
429:. Sorry ! --
424:
408:
400:
397:
383:
366:
348:
330:
328:
317:File Éireann
314:
311:Crooks mound
306:
270:is for :) —
210:
198:. Thanks, —
163:
141:
129:Spikebrennan
127:
113:
95:
81:
69:
66:
59:
51:
40:
30:
1962:let me know
1679:Delta Force
1677:infobox on
1536:Consistency
1319:Thank you!
1309:WikiProject
1000:Us mil stub
969:Comment on
645:MAG-36 page
371:to 3RR vio
361:Michelbytes
144:TheMadBaron
70:Merovingian
1930:Looper5920
1912:Kirill Lok
1864:Looper5920
1828:Looper5920
1772:Looper5920
1669:Myles Long
1614:Looper5920
1564:Looper5920
1520:articles (
1518:Commandant
1268:RfA thanks
1178:Farmbrough
1127:Looper5920
932:Swatjester
899:February 5
854:PhillyWolf
845:PhillyWolf
787:, not the
110:Categories
45:Matt White
34:Matt White
1357:category.
1230:vandalism
1034:CarolGray
1028:User page
1012:JLaTondre
983:Thryduulf
979:stay cool
965:policy:
930:article.
793:Ian Manka
676:try these
648:graphics.
563:Lucky 6.9
369:Sly100100
121:trácht ar
117:Boothy443
102:trácht ar
98:Boothy443
1843:Dan Daly
1504:SimonATL
1236:Gamaliel
1215:Martyman
1004:bad idea
519:HMLA-267
489:HMLA-367
331:notabliy
1954:pleased
1881:ERcheck
1847:ERcheck
1826:work.--
1813:ERcheck
1754:ERcheck
1739:MARK S.
1735:decidet
1650:MARK S.
1604:ERcheck
1588:ERcheck
1551:ERcheck
1526:ERcheck
1485:ERcheck
1472:ERcheck
1364:ERcheck
1342:ERcheck
1298:JaredW!
1082:WP:NPOV
975:blocked
971:content
830:ERcheck
808:ERcheck
656:ERcheck
619:ERcheck
602:ERcheck
505:ERcheck
493:ERcheck
485:HMM-262
449:Chazz88
440:Chazz88
335:Jaranda
1969:Cactus
1958:80/1/1
1697:Jester
1665:my RFA
1659:My RFA
1625:MARSOC
1405:Jester
1389:portal
1275:my RfA
1188:My RfA
1101:Thanks
1086:WP:NPA
943:please
592:MAG-39
411:Jasmol
377:feydey
297:(talk)
276:(talk)
242:(talk)
204:(talk)
1718:Fire!
1426:Fire!
1283:Bobet
1175:Rich
1168:Dates
1095:WP:DR
1090:WP:RS
911:Loopy
839:Hello
791:. :P
700:Joe I
543:Joe I
524:Joe I
394:Hello
386:Homey
384:Done
174:from
16:<
1694:SWAT
1580:DONE
1462:The
1455:The
1402:SWAT
922:IWVO
891:here
882:The
749:USAA
693:usmc
590:For
491:. I—
487:and
363:etc.
1973:man
1950:RfA
1920:hin
1712:Aim
1420:Aim
1205:My
1024:hi
226:or
188:or
77:(c)
74:(t)
1907:}}
1901:{{
1883:@
1849:@
1815:@
1756:@
1744:)
1655:)
1606:@
1590:@
1553:@
1487:@
1474:@
1366:@
1344:@
1258:--
1218:-
1181:.
1155:"
1020:hi
951:-
909:--
894:.
832:@
810:@
658:@
621:@
604:@
507:@
495:@
375:.
295:|
274:|
268:}}
265:tl
262:{{
258:}}
252:{{
240:|
234:}}
231:db
228:{{
224:}}
218:{{
202:|
196:}}
193:db
190:{{
186:}}
180:{{
172:}}
166:{{
159:}}
153:{{
119:|
100:|
1978:✍
1971:.
1964:.
1916:s
1910:—
1811:—
1688:⇒
1648:(
1549:—
1396:⇒
901:.
806:—
654:—
600:—
503:—
255:d
221:d
183:d
169:d
156:d
84:)
82:e
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
