User talk:MarnetteD/archive13

1179:

is only a minor documentary series, but it is still technically a title that is passed on, and there are boxes for presenters of shows such as Crimewatch, Loose Women, and the short-lived quiz show The People Versus - are these necessarily any more notable than Doctor Who Confidential, particularly when Doctor Who Confidential is a spin-off from a massively successful BBC Drama? Another reason I put them back up when you removed them is that I thought it was likely you had classed me as a 'troublemaker' and were just reverting edits I made. I came to this belief when you reverted perfectly legitimate updates I made to the character list of BBC drama The Cut. As this programme is not particularly well-known, I thought it was probable that you just had me on your watchlist. Rodhullandemu said that my reasons are fair enough, but it is "up to me to show their importance, and other editors may disagree". However, they did not make it clear how I was to do that, so if you or them could add any suggestions that would be much appreciated. I do not wish to be blocked, and I do not want to get into a conflict with other editors, but I do think these boxes are important enough to be on the article and I do not see why they are "not notable" and why it only being a "minor" series is not just someone's opinion.

1239:

them without discussing it on the talk page. You have been removing perfectly legitimate updates - for example, the character called Frankie used to be a future character, but as she is now appearing on screen, she is now a regular character and so is perfectly eligible to be in that section, as are all the other current characters. If you have a problem with the way that I edit, please bring it up on my talk page, the way you did with Doctor Who Confidential, but I would appreciate it if you would not make any more unnecessary edits to this particular article without discussing it. This is particularly relevant because it says on your user page that you live in America, and to the best of my knowledge, The Cut doesn't broadcast there, so you have probably not even seen the program.

1072:

Matters can't be used as a source is nonsense. Fox News is used as a source all over wikipedia and they could not be more POV. I notice that you did not leave a message like this on that editors talk page by the way. I know that you will find some, or all, of my comments inflammatory so I need to add that I think that you are handling this situation in the wikipreferred manner (with the exception of the item mentioned) and you should be complimented for that. I will remove that page from my whatchlist. Hope you have happier editing then you've had in having to deal with me.

31: 1097:

of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page.

1238:

Maybe I shouldn't have brought this issue up when discussing Doctor Who Confidential, but please get things straight when updating the article for The Cut. If there is a problem with brief plot overviews, then they can easily be merged into a List of Characters article, but please do not just delete

1178:

As I explained to Rodhullandemu, I do not actually understand why this goes against Knowledge's policies (although you have made things slightly clearer now.) I did check out the policies for succession boxes, and I do not see anything to suggest that the edits I make are not notable. You may say it

743:

Well it's great to hear from someone on your side of the pond that appreciates F1! I bet that all those overseas races make it a real labour of love to follow the sport, but as you say, at least technology is on our side now. I was up early today to watch the Chinese GP and it's certainly a bit of a

212:

Le Grand Choral always creates a frisson, but it is maddeningly short. As you probably know, there is a clip from the Truffaut film on YouTube. I watched the first Doctor Who episode (An Unearthly Child with William Hartnell, also on YouTube), but I haven't recovered from my loss since Katy Manning

143:

I see you like to go Glenn Back (not a typo). It is clear that you have an agenda of your own by deleting this small little detail. It shows bad faith in your editing of articles. What do you want? A picture of KO in the hospital next to his dad? You would probably say that that isn't enough either

475:

Thanks for your question RothorpeTo the best of my knowledge youtube links are to be avoided. This is only based on the conversations that I have seen in various areas of wikipedia. Of course I could be wrong or at least the consensus towards them might have changed since I last paid attention. If

1219:

Hey, its Jordancelticsfan. I can see British film means a lot to you and American film means a lot to me. I'm interested in all kinds of cinema, and I love British movies. Britain has made a major contribution to cinema. I love Britain. I just thought Frenzy was an American film, because this was

783:

Thanks for your question. I am simply following what I have noticed other editors using as their edit summaries. Anymore most films have multinational financing, acting casts and behind the camera crews so it is a little dicey claiming that they are one countries films. This also applies to older

356:

limits) articles about copyrighted contemporary works" (boldface mine). I don't see why you're getting so bent out of shape about this. This not a commentary on you as an editor or your judgment or anything like that. There are obviously acceptable and obviously unacceptable uses, and there are a

128:

You are right about one thing it is not a close call that it is a fact that his father is ill. Just put in your edit summary that you think that this is a lie and be done with it. None of the other names that you use have anything to do with this situation and your need to mention them is, sadly,

990:

If you use 10% of what computers can do, I think I am about up to 55-60%. Google Earth uses satellite photos, but allows you to "tilt" the image, and then computes what the tilted image would look like and can have a "terrain" feature turned on or off. The terrain feature works fantastically for

393:

112:

This isn't a close call. Knowledge is supposed to be based on reliable secondary sources. If we entirely trusted the word of the subject of each article (Hitler, Stalin, Castro) or (George W Bush, Dick Cheney, Carl Rove) we could allow them or their sycophants to write their own articles as they

70:

1304:

Secondly, that notice from February was about something altogether different. Originally I made a really long blow-by-blow account of each characters history. Fences&Windows made me realise that was not the right way to do it, and I have significantly reduced them from what they were before

1071:

You may feel that those items are rubbish but Gibson said them they are on the record. Thus, they are as fair game for an online encyclopedia article as anything else that he may say. To claim, as LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (who has not added to the discussion either I notice) does, that Media

617:

90% of the way I think the new guy(/gal?) has done an excellent job of trimming, especially the pop culture section in which he rather deftly managed to salvage most of the references while trimming the explanations. (S?)he also did some very good work merging some sections. The Jonathan Romney

923:

s being an American picture. It was an American studio, American producer/director, American writers, two of the three stars American... it is indeed an American movie. Just because it was filmed on location doesn't make it a multinational production — its financing, development, production,

1308:

I will leave the DWC narrators alone in future, but the edits I make to The Cut article are productive and beneficial, and as it says on Knowledge: Ignore All Rules (which there is a link to on your talk page) 'If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Knowledge, ignore it.'

894:

Actually, it doesn't ring a bell specifically, although the editor's work at least raised my eyebrows and made me go look to see what he was up to. If he's hiding behind an IP too, it's something for SPI, isn't it? Tied to the earlier thing, I'd think it would go easily?

357:

bunch in the middle where it's hard to tell. These usages fall far to the unacceptable side and if you ask anyone familiar with the policies, you're not going to find anyone disagreeing with me. I've been doing this for a long time, so I do know what I'm doing here.

283: 1269:

Please don't add back in those plot descriptions for each character. Feel free to write a brief and sourced account of the plot in the Plot section, but giving a blow-by-blow account of each character is not what Knowledge is for, especially when no sources are

973:

Yes I think you got it all nailed down, though I hadn't noted the Stapleton airport scene. BTW, using Google Earth (a separate piece of software that does not use a browser) I was able to reconstruct the opening shot of the Shining exactly sans Jack Torrance's

838:

Short answer: No, I am afraid I do not. As his edits come up on my watchlist, I generally revert them, same with the anon. But, I am not certain that he has violated any specific policy. As you say, just busy work, and pointless busy work at that. Cheers!

440:

My mistake. Put back in what you wish (maybe give them a separate subsection for WileE by himself) but you know as well as I that, if a deltionista comes along the whole thing may go. Again my apologies for not being more thorough and happy editing.

1330:. There is a little box that you can check that means you will always be logged in but that may be too difficult for you. Knowledge's guidelines are obviously beyond you so good luck when you bump into an editor that wants to make you follow them. 1220:

British filmmaker Hitchcock's Hollywood era, but I guess I was wrong. On IMDB, it said Frenzy was an American film, but now it says its British, so I won't change it anymore. Sorry about the trouble dude. I feel, honestly, quite stupid about this.

305:, you can see how screenshots are supposed to be used. Each usage in those Featured Articles supports a specific point made in the text. In the DVD and Taming of the Shrew articles, they're just decoration. See the difference? Regards, 490:

Thanks for your civilised reply. Yes, I've restored it because I think it's interesting and it's probably too ancient to have any copyright issues. But we'll see: if anyone else removes it I expect they'll give a good reason. Cheers!

578:

My apologies for not reading your user page and learning where you are. I am a bit of an old-timer and I like watching the shows on my HDTV so I order the DVDs from AmazonUK. Keep enjoying the show and happy editing here at WikiP.

163:

Hi, MarnetteD. The material you recently deleted from the Kubrick article almost certainly did not belong there. The definitive biography by LeBrutto makes absolutely no mention of such an incident, nor does anything on the

991:

natural landscapes, but poorly for human buildings unless it is an area where GooEar has "stored" info about it. When terrain is turned on, it tends to place dents in highways when they go over overpasses that isn't there.

546:

I forgot to mention that I am, naturally, jealous that you are watching the new episodes at this moment. Fortunately, I have a region free DVD so I won't have to wait the year or more til they finally show up in the US.

1036:

Hi Dr B. Long time no bump into. I am glad that you are well and still around. I haven't worked with those tables for awhile but I am sure it will come back to me and I will get to these when I have a chance. Cheers.

281:

Hi MarnetteD. I've been looking for a long time a photograph of this great actor to put it in his biography, but got no worth. Can you help? Do not put the image to vandalize, but I do not understand how. Thank you.

178:

Oh, please feel free to e-mail me via the UserPage link, but leave a post on my talk page that you have done so. I have two e-mail addresses and will need to check which one of my mailboxes by WP account is linked

1283:

that is also not allowed. There are plenty of other blogs and Facebook style pages where you could make your edits, but Knowledge has guidelines that need to be followed and you are not, currently, doing that.

287: 1305:(which was basically a wall of text - too much to read.) I am only putting up brief mentions of significant events on the programme. And as for sourcing them, how am I supposed to do that - it's on TV! 618:

review quotations could have used some cutting, but (s/)he cut a bit more than I am happy with. I may put back about 30% of what was removed there, but on the whole fairly judicious, I think.--

421:, with your edit summary including, "...ones referring to Wile E. should go on his page...." What makes you think he has one? He doesn't, and there has been discussion on the talk page, 939:

See my answer above. Add toi that the American distinction is noted in several other places - infobox and categories but if you feel the need to change it plz feel free to do so

697: 994:

Now if only I could find some of the areas in Monument Valley that were used in the StarGate trip in 2001. I have looked for one of them without success. No road to follow.--

352:: "Their use, with limited exception, should be to illustrate historically significant events, to include identifying protected works such as logos, or to complement (within 953: 66: 257: 815:

Thanks for your reply and understanding. If you ever see a conversation where the community changes this please let me know and I will reverse my pattern. Thanks again.

1093: 389: 967: 883: 1138: 1260:

You are use of multiple accounts to edit which is not the way to do things around here. Next a message was left on your talk page last February regarding

260:

to help me keep an eye on this directors pages throughout the celebration of the 100th anniversary of his birth in case of increased test edit/vandalism.

763: 598:

No problem! It seems I've missed some other items on the list that I just updated. I'm glad I'm not the only person who is watching the article. Cheers!

84: 753: 738: 724: 59: 784:

films though not as often. You may want to post this question on the film wikiproject page to get a wider discussion going. Cheers and happy editing.

407: 947: 1338: 1292: 933: 777: 137: 1208: 1045: 382: 1080: 449: 291: 1003: 983: 555: 1301:

I do not use multiple accounts, I just can't be bothered to log in sometimes when I'm editing, is there anything necessarily wrong with that?

484: 374: 336: 1130: 587: 537: 202: 188: 173: 425:, although somewhat scattered. A separate article for him is just not the least bit likely to happen. I advise reworking your edit a bit. -- 823: 810: 802: 792: 769: 245: 1165: 1111: 529:

You are very welcome Derekbd. Thanks to you for the extra work in making everything work better on the page. Cheers and happy editing.

1194: 1149:

too, which wasn't templated. I suspect that a general sweep will be needed for all three varieties; there seems to be a discussion at

909: 153: 122: 858: 158: 709: 349: 1056:

Your edit warring over such rubbish content, you must be joking, don't you want to discuss at all? or ask at the noticeboard?

1116: 1065: 1030: 434: 268: 1318: 1254: 686: 664: 607: 500: 469: 422: 145: 1145: 322: 924:

postproduction, personnel and distribution were strictly American. Think maybe we could restore that item? Regards —

641: 572: 523: 102: 98:" parameter in the standard warnigns as there were several you issued today without? Thank you for your attention. -- 1186: 1150: 1107: 1086: 403: 80: 904: 627: 1264:

which you seem to have ignored. I can simply reprint the statement that you did not discuss with the other editor.

222: 1170: 273: 328:

Each of the texts mentions where the shots came from. Nice narrow job of interpreting the GUIDELINES not rules.

107: 418: 232:

because the sound, is electronic not orchestral. I always liked the quote from Ron Grainer about the work of

875: 850: 1224: 38: 228:

I recorded 'Life Story' on to DVD. I have just checked it. The music was re-recorded, probably by the

929: 801:

initiative though, but doesn't look like you're taking much flak for it, so kudos for the good work.

729:

Yes, sometimes things really do work smoothly! Thanks again, and you enjoy your Sunday too. Cheers,

1314: 1250: 691: 670: 1123: 1051: 900: 867: 842: 749: 734: 720: 705: 149: 118: 833: 603: 412: 251: 505: 1221: 1190: 1103: 1009: 646: 455: 399: 89: 76: 1200:

Except you did not explain it since you deleted the message that you left on his talk page.

1326:

Actually not logging in means that you are using multiple accounts which is a violation of

1061: 925: 430: 229: 8: 1335: 1310: 1289: 1246: 1205: 1161: 1077: 1042: 999: 979: 963: 944: 820: 789: 623: 584: 552: 534: 481: 446: 333: 296: 265: 198: 184: 169: 134: 47: 17: 1121:

These stopped working about a year ago, I think. Following on your recent removals from

896: 745: 730: 716: 701: 680: 658: 632: 496: 465: 368: 316: 114: 1261: 599: 593: 568: 519: 241: 218: 1099: 1019: 395: 233: 72: 1230: 1057: 806: 773: 612: 514:

and did a further adjustment. I think it works much better. Thanks for checking!

426: 302: 207: 95: 129:

very suspect. Also, please do not hide behind any more posts to this talk page.

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1331: 1285: 1201: 1154: 1073: 1038: 995: 975: 959: 940: 816: 798: 785: 619: 580: 548: 530: 477: 460:

Hello. Why did you remove the Harry Worth external link from the Delgado page?

442: 341: 329: 275: 261: 194: 180: 165: 130: 94:

Thank you for reverting vandalism and warning users. Would you please use the "

1327: 911: 675: 653: 638: 492: 461: 360: 308: 193:

I received your thoughtful e-mail, but won't be able to reply until Monday.--

1279:) which means that they are your interpretations of events in the show. Per 1018:. Can you add the new films he has added to the British/American film lists? 1015: 1280: 1276: 564: 515: 511: 237: 214: 700:

FYI. You're already being reverted by one of the socks. This guy is busy.

889: 99: 768:

Do you have a link to the discussion that resulted in this decision?

476:

you want to put that one back on his page please feel free to do so.

651:...on the George Harrison sock; I'll let the involved admin know. 919:

Hi. I was wondering why you deleted the infobox reference to

797:

You make valid points, so the edit makes sense. It's such a

715:

Thanks for your message, and thanks for your help :) Cheers,

744:

struggle on a Sunday! Keep enjoying it, and all the best :)

113:

pleased. As an experienced editor you should know better.

348:. And as for the "narrow" interpretation, the Foundation 1214: 958:

Not in CA or Colorado per stuff you rightly deleted.--

954:

American Shining Footage actually shot in Montana FYI

144:

because they could simply be faking for the photo.--

236:of the RW on the Dr Who theme. "Did I write that?" 1275:All of your edits on that page are unsourced (see 510:I took heed of your advice after my edit on the 60:WikiProject Films February 2010 Newsletter 1298:Right, let me get a few things straight. 1182:Thank you for contacting me about this, 383:WikiProject Films March 2010 Newsletter 14: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1151:WT:DW#Links to Outpost Gallifrey site 25: 423:Talk:Wile E. Coyote and Road Runner 23: 24: 1352: 764:"nationality not needed in intro" 563:I am in Texas. I use bittorrent! 159:Correct Deletion of SK material. 29: 419:Wile E. Coyote and Road Runner 13: 1: 1117:Outpost Gallifrey: dead links 637:No problem: glad to help! -- 7: 10: 1357: 1004:14:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC) 984:07:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC) 968:22:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 948:11:38, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 934:06:02, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 905:04:28, 23 April 2010 (UTC) 884:03:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC) 859:03:14, 23 April 2010 (UTC) 824:18:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 811:18:48, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 793:16:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 778:12:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 754:19:55, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 739:19:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 725:19:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 710:19:37, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 687:23:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 665:23:34, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 642:20:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 628:20:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 608:22:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) 588:20:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 573:19:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 556:04:29, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 538:04:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 524:03:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 501:23:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 485:22:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 470:22:22, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 417:I just found your edit to 375:21:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 337:21:25, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 323:21:17, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 292:17:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC) 246:07:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 1087:WP:FILMS April Newsletter 450:21:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC) 435:20:54, 4 April 2010 (UTC) 408:03:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC) 269:16:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 223:09:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 203:00:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 189:19:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 174:05:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 154:00:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 138:00:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 123:00:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 103:18:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 85:04:37, 1 March 2010 (UTC) 301:Hi, if you look through 1339:22:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC) 1319:22:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC) 1293:21:41, 9 May 2010 (UTC) 1255:20:41, 9 May 2010 (UTC) 1209:22:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC) 1195:23:41, 8 May 2010 (UTC) 1171:Doctor Who Confidential 1166:08:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC) 1124:The Edge of Destruction 1112:22:58, 2 May 2010 (UTC) 1081:21:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC) 1066:21:06, 2 May 2010 (UTC) 1046:18:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC) 1031:17:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC) 394:page. --Happy editing! 256:I am posting this link 71:page. --Happy editing! 1014:Hi, how are you?. See 284:فيكتور غوميز مارتينيز 42:of past discussions. 230:Radiophonic Workshop 108:Olbermann's Absences 915:country deletion... 67:February 2010 issue 18:User talk:MarnetteD 1227:May 8, 2010 (UTC) 869:RepublicanJacobite 844:RepublicanJacobite 1098:--Happy editing! 372: 320: 213:left the series! 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1348: 1222:Jordancelticsfan 1157: 1148: 1142: 1134: 1094:April 2010 issue 1028: 1027: 882: 878: 870: 857: 853: 845: 692:Deep Purple sock 683: 678: 669:BTW, he did one 661: 656: 390:March 2010 issue 373: 366: 363: 321: 314: 311: 234:Delia Derbyshire 33: 32: 26: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1233: 1217: 1173: 1155: 1144: 1143:, I've removed 1136: 1128: 1119: 1089: 1054: 1052:rubbish content 1021: 1020: 1012: 956: 926:HarringtonSmith 917: 892: 881: 876: 868: 865: 864:No worries. --- 856: 851: 843: 840: 836: 766: 694: 681: 676: 659: 654: 649: 635: 615: 596: 508: 458: 415: 385: 361: 358: 309: 306: 299: 279: 254: 210: 161: 110: 92: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1354: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1311:George.millman 1296: 1295: 1272: 1271: 1266: 1265: 1247:George.millman 1232: 1229: 1216: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1172: 1169: 1127:to remove the 1118: 1115: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1011: 1008: 1007: 1006: 992: 987: 986: 955: 952: 951: 950: 916: 908: 891: 888: 887: 886: 877:The'FortyFive' 873: 852:The'FortyFive' 848: 835: 834:Do I remember? 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 765: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 693: 690: 648: 645: 634: 631: 614: 611: 595: 592: 591: 590: 561: 560: 559: 558: 541: 540: 507: 504: 488: 487: 457: 454: 453: 452: 414: 413:Wile E. Coyote 411: 384: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 298: 295: 278: 276:Michael Gambon 272: 253: 252:Akira Kurosawa 250: 249: 248: 209: 206: 160: 157: 141: 140: 109: 106: 91: 88: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1353: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1306: 1302: 1299: 1294: 1291: 1287: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1273: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1243: 1242:Best wishes, 1240: 1236: 1228: 1226: 1223: 1210: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1183: 1180: 1176: 1168: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1152: 1147: 1140: 1132: 1126: 1125: 1114: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1096: 1095: 1082: 1079: 1075: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1047: 1044: 1040: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1017: 1010:British films 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 988: 985: 981: 977: 972: 971: 970: 969: 965: 961: 949: 946: 942: 938: 937: 936: 935: 931: 927: 922: 914: 913: 912:Roman Holiday 907: 906: 902: 898: 897:Wildhartlivie 885: 880: 879: 872: 871: 863: 862: 861: 860: 855: 854: 847: 846: 825: 822: 818: 814: 813: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 795: 794: 791: 787: 782: 781: 780: 779: 775: 771: 755: 751: 747: 746:Bretonbanquet 742: 741: 740: 736: 732: 731:Bretonbanquet 728: 727: 726: 722: 718: 717:Bretonbanquet 714: 713: 712: 711: 707: 703: 702:Bretonbanquet 699: 689: 688: 685: 684: 679: 672: 667: 666: 663: 662: 657: 647:Good catch... 644: 643: 640: 630: 629: 625: 621: 610: 609: 605: 601: 589: 586: 582: 577: 576: 575: 574: 570: 566: 557: 554: 550: 545: 544: 543: 542: 539: 536: 532: 528: 527: 526: 525: 521: 517: 513: 503: 502: 498: 494: 486: 483: 479: 474: 473: 472: 471: 467: 463: 456:Roger Delgado 451: 448: 444: 439: 438: 437: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 410: 409: 405: 401: 397: 392: 391: 376: 370: 365: 364: 355: 351: 347: 343: 340: 339: 338: 335: 331: 327: 326: 325: 324: 318: 313: 312: 304: 294: 293: 289: 285: 277: 271: 270: 267: 263: 259: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 226: 225: 224: 220: 216: 205: 204: 200: 196: 191: 190: 186: 182: 176: 175: 171: 167: 156: 155: 151: 147: 146:69.209.114.49 139: 136: 132: 127: 126: 125: 124: 120: 116: 115:Badmintonhist 105: 104: 101: 97: 90:User warnings 87: 86: 82: 78: 74: 69: 68: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1307: 1303: 1300: 1297: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1234: 1218: 1184: 1181: 1177: 1174: 1122: 1120: 1092: 1090: 1055: 1023: 1022: 1013: 957: 920: 918: 910: 893: 874: 866: 849: 841: 837: 767: 695: 674: 668: 652: 650: 636: 616: 600:Andrzejbanas 597: 562: 509: 489: 459: 416: 388: 386: 359: 353: 345: 307: 300: 280: 255: 211: 192: 177: 162: 142: 111: 93: 65: 63: 55: 43: 37: 1187:82.32.35.81 1100:Nehrams2020 1024:Dr. Blofeld 696:ANI report 512:Foyle's War 506:Foyle's War 396:Nehrams2020 350:dictates it 303:WP:FA#Media 297:Screenshots 164:Internet.-- 73:Nehrams2020 36:This is an 1262:WP:NOTPLOT 1058:Off2riorob 633:Re: Thanks 427:Tbrittreid 1332:MarnetteD 1286:MarnetteD 1235:Hi there 1202:MarnetteD 1175:Hi there 1139:OG review 1074:MarnetteD 1039:MarnetteD 996:WickerGuy 976:WickerGuy 960:WickerGuy 941:MarnetteD 817:MarnetteD 786:MarnetteD 620:WickerGuy 594:Criterion 581:MarnetteD 549:MarnetteD 531:MarnetteD 478:MarnetteD 443:MarnetteD 346:guideline 344:is not a 330:MarnetteD 274:Photo of 262:MarnetteD 195:WickerGuy 181:WickerGuy 166:WickerGuy 131:MarnetteD 1146:this one 673:, too. 639:xensyria 493:Rothorpe 462:Rothorpe 362:howcheng 310:howcheng 1245:George 1231:The Cut 1185:George 1108:contrib 799:WP:BOLD 613:Shining 565:Derekbd 516:Derekbd 404:contrib 342:WP:NFCC 208:Delerue 81:contrib 39:archive 1328:WP:SSP 1215:Frenzy 1158:rose64 974:car.-- 354:narrow 1281:WP:OR 1277:WP:RS 1270:used. 803:BLGM5 770:BLGM5 179:to.-- 100:Alexf 96:subst 16:< 1336:Talk 1315:talk 1290:Talk 1251:talk 1225:talk 1206:Talk 1191:talk 1162:talk 1153:. -- 1135:and 1104:talk 1091:The 1078:Talk 1062:talk 1043:Talk 1016:this 1000:talk 980:talk 964:talk 945:Talk 930:talk 901:talk 821:Talk 807:talk 790:Talk 774:talk 750:talk 735:talk 721:talk 706:talk 698:here 682:1969 677:MPFC 671:here 660:1969 655:MPFC 624:talk 604:talk 585:Talk 569:talk 553:Talk 535:Talk 520:talk 497:talk 482:Talk 466:talk 447:Talk 431:talk 400:talk 387:The 369:chat 334:Talk 317:chat 288:talk 266:Talk 258:this 242:talk 238:JMcC 219:talk 215:JMcC 199:talk 185:talk 170:talk 150:talk 135:Talk 119:talk 77:talk 64:The 1156:Red 921:RH' 890:re: 839:--- 1334:| 1317:) 1288:| 1253:) 1204:| 1193:) 1164:) 1141:}} 1137:{{ 1133:}} 1131:OG 1129:{{ 1110:) 1106:• 1076:| 1064:) 1041:| 1002:) 982:) 966:) 943:| 932:) 903:) 819:| 809:) 788:| 776:) 752:) 737:) 723:) 708:) 626:) 606:) 583:| 571:) 551:| 533:| 522:) 499:) 480:| 468:) 445:| 433:) 406:) 402:• 332:| 290:) 282:-- 264:| 244:) 221:) 201:) 187:) 172:) 152:) 133:| 121:) 83:) 79:• 1313:( 1249:( 1189:( 1160:( 1102:( 1060:( 998:( 978:( 962:( 928:( 899:( 805:( 772:( 748:( 733:( 719:( 704:( 622:( 602:( 567:( 518:( 495:( 464:( 429:( 398:( 371:} 367:{ 319:} 315:{ 286:( 240:( 217:( 197:( 183:( 168:( 148:( 117:( 75:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index