User talk:MarnetteD/archive 8

167:

completing all the lists but so much needs doing on world geography and culture that I got kinda busy. If the side plate is causing problems, which you should be able to adapt the tables so they fit, I would recommend converting it to a horizontal one across the top. If people are browsing the lists then it would be better to have it at the top. Other than this you could place the CinemaoftheUK twmplate itself at the top of every list article. Excellent work for filling those in!! I'm afraid many of the American and world lists need a lot of work which I had hoped given the size of wikipedia other people like yourself may have continued my work on them. Some of the have developed but particularly the odd years are poor! We have lists like

794:

and as far as I can see the only reason it is an invalid link is because I run the site. I still think it is a worthwhile link to include, and note that many other actors/actresses have fan-page links (some of which I also run) on their Wiki pages. I won't try and add it again, but would like to stress that it is not a money-making site and I don't care about driving traffic to it, it is a personal labour of love, and the intention was to direct people visiting the wiki page to further information about Miranda. Indeed there are links to articles and research I have done within the existing wiki page.

643:-Kubrickian in their adaptations, and as such the shadow of Kubrick is there. And all three had the authors of the source material involved in the production process, all of whom had expressed dissatisfaction with Kubrick's work. Given that SK made only 13 films, this seems to me to be statistically significant, though it certainly verges on OR. I should at least be able to cite sources re the involvement of Dmitri Nabokov, Stephen King in the related works, and Burgess' intent in making a stage adaptation of Clockwork Orange. 691:

couple of specific reasons, besides the more general resonances: (1)The novelist obviously functions as a Mephistopheles character, as noted before; and (2)Toyo functions as the divine feminine that leads Watanabe away from hedonistic indulgence, much the same as Gretchen in Faust. If you disagree, I'm okay with not editing it another time, but I thought you'd like to know that I had at least had reasons for adding such a line. Just get back to me on whether you think such an addition is appropriate. Thanks,

31: 1523:. Old days? You're first edit is January of 2007. All of the policies that other editors and I have been asking you to follow have been in place long before then. It is true that you must be somewhat tired since typing four tildes must be beyond you since you have yet to sign a single message that you've left on the talk pages. How, in heavens name, will you ever finish (or start) your book on Hepburn when this simple task was almost beyond you. Sheesh and again I say sheesh. 1373:

the body of most director related articles (and this was my original motivation to include the table since the article did not have a specified awards section at the time). It seems that these sections are where such lengthy lists of awards are typically kept while the infobox is generally limited to Acadamy Awards and Golden Globes. For this reason I believe the article merits an awards section, whether it be presented as a table or prose.

488:. If it can't be done, though, I wouldn't worry about it. I was blocked twice in the course of my first two years here. The first was a 3RR block, which occurred because I wasn't familiar with the 3RR rule at the time. The second was also for 3RR, and I had that block undone by citing the exception that says removing obvious vandalism does not count toward it. Both blocks were thus explained when I was up for RfA, and it didn't stop me from 569:

versions" of an earlier film rather than as remakes of a film, so it would indeed be appropriate for Knowledge to honor a similar distinction. It does seem to me that given that SK made only thirteen films, if in three cases authors of source material get closely involved in a subsequent version of the material that this is significant.

1827:

of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also note that after the roll call for active members, we've cleared

1765:

Thanks for zapping the erroneous snowmobile reference in "The Shining". Actually, in the novel it definitely is a snowmobile (or at least is called that), which is perhaps how that editor got confused. However, you didn't catch an earlier plot-reference in the article to Hallorann's snowmobile, which

1549:

I added two better references than Imdb for the bizness of King wanting to cast Jon Voight as Jack Torrance. I knew the info was reliable, but was admittedly a bit lazy in providing Imdb as a reference. Happily, I have been able to find both the original interview with King in which he said this, and

1545:

I did not add the bizness of putting the film "The Shining" in "Project Colorado" which you deleted. Although none of the The Shining was filmed in Colorado, it is explicitly set in the state of Colorado, and as such might be worth including depending on what the criteria for Project Colorado exactly

1240:

If two editors are giving contradictory information about the same source, perhaps you should make some effort to discuss this, in case you're referring to different editions of the book? It doesn't seem impossible that a particular political reference could have been dropped from a later edition, or

793:

Hi MarnetteD Sorry I didn;t realise the link to the 'Miranda Online' website broke the rules. The link had been there quite happily for ages, and when it disappeared I tried adding it again. I didn't see any explanation for its removal the next times, so re-added it. Definitely not trying to spam,

690:

Marnette, thank you for putting forth the effort to make sure that my connection of Akira Kurosawa's Ikiru to Goethe's Faust is a valid one. I admit I do not have a source, but I also stress that the influence is obvious to anyone who has both read Goethe's Faust and watched Ikiru. This is true for a

594:

At any rate, I was commending Imdb here on the basis of their terminology usage, not their facts. By Imdb's vocabulary usage in their ubiquitous "movie connections" link, Jackson's "King Kong" is a "remake" of the older "King Kong", but Adrian Lyne's "Lolita" is (according to Imdb) a "new version of"

1855:

Hello. Thanks for attracting my attention to your genuine concerns. I am a serious student of the genre of horror films for 35 long years. Many persons now genuinely believe that Stanley Kubrick had the unique ability to combine eroticism with horror, and he does this twice very successfully in this

1422:

This is one of those rare times when Ed and I are on the same side of the page. You can practice with the checklinks tool all you want, even hit the "save changes" button. It will pop up a new window and you can see the changes, just like a regular preview. You don't have to save it and it will give

743:

I see that you took out my addition to the Production. It was unreferenced - so fair enough. I know that I'd read that and went to find out. Added the reference - only to find there were precious few other references. So now tell me, why haven't you removed everything else that doesn't have one? I'm

603:

for examples.) Alas, Imdb is ONLY consistent on this when you click on the "movie connections" links, but not elsewhere. For example, if you go to the Imdb entry on "A Perfect Murder" and click on "movie connections" they appropriately list this as a "version of" "Dial M for Murder", but their "plot

568:

Hi, MarnetteD. Over the next few days I should be able to find references about the authorial intents on the three Kubrick so-called 'remakes'. I can also reframe the entry to refer to remakes of Kubrick's source material rather than the film itself. IMDB generally refers to works like this as "new

374:

I've done everything to make this section to fit the guidelines and have not contested some deletions that are unsourced and are indeed obscure, but when you start deleting things arbitrarily, and saying things are non-notable and indisicriminate without any justification but your own personal whim,

1372:

for the basis of removal, however as the table has been used in another article without complaint, I don't believe it was questionable in its presentation. As such I wish you would have at least notified me, or inquired at the talk page before removing it. Awards sections themselves are included in

67:

The edits made by the IP 86.42... to the article are complete fiction. The user changes IP address frequently and seems preposessed with tragic deaths, making various kinds of disruptive edits. I'm just tracing back his edits and removing them. I've added the real funeral info from one of the cited

1489:

Well, all I wanted to do was add a small fact about Hepburn, which is a matter of Canadian Public record, but it seems that was a bit too much. I don't have enough time or energy to deal with these issues (Wiki was much easier back in the old days) so I think I'll just work on my Hepburn book and

843:

Your edits show that you lack understnading of wikipedia's guidelines and rules. IMDb Spanish or otherwise is not a reliable source. For example you provide no verifiable sources for the changes that you make. You break existing links and add links that don't go to the proper pages. You try to add

607:

The distinction can get hazy. As I myself noted on the page of the Kubrick film "Lolita", Edward Albee's play of the same novel follows Kubrick rather than Nabokov with regard to the notorious guidance-counselor scene. This is a massive and significant plot-change so it's quite obvious, yet no one

322:

article. I understand what you're driving at and agree the page looks dubious. Generally hoax articles (except perhaps for the most obvious) are removed via the prod or afd method, just to gather more input. I have gone ahead and tagged it as such. I hope this is alright with you; feel free to

87:

seen warnings i've sent or hidden as comments in articles and just keeps going with the same edits. I'm just massively confused as to why he persists, surely reversions annoy him as much as his editing annoys us? I have to say he's been the source of my least pleasant wiki experiences. Keep up the

1922:

Thanks for your note but you may want to double check what you are commenting on. Critical reception sections tend to be focused on (though not always) what the reaction to the film was when it came out. Anil is trying to place in one persons interpretive theory. These tend to come much later and

1694:

Um, you might want to be a tad careful. What you were reverting wasn't what most people would call vandalism - an anon. editor who pushes their point of view without discussing is a disruptive editor, but not really a vandal. Clearly I'm not going to do anything more in this case, but please bear

1256:

And okay, the book's searchable on Amazon.com - the version there clearly mentions the changing of the will and "iron-clad, redneck Republican Wayne", but the anecdote seems to be more about Price correcting a presumed misunderstanding than the POV edit of "prevent her from bequeathing money". It

1277:

Thank you for taking the time to do the extra research on this. I am afraid that I have let some off wiki stress spill over to my editing. My apologies. I have only had a chance to cursorily look at my copy of VP's bio of her dad and missed what you found so easily so again thanks for your work.

166:

Hi sorry I got sidetracked from filling in the film lists myself, I as you can see have been attempting to take over the world lol. Yes people think I am a bot sometimes I'm sure, which is ironic as I'm probably more friendly and humane than many of them on here! I wish I had time to dedicate to

1594:

Dude, No I am not. When reverting someone who won't discuss on the talk page I am reverting vandalism. You have a lot too learn here before you start throwing around threats as you did on the talk page for this episode. Also try getting your facts straight. You claimed that there were only two

1301:

How about you google info on the Monty Python team and read their interviews, and learn that others might know more than you about subjects, before calling someone's info nonsense. To settle you down, a source has now been given, so you don't need to get your knickers in a twist anymore.

590:

I can understand that the trivia sections of Imdb might be regarded as a not fully reliable source (in spite of Imdb's editors making efforts to verify material from film magazines etc.). However, It is surely reliable in other areas such as release dates, awards, and so forth.

1553:

Is there a Knowledge guidelines page which overtly states that Imdb trivia is not a reliable source? According to the Imdb website, if you submit a piece of trivia to them, they won't add it until their editors check it out, though I have no idea what their process involves.

1856:

film. So if we have to give a fair critical comment to this film, we must add this section. I respect your point of view, but may I say that the general view of academicians on Kubrick is what I am saying and thus these pages should be restored. With regards Anil Aggrawal

298:

article and corrected it. Then I saw it a second time in the same paragraph and corrected that. When I saw it a third time in a different paragraph, I figured it probably wasn't a mistake after all, but rather a Briticism I didn't know - as you have now confirmed. Cheers.

744:

more interested in creating articles/adding to articles and sharing my knowledge (however limited) - whereas you are obviously more interested in deleting other people's work (from your recent history), so I'll leave it to you to take everything else out.--

1725:

OK, enough, both of you. This situation has been resolved by my blocking the anon. IP - no need rehash arguments one way or the other any more. I suggest that this discussion is allowed to die now, or else one or other of you is at risk of violating

993:

I just checked using Firefox and Safari (I'm on IE), and got the same result. The extent of the essay visible to me is "As a filmmaker, G. W. Pabst" and then comes J. Hoberman's bio, which presumably is meant to appear at the bottom of the

1067:) that he has done so again to yet more pages despite the warnings. He is very, very prolific, I have removed the links already, but there are so many links put in over so many pages that it's pretty much impossible to get them all.( 1474:

Please do as it is obvious, since I am not the only person that has reverted it, that you do not understand wikipolicy whatsoever. When you learn how to sign a post on a talk page that will be a start for your fragile cyberego.

1396:

and one only need type in the correct article title to check the links in the article. It will sometimes give you an archive address or redirect address if one or the other exists. The place that Collectonian was suggesting was

274:

511:

has the ability to have selected versions of an article history (and I presume a block log) hidden from public view in the Knowledge version logs, in effect removing them from all but Knowledge administrators' view, as seen

1013:

Sounds good. You might want to take a glance at other Criterion essays, because I have a vague recollection that I've seen this problem before. Perhaps they changed their policies and a subscription is needed to see the

1206:

544:

969:

My comment on deletion of the link tot he Criterion essay was literal -- when I go there I get the introduction to the essay, and nothing else. Do you see an essay? I have no objection to the content, because I can't

1883:. There are plenty of places on the web where you can post you theories. This is not one of them. There is usually not a general view of academicians since some will agree with your theories and others will not. 1923:

also tend to revolve around highly personal interpretations of a film. They often have more to say about the author then they do about the filmmaker and what he or she was trying to present on the screen.

1674:

I can understand your request. In my experience liars always have a hard time dealing with their lies. There is no need to compare you to a fictional bad guy. You've acheived that in reality on your own.

338:

Thanks for the note. Contacting the creator of the article is probably not a bad idea. I must have missed your comment on the talk page. Thanks again and let me know if anything else arises. Best, --

1368:

article, which has been identified as a GA. The table used the same X's and check scheme to identify wins and nominations, which appeared to be sufficiently clear. I understand the phrase you used at

611:

I have looked again at the Knowledge OR section. It states you are not supposed to put out a "new ...synthesis of material...not advanced by the sources." Is this the area of concern about my entries?

1519:

Sheesh what a whiner. You had time and energy to edit war. You had time and energy enough to be rude and incivil about me. You gladly ignored wikipolicy and the good advice that you received from

585: 1595:

editors involved in your note on Islander's talk page when there were actually three - the anon IP, Edoktor and myself - and now Islander has also reverted the edits and blocked the IP.

1033:

I viewed the source of the page, thinking that perhaps some HTML coding error was preventing the rest of the essay from appearing, but all that's there is what we see on the page.

1550:

also a published book in which this is stated. I restored the Voight line and added both of these as references. With the Imdb reference, there are now three citations for this.

1096:

Not only is the page too long, he insists on inserting his spam links, (he knows better than the admin he says, they're what's wrong with wikipedia), so he ignores the warnings.

1823: 1815: 1760: 1134: 938: 1187: 957: 903:

Just click on any two of the links that you create and you will find that they don't go to the pages intended. No one has time to amend the mistakes that you are making.

378:

Furthermore I have not violated the three revert rule unless today is still July 18 before 3:30 PM Knowledge time, so please check your facts before you make accusations.

1792:

An online store selling snow vehicles actually does identify Hallorann's vehicle as a snowmobile. It's official model name is a Sno-cat, and the site can be found here.

1202: 1194: 625: 832: 540: 532: 270: 262: 1808: 1782: 1364:

Hi, I noticed that a while back you deleted the awards table I made for the Stanley Kubrick article. The table in question was adapted from the same table used in

1152:, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name back to the 928: 1850: 1392:

Hi. I saw the note on the WP:Films page, which is why I went over and ran the checkuser tool on the version with the apparently deleted essay. The tool I use is

844:

semiprotection templates to pages that aren't protected. The fact that your English is minimal at best shows that you probably should be editing somewhere else.

696: 608:

would say that Albee has overall based his play on Kubrick's movie. Perhaps here it would be best to say that Albee's play "pays tribute" to the Kubrick film.

939: 1916: 595:

the Kubrick film. This may not be the best option for word-choice, and I myself would suggest referring instead to a "remake of the source material". (See

1865: 1034: 1017: 997: 977: 319: 1813: 1171: 1145:

It's that time of year again – we're wiping everyone's name off of the active members list and doing a project roll call. Your username is listed on the

1844: 1520: 1432: 1402: 1044: 1027: 1007: 692: 580: 563: 1766:

I changed to snow-tractor (which I think is correct although not all are enclosed. H's vehicle in the movie is a slightly lower-tech version of this

458: 284: 97: 1219: 1087:

I tried to report him, but haven't gotten a response yet. I may have been doing it wrong, so i thought I'd try here again, sorry for bothering you!

996:

I can send you a screenshot, if you're seeing the whole thing, and it would be helpful to see what I'm sesing. Could this be a subscription thing?

700: 352:

Thanks for the concern. I am indeed fine, but trying (desperately) to finish my master's thesis. My editing has been rather sporadic. Cheers, --

1192: 852: 795: 501: 1770:). I fixed that and I put back that editor's change and used "vehicle". It IS certainly worthwhile to note that Danny escapes with Wendy and how. 1153: 557: 1500: 1455: 1316:

that's very odd. i realized what i had done and went back and corrected it (i thought). in fact, my contribution list confirms that i did. hmmmm.

361: 347: 1170:

selection process! We are aiming to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up

1931: 1128: 665: 530: 489: 260: 1891: 1531: 1483: 1286: 435: 83:

I'm glad I'm not the only one doing the reversions! I'm tired of vandal fighting but sometimes, as in this case, it's necessary. The user has

1747: 1266: 685: 1829: 1683: 1645: 1621: 1603: 783: 246:

How did you get that Good, Bad & Ugly thing so fast? It was about 5 minutes ago. Do you have some kind of cell phone alarm, ala Ebay? --

1712: 1445:

Of note, I have posted my comment re Canada Post stamps for a second time. It is a matter of public record and does not need a reference.

763:

FYI this page is only protected against moving - saw your comment on my watch list. If you feel it needs further protection, head over to

1665: 1076: 803: 716:- however that doesn't explain the statement about the Barcarolle and the 'Communist Govt' - probably best deleted as you did. Best. -- 758: 893:

The Spanish version if it is reliable. The one that is unreliable and also imcompleta is yours. Do not you get the ready, beautiful.

469:

Hi. I accidentally blocked you by clicking on your link instead of User:97.88.198.14's, but I've reversed my error. Sorry about that.

1414: 987: 753: 1167: 1149: 836: 156: 119: 729: 387: 397:

Sorry about that title edit. The BBC had it listed as "Setting" and I stupidly assumed they were right. Thanks for fixing it.

332: 233: 204: 187: 1569: 764: 411: 77: 932: 308: 1114: 1325: 406: 255: 1354: 1082: 911: 817:. That you do not want to complete it does not mean that others do not want. Everything that is fully completed and tested 788: 1512: 1467: 635:

My point in noting these on the Kubrick page is precisely in the fact that all three non-remakes/new-versions consciously

1382: 1250: 828: 525: 478: 379: 192:

I checked out the page and it looked fine. What distortion did you mean? If the table doesn't fit then it can be adapted

680: 924: 882: 148: 1063:) you warned a user for inserting spam links in Straw Dogs, and told him not to do so again. His contributions show ( 131: 1159: 654: 1901:

section of the article on The Shining, but even properly sourced it does not in any way shape or form belong in the

917:

But you delete information if they go to their pages designed, fails to clear the site, yours is very incomplete.

1588: 878: 1099:

Also, that's certainly him, you can tell from the writing style. Conflict of interest. Please, please ban him.

962: 68:

books. Not entirely necessary for the article but should deter further nonsense edits. Just a heads-up. Thanks.

1508: 1463: 1054: 734: 446: 442: 419: 412: 1635: 1448:

If you have a problem with this entry, take it up with the conflict resolution service at wiki. I plan to.

1183: 705: 295: 323:

keep the page watchlisted and let me know if anything comes up. Many thanks and keep up the great work! --

1387: 1342: 1305:

And in future, try to be a bit nicer to people rather than throwing insults from behind a computer screen.

113: 1730:(that is assuming you haven't already). Also, please try and preserve the ordering of talk page messages. 175:

project that I proposed is up and running I'll have more time to address the lists again.Hope you are well

604:

summary" says it is a "remake of the Hitchcock classic" which as you and I would agree it really is not.

136: 369: 1537: 808: 313: 289: 168: 38: 171:

but Italy, France and Hong Kong are my main objectives to fill aside from USA. Hopefully once the new

1257:

also seems fairly trivial as part of Price's life, so I wouldn't push to re-add it to the article. --

1124: 1110: 1072: 1179: 221:. I want to set up a western film task force sometime. I need to get some members together though 1428: 1410: 1359: 1311: 946: 676: 516:. I don't know if he'll go so far a to do this for a user, but I thought you might like to know. 392: 383: 294:

Thanks for definitively clearing that up for me. Yes, I saw "series" instead of "seasons" in the

222: 193: 176: 109: 59: 1796:. Nonetheless, it would be more common to view this as a snow-tractor, so I'm keeping it as is. 141:

Marnette, I just wanted to apologize to you personally for abusing your trust. Read my comments

1871:

This is an encyclopedia not a place for academic theory. The items that you are adding violate

1440: 1365: 888: 740: 668:- it is a real pain when people behave like him/her! Let's hope he/she gets the message now! -- 454: 431: 152: 93: 73: 1907:(In case you hadn't noticed, Anil has had lots and lots of his contributions to WP deleted.)-- 1350: 1225: 963: 749: 706: 521: 508: 497: 485: 474: 280: 251: 241: 1767: 1496: 1451: 1401:, which has archives for a great many web pages. In fact, it does have an archive link for 1330: 1120: 1106: 1102: 1068: 920: 866: 824: 357: 343: 328: 1393: 896:

By the way, stops amend this article, if you do not mind that this incopleto, of course.

8: 1928: 1912: 1888: 1804: 1778: 1680: 1642: 1600: 1565: 1528: 1480: 1321: 1283: 908: 874: 849: 799: 723: 650: 621: 576: 402: 103: 47: 17: 600: 596: 513: 1861: 1840: 1731: 1696: 1504: 1459: 1424: 1406: 1262: 1246: 1215: 858: 814: 670: 553: 484:

I don't think admins like me have that ability, but I left a question at the Help Desk

464: 304: 161: 1231:"this loser IP has provided no veriviable source yet despite violating the 9 rvv rule" 147:. Please carry on with some of the good things I tried to do. Once again, I am sorry. 450: 427: 127: 89: 69: 1661: 1617: 1584: 1378: 1346: 779: 745: 630: 517: 493: 470: 276: 247: 210: 172: 818: 1574: 1369: 1146: 659: 353: 339: 324: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1924: 1908: 1884: 1880: 1800: 1774: 1676: 1638: 1596: 1561: 1524: 1476: 1317: 1279: 904: 870: 845: 718: 646: 617: 572: 398: 214: 1064: 1876: 1872: 1857: 1836: 1740: 1727: 1705: 1258: 1242: 1211: 821:, if you want to check it looks this link, if you have to make ready. Thanks 549: 300: 1405:, so it may have the others which you may have to replace. Hope that helps. 218: 1338: 1331: 143: 123: 1793: 1612:

No claims were made to two anything. I am bowing out of this controversy.

1657: 1613: 1580: 1374: 769: 713: 61: 375:

you're just being ridiculous and refusing to come to any common ground.

1341:. However, I have deleted the page as a hoax - it is in fact a copy of 899:

Thank you - Good Job on signing your message per wikipedia guidelines.

813:

Hi MarnetteD: We fail to remove import information from the article by

1091: 1897:

Properly sourced and contextualized, Anil's material could go in a

1016:

P.S. I didn't seek this out, I went to the link to read the essay!

441:

The bot hasn't finished running yet. It ll run once more to remove

1060: 507:

You're welcome. One other thing I can suggest is that WP founder

1296: 1828:

the specialized delivery lists. Feel free to sign-up in the

1065:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/67.234.188.136

586:

In what regard is Imdb unreliable? Trivia? Plus OR/NOR query

1398: 1768:

http://www.bmclark.org/accuwx_blog/snowtractor_small.jpg

1337:

Hi, I notice that you have undone apparent vandalism to

1761:

Shining vehicles- Last fellow confused book and movie.

1135:

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

940:

Knowledge:WikiProject Films/British cinema task force

1656:

Please don't contact me any more about this matter.

1158:

list. You can also add your name to any of our many

601:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120787/movieconnections

597:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0360717/movieconnections

1092:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Dan_Schneider_(writer)

1637:mean the number 2 or do they mean something else? 108:Marnette, you are just so nice to the banned user 426:. Tasks performed by User:Yobot are approved. -- 1061:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:67.234.188.136 1851:Stanley Kubrick combining eroticism with horror 639:Kubrick's approach. They are all consciously 1237:in violation of the exact same revert rule. 712:The reference is to the 1881 burning of the 1579:Dude, you are over the 3RR limit yourself. 318:Howdy, thanks for the clarification on the 564:Will Check references on the Kubrick films 122:), I am not as nice. I am a big meanie! ~ 88:good work (and keep an eye out!) Thanks. 1835:This has been an automated delivery by 1794:http://www.snowmobiletrailgroomers.com/ 1634:Do the letters t-w-o used in this edit 1210:This has been an automated delivery by 548:This has been an automated delivery by 490:being made an admin by a unanimous vote 14: 765:Knowledge:Requests for page protection 449:should not be in the article page. -- 445:if Category:xxxx births exists. Still 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1141:Roll call and Coordinator nominations 686:Kurosawa Influences Edit (re: Goethe) 863:can i have a source for the codes? 209:Three new articles. Recognize them? 25: 23: 1423:you practice. Glad to be of help! 759:James Earl Jones - page protection 24: 1943: 1308:Turns out your info was nonsense 1733: 1698: 664:Thanks for helping to challenge 29: 1176:by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14! 1809:15:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 1783:15:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 1570:16:55, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 1532:11:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 1513:04:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 1484:07:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 1468:01:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 1433:08:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 1415:21:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 1383:06:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 945:Thought you may be interested 447:Category:Date of birth missing 443:Category:Year of birth missing 420:Category:Date of birth missing 413:Category:Date of birth missing 13: 1: 1490:let you guys do as you must. 1366:No Country For Old Men (film) 1355:23:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1326:14:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1287:21:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 1267:09:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 1251:09:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 1220:00:43, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 1188:04:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 1168:WikiProject Films coordinator 1117:) 16:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 296:All Creatures Great and Small 1741: 1706: 1343:Brian Turner (American poet) 1166:It's also time to start the 1083:Reporting another user again 789:Miranda Richardson page link 773: 770: 418:Please read instructions in 7: 1932:08:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 1917:04:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 1892:05:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 1866:05:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 1845:00:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 1748:08:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1713:09:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 1684:07:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1666:01:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1646:21:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 1622:18:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 1604:08:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 1589:03:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 1129:16:20, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 1077:19:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC) 1045:14:46, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 1028:14:38, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 1008:14:32, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 988:14:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 958:10:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 933:19:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 912:00:06, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 883:20:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 853:19:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 837:18:17, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 804:07:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 784:09:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 754:13:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 730:05:22, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 701:21:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 10: 1948: 681:20:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 655:15:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC) 626:11:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC) 581:00:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC) 558:02:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 169:South Korean films of 2005 1816:September 2008 Newsletter 526:20:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 502:15:35, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 479:01:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 459:21:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 436:21:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 407:14:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 388:09:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 362:18:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC) 348:00:58, 17 July 2008 (UTC) 333:00:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC) 256:04:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 205:12:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 188:09:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 157:01:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 132:07:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC) 98:22:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 78:22:39, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 1241:an American printing. -- 309:16:31, 5 July 2008 (UTC) 285:23:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 234:14:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC) 422:. It should only be in 1195:August 2008 Newsletter 1055:Reporting another user 741:The Caves of Androzani 735:The Caves of Androzani 767:and leave a request. 707:The Tales of Hoffmann 42:of past discussions. 1824:September 2008 issue 1388:Criterion Collection 964:Pandora's Box (film) 533:July 2008 Newsletter 263:June 2008 Newsletter 227:♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ 198:♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ 181:♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ 1399:The Wayback Machine 1180:Girolamo Savonarola 137:Abuse of Your Trust 18:User talk:MarnetteD 1899:critical reception 1814:WikiProject Films 1538:Shining Miscellany 1193:WikiProject Films 815:Sir Michael Gambon 809:Sir Michael Gambon 531:WikiProject Films 320:Victoria Cobbleton 314:Victoria Cobbleton 290:Series vs. Seasons 261:WikiProject Films 110:Diamond Joe Quimby 1847: 1830:relevant sections 1499:comment added by 1454:comment added by 1222: 1203:August 2008 issue 1150:participants list 1147:WikiProject Films 1118: 1105:comment added by 1042: 1025: 1005: 985: 935: 923:comment added by 885: 869:comment added by 839: 827:comment added by 560: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1939: 1834: 1745: 1737: 1710: 1702: 1515: 1470: 1209: 1100: 1041: 1024: 1004: 984: 955: 954: 918: 864: 822: 775: 772: 726: 721: 673: 547: 370:I don't think so 231: 230: 211:Wolfgang Lukschy 202: 201: 185: 184: 33: 32: 26: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1905:of the article. 1853: 1819: 1763: 1738: 1703: 1577: 1540: 1494: 1493:All the best. 1449: 1443: 1403:Grand Illusions 1390: 1362: 1360:Stanley Kubrick 1335: 1314: 1312:Geoffrey Palmer 1299: 1228: 1198: 1177: 1143: 1137: 1121:StevenEdmondson 1107:StevenEdmondson 1085: 1069:StevenEdmondson 1057: 967: 948: 947: 943: 891: 861: 811: 791: 761: 737: 724: 719: 710: 688: 671: 662: 633: 588: 566: 541:July 2008 issue 536: 467: 416: 395: 393:Inspector Morse 372: 316: 292: 271:June 2008 issue 266: 244: 224: 223: 195: 194: 178: 177: 164: 139: 106: 65: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1945: 1935: 1934: 1906: 1895: 1894: 1852: 1849: 1833: 1818: 1812: 1790: 1789: 1762: 1759: 1757: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1732: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1697: 1695:this in mind. 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1669: 1668: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1607: 1606: 1576: 1573: 1539: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1487: 1486: 1442: 1441:Audrey Hepburn 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1389: 1386: 1361: 1358: 1334: 1329: 1313: 1310: 1298: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1270: 1269: 1227: 1224: 1208: 1197: 1191: 1155:Active Members 1139: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1090:Look at this: 1084: 1081: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 966: 961: 942: 937: 915: 914: 890: 889:LEAVE TO AMEND 887: 860: 857: 856: 855: 810: 807: 790: 787: 760: 757: 736: 733: 709: 704: 687: 684: 661: 658: 632: 629: 587: 584: 565: 562: 546: 535: 529: 505: 504: 466: 463: 462: 461: 415: 410: 394: 391: 371: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 315: 312: 291: 288: 265: 259: 243: 240: 238: 215:Sieghardt Rupp 163: 160: 138: 135: 105: 102: 101: 100: 64: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1944: 1933: 1930: 1926: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1904: 1900: 1893: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1848: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1831: 1826: 1825: 1817: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1797: 1795: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1771: 1769: 1758: 1749: 1746: 1744: 1739: 1736: 1729: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1714: 1711: 1709: 1704: 1701: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1685: 1682: 1678: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1654: 1647: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1598: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1533: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1491: 1485: 1482: 1478: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1446: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1425:Wildhartlivie 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1407:Wildhartlivie 1404: 1400: 1395: 1385: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1371: 1367: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1333: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1309: 1306: 1303: 1288: 1285: 1281: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1238: 1236: 1232: 1226:Vincent Price 1223: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1205: 1204: 1196: 1190: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1175: 1174: 1169: 1165: 1163: 1162: 1157: 1156: 1151: 1148: 1142: 1132: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1097: 1094: 1093: 1088: 1080: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1037: 1036:Ed Fitzgerald 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1026: 1022: 1020: 1019:Ed Fitzgerald 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1002: 1000: 999:Ed Fitzgerald 992: 991: 990: 989: 986: 982: 980: 979:Ed Fitzgerald 976:the content. 975: 974: 965: 960: 959: 956: 953: 952: 941: 936: 934: 930: 926: 922: 913: 910: 906: 902: 901: 900: 897: 894: 886: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 854: 851: 847: 842: 841: 840: 838: 834: 830: 829:77.208.16.195 826: 820: 816: 806: 805: 801: 797: 786: 785: 781: 777: 776: 766: 756: 755: 751: 747: 742: 732: 731: 728: 727: 722: 715: 708: 703: 702: 698: 694: 683: 682: 679: 678: 677: 674: 672:Timothy Titus 667: 657: 656: 652: 648: 644: 642: 638: 628: 627: 623: 619: 615: 612: 609: 605: 602: 598: 592: 583: 582: 578: 574: 570: 561: 559: 555: 551: 543: 542: 534: 528: 527: 523: 519: 515: 510: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 482: 481: 480: 476: 472: 460: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 439: 438: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 414: 409: 408: 404: 400: 390: 389: 385: 381: 380:206.41.234.41 376: 363: 359: 355: 351: 350: 349: 345: 341: 337: 336: 335: 334: 330: 326: 321: 311: 310: 306: 302: 297: 287: 286: 282: 278: 273: 272: 264: 258: 257: 253: 249: 242:Holy mackrel! 239: 236: 235: 232: 229: 228: 220: 216: 212: 207: 206: 203: 200: 199: 190: 189: 186: 183: 182: 174: 170: 159: 158: 154: 150: 146: 145: 134: 133: 129: 125: 121: 118: 115: 111: 99: 95: 91: 86: 82: 81: 80: 79: 75: 71: 63: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1903:plot summary 1902: 1898: 1896: 1854: 1822: 1820: 1798: 1791: 1772: 1764: 1756: 1742: 1734: 1707: 1699: 1578: 1559: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1541: 1492: 1488: 1447: 1444: 1391: 1363: 1339:Mason Turner 1336: 1332:Mason Turner 1315: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1239: 1234: 1230: 1229: 1201: 1199: 1178: 1172: 1160: 1154: 1144: 1140: 1098: 1095: 1089: 1086: 1058: 1040: 1035: 1023: 1018: 1015: 1003: 998: 995: 983: 978: 972: 971: 968: 951:The Bald One 950: 949: 944: 925:77.208.154.9 916: 898: 895: 892: 862: 812: 792: 768: 762: 738: 717: 711: 689: 675: 669: 666:User:CIMorse 663: 645: 640: 636: 634: 616: 613: 610: 606: 593: 589: 571: 567: 539: 537: 506: 468: 451:Magioladitis 428:Magioladitis 423: 417: 396: 377: 373: 317: 293: 269: 267: 245: 237: 226: 225: 208: 197: 196: 191: 180: 179: 165: 149:4.240.165.59 142: 140: 116: 107: 90:Sillyfolkboy 84: 70:Sillyfolkboy 66: 55: 43: 37: 1521:Primehunter 1495:—Preceding 1450:—Preceding 1347:TerriersFan 1161:task forces 1101:—Preceding 919:—Preceding 865:—Preceding 823:—Preceding 746:Tuzapicabit 714:Ringtheater 693:Tommillay54 518:Nightscream 509:Jimbo Wales 494:Nightscream 471:Nightscream 277:Nehrams2020 248:Ragemanchoo 104:Banned User 62:Mario Lanza 36:This is an 1542:Marnette, 1297:Rude much? 1233:- you are 859:DW Serials 465:Apologizes 424:Talk pages 354:TeaDrinker 340:TeaDrinker 325:TeaDrinker 219:José Calvo 162:Film lists 85:definitely 1925:MarnetteD 1909:WickerGuy 1885:MarnetteD 1801:WickerGuy 1775:WickerGuy 1677:MarnetteD 1639:MarnetteD 1597:MarnetteD 1562:WickerGuy 1525:MarnetteD 1477:MarnetteD 1318:Toyokuni3 1280:MarnetteD 905:MarnetteD 871:ATMarsden 846:MarnetteD 796:Threecard 647:WickerGuy 618:WickerGuy 614:Regards, 573:WickerGuy 399:Slowmover 173:WP:GEOBOT 1858:Anil1956 1837:BrownBot 1788:Addendum 1743:Islander 1708:Islander 1557:Regards 1509:contribs 1501:Mcatch23 1497:unsigned 1464:contribs 1456:Mcatch23 1452:unsigned 1370:WP:Lists 1259:McGeddon 1243:McGeddon 1212:BrownBot 1115:contribs 1103:unsigned 1059:Here: ( 1038:(unfutz) 1021:(unfutz) 1001:(unfutz) 981:(unfutz) 921:unsigned 879:contribs 867:unsigned 825:unsigned 631:Addendum 550:BrownBot 301:Krakatoa 120:contribs 1881:WP:PLOT 1575:Pompeii 1375:S. Luke 1345:. HTH. 660:CIMorse 124:WikiDon 39:archive 1877:WP:POV 1873:WP:NOR 1832:again! 1728:WP:NPA 1658:Lots42 1614:Lots42 1581:Lots42 1014:essay? 994:essay. 819:Gambon 774:Rawle 720:Klein 637:avoid 16:< 1929:Talk 1913:talk 1889:Talk 1879:and 1862:talk 1841:talk 1821:The 1805:talk 1779:talk 1735:Talk 1700:Talk 1681:Talk 1662:talk 1643:Talk 1618:talk 1601:Talk 1585:talk 1566:talk 1546:is. 1529:Talk 1505:talk 1481:Talk 1460:talk 1429:talk 1411:talk 1394:here 1379:talk 1351:talk 1322:talk 1284:Talk 1263:talk 1247:talk 1235:also 1216:talk 1207:you. 1200:The 1184:talk 1173:here 1125:talk 1111:talk 1073:talk 929:talk 909:Talk 875:talk 850:Talk 833:talk 800:talk 780:Talk 750:talk 739:Re: 725:zach 697:talk 651:talk 622:talk 599:and 577:talk 554:talk 545:you. 538:The 522:talk 514:here 498:talk 486:here 475:talk 455:talk 432:talk 403:talk 384:talk 358:talk 344:talk 329:talk 305:talk 281:talk 268:The 252:talk 153:talk 144:here 128:talk 114:talk 94:talk 74:talk 60:RE: 1131:). 1079:). 973:see 641:non 1927:| 1915:) 1887:| 1875:, 1864:) 1843:) 1807:) 1799:-- 1781:) 1773:-- 1679:| 1664:) 1641:| 1620:) 1599:| 1587:) 1568:) 1560:-- 1527:| 1511:) 1507:• 1479:| 1466:) 1462:• 1431:) 1413:) 1381:) 1353:) 1324:) 1282:| 1265:) 1249:) 1218:) 1186:) 1164:! 1127:) 1113:• 1075:) 931:) 907:| 881:) 877:• 848:| 835:) 802:) 782:) 752:) 699:) 653:) 624:) 579:) 556:) 524:) 500:) 492:. 477:) 457:) 434:) 405:) 386:) 360:) 346:) 331:) 307:) 283:) 275:-- 254:) 217:, 213:, 155:) 130:) 96:) 76:) 1911:( 1860:( 1839:( 1803:( 1777:( 1660:( 1616:( 1583:( 1564:( 1503:( 1458:( 1427:( 1409:( 1377:( 1349:( 1320:( 1261:( 1245:( 1214:( 1182:( 1123:( 1119:( 1109:( 1071:( 927:( 873:( 831:( 798:( 778:( 771:J 748:( 695:( 649:( 620:( 575:( 552:( 520:( 496:( 473:( 453:( 430:( 401:( 382:( 356:( 342:( 327:( 303:( 279:( 250:( 151:( 126:( 117:· 112:( 92:( 72:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index