User talk:MatthewVanitas/Archive 17

2005:

articles, I do suggest that you just carefully watch your use of Raj sources to try to balance out the bias. If a given person is covered by both Raj and modern sources (or contemporary Indian/Moghul sources) it's good to get multiple perspectives in there. If someone is known mainly through Raj/East India Company materials, though it's fine to quote passages directly, it's important to ensure that your/Wiki's treatment of the topic is phrased in a modern neutral/professional way that doesn't necessarily glorify the Brits or denigrate the locals, but reports factually and neutrally.

2872:-members have written about the group. Not saying just you, but a lot of such groups spend time on minutiae of their history and namedropping people of near-zero interest to those not intimately familiar with the movement. If "Joe Smith" and "Bob Smythe" had an argument about the movement and Smythe left in 1995, unless we have existing articles on Smith and Smythe, and there are greater significances to that split, the casual reader probably doesn't need to know it, no matter how interesting it may be to people familiar with Smith and Smythe. 592:, where another editor noted the copyvio problem. I tried to suggest the problem mildly at the AFC. I am afraid the new editor is gonna get a bad experience when the article is identified publicly as a copyvio, which would be justified if any editor wants to identify it. I dunno, i think you are responsible now, to edit the article to remove the copyvio/plagiarism, since you promoted it. Sorry not to be more positive. I do think you are doing great to participate in RFC and you have me a bit interested in helping in that arena, too. -- 1832:

cooperative way.. I've inserted a few images on the article (illustrating some of the activities of this organization as I usually do on WP) to make it more interesting. "Per Knowledge one word should not be linked in every sentence of an article": I agree with you please delete the links that you consider excessive. I don't understand what you mean about the references/citations of the article. If your opinion is that this article is in a very poor condition please give your contribution on the discussion page. Thanks--

2985: 2345: 31: 2530:

improving the article, much less having a specific "hurry" to do so. I can't prevent you from being emotionally invested, but hopefully you can understand why others are leery to help "push" an article through on a timeline that matters only to the originator. If the article were, for example, someone from X War and this was the ABC Anniversary of X War, hurry for proper timing might make sense, but otherwise hurry seems unnecessary.

790: 529:. That said, you can still take this type of information and put it on other sites with differing missions, maybe write an online article for a site about education development? There are a lot of ways to address the issue, and even if Knowledge isn't quite the right place at this stage, there are a lot of options out there. Sorry there's not an easier answer, but hope this at least clears up the policy reasons. 314: 502:

until published info is readily available perhaps a private tribute/fan/advocacy site would be a more appropriate place? I'm not seeing any current hits for the name on GoogleBooks or Google News Archive, so not much to work with. This is, of course, not to denigrate her work, just noting that we don't have a body of independent, established sources to work with.

1561:

would mean that this is not original research. I assumed that having linked to their respective WP pages would serve as sufficient foundation for inclusion of the remark without a footnote. I could of course have stated it with different - more 'encyclopedic' language. I am new to this, but I will get the hang of it. --

442:

more external links and therefore evidence. This article is written about my sister. All evidential material has been lost since her death in difficult circumstances (I have done extensive researching to try and dig up more information), so I doubt whether I have the slightest chance to meet the requirements to

2947:

Go to the article's Talk page, start a new section saying "Do we need to include info about Classes?" and give them a link to your page. They should either say "hey, good idea" and they can get an exemption to have it added, or they'll say "no, we don't need it" and that'll be it. Go communicate with

1162:

Hi Doc. I fixed it up, weighed its accolades and the coverage already received for where this was made and by whom, and advanced it. Independent short films always have a difficult time showing notability, specially when compared to feature films created by major names or notable production companies

446:

you point out. One of my hopes is that by getting a basic factual page up online more of this evidence will become visible over time. This woman co-wrote a series of books that is still in print after a decade and is being used around the world in specifically difficult developing country contexts to

2859:

Hello AsataReign, some good questions there. First off, I would keep everything on one Terasem article at first. If there isn't a good basic article on the overall TM movement, having branches thereof will be unstable. Also, my vague impression is that the branches have a lot of basic commonalities,

2696:

Several sections, like "Bio" and the Te Deum translation, are covered at length in other articles, and you should just link said articles rather than summarise them here. The article is about Zoltan's Te Deum, so you need to keep it focused to specifics about this individual work, with only the bare

1560:

Thanks for the clarification, Matthew. I did understand the point about the problem with original research, having read the policy document about NOR. My main point was that everything I said about Bentham and Singer and Utilitarianism is also stated in their respective WP articles. Presumably, that

966:

Hi Mathew, Can you please look at the Andreas Georgiou Thomas article and let me know what you think. I appreciate the fact that some people cannot speak or read Greek but that does not detract from my efforts to find references that attest to Thomas as important to Cyprus" Education, literature and

632:

Thanks for taking care of it. I amended my note at the Talk page, too. All done for now, good work. By the way, I think that many persons who start as this originator did, can come along and be great contributors, if they get kinder rather than abusive first interactions. Thank you for doing what

3097:

No, I think you're right, it's just I was reading the two different things as relatively synonymous terms, but Ninalill is stating that there are some significant technical differences. If someone else wants to take a look and move the draft to take the place of the redirect (if the draft itself is

2972:

Specifically adding pictures. I'm not sure how to do that. Usually I look at articles that have features I want and see how they're done, then try to copy the format. I can't figure out how pictures are added or embedded in the articles, though. I've looked at the directions, but I'm not conversant

2833:

Thanks for the feedback on the Terasem Movement article. There are a couple points I was on the fence about when I started out to write this piece. Would it be more appropriate to give each branch their own article? If not, am I attempting to get too deep, and therefore should I be abbreviating the

2292:

Can you delete two profiles on the teahouse guest? I happened to make two profiles and didn't think about. One is named James Jamarcus Darquan Smith and the other Jamarcus D. Smith can you get rid of them please? Thank You. CHAOS IS PERFECTION CONFUSION IS DOMINANCE 19:45, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

2224:

Thank you for your review of my page on Fraternal Benefit Societies. I see that you have rejected its submission due to other similar pages--which I suspected might happen, because at first glance, Fraternal Benefit Societies often appear to be mutual organizations, etc., which they really are not.

2125:

Hello, thank you for your feedback. I will continue to work on the page. As for sources, I can look for more sources to verify the information on Dr. Wilde, but The Society has been formed recently and does not have credible publicity other than locally within NJC. I am one of the cofounders of The

1650:

Matthew, thanks for your help. This article need to be changed to make it more adherent to the rules of WP. When it'll possible for me I'll try adding some changes. It's a big work because the author was very prolific. Recently You removed the Photo of Subash Chandra Bose (that I've inserted months

1537:

commentator, in a published work, observed that Bentham and Singer are exceptions, that's fine to include and footnote to that commentator. However, it is not for us as individual editors to make our own assessments of whether Bentham and Singer are truly exceptions or no. That is why I removed the

796:

Thank you again for the comment! I corrected again. You are the best! My last but not least question is about uploading a picture - there is a picture - yarovskayagoreguggenheim.jpg - that would like to upload - first technicalities are hard to figure out... and overall, how is the article now? too

693:

Hello Ibrahim, while clearly God plays the key role in Islam, the {Allah} template is for topics that are features or aspects of God in Islam. The Shahada is not an aspect of God, it's an aspect of human religion which recognises God. Regarding your suggestion to use both templates, it is generally

2249:

How do we resolve this? Trying to edit any of these pages "Friendly Societies," "Mutual organizations" and "Benefit Society" would largely result in me effectively overwriting the their content, which I'm sure Wiki doesn't want me to do. But to try to just tweak what they have would not accomplish

2148:

Matthew, finally figured out how to thank you at your home page. Thanks to your time, patience, and instructions, the Luo Xian Xiang article has been posted. Also took your advice and visited the History project site, left word etc... Will check in with the group again to see where I could help

1985:

Thanks for all of your suggestions and editing help. It's great to see my article has finally made it onto Knowledge. However, I wondered if it was possible to change the title, so that it does say Lieutenant George Willoughby, rather than just having George Willoughby (soldier). The reason why is

1850:

article too I don't know what they have tried to do with citations! Adding long long comments/opinions in citations. And irrelevant images, I had a hard time to understand where actually to click to verify the inline citations! I don't know who is Ashish ictc, but he has added multiple song (audio

1453:

Hi Matthew looking some advice on improving page about band Lulubelle III, they are being played again next week on BBC 6Music and the playlist pages uses Knowledge for biographical info. They are also due to get an interview on BBC Radio Foyle at the end of this month and I iamgine they will also

839:

with each save explaining briefly what it is you're changing, like "adding draft paragraph about her time at Harvard", or "adding material from my draft about 1970-1980 New York period". Just make sure that you have proper referencing for whatever material you move offer, that you're communicating

834:

Hello Lydia, are you saying you already have this topic published as a full article, but have further content at your draft page that you want to migrate over to the published article? If so, there's not rule about the speed of doing such. If the article has a lot of other editors working on it or

441:

I admire wikipedia greatly for it's dedication to standards of evidence and truth, I am on your side, I think these things actually matter. My mistake may by that I had intended this page to be a simple biographical page which would link into pages for each of her three main books which would have

986:

Thanks for the addition about the documentary. Sometimes I find the notability guidelines frustrating that teams with a reasonable history like this one are borderline because they have never risen above tier 7 of the FA but some hip-hop singer who had one week in the top 100 and number 99 is an

501:

So far as "getting a basic factual page up online more of this evidence will become visible over time", it's not a goal of Knowledge to publicise issues. To the contrary, things need to have public knowledge to have an article. I empathise with your interest to reach out to share information, but

2867:

Secondly, I do think the article needs to take a broader focus, and is bit too down into the nitty-gritty without even giving enough of a broad-overarching view of the Movement. This is a common problem with articles written by adherents of spiritual or political movements. A good way to try and

155:

Barrack Point and Barrack Heights are two different suburbs (Barrack Point is even mentioned in the Barrack Heights article) Barrack Point is smaller than Barrack Heights and contains a caravan park. Also Barrack Point is on the coast line, Barrack Heights is not. For prove, here is Google Maps:

2537:

issues to fix the article. If this person is near and dear to you and there's some personal reason for rushing the article, I empathise, but we can't publish unready articles, or divert efforts from other articles, based on personal reasons, which is one of many reasons we discourage editing on

1752:

For last few months I have been trying to work there. But, it's more a dog's curly tail! For example, per Knowledge one word should not be linked in every sentence of an article or we should use bold characters unnecessarily in body! Everytime I correct these after few days I see the issues are

1610:

Thanks. I doubt that there is a single footnote elsewhere. I collated information from three articles. In any event, my own remark that you removed was - IIRC - was already a footnote. To add a footnote to a footnote is a bit too extreme for my taste. So maybe I'll just let this one slide. :)

916:

While independent sourcing is good, I can see no real issue if both teams say that it is their longest standing rivalry,or something similar. I think we need to be careful about allowing our policies which are there to protect us from charlatans and self-publicists, among others, to prevent us

2568:

Hey Matthew Thank you for your response which I fully understand. My only desire to rush was to show it to my 93 year old mother before she dies. But we can exclude that and as you say, take my time sorting out a good article. I'm not 'emotional' about it but my mother is the one with all the

2421:

of this article simply because it's about them. Secondly, material was removed because it was inappropriate, and/or uncited. We don't make exceptions for "personal knowledge", political advocacy, or any other such reasons. If material does not follow Knowledge's standards and guidelines, it is

1583:

If the Bentham/Singer point is cited elsewhere, you can copy that footnote and bring it over. I'd just suggestion caution in digressions, as it's easy to start explaining other examples and diverge too far from the actual subject of Sarkar! Glad the clarification helped, and glad to see you're

2973:

yet with the nomenclature used to understand exactly what to do. I started the piece on the Leesburg Transfer Company in the Sandbox because I couldn't see a tab that let me create an article. It's there, I'm sure- but when I was looking for it I couldn't find it. So- any help is appreciated!

2004:

No worries, glad it all worked out! It's always a steel learning-curve, getting one's first article out, but you stayed positive, learned the ropes, and the article came out really well! I hope you'll do more articles in the future! As someone who's learned by doing on a lot of Indian history

1831:

Titodutta I have worked hard to make the "Ananda Marga" article better. I'm not a full time worker of WP neither an Ananda Marga supporter. I've practically rewritten all the article inserting detailed information and quotations. If something is wrong of course it's possible to change it on a

2529:

If I recall your other posts correctly, you have some ties to the subject. This is exactly why we discourage people from writing on things they have close ties to. Someone who simply finds EJSvS an interesting historical personage is unlikely to be deeply emotionally hurt from the process of

2245:

they are vital, non-profit businesses and organizations that sell financial products geared toward middle income people. They are largely "fraternal life insurers" but also sell annuities and other products in some cases. But unlike commercial life insurers, they invest profits back into the

1509:

are notable exceptions to that rule." What I don't understand here is that everything in that note is consistent with and substantiated by the Knowledge links that I have given. I am not convinced that original research should be a crime, but - regardless of that - what is "original" here?

2459:

If the parts are properly cited and neutrally phrased, they wouldn't be removed. They were removed because they are inappopriate, the parts that were at least somewhat cited or appropriately phrased have been retained (though much of the article still needs to be checked and improved).

2546:

by all means bring them in under this collaborative effort. But there is no "shortcut" to a good article, and a poor or unreferenced article which lunges out of WP:AFC into publication prematurely is likely to be deleted for lack of sourcing in order to protect the reputation of the

1796:

Ok MatthewVanitas. I thought I had done a good thing adding the photo of Subash on Sarkar's article. I respect your experience on WP and I accept to delete it. As you can see from the history of the article I didn't write it but I have just added some information and links on

2246:

communities they serve through community service projects, scholarships, etc. They are not credit unions, social clubs like the Moose or Elks, or Greek fraternity houses on college campuses--all misconceptions that fraternal organizations are trying very hard to correct.

2523: 2476: 716:

Hmm Thanks for the expatiation it really clarify. Frankly speaking i was also uncertain about weather its appropriate to use this one or not. So i thought why not try it, if i would be wrong some one might correct me. Thanks for the help. Stay well and Edit happily. --

114:

I love editing and creating articles on Knowledge but when it comes to all the technical side of doing some things I am useless. Maybe one day I will be able to sit down with someone who is in the know and pick up a few hints!Rocketrod1960 00:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

587:

article development. I think you're doing a great thing in helping deliver a good experience to a tentative, new wikipedia editor. But, as i have noted at the published article's talk page, there remain problems. My attention to all this was from your posting at

369:

Do not use ALL CAPITAL LETTERS for words like "Winner", etc. This is considered "shouting" on much of the internet. Instead just type "Winner:". The only time you'd capitalise words is if the words themselves are always written like that, like USA, or if a book was

1668:

I've seen that You have also added a neutrality template on the top of this article but I did'nt find specific proposals of changes on the related talk page. Anyway as I have already said before this doesn't means that I consider the article well written.. Thanks.

559:. I have just categorized the article as a art / arts organization stub, because I want to put it up in order for other people to add references and information to it? Is this the best course of action? What else can I do to the article to make it verifiable? 1528:

Greetings, thanks for coming over to chat! As noted in my edits, phrases like "it may also be noted that", "interestingly enough", etc. are to be avoided on Knowledge (unless in direct quotations) as unencyclopedic. Similarly, our policies strongly prohibit

2228:

In fact, searches for Fraternal Benefit Society link directly to Mutual Organizations page; however this is not what a benefit socieity is, further confusing the issue to the average reader--which is exactly what I tried to dispel by writing this page.

511:

I do also empathise with the desire to support your sister's memory, which is one reason Knowledge discourages writing about people you know personally; the emotions of the relationship get caught up in the article and make situations like this more

361:

The cites are better and better-placed, but you'll want to also have clear cites for the award claims, either to the website of the award, or to a media article which states "Marianna won the X award on Y date". Everything in the article should be

1692:

to be particular, and restrict ourselves to photos of the person, his works, and specific objects in his life (his own desk, his own house). Additionally, since the article only briefly mentions Bose, forcing in his picture comes across as

2541:

All that aside, for better of for worse you've started an article. My best recommendation is to slowly improve it based on guidance from other editors to bring it up to standards. If you know other people who want to help out (maybe even

678:. so i believe that the template Allah should be placed in the article.Although your are also right that the template Islam is also appropriate. why not place both the templates by adjusting the images. Hope to hear a positive reply. -- 1097:, but if you can find at least a few footnotes (about the filming, public response, etc) from major magazines or newspapers (in Italian is fine too) to show how wide the film was discussed in media, that'd make the article very strong. 1533:(see link for the full policy). Since an encyclopedia is a compilation of established facts and theories, not newly-discovered ones, we have to limit ourselves to opinions which are already documented in authoritative writing. If an 1289: 2518:

I'm doing fine for cash, so I'm not a paid editor, which though not totally prohibited is discouraged on Wiki for a variety of reasons. If for whatever reason you choose to use an advertised paid editor, please exercise all due

2232:

The closest page that already exists on Knowledge related to Fraternal Benefit Societies is "Friendly Societies," but the tone of this page is historical, as if these types of organizations are archaic and no longer exist, when

1085:, so that each fact can be traced to its origin. If you say in the article "It won the Acme Award in 2011", you should have a footnote to the specific website where this can be verified. Also for your links, right now you have 554:

I was just wondering if I could get some advice about the iDMAa article I submitted on my sandbox. I modeled the article on several other articles written about similar arts organizations with similar citing styles, including

157: 1687:

Bose, that'd be great, but it isn't. There are always hundreds of photos we could add to any bio, like the flag of a country he lived in, or skyline of a city he lived in, but to avoid the article being a mass of photos we

941: 2475: 2269:

to get advice from the volunteers there. That way you'll get lots of oversight and a breadth of opinions. Thanks again for your work and for being a good communicator, and Teahouse should help you find a solid solution.

2149:... OR I will start another project that may involve US Case Law or a bio for another Chinese personnel. Again, without your help, who knows how much longer it will take to bring the article to fruition Many thanks! 1986:

because people interested in him cannot find him unless they put that specific search in and if they only put 'George Dobson' a Quaker comes up. Could this be changed do you think? I seem unable to edit that part.....

1699:, which again compromises the perceived neutrality of what is otherwise a pretty good article. So far as the POV tag, I'd like to get some second opinions to make sure it's not just me, so I suggest you drop into 2757:

which say "Hey, there's a TD by Kodaly, and here is why it is significant/important." Not your personal analysis, not non-TD details about the composer or the school of music, but to have an article about the

1256: 895:

and try it yourself (it's hard to go too wrong with a redirect), or if you're not comfortable with that let me know and I'll do it for you, and you can observe the coding to see how it's done. Let me know!

119:

Hello Rocketrod! No worries, glad to help, and nice article! So far as formatting, my common advice, and what I did that worked well, is just find an article where you like the format, and take a squint at

2322:

MiszaBot III operates in a cyclical fashion, so if you're attempting to archive information immediately, or within twenty-four hours, it can appear as though the parameters aren’t functioning as expected.

1943:, and the consensus was to use the english name. Unfortunately, until now no-one had taken the logical step of merging the two articles accordingly. Would it be possible for you to merge the content into 835:

the material is controversial, you may want to bring it up at the article's Talk page first. If that's not the case, you can move it over at whatever pace you like, but just make sure you leave a clear

124:

coding to see how it's done. The rest comes with practise, and fortunately Wiki is a collaborative environment, so as long as you have clear statements and good citations, the rest will work itself out.

880: 3010:

I was unsuccessful in trying to find your response to my comments regarding your denial of my Fraternal Benefit Societies page. I'm new to "Talk" Can you send a direct link to your comments? Thanks!

1746:, I can not understand which one is references, which one is note! I have a feeling that editors are there writing own commentary in references section which is not purpose of the references section. 2700:

Don't use "Ibid" in footnotes; the beauty of Wiki footnotes is that you can move text around and the numbers automatically re-sort themselves with no effort needed. However, a note saying "Ibid" is

2885:

TM vice about it. For an uninvolved reader, it comes across as a lot of internal minutes, namedropping, lots of jargon, etc. The concept is certainly interesting, but it needs to be phrased for an

484:. If there's some info about her that's so rare that misplacing it can cause it's loss, then it's not really available research material. Baptismal certificates, correspondence, etc. are great for 2693:

Ah, okay, I see now. The intro was a bit unclear as to the topic, so at first glance it looked like just his bio. That said, though this is a good start, you have a number of things to clean up:

2601: 2505: 1281: 1261:

Dear Mr. Vanitas- I wish to thank you personally for your patience, advice, and kind assistance in my writing of the Kurn Hattin article. You are a truly professional editor and a gentleman.

2704:

upon always being in a certain order, so if someone inserts some more info and a new footnote between #15 and #16 footnotes, now "Ibid" is #17 and incorrectly looks like it's an ibid to the

1489:

Recently you removed a reference note from the Neohumanism article on grounds of WP:OR, suggesting that it was my original research. The note read: "From this emphasis on utility value, the

158:

https://maps.google.com.au/maps?q=barrack+point&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x6b131470f5c97f2b:0x5017d681632e0f0,Barrack+Point+NSW&gl=au&ei=vF-GUI-1FbCSiAelkYDwDQ&ved=0CHIQtgM

1354:

I added media sources as you advised, and other links. I started small, as I'd been advised in creating a new entry with an idea to letting others add to it. Kindly re-review, and thanks!

1481: 144: 2046:. That will create a "redirect" so anyone searching that term will arrive at your page. You could do the same, if you like, with as many reasonable variants of his name as you see fit ( 1977: 2026:

phrase to clarify which person, generally by what they're most famous for: "John Smith (architect)", "John Smith (Romantic poet)", "John Smith (Opium Wars)". So while the main title

1510:

Furthermore, in this footnote I am presenting an impartial point as I am not a supporter of utilitarianism or the parties mentioned. So I am confused. Why remove the reference note?

812:

You responded to one of my questions at the teahouse so I thought I would ask you a question direct. I currently have the beginning of a draft article in my sandbox here is the link

525:

material about her like media or academic coverage, we don't have an article. Even if we have evidence she wrote books ISBN xyz through a certain publisher, that's still not meeting

1703:

and ask the volunteer mentors there for input on where the article can be made more neutral. Thanks again for your article, and your willingness to communicate with the community!

1522: 1420:

HI Matthew - thank you very much for looking at my submissionm and improving it so so much. I really do appreicate. I'm off to have another go at editing it as per your comments.

1288: 3061: 2074: 2065:

Great. Thanks so much. I'll do that. And yes, it was tricky being unbiased as a lot of the information out there is similar and clearly from older sources. Regards Katzeaugen

1998: 188: 2753:

Kodaly's Te Deum. Instead, they substantiate non-TD facts about his life, about TDs in general, or are "cited" to recordings of the work or the score itself. What we need is

426: 3005: 2652:

No worries, and let's both keep an eye on his Contribs and see if he makes any other bad moves, at which point we should take him right to ANI. He's had plenty of warnings.

1739:

quality. Not only image of Bose, there were more irrelevant images. Like we are teaching alphabets to kids.. A for apple (now a photo of apple), B for ball (photo of ball).

1538:

phrase; it's not a "crime", but it is generally prohibited as per the policy. I hate to ask folks to read dry policy documents, but if you just read a paragraph or two of

1371: 470: 2328: 1349: 1314:

Thanks for your approval of my article on Kelly Mark. Though I have done a few entries, I admit I still find Knowledge confusing. But Im working on it :) Thanks again,

1304: 976: 3030: 2126:

Society, would I be able to site myself or other members of The Society on the mission statements and structuring of the group? If so, how can I go about doing this?

1858:

I had a strong wish to delete most of the unencyclopedic portions in these two articles and reduce to stubs which I have not done so far most probably not going to so.

1295:

Hi Matthew--I don't know what's wrong with that submission (technically), but I am unable to decline it, and be declined it must, definitively. Can you help? Thanks.

3071:. I thought that if/when it gets accepted, we were supposed to delete the redirect (with the help of admin, of course) and move the submission to the article space. 864:, and I found that it already had the game, listed under Clue Junior: The Case of the Missing Cake. So, I guess I don't need to change anything there. Thanks again - 251: 1269: 944:

is mostly copy and pasted from a web site. Even if the editor works for them, we would still need OTRS. I won't mark it for G12, I'll let you decide what to do.

2163: 2047: 1203: 320:

Hello thank you for the comment - I corrected where the references are - any other comments? I have never posted a wiki article (at least not in English) before

195: 2211: 1251: 849: 303: 247: 3141: 3111: 3084: 2893:

of your footnotes, other than points where you cite the org itself on basic non-controversial data like founding date, mission statement, etc. Does this help?

2775: 2572:

But the family art history is deeper than that, 2 really really old relations are in BENZIT and have paintings in museums as does my grandmother come to that.

2469: 2431: 2325: 565: 2822: 1660: 1631: 1593: 1570: 1551: 538: 3129: 3072: 2526:. I checked out the current version, and though a good start it is nowhere near ready to publish, since it needs much clearer sourcing than it currently has. 2130: 1712: 1115: 961: 816:

some of it I have already started to publish to the page as a stub. However how fast are you allowed to transform work from the sandbox to the actual page?

2561: 1971: 905: 748: 726: 707: 2998: 2939: 2362: 2059: 1841: 1775: 1678: 391: 2575:

It's just that no one has ever bothered to get the info out onto Knowledge. So I'm gonna try. So you know, I love Knowledge and recently made a donation.

1956: 1916: 1501:, emerged. It may also be noted that not all utilitarian or consequentialist philosophers have argued solely in terms of the pleasure and pain of humans. 1033:

Hello MatthewVanitas, thanks for reviewing the page related to the short film Doina. I've corrected the error and would like you to check the page again:

3051: 2961: 2719:

This is overall a good start, but needs some fine-tuning before you resubmit. If you'd like a wider opinion, you can check with the volunteer mentors at

2661: 2087:

appears to be non-notable? REALLY? I agree that the 'article' that was being created was pointless fluff, but at least decline it for the right reasons.

1904: 1462: 1130: 1044: 698:

link; this is the great thing about Knowledge, that expansions of each topic are available with the click of a button. Hope this explains the reasoning.

2452: 2410: 1870: 1806: 1195: 649: 623: 227: 2589: 2493: 1432: 2732: 2910: 2066: 1990: 1157: 323: 2889:

audience. My strongest suggestion is to dig into what non members (journalists, academics, etc) have taken time to write about, and use that as the

223: 2279: 1645: 770: 608: 176: 1474: 694:

discouraged to have multiple templates on an article, as this is distracting to the reader. Any reader wanting to no more can always click on the

573: 3018: 2234: 480:

Greetings, from what I'm understanding there are a few issues here. When you mention "evidential material", my concern is that you're looking at

2552:

Sorry there's no easy answers, but Wikipedians overall would be glad to help you with your questions about how to bring this article up to par.

2138: 2096: 687: 2672:

Hi, you rejected my article because you said there is already an article written on Zoltán Kodály. I realize this. My article was written on

2242: 1923: 2679: 1888: 928: 1440: 953: 828: 331: 2181: 1940: 614:

Chopped that section and left a note with some suggestions with the originator. Thanks for the help and the good catch on the copyvio.

578: 275: 2806: 2687: 2191: 2158: 1231: 211: 2177: 2115: 1651:

ago) from the related article. I added it again 'couse I suppose it was an error from You. If not please let me know. Thanks again--

1221: 2978: 2390: 987:'automatic' notable. I'm hoping that Waterbeach once played in the FA Cup, just needs to be the once to cross the same threshold. 447:

empower teachers with limited access to resources. Should I just take everything out except her writing credits? I need your help.

2712:

to get footnotes to the same source to stack properly. Let me know if you need help figuring that out even after reading the link.

2351: 2344: 2332: 271: 1756:

I have tried to talk to you also. You have replied me some "thank you" messages, but I could not see any progress in the article!

1683:

Hello Cornelius, I removed the picture of Bose because, simply put, it isn't a picture of Sarkar. If it were a picture of Sarkar

1277: 200:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

138: 1217: 2902: 2385: 2079: 873: 2646: 2184:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1224:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 778: 2358: 2187: 1944: 1932: 1227: 1023: 996: 207: 204:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2395:

Dear. This Article is about the Saraiki people. We should listen their voice and claim. so kindly don't remove the edits.

1342: 3137: 3080: 2444: 2402: 1448: 1355: 1138: 1052: 936: 421: 1391:- just handled the navigation issues. I don't know whether the article is still close to the version you rejected at AfC. 2798: 2309: 2216: 1627: 1410: 466: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2860:

so probably most efficient to have a general TM article and some brief explanation of the variants later in the article.

2483:

Hey Matthew Did you get my message? I need help and fast. I'm happy to pay for someone to set the page up. Please reply

2952:

page, see what happens. Make sure you check that page's Archive first to make sure that hasn't already been discussed.

1912: 1470: 1061:

Greetings, I haven't done a new review since I'm not a strong film reviewer, but I've done some basic technical fixes:

108: 2597: 2501: 1123:

Greetings to you, I followed your instructions and worked hard to fix the page. I really hope now you can accept it.

657: 546: 2949: 2850: 2120: 1384: 184: 3026: 2935: 2667: 1338: 1962:

No worries, I have a mess of other deconflicts to do, so I'll add that one to the list. Thanks for the catch!

2754: 2543: 2168:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1415: 1208:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

644: 603: 308: 150: 2720: 2266: 2035: 1700: 766:

Hi, Matthew, I've done my best now: Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Journal of Early Modern Studies.

168:

Edit: I think I know what you mean, I fixed the Barrack Point page from the link on Barrack Heights page.

2027: 1530: 1273: 1009:

I added the template for the article review for the Logicworks article, I think I removed it by mistake.

972: 481: 1743: 3107: 3047: 3038:

Hello, it's filed in my Archives (to keep my Talk page from getting too long). Here's the link for it:

2957: 2916: 2898: 2818: 2771: 2728: 2657: 2557: 2465: 2427: 2275: 2143: 2055: 1967: 1708: 1589: 1547: 1179:

for Knowledge. As it is still making the festival circuits, and already has commentary and analysis in

1111: 1094: 911: 901: 845: 744: 703: 619: 534: 435: 387: 134: 38: 3064: 2919:

is locked for editing (until March 29th of next year). I don't know if I can merge it at this time.

2101: 1192: 1145: 922: 824: 569: 3133: 3076: 2967: 2448: 2406: 2173: 2134: 2023: 1359: 1089:, that is you just have URLs instead of a citation, so preferably you want to turn those into full 804: 201: 47: 17: 2802: 2305: 1623: 1566: 1518: 1070:

Here's a big one: adding "bullets" (like on this line I'm typing now) to separate lists of items.

462: 243: 2881:

My vague impression is that this is a Notable topic, but it unfortunately reads like an article

2783: 1908: 1837: 1802: 1749:

Both these articles are written like advertisements or template of any religious organizations.

1674: 1656: 1466: 1163:

with greater access to press and coverage. It will never have the notability of something like

1134: 1106:

Don't get discouraged, you're most of the way there, just a little polishing to make it great.

1048: 981: 968: 836: 584: 1183:

sources, it serves the project that it remain and grow over time and through regular editing.

2593: 2497: 2376: 2019: 1952: 1894: 1436: 869: 774: 722: 683: 2617:, there was no way I could clean it all alone without looking like I'd gone on a witchhunt. 3014: 2923: 2846: 2838: 2794: 2742: 2614: 2608: 2585: 2489: 2440: 2398: 2297: 2070: 1994: 1900: 1615: 1458: 1326: 1265: 1185: 1036: 1001: 919: 820: 526: 454: 363: 327: 172: 151:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Barrack_Point,_New_South_Wales

8: 3103: 3099: 3068: 3043: 2991: 2984: 2974: 2953: 2894: 2814: 2767: 2724: 2653: 2553: 2461: 2423: 2418: 2271: 2154: 2111: 2051: 1963: 1866: 1847: 1771: 1704: 1585: 1543: 1376: 1367: 1107: 1090: 1082: 897: 841: 761: 740: 699: 663: 615: 589: 530: 383: 344: 180: 130: 3022: 2931: 2708:#16 note. Does that make sense? Instead of using "ibid", there's a little trick called 2534: 2301: 2238: 2031: 1619: 1584:

getting a good feel for the Wiki format and customs. Good luck in your continued work!

1562: 1514: 1334: 1319: 1309: 1086: 892: 888: 855: 458: 401: 2709: 2317: 2253:

What do you suggest? Thank you so much again for your kind attention to this matter.

2207: 2198:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2092: 1833: 1798: 1670: 1652: 1247: 1238:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1019: 639: 598: 417: 299: 290:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

219: 102: 2369: 2338: 1948: 1498: 1300: 1180: 1153: 1081:

Here's my main recommendations: instead of just listing references, turn them into

865: 718: 679: 879:

Hello Jakob, glad that worked out! If you want to make sure that people searching

2842: 2828: 2683: 1093:. I don't know enough about the film world to judge which of your references are 992: 2745:

of this composition in the first place. You have a lot of footnotes, but almost

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2150: 2107: 1862: 1861:

IMO, the article was a much better condition last year. Shorter but better! --

1767: 1763: 1502: 1494: 1401: 1388: 1363: 949: 667: 3102:

editors to see if they though the two should remain separate or should merge.

2927: 2618: 2380: 2250:

getting the news out about Fratneral Benefit Societies as they exist today.

1936: 1330: 1315: 1028: 3060:

Are we supposed to decline submissions that already exist only as redirect?

2524:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Edith Jeanette Soterius von Sachsenheim

2477:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Edith Jeanette Soterius von Sachsenheim

784: 2203: 2199: 2088: 1895:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/News_in_Levels

1723: 1695: 1539: 1506: 1243: 1239: 1168: 1015: 884: 861: 695: 634: 593: 413: 295: 291: 2613:

Thank you for your attention to and help with the massive mess created by

891:

from that title to the section of the larger article. You can either read

434:

Thank you for taking the time to evaluate my submission for an article on

1377: 1296: 1149: 1037:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Doina_(film)

1759:

These articles (or multiple sections of these articles) need rewriting).

488:

research like scholars and journalists, but for an encyclopedia we need

1257:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Kurn Hattin Homes for Children (2)

988: 258: 813: 2169: 2084: 1490: 1392: 1164: 945: 670:

the reason being placing Allah template is that the whole concept of

3098:

kosher), I have no objections, but then we'd have to check with the

2437:

Thanks But don't delete so many. some parts be retained in this.

1486:

Matthew, thanks for all your help, and I wish you a pleasant break.

382:

for some aesthetic reason by the author/publisher. Hope this helps!

1851:

files) in the article and those files have worstly positioned (see

1213: 789: 556: 267: 234: 1209: 1144:

I don't see how this film is notable, but you might could ask at

671: 2030:

should probably stay, to address your concern the best was is a

3040:

User talk:MatthewVanitas/Archive_17#Fraternal_Benefit_Societies

2766:

from the media or academia. Does that help clear up the issue?

2265:

Hello Nina! My best recommendation is to bring up the topic at

2014:

of the article is pretty fixed. Generally speaking, people are

1423: 1171:

films, but for what it is and where it was made, it is getting

282: 2788:

Hi there Mathew, how do I see what was wrong with my article?

1766:

which I suggested(and you thanked for the suggestion too)? --

313: 1893:

Hello could you please review the article again? Thank you.

675: 3001:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2365:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1482:

Question: WP:OR relating to reference in Neohumanism article

492:

information like newspaper articles, mentions in books, etc.

145:

Barrack Point and Barrack Heights are two different suburbs.

1978:

Thank you regarding the George Willoughby (soldier) article

1762:

Reply here. I am watching this page! BTW, have you gone to

1067:

Removed excess spaces that were showing gaps in the article

967:

the Scout Movement. Any suggestions will be appreciated.

2697:

minimum of reference to outside topics just for context.

2287: 1290:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Chris van Ouwerkerk

2741:

Looking at it further, you still need to establish the

2221:

Matthew--a great name, also my 11-year-old son's name!

2172:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1212:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 409:

I moved the Logicworks article, hope this was correct.

2834:

area I cover? Forever. 15:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

3006:

Matthew--how do I find your response to my questions?

2813:

Hello Marcelle, which article are you referring to?

1064:

Added the "official" template for the film's website

942:

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Architecturemps

840:

clearly with other editors, and you should be good.

814:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User:LydiaRDoyle1992/sandbox

2569:information as it's her mother, so my grandmother! 2022:, and if their name is shared with other people, a 1350:

Earth Journalism Network | Request review at WP:AFC

427:

The tricky art of establishing subject's notability

917:creating good well sourced content. All the best, 674:revolves around the fact that there is no god but 2990:Hello, MatthewVanitas. You have new messages at 2350:Hello, MatthewVanitas. You have new messages at 3039: 1387:. I didn't really read the article - a touch of 2164:Disambiguation link notification for November 8 1204:Disambiguation link notification for October 30 196:Disambiguation link notification for October 23 2010:So far as the next part of your question, the 1742:I am not satisfied with references there. See 2034:. For example, you could create the new page 2018:filed by title, but are referred to by their 1424:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Johnalex001 962:Clear Andreas Georgiou Thomas for publication 583:Hi, thanks for your note about my helping on 358:Thanks for the appreciation! A few comments: 2106:Thanks for moving to appropriate section;)-- 1542:it may clear up the issue. Hope this helps! 444:adequately evidence the subject's notability 1939:. This issue has been discussed already at 2538:topics near and dear to your own emotions. 1941:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mahazamili 860:Thanks Matthew! I checked under your link 1175:coverage and commentary to be considered 881:Clue Junior: The Case of the Missing Cake 1646:Deleting of Photo on P.R. Sarkar article 1385:User_talk:MrNiceGuy1113#Usurping_a_link 162:Hopefully that clears everything up :) 14: 2533:Fundamentally, you need to bone up on 1126:let me know and thanks for the imputs 739:No worries, thanks for communicating! 666:i have seen your recent revert of the 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1945:National Islamic Front of Afghanistan 1933:National Islamic Front of Afghanistan 1924:National Islamic Front of Afghanistan 800:Y_otter 08:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 2911:Merging "Classes in SWTOR with SWTOR 1889:Articles for creation/News in Levels 1454:build their playlist that way too. 25: 2676:written by him. Please reconsider. 129:Thanks again for your new article. 23: 2983: 2723:. Good luck and nice work so far! 2343: 797:many cross references and links? 788: 579:about helping on RFC, and an issue 312: 109:Temple of Peace (Toowong Cemetery) 24: 3159: 107:Hi Matthew, thanks for approving 3062:The submission that you declined 2950:Talk:Star Wars: The Old Republic 2868:break from that is look at what 2391:Saraiki Language And Saraikistan 1744:Prabhat_Ranjan_Sarkar#References 1322:) 16:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC) 521:Fundamentally, if we don't have 29: 1362:) 04:42, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 2764:coverage of this specific work 1931:I see you recently redirected 809:Hey I am a first time editor, 13: 1: 3142:03:02, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 3112:01:29, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 3085:23:43, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 3052:21:41, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 3031:21:35, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2979:20:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2962:17:39, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2940:17:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2903:16:06, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2823:15:23, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2807:11:37, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2776:01:54, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2733:01:47, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2688:01:27, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2662:18:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 2647:12:10, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 2602:19:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 2562:05:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 2506:01:34, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 2470:08:19, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 2453:08:17, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 2432:08:12, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 2411:08:09, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 2386:01:13, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 2359:01:13, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 2333:01:12, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 1855:section of Sarkar's article). 2721:Knowledge:Teahouse/Questions 2280:18:03, 8 November 2012 (UTC) 2267:Knowledge:Teahouse/Questions 2243:17:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC) 2212:11:19, 8 November 2012 (UTC) 2159:16:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 2139:12:09, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 2116:19:29, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 2097:16:47, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 2075:16:55, 8 November 2012 (UTC) 2060:02:56, 8 November 2012 (UTC) 2036:Lieutenant George Willoughby 1999:12:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 1972:15:52, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 1957:15:18, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 1917:04:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 1871:01:16, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 1842:23:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 1807:23:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 1776:22:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 1713:21:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 1701:Knowledge:Teahouse/Questions 1679:19:42, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 1661:19:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 1632:00:01, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 1594:21:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 1571:21:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 1552:21:39, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 1523:17:16, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 1475:19:44, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 1449:Lulubelle III entry question 1441:15:33, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 1411:07:46, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 1372:04:44, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 1343:16:40, 31 October 2012 (UTC) 1305:14:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC) 1282:18:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 1252:11:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 1196:21:21, 4 November 2012 (UTC) 1158:14:58, 31 October 2012 (UTC) 1139:17:59, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 1116:15:32, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 1053:09:48, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 1024:16:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 997:10:37, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 977:09:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 954:03:44, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 937:Check for copyright problems 929:23:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 906:04:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 874:15:57, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 850:04:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 829:14:00, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 779:05:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 749:15:21, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 727:15:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 708:15:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 688:14:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 650:01:10, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 624:00:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 609:22:15, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 574:19:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 539:22:44, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 471:17:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 422:10:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 392:23:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 332:05:22, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 304:09:26, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 189:09:21, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 139:03:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 7: 2578:Ok onwards nice and slowly 2522:I assume this is regarding 2217:Fraternal Benefit Societies 2028:George Willoughby (soldier) 1383:You might be interested in 10: 3164: 2917:Star Wars The Old Republic 1846:In these two articles and 1721: 1497:, perhaps an extension of 2050:, etc). Hope this helps! 1735:Both these articles in a 1146:User talk:MichaelQSchmidt 658:Recent revert to my edit. 547:iDMAa Notability Question 281:added a link pointing to 257:added a link pointing to 233:added a link pointing to 2513:Greetings, a few points: 2174:Ministry of Home Affairs 2121:The Society Page Sources 450:Many Thanks Steve Kerr 18:User talk:MatthewVanitas 2417:Saraiki people have no 2352:I Jethrobot's talk page 1989:Many thanks Katzeaugen 244:Ashraf Jahangir Semnani 149:Hi Matthew, regarding, 3128:OK, that makes sense. 2988: 2755:WP:Independent sources 2668:Te Deum, Zoltán Kodály 2544:WP:WikiProject Romania 2348: 2038:and then save it with 793: 585:Granville Fuller House 523:independent, published 317: 2992:LPBrennan's talk page 2987: 2749:of them are actually 2581:Thanks Dylan White 2347: 2048:Lieutenant Willoughby 1416:Walkodile - Thank you 792: 316: 309:A kitten for you! (2) 42:of past discussions. 2200:opt-out instructions 2089:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 2080:"Non notable person" 2042:the following code: 1928:Hi MatthewVanitas, 1531:WP:Original research 1240:opt-out instructions 1181:Italian and Romanian 482:WP:Original research 292:opt-out instructions 202:disambiguation pages 3100:Mutual organization 3069:Mutual organization 3042:. Hope this helps! 2182:fix with Dab solver 1848:Subhas Chandra Bose 1222:fix with Dab solver 1177:just notable enough 1095:WP:Reliable sources 436:Joanna Louise Baker 345:Marianna Yarovskaya 276:fix with Dab solver 252:fix with Dab solver 228:fix with Dab solver 165:Cheers, Nikachu88 2999:remove this notice 2989: 2791:Regards Marcelle 2363:remove this notice 2349: 2190:• Join us at the 2144:A hearty Thank You 1505:and more recently 1230:• Join us at the 912:Football rivalries 887:, we can create a 885:Cluedo#Other_Games 862:Cluedo#Other_Games 794: 490:existing published 318: 210:• Join us at the 3067:as a redirect to 3034: 3017:comment added by 2943: 2926:comment added by 2855: 2841:comment added by 2797:comment added by 2710:Knowledge:REFNAME 2605: 2588:comment added by 2509: 2492:comment added by 2443:comment added by 2401:comment added by 2384: 2314: 2300:comment added by 2195: 2102:Tricia McLaughlin 2024:WP:Disambiguation 1920: 1903:comment added by 1635: 1618:comment added by 1478: 1461:comment added by 1346: 1329:comment added by 1285: 1270:Charles Dickinson 1268:comment added by 1235: 969:Christos Evangeli 932: 785:A kitten for you! 474: 457:comment added by 347: 220:Abani Chakravarty 215: 192: 175:comment added by 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3155: 3033: 3011: 3002: 2968:Thanks for Offer 2942: 2920: 2854: 2835: 2809: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2604: 2582: 2508: 2486: 2455: 2413: 2378: 2374: 2366: 2331: 2313: 2294: 2185: 2178:check to confirm 2045: 1919: 1897: 1634: 1612: 1499:consequentialism 1477: 1455: 1408: 1399: 1345: 1323: 1284: 1262: 1225: 1218:check to confirm 1188: 927: 805:Draft in Sandbox 647: 642: 637: 606: 601: 596: 473: 451: 412:Jordan Glogau -- 342: 272:check to confirm 248:check to confirm 224:check to confirm 205: 191: 169: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3163: 3162: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3012: 3008: 3003: 2996: 2970: 2921: 2913: 2836: 2831: 2792: 2786: 2670: 2634: 2632: 2630: 2628: 2626: 2624: 2622: 2620: 2615:Historylover123 2611: 2583: 2487: 2481: 2438: 2396: 2393: 2370: 2367: 2356: 2341: 2326:Mephistophelian 2324: 2320: 2295: 2290: 2219: 2192:DPL WikiProject 2166: 2146: 2123: 2104: 2082: 2043: 1980: 1926: 1898: 1891: 1726: 1648: 1613: 1484: 1456: 1451: 1418: 1402: 1393: 1381: 1352: 1324: 1312: 1293: 1263: 1259: 1232:DPL WikiProject 1206: 1186: 1031: 1004: 984: 964: 939: 914: 858: 837:WP:Edit summary 821:LydiaRDoyle1992 807: 787: 764: 660: 645: 640: 635: 604: 599: 594: 581: 566:Timegiftartists 549: 452: 429: 404: 311: 212:DPL WikiProject 198: 170: 147: 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3161: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3130:The Anonymouse 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3104:MatthewVanitas 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3073:The Anonymouse 3065:already exists 3055: 3054: 3044:MatthewVanitas 3007: 3004: 2995: 2982: 2969: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2954:MatthewVanitas 2912: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2895:MatthewVanitas 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2862: 2861: 2830: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2815:MatthewVanitas 2785: 2784:Which article? 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2768:MatthewVanitas 2762:work, we need 2736: 2735: 2725:MatthewVanitas 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2698: 2669: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2654:MatthewVanitas 2610: 2607: 2567: 2565: 2564: 2554:MatthewVanitas 2549: 2548: 2539: 2531: 2527: 2520: 2515: 2514: 2480: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2462:MatthewVanitas 2445:182.186.90.154 2435: 2434: 2424:MatthewVanitas 2403:182.186.90.154 2392: 2389: 2357:Message added 2355: 2342: 2340: 2337: 2319: 2316: 2289: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2272:MatthewVanitas 2256:Best Regards, 2218: 2215: 2165: 2162: 2145: 2142: 2131:Mark.broadfoot 2122: 2119: 2103: 2100: 2081: 2078: 2063: 2062: 2052:MatthewVanitas 2020:WP:Common name 2007: 2006: 1979: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1964:MatthewVanitas 1925: 1922: 1890: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1859: 1856: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1760: 1757: 1754: 1750: 1747: 1740: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1705:MatthewVanitas 1647: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1586:MatthewVanitas 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1555: 1554: 1544:MatthewVanitas 1503:Jeremy Bentham 1495:utilitarianism 1493:philosophy of 1483: 1480: 1450: 1447: 1445: 1417: 1414: 1380: 1375: 1356:76.105.249.191 1351: 1348: 1311: 1308: 1292: 1287: 1258: 1255: 1205: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1108:MatthewVanitas 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1065: 1030: 1027: 1012:Jordan Glogau 1003: 1000: 983: 982:Waterbeach F.C 980: 963: 960: 958: 938: 935: 933: 913: 910: 909: 908: 898:MatthewVanitas 857: 854: 853: 852: 842:MatthewVanitas 806: 803: 801: 786: 783: 763: 760: 758: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 741:MatthewVanitas 732: 731: 730: 729: 711: 710: 700:MatthewVanitas 668:Template:Allah 659: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 627: 626: 616:MatthewVanitas 580: 577: 548: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 531:MatthewVanitas 516: 515: 514: 513: 506: 505: 504: 503: 496: 495: 494: 493: 428: 425: 403: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 384:MatthewVanitas 367: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 334: 310: 307: 288: 287: 286: 285: 264: 263: 262: 261: 240: 239: 238: 237: 197: 194: 146: 143: 142: 141: 131:MatthewVanitas 126: 125: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3160: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3063: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3000: 2993: 2986: 2981: 2980: 2976: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2918: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2871: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2799:196.2.126.176 2796: 2789: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2743:WP:Notability 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2717: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2694: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2675: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2645: 2644: 2616: 2606: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2579: 2576: 2573: 2570: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2550: 2545: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2516: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2485: 2478: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2420: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2388: 2387: 2382: 2379:(note: not a 2377: 2375: 2373: 2364: 2360: 2353: 2346: 2336: 2334: 2330: 2327: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2302:QuickFireSnyp 2299: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2268: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2257: 2254: 2251: 2247: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2214: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2196: 2193: 2189: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2161: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2141: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2127: 2118: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2099: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2077: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2012:primary title 2009: 2008: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1987: 1983: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1937:Mahaz-e Milli 1934: 1929: 1921: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1896: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1857: 1854: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1758: 1755: 1751: 1748: 1745: 1741: 1738: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1725: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1697: 1691: 1686: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1620:Abhidevananda 1617: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1563:Abhidevananda 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1536: 1532: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1515:Abhidevananda 1511: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1487: 1479: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1429: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1413: 1412: 1409: 1407: 1406: 1400: 1398: 1397: 1390: 1386: 1379: 1374: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1347: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1321: 1317: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1291: 1286: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1236: 1233: 1229: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1197: 1194: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1127: 1124: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1069: 1066: 1063: 1062: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055:Evahenger Hu 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1010: 1007: 999: 998: 994: 990: 979: 978: 974: 970: 959: 956: 955: 951: 947: 943: 934: 930: 925: 924: 921: 907: 903: 899: 894: 890: 886: 882: 878: 877: 876: 875: 871: 867: 863: 851: 847: 843: 838: 833: 832: 831: 830: 826: 822: 817: 815: 810: 802: 798: 791: 782: 780: 776: 772: 767: 759: 750: 746: 742: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 728: 724: 720: 715: 714: 713: 712: 709: 705: 701: 697: 692: 691: 690: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 651: 648: 643: 638: 631: 630: 629: 628: 625: 621: 617: 613: 612: 611: 610: 607: 602: 597: 591: 586: 576: 575: 571: 567: 563: 560: 558: 552: 540: 536: 532: 528: 527:WP:Notability 524: 520: 519: 518: 517: 510: 509: 508: 507: 500: 499: 498: 497: 491: 487: 483: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 472: 468: 464: 460: 459:Hendon Runner 456: 448: 445: 439: 437: 432: 424: 423: 419: 415: 410: 407: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 368: 365: 364:WP:Verifiable 360: 359: 357: 356: 355: 354: 346: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 333: 329: 325: 321: 315: 306: 305: 301: 297: 293: 284: 280: 279: 277: 273: 269: 266: 265: 260: 256: 255: 253: 249: 245: 242: 241: 236: 232: 231: 229: 225: 221: 218: 217: 216: 213: 209: 203: 193: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 166: 163: 160: 159: 153: 152: 140: 136: 132: 128: 127: 123: 118: 117: 116: 112: 110: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3013:— Preceding 3009: 2971: 2922:— Preceding 2915:The article 2914: 2890: 2887:encyclopedic 2886: 2882: 2869: 2837:— Preceding 2832: 2793:— Preceding 2790: 2787: 2763: 2759: 2750: 2746: 2705: 2701: 2678: 2673: 2671: 2619: 2612: 2584:— Preceding 2580: 2577: 2574: 2571: 2566: 2488:— Preceding 2484: 2482: 2439:— Preceding 2436: 2419:WP:Ownership 2397:— Preceding 2394: 2372:I, Jethrobot 2371: 2368: 2321: 2296:— Preceding 2291: 2258: 2255: 2252: 2248: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2220: 2197: 2167: 2147: 2128: 2124: 2105: 2083: 2064: 2039: 2015: 2011: 1988: 1984: 1982:Hi Matthew, 1981: 1930: 1927: 1905:Libor.skodik 1899:— Preceding 1892: 1852: 1834:Cornelius383 1799:Cornelius383 1736: 1724:Ananda Marga 1696:namedropping 1694: 1689: 1684: 1671:Cornelius383 1653:Cornelius383 1649: 1614:— Preceding 1534: 1512: 1507:Peter Singer 1488: 1485: 1463:Musicfan1812 1457:— Preceding 1452: 1444: 1430: 1427: 1422: 1419: 1404: 1403: 1395: 1394: 1382: 1353: 1325:— Preceding 1313: 1294: 1264:— Preceding 1260: 1237: 1207: 1191: 1184: 1176: 1172: 1169:Harry Potter 1131:Evahenger hu 1128: 1125: 1122: 1091:WP:Citations 1083:WP:Footnotes 1045:Evahenger hu 1043: 1040: 1035: 1032: 1014: 1011: 1008: 1005: 985: 965: 957: 940: 918: 915: 859: 818: 811: 808: 799: 795: 768: 765: 757: 696:God in Islam 661: 582: 564: 561: 553: 550: 522: 489: 485: 453:— Preceding 449: 443: 440: 433: 430: 411: 408: 405: 379: 378:rather than 375: 371: 322: 319: 289: 199: 171:— Preceding 167: 164: 161: 154: 148: 121: 113: 106: 78: 43: 37: 2590:Dylan White 2535:WP:Sourcing 2494:Dylan White 2044:#REDIRECT ] 2032:WP:Redirect 1949:Raoulduke47 1947:instead? -- 1535:established 1433:Johnalex001 1378:Neohumanism 1173:just enough 1087:WP:Link rot 893:WP:Redirect 889:WP:Redirect 866:B. Jakob T. 762:Improvement 719:Ibrahim ebi 680:Ibrahim ebi 431:Hi Matthew 36:This is an 2843:AsataReign 2609:Thank you! 2361:. You can 2259:Nina Lill 2202:. Thanks, 2067:Katzeaugen 1991:Katzeaugen 1863:Tito Dutta 1797:it.Tanks-- 1768:Tito Dutta 1722:See also: 1310:Thank you! 1242:. Thanks, 1002:Logicworks 923:Farmbrough 883:arrive at 856:References 819:Thank you 633:you do. -- 512:difficult. 402:Logicworks 372:explicitly 343:Regarding 324:Y marianna 294:. Thanks, 259:Jamaluddin 95:Archive 20 90:Archive 19 85:Archive 18 79:Archive 17 73:Archive 16 68:Archive 15 60:Archive 10 2702:dependent 2422:removed. 2329:(contact) 2318:Archiving 2186:Read the 2170:Honnavile 2151:CHHistory 2108:Aichikawa 2085:Max Bruch 1737:very poor 1491:normative 1364:Hochungra 1226:Read the 1165:Star Wars 771:Zbenguiel 206:Read the 177:Nikachu88 103:Thank you 3138:contribs 3081:contribs 3027:contribs 3019:Ninalill 3015:unsigned 2997:You can 2936:contribs 2928:Isaac149 2924:unsigned 2891:majority 2851:contribs 2839:unsigned 2795:unsigned 2760:specific 2674:Te Deum, 2598:contribs 2586:unsigned 2547:subject. 2519:caution. 2502:contribs 2490:unsigned 2441:unsigned 2399:unsigned 2339:Talkback 2310:contribs 2298:unsigned 2235:Ninalill 2129:Thanks, 1913:contribs 1901:unsigned 1628:contribs 1616:unsigned 1471:contribs 1459:unsigned 1428:Cheers! 1339:contribs 1331:Filtrate 1327:unsigned 1316:Filtrate 1278:contribs 1266:unsigned 1214:Famous 5 1187:Schmidt, 1016:Jordan G 557:Siggraph 467:contribs 455:unsigned 414:Jordan G 374:entitle 268:Pir Baba 235:Assamese 185:contribs 173:unsigned 2829:Terasem 2288:Delete! 2204:DPL bot 1853:Sadhana 1764:WP:GOCE 1389:WP:TLDR 1244:DPL bot 1210:Jivdhan 1041:Thanks 672:Shahada 664:Matthew 590:wt:NRHP 562:Thanks 486:primary 380:The Dog 376:THE DOG 296:DPL bot 39:archive 1431:John. 1297:Drmies 1150:Drmies 1129:Best, 283:Chilla 2751:about 2680:Lwhit 1753:back. 1540:WP:OR 1029:Doina 989:NtheP 676:Allah 122:their 16:< 3134:talk 3108:talk 3077:talk 3048:talk 3023:talk 2975:talk 2958:talk 2948:the 2932:talk 2899:talk 2847:talk 2819:talk 2803:talk 2772:talk 2747:none 2729:talk 2684:talk 2658:talk 2594:talk 2558:talk 2498:talk 2466:talk 2449:talk 2428:talk 2407:talk 2306:talk 2276:talk 2239:talk 2208:talk 2155:talk 2135:talk 2112:talk 2093:talk 2071:talk 2056:talk 2040:just 1995:talk 1968:talk 1953:talk 1909:talk 1867:talk 1838:talk 1803:talk 1772:talk 1709:talk 1690:have 1685:with 1675:talk 1657:talk 1624:talk 1590:talk 1567:talk 1548:talk 1519:talk 1467:talk 1437:talk 1368:talk 1360:talk 1335:talk 1320:talk 1301:talk 1274:talk 1248:talk 1154:talk 1135:talk 1112:talk 1049:talk 1020:talk 1006:Hi: 993:talk 973:talk 950:talk 946:Gigs 920:Rich 902:talk 870:talk 846:talk 825:talk 775:talk 745:talk 723:talk 704:talk 684:talk 620:talk 570:talk 551:Hi, 535:talk 463:talk 418:talk 406:Hi: 388:talk 328:talk 300:talk 181:talk 135:talk 2883:for 2870:non 2706:new 2381:bot 2188:FAQ 2016:not 1935:to 1396:Pam 1228:FAQ 1167:or 662:Hi, 641:ncr 600:ncr 208:FAQ 3140:) 3136:• 3110:) 3083:) 3079:• 3050:) 3029:) 3025:• 2977:) 2960:) 2938:) 2934:• 2901:) 2853:) 2849:• 2821:) 2805:) 2774:) 2731:) 2686:) 2660:) 2600:) 2596:• 2560:) 2504:) 2500:• 2468:) 2451:) 2430:) 2409:) 2383:!) 2335:. 2312:) 2308:• 2278:) 2241:) 2210:) 2180:| 2157:) 2137:) 2114:) 2095:) 2073:) 2058:) 1997:) 1970:) 1955:) 1915:) 1911:• 1869:) 1840:) 1805:) 1774:) 1711:) 1677:) 1669:-- 1659:) 1630:) 1626:• 1592:) 1569:) 1550:) 1521:) 1513:-- 1473:) 1469:• 1439:) 1370:) 1341:) 1337:• 1303:) 1280:) 1276:• 1250:) 1220:| 1156:) 1148:. 1137:) 1114:) 1051:) 1022:) 995:) 975:) 952:) 926:, 904:) 872:) 848:) 827:) 781:) 777:) 747:) 725:) 706:) 686:) 646:am 636:do 622:) 605:am 595:do 572:) 537:) 469:) 465:• 438:. 420:) 390:) 330:) 302:) 278:) 274:| 254:) 250:| 230:) 226:| 187:) 183:• 137:) 111:. 64:← 3132:( 3106:( 3075:( 3046:( 3021:( 2994:. 2956:( 2930:( 2897:( 2845:( 2817:( 2801:( 2770:( 2727:( 2682:( 2656:( 2635:d 2633:e 2631:g 2629:e 2627:i 2625:s 2623:e 2621:b 2592:( 2556:( 2496:( 2479:= 2464:( 2447:( 2426:( 2405:( 2354:. 2304:( 2274:( 2237:( 2206:( 2194:. 2176:( 2153:( 2133:( 2110:( 2091:( 2069:( 2054:( 1993:( 1966:( 1951:( 1907:( 1865:( 1836:( 1801:( 1770:( 1707:( 1673:( 1655:( 1622:( 1588:( 1565:( 1546:( 1517:( 1465:( 1435:( 1405:D 1366:( 1358:( 1333:( 1318:( 1299:( 1272:( 1246:( 1234:. 1216:( 1152:( 1133:( 1110:( 1047:( 1018:( 991:( 971:( 948:( 931:. 900:( 868:( 844:( 823:( 773:( 769:( 743:( 721:( 702:( 682:( 618:( 568:( 533:( 461:( 416:( 386:( 366:. 326:( 298:( 270:( 246:( 222:( 214:. 179:( 133:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index