User talk:MatthewVanitas/Archive 22

2927:

the british "twig" site, Alma of the american "connections" site and Chris a current historian and Pomeroy family DNA researcher( lecture /speach on uk national archives regarding dna studies via podcast .Chris Pomroy is his correct spelling but he uses both). So many Pomeroys need articles as you would see on both those sites that its incredible the one that immediately that comes to mind today which would be Eltweed Pomeroy not only grandfather to almost half the current population of usa pom's but father to USA town hall meetings.. I wish I could get into writing or recruit other family members to contribute here but they obviously are very busy with their own family sites or just life in general. another pom not on here discovered or was first to see a certain metalurgic occurence at the university of BC that also should be on. Honestly so many in our family should have a wiki article and linked under the pomeroy banner is quite amazing and something I will never truly believe many are modern, many old, one buried in Westminster Abbey isnt on here yet thats quite an honor from what i hear . I would encourage you as a writer simply to read the first 20 pages of the Book by AA Pom and or do a google search with pomeroy and a keyword, thats how i originally found my lineage was my surname with berry , which led to the castle and onward until I questioned those mentioned above and shared emails and lineages and documents because it was really surprising as i thought there were very very few of us.. cheers again and thanks hopefully you'll become interested enough to take on a few hours of time to which i can assure you will be as entertaining as the older stories and history from Britain and Ireland are awesome , i do guess it depends on your interests and where your from but i would think most have never heard the name despite its truly amazing 950 (soon1000 year old name, their is a family gathering for that anniversary in a few years . and hey if your ever want to give to a church... im not religious but i got the 88 year old vicar to put paypal on his website for the friends of berry pomeroy church built around 1490 and in Jane Austens movie.. but as a wiki user if you know other writers as i say the first 20 pages of AA Poms 100+ year old book available free on googlebooks and brings up 1000 year old stories to mind like romeo and juliet or robin hood type stories, its very very cool and all other users reading this, take interest for entertainment and write an article on a Pom for pleasure. the sites listed on the article are the most recent and their creators would probably be very helpful and help with citations , i would love to add more articles on my immediate family members such as an original world wide wrestler who was known as the mad russian or my cousin david the opera singer.. its hard to write about stuff close to you without bias but i believe whats written now is correct and confirmable without much problems.. cheers!

1743:

I can get it to work, but then don't know exactly what it is I do that's correct. Closing down my PC & rebooting sometimes helps. Beats me. I log in. Hit the contribution button, then the current version, which is in read mode. I then hit the edit button which pulls up the edit box. I then try to use the cite dropdown template box in the edit zone, hit the line I want & nothing happens. It is on this simple function I have wasted 11 hrs thus far. What am I doing wrong please? And while I've got you, I uploaded the picture (File:Penguin General Cemetery, Penguin, Tasmania, Australia.jpg) & have successfully got it to my page, though perhaps not in the correct place. But I GOT it there (Ya!). I need to link my article to one already on Wiki (File: Penguin, Tasmania) but have not been successful in doing this.Finally, I can add a few current websites for verification, hoping this will be straight forward. Then I reckon I should be ready to re-resubmit. Thanks for everything Matthew. Baruinga

2756:

somehow? I did successfully upload the existing image (but into the wrong part of my page (Penguin General Cemetery), which was corrected for me. Also what about image quality please? Re the citations, I'm assuming that in the edit screen I simply add to the existing reference sequence the insertion I want. These are mainly URLs, with one new reference for which I'm hoping the template will work but if not I can sequence the information anyway (I think). A final question. The current page is asking for a citation re convict burials. There is no information whatsoever on this claim apart from one of the images I'll be uploading - a recently erected monument, by descendants, which clearly states the late 1800s burial had been a 'guest of the crown' (convict). Thanks again.

320:, so there's no rush. We're not going to publish a piece that's not ready just because someone is in a hurry. There's no need at all to delay getting married an having a family over an article (?!?!?!?), but if you want to just spend a few minutes a week on it you could get it cleaned up pretty easily. If you think it'll be more than a month before you get back to it, let me know and I can have it moved to your Sandbox for safe-keeping, and you can Submit it whenever you have it ready. No hurries, but we want to make sure the article is done properly so we're being fair to Chen and not doing an improper article. 1889:

a guide, but this has failed. Sourcing in footnotes, sourcing at the same level as these other pages--none of it has allowed pages such as Lawn and Garden Retailer to be published. If I can't learn how to do a Knowledge article correctly from these and from my own attempts to publish, as well as two help desk requests, is it possible that I'm never going to "learn"? Or do I just need to wait for a Knowledge editor to come along who deems my article appropriate, or for there to be a day when you're running on a standard that allows my article to be published?

2154:

cited? (Not that I want to quit, I'd really like to see the entry succeed.) I've cited primary sources $ secondary sources about the primary, all directly verifiable, though not all have a direct weblink. I cannot think of any overarching tertiary confirmatory source I can cite. Or is it that I need to provide more information in just some of the references already cited rather than provided more references, which is quite a different issue & likely easily redressed? Any suggestions please Matthew? I really do appreciate your kind mentoring.Baruinga

1052: 31: 2057:(the policy) more that literally "is a person who may be worth noting". What we need to see is evidence that others have found him worth writing about (journalists, academics, etc). If he preaches at the 2d biggest US church, presumably newspapers or magazines have discussed his filling that role? You can cite very non-contentious things to a bio of him on a publisher's or church's website, but anything about his accomplishements, impacts, etc. has to be from an outside, neutral source. 2829: 815: 2203: 1082: 1779: 1373: 1316: 1259: 488:

directly after an Album or Movie, etc. is released, Knowledge seems to have an article about that item a few days later. I would like to know how the user or creator of the article retrieves enough information on the internet despite the fact that the item being described has JUST been released... and Knowledge accepts it ? If you do not exactly know, then it is completely fine. Thanks

1696:

Not sure why. I can use a latter reference in its place, but the one cited is the original. & I don't know how to remove the sentence & word you have lined through. I've tried. Without your hands-on help, I'd have eventually given up on the submission. It's like landing in a foreign country where I don't speak the language. So thanks heaps. Baruinga

279:, and while talking to someone is a vital skill for a reporter or historian, it is not what is used in an encyclopedia. If you know something because Chen told you so, but it's not written down anywhere in a newspaper article or political science book, then it can't be in the article. If the fact appears in a newspaper article next month, 1675:, such as that a reader could theoretically go to a Michigan library and look this up on the old microfiche. Hit the "Cite" button at the top of your edit window, and fill in all the needed details for your source for a given sentence/paragraph, and it will create an automatic footnote for you. I'll go leave you an example just for show. 595:

Caucus". It might actually be best that you keep mention of AC in your username so that you're being transparent about your involvement. If there's more than one of you, you each need a separate nickname account, since account sharing is prohibited (thus the rule against having a "group" name). The page to request a name-change is here:

1720:

or dramatic, but it is pretty concise and clear, so it's a certain style. Nice work so far, ping my Talk if you hit any snags. And yes, pictures would be a very great addition, especially if you have ones you personally took that you can upload to Wikimedia Commons as "Creative Commons" so the whole world can use them.

2926:

Thanks Matthew for your input on the Pomeroy surname page and your additions to it. I am the original writer of the article and a Pomeroy family member. I did have to change a few of your additions to make them more current with the tremendous ongoing work by several family members including Annie of

2755:

Hello Matthew. (I am assuming that contacting you here is what is called pinging you.) I'm going to modify some of the references in my recently uploaded (novice) page. And upload two more images. Two questions re the latter. Will they end up in the correct place on the page or do I abracadabra them

2181:

I've just been in to my page to try yet again with my contribution, to find, on trying to save my changes, that mine were in conflict with anothers. But before jumping out my window in frustration (ground floor thankfully) I googled the PGC. And Bingo, there it was, in Knowledge. Simply saying thanks

2125:

Yea, this helps a ton! I found all everything I needed to through journals, newspapers, and professional book reviews in journals. I had thought for a moment that I was indeed summarizing his thoughts alone, but as you said I ended up finding these summations already present within reviews, thanks so

507:

Hi Matthew, Thank you for the prompt response. The Armenian Assembly of America (AAA) was established in 1972 and is a 501(c)(3) organization. We are a primary source for news and information regarding the Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues (Armenian Caucus), as we led the organizational efforts

439:

I've created 50 articles, so I'll be fine with categories. The only reason I asked a Teahouse question about the notability was because it was a 26-line poem recited by the least-famous American presidential assassin right before his execution, so I wasn't sure if it could be AfD'ed. As for pictures,

335:

OK I wont postpone my wedding and having kids. I added the format with the publication or news source; and the date--so people can see that everything is backed either by a government ministry, a newspaper article, a financial paper, or one of our tv networks. I think it is clear now. I prefer not to

303:

Ok since we live in Israel mostly the information is from Hebrew news articles and websites. I added six references from the media and a publication to back these facts. Please accept it I have to move on with my life. I have to move on I have been working on this for so long. Please please please. I

1888:

We've got multiple publications online (other than The Diapason and Imaging News Technology--I'm pretty sure you guys published the latter). These are about as notable as the ones I'm trying to get online and are not sourced in a more extensive way. I have been trying to use other Knowledge pages as

1884:

As for notability, I guess I could say that our publications largely command the largest market share in their respective industries, but that's based on our own data, which you wouldn't trust, and by reports from marketing firms that I can't disclose to a site like Knowledge. There's only so much I

1742:

More thanks Matthew. (& glad something happened which you too don't understand - makes me feel better!). Since you're the only person getting back to me with detail & any sense, I need more help please. I cannot add references into my edit box using templates. Sometimes, after hrs of trying,

1719:

formatting, were some off-Tone bits that were more flowery than encyclopedic, and I also marked a few too-twee bits like "guests of the Crown" or whatnot (aside from being cutesy, as a non-Australian I'm not even sure what that means, prisoners?). So yeah, encyclopedic writing isn't particularly fun

1154:

Hi Matthew - You just approved the Leo Sarkisian page for me. I realized that there are two very different Leo Sarkisians (one who was an advocate for Armenian Americans and one who did the Voice of America shows in Africa). The former is the one I wish to create a page for, though they both deserve

1005:

It does not yet need to have the name changed; there is currently no other article called "Calcis" on Knowledge, and thus no need to distinguish this article from another of similar title (yet). It's a good start in that you have the formatting and coding down very well, but now a good step would be

1000:

Thanks for approving my article on Calcis! This was my first article I've created, and I forgot an important part. The article doesn't need to be named "Calcis." Instead, it should be named "Calcis, Alabama." I can't seem to find how to change that, so if you could help me out I'd greatly appreciate

594:

change your username. It's currently a violation since it represents an organisation rather than an individual. You either need to change it to a nickname of your choice, or you can even mention the AC but have it be a specific person: "User:Ricky from Armenian Caucus" or "User:Raidersfan47 Armenian

283:

we can add it, with footnote to the newspaper article. In the same way, you cannot cite the Knowledge page in Hebrew, because it is a compilation of facts, not the original record. Now, if the WP Hebrew page states a fact and has a footnote to an article in Hebrew from a newspaper, you can certainly

2540:

The map titled above, which has been added on numerous ages is incorrect and biased towards pahstuns. This Map shows other languages as majority in districts where pashto is clearly a majroity. The said districts are Battagram, Toorghar, Tank, Shangla and Karak. Moroever, Districts such as Manserha

1947:

belongs to Artist rajasekharan. The contents will be same and were true. But now that blog having some paintings only. In the 'about me" page, only Guinness World record news was given. Kindly verify once again and redeem the Article creation/Artist Rajasekharan. Thank you once again for you advice

1713:

No worries; regarding the "crossed out" reference, I didn't intend to do that, and glancing at it I'm not seeing how that's happening. So don't fret that ref, it looks fine overall, and when we clean up the formatting we'll look to catch whatever misplaced bit of code is crossing that out. The only

1695:

Thanks Matthew for your very helpful comments & edits. I could never have worked out to do what you have done with the draft. I've redressed the 'tone' problem & shall shortly insert the references you've posted. I note you have a line through my first reference, which I repeat a few times.

414:

As it is it's great, but one of the things that would really perk it up would be any imagery. Do you know of any old printed depictions of his actually reciting the speech (not just the hanging itself)? Or is there any photo of the actual sheet of paper he used? If the paper exists it'd be great to

2974:

independent periodical articles or reviews." I would argue that Anthony Del Col's status as the co-creator of "Kill Shakespeare," a work that has been the subject of multiple articles and reviews (as I have demonstrated in the current article I'm attempting to create), could warrant him notability.

2973:

page. The article states that a Creative Professional might be considered notable if "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple

2066:

So far as citing his beliefs/works/statements: it's a bit of a fine line. Certainly there are points in many articles where we quote a writer's key statements, but what you want to avoid is creating your own personal take on him. That is, if for example a guy is mostly famous for writing about the

1880:

I am sorry for tying up Knowledge editors, but I wouldn't have to if you guys weren't vague and inconsistent. You can tell me as many times as you like that my sources aren't reliable, but that doesn't help me when I've tried all sorts of sources--from scientific books to WorldCat entries. I don't

1234:

In any case, while I was taken aback by RadioFan's terse response to my inquiries, I appreciate you moving the article. With any luck, The New York Times will cover HogMaw soon, or the submission of articles from folk bands will be more welcome so their important contributions to music aren't lost

2088:

Keep as your key concept: an encyclopedia is a tertiary source, that is we take existing views on a topic and summarise them, but we don't create new ways of viewing things. So figure out what the general world perspective on this guy is, present that, and footnote it in ways that we can say "why

2031:

Also, in the beliefs section, those are summaries of his ideas by looking for his thesis's in his papers and books. I am a student at Princeton and I know that paraphrasing author's thesis themselves by citing the author, without citing independent source, is a kosher thing to do in the world of

1230:

RadioFan rejected the article on grounds of lack of notability. I wish I understood why a major regional radio station and two major regional online publications do not fulfill Knowledge's notability and verifiability requirements. As an author published in two academic journals in two fields, I

2153:

Another rejection Matthew. My frustration is that a 7-word feedback about not thoroughly reliable sources tells me nothing about what I should do. What is it exactly I have to do, or am doing wrong? Should I simply quit because any other references are very much of the same ilk as those already

487:

Thanks so much for that information. I was reading the instructions page on how to create an article, and it did mention that I needed to have have specific notability of FOCIS. I was not aware that Knowledge worked in the way that you described. I do however have one question: I noticed that

2961:

Anthony has produced feature films in Canada, including exec producer on the Nelly Furtado Loose Live Album CD. Anthony is also an accomplished film pitch consultant; He won the Telefilm Canada Pitch This contest in 2006 and 2010. Anthony also served as a coach for the contest in 2011 and

1876:

I am a paid employee of Scranton Gillette and I have disclosed that on my user page. However, though I may not be smart enough to publish articles successfully, I know better than to try and use Knowledge to advertise. The reason my pages are so bare is because I am trying to keep them

1010:

such as news articles, books of local/state history that mention Calcis, etc. Also if you live nearby one or two photos would be a good supplement; you can upload photos to Wikimedia Commons so that they can be shared across all Wikimedia projects. Good start, keep up the good work!

196:

Hello Elia, while it's good that you've added some links to newspaper articles, there are more steps needed. First off, your articles are just lumped at the bottom, with no indication of how those news articles support your Knowledge article, so what you want is to turn them into

2354:

from the subject of the article. Not: books or articles written by the subject (including interviews), articles paid for by the subject, press releases, a Q&A interview where virtually all of the information is just the subject or a spokesperson speaking for themselves.

1204:

Helow Mr Matthew Vanitas sir.. I tried a lot to do the reference footnotes for an article for creation/Artist Rajasekharan. I was not able to arrange in proper way. The serial numbers are not coming up properly.Kindly arrange me in proper way. Regards Rajasekharan

2687:

Just wanted to say thank you for all your help with the page for Dissimilar Metal Design. Your feedback is beyond helpful. Resubmitted the article based on all of your feedback (and followed it as closely as possible), and was wondering if it's been approved?

1169: 1661:

like conducting field interviews or digging up personal letters from archives, because an encyclopedia can only use "digested" materials that have already been cleaned up and researched by academics and journalists. If you're not sure what counts, check

1397: 1340: 1283: 2336:. Usually this means that the publisher has a reputation for fact checking and the text must be approved by an editor before it is printed. For example: books from reputable publishing houses, mainstream newspapers, or other periodicals. Not: 2024:

Thomas is a pretty well known guy with book sales way over a million--he has over 600,000 on just one of his books alone. He speaks at all kinds of Christian conferences. And he preaches at the 2nd biggest church in the United States.

336:

safe-keep it but have it reviewed and accepted so I can resume things I would do before editing on Knowledge, like studying and spending time with my family and writing. I think we're being fair to Chen. Thanks so much. Let me know

274:

Facts that you simply know personally are not admissible, because a reader has no way of verifying them. That's not to say that they're false, simply that they don't help a reader because he has no support for them. This is called

1868: 2789:

Dear Matthew, Thank you for the feedback and I will start the submission again, from scratch. Your comments are useful and helpful. I see you are on break through the month. I wish you much relaxation. Yours, Mary Beth McCabe

1197: 2948: 912:

article. I have been rewriting some of the problems you marked, but I can't find the reference where you say that Knowledge is used to reference itself. Can you point it out to me so that I can fix it? Thanks.

2067:

American Revolution, but also writes about birdwatching, and you like birdwatching so quote a lot of his works despite the fact that his AmRev works have caused great discussion and controversy, then that would be

214:

grouping of facts, you want a footnote. If you say he was born in X place and went to Y school, you want a footnote to some book or news piece which says this. The article shows you know many facts about Chen, but

2513: 620:

to convert the gBooks urls to proper footnotes. So if the article says (for example) "the Smith Foundation received a letter of praise from the Dalai Lama in 1983", there should be a footnote to some book like

533:

basic facts (year of establishment, 501(c)(3) status etc) but that's it. Basically about every other fact stated needs to be substantiated by some other source such as media, gov't documents, academic mention,

424:

Thanks for your great work; I first heard this song only a few years after the film came out (my uncle was huge into theater). Really well done, and I hope you'll continue to bring your talents to Knowledge.

419:

which show the cakewalk; if you can reach out to anyone who's taken photos of productions of the play and has a photo of that scene they're willing to release to the Public Domain, that'd be a neat addition.

369: 1834:

It might be because I moved it from Sandbox to AFC in order to template it properly? I'm not annoyed or anything, just wondering how the message came to me rather than the original writer. No huge deal.

1469:

Thank you for your comment regarding entry on Artist Ya'akov Boussidan. I am working on your comment to add footnotes and several other improvements and will get back to you once the entry is ready.

625:. J. Smith, Cambridge Press (1989)". Ideally you should use AC's own site only for basic facts, and as an "official site" link at the bottom. So I suggest you get digging into books and news articles. 2576:

You left a comment on my user page clarifying what i should do about my post I wrote about the company Ironshore. I am a Social Media Intern, how would you like me to make that transparent? Thanks

1901: 372:. Feel free to play around with anything you want, especially the thing about the flood, because I don't completely understand that part, but I desperately want to keep it because someone used it. 2959:

I appreciate you getting back to me with your comments on my Anthony Del Col article. I've researched some more information about Anthony, and I was wondering if it would grant him notable status:

1440:

did, by moving someone's userpage into mainspace. I then attempted to fix it, borked it, and had to enlist administrator help to correct my mistake. I believe the previous article was deleted. --

2028:

If I can back all of this information up with independent sources, and I should be able to, can I do it without having to change what I wrote that much? Or am I looking at a script makeover?

1214: 2991: 1881:

really know how much more reliable and non-biased you can get than a book published by Cornell about how to grow perennial plants. This is a verifiable source, unless I'm much mistaken.

246:

Hi. Thank you for your reply. I know the facts because he gave them to meee. I will add footnotes but will an existing wikipedia page in Hebrew help? I'll add the notes tonight! Thanks

1969:

of the blog. Nobody is saying the blog isn't true, they're saying (quite rightly) that you can't just copy-paste material from other websites into Knowledge. Does that make more sense?

1336: 304:

would never make up facts. Its all true. He is an Israeli journalist. Please help and publish this so I can move on with my life and get married and have a family and a house. Please

1461: 1279: 2322:

sources that discuss the topic directly and in detail. Not: passing mentions, directory listings, government records, or any old thing that happens to have the topic's name in it.

1943:

Dear sir. Unfortunately "Articles for creation/Artist Rajasekharan" was deleted from wikipedia. Kindly redeem that one. The reason they told about was not acceptable. The said blog

2501: 2511:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 1816:

I just rejected the page using the template, not sure why you got the message. I'll see if I can figure out what is going on. Perhaps you had warned or mentioned them before?

1393: 2964:

Of course, if this information would warrant Anthony as notable, I would re-structure it to better incorporate it with the rest of the information in the unpublished article.

1604: 1227:

I wrote my first new Knowledge article today, the one about folk music band HogMaw. You were kind enough to move it to "Articles for Creation". I just wanted to say "thanks".

228: 1632: 1618: 1481: 205:. Helena Times, 20 April 2013", so the reader knows that if he wants verification that Smith did 12 years in the army, he can just follow the link to an article that says so. 1892:

I'm as frustrated as all of the editors are with these articles. Try not to take this as a personal attack, it's just based on the experience I've had with you guys so far.

415:

add mention of what archive holds it. Alternately, whether for the main photo or just the Sondheim bit, I see on GoogleImages that there are some photos from productions of

1957: 1657:

It isn't required that articles exist on the Web, or that they be in English. What is required is that they be Reliable, Independent, Published sources. So we can't accept

1135:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

201:. Let's say you have a sentence that says "John Smith was in the US Army for 12 years before he ran for the Montana Congress", right after that you want a footnote saying " 1978: 471: 434: 1623:

MatthewVanitas, Hello...I have re-submited the article (I think!) dont want to do it again, so pls advise if I need to make more alterations or await confirmation...tks

2530: 329: 922: 395: 2942: 2938: 903: 356: 266: 188: 2507: 2187: 1164:

I almost wondered if that was the case; thinking back I should've checked that more carefully when I first started wondering. Tell you what, I'll take the current

1132: 1124: 1116: 1110: 857: 161: 1158:

Can you erase all the references to VoA and I'll start citing more about the Sarkisian that was an advocate for Armenians? Thank you and sorry for the confusion.

2875: 2191: 2135: 2107: 1671:

That said, newspapers are generally a good source, so if you have old news clippings that exist on paper but not online, that's fine. Just make sure you give a

2921: 2127: 2036: 641: 1519: 1045: 312:

it's fine to use Hebrew news articles and the like, in any language. The footnotes you've added look reasonable, though it'd be best to format them into full

3044: 2674: 1624: 1610: 509: 1599: 1571: 983: 955: 941: 798: 2996: 2950: 2590: 2561: 2008: 1473: 1065: 297: 240: 1684: 1515: 2699: 2549: 2227: 2176: 1729: 1487: 1144: 969: 822: 808: 686: 1858: 1844: 1567: 2836: 2822: 898: 2916: 2196: 2171: 663:

Does the fact that one of my major works has been cited 460 times qualify as evidence of thought leadership in the area of human resource development?

231:), and then hit "Resubmit" so we can review again. And feel free to write me on this Talk page if you get the article footnoted and ready for review. 1938: 1911:

Hey, thanks for all the help! I had a quick question about the locations tab, in the company info box. Why does it keep adding number of locations?

1437: 909: 681: 673: 2494: 2396: 1643: 1108: 162: 2044: 1768: 2771: 2757: 2428: 2163: 2155: 1931: 1825: 1760: 1752: 1744: 1697: 1247: 465: 389: 156: 132: 2622: 803: 718: 2817: 2810: 2535: 1020: 2779: 2765: 2618: 1642:

how do i find a source if there is nothing on the internet? i have people and old articles (newpaper)but those articles are not on the web.

1547: 2148: 1430: 1705: 714: 605:

for your new personal name, maybe add a little blurb at top saying "I work for (am a membe or, whatever) the Armenian Caucus, I have read

1986: 1026: 363: 1543: 405:

well done. One can nitpick anything, but I don't see any reason at all you shouldn't go ahead and publish. Are you familiar enough with

2646: 1651: 1456: 116: 3024: 2606: 1503: 1189: 702: 647: 102: 3014: 2079:

engendered great controversy, particularly Smith's statement that Acme had copied many of its designs from the Zapme corporation..."

746: 1737: 2642: 1100: 526:

The main thing: we definitely should have an article on this group, so let's state that clearly right out. So that's a good start.

2595:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

1492:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

1219: 691:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

497: 3010: 2711: 770: 742: 517: 3078: 2896: 1794: 1663: 929: 878: 3017:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 660:

Do you consider work like "consultant/advisor to NASA and 3M on their first leadership development programs" to be verifiable?

529:

No, having the AC write its own article about itself, citing itself, it 100% absolutely not going to work. We can cite AC for

3020: 2602: 2599:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2585: 2422: 1499: 1496:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1423: 1366: 1309: 698: 695:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 632:

Not to overwhelm you with data, but if this it to be done, it has to be done right. Feel free to ping me with any questions.

2976:

Please let me know your thoughts on the matters, and if there is anything further I can do to ensure the article's creation.

1810: 1035: 766: 2806: 1906: 2744: 2481: 1168:

article and I'll remove anything that's about the Armenian American activist, and I've put your draft back up for review:

2934: 2518: 2089:

yes, per these footnotes he is seen as having a great impact on XYZ, though the Foo faction disagrees with his method Y."

1953: 1210: 460: 384: 317: 224: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2750: 2736: 2707: 2557: 2183: 1155:

pages. But part of my assignment by my employer is to do the former because a lot of Armenians know nothing about him.

1028: 596: 2433: 2412: 2389: 2013: 1927: 1609:

Hi! thank you for pointing out...have made the changes...are there any more suggestions you can make? Thank you again

616:

of mentions of AC in academic books available on GoogleBooks. Hundreds of mentions. You can go into those books, use

117:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#Regarding_creating_region_wise_article

1690: 352: 262: 184: 2900: 2021:

In your review you said I basically needed to: 1. Prove his nobility and 2. Do that through independent sources.

882: 567: 563: 1949: 1428: 1206: 606: 542: 455: 379: 2440:

I could do some magic to make it appear more like this if it pleases you (it wouldn't affect the rendering of

652:

Hi, Matthew, I appreciate your feedback and understand the main points. It will help to know the following:

3001:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2784: 2231: 1966: 995: 1396:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1339:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1282:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

2210: 2202: 1123:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1995:. I have added more references to this article as it is valid book store which is the first book store of 2888: 2840: 2818: 2581: 1658: 1637: 1091:. That was the second article I ever edited, and between my edit and yours, no non-bot even touched it. 1058: 1051: 1041: 870: 826: 804: 508:

to establish the Armenian Caucus back in 1995. I hope this adequately addresses your concerns. Thank you.

276: 960:

I see that you have added an infobox. Do you think it's time to suggest that the submitter resubmit? —

2892: 2417: 2218: 2103: 1974: 1840: 1725: 1680: 1185: 1016: 979: 937: 874: 637: 448:

by Adam Selzer et al. of him singing the first verse, but I'm not sure if that image is public domain.

430: 325: 293: 236: 38: 284:

copy that footnote and add it and its facts to the article here. You may find it very helpful to read

3067: 2182:

just doesn't convey my gratitude Matthew. What I can do however is pay forward your kindness. Thanks.

2131: 2040: 1798: 1072: 309: 2802: 2596: 2004: 1628: 1614: 1493: 692: 513: 47: 17: 1198: 2071:

slant even though you are technically presenting his ideas. Probably a safe way to go is to note

1477: 285: 440:

that's not my thing, and I looked on Commons to find that there were no depictions of Guiteau's

2740: 2703: 2577: 2553: 1897: 1037: 657:

Do the awards, article, and book sections of my submission meet the requirements, in your view?

578:

want to have included in an article, note that it will probably find its way there eventually.

2970: 2969:

In addition, I've done some research on Knowledge's criteria for a person's notability on the

2857:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

2298: 839:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

1923: 1786: 1149: 1088: 965: 951: 918: 609:

and I will work with other editors to make sure the article remains neutral, and will ask Car

479: 3079:

http://variety.com/2010/biz/news/shakespeare-wins-telefilm-canada-pitching-event-1118024158/

2770:

I've successfully addressed some referencing problems & uploaded images. Thanks Matthew.

2930: 2794: 2732: 2695: 2629: 2545: 2054: 1992: 1915: 1511: 1419: 1362: 1305: 1173: 677: 493: 406: 348: 340: 258: 250: 180: 172: 8: 2904: 2798: 2099: 2000: 1970: 1836: 1773: 1721: 1676: 1647: 1563: 1181: 1012: 975: 933: 886: 633: 426: 321: 313: 289: 232: 198: 3056: 2775: 2761: 2679: 2337: 2291: 2276: 2167: 2159: 1764: 1756: 1748: 1701: 1243: 602: 2284: 562:

If you write about yourself, your group or your company, once the article is created,

288:, which gives a good explanation of what can and cannot be used on Knowledge. Thanks! 3040: 3031:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2912: 2871: 2849: 2670: 2661:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1893: 1854: 1821: 1806: 1595: 1586:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1328: 1252: 1140: 1096: 894: 853: 794: 785:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2858: 2726:

Please Approve my Article. as its emergency. its about a notable person in industry

840: 2526: 2406: 2314: 2075:

books/statements he's famous-er for, so you can say things like "Smith's 2003 book

1919: 1454: 961: 947: 914: 574:

with every edit. If there is anything publicly available on a topic that you would

502: 152: 128: 2307: 1869:

From Gulpingguppy, the user that managed to get a cease and desist order from you.

2987: 2068: 1415: 1377: 1358: 1320: 1301: 1271: 1263: 489: 344: 254: 176: 2343: 1199:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Artist_Rajasekharan

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2371: 2350: 219:

did you get these facts? Where should the reader go to see these facts proved?

1965:

Greetings, as the message indicates, the article was deleted because it was a

2881:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

2614: 2489: 2476: 2222: 1239: 1165: 1128: 1120: 863:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

2971:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals

537:

While it is not absolutely prohibited for a group to write its own article,

3036: 3032: 2908: 2718: 2666: 2662: 2441: 2399:, and in particular, the repeating attempts of adding "mostly harmless" at 2376: 2332: 1850: 1817: 1802: 1591: 1587: 1578: 1136: 1092: 890: 790: 786: 710: 2325: 1944: 1873:

I'm sure you're pleased to read more things written by me at this point.

1238:

I won't waste anyone else's time. Thanks for your hard work on Knowledge.

587:

Okay, presuming you want to proceed with this. here's what has to happen:

2522: 2365: 2209:

Hello, MatthewVanitas/Archive 22. Your question has been answered at the

1539: 1442: 777: 753: 148: 124: 113:

I have sought information and clarification at the below mentioned url:-

2032:

academia. So surely this can stay without independent sources, correct?

2983: 2571: 2400: 1849:

It has to be because of that. Wonder who the glitch should be sent to?

1231:

must say I find the application of Knowledge's requirements puzzling.

1170:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Leo Sarkisian (Armenian activist)

1385: 1081: 2638: 1530: 1526: 1006:

adding a little bit about the history or significance of the town,

725: 3068:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2006/09/12/tiff-pitch-outsourced.html

1381: 1324: 1267: 1119:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 3002: 738: 444:, much less his reading, there. There was one picture I found in 138: 137:

As suggested by you, I had made changes to the existing article (

2392:; please defer to such in cases of inconsistency with this page. 2363:

Readers should be able to rely on what they read and be able to

1180:

coverage of Sarkisian and his impact, not his books themselves.

409:

to make sure it's cat'ed right, or do you need a hand with that?

107:

Respected Sir/Madam, I have seen your reservations posted at :-

1885:

can say about notability without sounding like an advertiser.

1389: 1332: 1275: 2358: 1999:. Please review this article and help to remove the tag.Thanks 1131:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

2234:

at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

1996: 762: 729: 2340:, discussion boards, fansites, social media, or most blogs. 1991:

Hi, You have placed proposed for deletion tag in my article

1068:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

617: 144:

But this revision by me was undone by user Mean as Custard.

3006: 2653: 1554: 2541:

and Kohistan have significant number of pashto speakers.

110: 1125:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ibeauty34/sandbox

2508:

Category:World War I armoured fighting vehicles of Italy

2502:

Category:World War I armoured fighting vehicles of Italy

3005:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2899:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

1462:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Ya'akov Boussidan.

928:

Hello, that was in reference to earlier review drafts,

881:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

523:

No worries, glad to help with reviewing. A few points:

223:

is why we need footnotes. Please add in footnotes (see

2864:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

1605:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Dimitri Papadimos

846:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2488:

Had to subst: the second one, now finished the edit ~

1172:. Note, you still need to add proper sources to show 908:

Dear MatthewVanitas: I've been trying to fix up the

2951:

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Anthony_Del_Col

2382: 566:

to control its content, or to delete it outside the

168:Hi I added the refernces to my page. Is it ok now? 3057:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0215514/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1

2852:. Would use CSD/A7, but I want to give it a chance. 1392:by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just 1335:by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just 1278:by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just 2395:For an explanation of the title of this page, see 1057:Hello, MatthewVanitas. You have new messages at 1034:{{TB|Ganesh J. Acharya}} thanks for the response 910:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Totu, Shimla 904:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Totu, Shimla 2397:The answer to life, the universe, and everything 2221:after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ~ 1404:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 1347:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 1290:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 308:That's not a problem at all: so long as it is a 163:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Nitzan Chen 2429:Knowledge:Common sourcing mistakes (notability) 2053:Greetings, regarding notability, we're talking 1797:. Users who create or add such material may be 545:. Let me explicitly state our standard warning: 139:http://en.wikipedia.org/Cow_protection_movement 2922:Thanks for your work on the Pomeroy surname... 2018:Thanks for reviewing my the page I submitted. 1436:Hello! I didn't actually create this article, 2369:claims they read in Knowledge articles. So, 1714:things I intentionally crossed out, with the 1235:amidst bands with gold records and PR firms. 147:Please tell what can be done in this regard. 2997:Disambiguation link notification for July 30 2591:Disambiguation link notification for July 16 2177:Baruinga says thanks & farewell ....... 1488:Disambiguation link notification for July 9 687:Disambiguation link notification for July 2 446:The Smart Aleck's Guide to American History 668:I will appreciate your advice and opinion. 558:Knowledge's Law of Unintended Consequences 1939:Articles for creation/Artist Rajasekharan 316:for cleanliness. So far as "moving on", 111:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Ntu129 2870:notice, but please explain why in your 2217:Please note that all old questions are 2197:Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! 1945:http://artistrajasekharan.blogspot.com/ 852:notice, but please explain why in your 14: 2475:I can look at the other one later :) ~ 1789:their subject. Attack pages and files 1664:Knowledge:Identifying reliable sources 946:Good, I thought I was going blind....— 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2536:Languages of Khyber-Puhktunkhwa (Map) 2423:Knowledge:Everything you need to know 1380:. I have automatically detected that 1323:. I have automatically detected that 1266:. I have automatically detected that 834:Not enough sources to show notability 2979:Thank you for your time and insight. 2425:: a similar guide in the same style. 2243: 2149:Penguin General Cemetery - yet again 1801:from editing Knowledge. Thank you. 25: 1987:Reply for the proposed for deletion 1759:) 07:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Baruinga 318:Knowledge:Knowledge has no deadline 203:An Interview with Congressman Smith 23: 2859:deleted for any of several reasons 2843:because of the following concern: 2827: 2201: 1777: 1050: 841:deleted for any of several reasons 829:because of the following concern: 813: 597:Knowledge:Changing username/Simple 24: 3092: 648:Request for further clarification 590:Before you do anything else, you 103:Regarding rejection of my article 2434:Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy 2413:Knowledge:Don't cite WP42 at AfD 1948:and helps. Regards Rajasekharan. 1785:Please do not create pages that 1738:Penguin General Cemetery - again 1371: 1314: 1257: 1080: 29: 1220:Thank you for moving my article 3072: 3061: 3050: 1787:attack, threaten, or disparage 932:, that have since been fixed. 13: 1: 1059:Ganesh J. Acharya's talk page 1008:backed up by reliable sources 2848:Orphan, non-notable entity, 1907:Question on Downsize Fitness 1751:) 06:30, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 552: 225:WP:Referencing for beginners 7: 2903:allows discussion to reach 2884:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 2867:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 2249:Articles generally require 2213:. Feel free to reply there! 2162:) 22:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC) 885:allows discussion to reach 866:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 849:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 121:Please aid in this regard. 10: 3097: 2895:exist. In particular, the 2751:Penguin ....Photo uploads+ 2418:Knowledge:Cite WP42 at AfD 2274: 877:exist. In particular, the 3045:11:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC) 2992:18:02, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 2949:Notability questions for 2943:09:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC) 2917:01:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC) 2889:proposed deletion process 2811:23:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC) 2780:01:09, 19 July 2013 (UTC) 2766:05:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 2745:21:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 2712:00:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 2675:11:05, 16 July 2013 (UTC) 2652:added a link pointing to 2628:added a link pointing to 2586:14:00, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 2562:05:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 2531:04:44, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 2519:Categories for discussion 2495:02:36, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 2482:02:35, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 2348:We need sources that are 2330:We need sources that are 2228:02:33, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 2192:08:29, 13 July 2013 (UTC) 2172:03:18, 13 July 2013 (UTC) 2136:17:29, 12 July 2013 (UTC) 2108:16:58, 12 July 2013 (UTC) 2045:23:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 2014:Gary Thomas (Author) Wiki 2009:12:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC) 1979:15:34, 12 July 2013 (UTC) 1958:05:54, 12 July 2013 (UTC) 1950:Rajasekharan Parameswaran 1932:18:49, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 1902:17:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 1859:16:53, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 1851:The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 1845:16:49, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 1826:16:44, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 1818:The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 1811:16:34, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 1803:The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 1769:08:36, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 1730:06:05, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 1706:05:39, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 1685:03:42, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 1652:03:36, 11 July 2013 (UTC) 1633:17:19, 10 July 2013 (UTC) 1577:added a link pointing to 1553:added a link pointing to 1207:Rajasekharan Parameswaran 1029:WP:Verifiability, and lie 871:proposed deletion process 776:added a link pointing to 752:added a link pointing to 618:http://reftag.appspot.com 541:be aware of the policies 435:23:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC) 396:23:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC) 368:I put up a draft version 364:"I am Going to the Lordy" 357:05:18, 29 June 2013 (UTC) 330:19:01, 28 June 2013 (UTC) 298:19:32, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 267:17:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 241:14:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 189:12:05, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 157:11:00, 29 June 2013 (UTC) 133:10:26, 25 June 2013 (UTC) 2035:Thank you for your help 1691:Penguin General Cemetery 1619:16:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 1600:10:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 1525:added links pointing to 1482:05:35, 9 July 2013 (UTC) 1457:22:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC) 1424:21:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC) 1367:20:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC) 1310:20:29, 8 July 2013 (UTC) 1248:01:14, 8 July 2013 (UTC) 1215:14:54, 7 July 2013 (UTC) 1190:15:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC) 1145:05:57, 5 July 2013 (UTC) 1101:00:30, 5 July 2013 (UTC) 1046:04:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 1021:04:00, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 984:04:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 970:04:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 956:02:59, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 942:02:51, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 923:02:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 899:12:16, 3 July 2013 (UTC) 799:13:12, 2 July 2013 (UTC) 724:added links pointing to 682:00:52, 2 July 2013 (UTC) 642:21:52, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 518:20:21, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 498:02:23, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 472:13:39, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 18:User talk:MatthewVanitas 2876:the article's talk page 2375:to your article citing 2241:{{Knowledge:42}} makes 1466:Hello MatthewVanitas, 1398:my operator's talk page 1341:my operator's talk page 1284:my operator's talk page 1087:For adding an image to 858:the article's talk page 607:WP:Conflict of interest 543:WP:Conflict of interest 2832: 2211:Teahouse Q&A board 2206: 1967:WP:Copyright violation 1782: 1133:User:Ibeauty34/sandbox 1127:and please be sure to 1117:User:Ibeauty34/sandbox 1111:User:Ibeauty34/sandbox 1055: 818: 2901:articles for deletion 2841:proposed for deletion 2831: 2785:American Tea Ceremony 2205: 1793:by Knowledge and are 1781: 1089:Evans Repeating Rifle 1054: 996:Newly created article 883:articles for deletion 827:proposed for deletion 817: 623:The Lama and the West 229:WP:Footnotes for help 42:of past discussions. 3033:opt-out instructions 2663:opt-out instructions 2630:University of Madrid 2597:disambiguation pages 2514:the category's entry 2451:significant coverage 2315:significant coverage 2308:Significant coverage 2252:significant coverage 1993:Ratna Pustak Bhandar 1659:WP:Original research 1588:opt-out instructions 1512:Muhammad Ilyas Qadri 1494:disambiguation pages 1388:may have broken the 1331:may have broken the 1274:may have broken the 787:opt-out instructions 693:disambiguation pages 277:WP:Original research 3015:fix with Dab solver 2647:fix with Dab solver 2623:fix with Dab solver 2390:policy or guideline 2344:Independent sources 1638:Soccer club source. 1572:fix with Dab solver 1564:Victoria Keon-Cohen 1548:fix with Dab solver 1520:fix with Dab solver 771:fix with Dab solver 747:fix with Dab solver 719:fix with Dab solver 3023:• Join us at the 2956:Hi MatthewVanitas, 2893:deletion processes 2833: 2605:• Join us at the 2232:remove this notice 2207: 1783: 1502:• Join us at the 1129:sign your comments 1109:MfD nomination of 1066:remove this notice 1056: 875:deletion processes 819: 701:• Join us at the 310:WP:Reliable source 3028: 2933:comment added by 2819:Proposed deletion 2814: 2797:comment added by 2735:comment added by 2715: 2698:comment added by 2610: 2578:TaylorLikesDogs93 2565: 2548:comment added by 2521:page. Thank you. 2497: 2448:Articles require 2273: 2272: 2098:Hope this helps, 1935: 1918:comment added by 1877:non-promotional. 1791:are not tolerated 1507: 1329:Von Delany Mizell 1106: 1105: 1073:A cookie for you! 1038:Ganesh J. Acharya 823:Ruthie Harper, MD 809:Ruthie Harper, MD 805:Proposed deletion 706: 582: 581: 572:irrevocably added 564:you have no right 401:Hey man, this is 360: 343:comment added by 270: 253:comment added by 192: 175:comment added by 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3088: 3081: 3076: 3070: 3065: 3059: 3054: 3018: 3011:check to confirm 2945: 2886: 2885: 2869: 2868: 2837:Al-Nidaa Brigade 2830: 2823:Al-Nidaa Brigade 2813: 2791: 2747: 2714: 2692: 2643:check to confirm 2619:check to confirm 2600: 2564: 2542: 2492: 2487: 2479: 2470:of the subject. 2468: 2460: 2459:reliable sources 2452: 2377:reliable sources 2326:Reliable sources 2301: 2294: 2287: 2267: 2260: 2259:reliable sources 2253: 2244: 2235: 2225: 1934: 1912: 1795:speedily deleted 1780: 1718: 1568:check to confirm 1544:check to confirm 1516:check to confirm 1497: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1375: 1374: 1318: 1317: 1261: 1260: 1084: 1077: 1076: 1069: 930:such as this one 868: 867: 851: 850: 816: 767:check to confirm 743:check to confirm 715:check to confirm 696: 553: 470: 468: 463: 458: 453: 452: 394: 392: 387: 382: 377: 376: 359: 337: 286:WP:Verifiability 269: 247: 191: 169: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3096: 3095: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3077: 3073: 3066: 3062: 3055: 3051: 3025:DPL WikiProject 2999: 2954: 2928: 2924: 2897:speedy deletion 2883: 2882: 2866: 2865: 2828: 2826: 2792: 2787: 2753: 2730: 2721: 2693: 2682: 2607:DPL WikiProject 2593: 2574: 2566: 2543: 2538: 2504: 2490: 2477: 2472: 2471: 2466: 2458: 2450: 2409: 2385: 2361: 2346: 2328: 2310: 2305: 2304: 2297: 2290: 2283: 2279: 2265: 2258: 2251: 2236: 2223: 2216: 2199: 2179: 2151: 2128:Brookspowell629 2077:History of Acme 2037:Brookspowell629 2016: 1989: 1941: 1913: 1909: 1871: 1778: 1776: 1740: 1717:and </s: --> 1715: 1693: 1640: 1607: 1504:DPL WikiProject 1490: 1464: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1438:User:Rohanverse 1434: 1409: 1372: 1352: 1315: 1295: 1272:Visitors health 1258: 1255: 1222: 1202: 1152: 1137:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1114: 1075: 1070: 1063: 1032: 998: 906: 879:speedy deletion 865: 864: 848: 847: 814: 812: 703:DPL WikiProject 689: 650: 568:normal channels 560: 505: 482: 466: 461: 456: 454: 450: 449: 390: 385: 380: 378: 374: 373: 366: 338: 248: 210:Basically, for 170: 166: 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3094: 3083: 3082: 3071: 3060: 3048: 2998: 2995: 2982: 2980: 2978: 2977: 2975: 2966: 2965: 2963: 2960: 2958: 2957: 2953: 2947: 2923: 2920: 2907:for deletion. 2887:will stop the 2855: 2854: 2825: 2816: 2799:Marybethmccabe 2786: 2783: 2752: 2749: 2720: 2717: 2681: 2678: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2592: 2589: 2573: 2570: 2568: 2539: 2537: 2534: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2474: 2462: 2454: 2447: 2446: 2439: 2437: 2436: 2431: 2426: 2420: 2415: 2408: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2393: 2388:This is not a 2384: 2381: 2379:as described. 2360: 2357: 2345: 2342: 2327: 2324: 2309: 2306: 2303: 2302: 2295: 2288: 2280: 2275: 2271: 2270: 2262: 2255: 2247: 2215: 2200: 2198: 2195: 2178: 2175: 2150: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2115: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2100:MatthewVanitas 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2047:Brooks Powell 2015: 2012: 2001:Ashishlohorung 1988: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1971:MatthewVanitas 1940: 1937: 1908: 1905: 1870: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1837:MatthewVanitas 1829: 1828: 1775: 1772: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1722:MatthewVanitas 1692: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1677:MatthewVanitas 1668: 1667: 1639: 1636: 1625:Yani papadimos 1611:Yani papadimos 1606: 1603: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1489: 1486: 1484:RuthBoussidan 1463: 1460: 1433: 1427: 1412: 1411: 1406: 1405: 1355: 1354: 1349: 1348: 1298: 1297: 1292: 1291: 1254: 1251: 1221: 1218: 1201: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1182:MatthewVanitas 1176:, which means 1151: 1148: 1113: 1107: 1104: 1103: 1085: 1074: 1071: 1062: 1049: 1031: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1013:MatthewVanitas 997: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 976:MatthewVanitas 934:MatthewVanitas 905: 902: 889:for deletion. 869:will stop the 837: 836: 811: 802: 783: 782: 781: 780: 759: 758: 757: 756: 735: 734: 733: 732: 688: 685: 669: 666: 665: 664: 661: 658: 653: 649: 646: 645: 644: 634:MatthewVanitas 629: 628: 627: 626: 610: 599: 584: 583: 580: 579: 561: 556: 549: 548: 547: 546: 535: 527: 510:ArmenianCaucus 504: 501: 481: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 427:MatthewVanitas 421: 420: 411: 410: 365: 362: 333: 332: 322:MatthewVanitas 301: 300: 290:MatthewVanitas 244: 243: 233:MatthewVanitas 207: 206: 165: 160: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3093: 3080: 3075: 3069: 3064: 3058: 3053: 3049: 3047: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3029: 3026: 3022: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 2994: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2972: 2967: 2952: 2946: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2935:70.67.169.199 2932: 2919: 2918: 2915: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2879: 2877: 2873: 2862: 2860: 2853: 2851: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2842: 2838: 2824: 2820: 2815: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2782: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2768: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2748: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2729:Thanks Lijo 2727: 2724: 2716: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2689: 2685: 2677: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2655: 2651: 2650: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2637: 2636: 2631: 2627: 2626: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2615:Harry Willson 2613: 2612: 2611: 2608: 2604: 2598: 2588: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2569: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2533: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2515: 2510: 2509: 2496: 2493: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2480: 2469: 2463: 2461: 2453: 2445: 2443: 2435: 2432: 2430: 2427: 2424: 2421: 2419: 2416: 2414: 2411: 2410: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2391: 2387: 2386: 2380: 2378: 2374: 2373: 2372:add footnotes 2368: 2367: 2356: 2353: 2352: 2341: 2339: 2335: 2334: 2323: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2300: 2299:WP:GOLDENRULE 2296: 2293: 2289: 2286: 2282: 2281: 2278: 2269:of the topic. 2268: 2261: 2254: 2248: 2246: 2245: 2242: 2239: 2233: 2229: 2226: 2220: 2214: 2212: 2204: 2194: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2174: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2138:Brooks Powell 2137: 2133: 2129: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2056: 2055:WP:Notability 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2033: 2029: 2026: 2022: 2019: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1946: 1936: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1673:full citation 1670: 1669: 1665: 1660: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1635: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1621: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1602: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1580: 1576: 1575: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1561: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1538: 1537: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1523: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1501: 1495: 1485: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474:RuthBoussidan 1472:Many thanks, 1470: 1467: 1459: 1458: 1455: 1453: 1452: 1439: 1432: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1399: 1395: 1394:edit the page 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1369: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1351: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1342: 1338: 1337:edit the page 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1294: 1293: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1285: 1281: 1280:edit the page 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1225: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1200: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1174:WP:Notability 1171: 1167: 1166:Leo Sarkisian 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1156: 1150:Leo Sarkisian 1147: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1112: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1078: 1067: 1060: 1053: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1036: 1030: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1009: 1004: 1003: 1002: 985: 981: 977: 973: 972: 971: 967: 963: 959: 958: 957: 953: 949: 945: 944: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 926: 925: 924: 920: 916: 911: 901: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 861: 859: 855: 844: 842: 835: 832: 831: 830: 828: 824: 810: 806: 801: 800: 796: 792: 788: 779: 775: 774: 772: 768: 764: 761: 760: 755: 751: 750: 748: 744: 740: 737: 736: 731: 727: 723: 722: 720: 716: 712: 709: 708: 707: 704: 700: 694: 684: 683: 679: 675: 670: 662: 659: 656: 655: 654: 643: 639: 635: 631: 630: 624: 619: 615: 611: 608: 604: 601:Next, on the 600: 598: 593: 589: 588: 586: 585: 577: 573: 570:. Content is 569: 565: 559: 555: 554: 551: 550: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 525: 524: 522: 521: 520: 519: 515: 511: 500: 499: 495: 491: 485: 480:FOCIS article 473: 469: 464: 459: 447: 443: 438: 437: 436: 432: 428: 423: 422: 418: 413: 412: 408: 407:WP:Categories 404: 400: 399: 398: 397: 393: 388: 383: 371: 361: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 306: 305: 299: 295: 291: 287: 282: 278: 273: 272: 271: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 213: 209: 208: 204: 200: 195: 194: 193: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 164: 159: 158: 154: 150: 145: 142: 140: 135: 134: 130: 126: 122: 119: 118: 114: 112: 108: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3074: 3063: 3052: 3030: 3000: 2968: 2955: 2929:— Preceding 2925: 2911: 2891:, but other 2880: 2872:edit summary 2863: 2856: 2847: 2835:The article 2834: 2793:— Preceding 2788: 2769: 2754: 2737:202.45.11.11 2731:— Preceding 2728: 2725: 2722: 2700:TheArtOfRust 2694:— Preceding 2690: 2686: 2683: 2660: 2594: 2575: 2567: 2550:Tigerkhan007 2544:— Preceding 2512: 2506: 2505: 2473: 2465: 2457: 2455: 2449: 2442:Knowledge:42 2438: 2370: 2364: 2362: 2349: 2347: 2331: 2329: 2319: 2313: 2311: 2264: 2257: 2250: 2240: 2238:To expand - 2237: 2208: 2184:49.176.1.192 2180: 2152: 2114: 2076: 2072: 2034: 2030: 2027: 2023: 2020: 2017: 1990: 1942: 1914:— Preceding 1910: 1894:Gulpingguppy 1891: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1872: 1790: 1784: 1741: 1694: 1672: 1641: 1622: 1608: 1585: 1579:Killer Elite 1491: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1441: 1435: 1429:Deletion of 1413: 1410: 1370: 1356: 1353: 1313: 1299: 1296: 1256: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1226: 1223: 1205:Parameswaran 1203: 1177: 1157: 1153: 1115: 1033: 1007: 1001:it. Thanks! 999: 974:No worries. 907: 873:, but other 862: 854:edit summary 845: 838: 833: 821:The article 820: 784: 711:Najabat Khan 690: 671: 667: 651: 622: 613: 612:There are a 591: 575: 571: 557: 538: 530: 506: 486: 483: 457:Brambleberry 445: 441: 416: 402: 381:Brambleberry 367: 339:— Preceding 334: 314:WP:Citations 302: 280: 249:— Preceding 245: 220: 216: 211: 202: 199:WP:Footnotes 171:— Preceding 167: 146: 143: 136: 123: 120: 115: 109: 106: 78: 43: 37: 2691:Thank you 2467:independent 2351:independent 2318:. We need 2266:independent 2230:. (You can 1920:2superkards 1540:Mukkulathor 1376:Hello, I'm 1319:Hello, I'm 1262:Hello, I'm 1178:independent 962:Anne Delong 948:Anne Delong 915:Anne Delong 778:Untouchable 754:Untouchable 603:WP:Userpage 36:This is an 3035:. Thanks, 2850:WP:NOTNEWS 2680:Thank you! 2665:. Thanks, 2401:Talk:Earth 2359:References 1716:<s: --> 1590:. Thanks, 1431:Ugur Guven 1416:BracketBot 1378:BracketBot 1359:BracketBot 1321:BracketBot 1302:BracketBot 1264:BracketBot 1027:Regarding 789:. Thanks, 674:Patmclagan 490:Easports13 345:EliaBerger 255:EliaBerger 177:EliaBerger 95:Archive 25 90:Archive 24 85:Archive 23 79:Archive 22 73:Archive 21 68:Archive 20 60:Archive 15 3019:Read the 2905:consensus 2839:has been 2601:Read the 2464:that are 2444:proper)- 2277:Shortcuts 2263:that are 1774:July 2013 1644:Daffy1969 1498:Read the 1386:Sri Chand 1382:your edit 1325:your edit 1268:your edit 1253:July 2013 1224:Matthew, 887:consensus 825:has been 697:Read the 672:Thanks, 484:Matthew, 467:RiverClan 417:Assassins 391:RiverClan 2931:unsigned 2807:contribs 2795:unsigned 2772:Baruinga 2758:Baruinga 2733:unsigned 2708:contribs 2696:unsigned 2639:Vanniyar 2558:contribs 2546:unsigned 2491:Charmlet 2478:Charmlet 2407:See also 2338:tabloids 2333:reliable 2320:multiple 2312:We need 2224:Charmlet 2219:archived 2164:Baruinga 2156:Baruinga 2069:WP:Undue 1928:contribs 1916:unsigned 1761:Baruinga 1753:Baruinga 1745:Baruinga 1698:Baruinga 1531:Khalifah 1527:Junagarh 1414:Thanks, 1357:Thanks, 1300:Thanks, 1240:Jdubbleu 1121:deletion 1064:You can 726:Lal Qila 503:Response 353:contribs 341:unsigned 263:contribs 251:unsigned 185:contribs 173:unsigned 3037:DPL bot 3003:Masubia 2981:Cheers, 2684:Hello 2667:DPL bot 2517:on the 1799:blocked 1592:DPL bot 1093:Howicus 891:Mdann52 791:DPL bot 739:Lonaria 442:hanging 39:archive 2874:or on 2723:Dear, 2523:DexDor 2366:verify 2292:WP:VRS 2126:much! 1390:syntax 1333:syntax 1276:syntax 856:or on 539:please 149:Ntu129 125:Ntu129 2984:Srz92 2962:2012. 2383:Notes 2285:WP:42 2073:which 1997:Nepal 763:Lonia 730:Sanad 217:where 212:every 16:< 3041:talk 3007:Lozi 2988:talk 2939:talk 2909:Ansh 2803:talk 2776:talk 2762:talk 2741:talk 2719:Help 2704:talk 2671:talk 2654:Jati 2582:talk 2554:talk 2527:talk 2188:talk 2168:talk 2160:talk 2132:talk 2104:talk 2041:talk 2005:talk 1975:talk 1954:talk 1924:talk 1898:talk 1855:talk 1841:talk 1822:talk 1807:talk 1765:talk 1757:talk 1749:talk 1726:talk 1702:talk 1681:talk 1648:talk 1629:talk 1615:talk 1596:talk 1555:Jati 1529:and 1478:talk 1420:talk 1363:talk 1306:talk 1244:talk 1211:talk 1186:talk 1141:talk 1097:talk 1042:talk 1017:talk 980:talk 966:talk 952:talk 938:talk 919:talk 895:talk 795:talk 728:and 678:talk 638:talk 592:must 534:etc. 531:very 514:talk 494:talk 431:talk 403:very 370:here 349:talk 326:talk 294:talk 281:then 259:talk 237:talk 227:and 221:This 181:talk 153:talk 129:talk 3021:FAQ 2913:666 2821:of 2603:FAQ 2456:in 2256:in 1500:FAQ 1384:to 1327:to 1270:to 807:of 699:FAQ 614:ton 576:not 3043:) 3013:| 2990:) 2941:) 2878:. 2861:. 2809:) 2805:• 2778:) 2764:) 2743:) 2710:) 2706:• 2673:) 2649:) 2645:| 2625:) 2621:| 2584:) 2572:Hi 2560:) 2556:• 2529:) 2190:) 2170:) 2134:) 2106:) 2043:) 2007:) 1977:) 1956:) 1930:) 1926:• 1900:) 1857:) 1843:) 1824:) 1809:) 1767:) 1728:) 1704:) 1683:) 1650:) 1631:) 1617:) 1598:) 1574:) 1570:| 1550:) 1546:| 1522:) 1518:| 1480:) 1422:) 1400:. 1365:) 1343:. 1308:) 1286:. 1246:) 1213:) 1188:) 1143:) 1099:) 1044:) 1019:) 982:) 968:) 954:) 940:) 921:) 897:) 860:. 843:. 797:) 773:) 769:| 749:) 745:| 721:) 717:| 680:) 640:) 516:) 496:) 462:of 433:) 386:of 355:) 351:• 328:) 296:) 265:) 261:• 239:) 187:) 183:• 155:) 141:) 131:) 64:← 3039:( 3027:. 3009:( 2986:( 2937:( 2801:( 2774:( 2760:( 2739:( 2702:( 2669:( 2641:( 2617:( 2609:. 2580:( 2552:( 2525:( 2186:( 2166:( 2158:( 2130:( 2102:( 2039:( 2003:( 1973:( 1952:( 1922:( 1896:( 1853:( 1839:( 1820:( 1805:( 1763:( 1755:( 1747:( 1724:( 1700:( 1679:( 1666:. 1646:( 1627:( 1613:( 1594:( 1566:( 1542:( 1514:( 1506:. 1476:( 1450:K 1447:K 1444:T 1418:( 1361:( 1304:( 1242:( 1209:( 1184:( 1139:( 1095:( 1061:. 1040:( 1015:( 978:( 964:( 950:( 936:( 917:( 913:— 893:( 793:( 765:( 741:( 713:( 705:. 676:( 636:( 621:" 512:( 492:( 451:ö 429:( 375:ö 347:( 324:( 292:( 257:( 235:( 179:( 151:( 127:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index