1563:"If Knowledge had been available around the fourth century B.C., it would have reported the view that the Earth is flat as a fact and without qualification. And it would have reported the views of Eratosthenes (who correctly determined the earth's circumference in 240BC) either as controversial, or a fringe view. Similarly if available in Galileo's time, it would have reported the view that the sun goes round the earth as a fact, and Galileo's view would have been rejected as 'original research'. Of course, if there is a popularly held or notable view that the earth is flat, Knowledge reports this view. But it does not report it as true. It reports only on what its adherents believe, the history of the view, and its notable or prominent adherents. Knowledge is inherently a non-innovative reference work: it stifles creativity and free-thought. Which is A Good Thing." --
2007:
encyclopedia that anyone can edit" and to gather crowdsourced information. This point has been lost since, if articles like that are being deleted. According to the policy, it seems to me, every article regarding a smaller or even bigger open source projects is a subject for a deletion. My question is: why is that? You need from the article to be "notable" and it is hard for open source projects, because the projects there, especially the less known but great games like
Minetest, hardly ever win some prize or are reviewed on games websites or in magazines - just because they are free and open source, and websites and magazines like that focus on the commercial projects. In my opinion, having some information about this game on Knowledge would not be a harm to Knowledge itself, more - it will be an enrichenment. Please reconsider your decision.
838:
1768:. The "delete" !voters, on the other hand, mostly pointed towards the lack of coverage in reliable secondary sources. I chose to delete because the "deletes" seemed much better based in policy than the "keeps". Most of the mentions in that Google Books search you linked to above look like mentions in passing, so they could reasonably be argued not to count towards notability; if solid sources can be found, though, there is no reason that another article on fazhengnian cannot be created. I think probably the best way of going about this would be to add more content on fazhengnian to the main falun gong article, and
1570:
practical upshot will likely be the same as if the close had been "keep". There is a reasonable chance that the article would be kept an any future AfD debate, but there is not a lot we can do about that now unless more secondary sources are published that cover the subject in detail. There will likely be a quiet period at the article now that the AfD has been closed, so I recommend taking a break from it and concentrating on other articles you are interested in. And for next time, try starting with the secondary sources - it will save you a lot of headaches in the long run. This has been a bit
2991:
31:
2345:
move review to sink in. A minimum of three months is the general accepted standard, as it is usually seen as disruptive to start new move discussions very soon after a previous discussion has been closed. Personally, I think six months may be a more appropriate figure, to give everyone some breathing space. After that, we can reassess the mood at the page and see whether another move discussion, or perhaps a
410:. Just look at the last comment over the "Request for Comment" title. He makes mock of the proposed change, "Bozcaada", by deforming it like "Bozcashat". (I am sure he hopes to get away with this for changing the (i) of the word "shit" to "shat".) However, in no typing board "ada" could change to "shat" for typing mistake, especially if the "Bozca" part is intact there... All the best and sayonara. --
2349:, would be worthwhile. However, if the move review ends with no consensus and the title is still in active dispute, it may be worthwhile to start a request for mediation straight away in order to prevent the dispute from becoming further entrenched. Send me another message here when the move review is closed, and I'll be able to give you a clearer answer. Best ā
2032:
fact-checking to be considered as reliable, and this is where the sources that were in the article seem to fall down. If sources that have this kind of fact-checking are found in the future, then we can consider having an article about
Minetest and possibly restoring the article that was deleted. But until this is the case, we have to abide by Knowledge's
3033:
Paper Eleven, might give it the notability it may need to stay afloat. I've tried to read up on
Knowledge guidelines for notability, and I believe a webcomic with at least two of these under its belt can have an article put up. What are your thoughts? If you would like, I can provide you with the appropriate links in another PM. Thank you.
716:, which you proposed for deletion. I am leaving this message here to notify you about it. I have removed the WP:PROD tag due to the addition of secondary sources as well as my intent to continue building on the article and working to get it up to standards. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the
1161:
982:, which is a very good example of the sort of sources that we are looking for. However, I couldn't find any other similar sources, and unfortunately articles are generally deleted when there is only one source available on the subject. Are you aware of any other sources like this which we could use? Best regards ā
235:) and isn't actually used in English at all. The reason seems to be some sort of naming dispute between Armenian and Azerbaijani, but I'm not sure of the details. Whatever those details might be, the few English-language sources there are all use "Kachaghakaberd", so the case for "Qaxach Tower" seems very weak. ā
3032:
Today I found some more content that may (or may not) make Clone Manga's page eligible to return. It seems Clone Manga recently won an award The 5th
International Manga Award. I believe it, along with the Shuester Awards it won in the past, plus the addition of the fact that Kim has published NNN and
1546:
I think the basic issue here is that, from a
Wikipedian point of view, the article has been written backwards. It was written from the main primary sources in the field, and then secondary sources were sought to provide additional views and commentary. In the academic world this is good practice, and
1527:
Hello, there were three votes for keeping the article (Kitfoxxe, Trevj and
Bearian), one person had no opinion (Dbrodbeck). Two people who had voted to delete (Ipsign and S Marshall) earlier have not responded since I made substantial edits to address their concerns. So I think the result of the vote
1232:
With only the two sources from El Tiempo and Russia Today an article about you would have borderline notability, and it could face being deleted again, although this may be uncertain. I recommend waiting until there are more sources out there about you, and and then perhaps someone else will start an
1090:
Ah, sorry, I didn't see the link to the Russia Today video. That too looks like a good source that we can use. I'm afraid we can't use Who's Who as evidence of notability on
Knowledge - there's a long-standing consensus against using them for that purpose. (I can link the discussions if you want, but
667:
Hi there, and sorry for the delay in replying. The IP is already stricken from the list, so I don't think any more action is needed there. I've collapsed the only comment by them on the mediation page that I could see as well. (If there are any others, feel free to collapse them unless doing so would
3089:
Hello again! I would like to give it a shot, if possible. I'm a little new to this, so I would greatly appreciate any help you could give me in regards to filing a report. In addition, I did find out that Kim also published two of his works. In and of itself, it's not notable, but maybe if lumped in
2843:
Please remove the disruptive addition of a third option to the poll text. I agree with
Piriczki. If the poll text changes during the process we open ourselves up to charges of confusion and disruption. Also, the mediators advised all parties to the mediation that the poll would not go live until the
2344:
Hi there TDLS! First of all, we need to wait for the move review discussion to be closed, as dispute resolution processes usually won't take on cases that are already under discussion in other venues. Then I think it would be a good idea to wait a while for the results of the move discussion and the
2328:
Hi, as FP mentioned I'm, and possibly few silent others, are seeking information on mediation concerning the title for
Tenedos/Bozcaada article. Currently, there is a move conflict that seems to have spilled into a various sections of Knowledge. The question I'm looking for an answer is what kind of
2140:
Sure. I decided to relist basically because there weren't any new convincing arguments presented since the last relisting. At the moment the discussion seems to be leaning towards redirection, but I saw it as borderline as to whether there was a strong enough consensus for it to be closed. As it was
1543:
Hi there FMT. I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the concerns raised by Ipsign and S Marshall. Their arguments were well-grounded in
Knowledge's deletion policy, and it could also be reasonably argued that the Patsiurko, Campbell and Hall (2012) source is a primary source, depending what parts and in
1432:
Hey! You've helped out a lot, and I just wanted to ask you if you can pleae add me to your Watchlist! That would be great Mr. Stradivarius. I am trying to improve my talk page. If you can come over and help me out a little, once in a while, I would really appreciate it! Thank you! I reallly hope you
1388:
Hi Camilo, and thanks for your post. I closed the discussion as it has been open for two weeks and was in the queue to be closed. I can see how you might like the discussion to stay open for longer, but actually it is usually preferable to close discussions as "no consensus" rather than relisting if
1225:
Hello Patricia, and thank you for all those sources. Sorry to make you run around and find all the information for me, but thanks to your work I now have a pretty good idea of how an article on you would stand in relation to Knowledge's policies and guidelines. I'm afraid to say that the news I have
969:
Hello Patricia, and thank you for your message. Actually, questions of whether articles should be included in Knowledge or not are not well suited to mediation. Mediation works best for disputes over article content, but as there is no article at the moment, there is no content that can be disputed.
793:
Apologies again that this reply has been so slow - something in real life came up and I haven't been able to access Knowledge for the last three days. It looks like that particular thread has already been settled in my absence, but I see that a new issue has come up in the thread below that could do
3069:
was inserted on September 16, 2012. That is after all the comments in the deletion debate were made, so you could be right that we have a faulty discussion on our hands. However, it looks like the award wasn't the top prize, but a "bronze award" that would put Kim in somewhere between 5th and 14th
2574:
Hey Mr. Stradivarius. This will be, if not our final newsletter, one of the final onesĀ :). After months of churning away at this project, our final version (apart from a few tweaks and bugfixes) is now live. Changes between this and the last release include deletion tag logging, a centralised log,
634:
Now, a question: Would it be at all possible for us to remove 99's address from the list of involved parties? I feel like this is part of why he feels the need to keep coming back; he feels that he's still legitimately part of it, when the community at large seems to have recognized him as a troll
921:
IĀ“m a classical musician with years of experience, many concerts, a doctorate and I appear in WhoĀ“s who in America and WHoĀ“s who in the world and WhoĀ“s Who in American Women among many other publications. I have published 4 books, 5 CDs and many articles and normally present concerts in different
230:
Ok, I get four GBooks hits for "Kachaghakaberd" versus zero for "Qaxach Tower", and about 1500 Google hits for "Kachaghakaberd" versus about 40 for "Qaxach Tower" (and the hits for "Qaxach Tower" all seem to be from Knowledge, despite me trying to exclude Knowledge from the search). It looks like
2405:
Hi there. The problem is that another user also objected to including the photo in the article, so there is no clear consensus for including it. This means that more discussion is needed - if more discussion results in a consensus, then we can include it. If there is no consensus for inclusion,
1569:
Hopefully with this you can begin to understand the attitude to primary and secondary sources on Knowledge, and why that attitude led to the article you wrote being nominated for deletion. With a "no consensus" close the article is not likely to be nominated again for a few months at least, and
250:
Ok, thanks for checking. I'm happy to leave it at that if you feel the evidence is clear enough. (All the more annoying though, that if the situation is so clear, none of the editors involved could be bothered to do the correct thing and file an RM; they could have spared us all a lot of work.)
3209:
page was indeed a perfect well researched page on wikipedia, I am surprised to see its deleted, people will think its mafia`sm is on wiki if such pages are deleted for ulterior motives, I kindly request you to put back this page or else all peoples will loose faith on wiki for your unpleasing
1326:
This dispute has been going on for over ten years and there have been over 1,300,000 words posted on the article talk page (by comparison, all of the Harry Potter books together total 1,084,170 words). Over the years the dispute has been through multiple noticeboards, mediators, and even the
2819:
Sounds like a good way of doing things to me. Propose a wording on the talk page, and we can work together until everyone is satisfied with it. Also, if a post on the talk page doesn't receive a response in a while, I think it would be ok to add the material to the article. We don't want to
2006:
In my opinion, this article should not be deleted. Of course, it may be not fitting in your "notability guideline", but really, what exactly does it mean? And why are the articles from the community-driven pages considered as "unreliable"? Seriously, Knowledge was meant to be "free and open
2785:
That's fine with me. However, the article has become outdated. Since we stopped editing in June, some new CI controversies have arisen, including one involving LSE Professor Hughes. I've been waiting to update the page, but what should I do? Wait? Post the links on the Talk page? And PCPP,
2031:
for the policy.) I hope that you can understand that it would not be a good idea for us to allow this kind of thing on Knowledge. But actually, the guideline for identifying reliable sources goes one step further. It requires that sources have some sort of process of editorial oversight or
917:
Dear Mr. Stradivarious, my name is Patricia Caicedo, my username is singerpat. IĀ“m writing you to ask for help. A few years ago, I believe on 2007, the article with my biography was deleted and blocked after I uploaded a picture. This because the person in charge of articles thought I was
2427:
Hi, Mr. Stradivarius - I don't think I'm quite ready to go for the mop at this time, but I am genuinely flattered that you would think enough of my contributions here to ask. If I reconsider in the future, I'd hope to still have your support. Thanks again for the nice words! Cheers,
928:
I donĀ“t know how to manage the Knowledge page very well reason because IĀ“m asking for your help and mediation. Last week I decided to ask for a mediation but did not anderstand well the procedure and Im sure I did it wrong. So please, could you help me resolve this situation?
2257:
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at
3090:
together with the other stuff can be considered enough to bring it back? I'm not entirely sure, so maybe you could clarify that as well? As for the page, is it possible to just bring it back or would it need to be re-written from scratch? Again, thanks for hearing me out.
1047:
Dear Mr. Stradivarious, thanks for your answer and guidance. There are many articles like the one in El tiempo and interviews on video like this one on Russia Today. . Most of news an articles related to my work are in Google US. What can I do now? Thanks again! SINGERPAT
1965:
closed dispute, I see no progress have been made. I had to be absent since almost a year and user Chzz seems to have turned inactive meanwhile. Besides, unfortunately, I see no progress in the page. Do you have any suggestions as to how to solve this issue? Best regards,
570:
Hey, I was just using a script, it wasn't a big deal at all. Really I'd like to leave a personalized message for everyone whose speedies I decline, but that would be an awful lot of typing. I'd be happy to answer any questions you have about the process though. Best ā
424:
Hmm... actually, I have no idea whether the word "Bozcashat" is rude or not. It might just be some idiom or expression in Greek or Turkish. I don't want to give out warnings for editors who use words I don't understand. Maybe you could ask for the second opinion of a
1091:
it's probably best to just trust me on this point.) So that's two good sources we have, the El Tiempo and Russia Today. Are there any other quality sources like this that you're aware of? The more high-quality sources there are the better your case will be. Best ā
1544:
what context it is used. It would have been nice for there to have been more discussion about this particular source, but in the absence of such discussion I simply assumed that Ipsign's and S Marshall's arguments would also extend to cover that source as well.
2179:
Hi. I have created an article about Radha Thomas and am contemplating it to move it to the AFC space. Before that, I'd really appreciate if you could have a look and give me some inputs, suggestions and advice and hopefully a green signalĀ :-). Here's the link:
202:
tag. The only one who merged any actual history that time was me. I agree with you that it doesn't feel right, though. I was actually considering fully protecting the redirect, but it didn't really seem justified as no-one actually did a cut and paste move to
3245:, and since administrators are only supposed to delete articles for valid reasons, I ignored those comments when I closed the discussion. After I ignored those comments there seemed to be a rough consensus to delete the article. If there are independent,
2657:
Hi everyone, sorry I haven't be editing for a while, but the AE case ended and the arbitrators didn't touch the really touch anything related to DR, so I'll be happy to reopen the case and hopefully work something out with Keahapana. The old case is here
183:
Yes, that one was a bit chaotic - it took me half an hour just to figure out which bits of history had been at which title at which times. It looks like Explicit didn't actually merge anything, which makes the logs even more confusing. He just moved
609:
Hi there. There's no particular need to redirect talk pages if the corresponding article is redirected, and in fact if you don't redirect the talk page it makes it easier to find. I don't think there's any particular rule about it though. Regards ā
1603:. So I thought of removing the tag and nominating again. Now, This should have resulted in two nominations. I beg your pardon and am very Sorry for this. I don't know how to rectify the same. So am kindly requesting you to rectify the mistake. --
2939:, which gave me a little chuckle). For some reason the script tries to revert everything twice, but luckily it seems the MediaWiki software doesn't allow that. Anyway, thank you for helping me deal with this quickly - it's much appreciated. ā
1521:
1515:
1658:. That said, if you want to close it, feel free. Just revert my changes and have at it. I should probably leave a relisting comment if you don't, though, as it is probably going to confuse people given the two "keep" !votes. Best ā
1230:. The "third-party" part is the main problem - most of them look reliable enough, but we generally only regard sources as third-party if they are published by respected publishing houses, news organizations, or scholarly journals.
2125:? Something beyond the boilerplate in the discussion of "generating more discussion". Is there anything in particular you see missing from the discussion? Please be specific, I'm trying to understand why this was relisted.--
2856:
I left a message on the talk page of the editor who added it, and Feezo removed it before I could get to it. Discussion about the option is now in the discussion section, which I think is probably a good place for it to go. ā
1226:
isn't so good though. Though the El Tiempo article and the Russia Today interview are good sources, the other sources cannot be used to prove your notability, because they don't meet Knowledge's fairly strict definition of a
1493:) 20:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC) Oh, yes, I wanted you to come to my talk page and talk to me about the perfect steps to editing an article, because I really want to finally be accepted into Knowledge. I really don't get the
1634:
1484:
Okay. Thanks. What I was trying to do, was do my talk page perfectly so I can start to work with articles I have a higher knowledge of. Thanks anyway. Also, later I need to ask you a question about editing articles.
2026:
as anyone is free to write anything they like about a subject. If we did not have this rule then editors could write an article about their pet subject, and then source it to sources that they themselves wrote. (See
1537:
1346:
Thankyou very much Mr. Stradivarius for giving me those links to click on. I will try them. They are very useful, and it means a lot to me that you would help me with my talk page. Thank you Mr. Stradivarius!
2737:
Hey, on second though I'd be leaving for China later this week, and it doesn't seem like this dispute can be solved in a few days, so is it possible to pospone the DR until I get back in mid October? Thanks--
2467:
Thank you very much for the offer, but I just can't see going thru the vetting process just so I could delete the odd redirect page - that's about the only thing I'd like to be able to do that I can't now.
2156:
I appreciate the explanation. I get a bit concerned when I see multiple re-listings. They generally drag things out and rarely produce much additional productive discussion. Occasionally it does happen
1635:
345:
Don't worry, I got that part already. That was an issue in the Kachaghakaberd/Qaxach Tower histmerge described above, in fact. And I wouldn't have had the faintest idea of what I was doing had I not read
162:; I told them they should do the normal thing and file an RM; instead of doing that, another editor comes out of the woodwork, does yet another cut-n-paste move, files an out-of-process AfD against the
2533:
Yes, it's probably about time I had a look at those! I did say I would help there in my RfA, after all. I'll close some when I have a spare moment. And thank you for the compliment, by the way.Ā :) ā
2628:, and link to the old case that was closed due to the conflict with the ArbCom proceedings. If we can resolve it there, we will, and if not, then we'll refer it on to the appropriate venue. Best ā
2216:
1648:
2886:
also. thank you very much I hadn't heard anything about the controversial status. Off to catch your link. (if you could let me know if your script works, if not I'll start it manually) Cheers
3070:
place in terms of numbers. I don't personally think that a bronze award would count much toward notability, but if you feel strongly about it then the appropriate place to bring this up is at
2503:
166:
page, fools one administrator into speedy-deleting that original page as an alleged duplicate, and then everything gets doubly hist-merged another time (or twice? Why did Explicit and you
2844:
parties had reached agreement. Since no discussion for this third "option" occured during mediation, I argue that to allow it now is in fact to be in breach of the mediation agreement. ~
1448:
Hi. You're on my watchlist already, actually, because I welcomed you. I can't help but think that you should be improving articles rather than improving your talk page - after all we are
170:
end up having to do one?) ā Pure chaosĀ :-) I mean, I couldn't care less whether it ends up at this title or the other, but somehow it just doesn't feel right that it happens in this way.
1737:
Sending forth righteous thoughts is one of the three things that Master requires of us. It is very important, and every Fa-rectification period Dafa disciple must do well in this regard.
889:
2643:
Hi Mr. Stradivarius, I've just left a message on PCPP's talk page, but noticed that he/she hasn't contributed since 8 August. I'll keep you updated. Thanks again for your help. Best,
2294:
970:
Instead, Knowledge has developed a few guidelines about the creation and deletion of articles to decide what subjects can be included. The most important of these to your case is the
1173:
831:
780:
513:
lately where you listed yourself as a volunteer - I was hoping if you had some spare time if you could take a look there and offer some assistance. Thanks again for your helpĀ :-)
827:
2225:
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Knowledge email!
340:
290:
278:
3156:
Great, I stated my case there just now. I read the notability guideline before, but I'm going to give it a more thorough read through. Again, thanks a lot for helping me out!
3027:
1584:
455:
258:
225:
151:
two more admins have had to perform yet more histmerges, after I did one just a month ago or so. Did you see what happened there? As far as I see, the page was originally at
2487:
as well if you like dealing with page moves. The offer is always open, so feel free to mull it over as long as you want and let me know if you're ready to go for it. Best ā
1238:
2527:
2323:
215:. I'll go and have a look at the sources and see if I can find out what the right title should actually be. Hopefully we can prevent the need for a third history merge. ā
3053:
3249:
about Indiavision news, then we may be able to undelete the page, however. Are you aware of any such sources? Let me know if you have any more questions. Best regards ā
2515:
2504:
1038:
My biography also appears in the WhoĀ“s Who in the world, WhoĀ“s WHo in America, WhoĀ“s Who in American Women. This publications are made by Marquis and are very respected.
896:
2116:
1301:
304:
2368:
Thanks. My gut tells me that it will be less than 6 months that we'll see an other move request but let's see how the move review ends. I'll inform you when it does.
2134:
1908:
Hmm, I suppose so, but then I don't think it would make that much sense to use a wikilink with "written in" and "available in". This seems like a good place to apply
1750:
360:
319:
135:
2141:
borderline, I thought I would err on the side of caution and defer to the previous relisting admin's decision. Hope this explains things well enough. Best regards ā
1277:
1101:
245:
2377:
2359:
1336:
3259:
3229:
page deleted. I assure you though that I didn't have any ulterior motives in doing so. It might help you to understand why the page was deleted if you look at the
3121:, and please consider commenting there and putting it on your watchlist. Kim having published something doesn't count at all towards his notability - it has to be
2561:
2543:
1478:
1407:
3219:
2110:
1075:
Just link them to me here, and I'll take a look at them. If they are good enough to pass Knowledge's guidelines, we can talk about making a draft article. Best ā
925:
Other people I know also tryied to create an article about me and those were erased. The company who manages me also tried to create the article with no success.
810:
2746:
2732:
2497:
2338:
1836:
1800:
1786:
1307:
3151:
3110:
3084:
1975:
1695:
1680:
1668:
787:
620:
3004:
1705:
1628:
768:
2652:
2638:
2094:
2046:
2016:
1251:
1198:
1085:
1068:
1025:
992:
804:
687:
581:
3211:
2511:
2456:
2416:
2166:
2151:
1956:
1940:
1922:
1903:
1885:
1870:
1852:
1814:
1808:
1320:
2981:
2949:
1995:
159:
in June; then I repaired that by merging it back to the original location on 30 June, drawing furious protests by the POV warriors who didn't get their way
2867:
2606:
2162:
2130:
1654:
I was relisting pretty much per Stalwart111's comment - I'd like to see more discussion along that general theme, and also about how the sources relate to
1285:
1233:
article about you. I don't want to leave you with a completely negative message, so here are a couple of good essays that you should read in the meantime:
678:
499:
1397:
where everyone interested can comment on it. Let me know if you have any more questions about the process here, and I'll be happy to help you out. Best ā
443:
419:
402:
2830:
2765:
2717:
2703:
2670:
2304:
Just wanted to let you know I mentioned your name to someone seeking advice about dispute resolution in a particular protracted article naming issue, at
774:
1001:
Dear Mr. Stradivarious, thanks for your answer and guidance. There are many articles like the one in El tiempo and interviews on video like this one on
3226:
2122:
555:
Haha thanks for notifying me and not biting me - I cocked up with the CSD templates. Need to learn slowly - only just really got going with it again.
2549:
2001:
1371:
and what do you mean "no consensus" when like only 4 editors gave their opinion, re open that AfD and allow more time or else I will do it myself. --
738:
1422:
1382:
662:
3238:
3201:
2008:
1186:
1056:
1013:
949:
481:
2820:
completely stop the flow of edits, especially while PCPP isn't free to participate in dispute resolution, but there's also no need to be hasty. ā
2814:
961:
392:
Hi there. I couldn't really see anything disruptive in the talk page history, but I might have just missed it. Could you give me a diff? Thanks ā
3118:
2391:
2158:
2126:
1927:
I'm OK with no links. If anybody isn't, malcontent will surface on talk page, and dedicated discussion will result in some explicit consensus. ā
448:
It most certainly isn't some idiom or expression in Greek (Greek has no "sh" sound, for starters), and I can't think of anything Turkish either.
2882:
at once, your offer to mass revert is a good offer and will take you up on that if you don't mind, there might be a couple via my phone account
2595:
2235:
Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
1393:. You're quite welcome to contest my close, but I'm afraid that you're not allowed to revert an AfD close by an admin. Instead you should go to
1146:
1002:
794:
with some attention. This looks like one I will need to discuss with Feezo, so I don't want to say anything about it right away, though. Best ā
650:
177:
2299:
475:
373:
Mr Stradivarius, I just saw you eliminating disruptive edition from a Talk Page. Do you happen to have sysop rights? There is an IP disrupting
3196:
2684:
2553:
2519:
2446:
I think you would pass an RfA easily, but it's your choice, of course, and if you don't feel like running now then I'll respect that. Best ā
2052:
1706:
1389:
enough people have commented on it. (And I count ten different contributors, not four, correct me if I'm wrong.) The guideline on this is at
564:
2192:
2061:
526:
487:
2929:
2905:
2799:
2618:
2477:
1273:
3062:
1722:
1547:
the sign of a well-thought-out and well-written article. However, in Knowledge, this is a tell-tale sign that an article may be based on
3022:
120:
2675:
Hi sorry again is there any follow up to the case? I was really busy in the last couple of weeks but I can spare some time next week.--
1890:
Thanks! I'm only not sure whether it is right to remove the links per lack of consensus ā as I get it, no consensus means no change. ā
1596:
918:
selfpromoting myself and because I did not have rights for using the image. Same happen with the covers or my CDs that were rejected.
125:
You're welcome! Always glad to help out. It was a bit confusing the first couple of times, but I think I've got the hang of it now. ā
713:
2962:
I'm glad someone else found it lighthearted as it was meant (I wasn't absolutely sure it would be taken that way when I wrote it).
2399:
826:(DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are
160:
1612:
386:
347:
328:
1510:
1442:
974:, which states that any topic must have "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". (See also
2850:
2440:
1776:
if you think there was a procedural problem with my close. Let me know if you have any more questions about any of this. Best ā
1730:
603:
2023:
1452:- but hey, if it results in Knowledge being improved in the long run then it can't be so bad. By the way, I had a look at your
1356:
1733:, secondary reliable sources discuss the subject of FLG "sending forth righteous thoughts". According to primary FLG sources:
1268:
912:
750:
97:
89:
84:
3175:
I am just letting you know that there is an RFC discussing changes to dispute resolution on Knowledge. You can find the RFC
1501:
because my knowledge of it is pretty outstanding. If you could give me some pointers on it, that would be great. Thanks.
1362:
779:
Just a note, in case it gets lost in our current wall of text, that your input has been requested in regard to the issue of
2211:
72:
67:
59:
2320:
1985:, and linking to the discussion that was closed. We can work out what the best course of action is after that. Regards ā
1533:
626:
545:
452:
287:
255:
174:
3137:
for a better idea. And yes, it is possible to undelete the page as it was. It may also be possible to move it into your
2036:, I'm afraid. Let me know if you have any questions about any of this, and I'll be glad to help you out. Best regards ā
1823:
the RfC and didn't !vote there, I wanted to ask you to close it formally and implement the result. Thanks in advance! ā
594:
Hello. I edited Talk:Qoma. He was a chief in Fiji, but when some article is redirected, what happens to its talk page?--
2174:
3106:
3049:
1498:
595:
2238:
Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Knowledge will see it).
2873:
2569:
746:
550:
2805:č°¢č°¢ä½ ,Keahapana. BTW feel free to include the stuff you want to add either in the talk page or your own user page.--
1962:
1465:
1453:
1194:
1064:
1021:
957:
727:
3166:
2600:
2317:
1936:
1899:
1866:
1832:
1529:
1494:
449:
331:
is useful reading. And watch out in case any page involved is already sitting over a deleted parallel history.
284:
252:
171:
1005:. Most of news, articles and videos related to my work are in Google US. What can I do now? Thanks again! P.
407:
2725:
2536:
2266:
631:
Hi, Mr. Stradivarius. First off, thanks for keeping my talk page clean while I was gone. I do appreciate it.
1726:
3074:. Let me know if you have any questions about filing a report there, and I'll help you out. Best regards ā
2879:
2609:
dispute that was temporarily closed on 18 June 2012. Would you be willing to help us resolve this? Thanks,
2579:
1281:
504:
2578:
Hopefully you like what we've done with the place; suggestions for future work on it, complaints and bugs
2259:
1555:
sources, and then primary sources can be used to flesh out the details. This reminds me of a quote which
1156:
536:
Thanks for your support in my RfA and your well wishes. I look forward to maintaining your trust in me.ā
336:
300:
274:
116:
1842:
Hi there.Ā :) I'd be glad to close it, but I'm going to be busy today. Can you hold on until tomorrow? ā
1497:. So I would love it if you went to my talk page and told me some professional things. I want to edit
2462:
2313:
1734:
368:
47:
38:
17:
1368:
3066:
2373:
2334:
377:. I removed his "shit" comment but I think he needs a more authoritative warning/measure. Arigato. --
2787:
2483:
I saw that you were active at AfD, so I thought you might be able to help out there. There's always
1316:
Because of your interest in dispute resolution,, I am inviting you to comment on the following RfC:
3215:
2385:
1506:
1490:
1438:
1418:
1378:
1352:
2022:
Hi Phitherek. Articles from community-driven sites are not generally considered as "reliable" per
1600:
1169:
2838:
2090:
1234:
3190:
2591:
2473:
1796:
1765:
1746:
1522:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of countries ranked by ethnic and cultural diversity level
520:
332:
296:
270:
112:
2312:. Maybe you could offer some advice on the basis of your mediation experience. Current thread
1618:
Hi there. I've fixed it for you. Let me know if you have any more AfD trouble. Best regards ā
837:
3252:
3144:
3102:
3077:
3045:
2942:
2860:
2823:
2758:
2696:
2659:
2631:
2490:
2449:
2422:
2409:
2352:
2241:
You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).
2207:
2144:
2103:
2039:
1988:
1915:
1878:
1845:
1779:
1688:
1677:
1661:
1645:
1621:
1590:
1577:
1471:
1400:
1294:
1244:
1094:
1078:
985:
797:
761:
671:
613:
599:
574:
436:
395:
353:
312:
238:
218:
128:
1819:
3094:
3037:
2752:
2369:
2330:
2290:
2181:
1756:
Hi AgadaUrbanit. Among some of the "keep" !voters there seemed to be a misunderstanding of
1608:
1551:, which is a big no-no. On Knowledge, the bedrock of the article should be provided by the
1327:
Arbitration Committee without resolving the conflict, so a lot of wisdom is needed here. --
1182:
1052:
1009:
945:
742:
734:
646:
Just some thoughts. I could be completely off-base, so if I am please let me know. Thanks!
232:
2583:
8:
3138:
2795:
2648:
2614:
2329:
formal actions can we consider to resolve this and avoid it for a longer amount of time.
2012:
1655:
1502:
1486:
1434:
1414:
1373:
1348:
1332:
1190:
1060:
1017:
953:
668:
interrupt the flow of conversation.) Let me know if there's anything I've missed. Best ā
560:
105:
2271:
Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
1875:
Ok, closed. Let me know if there's any aspect of the implementation that I messed up. ā
979:
3176:
2883:
2395:
2086:
1932:
1895:
1862:
1828:
1457:
1309:
196:
2390:
I do understand why consensus is needed. A user requested a photo. I have one to add.
3185:
2972:
2920:
2896:
2587:
2469:
2275:
2218:
1971:
1792:
1742:
587:
541:
515:
495:
2910:
According to my watchlist your script seems to be working, thank you for your help.
1641:
Got an EC with you while trying to close this AFD. Are you sure it needs relisting?
295:
And watch for A or B or Talk:A or Talk:B already having archives or other subpages.
3098:
3041:
2624:
Hi Keahapana. I think the best course of action would be to file a new case at the
2557:
2523:
2203:
2188:
1674:
1642:
1516:
Result of discussion on 'List of countries by ethnic and cultural diversity levels'
1427:
1390:
1321:
Talk:Monty Hall problem#Conditional or Simple solutions for the Monty Hall problem?
830:, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to
430:
426:
231:"Qaxach Tower" is a direct translation from the Azerbaijani name for the fortress (
2959:
2936:
2286:
2071:
1912:
to me, although I'm not opposed to adding back the wikilinks if people object. ā
1772:
it out if it becomes big enough. Or if you like, you are welcome to take this to
1769:
1718:
1604:
758:
Thanks for notifying me. I've listed it at AfD with a more detailed rationale. ā
697:
639:
and also remove all of his comments at the mediation page, if that is allowed by
471:
415:
382:
269:
If you histmerge page A to page B, what do you do it both pages have talk pages?
3225:
Hello Farhan.dastoor. I can appreciate that you might be angry after seeing the
1276:
Would've refiled, but the last report I made didn't seem to get archived yet. --
781:
whether or not a rhesus monkey and a dishwasher can be considered the same thing
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
3230:
3018:
2997:
2990:
2810:
2791:
2742:
2713:
2680:
2666:
2644:
2610:
1571:
1564:
1556:
1449:
1328:
784:
684:
647:
556:
531:
509:
Hey there Mr. Stradivarius, I noticed that you haven't been very active at the
212:
185:
156:
148:
143:
About hist-merging: I'm a bit confused (or slightly irritated perhaps) that at
3241:
weren't based on these guidelines or on any other valid reasons listed in the
1815:
Template talk:Infobox software Ā§Ā RfC: natural and programming languages labels
3172:
3071:
2690:
2625:
2431:
2346:
2202:
It was a trial template that I forgot to delete - thanks for pointing it out
2028:
1982:
1928:
1909:
1891:
1858:
1824:
1773:
1636:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Georgetown Emergency Response Medical Service
1548:
1394:
1341:
971:
720:
706:
640:
636:
510:
2512:
Template talk:Infobox software#RfC: natural and programming languages labels
3246:
3242:
3234:
3134:
2963:
2911:
2887:
2484:
2197:
1967:
1757:
1227:
975:
823:
537:
491:
374:
208:
204:
189:
152:
144:
1241:. Let me know if you have any questions ahout any of this. Best regards ā
3130:
2845:
2283:
2282:
Thanks for helping make Knowledge better. Enjoy your research! Cheers,
2184:
2182:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Radha_Thomas
2033:
1761:
1461:
657:
1165:
111:
Thanks: I see that at last I am getting some help with history-merging.
2230:
656:
Sounds good to me! I agree with Evan, assuming protocol allows this. ~
467:
411:
378:
283:
Normally, move one of them to become an archive of the other, I'd say.
3141:, but let's see what conclusion the deletion review comes to first. ā
1122:
Hello again! IĀ“m attaching a few sources. Hope it works. THANKS AGAIN.
3237:. The two arguments for "Kindly UnDelete" and "Do NoT Delete" in the
3012:
2806:
2738:
2709:
2676:
2662:
588:
2253:
along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Knowledge).
3181:
If you have already commented there, please disregard this message.
2309:
822:. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in
2958:
Your welcome, and thank you for the help, also I forgot about the
2548:
I didn't notice you had volunteered to help out at ANRFC in Q2 of
1464:, and to check how those notes work. That's why your addition got
3065:, but I've just checked the article, and a mention about the 5th
2518:
in addition to the AfD discussions you already close? Thank you,
2305:
1673:
I'll leave it open. Do go ahead and add your relister's comment.
1599:
for afd. But initially i found that it is not properly listed in
876:: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
726:
template back to it. Instead, feel free to list the article at
978:.) When I searched the internet for sources about you, I found
2100:
Ah, that's a good point. I'll go and remove it now. Thanks! ā
2935:
Yep, I think I've got all of them now (apart from the one at
1413:
I love manga! You were doing a section about manga? COOL!
1239:
Knowledge:An article about yourself is nothing to be proud of
976:
this simple explanation of what notability means on Knowledge
192:, then apparently gave up and moved it back again, leaving a
3007:
at any timeĀ by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1857:
Sure, no deadlines on Knowledge, and I'm not in a hurry. ā
2516:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure
2505:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure
1741:. Bottom line is I am not sure why the page was deleted.
890:
Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard
2586:
sessions, which I hope you'll all attend. Many thanks,
2722:
I think it would be fine just to leave a link to it. ā
2514:. Would you consider closing the discussions listed at
1729:
before the Chinese Consulate in New York. According to
882:: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
2708:
No problem, but should I repost the archived thread?--
2064:. It was long overdue. I am glad it has finally come.
870:: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
2607:
Concerns and controversies over Confucius Institutes
2406:
though, then it should stay out, I'm afraid. Best ā
3028:
Hello. In regards to Clone Manga's recent deletion.
2996:Hello, Mr. Stradivarius. You have new messages at
2278:
to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
1981:Hi Filanca! I recommend filing another case at the
3135:this simple (and in-your-face) guide to notability
2123:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/We Just Decided To
2117:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/We Just Decided To
864:: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
486:Hi, I wonder if you've noticed that I reactivated
3235:short and simple guide to notability on Knowledge
2689:Hi there. Again, let's open up another thread on
2550:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Mr. Stradivarius
935:Thanks in advance and look forward to your news.
2693:and see what conclusions we can come to. Best ā
1530:I am invariant under co-ordinate transformations
155:; then somebody did a cut-n-paste move of it to
3119:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2012 September 27
1725:. Here is an image of Falun Gong practitioners
1460:, and it looks like you need to check out our
466:It is simple shit, Future Perfect, it is... --
2605:I don't know how to proceed in reopening the
2245:If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at
1957:Dispute resolution about minorities in Greece
1809:RfC: natural and programming languages labels
814:: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
3129:(or about Clone Manga). Have a look at the
3061:Hi Super-staff. It wasn't mentioned in the
1723:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Fazhengnian
775:Request for your input at Beatles mediation
2510:I was impressed by your detailed close of
2121:Can you share more about why you relisted
1528:should be keep, not no consensus. Thanks.
941:Patricia Caicedo www.patriciacaicedo.com
2575:and fixes to things like edit summaries.
2002:According to deletion of Minetest article
3202:Unscruplous deletion of Indiavision news
3117:Ok, I've gone ahead and listed it - see
2274:When the 1-year period is up, check the
836:
683:Thanks! And no worries about the delay.
482:Edit request on Template:Infobox_disease
348:Knowledge:How to fix cut-and-paste moves
329:Knowledge:How to fix cut-and-paste moves
2265:Questia would love to hear feedback at
852:: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
635:for the past month or so. I suggest we
14:
2300:Talking about you behind your back ...
2024:Knowledge:Identifying reliable sources
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2053:Thanks for action in Infobox Software
2231:https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
1574:but I hope it helps. Best regards ā
25:
3231:notability guidelines for companies
1709:/āSending Forth Righteous Thoughtsā
841:Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow
23:
2989:
2751:Sure, that's no problem - there's
2067:By the way, you needn't have used
1764:'s comment seemed to be a case of
24:
3271:
1499:Adventure Time with Finn and Jake
897:Read the entire first edition of
3125:people who have published stuff
818:Welcome to the first edition of
29:
2079:|labelstyle=white-space: nowrap
728:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
3260:09:31, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
3220:09:11, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
3197:08:52, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
3173:Wikiproject Dispute Resolution
3152:14:56, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
3111:14:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
3085:09:52, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
3054:07:12, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
3023:19:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2982:03:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
2950:15:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2930:15:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2906:15:24, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2868:09:56, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
2851:21:36, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2831:09:52, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
2815:06:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
2800:00:51, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
2766:13:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2747:11:00, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2733:06:37, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2718:06:29, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2704:13:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
2685:12:13, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
2626:dispute resolution noticeboard
2596:11:07, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2562:06:56, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2552:. Thank you for volunteering!
2544:06:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2528:00:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
2498:13:43, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
2478:23:18, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
2457:02:26, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
2441:02:18, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
2417:00:01, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
2400:15:13, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
2378:13:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
2360:12:24, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
2339:16:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
2324:15:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
2295:05:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
2212:21:43, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
2193:09:13, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
2167:12:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
2152:04:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
2135:03:01, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
2111:00:38, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
2095:00:19, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
2047:15:07, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
2017:14:03, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
1996:15:08, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
1983:dispute resolution noticeboard
1976:12:31, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
1941:17:10, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
1923:15:10, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
1904:09:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
1886:04:33, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
1871:13:45, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
1853:13:21, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
1837:11:55, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
1801:07:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
1787:02:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
1751:21:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
1696:13:50, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
1681:11:40, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
1669:11:31, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
1649:11:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
1629:06:37, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
1613:01:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
1585:07:41, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
1538:20:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
1495:Knowledge:Verifiability policy
1160:Departament Cultura Barcelona
909:19:18, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
751:14:46, 2 September 2012ā (UTC)
511:dispute resolution noticeboard
13:
1:
2671:02:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
2653:01:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
2639:13:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
2619:20:59, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
2081:that is already in the code.
1727:send forth righteous thoughts
1713:I came here after noticing a
1511:20:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
1479:19:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
1450:here to build an encyclopedia
1443:18:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
1423:20:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
1408:15:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
1383:14:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
1357:17:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
1337:00:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
1302:15:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
1286:06:29, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
1269:King genovese - another sock?
1252:11:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
1199:18:29, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
913:Request for help in mediation
805:12:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
788:03:42, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
769:12:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
688:03:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
679:13:08, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
663:02:44, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
651:01:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
1145:Russia Today interview here
972:general notability guideline
309:Yes, that seems sensible. ā
7:
1228:reliable third-party source
1102:16:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
1086:14:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
1069:14:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
1026:14:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
993:03:43, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
962:17:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
627:Regarding Beatles mediation
621:12:00, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
604:11:49, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
582:23:22, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
565:23:19, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
546:00:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
527:11:30, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
500:03:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
476:20:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
456:18:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
444:14:02, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
420:13:50, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
403:12:34, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
387:09:39, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
361:17:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
341:16:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
320:08:58, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
305:06:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
291:05:47, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
279:05:44, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
259:05:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
246:20:54, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
226:19:47, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
178:19:11, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
136:18:50, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
121:18:03, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
10:
3276:
2878:Thank you, I will look at
2175:Article about Radha Thomas
1363:Children's manga and anime
18:User talk:Mr. Stradivarius
3067:International Manga Award
2221:account is approved ready
1817:is now month old. As you
1308:Invitation to comment at
980:this article in El Tiempo
932:I will be very grateful.
888:: It's time to close the
874:DR Noticeboard comparison
858:: The most recent DR data
207:- both of them went from
2874:Re:Beatles notifications
2727:Mr. Stradivarius on tour
2584:a couple of office hours
2570:Page Curation newsletter
2538:Mr. Stradivarius on tour
2057:Hello, Mr. Stradivarius
1791:Sounds good, thank you,
1367:Why are you closing the
1291:I've filed a new SPI. ā
1274:Barely a few days after.
551:Thanks for not biting me
433:-speaking Wikipedian? ā
2880:Andreasegde's talk page
2251:QuestiaHelp@cengage.com
1235:Knowledge:Autobiography
3167:Dispute Resolution RFC
2994:
2601:Request for assistance
2267:WP:Questia/Experiences
2219:Questia online library
1595:Sir, I have nominated
1568:
842:
3171:Hello.As a member of
3131:notability guidelines
2993:
2582::). We'll be holding
2347:request for mediation
2034:notability guidelines
1561:
1369:this AfD discussion??
892:. Agree or disagree?
840:
42:of past discussions.
2580:to the usual address
2260:WP:Questia/Citations
2247:wikiocaasi@yahoo.com
1721:. Then I discovered
1559:has on his userpage:
1462:verifiability policy
505:DRN needs your help!
350:before I started. ā
3239:deletion discussion
2755:here, after all. ā
2249:and, second, email
1929:DmitrijĀ D. Czarkoff
1892:DmitrijĀ D. Czarkoff
1859:DmitrijĀ D. Czarkoff
1825:DmitrijĀ D. Czarkoff
1685:Ok, done. Thanks ā
1433:have a great week.
702:I have removed the
3015:
3005:remove this notice
2995:
2884:User:Mlpearc Phone
2463:Adminship, part II
1458:Taki (Soulcalibur)
1310:Monty Hall problem
1278:Lenin and McCarthy
1155:Colombia Exterior
843:
824:dispute resolution
369:Disruptive editing
3182:
3114:
3097:comment added by
3057:
3040:comment added by
3021:
3011:
2980:
2928:
2904:
2439:
2276:applications page
2217:Your free 1-year
1961:Hi. Referring to
1549:original research
1202:
1185:comment added by
1072:
1055:comment added by
1029:
1012:comment added by
965:
948:comment added by
880:Discussion update
868:Activity analysis
845:In this issue:
754:
737:comment added by
488:this edit request
333:Anthony Appleyard
297:Anthony Appleyard
271:Anthony Appleyard
113:Anthony Appleyard
103:
102:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
3267:
3255:
3254:Mr. Stradivarius
3247:reliable sources
3227:Indiavision news
3207:Indiavision news
3195:
3193:
3188:
3180:
3147:
3146:Mr. Stradivarius
3113:
3091:
3080:
3079:Mr. Stradivarius
3056:
3034:
3017:
3008:
2998:Tvoz's talk page
2977:
2970:
2968:
2945:
2944:Mr. Stradivarius
2925:
2918:
2916:
2901:
2894:
2892:
2863:
2862:Mr. Stradivarius
2848:
2826:
2825:Mr. Stradivarius
2761:
2760:Mr. Stradivarius
2728:
2699:
2698:Mr. Stradivarius
2634:
2633:Mr. Stradivarius
2539:
2493:
2492:Mr. Stradivarius
2452:
2451:Mr. Stradivarius
2438:
2435:
2429:
2412:
2411:Mr. Stradivarius
2386:Toronto FC photo
2355:
2354:Mr. Stradivarius
2147:
2146:Mr. Stradivarius
2106:
2105:Mr. Stradivarius
2080:
2076:
2070:
2042:
2041:Mr. Stradivarius
1991:
1990:Mr. Stradivarius
1918:
1917:Mr. Stradivarius
1881:
1880:Mr. Stradivarius
1848:
1847:Mr. Stradivarius
1822:
1782:
1781:Mr. Stradivarius
1691:
1690:Mr. Stradivarius
1664:
1663:Mr. Stradivarius
1624:
1623:Mr. Stradivarius
1580:
1579:Mr. Stradivarius
1474:
1473:Mr. Stradivarius
1403:
1402:Mr. Stradivarius
1381:
1376:
1297:
1296:Mr. Stradivarius
1247:
1246:Mr. Stradivarius
1201:
1179:
1097:
1096:Mr. Stradivarius
1081:
1080:Mr. Stradivarius
1071:
1049:
1028:
1006:
988:
987:Mr. Stradivarius
964:
942:
907:The Olive Branch
899:The Olive Branch
820:The Olive Branch
812:The Olive Branch
800:
799:Mr. Stradivarius
764:
763:Mr. Stradivarius
753:
731:
725:
719:
711:
705:
674:
673:Mr. Stradivarius
660:
637:deny recognition
616:
615:Mr. Stradivarius
577:
576:Mr. Stradivarius
525:
523:
518:
439:
438:Mr. Stradivarius
398:
397:Mr. Stradivarius
356:
355:Mr. Stradivarius
315:
314:Mr. Stradivarius
241:
240:Mr. Stradivarius
221:
220:Mr. Stradivarius
201:
195:
131:
130:Mr. Stradivarius
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
3275:
3274:
3270:
3269:
3268:
3266:
3265:
3264:
3253:
3243:deletion policy
3204:
3191:
3186:
3184:
3169:
3145:
3092:
3078:
3072:deletion review
3063:deletion debate
3035:
3030:
3009:
3002:
2973:
2964:
2960:Talk:Rock music
2943:
2937:Talk:Rock music
2921:
2912:
2897:
2888:
2876:
2861:
2846:
2841:
2839:Poll disruption
2824:
2759:
2726:
2697:
2632:
2603:
2572:
2537:
2508:
2491:
2465:
2450:
2433:
2430:
2425:
2410:
2388:
2370:TheDarkLordSeth
2353:
2331:TheDarkLordSeth
2302:
2223:
2200:
2177:
2145:
2119:
2104:
2078:
2074:
2068:
2055:
2040:
2004:
1989:
1959:
1916:
1879:
1846:
1818:
1811:
1780:
1774:deletion review
1766:WP:ITSIMPORTANT
1719:Talk:Falun Gong
1711:
1689:
1662:
1639:
1622:
1593:
1578:
1518:
1472:
1430:
1401:
1395:deletion review
1377:
1372:
1365:
1344:
1314:
1295:
1271:
1245:
1180:
1152:Other sources:
1095:
1079:
1050:
1007:
986:
943:
915:
903:
816:
798:
777:
762:
732:
723:
717:
709:
703:
700:
672:
658:
629:
614:
592:
575:
553:
534:
521:
516:
514:
507:
484:
437:
396:
371:
354:
313:
239:
233:az:QaxaƧ qalası
219:
199:
193:
129:
108:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3273:
3263:
3262:
3212:Farhan.dastoor
3203:
3200:
3168:
3165:
3164:
3163:
3162:
3161:
3160:
3159:
3158:
3157:
3029:
3026:
3001:
2988:
2987:
2986:
2985:
2984:
2953:
2952:
2875:
2872:
2871:
2870:
2840:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2780:
2779:
2778:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2655:
2602:
2599:
2571:
2568:
2567:
2566:
2565:
2564:
2507:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2464:
2461:
2460:
2459:
2424:
2421:
2420:
2419:
2387:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2380:
2363:
2362:
2301:
2298:
2280:
2279:
2272:
2269:
2263:
2243:
2242:
2239:
2236:
2233:
2222:
2215:
2199:
2196:
2176:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2118:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2085:
2054:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2003:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1958:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1810:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1717:discussion at
1710:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1638:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1592:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1525:
1524:
1517:
1514:
1482:
1481:
1429:
1426:
1411:
1410:
1374:Camilo SƔnchez
1364:
1361:
1343:
1340:
1313:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1270:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1158:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
996:
995:
914:
911:
895:
894:
893:
883:
877:
871:
865:
862:Survey results
859:
853:
815:
809:
808:
807:
776:
773:
772:
771:
699:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
628:
625:
624:
623:
591:
586:
585:
584:
552:
549:
533:
530:
506:
503:
483:
480:
479:
478:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
370:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
293:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
213:Kachaghakaberd
186:Kachaghakaberd
157:Kachaghakaberd
149:Kachaghakaberd
141:
140:
139:
138:
107:
104:
101:
100:
95:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3272:
3261:
3258:
3257:
3256:
3248:
3244:
3240:
3236:
3232:
3228:
3224:
3223:
3222:
3221:
3217:
3213:
3208:
3199:
3198:
3194:
3189:
3178:
3174:
3155:
3154:
3153:
3150:
3149:
3148:
3140:
3136:
3132:
3128:
3124:
3120:
3116:
3115:
3112:
3108:
3104:
3100:
3096:
3088:
3087:
3086:
3083:
3082:
3081:
3073:
3068:
3064:
3060:
3059:
3058:
3055:
3051:
3047:
3043:
3039:
3025:
3024:
3020:
3014:
3006:
2999:
2992:
2983:
2978:
2976:
2969:
2967:
2961:
2957:
2956:
2955:
2954:
2951:
2948:
2947:
2946:
2938:
2934:
2933:
2932:
2931:
2926:
2924:
2917:
2915:
2908:
2907:
2902:
2900:
2893:
2891:
2885:
2881:
2869:
2866:
2865:
2864:
2855:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2849:
2832:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2818:
2817:
2816:
2812:
2808:
2804:
2803:
2802:
2801:
2797:
2793:
2789:
2767:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2754:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2731:
2730:
2729:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2715:
2711:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2702:
2701:
2700:
2692:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2682:
2678:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2668:
2664:
2660:
2656:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2627:
2623:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2598:
2597:
2593:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2576:
2563:
2559:
2555:
2551:
2547:
2546:
2545:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2506:
2499:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2486:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2458:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2437:
2436:
2423:Re: Adminship
2418:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2379:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2361:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2348:
2343:
2342:
2341:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2326:
2325:
2322:
2319:
2315:
2311:
2307:
2297:
2296:
2292:
2288:
2285:
2277:
2273:
2270:
2268:
2264:
2261:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2252:
2248:
2240:
2237:
2234:
2232:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2220:
2214:
2213:
2209:
2205:
2195:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2183:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2112:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2087:Codename Lisa
2084:Best regards,
2082:
2073:
2065:
2063:
2058:
2048:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2035:
2030:
2025:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2014:
2010:
1997:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1984:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1964:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1911:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1738:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1708:
1697:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1679:
1676:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1657:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1647:
1644:
1637:
1630:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1591:Regarding afd
1586:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1573:
1567:
1566:
1560:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1523:
1520:
1519:
1513:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1480:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1425:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1409:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1396:
1392:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1380:
1375:
1370:
1360:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1317:
1311:
1303:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1283:
1282:Complain here
1279:
1275:
1254:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1240:
1236:
1229:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1178:
1174:
1172:
1170:
1168:
1166:
1164:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1153:
1151:
1147:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1103:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1074:
1073:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1004:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
994:
991:
990:
989:
981:
977:
973:
968:
967:
966:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
939:
936:
933:
930:
926:
923:
922:countries.
919:
910:
908:
902:
900:
891:
887:
884:
881:
878:
875:
872:
869:
866:
863:
860:
857:
854:
851:
848:
847:
846:
839:
835:
833:
829:
825:
821:
813:
806:
803:
802:
801:
792:
791:
790:
789:
786:
782:
770:
767:
766:
765:
757:
756:
755:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
729:
722:
715:
708:
689:
686:
682:
681:
680:
677:
676:
675:
666:
665:
664:
661:
655:
654:
653:
652:
649:
644:
642:
638:
632:
622:
619:
618:
617:
608:
607:
606:
605:
601:
597:
590:
583:
580:
579:
578:
569:
568:
567:
566:
562:
558:
548:
547:
543:
539:
529:
528:
524:
519:
512:
502:
501:
497:
493:
489:
477:
473:
469:
465:
457:
454:
451:
447:
446:
445:
442:
441:
440:
432:
428:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
409:
406:
405:
404:
401:
400:
399:
391:
390:
389:
388:
384:
380:
376:
375:Talk: Tenedos
362:
359:
358:
357:
349:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
330:
327:
321:
318:
317:
316:
308:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
292:
289:
286:
282:
281:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
260:
257:
254:
249:
248:
247:
244:
243:
242:
234:
229:
228:
227:
224:
223:
222:
214:
210:
206:
198:
191:
187:
182:
181:
180:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
154:
150:
146:
137:
134:
133:
132:
124:
123:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
99:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3251:
3250:
3206:
3205:
3177:on this page
3170:
3143:
3142:
3126:
3122:
3093:ā Preceding
3076:
3075:
3036:ā Preceding
3031:
3010:
2974:
2965:
2941:
2940:
2922:
2913:
2909:
2898:
2889:
2877:
2859:
2858:
2842:
2822:
2821:
2784:
2757:
2756:
2724:
2723:
2695:
2694:
2630:
2629:
2604:
2588:Okeyes (WMF)
2577:
2573:
2535:
2534:
2509:
2489:
2488:
2470:Clarityfiend
2466:
2448:
2447:
2432:
2426:
2408:
2407:
2389:
2351:
2350:
2327:
2316:. Cheers, ā
2303:
2281:
2250:
2246:
2244:
2224:
2201:
2178:
2143:
2142:
2120:
2102:
2101:
2083:
2066:
2059:
2056:
2038:
2037:
2005:
1987:
1986:
1960:
1914:
1913:
1877:
1876:
1844:
1843:
1812:
1793:AgadaUrbanit
1778:
1777:
1743:AgadaUrbanit
1736:
1731:google books
1714:
1712:
1687:
1686:
1660:
1659:
1656:WP:CORPDEPTH
1640:
1620:
1619:
1594:
1576:
1575:
1562:
1552:
1545:
1526:
1483:
1470:
1469:
1431:
1412:
1399:
1398:
1366:
1345:
1325:
1319:
1318:
1315:
1293:
1292:
1272:
1243:
1242:
1231:
1181:ā Preceding
1093:
1092:
1077:
1076:
1051:ā Preceding
1008:ā Preceding
1003:Russia Today
984:
983:
944:ā Preceding
940:
937:
934:
931:
927:
924:
920:
916:
906:
904:
898:
885:
879:
873:
867:
861:
855:
849:
844:
828:active in DR
819:
817:
811:
796:
795:
778:
760:
759:
733:ā Preceding
730:. Thanks!
701:
670:
669:
645:
633:
630:
612:
611:
593:
573:
572:
554:
535:
508:
485:
435:
434:
394:
393:
372:
352:
351:
311:
310:
237:
236:
217:
216:
209:Qaxach Tower
205:Qaxach Tower
190:Qaxach Tower
167:
163:
153:Qaxach Tower
145:Qaxach Tower
142:
127:
126:
78:
43:
37:
3133:, and also
3099:Super-staff
3042:Super-staff
2753:no deadline
2204:Victuallers
2077:because of
2060:Thanks for
1762:User:Cravix
1707:Fazhengnian
1601:afd listing
938:Cordially,
596:93.136.0.50
490:. Thanks!
106:Histmerging
36:This is an
3210:actions.--
2287:EdwardsBot
1715:Notability
1605:Bharathiya
1379:Talk to me
850:Background
783:. Thanks!
739:Jessbear14
98:ArchiveĀ 15
90:ArchiveĀ 12
85:ArchiveĀ 11
79:ArchiveĀ 10
3183:Regards,
3139:userspace
3127:about Kim
2792:Keahapana
2645:Keahapana
2611:Keahapana
2434:Gongshow
2318:Fut.Perf.
2157:though.--
2062:this edit
2009:Phitherek
1557:Guy Macon
1553:secondary
1503:DEIDRA C.
1487:DEIDRA C.
1468:. Best ā
1435:DEIDRA C.
1415:DEIDRA C.
1391:WP:RELIST
1349:DEIDRA C.
1329:Guy Macon
1187:Singerpat
1057:Singerpat
1014:Singerpat
950:Singerpat
832:this page
785:Evanh2008
712:tag from
685:Evanh2008
648:Evanh2008
589:Talk:Qoma
557:Porterjoh
450:Fut.Perf.
285:Fut.Perf.
253:Fut.Perf.
197:histmerge
172:Fut.Perf.
73:ArchiveĀ 9
68:ArchiveĀ 8
60:ArchiveĀ 5
3233:and the
3107:contribs
3095:unsigned
3050:contribs
3038:unsigned
3003:You can
2392:Kingjeff
2310:Bozcaada
2159:RadioFan
2127:RadioFan
1820:proposed
1597:Sanmarga
1428:Can you?
1195:contribs
1183:unsigned
1065:contribs
1053:unsigned
1022:contribs
1010:unsigned
958:contribs
946:unsigned
886:Proposal
856:Research
747:contribs
735:unsigned
164:original
2966:Mlpearc
2914:Mlpearc
2890:Mlpearc
2306:Tenedos
1968:Filanca
1813:Hello!
1565:WP:FLAT
1359:Deidra
901:--: -->
714:TALK2ME
698:TALK2Me
538:Bagumba
492:Klortho
431:Turkish
39:archive
3187:Steven
2975:powwow
2923:powwow
2899:powwow
2847:GabeMc
2691:WP:DRN
2554:Cunard
2520:Cunard
2284:Ocaasi
2229:Go to
2185:Varunr
2072:nowrap
2029:WP:SPS
1760:, and
1678:yck C.
1646:yck C.
1466:undone
659:GabeMc
641:WP:RTP
532:Thanks
517:Steven
3192:Zhang
3123:other
2485:WP:RM
1937:track
1900:track
1867:track
1833:track
1770:split
1758:WP:RS
1572:tl:dr
1342:Links
522:Zhang
468:E4024
429:- or
427:Greek
412:E4024
379:E4024
16:<
3216:talk
3103:talk
3046:talk
3019:talk
3013:Tvoz
2811:talk
2807:PCPP
2796:talk
2788:äøč·Æå¹³å®
2743:talk
2739:PCPP
2714:talk
2710:PCPP
2681:talk
2677:PCPP
2667:talk
2663:PCPP
2649:talk
2615:talk
2592:talk
2558:talk
2524:talk
2474:talk
2396:talk
2374:talk
2335:talk
2314:here
2291:talk
2208:talk
2198:Opps
2189:talk
2163:talk
2131:talk
2091:talk
2013:talk
1972:talk
1963:this
1933:talk
1896:talk
1863:talk
1829:talk
1797:talk
1747:talk
1609:talk
1534:talk
1507:talk
1491:talk
1454:edit
1439:talk
1419:talk
1353:talk
1333:talk
1280:| (
1237:and
1191:talk
1061:talk
1018:talk
954:talk
743:talk
721:prod
707:prod
600:talk
561:talk
542:talk
496:talk
472:talk
416:talk
408:Here
383:talk
337:talk
301:talk
275:talk
168:both
117:talk
2661:.--
1910:IAR
1675:Der
1643:Der
1456:to
1312:RfC
211:to
188:to
3218:)
3179:.
3109:)
3105:ā¢
3052:)
3048:ā¢
2813:)
2798:)
2790:.
2745:)
2716:)
2683:)
2669:)
2651:)
2617:)
2594:)
2560:)
2526:)
2476:)
2398:)
2376:)
2337:)
2293:)
2210:)
2191:)
2165:)
2133:)
2093:)
2075:}}
2069:{{
2015:)
1974:)
1939:)
1902:)
1869:)
1835:)
1799:)
1749:)
1611:)
1536:)
1509:)
1441:)
1421:)
1355:)
1335:)
1284:)
1197:)
1193:ā¢
1067:)
1063:ā¢
1024:)
1020:ā¢
960:)
956:ā¢
905:--
834:.
749:)
745:ā¢
724:}}
718:{{
710:}}
704:{{
643:.
602:)
563:)
544:)
498:)
474:)
418:)
385:)
339:)
303:)
277:)
200:}}
194:{{
147:/
119:)
94:ā
64:ā
3214:(
3101:(
3044:(
3016:/
3000:.
2979:)
2971:(
2927:)
2919:(
2903:)
2895:(
2809:(
2794:(
2741:(
2712:(
2679:(
2665:(
2647:(
2613:(
2590:(
2556:(
2522:(
2472:(
2394:(
2372:(
2333:(
2321:ā¼
2308:/
2289:(
2262:.
2206:(
2187:(
2161:(
2129:(
2089:(
2011:(
1970:(
1935:ā¢
1931:(
1898:ā¢
1894:(
1865:ā¢
1861:(
1831:ā¢
1827:(
1795:(
1745:(
1739:"
1735:"
1607:(
1532:(
1505:(
1489:(
1437:(
1417:(
1351:(
1331:(
1189:(
1059:(
1016:(
952:(
741:(
598:(
559:(
540:(
494:(
470:(
453:ā¼
414:(
381:(
335:(
299:(
288:ā¼
273:(
256:ā¼
175:ā¼
115:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.