User talk:Nsae Comp

2521:) in that "Age of Sail" is mentioned, but is not really the subject of the paper and is certainly not defined or explained. That accusation is probably a little unfair, as the ref suggests that there is a (for want of a better description) trade/exploration meaning to "Age of Sail". However, we do not seem to have any more than that. I have looked for other papers presented at the same conference, but currently without success. Whilst we have a naval historian giving us a definition of the "Age of Sail" from a naval perspective (see archived talk pages of the article), there is still no source that makes clear what is meant in a trade/exploration context - just some suggestive evidence that the term is used in this field. I feel that the sources available so far do not make clear whether this is the same term used in 2 parts of maritime history, or 2 similar that different historical labels that have the same name. Further editing of the article without getting this point cleared up by authoritative references seems a little brave to me. 1136: 2475:"Age of sail" appears not to be used by maritime historians for trading vessels - which is perhaps just as well, since it would be a conflicting definition with that of naval historians. The "golden age of sail" is an unrelated period which refers to the surge in technological development of sailing vessels that happened (perhaps coincidentally) after the arrival of steam power. That is things like the replacement of rope standing rigging with wire, wrought iron components for hulls (knees, beams, etc.), iron hulls, patent winches and other equipment, and better understanding of optimal routing ( 4929: 4809: 168: 5197: 4182: 2690: 1528: 966: 718: 645: 572: 265: 1408: 5084: 3940: 3583: 1269: 847: 4640: 3119: 1373: 3265: 2900: 912:

issue of space colonization” which is a misreading of the referenced article. This WP article is about exploration, not colonisation, and the reference argues that colonisation is a misleading term because it’s not the same as “real” colonisation. That’s utterly different from what you wrote. And in any case who says that this subject is “often discussed”?

4393:

iconography section (iirc in the past you just ignored there is an iconography section altogether) and info about its later use could easily be incorporated into it. The images could easily be added to the already present gallery, too, if anything that would better highlight the history of the solar symbol's usage both in antiquity and recently.

4946:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4826:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2472:(1511) through to the 1850s, when there was a rush to build or convert the main warships of the French and British navies to screw propulsion (with some notable US Navy participation in this race). Frustratingly, naval historians just about to refuse to put this definition into print, so it is very difficult to cite a source for this. 3089:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 5430:

processing of the images, but there is no trace of that, and even the parts not cut off are unrealistic - say there is no effect of Mars or Venus. Also, it only adds to the confusion that Earth is inserted (as are the planets) in a specific formation: the only asteroids for which that would matter are co-orbital ones.

1614:

independent sources is probably the no.1 most important rule on WP, and therefore unreferenced articles like this are unlikely to survive for long. I'm still happy to move this to drafts, if you think it'll take you a while to add sufficient sources; that would at least protect it against deletion. What say you? --

4025:

information should be sourced and added to the body of the article before it is summarised in the lead. The article on the Discovery Doctrine states that Terra Nullius is just one part of the doctrine. If you can cite sources which prove they are the same thing, then the two articles will need to be merged.

5390:

So what do you think? Do you remember your original intent in adding these? Are there maybe better alternatives? Or maybe you know some other editor who is both graphically skilled & knowledgeable about astronomy who could be asked to improve upon these four images? Or replace these four and that

4054:

Hello. I have reverted to the previous version because I think your proposed changes need discussion. I think the whole article needs a rewrite to make it more concise and clear. I would be happy to work with you to improve the article and we might be able to get others to contribute through the talk

2779:

article. I share the concerns expressed there, particularly on readability. The previous version was not perfect by any means, but it was the result of extensive discussion during the recent featured article review. I hope that you will be able to help us improve the lead by reaching consensus on the

2545:

seems to have useful content, though I would like to see material that would be fundamental to an article in more than one source. I still have the feeling that "Age of Sail" has different definitions in military and non-military contexts - but that is something that needs to be confirmed in sources.

2234:

I didn't feel a need to make it into a very polished page, as it's just for brainstorming. What do you think of the options I have listed there so far? Have I missed any? Are there any pros and cons missing? Do you think this will be useful, or is there anyway no chance to ever resolve this big knot?

1699:

An article does not need to feature fotos, just diagrams is totally fine. Afterall its an empirical issue and not one of momentous situations like traffic jams, school classes, body hygiene. And no they were not well referenced. One image was for example just croped from another image that wasnt even

911:

because it didn’t seem to make sense. You said “Habitability and the actual living in space is an intrinsic issue for human space exploration” which is ungrammatical and doesn’t mean anything (which is why I couldn’t fix it). And you said that it’s “often discussed along with the seperate colonialist

3981:

template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can

3620:

3237:

Thanks. Well as far as I am concerned the main entry is not sourced wrong and since you have no source that says it is not viewed valid anymore I would keep the entry. If you like I can take the Laniakea reference out, since it is infered by us (and anyway redundant if Laniakea is the entry before).

3155:

I feel responsible for this, since I was the one who initially added it to the list, but "supercluster complex" is an outdated term that hasn't been used since the early 90s, and since the discovery of Laneakea, it would appear Pieces-Cetus is falsified. That said, no one seems interested in talking

2225:

Hi Nsae Comp! You'll remember the discussions we had about Sea and Ocean on various talk pages. User:Femkemilene had suggested that I centralise the discussion and that I first have it in user space, and later bring it back to the talk pages. I have now set up a page in user space for brainstorming.

1310:

331:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page

5465:

It was already in the article, I just updated the access date when checking the definitions again - unlike you, I didn't notice that further down there is a public domain image that can be used. You solved this conundrum, quickly, thanks!!! I marked the graphics request (where another user proposed

5410:

I agree that all these diagrams are very basic and it would be nice to provide better ones. But they are better than none, since these diagrams are in my opinion the most important images (beside the stats) of the article, because they help to describe the difficult to understand orbital spaces and

941:

PS: You said "And in any case who says that this subject is “often discussed”?" ... National Geography in the article does:"When discussing space exploration, people often invoke stories about the exploration of our own planet, like the European conquest and colonization of the Americas" ... and it

230:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that

5372:

The diagrams purport to show the "general location" of these types of objects. However, the green area drawn for Atens & Apollos have sharp, arbitrary outer edges, which look like the orbit of a single asteroid, but there certainly are Atens & Apollos in the region beyond that; in fact, at

5429:

Well my points were to the tune that those images show the orbital spaces & types in a wrong & confusing way. In fact even worse and even more confusing, after having thought about it more. Somehow I assumed that they are based on actual known distributions which were just mangled in the

369:

Hi there. We're having a content dispute at the article above - the list of empires has a large 216 entries, and currently the article sees fit to repeat this list 6 times! Clearly a waste of storage and bandwidth. A better solution (saving at least 30% and making it much easier to read and use)

1683:

I added the pictures there and added citations for them to show examples. Obviously we can't insert everything there, so I we used a minimal of examples to illutrate an image. The article has plenty of diagrams but lacks pictures as it is. Adding three more is harmless; especially when reliably

2468:. As I understand the term, it applies to naval history, as opposed to maritime trade. It was coined by naval historians to refer to the period in which purpose-built sailing warships armed with cannon were the principal warships of navies (and particularly European/Western navies). So that is 2201:

for GAC? I am the reviewer of record, but now my review notes are basically worthless since you've come in and made modifications. That would normally be fine, but during the formal GAC process, things are supposed to follow stricter procedures (the reviewer makes suggestions and the nominator

1613:

Hi, I came across this in the uncategorised articles list, and noticed it also has no references. I would normally move it automatically to drafts, but I'm trying go kick that habit, so wanted to check with you first as to what your plans are? As I'm sure you know, verifiability from reliable,

5679:

Well hello there, nice to have met you. Have you presumably as a Wikipedian heared about "assuming good faith". Reverting something and stating a guideline is one thing, but you react like I am trying to hide some crucial imagery and put my subjective personal feelings before the issue of the

4392:

as they are factually correct, but there are no sources provided (which is a particular problem here because it's otherwise a very rigorously sourced article) and you, as far as I can tell, essentially did not pay attention to the fact there is already a paragraph on the solar symbol in the

4600:) that say the Romans named Venus (and four other planets). I think that information should be added to the article, but I didn’t want to interfere since you seem to be doing a lot of work on the article these days and probably have a better feel for how best to integrate this information. 4024:

I deleted your reference to the discovery doctrine as you didn't cite a source stating that Terra Nullius is just another term for the discovery doctrine. Nor is there a discussion of this in the body of the article. Please note that the lead is meant to be a summary of the article and new

657:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

926:

Do me a favour if you say that "This WP article is about exploration, not colonisation", then take the first paragraph about space colonisation out, then I will not see the necessity anymore to make the point about distinguishing the issue of space exploration and space colonisation.

730:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4769:

The box is a navbox, which is a reputable use. I'm not the person to ask, have never made an infobox. One of the unusual things about Knowledge viewing is that the Foundation hasn't made navboxes visible on mobile. Coding, lack of expertise, I don't know why they haven't done this.

2945:, and it would be good if you're more familiar with policy and guidelines when writing on those topics. Bringing an article up to GA isn't that difficult, and you get a 50% chance that you get an in-depth review. At the very least, the reviewer will help you with your prose :). 5406:

Hi, firstly thank you for your very considerate message. Regarding the images I think the diagram you were refering to is okay but only in combination with the ones in question because the diagram describe the orbital types and the other the areas where the types are to be

4301:

On 19/1/2023, you made a number of edits saying that Galileo "discovered" the phases of Venus. They were seen earlier by the Babylonians. Perhaps you would like to replace the alleged discovery by a reference to the fact that Galileo observed the phases of Venus.

5386:

I note I have unceremoniously cut some other images from the article due to low relevance, but in spite of all of the above, I'm not entirely sure that these four need to go: the extra they could bring would be showing distribution, not just orbit geometry.

4688: 584:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1700:

about what it was croped for (I marked it for deletion). And no the citation was highly flawed, no dates, no publishers, no page. ... Plus at unfitting parts of the article: e.g. image of schoolclass in the para about the history of the concept....

4676: 5529:

I hope this message finds you well. I've noticed that your Talk page has grown quite extensive, which is a testament to your active engagement on Knowledge. However, I'd like to suggest considering archiving some of the older discussions.

1161:). I dont know if you are familiar with german? Please allow the source that I provided to be in the article and its content. If a sourced input is not allowed, what is? PS: this picture shows only a specific type of depiction of jesters. 2205:

I think I'm going to fail the GAC until the article is in stable form. I really can't work on an automobile that's being taken apart as fast as it's being assembled. It can be resubmitted when you and Justin have worked out a plan.

3376:

doesn't have a height on its page and the two external links don't list one. I queried the anon who said they where just copying data. Seems rather suspect. As you seem to be in the know and have worked on that page, I thought I'd

2855:, in which case the redirect should be reversed; or "ocean observatory" is ambiguous and that page should either be a disambiguation page, a redirect to some page that disambiguates the term or discusses multiple meanings (maybe 395: 2041: 1156:

If the word "jester" is the problem, then "fool" would be an alternative, or "traveling entertainer" as a last resort. But the word used by the artist is "Gaukler" which is translated by the Cambridge Dictionary as "jester" (

429: 370:

would be a table with a column for each attribute, sortable, as used in many other articles (see the discussion). However, a silent editor keeps reverting attempts to clean up the article, without explanation. Please see the

2930:. Your text would greatly benefit from having a (near)-native speaker copy-edit it. You're allowed two requests at the same time. I would very much recommend you make use of this, also to improve your mastery of English. 2795:

A total undo is highly unfounded and very destructive to the effort that I put in it. I do agree that a discussion is needed but I did not shy away from that and did answer and attend to it and the critique raised.

3653:

Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those

527:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1914: 3648:

Hello, and thank you for your contributions. Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

420:

require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

333: 232: 4387:

Please consider two things in the future: adding proper sources for information you add, and paying attention to whether something is already discussed in the article. I will not delete your additions to

400:

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

2046:

but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the

5554:

Thank you for considering this suggestion. Your contributions to Knowledge are greatly valued, and I believe that archiving could make your Talk page even more effective as a tool for collaboration.

5362:, each intended to show the four basic NEA orbital types. I'd like to ask for your opinion before doing anything about them, because I find them confusing and problematic, for the following reasons: 5226:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4211:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2717:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1555:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 993:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 742:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 669:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 596:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4408:

I am sorry to have upset you, but I dont see a problem to attend to the problems you see directly instead of writing this long message. But I of course took care of what you pointed out. See ya!

4672: 5433:

These images were good for Knowledge as it was over a decade ago, but I think we should do better by now. So in the end, I made a request for a new illustration at the Graphics Lab (see at

5366:

Neither the original creator (AndrewBuck) nor the editor who made the latest versions back in 2015-6 (Rfassbind) seem to be around any more, to be asked for explanations or improvements.

3109: 5242: 4227: 2871:, and I'm not hugely familiar with the topic myself, so I thought I'd first ask if you have any thoughts? Since generally we don't do redirects from a broader term to a narrower one. 2733: 2517:

I note the reference that you have given. However, I think there is still a problem for the article. Firstly one could throw the accusation that your ref is a "reference in passing" (

1571: 1009: 758: 685: 612: 3521:. Unfortunately it did not include which recognised authority verified the record. Feel free to re add the claim if you can cite a recognised authority that verified this claim. -- 448: 5211: 4196: 3933: 2703: 1541: 979: 3667:

button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.

405: 876:

I’m sure it’s not intentional but your recent edits have been disruptive. Your edits are badly written, unclear, and offer your opinion rather than properly referenced facts.

2813:

Under the editing tab: "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary)". An edit summary makes it easier for other to detect when help is needed.

2016: 1885: 1363: 323: 253: 4818: 4592:). Since you wrote "trying without omiting content" in the edit summary, I was wondering whether you perhaps accidentally removed this part. There are some pages (e.g. 3131: 2959: 244: 1381: 4568:

to find out who gave the planet that name and was surprised to find that there's no information on this in the article. Whereas e.g. the article on the Jupiter moon

4040:

I was not aware that my edit equated terra nullius with the discovery doctrine. But fair enough that it is not in the body, thus not warrented to have in the lead.

1958:

It is true for all of them, for a detailed description see the file-description. PS: Some stars have allmost no line because they are close to the reference plane.

3003: 1851: 1644: 1484: 1450: 317: 272: 258: 5537:

Better Organization: It makes it easier for you and others to navigate through current discussions without scrolling through a long history of past conversations.

3082: 2646: 2032: 1817: 1783: 1749: 1715: 6004: 2584: 1397: 1329: 783: 134: 5540:

More Conducive Conversations: With a cleaner Talk page, it becomes simpler for other editors to engage in ongoing discussions and for you to manage responses.

3290: 3145: 3063: 2220: 1977: 1262: 453: 5543:

Improved User Experience: For users on older computers or slower networks, a shorter page can significantly enhance loading times and overall accessibility.

1905: 5345: 4803: 3831: 3793: 2927: 2425: 2391: 2357: 2288: 1220: 1086: 1044: 630: 357: 5311: 5155: 5121: 4457: 4423: 3759: 3725: 3535: 3456: 3411: 2088: 1178: 2083: 5277: 5043: 5009: 4348: 4262: 4140: 4106: 4072: 3899: 2760: 1597: 1437: 863: 6033: 5884:. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 4671:" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( 1035: 776: 703: 125:

text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Knowledge's policies and guidelines, take a look at our

5793: 4889: 3865: 3324: 3995: 471: 4525: 3059: 2988: 2555: 3372:

was set to 7.0km. It's not stated on the article nor in the single citation. A 7km high mountain with a diameter of 10km seems rather remarkable.

556: 5970: 5936: 5902: 5827: 5487: 5379:

Amors are shown to be most frequent near Mars's orbit, then sharply drop off at 1.1-1.2 AU. They should be frequent all the way to Earth's orbit.

4975: 4923: 4855: 4491: 2482:

Do you have any particular knowledge or sources that help resolve the problem of defining "age of sail", a term widely used by naval historians?

1880: 1673: 1513: 1479: 561: 87: 6010: 2675: 2011: 1846: 1812: 1778: 1744: 467: 5759: 5721: 2641: 1358: 835: 159: 3319: 2244: 2006: 1324: 501: 248: 5400: 5269: 4254: 2454: 2420: 2386: 2317: 1685: 1257: 1123: 1081: 424:

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of

3571: 3505: 3451: 2530: 2508: 2351: 2137: 1215: 432:

will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

3959:

does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Knowledge, this is supplied at minimum in an

3598:

does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Knowledge, this is supplied at minimum in an

3348: 2610: 1288:

does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Knowledge, this is supplied at minimum in an

153: 3390: 1170: 5664:

are policy. Regardless, please don't remove content for being offensive or vulgar, it's against policy and can be considered disruptive.

3280: 3247: 3224: 3201: 2680: 1967: 1945: 1925: 1638: 1518: 3860: 3826: 3171: 80:

because it is against Knowledge practice to link to the same article more than once in the same article (or at least the same section).

5861: 5521: 5340: 5184: 5150: 4486: 4452: 3788: 3754: 3344: 2825: 2327:

Nice observation, FYI I added a thread pointer with the climate project talk page to try to get some additional climate eds involved.

2282: 1445: 1402: 956: 710: 637: 108: 25:

to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

5369:

Rfassbind didn't clean up two of the images the way he did the other two (the ones for Atiras & Amors still show Martian Trojans).

5306: 5072: 5038: 4850: 4377: 4291: 4169: 4135: 4101: 3928: 2805: 2175: 6030: 5822: 5656:

I hate to be some what rude and condescending but how can you have been on the project for so long and not be aware of the fact that

4918: 4572:

contains an extensive section on its name and naming, the only information in the article on Venus is the minimal entry "Named after

3894: 3150: 1429: 815: 481: 138: 5376:

In addition, the sharp outer edge for Apollos is a great source for confusion, because that edge is not an Apollo but an Amor orbit.

4554: 5999: 5965: 5931: 5897: 5856: 5516: 5004: 4884: 4520: 3405: 404:

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (

5788: 5754: 4958: 4838: 2915: 1709: 4970: 3336: 1629:

Thank you very much for being so considerate! I will try to catch up and add some references today, they should be easy to find.

65: 801: 5189: 4861: 4174: 3086: 2336: 1623: 1433: 506: 337: 254: 49: 2579: 1911:

Thank you, but I am afraid thats a misreading of the map. The distance is read at the unmarked end of the lines of the stars.

474:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 389: 2883: 2835: 811: 477: 5566: 4726:

Really good presentation at the Ocean navbox, look nice and the information presented expanded up a notch or seven. Thanks.

942:

does not differentiate between any "real" colonization and "?" colonization, it speaks of space exploration VS colonization

371: 68:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

5265: 4250: 3530: 2756: 1593: 1031: 772: 699: 626: 552: 104:. I'm sorry if I'm mistaken about this. The following is the official blurb that I'm supposed to put on your talk page :-) 4402: 3067: 5127: 4064: 4049: 3216: 3163: 2789: 1937: 1897: 867: 381: 6018: 5382:

There was already another diagram in the article showing one example for each orbital class (though Atiras are missing).

4755:

The only downside: I would like to make the infobox so that it works for mobile view, but I wouldnt know how. Any idea?

4417: 76:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! I reverted your change at

5701: 4668: 3983: 3643: 3622: 3127: 3111: 2954: 2048: 1365: 1312: 539:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

5716: 4942:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4822:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4589: 4585: 4576:" in the infobox. Browsing the version history, I found that the very first sentence used to read "is named after the 3207: 3090: 2491: 1441: 1419: 859: 428:, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then 5689: 5673: 5475: 5460: 5446: 5420: 3519: 2226:

My plan is to invite everyone to it in a little bit but fist I wanted to show it to just 1-2 people, namely you and

1238: 4715: 3686: 2255: 1606: 5645: 4793: 4779: 4764: 4750: 5695: 5261: 4246: 3944: 3587: 3510: 2856: 2752: 2565: 1589: 1273: 1104: 1027: 851: 768: 695: 622: 548: 362: 280: 183: 6021:. That gives two links to the same article which does not seem correct. I have changed it to point to landmass. 4609: 4342: 4326: 2215: 921: 886: 874:

for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

797: 4700: 4010: 3692:

Was there anything in the above message that you found difficult to comprehend? I would be happy to elaborate.

3104: 2810:

Nothing ever gets destroyed on Knowledge, don't worry. There are two editing preferences you may benefit from:

1148: 951: 936: 5651: 4947: 4827: 4624: 4034: 2775:

Hi Nsae Comp, following concerns on the talk page I have restored an older version of the lead section of the

1062: 6026: 4664: 4559: 4382: 3799: 3478: 3420: 2844: 2770: 2322: 2160: 458:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

5359: 3717: 1196: 5680:

article. So thank you for your objection, but please leave it at that. See you at the articles discussion.

5235: 4317:

Fine with me, since my edit was about the conclusions not necessarily a discovery. Thank you for the info.

4220: 2726: 2267: 2068: 1564: 1002: 751: 678: 605: 114: 34: 22: 1158: 96:

that you started with a copyright violation notice because it was verbatim identical with the text at the

5942: 5247: 4593: 4232: 4060: 4030: 3948: 3340: 2993: 2738: 1576: 1014: 763: 690: 617: 544: 296: 5630: 4615:

Thank you very much, I seem to have not realized that it is not in the body. I added now a proper para.

1693: 5908: 5833: 5548: 5116: 4943: 4823: 4398: 3696: 3356: 2921: 2551: 2526: 2487: 2332: 1392: 789: 288: 191: 3134:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

1384:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

1315:. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — 5870: 5862: 788:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

54: 3638: 1234: 283:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

186:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

6022: 5881: 5603: 4696: 3364: 2543: 2518: 1607: 1144: 1135: 222: 408:). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was 4652: 3516: 3352: 3219: 3166: 2575: 1940: 1900: 1857: 1619: 1490: 1100: 385: 363: 292: 195: 5892: 5669: 5471: 5442: 5396: 5103:. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 5100: 4735: 4056: 4026: 3331: 2934: 2476: 2181: 1913: 1335: 355: 302:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

201:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

126: 29: 3971:. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted 3610:. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted 1300:. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted 1058: 279:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see 182:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see 5657: 5223: 4394: 4208: 3632: 2950: 2821: 2714: 2547: 2522: 2483: 2328: 2263: 1552: 990: 739: 666: 593: 295:

their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the

61: 4311: 1192: 5877:. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. 5713: 5625: 5234:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5112: 5104: 4938: 4775: 4731: 4630: 4463: 4219:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3956: 3837: 3595: 3594:

into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Knowledge's content, here or elsewhere,

3526: 3072: 2785: 2725:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2156: 1563:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1285: 1001:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 917: 882: 840: 805: 750:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 677:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 604:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 535:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 377: 284: 187: 122: 8: 5547:

If you're unsure about how to archive your Talk page, you can find detailed instructions

4692: 4644: 3540:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

3461:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

3416:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

3099: 2589:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2459: 2093:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2079: 2038:

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can

1140: 540: 444: 216: 175: 161: 97: 69: 2231: 808:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 5587: 4307: 4078: 3871: 3211: 3179: 3158: 2571: 2211: 1932: 1892: 1823: 1615: 1277: 44: 5995: 5961: 5927: 5885: 5852: 5818: 5784: 5750: 5665: 5661: 5571: 5512: 5467: 5438: 5392: 5358:

standards. I find that back on 8 February 2022, you added four images to the section

5351: 5336: 5302: 5205: 5180: 5146: 5068: 5034: 5000: 4914: 4880: 4597: 4581: 4577: 4573: 4550: 4516: 4482: 4448: 4373: 4287: 4268: 4190: 4165: 4131: 4097: 3991: 3960: 3924: 3890: 3856: 3822: 3784: 3750: 3731: 3674: 3663: 3599: 3567: 3501: 3447: 3386: 3315: 2984: 2860: 2852: 2837: 2697: 2671: 2637: 2593: 2450: 2431: 2416: 2382: 2313: 2240: 2192: 2142: 2133: 2002: 1876: 1842: 1808: 1774: 1755: 1740: 1721: 1669: 1535: 1509: 1475: 1354: 1320: 1289: 1253: 1211: 1119: 1077: 973: 908: 871: 831: 822:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

726: 653: 580: 562: 516: 507: 497: 488:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

349: 343: 321:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 220:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 5803: 5607: 5599: 5595: 5287: 5254: 5219: 5131: 5077: 4711: 4605: 4239: 4204: 4016: 3626: 3484: 3465: 3296: 2946: 2848: 2817: 2745: 2710: 2435: 2363: 2259: 1890:

You have Alpha Centauri as 2 light years away; it is in fact 4.5 light years away.

1689: 1678: 1583: 1548: 1494: 1188: 1021: 986: 735: 662: 589: 536: 520: 5582:

Human remains on the Moon, particularly of deceased humans, have been an issue of

1414:

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Knowledge's articles related to

5980: 5946: 5799: 5705: 5562: 5108: 5088: 4966: 4846: 4771: 4727: 4569: 4146: 3975: 3614: 3522: 2781: 2294: 2152: 2097: 1418:. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining 1304: 1128: 913: 878: 459: 425: 307: 206: 150: 5873:. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because 3004:

2022_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine#Other_countries_and_international_organisations

276: 275:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

179: 178:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

5681: 5637: 5452: 5412: 5391:

other diagram with new, cleaner drawings of example orbits? Or just drop them?

5231: 5096: 4785: 4756: 4742: 4684: 4616: 4409: 4334: 4318: 4216: 4041: 4002: 3964: 3709: 3655: 3603: 3397: 3272: 3239: 3193: 3185: 3094: 2907: 2797: 2722: 2500: 2401: 2397: 2343: 2274: 2249: 2167: 2075: 2025: 1983: 1959: 1917: 1701: 1630: 1560: 1293: 1226: 1162: 998: 943: 928: 855: 747: 674: 601: 532: 524: 440: 436: 146: 77: 4683:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

3040:{{legend|#FF8F8F|Countries that have blamed the invasion on NATO provocation}} 3015:{{legend|#FF6600|Countries that have blamed the invasion on NATO provocation}} 2035:

for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

101: 5976: 5765: 5731: 5434: 5227: 5165: 4580:" and that you first replaced this by "gaining its mainly used name from the 4303: 4212: 3138: 2868: 2718: 2207: 1759: 1725: 1556: 994: 743: 670: 597: 528: 39: 5451:

lol I just saw you also found and used that NEOs JPL site today. High five!

3369: 412:. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to 5991: 5987: 5957: 5953: 5923: 5919: 5848: 5844: 5837: 5814: 5810: 5780: 5776: 5746: 5742: 5735: 5591: 5508: 5504: 5355: 5332: 5328: 5321: 5298: 5294: 5283: 5176: 5172: 5142: 5138: 5092: 5064: 5060: 5030: 5026: 4996: 4992: 4910: 4906: 4876: 4872: 4546: 4542: 4512: 4508: 4478: 4474: 4444: 4440: 4369: 4365: 4283: 4279: 4161: 4157: 4127: 4123: 4093: 4089: 3987: 3920: 3916: 3886: 3882: 3852: 3848: 3818: 3814: 3780: 3776: 3746: 3742: 3576: 3563: 3559: 3497: 3493: 3443: 3439: 3382: 3311: 3307: 3123: 3078: 2980: 2976: 2864: 2667: 2663: 2633: 2629: 2446: 2442: 2412: 2408: 2378: 2374: 2309: 2305: 2236: 2227: 2129: 2125: 1998: 1994: 1872: 1868: 1838: 1834: 1804: 1800: 1789: 1770: 1766: 1736: 1732: 1665: 1661: 1505: 1501: 1471: 1467: 1424:? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall coverage of 1350: 1346: 1316: 1249: 1245: 1207: 1203: 1115: 1111: 1073: 1069: 827: 823: 493: 489: 435:

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of

81: 3955:. While you are welcome to re-use Knowledge's content, here or elsewhere, 2999: 1284:. While you are welcome to re-use Knowledge's content, here or elsewhere, 5583: 5493: 5317: 5049: 4895: 4707: 4601: 4497: 4433: 4001:

Thank you for the reminder, must have forgoten. I am leaving now a note.

3963:

at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and

3602:

at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and

3373: 3300: 2891: 2875: 2465: 2110: 2031:

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started,

1793: 1425: 1415: 1292:

at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and

1092: 142: 118: 105: 93: 5238:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4223:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3705:

Thank you for your reminder. I will take more care. Everything is clear.

2729:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1567:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1005:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

754:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

681:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

608:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

167: 5558: 5215:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

5053: 4985: 4981: 4962: 4899: 4842: 4467: 4200:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4082: 3909: 3875: 3550: 2896:

I redirect as you recommended to Ocean observations. Makes sense, thx.

2707:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2616: 2599: 2232:

https://en.wikipedia.org/User:EMsmile/Ocean_and_sea_articles_discussion

2198: 2148: 2055:

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with

1545:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1159:

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/de/worterbuch/deutsch-englisch/gaukler

983:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

396:

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

2816:

And under gadgets: "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange".

2498: 5196: 4181: 3693: 3683: 3471: 2689: 2469: 2367: 1527: 1428:

on Knowledge. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the

1281: 1096: 965: 793: 717: 644: 571: 6014: 5769: 5019: 4721: 4501: 3952: 3426: 2620: 2603: 2298: 2103: 1987: 1861: 1654: 1460: 1050: 264: 5576:

Hi, I'd like to ask about the meaning of a paragraph you added to

4584:

which it is associated with" further down in the introduction (in

3038:{{legend|#666666|Countries that have maintained a neutral stance}} 3013:{{legend|#666666|Countries that have maintained a neutral stance}} 5700:

Hi Nsae Comp :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview

4296: 3396:

Sorry, but I seem to also not find a source. Thanks for pinging.

3132:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Space ethics

2116: 1827: 523:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

463: 5975: