User talk:OJOM - Knowledge

1171:

his actions" - provided of course that it is properly referenced. The word "martyred" in unsuitable because it is not neutral, not becuase it's unpleasant - "killed" isn't pleasant either. "Martyr" has a religious connotation in English, someone who is murdered for refusing to renounce his faith is martyred. Someone who is killed during a border clash with soldier from another country is not martyred, he died defending his country - a noble thing in its own right - not his faith. To say "It is logical to link each act of Defense performed on is behalf to the Ministry of Defense and link each action on behalf of a Kuwaiti Officer to the Military of Kuwait and to the Ministry of Defense" is not relevant, an article should generally have only one link to another article in it, please read

1161:

not conform to that policy - put another way, the article cannot have a layout that is not in accordance with policy just because you want it to. The fact that "There are over hundreds with the name of Mubarak Al-Abdullah", while true, doesn't matter, because the article is only about one of them, there is no need to use a longer term just to identify a particular Mubarak Al-Abdullah, we are already at the article about that particular Mubarak Al-Abdullah. There are millions of people called "William", but the article about Prince William is only about him.

1175:. Maybe you have confused "linking" with "referencing", when I say "linking" I mean the red and blue links in the text. There is no need to link "Six Day War" every time it appears in an article, in fact policy is against this. As I said before "Kuwati Armed Forces" is a redirect to "Military of Kuwait", so clicking the "Kuwati Armed Forces" link takes a person to the "Military of Kuwait" article. Therefore linking "Kuwati Armed Forces" in the "Military of Kuwait" article is pointless, because it's just a circle; please read 2649: 2265: 2732: 3517: 2923: 3636: 3552: 2708: 2333: 608: 455: 395: 303: 165: 115: 65: 3902: 277: 257: 4070:

view; in others, we describe multiple points of view, presenting each accurately and in context rather than as "the truth" or "the best view". All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative sources, especially when the topic is controversial or is on living persons. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong."

4964:(assuming you were right, which you are not) before incorrectly administering two false blocks and fake accusations, specially that your Administrator status is governed by a limited to non-existent version of applicable Language capacities. Such is another clear evidence of absolute inconsideration to respectful contributions and is another indication of unclear motives. 4488: 3931:). This author has also created each active squadron based on the official correspondent French Knowledge Article which is listed in the main list as well. The listing of the French Knowledge Article is for the proper Fluent French authority to authenticate the content of what this author has added. Such cannot be done by an individual who barely speaks a language. 4968: 378: 4606: 4483: 4509:

English that distort the ability of English-speakers to understand. Other wikipedians have to follow you around and correct these passages!! An example is your sentence 'mixed with integrity clauses' above. I think you may mean that I am inappropriately insulting your integrity, but I cannot be sure!!

4073:

French official sources are not "the truth". Your articles *must* "strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative sources, especially when the topic is controversial or is on living persons. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong." I urge you to read

2362:

Don't fixate on one particular case, just stop linking to articles about rulers of Kuwait when the persons mentioned are or were not rulers of Kuwait. Ali Salem Al-Mubarak Al Sabah was not the same person as Mubarak Al Sabah, so don't link Mubarak Al Sabah. Mubarak Abdullah Al-Jaber Al-Sabah's mother

2133:

Leaving aside the issue of whether the French soldiers' name should be listed or not listed, and also leaving aside the use of the word "martyr" - which you have been told before you should not use and why - you shovelled a heap of information into the article without bothering to reference it. Now,

1155:

section is for links to "Knowledge articles refer to subjects not directly related to the article itself but of similar related content" as you say. I put in links to articles about subjects related to the House of Sabah and the politics of Kuwait and you removed all of them. Having a link to Tomb of

1440:

You totally misunderstand "camp". It doesn't refer to a locale with a camp fire and tents; it refers to sides in an argument. It is obvious that your sources are pro-Kuwaiti (you haven't cited a single book or journal article--nothing but Kuwaiti government websites), and the language reflects that:

1170:

You are quite right about "bravery" and "courage" - they are also non-neutral, and being killed in action does not automatically mean that a soldier was brave or courageous. If a soldier is awarded a medal for bravery, then a WP article can say that he was "awarded a medal for bravery as a result of

5077:

about how to respond to talk page comments). Labeling them all as "initial language was French" was simply an initial, default position, since I hadn't examined every one of them. Knowledge being a wiki, they can be updated to make them more accurate, and I would be happy to do so. If you can list

4508:

when you did not create the article nor command a better grammatical language understanding and typing". This is the *English* wikipedia. You are writing distorted, partially comprehensible English that is not grammatical in many places, and is filled with direct literal translations from French to

4318:: interviewed in English by a reputable media organisation, the French commander allowed the use of 'Joint Space Command' to go forward. As I know from previous experience, French military organisations usually decide on a authorised translation for their organisation in English; this is an example. 1478:

the writing of those articles to those who (claim to) represent those governments, or who edit as if they do. You may feel free to reinstate whatever you like, but if you do so based on unreliable sources, if you remove valid sources, if you reinstate non-neutral language, if you edit against other

1417:

OJOM, I appreciate your quick and courteous response, but in the interest of economy, let me be clear: in no way will we accept "government sources" over published accounts in reliable sources. One wonders what glory tales the Saudis will be telling about this battle and given that a. it seems that

4174:

to better the encyclopedia, and, thus, I would again urge you to consider changing the way you edit (looking at some reliable English language sources on this kind of thing, Air International, Air Forces Monthly etc would show you how the French Air Force terms are portrayed in English). Now, I am

2404:

of Kuwait is of no assistance to the reader, because there is nothing about the Kuwaiti military forces in that article. What you have been doing is exactly the same - you have been in the habit of linking part of the names of people, to articles about different people, rulers of Kuwait; and those

2206:

Well, unlike you, I will not dodge your question: I didn't know anything about OJOM11 until yesterday, but what he or she did was wrong and an Admin quite rightly took firm action. However OJOM11 didn't add unreferenced information to any article - he or she removed information; and OJOM11 did not

1449:

is another indication that you are working on glorifying the past from a specific point of view, no matter what the present situation is between the countries. Now, you may sing the praises of Saudi-Kuwaiti unity right now, but the time period of those articles you wrote was one of warfare, and in

1160:

section because he visited Washington. With regard to the other articles about royal persons, the point is not that they should all be changed to match the Sheikh Mubarak Al-Abdullah article; it is that they are examples of following Knowledge policy and the Sheikh Mubarak Al-Abdullah article does

1131:

Linking or referencing a military officer with his armed force that belongs to the ministry is a logical task to perform. Linking the actions of an officer and environment to the concerned military institution grounds readers from not getting confused with other misleading sources. It would not be

4864:

when you can't even put together the basics, and that as far as Languages where your Administrator status is elementary and other Languages where your status is non-existent. Similarly and more seriously, another major indication of your incapacity to judge correctly is your lack of understanding

4580:

Hi OJOM. You do not appear to have listen to me or any of the other editors who have attempted to reason with you on your talkpage. If the last twelve hours, you've not only added near-incomprehensible French to several pages but have created new pages - even with incorrect English in the *title*

3841:

Your record here, as depicted in the page history of this talk page, and the notes also still present, does not encourage me to believe that you are too worried about copyright, nor the conventions and rules of the English wikipedia. One barnstar doesn't change that. If you make an effort to make

4069:

says "We strive for articles that document and explain major points of view, giving due weight with respect to their prominence in an impartial tone. We avoid advocacy and we characterize information and issues rather than debate them. In some areas there may be just one well-recognized point of

4090:

The sections "History" and "Operational beginnings" are almost certainly copyright violations - very close paraphrasing, including a mistake about the identity of "No. 338 Wing USAAF" - from the aeroneufs site and thus the wing's semi-official history, translated into English. You inserted that

3912: 4094:

No, you didn't create it, you rewrote it, translating the text and infringing the copyright in the process. The article is likely to be deleted (because otherwise the copyright violation will remain in the page history, and Knowledge could be sued by the authors of the semi-official history).

4149:

accurate in English. They are a mix of English, French, and French terms translated literally into English, which makes them quite hard to read for people who do not understand French. I've given you two examples - formation and interarm - and there's also the repeated use of "Hunter" when

2062:, myself, and many others. Please, listen to the advice you have been given, and try to follow Knowledge's guidelines on proper addition of content. And when you respond on talk pages please try to use plain english, and address the specific information that is being brought up by others. 4478: 383: 3816:, the article subject. The official French description may have, in some cases, major distortions (this is more frequently the case on U.S. military articles, and pales with the propaganda sometimes present on unit/formation pages on Ru:wiki), but accurate descriptions better follow our 4346: 4410: 3017: 3797: 4415: 2258: 2395:

The "lecture", as you put it, is completely justified. The purpose of a wikilink is to deliver a reader to another article with more information about the wikilinked term. Let's say there is a sentence "the Kuwait Air Force is an arm of the Military of Kuwait"; a wikilink for

3890: 2642: 5063: 4635: 4130:

sources, nor concerns over your unsteady grasp of military English. These concerns are very long term, dating back to 2015 and earlier. As a result, I am now considering administrator action. I would urge you to consider changing your editing practices. Kind regards

1132:

logical to assume that links and articles are more authentic than quality of institutions. There are over hundreds with the name of Mubarak Al-Abdullah. This author does however appreciate your concerns and remarks and would like to thank you for your assistance. (

4425:

signifie. N'utilisez pas de traductions littérales. Rien sur Wikipédia n'est "officiel". Arrêtez d'écrire ici jusqu'à ce que vous amélioriez votre anglais, s'il vous plaît. Pardon my imperfect French, please; we don't seem to be communicating properly in English.

4589:. You show no comprehension that you are not writing correct English, and have no seeming interest in dialogue or WP's rules. I had considered blocking you for a year, but on second thought, I am about to block you indefinitely for damaging the encyclopedia and 3803:

Your grasp of military English is seriously inadequate - the wordings you're using frequently don't make sense. Any belief by you that the French Knowledge article should be the model of the En:wiki article is simply not based in any WP rule I've ever heard of.

3971: 4871:

which are created and developed based on sourced facts in the respective applicable Language, some which your stance is elementary and others which you don't speak, let alone have the vetting authority to administer judging within a limited and incapacitated

373: 4341: 4443:

diff: "Commandements" is simply NOT english. "Commandements" n'est pas correct anglais. Votre pauvre anglais a endommagé beaucoup de pages. Vous arrêtez fréquemment d'autres Wikipédiens réparant les dégâts. Faites-le une fois de plus et vous voulez être

4640: 4405: 4382:

I've received from both the copyright expert and another administrator general acquiescence with my approach to you, so be warned: further attempts to continue your French-lish translation practices into English, like I had to clean up after you at

4175:

trying to remain courteous and patient, but your insistence on ignoring a number of wikipedia rules is testing that. You need to give me a clear indication that you will, at the very least, seriously consider changing the way you edit. Regards

3838:, unlike the permission given to groupaeronefs.free.fr - which is also copyrighted. For that reason, I've have escalated the issue to a degree, marked the page as a copyright violation, and started the process of discussion over its deletion. 2363:

Munira Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah was not Sheik Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, so don't link Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah. Abdullah Jaber Al Abdullah II Al-Sabah was not the same person as Abdullah II Al-Sabah, so don't link Abdullah II Al-Sabah. Simple

586:

You are using false equivalency standards. Just because it is on the Arabic Knowledge does not mean it should automatically be part of the English Knowledge, especially if the sources do not comply with the English Knowledge policies.

4943:, your Administrator status didn't even consider fairly judging, the numerous contributions on existing Encyclopedic Language Articles (which were also not created by this author) as well, that are as significant as the various 4387:, will result in administrator action. Do me a favour, stop editing for a while, and consider your position. Read some English sources, like Air Forces Monthly, Air International etc etc, that cover such French military issues. 4453:, which had included within it a tense error about who was replaced in 1991 - Schmitt did not replace Admiral Lanxade, but was replaced by him. I now have no option but to block you for again damaging the encyclopedia. Regards 4391:

RAIDS, which starts from French anyway. You've done amazing and significant work on French military units, but if you persist in stopping people clearing up your translations, or making more of them, I will have to block you!!

2080:"keen and interested to conserve the intergrity of the information on such an Esteemed Institution such as Wikipidia than to adhere to the limited procedures of referencing that does not always reflect fact and true history" 4621:) by definition in both the English and French languages is a cluster group/s arrangement of various groups (plural) or a group (singular) in form of a sequential series. Accordingly, in reference referral to "Arrangement" ( 3868:

fills a gap that otherwise I would have only scant notes in old references works for. But it means that much of your content may have significant problems. (For example, "Interarm" in French = effectively "combined arms" in

3013: 368: 4226:

Heritage, while description and actions of another country's military unit can be described in the designated language of the respective country, the unit name designation is surely listed under the local unit language

4724:

based also again and normally on the French Encyclopedic Article. For a fact, in the process, your Administrative status wrongly accused this author of copying material from a website which was not the case, since the

4284:

of the French Air Force have been formed and reformed several times across their history. During the course of that history, these units have their respective memorial heritages and these unit designations are in the

2498:

they are just wisps of smoke. In one edit I added a reliable source, which you then removed. Experience has nothing to do with it, except that your lack of such in terms of Knowledge is leading you to make bad edits.

2029:

The issue is that you are adding a lot of unnecessary material to articles without regards to formatting, due weight, or proper referencing. Your edits have been consistently reverted by many editors, including

2102:

Yes, you are saying, and showing through your edits, that you do not have to comply with Wikipedias established procedures for verifiability of information. Knowledge is not a place for original research (per

4378:

when those sources are official French military statements or documents that show the way French military officials translate terms, unit titles, etc, in dealing with English-speaking armed forces, often the

363: 5038: 26: 3475: 4565:

representations, including favourable depictions of French military units, are not what we are here for. Comply with these policies, and things will be fine. Otherwise administrator action will follow.

3895: 4844:

capability. Your Administrator status (even if your Administrator status has a repertory of other Languages) can apply only in this case, administrative procedure to fully exclusively created English

2082:, is it your position that Knowledge's requirements for proper referencing do not apply to your work? Should Knowledge just accept that whatever you write is a fact, just because you wrote it and are 1470:

know I have a penis), you said "The government of a country is held responsible for the history of its existence and not books and journals." The moment when he hold a government responsible for the

4120: 3967:). This author has also created each Escadre ( which has no official translation to English) based on the official correspondent French Knowledge Article which is listed in the main list as well. 4356: 5045: 4960: 4947: 4944: 4931: 4923: 4916: 4912: 4908: 4883: 4868: 4860: 4854: 4824: 4819: 4811: 4806: 4800: 4795: 4791: 4764: 4748: 4744: 4717: 4683: 4675: 4648: 4351: 2013:

You stated "Your concerns have been duly been noted", but you are still doing what you want. Please do not distort the format of the articles. I am sorry but I should say again, "enough". --

1156:

the Unknown Soldier means nothing in the context of Mubarak, Kuwaiti history or its politics or its foreign relations. It's the same as putting a link to the Smithsonian Institution in the

537: 3885: 1311: 1079: 748: 3945: 2241:

I also apologise for failing in my job as an author and remaining unaware of imaginary identical users such as OJOM11 being created, and for any offence caused to you for that failure.

533: 3927: 1335: 1307: 1287: 1239: 1075: 744: 2701: 1151:

Thank you for responding. Your answers to the questions "Why" seem to be "because that's the way I want the article to look" and you seem to have missed the point completely. The

2405:

articles do not even mention people such as Munira Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah. In conclusion, the links are unhelpful, and such linking is against Knowledge policy, so don't do it.

1331: 1283: 1235: 1215: 2326: 724: 1211: 513: 4366:

to you about your personal views not being particularly relevant; as regards translation of technical military French, as I now say for about the fourth time, it depends on

1359: 720: 4991: 640:

give as much detailed source, date and licensing information as possible. A brief citation, such as "Kuwaiti Publications", does not provide sufficient source information.

1474:

of its history will be the moment we can shut this encyclopedia down and replace all articles with a link to the "official" website. In the meantime, we are not going to

509: 2759: 4743:

that was being developed correctly based on how your Administrator status capability was able to award earlier a (barnstar award) in 2015, on a similar context created

2475:

Don't deliver lectures which factual verifiable experience knows little of like you previously did on other topics. This author is adding Encyclopedic facts as usual. (

2207:

edit 1983 Beirut barracks bombing at all and therefore did not shovel any unreferenced information into that article - you did. So my question still stands unanswered:

1355: 4607:

February 2018 - Response to Fourth False/Incorrect Disruptive Block & Fake Accusations based on Invalid Justifications within Content Application of Language Facts

3963: 1422:, for instance), because if this becomes a battle between camps, you are not likely to win. And I'm sure you do not want the other side to write this article, do you? 4629:), spelled the same in both the English and French languages, your classification of "vague" and suggestion of "Group" exclusively is not correct nor even applicable 3741: 3034: 3029: 1604: 4237:) was to be enacted in an English speaking country, you would not translate that unit name to that country's language. La Fayette Escadrille is still designated as 3823:

Sure you favour keeping the French terms: understand, it's what you know. But the English wikipedia uses "wing", "squadron", and, for escadrille = basically equals

3685: 3647: 3603: 3024: 1764: 1713: 1708: 1703: 1698: 1599: 1395:

That begs the question of how much historical fact is in the documents you cite, all supplied by the Kuwaiti government. I had to look elsewhere to learn that the

900: 895: 499: 347: 4523:

Your block expires in about four days. I expect you to carefully go and fix your partially comprehensible English, not add over-complimentary descriptions of the

3830:

I will say again: the EC 3/3 article is a copyvio-though-translation of the page I've now linked. The very fact that you've remove the link to the original page (

3091: 3086: 1898: 1808: 763: 4107:

Do not wholescale try to translate French articles into English!! In doing so, the readability of the resulting article in English decreased by a great degree.

3690: 3081: 3039: 2982: 2977: 2582: 1803: 1661: 1594: 710: 705: 357: 5002:

is evidence that nothing has changed in four years: I say this for the benefit of any admin who is asked to come here to evaluate a possible unblock request.

4433: 3949:). This author has also created each dissolved squadron based on the official correspondent French Knowledge Article which is listed in the main list as well. 3591: 3586: 3568: 3563: 3395: 3368: 3298: 3258: 3223: 3161: 2972: 2891: 2765: 2430: 2425: 1507: 1384: 1379: 1201: 1196: 3652: 1055: 4720:(this author had not created the Article on the English Knowledge), was deleted by your Administrator status as this author was developing the undeveloped 3847: 3670: 3497: 3492: 3430: 3293: 3126: 2908: 2903: 2420: 1374: 989: 1549: 1263: 1003: 914: 4421:

Vous écrivez très mauvais anglais. Vous ne coopérez pas avec d'autres éditeurs. Vous ne semblez pas vouloir suivre les règles de Wikipédia. C'est ce que

4270: 3936: 3502: 3440: 3435: 2898: 2775: 1564: 1051: 4958:, your Administrator status didn't even consider fairly judging, the right of this author to retain at minimum the editing rights to edit at least the 3680: 2770: 2108: 2063: 1988: 643:

Scanning and cropping an existing, copyrighted photograph, and then uploading it to Knowledge, does not transfer the ownership of the copyright to you.

1545: 1259: 999: 910: 3350: 3327: 3304: 4682:(barnstar award) by your Administrative status. In the process, your Administrative status thanked this author very much and requested to have more 3913:

List of French Air Force Articles created based on the Official correspondent French Encyclopedic Article & Not Any Website as Fakely Insinuated

3806:

authority behind them (official French military writings in case of French military articles) and content on the French article should be identical.

966: 5119:. Nevertheless, this author would like to thank you very much for such a respectful, professional and courteous reply. Thank you and Kind Regards.( 4753: 4739: 4695: 4266: 3918: 3642: 25: 4934:

added by this author. Such is clear evidence of absolute inconsideration to respectful contributions and is another indication of unclear motives.

2517:

It was impossible to know what you were referring to before, you wrote English words, but not a coherent sentence. No matter, the only thing that

1521: 1031: 4193: 3666: 3541: 4561:, as well as all the others, including adherence to U.S. copyright law. The factual data *must* follow the rules of the site it is hosted upon. 1125: 962: 3827:, not "wing". En:wiki has a responsibility to educate in English, and if the professional military terminology is wrong, education is hindered. 3578: 3007: 4593:

editing. You may appeal on this talkpage, for a couple of months or so, or if another admin sees fit to restore your right to edit elsewhere.

4489:

Response to further Fake Disruptive Claims in relation to Third False/Incorrect Block Description within Content Application of Language Facts

4479:

January 2018 - Response to Third False/Incorrect Disruptive Block based on Invalid Justifications within Content Application of Language Facts

3704: 1517: 1027: 2869: 16: 4950:

by this author. Such is clear evidence of absolute inconsideration to respectful contributions and is another indication of unclear motives.

4247:

if An American military unit has a memorial in Europe, in France for instance, you may find the actions of that U.S. unit translated to the

3834:) does not fill me with confidence. The authors of "Ne recule ni ne dévie" spent what might have been thousands of hours on their work. You 3746: 4969:

Separate Distorted Nonsense Reply Responses within Content Application of a Fourth False/Incorrect Indefinite Block & Fake Accusations

4858:. However, under no circumstance is your Administrator status in line to handle the authenticity and capacity of judging fully translated 4126:

Thank you for your response to my concerns. You do not appear to believe in Knowledge's fundamental rules about collaboration, copyright,

5120: 4465:

I have blocked you for one month. You may appeal here, on this talkpage, to me or to another administrator should you wish. Kind regards

4273: 2476: 1133: 467: 407: 315: 177: 127: 77: 481:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 421:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 329:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 191:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 141:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 91:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 4092: 3798:

Exclusive Translation from official correspondent French Encyclopedic Article Only and Not from any Fakely Insinuated Suggested Website

3628: 3002: 1115: 439: 4582: 557: 4786: 4262: 3954: 3696: 2469: 2259:

February 2015 - First False/Incorrect Disruptive Block based on Invalid Justifications within Content Application of Language Facts

4670: 4472: 4460: 3791: 5033: 3244: 3167: 2994: 2987: 2799: 2643:

April 2015 - Second False/Incorrect Disruptive Block based on Invalid Justifications within Content Application of Language Facts

602: 552: 225: 49: 5078:

the ones that are not from French below, and what language they are translated from, I will be happy to update the project page.

4299:. We are also not required to comply with official terminology, instead we go with the common term in use, primarily in English 3864:

Finally, none of this changes the fact that you've translated and made wiki-accessible massive chunks of French units' history.

596: 579: 4734: 3891: 3401: 3074: 2855: 2827: 1625: 269: 5057: 4898:. Such is clear evidence of absolute inconsideration to respectful contributions and is another indication of unclear motives. 4102: 3700: 4810:

based on Fake and False accusations insinuating again copying material from a website which was not the case again since the

4636:

2018 Encyclopedic Straightening of an Elementary 2015 Request Appreciation Award within Content Application of Language Facts

3846:

sources, and accurately cover not just the high points of a military unit/armed service, but the low points (see for example

2116: 2071: 4747:, based exclusively on the official correspondent French Encyclopedic Article. Accordingly, awarding and thanking very much 4600: 4573: 4542: 4399: 4335: 4289:

under French designations, no matter where they are, similarly to what has been explained to you in this paragraph above.

4138: 4114: 4085: 3879: 2250: 4586: 588: 571: 5128: 5102: 3674: 5027: 4362:

You need to give me a *clear indication* that you are seriously considering changing your editing practices. I've quoted

2879: 2875: 2677: 2564: 2546: 2530: 2508: 2484: 2414: 2388: 2372: 2309: 2236: 2220: 2095: 1445:, an article I just tagged as not-neutral), and your persistent insistence on including all honorifics of those from the 1188: 567: 529: 5011: 4182: 2022: 1459: 1431: 1408: 4896:

All your nonsense Administrative blocks, within applicable means, are distorted and based on False and Fake accusations

4712: 4158:

arrangements. Referencing? The articles need to be properly referenced in English, and, also, on the French wikipedia (

4053: 4032: 4011: 3990: 2813: 2637: 1303: 1071: 740: 268: 4159: 3726: 2555:

I don't speak Enlgish, but English is my native language. Perhaps if you did not make up words such as "miracling"...

2227:

So, is your answer to my earlier question that the information does not need referencing because they died violently?

4170:

and you seem not to be interested; and you've shrugged off a potential copyright violation. My sense is that you are

2632: 1172: 3532: 3580: 3264: 2720:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2436: 2354: 2345:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1829: 1327: 1279: 1231: 619: 4499:<"Disruptive" editing: "refusal" to improve "Franglish articles", refusal to cooperate with other editors": --> 2946: 3416: 1987:, a wikilink under "see also" would be enough, although there are probably better pages from which to link from. 624: 4441: 4295:

Knowledge is not an international war memorial, indeed we have a specific rule which says we are not a memorial

4828:

is clear evidence of a conflicting, two sided, juxtaposition behavior, which mainly insinuated unclear motives.

4757:

is clear evidence of a conflicting, two sided, juxtaposition behavior, which mainly insinuated unclear motives.

3596: 3467: 1207: 1418:

they won and b. there's more of them then there are of you we need our editorial policies to be followed (see

1141: 4769: 4653: 4188: 3573: 3507: 3279: 3229: 3112: 3097: 2936: 2572: 1874: 716: 230: 215: 5018:

It's ironic that you claim integrity for this page OJOM, considering you have been sanitising it for years.

4892:

re-blocked again on February 25 2018 (for a fourth time), resulting in a further disruptive indefinite block

4998:

Well, this block is indefinite. And I knew I remembered your name and your style; the section above titled

4512:

A French wikipedia article can have literally nothing to do with an En:wiki article, except as a source of

4315: 3659: 2665: 2187:

didn't think about the integrity of this author first and doing the simple minimum, of asking respectfully.

1859: 505: 220: 4641:

Concluding proper Judgment exclusively within Content Application and based on Encyclopedic Language Facts

3842:

sure your articles are in properly understandable English, including military English, are based on solid

2288:, and excess detail to articles despite requests to stop. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 4979: 4166:- the editor who inserts the text needs to be able to reference it. Now you've already been warned about 3613: 3608: 2913: 2673: 2293: 2173: 2002: 1893: 1610: 1351: 4836:

in application with the case at hand, your Administrator status on this case application is that of the

1996: 1580:

kw/MOD/Arabic_P/index.jsp], Kuwaiti Ministry of Defense,(Section Arabic Read الجيش الكويتي)</ref: -->

2841: 2809: 2805: 2749: 379:

File:Sheikh Mubarack Abdullah Al-Jaber Al-Sabah amongst Kuwaiti Commandos in Operation Vantage 1961.jpg

4253:. Since your French is elementary, allow this author to enlighten your French knowledge in respect to 4200:

However, the main point of this and sticking to official French Air Force echelons designation in the

3722: 4154:

sources invariably translate 'Chasse' in this context as 'Fighter'. You also seem to be ignoring our

3209: 2865: 2861: 2721: 2697: 2656: 2494:

There is no lecture, just an instruction to adhere to policies. You say you write facts, but without

2346: 2272: 2179: 2122: 1903: 1589: 449: 389: 352: 297: 292: 159: 109: 4406:

Response to False/Incorrect Block & Fake Accusation within Content Application of Language Facts

5081:

Should you wish to reply, please add your comments in this section rather than a new one, applying

3861:

As it is, I'm seriously considering running Earwig's bot over a wide variety of your previous work.

2715: 2340: 1120: 877:{{WIA}}. , H.E.Sheikh Salman Al-Humoud Al-Sabah and Sheikh Abdullah Jaber Al-Abdullah II Al-Sabah ( 862:

Security Forces was appointed under which Sheikh Abdullah Jaber Al-Abdullah II Al-Sabah (1898-1996)

832:

Security Forces was appointed under which Sheikh Abdullah Jaber Al-Abdullah II Al-Sabah (1898-1996)

592: 575: 4449:

I told you to fix your English before you continued. You instead created an entirely new article,

4440:

I've asked you, several times, to stop using garbled English. You've just done so again with this

4347:

Distinguishing between an authority and an author within Language Articles and Content Application

3060: 880:

H.E.Sheikh Salman Al-Humoud Al-Sabah and Sheikh Abdullah Jaber Al-Abdullah II Al-Sabah (1898-1996)

871:

Al-Sabah{{KIA}} to form an army commanded by cavalry commanders H.E.Sheikh Ali Al-Khalifa Al-Sabah

444: 3851: 3623: 2851: 2847: 2780: 1972: 287: 59: 4370:

sources, first of all in English. Your personal opinions about how to translate military French

2400:

allows a reader to go to that article and learn more about the Kuwaiti military. A wikilink for

1105:

assaulted post. Accordingly, Kuwaiti authorities refused this proposition and demanded from the

4251:(possible or unlikely); but NOT the unit name or unit acronyms, the later will still read US... 3824: 3597: 2669: 2289: 1694:({{lang-ar| origin word -" Min Doun "}}- meaning " Without"); however, most of the armed forces 1496: 886:{{WIA}}. Vehicle armed men from Al-Jahra and Kuwait City joined the battle formation contingent 520: 251: 235: 5064:

Proper Cultural Languages translations of Encyclopedic Articles based on Factual Applicability

2107:). Your statements and edits show that you are unwilling to conform to Knowledge's standards. 2084:"more experienced than the cumulative knowledge of all these repsectful authors put together" 4804:

was fully created and developed by this author; your Administrator status deleted the entire

4296: 3977:

Translation of the motto to English (the motto of the squadron was not added by this author).

3865: 3855: 3618: 3483: 3132: 3045: 2795: 2791: 2785: 2455: 2321: 2127: 2112: 2067: 1992: 1913: 1666: 1502: 768: 489: 429: 337: 199: 149: 99: 4978:'s comments about your English are in fact correct. If you wish to be unblocked, please see 4597: 4590: 4570: 4539: 4469: 4457: 4430: 4396: 4332: 4300: 4238: 4230: 4179: 4135: 4111: 4099: 4082: 3876: 3781: 3528: 2943: 2693: 2007: 1888: 1639: 654: 4882:, in the process of the above clear line of work, your Administrative status blocked this 4527:, not to link French articles directly in the text of English wikipedia articles (use the 8: 4532: 4528: 4513: 4167: 4155: 3373: 2887: 1770: 1442: 1047: 811:

Commander]] ] of Defense and Security Forces in metropolitan and desert areas (1928-1938)

263: 5098: 5053: 4367: 4308: 4151: 4127: 3843: 3767: 3190: 3147: 2883: 2837: 2833: 2823: 2819: 2577: 2397: 1789: 1742: 1719: 1541: 1255: 1176: 1094: 995: 906: 463: 403: 311: 245: 173: 123: 73: 34: 5111:

Many thanks for your prompt clarifications, which are highly appreciated. In general,

5023: 4554: 4422: 4363: 4304: 4171: 4075: 4066: 3817: 3809: 3808:

This is simply not correct. Knowledge is here to accurate document, in line with our

3542: 3235: 3075: 2954: 2753: 2560: 2542: 2526: 2521:

matter is your mistaken belief that you do not have to adhere to Knowledge policies.

2504: 2410: 2384: 2368: 2246: 2232: 2216: 2169: 2091: 1569: 1532: 1366: 1342: 1318: 1294: 1270: 1246: 1222: 1184: 614: 482: 422: 384:

File:Sheikh Mubarack Abdullah Al-Jaber Al-Sabah amongst Kuwaiti Commandos in 1961.jpg

330: 192: 142: 92: 45: 4484:

Response to Third False/Incorrect Block within Content Application of Language Facts

2138:, which is to ADD YOUR SOURCES? I can only assume it's one of the following reasons: 2136:

Why did you not do what you are supposed to do with everything you add to an article

1656:, Official website of the Kuwaiti National Guard, (Section Arabic Read)</ref: --> 646:

Do not upload a particular image more than once. Unused duplicates are eligible for

5086: 5082: 5074: 5007: 4987: 4837: 4550: 4321: 4281: 4277: 4258: 4254: 4213: 4209: 4205: 4163: 3872:

I would encourage you to consider continuing to reply to my comments. Kind regards

3718: 2683: 2588: 2313: 2299: 2018: 1977: 1908: 1492: 1455: 1427: 1404: 209: 4867:"unreferenced exclusively created English Language Articles and mostly referenced 3177: 1441:

you refer to the Ikhwan who "killed the innocent bedwins and looted their farms" (

4975: 4841: 4781: 4707: 4665: 4622: 4614: 4594: 4567: 4536: 4505: 4466: 4454: 4450: 4427: 4393: 4329: 4286: 4248: 4201: 4176: 4132: 4108: 4096: 4079: 4048: 4027: 4006: 3985: 3958: 3940: 3922: 3873: 3772: 3761: 3558: 3524: 3215: 3200: 2940: 1814: 1396: 958: 731: 4814:

was being created and developed based exclusively on the official correspondent

4235:

by the way, "Lafayette" is a composite word and should be listed as "La Fayette"

4220:

or "Fighter Squadrons of the French Air Force" are concerned is the following :

647: 5116: 5112: 5070: 4504:

You have complained above that I should not "lecture or block the creator of a

3461: 3446: 2745: 1880: 1865: 1850: 1844: 1835: 1820: 1795: 1780: 1513: 1446: 1023: 755: 563: 5094: 5049: 4562: 4558: 4517: 4325: 3751: 3196: 2033: 1480: 240: 3516: 5090: 5019: 4223: 3831: 3752: 2731: 2672:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 2648: 2618: 2603: 2556: 2538: 2522: 2500: 2495: 2406: 2380: 2364: 2292:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 2281: 2264: 2242: 2228: 2212: 2165: 2104: 2087: 2057: 1983:

You are giving undue weight to the bombings/memorial in multiple pages. At

1419: 1389: 1180: 41: 4733:. In addition, for a Fact also, your Administrator status applied falsely 4342:

Knowledge is a Universal (All Languages) Cultural Educational Encyclopedia

3858:), I would be more likely to treat you with the respect you're asking for. 2922: 2379:

Don't argue about it, just don't do it. I can't be any clearer than that.

477:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

417:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

325:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

187:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

137:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

87:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

5003: 4983: 4384: 3813: 2285: 2049: 2041: 2014: 1488: 1451: 1423: 1400: 2965:

pavillion acquired following the ] in 1884, which should not have left

1678:

Spread#5-Sheikh Fahad Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah ( first from the left)

5046:

Knowledge:Pages needing translation into English/Articles by user/OJOM

2939:. Il est bon d'avoir plus l'histoire militaire française sur En:Wiki. 4026:

translated from the official correspondent French Knowledge Article (

4005:

translated from the official correspondent French Knowledge Article (

3635: 3551: 3285: 3051: 2740: 1688:

mainly known Kuwaiti ] tribes and foreign ] ] classified as "Bidoon"

1556: 949: 929: 632:

What is the copyright status of this/these book(s) or publication(s)?

374:

File:Sheikh Mubarack Abdullah Al-Jaber Al-Sabah is his early 20's.jpg

4930:

not initially added by this author, which are as significant as the

4729:

was being developed based exclusively on the official correspondent

4324:

are standards that all users should normally follow. The exception,

3476:

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

2134:

you list the sources here on your talk page, but what good is that?

630:

From which book(s) or publication(s) have your uploads been copied?

4314:

I've just demonstrated this with the Space News link I've added to

3984:

exported from the official correspondent French Knowledge Article (

3733: 3711: 3422: 3341: 3337: 3181: 2401: 1776: 1086: 1062: 1038: 1010: 981: 977: 973: 945: 937: 925: 4411:

Clear Logical Statement with content Application of Language Facts

2998: 570:. Nothing. Find a source that does include information about him. 4906:, your Administrator status didn't even consider fairly judging, 4888:

30 days on January 25 2018 (for the third time on this talk page)

3407: 3356: 3310: 3250: 2442: 1948:'' ('''FAL''') in ], also known as the '''Armed Forces of Lebanon 1756: 1748: 1733: 1725: 544: 4549:

You may not fully understand. You must comply with wikipedia's

4416:

Distorted Nonsense Reply to Statement on behalf of other author

3360: 3318: 3270: 3153: 3138: 1752: 1729: 1631: 1616: 921: 40:

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend,

4702:

which was developed (not created) based on the correspondent

3333: 3314: 3173: 3118: 3103: 3066: 2624: 2609: 2594: 1528: 1014: 868:{{WIA}} operated until the Hamadh Battle in 1919.<ref: --> 838:{{WIA}} operated until the Hamadh Battle in 1919.<ref: --> 4585:). Vaguely correct English for this unit would be more like 3886:

January 2018 - Fake Accusation & False Insinuating Claim

3522:

Thank you for your recent edits to military units from WWI.

4776:

which was created and developed based on the correspondent

4660:

which was created and developed based on the correspondent

4216:) along with their language respective unit designation as 3452: 2537:

Sorry, but I do not understand what you are trying to say.

2461: 941: 933: 495: