1107:
1313:
1240:
1167:
258:
583:
I also now see that you not only have continued your personal attacks, you then hatnote the whole discussion, including your personal attacks. That sort of behavior is obviously not done in good faith. I'm hoping that this will be the end of it, and that people can cool down and stop insulting others
520:
I am starting to see why admins are so overwhelemed though. Apparently any form of trying to reason with people has become pointless, every little disagreement nowadays turns into an RfC, and at least five ANI's on the way. It's very tiring. What happened to constructive discussions? I know I used to
480:
I'm not sure what you are saying here. You mean I should go directly to the noticeboard and not warn him first? That seems strange. Yes, it's following another incident. Eric
Corbett this Saturday evening violated the 3RR rule. Since I wasn't there at that time, I didn't file an incident until Monday
171:
Didn't you notice? He is a monarchist, or at least a royalist, and a very patriotic
Canadian, who spends a lot of effort not only on the Canadian royalty articles, but also in trying to get the Canadian flag into as many articles as possible. NOT doing that automatically makes you an evil republican.
568:
No, I did it so you would stop insulting people, obviously. I did a mistake on your page though, I didn't read through it and see all the previous people who also asked you to stop the personal attacks. Now I realize that your personal attacks aren't mistakes. It seems from what
Ddstretch said above
460:
as it seems to clearly be baiting and inflammatory, by making a non-specific, yet templated, warning to Eric
Corbett, following a judgment by another administrator that a previous complaint by you about him was stale. If you feel that a particular comment by this user warrants action, then raise the
408:
and Moscow
Connection are arguing that you lack sources and that the current version has a long standing consensus. Neither argument is good. Also, the version that Moscow Connection defends has terrible sourcing. You both needs to find reliable sources and work from there. That is my third opinion.
602:
You did it to provoke a reaction, pure and simple. If you think a patronising template is going to calm the waters then you are very much mistaken. DD Stretch is 100% right; you of all people should not warn others of such behaviour when it is you exhibiting most of it. That kind of behaviour fans
607:
turn up to kick it into the gutter is disgusting and has provoked this kind of reaction. I will not be saying anything further on the talk page now and you and your tag-teamer can carry on reverting me if that's what turns you on. I'm supposed to be on holiday and enjoying myself. It is now up to
748:
It wasn't me he reverted in the reverts I mentioned above, although he most certainly was not right to revert that either. So here are two editors, both telling him that his change violates the RfC, and he edit wars, for a total of 8 reverts in 24H. He knew he was editing against RfC, he was told
693:
A collapsed discussion isn't archived. First I've heard you can't add comments to them. And since that was your intention I should have in that case uncollapsed it. You can't insult somebody in a discussion and then add collapse headers and expect to get the last word that way. That's again more
355:
Sorry to bother you again, but there seems to have been a misunderstanding regarding the dispute. I guess this is mostly my fault for not providing a proper summary, but you missed the fact that my last edit actually was properly sourced. I put a link to the relevant version on the talk page
1252:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
744:
The point of collapsing is to get the irrelevant discussion out of the way, so people don't have to read it. The point is most DEFINITELY not to get the last word in, like you tried to do. You can't insult people and then tell them they aren't allowed to respond, I'm sure you realize
1325:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
297:
749:
that repeatedly. He was asked to take it to the talk page, which he didn't do. He knows about the 3RR rule, and intentionally breaks it. He even removed tags, which he very well know he isn't allowed to without discussion. That is not good-faith editing. --
389:
Well, it's a "my source versus his source" kind of thing. We do actually agree that that's our disagreement. Our sources offer different definitions, and the question for the 3O was "Which definition is the more appropriate one to use for the article".
1179:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
309:
603:
the flames, exactly as it has done here. FWIW, Eric and SP are tremendous writers and they have done a fantastic job on the article. A lot of time, planning, and no doubt money for books etc has been spent. To then have the likes of you and
374:
Then the conflict should be resolved as the issue discussed was clearly that you didn't have sources. You need to discuss constructively at least to that point that you agree on what you disagree about. Then you can ask for a third opinion.
335:
and possibly getting involved in it? It seems pretty out of control to me with O.r., it has just been mono edited mostly so I am trying to reorganize it. The one editor removed a couple of tags and does not leave edit summaries. Thanks
549:
simply to get a reaction, so I suppose you've got what you wanted. I would, however, ask you to stop this behaviour as it will just end badly for you and it's making you look like a troll. Please don't confirm my suspicions.
68:
an administrator will respond to my request at WP:AN & closes the previous Rfc, we'll have a clearer picture. I made the request there, as you were getting too much mud thrown at you, for having closed it earlier.
293:
1337:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1264:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1191:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
135:
alone (with or without a footnote) were adopted. Anyways, thanks for giving your input there (your further participation is encouraged, as welll) & not being harsh on me. I appreciate that :)
1353:
1280:
1207:
502:
I also have to say that it's pretty absurd to claim that a warning of personal attacks is baiting and inflammatory. Isn't it the personal attacks that are baiting and inflammatory? --
569:
I generally should not warn people at all. This is the opposite of what I have been told previously, so that's fairly confusing. I'm hoping
Ddstretch will clarify. --
608:
you whether you want to stay there with Curly Turkey and troll the page, or whether you want to assume your own desires of " better things...than dealing with this".
1225:
1371:
1298:
625:
No, I did not. Stop assuming bad faith, stop the personal attacks, and stop removing peoples comments from the talk page. Calm down, stop fanning the flames. --
718:
Then what's the point of hatting an irrelevant discussions? The whole point is so it helps diffuse the situation. Have you learnt nothing in your time here?
461:
issue using specific and linked examples of what you think are actionable examples of poor behaviour on his part to the relevant
Administrator's noticeboard.
1136:
127:
option, will be adopted. Particularly, when you consider that Elizabeth II's successors will likely be chosen TPOTY someday & trying to squeeze
1088:
474:
243:
1066:
1049:
1032:
1015:
998:
970:
953:
936:
919:
224:
1156:
758:
530:
872:
855:
841:
820:
806:
789:
775:
737:
709:
686:
671:
665:
651:
634:
620:
593:
578:
511:
490:
481:
morning. That was apparently too late. He also insults people frequently. These things are not exclusive, so I don't see how that's relevant. --
432:
418:
399:
384:
1120:
444:
181:
144:
118:
78:
59:
639:
It's sweet that you should try now to play the victim. However, you are not fooling anyone. You have behaved appallingly and you know it.
521:
have them here a few years ago, that worked, and they very rarely turned into RfC's or incident reports. Man, what happened to Knowledge? --
321:
453:
368:
282:
404:
I've read through the discussion again, and I disagree. Neither you, nor Moscow Connection are arguing from sources. You are arguing from
1305:
1232:
1151:
165:
103:
44:
350:
700:
Eric reverted against an RfC 6 times in 15 minutes, including removing tags. If that doesn't count as vandalism, what does? --
357:
197:
193:
345:
131:
countries into their Notes Box, would be very interesting. This potential problem (of course) would also be avoided, if the
1367:
1294:
1221:
251:
725:. The "damage" was not caused by Eric and you, nor anyone, lays claim to any article. This term was therefore I correct.
233:, I had every right to revert his BOLD edits. He should have discussed his proposed changes on the talkpage beforehand.--
237:
546:
562:
209:
1363:
1290:
1217:
26:
1037:
Oh, fuck me—you've done it. Your bait worked—you've dragged me into your manure dramah vortex. I'm done here.
156:
pushing a Canadian republican agenda, there. Not sure what the other individual is going on about. Oh well.
1346:
1273:
1200:
1358:
1285:
1212:
1147:
1113:
1106:
958:
I wasn't baiting you; I was letting you know that I was talking about you. There's a fucking difference.
1003:
Read into it as you will. In future, I'll just slag you off behind your back, if that's what you want?
35:
of the flag/country column, an option you've decided to support. Therefore, why did you abort the Rfc?
794:
I'm not familiar with such vague abbreviations so please readdress that question in a literate way.
341:
1143:
1127:
1084:
1044:
1027:
993:
948:
914:
851:
816:
785:
754:
721:
Eric was right to revert you. I suggest you look up the term "vandal"; in fact, don't bother,
705:
661:
630:
589:
574:
526:
507:
486:
457:
446:
414:
380:
317:
274:
240:
220:
177:
114:
55:
722:
50:
Because we can't have two RfC's about the same topic. Or, in shorter word: Because fuck it. --
1334:
1261:
1188:
1062:
1011:
966:
932:
868:
837:
802:
771:
733:
682:
647:
616:
558:
205:
1345:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1272:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1199:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
326:
269:
that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
17:
8:
763:
Which tags? also, I note that you had the last word there anyway, so your point is moot.
469:
428:
395:
364:
332:
670:
Adding comments to hatted discussions; failure to accept others opinions; calling Eric
337:
1321:
1248:
1175:
1157:
1038:
1021:
987:
942:
908:
604:
313:
262:
234:
161:
140:
99:
74:
40:
1330:
1257:
1184:
287:
201:
1080:
847:
812:
781:
750:
701:
657:
626:
585:
570:
522:
503:
482:
410:
405:
376:
216:
173:
110:
51:
1342:
1269:
1196:
1057:
1006:
961:
927:
863:
832:
797:
766:
728:
677:
642:
611:
553:
538:
497:
462:
424:
391:
360:
305:
304:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
1338:
1265:
1192:
539:
230:
31:
From what I could tell, the Rfc you opened was likely going to result in the
826:
656:
I most certainly do not know it. In what way have I behaved appallingly? --
187:
157:
136:
95:
70:
36:
697:
That's simply false. You are just trying to make me angry. It won't work.
1349:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1276:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1203:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
90:
option. It's highly unlikely that folks would want to delete the entire
984:
860:
Good. For a moment there I thought I really would have to be uncivil.
584:
now. I really have a lot better things to do than dealing with this. --
1312:
1239:
1166:
278:
1352:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1279:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
1206:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
1020:
Same shit, different pile—you aren't getting any more honest.
1123:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1100:
86:
Per your suggestion, I made option D in the latest Rfc, a
1137:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#MugiMafin
941:
Well, they'd never take the bait if you did, would they?
1333:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1260:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1187:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
811:Neutral Point of View, if I recall correctly. --
359:(under your response). Can you revise your 3O?
1112:Hello, OpenFuture. You have new messages at
423:Sounds about right. Thank you for your time.
123:IMHO, it's highly likely that your preferred
331:Would you mind taking a look at this page
1142:I'm not sure if ping works from there. --
985:Not a difference that makes a difference.
14:
1322:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
1249:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
1176:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
924:I don't talk behind people's backs.
907:Why are you pinging me, Cassianto?
825:Do you mean to say you templated a
23:
1306:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
1233:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
1105:
979:was "just letting me know" of the
545:I suspect you have templated Eric
24:
1384:
1319:Hello, OpenFuture. Voting in the
1246:Hello, OpenFuture. Voting in the
1173:Hello, OpenFuture. Voting in the
1311:
1238:
1165:
256:
1356:and submit your choices on the
1283:and submit your choices on the
1132:Could you look at this please?
694:evidence of bad faith from you.
351:Third Opinion on Japanese Idol
13:
1:
1372:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
1335:Knowledge arbitration process
1262:Knowledge arbitration process
1226:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1189:Knowledge arbitration process
1114:Forward Unto Dawn's talk page
1299:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
252:Reference errors on 24 April
7:
1210:and submit your choices on
10:
1389:
1364:MediaWiki message delivery
1291:MediaWiki message delivery
1218:MediaWiki message delivery
1208:the candidates' statements
1079:Calm down, both of you. --
346:04:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
322:00:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
244:19:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
225:18:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
210:18:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
182:05:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
166:02:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
145:15:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
119:02:10, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
104:21:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
79:05:44, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
60:05:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
45:05:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
1152:17:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
1089:12:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
1067:23:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
1050:22:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
1033:22:48, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
1016:22:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
999:22:29, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
971:14:49, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
954:12:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
937:12:27, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
920:12:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
873:21:13, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
856:21:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
842:20:54, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
821:19:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
807:19:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
790:18:57, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
776:17:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
759:16:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
738:16:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
710:15:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
687:14:55, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
666:12:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
652:12:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
635:11:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
621:11:54, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
594:07:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
579:07:50, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
563:06:46, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
531:08:51, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
512:06:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
491:06:30, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
475:06:16, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
310:report it to my operator
983:in which you bait me.
433:17:15, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
419:03:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
400:20:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
385:20:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
369:18:33, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
27:Time Person of the Year
1110:
458:User talk:Eric Corbett
447:User talk:Eric Corbett
275:The Zeitgeist Movement
267:automatically detected
1331:Arbitration Committee
1258:Arbitration Committee
1185:Arbitration Committee
1158:ArbCom Elections 2016
1109:
1054:Good, fuck off then.
333:Epistemic democracy
94:from the article :)
18:User talk:OpenFuture
1347:arbitration policy
1274:arbitration policy
1201:arbitration policy
1160:: Voting now open!
1121:remove this notice
1111:
1144:Moscow Connection
291:
64:Very well. BTW -
1380:
1315:
1242:
1169:
1124:
1064:
1060:
1043:
1026:
1013:
1009:
992:
968:
964:
947:
934:
930:
913:
870:
866:
839:
835:
827:featured article
804:
800:
773:
769:
735:
731:
684:
680:
674:, need I go on?
649:
645:
618:
614:
560:
556:
501:
472:
467:
466:
445:Your message on
285:
260:
259:
1388:
1387:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1316:
1308:
1303:
1302:
1243:
1235:
1230:
1229:
1213:the voting page
1170:
1162:
1130:
1125:
1118:
1103:
1058:
1056:
1041:
1024:
1007:
1005:
990:
962:
960:
945:
928:
926:
911:
864:
862:
833:
831:
798:
796:
767:
765:
729:
727:
678:
676:
643:
641:
612:
610:
554:
552:
543:
495:
470:
464:
463:
452:I have removed
450:
353:
329:
257:
254:
190:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1386:
1354:the candidates
1317:
1310:
1309:
1307:
1304:
1281:the candidates
1244:
1237:
1236:
1234:
1231:
1171:
1164:
1163:
1161:
1155:
1140:
1139:
1129:
1128:Please come by
1126:
1117:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1035:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
780:npov, iirc. --
746:
741:
740:
719:
713:
712:
698:
695:
597:
596:
581:
542:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
515:
514:
493:
449:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
352:
349:
328:
325:
306:false positive
302:
301:
253:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
189:
186:
185:
184:
150:
149:
148:
147:
133:United Kingdom
84:
83:
82:
81:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1385:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1360:
1355:
1350:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1327:
1324:
1323:
1314:
1301:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1282:
1277:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1254:
1251:
1250:
1241:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1214:
1209:
1204:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1181:
1178:
1177:
1168:
1159:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1122:
1115:
1108:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1068:
1065:
1063:
1061:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1048:
1047:
1040:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1010:
1002:
1001:
1000:
997:
996:
989:
986:
982:
978:
974:
973:
972:
969:
967:
965:
957:
956:
955:
952:
951:
944:
940:
939:
938:
935:
933:
931:
923:
922:
921:
918:
917:
910:
906:
874:
871:
869:
867:
859:
858:
857:
853:
849:
845:
844:
843:
840:
838:
836:
828:
824:
823:
822:
818:
814:
810:
809:
808:
805:
803:
801:
793:
792:
791:
787:
783:
779:
778:
777:
774:
772:
770:
762:
761:
760:
756:
752:
747:
743:
742:
739:
736:
734:
732:
724:
720:
717:
716:
715:
714:
711:
707:
703:
699:
696:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
685:
683:
681:
673:
669:
668:
667:
663:
659:
655:
654:
653:
650:
648:
646:
638:
637:
636:
632:
628:
624:
623:
622:
619:
617:
615:
606:
601:
600:
599:
598:
595:
591:
587:
582:
580:
576:
572:
567:
566:
565:
564:
561:
559:
557:
548:
541:
532:
528:
524:
519:
518:
517:
516:
513:
509:
505:
499:
494:
492:
488:
484:
479:
478:
477:
476:
473:
468:
459:
455:
448:
434:
430:
426:
422:
421:
420:
416:
412:
407:
403:
402:
401:
397:
393:
388:
387:
386:
382:
378:
373:
372:
371:
370:
366:
362:
358:
348:
347:
343:
339:
338:Earl King Jr.
334:
324:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
299:
295:
289:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:
270:
268:
264:
245:
242:
239:
236:
232:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
183:
179:
175:
170:
169:
168:
167:
163:
159:
155:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
121:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
106:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
80:
76:
72:
67:
63:
62:
61:
57:
53:
49:
48:
47:
46:
42:
38:
34:
19:
1357:
1351:
1328:
1320:
1318:
1284:
1278:
1255:
1247:
1245:
1211:
1205:
1182:
1174:
1172:
1141:
1131:
1055:
1045:
1039:Curly Turkey
1028:
1022:Curly Turkey
1004:
994:
988:Curly Turkey
980:
976:
959:
949:
943:Curly Turkey
925:
915:
909:Curly Turkey
861:
830:
795:
764:
726:
675:
640:
609:
605:Curly Turkey
551:
544:
454:your message
451:
354:
330:
327:Take a look?
314:ReferenceBot
303:
298:Ask for help
266:
263:ReferenceBot
255:
191:
153:
151:
132:
128:
125:no countries
124:
92:Notes column
91:
88:no countries
87:
85:
65:
32:
30:
1359:voting page
1286:voting page
409:The end. --
261:Hello, I'm
202:Baking Soda
192:Please see
109:Awesome. --
1343:topic bans
1270:topic bans
1197:topic bans
1081:OpenFuture
848:OpenFuture
813:OpenFuture
782:OpenFuture
751:OpenFuture
723:here it is
702:OpenFuture
658:OpenFuture
627:OpenFuture
586:OpenFuture
571:OpenFuture
523:OpenFuture
504:OpenFuture
483:OpenFuture
465:DDStretch
411:OpenFuture
377:OpenFuture
312:. Thanks,
308:, you can
283:cite error
217:OpenFuture
174:OpenFuture
152:FWIW, I'm
111:OpenFuture
52:OpenFuture
1339:site bans
1266:site bans
1193:site bans
1059:Cassianto
1008:Cassianto
963:Cassianto
929:Cassianto
865:Cassianto
834:Cassianto
799:Cassianto
768:Cassianto
730:Cassianto
679:Cassianto
644:Cassianto
613:Cassianto
555:Cassianto
498:Ddstretch
425:MugiMafin
392:MugiMafin
361:MugiMafin
281:caused a
279:your edit
265:. I have
1119:You can
1101:Response
1046:¡gobble!
1029:¡gobble!
995:¡gobble!
950:¡gobble!
916:¡gobble!
672:a vandal
406:WP:TRUTH
215:Sigh. --
33:deletion
981:comment
273:On the
241:selbert
158:GoodDay
137:GoodDay
96:GoodDay
71:GoodDay
37:GoodDay
846:No. --
540:WP:DTR
471:(talk)
277:page,
231:WP:BRD
745:that.
547:and I
16:<
1368:talk
1329:The
1295:talk
1256:The
1222:talk
1183:The
1148:talk
1085:talk
977:ping
975:The
852:talk
817:talk
786:talk
755:talk
706:talk
662:talk
631:talk
590:talk
575:talk
527:talk
508:talk
487:talk
429:talk
415:talk
396:talk
381:talk
365:talk
342:talk
318:talk
288:help
235:Neve
229:Per
221:talk
206:talk
188:Neve
178:talk
162:talk
141:talk
115:talk
100:talk
75:talk
56:talk
41:talk
456:on
294:Fix
292:. (
154:not
1370:)
1362:.
1341:,
1297:)
1289:.
1268:,
1224:)
1216:.
1195:,
1150:)
1087:)
1042:🍁
1025:🍁
991:🍁
946:🍁
912:🍁
854:)
829:?
819:)
788:)
757:)
708:)
664:)
633:)
592:)
577:)
529:)
510:)
489:)
431:)
417:)
398:)
383:)
375:--
367:)
344:)
320:)
296:|
223:)
208:)
200:.
196:,
180:)
172:--
164:)
143:)
129:16
117:)
102:)
77:)
66:If
58:)
43:)
1366:(
1293:(
1220:(
1146:(
1116:.
1083:(
850:(
815:(
784:(
753:(
704:(
660:(
629:(
588:(
573:(
525:(
506:(
500::
496:@
485:(
427:(
413:(
394:(
379:(
363:(
340:(
316:(
300:)
290:)
286:(
238:–
219:(
204:(
198:2
194:1
176:(
160:(
139:(
113:(
98:(
73:(
54:(
39:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.