1310:, and gives your little custom rule more weight than it deserves.But let me remind you that guidelines are not binding, especially when you bypass the procedure and follow the spirit they were aiming for.In that regard, there was no retrograding of the pages I've been working on.They've continually improved.There has been no opposition, and no edit warring.I have a great deal of experience with Knowledge's design elements and with the modifying (and creating) of top-level pages, having personally initiated the overhaul of most of them.I've acquired a feel for what will be accepted versus what will cause alarm.Tweaking has been at a minimum because I'm now fairly fluent in wiki markup.The styles and colors are in line with the rest of Knowledge's "high-level" pages.There have been no complaints that I know of concerning the refbar page designs, just compliments.
333:
consistency between the pages, no endless sandbox edits), and I templatized them on your suggestion.I don't want an argument here, that's not why I've come.I want to pick up where we left off before the conflagration started on the sidebar redesign (You know me, I push an issue pretty hard, but the nature of consensus is that if someone is pushing hard against it, then almost by definition there is no consensus on that issue, unless a lot more people show up - which is rarely the case on such discussion pages.It is much easier to kill a new idea on
Knowledge than it is to promote one.My point here is that I know "basic topics" and "fields of study" won't be on the sidebar redesign final proposal, so it would be futile for me to push that issue any longer.)
31:
1803:
974:. The page would then be formatted as follows: the text entered in the rest of the page would be compressed so it was around 80 characters wide, with a margin on the left of about ten or so characters. Then, in the big gap on the right of the page, there would be a "toolbox" which contains various links to different parts of the wiki. I have been able to do this using <nowiki: -->
528:
867:
510:
1304:, that is a guideline, which YOU and 3 others drafted and ratified.The message at the top of the page reads "It is generally accepted among editors and is considered a standard that all users should follow."How can that be true if hardly anyone knew about it at the time it was being written, or since?That statement is highly misleading, no, it's blatantly
766:
his/her original action, and she/he argues that the positive after-effects are worth the initial action, disregarding the actual (or potential) negative effects and arguing there are ramifications nobody can predict. Please note I'm a
Romanian, therefore what you and I consider common knowledge might be two almost completely disjunct sets of events.
1888:
1868:
1893:
1863:
1883:
1873:
1317:
You boldly moved forward with the portal page merge, and when I reverted you, you totally changed the subject and accused me of policy and guideline violations on the unrelated previously mentioned page layouts, even though you know that I have followed the spirit of the relevant guidelines.Quiddity,
217:
You ask difficult questions good sir. Since I added the tag, it must probably have had a peer review at some point, but if it isn't in the archives, I have no idea. It should be added that I did a bunch of old peer review template adds, probably hundreds. So it might just have been a mistake. Hard to
169:
Okay. It just seems a shame that such an important issue left over from the Main Page redesign would be ignored. I may in the future submit it to
Village Pump, but I am still undecided. But you are, of course, right -- it would be even more of a shame to have the Sidebar Project splinter over such an
830:
In response to Five
Pillars of Knowledge, the link was quite insightful. Interestingly, Last I checked there are no images of Mohammut on his page, none of which would have any historical significance anyway, and would be cause much disrespect (worthy of death in some states) to the Islamic doctrine
332:
Hey, we've made pretty good strides working together, so there's no need for threats.I've been working closely with you on the ref pages, have not engaged in competition with anyone on those, I stuck to
Knowledge design standards which you support (Knowledge colors and border thicknesses, maintained
1406:
Now I'm guessing that you're resorting to using multiple accounts again, after the last few days of argumentative discussion with myself and others. But I'm hoping this isnt necessary. I really don't intend to aggravate you on purpose. You really do incredibly good work with content generation, and
1382:
we both just want a good encyclopedia, but our divergent ideas on how that is best achieved seem to cause a lot of conflict. I'm sorry that seems to happen, but that is how strong opinions work. We're both lovers of lists and ontologies, and probably too smart (and young) for our own good, which is
1313:
The most important detail in this little confrontation you've started is that you haven't pointed out anything which you dislike about the reference page design formats, nor have you pointed out any problems with my development of them. Instead, you've been using the guideline as a weapon, bringing
1142:
as ostensibly making little sense; I myself didn't revert because I thought perhaps the formulation was simply too recondite for my comprehension, but I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who was a little confused (I think I gather Chuck's meaning, but I don't think the reference is appropriate for
658:
Now, before you get the idea that I'm calling you a Nazi, I want to clarify that I'm convinced you acted in good faith when you added that boilerplate--after all, the Color WikiProject's page clearly states "To be emblazoned across the talk pages of every color-related article and non-article color
420:
For the record, I tried very hard to avoid getting into an argument.I succeeded until the
Transhumanist decided to take issue with a single word from one of my replies ("unilaterally"), claiming that I had defamed him via all sorts of accusations that I never made.I attempted to explain that he had
344:
Another solution is to replace the section template with actual embedded code.This doesn't make changing colors any harder, but we'll lose the benefit of the template in easy tweaking of other formatting elements.So we could leave it in there until we are sure there won't be any need to adjust the
1455:
BTW, I can't find nor remember your question about "the overview articles list".Only one person complained on my talk page about my approach (because of the
Geometry article, but that move was a no-brainer).The other person, David, was just lending a hand by pointing out the glitches in my use of
616:
Also--I hope this doesn't come as very harsh, but I don't know how else to put it--please don't throw the weight of a WikiProject behind an article as long as you don't really understand what's in there. In this instance, it gave credibility to an article which shouldn't have existed in the first
909:
regardless of if you start or finish projects, just to let you know, i'm going to be out of town for the weekend which probably means a lot of the sidebar voting action. although i think it'll mostly be votes, you may want to watch my talkpage to see if anyone replies to my
Talkpage notes i just
352:
The last solution that I know of is to create 2 templates to replace the existing one.One to place before each heading, and one to place after each heading.That way the headings' edit buttons won't be affected, and we'll still have the benefit of implementing adjustments across the set of pages.
1418:
Personally, I'm a minimalist - I am that person who mercilessly edits what others contribute, attempting to refine and clarify and simplify without losing any signal. Which I guess is why we're always interacting in this way? We're interested in many of the same subjects, so we're going to keep
765:
Ok, since you come so hard on me with the
Holocaust thing, I challenge you to provide another universally known analogy for the following situation: someone does something unaware of its consequences, the consequences are (or could be) strongly negative, there are some positive after-effects to
646:
I acknowledge your rationale, but still don't agree that a "support" boilerplate was appropriate for that article in the first place. We're delving into philosophy here, but in essence your line of thought is somewhat similar to saying "the
Holocaust was good because the net result is political
153:
Do you think the issue of coloring the search box should be pursued during the sidebar redesign? I'm almost ready to wave the white flag on the issue, and save it for... whenever another major design change comes about. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks again,
769:
Please note that you shouldn't feel in any way offended now--you might even be entitled to gloat, if you're so inclined--given that I retracted my request for deletion on this article. Therefore I feel more at large now talking about the logic of your reactions, given that you can't accuse me
969:
I am working on another wiki which is being used for a private project. It is using MediaWiki, so the template markup is the same as for WP. Essentially, we are trying to use our wiki to write a book. Some pages on the wiki are sources we are going to use for the book, others are actual book
787:
As for an alternative analogy, I can't think of one offhand. I had thought "the ends do not justify the means" covered it as an abstraction, but now that I think about it harder, they don't really cover the same problem at all. How about, "A kid throwing stones off a bridge onto a highway
1878:
1829:
and after seeing how frustrated the proposer was with our opposition, I decided to research the issue and found that copying the glossaries to Wiktionary doesn't necessarily mean removing them from Knowledge.I've added my support, with the condition that the glossaries remain on
1515:).Add each of these tags on the vandal's talk page, in sequential order, after each instance of vandalism. Adding warnings to the talk page assists administrators in determining whether or not the user should be blocked.If the user continues to vandalize pages after you add the
709:(I hope you don't think I'm being confrontational!) ((I'm sure there's a proper linguistic term for apologizing immediately after an insult, as if that somehow retracts it, but I cannot seem to discover it right now... (not that I was insulted, I just enjoy technical jargon)))
336:
The issue at hand, and where we left off, is the section template on the ref pages.We still need to find a solution to the edit button glitch.The easiest immediate solution is to NOEDITSECTION the pages (which I've already done), which works fine on all but the longest page
1758:
Turquoise makes a good base color.Good job.I couldn't quite find an orange scheme that works.Could you?I think pumpkin would make a good base, if we get the right saturation, and not too pink.For use on one of the other pages with a redundant color
1564:
pages is a good example.The new name you have chosen is a better name.Not having to discuss it in advance frees you up to make another change somewhere.If you push change too far beyond what the community wants, believe me, they'll let you know.:-)
196:
You asked if it is used anywhere - and I said no but I got to thinking that it may be to put it in the appropriate place in the wikipedia namespace - along with a chart I have been working on that has all of the HMTL named colors - Scroll down at
424:
One of my faults is that once I begin arguing something, I can't walk away.That's why I avoid so many of the site's controversial goings-on.As it is, I sometimes sacrifice sleep to type replies to the discussions in which I end up getting myself
504:
470:
I'll be gone for the foreseeable future (at least a few weeks), and don't have time to install the templates onto the rest of the ref pages.The instructions are included on the closing template, but cutting and pasting the heading block from
810:
Humm... yes, I did consider Godwin's law when I wrote that, but I was also unable to come up with a better analogy. Anyway, I'm glad I was mistaken and you didn't actually think I was the bastard that I tought you thought I was. :-) Cheers!
1402:
I just saw a redlinked-talkpage-user editing a page I watchlist, and went to give a welcome template. I checked their edit history to give a quick scan, as I always do before welcoming someone, and it was instantly obvious that it is you.
1647:
I'm just going to tweak the history section a bit, and I'm also going to replace the geography section images with a continent link instead, so that it can be inserted back in the normal order. Those images are a non-essential use of the
1608:
Forgot about that post - it was way back in August!That's too much time lag for me.I prefer 5 minutes, or 5 seconds. :-) If you can reasonably assume no one will object, just change it.If you guessed wrong, they can change it back.YOU
1359:
As for your accusations, I have made no personal attacks, have been as civil as I can be in all recent interactions, and have assumed as much good faith as is possible. My mentioning DISCUSS and OWN was intended as a reminder, not an
1748:
I appreciate that you are trying to keep it to scheme, but I was going for yellowish, not greenish.Can you shift it a bit toward the red side of the spectrum.Also, the border is ugly.Needs to be a little lighter, and definitely not
1407:
you're obviously an immensely well-read person, something I admire greatly - words are the most potent things humans have yet devised and my bible is the dictionary - but you also have a tendency to overdevelop - cases in point
1422:
I'll end by apologizing for inappropriately beinging up the basic topic lists issue, my only defence is that was a 3am gut-reaction to your (to my mind) hasty revert of the Portal:Browse merge, which as I mention above, I
1174:- I generated it from a table, and am pokign at it off and on to get it into shape, but it's low-priority compared to the main text of the W. S. Gilbert article, which is still in need of a lot of work. Ach, weel!
175:
Hopefully I responded at the right place (I wasn't entirely sure where I should reply to the thread). Anyways, thanks for all your help... and I'll look forward to your support if/when I submit it to Village Pump.
1314:
it out and waving it around whenever you are confronted on issues which have nothing to do with the page layouts.The sidebar/extortion incedent is a prime example.And it is in writing for everyone to plainly see.
1257:
I restored the prior introduction pages - I didn't see anywhere this was discussed prior to the change - I think it looks good to have the header tied into the tutorial better, but lets get concensus first on
1235:
629:
Part of the purpose of the tagging, was to properly list all the articles that are in the Color categories, so that interested parties can check them over, to determine their worth and validity and accuracy,
883:
Hi Quiddity.This content in question was removed because it was unsourced and contributed by an IP address known for vandalism.If you can provide a source for this, please feel free to restore it.Thanks,
1259:
633:
If I hadnt, we wouldnt all now know about that article's problems, as they'd be confined to only its talk page. But now you have a large forum of potentially interested/expert people to communicate with!
976:
tags, but doing it that way clutters up the page. I would rather just be able to add the template tag at the top, and have the page automatically formatted. Do you have any idea how I could do this?
434:
But the connotation was clearly there, whether by intention or not.But I sympathize with your arguing problem, because when I get "locked-in" I'm pretty much doomed for the duration just the same. --
1444:
Control that temper of yours, and we'll get along just fine.That account you spotted was reserved for sandbox editing, but I forgot what account I was logged on with from time to time.Oh well.--
1042:
Your revert is hours out of date. You wiped out more recent changes which included an earlier revert of the removal you seemed concerned about. I don't understand how you managed to do that ;).
1076:
1100:
Hi, the only reason WP:THANKS got 5 msgs, is because it was listed on the Community Bulletin Board; but notices are only there for 7 days, after which it would have dropped 'off the radar'.
1231:
498:
457:
120:
784:
No problem at all. No offence taken at all :) Sorry, my rambling was misinterpreted too, I get tired of formality sometimes, and resort to expressive-but-ambiguous turns of phrase.
317:. The aim is to integrate all information into normal prose english in each article. (Re: Purple -- whilst only 10 items, it makes up 50% of the article. That's especially bad). --
146:
I've removed my comments and have summarised in just a few short words. You can find them at the discussion page. Anyways, I must have misinterpreted your words. Admittedly, I was
1152:
109:
1808:
I think it is the replacement image that shows up when the specified size is too small for the image to be shrunk down.Trouble is, I don't know what that image is called.
1125:
659:
page." With this reply I simply wanted to answer to what I see as flawed logic in your previous post; I honestly don't intend to be confrontational or to insult you. --
1561:
1178:
534:
516:
238:
1165:
1088:
and have also noted that there are almost no compliments this month (three, compared to WP:THANKS's five in it's week of operation). I would like to help promote
898:
241:, as we seem to agree on most things in it. (You're obviously welcome to tweak it whenever, too). I'm trying to whittle the variants down a bit. That's all :) --
1524:
1350:
merge: cyberjunkie (the page's main maintainer) and rfrisbie and I preferred the original design. My other reasons for wanting a quick merge are mentioned at
370:
251:
Oh, and I'm changing the toolbox section internal ordering. I'm not sure where you stand on that; it's the bottom thread at the talk page, if you disagree. --
341:, which is too long to rely solely on "edit this page").So I've contacted CBDunkerson, the wiki-programming wiz, to get his expert opinion on the templates.
1845:
1318:
you are not being honest, and therefore you are not acting in good faith.You've violated 3 policies that I know of so far: attacks, civil, and good faith.
1369:
in with the Portal merge discussion, though they are two sides of the same coin (and you still haven't answered my question concerning consensus over the
682:
respect for you, was that I "acknowledge your rationale" too. But your method of explanation in that reply is ridiculous and ghastly (according to my own
1708:
Thanks! I don't really 'need' them currently, though I might apply for the mop after Christmas. I'll see how time pressures are going then. Too much to
733:
Ok, let's leave it at that then. I think you misunderstood what I meant to say, but we both already invested too much time in a pointless discussion. --
1844:
Your automated response was kind of meaningless. I don't register because I don't feel like signing in everytime I make an edit. Again, thanks anyway.
438:
281:
This page's edit buttons are acting all freaky, and we need to find a fix soon, because we can't really turn them off due to the length of the page. --
1777:
1662:
1613:
1603:
1460:
1448:
1396:
492:
409:
396:
383:
704:. No, they didnt -- check the dates. Nobody has edited since I added the template. Get your facts straight before accusing someone of something! :P
595:(I'm not a color expert. I was just adding the WikiProject template to everything in the relevant categories. :) I'll add a note about the AfD. --
1073:
Sorry - the link for his user page was red and I thought I could do some housekeeping by removing it. Auroranorth 09:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
973:
I would like to setup a template that I stick at the top of every page that contains a book chapter, say by typing {{bookchapter}}<nowiki: -->
360:
1588:
321:
1027:
1009:
888:
482:
429:
268:
2005:
1321:
We're supposed to be working toward reaching consensus, but instead you have been employing tactics to try to get what you want.Please stop.
1569:
1242:
1225:
1209:
949:
936:
849:
575:
566:
285:
255:
185:
1716:
1434:
I hope that we can get along as fellow editors, and that you won't feel it necessary to use multiple accounts in the future. Sincerely, --
1428:
1384:
1058:
next to it in his contribs list, and the page takes so long to load I must not have seen the "newer edit →" link. Thanks for fixing :) --
802:
759:
727:
640:
314:
136:
1681:
839:
Sorry I put my idea in the wrong place - gulp - I am a wikinovice who has not yet taken vows - I put my idea where it probably belongs.
591:
1147:
1093:
1297:. I have neither proceeded in the face of opposition nor impeded others from working on those pages.Therefore, WP:OWN does not apply.
1002:
1234:, specifically Dragons flight and Rob Church, i think. (Rob volunteered to "suspend my development break" to do the main coding). He
1171:
264:
I'm okay with either toolbox configuration.Given the choice, I'd probably go with the order that you just implemented in version 20.—
1419:
bumping into each other, and I truely would like to work things out better, as this is an uncomfortable stalemate we seem to be in.
1815:
1328:
647:
corectness, tolerance, and Israel." Which is obviously flawed--while the "final solution" certainly did have considerable positive
1789:
1626:
I've been working on categories page.Comments welcome.Will take a look at cycles as per your request.Thanks for the opportunity.--
1096:
is no sentence a normal human being would know unless they had previously heard of it. Auroranorth 09:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
1739:
The border was a bit dark, and greenish, so I fixed that.Also, missed the footer during the color change, so I fixed that too. --
1709:
1630:
1139:
392:
I was pissed off to see you and david levy arguing, yet again. So, sure, sorry, let's just ignore all that. Ostriches unite :) --
1763:
1753:
1743:
1734:
1268:
599:
1848:
1834:
1668:
1408:
307:
988:
817:
776:
739:
665:
623:
611:
1826:
1131:
885:
327:
1853:
1438:
926:
914:
1555:
1536:
1702:
1674:
1158:
1085:
448:
1595:; but then I gave in to temptation, and went for the easier instant-move, as I knew it would just leave a redirect at
1592:
1576:
825:
163:
1199:
617:
place, and well-intended users wasted their time editing it instead of doing something more useful for Knowledge. --
207:
1220:
1194:
276:
966:
and you seemed to know what you are talking about. I thought you might be able to help me with a question I have.
873:
245:
1477:
1115:
1770:
1062:
1252:
843:
556:
345:
formatting (depth, margins, padding, etc.), and then embed the code.In the meantime, we can embed the code in
227:
1730:
looks blanched compared to the other pages in the headerbar set.Is there something you can do to fix that? --
1580:
1370:
831:
of iconoclyst. So at least Knowledge is somewhat respectful. I bow to the majority leaving it as is. Thanks.
421:
misunderstood my post, but this only convinced him that my alleged deception had escalated to a higher level.
97:
89:
1550:
1935:
1335:
1132:
1043:
998:
702:"and well-intended users wasted their time editing it instead of doing something more useful for Knowledge"
583:
81:
76:
64:
59:
198:
2001:
1971:
1339:
1108:
850:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A18VVP5FU32AC5/ref=cm_aya_bb_rev/104-4222713-5622341?ie=UTF8
1281:
798:
Anyway, as you said, we must move on to other things! Happy editing, and see you around the place :) --
770:(explicitly or implicitly) of rubbing your nose into it (which I really never intended, by the way.) --
692:
38:
1640:" more, now that it's consistent within the page. We should probably decide on a convention to use at
1412:
1596:
1584:
1531:
671:
Ha! No insult taken, though frankly I lost a lot of respect for you the moment you resorted to that
1959:
1795:
I can't figure out how to restore the map, nor figure out where the ad is coming from.Please help.
1727:
1111:. Either to promote WP:TEA, or to properly formalize your WP:THANKS proposal into something unique.
919:
P.S.and we're all just project starters in some sense: wikipedia is a project that won't ever end.
472:
464:
346:
338:
1917:
For graphic design, workin' hard, and diligent relentless non-stop editing week after week on the
1783:
1641:
1288:
1143:
the tutorial in any case).Of course, it's eminently possible that we're both crazily dense... :)
957:
290:
745:
Nono! Did my message above not come across as tongue-in-cheek/smiling? It was intended that way.
1839:
1831:
1812:
1760:
1750:
1740:
1731:
1686:
1627:
1610:
1566:
1457:
1445:
1325:
904:
549:
545:
479:
435:
406:
367:
357:
282:
133:
1947:
1621:
878:
1456:
punctuation in article names, cuz he knew I'd do whatever was needed to fix 'em.Good guy. --
1722:
1366:
1023:
984:
788:(mischeivously), happens to alert a sleepy truck driver, helping him to avoid a collision".
571:
Thanks. Do you think some of it would be useful at any of the projects you're working on?
8:
1471:
1104:
191:
1373:
multiple pagename moves. Though I see others have complained at your talkpage about it).
1263:
475:
is just as easy.Just replace the color codes and heading text (don't forget the icon!).
202:
1941:
1923:
1820:
1560:
I think we're getting more and more on the same wavelength all the time.You're move of
1351:
963:
181:
159:
141:
47:
17:
1427:
see as having consensus. The wp:own and wp:discuss pointers were intended to refer to
1929:
1301:
1183:
1175:
834:
1696:
1383:
why I'm trying to be cautious about changing the top taxonomies of Knowledge (see:
304:
1887:
1867:
1953:
1528:
1019:
980:
854:
426:
265:
232:
225:
1892:
1862:
1466:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1652:
1541:
1518:
1510:
1502:
1494:
1114:
The place for a permanent link (for either WP:TEA or WP:THANKS) would be under
212:
102:
All the ref pages on the ref bar have been templatized.The new templates are:
1982:
1774:
1713:
1678:
1659:
1600:
1486:
1435:
1393:
1347:
1294:
1239:
1215:
1206:
1205:
Next it gets handed off to the programmers, with our blessings and thanks? --
1189:
1162:
1144:
1122:
1089:
1059:
1035:
1006:
946:
933:
923:
911:
895:
870:
861:
799:
792:
756:
724:
637:
596:
572:
563:
553:
531:
513:
489:
393:
380:
318:
299:
article is only a normal-sized article, and its trivia section contains only
252:
242:
177:
155:
147:
1324:
I'm very disappointed, because we were starting to get along rather well.--
1036:
675:/emotionally-loaded analogy. How were you expecting to get taken seriously?
655:
negative effects make it repugnant and utterly undesirable in retrospect.
1965:
1692:
539:
1882:
1872:
1273:
812:
771:
734:
683:
660:
618:
606:
220:
1068:
1003:
meta:Help:FAQ#I have a question not answered here. Where do I go next?
848:
No, the tinyurl is not broken, I've just reopened it. It points here:
1599:, so you or anyone else could easily revert at once. ermm. yeah :) --
1188:
well quiddity, the sidebar redesign project has slowed. what's next?
672:
1483:
Be sure to put warning tags on the vandal's user talk page (such as
1232:
Knowledge talk:Village pump (proposals)/Sidebar redesign/programming
864:
home page inspired me to try out a copy-cat version. Check it out.
636:
There are often multiple ramifications for any given action... ;) --
548:) be of any use to you? I made an HSV table based (more or less) on
1547:
840:
1293:
It was totally uncool and inappropriate to accuse me of violating
366:
According to CB, the 2-template method looks like the way to go.--
1802:
1238:
putting the request on Bugzilla, but I don't know how or where.--
467:.They work fine, and the section edit buttons work properly now.
748:
I was being incredibly hyperbolic, in response to your using a
296:
1877:
1077:
Compliment a Wikipedian! and A nice cup of tea and a sit down.
945:
Now that was deep. I'm going to save that one somewhere... :)
1857:
1583:. I had even filled out all the templates for a full-process
994:
I just know where things are, not how to build them! sorry :(
1658:
template, and not that useful for the space they take up. --
527:
605:
Then I'll take the liberty to remove the support notice. --
1392:
I think the other points have been addressed elsewhere. --
405:
Me too.:-)But I don't want to stick my head in the sand.--
1527:.Again, thank you for helping to make Knowledge better.--
752:, over so simple a matter as a project tag on a talkpage.
716:
your supposition that Israel is a "good" thing. Have you
499:
Races and species in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
379:
Sounds fine. He knows the code better than most of us. --
1153:
Template:Knowledge principles – two-level header palette
866:
509:
1987:
is hereby awarded this fireworks display of barnstars!
1587:, after I realized I had misinterpreted your last edit
1118:
in the "Community support groups and programs" section.
932:
Muahah! Epiphany is the journey and the destination. --
592:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Color#Absolute color space
1092:
as it is failing. The name must also be promoted as
522:
Hence, our well-selected user page pallette choices!
795:
for my comfort ;) Not a big deal, just a pet peeve.
1790:List of articles, an overview#Geography and places
1575:Not to be contrary (!) but it was discussed, both
1103:I'd suggest you discuss and organize things with
1827:Category talk:Glossaries#Transfer to Wictionary?
1644:, whether that or bolding or small caps or what.
894:Oh, hmmm, I see what you mean. Ok, thanks :) --
1546:thanks for getting the POV/NPOV refs correct.
552:with some extra shades for two-level headers.
295:What is the limit of the trivia section?? The
562:Zow! Nice stuff. You know your wikitables ;)
313:There should not be any trivia sections. See
755:Anyway, don't worry, and happy editing :) --
1921:of Knowledge, including but not limited to
453:I've created the replacement templates for
315:Knowledge:Avoid trivia sections in articles
1260:Template talk:Please leave this line alone
1094:Knowledge:A nice cup of tea and a sit down
463:, tested them, and have installed them on
1899:
1860:
1523:tag, request administrator assistance at
1431:, which had been on my mind for a while.
1365:I shouldn't have mixed the discussion of
1172:List_of_theatrical_works_by_W._S._Gilbert
129:They're ready for your artistic touch.
14:
1989:On behalf of the Knowledge community,
1771:Knowledge talk:Contents#Page colouring
1712:for me to contemplate this month ;) --
826:Thanks for talking my querry seriously
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1409:List of basic thinking-related topics
1116:Knowledge:Community Portal#Resources
691:The phrase you are looking for is, "
25:
1636:It looks great. I like the use of "
1354:(confusion over duplicated content)
1338:, but regardless, I implore you to
23:
1675:Template talk:Knowledge principles
1282:Portal talk:Browse#List of portals
1159:Template talk:Knowledge principles
1086:Knowledge:Compliment a Wikipedian!
237:Just FYI, I've added our names to
24:
2020:
1691:Shouldn't you have admin tools? —
1018:Thanks mate. I will keep trying!
693:The ends do not justify the means
1891:
1886:
1881:
1876:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1801:
1792:standing in for the arctic map.
1478:reverting vandalism on Knowledge
865:
526:
508:
349:, so that its edit buttons work.
29:
1050:19:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
962:Hi, I've seen your comments at
1269:00:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
1243:20:00, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1226:15:59, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1210:07:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1200:06:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1179:19:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
1166:18:01, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
1148:19:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
1126:18:17, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
1084:I have noted your redirect of
1063:20:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
1028:11:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
1010:18:12, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
989:17:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
950:07:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
937:07:19, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
927:07:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
922:P.S.S. man, that was deep. ;)
915:06:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
886:Can't sleep, clown will eat me
678:The only reason I didn't lose
13:
1:
1669:Template:Knowledge principles
1371:List of articles, an overview
1170:Just wanted to apologise for
899:20:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
889:20:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
874:01:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
844:04:43, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
818:09:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
803:08:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
777:07:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
760:07:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
740:06:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
728:02:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
576:04:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
356:Let me know what you think.--
2006:09:34, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
1849:06:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
1835:09:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
1816:23:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
1778:22:21, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
1764:21:45, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
1754:21:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
1744:21:41, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
1735:21:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
1133:Knowledge:Tutorial (Editing)
999:Knowledge:Computer help desk
712:(And I'm not going anywhere
328:Picking up where we left off
7:
1717:22:45, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
1703:22:30, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
1682:17:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
1663:08:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
1631:07:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
1614:07:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
1604:21:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
1570:21:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
1551:18:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
1537:14:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
1461:13:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
1449:12:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
1439:07:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
1397:22:54, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
1329:14:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
1109:Knowledge:Kindness Campaign
910:dropped to people. cheers.
666:21:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
651:-effects, its overwhelming
641:21:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
624:19:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
612:19:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
600:19:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
567:19:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
557:05:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
535:20:11, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
517:20:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
493:23:00, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
483:21:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
439:21:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
430:08:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
410:06:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
397:18:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
384:18:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
371:18:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
361:07:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
322:20:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
308:20:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
286:03:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
269:20:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
256:19:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
246:19:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
228:18:59, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
208:21:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
186:00:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
164:00:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
148:editing under the influence
137:20:23, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
10:
2025:
1916:
449:The new templates are done
1854:Okay, you've earned it...
1788:There's a TechSpot ad in
1597:Knowledge:Reference pages
1214:Who are the programmers?
791:It was just too close to
544:Hi Quiddity, would this (
1728:List of reference tables
1562:Knowledge:Refrence pages
1556:Now you're getting it...
1525:Request for Intervention
473:List of reference tables
465:List of reference tables
347:list of reference tables
339:list of reference tables
277:List of reference tables
1798:Here's the image/link:
1642:Knowledge talk:Contents
1906:"I'm Really Impressed"
1591:as a reversal of your
1253:Introduction templates
997:I'd suggest asking at
550:Knowledge talk:Colours
546:User:Rfrisbie/Palettes
458:Reference page section
121:Reference page section
1138:Thanks for reverting
1005:. Hope that helps. --
979:Many, many thanks! --
505:couldn't help yorself
110:Reference page header
98:Ref pages templatized
42:of past discussions.
1593:initial disagreement
1367:List of basic topics
1236:said something about
1054:Ahh, whoops! It had
750:Holocaust analogy(!)
720:the news lately?! ;)
584:Absolute color space
201:. Have a good day --
1467:Reverting vandalism
1157:What do you think (
1105:Knowledge:Esperanza
723:So there! :-P ;-)--
1352:Portal talk:Browse
1346:agreement for the
1334:Possibly you mean
1230:The folks reading
18:User talk:Quiddity
2012:
2011:
2002:The Transhumanist
1832:The Transhumanist
1813:The Transhumanist
1761:The Transhumanist
1751:The Transhumanist
1741:The Transhumanist
1732:The Transhumanist
1628:The Transhumanist
1611:The Transhumanist
1567:The Transhumanist
1458:The Transhumanist
1446:The Transhumanist
1340:assume good faith
1326:The Transhumanist
1224:
1198:
816:
775:
738:
664:
622:
610:
480:The Transhumanist
436:The Transhumanist
407:The Transhumanist
368:The Transhumanist
358:The Transhumanist
283:The Transhumanist
184:
162:
134:The Transhumanist
95:
94:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2016:
2008:
1974:
1968:
1962:
1956:
1950:
1944:
1938:
1932:
1926:
1910:Barnstar Barage!
1895:
1890:
1885:
1880:
1875:
1870:
1865:
1858:
1805:
1657:
1651:
1534:
1522:
1514:
1506:
1498:
1490:
1266:
1218:
1192:
1140:Chuck's addition
1048:
869:
815:
774:
737:
663:
621:
609:
530:
512:
462:
456:
303:pieces of info.
205:
180:
158:
125:
119:
114:
108:
73:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2024:
2023:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2015:
2014:
2013:
1998:
1996:
1986:
1985:
1972:
1966:
1960:
1954:
1948:
1942:
1936:
1930:
1924:
1856:
1842:
1823:
1786:
1784:Vandalism alert
1725:
1689:
1671:
1655:
1649:
1638:Main category:
1624:
1558:
1544:
1532:
1516:
1508:
1500:
1492:
1484:
1474:
1469:
1429:this discussion
1385:this discussion
1291:
1289:Your accusation
1276:
1274:List of portals
1264:
1255:
1186:
1155:
1136:
1081:Hello Quiddity
1079:
1071:
1044:
1040:
960:
958:Template advice
907:
881:
857:
837:
828:
586:
542:
501:
460:
454:
451:
330:
293:
291:Too much trivia
279:
235:
215:
203:
199:Trödel/Sandbox2
194:
144:
123:
117:
112:
106:
100:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2022:
2010:
2009:
1997:
1988:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1919:contents pages
1914:
1913:
1897:
1896:
1855:
1852:
1841:
1840:Thanks anyway.
1838:
1822:
1819:
1785:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1724:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1688:
1687:Administrators
1685:
1670:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1645:
1623:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1557:
1554:
1543:
1540:
1482:
1481:
1476:Thank you for
1473:
1470:
1468:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1452:
1451:
1400:
1399:
1389:
1388:
1375:
1374:
1362:
1361:
1356:
1355:
1290:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1275:
1272:
1254:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1185:
1182:
1154:
1151:
1135:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1119:
1112:
1101:
1078:
1075:
1070:
1069:CanadianCaesar
1067:
1066:
1065:
1039:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1013:
1012:
995:
959:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
940:
939:
906:
905:sidebar action
903:
902:
901:
880:
877:
860:
856:
853:
836:
833:
827:
824:
822:
808:
807:
806:
805:
796:
789:
785:
763:
762:
753:
746:
731:
730:
721:
710:
706:
705:
697:
696:
688:
687:
676:
644:
643:
634:
631:
603:
602:
585:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
541:
538:
524:
523:
507:, could you?
500:
497:
496:
495:
450:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
422:
415:
414:
413:
412:
400:
399:
389:
388:
387:
386:
374:
373:
355:
354:
351:
350:
343:
342:
335:
334:
329:
326:
325:
324:
292:
289:
278:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
259:
258:
234:
231:
214:
211:
193:
190:
189:
188:
172:
171:
143:
140:
127:
126:
115:
99:
96:
93:
92:
87:
84:
79:
74:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2021:
2007:
2004:
2003:
1994:
1993:
1984:
1977:
1975:
1969:
1963:
1957:
1951:
1945:
1939:
1933:
1927:
1920:
1915:
1912:
1911:
1907:
1904:
1903:
1898:
1894:
1889:
1884:
1879:
1874:
1869:
1864:
1859:
1851:
1850:
1847:
1846:68.222.30.134
1837:
1836:
1833:
1828:
1818:
1817:
1814:
1809:
1806:
1804:
1799:
1796:
1793:
1791:
1779:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1762:
1756:
1755:
1752:
1746:
1745:
1742:
1737:
1736:
1733:
1729:
1718:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1700:
1699:
1694:
1684:
1683:
1680:
1676:
1664:
1661:
1654:
1646:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1629:
1622:Category page
1615:
1612:
1609:CONTRARIAN!--
1607:
1606:
1605:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1568:
1563:
1553:
1552:
1549:
1539:
1538:
1535:
1530:
1526:
1520:
1512:
1504:
1496:
1488:
1479:
1462:
1459:
1454:
1453:
1450:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1437:
1432:
1430:
1426:
1420:
1416:
1414:
1410:
1404:
1398:
1395:
1391:
1390:
1386:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1363:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1348:Portal:Browse
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1327:
1322:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1309:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1296:
1284:
1283:
1278:
1277:
1271:
1270:
1267:
1261:
1244:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1222:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1208:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1181:
1180:
1177:
1173:
1168:
1167:
1164:
1160:
1150:
1149:
1146:
1141:
1134:
1127:
1124:
1120:
1117:
1113:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1082:
1074:
1064:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1049:
1047:
1038:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
993:
992:
991:
990:
986:
982:
977:
971:
967:
965:
951:
948:
944:
943:
942:
941:
938:
935:
931:
930:
929:
928:
925:
920:
917:
916:
913:
900:
897:
893:
892:
891:
890:
887:
879:John McEntire
876:
875:
872:
868:
863:
852:
851:
846:
845:
842:
832:
823:
820:
819:
814:
804:
801:
797:
794:
790:
786:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
773:
767:
761:
758:
754:
751:
747:
744:
743:
742:
741:
736:
729:
726:
722:
719:
715:
711:
708:
707:
703:
699:
698:
694:
690:
689:
685:
681:
677:
674:
670:
669:
668:
667:
662:
656:
654:
650:
642:
639:
635:
632:
628:
627:
626:
625:
620:
614:
613:
608:
601:
598:
594:
593:
588:
587:
577:
574:
570:
569:
568:
565:
561:
560:
559:
558:
555:
551:
547:
537:
536:
533:
529:
521:
520:
519:
518:
515:
511:
506:
494:
491:
487:
486:
485:
484:
481:
476:
474:
468:
466:
459:
440:
437:
433:
432:
431:
428:
423:
419:
418:
417:
416:
411:
408:
404:
403:
402:
401:
398:
395:
391:
390:
385:
382:
378:
377:
376:
375:
372:
369:
365:
364:
363:
362:
359:
348:
340:
323:
320:
316:
312:
311:
310:
309:
306:
302:
298:
288:
287:
284:
270:
267:
263:
262:
261:
260:
257:
254:
250:
249:
248:
247:
244:
240:
230:
229:
226:
223:
222:
210:
209:
206:
200:
187:
183:
179:
174:
173:
168:
167:
166:
165:
161:
157:
151:
150:(too tired).
149:
139:
138:
135:
130:
122:
116:
111:
105:
104:
103:
91:
88:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
72:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2000:
1991:
1990:
1949:Basic topics
1922:
1918:
1909:
1908:
1905:
1901:
1900:
1843:
1830:Knowledge.--
1824:
1810:
1807:
1800:
1797:
1794:
1787:
1757:
1747:
1738:
1726:
1723:Tables color
1697:
1690:
1672:
1637:
1625:
1559:
1545:
1475:
1433:
1424:
1421:
1417:
1405:
1401:
1379:
1343:
1323:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1306:
1305:
1299:
1292:
1279:
1256:
1187:
1176:Adam Cuerden
1169:
1156:
1137:
1121:Thanks :) --
1083:
1080:
1072:
1055:
1045:
1041:
978:
975:<div: -->
972:
968:
961:
921:
918:
908:
882:
859:Hi Quiddity,
858:
847:
838:
829:
821:
809:
793:godwin's law
768:
764:
749:
732:
717:
713:
701:
679:
657:
652:
648:
645:
615:
604:
589:
543:
525:
502:
477:
469:
452:
331:
300:
294:
280:
236:
219:
216:
195:
152:
145:
131:
128:
101:
70:
43:
37:
1825:Concerning
1769:Please see
1519:subst:test4
1511:subst:test4
1503:subst:test3
1495:subst:test2
1472:Vandal tags
1360:accusation.
1336:exhortation
1046:NoSeptember
964:WP:TEMPLATE
305:Georgia guy
192:color table
182:Talk to me!
160:Talk to me!
36:This is an
1973:Categories
1943:Glossaries
1821:Glossaries
1673:Check out
1487:subst:test
1302:WP:DISCUSS
970:chapters.
862:Radiant!'s
684:world view
673:hyperbolic
427:David Levy
425:involved.—
266:David Levy
239:Version 20
142:Search box
90:Archive 10
1992:thank you
1931:Overviews
1759:scheme.--
1585:page move
1529:Dylan Lak
1280:moved to
1221:p-review!
1195:p-review!
835:mea gulpa
590:moved to
503:You just
178:Ian Manka
156:Ian Manka
82:Archive 5
77:Archive 4
71:Archive 3
65:Archive 2
60:Archive 1
1983:Quiddity
1925:Contents
1775:Quiddity
1749:green.--
1714:Quiddity
1679:Rfrisbie
1660:Quiddity
1601:Quiddity
1436:Quiddity
1394:Quiddity
1342:. There
1240:Quiddity
1216:JoeSmack
1207:Quiddity
1190:JoeSmack
1163:Rfrisbie
1123:Quiddity
1060:Quiddity
1007:Quiddity
947:JoeSmack
934:Quiddity
924:JoeSmack
912:JoeSmack
896:Quiddity
871:Rfrisbie
800:Quiddity
757:Quiddity
725:Quiddity
638:Quiddity
597:Quiddity
573:Rfrisbie
564:Quiddity
554:Rfrisbie
532:Rfrisbie
514:Rfrisbie
490:Quiddity
488:Done. --
394:Quiddity
381:Quiddity
319:Quiddity
253:Quiddity
243:Quiddity
1967:Portals
1413:thought
1300:As for
1262:. thx--
1184:sidebar
1107:and/or
855:Collage
700:As for
233:Sidebar
39:archive
1970:, and
1961:Tables
1955:Topics
1937:Fields
1693:Centrx
1542:thanks
1295:WP:OWN
1265:Trödel
1090:WP:TEA
653:direct
297:Purple
218:tell.
213:Yellow
204:Trödel
170:issue.
1653:click
1411:, or
1307:false
1056:(top)
1037:WP:LA
813:Gutza
772:Gutza
735:Gutza
661:Gutza
649:after
619:Gutza
607:Gutza
221:Inter
16:<
1773:. --
1710:read
1698:talk
1589:here
1581:here
1579:and
1577:here
1380:know
1024:Talk
985:Talk
718:seen
714:near
630:etc.
1976:...
1902:The
1548:DGG
1425:did
1415:.
1344:was
1161:)?
1145:Joe
1020:Jim
1001:or
981:Jim
841:Lgh
680:all
540:HSV
1999:–
1964:,
1958:,
1952:,
1946:,
1940:,
1934:,
1928:,
1811:--
1701:•
1677:.
1656:}}
1650:{{
1565:--
1521:}}
1517:{{
1513:}}
1509:{{
1507:,
1505:}}
1501:{{
1499:,
1497:}}
1493:{{
1491:,
1489:}}
1485:{{
1480:!
1387:).
1378:I
1026:)
987:)
811:--
695:".
686:).
478:--
461:}}
455:{{
301:10
132:--
124:}}
118:{{
113:}}
107:{{
86:→
1995:.
1695:→
1533:e
1223:)
1219:(
1197:)
1193:(
1022:(
983:(
337:(
224:\
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.