User talk:Rab V - Knowledge

306:) 19:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC) johnnie ray had a son ... the more you know. did you know johnnie had a son born in 1956 this boy had 2 fathers, lover of johnnie ray,kept secret for many years also some family members know of his existence, some articles have been written but he has kept himself low key for so many years, at the age of 60 years old many friends family members of johnnies have embraced him, him name was lary, at this point, he lives in las vegas, and is the biological of johnnie ray, alot of the information is not correct. if you would like to contact him about any of the information regarding you editing of these articles, please leave your message here so we may correspond, 2521:. A person should not be put into a sexual orientation category unless they identify as the sexual orientation in question. A source calling the person gay, lesbian, bi, asexual is not enough because sources have gotten it wrong and have sometimes just assumed. Most of your sexual orientation category edits are okay, but some are questionable because the Knowledge article might say a person is bisexual, but there's no source for it. Or there is a source naming the person's sexual orientation, but the person hasn't identified as such or may reject labels even if the source gives them a sexual orientation label. For 428: 1591: 1535: 212: 2100: 2868: 2549: 2223: 1947: 2781: 2664: 2432: 1859: 1259: 924: 462: 233: 1133:. You mentioned in an edit reason that it's not clear whether the author of a certain statement meant she was trans and a feminist or a trans feminist. I intended to mean that she was trans and a feminist; I have no idea whether she is a transfeminist, but the source that she's trans is the same YouTube video that's the source for the claim (or essentially any of her other videos) and the source that she's a feminist on her own page is 1187: 327: 81: 1750:

is part of the manual of style and is a guideline. Maines has also waived privacy here as she was part of the authorship of the book which published her birth name. The onus will be on you to show that the privacy issue is genuine or that consensus has changed. Do not remove as you are being disruptive by going against the current consensus. Multiple users have reverted removal of the years it has been included.

1703:

is authorised by Maines which released her birth name and was the initial basis for her notability surrounding the Maine Court Case surrounding School bathroom usage. I say this before you make arguments which have been made before and the consensus has come to the conclusion that inclusion is warranted and Maines agreed to the publishing of her birth name as part of her notability surrounding the court cases.

1038: 1669:

policy and as such local consensus can form which provides an exception to following the Manual of Style, as has occurred in this case. Please do not re-remove the birth name unless you can gain a fresh consensus on the talk page of the article regarding removing the birth name. This is because a new consensus is needed to be shown before removing content which has a firm consensus.

621:). Either "in the United States" or "in Western countries" etc. ought to be added to make the article comply with the worldview requirement. We'll need to look at the reference to determine which one is the best to use. Thankfully it's on Google Books so I can check it for context, whether the author is talking about the US or western countries in general. 2625:, where the question is something like the simple straighforward "Should we insert 'or recently deceased' into the sentence 'If a living transgender or non-binary person was not notable under a former name'"? That would bring it more in line with the BLP policy, which also has the caveat of 'living or recently deceased'. 1159:

Hi there! I was mainly unsure of the usage since the same phrase was linked to transfeminism in the previous sentence. Maybe referring to her as a transgender feminist or trans woman feminist is a good way to avoid other readers being confused too? And the secondary source looks good! Primary sources

53:

Oh, dear. I think I cheated a bit, though. Additionally, it seems that I don't think about anything but Stephin Merritt. I hope both work and California itself are exquisite. Apparently, MOCA is running "Night Vision" shindigs every Saturday night with "artmaking, screenings, groundbreaking DJs, live

1702:

Please feel free but Please be aware the consensus is very long-standing and relates to a book which Maines took part in authoring and openly published her birth name. This is not a case of a privacy issue as claimed as Manes has waived any privacy regarding this issue by taking part in a book which

1404:

No I did not. This seems like the kind of thing that should be in the talk page of the article in question instead of on my talk page or those other pages so editors working on the article can see it. Would you be OK with moving this convo there? Either way all phrases are meaningless without their

1749:

Do not remove the birth name from the article until you have established that new consensus exists to warrant the removal. The new policy does not give carte blanche for the removal of all birth names on all articles. It has to be justified and applied with common sense. Also, be aware MOS:Deadname

767:

Sure! It should be clear from each sentence whether an argument is being made by Knowledge itself or by some other person. This is especially important for contentious topics. For example 'John Doe argues the Earth is flat. That is why gravity always works in the same direction' would not be OK but

1384:

In transgender people, a distinction is usually made between the assigned sex and gender identity, with "assigned sex" in this context essentially meaning the gender they are "born with". But if you're trans, then the desired gender is your 'true' gender, which would be the gender you are *really*

1228:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

608:

Which country are you located in, if you are comfortable disclosing? I would expect it would be a western country (such as Canada, Western Europe, Australia and New Zealand, or possibly Latin America) and understandably I could see the same paradigm there too. The problem with "person of color" is

1048:

regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to

796:

Other Radical feminists, according to Michelle Goldberg, refuse to include trans women on the basis of choice. She argues that trans women have a choice in the way society views them, a choice in their gender identification, and a choice no other woman typically experiences. Goldberg believes cis

1668:

Thank you for your recent good-faith edit removing her birth name. I have reverted this as the issue has been thoroughly discussed on the articles talk page and a local consensus to include the birth name has been established. The Manual of Style is only a Knowledge guideline and not a Knowledge

1797:

you will be seen as being disruptive when combined with your ignoring of the existing local consensus and a failure to read that local consensus. The most appropriate venue is the talk page which initially reached the existing local consensus and that local consensus will need to be shown to no

693:

Please clarify what you objected to in my edit, specifically where I wasn't neutral. I probably should have clarified the distinctiom between prejudice against femininity vs prejudice against females but what's non-neutral about saying radical feminists believe X because of Y? I appreciate your

474:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

936:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1813:

I would also like to point out that you began editing the article on 31 August 2017‎ so you should be well aware of the consensus surrounding the longstanding inclusion of her birth name and the longstanding local consensus. Please do not act like you are new and unfamiliar.

54:

music, spoken word, guided tours, and a cash bar" this summer. With a membership card, one gets free admission for two and free parking. Would you be interested in being mailed MuCC's membership card? (In retrospect, I should have thought to leave it with you earlier.)

1160:

are fine for describing someone's gender identity. The secondary source is helpful if we are also calling her a feminist or transfeminist. PS I don't mind responding here but my preference is to talk things out on respective article talk pages so others can join.

2247:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

245:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

568: 1551:

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

797:

women do not have that same choice. Rather, she thinks women continue to be seen as inferior in a patriarchal world. By demanding acceptance, Goldberg thinks trans women are further expressing a different form of male entitlement.

612:

The reason why I added "in the United States" is that it's contextually necessary with the source and the phrase. Otherwise the article is slanted towards a United States/Western-worldview; articles on Knowledge need to reflect a

2525:, her Knowledge article says she now identifies as queer, although she once identified as bisexual. I don't know how true that is, but you might want to look into it since you added a bisexual category to her article recently. 633:

It would be unfortunate for people to mistakenly think the intro is saying intersectionality-abuse doesn't happen anywhere but the US, but nonetheless I see it as the reader's responsibility for seeing something that isn't

2614: 1345:

It was vandalism. I made a mistake of letting someone borrow my phone to make a phone call. They not only made a call and vandalized an article, they messed up my Facebook settings. Thanks for the quick response, though.

713:

This conversation should probably be on the article's talk page so other editors can participate as well. Your edit summary was clear you're edit was based on your own reasoning as opposed to reliable sources though.

2251:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

176:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 578:

Knowledge is about what is verifiable, not necessarily the truth. I don't doubt that trans discrimination of an intersectional nature happens elsewhere in the west, but we need refs that state this explicitly.

1175: 2640:

I think that is a reasonable suggestion! I hope we can also have clarity on how to discuss trans people deceased further in the past as well but I think your suggestion would be an easier addition to MOS.

1225: 1194: 1180: 575:

Hi! Because the term 'person of color' is a US-only term (the term isnt used outside of the US), statements about 'person of color' should be assumed to be US-centric unless the author says otherwise.

2810:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2693:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2459:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1886:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1286:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 948:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 486:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 257:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 841:! If you have any thoughts about the list, let me know on the list's talk page. Most of the "Description" cells are empty at this time since I felt like I would take too long to fill them all out. 594:

Hi, I'm confused about your claim about the term since I'm outside the U.S. and see it used here often. But my mainissue was more the phrasing you used seemed to imply something you didn't mean.

1494:

Twice I've had my additions regarding daniel Radcliffe admission of having racist friends removed. Once with the excuse of not being notable, the other being trivia. It will and should be added.

1497:

Radcliffe confession is both part of the public and media domain and that makes it notable and important to add. It's both credible and not trivia supported by renowned media reports/sources

1937: 1643: 1120: 1963: 2539: 2194: 2826: 2709: 2475: 1902: 1302: 964: 502: 273: 1635: 1572: 2795: 2678: 2565: 2445: 1872: 1628: 1565: 1272: 2274:'s comment above, this is simply due to the subjects request. I'm sure you didn't mean any harm, and in a more general I'd be happy to see more articles in this broad area. -- 415:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting

2555: 2540: 1405:

common use. Knowledge is not the place for novel language from individual editors, we should follow what is common in quality RS so we are as clear and legible as possible.

2377:. A lesbian is a woman who is attracted to other women and this film doesn't appear to discuss whether this kid is attracted to boys or girls according to those sources. 1620: 1557: 1032: 311: 303: 2530: 43: 588: 1988: 25: 2299: 2211: 1616: 1553: 2327:

did not use the name mentioned in the source you linked (a potential BLP issue); I have now updated the article to use the correct name as shown in the source.

1998: 1244: 2580: 1146: 1486: 1063: 658:) from the book, he is talking exclusively about the United States. I did a "search" function for "Canada" and "Europe" in both books and couldn't find them. 110: 1378: 2884: 2610: 859: 64:

How's that cheating. Plus I already knew you have Merritt-track mind. Try to stop think what the 70th love song woulda been like and send me that card.

2351: 291: 768:'John Doe argues the Earth is flat. He argues that is why gravity always works in the same direction' would be fine. You can read more about this at 527: 1506: 1058: 2502: 1928: 216: 1328: 982: 520: 1815: 1799: 1751: 1704: 1670: 733: 222: 1957:

has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

1646:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 1583:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 205: 2604: 2147: 1580: 1210: 1206: 315: 2283: 1527: 788: 35: 17: 1115: 708: 150: 2853: 2736: 2422: 1849: 2120: 1081: 911: 1684:

I'd prefer to talk about this on the Nicole Maines article talk page so other interested editors may see or comment on the discussion.

1355: 1337: 1249: 916: 731: 684: 454: 723: 563: 2264: 2234: 1521: 1095: 891: 609:

that the term becomes completely meaningless in other places, such as Japan, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Singapore, China, etc.

537: 130: 1658: 2621:. That RfC closed with no consensus, in no small part due to a split vote between three options. What do you think of a new RfC on 2229: 2213: 2206: 2188: 2107: 2093: 1982: 1045: 832: 752: 2634: 1828:

To be clear I am asking you not edit my talk page any further and discuss your issues on the article's talk page in question. See

1798:

longer exist. I also advise against asking around as that could be seen as asking for help to bolster your position artificially.

68: 1450: 1432: 1414: 995: 2773: 2656: 2599: 2585: 2414: 2400: 2386: 2244: 2168: 1823: 1176: 1169: 820: 806: 781: 676: 661:

If you want to say that this happens outside of the United States, you need to find a reference that supports this explicitly.

645: 603: 155: 1026: 88:, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Knowledge's 2355: 1091: 887: 307: 299: 126: 123:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2080: 2060: 1841: 1773: 1759: 1726: 1712: 1693: 2849: 2732: 2526: 2498: 1924: 1324: 1126: 978: 516: 287: 201: 39: 2202: 2184: 854: 2900: 2892: 2861: 2570: 2088: 1968: 1214: 21: 1764:

I have started a discussion on the talk page of that article if you'd like to discuss this in a more appropriate place.

1077: 1202: 1069: 188:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2754: 1512:

The talk page for article in question is where I'd prefer to discuss this so it's easier for other editors to follow.

2195:

User_talk:331dot#Do_not_ever_condescend_to_me_again,_baby!_KOKUMOTheQueenOfQueerSoul_(talk)_12:44,_4_March_2021_(UTC)

1419:

So, what you're basically saying is: if an RS says something, then we should say it. But what if it's wrong? Cheers,

442: 811:

I think that avoids the issue. I'd maybe try to condense the Goldberg's argument a bit too but that's my preference.

2311: 877: 838: 361:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The

2845: 2728: 2494: 2172: 1920: 1639: 1576: 1320: 974: 512: 283: 197: 2559:

has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

2271: 2198: 2180: 421: 1476: 1398: 1385:

born with. So, the phrase "assigned sex" is arguably meaningless, notwithstanding its widespread use. Cheers,

1374: 1011: 626:

The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (October 2015)

449: 2123: 362: 115:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2650: 2367: 2336: 2819: 2753:

I've added a request for a third opinion re the poll data on gender self-identification here on this page:

2702: 2468: 2289: 1976: 1895: 1807: 1678: 1295: 957: 703: 495: 266: 2534: 2831: 2714: 2480: 2193:

Hello! No fault on your part, but it seems the subject really doesn't want it here. So per discussion at

2160: 2111: 2089: 1953: 1938: 1907: 1502: 1441:

to have this conversation so all relevant editors can be involved or look up this conversation happened.

1307: 969: 507: 331: 278: 193: 2563:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

1961:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

2164: 2010: 1624: 1561: 1230: 850: 569: 548:

to back up your addition so it has been reverted. Please do not restore it without providing a direct

96:

content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. --

2048: 2041: 105: 2888: 2238: 1608: 1068:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

864:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1481: 740:

Hi, I was wondering what you meant by a Knowledge voice. Could you clarify, so I can rework my edit?

2560: 2294:

Perhaps you have a better idea about this, but it seems evident, per individual's preference, that

2279: 2260: 1958: 1612: 873: 89: 58: 47: 29: 2896: 1972: 1426: 1392: 769: 695: 373: 93: 2356:

At school, Sasha is not allowed to appear as a girl but must wear gender-specific boys' clothes"

1134: 2768: 2630: 1498: 989: 2807: 2690: 2595: 2456: 2410: 2396: 2363: 2323: 2022: 1883: 1663: 1283: 1142: 1054: 945: 802: 748: 672: 655: 651: 641: 584: 483: 378: 320: 254: 1597:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

1541:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

2818:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2764: 2701:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2467:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2332: 2316: 1894:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1360: 1348: 1294:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1085: 1007: 956:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 881: 494:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 398: 265:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 184:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2391:

So, how should I write it then? On the cover - she is a girl. In sources - she is trans.--

1793:

Please see the extensive response I have given to you I strongly advise against you going

8: 2876: 2618: 2341: 2307: 2275: 2256: 2176: 2006: 1794: 417: 189: 55: 1088:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 884:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2872: 2295: 1819: 1803: 1755: 1708: 1674: 1473: 1421: 1387: 994:

I think Mouncey was notable under her previous name as she played for Australia at the

618: 2789: 2672: 2626: 2439: 2143: 1866: 1266: 1111: 1102:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

932: 907: 898:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

558: 470: 408: 350: 342: 241: 223: 165: 156: 146: 137:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

101: 74: 2130: 570:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Transphobia&oldid=prev&diff=821896182

2838: 2803: 2721: 2686: 2591: 2518: 2487: 2452: 2406: 2392: 2373:

Hi. Thanks for asking. A girl who was assigned male at birth means she is likely a

2359: 2015: 1993: 1914: 1879: 1370: 1366: 1314: 1279: 1154: 1138: 1050: 941: 798: 762: 744: 668: 637: 580: 479: 437: 403: 250: 185: 169: 2590:

Hi Rab V. Please see my discussion topic on the Cisgender talk page. Thanks. :) --

2047:

Oh I was referring to a source I now see was recently removed from that sentence,

1615:. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called 2760: 2328: 1829: 1652: 1073: 1003: 335: 120: 2129:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

1229:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1198: 1197:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

2880: 2815: 2698: 2512: 2464: 2303: 2002: 1891: 1460: 1291: 999: 953: 846: 532:

You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from

491: 383: 262: 181: 173: 2811: 2694: 2522: 2460: 2066: 2027: 1887: 1470: 1466: 1287: 949: 865: 686: 487: 393: 258: 177: 2871:

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge, as you did at

427: 2744: 2622: 2609:

Hey. I wanted to address this here, to see what you think. I had a look at

1107: 1103: 903: 899: 553: 549: 142: 138: 97: 2153:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

1217:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. 1201:, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a 1438: 1339: 869: 533: 85: 2822:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2705:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2471:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1898:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1590: 1534: 1298:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

960:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

498:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

269:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2799:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2750: 2682:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2642: 2449:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2378: 2374: 2052: 1876:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1833: 1765: 1718: 1685: 1513: 1442: 1406: 1276:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1161: 1018: 812: 773: 715: 595: 219:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

65: 1220:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

793:

Okay, that makes so much more sense! Thank you! So if I were to write-

2867: 2780: 2663: 2431: 1858: 1258: 923: 842: 772:, the quick summary from there is 'Avoid stating opinions as facts.' 461: 388: 232: 116: 20:

and for reverting so many names back to the list where they belong.

1235: 1044:

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the

172:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

2835:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2718:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2484:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1911:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1603:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

1547:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

1311:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 536:

and direct sources are required for additions. For details see

2825:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

2793:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

2708:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

2676:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

2474:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

2405:

Never mind, I wrote it as "trans girl Sasha". Seems good now.--

1901:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

1301:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

963:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

545: 541: 501:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

272:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

2443:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

1870:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

80: 2611:

Knowledge:Manual of Style/Gender identity#Discussion timeline

1121:

Clarification of edit on Feminist Views on Transgender Topics

1037: 1379:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Gender identity#Assigned sex

1130: 365:

are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

1270:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

2806: