User talk:Retired username/Archive8

2483:. I had no opportunity to contribute to this discussion (which apparently consists of the negative comments of only two editors), as I have just returned from traveling for five days. In addition, I had no opportunity to merge the text into the article about the history of Australian bush bands. I do work hard at Knowledge and believe I am the 77th most prolific contributor, and I feel strongly about documenting this little known musical tradition for our users. Regardless of what the editors who felt strongly about deleting my work believe, the names of bands performing this music are important. I hope you will give me the chance to merge this data, which I hope is not irretrievably lost following this overly hasty decision. Thank you for this and I look forward to hearing from you. 2083:

and page, which are the ones I usually work with). It's also much larger than those two: I might have some difficulty building that table on the disk I'm using at present. I'll see if I can rejig things to use a different disk, or if necessary a different computer. That might take me a while, and the build itself is likely to take a fair bit of time, so hopefully you're not in a desparate hurry. It seems a bit daft that the special page is truncated at 1000; it doesn't look as if the whole list would be more than 2-3k, if the alphabeticisation is anything to go by.

1245: 1905:

used and apartments for students. I respect Tom Owen, but I feel that he wouldn't let a site like that sit in his neighborhood. I have had email correspondence with him about this and other things (namely bike lanes & SouBro development) and I personally feel he is sitting on the land to force the price up for U of L to buy it. I interviewed his son about the protect for U of L's dinky paper last year and he stated that they only wanted to get the site 100% filled w/ industrial storage, and had no plans of redeveloping it.

2040:"nothing less" than Final Four from Tubby, but the FACT is that Tubby has NEVER taken a club he built to a Final Four, in his entire career. The ONLY time Tubby ever went to a Final Four was in 1998 with the team BUILT BY PITINO. And if you think there aren't people out there more objective than you, I encourage you to read this FOX SPORTS article just published today which mentions Tubby's perceived "success" that you so wildly proclaim: 2158:

easier to do second time around, but still not something I'll be likely to be doing as regularly as I work with the other tables. Counting links-from-articles-and-your-user-space is possible, though on the whole it's probably easier just to exclude those marked as "linkless", as that's category information (which is somewhat more manageable, and which I'm trying to keep up to date after each dump).

1548:

the same texts. I sometimes adapted them to make them sound more neutral, sometimes (in the case of NEWS!) not when I judged their tone appropriate for Knowledge. Of course, I fully agree with the GFDL licenses... any suggestions on what I should do next to get that tag removed? Should I send an email from my @fairtrade.net address saying I agree with the GFDL licenses? Thank you for your time.

1981: 1379:

that. So as far as I'm concerned I only made a mistake if you have 20/20 hindsight or if you expect every AfD closer to redirect the article if every claim in it doesn't have an inline citation (which covers basically every article that goes to AfD). You fixed the problem, thanks, I'm glad you did it. But I do look at articles and I do do my best with WP:LIVING issues. I'm not perfect. --

708: 242:

the tag in order to give him time to prove the article's validity. I think that he has failed in that endeavor, and I stand by the OR tag I placed on the article more than a week ago. My next step may be to request a peer review. Would you be willing to take a closer look at the article and offer your opinion on its value? Thanks for your time. ---

2325:

the tools than editing. And with this you dismissed one of my fears: that I would disappoint people who trust me with such tools. If I can give a hand with the backlogs, copyright issues and anything that might be bothering around, I will gladly present myself in the near future for a request to see if others do agree. Thank you again. --

2148:

double-checking these, then please do: I already found one batch of false-positives, due to having "missed" one batch of links, so I wouldn't be surprised if there are further such errors, so please let me know if you find any. (Obviously in addition, many have been deleted, or had links added since the db dump (which was on the 31st).

721:(~90%). It was an interesting process which gave me a chance to learn a bit about myself and about the community. My intention now is to slowly ease into using those additional buttons on my page. No use being over eager and mucking up the works. The support of all those who went over my record and/or rallied to my defense after the 1368:

article were obvious at the time of the afd. And there really is no need to abuse me in edit summaries. I believe in pointing issues out to people - and I invite them to do the same to me. If you don't agree with my analysis that's fine, just note it and we'll move on. No need for a drama - again sorry if I sounded too critical. --

2013:

site) along with the making of photos of the production of the movie. When i typed in The Forest into your search I found 1 link to another movie by the same title and feel it only fair others find us here too! second I found 1 link to a game called the forest by nintendo which is blatant advertising of a company is it not?

614:

place, makes a tedius process more tedius. So basically I oppose out of principle, sorry, my fear is that if we just keep adding processes onto closing AfDs, the backlog will get even worse. This seems like a process AWB could do easilly, just run once a day, if the AfD is closed, remove the template, otherwise skip. --

2028:

In St. Louis we call him "Hollywood Edmonds". He looks like an action star. Take one look at him and he looks as comfortable swinging a bat as he would kicking down a brick wall decked out in camo holding an M-16 throwing led into Russian terrorits. Hence the name, "Hollywood Edmonds". Thanks for your time.

1313:. Unfortunately consensus was not reached, and the nomination was not successful. I do however very much appreciate your comments. I am still very much in support of the Knowledge project, and will continue to contribute without interruption, especially in the categorization project! Thanks again, -- 377:, but it's debateable. I didn't feel comfortable deleting this wholesale just because no one had bothered commented in the AfD. It does bog AfD down, sure, but even people such as JzG have said they prefer relisting an under-represented AfD to just deleting to article because no one commented on it. -- 2324:

Thanks for your advice. As I told to Interiot, I believe adminship is something you need to need. Until a month ago, I did not need it for myself, because I was focused on cleaning external links. However, both explained to me that, in order to be a good admin, you don't need to spend more time using

2027:

I do not know why you changed the Jim Edmonds article I edited. I was born and raised in St. Louis and currently attend school here. In St. Louis, no one has ever called Edmonds "Jimmy Basesball". That sounds like as if it was coined by an ignorant fan, of the game, due to a crush on the big guy.

1378:

Look, I know I'm not the best guy at taking criticism, but no one mentioned WP:LIVING in that AfD and the article cited 2 references at the time I closed it, so I can only conclude that I assumed good faith 7 months ago by assuming the sources listed backed up the claims, since no one was challenging

773:

page. Are you referring to the red / dead links? I agree that there is just too many of them. Would you want me to get rid of them...i.e. de-link them? The only way I can "introduce links" is to actually create new pages to link to this one...and I feel that would only create more "red / dead links".

641:

As disorganized as Knowledge is... I'd never heard of the poll personally, so I wouldn't consider one consensus somewhere to be something that's set in stone. Ultimately since this is something that a bot can do perfectly, it's something that philosophically, I think it should do so human editors can

572:

I don't really know what to tell you. It seems like it's easy to rub this highways crowd the wrong way. They mostly ignore me since I just talk occasionally and never do anything related to actually moving the articles. I found this quote from your editor review kind of amusing: "It is perfectly okay

82:

Hi, I just went back through all the logs and see what happened. Ideaworks3D was deleted as a copyvio. Then Ideaworks3d was created and Ideaworks3D was created as a redirect to 3d. I Prod'd 3d and it was deleted. I then went back to 3D (not remembering that it was originally deleted as a copyvio) and

60:

Hi, Ideaworks3d (lower case d) was deleted via PROD. Ideaworks3D redirected to it. Since the main article was deleted, I thought the redirect should / could be speedied --- and I stated that both on the talk page and the comments. You removed the speedy. I've placed a PROD on this article (that was a

2082:

The good news is that the SQL would indeed be pretty straightforward to run on the full database. The less-good-news is that I can't run such a query immediately, as I don't have a rebuilt database table corresponding to the one that information is stored in: (pagelinks, as opposed to categorylinks

1547:

in Bonn - I am quite passionate about what I do and I have been spending a lot of free time on wikipedia in the past months, considerably improving all the articles on the topic. Since I have been working on both our new website (which was relaunched in August) and on Knowledge, I have used some of

1032:

Thanks again for your speedy response. Can you please explain, or direct me to an explanation, of an "in link" and where and how it would appear in an article? The link you sent me explains its importance, but clearly I don't understand fully what it means, how it's used, or where it would appear in

544:

but the admin would probably tell you the same thing. I say tell him you'd prefer not to be called a troll, point him to this diff if you want. No one should have to be called a troll just because people disagree with them. But beyond that... I dunno, the whole argument is messed up, as you probably

241:

I did not realize the "inuse" template could only be used for 3 hours, so I appreciate your removing it from the article in question. The article is of a highly questionable nature, and I was involved in an edit war with its original author (as one can see from the article history), finally placing

2147:

Looks like you're right about the mainspace-link orphans; that seems to be very considerably larger, getting on for another 50,000 in addition to the above. I'll see if I can write a query to find the articles with no article links that are no already tagged as "linkless". If you have a means of

1904:

I don't have a published source, but I talk quite often with high ranking people at U of L who say that he has not pushed harder to have the site redeveloped, even as almost every other brownfield adajacent to it is (like the other Reynolds Bldg or Industry Rd) U of L wants the site to become mixed

576:

I don't really no what else to say... I'd change the highway naming convention if I could, but right now it just seems like it's not going to change, so why really bother? I'm just going to keep pointing out that it's a bizarre and silly policy that sticks out like a sore thumb, and because of that

337:

I'll admit I haven't been doing much with AFD lately - however, we know from PROD that it's pretty much okay to delete an article if nobody objects. So from that angle, it seems to me like needless bureaucracy to relist an AFD that has lack of participation. Could you please explain to me the point

2157:

Excellent, always nice to see a satisfied customer. It's probably a very good thing your bot does said checking: I can't rule out major gotchas, especially due to the piecewise way I ended up building the links table (not to mention the information being several days out of date now). Should be

2039:

You continue to revert MY edits, which are actually more neutral and factual than the overhyped UN-objective puffery that you submit concerning Tubby Smith. What makes you think your unqualified praise of Tubby is more deserving of space than the FACTS that I submit? You claim that UK fans expect

613:

No, at the risk of sounding like a jerk. This is a process that can easilly be done by a bot, and I suggested that happen, apparently it hasn't yet. As useful as these categories may be, requiring closers to remove them, when closers (as far as I know) never asked for them to be there in the first

511:

Well that seems like an invalid warning. I say just let it cool down, ignore it and talk about the actual issue if possible. It seems like you're acting in good faith, and even if he blocks you it wouldn't be a good idea since he's involved in a dispute with you, so I wouldn't worry too much. Just

368:

For one thing, unlike with PRODs, you can't contest an AfD by just recreating the article, so an AfD decision is somewhat more binding. So that puts in the closer in position of not merely making sure no one contested the deletion, but that it actually makes some sense. For example earlier today I

1367:

Sorry, I genuinely didn't mean to patronise, the heading to my post was supposed to be tongue in cheek, but perhaps it was too strong. However, if we can't point out mistakes to each other as admins then it's a pretty poor world. My comments were not really 'hindsight' since the problems with the

72:

Actually, recreating a PROD'd article counts as contesting the deletion, or at least that's what consensus seems to be. Since this is technically a different article I'll let the PROD stay up... but the article did assert importance ("leading developer of Mobile and Hand Held") so I didn't really

2012:

In searching your site for film makers, of which i have found many, I havent found any films or film makers who have shared there secrets publicly. We are only just starting to germinate so to speak, I am making all the eqipment by hand from recicled materials (this i would like to share on your

2365:

Hello W marsh, I noticed that you recently deleted the ask jolene article, although I really don't especially care since I only created it as a peripheral matter to another article in a subject that I have never even edited before, I still must admit I am somewhat surprised about the deletion

627:

but it is run on an ad-hoc basis and I am impatient. I am against the categories myself and I think there has been a general fall in the number of responses to AFDs since the scheme was introduced (meaning more have to be relisted), but since the change had majority support what can you do?

2502:

i started an article called "the garment district", cambridge, ma it was deleted as 'advertising'. i think that was wrong. this store has a major amount of press and articles in major newspapers and national media, therefore its relevance is more than sufficient for wikipedia. this is

940:, and it will get handled promptly. We're currently waiting for bugzilla to make "Transwiki:" into a full namespace, then we'll be rolling with it faster (using the categories here), but at the moment it's just by request, because at the moment we have to import, then move to transwiki. -- 2308:. These particular articles are for songs that definitely have no real claim to notability and the articles themselves are all rather short and are mostly made up of what people think the meaning of the song to be, they also do not contain a single reputable source. Thanks for your time. 2093:

Ah, of course if they're being emptied "from the front", that's going to skew the alphabetic distribution: didn't think of that. I'm going to have a bash at this over the weekend, partly so's I don't have to be around to listen to the horrible disk-grinding noises. If the table builds

488:

As an admin I don't think you did anything wrong since you seem to be acting in good faith. But personally I'm not a fan of removing comments in most cases, it just ultimately makes things more clear to leave them in until a normal archive occurs, unless they're trolling, misplaced, etc.

594:

I was in two minds whether to mention this given your sterling efforts in keeping AFD running smoothly, but I figure you can always ignore me if it is going to be the straw that breaks your back, so...when closing AFDs can you remove the categorisation template under the title. I use

2304:. Personally I think the consensus reached was 'merge and redirect', but I'm not asking about that. The point I was trying to make with these AFDs was to try and dissuade people from trying to create an article for every song of their favourite band, especially taking into account 2366:

considering the fact that the result of the vote was 5 keeps to 6 deletes which would usually result in a no consensus. I don't really know anything about the site but from the other keeps on the afd it seemed like the alexa rating was not the only argument in favor of keeping.-

2424:

And then someone adds another process for closers to follow without asking closers, and it takes 2 seconds, then 3... then all of the sudden it takes 5 minutes for the procedural part of closing an AfD. I don't think you're understanding what I mean by "object in principle".

1825:

We take down copyright violations when we realize that they're copyright violations, we don't wait for a complaint. Knowledge content needs to be liscensed under the GFDL, because sometimes it is resold or profitted from, so we can't knowingly use copyrighted text/images.

252:

It's not my area of expertise, I just remove the inuse template from articles if they've been up too long. Anyway I reverted to an earlier version of the article that looks a bit better, I'm not sure what was going on with the other version. Sorry I can't be of more help.

83:

put a db-empty on it (probably the wrong tag - it was an orphan redirect at that point). Based on all the history, I've removed the PROD and tagged it as a repost of the copyvio material. I hope this is ok. Thanks for your help and your explanations (and your patience!).

1221:

Yeah I just spoke to Dragonfly6-7 about the same thing. Initially I thought it was just me working on them so I was gonna kill them all to get DB off our back, then progressively work my way back as you suggested. Now I know theres at least 4 of us I'll take my time :)

61:

redirect), per your suggestion, but it seems to me that if the target of the redirect is deleted via PROD or AfD then the redirect itself should not have to go through the same process. I'm just trying to learn, I'm fine with whatever the proper process is ... thanks,

2528:

Eh, it seemed like advertising to me... "The Garment District is known as a good place to find affordable fabulous clothing as well as a place which gives the shopper a unique and cultural experience." Knowledge is not an advertising service. If you recreate it, see

573:

to disagree with consensus, but Knowledge operates by consensus. Without consensus we cannot get anything done. Thus, your going along with consensus would be appreciated." What does that mean... it's okay to disagree with consensus, just don't tell anyone about it?

2212:

I don't really know road websites well enough (or at all) I'm afraid. If they're written by experts with credentials and experience that would help... if it's just another set of internet people looking at Google Maps, I'd agree that they're not very reliable.

1018:

Thanks for your explanation re: the use of the "linkless" template. However, this entry is for a TV series that is 50 years old. What are the odds there would be on-line artcles that could be linked to it? Must every Knowledge entry include such links? Thanks!

262:

No, it's not my area of expertise, either. I think the article's creator was well-intended, and, as I've said, I wanted to give him the opportunity to improve the article. At this point, I think it is unsalvagable. At this point, AfD may be the next option.

222:

It was not clear to me from the first reading that the actress in question had actually appeared in movie, due to the strange wording of the article. On second view, I understand what the author meant, though I believe the article needs a serious rewrite.

1877:. If something is actually "common knowledge" it should be easy to find a published source confirming it. If no one's bothered to print something, chances are it's just your opinion. Anyway, if you doubt any of the claims in the article are true, add a 752:

to my user area so I can add sources? I have a number of magazine clippings, and articles and awards from many gaming websites, which I believe will fix the "no references" problem for the former and the "not notable" problem for the latter. Thanks!

663:

Hey I was wondering if anyone relist a article on AfD I was going through the backlog and found one that didn't have any "votes" other than the nomination. So I was wondering what the subst for that is and where I could find it if I can thanks.

394:

I believe you made a mistake closing this with no consensus. The only people arguing to keep it were a bunch of pupils at the guy's school and a guy who can't spell professional and seems to believe Jamaica has a professional chess league.

2269:

Two things: One, the discussion is still ongoing. I'm reaching my wit's end at this point, think you could dive in on this? Two, I took care of the issues at the Kroger Babb FAC if you don't mind taking a quick look. Thanks, sir.

1195:

I'm glad to see you swatted an "interestingly" in a sentence. There are bazillions of them on Knowledge. Often when I'm bored, I use the "search" button to look for them. Interestingly, there's almost never a need for that word.

2414:

I routinely go through the sub-categories to monitor AfD debates. When a category is 90% filled with closed debates, it is incredibly frustrating. It wouldn't take you more than a second to remove the template when closing. ---

309:

I can neither correct the spelling of Gadsbey's Tavern Museum to Gadsby's Tavern Museum nor can I create a link to it from the American Whiskey Trail, where it is listed as part of that trail. Many thanks for any help you can

2443:

I never asked for those procedures... they weren't there when I started closing AfDs. I suggest you stop nagging the people who thanklessly deal with the AfD backlog day in, day out... we might just stop dealing with it.

975:? I'm a little shy to be bold and just make the templates discussed there, because after making one of them earlier a bot came through and de-fanged it (I never could find any discussion of why that occurred). -- 2301: 1797:

You're going to need to link to this page for me to know what you're talking about. But most likely you just copy and pasted it from another website that claimed a copyright, which is unacceptable, see

2453:

Rock, in all seriousness, you could probably ask one of the folks who run a bot to have it run thought the categories every 12 hours and remove the templates. I can't imagine it'd be too difficult. --

1974: 2568:) really indicated that the article should be kept; there were two merge opinions, but the rest were basically for delete. So, I think it really shouldn't be considered a lack of consensus. -- 599:'s script to track down broken noms and it uses this category to build the list of open AFDs (so I guess I'm basically saying, can you make my life easier by making your life harder?). Cheers, 2293: 1294: 1137:

is indeed in the main (article) namespace. The "/" doesn't make it a subpage or anything in this namespace. At any rate it's clearly meant to be an article so it should have incoming links. --

154:), I know who this is, and it needs to go. How would you feel about deleting the talk page? I'm not going to do it personally because I know there is lots of important discussion on the page. 1008:

When I created this entry, I included at least twenty links to other Knowledge articles, so I don't understand why you added the "linkless" template to it. Could you please explain? Thanks!

972: 2405:

This is a task that could be done by bots, even just by AWB, as I've explained before... I don't see the need to make closing AfDs more tedius for humans, sorry. I object in principle. --

1277: 1609: 1479: 1423: 2167: 1324: 2480: 2386:

Hey. I've noticed that you almost never remove the "REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD" template when you close Afd's. Can you please try to do this in the future? ---

1605: 1475: 1419: 936:

We now have import enabled, and the current feeling is to do it that way, rather than copy/paste. If you see any that definitely merit copying, you can always list them on

2595: 2515: 2458: 2275: 2259: 420:

Okay thanks for closing it anyway, I guess the backlogs must be frustrating. I'll give the article a few more months, to see if it improves and maybe relist it again.

405:

I don't really know much about chess in Jamaica, so unless you mention it in the discussion I can't really take that into consideration. If you'd like to take this to

2183: 1344: 2584: 2177: 2074:

Hi, I am new to wikipedia and am very unsure about why my page keeps saying that there are not enough links? Could I get some help on what to do here? Thanks SMason

2251: 246: 2279: 1276:

You stated in an edit summary that you're "not quite sure what's going on" with my User Page being tagged for speedy deletion. For an explanation, please see

151: 2374: 2511: 2454: 2271: 2255: 2053: 1960:. Thanks for the feedback. Please let me know when I'll be able to see the article via the search engine or when I will be able to locate it on Knowledge? 1757: 822: 438: 311: 296: 47: 2545: 1911: 1780: 1114: 1097: 1083: 540:

Well, I don't think you seem like a troll, and calling you one seems a bit insulting. But it's nothing blockable at this point, you could bring it up at

267: 257: 2577: 2462: 825: 729: 234: 1317: 1284: 1223: 1048: 749: 714: 471: 324: 962:

Thanks, I'll look into it. I have the subpage so pages in the category don't show up as orphaned articles though, which is my main area of concern. --

2585: 1396: 1383: 1134: 1121: 1052: 1037: 1023: 722: 424: 216: 99: 801:

page (See the individual talk pages) and by the time you read this, I've removed the "orphan" tag. If you want more links, please contact me at the

687: 2434:

There are proper procedures to follow when closing Afd debates, none of which you seem to ever do. This is a pretty low expection for a sysop. ---

2371: 2309: 2305: 1452: 1034: 1020: 1009: 896: 745: 646: 636: 618: 502:

that seems to apply only to user and user talk pages. This whole situation, and how quickly things escalate, is leaving a bad taste in my mouth. --

413: 1580: 1571: 1562: 1176: 1167: 1158: 1141: 991: 966: 381: 2448: 2438: 2429: 2419: 2409: 1558:

Yes, releasing permission through e-mail should be enough, if you do own the rights to the text on the page that claims the copyright. Thanks. --

1544: 1302: 886: 170: 145: 2487: 199:, having youtube videos isn't really a claim to notability. Please cite an off-youtube source about this guy's importance and I will restore. -- 87: 77: 2534: 2445: 2426: 2406: 2349: 2297: 2214: 1957: 1945: 1942: 1888: 1827: 1803: 1623: 1577: 1559: 1497: 1437: 1380: 1354: 1333: 1326: 1164: 1138: 963: 782: 684: 643: 615: 578: 546: 513: 490: 462: 410: 378: 321: 254: 200: 167: 74: 44: 2551: 2263: 2234: 2217: 1448:, the user above told me that it is not a copyvio but got deleted. I had a look myself and did not find why it was copied from the source.-- 956: 581: 549: 516: 506: 493: 161: 461:

I will eventually, it's rather convoluted and I don't have the energy right now. I'll see if I have an opinion when I read it all though. --

2348:

Well I'm waiting for him to declare victory or a CJ story that he won, but you can update the article with the early report if you like. --

2098: 1613: 1483: 1427: 1047: 2537: 1830: 1806: 2367: 1737: 1719: 1697: 1659: 1337: 455: 123: 1253: 227: 1467:

I have found some vandalism on the Innuitian Mountains page while i was looking in the list of mountain ranges just to let you know..

1760: 1290:

Thanks for your attention to this--I appreciate your blocking him--but most of this vandal's damage is done via anonymous accounts.--

235: 2399: 2390: 1500: 607: 133: 65: 1521: 1208: 512:

try not to get too riled up, if at all possible. I'd say he's within his rights to restore the comments though, if he wants to. --

314: 1310: 1303: 870: 794: 695: 527: 203: 37: 2312: 1935: 1012: 2619: 2329: 1941:

I'm not really surprised... from his first post it was clear he was a sock of somebody or other. Thanks for letting me know. --

1753:"Eckstein is a fan favorite in St. Louis, who consider him to be a "pesky" hitter (he chokes up on the bat about 1-2 inches)." 1552: 362: 73:

feel speedy deletion was a good idea. Anyway, being a recreation of a PROD'd article isn't a reason to speedy delete either. --

2206: 399: 2474: 2227: 1058:

This person is continuing to spread the same link spam on other articles; I noticed you've reverted him several times on the

863: 764: 1891: 1853: 1821:

I didn't set the page up but it looked like the band's bio...I can't believe the band complained about copyright violation.

1626: 910: 210:

Okay, I was just kind of making the place, but was going to go into him as an actor in Tamil and Bollywood movies. Thanks.

111: 2591:

Shouldn't the outcome be "keep" instead of "no consensus"? Only 3 people called for delete while 8 people called for keep.

2519: 1291: 1281: 1124:, which isn't even in the main article space and thus should not have anything linking to it. Might want to fix that. :) -- 921: 757: 2162: 2152: 2112: 2087: 1372: 1128: 286: 33:

Welacome back, sorry I didn't get a chance to show my support at your recent RfA. You have my support, regardless. Peace!

2061: 928: 668: 465: 2352: 1914: 1440: 1232: 1788: 1263: 1513:

Hi, I agree with your merge (which another user reverted), but only to a different page. Would you please comment on

2494: 1767: 566: 534: 482: 445: 2611:, would you mind providing the content from the deleted article, since it contains updated information not found on 282:

Thanks for taking care of the problem with the guy who was trying to impersonate me. I very much appreciate it. --

2199: 909:

My administratorship candidacy succeeded with a final tally of 81/0/1. I appreciate your support. Results are at

2016:

perhaps you would like the removal our busines "hot cocky films" which can be done. we have no problem with that.

166:

Eh personally I don't see how important the discussion is for keeping, so I've gone ahead and deleted the page. --

2565: 1634: 1993: 1537: 845:, so the article will be linked to the 40 or 50 other piercing articles. Is this sufficient to remove the tag? 1756:

It's just common knowledge that Eckstein is not a very good player. That's why there's no article about it.

933:

Hi, Judging by one of your user subpages, I suspect you're interested in the transwiki to wikibooks process.

2244: 882:

There are links to her from the War on Terrorism page. & links from her page at the base of the article.

2094:

successfully, the actual query should be no problem; if not, I'll think about how to proceed from there.

1908:

Again, I overall respect him, but on this issue he is lining his own pockets at other people's expense.

55: 683:. Remember to remove it from the old AfD page too, otherwise it's still open on that day's log. Thanks. -- 409:

that's probably the best option... unclosing and relisting the AfD at this point seems like a bad idea. --

2381: 1462: 769:

Could you clarify what you mean by "linkless"? I feel that there is a sufficient amount of links in the

17: 2395:

Also, please check "what links here" when deleting an article, especially for redirects. Thanks. ---

2190: 2173: 1922: 1190: 1089:

Since leaving this message, another admin took care of this guy. Thanks for your help reverting him.

589: 2007: 1073: 555: 1514: 182: 2479:

Hello, you seem to have hastily closed discussion on the deletion of an article I began entitled

2057: 1838: 1712: 1681: 1674: 1646: 1635: 1071: 215: 98: 1652:

The reason for my request is that the Latin predominates--the English is merely Its translation.

577:

the people responsible for it will continuously be having to answer for it, until it's fixed. --

2602: 2360: 1784: 1745: 1271: 842: 739: 892:

Thanks for resolving this and getting back to me. BTW, pretty photo of the bridge in winter.

2319: 2287: 2245: 1528: 1508: 1393: 1369: 1095: 1081: 1001: 332: 293: 34: 1956:

Please note that I have created external and internal links to and from the article for the

2507: 2141: 2131: 2126: 2121: 2077: 2049: 1776: 1601: 1471: 1415: 1163:

No problem, I deleted the article redirect so it should just exist in the userspace now. --

834: 726: 697: 264: 243: 224: 2108:

space, as distinct from those with no links whatsoever. Correct me if that's not right.

8: 2592: 2559: 1860: 1799: 1592: 1280:. Basically, this guy is mad at me for repeatedly nominating his article for deletion.-- 1244: 904: 798: 634: 623:

Ok, I quite understand - not a problem. There is actually a bot removing the categories:

605: 559: 389: 304: 2136: 2104:

Incidentally: I'm assuming what you're looking for is articles with no links from the

1973: 1567:

Thanks for the quick response! Which email address should I send this to? Thanks again

1260: 806: 475: 373:, an article about an academic that asserts some importance, but may not actually meet 339: 2292:

Hi, I was wondering if you could take another look at these AFDs you recently closed;

2117:

OK, here's the list -- or rather lists, didn't seem to like being uploaded in one go.

1536:

I noticed you have added a copyright violation tag on the page I just created on the

1205: 876: 861: 277: 158: 1951: 499: 1518: 1216: 1105: 1090: 1076: 432: 130: 105:

Just looked at page logs and this had previously been deleted in November 2005. ––

2533:, you should assert meaningful coverage of the store by 3rd party publications. -- 985: 950: 562:, and it blew up, so I don't have good expectations of getting along with them. -- 139:

And it's back again with lots of single purpose accounts to defend it to boot. ––

129:

He's recreated twice; recommend delete and protection against further recreation.

2336: 1846: 1839: 1711:

Clicking or Entering the English should simply call up the Latin titled article:

1406: 790: 677: 665: 28: 2342: 1963: 1150:

Oh, geez. It's supposed to be in User:Glump/Firebirds. My mistake! I'll move it

841:

i saw you tagged this page as orphaned. I just created a body piercing template

2555: 2530: 2484: 2302:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/You Know What They Do to Guys Like Us in Prison

1928: 1874: 1687:

It's the Latin that is used, not the English translation. Do you understand me?

1493: 1449: 976: 941: 814: 629: 600: 541: 421: 396: 192: 2573: 2326: 2041: 1881: 1734: 1716: 1694: 1656: 1568: 1549: 1446: 1362: 1257: 1249: 1239: 1173: 1155: 1125: 1002: 893: 883: 779: 658: 545:

know better than me. Don't let it keep you from making good contributions. --

498:

Hmmm. So what do you propose I do if he restores them again? He's given me a

406: 374: 196: 2616: 2435: 2416: 2396: 2387: 2341:

Wave3 is reporting w/ 100% in Yarmuth has won. No time machine needed now!

1597:

I'm just letting you know that I'm going to redue the ones that I copied..

1201: 846: 835: 818: 802: 775: 770: 283: 155: 2612: 1870: 1351: 1341: 1314: 971:

Wow... good thinking! BTW: if you get a chance, could you have a look at

915: 810: 624: 596: 84: 62: 2608: 2294:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/I Never Told You What I Do for a Living

2191: 1932: 1899: 2223: 2159: 2149: 2109: 2095: 2084: 1067: 937: 725:

was instumental to the success of this review. Again, thank you! --

2569: 2231: 2203: 2180: 1850: 754: 563: 531: 503: 479: 452: 442: 370: 141: 119: 107: 1200:

PS: I agree with an awful lot of the opinions on your userpage.

1059: 451:

Sorry, I meant the clusterfuck that's happening at the bottom. --

2034: 2022: 1496:

for how you can take care of vandalism yourself if you want. --

1063: 805:

talk page. I've looked at the "related topics" in the tag and

437:

Would it be possible for you to comment on the new section of

789:

Okay, I think I get the hang of it now. I added links in the

187:

Why did you delete that article? It was just being started.

2001:

All of a sudden you deleted a GREAT page of African cities.

1980: 875:

Could we remove the links question flag at the top of her (

2550:

Can you explain why you thought there was no consensus on

1690:

So there should not be an article under the English title!

150:

Repeating this from the talk page of the deleted article (

2615:. Thx. (You could copy it to a subpage on my Userspace). 2178:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Superior (proposed state)

2168:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Superior (proposed state)

707: 292:

He's speedy, no doubt! Good work there, beat me too it!

2230:. There's never been a clear definition of the term. -- 1772:

Just wondering why you deleted the Spoiler NYC page???

1252:

astronaut for the very fast work with the copyvio's on

470:

As an administrator, do you think I was right to make

1816: 1340:, but for some reason it doesn't work, can you help? 2069: 1062:

article, as have I. He/She is now placing it on the

439:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style (U.S. state highways)

1708:

There should NOT be an article under the English: !

2019:kind regards M Zilm CAMTECC for (hot cocky films) 1845:You might want to contribute to the discussion at 1730:I think you are right--it has been done already!!! 558:. Do you have any suggestions? I tried talking on 2586:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Enochian angels 2 2306:Knowledge:WikiProject Music/Notability and Songs 1545:Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International 2298:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Cemetery Drive 1958:Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy 117:I wasn't aware there was a NN warning tag. –– 2343:http://www.wave3.com/global/link.asp?L=214150 1334:BCG_disease_outbreak_in_Finland_in_the_2000's 1327:BCG_disease_outbreak_in_Finland_in_the_2000's 1684:, should simply be redirected to this Latin! 2552:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Balkan 176° 2546:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Balkan 176° 1338:National_Public_Health_Institute_of_Finland 1309:Thank you very much for your support in my 774:Please leave a message in this page or the 2042:http://msn.foxsports.com/cbk/story/6110884 1649:to the Latin? --I don't know how to do it. 1243: 911:Knowledge:Recently_created_admins#Durova 236:Theories on Columbus' Portuguese origins 2200:Talk:Ghost ramp#"Reliable sources" poll 1673:The article title should be the Latin: 1304:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Elonka 795:List of programs broadcast by Studio 23 14: 2368:Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg 1733:Best regards, your fellow Wikipedian, 1033:an entry. I appreciate your patience. 1515:Talk:Entropy#Introduction to entropy 1817:http://en.wikipedia.org/Spoiler_NYC 1576:permissions at wikimedia dot org -- 23: 2228:discussions on misc.transport.road 713:Thank you for participating in my 24: 2630: 2226:- a term that came about through 2176:and consider changing your vote. 1670:But the articles are NOT correct. 1411:im sorry i will not copy anymore 717:, which finished with a tally of 1994:Where's the African Cities list? 1979: 1972: 1154:of the article space. Thanks! -- 778:talk page. Thank you very much. 706: 556:I seem to have made some enemies 1968: 1750:Well, this isn't cited either: 1445:Could you take another look at 1292:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 1282:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 871:Brigitte L. Nacos flag re links 702: 530:. Is this standard practice? -- 320:Should be taken care of now. -- 1538:Network of European Worldshops 1350:Now it works, problem solved. 973:my request on the village pump 88:15:51, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 78:15:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 66:15:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 48:21:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 38:21:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 13: 1: 2620:14:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC) 2596:14:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC) 2481:List of Australian bush bands 2475:List of Australian bush bands 2008:The forest film in the making 1704:Just to make myself clearer! 1543:I work at Communications for 765:Cory Quirino page...linkless? 2578:19:14, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 2538:14:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 2488:04:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 2463:02:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 2449:02:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 2439:02:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 2430:02:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 2420:02:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 2410:02:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 2400:02:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 2391:02:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 2375:19:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 2353:02:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 2330:21:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 2313:18:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 2280:21:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 2264:17:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 2235:23:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 2218:22:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 2207:22:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 2184:18:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 2174:Vanderbilt University source 2163:21:57, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 2153:10:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 2113:01:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 2099:20:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 2088:05:40, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 1946:03:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 1936:03:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 1915:23:37, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 1892:03:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 1854:01:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 1831:16:22, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 1807:21:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 1761:20:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 1738:22:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 1720:22:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 1698:22:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 1660:18:33, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 1627:20:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1581:16:10, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1572:16:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1563:16:07, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1553:16:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1522:09:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1501:00:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1453:23:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 1441:23:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 1397:15:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 1384:14:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 1373:14:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 1355:13:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 1345:13:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 1318:07:35, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 1295:16:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 1285:16:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 1264:04:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 1248:I, Garion96, award you this 1233:02:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 1209:23:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1177:00:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1168:00:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1159:00:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1142:00:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1129:00:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1098:22:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 1084:20:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 1038:15:19, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 1024:15:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 1013:15:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 992:15:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 967:15:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 957:14:58, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 922:14:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 897:02:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 887:02:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 864:01:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 826:09:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 783:07:53, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 758:23:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 730:11:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 688:01:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 669:00:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 7: 1666:Got your message! However: 929:Import enabled on wikibooks 647:14:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 637:14:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 619:14:39, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 608:14:28, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 582:01:32, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 567:21:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 550:18:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 535:18:25, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 517:22:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 507:22:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 494:22:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 483:22:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 466:22:24, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 456:22:23, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 446:22:12, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 425:20:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 414:20:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 400:20:18, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 382:15:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 363:15:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 325:23:39, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 315:23:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 297:02:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 287:02:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 268:00:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 258:23:57, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 247:20:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 228:02:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 204:02:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 171:13:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 162:05:19, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 146:03:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 134:02:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 124:02:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 112:02:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 10: 2635: 2252:Thought you should know... 1256:and copyvio's in general. 18:User talk:Retired username 2607:Hi, you recently deleted 2495:deleted article craziness 1768:Spoiler NYC page deletion 2198:What do you think about 1715:--do you understand me? 1713:Praemonitus praemunitus 1682:Forewarned is forearmed 1675:Praemonitus praemunitus 1647:Forewarned is forearmed 1636:Praemonitus praemunitus 1172:Thank you very much! -- 1865:See previous message. 1606:Duggie roy@hotmail.com 1476:Duggie roy@hotmail.com 1420:Duggie roy@hotmail.com 1266: 2246:V for Vendetta (film) 1952:Furman Center Article 1247: 2142:User:Alai/orphansT-Z 2132:User:Alai/orphansP-R 2127:User:Alai/orphansM-O 2122:User:Alai/orphansA-L 1392:Nor am I, thanks. -- 152:Talk:Mike the Rocker 56:Question of protocol 2382:Closing Afd debates 1964:RfB With A Smile :) 1800:Knowledge:Copyright 1463:Innuitian Mountains 1436:Alright, thanks. -- 1110:Marshbot added the 817:are not related to 799:Alessandra de Rossi 474:to try and restore 2137:User:Alai/orphansS 1332:There's a link to 1267: 807:Benigno Aquino Jr. 744:Could you restore 642:do human tasks. -- 2554:? Nobody except 2524: 2510:comment added by 2461: 2278: 2262: 2066: 2052:comment added by 1987: 1986: 1923:Wissahickon Creek 1813:Here's the link: 1793: 1779:comment added by 1680:And the English, 1645:Can you REDIRECT 1618: 1604:comment added by 1488: 1474:comment added by 1432: 1418:comment added by 1191:Interestingly.... 877:Brigitte L. Nacos 735: 734: 590:Categories in AFD 500:vandalism warning 2626: 2523: 2504: 2457: 2274: 2258: 2065: 2046: 1983: 1976: 1969: 1927:...was actually 1886: 1880: 1792: 1773: 1617: 1598: 1487: 1468: 1431: 1412: 1228: 1119: 1113: 1093: 1079: 1049:User:66.246.83.2 988: 981: 953: 946: 918: 858: 855: 852: 849: 750:Forgotten Hope 2 710: 703: 696:RfA thanks from 682: 676: 632: 603: 359: 357: 355: 353: 351: 294:Hamster Sandwich 183:Little Superstar 35:Hamster Sandwich 2634: 2633: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2605: 2589: 2548: 2505: 2497: 2477: 2384: 2363: 2339: 2322: 2290: 2249: 2196: 2170: 2080: 2072: 2047: 2037: 2025: 2010: 1996: 1988: 1966: 1954: 1925: 1902: 1887:tag to them. -- 1884: 1878: 1863: 1847:Talk:Ghost ramp 1843: 1840:Talk:Ghost ramp 1774: 1770: 1748: 1639: 1599: 1595: 1531: 1511: 1469: 1465: 1413: 1409: 1365: 1330: 1307: 1274: 1242: 1226: 1219: 1193: 1135:Glump/Firebirds 1122:Glump/Firebirds 1117: 1111: 1108: 1091: 1077: 1056: 1053:User:AnthonyNgo 1006: 990: 986: 977: 955: 951: 942: 931: 916: 907: 873: 856: 853: 850: 847: 839: 791:Elpidio Quirino 767: 742: 727:StuffOfInterest 723:big oppose vote 701: 698:StuffOfInterest 680: 674: 661: 630: 601: 592: 435: 392: 349: 347: 345: 343: 341: 335: 307: 280: 239: 220: 217:Veronica Segura 185: 103: 100:Mike the Rocker 58: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2632: 2604: 2603:Yuvashakti afd 2601: 2593:Kavadi carrier 2588: 2583: 2547: 2544: 2541: 2540: 2512:Goscaranderson 2496: 2493: 2476: 2473: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2455:badlydrawnjeff 2451: 2432: 2412: 2383: 2380: 2362: 2361:Ask Jolene afd 2359: 2356: 2355: 2338: 2335: 2321: 2318: 2289: 2286: 2283: 2282: 2272:badlydrawnjeff 2256:badlydrawnjeff 2248: 2243: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2195: 2189: 2169: 2166: 2145: 2144: 2139: 2134: 2129: 2124: 2102: 2101: 2079: 2076: 2071: 2068: 2036: 2033: 2024: 2021: 2009: 2006: 1995: 1992: 1990: 1985: 1984: 1977: 1967: 1965: 1962: 1953: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1929:User:Bonaparte 1924: 1921: 1901: 1898: 1895: 1894: 1862: 1859: 1842: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1812: 1810: 1809: 1769: 1766: 1747: 1746:David Eckstein 1744: 1741: 1740: 1731: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1709: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1693:Thanks again! 1691: 1688: 1685: 1678: 1671: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1653: 1650: 1638: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1594: 1591: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1530: 1527: 1510: 1507: 1504: 1503: 1494:Help:Reverting 1464: 1461: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1408: 1405: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1387: 1386: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1357: 1329: 1323: 1306: 1301: 1298: 1297: 1278:this complaint 1273: 1272:Jesús Gabaldón 1270: 1241: 1238: 1218: 1215: 1212: 1211: 1192: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1145: 1144: 1107: 1104: 1101: 1100: 1055: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1027: 1026: 1005: 1000: 997: 996: 995: 994: 984: 949: 930: 927: 906: 903: 900: 899: 872: 869: 838: 833: 830: 829: 815:Claro M. Recto 766: 763: 746:Forgotten Hope 741: 740:Forgotten Hope 738: 733: 732: 711: 700: 694: 691: 690: 660: 657: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 591: 588: 585: 584: 574: 553: 552: 528:called a troll 526:I've now been 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 459: 458: 434: 431: 428: 427: 417: 416: 391: 388: 385: 384: 338:of relisting? 334: 331: 328: 327: 306: 303: 300: 299: 279: 276: 273: 272: 271: 270: 238: 233: 219: 214: 209: 207: 206: 184: 181: 178: 177: 176: 175: 174: 173: 127: 126: 102: 97: 94: 93: 92: 91: 57: 54: 51: 50: 30: 27: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2631: 2622: 2621: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2600: 2598: 2597: 2594: 2587: 2582: 2580: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2564: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2543: 2539: 2536: 2532: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2500: 2492: 2490: 2489: 2486: 2482: 2472: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2450: 2447: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2437: 2433: 2431: 2428: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2418: 2413: 2411: 2408: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2398: 2393: 2392: 2389: 2379: 2377: 2376: 2373: 2369: 2358: 2354: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2334: 2332: 2331: 2328: 2320:Re: Adminship 2317: 2315: 2314: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2288:AFD decisions 2285: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2247: 2242: 2236: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2216: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2205: 2201: 2193: 2188: 2186: 2185: 2182: 2179: 2175: 2165: 2164: 2161: 2155: 2154: 2151: 2143: 2140: 2138: 2135: 2133: 2130: 2128: 2125: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2115: 2114: 2111: 2107: 2100: 2097: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2086: 2075: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2054:71.226.73.149 2051: 2044: 2043: 2032: 2029: 2020: 2017: 2014: 2005: 2002: 1999: 1991: 1982: 1978: 1975: 1971: 1970: 1961: 1959: 1947: 1944: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1934: 1930: 1920: 1918: 1916: 1913: 1909: 1906: 1897: 1893: 1890: 1883: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1858: 1856: 1855: 1852: 1848: 1841: 1836: 1832: 1829: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1808: 1805: 1801: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1765: 1763: 1762: 1759: 1758:70.168.242.15 1754: 1751: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1732: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1721: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1699: 1696: 1692: 1689: 1686: 1683: 1679: 1676: 1672: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1661: 1658: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1628: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1590: 1582: 1579: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1551: 1546: 1541: 1539: 1534: 1529:NEWS! article 1526: 1524: 1523: 1520: 1517:. Thanks: -- 1516: 1509:Entropy merge 1506: 1502: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1460: 1454: 1451: 1447: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1439: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1404: 1398: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1382: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1371: 1360: 1356: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1328: 1322: 1320: 1319: 1316: 1312: 1305: 1300: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1283: 1279: 1269: 1265: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1250:Public Domain 1246: 1237: 1235: 1234: 1231: 1230: 1214: 1210: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1188: 1178: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1136: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1127: 1123: 1116: 1103: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1074: 1072: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1054: 1050: 1045: 1039: 1036: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1011: 1004: 1003:Alcoa theatre 999: 993: 989: 982: 980: 974: 970: 969: 968: 965: 961: 960: 959: 958: 954: 947: 945: 939: 934: 926: 924: 923: 920: 919: 912: 902: 898: 895: 891: 890: 889: 888: 885: 880: 878: 868: 866: 865: 862: 859: 844: 837: 832: 827: 824: 823:202.128.60.13 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 787: 786: 784: 781: 777: 772: 762: 760: 759: 756: 751: 747: 737: 731: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 709: 705: 704: 699: 693: 689: 686: 679: 673: 672: 671: 670: 667: 656: 648: 645: 640: 639: 638: 635: 633: 626: 622: 621: 620: 617: 612: 611: 610: 609: 606: 604: 598: 587: 583: 580: 575: 571: 570: 569: 568: 565: 561: 557: 551: 548: 543: 539: 538: 537: 536: 533: 529: 518: 515: 510: 509: 508: 505: 501: 497: 496: 495: 492: 487: 486: 485: 484: 481: 477: 473: 468: 467: 464: 457: 454: 450: 449: 448: 447: 444: 440: 430: 426: 423: 419: 418: 415: 412: 408: 404: 403: 402: 401: 398: 387: 383: 380: 376: 372: 367: 366: 365: 364: 361: 360: 333:AFD relisting 330: 326: 323: 319: 318: 317: 316: 313: 312:Gadsbey Ghost 302: 298: 295: 291: 290: 289: 288: 285: 275: 269: 266: 261: 260: 259: 256: 251: 250: 249: 248: 245: 237: 232: 230: 229: 226: 218: 213: 211: 205: 202: 198: 194: 190: 189: 188: 180: 172: 169: 165: 164: 163: 160: 157: 153: 149: 148: 147: 144: 143: 138: 137: 136: 135: 132: 125: 122: 121: 116: 115: 114: 113: 110: 109: 101: 96: 89: 86: 81: 80: 79: 76: 71: 70: 69: 67: 64: 53: 49: 46: 42: 41: 40: 39: 36: 26: 19: 2606: 2599: 2590: 2581: 2562: 2549: 2542: 2501: 2498: 2491: 2478: 2471: 2394: 2385: 2378: 2364: 2357: 2340: 2333: 2323: 2316: 2291: 2284: 2250: 2241: 2197: 2187: 2171: 2156: 2146: 2116: 2105: 2103: 2081: 2078:Lonely pages 2073: 2045: 2038: 2030: 2026: 2018: 2015: 2011: 2003: 2000: 1997: 1989: 1955: 1926: 1919: 1912:67.150.93.18 1910: 1907: 1903: 1896: 1864: 1857: 1844: 1835: 1820: 1815: 1811: 1781:Alec Hiddell 1771: 1764: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1742: 1726:My apology! 1725: 1703: 1665: 1640: 1631: 1596: 1589: 1542: 1535: 1532: 1525: 1512: 1505: 1466: 1459: 1410: 1403: 1366: 1359: 1331: 1321: 1308: 1299: 1275: 1268: 1236: 1224: 1220: 1213: 1194: 1187: 1151: 1120:template to 1109: 1102: 1066:article and 1057: 1044: 1007: 998: 978: 943: 935: 932: 925: 914: 908: 901: 881: 874: 867: 840: 836:anti-eyebrow 831: 819:Cory Quirino 803:Cory Quirino 776:Cory Quirino 771:Cory Quirino 768: 761: 743: 736: 718: 692: 662: 655: 593: 586: 554: 525: 469: 460: 436: 429: 393: 386: 340: 336: 329: 308: 301: 281: 274: 240: 231: 221: 212: 208: 186: 179: 140: 128: 118: 106: 104: 95: 59: 52: 32: 25: 2613:Sahaja Yoga 2506:—Preceding 2172:Please see 2048:—Preceding 2035:Tubby Smith 2023:Jim Edmonds 1861:Eckstein... 1775:—Preceding 1600:—Preceding 1593:non-copying 1519:Sadi Carnot 1470:—Preceding 1414:—Preceding 1092:AuburnPilot 1078:AuburnPilot 913:. Warmly, 879:) article? 811:Cory Aquino 390:Ryan Palmer 305:Please help 191:Please see 131:ColourBurst 2609:Yuvashakti 2192:Ghost ramp 2004:How come? 1869:Look, see 1622:Thanks. -- 1492:Done. See 1450:Konst.able 1070:articles. 821:. Thanks. 666:Whispering 43:Thanks! -- 2556:Unfocused 2485:Badagnani 2310:Timkovski 2224:neologism 1998:Hey Now! 1325:linkless 1254:this list 1068:Fairbanks 979:SB_Johnny 944:SB_Johnny 905:Thank you 785:Doberdog 631:Yomangani 602:Yomangani 472:this edit 422:Catchpole 397:Catchpole 369:relisted 278:Thank you 2566:contribs 2520:contribs 2508:unsigned 2327:ReyBrujo 2062:contribs 2050:unsigned 1789:contribs 1777:unsigned 1735:Ludvikus 1717:Ludvikus 1695:Ludvikus 1657:Ludvikus 1655:Thanks. 1614:contribs 1602:unsigned 1569:Vincentl 1550:Vincentl 1484:contribs 1472:unsigned 1428:contribs 1416:unsigned 1258:Garion96 1217:Copyvios 1174:Masamage 1156:Masamage 1126:Masamage 1115:linkless 1106:Marshbot 938:b:WB:RFI 894:Dogru144 884:Dogru144 828:Doberdog 797:and the 780:Doberdog 476:WikiLove 433:Highways 371:Min Zhou 310:provide. 2617:Sfacets 2535:W.marsh 2531:WP:CORP 2503:unfair. 2446:W.marsh 2436:RockMFR 2427:W.marsh 2417:RockMFR 2407:W.marsh 2397:RockMFR 2388:RockMFR 2350:W.marsh 2337:Yarmuth 2222:It's a 2215:W.marsh 2194:, again 2106:article 2031:-Eddie 1943:W.marsh 1889:W.marsh 1875:WP:NPOV 1828:W.marsh 1804:W.marsh 1624:W.marsh 1578:W.marsh 1560:W.marsh 1533:Hello, 1498:W.marsh 1438:W.marsh 1407:copying 1381:W.marsh 1202:Joyous! 1165:W.marsh 1139:W.marsh 1060:Alabama 964:W.marsh 685:W.marsh 644:W.marsh 616:W.marsh 579:W.marsh 560:WT:USSH 547:W.marsh 542:WP:PAIN 514:W.marsh 491:W.marsh 463:W.marsh 411:W.marsh 379:W.marsh 322:W.marsh 284:Alan Au 265:Charles 255:W.marsh 244:Charles 225:Charles 201:W.marsh 193:WP:VAIN 168:W.marsh 75:W.marsh 68:btbakk 45:W.marsh 29:Belated 1933:Jayjg 1352:Jkpjkp 1342:Jkpjkp 1315:Elonka 1261:(talk) 1064:Alaska 917:Durova 719:52/6/1 678:relist 625:Bot523 597:ais523 407:WP:DRV 375:WP:BIO 197:WP:BIO 90:btball 2070:links 1363:Sorry 1240:Award 987:books 952:books 659:subst 342:: --> 85:Brian 63:Brian 16:< 2574:talk 2560:talk 2516:talk 2499:hi 2459:talk 2372:Talk 2300:and 2276:talk 2260:talk 2202:? -- 2160:Alai 2150:Alai 2110:Alai 2096:Alai 2085:Alai 2058:talk 1882:fact 1873:and 1871:WP:V 1849:. -- 1802:. -- 1785:talk 1641:Hi! 1610:talk 1480:talk 1424:talk 1206:Talk 1051:aka 843:here 813:and 748:and 478:? -- 441:? -- 358:< 195:and 156:Bobo 2570:Nlu 2232:NE2 2204:NE2 2181:MPS 1851:NE2 1540:. 1394:Doc 1370:Doc 1336:in 1311:RfA 1152:out 1035:TOM 1021:TOM 1010:TOM 755:Ctz 715:RfA 564:NE2 532:NE2 504:NE2 480:NE2 453:NE2 443:NE2 263:--- 223:--- 142:Lid 120:Lid 108:Lid 2576:) 2522:) 2518:• 2444:-- 2425:-- 2370:| 2296:, 2270:-- 2254:-- 2213:-- 2064:) 2060:• 1931:. 1917:! 1900:TO 1885:}} 1879:{{ 1826:-- 1791:) 1787:• 1616:) 1612:• 1486:) 1482:• 1430:) 1426:• 1225:Gl 1204:| 1118:}} 1112:{{ 1075:. 983:|| 948:|| 860:: 854:an 851:uf 848:Na 809:, 793:, 681:}} 675:{{ 489:-- 253:-- 2572:( 2563:· 2558:( 2514:( 2056:( 1783:( 1677:. 1608:( 1478:( 1422:( 1229:n 1227:e 857:a 356:t 354:n 352:a 350:i 348:d 346:a 344:R 159:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index