User talk:Ritchie333/Archive 8

1521:

lot of information in the original report that was too detailed for the general public so I cut the report down into a more useful document. Since submitting the page for review I attended a meeting with a local flood group to preview the page. They were excited about it and commented on how useful it will be as a teaching resource for local schools. Following from this I must disagree that the article is not neutral - it is merely a statement of scientific data throughout. I have added some useful Wiki refs detailing context about the floods and some YouTube video footage. I fail to see how the YouTube footage could be unreliable as it shows videos of the floods that took place on the 12 June 2012. There is no commentary. Also, surely saying that other Wiki pages are unreliable is a circular argument – you are saying that the resources that you help to create can’t be trusted? Furthermore, I must disagree with your comments about the references - they are far more reliable than most you will find on a Wiki page because they are peer reviewed scientific articles. The article is also written in an encyclopaedic manner with facts and tables etc.

1702:

us of doing earlier. As you know since you keep bringing this up, the US roads project spent our first few years fighting which led to two arbitration cases (2006, 2008). It then took us time after that to figure out standards and to figure out how GAN and FAC worked. We've figured stuff out and we're only trying to help the UK roads project so they don't have to waste 3 years of fighting and 1 year cleaning up from that. Do you have to take our advice? Quite frankly, no. But you're taking a risk if you don't, in my opinion; we're telling you where we screwed up so you don't have to make the same mistakes.

1713:? It's a good way to collaborate and to ask questions. I'm dead serious on this one - Floydian, a user from Canada, used to hate us (if you go back in the archives), but then when he came on the channel he realized that all we're trying to do is help road editors around the world, and we learned to get along. And no, we won't ban you just because you're from the UK roads project - the channel is for all road editors, worldwide, and as the channel owner, I have been very firm about not banning people if at all possible, even if we don't necessarily like them. -- 2318:

dismiss all that as unproductive. I spent my first several years on this site building up USRD and its editors and did not do much article work. It sure paid off. There's a saying that goes "Give a man a fish, and you will feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, and you will feed him for a lifetime." We've built a solid team of editors all across the United States who enjoy what they're doing and who could do much more work than I can do by myself, considering that we got 9 FAs in 2012, and over 200 GAs - no one human can do that, even if unemployed!

2156:

But what concerns me is that it seems that you like to show up right after my posts, throwing more criticism my way. You can hold your own views about my participation in such meta issues, but I ask that you treat me with the courtesy that is expected of everyone, and if you don't have anything to say other than what comes off as an attack, then perhaps it's better to not say it at all. In your own words, you've been quite aggressive lately. Can you at least see why I'm concerned, and tone it down a few notches? --

934: 2842: 2627: 31: 174:), who closed the recent SPI case, to have a look. The trouble is, I can't hand on heart say he doesn't have a case at AfD right now without finding some more sources to support these bios, so I'm reluctant to just dismiss it as disruptive. I wouldn't put a hard limit on using the templates as I can see a legitmate use - say if a notable person stumbles across a badly sourced BLP of themselves and wants to argue they're non notable for a quiet life. 3098: 1112: 3179: 3321: 1817:

there. I learned about what's a GA and FA and why you should try writing one through other topics. I certainly don't see anyone else taking UK road articles to GA - nobody else cares. Look how my recent request for attempting to collaboratively get an article to GA have been received - complete silence, save for the predictable ranting of Marvin (who I'm not particularly happy with either). What do you suggest we do about that?

632:(in article space at that name). I moved it to the page it's at now but upon further inspection I'm not sure if it should perhaps be moved into AfC space. I can't find any evidence of it being in AfC space to begin with (looking at the authors contribs). I'm not quite sure what's happened but I suspect perhaps that the author has simply created the article and added the AfC tags to avoid it being deleted? I want to 2565: 897: 714: 3193: 1878:

roadgeek site) who have sworn off Knowledge, and ultimately there's nothing that we can do about that. We want to welcome editors, but if they are ultimately unwilling to follow Knowledge guidelines, then it isn't best for us or for them to continue the partnership because it's just not a good fit. We don't have articles on county-level roads or B roads in the UK, for example.

3373:. Although this shares a common trait with flamenco in that the music was designed for dancing and popular entertainment, which tends to annoy the establishment who like "serious" music for "serious" people. As time passes on, what was once shocking and vulgar becomes acceptable - for a possible contemporary British comparison, with Paco's Royal theatre performance, consider 344:

and most all coverage I had was in magazine form. Remember those? My reissue division has released 40 titles since 2008. So again, I suggest you do some research, even if only on this website to find out. But, regardless I have survived so much more in this industry over the years so whatever personal issue you have with me, enjoy it, because it's all you have.

2370:

in any missing holes (if there are any), sort them out, write it all up, and send it to GAN, ACR, and FAC in succession. It takes about 2-3 days working straight through per FA, not counting answering the GA/ACR/FA reviews. It's slow, but this way I don't waste time writing something to the GA standard, then rewriting it so it meets FA standards. --

1757:

down from this, which is good. What really annoyed me recently is I explained all this to you in as polite and diplomatic a manner as I could, and you sent a curt reply about ten minutes later instantly leaping to your defence, which suggested to me you didn't really read what I said and take in the message I was trying to give to you.

275:

totally out of hand, and "naming and shaming" is not part of that. I had already subtly hinted at "take it to the talk page" earlier, and since the discussion had got the point where everyone was saying "we need to discuss this elsewhere" I felt it was time for a close. In future, if you see anyone edit warring on the article, use

2344:

article was not going to make it to FAC. There it's best to just cut our losses and fail the article, giving it back to the nominator to fix and try again. Resource management is never a waste of time. By the way, those notices were sent to all the national projects as a courtesy; it only took 5 minutes to send them.

2046:. I'm not convinced that the article could impart any information that I could not tell by getting hold of a current map and an old map, such as the many that the University of Texas in Austin's Perry-Castañeda map library provides. Do you think I'd be within my rights to quickfail this article at GAN right now? 2454:

As the one who approved this article can you please confirm that the majority of this article is written by Thirty-six dragons formerly known as Iantheteacher who is widely known to be the promoter of Openpostcode and therefore has a very obvious Conflict Of Interest. It will be noted that the detail

2343:

The ACR changes are more in the form of resource management - is our reviewer team using our time and labor most effectively? There were some articles sent to ACR that were nowhere near the standard, and our reviewers kept adding unnecessary reviews when enough feedback had already been given and the

2291:

I don't think it's a productive exercise for me to point out the numerous times you have insulted me needlessly, and then have you defend those times, etc. (though they were generally when you referred to issues that happened years ago and which were completely irrelevant to the matter at hand). It's

2063:

can't improve UK road articles yourself. As I made pains to point out in the "Group collaboration" thread, I have the necessary sources and can provide them. All other people need to do is take the sources, reword them, cite them correctly, and use good English. The skills you need to do this, are in

1363:

on July 5th or 6th, which would be somewhat appropriate in my view. Last time I saw Harper would have been in about 2001-2002, I recall he was seriously sounding off about the Iraqi conflict between songs. Haven't a clue about the infobox - that seems to be way it's designed. I'm not sure who you can

957:

Hello, i've been fairly busy and didn't notice that my article had been reviewed. You said my song was not notable but it is. Also you said that songs on wikipedia, with the exception of Beatles songs, should be notable like a chart-topper, yet the song is not a single or album so it cannot be on the

493:

I'm not engaging in further conversation, but there's something I want to make clear from the getgo: I've never been one to play civility cop, even as an admin. I don't agree with everything Malleus has said for example, but I don't waste my time trying to write him up at ANI and file the paperwork -

3408:

was a big influence on him from the late 70s onwards. I suppose old flamenco is "traditional Spanish music" played on a nylon guitar so is generally assumed to be classical music. That would have Segovia turning in his grave though!! Classic Spanish musicians viewed flamenco musicians much like most

2714:

archtects 100 odd years previously. I'm away for the weekend and writing this on my phone, so I'm not really going to be in a position to properly look at it until Monday, but iirc the source is on Google books so it should be fairly straightforward for someone to look at this and fix the ambiguity.

2369:

To write FAs, I go through my newspaper databases, and add everything that I can find about a road that is notable (so not "On Tuesday Fred got in an accident on this road.") I usually wind up with 100-200 articles per road. I do a Google search to make sure nothing else is missing, use maps to fill

1816:

Incidentally, you talk about a "UK Roads Project", but in my view, no such project exists. There might be a page with that name on WP, but discussions on it tend to be one line comments that are universally ignored. I'm not sure anyone's actually listened to, let alone learned from, your comments on

1756:

consider, that sometimes you are wrong. Nobody's perfect and we all make mistakes. That's fine. Look at the recent ANI thread you created - you started with a general attitude of "Wondering55 is NOT HERE TO BUILD AN ENCYCLOPEDIA GOD DAMMIT - stick his head on a plate now!" although you've now backed

1701:

That being said, if we are being critical of what the UK roads project is doing, it is because we're being honest about ways in which you as a project need to improve rather than sugarcoating things. Otherwise, yes we would be guilty of ignoring your project and not helping you out, like you accused

1688:

I just want to say again that I, and my colleagues in the US, only want to help the UK roads project. We care about road articles across all Wikimedia projects, regardless of their location in the world. Sure, several years ago we got a bit carried away, and got things started off on the wrong foot.

300:

editors who read why it was closed. And I've had no involvement in that article, so I would have no reason to ever take it to AN3 or the talk page. ;) And Duff didn't take it to AN3 because he obviously wasn't looking at it as an edit-warring issue, but ironically as an inappropriate-behavior issue.

2931:

Thanks for your assistance. I wasn't sure it was quite A7, but had forgotten about PROD. I left the article creator a message suggesting he merge it into a full-decade list; I think single-year history lists can get really out of hand after a while. Let me see if he responds to that before I tag

2813:

Thanks for starting the review. I'm not entirely sure your NFCC rationale will wash (and I tend to err on the side of "not suitable", which is why I didn't add an image myself). Theoretically, any one of the 250,000 - 500,000 attendees could have taken a photo, and sufficient of them would still be

2155:

to the roads projects is because I do care about the overall health of this site, and of other Wikimedia sites. That's why I hold sysop on the English Wikivoyage, a site where the vast majority of road articles are deleted. That's why I have almost 600 edits on Meta. That's why I'm involved in SPI.

2107:

I don't work on UK road articles because I already have enough to do with US road articles. Believe me, if I had the time, I would work on the UK, and on Australia, and on Costa Rica, etc. But I don't, so I focus my time on the areas that I know the most about, where I can make the most impact. But

1914:

We talk about a lot of things in the roads channel - some of the participants aren't even road editors at all but stick around because they like us. It's a good place to discuss article writing and to help other road editors out - I can say for a fact that the US and Ontario road articles would not

1810:

it's not recorded on WP. I'd go as far as saying that I know a number of people who could contribute a lot on here to the roads articles, but deliberately choose not to for fear of being trampled on - Chris Marshall for instance. What he doesn't know about British roads probably isn't worth knowing

1736:

I can categorically state I have absolutely no desire to see you desysopped and banned, and never have done. I can't think of a single action you've ever performed which has been the abuse of the tools - none whatsoever. I don't want to go to RFC / Arbcom as I hate drama and avoid it where possible

1520:

This Wiki page is part of a community flood risk project to create web resources for a village in Wales that was badly flooded in June 2012. Essentially, the page I created is a summarised version of a 53 page report that I wrote for Aberystwyth University (see ref 5 - S. Foulds is me). There was a

1408:

Before we go there, it probably wants to go through a GA review first - imho it's nearly there. Main facts I want to sort out now is a bit more on why the Stones stopped touring, Keef's tunings ("Life" has a bit more about this) and anything else about the other acts on the bill, which nobody seems

1211:

Sorry - I wasn't clear in my former message. SOMEONE ELSE offered to do a posting for $ $ $ . I said I would try to do it for them for free. No money out of their pocket or into mine. I am a big supporter of Knowledge and it's approach. As with most human beings I do things when there's a NEED

525:

i thought that my "list of firsts in major human achievements" would be very useful for people to know what significant milestones mankind has achieved during its existence and when. consider from the point of view of an extraterrestrial civilization- WHAT HAVE THEY ACHIEVED SO FAR AND WHEN AND WHO

274:

closing it, yeah - for which I give anyone full permission to reopen the thread if they so wish (that goes for any ANI conversation I happen to close, by the way). I don't think a giant list of what you think duffbeerforme did wrong is appropriate though - ANI is for stopping disputes that have got

254:

bypassed proper protocol by going to AN/I (after his bad behavior) without ever attempting to discuss the matter on the article's talk page. I hope you'll add those things because the editor's edit-warring was only a part of their very inappropriate behavior; it was only one-third of the reason for

130:

I see you also noticed. Is that a sock of a some kind of anti-NZ banned editor? Bit unusual first edits, and all following one editors creations. This makes me wonder what I have wondered before whether 1000 edits should be a threshold before using that template. If such a limit is even technically

1849:

It has just been seeming that every chance you get, you level some criticism at me - sure, once and in the appropriate forum, it might be more well-received. But right now, it's coming off as ax-grinding, to be blunt, and it's also come off as quite irritating because you're missing the context of

1822:

I'm not sure I'd really fit in with your IRC channel to be honest - my interest is more with transport history and the political background behind it, and I'd probably struggle to find topics to talk about. As you might have noticed, my main interest on here is more with musician / band articles -

1705:

But regardless, you don't have to like my opinions, and you don't have to like the U.S. Roads WikiProject, and you don't even have to like me, but I do ask that on Knowledge, you treat everyone with respect and courtesy, and that includes me. If you honestly believe that my behavior is disruptive,

1040:

Also, you said the best references of all, "Automated Lighting: The Art and Science of Moving Light," and "Concert Lighting: Techniques, Art, and Business," both published by Focal Press, don't seem to even mention High End Systems. But Automated Lighting has a whole section about High End Systems

343:

Not really sure what deems a record label "notable" but it seems you have something personal against me or else you would simply search this website and find all the bands I have worked with since 1999. The label has released 113 releases since 1999, I understand that is before internet took hold

1385:

I was thinking just the same about the FA. Would all of the Norman refs I've cited need to be given their individual page nos for FA status, rather than just the spans? Yes, he did a lot of patter when I saw him, and copious toking, but was a bit more mellow: first time was in some sports hall in

555:

The problem with your list being an article is that deciding what can go in and what should be left out is incredibly subjective, particularly where we need to take a worldwide view. I appreciate your list isn't complete, but I'm not sure it ever could be - where might you draw the line at what's

2317:

And that's where our Knowledge philosophies differ. It takes everyone to write an encyclopedia. Content writing would be useless without people keeping the vandals away, people looking for grammar errors, people looking for formatting issues, people resolving disputes, etc. We shouldn't flat out

1895:

last night; but it took several months of him working alone and figuring out how to write Australian road GAs. But we helped along the way and gave him some support, and I'm pretty encouraged by where that project's going - I think they'll be joining the US and Ontario as parts of the world that

1793:

Part of the problem is that a lot of the negative feedback you've received isn't measured on Knowledge itself (and, believe me, it's not pleasant to have to tell you that I know off-wiki people who, without any doubt, consider you to be a jerk. Sorry.) But remember anyone in the world with a web

1472:

Cool. For the record, I won't be going to the 6th July show as I'm already booked to play at another, rather more low key, summer festival gig elsewhere. Done a few Hyde Park Calling gigs over the past decade, but I personally just prefer wandering around the park when nothing else is going on.

3492:

Hi, I've been absolutely snowed under with work and it looks like it's going to continue for the next week. To be specific, as well as my day job I'm arranging, scoring and generally MDing a film soundtrack of which recording has to be finished at the end of this month come hell or high water.

1877:

I'm aware of the negative feedback that some people have for me offwiki (I'm "Der Autobahnenfuhrër" on WR). What it boils down to usually is that writing a general-purpose encyclopedia is fundamentally different from writing a roadgeek site. There's plenty of people on aaroads.com (the main US

1762:

You also seem to have a greater enthusiasm for following rules, regulations and policies, such as the many guidelines set out in MOS. I'm not sure that's a problem, just a different way of working. I tend to be a lot more pragmatic and look carefully at context. For me, provided information is

1036:

My submission was declinced because you said the references are either self-published or don't appear to be about High End. One of the references is self-published but none of the others are. They are: 1. Performance Magazine, an industry publication 2. Reuter's, a well-known news agency 3.

3336:

and the Spanish elite frowned upon flamenco music which they considered dirty, the music of filthy gypsies and a disgusting tribute to Arabs who once dominated their land. When Paco was permitted to play in the royal theatre of Madrid in '75 it was considered a groundbreaking event in Spanish

3277:

Yeah, it does seem a tough choice for an FA. I just have a bit to add on his most recent albums that's all for Paco, I'll try to rid of some of the red links too but I've ransacked google books and used about what I can on him. He's not exactly biographical material. BTW listen to this before

2150:

I honestly haven't been involved in ANI in quite a while, to be honest. There's plenty of admins, and plenty of non-admins even, who go around stirring up much more drama than I do on that page, and who don't contribute to mainspace at all. The reason I do get involved in sitewide discussions

1684:

We're obviously in a content dispute right now. However, I think you're taking this dispute personally, making it more about "defeating Rschen7754" than doing what you think is best for the encyclopedia. To be frank, I get the impression that you want me topic banned from all roads articles,

2273:

We'll have to agree to disagree on the notability - I maintain that most roads are non-notable and don't really see any good counter arguments. And a brief glance just tells me that there are some people on Knowledge who enjoy arguing more than writing articles, unfortunately. Such a shame.

1962:, there would be no problem. It's true that I've got a little aggressive recently, but as you said yourself, when stuff gets escalated up to ANI, RFC, it can prompt people to think "maybe something is wrong after all." It can happen to you, and me, just as much as Wondering55 or anyone else. 1697:

trying to destroy the UK roads project, delete all the articles, cripple the project so that it will never have GAs again, disrupt the UK roads project, etc. I wish that you would assume good faith and realize that we are trying to help you, rather than trying to smash UKRD into the ground.

1075:

Hi. Well, the good news is that if I say "the company certainly looks like it should be notable at first glance", then it's not far off passing, and it's simply a question of tidying up the references so it's unambiguous exactly where you're getting the information from. Have a look at our

1867:

Sure, Wondering55 could have been handled better, but I also have seen plenty of times where editors, when faced with a site ban, ArbCom case, or whatever, are suddenly willing to change their tune. I'm not saying that that necessarily happened here, but I'm also not saying that it

1975:

I feel people would be more willing to follow WP guidelines if they understood them, but my experience is people don't, and they need to be treated carefully, since this is a voluntary project. Even a revert on a good faith but unsourced and questionable edit can be interpreted as

2947:

Lists are always tricky. Some people like them, some people hate them. Because criteria for keeping or nuking them isn't as cut and dried as articles, I have seen some heated AfDs around them. Certainly, a list with one entry is worth merging, but for that I'd suggest a full AfD.

529:

wouldn't it be great to list out all first major events important for us which changed our world like say "FIRST PHONE CALL", "FIRST TV BROADCAST", "1ST HUMAN ON MOON"! when Knowledge has lists for some other game/ sport achievement/ records... isn't it more important than that?

1080:, particularly the section on book and magazine sources - you ideally need the ISBN number of the publication and specific pages. Incidentally, I've been away for the Easter break, so apologies for not getting back sooner - you can sometimes get a quicker response on the 2673:

Hi, you can always rely on Malleus' stalkers to get jobs done! I think that edit is making something factually incorrect regards the source. There wasn't an atrium in the original architecture - that's why they had to knock out a bunch of rooms to make one.

1980:. I'm not sure what we can do about this - I think I've survived since I've been an admin / moderator elsewhere on the 'net for years, I've got used to people disagreeing vocally with me, whereas other people misinterpret it as an attack and act accordingly. 3297:

recently (my other half likes listening to it while doing the housework), so I'll probably find this an enjoyable review. I'll keep you posted. As far as sources go, my gut feeling is you'll find a lot more in Spanish book sources that aren't online.

1794:

browser and an internet connection can generally read Knowledge, and if they don't like what they read, they won't stay to contribute. I have no doubt that you had the best of intentions when you tried to explain processes to other editors, but the

1745:

be topic banned", suggesting that I predicted it would happen anyway regardless of my input by someone else if you carried. I have no opinions on the US Roads Wikiproject as it's not a subject I know anything about, so I don't comment or contribute

1957:

to add to a discussion. You do have a tendency to always have the last reply in a discussion and always want to put your point of view in. Sometimes, I feel this causes more harm than good. If all you ever did was write lots of FA quality articles

967: 3331:

Its funny that you, Ipigott and most people I think classify flamenco as classical music. Actually classical music and flamenco in Spain have always been at complete ends of the spectrum and forces which have greatly opposed each other.

2458:

Furthermore, user Rugxulo has suddenly became involved in editing this topic even though he has been inactive on Knowledge for several years and showed no previous interest in Ireland, post or postcodes or geographic topics of any sort.

2133:, and you cannot get a comprehensive article off just looking at maps. In my editing philosophy, whenever I can, I just write to FA standards because it's the most time-efficient, in my opinion, but not everyone has that same philosophy. 1340:

Good work on this to you, too. Harper: me too (many times, first in 1979... Delightful man.). A question: why does The Rolling Stones concert chronology appear above attendance in the infobox? It shouldn't but I can't seem to change it.

3353:

than classical. That said, some of the real old traditional flamenco compositions sound more like classical music and both forms are played on nylon strings, although a classical guitar is built differently from a flamenco guitar. ♦

3337:

history, sort of like allowing a tramp to play an accordion in Buckingham Palace in terms of the opposition once held towards flamenco. Extremely few guitarists in the world today perform both classical music and flamenco. Some like

315:

Don't worry about it. I'd be surprised if anyone is interested in the thread now beyond those who have already participated, if I'm honest. It'll be archived soon, we'll all forget it about it, and we'll all move onto other things.

1858:). Even if that's not your intended outcome, your comments alone affect other editors' opinions of me - and repeated loudly and frequently enough, could lead to my being sanctioned, because that's how the ANI pitchfork mob works. 374:, which shows you how to cite print material. Regarding research, the onus is generally on the person adding the content to have done this first, though I will try and cite things to a web source if I can easily come across one. 2068:

people need to do to improve them. In my view, the best way to get your point across here would be to improve an article yourself, point to it as an example, and say "this is what you need to do". I did this when going through

2691:

OK--so the architects felt their own work was a detriment to the building? I'm just asking to make sure: it's odd, though not unimaginable. If the answer is yes, feel free to change it back if you get to it before me. Thanks,

910: 1751:

The only thing I really want is for you to change your attitude a little bit and realise that some of your actions, even when made in good faith, have undesirable consequences. Very specifically, I want to consider,

3424:, the tendency for YouTube users to say "545 people who disliked are Justin Bieber fans" in reference to those who dislike good music. It is definitely a notable internet thing, but I couldn't find anything on it.♦ 3292:

I never listened to much classical music when I was younger, having had it beaten into me at school and piano lessons, but I've become more mellow and relaxed as I've got older, and have been listening to a lot of

1037:

Projection, Lights and Staging News, an industry publication published by Timeless Communications 4. Mondo Magazine is an industry publication 6. Austin Business Journal is an Austin-based business newspaper

438:

I have closed the discussion as it is clear that you do not understand the GA/FA processes, and your comments were descending into personal attacks. However, you are welcome to bring any USRD or CRWP article to

2251:

sources. It takes me about 6 weeks to write a GA quality article, and I think a FA quality one would take me about six months. I can't write 15 FA articles at that speed - I'm not sure I'm going to live that

629: 724:

regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is

2415:

articles I intend to take up to FAC are critically acclaimed and commercially successful books. I cannot believe you can get an article to FA without physically visiting a library - just impossible.

1993:

Part of the problem is my opinions on notability don't seem to match any of the other regular editors on road articles. I think most roads are non-notable, as they don't contain coverage in reliable

366:

Sorry, I've no idea what this is about. Could you provide some context? If you have magazine sources, providing they were commercially published and had wide circulation, they're pretty likely to be

2633: 2626: 2243:, I was presented with an existing lengthy article, which had many parts unsourced, some parts sourced questionably, and some significant chunks missing. Six months after working on it, it's still 1905:

I have no idea what to do with Martinvl, or Andy who keeps inserting his coordinate stuff in there too, or with the DeFacto socker. Unfortunately it may take an ArbCom to sort out all that stuff.

621:

talk page but he said he wasn't too familiar with the AfC process. You had the unfortunate luck of being the first admin I recognised on the AfC talk page and now have been landed with this :)

1322:

Thanks. Ah, I see. That's much clearer; at first glance the original passage seemed contradictory. I hope you won't mind my pasting your amended passage into the article, even without a ref.

250:

since you participated in it, but I'm glad you did. Haha. I think you should add to your closing comment so that it mentions that the editor also ignored numerous warnings on their talk page

3493:

Hopefully by the end of the week, I'll be able to get back onto other things like this and do the review. I can only apologise and suggest being patient or getting another reviewer. Sorry.

2021:) as proof of this. In the past, I've had counter arguments which to me seem to resemble the form "State roads are notable because we say they are." This is why I've focused on things like 1737:(most of my contributions to ANI tend to try and get threads closed down and resolved). In fact, I don't want you topic banned from anything either - the precise wording I used was : "I 3437:

In any debate about the merits of a musical act, be it solo or band, as discussion continues, the probability of comparing the perceived quality of the act to Justin Bieber approaches 1

865: 2064:

my view, pretty universal. Shouting "UK road articles are crap compared to the US, Canada, Holland, Croatia, Antarctica, etc etc" isn't really helpful as it doesn't actually specify

2042:. I read the lead and thought "so what?" Why is this road important or special enough to be worthy of note by the general population? I had a look through the sources - mostly maps, 3244:

for me? If you want to, can you reserve it and review in another week or so to allow me to improve it during the meantime? There's still some outstanding things I wanted to add. ♦

1041:

starting on page 27 in the 1st edition and starting on page 28 in the 2nd edition. Also, Concert Lighting discusses High End Systems extensively starting on pages 184 and on 165.

296:

I'm just saying that if you're going to mention the boomerang, it should mention exactly why instead of just singling out one reason; not to shame the editor, but for accuracy for

726: 2125:

Maps are not primary sources; there's plenty of discussions in the USRD and RSN archives about that. And the only thing that matters about a GA candidate is whether or not it

1593:

Thanks for your input, Mdann52. When we mean "reliable sources", we mean that the source in question generally has a reputation for strong editorial control, and hence we can

1002:

extensively, not least Ian McDonald's "Revolution in the Head", my "go-to" source on Beatles articles. I also saw your Beatles' history article and commented about it on the

3260:

ground to a halt, I've got no outstanding GA reviews at the moment, so I'm happy to review Paco de Lucia. Seems only fair! I'll have a look through the article later today.

2992:

Aucune probleme, si vous preferiez lui repondre en Francais et il le peut comprendre. (Okay, my French is a little rusty and this keyboard doesn't have accents, but hey...)

2509: 2247:

FAC quality - I would need at least two more sources, Richard Barnes' "Maximum R&B" and the more recent DVD documentary "Amazing Journey" to be sure of having the four

3404:

Oh yeah, of course, "jazz guitarist" is Django, Joe Pass, Barney Kessel, Tal Farlow, Wes Montgomery, Charle Christian etc. Paco began as a traditional flamenco player but

1409:

to talk about. On the subject of the Norman refs, you can probably get away with the existing formatting for GA, but not for FA - you probably want to convert them to use

1206: 210: 2214:. Everything else is secondary. Okay, so you don't have time to write some articles. But you seem to find the time to post seemingly nonsensical bureaucratic posts on 3021:

If you have a French dictionary/spell checker on your browser, just change languages. It will mark all your unaccented words as "wrong," and will let you fix them.

1613:. Regarding your comment of "saying that the resources that you help to create can’t be trusted?" - Yes, absolutely! After all, somebody once wrote on Knowledge that 544: 355: 2411:

I've hatted this, but I can't help comment about "I go through my newspaper databases." Good grief. FAs are supposed to be supported by the uttermost best sources.

2845:

Historically, having several more fingers in pies than illustrated here can frequently lead to conflict of time and apologies for being unable to attend WikiMeets.

2473: 810:

It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

2550: 1235: 3213:

Thank you for you contributions to Knowledge at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the

1266:

Hi Ritchie, Do you know what this means: "They had not performed to the general public since early 1967, and had only given sporadic concerts since that time."?

1146: 625: 206: 1285:- it's looking better already. Well, another, more precise, and perhaps better way of putting it would be, "They had not performed a public concert since the 3256:

Thanks for another productive GA review. I honestly can't see making a FA out of it at the moment, but we'll see if anyone else comes forward to help. Since

2737: 771:

discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

3421: 2789: 2210:

I still don't really feel you've taken in what I said, but I'll spell it out in as clear a language as I possibly can. The purpose of Wikipedians is to

102: 2526: 556:

important and what's not? Lists tend to be most useful when they convey a clear and unambiguous set of information, such as (to pick a random example)

2801:

Started review, added a lower resolution non free pic, I think you can claim fair use. Will continue review once initial points have been addressed.♦

1953:

Regarding the ANI "torches and pitchforks mob", that is a problem, but it's one I think you can avoid if you just remember that sometimes it's better

1067: 979: 887: 1055: 593: 579: 386: 231: 200: 186: 3466: 3430: 3415: 2503: 567:

titled "Significant human achievements", or something similar, would be able to convey the same information, and fit into a more acceptable format.

328: 310: 291: 3505: 3451: 3397: 3310: 3287: 3272: 2830: 2614: 1540: 1223: 971: 952: 755: 659:

where it was moved to the wrong location. AfC submissions are stored in the Knowledge talk namespace so that IP users can create them (since, post

2427: 2382: 2286: 2168: 2102: 1927: 1844: 1706:

you are more than welcome to bring it up at the appropriate forums such as RFC/U, which I am sure you know of. Does that sound reasonable to you?

1096: 506: 488: 459: 3030: 3004: 2987: 2960: 2876: 2640: 1485: 1463: 1445: 1399: 1376: 1331: 1313: 1255: 1028: 1022: 708: 3082: 1350: 675: 548: 2488: 1649: 557: 3047:

I didn't realize songs deletions were different from some others, where notability of the artist prevents it from speedy deletion. I probably

2969:

Gotcha. Let's see how he reacts. His English isn't the best, so I responded in French. Maybe that will help him feel a little more at ease.

2920: 2727: 2701: 2686: 1588: 702: 963: 605: 2759: 359: 1200: 869: 3240:

Hi, I passed this after giving it an edit. One last question on the review page though. Any chance you could return the favour and review

2090:

is now sitting at GAN, and I would dearly love to get it all the way through FAC in the future - just I fear I might go insane doing so.

2755: 2455:

about Openpostcode is substantial and the absence of detail and subtle negative comment about the other codes serves to undermine them.

2218:

as you did this morning. Who specifically were you aiming that post towards? How do you think your post will help people write articles?

2018: 1788:

makes it abundantly clear that the majority of editors do not understand these shortcut acronyms, and consider them to be gobbledegook.

1605:. Since anyone can create a YouTube video about anything, it is generally not considered reliable - the footage might show the floods 2769: 1887:

I understand your frustration with UKRD, or the lack thereof. Sometimes you've just gotta start by yourself, and others will follow.

3360: 3250: 2807: 2059:

Another issue I have, and I really can't stress this enough, is that, aside from time constraints elsewhere, I really don't see why

3486: 2189:

My standard offer applies - please point out where I have insulted you in bad faith, and I will apologise and retract the comments.

948: 917: 904: 721: 264: 1725: 649: 3226: 1275: 1188:

right around here and makes all the grief and hassle I've had over the past fortnight (don't ask!) seem less important. Cheers!

1102: 970:, if you could check it out and give me feed back I would be much appreciated. Thank you, and please look back into my article! 3435:

I refer the honourable gentleman to the "Zen and the art of Knowledge Maintenance" list on my userpage, specifically item 3: "

2477: 1552: 966:

by the Beatles, so what you said is purly an opinion, even though i'm working on an history related article about the beatles,

911:

Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Knowledge:Manual of Style/Road junction lists

520: 494:

I have articles to write. If you look through the blocks I've made, you will find very few blocks related to civility alone. --

219:). Looks like a blocked or banned editor socking - no new user would leap straight to an AfD and make policy backed arguments. 3472: 2858: 2762:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2667: 3151:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

3066:

No worries. For what it's worth, I'm not sure they'd even get nuked at an AfD - any Tom Petty single probably is notable per

2765: 1301:) to hand to back any of that up right this minute. Basic point is, by the standards of the 60s, they hadn't played in ages. 1286: 1165:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

216: 2941: 2522: 1780:, containing numerous questionable facts with no evidence of editorial control. If you try and submit this article to the 998:

page to see that album's article instead. The Beatles' songs are very much the exception, as they have been documented in

990:, is that songs have to stand out specifically in their own right. In this case, you could take the content and add it to 851: 2902: 540: 351: 140: 3365:

Well, I'd consider "jazz", particularly that with a strong tie to popular and folk music, to be something more akin to

2469: 1289:, and in 1968 only performed at the NME Poll Winners Concert and at the Rolling Stones Rock 'n' Roll Circus" - which I 338: 302: 256: 157: 656: 473: 3104: 1811:

about - seriously - but I don't think you'll ever get him contributing to Knowledge - ever. It's not going to happen.

114: 2655: 1118: 3503: 3449: 3395: 3308: 3270: 3080: 3002: 2958: 2918: 2874: 2828: 2725: 2684: 2612: 2501: 2425: 2378: 2284: 2164: 2100: 1923: 1842: 1721: 1647: 1483: 1443: 1374: 1311: 1253: 1198: 1094: 1063: 1020: 686: 673: 601: 577: 502: 486: 455: 432: 428: 384: 326: 289: 229: 184: 171: 2593: 1940:

Well I'll pop on if I have time, but I sincerely think that's not going to be in the next fortnight if I'm honest.

1827:

to GA quality, it's taken six months and counting, and shows no sign of ending yet. That's where my real focus is.

3370: 3060: 1622: 1548: 1231: 660: 94: 86: 3088: 2587:

to Good Article status. One of the most rock'n'roll articles on wikipedia! Thanks, and keep up the good work! ♦

941:

So a print encyclopedia, a strawberry shortcake, and a sycamore walk into a bar - wait, have you heard this one?

247: 3477: 1997:

sources - maps are not secondary sources, and my gut feeling is that travel guides, bar esoteric cases such as

1806:

is said. Because people deal with adversity by voting with their feet, you can't tell if there's a problem, as

804: 696: 643: 81: 69: 64: 59: 1784:, which is supposed to be the best that we can offer, it will be rejected." My experience with working on the 2742:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

612: 417: 3235: 3169: 2794: 1896:

actually have road articles that are decent. And there's no reason why the UK can't be added to that list.

3125: 3116: 2647: 1681:

This situation is obviously untenable, and I know this is a lot of text, but please hear me out on this.

1657: 1562: 1184:

I spotted this yesterday on my phone. Having something I created on the front page means I must be doing

2129:. A brief glance tells me that it would. It would not pass FA, however, because the FA criteria include 1776:

say "Fred's National Enquirer Fansite is SPS and fails FAC", say "Fred's national Enquirer Fansite is a

468:

and I will apologise and withdraw them. Just watch out for Malleus - he takes a dim view of this. Also,

191:

Okay, AGF or not I'll have a look at a couple of them. English language sourcing isn't really my forte.

3345:

play both and argue that more classical players should introduce flamenco music into their repertoire.

3152: 3138: 1998: 1261: 1166: 1152: 241: 38: 2025:- for whatever reason, anti-road protests seem to be more notable in the UK than the roads themselves. 1298: 663:, they can't create anything in main space). It seems Drmies and Mabdul have sorted this one out now. 1517:). I would be most grateful if you could read the following text and possibly revisit your decision. 1505: 1433:

to see how it's done. I could do it myself but i don't have the source to work out the page numbers.

944: 560:. Notice also that article has several paragraphs explaining to the reader what the article is about. 2005:

are okay because they've had regular news coverage, such as the ongoing debate over improvements in

3130: 2836: 2039: 1685:

desysopped, and/or sitebanned. If that's not what you want, then you're coming off way too strong.

1710: 3257: 2888: 2574: 1006:- as well as being a duplicate of articles we already have, it has too much bias towards the US. 928: 196: 136: 1514: 868:, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located 3160: 2926: 2882: 2449: 1174: 995: 306: 260: 151: 3409:

of us classic rock fans scoff at a lot of the rap and Bieber crap which dominates the world.♦

3097: 1111: 3481: 3461: 3425: 3410: 3355: 3282: 3245: 3142: 3109: 2908:

Done. Since you didn't nominate this, it's not entirely fair to keep this review hanging on.

2802: 2634:

Knowledge:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#Abandoned_articles_in_the_AFC_workspace

2588: 2022: 1139: 1130: 1123: 768: 118: 1798:

in which you said it came across as sanctimonious lecturing, I'm afraid. Remember, that the

3501: 3447: 3393: 3306: 3268: 3078: 3000: 2956: 2916: 2872: 2826: 2723: 2682: 2610: 2499: 2423: 2375: 2282: 2239:

About writing FAC quality articles - I would like to know how you do this. Taking on board

2161: 2098: 1920: 1840: 1718: 1645: 1568: 1536: 1513:

Thank you for taking the time to review my article about floods in Wales during June 2012 (

1481: 1441: 1372: 1309: 1251: 1219: 1196: 1092: 1059: 1051: 1018: 940: 671: 597: 589: 575: 536: 499: 484: 452: 425: 382: 347: 324: 287: 227: 182: 165: 110: 47: 17: 781:

It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about

8: 3026: 2983: 2937: 2854: 2648: 2215: 1544: 1459: 1395: 1346: 1327: 1271: 1227: 975: 844: 840:. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion. 793: 3051:

have realized if I'd read the text first! :) Anyways, thanks for the head's up. Cheers!

1156: 720:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

3214: 3148: 3056: 2795: 2541: 2462:

In the interest of fairness it is important that these matters are fully investigated.

1576: 1282: 1162: 1044:

Please let me know what we need to do to make this right. I appreciate your guidance.

821: 192: 132: 2108:

if you have any questions about a specific article, I'm always willing to take a look.

3378: 3222: 2785: 2776:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2491:. Can't remember why I passed it, but I think it's worth a deletion discussion now. 2070: 2043: 2001:, are only trivial mentions. Most motorways are okay. Other major roads, such as the 1614: 1584: 1007: 147: 2602:

Thanks for a quick, diligent and encouraging review. Now then, this FAC business...

1832:

Happy to discuss this further. If you have any other questions, please let me know.

881:

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you!

3366: 3338: 3210: 3067: 2897: 2697: 2663: 987: 3494: 3460:

There must be some sources discussing it somewhere, it is a big internet thing!♦

3440: 3405: 3386: 3299: 3261: 3071: 2993: 2949: 2909: 2865: 2819: 2716: 2675: 2603: 2518: 2511: 2492: 2416: 2372: 2275: 2158: 2091: 2010: 1917: 1833: 1785: 1715: 1689:

I apologize for that. But going off and ranting about what happened in 2008-2010

1638: 1572: 1474: 1434: 1365: 1302: 1244: 1189: 1149:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 1085: 1081: 1011: 1003: 991: 933: 664: 568: 496: 477: 449: 422: 375: 317: 280: 220: 175: 161: 125: 2864:

Cheers. Replied there. Bottom line is I have too many fingers in too many pies!

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3346: 3333: 3135:

You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page

3022: 2979: 2933: 2850: 1977: 1892: 1618: 1602: 1455: 1391: 1342: 1323: 1267: 1077: 882: 829: 825: 371: 107:

suit urself n do what u wish abt those lines in the talk abt Spectrum pages :)

3279: 2841: 1763:

factually correct, verifiable and written in good English, it's probably okay.

1515:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/2012_Welsh_floods

1386:

Leatherhead of all places, the last in a Durham Miners' Hall in the late 80s.

464:

You are also welcome to take any evidence of personal attacks, with diffs, to

3241: 3052: 2815: 2532: 2484: 2014: 1781: 1777: 1423: 1360: 837: 691: 638: 633: 564: 469: 465: 444: 440: 276: 271: 3218: 3042: 2781: 2777: 2017:

and should not have an article and I've I've taken the odd one to AfD (eg:

1580: 1413: 999: 797: 392: 367: 3342: 1850:

some of the issues that you have brought up (DRN, the edit warring blocks

2892: 2743: 2693: 2659: 1888: 1598: 916:

This template is only a talk page banner - the dispute must be listed at

618: 3420:

BTW I was actually looking for some sources to write an article on the

3320: 3294: 2584: 2555: 2240: 2087: 2006: 1824: 1430: 1294: 959: 803:

It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been

533:

i know my list is incomplete but that's why Knowledge is there right?

3178: 1293:

is factually correct, though I don't have my "go-to" source for that (

3374: 2151:

sometimes, and why I've filed case requests and ANI threads entirely

2002: 3133:, London, used to have fresh sea water brought in for guests' baths? 2891:

be failed, so that I may tackle the issues at my own pace? Best,

2658:--I can't comment on it since I haven't seen the source. Thanks! 1524:

Please could you revisit my page and let me know your decision.

3164: 2747: 1178: 968:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/The History of The Beatles

2564: 843:

Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{

636:

on this so I thought I'd ask an admin to take a looksee at it

2751: 896: 3121:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 2643:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1575:- this is not appropriate material for Knowledge. Also, per 1135:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 713: 3350: 3192: 146:

Yes, I think it's a sock of an editor who's been following

2620: 2483:

Hi. This article actually looks suspicious, with a lot of

807:(not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN. 160:) around and generally trying to delete stuff. I've asked 1243:

I have responded via email to your lengthier note there.

958:

charts. Also i'm sure not many people heard of the songs

1010:

gives a more balanced worldwide viewpoint, for example.

246:

I don't know if it was appropriate for you to close the

2746:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 103:

no problem just challenged u with my ideas abt Spectrum

2814:

alive today to come forward and produce a free image.

1768:

I also want you to stop using acronyms unless you are

1147:

Template:Did you know nominations/Elvis' Greatest Shit

767:

It is an early step to resolve content disputes after

447:

if you believe that it does not meet the standard. --

2978:but it can get a little extreme at times, ya know? 2849:

I have left a message about the London Wikemeet....

1212:for them - and my friends at Cedexis have a NEED. 1207:

More re Cedexis - I did NOT offer to do it for $ $ .

1145:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

832:, and objective. Comment only about the article's 2639:Message added 12:50, 12 April 2013 (UTC). You can 758:for an easy to follow, step by step request form. 400:The law of the NE Ents say : "Cause no drama".... 3480:. Any chance of you finishing the Paco review??♦ 3324:Even Jimbo got involved in the big Bieber debate. 1709:By the way, have you thought about joining us at 1390:still my fave, although not heard it since then! 1359:It strikes me with a bit more TLC, this could be 756:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request 792:It is not a place to discuss disputes that are 416:You may wish to read my comments about UKRD at 3201:Congratulations, Ritchie333! You're receiving 2974:I don't necessarily have a problem with lists 2710:architects didn't like the design made by the 2517:Hi, an RfC has begun which proposes rewording 558:List of UK Singles Chart Christmas number ones 3281:to get an idea, especially 4:30 to the end!♦ 2738:Disambiguation link notification for April 13 2632:Hello, Ritchie333. You have new messages at 2510:Requests for Comment: Proposal for rewording 748:If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the 727:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Road junction lists 685:No need to worry, all sorted now. Explained 1802:in which you say things is as important as 655:Hi. The problem seems to have stemmed from 630:Articles for creation/InSystems Corporation 2073:with SilkTork, and it worked well, I feel. 2019:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/A2199 road 1670:The following discussion has been closed. 405:The following discussion has been closed. 3113:was updated with a fact from the article 2562: 1127:was updated with a fact from the article 988:our guidelines for music related articles 3319: 2840: 953:Straight Into Darkness submission denial 932: 918:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard 905:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard 722:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard 617:Hey Richie, I originally posted this to 372:our instructions for how to cite sources 3217:. Thank you and keep up the good work! 1029:Articles for creation: High End Systems 709:Notice of Dispute resolution discussion 14: 2654:Hey, thanks for your help. Please see 2013:. Beyond that, I feel most roads fail 1609:, but it doesn't explain why they are 1454:OK, thanks, will do when I have a mo. 986:Hi. The general consensus, as seen in 903:An editor has requested assistance at 864:If you ever need any help, ask one of 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 418:User talk:Rschen7754#Cap-Saint-Martin 3381:playing - double, shock horror - an 3377:standing on top of - shock horror - 3092: 1579:, Knowledge can't reference itself. 1106: 994:as suggested, and put a note on the 907:regarding a dispute about this page. 891: 805:discussed extensively on a talk page 25: 3089:DYK for Great Eastern Hotel, London 2583:For your contributions in bringing 2521:. As you participated in a related 1637:they are reliable and appropriate. 1084:if somebody else knows the answer. 23: 2625: 1960:and never touched the noticeboards 1621:without a shred of evidence - see 712: 24: 3521: 2887:Hello Ritchie. Can I request the 1915:be where they are without IRC. -- 754:button below this guide or go to 474:have an opinion contrary to yours 370:, so can be used. Have a look at 3349:players like Paco are much more 3191: 3177: 3096: 2563: 1110: 895: 29: 3371:Quintette du Hot Club de France 3186:The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar 1786:Articles for Creation Help Desk 1623:Knowledge biography controversy 1082:Articles for Creation Help Desk 3211:AFC Backlog elimination drive! 2038:Let's take a recent example - 850:Sign and date your posts with 689:if you're interested. Thanks, 521:about my article submission... 13: 1: 3167:) 08:04, 18 April 2013 (UTC) 2086:Anyway, onwards and upwards. 909:The discussion is located at 776:What this noticeboard is not: 279:or discuss on the talk page. 270:Technically, it was a bit of 3070:, even if it doesn't chart. 1823:I'm still trying to improve 1364:ask about that, I'm afraid. 1181:) 08:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC) 1103:DYK for Elvis' Greatest Shit 751:"Request dispute resolution" 526:WAS THE PIONEER DOING THAT? 7: 3209:articles during the recent 3117:Great Eastern Hotel, London 1691:doesn't get us anywhere now 1281:Hi. Good work in improving 847:}} on their user talk page. 10: 3526: 3467:11:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 3452:10:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 3431:10:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 3416:10:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 3398:10:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 3361:09:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 3311:09:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 3288:09:09, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 3273:08:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 3251:10:46, 20 April 2013 (UTC) 3227:12:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC) 3083:16:01, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 3061:15:55, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 3031:18:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 3005:14:29, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 2988:14:04, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 2961:13:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 2942:13:50, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 2921:08:04, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 2903:20:52, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2877:13:17, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2859:12:08, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2831:10:02, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2808:18:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 2790:14:31, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 2728:06:27, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 2702:22:31, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 2687:21:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 2668:17:45, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 2615:21:49, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 2594:21:43, 11 April 2013 (UTC) 2551:04:58, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 2504:10:04, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 1665:Going round in circles... 1068:19:32, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 980:23:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 888:08:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 703:16:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 676:16:28, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 650:15:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 606:09:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 580:10:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC) 563:Now, on the other hand, a 549:19:05, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 507:04:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC) 489:11:50, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 460:21:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC) 433:21:43, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 387:16:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 360:15:36, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 339:Matt from Tribunal Records 329:21:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 311:21:10, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 292:20:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 265:20:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 232:14:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 201:14:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 187:13:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 141:13:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 3385:guitar! With distortion! 3190: 3176: 2816:Media Copyright Questions 2569: 2489:nominated it for deletion 2478:20:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 2428:16:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 2383:09:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 2287:09:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 2169:17:52, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 2103:11:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1928:22:12, 6 April 2013 (UTC) 1845:16:11, 6 April 2013 (UTC) 1726:09:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC) 1650:13:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1629:re-use the sources cited 1589:12:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1553:12:13, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 1486:14:55, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 1464:12:04, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 1446:11:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 1400:11:26, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 1377:11:21, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 1351:11:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 1332:18:07, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 1314:17:24, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 1276:17:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 1256:11:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 1236:17:12, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 1201:10:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 1097:10:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 1023:10:40, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 949:00:09, 1 April 2013 (UTC) 872:and on the DR/N talkpage. 798:dispute resolution forums 762:What this noticeboard is: 628:during NewPage patrol at 255:the boomerang. Thanks. -- 3147:and it will be added to 3131:Liverpool Street station 2040:New York State Route 132 1893:Australian Roads Project 1854:, the arbitration cases 1782:featured article process 1673:Please do not modify it. 1361:Today's featured article 1161:and it will be added to 1047:Best regards, Richard 794:already under discussion 408:Please do not modify it. 3506:15:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 3487:20:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC) 3258:Talk:Northern Songs/GA1 3153:Did you know? talk page 2525:, I invite you to join 1999:A272 : an Ode to a Road 1772:sure of your audience. 1299:Rolling With The Stones 1167:Did you know? talk page 920:for editors to respond. 3325: 2846: 2630: 996:Straight Into Darkness 938: 820:Discussions should be 741:Guide for participants 717: 3323: 3205:because you reviewed 2844: 2629: 2023:M11 link road protest 1778:self-published source 1603:neutral point of view 936: 785:, not disputes about 716: 626:InSystems Corporation 613:InSystems Corporation 42:of past discussions. 3170:An Barnstar for You! 2778:opt-out instructions 2527:the RfC conversation 1143:was dropped in 1982? 1140:Elvis' greatest shit 1131:Elvis' Greatest Shit 1078:reference guidelines 18:User talk:Ritchie333 3473:De Lucia and Bieber 3126:Great Eastern Hotel 2760:fix with Dab solver 2649:Great Eastern Hotel 2468:a concerned reader 1711:#wikipedia-en-roads 1658:Honest conversation 1597:on it to report on 815:Things to remember: 3326: 3236:Stones in the Park 2847: 2796:Stones in the Park 2768:• Join us at the 2641:remove this notice 2631: 2485:unreliable sources 2292:better to move on. 2127:meets the criteria 1287:1967 European Tour 1283:Stones in the Park 1262:Stones in the Park 939: 718: 272:ignoring all rules 242:Your close at AN/I 3513: 3512: 3422:Bieber phenomenon 3379:Buckingham Palace 3233: 3232: 3159: 3158: 3146: 2901: 2889:Northern Songs GA 2773: 2599: 2598: 2549: 2447: 2446: 2071:A1 road in London 1615:John Siegenthaler 1563:talk page stalker 1556: 1539:comment added by 1530:Dr. Simon Foulds 1506:Welsh Floods 2012 1429:- have a look at 1239: 1222:comment added by 1173: 1172: 1160: 1071: 1054:comment added by 1008:Bigger than Jesus 926: 925: 922: 878: 877: 838:the other editors 684: 609: 592:comment added by 539:comment added by 518: 517: 350:comment added by 122: 113:comment added by 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3517: 3499: 3484: 3464: 3445: 3428: 3413: 3391: 3367:Django Reinhardt 3358: 3339:Grisha Goryachev 3304: 3285: 3266: 3248: 3195: 3181: 3174: 3173: 3136: 3100: 3093: 3076: 2998: 2954: 2914: 2895: 2870: 2837:London Wikimeet. 2824: 2805: 2763: 2756:check to confirm 2721: 2680: 2644: 2608: 2591: 2567: 2560: 2559: 2548: 2545: 2539: 2536: 2530: 2497: 2421: 2280: 2096: 1856:in 2006 and 2008 1838: 1675: 1662: 1661: 1643: 1633:another article 1566: 1555: 1533: 1479: 1439: 1428: 1422: 1418: 1412: 1370: 1307: 1249: 1238: 1216: 1194: 1150: 1114: 1107: 1090: 1070: 1048: 1016: 1000:reliable sources 914: 899: 892: 885: 860: 858: 845:subst:drn-notice 737: 736: 732: 731: 701: 699: 694: 682: 669: 648: 646: 641: 608: 586: 573: 551: 482: 472:would appear to 410: 397: 396: 380: 368:reliable sources 362: 322: 285: 225: 180: 108: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3525: 3524: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3495: 3482: 3475: 3462: 3441: 3426: 3411: 3406:John McLaughlin 3387: 3356: 3300: 3283: 3262: 3246: 3238: 3188: 3172: 3161:The DYK project 3091: 3072: 3045: 2994: 2950: 2929: 2910: 2885: 2866: 2839: 2820: 2818:may know more. 2803: 2799: 2770:DPL WikiProject 2740: 2717: 2676: 2652: 2645: 2638: 2623: 2604: 2589: 2558: 2543: 2540: 2534: 2531: 2515: 2493: 2452: 2417: 2276: 2092: 2044:primary sources 2011:Blackdown Hills 1834: 1671: 1660: 1639: 1625:. However, you 1560: 1534: 1510:Hello Ritchie, 1508: 1475: 1435: 1426: 1420: 1416: 1410: 1366: 1303: 1264: 1245: 1217: 1209: 1190: 1175:The DYK project 1105: 1086: 1049: 1031: 1012: 992:Long After Dark 955: 931: 929:Happy Easter!!! 883: 879: 856: 854: 817: 783:article content 778: 764: 742: 711: 697: 692: 690: 665: 644: 639: 637: 615: 587: 569: 534: 523: 478: 406: 395: 376: 345: 341: 318: 281: 248:AN/I discussion 244: 221: 207:BourbonandRocks 176: 128: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3523: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3474: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3418: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3347:Nuevo flamenco 3334:Andres Segovia 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3237: 3234: 3231: 3230: 3197: 3196: 3189: 3184: 3182: 3171: 3168: 3157: 3156: 3101: 3090: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3044: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 2971: 2970: 2964: 2963: 2932:it for PROD. 2928: 2927:1635 in Quebec 2925: 2924: 2923: 2884: 2883:Northern Songs 2881: 2880: 2879: 2838: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2798: 2793: 2739: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2651: 2646: 2637: 2624: 2622: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2597: 2596: 2580: 2579: 2570: 2568: 2557: 2554: 2514: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2465:Thanking you, 2451: 2450:Irish Geocodes 2448: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2212:write articles 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1829: 1828: 1819: 1818: 1813: 1812: 1790: 1789: 1765: 1764: 1759: 1758: 1748: 1747: 1733: 1732: 1677: 1676: 1667: 1666: 1659: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1619:John F Kennedy 1601:subjects in a 1507: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1467: 1466: 1449: 1448: 1403: 1402: 1380: 1379: 1354: 1353: 1335: 1334: 1317: 1316: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1208: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1171: 1170: 1115: 1104: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1030: 1027: 1026: 1025: 954: 951: 930: 927: 924: 923: 913: 900: 876: 875: 874: 873: 866:our volunteers 862: 848: 841: 813: 812: 811: 808: 801: 790: 774: 773: 772: 760: 744: 743: 740: 735: 710: 707: 706: 705: 679: 678: 624:I came across 614: 611: 583: 582: 561: 522: 519: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 412: 411: 402: 401: 394: 391: 390: 389: 340: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 243: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 127: 124: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3522: 3507: 3504: 3502: 3500: 3498: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3485: 3483:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 3479: 3468: 3465: 3463:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 3459: 3453: 3450: 3448: 3446: 3444: 3438: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3429: 3427:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 3423: 3419: 3417: 3414: 3412:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 3407: 3403: 3399: 3396: 3394: 3392: 3390: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3359: 3357:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 3352: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3335: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3322: 3312: 3309: 3307: 3305: 3303: 3296: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3286: 3284:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 3280: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3271: 3269: 3267: 3265: 3259: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3249: 3247:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 3243: 3242:Paco de Lucia 3229: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3199: 3198: 3194: 3187: 3183: 3180: 3175: 3166: 3162: 3154: 3150: 3144: 3140: 3134: 3132: 3128: 3127: 3123:... that the 3120: 3119: 3118: 3112: 3111: 3110:Did you know? 3106: 3105:18 April 2013 3102: 3099: 3095: 3094: 3084: 3081: 3079: 3077: 3075: 3069: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3006: 3003: 3001: 2999: 2997: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2972: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2962: 2959: 2957: 2955: 2953: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2922: 2919: 2917: 2915: 2913: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2899: 2894: 2890: 2878: 2875: 2873: 2871: 2869: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2843: 2832: 2829: 2827: 2825: 2823: 2817: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2806: 2804:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 2797: 2792: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2774: 2771: 2767: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2729: 2726: 2724: 2722: 2720: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2685: 2683: 2681: 2679: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2650: 2642: 2635: 2628: 2616: 2613: 2611: 2609: 2607: 2601: 2600: 2595: 2592: 2590:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 2586: 2582: 2581: 2578: 2576: 2571: 2566: 2561: 2553: 2552: 2547: 2546: 2538: 2537: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2513: 2505: 2502: 2500: 2498: 2496: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2466: 2463: 2460: 2456: 2429: 2426: 2424: 2422: 2420: 2414: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2377: 2374: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2285: 2283: 2281: 2279: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2250: 2249:best possible 2246: 2242: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2170: 2167: 2166: 2163: 2160: 2154: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2132: 2131:comprehensive 2128: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2101: 2099: 2097: 2095: 2089: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2072: 2067: 2062: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1979: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1961: 1956: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1929: 1926: 1925: 1922: 1919: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1857: 1853: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1843: 1841: 1839: 1837: 1831: 1830: 1826: 1821: 1820: 1815: 1814: 1809: 1808:by definition 1805: 1801: 1797: 1792: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1761: 1760: 1755: 1750: 1749: 1744: 1740: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1724: 1723: 1720: 1717: 1712: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1696: 1692: 1686: 1682: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1669: 1668: 1664: 1663: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1644: 1642: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1569:WP:NOTWEBHOST 1564: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1531: 1528: 1525: 1522: 1518: 1516: 1511: 1487: 1484: 1482: 1480: 1478: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1447: 1444: 1442: 1440: 1438: 1432: 1425: 1415: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1378: 1375: 1373: 1371: 1369: 1362: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1315: 1312: 1310: 1308: 1306: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1257: 1254: 1252: 1250: 1248: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1213: 1202: 1199: 1197: 1195: 1193: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1180: 1176: 1168: 1164: 1158: 1154: 1148: 1144: 1142: 1141: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1126: 1125: 1124:Did you know? 1120: 1116: 1113: 1109: 1108: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1091: 1089: 1083: 1079: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1045: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1033:Hi Ritchie, 1024: 1021: 1019: 1017: 1015: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 984: 983: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 961: 950: 946: 942: 937:Happy Easter! 935: 921: 919: 912: 908: 906: 901: 898: 894: 893: 890: 889: 886: 871: 867: 863: 853: 849: 846: 842: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 818: 816: 809: 806: 802: 799: 795: 791: 788: 784: 780: 779: 777: 770: 766: 765: 763: 759: 757: 753: 752: 746: 745: 739: 738: 734: 733: 730: 728: 723: 715: 704: 700: 695: 688: 683:edit conflict 681: 680: 677: 674: 672: 670: 668: 662: 658: 654: 653: 652: 651: 647: 642: 635: 631: 627: 622: 620: 610: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 581: 578: 576: 574: 572: 566: 562: 559: 554: 553: 552: 550: 546: 542: 541:106.77.220.17 538: 531: 527: 508: 505: 504: 501: 498: 492: 491: 490: 487: 485: 483: 481: 475: 471: 467: 463: 462: 461: 458: 457: 454: 451: 446: 442: 437: 436: 435: 434: 431: 430: 427: 424: 419: 414: 413: 409: 404: 403: 399: 398: 388: 385: 383: 381: 379: 373: 369: 365: 364: 363: 361: 357: 353: 352:98.26.172.239 349: 330: 327: 325: 323: 321: 314: 313: 312: 308: 304: 299: 295: 294: 293: 290: 288: 286: 284: 278: 273: 269: 268: 267: 266: 262: 258: 253: 249: 233: 230: 228: 226: 224: 218: 215: 212: 208: 204: 203: 202: 198: 194: 193:In ictu oculi 190: 189: 188: 185: 183: 181: 179: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 156: 153: 149: 145: 144: 143: 142: 138: 134: 133:In ictu oculi 123: 120: 116: 112: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3496: 3478:See this LOL 3476: 3442: 3436: 3388: 3382: 3301: 3263: 3239: 3206: 3202: 3200: 3185: 3124: 3122: 3115: 3114: 3108: 3073: 3048: 3046: 2995: 2975: 2951: 2930: 2911: 2898:Talk tonight 2886: 2867: 2848: 2821: 2800: 2775: 2741: 2718: 2711: 2707: 2677: 2653: 2605: 2575:Good Article 2572: 2542: 2533: 2516: 2494: 2487:, so I have 2470:62.40.49.123 2467: 2464: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2418: 2412: 2371: 2277: 2248: 2245:nowhere near 2244: 2211: 2157: 2152: 2130: 2126: 2093: 2065: 2060: 1994: 1959: 1954: 1916: 1891:started the 1855: 1851: 1835: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1773: 1769: 1753: 1742: 1738: 1714: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1694: 1690: 1687: 1683: 1680: 1672: 1640: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1610: 1606: 1594: 1535:— Preceding 1532: 1529: 1526: 1523: 1519: 1512: 1509: 1476: 1436: 1388:Folkjokeopus 1387: 1367: 1304: 1290: 1265: 1246: 1218:— Preceding 1214: 1210: 1191: 1185: 1138: 1136: 1129: 1128: 1122: 1119:1 April 2013 1087: 1050:— Preceding 1046: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1032: 1013: 956: 915: 902: 880: 833: 814: 787:user conduct 786: 782: 775: 761: 750: 749: 747: 719: 666: 661:Siegenthaler 623: 616: 588:— Preceding 584: 570: 535:— Preceding 532: 528: 524: 495: 479: 448: 421: 415: 407: 377: 346:— Preceding 342: 319: 303:76.189.111.2 297: 282: 257:76.189.111.2 251: 245: 222: 213: 177: 168: 154: 148:Stuartyeates 129: 109:— Preceding 106: 75: 43: 37: 3143:quick check 2744:Kim McLagan 2706:Ah no, the 2529:. Regards, 1577:WP:CIRCULAR 1567:Please see 1157:quick check 964:Sexie Sadie 852:four tildes 619:User:Drmies 115:192.168.1.1 36:This is an 3497:Ritchie333 3443:Ritchie333 3389:Ritchie333 3302:Ritchie333 3295:Classic FM 3278:reviewing 3264:Ritchie333 3139:here's how 3074:Ritchie333 2996:Ritchie333 2952:Ritchie333 2912:Ritchie333 2868:Ritchie333 2822:Ritchie333 2780:. Thanks, 2719:Ritchie333 2678:Ritchie333 2606:Ritchie333 2585:Keith Moon 2523:discussion 2495:Ritchie333 2419:Ritchie333 2278:Ritchie333 2241:Keith Moon 2094:Ritchie333 2088:Keith Moon 2007:Stonehenge 1836:Ritchie333 1825:Keith Moon 1641:Ritchie333 1477:Ritchie333 1437:Ritchie333 1431:Keith Moon 1368:Ritchie333 1305:Ritchie333 1295:Bill Wyman 1247:Ritchie333 1192:Ritchie333 1153:here's how 1088:Ritchie333 1056:SCandela13 1014:Ritchie333 982:JoshBlitz 960:Maggie Mae 667:Ritchie333 594:Chetan8945 571:Ritchie333 480:Ritchie333 378:Ritchie333 320:Ritchie333 283:Ritchie333 223:Ritchie333 178:Ritchie333 162:Rschen7754 131:possible. 95:Archive 15 87:Archive 10 3375:Brian May 3343:Paco Peña 3215:talk page 3203:a Brownie 3068:WP:NMUSIC 3023:StevenJ81 2980:StevenJ81 2934:StevenJ81 2764:Read the 2656:this edit 2153:unrelated 2003:A303 road 1995:secondary 1741:that you 1693:. We are 1617:murdered 1541:Redavenbk 1456:Ericoides 1392:Ericoides 1343:Ericoides 1324:Ericoides 1268:Ericoides 1224:Manncraik 1186:something 1137:... that 1004:help desk 972:JoshBlitz 884:EarwigBot 796:at other 769:talk page 657:this edit 82:Archive 9 76:Archive 8 70:Archive 7 65:Archive 6 60:Archive 5 3383:electric 3369:and the 3165:nominate 3149:DYKSTATS 3053:Woodroar 2712:original 2621:Talkback 2577:Barnstar 2519:WP:NSONG 2512:WP:NSONG 2009:and the 1607:happened 1573:WP:ESSAY 1549:contribs 1537:unsigned 1527:Thanks, 1232:contribs 1220:unsigned 1179:nominate 1163:DYKSTATS 1064:contribs 1052:unsigned 824:, calm, 602:contribs 590:unsigned 565:category 537:unsigned 470:SilkTork 348:unsigned 301:Haha. -- 217:contribs 172:contribs 158:contribs 111:unsigned 3219:Mdann52 3129:, near 2976:per se, 2782:DPL bot 2216:WT:UKRD 1868:didn't. 1852:in 2006 1611:notable 1599:notable 1581:Mdann52 834:content 830:neutral 826:concise 585:okay. 126:NZ bios 39:archive 2893:yeepsi 2748:Malaya 2694:Drmies 2660:Drmies 2015:WP:GNG 1978:biting 1889:Evad37 1796:manner 1754:really 1746:there. 836:, not 634:WP:AGF 445:WP:GAR 441:WP:FAR 277:WP:AN3 3049:would 2851:Gordo 2752:Faces 2535:Gong 2252:long! 1774:Don't 1291:think 822:civil 205:Also 16:< 3351:jazz 3341:and 3223:talk 3057:talk 3043:Oops 3027:talk 2984:talk 2938:talk 2855:talk 2786:talk 2750:and 2698:talk 2664:talk 2573:The 2544:show 2474:talk 2379:7754 2376:chen 2165:7754 2162:chen 2066:what 1924:7754 1921:chen 1804:what 1770:very 1739:fear 1722:7754 1719:chen 1595:rely 1585:talk 1571:and 1545:talk 1460:talk 1424:sfnp 1396:talk 1347:talk 1328:talk 1272:talk 1228:talk 1060:talk 976:talk 945:talk 870:here 857:~~~~ 729:". 698:6403 693:Cabe 687:here 645:6403 640:Cabe 598:talk 545:talk 503:7754 500:chen 456:7754 453:chen 429:7754 426:chen 420:. -- 393:UKRD 356:talk 307:talk 261:talk 211:talk 197:talk 166:talk 152:talk 137:talk 119:talk 3439:". 3103:On 2766:FAQ 2708:new 2061:you 1955:not 1800:way 1743:may 1731:Hi, 1695:not 1627:can 1419:or 1414:sfn 1297:'s 1215:S 1117:On 962:or 466:ANI 443:or 298:all 252:and 3225:) 3207:20 3141:, 3107:, 3059:) 3029:) 2986:) 2940:) 2857:) 2788:) 2758:| 2700:) 2666:) 2556:GA 2476:) 2413:My 2373:Rs 2159:Rs 1918:Rs 1716:Rs 1635:if 1631:in 1587:) 1551:) 1547:• 1462:) 1427:}} 1421:{{ 1417:}} 1411:{{ 1398:) 1349:) 1330:) 1274:) 1234:) 1230:• 1155:, 1121:, 1066:) 1062:• 978:) 947:) 828:, 604:) 600:• 547:) 497:Rs 476:. 450:Rs 423:Rs 358:) 309:) 263:) 199:) 139:) 121:) 91:→ 3221:( 3163:( 3155:. 3145:) 3137:( 3055:( 3025:( 2982:( 2936:( 2900:) 2896:( 2853:( 2784:( 2772:. 2754:( 2696:( 2662:( 2636:. 2472:( 1583:( 1565:) 1561:( 1543:( 1458:( 1394:( 1345:( 1326:( 1270:( 1226:( 1177:( 1169:. 1159:) 1151:( 1058:( 974:( 943:( 861:. 859:" 855:" 800:. 789:. 725:" 596:( 543:( 354:( 305:( 259:( 214:· 209:( 195:( 169:· 164:( 155:· 150:( 135:( 117:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index