User talk:Slatersteven/Archive 11

2101: 3402: 214: 768: 2177: 2224: 31: 119: 3370: 3859: 3955: 1362: 2620: 4001: 3627: 2893: 2445: 1992: 1625: 1004: 1781:"This is a huge step forward towards the US climate target of 50-52% below 2005 levels in 2030, though clearly more action is needed. No single action on its own will be enough to meet the target. Still the IRA changes the game, not just with the deep emissions reductions it generates but also by cutting the cost of additional action by the executive branch and states, which could put the 2030 target within reach." 1501: 3817:. It makes it significantly more complicated for someone else to simply delete it, which is the appropriate thing to do with grossly insulting soapboxing. As it stands, it's now a puzzle how to hat / retitle all the inappropriate threads started by obvious meatpuppets. In the future it would be much simpler to revert on sight (or let others do it). Thanks, 4111:, not activism); and 3) PV itself has not actively engaged in or called for minimalist government or reactionary social policy, and while it does seem to associate with reactionary groups, it is not truly far-right (which, in opposition to things like totalitarian socialism and Communism, would advocate for minimalist or completely absent government). 4161:

3 months"), and not necessarily for characterizations of competing sources/platforms. For example, if an article by a major Reuters journalist characterized the entirety of CNN as a left-wing propaganda machine, unless other neutral or opposing-view sources also agreed, the article in question could not be considered to be a RS.

646:. And sorry about the above confusion: I have no idea why I was conviced that I had added the 2019 date of death. Anyway, now we have a source stating that he did die in 2018, and the June 22 2018 date seems to be confirmed by several clues: we just need to have a reliable source for this, and for his exact birth date as well. 3283:

removed what is thought to be the last public Confederate statue in Maryland other than those on battlefields or in cemeteries." (no mention of courts) and " "said to be the last such monument in the state on public property outside of a battlefield or cemetery."" (again no mention of court houses). So my edit here

3499: 4160:

That in itself is fair. However, I note that the characterization of PV depends heavily on quotations from news media sources (see wp:newsorg), which given wp:rs, is reliable only for statements of fact (e.g. "police reports indicate x number parking tickets were collected on this block over the past

3755:

Hi, About our discussion that you didn't agree. You need to remember that Poland during WW2 was divided between Polish Underground State that was against Soviet Union and Polish Committee of National Liberation in 1944 that was against USA and against Polish Underground State. That's why writing just

3152:

This man is using his edits to obfuscate the number of confederate statues remaining in Maryland. He is using one article about statues at courthouses that is 3 sentences and a link and two of those sentences contradict what he's trying to assert, that all statues in the entire state are gone. I gave

3014:

Hello, I edited the Knowledge article on the " Sinpar " automobile, these were good faith edits as you wrote in your edit summary, so why did you undo my edits ? I used a citation and these were indeed good faith edits, could I put them back without you undoing them again ? By the way I am in no way

2805:

Alpha 2, an F-16, was shot down that day. While Wg Cdr Abhinandan may or may not have fired a missile at the F-16, radio messages intercepted by the Indian AWACS have recorded frantic calls to Alpha 2. We old-timers believe it was a blue-on-blue. Of the 26 PAF aircraft that comprised this mission, 25

1937:

No, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that there are multiple reliable sources taking this position in the international press. You have no reliable sources to state the opposite, and you are trying to draw your own conclusions without reliable sources. That's against Knowledge policy for use of

1895:

You appear to be editing without reliable sources to draw your conclusions. You are also not answering Talk page comments, while at the same time commenting on other threads on the same Talk page. You need to follow RS, and I have given multiple reliable sources for my edit. I request you explain why

953:

Why would Slatersteven need to be a university professor to know the details of sourcing policy on Knowledge? Why would it help him to be one? Knowledge editors should not be evaluating the merits of sources based on content. They should be evaluating the sources based on the provenance and adherence

134:

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly

2810:

later. These first six were Mirage 2000I upgraded aircraft that swept the target area. Of the remaining twelve, only six dropped their munitions. Foreign agencies gave India the death toll-253. Forty more died in hospital. There was a film of a Pakistani JCO consoling villagers and relatives of some

1910:

Really, are you saying then that those events (apart from the one you are trying to add) did not occur in the Crimea? And you have so far not provided one source as far as I can see that says any of these attacks were defiantly by Ukraine. What we have is "unnamed US sources", which is not enough to

1297:

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues

576:

Ok, I was convinced that I had put the 2019 date, but apparently that was an IP and not me. My bad. Anyway, I found a source stating that he did die in 2018. As for his exact birth date, we do not have very reliable sources either (and this time, I'm pretty sure I had nothing to do with this) except

267:

If you are no longer very active on Knowledge or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and

154:

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower.

4106:

I understand your complete dependence on RS to defend your characterization of Project Veritas as far-right activism. However, I disagree on this characterization, and I would appreciate it if you could take the time to consider my position. My contention is as follows: 1) mass media sources cannot

3255:

I don't expect an IP editor to know the fine points of what qualifies as "vandalism" on Knowledge, but yours is a bad edit. It is true that they have been removed from courthouses. That we don't list the multiple sorts of public land that they have not been removed from does not mean that they have

2768:

The reason I had to reply so much on that talk page is that you kept missing the mark, distorting reliable sources, and making recommendations that were unnecessary according to guidelines, the latter being very curious coming from someone who was ostensibly preoccupied with preventing bloating. If

1448:

Let me try it another way, look how I worded the question as Qanon. That is how you should have worded it. If you had done that you would have had no warnings, and it would not have been deleted. No you were not in a no-win situation, you choose to continue to act in a way you were told was wrong.

1135:

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View

4164:

This isn't wp:or but rather a detail in wp:rs that strongly refutes the characterization of several of the sources as RS. I should note that even the Virginia Law Review's article cites no supporting evidence to justify the far-right characterization. The Columbia Journalism Review's article bases

2137:

for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021

1101:

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are

509:

Could you please stop reverting me like this ? That feels a bit hostile. If you disagree, you may just manually undo what I did. Please note that I'm the one who put the "2019" date, as the page originally said June 22 2018. I'm pretty sure that 2019 is incorrect so I'm trying to fix this. Thanks.

3282:

And as I am not an American I am not always up on the finer points what iS "government land" in America. So yes that was a mistake, I should have said "Government land", as to the source, you should be aware we do not use headlines, we use what the body says it says things like "Workers on Monday

2205:

Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories,

1758:

I have posted a sentence about the ability of the law to help USA accomplish it pledge in Paris agreement. You deleted it saying: wait for they will do it! But several sentences before there are suggestions about how much the bill wil reduce the GHG emissions. These are also suggestions based on

3580:

article in its "Peace negotiations" section, stating "let's see if it holds". In full respect of your choices, I suggest re-adding the section as "2023 truce attempt" or otherwise, since it's still a notable event during the invasion considering that it's been covered by multiple reliable news

1575:

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for

2713:). I am not saying that the article should endorse these theories, but the current wording is one-sided, I would be happy if you could take another look at it and maybe make a suggestion of your own. I am especially looking at words like 'descended', which are unnecessary and unhelpful. 3194:

If you are attempting to paraphrase, you are doing a very poor job of it. The "outside of" phrase in the source means that it is not speaking of all the public land in the state, and is an inherent suggestion that there are statues on public land that is not "outside of" those places.

3209:

I did not, I returned it to a previous version created by someone else. Then attempted to make it clear it was only a claim, not a fact. The source says there were not left on public land outside of cemeteries, we now (in effect) say they have only been removed from court houses.

2234:

to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

2806:

landed at their home bases. Selective security can be irritating. In the attack over Balakot, villagers heard the sound of a few aircraft roaring past. This is on record everywhere. That meant that aircraft flew past at a relatively low level. Bomb blasts were heard

4146:. And they can be all of these things, they can use gotcha journalism to push an agenda (as I believe they are) that seeks to impose their values on America (so christo-facist). But as my opinion (or OR) does not trump yours I also must go by how RS describes them. 4114:

I am, of course, discussing my position with you (and I will do so with other editors) in order to resolve a dispute amicably and reach a resolution, since my edits, which were in good faith, and my edit comments were categorically ignored by you and several other

1298:

concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available

3883:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

3265:

land with significant exceptions. The courthouse claim is made in the RS's voice.... even though as a headline, and thus not in the brightest spot of reliable sourciness. The version you're undoing is far more accurate to the source than the claim you prefer.

2784:

I am concerned the section on Twitter is bloated, it is one company (musk has only owned it for less than 2 months) and yet we have over 4 paragraphs on it. Thus any material must be highly significant, and the opinion of one RS. It is also easy to miss one

2709:, seemingly saying my edit was in conflict with Reliable Sources; I disagree with you, and in fact the current language on the page is in itself misleading, as it discounts as pseudoscience a range of theories that are in fact at worst questionable ( 3887:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

1753: 613:

I didnt' add that video myself. The video I did add today was the one published by his disciple about the date of his death, and I only considered using that one because I had seen that a Youtube video was used as a source for his birthday.

1170:

Apparently, PBS considers Project Veritas to be a reliable source. At least, reliable enough that PBS did not want to continue employing one of its lawyers after he was shown saying certain controversial things in a Project Veritas video.

1722:

I have started a discussion on the talk page. The text I removed is inaccurate, so I have no idea why you would want to put it back as is. Please engage in the discusion instead of just blindly reverting to reinstate an inaccuracy.

3502:

in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as

1102:

responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available

1814:

But until it happens it might not. So I suggest you make a case at the articles talk page why what might happen is relevant to the page about Biden (rather than say his presidency, where, even then, it might not be relevant).

3153:

him the benifit of the doubt but I cannot when hes following after me changing it back without addressing that his source and the rest of the Knowledge article hes editing contradict him. This man is operating in bad faith.

2164:

have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently

1276:

I can't ban you anywhere, I can only report you if you breach 3RR, I posted the waning before you breached it, as it was just that, a warning you might be about to breach it. So it would give you a chance to step back.

3392:

for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2206:

etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.

1576:

maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available

3260:

is false on multiple fronts, as the source says nothing about specifically federal land (it's focused on removal from a county courthouse, which is not likely to be federal land) and only makes the claim about

3224:

Nor was the edit made in bad faith or vandalism, thus (in a sense). Another reason for the revert is I felt the reasoning behind it was not good enough, and may have been a violation (and in fact still do) of

1174:

In my opinion, this speaks highly in favor of the reliability of Project Veritas. PBS is usually praised by people on the political left, the very same people who claim that Project Veritas is not reliable.

3497:

signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted

1404:

You successfully cyberbullied me. I deleted MY topic on the qanon page talk. I deleted my PM page. And I'm closing this up and leaving. Because that's the only thing left to do with a cyberbully like you.

1096: 4107:

be considered RS when discussing a competing platform/source, and academic sources are not NPOV until proven otherwise; 2) the characterizations are based on flawed definitions (by all definitions, PV is

3963: 3413:

won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar.

2111:

finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the

561:

What does the fact that you name a mistake last time tell you? This is why we do not use OR, we can get things wrong. Also I doubt your source for this is an RS. Find an RS to confirm it, or remove it.

2649:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2552:

I notice that the COVID-19 articles are under discretionary sanctions from the Arbitration Committee. Putting your own opinions in Knowledge's voice rather than quoting someone, as is required by

1292: 4168:

With regards to activism, none of those sources actually called PV activists, but rather outlets or groups, which would lend support to my position that PV is more gotcha journalism than activism.

786:, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated. 1570: 1767:

If you think my edit is based on my own proposition you are wrong: the same sources who are cited when talking about suggested GHG reduction several sentences above says it explicitly (page 1):

1125: 1656: 1640: 4040: 4032: 4016: 3475:: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see 2940: 2924: 2908: 2811:

of the victims. As an ex-Mirage 2000 Sqn Cdr (1 Sqn), I was allowed to listen to the tapes and watch the assortment of films. We will have to wait 27 years to get actualities of a non-event.

2476: 2460: 1319: 3666: 3658: 3642: 2023: 2007: 1603: 1577: 1299: 1103: 1137: 1035: 1019: 1808: 2932: 2769:

you don't want other editors to spend several posts explaining you what a source is saying and what Knowledge's editorial guidelines suggest, try to become a better reader on your own.

1648: 1529: 2564:

would appear to me to be reportable under those sanctions. Before I do so, have you ever received any previous warnings or sanctions by the arbitration committee or an administrator?

2166: 4024: 2916: 2665: 2468: 2266:

If you are no longer very active on Knowledge or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at

2230:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the

1586: 1337: 1108: 3650: 2015: 819:

I wrote multiple long compound sentences which required even more references to became a fairly well supported text. Why did you revert my edits? Thank you for your reply! Cheers!--

591:

OK, but you can't use youtube videos as a source unless they are by recognized subject experts (and maybe not even then). Certainly not by a self-appointed judge. You need to read

2634: 1839:

as Pellumb Xhufi. You are one of the editors who has either used Xhufi as a source or expressed a concern about the use of Xhufi as a source. The place for the discussion is at

1027: 2948: 2484: 2031: 3303:

once reverted the user should have taken it to talk, and not edit warred to get their preferred version (which I do not think actually reflects what the source says) either.

1773: 3154: 2851: 3948: 1881:

NO, as that page is about her. The other page is about an invasion she was not a party to. If you want to make a case do so at the articles talk page, and not here.

1350: 1770:" If the IRA passes, additional executive and state actions can realistically achieve the U.S. nationallydetermined commitments(NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. " 1141: 3494: 3456:. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your 2108: 783: 194: 3185: 3389: 2231: 1840: 1513: 1493: 294: 289: 3979: 3865: 3849: 2770: 1804: 3162: 3562: 2692: 2274: 2170: 1541: 791: 272: 3880: 3520: 1591: 1307: 1113: 148: 2196:

an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more.

1167:, but my account seems to be too new for that. I see that you have made quite a few edits to the article, so I thought you might be interested in this. 197:. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive. 3024: 3009: 336: 3847: 3452:: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly 3158: 2747: 2714: 3971: 2113: 1800: 1366: 486:

terrorist group banned in many countries, but only few are mentioned in article info-box can you please add remaining countries by importing from

3832:

I have now started just removing them, but I always start by treating them like they are genuine requests, trolling only works if you get angry.

3257: 3115: 1324: 399:. And secondly did you just violated the 1RR imposed on the page? I see there is an ARB imposed on the page, which stops us to do second revert. 3922: 3900: 4065: 3691: 2973: 2509: 2056: 1681: 1565: 1478: 1060: 190: 1185: 1286: 1711: 1774:

https://energyinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Modeling-the-Inflation-Reduction-Act-with-the-US-Energy-Policy-Simulator_August.pdf

2086: 1270: 4000: 3959: 3814: 3626: 3595:

It may be notable, but we do not yet know if it has had any impact, or even if it has been accepted (as I pointed out on the talk page).

3554:

If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at

3516: 2892: 2539: 2444: 1991: 1624: 1608: 1237: 1223: 1003: 3841: 3736:. Would you mind taking a look and correcting it please? Otherwise I fear it's time wasted and worse, confusing for everyone involved. 1090: 4095: 3534: 2870: 2794: 2606: 2592: 2246: 1112:

by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the

3937: 3721: 3425: 3141: 3003: 2143: 1824: 1472: 1458: 1443: 1429: 1393: 643: 3870: 3604: 3548: 2355: 2341: 2311: 2260: 2191:

There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".

1975: 1961: 1947: 1920: 1905: 1890: 1378: 935:

Assistant Professor Nicholas Mulder Cornell University Assistant Professor of Modern European History in the Department of History.

250: 102: 4213: 4191: 4177: 4155: 3126: 1414: 655: 637: 623: 608: 586: 571: 556: 542: 4165:

its characterization of PV on articles from the Washington Post, whose position, per wp:newsorg, calls its RS status into question.

3905: 3589: 3334: 3312: 3294: 3275: 3238: 3219: 3204: 3097: 3083: 3065: 3043: 2835: 2755: 2737: 2428: 2422: 1335:) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur 806: 1190: 967: 735: 3792: 3780: 2407: 2394:. Very, very few edits, but there's a bad smell coming from that. I think it's a blocked editor, but not sure which one. FYI. 987: 981: 913: 898: 875: 861: 847: 710: 1747: 1195: 888:

I'm just telling, the value of their texts have not even comparable weight with the opinion of an average (layman) Wiki editor.

181:

will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

4061: 3984: 3687: 2969: 2612: 2579:

Yes I have, but I would also advise you that making such accusations needs very good evidence to not be seen as a violation of

2505: 2052: 1677: 1056: 750: 721: 467: 453: 439: 425: 382: 351: 189:

The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at

4124: 4069: 3765: 3695: 3610: 3116:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Talk:Muslim_conquest_of_Persia#Adding_the_fact_of_numerical_and_equipment_superiority_of_sassanids

2977: 2876: 2573: 2513: 2060: 1685: 1208: 1064: 491: 3826: 3476: 2847: 2688: 2565: 1599: 1346: 1315: 1121: 802: 285: 3480: 3350: 2722: 2380: 1852: 1540:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

1150: 1406: 1370: 487: 2092: 3555: 2778: 2333: 2288: 2267: 547:

Well, as I said I originally put the June 22 2019 date, so allow me to feel responsible for what I think is a mistake.

3054: 1875: 1519:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.

342:

No its not, as Kashmir is divided between two nations. We need to be clear they did not drop bombs in their own part.

3421: 2139: 296: 225: 94: 89: 84: 72: 499: 306:, as it's already in the title. And your revert reinstated the 90 charactered shortdesc, which is almost double the 3911: 3577: 2391: 2326: 2296: 67: 59: 1843:. Your participation is not required but is encouraged, and may be the best way to have your opinion considered. 1355: 519: 388: 3442:). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the 2820: 2684: 1595: 1342: 1311: 1117: 947: 828: 798: 681: 281: 2855: 1434:

You are welcome to edit here, but you must do so within out guidelines, asking you to do that is not bullying.

1266: 852:

The Authors are academically highly skilled economic historians. Check their names and their academic careers.

458:

In fact "Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes" might read like attacks in two places to anyone not up on the subject.

205:

Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated

3585: 3229:, I would have preferred a much better argument than " I do not think this was an error made in good faith," 3112:

Please join the “muslim conquest of persia” talks in the talk page regarding my contribution that you erased

2138:(including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the 1938:

reliable sources. The international press and multiple reliable sources are not supporting your conclusions.

1130: 193:). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it 3446:

are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

2199: 1732: 3571: 3107: 2658: 2385: 1754:

About the edit you have deleted about Joe Byden and the climate consueqences of the Inflation Reduction Act

1554: 1399: 1306:

and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the

1186:

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-entertainment-coronavirus-pandemic-8f586d687ab332777a7a059457ff818e

233: 3576:

Hello sir. I have noticed that you recently reverted an edit of mine adding a "2023 truce" section to the

3745: 2670: 1784: 1245: 694: 177:

have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out.

3776: 3750: 3226: 3147: 2550: 1233: 1204: 206: 38: 1762: 1214:

You really need to suggest this at the articles talk page. There other eyes can look at this as well.

1182:

article based on this content, if you think this content is notable enough to deserve being included.

232:

exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page

3874: 3822: 2210: 1848: 1487: 1262: 495: 483: 2597:

I have left a DS notice on your talk page relating to the DS sanctions for cCovid related articles.

1463:

Hell I even warned you not to take it to ANI or the help desk. Maybe that should tell you something.

4209: 4187: 4151: 3933: 3837: 3788: 3733: 3600: 3457: 3453: 3330: 3308: 3290: 3234: 3215: 3181: 3137: 3093: 3079: 3039: 2866: 2831: 2790: 2774: 2733: 2706: 2602: 2588: 2569: 2418: 2351: 2322: 2307: 1957: 1952:

No, I am following policy, we cannot use an anonymous claim to attribute clear guilt in our words.

1916: 1886: 1820: 1743: 1468: 1454: 1439: 1425: 1389: 1282: 1219: 977: 909: 871: 843: 731: 706: 633: 604: 567: 538: 463: 449: 435: 347: 717:

That edit would be very out of character for Slatersteven. It appears to be an inadvertent error.

4101: 3918: 3122: 2317:

And if your apology was genuine you would drop it now, and not continue it with a side of snark.

1657:

Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

1410: 1374: 302:

Hi, I've reverted your revert. I agree including location is helpful, but here in this case it's

3061: 3020: 1896:

you are reverting without any reliable sources, when I am presenting multiple reliable sources.

4075: 3701: 2983: 2519: 2337: 2292: 2066: 1943: 1901: 1871: 1691: 1191:

https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/pbs-lawyer-resigns-caught-veritas-sting-75208013

1070: 228:

is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read

47: 17: 1329:

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (

4182:

You should make this point at the article talk page. Do any of them say "gotcha journalism"?

4173: 4120: 2746:

the talk page before editing, but yes, I will go ahead and do that; Thank you for your time.

2700: 2646: 2376: 1341:; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. 1229: 1200: 1196:

https://www.pbs.org/publiceditor/blogs/pbs-public-editor/pbs-addresses-project-veritas-video/

651: 619: 582: 552: 515: 701:

I have no idea, must be some bizarre cut-and-paste error. After all I am agreeing with you.

260:

understanding of Knowledge notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing

3967: 3818: 3443: 3438:

guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and

3271: 3200: 2816: 2751: 2718: 2657:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2545: 2403: 2396: 2363: 1844: 1164: 938:

Mr. Slatersteven, May I ask you, which university do you teach at and what is your title?--

894: 1738:

Yes, but to make your edit you must get consensus, not just start a talk page discussion.

8: 4201: 4130:

NO, we address them in the edit summaries you were not ignored, you were disagreed with.

3975: 2710: 782:

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see

4083: 3914: 3761: 3709: 3420:

led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the

3118: 2991: 2527: 2074: 1699: 1258: 1155: 1078: 959: 943: 857: 824: 743: 687: 307: 303: 174: 3057: 3016: 1228:

Thank you. I see I just had to wait four days. Thanks for your feedback and comments.

4205: 4183: 4147: 4108: 4074:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

3929: 3833: 3810: 3798: 3784: 3700:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

3596: 3582: 3515:

have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also

3382:

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to

3326: 3304: 3286: 3230: 3211: 3177: 3133: 3089: 3075: 3035: 2982:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

2862: 2827: 2786: 2729: 2628: 2598: 2584: 2518:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

2414: 2347: 2318: 2303: 2065:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

1953: 1939: 1912: 1897: 1882: 1867: 1816: 1739: 1728: 1690:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

1464: 1450: 1435: 1421: 1385: 1278: 1252: 1215: 1069:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

973: 905: 867: 839: 727: 702: 629: 600: 563: 534: 459: 445: 431: 396: 343: 3401: 2100: 929:

Prof Ágnes Pogány: Professor of econonomic history, Corvinus University of Budapest

926:

Stephen Gross: Associate Professor of History & European Studies Stephen Gross.

4169: 4131: 4116: 4091: 3741: 3717: 3055:

https://www.gazette-drouot.com/lots/14498276-1905-demeester-voiturette-torpedo-8-cv

2999: 2677: 2642: 2535: 2372: 2346:

Then why did you remove that hat? That meant "conversation over", you reopened it.

2082: 1830: 1763:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Joe_Biden&oldid=prev&diff=1114029121

1707: 1550: 1086: 647: 615: 596: 578: 548: 511: 430:

Yes, but this is a quick description for people who have not read those articles.

3267: 3196: 2812: 1857: 1581: 1303: 1179: 417: 374: 356:

Yeah thanks for improving it further. It's much better than previous two. Thanks

328: 140: 2252:

If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the

1866:

is on the Knowledge page for her. Are you going to challenge that page as well.

726:

I can't imagine how it even occurred, as I would not have edited his signature.

213: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3896: 3800: 3439: 2763: 2654: 2557: 2223: 2176: 811: 759: 718: 178: 144: 3775:

say. Also, we do not say "Polish Committee of National Liberation" we link to

3659:

Hawkeye7 on the key contributions of two Australian scientists in World War II

2119:. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section. 1584:

and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring

767: 525:

You being "pretty sure" is not enough, you need RS conforming it, please read

4197: 4143: 4079: 3757: 3705: 3484: 3435: 3322: 3318: 3300: 3173: 3172:

so as not to breach its copyright. And as you have only edited one page (see

3071: 2987: 2650: 2580: 2561: 2523: 2070: 1695: 1261:

that justifies sending me a Revert Warning with your threat to ban me there.

1074: 939: 889: 853: 820: 490:, I'm requesting you here because this page is Extended confirmed protected. 229: 932:

Prof Martin Horn Professor in the History department at McMaster University

4139: 4135: 3772: 3169: 3031: 2800: 2553: 2282: 1863: 1836: 1724: 955: 835: 592: 526: 504: 392: 1097:

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

118: 4087: 3737: 3713: 2995: 2531: 2078: 1703: 1559: 1082: 530: 136: 3962:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

3541: 3256:

not all been removed from courthouses. The edit summary where you claim

2661:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2253: 3369: 3317:

Note as well, I did not report them, I told them what policies to read

2638:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1717: 1178:

I present these three sources, and ask that you consider adding to the

972:

Again, this needs to be discussed at the articles talk page, not here.

477: 400: 357: 311: 4200:

if you are reverted it is down to you to make a case at talk, and get

2390:

I found something odd on an article on the Simple English wikipedia -

2371:

Sorry about that edit i was confused on the defintion of fake news. --

1785:

https://rhg.com/research/climate-clean-energy-inflation-reduction-act/

1293:

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

3892: 2619: 2107:

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The

1790: 1571:

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

1369:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

3030:

As far as I could tell they were unsourced or sources that were not

1789:

I think this is enough important for being mentioned on the page of

577:

a Youtube video in which he said that his birthday is September 17.

3809:

I'm writing to request that you don't respond to grossly insulting

3727: 2365: 1384:

A bit late, and this will be added, are you trying to get a block?

3964:

Weasel words, lack of NPOV, etc. on article: Gab (social network)

2728:

I suggest you read the article talk page, and make a case there.

2256:, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers. 1257:

Please specify by link the three revert examples you refer to at

1145: 170: 143:, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to 3943: 2674:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3015:

angered or irritated, just confused ( I am relatively new ) :)

2841: 2664:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

2632:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

1835:

I have been asked to coordinate discussion of the issue of the

1500: 675: 3667:

Nick-D reports on his recent visits to British military sites

2125:: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to 1590:

If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the

904:

You need to make a case at the articles talk page, not here.

684:? If not a mistake thats grounds for an indefinite blocking. 3505: 2154: 4142:. If you have issues with the sources being rs take it to 3384: 2287:

I’ve been thinking about what you said and I apologize. -

1522:

Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles.

3511: 2160: 2133: 2127: 3863:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3416: 3409: 2645:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1331: 628:

I did not say you did add it, I said it was not an RS.

249:

Consider staying informed on project issues by putting

3949:

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

3561:

To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself

2273:

To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself

2131:), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to 1841:

Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Pellumb Xhufi

790:

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

271:

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

4017: