31:
457:
435:
332:
244:
109:
That's a mess. But being a new editor, I feel so clueless about proper sourcing, particularly where I'm writing about a somewhat obscure topic that is not well covered in traditional RSes, so I'm kind of stitching together multiple kinds of sources (her own interview, her employer/alma maters, small
98:
Edited copyvio issues and reduced the quote down to where Earwig is at 74%. I don't know if you think I reduced the quote properly (i.e., left "the best part"), or if you even think that quote needs to be there at all (I mean the last one, which was the long one). All the Earwig problems now are
184:
Sorry, didn't mean to skip the first paragraph; fixed that, with some slight rewording to get earwig down a bit more (now 62.1%). I also unbundled the cites and added some more detail about her early life. How's it look? Your comments have been very helpful, I think it's gotten much better!
380:
324:
135:? You can see in the unbundled version linked to above that a lot of the sources provide the same information, so we don't need all of them, probably one or two would be enough? But I'm not sure
416:
390:
142:
Are the statements from RPI/IIT's website sufficient on their own? Under WP:SELF? Or are they not independent and thus not good enough to stand on their own? What about ASHRAE and SWE?
368:
351:
121:
Generally speaking, should it be left at paragraph-level cites, or should it be sentence cites? I did paragraph cites except direct quotes and potential controversial statements.
538:
283:
157:
In sum I'd appreciate guidance on whether I should cite every sentence; expand the bundle or unbundle; and/or delete any sources in favor of others when there is overlap
606:
319:
99:
proper nouns, quotes, and "first woman in the United States" and "PhD in mechanical engineering." I don't think it's actually a copyright violation, though?
293:
178:
399:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
302:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
559:
587:
231:
510:
498:
486:
474:
465:
145:
What about her interview and family death notice? I see these as the least reliable, but they also provide the most information in one place.
70:) per your suggestions (and also tweaked some other stuff). What do you think? Also, what do you think about combining hook1 and alt2 into:
543:
78:
I'm not sure if I'm supposed to post this on the DYK nom page, or here or elsewhere, so sorry if this is the wrong place. Thanks again!
236:
110:
newspapers, a family death notice, brief mentions in published books/journals). Without an encyclopedia article, full book chapter, or
534:
208:
194:
114:
profile to sort of rely on, I'm not sure which of a bunch of second-tier sources should stay and which should go. Specific questions:
87:
522:
374:
421:
339:
251:
446:
396:
299:
219:
569:
400:
386:
303:
289:
272:
263:
213:
38:
356:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
268:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
106:
381:
Template:Did you know nominations/Cyberwar: How
Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President
222:
of a celebration in the Twin Cities on
January 19. It would be great if that fits your schedule.
602:
359:
277:
344:
256:
227:
47:
17:
8:
555:
315:
67:
59:
583:
204:
190:
174:
83:
383:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
286:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
105:
Citations... here is what it looked like before I bundled citations (an older draft):
412:
223:
598:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
551:
311:
72:... that no woman in the US was awarded a PhD in mechanical engineering until
66:
Hi--thank you very much for taking the time to review the DYK nom! I revised (
594:
579:
200:
186:
170:
79:
408:
276:
is thought to have caused the spontaneous detonation of numerous U.S. Navy
575:
325:
DYK for
Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President
73:
60:
456:
373:, thinks it "highly probable" that Russia changed the outcome of the
124:
Better to expand the description of the sources in the bundled cite (
434:
331:
243:
391:
Cyberwar: How
Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President
352:
Cyberwar: How
Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President
102:
Incorporated your edits for STEM, Degrees awarded, and the lead.
284:
Template:Did you know nominations/Solar storm of August 1972
139:
sources from the ones used are "more" or "less" reliable.
93:
Thanks for helping me with this! Especially the sandbox!
574:
Just wanted to say thank you for your help with the
379:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
282:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
152:? I can't tell if this is a reliable source or not.
440:January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108
547:Image attribution: Nevit Dilmen (CC BY-SA 3.0)
449:! Please join us for these virtual editathons.
455:
535:Women in Red/English language mailing list
348:was updated with a fact from the article
260:was updated with a fact from the article
164:Tartan: Wow, good eye... and small world!
128:, etc.), or split apart the bundled cite?
14:
199:Thank you again for all of your help!
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
25:
23:
433:
237:DYK for Solar storm of August 1972
24:
618:
520:Help us plan our future events:
330:
242:
131:Are there sources that can just
29:
539:Women in Red/international list
375:2016 U.S. presidential election
220:Knowledge talk:Meetup/Minnesota
508:Continuing global initiative:
13:
1:
607:22:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
588:02:21, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
560:17:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
417:12:01, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
320:12:01, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
232:01:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
179:22:07, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
88:04:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
422:January 2019 at Women in Red
209:15:32, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
195:02:07, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
7:
496:New, year-long initiative:
270:... that a record-breaking
10:
623:
294:Solar storm of August 1972
273:solar storm of August 1972
264:Solar storm of August 1972
544:Women in Red/Opt-out list
430:
428:
395:, and it may be added to
298:, and it may be added to
76:became the first in 1959?
570:On the main page! Woo!
468:Women of War and Peace
460:
438:
401:Did you know talk page
360:Kathleen Hall Jamieson
304:Did you know talk page
218:There's discussion at
459:
437:
42:of past discussions.
593:Congrats! Well done
445:Happy New Year from
18:User talk:SusanLesch
397:the statistics page
300:the statistics page
562:via MassMessaging
484:January geofocus:
461:
439:
214:Knowledge Day 2019
567:
566:
548:
526:
514:
502:
490:
478:
469:
394:
297:
280:in North Vietnam?
150:North Country Now
54:
53:
48:current talk page
614:
532:
529:
527:
524:
517:
515:
512:
505:
503:
500:
493:
491:
488:
481:
479:
476:
472:
470:
467:
463:January events:
426:
425:
384:
340:19 December 2018
334:
287:
252:15 December 2018
246:
77:
33:
32:
26:
622:
621:
617:
616:
615:
613:
612:
611:
572:
523:
521:
513:#1day1woman2019
511:
509:
499:
497:
487:
485:
475:
473:
466:
464:
451:
424:
406:
405:
335:
327:
309:
308:
247:
239:
216:
71:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
620:
610:
609:
571:
568:
565:
564:
549:
546:
541:
533:To subscribe:
531:
530:
519:
518:
507:
506:
495:
494:
483:
482:
453:
452:
443:
442:
431:
429:
423:
420:
336:
329:
328:
326:
323:
248:
241:
240:
238:
235:
215:
212:
182:
181:
169:Thanks again.
166:
165:
161:
160:
159:
158:
154:
153:
146:
143:
140:
129:
122:
116:
115:
112:New York Times
103:
100:
95:
94:
63:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
619:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
591:
590:
589:
585:
581:
577:
563:
561:
557:
553:
545:
542:Unsubscribe:
540:
536:
528:
516:
504:
492:
480:
471:
458:
454:
450:
448:
436:
432:
427:
419:
418:
414:
410:
404:
402:
398:
392:
388:
382:
378:
376:
371:
370:
366:
362:
361:
355:
354:
353:
347:
346:
341:
333:
322:
321:
317:
313:
307:
305:
301:
295:
291:
285:
281:
279:
275:
274:
267:
266:
265:
259:
258:
253:
245:
234:
233:
229:
225:
221:
211:
210:
206:
202:
197:
196:
192:
188:
180:
176:
172:
168:
167:
163:
162:
156:
155:
151:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:
118:
117:
113:
108:
104:
101:
97:
96:
92:
91:
90:
89:
85:
81:
75:
69:
62:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
573:
462:
447:Women in Red
444:
441:
407:
372:
367:
365:, author of
364:
357:
350:
349:
345:Did you know
343:
337:
310:
271:
269:
262:
261:
257:Did you know
255:
249:
217:
198:
183:
149:
136:
132:
125:
111:
65:
55:
43:
37:
576:Lois Graham
224:Jonathunder
148:What about
74:Lois Graham
61:Lois Graham
36:This is an
599:SusanLesch
525:Ideas Cafe
387:here's how
363:(pictured)
290:here's how
578:DYK nom!
552:Rosiestep
358:... that
312:Alex Shih
278:sea mines
126:For RPI:'
595:Levivich
580:Levivich
501:Suffrage
489:Caucasus
409:— Maile
369:Cyberwar
201:Levivich
187:Levivich
171:Levivich
80:Levivich
39:archive
477:Play!
137:which
68:diffs
16:<
603:talk
584:talk
556:talk
537:and
413:talk
316:talk
228:talk
205:talk
191:talk
175:talk
107:diff
84:talk
597:. -
338:On
250:On
605:)
586:)
558:)
550:--
415:)
403:.
389:,
342:,
318:)
306:.
292:,
254:,
230:)
207:)
193:)
177:)
133:go
86:)
601:(
582:(
554:(
411:(
393:)
385:(
377:?
314:(
296:)
288:(
226:(
203:(
189:(
173:(
82:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
