31:
422:
303:, for example, have custom infoboxes? I guess we are talking about a maximum of about 80 articles. Something like water or dietary fiber doesn't have any infobox. Protein and lipid are both GAs and without infoboxes. Looking quickly, every vitamin source I have gives the following information on each. Among those, Infobox drug already has metabolism, excretion, synonyms, bioavailability.
194:
My COI is that, as stated on my User page and several article Talk pages, I am a science consultant to dietary supplement companies. None of my clients have ever asked me to edit
Knowledge and none (to my knowledge) know that I am an editor. I think if we all tread carefully - and transparently - we
135:
My bias is toward a narrative that is not daunting to a non-scientist reader, yet makes clear that countries are not necessarily in agreement on recommended intakes or upper limits. I feel that multiple tables is too much. I will point out that the content for
Vitamin D is closer to what you have
174:
are in infoboxes for drugs, which is potentially a mistake. (Niacin is in a chembox.) We can create an infobox nutrient that is compatible with WHO's medicines and the other WikiProjects. I feel the essential nutrients deserve a little better treatment than they have
163:
First, I read the GA2 discussion for vitamin C. Well done, David, and congratulations on GA! Sorry I hadn't realized that was going on. Second, I agree that
Knowledge's audience is primarily non-scientists. Third, the tables were indeed getting out of
72:. I wanted to have the data listed down the side, without big blocks interrupting the flow of text -- as it is rather dry, especially where different countries vary only slightly. Maybe you could stack them as we did for vitamin D. Also
241:
I am sort of here. What do you propose the "infobox nutrition" would contain? The essential nutrients are often both important dietary components as well as important medicines. Chemicals are a broader
515:
178:
My bias: I believe that with a few exceptions people should get their nutrients from food and not from dietary supplements. I have a COI when my professors are involved in the literature. -
536:
520:
355:
is on the WHO list. The special infoboxes are for elements. We could add a number of these to the "infobox drug" which would be easier than creating a new infobox.
208:
187:
145:
130:
398:
376:
266:
505:
167:
Two proposals for you gentlemen. 1) Can you see a WikiProject
Nutrition? 2) Can you see an Infobox nutrient? An RDA/UL chart could be part of the bottom.
99:
SusanLesch - I have started a discussion at Niacin on how to best address presenting dietary recommendations when there is disagreement among countries.
222:
108:
236:
344:
93:
554:
510:
121:. Thank you for responding to my edit summary's cry for help. I will try to send you a proper response by today after noon US Pacific time. -
540:
484:
473:
464:
455:
446:
532:
80:
is trying to get a more uniform order in nutrient articles. I think dietary or other recommendations should come early but see
59:
171:
389:
Thank you. Every element has its own box, as it should be. We're only humans making use of them, probably temporarily. -
431:
408:
368:
292:
258:
372:
262:
213:
I could see both of these proposals being beneficial but would have little time to work on them myself.
227:
Thanks, waiting for Doc James to get back online. David, it sounds like we balanced out our biases.😃 -
38:
394:
340:
232:
183:
126:
204:
141:
104:
335:
It also may be that existing infoboxes could simply add a field for "essential nutrient". -
47:
17:
8:
550:
364:
254:
218:
200:
151:
137:
118:
100:
89:
75:
390:
336:
228:
179:
122:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
546:
356:
286:
246:
196:
352:
245:
The RDA are fairly technical and as such IMO belong lower in the article.
214:
155:
114:
85:
170:
I'm guessing a bit here, but think all the vitamins and minerals on the
136:
created for niacin, albeit stacked vertically rather then across page.
81:
69:
421:
195:
can keep this to the benefit of
Knowledge. I'd like to hear from
496:
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (
65:
516:
Publication about
Knowledge's coverage of women mathematicians
300:
296:
313:
digestion, absorption and inhibitors, transport, storage
291:can you please tell me why iron is not on the
533:Women in Red/English language mailing list
325:deficiency and toxicity symptoms/diseases
68:, copying the table style I started for
14:
441:July 2018 worldwide online editathons:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
511:London calling (the Mayor of London!)
172:WHO Model List of Essential Medicines
25:
521:Women in Red is featured in Toolhub
23:
420:
24:
570:
487:Notable women, broadly-construed!
29:
537:Women in Red/international list
293:WHO list of essential medicines
60:Niacin dietary recommendations
13:
1:
7:
307:scientific and common names
10:
575:
64:Thanks for doing this for
555:14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
541:Women in Red/Opt-out list
417:
415:
409:July 2018 at Women in Red
399:18:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
377:17:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
345:17:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
267:14:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
237:23:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
223:20:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
209:20:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
188:19:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
146:15:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
131:14:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
109:13:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
94:10:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
506:Are we losing momentum?
322:assessment of nutriture
295:? Also do you know why
498:Join the conversation!
425:
424:
316:metabolism, excretion
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:SusanLesch
84:for his structure.
557:via MassMessaging
449:Sub-Saharan Africa
426:
328:prevalence of each
562:
561:
544:
488:
477:
468:
459:
450:
429:Hello again from
199:on this, though.
54:
53:
48:current talk page
566:
530:
491:
489:
486:
480:
478:
475:
471:
469:
466:
462:
460:
457:
453:
451:
448:
413:
412:
361:
319:function or role
290:
251:
79:
33:
32:
26:
574:
573:
569:
568:
567:
565:
564:
563:
539:. Unsubscribe:
531:(To subscribe:
485:
483:
474:
472:
465:
463:
456:
454:
447:
445:
437:
411:
357:
310:dietary sources
284:
247:
73:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
572:
560:
559:
526:
525:
524:
523:
518:
513:
508:
494:
493:
492:
481:
443:
439:
427:
418:
416:
410:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
382:
381:
380:
379:
333:
332:
329:
326:
323:
320:
317:
314:
311:
308:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
243:
191:
190:
176:
168:
165:
160:
159:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
571:
558:
556:
552:
548:
542:
538:
534:
528:
527:
522:
519:
517:
514:
512:
509:
507:
504:
503:
502:
501:
499:
490:
479:
470:
461:
452:
442:
436:
435:
433:
423:
419:
414:
400:
396:
392:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
360:
354:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
342:
338:
330:
327:
324:
321:
318:
315:
312:
309:
306:
305:
304:
302:
298:
294:
288:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
250:
244:
240:
239:
238:
234:
230:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
198:
193:
192:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
162:
161:
157:
153:
149:
148:
147:
143:
139:
134:
133:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
111:
110:
106:
102:
98:
97:
96:
95:
91:
87:
83:
77:
71:
67:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
529:
497:
495:
482:Continuing:
467:20th-century
458:Film + stage
440:
438:
432:Women in Red
430:
428:
358:
353:Ferrous salt
334:
283:
248:
63:
55:
43:
37:
201:David notMD
152:David notMD
138:David notMD
119:David notMD
101:David notMD
76:David notMD
36:This is an
476:Women Rock
391:SusanLesch
337:SusanLesch
331:RDA/RDI/UL
229:SusanLesch
180:SusanLesch
123:SusanLesch
547:Rosiestep
359:Doc James
287:Doc James
249:Doc James
242:category.
197:Doc James
82:vitamin C
70:vitamin D
369:contribs
259:contribs
39:archive
215:Jrfw51
156:Jrfw51
115:Jrfw51
86:Jrfw51
66:niacin
444:New:
373:email
263:email
164:hand.
16:<
551:talk
535:and
395:talk
365:talk
341:talk
301:zinc
299:and
297:iron
255:talk
233:talk
219:talk
205:talk
184:talk
175:now.
154:and
150:Hi,
142:talk
127:talk
117:and
113:Hi,
105:talk
90:talk
553:)
545:--
500:):
397:)
375:)
371:·
367:·
343:)
265:)
261:·
257:·
235:)
221:)
207:)
186:)
144:)
129:)
107:)
92:)
549:(
543:)
434:!
393:(
363:(
339:(
289::
285:@
253:(
231:(
217:(
203:(
182:(
158:.
140:(
125:(
103:(
88:(
78::
74:@
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.