48:
embarrass me and my then employer. I had recently started a new position and was relatively junior, so that was a threat that I could not ignore. I withdrew from the elections and resigned as an admin and bureaucrat. Some months later, when I felt more secure and established at work, I resumed service as an admin and bureaucrat. It has been a matter of great sadness to me to see some suggest that I don't take the issue of harassment seriously or that recent actions by me are supportive of harassment. That is not the case, and I caution people against being overly quick to accept unquestioningly a narrative that has been presented to them. The WMF account of its actions in relation to Fram does not withstand the most cursory scrutiny - it should be treated with utmost suspicion.
64:. In all judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings, the accused must have basic rights. Those include the right to know the name of their accuser(s), to understand what they are accused of, and to have the opportunity to defend themselves. The accused must also have the right for any public statement about them to clearly identify the misconduct that they were found to have committed, rather than to be subject to vague insinuations and innuendo thrown about from those who claim to speak from a position of authority. Fram has been treated abysmally. The decision of two of my fellow bureaucrats to re-enact a punishment applied by WMF with no respect for basic concepts of fairness was the last straw in convincing me that I could not continue here.
233:. They liken WMF to Facebook without understanding how Knowledge is (was?) different. I feel that Facebook provides a service to its users whereas WMF receives services from the community. But it seems people don't see it that way. That's fine, I get it. From my point of view though, the battle for self-governance we won with Jimbo was then lost to WMF, which whittled it away a piece at a time. WMF forces through policies and tech features that no one wants, while ignoring the features that the community asks for and the bugs it's crying out to have fixed (e.g.
58:. There is an urgent need to clarify the extent to which WMF is required to defer to community consensus, and the extent to which it must explain its actions and be held accountable for them by local communities. Without this, the project will hemorrhage contributors. Absent sufficient autonomy, wikipedia will simply not be the project that many of us chose to give our time to. The number of staffers would need to rise exponentially to fill the gap. I suggest WMF think long and hard about the value to them of the volunteer time they benefit from.
454:
114:
345:
361:
311:
237:). WMF now attempt to set the agenda, rather than responding to wishes of the projects. WMF even dictates where and how discussions happen, eschewing the noticeboards and consensus building structures we set up. People seem to be grudgingly accepting that. I couldn't and still can't. The result is that I don't want to give my time here any more, however tempting.
211:
It does feel both like a very long time ago and in another way just yesterday. I think even 5% is beating yourself up too much. I don't think events would have played out differently if you hadn't asked for your bits back at the noticeboard; I couldn't have watched things play out from the sidelines.
38:
Some have suggested that my recent actions have been out of character. I think that overlooks some of my history on this project. I have always believed more in principles than rules. Some may remember my unblock of Giano during the 2008 ArbCom elections, others my staunch objection to the existence
174:
On the off chance you still look in from time to time, I saw something that reminded me of something else which in turn reminded me of
Framgate, and I'm amazed to see that it all started 3 years ago yesterday. It feels so much more recent. While thinking back on everything, I still don't regret a
47:
Harassment is a serious issue, and one that has affected me personally in my time editing the project. I have never spoken publicly about the full reasons for my withdrawal from the 2008 ArbCom elections. I did so due to threats I received that actions would be taken against me in the real world to
214:
Ultimately, it's not because I resigned the bits that I don't contribute any more, I miss everyone and care for the project, but I don't want to give valuable free labour to WMF. I was comfortable contributing to a community-run project advancing free knowledge that was largely self-governing save
34:
I wanted to say a huge thank you not only to those who have posted supportive messages here and elsewhere, but also to those who have posted criticisms of my actions. It has been a pleasure editing this project alongside each and every one of you, whether we have agreed or not. I hope that those
68:
I would remind everyone that over the last few years I been minimally active on the project, with little time to dedicate to it. Everyone will be fine without me. I also think that it is time for this project to stop relying on old hands in key positions. ArbCom is increasingly comprised of
43:
that I felt ran contrary to the best interests of the project. It is probably true to say that I have been one of the most "activist" / "interventionist" bureaucrats. Whether that is a good or bad thing I leave to the judgment of others, but I make no apology for it.
265:
Well, it seems you have nudged me slightly out of my self exile. I have at least commented on the current RfBs. I do look in from time to time. It may be that the community / WMF balance will improve with time. One can only hope...
175:
lot, but I do regret my part in your resignation and retirement. I imagine it was like 95% WMF's fault and 5% mine, but I regret that 5%. Hope you're well, and thanks for caring so much about the integrity of the project. --
72:
I hope that matters are resolved in relation to the two issues that I have identified above such that in future I will feel able to continue contributing to this project, but my days as a bureaucrat or administrator are done.
529:
Let me second the sentiment that you are missed. It's hard to believe it's been five years since all that went down. I'm sorry things shook out like they did, but your principled stand was noticed by many.
215:
for the minimal legally required role that WMF originally had (and Jimbo's increasingly shrinking founder role). And I was happy to give my time to that project. But increasingly the projects are now
390:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
212:
In the end, the result would still have been the same, there wouldn't have been enough support for the actions I took (esp. re: Fram) and my position would have still have ended up untenable.
219:
by WMF, which sees itself as having a governance role over a social movement. The goal of trying (perhaps in vain) to build a NPOV online encyclopaedia that was free to all was alluring.
406:
229:
The community has failed to stand up to WMF and has tacitly endorsed its every encroaching remit. More of those who have stayed, and those who joined recently, believe that WMF are
375:
461:
121:
488:
Thank you again for both your actions and your articulation of the danger to the project posed by the WMF. I greatly respect your decision to leave, but it's a sad loss.
251:
Yes, I still see echoes of this in the recent UCoC enforcement vote (and many other issues too, but that's foremost in my head). Good to hear from you. Take care. --
545:
I will also add that you are definitely missed. I'm damn happy that I got to know you while you were here; I'm one of the lucky users that had this privilege.
35:
whose advice I have not felt able to follow over the last couple of weeks do think it fell on deaf ears. I have read every word and listened carefully.
69:
re-elected former Arbs, many bureaucrats (including me) were elected over a decade ago. That's not a good thing. We need fresh blood in key roles.
433:
289:
275:
260:
246:
82:
353:
51:
There are two very serious problems facing the community at the moment, and neither ought to be allowed to eclipse the other:
29:
184:
429:
144:
198:
164:
138:
234:
523:
514:" in your edit summaries. Were I to be minded to make any further edits in future, I would definitely adopt that!
478:
327:
425:
338:
169:
92:
569:
553:
399:
323:
101:
497:
411:
39:
of an off-wiki bureaucrat mailing list, or indeed my strong opposition to certain resysop decisions at
539:
441:
152:
301:
474:
280:
Sorry, only people who support the WMF unconditionally are allowed to oppose RFB candidates. --
160:
134:
493:
387:
285:
256:
180:
398:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
8:
194:
565:
535:
483:
470:
369:
331:
224:
220:
156:
130:
505:
489:
418:
383:
281:
252:
206:
176:
453:
113:
516:
395:
268:
239:
190:
75:
560:
391:
531:
40:
546:
402:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
379:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
148:
143:... so delighted to read your measured comments again, "old" crat ;) -
360:
326:, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made
344:
310:
415:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
469:
Best wishes for what you do with your time, - miss you here. --
405:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
373:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
91:
Replies to this message and further discussion have been
510:
Thank you, and I greatly appreciate your inclusion of "
386:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
189:
You two are forever my heroes for your actions then.
129:miss you - see Die Fliege (the fly) on my talk --
223:is depressing (it's like they didn't realise
23:This user is no longer active on Knowledge.
512:This edit is not an endorsement of the WMF
452:
112:
370:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
305:
354:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
235:Knowledge:Mobile communication bugs
13:
14:
583:
145:February flowers - late Valentine
359:
343:
309:
409:and submit your choices on the
322:Hi WJBscribe! On behalf of the
56:WMF v community self-governance
1:
570:04:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
554:04:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
434:00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
388:Knowledge arbitration process
339:21:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
165:16:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
30:Thank you and a farewell note
479:08:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
139:09:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
7:
62:Fair process in WMF actions
10:
588:
498:09:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
426:MediaWiki message delivery
330:and became a Wikipedian!
460:
451:
290:14:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
276:11:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
261:22:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
247:13:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
199:03:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
185:20:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
120:
111:
83:11:05, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
423:to your user talk page.
170:Three years ago? Yikes.
540:00:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
524:13:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
384:Arbitration Committee
367:Hello! Voting in the
318:Happy First Edit Day!
302:Happy First Edit Day!
442:Precious anniversary
102:Precious anniversary
448:
108:
522:
446:
400:arbitration policy
324:Birthday Committee
274:
245:
106:
81:
515:
467:
466:
436:
351:
350:
267:
238:
153:Handel's birthday
127:
126:
74:
579:
568:
550:
509:
456:
449:
445:
424:
422:
363:
347:
336:
313:
306:
210:
116:
109:
105:
20:
19:
587:
586:
582:
581:
580:
578:
577:
576:
564:
548:
503:
486:
444:
439:
438:
416:
364:
356:
332:
328:your first edit
320:
304:
204:
172:
104:
32:
24:
21:
17:
16:
12:
11:
5:
585:
575:
574:
573:
572:
527:
526:
485:
484:You are missed
482:
465:
464:
458:
457:
443:
440:
407:the candidates
376:eligible users
365:
358:
357:
355:
352:
349:
348:
341:
321:
316:
314:
303:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
228:
213:
171:
168:
125:
124:
118:
117:
103:
100:
99:
98:
97:
96:
66:
65:
59:
31:
28:
26:
22:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
584:
571:
567:
563:
562:
557:
556:
555:
552:
551:
544:
543:
542:
541:
537:
533:
525:
521:
518:
513:
507:
502:
501:
500:
499:
495:
491:
481:
480:
476:
472:
463:
459:
455:
450:
437:
435:
431:
427:
420:
414:
413:
408:
403:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
380:
378:
377:
372:
371:
362:
346:
342:
340:
337:
335:
329:
325:
319:
315:
312:
308:
307:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
277:
273:
270:
264:
263:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:
248:
244:
241:
236:
232:
226:
222:
218:
208:
203:
202:
201:
200:
196:
192:
187:
186:
182:
178:
167:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
140:
136:
132:
123:
119:
115:
110:
95:
94:
89:
88:
87:
86:
85:
84:
80:
77:
70:
63:
60:
57:
54:
53:
52:
49:
45:
42:
36:
27:
559:
547:
528:
519:
511:
487:
471:Gerda Arendt
468:
410:
404:
381:
374:
368:
366:
334:CAPTAIN RAJU
333:
317:
271:
242:
230:
216:
188:
173:
157:Gerda Arendt
142:
131:Gerda Arendt
128:
90:
78:
71:
67:
61:
55:
50:
46:
37:
33:
25:
506:Yngvadottir
490:Yngvadottir
462:Nine years!
412:voting page
282:Floquenbeam
253:Floquenbeam
207:Floquenbeam
177:Floquenbeam
396:topic bans
225:WP:PILLARS
151:and enjoy
149:Alte Liebe
122:Six years!
558:Me, too!
517:WJBscribe
392:site bans
269:WJBscribe
240:WJBscribe
231:in charge
227:existed).
191:Folly Mox
76:WJBscribe
549:~Oshwah~
447:Precious
107:Precious
93:archived
532:28bytes
419:NoACEMM
147:, read
18:Retired
520:(talk)
272:(talk)
243:(talk)
79:(talk)
561:Andre
41:WP:BN
536:talk
494:talk
475:talk
430:talk
382:The
286:talk
257:talk
221:This
195:talk
181:talk
161:talk
155:! --
135:talk
217:run
566:🚐
538:)
496:)
477:)
432:)
421:}}
417:{{
394:,
288:)
259:)
197:)
183:)
163:)
137:)
534:(
508::
504:@
492:(
473:(
428:(
284:(
255:(
209::
205:@
193:(
179:(
159:(
133:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
