User talk:Warrior4321/Archive 3

305:

previously, it has been greatly diminished for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is IP address, Madison, Wisconsin, not coming forward to identify why they have SUCH a vested interest in this entry. That would have solved everything but the hypocracy associated with this cat and mouse game is evident to the vast majority. Isit that some people think the public is stupid? That's apretty pedestrian stance if you ask me. That is not my problem. I am just here like thousands of others trying to make wikapedia better and more credible. Did you know that ANYONE can nominate themselves for a Pulitzer Prize? Fill out the form and send $ 50 and you have been nominated. There is, however, a huge difference between someone nominating themselves and a legitimate nomination by an unbiased source in the eyes of the vast majority. I once again applaud Mr. Abramson's many worthwhile accomplishments. But in my eyes, from an academic point of view, those accomplishments have been greatly tainted by the fact that the subject or the subject's close personal friends have placed this into wikapedia as a VANITY ENTRY. That is my humble opinion. I think a vast majorty of folks can smell a rat when they smell one. I will reiterate what I posted on my talk page: There are two quotes that best sum up my feelings on this subject. The first comes from Congressman Barney Frank who when talking to a disgruntled opponent at a health care forum stated, "Arguing with you is like arguing with my dining room table." The second comes from the person whom actually tracked down the IP address to Madison Wisconsin where Abramson goes to school. Their comment was simple and to the point. It was this: "BAGGED!" That's my take on this. Once again I'm just one of thousdands of folks who come here in the hopes of making wikapedia more authentic, credible,and accessible. Thank you for your attention.

441:

in droves and on a variety of sites and locations have mostly atacked him regarding the MFA consulting business he began. (Will that be posted by IP 216 on this entry and sourced correctly or perhaps I should post and reference how the poetry community has lined up against what they consider a foolish artificial business? Are you watching IP 216? Should I post THAT on Mr. Abramson's vanity entry? Hummm)The attacks on him have been brutal and have now carried over to his ability to actually write. So it goes. I was listening to an NPR program yesterday and before the announcer interviewed the person on the program they made a disclaimer stating that they knew the person they were interviewing and that they had worked with him before. I don't see what's wrong with such a disclaimer being posted on such vanity entires like Mr. Abramson's. I understand the argument that such a disclaimer doesn't exist, but then again slavery used to be legal but that CHANGED. If places are so rigid they can't or won't make or add changes they become stagnant. I once again feel that IP 216, Madison, Wisconsin has done themselves, this site and Abramson a great disservice. I also believe the "history" of these entires lend themselves to support the point that this was, is and will always remain in the eyes of the vast majority a vanity entry. The extent to which this was posted here on merit is suspect. But if wikapedia in its wisdom does not see the importance of leting readers know that something is or isn't entered based on merit and not a vanity entry like this Abramson entry is, far be it for me to interfere.

2161:

used only to revert edits that are clearly unproductive, such as vandalism; to revert content in your own user space; or to revert edits by banned users." I do see editors, usually IPs, doing edits like this, but I always use edit summaries. Using rollback makes it appear that you think I was vandalising. There's been quite a bit of discussion recently at ANI about the use of rollback for edits other than vandalism (which you've probably seen), and if you want to become an Administrator you don't want people thinking you don't know how to use such tools. Having said that, don't worry about it, I've probably used rollback some time when I should have added an edit summary, we all make mistakes or go too fast. Good luck with your administrator ambitions - we can always use more, although I know that being an Admin gets in the way sometimes of other work I want to do on Knowledge.

225:

down in Madison, Wisconsin. Please stop being so immature. Honestly it is beginning to show here and I know it certainly shows in your work. I've proven my point. There isn't a soul around who doesn't know you posted your own little autobiography, self-promoting some of you minor accomplishments to further your own self interest. And if by chance you happen to be some srarry eyed little student fawning endlessly over this entry, please give it a rest. He's just not that important or even well known. I'm sorry but in my opinion your credibility here is gone. Probably elsewhere too. I will give you this: You have helped coin the rather shabby phrase into the lexicon of our language: "VANITY ENTRY or VANITY POSTING" Good for you. Now it all seems so worthwhile to have your name asociated with this phrase. Sort of like having Nixon associated with Watergate.

188:

made by Abramson. "it was Abramson posting his own vanity entries"- not proven whatsoever. I said to you that students often create entries for their professors- particularly as regarding writers- so of course the subject city and editor city will be the same. And writers friends often work on their entries- again often from the same city. Youre ignorant to how WP:BLP tends to go, thats your problem not anyone else's. These things happens all the time in 1000s of entires. I am in Madison, no secret there. Mr. Trsutworthy has told you even if the guy did some of these edits it wouldn't matter if WP:NOT, WP:NPV, and WP:NOR were met. You dont like that policy-ok! Irrelevant to anything or anyone else. Postscript- i'm guessing you'd make a terrible lawyer

31: 1612:- I found that the majority of what is in the article is perfectly able to be sourced, and I'm getting around to it. Reducing the article to a single sentence certainly removes substandard and currently unsourced writing, but it also removes information that can be of more use to a reader than a microstub, and removes perfectly valid and useful external links and book references. When you come across an article in such a state again 172:

the person making these entries and or someone with a personal interest based on the IP geographic address, they SHOULD BE DISCOURAGED from doing so. You would I thought I asked you to drop an atomic bomb on Switzerland the way the vitrolic responses and denials poured out of this place. You want this place to grow? Then it has to stop being so ingrown and defensive every time a new kid comes around with a new idea.

2621: 2460: 767: 533: 463: 1835:? And as for whether I should immediately add sources to the articles I reverted, I will do that in my own time and not according to your timetable. You didn't revert an edit - you blanked entire pages without discrimination, and you also left behind microstubs on topics that should have been outright deleted. 2884:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

2547:

A lot of the information appeared superfluous, given that Judaism has relatively few adherents compared to Christianity or Islam, and that Orthodox Judaism itself is a minority movement among North American Jewish communities, who are predominantly Reformed or Conservative. I am currently transfering

1513:

I already know very well what original research means! I'm not proposing to leave the article permanently in its uncited state - I've gutted articles to become stubs myself when I felt they were irredeemable, but with this article I think there's a scaffold to work from that we'll lose by reducing it

1017:

440:

In MOST universities there are TWO six week sessions. This is the end of the second six week summer session. We do not open until AFTER Labor Day. Anyway, I really don't think this is the time for me to begin piling on poor Mr. Abramson since it was brought to my attention that the "poetry community"

187:

No actually we're not getting anywhere- as said before to you John, the article has been worked on 2 years- and voted on in AfD- by several dozen IP addresses in total. Youre trying to prove this guy is the only editor here..? So how does that addup. At best you are trying to show a few entries were

2951:

The "Hobbit Day" page was deleted with the reason "(G3: Blatant hoax)". The notion that this was a hoax is patently false. The article states plainly that it is to celebrate the birth of fictional characters. It is plainly marked as "Tolkien fandom". The article plainly states how it applies to

2160:

First, I agree with you, an IP changed BCE to BC (and the rest of the article uses BCE/CE), I put BCE back, and you used rollback to restore the IP's edit. Take a look. And I don't mean to be hypercritical, but you shouldn't be using rollback that way. The guidance on rollback says " These should be

703:

Okay I see what's going on. What you should do in this case is place the subscription template (with |display=none) on the project, and transclude the alerts on the /Template subpage. Gimme 5 secs and I'll show you what I mean. (And I've never done it so far, but I would probably use a bot if I ever

171:

Okay so now we're getting somewhere. In this case all I ever wanted was a recognition that it was Abramson posting his own vanity entries. That's all I ever asked-- to let the reading public know WHO was posting this information regardless of whether it is cited. And YES if we have identified him as

2962:

Further, I am disappointed in how I was contacted, and the true speedy-ness of the the deletion. A message was left in my talk page by Warrior4321 at 14:11 on 6 September 2009, and 28 minutes - not even a half of an hour - later the page was removed. I don't log in even every day, much less every

2955:

This page also has/had problems in lack of sufficient references, and challenged notability, however these are not the basis for the deletion, and these are not criteria for speedy deletion. Additionally, as various editors added the templates requesting these problems being fixed over a period of

304:

Yes. Well, I see no place on the entry where wikapedia has noted that this entry has been repeatedly questioned as to its authorship nor do I see where any disclaimer is noted that such behavior IS discouraged. That is up to you. In my humble opinion, whatever credibility associated with the entry

224:

Well, I know I make a better lawyer than Abramson wouldn't I, since I proved my case and you keep hiding. How many pounds of flesh? Sorry, this ain't no play, Shakespeare. I want you to stop lying to people here and readers who come here. That's what I want. Now answer the question. I tracked you

206:

Second postscript- by your logic if a friend of a subject posts an entry the entry is fradulent forever- even if dozens of editors work on it to fully source it afterward.. makes no sense- and we'd lose most contemp. artists' entries if so. You thik this guy's a putz- ok, point made. How many lbs

511:

I thought I'd say here, rather than on the ref desk, that I agree completely with your translation ("held the town" / "owned or possessed"). I was using "held" in a feudal sense (holding title to, rights over). "Possessed" is probably clearer to the average modern reader, as is your "since its

1663:

Well explained, but what I was trying to do was reduce it to a stub, and then watch it's re-growth in my watchlist. Every time, a statement would be added, I would ask the user to use references and cite their work, and if they did not, I would remove the information previously added. Thus, the

1471:

Knowledge does not publish original research or original thought. This includes unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position. This means that Knowledge is not the place to publish your own

320:

I have to apolize but I am unable to go through this particular vanity entry to ask for references. I am busy now winning a Pulitzer for my poetry and being nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. I am also all caught up in discovering a cure for cancer and proving the existence of God. All good and

1125:

You are right that the original editor should never remove the speedy delete tag, but on both of those articles the tag should never have been placed in the first place. Neither one of them met the criteria for the tag you placed on them so they shouldn't have been tagged in the first place.

3060:

Well, a first glance at it looked like a blatant hoax. Many people create their own days up, and I thought this was the same. However, your article has been restored, please take the time now to properly add references and to cite them. Sorry for any confusion, that may have occurred. Thanks!

1607:

What you stated is original research in the article isn't actually OR. Original research means that it is something the editor themselves came up with, i.e. "Material for which no reliable source can be found is considered original research", whereas I when I looked at reliable sources - see

395:

LOL. Yes, well I guess I want to get back to that state of grace I was in before I ventured out into this arena. What do I want? I want a little bit of honesty. Am I asking too much? I am spending too much time on this. Grades are due in shortly. Good luck and thanks. I guess al have already

1442:

from the article has been done. December 2008 was almost a year ago, and therefore plenty of time was provided to eradicate the OR. That is why I removed all of the information that seemed OR, and I made it a stub with only the lead sentence. It does not make to continue to maintain the OR.

491:

Once again, the end of the 2nd six week course is here. I have really given up on this matter. I think I have fleshed it out as much as I can and for those people I need to be concerned with the issue with or without a disclaimer is clear. A vanity entry is a vanity entry regardless of any

1862:

look for sources, I don't have to. I was not trying to add references to the articles, but I was going through a backlog of original research tagged from over a year. If you want to save the article, than feel free to add the sources, if not the challenged unsourced material must go.

2420: 1482:

Citing sources and avoiding original research are inextricably linked. To demonstrate that you are not presenting original research, you must cite reliable sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and that directly support the information as it is presented.

1514:

to a dicdef. It's hardly unusual for articles to go tagged for months with no work to address the problem, indeed that's standard. If we reduced all the unsourced articles and those with potential original research in them to stubs we'd lose most of the content of Knowledge.

1208:

All that was in the article was "A play written by Davey Holmes (2001)" and one actor. I could create a page saying "A play written by Warrior4321 (August 2009)". That would still not be enough to identify that the article subject is notable and can be included in Knowledge.

1747:

original research and can be removed. If you look at the histories of many FA's and GA's, you'll see that as soon as unsourced information is added, it is reverted. I was attempting to something of the similar, except I would actually try to address the issue with the

676:

It already did work/does work. It just doesn't work in the WikiProject Zoroastrianism/Template box. When you send out a confirmation to all WikiProject Physics participants to see if they are still interested every six months, do you send each one manually?

1103:, a page creator should never remove the template with a blank summary, and/or without notifying the person who proposed it for speedy deletion. If they do not wish to do that, then they can place a hang-on template, and state their case in the talk page. 567:

i m very confused. I created LinkedNow page, which you marked for the deletion. I used Hunch (website) as the general template for my contribution. Yet, my contribution is marked for the deletion. Please explain Why? How are the two profiles different?

2110:

I'm sure you know that you should use edit summaries and not just revert edits. You left the article in an inconsistent state, among other things. I'm reverting your revert. Please don't change it back without discussing this on my talk page. Thanks.

1616:; make an effort to source it yourself or ask a relevant WikiProject for help. Here are some other relevant policies: "It has always been good practice to make reasonable efforts to find sources oneself that support such material, and cite them." 1550:

publish original research or original thought. To demonstrate that you are not presenting original research, you must cite reliable sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and that directly support the information as it is

1759:

If someone discarded some good stuff when reverting, please don't revert the reversion. This can spark an edit war. Just find some of the good stuff and put it into the current version. Then do a diff and look for more good stuff. Repeat as

2966:

Personally, I am insulted by the demeaning allegation that I created a page as a vandalization. This page was created to contribute to Knowledge's well of knowledge on a subject matter that is real and, I believe, of interest to others.

2077:; other editors reverted some others too. I think the material in these articles is promising; most of the content doesn't smack of total OR and is likely to be able to be sourced. I've made appeals to two WikiProjects for improvements to 1887:

My last word on this: just because someone has tagged an article as containing original research it doesn't mean the whole article is suspect. Unsourced =/= original research. Tackling backlogs is admirable, but please tread more lightly.

1794:

You however, reverted the full article without addressing the concerns of original research that were presented in December 2008, instead of restoring parts of the article, and removing the OR, which had been presented almost a year ago.

1716:. I'm not an inclusionist - you'll have seen I'm no stranger to deleting articles when they're unverifiable or non-notable - but I don't think your "purist" approach to articles that might contain original research is the best one. 1315:

It is very unlikely that you took the image yourself. I have asked admins to check over this image and all of your other image uploads. Thank you for showing me the other images, as they all look full of copyright violations as well.

2996:

as the article and the facts inside of it seemed made up, even if the event wasn't made up. And yes, I too once, remember the slashing agony of the "speedy delete" as the user is hardly informed. However, you must take this up with

1692:, you're a fellow editor; you too can find reliable sources to help verify articles. Giving other editors ultimatums after which you'll remove unsourced content brings in an adversarial atmosphere, whereas the ideal for Knowledge is 411:

Grades are due in? In most countries, schools and universities should be opening next week, not ending.. Anyhow, what do you suggest when you state you want a little bit of honesty? What do you want done, I need to know

2058:; the material you blanked was hardly controversial, but equally is there any point having an article on this? It covers two dicdefs, basically. What is its potential? A soft redirect to Wiktionary might be best. 1079:

was questionable when you first tagged it, but it did have an external link that positively identified the subject of the article, then when you retagged it there was no question of what the article was about.

1381:

Look at the amount of problems, that are in that article. Yes, at the beggining only a few minor problems were there, so it was On Hold, criteria. However more and more problems were found. "On Hold" is for a

2036:

seems to be a horrible mish-mash of a topic - I'd recommend reverting the blanking and instead nominating it for deletion, as I'm not sure this is a real topic. An alternative might be a merge, but I favour

3036:

What facts seem made up? That the day exists and is celebrated? A quite google would clear that up. The day it's celebrated? That's answered in the one reference that was at the bottom of the page.

2602:

Hi even though we dont agree on a certain wikipedia article i would like to point out that i like your work overall here. Its great and i hope we will work together on some article one day. Cheers.--

2319: 1294:

Just to set the record straight, I took the picture of Saqib Ali that is in the infobox of his article; just as I have taken more than 50 pictures of other Maryland Legislators. You can check here

2238:. I can easily change the color/shade of the background star, or remove it entirely, if you want. I could also add a circle around the whole thing if you like. Let me know what you think, 1569:

Since, there are no sources or efforts to fix the original research issue since December 2008, the information must either become referenced or be removed, until sources can be brought.

1261:

with Wikipeditor before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to

1937:. In my opinion, the vast majority of the material you removed is not controvercial and should be backed up by an attributable source, not removed. Please feel free to discuss this at 1414:

Sure, it needs improvement, but blanking all the content with the edit summary "Removing OR" isn't that constructive. There's probably material to be built on in the present article.

2992:

was the one who deleted your article, so I'm sure you'll want to direct this to him. However, I must state that it was not deleted on grounds of vandalism, but on the grounds of

2009:

you, as "Proper use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing errors or violations of Knowledge policy or correcting related problems on multiple articles":

1237: 111:

Isn't Abramson attending school in Madsion Wiscomsin? Do you imagine it to be a coinsidence? This is circumstantial evidence that would stand up in any court. I rest MY case.

2321: 97: 2443: 2350: 1712:. Some of the material you removed in those articles was sourced or clearly verifiable, and you also removed valid book references, See alsos and External links - this is 2341:

Please let me know as soon as possible, because as soon as someone else comments on the AfD, they must agree also before I can userfy the article. Thanks for your time.

2669: 1274: 501: 450: 405: 330: 314: 234: 181: 139: 390: 298: 1059:

I think you should be a little more careful with your speedy delete nominations, especially the A1 criteria. I have removed the speedy delete tag from 2 articles (

2660: 802: 2916: 1752: 1713: 1100: 1704:. I've revamped articles and it can take time and effort, but it's much better for the reader than a microstub. For example, SpacemanSpiff drew my attention to 1049: 704:

decided to contact everyone. What I usually do is review the "contributions" from every user, and update their active/inactive status every couple of months).

2874: 2356:

I had previously prodded the article and got a message from the user. However, after replying to him, I never got a reply back. However, feel free to try :)

1221: 2095: 1982: 1902: 1882: 1849: 1814: 1730: 1683: 1658: 1586: 1528: 1460: 2930:". So curious, I came to your talkpage and found out that you are a Canadian of Indian origin. Since I'm from there too so just wanted to say hiiiiiii!! 1193: 1165: 1135: 1120: 637: 576: 216: 274:, then nothing can be done. If you feel that the facts written there are written by the article subject, and he is simply promoting himself, then place 197: 2013: 625: 485: 433: 165: 1500: 1353: 1089: 2202: 2170: 2155: 2311: 2282: 1403: 556: 1386:

minor problems. An entire list of problems does not require On Hold, but Fail. Once, you fix the article, you can always re-nominate the article.

790: 719: 694: 416:

what your goal is. What is the purpose of all this? I'm kinda confused right now, so once I know that, we can move in the right direction. Thanks

3106: 3080: 3047: 3020: 2644: 1333: 1858:. I am asking you to remove the OR ; if you have the time, to add sources later, then you can re-publish the facts. Concerning the fact, that I 747: 2483: 2389: 2375: 1735:

I was in no way trying to attain ownership. I was saying that I would ask for references, and if no references were found, I would revert the

1184:

and the external link that was with it, I could easily identify the subject of the article. That is why it does not meet the A1 criteria. --

2589: 2561: 2030:; you were right to remove all that material. Is there any point to having a standalone article on the topic? Is there a good merge target? 2215:

says to enforce style consistency for each article, but to stick with the style used by the historical main contributor to the article. --

492:

disclaimer or dispute resolution. Too bad Madison wisconsin couldn't see fit to "man-up" about this or the initial poster. But so it goes.

1339: 253:

Writing autobiographies is discouraged because it is difficult to write a neutral, verifiable autobiography and there are many pitfalls.

2664: 1212:

I just went back and relooked. You are right the article did not have the external link. I am sorry, the original tag was correct. --

3097:

Since you complained the loudest about the article, can you look at it again and see if any of my recent chances have improved it any?

2497: 2403: 2247: 1428: 1708:, and it was a mess of rambling prose and original research. I could've stubbed it or nominated it for deletion, but instead I wrote 1054: 2134:, and therefore I could not provide a edit summary. What is the point of keeping BC and A.D? The article has nothing to do with 2488:

I am happy to give it to you, you deserve it, with your compromising attitude, I am sure you will be receiving many more soon.

1609: 2959:

While I could understand other arguments against this article, I do not understand how you could conclude this is vandalism.

2338:, and this will give the new user a chance to rework this article and maybe wikipedia will get a long term dedicated editor. 1945: 1309: 670: 525: 2952:"the real world". It may have few people who celebrate this day, but it's at least as valid as "Talk like a pirate day". 645: 151:

create article about themselves, however it is discouraged. Editing your own article is completely acceptable, as long as

1344:

Dear Warrior4321! The above named article is written by me. I am going to change the content within the next few days. --

943: 208: 189: 2978: 2434:

This barnstar is awarded to Warrior4321, for helping and fostering new editors become dedicated wikipedians. Thank you.

1375: 2656: 2541: 2120: 1689: 1126:

Nominating articles for speedy deletion that do not meet the criteria can drive new editor's away from the project. --

584: 135: 2941: 2224: 1250: 1239: 2611: 588: 2328: 2235: 89: 1095:

At first I thought Focke-Wulfe was some 10 year old having a giggle by creating a page that sounded like the word

2229: 2033: 1705: 81: 76: 64: 59: 2650: 2019: 738: 710: 661: 1144:

not meet A1? A1 is for articles that do not have enough content assert their importance. A page that states :

341:

For those who believe, no explaination is necessary, and for those who don't believe no explaination is there.

2090: 1897: 1844: 1725: 1653: 1523: 1423: 3029:

I understand that you tagged the article and he deleted it. I posted the same message to him too. The

636:

Sorry about that :) I m a new user to Knowledge. But I love it. Thank you for your outstanding support!

2549: 2131: 2048: 1257:

with the following edit summary '(remove evil list-eating templates, see discussion)'. Please consider

38: 1367:

article, and then 3 days later you fail it. Is my math wrong? What happened to the other 4 days?--..

1002: 1739:. It is not biting the newcomers, if I go to them, and ask them to provide sources. However, if they 1217: 1189: 1131: 1085: 336:

I want to find a cure for cancer as well, and for the existence of God, none is necessary. Remember :

2570:

Thank you for the quick reply. I understand what you are doing now. Thanks for improving Knowledge.

1696:

building the encyclopedia. Your plan to monitor new contributions and revert all unsourced edits is

2927: 2904: 1959: 1181: 1141: 1037: 370: 278: 267: 321:

worthwhile things to do no doubt and all things I must remember to post for myself on wikapedia.

2963:

half hour. The "attempt" to get the input from the page creator was pro forma and disingenuous.

2828: 2292: 2082: 2074: 1988: 1942: 1889: 1836: 1717: 1645: 1617: 1515: 1415: 1286: 212: 193: 1965:

tags around the paragraph. If no references are provided, I will remove the information again.

1409: 1349: 650: 641: 580: 497: 446: 401: 326: 310: 230: 177: 131: 116: 2005:

I have had a look at some of the other article blanking you did the same day; I am not try to

1994:

is well written and is certainly a topic that can be sourced. Re: your note on the talk page,

1751:

As well, since you want to throw Knowledge essays and policies at me, please read them first.

3071: 3011: 2998: 2989: 2939: 2635: 2580: 2532: 2474: 2366: 2274: 2193: 2147: 1974: 1873: 1805: 1674: 1578: 1492: 1452: 1395: 1325: 1270: 1258: 1157: 1112: 1076: 1072: 1060: 984: 782: 686: 617: 548: 506: 477: 425: 387: 295: 162: 47: 17: 2912: 2893: 2166: 2116: 1213: 1185: 1127: 1081: 1045: 1026: 572: 123: 2331:

the article which you put up for deletion? The will delete it from main space completely.

8: 2946: 2869: 2307: 2243: 2220: 2044: 2006: 1709: 1625: 1438:. There has been an original research tag since December 2008, and no work to remove the 1434:

Yes, there is room for development, but that does not mean that we have to keep all this

521: 2820: 2062: 2023: 1828: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1198:

Yes, the external link might have had the information, but the article itself did not.

953: 3102: 3043: 2974: 2695: 2607: 1664:

pattern of original research in the article would stop and cited work would be added

1358: 1345: 1304: 631: 493: 442: 397: 322: 306: 226: 173: 127: 112: 1363:

On August 31, 2009 you indicated that we had seven days to fix the prolems with the

3063: 3003: 2931: 2851: 2838: 2810: 2627: 2572: 2524: 2466: 2358: 2266: 2185: 2139: 2051:

and no less than 79 on the individual neighbourhoods. Again, this is delete-worthy.

1966: 1865: 1797: 1666: 1570: 1484: 1444: 1387: 1317: 1266: 1254: 1246: 1149: 1104: 1068: 1064: 989: 774: 678: 609: 540: 469: 417: 382: 290: 157: 2956:

two years, no one has mistook this page for a "most obvious case" of vandalism.

2183:

Thank you, for the explanation. :) Wonderfully explained and makes perfect sense.

2908: 2802: 2765: 2674: 2597: 2557: 2162: 2112: 2103: 2070: 2040: 1041: 925: 913: 807: 366:

cite the information in the article, nothing can be done. However, you can place

1171: 655:

I have re-reverted you. The previous version did not work, so I'm trying a fix.

396:

contributed too much time to Mr. Abramson's 15 minutes of fame. Live and learn.

266:

even created the article? He has simply added facts to the article. Now, if you

108:

This IP address is 216.26.97.159 City: Madison, Wisconsin Country United States

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2897: 2833: 2507: 2493: 2439: 2399: 2385: 2346: 2303: 2239: 2216: 2078: 2066: 1824: 1701: 1368: 1030: 961: 743: 715: 666: 517: 457: 380:

no references are provided, delete that phrase from the article. Is that good?

376:

wherever you feel that it is not true or "self-promoted". After around a week,

2921: 2797: 2212: 1999: 1987:

I see that reducing articles to microstubs isn't a one-off. This kind of edit

1928: 1697: 1466: 1439: 1435: 1279: 1262: 1146:

A play written by Davey Holmes (2001). Original New York Cast : Jared Harris

1067:) that had plenty context to identify what the articles were talking about. 1007: 733: 705: 656: 605: 601: 362:

As for the Seth Abramson issue, I am not sure what you want done. As long as

285: 3098: 3039: 2970: 2603: 2135: 2027: 1621: 1297: 1177:

Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article.

873: 858: 363: 271: 152: 2380:

God bless you, how sweet. I will I will come right back after it is done.

2720: 868: 604:. Now that you have added more materai with references, it seems to meet 262:

Although it states it is discouraged and difficult, the IP user name has

2677:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

810:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

2780: 2755: 2740: 1938: 1071:

has some notability concerns that I am addressing with the author, but

903: 893: 848: 843: 562: 2253:

Great! The Barnstar looks wonderful. However, I have a few questions :

2234:

I finally got around to making that barnstar for you. Take a look at

147:

Good sir, I don't know what you want me to do. As stated above, users

2745: 2730: 2489: 2435: 2395: 2381: 2342: 2335: 2259: 1364: 1287: 930: 898: 863: 2903:

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on

1620:; "Be cautious with major changes: consider discussing them first." 1036:

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on

2846: 2553: 2055: 979: 888: 2885:

Your contributions make Knowledge better -- thanks for helping.

2775: 2735: 2705: 2690: 2104: 1018:

Your contributions make Knowledge better -- thanks for helping.

878: 853: 838: 823: 2815: 2760: 2750: 2519: 2508: 2419: 971: 948: 935: 2295:

heavily to the point that it is essentially it is a new image.

2043:

seems like a pointless article. There's already an article on

2864: 2792: 2710: 2322:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/422nd Military Police Company

1991: 1934: 1832: 1819:

You're still ignoring the fact that you can look for sources

1174:

has nothing to do with asserting importance. The criteria is

997: 883: 833: 1202:

Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject

2856: 2725: 2299: 908: 2518:

all of the information that was in the Judaism section of

1854:

Nobody is asking you to add sources according to anyone's

2770: 2715: 2700: 966: 828: 456:

Alright, this isn't going anywhere. Please take this to

2907:. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- 1040:. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- 3033:

is a subcategory of vandalism, and is still vandalism.

1955:

seems like a whole lot of OR. I have currently placed

2262:

did you use? I've never seen that image on Knowledge.

1245:

Hello Warrior4321, this is an automated message from

98:

The IP address is in Madison, Wisconsin. Coinsidence?

2892:

on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on

1025:

on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on

2456:Aw, thank you for the barnstar. It is my first one 1148:does not enough content to assert it's importance. 732:There, this should work and make both of us happy. 102:HERE IS THE GEOGRAPHIC ADDRESS OF IP 216.26.97.159 1472:opinions, experiences, arguments, or conclusions. 2670:Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot 803:Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot 1753:WP:Don't throw out the baby with the bath water 1249:to inform you the PROD template you added to 2625:. I'd love to work on an article with you. 2394:I just userfied the article. thanks a lot. 2016:for deletion, as it is totally unsourcable. 514:Ce qui n'est pas clair n'est pas français. 2265:Did you create the image using Inkscape? 1714:throwing the baby out with the bath water 352:Absence of proof is not proof of absence. 2926:I saw you supporting my nomination of " 1823:; have you actually looked for any for 14: 1610:User:Fences and windows/Alien language 1280:Learn how to opt out of these messages 270:written there, which are supported by 105:SOURCE: www.ipligence.com/geolocation 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2984:Yeah, I didn't delete the article, I 2464:. That was very kind of you. Thanks. 1265:for community discussion. Thank you, 2618: 2457: 2138:, and therefore Common Era is fine. 1253:has been removed. It was removed by 246: 25: 2002:for how to handle editing disputes. 1706:Sexual Interaction After Childbirth 1340:Eurydice (Next World Communication) 944:Update on the Aryan Invasion Debate 23: 608:and can be included in Knowledge. 512:founding" rather than my "from." 24: 3124: 2679: 2514:What was the reason for removing 1251:List of autostereotypes by nation 1240:List of autostereotypes by nation 812: 458:this noticeboard by clicking here 2999:the one who deleted your article 2619: 2458: 2418: 2236:Template:Zoroastrianism_Barnstar 1055:Use of A1 Speedy Delete criteria 765: 531: 461: 29: 2655:Your answers are ready for you. 2061:I've reverted your blanking of 2034:Image development (visual arts) 3107:14:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 3081:00:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC) 3048:04:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 3021:04:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 2979:03:53, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 2942:11:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 2917:23:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 2665:17:36, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 2645:00:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 2612:21:29, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2590:14:20, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2562:14:01, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2542:13:58, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2498:04:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2484:04:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2444:04:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2404:03:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2390:03:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2376:03:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2351:03:06, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2020:Secure Password Authentication 1903:01:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 119:) 04:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 13: 1: 2548:some of the information into 2312:14:01, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 2283:02:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 2248:23:25, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 2225:10:18, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 2203:10:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 2171:20:48, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 2156:20:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 2121:05:25, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 2096:01:29, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 1998:don't blank Synod again; see 1983:12:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1953:Uses in different commmunions 1946:08:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1883:21:41, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 1850:21:30, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 1815:21:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 1731:17:17, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 1684:10:48, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 1659:00:29, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 1587:22:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1529:17:28, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1501:13:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1461:13:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1429:17:28, 6 September 2009 (UTC) 1404:16:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 1376:16:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 1354:11:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 1334:01:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 1310:23:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC) 7: 2905:the SuggestBot request page 2022:was an appalling breach of 1933:I've reverted your edit to 1737:unsourced original research 1275:02:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1222:03:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1194:03:11, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1170:I understand the problem. 1166:03:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1136:02:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1121:02:52, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1090:02:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1050:20:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 1038:the SuggestBot request page 791:05:22, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 748:05:11, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 720:05:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 695:04:58, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 671:04:53, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 646:05:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 626:05:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 589:05:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 557:04:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 526:20:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 502:14:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 486:14:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 451:13:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 434:04:41, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 406:18:05, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 391:16:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 331:16:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 315:15:52, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 299:15:05, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 235:13:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 217:05:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 198:05:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 182:04:51, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 166:04:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 140:04:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 10: 3129: 2900:, SuggestBot's caretaker. 2682: 2550:heresy in Orthodox Judaism 2428:The Helping Hand Barnstar 2049:Neighborhoods of St. Louis 1033:, SuggestBot's caretaker. 815: 2786: 2424: 2417: 1743:provide sources, then it 919: 207:flesh do you want anyway. 1690:Judge Dredd of Knowledge 1614:please don't just gut it 1259:discussing your concerns 1075:is definitely notable. 2829:Zoroastrian eschatology 2293:File:Faravahar-Gold.svg 2230:Zoroastrianism Barnstar 2075:Marxist Group (Germany) 1003:Battle of al-Qādisiyyah 2894:SuggestBot's talk page 2651:Reference desk science 2327:Would you considering 1077:More Lies About Jerzy‎ 1073:More Lies About Jerzy‎ 1061:More Lies About Jerzy‎ 1027:SuggestBot's talk page 360: 349: 284:, everywhere where no 1238:Removal of PROD from 1180:Between what it said 1101:More Lies about Jerzy 985:Criticism of Hinduism 600:created did not meet 350: 339: 286:references are placed 240:Autobiography states: 42:of past discussions. 18:User talk:Warrior4321 2054:I'm in two minds on 1990:isn't constructive. 1702:biting the newcomers 268:don't like the facts 2875:New Mobility Agenda 2870:Battle of Chaldiran 2258:Which image of the 2045:St. Louis, Missouri 1710:Sex after pregnancy 2821:Nazanin Afshin-Jam 2063:First class travel 1951:The section about 1943:Blarneytherinosaur 1829:First class travel 954:Nazanin Afshin-Jam 2988:it for deletion. 2882: 2881: 2696:Sanjan (Khorasan) 2449: 2448: 2223: 1632:, and the essays 1440:original research 1436:original research 1296:], if you wish.-- 1283: 1069:Focke-Wulf Fw 62‎ 1065:Focke-Wulf Fw 62‎ 1015: 1014: 592: 575:comment added by 346:Frédérick Jézégou 260: 259: 143: 126:comment added by 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3120: 3079: 3077: 3069: 3019: 3017: 3009: 2937: 2852:Record Collector 2839:Iranian monarchy 2811:Moral skepticism 2680: 2643: 2641: 2633: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2617:Why, thank you. 2588: 2586: 2578: 2540: 2538: 2530: 2482: 2480: 2472: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2422: 2415: 2414: 2374: 2372: 2364: 2334:The editor is a 2280: 2272: 2219: 2201: 2199: 2191: 2153: 2145: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2014:Lady Paula Merry 1980: 1972: 1964: 1958: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1881: 1879: 1871: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1813: 1811: 1803: 1761: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1682: 1680: 1672: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1618:WP:Verifiability 1584: 1576: 1552: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1498: 1490: 1473: 1458: 1450: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1401: 1393: 1373: 1331: 1323: 1307: 1302: 1277: 1203: 1163: 1155: 1147: 1118: 1110: 990:Record Collector 813: 788: 780: 769: 768: 692: 684: 623: 615: 591: 569: 554: 546: 535: 534: 483: 475: 465: 464: 431: 423: 375: 369: 364:reliable sources 358: 347: 283: 277: 272:reliable sources 247: 153:reliable sources 142: 120: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3128: 3127: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3072: 3064: 3062: 3012: 3004: 3002: 2949: 2932: 2924: 2896:. Thanks from 2803:Safavid dynasty 2766:Tahirid dynasty 2672: 2653: 2636: 2628: 2626: 2620: 2600: 2581: 2573: 2571: 2533: 2525: 2523: 2512: 2475: 2467: 2465: 2459: 2367: 2359: 2357: 2325: 2291:I modified the 2275: 2267: 2232: 2194: 2186: 2184: 2148: 2140: 2108: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2071:Pundit (expert) 2041:South St. Louis 2012:I've nominated 1975: 1967: 1962: 1960:citation needed 1956: 1931: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1874: 1866: 1864: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1806: 1798: 1796: 1758: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1694:collaboratively 1688:You're not the 1675: 1667: 1665: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1579: 1571: 1546:Knowledge does 1545: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1493: 1485: 1470: 1453: 1445: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1396: 1388: 1369: 1361: 1342: 1326: 1318: 1305: 1298: 1292: 1243: 1214:A new name 2008 1201: 1186:A new name 2008 1158: 1150: 1145: 1128:A new name 2008 1113: 1105: 1082:A new name 2008 1057: 1029:. Thanks from 926:Safavid dynasty 914:Tahirid dynasty 805: 783: 775: 766: 741: 713: 687: 679: 664: 653: 634: 618: 610: 570: 565: 549: 541: 532: 509: 478: 470: 462: 426: 418: 373: 371:citation needed 367: 359: 356: 348: 345: 281: 279:citation needed 275: 121: 100: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3126: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3037: 3034: 3024: 3023: 2948: 2945: 2923: 2920: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2872: 2867: 2862: 2859: 2854: 2849: 2844: 2841: 2836: 2834:Middle Persian 2831: 2826: 2823: 2818: 2813: 2808: 2805: 2800: 2795: 2790: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2778: 2773: 2768: 2763: 2758: 2753: 2748: 2743: 2738: 2733: 2728: 2723: 2718: 2713: 2708: 2703: 2698: 2693: 2688: 2686: 2671: 2668: 2652: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2599: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2565: 2564: 2511: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2486: 2447: 2446: 2431: 2430: 2425: 2423: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2406: 2324: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2296: 2286: 2285: 2263: 2255: 2254: 2231: 2228: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2107: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2079:Fetish fashion 2067:Fetish fashion 2059: 2052: 2038: 2031: 2017: 2010: 2003: 1930: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1825:Alien language 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1756: 1749: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1411: 1410:Alien language 1408: 1407: 1406: 1360: 1357: 1341: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1291: 1285: 1242: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1056: 1053: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1005: 1000: 995: 992: 987: 982: 977: 974: 969: 964: 962:Middle Persian 959: 956: 951: 946: 941: 938: 933: 928: 923: 918: 917: 916: 911: 906: 901: 896: 891: 886: 881: 876: 871: 866: 861: 856: 851: 846: 841: 836: 831: 826: 821: 819: 804: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 737: 725: 724: 723: 722: 709: 698: 697: 660: 652: 651:Article Alerts 649: 633: 630: 629: 628: 564: 561: 560: 559: 508: 505: 489: 488: 439: 437: 436: 383:Mr.TrustWorthy 357:William Cowper 354: 343: 338: 337: 319: 303: 291:Mr.TrustWorthy 258: 257: 254: 251: 244: 242: 241: 222: 221: 220: 219: 201: 200: 169: 168: 158:Mr.TrustWorthy 99: 96: 93: 92: 87: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3125: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3082: 3078: 3075: 3070: 3067: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3038: 3035: 3032: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3022: 3018: 3015: 3010: 3007: 3000: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2957: 2953: 2944: 2943: 2940: 2938: 2936: 2929: 2919: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2901: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2886: 2876: 2873: 2871: 2868: 2866: 2863: 2860: 2858: 2855: 2853: 2850: 2848: 2845: 2842: 2840: 2837: 2835: 2832: 2830: 2827: 2824: 2822: 2819: 2817: 2814: 2812: 2809: 2806: 2804: 2801: 2799: 2798:Sumptuary law 2796: 2794: 2791: 2788: 2787: 2782: 2779: 2777: 2774: 2772: 2769: 2767: 2764: 2762: 2759: 2757: 2754: 2752: 2749: 2747: 2744: 2742: 2739: 2737: 2734: 2732: 2729: 2727: 2724: 2722: 2719: 2717: 2714: 2712: 2709: 2707: 2704: 2702: 2699: 2697: 2694: 2692: 2689: 2687: 2684: 2683: 2681: 2678: 2676: 2667: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2646: 2642: 2639: 2634: 2631: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2591: 2587: 2584: 2579: 2576: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2539: 2536: 2531: 2528: 2521: 2517: 2510: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2485: 2481: 2478: 2473: 2470: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2432: 2429: 2426: 2421: 2416: 2407: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2373: 2370: 2365: 2362: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2339: 2337: 2332: 2330: 2323: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2294: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2284: 2281: 2278: 2273: 2270: 2264: 2261: 2257: 2256: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2227: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2204: 2200: 2197: 2192: 2189: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2154: 2151: 2146: 2143: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2106: 2097: 2094: 2086: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2057: 2053: 2050: 2047:, another on 2046: 2042: 2039: 2035: 2032: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2018: 2015: 2011: 2008: 2004: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1981: 1978: 1973: 1970: 1961: 1954: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1904: 1901: 1893: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1880: 1877: 1872: 1869: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1848: 1840: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1812: 1809: 1804: 1801: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1757: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1729: 1721: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1678: 1673: 1670: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1657: 1649: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1588: 1585: 1582: 1577: 1574: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1549: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1530: 1527: 1519: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1502: 1499: 1496: 1491: 1488: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1468: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1459: 1456: 1451: 1448: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1427: 1419: 1405: 1402: 1399: 1394: 1391: 1385: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1374: 1372: 1366: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1335: 1332: 1329: 1324: 1321: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1303: 1301: 1295: 1289: 1284: 1281: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1241: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1207: 1200: 1199: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1173: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1164: 1161: 1156: 1153: 1143: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1119: 1116: 1111: 1108: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1052: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1034: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1009: 1008:Pre-existence 1006: 1004: 1001: 999: 996: 993: 991: 988: 986: 983: 981: 978: 975: 973: 970: 968: 965: 963: 960: 957: 955: 952: 950: 947: 945: 942: 939: 937: 934: 932: 929: 927: 924: 921: 920: 915: 912: 910: 907: 905: 902: 900: 897: 895: 892: 890: 887: 885: 882: 880: 877: 875: 872: 870: 867: 865: 862: 860: 857: 855: 852: 850: 847: 845: 842: 840: 837: 835: 832: 830: 827: 825: 822: 820: 817: 816: 814: 811: 809: 792: 789: 786: 781: 778: 772: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 749: 745: 740: 735: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 721: 717: 712: 707: 702: 701: 700: 699: 696: 693: 690: 685: 682: 675: 674: 673: 672: 668: 663: 658: 648: 647: 643: 639: 627: 624: 621: 616: 613: 607: 603: 599: 595: 594: 593: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 558: 555: 552: 547: 544: 538: 530: 529: 528: 527: 523: 519: 515: 507:Held the town 504: 503: 499: 495: 487: 484: 481: 476: 473: 468: 459: 455: 454: 453: 452: 448: 444: 435: 432: 429: 424: 421: 415: 410: 409: 408: 407: 403: 399: 393: 392: 389: 385: 384: 379: 372: 365: 353: 342: 335: 334: 333: 332: 328: 324: 317: 316: 312: 308: 301: 300: 297: 293: 292: 287: 280: 273: 269: 265: 255: 252: 249: 248: 245: 239: 238: 237: 236: 232: 228: 218: 214: 210: 209:216.26.97.159 205: 204: 203: 202: 199: 195: 191: 190:216.26.97.159 186: 185: 184: 183: 179: 175: 167: 164: 160: 159: 154: 150: 146: 145: 144: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 118: 114: 109: 106: 103: 91: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3073: 3065: 3031:blatant hoax 3030: 3013: 3005: 2994:blatant hoax 2993: 2985: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2934: 2925: 2902: 2889: 2888:If you have 2887: 2883: 2673: 2657:77.86.47.174 2654: 2637: 2629: 2601: 2582: 2574: 2534: 2526: 2515: 2513: 2476: 2468: 2427: 2368: 2360: 2340: 2333: 2326: 2276: 2268: 2233: 2211: 2195: 2187: 2149: 2141: 2136:Christianity 2130:I did was a 2127: 2109: 2007:WP:WIKIHOUND 1995: 1976: 1968: 1952: 1932: 1875: 1867: 1859: 1855: 1820: 1807: 1799: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1693: 1676: 1668: 1626:WP:IMPERFECT 1613: 1580: 1572: 1547: 1494: 1486: 1454: 1446: 1413: 1397: 1389: 1383: 1370: 1362: 1346:W.S.Herrmann 1343: 1327: 1319: 1299: 1293: 1244: 1176: 1175: 1159: 1151: 1114: 1106: 1096: 1058: 1035: 1022: 1021:If you have 1020: 1016: 874:Impermanence 859:Nabopolassar 806: 784: 776: 770: 688: 680: 654: 638:Suzan.nguyen 635: 619: 611: 597: 577:Suzan.nguyen 566: 550: 542: 536: 513: 510: 494:John Gardner 490: 479: 471: 466: 443:John Gardner 438: 427: 419: 413: 398:John Gardner 394: 381: 377: 361: 351: 340: 323:John Gardner 318: 307:John Gardner 302: 289: 263: 261: 243: 227:John Gardner 223: 174:John Gardner 170: 156: 148: 128:John Gardner 113:John Gardner 110: 107: 104: 101: 70: 43: 37: 2947:Hobbit Day. 2825:Add Sources 2024:WP:NOTHOWTO 1642:WP:DEMOLISH 1638:WP:DEADLINE 1634:WP:NOEFFORT 1630:WP:PRESERVE 1624:; also see 1267:SDPatrolBot 1255:Wikipeditor 1247:SDPatrolBot 958:Add Sources 869:Silver cord 571:—Preceding 388:Talk to Me! 296:Talk to Me! 163:Talk to Me! 155:are shown. 122:—Preceding 36:This is an 3001:. Thanks. 2909:SuggestBot 2781:Karim Khan 2756:Jalayirids 2741:Hindu Kush 2721:Arpa Ke'un 2675:SuggestBot 2336:new editor 2163:Dougweller 2113:Dougweller 1939:Talk:Synod 1551:presented. 1099:. For the 1042:SuggestBot 904:Hindu Kush 894:Karim Khan 849:Gordafarid 844:Jalayirids 808:SuggestBot 744:WP Physics 716:WP Physics 667:WP Physics 90:Archive 10 2928:4 Minutes 2898:ForteTuba 2746:Imamzadeh 2731:Ctesiphon 2329:userfying 2304:ThaddeusB 2260:faravahar 2240:ThaddeusB 2037:deletion. 1856:timetable 1698:ownership 1465:As well, 1371:BlackThor 1365:Saqib Ali 1359:Saqib Ali 1300:1MSU-LAX 1288:Saqib Ali 1172:WP:CSD#A1 1140:How does 1031:ForteTuba 931:Reza Shah 899:Vishtaspa 864:Ctesiphon 764:Alright, 632:LinkedNow 596:What you 518:OtherDave 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2990:This guy 2890:feedback 2847:Googoosh 2132:rollback 2056:Pop quiz 1821:yourself 1755:states : 1023:feedback 980:Googoosh 889:Holarchy 739:κοντριβς 734:Headbomb 711:κοντριβς 706:Headbomb 662:κοντριβς 657:Headbomb 585:contribs 573:unsigned 136:contribs 124:unsigned 3099:Dsmouse 3040:Dsmouse 2971:Dsmouse 2935:Legolas 2789:Cleanup 2776:Unitard 2736:Jamshid 2706:Apadana 2691:Alavids 2604:Judo112 2598:Comment 2298:I used 2105:Babylon 2092:Windows 1899:Windows 1846:Windows 1760:needed. 1727:Windows 1655:Windows 1525:Windows 1469:states 1425:Windows 922:Cleanup 879:Hanuman 854:Apadana 839:Alavids 824:Jamshid 414:exactly 39:archive 3068:arrior 3008:arrior 2986:tagged 2861:Expand 2843:Wikify 2816:Gorgan 2761:Abadan 2751:Bazaar 2632:arrior 2577:arrior 2529:arrior 2520:Heresy 2516:almost 2509:Heresy 2471:arrior 2363:arrior 2271:arrior 2213:WP:ERA 2190:arrior 2144:arrior 2128:revert 2084:Fences 2073:, and 2000:WP:BRD 1996:please 1971:arrior 1891:Fences 1870:arrior 1838:Fences 1802:arrior 1741:cannot 1719:Fences 1700:, and 1671:arrior 1647:Fences 1640:, and 1575:arrior 1517:Fences 1489:arrior 1467:WP:NOR 1449:arrior 1417:Fences 1392:arrior 1322:arrior 1306:•talk• 1154:arrior 1109:arrior 994:Expand 976:Wikify 972:330 BC 949:Gorgan 936:Anatta 779:arrior 771:Thanks 683:arrior 614:arrior 606:WP:WEB 602:WP:WEB 545:arrior 537:Thanks 474:arrior 467:Thanks 422:arrior 2922:Hello 2865:Urmia 2807:Merge 2793:Parsi 2711:Turan 2685:Stubs 2088:& 2028:WP:OR 1992:Synod 1935:Synod 1929:Synod 1895:& 1842:& 1833:Synod 1831:, or 1748:user. 1723:& 1651:& 1622:WP:EP 1521:& 1421:& 1290:image 1182:there 998:Urmia 940:Merge 884:Turan 834:Roham 818:Stubs 16:< 3103:talk 3044:talk 2975:talk 2913:talk 2857:Peri 2726:Arya 2661:talk 2608:talk 2558:talk 2494:talk 2490:Ikip 2440:talk 2436:Ikip 2400:talk 2396:Ikip 2386:talk 2382:Ikip 2347:talk 2343:Ikip 2320:RE: 2308:talk 2300:GIMP 2244:talk 2221:(𒁳) 2167:talk 2126:The 2117:talk 2026:and 1350:talk 1271:talk 1218:talk 1190:talk 1142:this 1132:talk 1097:fuck 1086:talk 1063:and 1046:talk 909:Jiva 642:talk 581:talk 522:talk 516:--- 498:talk 447:talk 402:talk 386:---- 327:talk 311:talk 294:---- 231:talk 213:talk 194:talk 178:talk 161:---- 132:talk 117:talk 3076:321 3016:321 2771:224 2716:Zal 2701:273 2640:321 2585:321 2554:ADM 2537:321 2479:321 2371:321 2302:.-- 2279:321 2217:dab 2198:321 2152:321 1979:321 1878:321 1860:can 1810:321 1679:321 1583:321 1548:not 1497:321 1457:321 1400:321 1384:few 1330:321 1263:AfD 1162:321 1117:321 967:651 829:Zal 787:321 691:321 622:321 598:had 553:321 482:321 430:321 264:not 149:can 3105:) 3046:) 2977:) 2933:-- 2915:) 2663:) 2610:) 2560:) 2552:. 2522:? 2496:) 2442:) 2402:) 2388:) 2349:) 2310:) 2246:) 2169:) 2119:) 2081:. 2069:, 2065:, 1963:}} 1957:{{ 1941:. 1827:, 1745:is 1644:. 1636:, 1628:, 1352:) 1273:) 1220:) 1192:) 1134:) 1088:) 1080:-- 1048:) 773:! 746:} 742:– 718:} 714:– 669:} 665:– 644:) 587:) 583:• 563:hi 539:. 524:) 500:) 460:. 449:) 404:) 378:if 374:}} 368:{{ 355:— 344:— 329:) 313:) 288:. 282:}} 276:{{ 256:” 250:“ 233:) 215:) 196:) 180:) 138:) 134:• 86:→ 3101:( 3074:4 3066:w 3042:( 3014:4 3006:w 2973:( 2911:( 2659:( 2638:4 2630:w 2606:( 2583:4 2575:w 2556:( 2535:4 2527:w 2492:( 2477:4 2469:w 2438:( 2398:( 2384:( 2369:4 2361:w 2345:( 2306:( 2277:4 2269:W 2242:( 2196:4 2188:w 2165:( 2150:4 2142:W 2115:( 1977:4 1969:W 1876:4 1868:w 1808:4 1800:w 1677:4 1669:w 1581:4 1573:W 1495:4 1487:W 1455:4 1447:W 1398:4 1390:W 1348:( 1328:4 1320:W 1282:) 1278:( 1269:( 1216:( 1188:( 1160:4 1152:W 1130:( 1115:4 1107:W 1084:( 1044:( 785:4 777:W 736:{ 708:{ 689:4 681:W 659:{ 640:( 620:4 612:W 579:( 551:4 543:W 520:( 496:( 480:4 472:W 445:( 428:4 420:W 400:( 325:( 309:( 229:( 211:( 192:( 176:( 130:( 115:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index