31:
262:
under 10 years of age describing acts of sexual assault or physical abuse of the child may be admitted if the court finds that the child is unavailable or unable to testify and that "the time, content and circumstances of the statement provide sufficient circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness." The court found sufficient evidence of reliability to admit the testimony.
352:
criminal proceeding." There are two requirements for a holding to be a "watershed rule" First, the new rule must be "necessary to prevent an impermissibly large risk of an inaccurate conviction." Second, it must "alter our understanding of the bedrock procedural elements essential to the fairness of a proceeding."
261:
At trial, the court held a hearing to determine whether the victim could testify. Finding that Autumn was too distressed to be sworn in, the State moved to allow Laura
Bockting and the detective to recount the victim's statements to the jury. Under Nevada law, out-of-court statements made by a child
351:
announced a new rule and because it is clear and undisputed that the rule is procedural and not substantive, that rule cannot be applied in this collateral attack on respondent’s conviction unless it is a watershed rul of criminal procedure implicating the fundamental fairness and accuracy of the
359:
did not meet the first requirement, as it was too limited in scope. It also did not meet the second requirement, in that it only slightly changed the cross-examination jurisprudence, but did not fundamentally alter it. Therefore, the Court held, it was not a "watershed rule" and did not apply
265:
After hearing the evidence, the jury found
Bockting guilty of three counts of sexual assault on a minor under the age of 14, and the court imposed two consecutive life sentences and another concurrent life sentence.
304:
in which the Court held that testimony of witnesses absent from trial are admissible only where the declarant is unavailable, and only where the defendant has had a prior opportunity to
849:
758:
1858:
293:, making the same argument. The Court denied the petition, stating that Bockting was not entitled to relief under the habeas statute. Bockting appealed that decision to the
258:
indicted
Bockting on four counts of sexual assault on a minor under 14 years of age. The victim testified at the preliminary hearing, and Bockting was held over for trial.
254:
of his wife Laura's six-year-old daughter. A police detective interviewed the victim in the presence of her mother, and physical evidence was gathered at a hospital. The
290:
452:
72:
294:
278:, alleging that by allowing the out-of-court statements to be read to the jury, the state had violated Bockting's confrontation clause rights under the
742:
529:
279:
1780:
1853:
1814:
520:
1863:
1868:
1621:
913:
1394:
825:
675:
490:
217:
35:
1580:
1541:
1442:
378:
312:
applied retroactively, and reversed the lower court decision. The State appealed, and the
Supreme Court granted
1255:
1057:
833:
1092:
1423:
513:
1279:
972:
1485:
798:
790:
1374:
1167:
945:
782:
694:
555:
1760:
1589:
1568:
1271:
1175:
937:
921:
897:
702:
571:
1629:
1349:
1191:
1076:
1049:
1041:
881:
726:
506:
1533:
1303:
1223:
889:
841:
659:
299:
226:
102:
297:. While the appeal to the Ninth Circuit was pending, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in
54:
Glen
Whorton, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections, Petitioner v. Marvin Howard Bockting
1790:
1645:
1605:
1509:
865:
734:
456:
64:
335:
apply retroactively to judgments in criminal cases that are already final on direct review?
1669:
1613:
1501:
1493:
1295:
1148:
873:
579:
275:
221:
203:
8:
1798:
1701:
1517:
1386:
1247:
1231:
980:
718:
667:
543:
498:
161:
463:
1822:
1768:
1693:
1661:
1549:
1402:
1263:
1127:
1012:
1004:
774:
766:
621:
472:
1685:
1677:
1525:
1469:
1461:
1330:
1207:
1084:
1020:
996:
988:
817:
305:
247:
129:
1806:
1725:
1653:
1597:
1311:
1183:
929:
67:
1215:
1199:
1032:
857:
563:
153:
141:
1741:
1717:
1709:
1477:
964:
750:
251:
165:
137:
87:
1847:
1733:
1287:
905:
710:
286:
1637:
613:
600:
344:
282:. That Court held that the admission of the testimony was constitutional.
231:
173:
149:
121:
481:
314:
255:
83:
106:
does not apply retroactively. Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals reversed.
420:
Bockting v. Bayer, 399 F. 3d 1010, as amended, 408 F. 3d 1127 (2005).
79:
86:
2826; 75 U.S.L.W. 4121; 72 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (Callaghan) 635; 44
434:
Whorton v. Bockting, 549 U.S. ___ (2006)(internal quotes omitted)
30:
528:
291:
United States
District Court for the District of Nevada
1859:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
411:
Bockting v. State, 109 Nev. 103, 847 P. 2d 1364 (1993)
295:
United States Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
347:gave the unanimous opinion of the Court. "Because
1845:
1422:
1373:
514:
285:Bockting then filed a petition for a writ of
234:, writing for a unanimous Court, ruled that
379:"Nevada case may affect inmates nationwide"
308:the witness. The Ninth Circuit held that
246:The respondent, Marvin Howard Bockting, of
521:
507:
1815:Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California
641:
430:
428:
426:
1147:
376:
599:
542:
491:Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
338:
1846:
1116:
423:
230:(2006) applied retroactively. Justice
1421:
1372:
1146:
1115:
640:
598:
541:
502:
377:Adrienne, Packer (October 22, 2006).
269:
18:2007 United States Supreme Court case
355:The Court found that the holding in
914:Southern Union Co. v. United States
13:
1395:United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
826:Almendarez-Torres v. United States
676:Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas
360:retroactively to Bockting's case.
220:case about the application of the
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
1880:
1854:United States Supreme Court cases
1342:Restrictions on cross-examination
459:406 (2007) is available from:
441:
90:777; 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 99
29:
1443:United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez
1864:2007 in United States case law
1256:Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
759:Rosales-Lopez v. United States
414:
405:
402:Nev. Rev. Stat. §51.385 (2003)
396:
370:
1:
1869:Confrontation Clause case law
530:United States Sixth Amendment
241:
238:did not apply retroactively.
216:, 549 U.S. 406 (2007), was a
1424:Assistance of Counsel Clause
7:
973:Rassmussen v. United States
321:
218:United States Supreme Court
10:
1885:
1323:Face-to-face confrontation
1093:Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado
791:McDonnell v. United States
482:Oyez (oral argument audio)
1779:
1752:
1579:
1560:
1453:
1434:
1430:
1417:
1381:
1375:Compulsory Process Clause
1368:
1341:
1322:
1168:Reynolds v. United States
1159:
1155:
1142:
1122:
1111:
1068:
1031:
956:
946:Erlinger v. United States
809:
799:United States v. Tsarnaev
783:Skilling v. United States
695:Reynolds v. United States
686:
651:
647:
636:
608:
594:
556:Klopfer v. North Carolina
550:
537:
274:Bockting appealed to the
202:
197:
186:
181:
115:
110:
100:
95:
59:
49:
45:Decided February 28, 2007
42:
28:
23:
1761:Massiah v. United States
1590:Strickland v. Washington
1569:Glasser v. United States
1542:Nichols v. United States
1272:Bullcoming v. New Mexico
1176:Dowdell v. United States
938:United States v. Haymond
922:Alleyne v. United States
898:Cunningham v. California
703:Glasser v. United States
572:Doggett v. United States
383:Las Vegas Review-Journal
363:
326:
1630:Glover v. United States
1350:Chambers v. Mississippi
1192:Bruton v. United States
1160:Out-of-court statements
1077:Tanner v. United States
1069:Impeachment of verdicts
1050:Burton v. United States
1042:United States v. Dawson
882:United States v. Booker
850:Harris v. United States
727:Witherspoon v. Illinois
43:Argued November 1, 2006
1753:Uncounseled statements
1581:Ineffective assistance
1534:Pennsylvania v. Finley
1304:Samia v. United States
1224:Crawford v. Washington
1058:Smith v. United States
890:Washington v. Recuenco
842:Apprendi v. New Jersey
834:Jones v. United States
660:Cheff v. Schnackenberg
300:Crawford v. Washington
227:Crawford v. Washington
103:Crawford v. Washington
1791:Faretta v. California
1646:Woodford v. Visciotti
1606:Kimmelman v. Morrison
1510:Argersinger v. Hamlin
866:Blakely v. Washington
735:Ham v. South Carolina
642:Impartial Jury Clause
204:U.S. Const. amend. VI
78:127 S. Ct. 1173; 167
1670:Wright v. Van Patten
1614:Lockhart v. Fretwell
1502:Anders v. California
1494:Gideon v. Wainwright
1296:Hemphill v. New York
1280:Williams v. Illinois
1149:Confrontation Clause
874:Schriro v. Summerlin
580:Betterman v. Montana
339:Opinion of the Court
276:Nevada Supreme Court
222:Confrontation Clause
1799:McKaskle v. Wiggins
1702:Padilla v. Kentucky
1518:Gagnon v. Scarpelli
1486:Hamilton v. Alabama
1387:Washington v. Texas
1248:Giles v. California
1240:Whorton v. Bockting
1232:Davis v. Washington
981:Williams v. Florida
719:Sheppard v. Maxwell
668:Duncan v. Louisiana
544:Speedy Trial Clause
449:Whorton v. Bockting
331:Did the holding in
213:Whorton v. Bockting
162:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
24:Whorton v. Bockting
1823:Indiana v. Edwards
1769:Brewer v. Williams
1694:Porter v. McCollum
1662:Holland v. Jackson
1622:Williams v. Taylor
1550:Alabama v. Shelton
1403:Taylor v. Illinois
1264:Michigan v. Bryant
1128:Rabe v. Washington
1117:Information Clause
1013:Ramos v. Louisiana
1005:Burch v. Louisiana
957:Size and unanimity
775:Morgan v. Illinois
767:Wainwright v. Witt
622:Presley v. Georgia
270:Procedural history
126:Associate Justices
1841:
1840:
1837:
1836:
1833:
1832:
1686:Wong v. Belmontes
1678:Bobby v. Van Hook
1526:Scott v. Illinois
1470:Johnson v. Zerbst
1462:Powell v. Alabama
1413:
1412:
1364:
1363:
1360:
1359:
1331:Maryland v. Craig
1208:Illinois v. Allen
1138:
1137:
1107:
1106:
1103:
1102:
1085:Warger v. Shauers
1021:Edwards v. Vannoy
997:Ballew v. Georgia
989:Apodaca v. Oregon
818:Walton v. Arizona
632:
631:
590:
589:
250:, was accused of
248:Las Vegas, Nevada
209:
208:
190:Alito, joined by
1876:
1807:Rock v. Arkansas
1726:Lafler v. Cooper
1654:Wiggins v. Smith
1598:Nix v. Whiteside
1432:
1431:
1419:
1418:
1370:
1369:
1312:Smith v. Arizona
1184:Pointer v. Texas
1157:
1156:
1144:
1143:
1113:
1112:
930:Hurst v. Florida
743:Ristaino v. Ross
649:
648:
638:
637:
596:
595:
539:
538:
523:
516:
509:
500:
499:
495:
489:
486:
480:
477:
471:
468:
462:
435:
432:
421:
418:
412:
409:
403:
400:
394:
393:
391:
389:
374:
111:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
20:
1884:
1883:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1829:
1775:
1748:
1575:
1556:
1449:
1426:
1409:
1377:
1356:
1337:
1318:
1216:Ohio v. Roberts
1200:Frazier v. Cupp
1151:
1134:
1118:
1099:
1064:
1033:Vicinage Clause
1027:
952:
858:Ring v. Arizona
805:
682:
643:
628:
604:
586:
564:Barker v. Wingo
546:
533:
527:
493:
487:
484:
478:
475:
469:
466:
460:
444:
439:
438:
433:
424:
419:
415:
410:
406:
401:
397:
387:
385:
375:
371:
366:
341:
329:
324:
280:Sixth Amendment
272:
244:
164:
154:Clarence Thomas
152:
142:Anthony Kennedy
140:
130:John P. Stevens
91:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1882:
1872:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1839:
1838:
1835:
1834:
1831:
1830:
1828:
1827:
1819:
1811:
1803:
1795:
1786:
1784:
1783:representation
1777:
1776:
1774:
1773:
1765:
1756:
1754:
1750:
1749:
1747:
1746:
1742:Garza v. Idaho
1738:
1730:
1722:
1718:Premo v. Moore
1714:
1710:Sears v. Upton
1706:
1698:
1690:
1682:
1674:
1666:
1658:
1650:
1642:
1634:
1626:
1618:
1610:
1602:
1594:
1585:
1583:
1577:
1576:
1574:
1573:
1564:
1562:
1558:
1557:
1555:
1554:
1546:
1538:
1530:
1522:
1514:
1506:
1498:
1490:
1482:
1478:Betts v. Brady
1474:
1466:
1457:
1455:
1451:
1450:
1448:
1447:
1438:
1436:
1428:
1427:
1415:
1414:
1411:
1410:
1408:
1407:
1399:
1391:
1382:
1379:
1378:
1366:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1358:
1357:
1355:
1354:
1345:
1343:
1339:
1338:
1336:
1335:
1326:
1324:
1320:
1319:
1317:
1316:
1308:
1300:
1292:
1284:
1276:
1268:
1260:
1252:
1244:
1236:
1228:
1220:
1212:
1204:
1196:
1188:
1180:
1172:
1163:
1161:
1153:
1152:
1140:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1133:
1132:
1123:
1120:
1119:
1109:
1108:
1105:
1104:
1101:
1100:
1098:
1097:
1089:
1081:
1072:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1063:
1062:
1054:
1046:
1037:
1035:
1029:
1028:
1026:
1025:
1017:
1009:
1001:
993:
985:
977:
969:
965:Maxwell v. Dow
960:
958:
954:
953:
951:
950:
942:
934:
926:
918:
910:
902:
894:
886:
878:
870:
862:
854:
846:
838:
830:
822:
813:
811:
807:
806:
804:
803:
795:
787:
779:
771:
763:
755:
751:Adams v. Texas
747:
739:
731:
723:
715:
707:
699:
690:
688:
684:
683:
681:
680:
672:
664:
655:
653:
645:
644:
634:
633:
630:
629:
627:
626:
618:
609:
606:
605:
592:
591:
588:
587:
585:
584:
576:
568:
560:
551:
548:
547:
535:
534:
526:
525:
518:
511:
503:
497:
496:
443:
442:External links
440:
437:
436:
422:
413:
404:
395:
368:
367:
365:
362:
340:
337:
328:
325:
323:
320:
271:
268:
252:sexual assault
243:
240:
207:
206:
200:
199:
195:
194:
188:
184:
183:
179:
178:
177:
176:
166:Stephen Breyer
138:Antonin Scalia
127:
124:
119:
113:
112:
108:
107:
98:
97:
93:
92:
88:A.L.R. Fed. 2d
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1881:
1870:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1851:
1849:
1825:
1824:
1820:
1817:
1816:
1812:
1809:
1808:
1804:
1801:
1800:
1796:
1793:
1792:
1788:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1778:
1771:
1770:
1766:
1763:
1762:
1758:
1757:
1755:
1751:
1744:
1743:
1739:
1736:
1735:
1734:Buck v. Davis
1731:
1728:
1727:
1723:
1720:
1719:
1715:
1712:
1711:
1707:
1704:
1703:
1699:
1696:
1695:
1691:
1688:
1687:
1683:
1680:
1679:
1675:
1672:
1671:
1667:
1664:
1663:
1659:
1656:
1655:
1651:
1648:
1647:
1643:
1640:
1639:
1635:
1632:
1631:
1627:
1624:
1623:
1619:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1600:
1599:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1586:
1584:
1582:
1578:
1571:
1570:
1566:
1565:
1563:
1561:Conflict-free
1559:
1552:
1551:
1547:
1544:
1543:
1539:
1536:
1535:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1523:
1520:
1519:
1515:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1504:
1503:
1499:
1496:
1495:
1491:
1488:
1487:
1483:
1480:
1479:
1475:
1472:
1471:
1467:
1464:
1463:
1459:
1458:
1456:
1452:
1445:
1444:
1440:
1439:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1420:
1416:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1397:
1396:
1392:
1389:
1388:
1384:
1383:
1380:
1376:
1371:
1367:
1352:
1351:
1347:
1346:
1344:
1340:
1333:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1325:
1321:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1306:
1305:
1301:
1298:
1297:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1288:Ohio v. Clark
1285:
1282:
1281:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1258:
1257:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1210:
1209:
1205:
1202:
1201:
1197:
1194:
1193:
1189:
1186:
1185:
1181:
1178:
1177:
1173:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1145:
1141:
1130:
1129:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1114:
1110:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1073:
1071:
1067:
1060:
1059:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1047:
1044:
1043:
1039:
1038:
1036:
1034:
1030:
1023:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1014:
1010:
1007:
1006:
1002:
999:
998:
994:
991:
990:
986:
983:
982:
978:
975:
974:
970:
967:
966:
962:
961:
959:
955:
948:
947:
943:
940:
939:
935:
932:
931:
927:
924:
923:
919:
916:
915:
911:
908:
907:
906:Oregon v. Ice
903:
900:
899:
895:
892:
891:
887:
884:
883:
879:
876:
875:
871:
868:
867:
863:
860:
859:
855:
852:
851:
847:
844:
843:
839:
836:
835:
831:
828:
827:
823:
820:
819:
815:
814:
812:
808:
801:
800:
796:
793:
792:
788:
785:
784:
780:
777:
776:
772:
769:
768:
764:
761:
760:
756:
753:
752:
748:
745:
744:
740:
737:
736:
732:
729:
728:
724:
721:
720:
716:
713:
712:
711:Irvin v. Dowd
708:
705:
704:
700:
697:
696:
692:
691:
689:
685:
678:
677:
673:
670:
669:
665:
662:
661:
657:
656:
654:
650:
646:
639:
635:
624:
623:
619:
616:
615:
611:
610:
607:
602:
597:
593:
582:
581:
577:
574:
573:
569:
566:
565:
561:
558:
557:
553:
552:
549:
545:
540:
536:
531:
524:
519:
517:
512:
510:
505:
504:
501:
492:
483:
474:
465:
458:
454:
450:
446:
445:
431:
429:
427:
417:
408:
399:
384:
380:
373:
369:
361:
358:
353:
350:
346:
336:
334:
319:
317:
316:
311:
307:
306:cross-examine
303:
301:
296:
292:
288:
287:habeas corpus
283:
281:
277:
267:
263:
259:
257:
253:
249:
239:
237:
233:
229:
228:
223:
219:
215:
214:
205:
201:
196:
193:
189:
185:
180:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
128:
125:
123:
120:
118:Chief Justice
117:
116:
114:
109:
105:
104:
99:
94:
89:
85:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
1821:
1813:
1805:
1797:
1789:
1767:
1759:
1740:
1732:
1724:
1716:
1708:
1700:
1692:
1684:
1676:
1668:
1660:
1652:
1644:
1638:Bell v. Cone
1636:
1628:
1620:
1612:
1604:
1596:
1588:
1567:
1548:
1540:
1532:
1524:
1516:
1508:
1500:
1492:
1484:
1476:
1468:
1460:
1441:
1401:
1393:
1385:
1348:
1329:
1310:
1302:
1294:
1286:
1278:
1270:
1262:
1254:
1246:
1239:
1238:
1230:
1222:
1214:
1206:
1198:
1190:
1182:
1174:
1166:
1126:
1091:
1083:
1075:
1056:
1053:(1905, 1906)
1048:
1040:
1019:
1011:
1003:
995:
987:
979:
971:
963:
944:
936:
928:
920:
912:
904:
896:
888:
880:
872:
864:
856:
848:
840:
832:
824:
816:
797:
789:
781:
773:
765:
757:
749:
741:
733:
725:
717:
709:
701:
693:
687:Impartiality
674:
666:
658:
652:Availability
620:
614:In re Oliver
612:
601:Public Trial
578:
570:
562:
554:
448:
416:
407:
398:
386:. Retrieved
382:
372:
356:
354:
348:
345:Samuel Alito
342:
332:
330:
313:
309:
298:
284:
273:
264:
260:
245:
235:
232:Samuel Alito
225:
224:and whether
212:
211:
210:
198:Laws applied
191:
182:Case opinion
174:Samuel Alito
169:
157:
150:David Souter
145:
133:
122:John Roberts
101:
71:
53:
15:
1454:Appointment
810:Facts found
388:October 24,
1848:Categories
315:certiorari
256:grand jury
242:Background
84:U.S. LEXIS
289:with the
192:unanimous
80:L. Ed. 2d
60:Citations
532:case law
447:Text of
357:Crawford
349:Crawford
343:Justice
333:Crawford
322:Decision
310:Crawford
236:Crawford
187:Majority
82:1; 2007
464:Cornell
96:Holding
1826:(2008)
1818:(2000)
1810:(1987)
1802:(1984)
1794:(1975)
1781:Pro se
1772:(1977)
1764:(1963)
1745:(2019)
1737:(2017)
1729:(2012)
1721:(2011)
1713:(2010)
1705:(2010)
1697:(2009)
1689:(2009)
1681:(2009)
1673:(2008)
1665:(2004)
1657:(2003)
1649:(2002)
1641:(2002)
1633:(2001)
1625:(2000)
1617:(1993)
1609:(1986)
1601:(1986)
1593:(1984)
1572:(1942)
1553:(2002)
1545:(1994)
1537:(1987)
1529:(1979)
1521:(1973)
1513:(1972)
1505:(1967)
1497:(1963)
1489:(1961)
1481:(1942)
1473:(1938)
1465:(1932)
1446:(2006)
1435:Choice
1406:(1988)
1398:(1982)
1390:(1967)
1353:(1973)
1334:(1990)
1315:(2024)
1307:(2023)
1299:(2022)
1291:(2015)
1283:(2012)
1275:(2011)
1267:(2011)
1259:(2009)
1251:(2008)
1243:(2007)
1235:(2006)
1227:(2004)
1219:(1980)
1211:(1970)
1203:(1969)
1195:(1968)
1187:(1965)
1179:(1911)
1171:(1878)
1131:(1972)
1096:(2017)
1088:(2014)
1080:(1987)
1061:(2023)
1045:(1853)
1024:(2021)
1016:(2020)
1008:(1979)
1000:(1978)
992:(1972)
984:(1970)
976:(1905)
968:(1900)
949:(2024)
941:(2019)
933:(2016)
925:(2013)
917:(2012)
909:(2009)
901:(2007)
893:(2006)
885:(2005)
877:(2004)
869:(2004)
861:(2002)
853:(2002)
845:(2000)
837:(1999)
829:(1998)
821:(1990)
802:(2022)
794:(2016)
786:(2010)
778:(1992)
770:(1985)
762:(1981)
754:(1980)
746:(1976)
738:(1973)
730:(1968)
722:(1966)
714:(1961)
706:(1942)
698:(1878)
679:(1989)
671:(1968)
663:(1966)
625:(2010)
617:(1948)
603:Clause
583:(2016)
575:(1992)
567:(1972)
559:(1967)
494:
488:
485:
479:
476:
473:Justia
470:
467:
461:
172:
170:·
168:
160:
158:·
156:
148:
146:·
144:
136:
134:·
132:
455:
364:Notes
327:Issue
457:U.S.
390:2007
73:more
65:U.S.
63:549
453:549
68:406
1850::
451:,
425:^
381:.
318:.
522:e
515:t
508:v
392:.
302:,
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.