Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Aeorads - Knowledge

Source 📝

129:. No reliable independent sources presented (all sources that are presented are either not independent or do not even talk about the subject of the article, but rather a particular industry). Declined speedy (which I will say is completely improper as none of the assertions are for notability but just statements of fact). Material relevant to this discussion is also at 216:
I had nominated it for speedy since I found the sources to be unreliable and thought the whole concept to be notable, but not this particular company. I'm with Cquan and Beagel here.
118: 113: 190: 225: 161: 199:. I would like to vote for keeping, but verification of all sources failed. Also web seach does not any reliable source to establish a notability. 208: 171: 148:
As speedy decliner. Sorry you don't find any of those statements, if sourced, would constitute notability, but I do. Still: unreferenced, fails
130: 76: 68: 60: 139: 54: 185: 17: 239:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
85: 80: 89: 240: 94: 36: 72: 106: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
8: 183: 221: 157: 102: 204: 49: 98: 59: 178: 126: 217: 153: 200: 149: 135: 233:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 243:). No further edits should be made to this page. 172:list of Business-related deletion discussions 170:: This debate has been included in the 14: 23: 24: 255: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 13: 1: 226:16:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 209:18:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 191:04:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 162:03:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 140:03:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 55:01:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 7: 10: 260: 125:Non-notable company under 51:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 236:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 193: 175: 251: 238: 181: 176: 166: 116: 110: 92: 52: 34: 259: 258: 254: 253: 252: 250: 249: 248: 247: 241:deletion review 234: 188: 179: 112: 83: 67: 64: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 257: 246: 245: 229: 228: 211: 194: 186: 164: 123: 122: 63: 58: 42: 41: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 256: 244: 242: 237: 231: 230: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212: 210: 206: 202: 198: 195: 192: 189: 184: 182: 173: 169: 165: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 144: 143: 142: 141: 138: 137: 132: 128: 120: 115: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65: 62: 57: 56: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 235: 232: 213: 196: 167: 145: 134: 131:Talk:Aeorads 124: 45: 43: 31: 28: 180:Raven1977 218:De728631 187:My edits 154:Jclemens 119:View log 127:WP:CORP 86:protect 81:history 69:Aeorads 61:Aeorads 214:Delete 201:Beagel 197:Delete 146:Delete 114:delete 90:delete 46:delete 136:Cquan 117:) – ( 107:views 99:watch 95:links 16:< 222:talk 205:talk 168:Note 158:talk 150:WP:V 103:logs 77:talk 73:edit 177:-- 174:. 224:) 207:) 160:) 152:. 133:. 105:| 101:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 79:| 75:| 48:. 220:( 203:( 156:( 121:) 111:( 109:) 71:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
01:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Aeorads
Aeorads
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
WP:CORP
Talk:Aeorads
Cquan
03:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
WP:V
Jclemens
talk
03:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
list of Business-related deletion discussions
Raven1977

My edits
04:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.