197:
383:
is in fact cited "This article is from
Knowledge licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Knowledge article "Wakefield Massacre"." The other link is dead at the time I'm writing this. It meets notability, it needs cleaned up, expanded, and inline citations and more
270:
piece referencing it in 2007. Notability is not temporary, but this hasn't left the public eye. And ... quite aside from anything else, I'm quite bewildered at the nom's assertion that a judge popping off about the media coverage on the case "pretty much shows" anything at all - let alone
248:
378:
287:
Even if there are no sources cited in the article, there are plenty out there that could be used, so this can't be a reason to delete it. Tagging it with refimprove would be enough. And that the incident is not notable simply isn't true. It
196:. This wasn't notable outside of the standard three-day media blitz (Google News shows this; the event was 12/26/00, and after 12/30/00, there was nothing except the jury selection note and trial outcome. As a matter of fact,
469:
I will rewrite the whole article, though it will take me at least a week before it's done. Until then, I'll simply add some links to a few newspaper articles, which hopefully will quell those complaining about the lack of
157:
246:
I'm afraid I'm not one of the
Wikipedians who increasingly equate "no inline sources" with "unsourced." As it happens, a simple Google News search for "Michael McDermott" + "Wakefield" returns a whopping 387 hits
357:. Finally, I wonder exactly what the nom's methodology was in declaring only three Google hits. "Wakefield Massacre" on Google News - a good bit stricter than the regular web search - returns 54 hits.
188:
Unsourced article on a provably nn workplace shooting in
Massachusetts in 2000. Google shows three hits for the title (one is this article), and the article has copvio taken from either
381:
Google hits for the search "Michael
Mcdermott"+"Wakefield MA", the article has +/- 1000 hits per month, and the first link offered as proof of a copyright violation for the article
113:
151:
118:
250:, and despite nom's assertion that there are no hits after December of 2000, EVERY hit on the first page of that search is after that date, and over a stretch of three
526:
522:
505:
354:
Come to that, there are two hits in May of this year; the article Lord Gon links also cites this case as the worst case of workplace violence in
Massachusetts history
393:
237:
461:
479:
365:
279:
441:
315:
341:
492:
incumbent upon the article being improved. Most of those comments were made in response to the claim the event was a flash in the pan non-notable event. As
412:
220:
303:
428:
irks me ... Please, if you are going to vote to "Keep" an unsourced article because there are sources out there, then it should be incombant on you to
209:
326:
172:
139:
85:
80:
89:
256:
Los
Angeles Times, Boston Herald, Philadelphia Inquirer, USA Today, Boston Globe, San Diego Union, Christian Science Monitor
54:
518:
517:
There is an article for every other shooting spree in existence, this one just needs to be written and referenced better.
72:
295:
133:
17:
355:
299:
94:
540:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
129:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
289:
106:
179:
59:
541:
36:
254:
not three days. (This search, by the bye, took me all of thirty seconds.) The sources include the
501:
389:
271:
notability or the lack thereof - other than that the judge needed a better handle on his temper.
102:
76:
145:
235:
298:, got quite intensive national media coverage and it is still cited as an example of a failed
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
98:
475:
311:
189:
8:
488:
It had actually been nominated less than 48 hours before your rant and keep or delete is
292:
497:
437:
385:
68:
60:
337:
228:
205:
193:
471:
307:
165:
493:
454:
358:
272:
432:
the problem by actually adding some of those sources. Thank you... rant over.
433:
408:
420:- It's been several days since this article was nominated, and in that time
200:
pretty much shows how non-notable it was at the time and place it happened.
453:
Which exhortation would have gone over better had you added any yourself.
333:
201:
50:
403:
496:
said, it would go over better if you'd bothered to add something.
401:
but more sources should be added; it seems they are available.
534:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
306:, especially the Boston Herald used this term numerous times. (
164:
221:list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
544:). No further edits should be made to this page.
302:. And yes, it was called "Wakefield massacre"
178:
424:source has been added to the article. This
258:... The G-News hits continue through 2004 (
327:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
325:: This debate has been included in the
219:: This debate has been included in the
14:
23:
24:
556:
260:Boston Herald, Chicago Sun-Times
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
13:
1:
7:
527:19:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
506:03:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
480:02:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
462:22:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
442:18:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
413:08:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
394:08:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
366:09:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
342:22:39, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
316:22:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
280:21:03, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
238:17:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
210:16:01, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
55:13:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
10:
561:
377:- In fact, there are over
264:Stoneham Sun, Boston Globe
537:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
384:references added.
69:Wakefield massacre
61:Wakefield massacre
44:The result was
344:
330:
240:
224:
552:
539:
458:
362:
331:
321:
300:insanity defense
276:
231:
225:
215:
183:
182:
168:
116:
110:
92:
34:
560:
559:
555:
554:
553:
551:
550:
549:
548:
542:deletion review
535:
456:
360:
274:
229:
125:
112:
83:
67:
64:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
558:
547:
546:
530:
529:
519:99.231.130.188
511:
510:
509:
508:
483:
464:
445:
444:
415:
396:
371:
370:
369:
368:
346:
345:
319:
282:
241:
186:
185:
122:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
557:
545:
543:
538:
532:
531:
528:
524:
520:
516:
513:
512:
507:
503:
499:
498:Wildhartlivie
495:
491:
487:
484:
481:
477:
473:
468:
465:
463:
460:
459:
452:
449:
448:
447:
446:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
416:
414:
410:
406:
405:
400:
397:
395:
391:
387:
386:Wildhartlivie
382:
380:
376:
373:
372:
367:
364:
363:
356:
353:
350:
349:
348:
347:
343:
339:
335:
328:
324:
320:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
293:international
291:
286:
283:
281:
278:
277:
269:
266:) ... even a
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
242:
239:
236:
233:
232:
222:
218:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
181:
177:
174:
171:
167:
163:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
131:
128:
127:Find sources:
123:
120:
115:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
57:
56:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
536:
533:
514:
489:
485:
466:
455:
450:
429:
425:
421:
417:
402:
398:
374:
359:
351:
322:
304:by the media
284:
273:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
243:
230:Juliancolton
227:
216:
187:
175:
169:
161:
154:
148:
142:
136:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
152:free images
457:RGTraynor
361:RGTraynor
275:RGTraynor
268:60 Minutes
494:RGTraynor
470:sources.(
334:• Gene93k
296:headlines
262:), 2005 (
472:Lord Gøn
467:Comment:
451:Comment:
434:Blueboar
352:Comment:
308:Lord Gøn
198:this hit
119:View log
486:Comment
422:not one
418:Comment
202:MSJapan
158:WP refs
146:scholar
86:protect
81:history
426:really
252:years,
130:Google
114:delete
90:delete
409:talk
285:Keep:
244:Keep:
173:JSTOR
134:books
117:) – (
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
523:talk
515:Keep
502:talk
476:talk
438:talk
399:Keep
390:talk
379:6700
375:Keep
338:talk
323:Note
312:talk
290:made
226:-- –
217:Note
206:talk
194:here
190:here
166:FENS
140:news
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
51:Tone
46:keep
490:not
430:fix
404:DGG
332:--
192:or
180:TWL
525:)
504:)
478:)
440:)
411:)
392:)
340:)
329:.
314:)
234:|
223:.
208:)
160:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
48:.
521:(
500:(
482:)
474:(
436:(
407:(
388:(
336:(
318:)
310:(
204:(
184:)
176:·
170:·
162:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
137:·
132:(
124:(
121:)
111:(
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.