Knowledge:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive267

4480:

didn't leave me with that impression. When the word "spy" is used, one usually thinks of someone divulging classified information. It seems unlikely Kristeva knew classified info that she could have divulged if she'd wanted to. What the Bulgarians got from her during the Cold War, with or without her knowledge (hard to judge), was "soft intelligence". She obviously wasn't any Philby. Also, the current Bulgarian government is not necessarily a disinterested source. There's a certain amount of witch-hunting that's been going on in some of the former Soviet bloc countries, and it's possible (hard to judge) that the Bulgarians are not above doing this. Finally, in their internal reports the bureaucrats in the old Bulgarian intelligence agencies would have had a vested interest in exaggerating their success in recruiting "informants", and could have easily described an unknowing informant as if they'd "recruited" her. I'm not saying we know any of this one way or the other. But the situation is murky based on what's publicly known so far. So I think BLP applies.

4415:

the internal reports refer to her codename. The NYT article is very good in this, and while it hedges its bets, it does leave with the overall impression she was a spy. If you look at the weighting they give towards the experts/people they asked for comment. For me the telling point is that while involved in Tel Quel they broke with the French soviet-communist supporting party to move towards Mao. This timeline certainly matches up with the dossier on Sabina - she starts off as a willing agent and then becomes less co-operative. But really, while she may deny it, she has been declared a collaborator by the people who are authorised to make those statements. Can she actually officially dispute its finding in any real way?

419:

Each person who was quoted anonymously said they were afraid to attach their name to the story, citing the influence of the Ford family or problems they may face in revealing their own involvement in the drug trade. One person sought legal advice and was advised that there is no statute of limitations for drug trafficking offences in Canada. Another source who wanted to go on the record sought the approval of his immediate family, who convinced him not to consent to his name being published. One concern that came up with several sources was how the disclosure of their identity might affect their ability to travel to the United States.

7142:, a Democratic candidate for Congress in California's 49th District, has suffered repeated vandalism by Levin's political opponents. There have been repeated violations of Knowledge's policies on biographies of living persons and neutral point of view. Today, I just removed false information that claimed that Mike Levin had been involved with a company that dumped toxic coal ash in Alabama, that claimed that he had donated $ 1000000 to his campaign, and that he was an environmental lobbyist. None of these claims had proper citation. A few days ago, I had had the same issue with other false and uncited information about Mike Levin. 4547:, somewhere out there, for the vast majority of entries on the list, or that having them would broadly be a good thing - so they can obviously all eventually be added and then the tag can be removed), I still think it's an extremely important question to resolve - I have concerns that eg. linked pages could change from their current state and we could end up with inclusion on the list being uncited anywhere as a result, while in many cases (where the linked page is long and complicated and doesn't contain a clear-cut statement with a single obvious set of sources) it's unclear exactly what source we're relying on. My reading of 2409:

support pseudoscience while calling out pseudoscience. I.e. I think he just meant that Bill Nye does not have scientist credentials, not that he advocates and/or practices pseudoscience, and is only a BLP violation if Legacypac doesn't know the word pseudoscientist doesn't mean "a science communicator/educator who does not have scientist credentials." (I suspect that he does know that, and is guilty of a misleading rhetorical move rather than of a BLP violation). This discussion is already spread out over a number of venues and doesn't seem necessary to continue here IMO. —

2906:"When asked about his brother's use of an antisemitic slur, Ford defended him by stating: "You know something? My doctor — my Jewish doctor, my Jewish dentist, my Jewish lawyer — Hold on, my Jewish accountant" and "Our family has the utmost respect for the Jewish community". His comments resulted in boos and laughter from the audience. Ford's campaign got the attention of Last Week Tonight's John Oliver who closed an episode begging Torontonians to vote for Doug Ford for the world's amusement" 7804: 35: 3412:- this is already being constructively discussed on the article's talk page, as well as having been brought up at ANEW and ANI. It would be more useful to establishing consensus if editors would add their comments to the preexisting discussion rather than forumshopping it all over the damn place. I'm not accusing anyone of anything, more eyes are always a good thing, but it's quite unconstructive to have parallel discussions on these things happening on many different pages. 3556:'s claim that "he information object to has been in the article for years" is questionable. It's also worth noting that both Curly Turkey and Nocturnalnow had edited the page by the end of January, within a day of Ford's announcing his candidacy for party leadership, while Nixon Now didn't touch the article until more than a month later, so the latter's claiming to know what the article looked like "years" ago contrary to word of the other two seems extremely tendentious. 3523:(My comments above were about Ford's comments, although they could apply to other controversial aspects of him as well.) Indeed the discussion heading implies that there is a dispute about whether to report what the subject's brother said, making this a guilt by association issue. But the dispute is not about that but about what Doug Ford said. "My lawyer is a Jew" is such a clique that it provokes laughter. Even Archie Bunker had a Jewish lawyer. 7813: 3737:

hoax--if that's what he concluded. Instead he wrote, "In the past few years, she’s been forced to fend off vile and unfounded conspiracy theories on Reddit and 4chan that suggest a white man has masterminded her career," and he refers elsewhere to "the unfounded Reddit allegations." By all means, let's improve the biography, add even more good sources besides Forbes, Newsweek, LA Times, etc. already cited writing about Naomi Wu.

3286:

he wasn't going to address it directly, stating: "You know something? My doctor — my Jewish doctor, my Jewish dentist, my Jewish lawyer — hold on, my Jewish accountant." Amidst booing and laughter, he continued, "Our family has the utmost respect for the Jewish community". The following day, during a radio appearance, he commented, "I said in the public numerous times his comments were unacceptable and inexcusable." (

2014:- Do you recognise the sentence form she's using? Because multiple sources do. They quote her in her entirety. It's like me saying "To John, to Mary, to Bob, happy birthday". Then all you focus is "To Bob, happy birthday", which isn't false, but to argue that "to John, to Mary" isn't included is absurd because "To John, to Mary" doesn't make sense on their own. Plus how can you accuse me of cherry picking when the 3775:

maker/hacking projects. I can't understand why anyone would care if she has a boyfriend or if she and her boyfriend might or might not ever have worked together on any projects. I know lots of male writers who get lots of help (research, proofreading etc.) from wives. Yet nobody screams that the men are fakes who couldn't possibly have written their own books, that their wives "really" wrote them.

5018:

responded in 2012 or 2013 to allegations made by one woman, back in 2009. Your attempt to build this into action against Krauss by 3 universities where he worked, (and to equate the behavior he's been accused of with much more serious behavior by Cosby, Epstein, Weinstein, etc.) reflects shallow knowledge of the topic and an attitude unsuited to creating NPOV text that belongs in an encyclopedia.

355:

Many refused comment. Many referred to second-hand information about the Fords’ role in the illegal drug trade. Our reporters searched only for people with direct knowledge – those who had purchased hashish from Doug Ford, supplied him with hashish or witnessed him possessing large amounts of the drug. Eventually, the reporters located and interviewed 10 people who said they had such knowledge.

7858: 3875:. I'd also like to note in a 2-cent ORish observation (though - I'm sure there are sources to back this up) that many of these social media stars (particularly the high income ones) have a team behind them - it's not unusual that there are people who help (e.g. draft posts, help with producing videos/photos) the public media personality - and we don't call "hoax" on all such personas. 2068:- there is no contradiction, only an omission. If a source says "That guy said happy birthday to Bob", it does not rule out "That guy also said happy birthday to John and Mary". Likewise "The National Rifle Association has issued a threatening message to US journalists" does not rule out that the NRA also issued a threatening message to US politicians - as reported by other sources. 1234:(Holy edit conflict batman) Given not just edit warring to include a ("shocking" is appropriate) BLP violation, but also edit warring to prevent discussion of it, and a complete lack of communication to boot, 24 hours is probably generous, and someone in a more sour mood might have opted for indef pending some type of explanation, or...literally any form of communication whatsoever. 4506:, which individually names a large number of activists whose relevance as individuals to the article subject is tenuous to say the least. None of the sources for the second and third of the three paragraphs in this section even mention Mohammad bin Salman. The five individuals named in the second paragraph were sentenced in 2012, five years before he became Crown Prince; and the 2466:. Reporting about scientific claims fairly and accurately isn't just about presenting those claims but about presenting the overwhelming scientific consensus about those claims in no uncertain terms (it's not trying to disprove belief in god, for example, but the pseudoscientific claims/explanations). Regardless, I would encourage you to take this to the article talk page (or 4763:

way to their notability (historians concentrating on the 2nd World War for example) or they have received significant coverage - legal cases etc. Rather than just 'Oh a load of media says this person is a holocaust denier'. That should cut it down quite a bit and turn it less a list of name + citation into an actual encyclopedic section. No one could argue that a link to

1028:

articles see this all the time. In 95+% if the cases, we just remove it. If it gets contentious, take it to talk and notify the projects following the article. In the very few cases where the school is culpable, and therefore making the perv on topic, I agree the coverage is often UNDUE and RECENT problems. And unfortunately, the (usually) SPAs have field day with it.

82:

and street-level dealers, but to dealers one rung higher than those on the street. His tenure as a dealer, many of the sources say, lasted about seven years until 1986, the year he turned 22. "That was his heyday," said "Robert," one of the former drug dealers who agreed to an interview on the condition he not be identified by name.

1073:

considering sending their child to the school. The school was of course not directly responsible for the crime but in the absence of this information on the wikipedia article, any prospective parent may be completely unaware of it before enrolling their child at St Edwards, thus I would advocate for the edit remaining on the page.

299:

are left wing as opposed to Ford's conservativism, you are mistaken. Also, like all responsible newspapers, the Globe's editorial division and news division are separate. The article in question was also the subject of a complaint to the Ontario Press Council, which upheld the Globe and Mail's position and rejected the complaint.

4613:"Knowledge generally uses reliable secondary sources, which vet data from primary sources. If the information on another Knowledge page (which you want to cite as the source) has a primary or secondary source, you should be able to cite that primary or secondary source and eliminate the middleman (or "middle-page" in this case)." 3599: 4571:

this: if the Knowledge article calls the subject a Holocaust denier, and that statement is properly supported there by a citation or citations from reliable sources, there's no real need to copy the citation(s) over to the list of Notable Holocaust deniers, since it exists elsewhere on Knowledge.This is not a case of

257:: "In the case of public figures, there will be a multitude of reliable published sources, and BLPs should simply document what these sources say. If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it" 170:". It hardly seems inappropriate for Knowledge to repeat these much-covered allegations, not in Knowledge's voice but in a neutral tone of coverage of an event. As for the BLPCRIME protection for low-profile individuals accused of a crime: Doug Ford is as far from low-profile as I am from a ballerina. 7770:

convicted of arson, specifically, setting fire to a makeshift shanty, a charge that was deemed a misdemeanor and for which he served probation. (No indication that he actually ever served any time for this incident.) His record was expunged after serving the required probation, meaning that as far as

7634:

As to the first point, the Washington Post and several other major publications indicate that Abrams was in fact convicted of felony arson. As per the below Washington Post reference, the conspiracy charge he was convicted of was a misdemeanor, and the arson charge a felony. The sentence passed down

4542:

page ends with a list of prominent holocaust deniers. I'm involved in a dispute on that page over (as far as I can tell) whether including someone on that list requires a citation, or whether it's sufficient for citations to exist on those people's linked Knowledge pages. While this might seem like

4414:

The commission (unusually) released all their evidence as a result of this. Essentially its transcripts of her reports, the evidence she provided (in some cases mundane like a fellow bulgarian's stomache!) there are reports about when she (Kristeva) complained her parents couldnt visit her in France,

3826:

Dispute tags need evidence in order to survive. Your evidence for the first dispute tag (hoax) was rejected. You offered zero evidence here or elsewhere for tagging the article instead pov. You can't just throw up dispute tags without supporting them with evidence contrasting what's in the article to

3285:

During a mayoral debate held by the United Jewish Appeal Federation of Greater Toronto and the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, Doug Ford's opponent Ari Goldkind responded to a question about Jewish safety by mentioning Rob Ford's use of an antisemitic slur while intoxicated. Doug initially said

3256:

Look at the 2014 quote, I see no mention of it past the time he gave it. It might be part of the view that he is anti-Jewish overall, but focusing so much on that quote which seems to have had no long term effect on his life is undue, the type that we need to be more aware of discussing a BLP overall

2102:

her clarificaton) and not a statement. I've seen ads like this when new programs aimed to tackle controversial subjects come on all the time, its just the state of the media and timing made the press take it threateningly rather than what it actually is. Once you get that, then its simply a matter of

1485:

the first citation is an opinion piece, the second one doesn't mention the content it's being cited for and most of it isn't cited at all. I've reverted this several times and left warnings but it isn't having any effect and since I started the article I can't take stronger action. I would appreciate

1072:

As the aforementioned editor, I would like to offer my opinion on the matter. The constant deletion of the added information clearly constitutes whitewashing. As this was a teacher who had been employed by the school for over a decade I consider it to be highly pertinent information for anyone who is

801:

the most recent discussions (one is about eight years old and the other is about five years old). We should not be using Media Matters for America for much of anything, let alone BLPs. The same goes for NewsBusters/MRCTV.org. This is not my personal opinion—it is widespread practice across Knowledge,

386:

Mr. Chairman, it may be worth reiterating at this point that the focal point of our investigation was never the recreational use of drugs or some fleeting misjudgment of youth, as has been suggested by the participants, perhaps as a way of diverting critical public attention; this was about a serious

112:

It seems to me The Globe does indeed make the explicit charge--but that is beside the point, as I see it. This is indeed a slim reed on which to predicate that entire section. I would personally be comfortable with a brief reference to this ("...accusations of drug activity in the past...." or some

8688:

sources call her "alt-right", although as a Jew, she squabbles with anti-Semitic elements of the chaotic and factionalized alt-right movement. The full range of reliable sources make it clear that she is a far right wing provocateur who can fairly be classified as alt-right even if every source does

7462:

including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed, or is accused of having committed, a crime, unless a conviction has been secured. A living person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until convicted by a court of law. Accusations, investigations and arrests do not amount

7234:

I removed these defamatory edits, but Nkbreen put the poorly sourced and libelous information back. I once again removed a portion of the defamatory edit that related to the nonexistent categories. In doing so, I may have inadvertently violated the three-revert rule, as I removed the category links

7081:

are appropriate, given the fact that they all rely on primary sources. Sure, it's not controversial that an order was filed against Leifman, but the other stuff (about the videos) seems inappropriate to attribute to primary sources, especially some of the things he is alleged to have said in some of

4762:

While that may seem the obvious solution, historically we have had trouble with stand alone lists that are entirely negative and about living people. A better solution would be to reformat and set some clear criteria for the bottom section in line with BLP: Their holocaust denial is relevant in some

4391:

She denies it, and the extant sources don't seem convincing enough to justify including it for a BLP. Simply being listed as a "collaborator" isn't proof of anything (Communist regimes aren't immune from falsification/puffery of records), some evidence of providing information (or some other action

4372:

As I understand it from reading the relevant sources, the people who have declared that she did collaborate with the communist regime are the relevant government authority who are tasked with investigating and then make the decision correct? And this is the final/end stage of a long process, not the

3953:

A new SPA IP just added a long "Controversy" section about the Patreon/Vice kerfluffle, citing various non-RS. Its length and detail are disproportionate to the rest of the article. I will removed it to the Talk page and encourage others to collaborate to create a consensus report about this matter,

3668:

article. This user has many edits asserting sexual orientation categories for subjects of articles; in some cases they're unsourced or poorly sourced, in some cases they're identified as minor edits (is m appropriate for that?), and in some cases they're about living or recently deceased people.

3196:

Maybe let TFD speak for themselves. Considering the end of the sentence you quoted only the beginning of is, "as have some of his more controversial statements," it seems that maybe TFD is not just referring to the hashish issue. I could be wrong about what TFD meant, but it seems extremely arrogant

1003:

A single purpose editor has been repeatedly adding information to this article about a former teacher that has apparently been convicted of sexual crimes. The content is referenced, but it has been repeatedly removed by different editors. I think this may be a bit of a grey area where maybe adding

81:

There's nothing on the public record that The Globe has accessed that shows Doug Ford has ever been criminally charged for illegal drug possession or trafficking. But some of the sources said that, in the affluent pocket of Etobicoke where the Fords grew up, he was someone who sold not only to users

8460:

Disclaimer: I am not a seasoned wikipedia editor, simply a transgender bystander who noticed vandalism and is struggling to report it through the proper channels. I signed up for an account in an attempt to flag someone with more knowledge, but discovered that this process is a lot more complicated

7657:

Third and finally, the sexual harassment case is material and is cited in every single article about him following the launch of the case. The allegations were so serious that his brother's campaign for Connecticut General Assembly was derailed, when then Governor Daniel Malloy personally demanded

5017:

ASU, where Krauss has worked for more than a decade, reports it has had zero complaints about Krauss during that time. CWU, which he left in a contentious way, reported interactions with two undergrads that made them feel uncomfortable. Perimeter Institute, where he visited and gave a talk in 2009,

4969:

Krauss has been accused of sexual assault or harassment by numerous women. He has been suspended from his university position at ASU, and the two previous universities for which he worked sanctioned him for sexual harassment of undergrads. : His WP fanboys are claiming that because the allegations

4570:

the results of Aquillion's insistence that his interpretation of BLP is the only possible one: a list in which every name (that has been worked on) has multiple citations, all lifted from other articles. (Aquillion did the ones at the top of the list, I'm working from the bottom). My contention is

3841:

I am not trying to add any material to the article, because there are no secondary sources on this yet, but I would be very surprised if Wu's own doxxing behavior combined with the archive.is primary sources showing that she lives in the same apartment with the same furniture as a well-known older

3759:

article could not be completed because when the author (a woman, not a man) started asking about the allegations, Wu doxxed her on YouTube, which is why she lost her Patreon. I agree we need secondary sources, but Naomi complains that the Vice author was non-technical, so how do you suggest she was

3736:

is perhaps the strongest evidence yet against the Naomi-hating theory that she is a nothingburger who parrots her boyfriend. The writer spent days walking around Shenzhen talking with Wu, photographing her house, meeting her friends, etc. He has every motivation to write a big story showing Wu is a

3361:

Basically, the comment was in the news for a few days, and then I have not seen any other source bring it up again. In a encyclopedic biography, we're supposed to summarize a person's life, not document every time they are in the news, so a comment that received only short-term attention and had no

3217:

No, this is actually not what UNDUE says. This is part of what's been plaguing WP for the last few years. Just because the media dislikes a person does not mean our article on that person should become an attack article supported by the media's dislike to list every skeleton in their closet. That's

2447:

What we call "truth" consists of facts and opinions (aka: theories, hypotheses, conclusions, notions, etc...). Therefore, your "truth" --your reality-- may be quite different from the next guy's, and so on. Knowledge is not about proving or disproving theories and opinion, because that is promoting

2438:

I don't really see that as being a BLP vio, but rather someone stating their opinion, which I don't think crosses the line thus far. I will say that I agree with Legacypac's reasoning. The problem is we are trying to factually disprove someone's belief, which is impossible. Any good scientist would

2383:

Bill Nye is trained to the B Sc level in engineering but his whole career is playing a scientist on TV - the very definition of fake scientist. He plays a scientist every time he steps in front of a camera - it's his thing. This user is trying to use Nye's "TV scientist" opinion to label something

2357:

Not really, no. He is a well-known popular science communicator, and the context is Ken Ham's ark park - Ham considers Nye to be sufficiently credible that he chose to debate him on TV. So it's not our judgment that Nye's commentary is valid here, it is the owner of the thing that is the subject of

601:

does not apply to public figures, which Doug Ford certainly is. Secondly, an argument that The Globe and Mail isn't claiming that Doug Ford actually dealt drugs is pretty much debunked when they prominently write: "This investigative report reveals that: Doug Ford, Toronto Mayor Rob Ford’s brother,

298:

I'm also not sure what you mean by "The Globe and Mail is active in Toronto politics". Like virtually all newspapers, they do run editorial endorsements. In the Globe's case, they've endorsed the Conservative Party in the most recent federal and provincial elections so if you are alleging that they

8343:

Perhaps nobody was sufficiently interested at the time. I've tried to take the action you've suggested above but I'm a bit confused by it all to be honest. I anticipate that, as the subject, if I indicate the sources do not exist then the burden of proof would fall on anybody wishing to retain the

7781:

Whether or not Abrams' brother had to drop out of his political race over the sexual harassment charges is immaterial to this matter: we are discussing Russell Abrams here, not Marc Abrams. As such, unproven allegations against him have no place in his Knowledge biography, whether or not the press

3925:

The blogpost from Vice is a primary source, published by one party to a dispute. What we don't have yet is a balanced, researched account from some RS, giving both sides a chance to be heard. Then the article can link to that RS, assuming that WEIGHT is considered, and COATRACKing of Reddit is not

3856:

Agreed, you have contented yourself with adding diverse unpleasant claims about Naomi Wu to the Talk page, and then seeking extra eyeballs for those claims here. Dispute tags require evidence from WP:RS. If Naomi Wu did or did not share an apartment with some older maker in the past, how does that

3495:

There are a few people in the talk discussion who simply believe that a loaded question asked of the Subject about one time Subject's brother used an offensive slur is notable enough to be in the Blp as well as the Subject's seemingly sincere response which was categorized as being humorous. So, I

2721:

No it is a statement he is not a real scientist (he is not), clear from the context (and it takes a massive breach of AGF to see it in any other light). As to the rest, as far as I know advocating for creationism is not specifically against any Knowledge policy, and if I am wrong and such a policy

2302:

The user in question is more than a bit... resistant... to factual claims about such things as the age of the Earth or whether Bill Nye can be said to be a competent reviewer of the latest creationist tripe. I'll leave it to others to continue to engage with him if they think they can bring him to

1154:

I explained: "Having a separate section dedicated to what was evidently just a slip of the tongue is a shocking WP:BLP violation, especially as it implies that she proudly believes she is a true anti-semite. Guido Fawkes is a personal blog and is not a RS." The text was put back without comment by

1027:

Unfortunately, pervy people are a fact of life. It's unfortunate, but likely unavoidable. Unless the school covered it up, discussion of an employee's or a student's misdeeds has no place in an article about a school. What are they supposed to do to prevent this? Editors that regularly edit school

418:

Some of our sources were interviewed more than five times and the reporters went back to them repeatedly to run new names and anecdotes by them, in order to test the credibility of these sources. Some of our sources met with senior editors and, on three occasions, with legal counsel for The Globe.

75:

or does its re-inclusion require a specific and clear affirmative consensus on the BLP talk page? The accusations were made in an Atlantic article which carefully ascribes the accusation to "The Globe and Mail" and does not make the accusations in The Atlantic's voice but phrases it as a question

8707:

WP:LABEL says "Value-laden labels—such as calling an organization a cult, an individual a racist, terrorist, or freedom fighter, or a sexual practice a perversion—may express contentious opinion and are best avoided unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject, in which case use

7576:

The issue with the misdemeanor seems very clear. For the other issue, I understand that WP:BLPCRIME doesn't apply to the lawsuit over naked pictures because as I understand it is just a civil trial (not a criminal one), still, not every thing reported by news should be included in an encyclopedic

7537:

and so BLPCRIME doesnt apply, or he isnt a public figure in which case once you remove all the lawsuits you are left with a rather standard non-notable hedge fund manager. In comparison: A lot of our other 'business leaders' (including hedge fund managers) have significantly more to back up their

7145:

At this point, the page needs to be locked and protected because the page has suffered repeated vandalism, and repeated violations of Knowledge's policies on BLP and NPOV. Mike Levin is a politician in a competitive election and any false and misleading information can have serious repercussions.

4656:

is non-negotiable on this. Any contentious piece of information about a living person that is not sourced with an inline citation can be removed without discussion. It doesnt matter if it is sourced elsewhere in a different article. Other lists where living people are not involved it is generally

4054:

In the past few years, she's been forced to fend off vile and unfounded conspiracy theories on Reddit and 4chan that suggest a white man has masterminded her career. I've seen Wu's speech and technical skills dissected at length in online electronics forums. Some have accused Wu of faking English

1293:

almost makes me wonder whether the account has been compromised. Were it not for the behavioral continuity in blanking their own talk page and the topical continuity regarding antisemitism I would say as much would be obvious. Still very strange when you look at their edit history, it seems to be

753:

An editor was banned for disruption and is unlikely to appeal, and I'm the only one left reverting your content, if we exclude restoring what you removed preceding your pseudo-AFD. The article may also be unprotected because IP and unconfirmed users aren't adding anything. I'm not accusing you of

354:

This story was 18 months in the making, in large part because the reporters (on the advice of editors, and in some cases, legal counsel) were sent back multiple times to corroborate details and further authenticate information provided in previous interviews. More than 100 people were approached.

7661:

To address the point made regarding the sources of information regarding the case being limited to tabloids, that simply isn't true. Dozens of non-tabloid sources covered the case (including CNBC, NY Magazine, FinAlternatives, Dealbreaker, Business Insider etc.), and as a result I think that any

7488:

I believe that the information about lawsuits by and against Abrams also have no place in this article. The suits filed by him and his wife against his former employees is a personal matter, and has little bearing on the public person about whom we are writing this article. (Yes, newspapers will

4712:

I'd also add: is that list of people that assert they are HD's or are those that journalists/analysis believe are HD, or a combination of both? There needs to be some type of intro sentence to explain that inclusion criteria here, as if it is the people that are being called HDs by the media, we

4479:

I agree. As I recall the NY Times article, it said that none of the released material contained anything written by Kristeva -- only reports written by people who talked to her. Whether the NY Times article "does leave with the overall impression that she was a spy" is a matter of opinion. It

2955:

See the POV-pushing going on at the article? This is a BLP of a polarizing politician, so the shenanigans going on at the article shouldn't be surprising. If something isn't done, it won't be long before the lead reads "Douglas Robert Ford Jr. (born November 20, 1964) is a Canadian antisemitic

1185:

Sigh, I have removed it again. While an incredibly stupid slip of the tongue, even the source cited claims it was a slip. Not even close to being able to state someone is an anti-semite in wiki-voice. And frankly any time I see someone cite guido fawkes its always in an attempt to smear someone.

450:

After repeated, unsuccessful efforts over many months to convince sources to agree to the use of their names, we faced a dilemma: we could publish the story citing only anonymous sources, knowing the facts of the story are both true and in the public interest, or we could not publish at all. The

8479:

Update - we have now had a substantial back and forth on my talk page. The editor is using my lack of familiarity with wikipedia's policy documents, and my clumsiness in using the editor, as evidence that they can continue to make changes. (Right now the article is correct, but most likely only

3457:

See, if that were true, you would invite editors paying attention to this noticeboard, who presumably are knowledgeable in policy, to comment on that aspect of policy within the already occurring discussion. Asking for an entirely separate discussion here reads like you just want to reframe the

3002:

By "It's not a case of Knowledge editors scouring for negative information", TFD is referring specifically to the "hashish dealer" allegations and not the "antisemitism" that is the subject of this report, nor to the general POV-pushing that aims at putting Ford in as negative a light as can be

2736:

Legacypac called Nye a "psudoscientist". Not a faux-scientist, not "not a scientist", a pseudoscientist. That word has a specific meaning, and in the context of Nye, someone who has spent most of his career critiquing pseudoscience, it is clearly inappropriate, but int he context of creationist

2408:

It seems clear to me that Legacypac's use of the term "pseudoscientist" was a rhetorical maneuver to make it seem like his inaccurate use of the word in relation to Bill Nye was equivalent to an accurate use of the word in relation to creation science, and thus to say that it's absurd jps would

3669:

Identifiers of sexual orientation, even if correct, could be an invasion of privacy if poorly sourced -- Knowledge is not the place to "out" people who might not want to be outed. I don't know how to handle this, so I'm hoping an administrator or experienced editor will look into it. Thanks.

3140:

First you say "unanimous consensus against having a subsection devoted to hashish-dealing allegations" and now you admit the RFC is over a "section header" which is exactly my point. So no, I'm not lying, you misstated the facts, something you've conceded in your choice of words while claiming

1255:

I have dropped an explicit DS warning, both template and a more detailed explanation on their talkpage. As they dont appear to be aware of the DS relating to BLP's (no prior notification that I could find when dropping the template) if they continue after their block expires without starting a

1219:

I have just gone through their contributions - they appear to be fixated at the moment on the Jeremy Corbyn anti-semitism row (hence the Vaz edits). If they go straight back to it after 24 hours can you consider topic banning them under BLP discretionary sanctions. I am about to drop a notice.

4348:

supports this. That is why the section discussing the allegation is titled, "Alleged collaboration with the Communist Regime in Bulgaria" rather than, "Collaboration with the Communist Regime in Bulgaria". Unfortunately some editors at the Kristeva article want it to present the allegation as

4214:

source I can find that says she passed away. I know indiatimes is generally regarded as reliable but aside from this and WP mirrors and blogs, I can find no evidence that she has actually died and I'm wondering if they mis-attributed this. I would think someone as notable as her would receive

806:

sources like Fox News have covered the subject? The Daily Caller may be reliable in some cases, but if there are better sources available, we should use them. We should not seek out cherry picked quotes from the biography subject to push a political POV. Note that MRCTV had to walk back their

3141:

simultaneously that I'm lying. You mistakenly claim the RFC was about removing a subsection when it was actually about removing subheadings (big difference), correct your language when I point it out while insisting that I'm lying and that you made no mistake. That's quite an accomplishment.

2987:

received wide attention, as have some of his more controversial statements. It's not a case of Knowledge editors scouring for negative information. And note that there was no adverse information in the article about his predecessor as PC leader, until the recent allegations that led to his

2737:

rhetoric against someone who skewers creationists (and let's not forget that real evolutionary biologists almost all ignore creationists, for obvious reasons), it is an understandable bit of rhetorical exuberance. Hence no sanctions will come of it, as long as he doesn't make a habit of it.

3987:

Rather than the sanitized passive voice, ("Wu has been accused...", as if her accusers were multiple and unassailable), I prefer the description of this claim in the most-reliable source we have on it: "vile and unfounded conspiracy theories on Reddit and 4chan that suggest a white man has

7429:, I wish I had time right now to look more closely. I did see, afterward, that you had removed that sentence earlier as well. Please do ping me if the need arises for administrative action, or if you think I can be otherwise helpful. Thanks, and thanks also for your dedication to the BLP. 7312:, which may likely represent a law firm. I will not reproduce the contents of the talk page here; readers can review it there. Instead, I request that the remainder of the discussion be held here, where it might receive wider attention than just the two editors involved so far (myself and 4633:

Of course citations are needed on the page which includes a fact. That's the bare minimum. (As I said on the other discussion page, this section would be better as a prose, and even better - not existing at all, because who goes in and who doesn't is a subjective editorializing decision).

3774:

The writer clearly believes that Wu is authentic. She had much more opportunity of detecting falsehood than I do or you do. The writer's impression, (and the impression of other writers for RS who interviewed Wu in the past), was that Wu is a clever and creative person, deeply immersed in

482:

Accepting this, we set extraordinary standards for the extent, documentation and validation of each interview. In addition to these direct sources, the reporters worked for months to seek all available public information, including court documents, related to the cases cited in the story.

7932:

appears to have a clear undeclared COI and has been creating poorly sourced (often only using primary sources including (own webpage, CV, symposium webpage, university course information!) biographies of living academics in their field of linguistics. I have created a listing for

2166:

LadleeFaujan is an editor that is associated as per their own admission with the subject. They are repeatedly editing the article to suit their own agenda. All information being added is sourced and they are adding their own conversations with the subject. This is highly biased.

7559:

The point isn't that WP:BLPCRIME doesn't apply. The point is that Abrams was not actually ever convicted of a crime; only a misdemeanor for which he served probation and community service. The event has been expunged from his criminal record, and so really has no place here.

7470:

of Russell Abrams' Talk page, the college firebombing case was resolved in a dismissal after Abrams served probation. If that is the case, then the information about the incident needs to be removed, per the policy cited above, because a conviction had not been secured.

3010:

has been violated repeatedly by POV-pushing editors hunting for ways to highlight this incident, including giving it its own one-paragraph subsection to ensure it appears in the table of contents (!!!). This subsection header has been restored more than once against

606:. In any case, Knowledge is not saying that Doug Ford for sure dealt hashish, which would be problematic under BLP, but it's saying that The Globe and Mail reported that he had done so, which is fine, given the widespread media coverage after the G&M report. ---- 3630:, which contains a section named as above. It certainly contains some weasel words and needs work, but the references it cites are in Dutch and I can't check their validity as I don't speak that language. The section needs to be reviewed by a Dutch-speaking editor. 4696:

Agreed. Any person that's not directly and reliably sourced inline needs to be removed from the list. We've been exactly here recently with the list of LGBT politicians in the UK (not comparing holocaust denial with being LGBT, but both are contentious, of course).

1675:

sir most humbly and respectfully, i want to say the on bhumihar on wikipedia is weitten in correct please correct it as soon as possible. it is a abuse for bhumihar community. please take a proper action on this. hope you will understand. here is the link of NCBI .

4781:

I mean, I'm not saying you wouldn't have to tread lightly re: BLP. But the difference between a category and a list, is that in a list you actually can provide brief and direct explanatory content supported by reliable sources that supports inclusion in the list.

1162:

I said "Please don't revert carefully-explained edits without comment. If you would like to argue why the text is not a WP:BLP violation, or why Guido Fawkes is a RS, please do so explicitly on the talk page". The text was again re-inserted without comment by

3619: 3294:

This addresses the NPOV and contextualization complaints. Beyond that, this was a noteworthy comment (reinforcing stereotypes) at a noteworthy event (mayoral debate) that was covered in media by referencing the issue in headlines of stories about the debate.

7665:

I would argue that the prominence of the case on the national level (requiring gubernatorial intervention in a major political race), and their mainstream coverage by the likes of CNBC, New York Magazine, Law360, and others, warrant their inclusion on this

2617:. If there is a nerve, it is that this is something that people have to explain to new POV-pushers every day, and I would prefer to just substitute a wikiacronym for someone who is not a new user but is not presumably familiar with that particular policy. — 5060:. They also did not realize that someone used the account of these IPs to evade the block and the only thing it does is look at the page of the Japanese voice actors knowing the little less than inventing the data to confirm the ages, the same happens with 3064:

the addition of "pro-Ford" material, but hte removal of material that Nixon Now has been editwarring to keep included against consensus. For instance, there is now a unanimous consensus against having a subsection devoted to hashish-dealing allegations at

3218:

violating BLP, NOT#NEWS, and NPOV. This is not how encyclopedic articles are written, but too many editors (not just here) feel that if the media backs up their dislike of a person, they can justify including every negative element the media brings up. --

7643:, you characterize tothe firebombing as a 'misdemeanor' multiple times. Given the Washington Post source, I think it's fair to come to consensus that the firebombing was both a felony, and that Abrams was passed a sentence (of probation and time served). 731: 7489:

trade in salacious gossip, but I don't believe that is the place of an encyclopedia.) And the countersuits filed by his former employees appear to remain largely unresolved, and so should not be included unless any actual wrongdoing has been verified.

4373:

start of an investigation? Its not really an allegation then is it. Granted she may dispute it, but that's a self-serving claim. As a similar example: we wouldnt state someone found guilty by a relevant court was not a criminal because they denied it.

7532:

Its a bit backwards to on the one hand claim someone notable enough for a biography is not a public figure so WP:BLPCRIME applies, then claim the crimes have "little bearing on the public person". Either he is a public figure as a business leader per

3789:

How many of those male writers do you think would distribute the home address of their biographers to their fans with wishes that they would have to repeatedly move upon being asked about how others have characterized their wives helping them?

5050:

says that it is not true. And when that data is not confirmed, the other IPs (including me) we reverse everything but insists that these data they invent are real or I imagine it, well was thought that they would report it to the case in the

2943:

The opposite actually. The information the two of you object to has been in the article for years. It's only since he announced his candidacy for PC Party leadership that the two of you and several IPs have consistently tried to remove it.

5055:

to apply for protection but others bureaucrats and administrators of this site protected temporarily and then expired and look at the amount of history of editions they made on the page of the same Japanese voice actress who will find it

2131:

I hope this addresses their concerns. If we're going to take the position that she was addressing everyone she mentioned in her ad, which was a long list, then we should summarize and not place undue emphasis on some of them over others.

483:

Additionally, as many of the events documented in the story occurred before the advancement of the Internet, they spent months examining microfiched newspapers, yearbooks and old phone directories for further contacts and information."

1369:

Since there appears to be no reasonable attempt to request an unblock, I have upgraded the block to indefinite and disabled talk page access (on the grounds that if I didn't, it would just get blanked) and advised him to use UTRS.

8498:"Give precedence to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources". From what I can tell, you are right in terms of what pronouns to use. -- 4981:

All RS mentions of Krauss since the allegations were publicized in February 2018 mention the controversy. (For example, a WaPo eulogy to Stephen Hawking Krauss wrote in March was prefaced by a extended mention of the controversy:

4510:

mentioned in the third paragraph were critical of the Saudi authorities as a whole but did not mention him (he was again in fact not yet Crown Prince), and neither do the sources for that paragraph. There is already an article on

7613:

Consensus appears to be on the side of removing the information that I had previously removed and which you restored. If you have more to add favoring keeping the material, please do. Otherwise I'll go ahead and remove it again.

7405:

That's a start, and is one of the changes I wanted to start with, but as I looked into the sources, I came to believe that none of the coverage of Abrams' legal troubles merit inclusion in the article, for reasons I've stated on

3104:

The above comment is misleading. The RFC is not on removing or retaining the section but on whether or not there should be section headings. And yes, POV editing on censoring sourced and verified material is still POV editing.

1941:, the way the current article presents the quote is very much POV and not appropriate. That her "time running out" was taken as a threat and she cleared it wasn't, that's fine, but ignoring that it was an ad, that's bad form. -- 4242:

I agree, the death of very first ever winner of the world's oldest and one of the most famous beauty pageants would almost certainly be widely reported, much more than just trivial mentions in one or two reliable sources.

3842:

American maker would not be sufficient to support dispute tags. Otherwise Knowledge is essentially complicit in the alleged plagiarism scam defrauding our readers. ...or would be, if she hadn't destroyed her own Patreon.

4970:

against Krauss are unproven--because there is no videographic evidence of the assaults, I guess?--that they must be stricken from the article. There is no policy on which they base this claim. And many WP pages, such as

4657:

considered fine as long as the blue-linked article has a source supporting the material and it is not contentious. But the BLP has stricter standards for sourcing regarding living people and contentious claims. See also

3709:. Having some familiarity with a few tangential issues, I am convinced and tagged the article as a potential hoax. I would like to see some third parties review those links for additional eyeballs on this issue, please. 2698:

Well, it actually is, since pseudoscience is a thing that Nye is well known for exposing, so it is an allegation of hypocrisy, but it's not a serious one. What's much more serious (and not for this venue, but instead

656: 6516: 6312: 6244: 6108: 5972: 5904: 5836: 5700: 5564: 5496: 5428: 1834:

is targeting when she warns "time is running out" in a recent video. DrFleischman maintains that she is only referring to journalists. Here are the sources proving that she is referring to a larger group of people:

1691: 1958:

Thanks to Starship.paint for listing those sources. The trouble, however, is that that's a cherry-picking of the sources. Other reliable sources are say that Loesch was referring specifically to journalists, e.g.:

2448:

our own "truth" at the expense of allowing a full understanding of other possible (however improbable) theories. It is not necessary to refute another's belief system, but only to report it fairly and accurately.

8651:

I am arguing Laura Loomer is not alt-right, and it is potentially libelous to characterize her as such. I am also arguing The Forward cannot be used as a source in this instance because of its own contradiction.

7945:

warned the user back in February. They didn't respond but also haven't edited since February either. Still a lot of cleanup of their articles needed and might need a concerted effort, hence why I'm posting here.

692: 6448: 6380: 3857:

show that her multiple public tech demos are just a "plagiarism scam"? The leap of logic here is amazing. But seriously, it does not matter what you believe or what I believe. What matters is what WP:RS report.

3615: 163:, numerous others). The Globe's report appeared in May 2013, a year and a half prior to the next Toronto election. The Globe continues to assert their allegation as fact as recently as February 9 of this year ( 5632: 4732:

Yes, any contentious material about living persons has to come with a citation, even in a list. Yes, the list on the article is hideous with citations. The obvious solution at least to me seems to be creating

7778:, but that's not an issue to be debated here. The only issue here is whether these unproven charges merit inclusion in his Knowledge biography. Knowledge policy would argue that they do not merit inclusion. 6579: 6511: 6307: 6239: 6103: 5967: 5899: 5831: 5695: 5559: 5491: 5423: 4130: 3532: 3639: 1715: 7658:

he pull out of the race pending the conclusion of the suit. As per the law firm's site that represented the claims of the two secretaries who were allegedly sexually harassed, the case is still ongoing.

2484:

Touch a nerve, did I? Context matters, and this is an article about an amusement park. What next, should we try to prove in the Disneyland article that mice don't really talk? It's totally unnecessary.

6443: 6375: 3242:, this situation you identify as being somewhat common is a serious flaw, maybe even existential in terms of the integrity of the encyclopedia. What can be done, for example, in this specific article? 2916: 3362:

long-term affects on their career is the last thing one would include in such a summary. That some see Ford as anti-Jewish, that's a broader criticism to be included, but not this specific comment. --

5627: 3604:

The section "Alleged mismanagement at The Hague Institute for Global Justice" is based on information that cannot be verified/cannot be determined to be factual. This should be removed immediately.

2321:

Legacypac called Nye a "psudoscientist", which clearly is a BLP violation as it implies he is engaging in pseudoscience. Ironic given that the context is Ken Ham's creationist theme park boondoggle.

4337:

collaborated with the communist regime in Bulgaria and was an agent for the Committee for State Security, a claim strongly denied by Kristeva herself and by some scholars and academics, as noted in

3308: 5042:

Good evening Knowledge, I come to report to one of the anonymous IPs that has been incurring again and again with placing false birth data of Japanese voice actors where they added on the page of

2643:...as in "He's a pseudo-scientitist. He's not even a scientist, he just plays one on TV." That Nye doesn't hold any bona fide scholarly or academic position was already the topic of conversation. 3046:

That's a false and self-serving claim. Pending changes was implemented after I requested page protection due to long term pro-Ford edit warring by IPs etc since the beginning of Ford's campaign.

8164:

I’m afraid that none of the impressive BBC references exist. The only legitimate links are to my own website, an article in the local press, and a few reviewers of my two self-published books.

7480: 7458:"This section (WP:BLPCRIME) applies to individuals who are not public figures; that is, individuals not covered by WP:WELLKNOWN. For relatively unknown people, editors must seriously consider 8316: 8074:

An article on an individual involved in a high-profile legal matter. Edits by an IP have introduced a serious BLP violation, outing a low-profile individual and an alleged victim of assault:

4386: 3542:

Ford became as prominent as he apparently is, so I took a look at the page history to find the last truly stable version of the article that was not edited once for more than a month. It was

710:. Sources used include NewsBusters, The Daily Mail, and The Daily Caller, MRCTV.org, dailyheadlinesnow.com, and conservativefiringline.com. A few more experienced eyes would be appreciated.- 4409: 2418: 7547: 4929: 4904: 2432: 8283:

is a key policy. If we strike the BBC reference, then notability is borderline in my opinion, as I'm not sure about significant mention in multiple secondary sources. As such, I'd suggest

8679: 1270:

As you know, I'm not a big fan of blocks. 24 hours will give him time to reflect, and if he comes straight back with problematic behaviour after that, he'll have an Arbcom block waiting.

6995: 7594: 7527: 6602: 6534: 6330: 6262: 6126: 5990: 5922: 5854: 5718: 5582: 5514: 5446: 3037: 2997: 2396: 7377: 7022: 4954:. I have been working on maintaining NPOV with many other Wikipedians, but I don't want to get into an edit war with somebody here to right a great wrong. Can others weigh in? Thanks! 4470: 4344:

story. Given that the accusation remains disputed, I consider it important that the article describe it as an accusation rather than presenting it as uncontroversial fact, and I think

3997: 3935: 3866: 3851: 3836: 3799: 3784: 3769: 3746: 2882: 2684:

No this is not a BLP violation, and frankly should never have been raised here {and as has been pointed out is spread over a number of venues, so there maybe issues of forum shopping).

2216: 2153: 2088: 2056: 2038: 2000: 8702: 7227:

A user named Nkbreen (whose only edits are on the Mike Levin page, and who likely created an account for the sole purpose of defaming Mike Levin) added a section to the page entitled

7001:

You see, the IP again put the year of the actress's birth without references and I do not know who is the prolific sockmaster who uses the multiple IPs to vandalize here, for example

4798: 4776: 4524: 4450: 4424: 2693: 2659: 1265: 1195: 7110: 4320: 3509: 3356: 3164: 2968: 2934: 1058: 660: 7959: 7393: 6466: 6398: 4994: 3730:

The conspiracy theories at reddit, Imgur, 4chan and other non-RS sources would love to get more eyeballs on their rantings, but none of this stuff deserves to be publicized in BLPs.

3570: 3025:

a concrete example of Nixon Now simutaneously adding something negative while removing something positive from the article. Someone's complained about it on the talk page as well.

1280: 1229: 1214: 1037: 7998:(another of Dollinger's PhD advisers). I also suspect that the same user has also used IPs to edit some of these articles. Note also the odd edit by an IP to the Dollinger article 7571: 7125: 4670: 4626: 4600: 3490: 3469: 3444: 1871: 1792: 1380: 1364: 1339: 1325: 1310: 1250: 739: 8436: 8415: 8363: 8338: 8306: 8240: 8226: 5650: 5027: 4753: 4305: 4258: 3133: 3114: 3093: 3055: 2626: 2494: 2479: 2249: 1962: 1695: 1080: 3920: 3884: 3591: 3336: 3230: 3210: 2677: 2457: 8143: 8107: 7283: 3678: 2922:

Some editors have been bending over backwards to highlight every skeleton in Ford's closet since he was recently elected leader of the Progrssive Conservative Party of Ontario.

2876: 2387:

The real problem here is jps who is edit warring, abusing Rollbacker, removing my talk pahe comments and templating me than insulting my beliefs just above. This is harassment.

1953: 1932: 1344:

You might be able to field a half-decent argument either way, but such a radical shift toward descriptiveness after so long does make one wonder whether, at the very least, the

634: 616: 266: 8738: 8489: 7875: 5012: 4110: 3423: 1530:. The dispute has happened in the past on these pages and others (see list of diffs below), and I have tried telling the user about identifying reliable sources and the strict 8167:

Some of the revisions are defamatory and distressing. I don’t believe that I meet Knowledge’s test of notability, and on that basis I would request that the page is removed.

4767:

is not a relevant and suitable article for anyone who wants to read about holocaust denial (and what happens when as a holocaust denier you sue someone claiming you are not.)

3394: 3374: 3269: 3251: 2118: 1876:"... and politicians “who would rather watch America burn than lose one ounce of their power.” The list goes on ... Enter the hourglass. “Listen up! Your time is running out…" 321:

through multiple interviews with multiple, independent sources, all of them anonymous" and then proceeds to go into great detail about just how thorough the investigation was:

237: 215: 181: 8724: 8129: 8057: 8043: 8010: 4646: 4560: 4489: 2371: 2352: 2275: 2261: 1971: 1415:, he does not appear to have been convicted of anything, so at most, we should have a few sentences, not six paragraphs. There has been an attempt to address these issues at 1128: 590: 557: 308: 291: 8392:

page. Regarding being the article subject, as editors are anonymous, there's fairly often a degree of skepticism over such claims. Consequently, you may wish to contact the

7774:

If a fraud case, in which no charges nor civil suits against Abrams were ever successfully litigated, is the only reason Abrams is notable, then we probably have a case for

7438: 7421: 4701: 2750: 2731: 2716: 1772: 652: 8510: 7828: 4687: 3902: 1348:

if not the account. But that's so exceptionally easy to clear up with basically any communication at all, I'm not sure that any communication at all is too much to expect.

1108: 313:

Furthermore, the Globe and Mail does actually make the accusation as a matter of fact, as they made clear in their statement to the Ontario Press Council which can be read

164: 130: 6590: 6522: 6318: 6250: 6114: 5978: 5910: 5842: 5706: 5570: 5502: 5434: 4983: 1743: 1687: 1170:

I have no particular interest in this article, but just stumbled across this attack-section and believe it should be removed. Input from other editors would be welcome.

8584: 1294:

almost or entirely perfectly cordial discussion with an appropriate concern for policy. Then they show up today, blank their user page and just go off on a wild tangent.

4734: 4358: 1768: 5079:

The question is could identify the IPs belonging to someone who has had an account similar to the one banned from Knowledge? I leave some vandalism contributions here:

4725: 4675:

It's a list that has a contentious inclusion criteria (that one is considered a HD). Absolutely sourcing is needed on the list itself; blue-linked is not sufficient. --

4191: 2593: 2575: 2561: 2536: 2522: 2508: 1662: 144: 7224:, has been the subject of edits that were not in good faith and that violate the policies on biographies of living persons, neutral point of view, and Verifiability. 6652: 6454: 6386: 4366: 4077: 3969: 3611: 3576: 2722:

does exit this is not its noticeboard. And there has been far too much of raising issues about users conduct on inappropriate boards involving this case for my liking.

7335:), thank you for escalating this - a collaborative discussion on BLP is a good next step. If anyone has any questions, please contribute here or to the talk page on 4909:

The tag does not say that "controversial content is included"; it says that neutrality is disputed. Neutrality can be breached by omission, was well as by inclusion.

1021: 8660: 7235:

and the defamatory content separately. However, my action was protected because I was removing libelous and defamatory content from the biography of a living person.

6176: 5638: 5360: 5292: 5224: 4119:, and also provide relevant diffs to support your allegation that an administrator has been repeatedly adding poorly-sourced content to the biography in question? — 1780: 7700: 7683: 7352: 2668:

Pseudoscientist has an understood specific meaning and it is confusing to use it to describe someone who doesn't claim to be a scientist, but is a science educator.

2334: 2316: 2297: 986: 969:

I don't even know what to trust in these topics as CNN and Fox constantly attack each other and play propaganda piano music in the background more than report news.

955: 789: 7018: 6856: 6040: 5768: 5156: 4091: 3006:

For the record, the hashish allegations are the subject of an RfC in which the importance of providing balance in the Knowledge article has been stressed, because

7099:

I have removed the content describing the videos and/or Leifman in a biased way that was sourced to the videos themselves in light of the concerns I noted above.

3600:

The section "Alleged mismanagement at The Hague Institute for Global Justice" is based on information that cannot be verified. This should be removed immediately.

888: 718: 4963: 4179: 3121:

This here is a flat-out lie. The section was opened in response to having the section header that you had no consensus for removed, and you forcing out back in.

2846: 143:" and is well respected for its balanced journalism and broad coverage, though it is often considered moderately conservative, politically. It's that paper that 4889: 2129:

In a March 2018 NRA video, Loesch turned an hourglass and said to celebrities, politicians, and media figures, "Your time is running out. The clock starts now."

7093: 6720: 4125: 4083: 603: 8664: 8092: 7631:

I'll chime in on three separate controversies on his page: 1. the firebombing of an Apartheid protest, 2. the fraud suit, and 3. the sexual harassment cases.

3968:

There is now an RFC, on whether to include the sentence "Wu has been accused of being an online persona created by her boyfriend, an electrical engineer." at

1910: 1845: 8396:

team to verify your identity, as it would make sense to me that the subject of the article challenging sources like you are would be taken with more weight.

8198: 7987: 7654:. The fraud case's coverage in Business Insider, Forbes, and other notable business publications was a large contribution to establishing Abrams' notability. 7042: 6647: 4293: 4236: 2850: 8186: 7849: 7793: 7625: 7500: 7327: 7267: 4895:

The controversial content discussed on the talk page is not included in the current version of the article, so there is no need for the tag at this time. --

1179: 581:. In short the OPC made zero findings of "fact" at all in this matter. Clear? That is how the OPC "ruled." I suspect it is not what you wanted to hear. 8775: 6632: 6564: 6360: 6292: 6171: 6156: 6020: 5952: 5884: 5748: 5612: 5544: 5476: 5355: 5287: 5219: 5083: 2196: 1608: 1592: 1576: 1496: 1096: 1074: 1047: 314: 8473: 3981: 3963: 3820: 3724: 3458:

context of the discussion to see if you get an answer you like better. That's not a very good way to construct a stable article on a controversial topic.

2233: 2100: 1855: 1428: 6919: 6851: 6783: 6035: 5763: 5151: 2202: 2180: 1885:"to politicians and late night hosts – and the list didn't end there. Released on Oscars night, it's a new message that warns, "Your time is running out" 1728:

I don't think this person is notable enough to merit a wikipedia page. I would imagine that she either made it herself or had a friend/publicist do it.

538: 106: 21: 2210:

Legacypac's comments were silly and unhelpful, and s/he shouldn't make a habit of repeating them, but there's no formal BLP-related action needed here.

1539: 8020: 7983: 7159: 6496: 6428: 4497: 1721: 7771:

the state of Maryland is concerned, he does not have a criminal record. As such, his Knowledge biography should not continue to indicate that he does.

4207: 8194: 6715: 5680: 4543:

a silly dispute at first glance (at the moment it's just over an additional-citations-needed tag, and I think there's no disagreement that citations

4285: 4217: 1816: 738:

so please take a look at it. If we can use Media Matters for BLPs, we can use Newsbusters/MRCTV.org for BLPs. The Daily Caller is a reliable source,

6638: 6570: 6366: 6298: 6162: 6026: 5958: 5890: 5754: 5618: 5550: 5482: 4551:

is that citations are needed on the page making the claim and that, even in a list, relying on there being cites on another page is insufficient. --

8481: 8465: 8428: 8371: 8351: 8254: 8232: 8174: 7745: 7733: 7309: 7034: 6584: 3197:

and presumptuous of you to explain what someone else meant, especially when that explanation seems to directly contradict that person's own words.

1620: 6608: 6540: 6502: 6434: 6336: 6268: 6132: 5996: 5928: 5860: 5724: 5588: 5520: 5452: 3700:, apparently because the reporter asked about rumors that her husband may help with some or most of her work, I looked a little further and found 8641: 8161:

I am posting this message further to correspondence with the Knowledge Volunteer Response Team. I am the subject of the above-mentioned article.

8028: 7995: 5686: 5037: 1640: 1628: 7231:. This user also added links to nonexistent categories on "Foreclosure lawyers" and "Countrywide Mortgage People" to make Mike Levin look bad. 6472: 6404: 1852:

with the previous paragraph mentioning the media, Hollywood, and athletes. In fact, that's also what the NRATV tweet wrote. It's in the article.

967:

agreed. I didn't even look at the sources. Of course we should use mainstream sources instead of these misrepresenting and unreliable websites.

223: 7881: 5656: 4264: 2103:

saying that the media took that as an attack/treatening message against media; you can also mention that March of our Lives spoofed the video (

6596: 6528: 6460: 6392: 6324: 6256: 6120: 5984: 5916: 5848: 5712: 5644: 5576: 5508: 5440: 1967:

The National Rifle Association has released a video containing a threatening message to journalists, warning them "your time is running out".

1706:

article extensively, so it is unclear -- to me at least -- how you feel that the article infringes WP:BLP. You will need to explain further.

1564: 1560: 1985:"To those who bring bias and propaganda to CNN, The Washington Post and The New York Times… your time is running out. The clock starts now." 1754:

This is just a shameless self promotion with no sources whatsoever.should be shortened to just the verifiable things or deleted completely.

902: 8461:

than that. This is why my profile is sparse. I am looking for an experienced editor to follow up on this problem, as I'm out of my depth.

4606: 4572: 4357:

edit on the talk page. I would like to see consensus established for presenting the allegation as what it still is, a disputed allegation.

4076:, currently the picture of the living person has been changed to an outdated picture and would like it changed to the following picture [[ 1535: 8718: 3287: 2104: 1537: 6664: 2777:

This biography has a) undue weight given to non-encyclopedic material, and b) suboptimal sourcing. In particular the following sections:

7577:

biography of a living person. I think there is no reason to include it as it is just a personal matter with no enduring notability per

4984:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/03/15/the-time-i-took-stephen-hawking-to-a-cowboy-bar/?utm_term=.90d9a0600955

1880: 750:, but it wasn't in the article in the first place. We're left with dailyheadlinesnow.com, which is a blog and can easily be blacklisted. 94:

from making an explicit charge which the Knowledge BLP does not shrink from making. If the source does not make a criminal charge, then

8518: 6188: 5372: 5304: 5236: 5100: 4120: 3645: 2640: 1012:

violation, but removing it might be seen as whitewashing. Could some more experienced editors please have a look and provide advice?

6614: 6546: 6342: 6274: 6138: 6002: 5934: 5866: 5730: 5594: 5526: 5458: 4043: 3734: 3697: 7221: 6936: 6868: 6800: 6052: 5780: 5168: 4377:

doesnt apply, and these sorts of actions (collaboration with foreign/oppressive governments) dont usually see a normal court anyway.

3890: 3713: 6478: 6410: 2106:-that source also gives a good descriptor "The NRA video seemed to be a threat against anyone who wasn’t supportive of the NRA"). -- 1050:, whose contributions suggest they have no other interest on wikipedia than adding this content, and invited them to join us here. 8376:

no problem, a bot waltzed in and linked the discussion, it's always hard your first time (people who do it regularly generally use

8275:

is more likely to be satisfied. Offline sources are hard to verify, especially a 7 year old radio programme. As a general rule, we

5662: 4529: 3257:

and why we must be careful of NOT#NEWS. We shouldn't include singular incidents unless they become affecting of a person's life. --

3066: 1862:

and more. Note that this fragment would make absolutely no sense on its own, there must be some sort of conclusion to the fragment.

681:. This indicates the citations must be provided that support the content within a reasonable period of time or it will be removed. 3022: 1865: 1286: 7903: 7701:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1986/09/11/3-convicted-of-hopkins-shanty-arson/a8db7c55-c062-485c-b8cc-4587f568012b/

7078: 6732: 2613:

x3 Sigh. No. No nerve. Just basic policy. Basic policy that isn't directly related to this BLP-specific thread. Again, just read

2283: 149:

This investigative report reveals that: Doug Ford, Toronto Mayor Rob Ford’s brother, sold hashish for several years in the 1980s.

51: 17: 8081: 8075: 1618: 1616: 1614: 1612: 1610: 1606: 1604: 1602: 1600: 1598: 1596: 1594: 1590: 1588: 1586: 1584: 1582: 1580: 1578: 1543: 8272: 7834:

Given that the only person arguing for the retention of this material has been found to be a sock puppet (likely with a strong

5052: 4187: 3281:

I suggest rewriting the section to read (internal citations present in the existing text omitted, but would also be included):

1839: 1764: 8116:. Those edits added information in a matter-of-fact way about a serious allegation that came out in the news today. I agree 4461:

Until we have strong sourcing to support strong claims, I agree with FreeKnowledgeCreator. There are too many caveats here.

4017: 996: 8729:

How did you arrive at the conclusion that the NBC News source is neutral, but everything that disagrees with it is biased?

7979: 6987: 6682: 6658: 2228:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2074: 2024: 1976:

The National Rifle Association has issued a threatening message to US journalists, warning them “your time is running out”.

1896: 7782:

chooses to haunt him with such coverage. Until such charges are proven in a court, we should not continue to report them.

6206: 5390: 5322: 5254: 5118: 4055:

proficiency, despite her being open about the fact that she receives help and proofreading with her written communication.

3152:

This whole comment is gibberish. The consensus is against having any sort of header for the hashish-dealing allegations.

2766:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1991:

So we have a conflict among the sources. I frankly don't know how to handle this without giving the issue undue weight. --

1804: 222:

And if anyone's interested, there has been an RfC active on the article's talk page for some time on this very thing. See

8656: 8201:, has been inactive for 3 years. The citations being queried were introduced with the original version of the page - see 7975: 6954: 6886: 6818: 6182: 6070: 5798: 5366: 5298: 5230: 5186: 5094: 4925: 4885: 3973: 3912: 3843: 3812: 3791: 3761: 3716: 2384:

as pseudoscience. We don't use the opinions of TV lawyers or TV doctors to support labels on legal or medical articles.

1735: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1456: 1451: 1104: 7339:. We may very well want to lock the page following the resolution of this conversation given the continued vandalism by 4737:, and linking to it, since there's already sufficient content there for a stand alone list rather than an embedded one. 2423: 1626: 1624: 1622: 1501: 7051: 7046: 7014: 6930: 6862: 6794: 6750: 6046: 5774: 5162: 4831: 4826: 4444: 4403: 3661: 3549:

Doug has stated that Karla's maternal grandparents were Jewish and immigrated to Canada from Europe to flee persecution

3069:, yet Nixon Now still stands i nthe way of its removal, claiming that 30 days need to pass first. Remember, this is a 1460: 863:, stating he continues to “disappoint” and that he’s “trafficking in fantasies”. As a result, he called for boycott of 698: 612: 4507: 3704: 2127:

I'm still on the fence about this, but I'm sympathetic to Starship.paint's arguments. I adjusted the language to say:

1642: 1638: 1636: 1634: 1632: 1630: 1574: 1572: 1570: 1568: 1566: 1562: 1541: 7055: 4835: 4338: 4256: 3474:

I didn't open this discussion (Nocturnalnow said more than once he was going to bring it up here before he did), and

2842: 1749: 1658: 7510:, I also think that the "lawsuits" section adds no encyclopedic value to the BLP and should probably be removed per 4354: 168:

Among the things we already know about Mr. Ford: He was, as revealed by this newspaper, a drug dealer in the 1980s.

8612: 8607: 8542: 8537: 8231:

Unfortunately, I have never been interviewed by the BBC. I am not a public figure. Can the page be removed? Thanks

8120:

needs to be built on the talk page before that goes back in, but I imagine that it will in some form go back in. –

7897: 7722: 6726: 3464: 3418: 1980: 1443: 1378: 1323: 1278: 1212: 921: 232: 176: 2426:- "The zany scientist talks about his recent transformation into the public—and controversial—face for science" -- 8616: 8546: 8359: 8182: 7999: 7871: 7845: 7789: 7621: 7567: 7496: 7417: 7373: 7323: 7250: 7038: 7006: 5073: 4818: 4296:– surely the maximum extent of any citation should be an in-text attribution and not an excessively POV cartoon? 3575:

Wow, given their zeal, I didn't realize NN had been editing the article less than a month. His interest in Ford

575: 8457:

article, which has been subject to repeated (3x) vandalism today on the basis of Blaire's transgender identity.

7746:

https://www.cnbc.com/2014/10/13/marc-abrams-hedgie-turned-pol-suspends-campaign-over-sexual-harassment-suit.html

7734:

https://www.cnbc.com/2014/10/13/marc-abrams-hedgie-turned-pol-suspends-campaign-over-sexual-harassment-suit.html

7671:

I'm more than happy to discuss any of these points further or otherwise be helpful for a speedy resolution here.

6620: 6552: 6348: 6280: 6144: 6008: 5940: 5872: 5736: 5600: 5532: 5464: 4277: 2902: 190:. The "Globe and Mail" was, and is, active in Toronto politics, and one should note that the allegations are 7188: 7183: 5065: 4362: 4350: 3565: 8642:

https://forward.com/news/breaking-news/376148/jewish-alt-right-woman-takes-on-richard-spencer-amid-infighting/

7002: 6706: 6484: 6416: 3015: 1482:

A number of IPs and new users have recently been adding material to this BLP which is problematic - e.g. with

939:

Even if these were reliable sources for a BLP, the material would be largely unencyclopedic, it would violate

69: 8599: 8529: 7192: 7010: 6230: 5668: 5414: 5346: 5278: 5142: 3320:

worthy of inclusion out of the mountain of information available on this very public figure? Why cherrypick

1465: 8640:

There is a user called "Dr. Fleischman" who seems to believe that Laura Loomer is "alt-right," citing this (

7300:

regarding the inclusion of negative information about legal issues and lawsuits. I invite readers to review

7060: 6978: 6910: 6842: 6670: 6094: 5822: 5210: 4840: 4515:– surely that report and these accounts of individual activists belong in that article and not in this one? 1890:

I hope that's enough to convince DrFleischman and anyone else that she isn't only referring to journalists.

1842:

in the last paragraph quotes her referring to the media, Hollywood, athletes, politicians, late night hosts.

1144: 8765: 7711: 7590: 7523: 7476: 6700: 6194: 5378: 5310: 5242: 5106: 4900: 4587:, and no one on the list doesn't have an article. Requiring copying over the citations appears to me to be 4512: 4183: 1549: 1483: 1419:, but the editor who has been adding excessive detail has not yet responded. More eyes are needed on this. 8621: 8551: 7927: 6942: 6874: 6806: 6774: 6058: 5786: 5174: 1411:

needs to be trimmed, but of perhaps more urgent concern is the reporting of a 2004 solicitation bust. Per

802:

based on numerous comments from highly experience editors. Additionally, why use these sources when other

645:

Hawaiian politician Sharon Har reports that she attended Harvard University. This has not been verified.

511:

the more it became apparent that the drug trade had been a part of the lives of Doug Ford and his siblings

8276: 7679: 7448: 7348: 7301: 7175: 6224: 5408: 5340: 5272: 5136: 4136: 2159: 997: 135:

I think you must be referring to The Atlantic with "a newspaper with a specific political position"; The

7915: 7197: 7119:

Agreed - the content should not be included. I've watchlisted the page and will revert if its restored.

6738: 3538:

Not keeping up with Canadian politics as much as I perhaps should, I didn't know off the top of my head

2047:

I understand that, but how do we reconcile it with the multiple sources that appear to contradict it? --

1477: 8675: 7072: 6972: 6904: 6836: 6088: 5816: 5204: 4852: 4316: 3970:

Talk:Naomi Wu#BuzzFeed article as justification for adding reddit theories? Get consensus before adding

1556: 1553: 1033: 671: 625:'s assessment of this content as "rumour" about activities alleged to have occurred over 30 years ago. 42: 4503: 1920:, it is inappropriate to use what other sources claim she is targetting, at least in a wiki voice. -- 8633: 8563: 8389: 8264: 4087: 3528: 3018: 2993: 2589: 2557: 2532: 2504: 2312: 2282:

He doesn't claim to be a scientist, so it's hard to see how he could be a fake one. In related news:

2271: 2245: 2015: 1739: 1511: 1100: 8750: 7965:

As I said in my posts on Moochooroo's talk page and my talk page, I'm reasonably certain this user

7921: 7209: 6991: 6768: 4796: 4751: 3475: 2657: 2081: 2031: 1903: 1362: 1308: 1248: 906: 706:

There are 2-3 editors repeatedly adding poorly-sourced content to a biography of a living child at

8480:

because the editor is trying to avoid the 3 revert rule.) I really need experienced help, please!

1803:

An IP introduces over and over potentially defamatory information about a living musician. Please

8280: 8260: 7586: 7543: 7519: 7472: 5088: 5023: 4959: 4937: 4921: 4896: 4881: 4772: 4666: 4596: 4420: 4382: 4065: 3993: 3977: 3959: 3931: 3916: 3862: 3847: 3832: 3816: 3795: 3780: 3765: 3742: 3720: 2427: 2347: 2256: 1654: 1433: 1261: 1225: 1191: 1077: 767: 6676: 206:

clearly applies, and the extended story certainly makes a "contentious claim" to say the least.

8410: 8333: 8301: 8221: 8153: 8067: 8039: 7955: 7909: 7758: 7675: 7608: 7359: 7344: 7313: 7289: 7105: 7088: 7028: 6924: 6788: 6200: 5384: 5316: 5248: 5112: 4808: 4438: 4397: 4326: 4273: 4197: 4166: 4161: 3908: 3655: 3586: 3505: 3485: 3439: 3428:

The purpose of bringing something like this up here is to determine whether it conforms to BLP

3389: 3351: 3331: 3247: 3194:

TFD is referring specifically to the "hashish dealer" allegations and not the "antisemitism"...

3159: 3128: 3088: 3032: 2963: 2929: 2912: 2727: 2689: 2542:

Therefore, your "truth" --your reality-- may be quite different from the next guy's, and so on.

2149: 2052: 1996: 1702:

It looks as though one of Knowledge's experts on India's caste system has already examined the

1402: 1335: 1175: 630: 8380:

to get it right). I still feel lost with the speedy deletion templates on other projects like

7662:

claim of reliance on tabloids is suspect. I have included a selection of these sources below.

6948: 6880: 6812: 6064: 5792: 5180: 1812: 1473: 922:"Parkland Student Calls For Boycott Of MSNBC Advertisers After Former Contributor Attacks Him" 8734: 8671: 8355: 8178: 8139: 8088: 7263: 7246: 7068: 4848: 4661:- although that is mainly for stand alone lists, its principles generally apply to any list. 4312: 4249: 2868:. I have also redacted two sections above which were copy/paste of removed article content. 2770: 1029: 519:

is extremely carefully parsed, again not making any actual charge of crimes by Doug Ford Jr.

517:

Eventually, the reporters located and interviewed 10 people who said they had such knowledge.

277:, but reports it only as an "anonymous" rumour is not usable for Knowledge to make the claim 63: 8203: 7585:. Weather or not the subject is notable enough for inclusion should be a different issue. -- 6744: 3907:

I suppose so, but I'm not adding anything until I've slept on this whole thing. In any case

2175:

for sexual assault allegations that have only passing mentions. The subject appears to fail

8645: 8629: 8589: 8559: 8448: 8347: 8170: 8125: 8103: 7891: 7582: 7515: 7238: 7165: 4990: 4698: 4658: 4485: 4230: 4175: 4044:"Shenzhen's Homegrown Cyborg: Three days with Naomi Wu, the face of China's cyberpunk city" 3811:

I note without further comment that dispute tags have been removed from the article twice.

3674: 3607: 3543: 3524: 2989: 2895: 2857: 2585: 2553: 2528: 2500: 2308: 2267: 2241: 1760: 1731: 1683: 1646: 1447: 1376: 1321: 1276: 1210: 1092: 683: 648: 526:

is not stated as such by the newspaper which used very carefully parsed language, indeed.

8757:

A discussion on his citizenship is taking place, and additional input might be helpful. --

8670:

Nope, she's definitely alt-right, insofar as reliable sources characterise her that way.

5057: 2639:

I'm pretty sure this was a figurative use of the word pseudo-scientist if you look at the

2462:

This is getting way off track from the BLP issue. What you're saying is problematic given

1469: 8: 8695: 8485: 8469: 8432: 8236: 8117: 7534: 7407: 7205: 7064: 4844: 4822: 4622: 4556: 4266: 4141: 3635: 3146: 3110: 3051: 2949: 2619: 2472: 2411: 2392: 2160: 2069: 2019: 1891: 1821: 1416: 1134: 747: 553: 491: 304: 262: 250: 140: 7467: 6688: 3382:—so how do we enforce that when there are editors who refuse to allow it to be removed? 1526:). They are adding contestants' surnames with questionable sources, including blogs and 8625: 8572: 8555: 8247: 7649: 7554: 7539: 7279: 7258:

I have removed the "material" in question and started a discussion on the talk page. --

7155: 7133: 6212: 5396: 5328: 5260: 5124: 5047: 5019: 5008: 4955: 4912: 4872: 4768: 4662: 4592: 4520: 4416: 4378: 4374: 4301: 4289: 3989: 3955: 3927: 3858: 3828: 3776: 3738: 3562: 3302: 3204: 2874: 2861: 2837: 2816: 2796: 2673: 2608: 2403: 2341: 2172: 2139: 1412: 1257: 1221: 1187: 1055: 640: 598: 254: 72: 6960: 6892: 6824: 6076: 5804: 5192: 4072:

There is one administrator repeatedly adding poorly-sourced content to a biography of

2499:

The agenda of Disney is not to convince people that mice really talk. Try to keep up.

903:"Newsweek's Kurt Eichenwald Attacks Parkland Survivor Kyle Kashuv, Blames a 'Mistake'" 8603: 8533: 8422: 8397: 8381: 8377: 8320: 8288: 8268: 8208: 7578: 7511: 7201: 7100: 7083: 4783: 4738: 4640: 4434: 4393: 3898: 3880: 3665: 3651: 3580: 3501: 3479: 3433: 3383: 3345: 3325: 3243: 3153: 3122: 3082: 3026: 2957: 2923: 2908: 2723: 2685: 2644: 2571: 2518: 2490: 2467: 2453: 2424:

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-blurse-of-being-bill-nye-180967244/

2346:

Saying that a mechanical engineer is not a scientist is on topic, though, I think. --

2145: 2063: 2048: 2009: 1992: 1827: 1788: 1711: 1507: 1424: 1349: 1331: 1295: 1235: 1171: 1046:

I agree with John that the information is undue in the school's article. I've warned

1017: 940: 626: 607: 586: 534: 287: 211: 126: 102: 7228: 6756: 4567: 4203: 1808: 889:"Parkland's Kyle Kashuv Says CNN Canceled Interview After RT Calling Out Their Bias" 8751: 8730: 8648:) where it states, "Her efforts didn’t get her much love from the 'alt-right...' ” 8385: 8135: 8084: 8053: 8006: 7970: 7941:

but then realised a lot of similar articles by the author that need investigation.

7434: 7389: 7259: 5069: 4971: 4539: 4531: 4466: 4247: 4018:"A Male CEO Has Apologized After Saying That This Female Tech Designer Wasn't Real" 3683: 3627: 3316:

You stil fail to respond to what's been asked on the talk page already: what makes

3007: 2978: 2700: 2614: 2463: 1668: 1650: 1527: 1164: 1156: 925: 8506: 8259:

Regarding the overarching issue of defamatory revisions, you can request that an

8033: 7991: 7949: 7934: 7886: 7824: 7179: 7120: 4986: 4951: 4947: 4721: 4683: 4481: 4073: 4066: 4048: 3670: 3459: 3413: 3370: 3265: 3226: 2440: 2114: 1949: 1928: 1798: 1439: 1371: 1316: 1271: 1205: 1009: 944: 856: 387:

and sustained commercial activity, something most of us associate with criminals.

227: 203: 171: 118: 7723:

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2009/07/everyone_is_wrong_in_hedge_fun.html

4713:

don't want to be looking like WP is saying these people are HDs in Wikivoice. --

2894:

This content was recently added with no consensus and has been discussed on the

807:

unreliable reporting when they realized that Eichenwald is no longer with MSNBC.

50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

8690: 8393: 8024: 7938: 7865: 7839: 7783: 7638: 7615: 7561: 7507: 7490: 7426: 7411: 7367: 7336: 7332: 7317: 7297: 7290: 7242: 5061: 4943: 4814: 4618: 4588: 4552: 4430: 4334: 4327: 4149: 3631: 3553: 3142: 3106: 3047: 2983: 2945: 2388: 2176: 2135: 2099:

I think the first step is needed is to establish it is an ad for her new show (

1677: 1408: 844: 763: 549: 487: 300: 258: 198:

is more careful than that. Actual allegations of felonious acts are one thing,

136: 8317:

Knowledge:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive262#Simon R. Taylor

8315:

I also note that there has been previous discussion on this noticeboard - see

3344:, perhaps you could explain why simply rewording doesn't address the problem. 2981:

to subjects as mainstream sources. The allegations of drug trafficking in the

2255:

It's inaccurate, but I don't know if I'd go as far as to call it a BLP vio. --

1204:

I have blocked Joshuaselig for 24 hours for blatant and obvious edit-warring.

8580: 8284: 8267:

function on the affected versions. The notabilility guideline in question is

8121: 8113: 8099: 8068: 7835: 7775: 7452: 7363: 7340: 7305: 7275: 7151: 5043: 5004: 5000: 4653: 4548: 4516: 4345: 4297: 4116: 4105: 4099: 3557: 3297: 3199: 3070: 2898:

also now seemingly entrenched position by at least one editor to keep it in

2891: 2883: 2869: 2865: 2832: 2811: 2791: 2790:

rm copy paste from article. also had iffy claim about existence of a tape --

2771: 2745: 2739: 2711: 2705: 2669: 2581: 2549: 2366: 2360: 2329: 2323: 2292: 2286: 2212: 2191: 2185: 1531: 1345: 1140: 1123: 1117: 1051: 1005: 981: 951: 784: 714: 114: 7982:. The user is an SPA on English linguistics, including substantial edits to 2566:

I was talking about Knowledge's agenda (implying your own). Try to keep up.

113:

such), but as currently constituted, I'd say the section runs afoul of both

8721: 8595: 8525: 8495: 8454: 7803: 4863: 4764: 4636: 3894: 3876: 3872: 2567: 2514: 2486: 2449: 2443:

wrote at length about it. You can find it discussed in many books, such as

1784: 1707: 1489: 1420: 1013: 972: 794: 775: 622: 582: 545: 530: 283: 224:

Talk:Doug Ford Jr.#Request for comment: Globe and Mail investigative report

207: 186:"The Atlantic" poses the "charge" as a question - not as a claim of fact. " 156: 122: 98: 451:

latter option would have been journalistically and socially irresponsible.

188:

Is Toronto City Councillor Doug Ford, Rob's Brother, a Former Hash Dealer?

8760: 8049: 8016: 8002: 7942: 7430: 7400: 7385: 7384:

I don't know what that one sentence was doing in the lead, but I cut it.

4462: 1831: 1148: 840: 707: 700: 529:

Knowledge is not Rumourpedia, as this sort of edit tries to accomplish.

7712:

https://www.wigdorlaw.com/titan-capital-group-sexual-harassment-lawsuit/

1315:

Any objections if I up to indef, since it may be a compromised account?

8499: 7838:

in this matter), may we move forward to strike the offending material?

7820: 7217: 7171: 7139: 4975: 4714: 4676: 3497: 3379: 3363: 3341: 3258: 3239: 3219: 2584:. It is not to hand-hold people so that they don't have to face facts. 2107: 1942: 1921: 678: 195: 152: 4148:" (nickname) keeps being change to "mcgregor’s Daddy", a reference to 4097:

Drive-by question: the COI googles easily, has this user declared it?

1330:

I think that would be best. It's not as if this is a neophyte editor.

3893:- from the Vice staff would perhaps satisfy RS for the doxxing issue. 3060:

Note carefully that what Nixon Now calls "pro-Ford edit warring" was

579:

does not examine legal issues or make any evidentiary findings at all

8576: 5046:

which says in the Google search that she was born in 1979 while in

3689: 2237: 1755: 1703: 1669: 962: 948: 848: 726: 711: 160: 90:

In short, a newspaper with a specific political position carefully

3707: 1858:

quotes her entire list in italics as a run-on sentence, including

3003:

gotten away with (considering the number of eyes on the article).

860: 832: 8027:

after the PROD was removed by an anon user. I'll take a look at

3546:. The only use of "Jew-" ("semit-" didn't appear at all) was in 7308:

that have been active on the page, including one account named

4605:

Copying the sources doesn't seem like a big deal. According to

2470:) rather than here for the sake of concentrating discussion. — 562:

The Ontario Press Council (OPC) found that the G&M did not

3067:

Talk:Doug Ford Jr.#RFC: Hashish dealing subsection and heading

2856:

I have removed the above three sections from the article; per

2841:

The article is "protected". Please can someone take a look? --

1256:

discussion here or on the talkpage any admin can take action.

1115:

If you can list diffs where it's visible, I will revdel them.

96:

ought Knowledge then make the charge the source does not make?

7220:, a living person running for US House of representatives in 4281: 4115:

Dulanjana Silva: Can you review our policy on declaration of

864: 852: 7990:(the second edition of the DCHP was directed by Dollinger), 602:

sold hashish for several years in the 1980s." at the top of

151:" The Atlantic is just covering it (as did Huffington Post, 8714:

2. Non-biased NBC News calls her "conservative" commentator

4575:, since we wouldn't be relying on Knowledge saying it, but 1722: 947:

unless other and better sources could be brought to bear.-

8711:

1. In this case "alt-right" is only used by biased sources

8453:

I'm looking for an editor to monitor the situation of the

7274:

We currently have 2 sections on this page for Mike Levin.

7150:

We currently have 2 sections on this page for Mike Levin.

4311:

It doesn't seem useful to me so I have boldly removed it.

3701: 3324:, other than to paint him in as poor a light as possible? 8080:

Is it worth a rev-del? There are 25 revisions involved:

8001:

claiming that the article had been written by Dollinger.

3688:

After seeing several reports that the Patreon supporting

2513:

And our agenda is what? To convince people of the truth?

1781:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jim Garrison (theologian)

1548:

Diffs (from the four aforementioned articles, along with

836: 324:"2. Were adequate efforts made to verify the allegations? 8646:

https://forward.com/series/forward-50/2017/laura-loomer/

6694: 2527:

Try again, darling. What's the agenda of Ark Encounter?

6218: 5402: 5334: 5266: 5130: 5068:, as well as the controversial change of birth date of 3432:, which takes precedence over any talk-page consensus. 2956:

former hashish dealer, businessman and politician ..."

2018:

account also quotes her targeting more than the media?

1868:

quotes the whole list just like Bustle as one sentence.

8644:) source, and ignoring an article from the same site ( 8112:

I don't think rev del applies. It doesn't meet any of

7976:

User talk:Meters#External examiner on Stefan Dollinger

6966: 6898: 6830: 6082: 5810: 5198: 5072:

where also says that he was born in 1976 and not 1974

4617:

Seems to apply to this case or any similar situation.

3650:

Could an experienced editor look at the edits of user

3014:

The POV-pushing has gotten so bad that the article is

1860:"to the Joy Ann Reids, the "Morning Joes," the Mikas;" 7988:

A Dictionary of Canadianisms on Historical Principles

4215:

slightly more coverage at least reporting her death.

7980:

User talk:Moochooroo#Managing a conflict of interest

6762: 76:only - which was made in a heated election season. 8048:I'll comment on the AFDs. Thanks for opening them. 3755:As indicated in the last link I posted above, that 2548:from editing any factual content on Knowledge. See 2181:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Gurinder Singh Mann

5064:of course, where his first edition was last March 2240:? Not sure I know how to deal with that question. 1756:https://en.wikipedia.org/Jim_Garrison_(theologian) 677:notice has been added to the Education section at 8717:The label "alt-right" must be removed per policy. 7304:. I'm particularly concerned about the number of 3496:came here for guidance on the matter and I think 4978:, mention "unproven" sexual assault allegations. 4578:on the source which supports Knowledge saying it 4504:subsection in this article headed ‘Human rights’ 1937:Also, given that the ad itself says it is for a 4274:cartoon featuring Trump and the article subject 8571:Could use some outside input on this possible 4206:article states that she died in 2011 based on 4172:I recommend this page be temporarily locked. 2266:Okay. Fair enough. I'll restore an edit then. 754:POV; however, I would like you to notice that 7296:There has been an ongoing content dispute on 3664:)? I removed a clear BLP violation from the 1850:"She tells them, "Your time is running out."" 84:" seems to be a weak source for a claim of 4999:More than half the lead is an obvious undue 1678:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12959898 544:And how did the Ontario Press Council rule, 8344:article to demonstrate otherwise. Thanks. 4869:tag, despite ongoing dispute on talk page. 3077:until a consensus is reached to keep them, 2886:; anti semitic comment by Subject's brother 2827: 2806: 2786: 2703:) is Legacypac's advocacy for creationism. 740:per the most recent RSN discussion about it 8388:in this case, I'll do some digging on the 8193:I believe that the article in question is 6626: 6558: 6490: 6422: 6354: 6286: 6150: 6014: 5946: 5878: 5742: 5674: 5606: 5538: 5470: 4498:Mohammad bin Salman - human rights section 3891:A Note About 'Shenzhen's Homegrown Cyborg' 2977:Articles are supposed to provide the same 2307:with respect to this noticeboard, though. 2171:Can't speak to that, but the article is a 1723:https://en.wikipedia.org/Katie_Rose_Pipkin 758:source you have disputed is conservative. 572:rule that Doug Ford Jr. committed felonies 8279:on these citations, but at the same time 7646:Regarding the second point, I agree with 7410:(and will reiterate here, if requested). 513:is a heck of a weak claim for felonies. 7453:Knowledge: Biographies of living persons 7222:California's 49th congressional district 3692:has been suspended because she doxxed a 843:saying that CNN is “biased” and calling 5038:Date of incorrect births of celebrities 4584:links to the articles about the subject 4041: 4035: 919: 839:after retweeting a tweet by journalist 653:2605:E000:D7C1:2900:302D:96B4:AEC9:DAD4 282:. Period. We are not Rumourpedia yet. 202:are a full step lower in credibility. 18:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons 14: 7882:Herbert Schendl, Herbert Koziol et al. 6580:2602:30B:82FB:C4B9:89FF:9F39:18CB:1D34 6512:2602:30B:82FB:C4B9:609E:E4E6:2CB2:F55A 6308:2602:30B:82FB:CBD9:8D04:A81F:9E9F:8323 6240:2602:30B:82FB:C0B9:4503:1A71:83F6:FCBE 6104:2602:30B:82FB:B159:587B:8BFA:E8FC:7037 5968:2602:304:AE83:69A9:E5D8:D039:9BAB:FBDE 5900:2602:304:AE83:69A9:25B1:7D37:81DF:C063 5832:2602:304:AE83:69A9:6C04:734D:20C0:4D77 5696:2602:304:AE83:6359:958E:8DFC:83CC:94ED 5560:2602:304:AE83:6D09:190D:2D2A:48DB:A429 5492:2602:304:AE83:6D09:48EB:DDC7:B536:922B 5424:2602:30B:82FB:B149:7961:7135:743F:4950 3911:and I've seen an archival copy of it. 3698:fairly complementary profile about her 3626:The article referred to is presumably 1826:There is a dispute between myself and 1688:2405:205:A0C2:55A7:106A:8C37:3566:6FBF 835:that he had an interview cancelled by 139:is considered by many to be "Canada's 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7994:(one of Dollinger'sPhD advisers) and 7635:upon their conviction was probation. 4637:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 4607:WP:Knowledge is not a reliable source 4573:WP:Knowledge is not a reliable source 4126: 3760:qualified to ascertain authenticity? 2544:Statements such as this should be an 1874:notes that Loesch is stating a list: 886: 7810:I've blocked The.dankest.keith as a 7763:Again, taking points one at a time: 6444:2602:30B:82FB:C4B9:F01F:FB:6CD5:B3B8 6376:2602:30B:82FB:CBD9:2E:FC5E:5551:A3DD 4581:. The list is, after all, a list of 3612:2601:18A:8300:B0:4111:608D:48A3:91A7 3500:, above, has given us exactly that. 2224:The following discussion is closed. 29: 8285:nominating the article for deletion 7468:"probation before judgment" section 7449:"People accused by a crime" section 7302:Talk:Russell Abrams#Content dispute 5628:2602:304:AE83:66A9:9F7:47C:ED4C:F9C 4015: 3871:Such claims should be backed up by 273:which does not make the accusation 200:anonymous rumours of felonious acts 27: 8519:Zenith court case and Devita Saraf 7358:For the record, I would note that 3954:assuming RS can be found to cite. 3646:multiple articles edited by a user 1939:new show to be broadcast by NRA TV 797:The discussions you linked to are 28: 8786: 8134:Thank you for looking into this. 2203:"Fake scientist" a BLP violation? 920:Johnson, Benny (March 30, 2018). 564:violate the Press Council's rules 522:In short, the claim being sought 7856: 7811: 7802: 4508:UN Special Rapporteur’s findings 4016:Cho, Kassy (November 20, 2017). 2762:The discussion above is closed. 2445:Philosophy of Scientific Method. 1506:I'm currently in a dispute with 1004:this content could be seen as a 887:Houck, Curtis (March 21, 2018). 816:Here is the content in question: 33: 7739: 4392:by her) seems necessary to me. 524:to be made in Knowledge's voice 317:and says, among other things, " 7727: 7716: 7705: 7694: 7538:notability. Philanthropy etc. 4009: 3909:Wu has admitted to the doxxing 3073:, in which the standard is to 1407:The controversies section for 913: 895: 880: 71:comport with the exception to 13: 1: 8287:, and state your case there. 4333:It was recently alleged that 4042:Emerson, Sarah (2017-03-25). 3827:what is in reliable sources. 577:In fact the OPC specifically 8427:Thanks for all your help :) 8273:general notability guideline 5053:Requests for page protection 4513:Human rights in Saudi Arabia 2303:reason. This is, of course, 1550:Top Model (French TV series) 1514:and three related articles ( 831:Kashuv stated in a tweet on 7: 7540:Only in death does duty end 4946:is suddenly being added to 4769:Only in death does duty end 4663:Only in death does duty end 4417:Only in death does duty end 4379:Only in death does duty end 3988:masterminded her career." 1346:person might be compromised 1258:Only in death does duty end 1222:Only in death does duty end 1188:Only in death does duty end 319:The facts were established, 86:explicit felonious conduct. 10: 8791: 8776:07:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC) 8739:05:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC) 8725:05:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC) 8703:02:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 8680:08:03, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 8665:06:45, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 8585:15:16, 16 April 2018 (UTC) 8511:14:34, 16 April 2018 (UTC) 8490:14:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC) 8474:23:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC) 8437:18:35, 15 April 2018 (UTC) 8416:18:31, 15 April 2018 (UTC) 8364:18:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC) 8339:17:59, 15 April 2018 (UTC) 8307:17:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC) 8241:17:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC) 8227:17:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC) 8187:17:33, 15 April 2018 (UTC) 8144:00:38, 14 April 2018 (UTC) 8130:04:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 8108:04:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 8093:04:37, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 8058:15:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 8044:06:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 8011:03:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 7960:20:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 7876:12:27, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 7850:00:36, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 7829:21:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 7794:21:30, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 7684:21:13, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 7626:12:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 7595:12:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 7572:12:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 7548:12:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 7528:12:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 7501:11:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 7481:19:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC) 7439:14:20, 10 April 2018 (UTC) 7422:11:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC) 7394:02:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC) 7284:06:07, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 7160:06:07, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 7126:01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 7111:01:19, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 7094:01:16, 13 April 2018 (UTC) 7023:17:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 5028:13:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 5013:05:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 4995:05:38, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 4964:05:34, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 4930:21:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4905:16:45, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4890:14:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4799:14:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4777:14:45, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4754:14:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4726:14:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4702:14:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4688:14:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4671:03:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4647:02:54, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4627:03:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4601:02:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4561:01:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC) 4525:18:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC) 4502:There are issues with the 4490:11:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC) 4471:02:46, 10 April 2018 (UTC) 3577:goes back slightly longer, 3410:Respectfully request close 2546:automatic disqualification 2142:if you want my attention.) 1285:As it happens, going from 1038:19:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC) 1022:13:26, 30 March 2018 (UTC) 998:St Edward's School, Oxford 770:if you want my attention.) 719:23:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC) 617:20:31, 29 March 2018 (UTC) 591:17:55, 29 March 2018 (UTC) 558:14:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC) 539:14:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC) 309:18:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 292:18:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 267:17:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 238:17:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 216:18:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 182:17:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 131:16:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 107:16:17, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 8384:. I'm not sure about the 7378:22:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 7353:22:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 7328:11:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 7268:00:53, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 6996:06:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC) 4735:List of Holocaust deniers 4451:23:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 4433:to assess the situation. 4425:23:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 4410:23:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 4387:23:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 4367:23:21, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 4349:confirmed fact, thus see 4321:11:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 4306:10:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 4259:16:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 4237:15:58, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 4192:15:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 4131:08:27, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 4111:12:36, 6 April 2018 (UTC) 4092:10:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC) 3998:04:19, 7 April 2018 (UTC) 3982:03:31, 7 April 2018 (UTC) 3964:18:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3936:16:03, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3921:07:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3903:06:46, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3885:06:41, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3867:03:47, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3852:02:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3837:02:39, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3821:02:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3800:02:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3785:02:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3770:01:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3747:01:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3725:00:41, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3679:08:55, 6 April 2018 (UTC) 3640:12:35, 5 April 2018 (UTC) 3620:23:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3592:06:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC) 3571:04:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC) 3533:04:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC) 3510:04:22, 5 April 2018 (UTC) 3491:22:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3470:14:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3445:13:36, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3424:13:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3395:00:44, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3375:13:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 3357:07:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 3337:03:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 3309:00:24, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 3288:source for the last quote 3270:02:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 3252:02:18, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 3231:22:33, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 3211:00:15, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 3165:00:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 3134:12:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 3115:08:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 3094:07:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 3056:04:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 3038:21:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 2998:17:20, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 2969:12:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 2935:09:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 2917:03:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 2877:03:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC) 2851:20:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2751:10:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 2732:22:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2717:21:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2694:19:59, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2678:19:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2660:19:20, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2627:19:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2594:19:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2576:19:42, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2562:19:39, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2537:19:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2523:19:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2509:19:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2495:19:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2480:19:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2458:19:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2433:19:07, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2419:19:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2397:19:00, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2372:21:43, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2353:18:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2335:18:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2317:18:47, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2298:18:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2276:18:42, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2262:18:41, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2250:18:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2217:18:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 2197:17:47, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 2154:17:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 2119:05:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 2089:09:23, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 2057:15:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 2039:11:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 2001:05:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1954:03:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1933:03:15, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1911:02:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1817:11:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 1793:23:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1773:20:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1750:Jim_Garrison_(theologian) 1744:21:28, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1716:19:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1696:16:24, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1663:18:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1497:21:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1429:20:15, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1381:17:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1365:16:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1340:16:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1326:16:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1311:14:01, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1281:13:24, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1266:13:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1251:13:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1230:12:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1215:12:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1196:12:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1180:12:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1129:21:24, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 1109:12:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1081:12:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 1059:18:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 987:12:54, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 956:12:38, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 847:a “fake news hypocrite”. 790:09:51, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 736:for NewsBusters/MRCTV.org 693:05:15, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 661:05:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 635:04:11, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 4942:Much text that violates 4353:edit at the article and 3733:The recent Vice article 3478:cannot override policy. 2764:Please do not modify it. 2236:a BLP violation against 2234:Is the edit summary here 2226:Please do not modify it. 1512:Holland's Next Top Model 1502:Holland's Next Top Model 1145:this stand-alone section 8197:. The article creator, 7408:the article's talk page 7366:involved in this page. 7341:single purpose accounts 7306:single purpose accounts 4152:, another UFC fighter. 3075:remove challenged edits 2822:Psychiatric confinement 943:, and it would violate 746:usually unreliable per 8015:Thanks for your input 4288:it’s fair to say that 4276:was recently added to 4210:which seems to be the 4167:Special:Diff/835407403 4162:Special:Diff/835407277 2580:Knowledge's agenda is 1528:self-published sources 869: 8708:in-text attribution." 3696:reporter who wrote a 2138:this page, so please 828:Attacks and Criticism 825: 766:this page, so please 46:of past discussions. 8494:You are looking for 7836:conflict of interest 4859:Repeated removal of 4359:FreeKnowledgeCreator 4284:Whether or not it’s 4122:Nearly Headless Nick 4117:conflict of interest 2429:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 2349:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 2258:SarekOfVulcan (talk) 1972:The Evening Standard 1916:If it is not stated 1486:some outside input. 8689:not use that term. 8023:to AfD, as well as 7937:at AfD and prodded 7107:(there's a halo...) 7090:(there's a halo...) 5076:the IP was wrong. 4278:Mohammad bin Salman 4267:Mohammad bin Salman 4265:POV image added to 4142:Khabib Nurmagomedov 4137:Khabib Nurmagomedov 3926:the real goal here. 2901:Below content from 2161:Gurinder Singh Mann 1417:Talk:David D. Smith 1139:In accordance with 279:as a matter of fact 275:as a matter of fact 141:newspaper of record 8271:, but I think the 7587:Crystallizedcarbon 7520:Crystallizedcarbon 7473:Michael Powerhouse 7079:these recent edits 5048:Japanese Knowledge 4897:Crystallizedcarbon 4591:for its own sake. 4290:Tasnim News Agency 4282:www.tasnimnews.com 4208:this single source 3581:Curly "JFC" Turkey 3480:Curly "JFC" Turkey 3434:Curly "JFC" Turkey 3384:Curly "JFC" Turkey 3346:Curly "JFC" Turkey 3326:Curly "JFC" Turkey 3154:Curly "JFC" Turkey 3123:Curly "JFC" Turkey 3083:Curly "JFC" Turkey 3027:Curly "JFC" Turkey 3019:WP:Pending changes 2958:Curly "JFC" Turkey 2924:Curly "JFC" Turkey 2227: 1807:and hide. Thanks. 1048:User:Endlesseditor 192:entirely anonymous 147:made the charge: " 8772: 8768:Attract and Repel 8413: 8366: 8350:comment added by 8336: 8304: 8277:assume good faith 8251: 8224: 8189: 8173:comment added by 8098:Lemme check... – 7969:<redacted per 7759:The.dankest.keith 7676:The.dankest.keith 7609:The.dankest.keith 7466:According to the 7463:to a conviction." 7360:The.dankest.keith 7345:The.dankest.keith 7314:The.dankest.keith 7254: 7241:comment added by 7077:Not sure whether 4699:Black Kite (talk) 4431:secondary sources 4254: 4194: 4178:comment added by 4109: 3666:L. Timmel Duchamp 3622: 3610:comment added by 3568: 3476:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS 2749: 2715: 2612: 2407: 2370: 2345: 2333: 2296: 2225: 2195: 2143: 1775: 1763:comment added by 1746: 1734:comment added by 1698: 1686:comment added by 1665: 1649:comment added by 1559:; some are old): 1545:to little avail. 1127: 1111: 1095:comment added by 970: 909:. March 30, 2018. 859:attacked Kyle on 772: 742:. The Daily Mail 672:unsourced section 663: 651:comment added by 58: 57: 52:current main page 8782: 8773: 8770: 8764: 8752:Talk:Liam Neeson 8700: 8698:Let's discuss it 8672:Nomoskedasticity 8637: 8619: 8567: 8549: 8503: 8426: 8411: 8408: 8405: 8400: 8375: 8345: 8334: 8331: 8328: 8323: 8302: 8299: 8296: 8291: 8258: 8245: 8222: 8219: 8216: 8211: 8206: 8168: 8158:Dear Community, 8021:Stefan Dollinger 7992:Herbert Schendl 7984:Stefan Dollinger 7931: 7904:deleted contribs 7868: 7864: 7860: 7859: 7842: 7815: 7814: 7806: 7786: 7762: 7748: 7743: 7737: 7731: 7725: 7720: 7714: 7709: 7703: 7698: 7653: 7642: 7618: 7612: 7564: 7558: 7493: 7414: 7404: 7370: 7320: 7236: 7213: 7195: 7123: 7108: 7103: 7091: 7086: 7076: 7058: 6983: 6982: 6937:deleted contribs 6915: 6914: 6869:deleted contribs 6847: 6846: 6801:deleted contribs 6779: 6778: 6733:deleted contribs 6711: 6710: 6665:deleted contribs 6643: 6642: 6603:deleted contribs 6575: 6574: 6535:deleted contribs 6507: 6506: 6467:deleted contribs 6439: 6438: 6399:deleted contribs 6371: 6370: 6331:deleted contribs 6303: 6302: 6263:deleted contribs 6235: 6234: 6189:deleted contribs 6167: 6166: 6127:deleted contribs 6099: 6098: 6053:deleted contribs 6031: 6030: 5991:deleted contribs 5963: 5962: 5923:deleted contribs 5895: 5894: 5855:deleted contribs 5827: 5826: 5781:deleted contribs 5759: 5758: 5719:deleted contribs 5691: 5690: 5651:deleted contribs 5623: 5622: 5583:deleted contribs 5555: 5554: 5515:deleted contribs 5487: 5486: 5447:deleted contribs 5419: 5418: 5373:deleted contribs 5351: 5350: 5305:deleted contribs 5283: 5282: 5237:deleted contribs 5215: 5214: 5169:deleted contribs 5147: 5146: 5101:deleted contribs 5070:Noriaki Sugiyama 4972:Harvey Weinstein 4928: 4919: 4915: 4888: 4879: 4875: 4868: 4862: 4856: 4838: 4794: 4793: 4790: 4787: 4749: 4748: 4745: 4742: 4718: 4680: 4643: 4540:holocaust denial 4532:Holocaust denial 4447: 4441: 4406: 4400: 4313:Jonathan A Jones 4253: 4250: 4246: 4235: 4233: 4229: 4225: 4220: 4180:Guywithacoolname 4173: 4128: 4123: 4103: 4058: 4057: 4039: 4033: 4032: 4030: 4028: 4013: 3889:The following - 3712:Please see also 3628:Abiodun Williams 3605: 3585: 3561: 3484: 3438: 3388: 3367: 3350: 3330: 3318:this information 3307: 3305: 3300: 3262: 3223: 3209: 3207: 3202: 3158: 3127: 3087: 3031: 2962: 2928: 2872: 2835: 2830: 2829: 2814: 2810:per BLPCRIME -- 2809: 2808: 2794: 2789: 2788: 2743: 2709: 2655: 2654: 2651: 2648: 2624: 2622: 2606: 2477: 2475: 2430: 2416: 2414: 2401: 2364: 2350: 2339: 2327: 2290: 2259: 2189: 2133: 2111: 2086: 2084: 2067: 2036: 2034: 2013: 1946: 1925: 1908: 1906: 1758: 1729: 1681: 1644: 1552:and two related 1492: 1481: 1463: 1360: 1359: 1356: 1353: 1306: 1305: 1302: 1299: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1239: 1121: 1090: 1030:John from Idegon 984: 980: 978: 975: 968: 966: 930: 929: 926:The Daily Caller 917: 911: 910: 899: 893: 892: 884: 787: 783: 781: 778: 760: 730: 691: 689: 676: 670: 646: 37: 36: 30: 8790: 8789: 8785: 8784: 8783: 8781: 8780: 8779: 8766: 8758: 8755: 8696: 8610: 8594: 8592: 8540: 8524: 8521: 8501: 8451: 8420: 8406: 8401: 8398: 8390:offline sources 8369: 8329: 8324: 8321: 8297: 8292: 8289: 8265:revision delete 8252: 8217: 8212: 8209: 8202: 8195:Simon R. Taylor 8156: 8072: 7935:Herbert Schendl 7889: 7884: 7874: 7866: 7857: 7855: 7848: 7840: 7812: 7808:Checkuser note: 7792: 7784: 7756: 7753: 7752: 7751: 7744: 7740: 7732: 7728: 7721: 7717: 7710: 7706: 7699: 7695: 7647: 7636: 7624: 7616: 7606: 7570: 7562: 7552: 7499: 7491: 7420: 7412: 7398: 7376: 7368: 7326: 7318: 7294: 7216:The article on 7186: 7170: 7168: 7136: 7121: 7106: 7101: 7089: 7084: 7049: 7033: 7031: 6922: 6918: 6854: 6850: 6786: 6782: 6718: 6714: 6650: 6646: 6582: 6578: 6514: 6510: 6446: 6442: 6378: 6374: 6310: 6306: 6242: 6238: 6174: 6170: 6106: 6102: 6038: 6034: 5970: 5966: 5902: 5898: 5834: 5830: 5766: 5762: 5698: 5694: 5630: 5626: 5562: 5558: 5494: 5490: 5426: 5422: 5358: 5354: 5290: 5286: 5222: 5218: 5154: 5150: 5086: 5082: 5040: 4952:User:Steeletrap 4948:Lawrence Krauss 4940: 4938:Lawrence Krauss 4917: 4911: 4910: 4877: 4871: 4870: 4866: 4860: 4829: 4813: 4811: 4791: 4788: 4785: 4784: 4746: 4743: 4740: 4739: 4716: 4678: 4645: 4641: 4568:on the list now 4536: 4500: 4445: 4439: 4404: 4398: 4331: 4270: 4251: 4244: 4231: 4227: 4221: 4218: 4216: 4200: 4139: 4121: 4084:Dulanjana.silva 4074:Dhammika Perera 4070: 4067:Dhammika Perera 4063: 4062: 4061: 4040: 4036: 4026: 4024: 4014: 4010: 3686: 3648: 3602: 3583: 3482: 3467: 3436: 3421: 3386: 3365: 3348: 3328: 3303: 3298: 3296: 3260: 3221: 3205: 3200: 3198: 3156: 3125: 3085: 3079:not the reverse 3029: 2960: 2926: 2888: 2870: 2833: 2826: 2812: 2805: 2792: 2785: 2775: 2768: 2767: 2652: 2649: 2646: 2645: 2620: 2618: 2473: 2471: 2441:Richard Feynman 2428: 2412: 2410: 2348: 2257: 2230: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2205: 2164: 2109: 2082: 2080: 2061: 2032: 2030: 2007: 1963:The Independent 1944: 1923: 1904: 1902: 1830:on who exactly 1824: 1801: 1785:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1765:178.201.130.146 1752: 1726: 1673: 1504: 1490: 1454: 1440:Christina Hagan 1438: 1436: 1434:Christina Hagan 1405: 1357: 1354: 1351: 1350: 1303: 1300: 1297: 1296: 1243: 1240: 1237: 1236: 1137: 1001: 982: 976: 973: 971: 960: 934: 933: 918: 914: 901: 900: 896: 885: 881: 857:Kurt Eichenwald 785: 779: 776: 774: 732:This is an RFC 724: 704: 699:Eyes needed at 684: 682: 674: 668: 643: 615: 235: 179: 66: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 8788: 8754: 8749: 8748: 8747: 8746: 8745: 8744: 8743: 8742: 8741: 8715: 8712: 8709: 8591: 8588: 8573:WP:BLPCRIMEish 8569: 8568: 8520: 8517: 8516: 8515: 8514: 8513: 8450: 8447: 8446: 8445: 8444: 8443: 8442: 8441: 8440: 8439: 8313: 8312: 8311: 8310: 8309: 8199:Authorprofiler 8155: 8154:Simon R Taylor 8152: 8151: 8150: 8149: 8148: 8147: 8146: 8071: 8066: 8065: 8064: 8063: 8062: 8061: 8060: 8025:Herbert Koziol 7939:Herbert Koziol 7883: 7880: 7879: 7878: 7870: 7844: 7832: 7831: 7799: 7798: 7797: 7796: 7788: 7779: 7772: 7750: 7749: 7738: 7726: 7715: 7704: 7692: 7691: 7687: 7673: 7672: 7669: 7668: 7667: 7663: 7659: 7655: 7644: 7620: 7604: 7603: 7602: 7601: 7600: 7599: 7598: 7597: 7566: 7495: 7486: 7485: 7484: 7483: 7464: 7445: 7444: 7443: 7442: 7441: 7416: 7381: 7380: 7372: 7362:is one of the 7337:Russell Abrams 7322: 7298:Russell Abrams 7293: 7291:Russell Abrams 7288: 7287: 7286: 7271: 7270: 7167: 7164: 7163: 7162: 7135: 7132: 7131: 7130: 7129: 7128: 7114: 7113: 7035:Steven Leifman 7030: 7029:Steven Leifman 7027: 7026: 7025: 6988:148.101.59.231 6648:110.139.90.101 5062:Nathan Pacheco 5039: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5033: 5032: 5031: 5030: 4979: 4939: 4936: 4935: 4934: 4933: 4932: 4815:Lawrence Liang 4810: 4809:Lawrence Liang 4807: 4806: 4805: 4804: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4757: 4756: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4704: 4691: 4690: 4673: 4650: 4649: 4635: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4615: 4610: 4535: 4528: 4499: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4474: 4473: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4429:I'll wait for 4389: 4342:New York Times 4335:Julia Kristeva 4330: 4328:Julia Kristeva 4325: 4324: 4323: 4269: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4204:Kiki Håkansson 4199: 4198:Kiki Håkansson 4196: 4170: 4169: 4164: 4150:Conor McGregor 4138: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4113: 4069: 4064: 4060: 4059: 4034: 4007: 4006: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3750: 3749: 3731: 3685: 3682: 3647: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3601: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3463: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3417: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3292: 3291: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3012: 3004: 2988:resignation. 2984:Globe and Mail 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2938: 2937: 2887: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2820: 2801:Legal troubles 2774: 2769: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2663: 2662: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2621:Rhododendrites 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2539: 2474:Rhododendrites 2413:Rhododendrites 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2337: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2231: 2222: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2204: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2163: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2146:Dr. Fleischman 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2049:Dr. Fleischman 2042: 2041: 2016:official NRATV 1993:Dr. Fleischman 1989: 1988: 1987: 1978: 1969: 1956: 1935: 1888: 1887: 1878: 1869: 1863: 1853: 1843: 1823: 1820: 1800: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1751: 1748: 1725: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1672: 1667: 1503: 1500: 1435: 1432: 1409:David D. Smith 1404: 1403:David D. Smith 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1342: 1232: 1199: 1198: 1136: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1041: 1040: 1000: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 932: 931: 912: 894: 878: 877: 873: 872: 871: 870: 845:Brooke Baldwin 830: 820: 819: 818: 817: 811: 810: 809: 808: 751: 703: 697: 696: 695: 642: 639: 638: 637: 619: 611: 597:First of all, 595: 594: 593: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 495: 485: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 322: 243: 242: 241: 240: 231: 220: 219: 218: 175: 137:Globe and Mail 65: 62: 60: 56: 55: 38: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 8787: 8778: 8777: 8771: 8769: 8762: 8753: 8740: 8736: 8732: 8728: 8727: 8726: 8723: 8719: 8716: 8713: 8710: 8706: 8705: 8704: 8701: 8699: 8694: 8693: 8687: 8683: 8682: 8681: 8677: 8673: 8669: 8668: 8667: 8666: 8662: 8658: 8657:72.42.159.123 8653: 8649: 8647: 8643: 8638: 8635: 8631: 8627: 8623: 8618: 8614: 8609: 8605: 8601: 8597: 8587: 8586: 8582: 8578: 8574: 8565: 8561: 8557: 8553: 8548: 8544: 8539: 8535: 8531: 8527: 8523: 8522: 8512: 8508: 8504: 8497: 8493: 8492: 8491: 8487: 8483: 8478: 8477: 8476: 8475: 8471: 8467: 8462: 8458: 8456: 8438: 8434: 8430: 8424: 8419: 8418: 8417: 8414: 8409: 8404: 8395: 8391: 8387: 8383: 8379: 8373: 8368: 8367: 8365: 8361: 8357: 8353: 8349: 8342: 8341: 8340: 8337: 8332: 8327: 8318: 8314: 8308: 8305: 8300: 8295: 8286: 8282: 8281:verifiability 8278: 8274: 8270: 8266: 8262: 8261:administrator 8256: 8249: 8248:edit conflict 8244: 8243: 8242: 8238: 8234: 8230: 8229: 8228: 8225: 8220: 8215: 8205: 8204:this revision 8200: 8196: 8192: 8191: 8190: 8188: 8184: 8180: 8176: 8172: 8165: 8162: 8159: 8145: 8141: 8137: 8133: 8132: 8131: 8127: 8123: 8119: 8115: 8111: 8110: 8109: 8105: 8101: 8097: 8096: 8095: 8094: 8090: 8086: 8082: 8078: 8076: 8070: 8069:Eric Greitens 8059: 8055: 8051: 8047: 8046: 8045: 8041: 8037: 8036: 8035: 8030: 8029:Nikolaus Ritt 8026: 8022: 8018: 8014: 8013: 8012: 8008: 8004: 8000: 7997: 7996:Nikolaus Ritt 7993: 7989: 7985: 7981: 7977: 7972: 7968: 7964: 7963: 7962: 7961: 7957: 7953: 7952: 7951: 7944: 7940: 7936: 7929: 7926: 7923: 7920: 7917: 7914: 7911: 7908: 7905: 7902: 7899: 7896: 7893: 7888: 7877: 7873: 7869: 7863: 7854: 7853: 7852: 7851: 7847: 7843: 7837: 7830: 7826: 7822: 7818: 7809: 7805: 7801: 7800: 7795: 7791: 7787: 7780: 7777: 7773: 7769: 7765: 7764: 7760: 7755: 7754: 7747: 7742: 7735: 7730: 7724: 7719: 7713: 7708: 7702: 7697: 7693: 7690: 7686: 7685: 7681: 7677: 7670: 7664: 7660: 7656: 7651: 7650:Only in death 7645: 7640: 7633: 7632: 7630: 7629: 7628: 7627: 7623: 7619: 7610: 7596: 7592: 7588: 7584: 7583:WP:NOTSCANDAL 7580: 7575: 7574: 7573: 7569: 7565: 7556: 7555:Only in death 7551: 7550: 7549: 7545: 7541: 7536: 7531: 7530: 7529: 7525: 7521: 7517: 7516:WP:NOTSCANDAL 7513: 7509: 7506:I agree with 7505: 7504: 7503: 7502: 7498: 7494: 7482: 7478: 7474: 7469: 7465: 7461: 7457: 7456: 7454: 7450: 7446: 7440: 7436: 7432: 7428: 7425: 7424: 7423: 7419: 7415: 7409: 7402: 7397: 7396: 7395: 7391: 7387: 7383: 7382: 7379: 7375: 7371: 7365: 7361: 7357: 7356: 7355: 7354: 7350: 7346: 7342: 7338: 7334: 7330: 7329: 7325: 7321: 7315: 7311: 7307: 7303: 7299: 7292: 7285: 7281: 7277: 7273: 7272: 7269: 7265: 7261: 7257: 7256: 7255: 7252: 7248: 7244: 7240: 7232: 7230: 7225: 7223: 7219: 7214: 7211: 7207: 7203: 7199: 7194: 7190: 7185: 7181: 7177: 7173: 7161: 7157: 7153: 7149: 7148: 7147: 7143: 7141: 7127: 7124: 7118: 7117: 7116: 7115: 7112: 7109: 7104: 7102:Every morning 7098: 7097: 7096: 7095: 7092: 7087: 7085:Every morning 7080: 7074: 7070: 7066: 7062: 7057: 7053: 7048: 7044: 7040: 7036: 7024: 7020: 7016: 7012: 7008: 7004: 7000: 6999: 6998: 6997: 6993: 6989: 6984: 6980: 6977: 6974: 6971: 6968: 6965: 6962: 6959: 6956: 6953: 6950: 6947: 6944: 6941: 6938: 6935: 6932: 6929: 6926: 6921: 6916: 6912: 6909: 6906: 6903: 6900: 6897: 6894: 6891: 6888: 6885: 6882: 6879: 6876: 6873: 6870: 6867: 6864: 6861: 6858: 6853: 6848: 6844: 6841: 6838: 6835: 6832: 6829: 6826: 6823: 6820: 6817: 6814: 6811: 6808: 6805: 6802: 6799: 6796: 6793: 6790: 6785: 6780: 6776: 6773: 6770: 6767: 6764: 6761: 6758: 6755: 6752: 6749: 6746: 6743: 6740: 6737: 6734: 6731: 6728: 6725: 6722: 6717: 6712: 6708: 6705: 6702: 6699: 6696: 6693: 6690: 6687: 6684: 6681: 6678: 6675: 6672: 6669: 6666: 6663: 6660: 6657: 6654: 6649: 6644: 6640: 6637: 6634: 6631: 6628: 6625: 6622: 6619: 6616: 6613: 6610: 6607: 6604: 6601: 6598: 6595: 6592: 6589: 6586: 6581: 6576: 6572: 6569: 6566: 6563: 6560: 6557: 6554: 6551: 6548: 6545: 6542: 6539: 6536: 6533: 6530: 6527: 6524: 6521: 6518: 6513: 6508: 6504: 6501: 6498: 6495: 6492: 6489: 6486: 6483: 6480: 6477: 6474: 6471: 6468: 6465: 6462: 6459: 6456: 6453: 6450: 6445: 6440: 6436: 6433: 6430: 6427: 6424: 6421: 6418: 6415: 6412: 6409: 6406: 6403: 6400: 6397: 6394: 6391: 6388: 6385: 6382: 6377: 6372: 6368: 6365: 6362: 6359: 6356: 6353: 6350: 6347: 6344: 6341: 6338: 6335: 6332: 6329: 6326: 6323: 6320: 6317: 6314: 6309: 6304: 6300: 6297: 6294: 6291: 6288: 6285: 6282: 6279: 6276: 6273: 6270: 6267: 6264: 6261: 6258: 6255: 6252: 6249: 6246: 6241: 6236: 6232: 6229: 6226: 6223: 6220: 6217: 6214: 6211: 6208: 6205: 6202: 6199: 6196: 6193: 6190: 6187: 6184: 6181: 6178: 6173: 6172:184.47.187.21 6168: 6164: 6161: 6158: 6155: 6152: 6149: 6146: 6143: 6140: 6137: 6134: 6131: 6128: 6125: 6122: 6119: 6116: 6113: 6110: 6105: 6100: 6096: 6093: 6090: 6087: 6084: 6081: 6078: 6075: 6072: 6069: 6066: 6063: 6060: 6057: 6054: 6051: 6048: 6045: 6042: 6037: 6032: 6028: 6025: 6022: 6019: 6016: 6013: 6010: 6007: 6004: 6001: 5998: 5995: 5992: 5989: 5986: 5983: 5980: 5977: 5974: 5969: 5964: 5960: 5957: 5954: 5951: 5948: 5945: 5942: 5939: 5936: 5933: 5930: 5927: 5924: 5921: 5918: 5915: 5912: 5909: 5906: 5901: 5896: 5892: 5889: 5886: 5883: 5880: 5877: 5874: 5871: 5868: 5865: 5862: 5859: 5856: 5853: 5850: 5847: 5844: 5841: 5838: 5833: 5828: 5824: 5821: 5818: 5815: 5812: 5809: 5806: 5803: 5800: 5797: 5794: 5791: 5788: 5785: 5782: 5779: 5776: 5773: 5770: 5765: 5760: 5756: 5753: 5750: 5747: 5744: 5741: 5738: 5735: 5732: 5729: 5726: 5723: 5720: 5717: 5714: 5711: 5708: 5705: 5702: 5697: 5692: 5688: 5685: 5682: 5679: 5676: 5673: 5670: 5667: 5664: 5661: 5658: 5655: 5652: 5649: 5646: 5643: 5640: 5637: 5634: 5629: 5624: 5620: 5617: 5614: 5611: 5608: 5605: 5602: 5599: 5596: 5593: 5590: 5587: 5584: 5581: 5578: 5575: 5572: 5569: 5566: 5561: 5556: 5552: 5549: 5546: 5543: 5540: 5537: 5534: 5531: 5528: 5525: 5522: 5519: 5516: 5513: 5510: 5507: 5504: 5501: 5498: 5493: 5488: 5484: 5481: 5478: 5475: 5472: 5469: 5466: 5463: 5460: 5457: 5454: 5451: 5448: 5445: 5442: 5439: 5436: 5433: 5430: 5425: 5420: 5416: 5413: 5410: 5407: 5404: 5401: 5398: 5395: 5392: 5389: 5386: 5383: 5380: 5377: 5374: 5371: 5368: 5365: 5362: 5357: 5356:74.232.54.208 5352: 5348: 5345: 5342: 5339: 5336: 5333: 5330: 5327: 5324: 5321: 5318: 5315: 5312: 5309: 5306: 5303: 5300: 5297: 5294: 5289: 5288:74.232.54.138 5284: 5280: 5277: 5274: 5271: 5268: 5265: 5262: 5259: 5256: 5253: 5250: 5247: 5244: 5241: 5238: 5235: 5232: 5229: 5226: 5221: 5220:74.232.54.101 5216: 5212: 5209: 5206: 5203: 5200: 5197: 5194: 5191: 5188: 5185: 5182: 5179: 5176: 5173: 5170: 5167: 5164: 5161: 5158: 5153: 5148: 5144: 5141: 5138: 5135: 5132: 5129: 5126: 5123: 5120: 5117: 5114: 5111: 5108: 5105: 5102: 5099: 5096: 5093: 5090: 5085: 5084:74.232.54.221 5080: 5077: 5075: 5071: 5067: 5063: 5059: 5054: 5049: 5045: 5044:Chie Nakamura 5029: 5025: 5021: 5020:HouseOfChange 5016: 5015: 5014: 5010: 5006: 5002: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4992: 4988: 4985: 4980: 4977: 4973: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4965: 4961: 4957: 4956:HouseOfChange 4953: 4949: 4945: 4931: 4927: 4923: 4918:Pigsonthewing 4914: 4908: 4907: 4906: 4902: 4898: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4891: 4887: 4883: 4878:Pigsonthewing 4874: 4865: 4857: 4854: 4850: 4846: 4842: 4837: 4833: 4828: 4824: 4820: 4816: 4800: 4797: 4795: 4780: 4779: 4778: 4774: 4770: 4766: 4761: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4755: 4752: 4750: 4736: 4731: 4727: 4723: 4719: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4703: 4700: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4689: 4685: 4681: 4674: 4672: 4668: 4664: 4660: 4659:WP:LISTVERIFY 4655: 4652: 4651: 4648: 4644: 4638: 4632: 4628: 4624: 4620: 4616: 4614: 4611: 4608: 4604: 4603: 4602: 4598: 4594: 4593:Beyond My Ken 4590: 4586: 4585: 4580: 4579: 4574: 4569: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4558: 4554: 4550: 4546: 4541: 4533: 4527: 4526: 4522: 4518: 4514: 4509: 4505: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4472: 4468: 4464: 4460: 4459: 4452: 4448: 4442: 4436: 4432: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4422: 4418: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4407: 4401: 4395: 4390: 4388: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4364: 4360: 4356: 4352: 4347: 4343: 4340: 4336: 4329: 4322: 4318: 4314: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4294:biased source 4291: 4287: 4283: 4280:, taken from 4279: 4275: 4268: 4260: 4257: 4255: 4248: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4234: 4226: 4224: 4213: 4209: 4205: 4195: 4193: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4177: 4168: 4165: 4163: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4153: 4151: 4147: 4143: 4132: 4129: 4124: 4118: 4114: 4112: 4107: 4102: 4101: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4089: 4085: 4081: 4079: 4075: 4068: 4056: 4051: 4050: 4045: 4038: 4023: 4022:BuzzFeed News 4019: 4012: 4008: 4005: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3990:HouseOfChange 3986: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3979: 3975: 3974:75.171.239.84 3971: 3966: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3956:HouseOfChange 3937: 3933: 3929: 3928:HouseOfChange 3924: 3923: 3922: 3918: 3914: 3913:75.171.239.84 3910: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3859:HouseOfChange 3855: 3854: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3844:75.171.239.84 3840: 3839: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3829:HouseOfChange 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3818: 3814: 3813:75.171.239.84 3801: 3797: 3793: 3792:75.171.239.84 3788: 3787: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3777:HouseOfChange 3773: 3772: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3762:75.171.239.84 3758: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3739:HouseOfChange 3735: 3732: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3722: 3718: 3717:75.171.239.84 3714: 3710: 3708: 3705: 3702: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3681: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3667: 3663: 3660: 3657: 3653: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3593: 3590: 3589: 3582: 3578: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3567: 3564: 3559: 3555: 3551: 3550: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3530: 3526: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3489: 3488: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3466: 3461: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3446: 3443: 3442: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3420: 3415: 3411: 3408: 3407: 3396: 3393: 3392: 3385: 3381: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3355: 3354: 3347: 3343: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3335: 3334: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3306: 3301: 3289: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3203: 3195: 3192: 3166: 3163: 3162: 3155: 3151: 3150: 3148: 3144: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3132: 3131: 3124: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3092: 3091: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3063: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3036: 3035: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3005: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2986: 2985: 2980: 2976: 2970: 2967: 2966: 2959: 2954: 2953: 2951: 2947: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2936: 2933: 2932: 2925: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2907: 2904: 2899: 2897: 2893: 2892:Doug Ford Jr. 2885: 2884:Doug Ford Jr. 2878: 2875: 2873: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2858:WP:NOTTABLOID 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2839: 2838: 2836: 2824: 2823: 2818: 2817: 2815: 2803: 2802: 2798: 2797: 2795: 2783: 2782: 2781:Relationships 2778: 2773: 2772:Mischa Barton 2765: 2752: 2747: 2742: 2741: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2713: 2708: 2707: 2702: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2661: 2658: 2656: 2642: 2641:original post 2638: 2637: 2628: 2623: 2616: 2610: 2609:edit conflict 2605: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2540: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2476: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2446: 2442: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2431: 2425: 2421: 2420: 2415: 2405: 2404:edit conflict 2399: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2385: 2373: 2368: 2363: 2362: 2358:the article. 2356: 2355: 2354: 2351: 2343: 2342:edit conflict 2338: 2336: 2331: 2326: 2325: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2294: 2289: 2288: 2284: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2260: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2229: 2218: 2215: 2214: 2198: 2193: 2188: 2187: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2162: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2141: 2137: 2130: 2126: 2125: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2105: 2101: 2098: 2090: 2087: 2085: 2078: 2077: 2073: 2072: 2065: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2040: 2037: 2035: 2028: 2027: 2023: 2022: 2017: 2011: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1979: 1977: 1973: 1970: 1968: 1964: 1961: 1960: 1957: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1940: 1936: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1919: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1909: 1907: 1900: 1899: 1895: 1894: 1886: 1882: 1879: 1877: 1873: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1861: 1857: 1854: 1851: 1847: 1844: 1841: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1833: 1829: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1757: 1747: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1736:83.202.103.34 1733: 1724: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1679: 1671: 1666: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1643: 1641: 1639: 1637: 1635: 1633: 1631: 1629: 1627: 1625: 1623: 1621: 1619: 1617: 1615: 1613: 1611: 1609: 1607: 1605: 1603: 1601: 1599: 1597: 1595: 1593: 1591: 1589: 1587: 1585: 1583: 1581: 1579: 1577: 1575: 1573: 1571: 1569: 1567: 1565: 1563: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1551: 1546: 1544: 1542: 1540: 1538: 1536: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1499: 1498: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1484: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1462: 1458: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1382: 1379: 1377: 1375: 1374: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1363: 1361: 1347: 1343: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1324: 1322: 1320: 1319: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1309: 1307: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1279: 1277: 1275: 1274: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1249: 1247: 1233: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1209: 1208: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1168: 1166: 1160: 1158: 1152: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1130: 1125: 1120: 1119: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1097:Endlesseditor 1094: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1075:Endlesseditor 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1060: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 999: 988: 985: 979: 964: 959: 958: 957: 953: 950: 946: 942: 938: 937: 936: 935: 927: 923: 916: 908: 904: 898: 890: 883: 879: 876: 868: 866: 862: 858: 854: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 829: 824: 823: 822: 821: 815: 814: 813: 812: 805: 800: 796: 793: 792: 791: 788: 782: 773: 771: 769: 765: 757: 752: 749: 745: 741: 737: 735: 728: 723: 722: 721: 720: 716: 713: 709: 702: 694: 690: 688: 680: 673: 666: 665: 664: 662: 658: 654: 650: 636: 632: 628: 624: 621:I agree with 620: 618: 614: 613:contributions 609: 605: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 573: 571: 565: 561: 560: 559: 555: 551: 547: 543: 542: 541: 540: 536: 532: 527: 525: 520: 518: 514: 512: 493: 489: 486: 484: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 452: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 420: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 388: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 356: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 323: 320: 316: 312: 311: 310: 306: 302: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 289: 285: 281: 280: 276: 270: 269: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 249: 248: 247: 246: 245: 244: 239: 234: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 184: 183: 178: 173: 169: 165: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 133: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 111: 110: 109: 108: 104: 100: 97: 93: 88: 87: 83: 77: 74: 70: 64:Doug Ford Jr. 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 8767: 8756: 8697: 8691: 8685: 8654: 8650: 8639: 8596:Laura Loomer 8593: 8590:Laura Loomer 8570: 8526:Devita Saraf 8496:MOS:GENDERID 8463: 8459: 8455:Blaire White 8452: 8449:Blaire White 8423:Bellezzasolo 8403:Bellezzasolo 8402: 8346:— Preceding 8326:Bellezzasolo 8325: 8294:Bellezzasolo 8293: 8214:Bellezzasolo 8213: 8169:— Preceding 8166: 8163: 8160: 8157: 8118:WP:CONSENSUS 8079: 8073: 8032: 8031: 8019:. I've sent 7966: 7948: 7947: 7924: 7918: 7912: 7906: 7900: 7894: 7885: 7861: 7833: 7816: 7807: 7767: 7741: 7729: 7718: 7707: 7696: 7688: 7674: 7605: 7535:WP:WELLKNOWN 7487: 7459: 7331: 7295: 7237:— Preceding 7233: 7229:Levin eleven 7226: 7215: 7169: 7144: 7138:The page on 7137: 7082:the videos. 7032: 7015:148.0.99.216 6986:That was it 6985: 6975: 6969: 6963: 6957: 6951: 6945: 6939: 6933: 6927: 6920:36.84.217.83 6917: 6907: 6901: 6895: 6889: 6883: 6877: 6871: 6865: 6859: 6852:36.74.23.175 6849: 6839: 6833: 6827: 6821: 6815: 6809: 6803: 6797: 6791: 6784:36.81.111.50 6781: 6771: 6765: 6759: 6753: 6747: 6741: 6735: 6729: 6723: 6713: 6703: 6697: 6691: 6685: 6679: 6673: 6667: 6661: 6655: 6645: 6635: 6629: 6623: 6617: 6611: 6605: 6599: 6593: 6587: 6577: 6567: 6561: 6555: 6549: 6543: 6537: 6531: 6525: 6519: 6509: 6499: 6493: 6487: 6481: 6475: 6469: 6463: 6457: 6451: 6441: 6431: 6425: 6419: 6413: 6407: 6401: 6395: 6389: 6383: 6373: 6363: 6357: 6351: 6345: 6339: 6333: 6327: 6321: 6315: 6305: 6295: 6289: 6283: 6277: 6271: 6265: 6259: 6253: 6247: 6237: 6227: 6221: 6215: 6209: 6203: 6197: 6191: 6185: 6179: 6169: 6159: 6153: 6147: 6141: 6135: 6129: 6123: 6117: 6111: 6101: 6091: 6085: 6079: 6073: 6067: 6061: 6055: 6049: 6043: 6036:74.232.54.14 6033: 6023: 6017: 6011: 6005: 5999: 5993: 5987: 5981: 5975: 5965: 5955: 5949: 5943: 5937: 5931: 5925: 5919: 5913: 5907: 5897: 5887: 5881: 5875: 5869: 5863: 5857: 5851: 5845: 5839: 5829: 5819: 5813: 5807: 5801: 5795: 5789: 5783: 5777: 5771: 5764:74.232.54.97 5761: 5751: 5745: 5739: 5733: 5727: 5721: 5715: 5709: 5703: 5693: 5683: 5677: 5671: 5665: 5659: 5653: 5647: 5641: 5635: 5625: 5615: 5609: 5603: 5597: 5591: 5585: 5579: 5573: 5567: 5557: 5547: 5541: 5535: 5529: 5523: 5517: 5511: 5505: 5499: 5489: 5479: 5473: 5467: 5461: 5455: 5449: 5443: 5437: 5431: 5421: 5411: 5405: 5399: 5393: 5387: 5381: 5375: 5369: 5363: 5353: 5343: 5337: 5331: 5325: 5319: 5313: 5307: 5301: 5295: 5285: 5275: 5269: 5263: 5257: 5251: 5245: 5239: 5233: 5227: 5217: 5207: 5201: 5195: 5189: 5183: 5177: 5171: 5165: 5159: 5152:74.232.54.70 5149: 5139: 5133: 5127: 5121: 5115: 5109: 5103: 5097: 5091: 5081: 5078: 5041: 4941: 4926:Andy's edits 4922:Talk to Andy 4913:Andy Mabbett 4886:Andy's edits 4882:Talk to Andy 4873:Andy Mabbett 4858: 4812: 4765:David Irving 4612: 4583: 4582: 4577: 4576: 4566:You can see 4544: 4537: 4501: 4435:power~enwiki 4394:power~enwiki 4341: 4332: 4271: 4222: 4211: 4201: 4174:— Preceding 4171: 4155: 4154: 4145: 4140: 4098: 4082: 4071: 4053: 4047: 4037: 4025:. Retrieved 4021: 4011: 4003: 3967: 3952: 3810: 3756: 3711: 3693: 3687: 3658: 3652:Deniz yildiz 3649: 3606:— Preceding 3603: 3587: 3548: 3547: 3539: 3522: 3502:Nocturnalnow 3486: 3440: 3429: 3409: 3390: 3352: 3332: 3321: 3317: 3293: 3280: 3244:Nocturnalnow 3235: 3193: 3160: 3129: 3089: 3078: 3074: 3061: 3033: 2982: 2964: 2930: 2909:Nocturnalnow 2905: 2903:this section 2900: 2889: 2840: 2825: 2821: 2819: 2804: 2800: 2799: 2784: 2780: 2779: 2776: 2763: 2738: 2724:Slatersteven 2704: 2686:Slatersteven 2545: 2541: 2444: 2422: 2400: 2386: 2382: 2359: 2322: 2304: 2285: 2232: 2223: 2211: 2184: 2165: 2128: 2079: 2075: 2070: 2064:DrFleischman 2029: 2025: 2020: 2010:DrFleischman 1984: 1975: 1966: 1938: 1918:in her words 1917: 1901: 1897: 1892: 1889: 1884: 1875: 1859: 1849: 1828:DrFleischman 1825: 1802: 1759:— Preceding 1753: 1730:— Preceding 1727: 1682:— Preceding 1674: 1645:— Preceding 1547: 1508:Ratherbe2000 1505: 1488: 1487: 1437: 1406: 1372: 1332:MichaelMaggs 1317: 1290: 1272: 1206: 1172:MichaelMaggs 1169: 1161: 1153: 1138: 1116: 1091:— Preceding 1089: 1002: 915: 897: 882: 874: 855:contributor 827: 826: 804:conservative 803: 798: 761: 759: 755: 748:WP:DAILYMAIL 743: 733: 705: 686: 647:— Preceding 644: 627:Nocturnalnow 608:Patar knight 578: 569: 567: 563: 546:User:Collect 528: 523: 521: 516: 515: 510: 509: 481: 449: 417: 385: 353: 318: 278: 274: 272: 251:WP:WELLKNOWN 199: 191: 187: 167: 157:Toronto Star 148: 95: 91: 89: 85: 80: 78: 67: 59: 47: 41: 8731:Someguy1221 8464:Thank you! 8136:K.e.coffman 8085:K.e.coffman 7260:Malerooster 4530:Dispute on 4375:WP:BLPCRIME 4146:other_names 2862:WP:BLPCRIME 2843:94.117.3.30 2831:per BLP -- 2439:know this; 2173:WP:COATRACK 1832:Dana Loesch 1822:Dana Loesch 1680:thank you 1651:Linguist111 1413:WP:BLPCRIME 1165:Joshuaselig 1157:Joshuaselig 1149:Valerie Vaz 1135:Valerie Vaz 851:and former 841:Clay Travis 708:Kyle Kashuv 701:Kyle Kashuv 604:the article 599:WP:BLPCRIME 255:WP:BLPCRIME 121:. Cheers. 73:WP:BLPCRIME 40:This is an 22:Noticeboard 8269:WP:NAUTHOR 8034:Polyamorph 7950:Polyamorph 7922:block user 7916:filter log 7887:Moochooroo 7689:References 7579:WP:NOTNEWS 7512:WP:NOTNEWS 7218:Mike Levin 7172:Mike Levin 7166:Mike Levin 7140:Mike Levin 7134:Mike Levin 7122:Meatsgains 6973:block user 6943:filter log 6905:block user 6875:filter log 6837:block user 6807:filter log 6769:block user 6739:filter log 6716:36.74.5.45 6701:block user 6671:filter log 6633:block user 6609:filter log 6565:block user 6541:filter log 6497:block user 6473:filter log 6429:block user 6405:filter log 6361:block user 6337:filter log 6293:block user 6269:filter log 6225:block user 6195:filter log 6157:block user 6133:filter log 6089:block user 6059:filter log 6021:block user 5997:filter log 5953:block user 5929:filter log 5885:block user 5861:filter log 5817:block user 5787:filter log 5749:block user 5725:filter log 5681:block user 5657:filter log 5613:block user 5589:filter log 5545:block user 5521:filter log 5477:block user 5453:filter log 5409:block user 5379:filter log 5341:block user 5311:filter log 5273:block user 5243:filter log 5205:block user 5175:filter log 5137:block user 5107:filter log 5003:campaign. 4987:Steeletrap 4976:Bill Cosby 4642:reply here 4619:—DIYeditor 4482:NightHeron 4004:References 3671:NightHeron 3460:Ivanvector 3414:Ivanvector 3016:subject to 3011:consensus. 2828:(Redacted) 2807:(Redacted) 2787:(Redacted) 2468:WP:FRINGEN 2179:. Sent to 2134:(I am not 1866:Daily Wire 1373:Ritchie333 1318:Ritchie333 1273:Ritchie333 1207:Ritchie333 1143:I removed 941:WP:SOAPBOX 875:References 762:(I am not 734:especially 679:Sharon Har 641:Sharon Har 228:Ivanvector 196:Daily Mail 172:Ivanvector 8575:stuff. ☆ 8482:Foxgloved 8466:Foxgloved 8429:Simtaylor 8372:Simtaylor 8352:Simtaylor 8255:Simtaylor 8233:Simtaylor 8175:Simtaylor 7971:WP:OUTING 7928:block log 7867:WikiDan61 7841:WikiDan61 7817:Confirmed 7785:WikiDan61 7639:WikiDan61 7617:WikiDan61 7563:WikiDan61 7508:WikiDan61 7492:WikiDan61 7427:WikiDan61 7413:WikiDan61 7369:WikiDan61 7333:WikiDan61 7319:WikiDan61 7310:Wigdorllp 7243:Narayansg 6979:block log 6911:block log 6843:block log 6775:block log 6707:block log 6639:block log 6571:block log 6503:block log 6435:block log 6367:block log 6299:block log 6231:block log 6163:block log 6095:block log 6027:block log 5959:block log 5891:block log 5823:block log 5755:block log 5687:block log 5619:block log 5551:block log 5483:block log 5415:block log 5347:block log 5279:block log 5211:block log 5143:block log 4553:Aquillion 4232:¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 3632:Neiltonks 3558:Hijiri 88 3544:last June 3143:Nixon Now 3107:Nixon Now 3048:Nixon Now 3008:WP:WEIGHT 2946:Nixon Now 2896:talk page 2701:WP:FRINGE 2615:WP:FRINGE 2464:WP:FRINGE 2389:Legacypac 2305:off topic 1872:USA Today 1809:Ganímedes 568:They did 550:Nixon Now 488:Nixon Now 301:Nixon Now 271:A source 259:Nixon Now 153:Maclean's 92:refrained 8360:contribs 8348:unsigned 8263:use the 8183:contribs 8171:unsigned 8122:Muboshgu 8100:Muboshgu 7898:contribs 7872:ReadMe!! 7846:ReadMe!! 7790:ReadMe!! 7622:ReadMe!! 7568:ReadMe!! 7497:ReadMe!! 7455:policy: 7418:ReadMe!! 7374:ReadMe!! 7324:ReadMe!! 7276:Bus stop 7251:contribs 7239:unsigned 7152:Bus stop 6931:contribs 6863:contribs 6795:contribs 6727:contribs 6659:contribs 6591:contribs 6523:contribs 6455:contribs 6387:contribs 6319:contribs 6251:contribs 6183:contribs 6115:contribs 6047:contribs 5979:contribs 5911:contribs 5843:contribs 5775:contribs 5707:contribs 5639:contribs 5571:contribs 5503:contribs 5435:contribs 5367:contribs 5299:contribs 5231:contribs 5163:contribs 5095:contribs 5005:Johnuniq 4517:Tarafa15 4298:Tarafa15 4286:reliable 4245:Linguist 4188:contribs 4176:unsigned 4156:Examples 3690:Naomi Wu 3684:Naomi Wu 3662:contribs 3608:unsigned 3588:¡gobble! 3579:though. 3487:¡gobble! 3441:¡gobble! 3391:¡gobble! 3353:¡gobble! 3333:¡gobble! 3299:tubedogg 3238:Thanks, 3236:Finally. 3201:tubedogg 3161:¡gobble! 3130:¡gobble! 3090:¡gobble! 3034:¡gobble! 2965:¡gobble! 2931:¡gobble! 2864:and per 2670:Martinlc 2238:Bill Nye 2213:MastCell 2136:watching 2076:.paint ~ 2071:starship 2026:.paint ~ 2021:starship 1898:.paint ~ 1893:starship 1840:Newsweek 1761:unsigned 1732:unsigned 1704:Bhumihar 1684:unsigned 1670:Bhumihar 1659:contribs 1647:unsigned 1105:contribs 1093:unsigned 1052:Bishonen 1010:WP:UNDUE 945:WP:UNDUE 849:Newsweek 764:watching 685:General 649:unsigned 253:trumps 204:WP:UNDUE 119:WP:UNDUE 20:‎ | 8686:Forward 8613:protect 8608:history 8543:protect 8538:history 8412:Discuss 8382:commons 8378:twinkle 8335:Discuss 8303:Discuss 8223:Discuss 7819:sock.-- 7766:Abrams 7364:WP:SPAs 7189:protect 7184:history 7052:protect 7047:history 4944:WP:NPOV 4832:protect 4827:history 4589:WP:BURO 4219:CHRISSY 4027:7 April 3895:Icewhiz 3877:Icewhiz 2568:Zaereth 2515:Zaereth 2487:Zaereth 2450:Zaereth 2177:WP:PROF 2140:ping me 1981:The Sun 1799:Laciana 1708:MPS1992 1534:policy 1491:Hut 8.5 1457:protect 1452:history 1421:Edwardx 1014:ANDREVV 861:Twitter 833:Twitter 795:Wumbolo 768:ping me 687:Ization 623:Collect 583:Collect 531:Collect 284:Collect 208:Collect 194:. The 123:Dumuzid 99:Collect 43:archive 8761:Ebyabe 8722:Lionel 8692:Cullen 8617:delete 8547:delete 8386:burden 8114:WP:CRD 8050:Meters 8017:Meters 8003:Meters 7973:.: --> 7943:Meters 7776:WP:AFD 7431:Drmies 7401:Drmies 7386:Drmies 7193:delete 7056:delete 5001:WP:RGW 4836:delete 4654:WP:BLP 4549:WP:BLP 4463:Drmies 4346:WP:BLP 3706:, and 3554:Nixoki 3430:policy 3304:(talk) 3206:(talk) 3071:WP:BLP 3023:Here's 2979:weight 2866:WP:BLP 2860:, per 2582:WP:ENC 2550:WP:CIR 1856:Bustle 1846:WBALTV 1532:WP:BLP 1461:delete 1141:WP:BLP 1006:WP:BLP 977:umbolo 780:umbolo 155:, the 115:WP:BLP 8684:Both 8634:views 8626:watch 8622:links 8564:views 8556:watch 8552:links 7821:Bbb23 7736:: --> 7666:page. 7210:views 7202:watch 7198:links 7073:views 7065:watch 7061:links 6949:WHOIS 6881:WHOIS 6813:WHOIS 6745:WHOIS 6677:WHOIS 6615:WHOIS 6597:(/64) 6547:WHOIS 6529:(/64) 6479:WHOIS 6461:(/64) 6411:WHOIS 6393:(/64) 6343:WHOIS 6325:(/64) 6275:WHOIS 6257:(/64) 6201:WHOIS 6139:WHOIS 6121:(/64) 6065:WHOIS 6003:WHOIS 5985:(/64) 5935:WHOIS 5917:(/64) 5867:WHOIS 5849:(/64) 5793:WHOIS 5731:WHOIS 5713:(/64) 5663:WHOIS 5645:(/64) 5595:WHOIS 5577:(/64) 5527:WHOIS 5509:(/64) 5459:WHOIS 5441:(/64) 5385:WHOIS 5317:WHOIS 5249:WHOIS 5181:WHOIS 5113:WHOIS 4853:views 4845:watch 4841:links 4545:exist 4292:is a 4106:Help! 4078:thumb 3873:WP:RS 3552:. So 3498:Masem 3465:Edits 3419:Edits 3380:Masem 3342:Masem 3240:Masem 2746:Help! 2712:Help! 2367:Help! 2330:Help! 2293:Help! 2192:Help! 1881:Salon 1848:says 1805:check 1478:views 1470:watch 1466:links 1147:from 1124:Help! 907:MRCTV 865:MSNBC 853:MSNBC 233:Edits 177:Edits 145:first 68:Does 16:< 8735:talk 8676:talk 8661:talk 8630:logs 8604:talk 8600:edit 8581:talk 8560:logs 8534:talk 8530:edit 8502:asem 8486:talk 8470:talk 8433:talk 8394:OTRS 8356:talk 8237:talk 8179:talk 8140:talk 8126:talk 8104:talk 8089:talk 8083:. -- 8054:talk 8040:talk 8007:talk 7978:and 7974:See 7956:talk 7910:logs 7892:talk 7862:Done 7825:talk 7680:talk 7591:talk 7581:and 7544:talk 7524:talk 7518:. -- 7514:and 7477:talk 7447:Per 7435:talk 7390:talk 7349:talk 7280:talk 7264:talk 7247:talk 7206:logs 7180:talk 7176:edit 7156:talk 7069:logs 7043:talk 7039:edit 7019:talk 7011:this 7009:and 7007:this 7003:this 6992:talk 6967:http 6961:RBLs 6955:RDNS 6925:talk 6899:http 6893:RBLs 6887:RDNS 6857:talk 6831:http 6825:RBLs 6819:RDNS 6789:talk 6763:http 6757:RBLs 6751:RDNS 6721:talk 6695:http 6689:RBLs 6683:RDNS 6653:talk 6627:http 6621:RBLs 6585:talk 6559:http 6553:RBLs 6517:talk 6491:http 6485:RBLs 6449:talk 6423:http 6417:RBLs 6381:talk 6355:http 6349:RBLs 6313:talk 6287:http 6281:RBLs 6245:talk 6219:http 6213:RBLs 6207:RDNS 6177:talk 6151:http 6145:RBLs 6109:talk 6083:http 6077:RBLs 6071:RDNS 6041:talk 6015:http 6009:RBLs 5973:talk 5947:http 5941:RBLs 5905:talk 5879:http 5873:RBLs 5837:talk 5811:http 5805:RBLs 5799:RDNS 5769:talk 5743:http 5737:RBLs 5701:talk 5675:http 5669:RBLs 5633:talk 5607:http 5601:RBLs 5565:talk 5539:http 5533:RBLs 5497:talk 5471:http 5465:RBLs 5429:talk 5403:http 5397:RBLs 5391:RDNS 5361:talk 5335:http 5329:RBLs 5323:RDNS 5293:talk 5267:http 5261:RBLs 5255:RDNS 5225:talk 5199:http 5193:RBLs 5187:RDNS 5157:talk 5131:http 5125:RBLs 5119:RDNS 5089:talk 5058:here 5024:talk 5009:talk 4991:talk 4974:and 4960:talk 4901:talk 4849:logs 4823:talk 4819:edit 4773:talk 4717:asem 4679:asem 4667:talk 4623:talk 4597:talk 4557:talk 4538:The 4534:page 4521:talk 4486:talk 4467:talk 4421:talk 4383:talk 4363:talk 4355:this 4351:this 4339:this 4317:talk 4302:talk 4252:Eins 4212:only 4202:The 4184:talk 4144:'s " 4088:talk 4049:Vice 4029:2018 3994:talk 3978:talk 3960:talk 3932:talk 3917:talk 3899:talk 3881:talk 3863:talk 3848:talk 3833:talk 3817:talk 3796:talk 3781:talk 3766:talk 3757:Vice 3743:talk 3721:talk 3694:Vice 3675:talk 3656:talk 3636:talk 3616:talk 3540:when 3529:talk 3506:talk 3366:asem 3322:this 3261:asem 3248:talk 3222:asem 3147:talk 3111:talk 3052:talk 2994:talk 2950:talk 2913:talk 2890:Re: 2847:talk 2728:talk 2690:talk 2674:talk 2590:talk 2572:talk 2558:talk 2533:talk 2519:talk 2505:talk 2491:talk 2454:talk 2393:talk 2313:talk 2272:talk 2246:talk 2150:talk 2110:asem 2053:talk 1997:talk 1945:asem 1924:asem 1813:talk 1789:talk 1779:See 1769:talk 1740:talk 1712:talk 1692:talk 1655:talk 1474:logs 1448:talk 1444:edit 1425:talk 1336:talk 1291:that 1287:this 1262:talk 1226:talk 1192:talk 1176:talk 1101:talk 1078:talk 1056:talk 1034:talk 1018:talk 756:each 657:talk 631:talk 587:talk 554:talk 535:talk 492:talk 315:here 305:talk 288:talk 263:talk 212:talk 127:talk 117:and 103:talk 8577:Bri 8077:. 7768:was 7460:not 7451:of 7316:). 4950:by 4920:); 4880:); 4864:PoV 4228:❯❯❯ 4223:MAD 4127:{c} 4100:Guy 4080:]] 3525:TFD 3062:not 3021:. 2990:TFD 2871:Jbh 2834:Jbh 2813:Jbh 2793:Jbh 2740:Guy 2706:Guy 2625:\\ 2586:jps 2554:jps 2529:jps 2501:jps 2478:\\ 2417:\\ 2361:Guy 2324:Guy 2309:jps 2287:Guy 2268:jps 2242:jps 2186:Guy 1983:": 1510:at 1289:to 1118:Guy 1008:or 983:^^^ 963:MrX 954:🖋 837:CNN 799:not 786:^^^ 727:MrX 717:🖋 667:An 610:- / 574:. 570:not 566:. 166:: " 161:CBC 8774:‖ 8763:- 8759:‖ 8737:) 8720:– 8678:) 8663:) 8655:-- 8632:| 8628:| 8624:| 8620:| 8615:| 8611:| 8606:| 8602:| 8583:) 8562:| 8558:| 8554:| 8550:| 8545:| 8541:| 8536:| 8532:| 8509:) 8488:) 8472:) 8435:) 8362:) 8358:• 8319:. 8239:) 8207:. 8185:) 8181:• 8142:) 8128:) 8106:) 8091:) 8056:) 8042:) 8009:) 7986:, 7967:is 7958:) 7827:) 7682:) 7593:) 7546:) 7526:) 7479:) 7471:-- 7437:) 7392:) 7351:) 7343:. 7282:) 7266:) 7253:) 7249:• 7208:| 7204:| 7200:| 7196:| 7191:| 7187:| 7182:| 7178:| 7158:) 7071:| 7067:| 7063:| 7059:| 7054:| 7050:| 7045:| 7041:| 7021:) 7013:. 7005:, 6994:) 5026:) 5011:) 4993:) 4962:) 4924:; 4903:) 4884:; 4867:}} 4861:{{ 4851:| 4847:| 4843:| 4839:| 4834:| 4830:| 4825:| 4821:| 4775:) 4724:) 4686:) 4669:) 4634:-- 4625:) 4599:) 4559:) 4523:) 4488:) 4469:) 4449:) 4443:, 4423:) 4408:) 4402:, 4385:) 4365:) 4319:) 4304:) 4272:A 4190:) 4186:• 4090:) 4052:. 4046:. 4020:. 3996:) 3980:) 3972:. 3962:) 3934:) 3919:) 3901:) 3883:) 3865:) 3850:) 3835:) 3819:) 3798:) 3783:) 3768:) 3745:) 3723:) 3715:. 3703:, 3677:) 3638:) 3618:) 3584:🍁 3569:) 3566:やや 3531:) 3508:) 3483:🍁 3468:) 3462:(/ 3437:🍁 3422:) 3416:(/ 3387:🍁 3373:) 3349:🍁 3329:🍁 3268:) 3250:) 3229:) 3157:🍁 3149:) 3126:🍁 3113:) 3086:🍁 3081:. 3054:) 3030:🍁 2996:) 2961:🍁 2952:) 2927:🍁 2915:) 2849:) 2730:) 2692:) 2676:) 2592:) 2574:) 2560:) 2552:. 2535:) 2521:) 2507:) 2493:) 2456:) 2395:) 2315:) 2274:) 2248:) 2183:. 2152:) 2144:-- 2117:) 2083:KO 2055:) 2033:KO 1999:) 1974:: 1965:: 1952:) 1931:) 1905:KO 1883:- 1815:) 1791:) 1783:. 1771:) 1742:) 1714:) 1694:) 1661:) 1657:• 1522:, 1518:, 1476:| 1472:| 1468:| 1464:| 1459:| 1455:| 1450:| 1446:| 1427:) 1338:) 1264:) 1228:) 1194:) 1178:) 1167:. 1159:. 1151:. 1107:) 1103:• 1054:| 1036:) 1020:) 949:Mr 924:. 905:. 744:is 712:Mr 675:}} 669:{{ 659:) 633:) 589:) 556:) 548:? 537:) 307:) 290:) 265:) 236:) 230:(/ 226:. 214:) 180:) 174:(/ 159:, 129:) 105:) 8733:( 8674:( 8659:( 8636:) 8598:( 8579:( 8566:) 8528:( 8507:t 8505:( 8500:M 8484:( 8468:( 8431:( 8425:: 8421:@ 8407:✡ 8399:∰ 8374:: 8370:@ 8354:( 8330:✡ 8322:∰ 8298:✡ 8290:∰ 8257:: 8253:@ 8250:) 8246:( 8235:( 8218:✡ 8210:∰ 8177:( 8138:( 8124:( 8102:( 8087:( 8052:( 8038:( 8005:( 7954:( 7930:) 7925:· 7919:· 7913:· 7907:· 7901:· 7895:· 7890:( 7823:( 7761:: 7757:@ 7678:( 7652:: 7648:@ 7641:: 7637:@ 7611:: 7607:@ 7589:( 7557:: 7553:@ 7542:( 7522:( 7475:( 7433:( 7403:: 7399:@ 7388:( 7347:( 7278:( 7262:( 7245:( 7212:) 7174:( 7154:( 7075:) 7037:( 7017:( 6990:( 6981:) 6976:· 6970:· 6964:· 6958:· 6952:· 6946:· 6940:· 6934:· 6928:· 6923:( 6913:) 6908:· 6902:· 6896:· 6890:· 6884:· 6878:· 6872:· 6866:· 6860:· 6855:( 6845:) 6840:· 6834:· 6828:· 6822:· 6816:· 6810:· 6804:· 6798:· 6792:· 6787:( 6777:) 6772:· 6766:· 6760:· 6754:· 6748:· 6742:· 6736:· 6730:· 6724:· 6719:( 6709:) 6704:· 6698:· 6692:· 6686:· 6680:· 6674:· 6668:· 6662:· 6656:· 6651:( 6641:) 6636:· 6630:· 6624:· 6618:· 6612:· 6606:· 6600:· 6594:· 6588:· 6583:( 6573:) 6568:· 6562:· 6556:· 6550:· 6544:· 6538:· 6532:· 6526:· 6520:· 6515:( 6505:) 6500:· 6494:· 6488:· 6482:· 6476:· 6470:· 6464:· 6458:· 6452:· 6447:( 6437:) 6432:· 6426:· 6420:· 6414:· 6408:· 6402:· 6396:· 6390:· 6384:· 6379:( 6369:) 6364:· 6358:· 6352:· 6346:· 6340:· 6334:· 6328:· 6322:· 6316:· 6311:( 6301:) 6296:· 6290:· 6284:· 6278:· 6272:· 6266:· 6260:· 6254:· 6248:· 6243:( 6233:) 6228:· 6222:· 6216:· 6210:· 6204:· 6198:· 6192:· 6186:· 6180:· 6175:( 6165:) 6160:· 6154:· 6148:· 6142:· 6136:· 6130:· 6124:· 6118:· 6112:· 6107:( 6097:) 6092:· 6086:· 6080:· 6074:· 6068:· 6062:· 6056:· 6050:· 6044:· 6039:( 6029:) 6024:· 6018:· 6012:· 6006:· 6000:· 5994:· 5988:· 5982:· 5976:· 5971:( 5961:) 5956:· 5950:· 5944:· 5938:· 5932:· 5926:· 5920:· 5914:· 5908:· 5903:( 5893:) 5888:· 5882:· 5876:· 5870:· 5864:· 5858:· 5852:· 5846:· 5840:· 5835:( 5825:) 5820:· 5814:· 5808:· 5802:· 5796:· 5790:· 5784:· 5778:· 5772:· 5767:( 5757:) 5752:· 5746:· 5740:· 5734:· 5728:· 5722:· 5716:· 5710:· 5704:· 5699:( 5689:) 5684:· 5678:· 5672:· 5666:· 5660:· 5654:· 5648:· 5642:· 5636:· 5631:( 5621:) 5616:· 5610:· 5604:· 5598:· 5592:· 5586:· 5580:· 5574:· 5568:· 5563:( 5553:) 5548:· 5542:· 5536:· 5530:· 5524:· 5518:· 5512:· 5506:· 5500:· 5495:( 5485:) 5480:· 5474:· 5468:· 5462:· 5456:· 5450:· 5444:· 5438:· 5432:· 5427:( 5417:) 5412:· 5406:· 5400:· 5394:· 5388:· 5382:· 5376:· 5370:· 5364:· 5359:( 5349:) 5344:· 5338:· 5332:· 5326:· 5320:· 5314:· 5308:· 5302:· 5296:· 5291:( 5281:) 5276:· 5270:· 5264:· 5258:· 5252:· 5246:· 5240:· 5234:· 5228:· 5223:( 5213:) 5208:· 5202:· 5196:· 5190:· 5184:· 5178:· 5172:· 5166:· 5160:· 5155:( 5145:) 5140:· 5134:· 5128:· 5122:· 5116:· 5110:· 5104:· 5098:· 5092:· 5087:( 5074:1 5066:1 5022:( 5007:( 4989:( 4958:( 4916:( 4899:( 4876:( 4855:) 4817:( 4792:G 4789:M 4786:G 4771:( 4747:G 4744:M 4741:G 4722:t 4720:( 4715:M 4684:t 4682:( 4677:M 4665:( 4639:| 4621:( 4609:: 4595:( 4555:( 4519:( 4484:( 4465:( 4446:ν 4440:π 4437:( 4419:( 4405:ν 4399:π 4396:( 4381:( 4361:( 4315:( 4300:( 4182:( 4108:) 4104:( 4086:( 4031:. 3992:( 3976:( 3958:( 3930:( 3915:( 3897:( 3879:( 3861:( 3846:( 3831:( 3815:( 3794:( 3779:( 3764:( 3741:( 3719:( 3673:( 3659:· 3654:( 3634:( 3614:( 3563:聖 3560:( 3527:( 3504:( 3371:t 3369:( 3364:M 3290:) 3266:t 3264:( 3259:M 3246:( 3227:t 3225:( 3220:M 3145:( 3109:( 3050:( 2992:( 2948:( 2911:( 2845:( 2748:) 2744:( 2726:( 2714:) 2710:( 2688:( 2672:( 2653:G 2650:M 2647:G 2611:) 2607:( 2588:( 2570:( 2556:( 2531:( 2517:( 2503:( 2489:( 2452:( 2406:) 2402:( 2391:( 2369:) 2365:( 2344:) 2340:( 2332:) 2328:( 2311:( 2295:) 2291:( 2270:( 2244:( 2194:) 2190:( 2148:( 2115:t 2113:( 2108:M 2066:: 2062:@ 2051:( 2012:: 2008:@ 1995:( 1950:t 1948:( 1943:M 1929:t 1927:( 1922:M 1811:( 1787:( 1767:( 1738:( 1710:( 1690:( 1653:( 1557:2 1554:1 1524:3 1520:2 1516:1 1480:) 1442:( 1423:( 1358:G 1355:M 1352:G 1334:( 1304:G 1301:M 1298:G 1260:( 1244:G 1241:M 1238:G 1224:( 1190:( 1174:( 1126:) 1122:( 1099:( 1061:. 1032:( 1016:( 974:w 965:: 961:@ 952:X 928:. 891:. 867:. 777:w 729:: 725:@ 715:X 655:( 629:( 585:( 552:( 533:( 494:) 490:( 303:( 286:( 261:( 210:( 125:( 101:( 79:" 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive267 - Knowledge

Index