Knowledge

:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 4 - Knowledge

Source šŸ“

11172:
minutes (an operational definition of an unassisted script). And likewise, any *task* over 1000 edits needs to be posted somewhere (WP:BOTREQ, for instance) with time allowed for objections, unless an exemption is part of the bot approval for a specific type of task. That way admins will have some specific to point to when dealing with editors who start up AWB and make hundreds of edits removing spaces, as noted above. It would address the issue with certain javascript tools which tie up a browser for an hour. And BetacommandBot would be given a considerably larger per-task/per-day edit allowance for image tagging, but whether that's 2000 or 5000 per day would have some community input.
135:
minutes (an operational definition of an unassisted script). And likewise, any *task* over 1000 edits needs to be posted somewhere (WP:BOTREQ, for instance) with time allowed for objections, unless an exemption is part of the bot approval for a specific type of task. That way admins will have some specific to point to when dealing with editors who start up AWB and make hundreds of edits removing spaces, as noted above. It would address the issue with certain javascript tools which tie up a browser for an hour. And BetacommandBot would be given a considerably larger per-task/per-day edit allowance for image tagging, but whether that's 2000 or 5000 per day would have some community input.
12392:. How efficient is a check for page existence? I don't know off the top of my head, but I expect it's pretty low overhead. Whenever a bot wants to edit a page in userspace, it checks for the existence of a bots.css page for that user. If it doesn't exist, it knows it has free reign in the userspace. If it does exist, it loads the page and parses it - we can work out the most versatile and efficient coding - and from that learns which bots can edit which pages in the user's userspace. This provides the additional advantage of being able to easily apply nobots to all your subpages if you so wish. I'm thinking something along the lines of: 517:. How efficient is a check for page existence? I don't know off the top of my head, but I expect it's pretty low overhead. Whenever a bot wants to edit a page in userspace, it checks for the existence of a bots.css page for that user. If it doesn't exist, it knows it has free reign in the userspace. If it does exist, it loads the page and parses it - we can work out the most versatile and efficient coding - and from that learns which bots can edit which pages in the user's userspace. This provides the additional advantage of being able to easily apply nobots to all your subpages if you so wish. I'm thinking something along the lines of: 2845:
rendered to HTML according to user preferences, then stays in the squid cache (and is invalidated weekly no matter what, I do believe). So basically, inclusion of an un-subst'ed template is a one-time server hit, plus rendering hits for each permutation of u-prefs. After that, it's just regular regen's, which we're busy collecting $ 6 million to deal with. (I paid my $ 20!!) We're almost always told to ignore server load - and the little pre- and post-expand + expensive parser function report in the page tells us how badly we're dragging the servers down. Especially in the case of
8054:
information in one place. If the bot doesn't pick up all the authors on the paper, say, I only have to complete the information once. Further, if the citation needs editing down the line - say a URL to the free text becomes available - editors only have to add it once; if the source is cited on five pages, then all five will immediately display the best source information available. Another massive point in favour of the system is that it makes adding references an order of magnitude easier. As an editor who spends a lot of time adding sources to articles, I find this
11539:. Furthermore, notifying admins about page deletions is particularly pointless, since we can still see "deleted" pages anyway. Also, wiki-gnomes like myself who currently don't edit and who have many thousands of small edits in their contribs, are particulary annoyed by having their talk pages plastered with these pointless wordy "notfications" which don't serve much more than making inactive editor's talk pages look like they would pertain to some stupid newbie who needs a pile of corrective warnings about his misplaced steps on this wiki. 1057:. Furthermore, notifying admins about page deletions is particularly pointless, since we can still see "deleted" pages anyway. Also, wiki-gnomes like myself who currently don't edit and who have many thousands of small edits in their contribs, are particulary annoyed by having their talk pages plastered with these pointless wordy "notfications" which don't serve much more than making inactive editor's talk pages look like they would pertain to some stupid newbie who needs a pile of corrective warnings about his misplaced steps on this wiki. 2817:
example before), say that unsigned is transcluded on 20,000 pages. Given that each page is, on average, viewed maybe 5 times a day, unsigned is being requested 100,000 times every day. That is quite a large load. I think that 25,000 small edits are a small price to pay for taking 3,100,000 fetches every month. As for the edit summary, that policy says that templates should be substituted when there are no issues with that; unsigned is fairly static right now. There's nothing we can really do to improve it, so why not subst it?
7745:(I for instance would likely unblock on request) unless it is clearly disruptive, and it will end up at another forum where your actions will be peer assessed. Any admin is quite right to block users for disruptive editing of course, but likewise if a bot is edit-warring it and its operator can be blocked too. This bot action has already come up on WP:AN and from the discussion there it appears that the use of automated tools to tag articles is not approved of. Your threat here is frankly unhelpful and provocative. 6066:(e/c)So we should shutdown all the antivandal bots at all times other than the few hours their operators are online? I agree 3 hours is far too short for "non-urgent queries." I would say within 48 hours for a "non-urgent" query and within a day for an "urgent query." If its so urgent that it needs a response within the hour or something bad will happen, it should just be blocked until the operator can respond. If nothing bad will come from lack of an immediate response, then its probably not very urgent. 42: 2020: 11168:. (I'm not linking it, and if it doesn't get deleted it can be found with a prefix search.) There is a more general problem of lack of oversight of bot tasks. Basically, anyone can do anything. Bot policy allows "assisted scripts" to work without approval with very little real restriction, so long as it doesn't edit so fast that it cannot resonably be an assisted script. If we AGF, it's difficult to justify under policy blocking most bots that do not display straightforward bugs. 131:. (I'm not linking it, and if it doesn't get deleted it can be found with a prefix search.) There is a more general problem of lack of oversight of bot tasks. Basically, anyone can do anything. Bot policy allows "assisted scripts" to work without approval with very little real restriction, so long as it doesn't edit so fast that it cannot resonably be an assisted script. If we AGF, it's difficult to justify under policy blocking most bots that do not display straightforward bugs. 5556: 10316:] \n' /home/tris1601/thewikipediaforum.com/pywikipedia/wikipedia.py in put(self=Page{]}, newtext=u"You have so many things in the background that y...''] by ]", comment=u'Testing', watchArticle=None, minorEdit=True, force=False, sysop=False, botflag=True) 1380 1381 # Check blocks 1382 self.site().checkBlocks(sysop = sysop) 1383 1384 # Determine if we are allowed to edit self = Page{]}, self.site = <bound method Page.site of Page{]}: --> 8080:
used would never be used for anything else, so the existence of the templates is not competing with anything else. Thirdly, this uses a minuscule amount of resources - marginally more than editing a very long article, and the subsequent maintenance of the citations also takes less computing resources. As discussed above, human resources (which are in important supply) are used more effectively under this system. Resource use cannot be a valid concern here.
8451:). Some articles link to publishers, others don't. Etc... This ain't so bad when the template is subst'd, as users can easily fix it withouth screwing up the 20 other pages which also references Smith and Schnellfarts. If you mean that the bot create a million templates (all lumped into a single hidden category such as "Citation templates for DOI Bot" ) to simplify its job, I don't have a real problem with it, as long as they are subst'd into articles. 5865:: So now we've got good parameters and categories, we need to make sure everybody uses them. Hopefully, this won't be too hard for bot operators around now, but we'll need to make the edits ourselves where there are bots that cam and went during 2005, or whatever. I propose the creation of bots to be that helping hand. However, what do you do when users have already manually added themselves to a contradictory cateogry? Filling methods might include: 8871: 9136:, I felt the line was inappropriate; it was also in many cases inaccurate as only certain data were based on the French Knowledge, a large majority of the articles were built independently. Nevertheless, you yourself already know I've ceased making the edits long ago to seek broader community input (you've participated in the TFD...). To be perfectly honest, posting this thread seems a rather juvenile response to 12614:
deletion logs, for pages with "/bots.css" in the title, the list would be completely current. I doubt that's a particularly onerous task, but it's not one that is even necessary for the system. Essentially what I'm saying is, Knowledge's back streets are created for its editors, not for its bots - any system should put user-interface first, and bot-interface second. Of course we should endeavour to optimise
739:
deletion logs, for pages with "/bots.css" in the title, the list would be completely current. I doubt that's a particularly onerous task, but it's not one that is even necessary for the system. Essentially what I'm saying is, Knowledge's back streets are created for its editors, not for its bots - any system should put user-interface first, and bot-interface second. Of course we should endeavour to optimise
11427:. When I asked him to stop his bot until that actually works, he first denied my request (later struck his denial) and labelled my comment here as "rant". Besides, that bot task is entierly uneeded and unwanted anway, so it doesn't have my approval (even if it would work as advertised). We simply don't need nor want this hard core talk page spamming. After all, there is a watchlist feature for a purpose. -- 945:. When I asked him to stop his bot until that actually works, he first denied my request (later struck his denial) and labelled my comment here as "rant". Besides, that bot task is entierly uneeded and unwanted anway, so it doesn't have my approval (even if it would work as advertised). We simply don't need nor want this hard core talk page spamming. After all, there is a watchlist feature for a purpose. -- 8072:. How editors choose to cite their sources - whether they use a template or plaintext, for instance - is currently a decision for editors to make on a page-to-page instance. If the editors of a page decide that one style of referencing is more appropriate, they can make their decision for themselves, one way or the other - the existence of the new template doesn't mean it has to be used universally. 5813: 10317:, ).checkBlocks undefined, sysop = False /home/tris1601/thewikipediaforum.com/pywikipedia/wikipedia.py in checkBlocks(self=wikipedia:en, sysop=False) 4457 if self._isBlocked: 4458 # User blocked 4459 raise UserBlocked('User is blocked in site %s'Ā % self) 4460 4461 def isBlocked(self, sysop = False): global UserBlocked = <class wikipedia.UserBlocked: --> 11102: 11095: 11088: 11081: 11067: 11060: 11053: 11046: 11032: 11025: 11018: 11011: 10995: 10988: 10981: 10964: 10957: 10950: 10943: 10924: 10901: 10880: 10873: 10866: 10859: 10421: 8555: 7130: 5771: 5621: 3550: 12912: 2003: 5859:. After much messing around this morning, I managed to implement an "unapproved" status category, but it doesn't have any members yet. Anyhow, if you look at the doc for the template, you will see that the text that accompanies the unapproved message doesn't really reflect the fact that the bot shouldn't be making any edits at all. Can someone knowledgeable have a go at fixing that? 6433:
butting ahead of the user who placed the tag to essetially spam article's author. If the bot runs periodically, it should have a built-in grace period of 15 mins to allow users to type their own explanations. There is no reason for a speedy to have an immediate follow up. The combination of a user tagging + an admin should be safety enough to ensure the article indeed meets
7216:, but this is neither a policy or guideline, thus the problem related to consensus. Until this is defined and the location determined (and a "the bot will not re-tag only a human can" type of commitment) the bot needs to be shutdown on this task. Once those issues are addressed, I personally have no problem with the purpose of this bot, its purely in the execution. 11123:, but wrong for a selection of articles about people with Chinese/Arabic names where "full name" format seems to be the preference. So as it stands the HEAD SVN revision is the most accurate it's ever been, though it's still not as accurate as it should be. When I have some time next weekend I can look at introducing logic to catch Arabic/Chinese names. 6470:"There is no reason for a speedy to have an immediate follow up" - well there is. Speedies, when I used to patrol them, rarely lasted more than a few minutes - often I would spend time ascertaining that an article should not be speedied, to find that it already had. Therefore unless an immediate notificationis made there wil be no time for a "hangon". 7368:]. Bots shouldn't be using their automated power to uglify wikipedia. The ugly and distracting presence for the reader (who doesn't give a toss if no other wiki article connects to it) does not make up for the apparent usefulness to the editor, not to mention the fact that articles can theoretically be classified without big ugly tags. 7309:
was running on out of date lists. As soon as I noticed this I stopped the bot from editing, This will explain the adition of some tags incorrectly. When the lists are back up and running the bot will be able to remove all of the tags that were added incorrectly and continue adding other tags correctly.
12880:
and "ru-sib" issue) that if an interwiki link is commented out on a page, the bots will leave it alone and not readd it? I remember we were discussing this some time ago, and it seemed to be working on another page where the problem came up recently. If the bots honor that, it's simple, effective and
11262:
Thanks for that, MBisanz. Hopefully this will work. I would like to see WP:BAG make some official, or semi-official pronouncement about this, as it will need their support to work. Some acknowledgment that they will act constructively on the results of bot requests for comments (ie. explaining things
10138:
I would disagree with the "should not run unsupervised in Template namespace" part. There's no reason a well-designed bot wouldn't be able to work as well on templates as it does on articles. The fact that the standard interwiki.py isn't this well designed is not reason to prohibit someone from using
8266:
The preponderance of templates with no links is due to an error with the Cite Doi template's interplay with the bot, which I have now fixed - users who used the bot to manually expand the template had been creating the pages in the wrong place (with a / instead of a .2f). I am having the pages which
8058:
valuable - since I added this function to the bot I have become a lot more efficient, and the article improvement process has become more enjoyable as a result. I would be very upset if I had to go back to a more difficult process, and I think that the process of making WP a reliable source would be
7632:
If I were solely being disruptive I would have started out disagreeing with everything AddBot did. Which seems to be what BAG wants. But I didn't, I supported the use of AddBot, disagreed with its use in a specific instance, and am being attacked for it on multiple fronts by BAG members for not going
7077:
I managed not to even recognise it was in your userspace until after I'd edited! (I was pointed to the page that transcludes it.) Merging code from other frameworks is a good idea, although I might leave reading the ClueBot source to someone else... If you would like Subversion access, let me know
6776:
be potential that the bot will step on users who are in the process of working a CSD tag so long as there is not a grace period written. This is counter-productive. Example: A user places a CSD tag in an article at 2:59 and then goes to the author's page to comment. At 3:00, CSDWarnBot places its
6505:
are articles written by novice users. A canned speedy notification from a bot is of limited use to them and (also as evidenced in my example) creates confusion. A user with a good-faith effort who receives a specific, detailed notice about an article is less likely to create the same article again,
6432:
I'm not sure what the next steps should be now. In my opinion, a bot that interferes in the useful, correct, good-faith efforts of users is unacceptable. The activity of the bot is, for all intents and purposes, no different than someone doing the same thing manually: seeing a tag on an article and
5258:
The listing of bots is already linked from BOTREQ & has been from ages. It's called out in the open paragraph. But I don't object if they're kept. I don't think they are going to turn out to be that helpful (especially with non-active bots included), but each to there own. Since it's not creating
2661:
Rationale is to "conserve processing power"? Who TF gave that mandate? Where is the analysis? Where is the authorization to say that "processing power" is of supreme (or any) importance? Since the devs have explicitly coded pre- and post-expansion limits and expensiveness right into the parser, I can
1955:
and "ru-sib" issue) that if an interwiki link is commented out on a page, the bots will leave it alone and not readd it? I remember we were discussing this some time ago, and it seemed to be working on another page where the problem came up recently. If the bots honor that, it's simple, effective and
225:
Thanks for that, MBisanz. Hopefully this will work. I would like to see WP:BAG make some official, or semi-official pronouncement about this, as it will need their support to work. Some acknowledgment that they will act constructively on the results of bot requests for comments (ie. explaining things
11171:
One idea I've had is to say that any bot needs approval which 1) edits at a clip too fast to reasonably check a good proportion its edits (maybe 5 per minute?), or 2) is doing a single job with more than some number of edits (maybe 1000), or 3) the operator does not respond to inquiries within 15-20
10443:
Doesn't look proper to me. Per NOTBROKEN this isn't a task that should even be done & the bot certainly wasn't approved for it... also "Robot-assisted disambiguation" is not an accurate description of what it actually did. It doesn't appear that the bot has done anything like this before, so I
8423:
Reply to above by Martin/Smith609: I'm not sure. I don't fully undestand why these are used in the first place. But the problem I have in mind is this. Consider the author parameter. Let's say you have two guy named John Denver Smith and Michael Bob Schnellfarts, you'd these possible desired outputs
8047:
I saw the function as falling under the banner of 'fixing and adding citation information', for which the bot is approved. Perhaps I interpreted that too widely - if so, then after a positive consensus for the function emerges here I would be happy to open another BRfA. Approval requires community
7683:
delete 100,000 tags, and I don't suppose anyone else can. It would have to be a bot automated task, which would have to gain community consensus--although the community consensus for adding the tags has yet to be gained. You're going to block editors for participating in the RfC about this issue?
7578:
Too late, the bot has already been reverted long before your threat, and reverted back, and the reversion of the bot deleting entire articles was also reverted. Provide the link to the consensus for the bot's doing this in the first place, so I can alert all of those community members that they are
7528:
Deacon yes the bot will not automaticly add any orphan tags until I have an RFC completed, I dont have a desire to tag, I just personaly think it is a good idea and is helpfull. The tags are used that is how they are used, If I were to go through the lists by hand and add all of these tags to all of
6927:
The bot runs on a cronjob every X minutes (15, I think). If the tagging occurred close to the last run there is plenty of time, but if the tagging happens right before a run, because the bot doesn't store its state or have a basic time check (both are really easy and involves no on wiki database) it
6711:
and don't know a damn thing about programming a bot. You don't see an issue, even though numerous users have pointed it out. Frankly, I don't think this bot really accomplishes very much, as most CSD taggers do leave talk page messages via Twinkle or manually, and it is obviously upsetting users who
3685:
Additionally it should be noted that when SoxBot X signs a post, the link to the talk page should be the page that he opperator whats a user to post to which at this time is the bot talk page and not the operators talk page. The goal is to make it easy for new users to respond, not to direct them to
3144:
As for long-running bots, they're not much different than short-running bots. They just run longer. You may want to investigate some way for the bot to automatically restart itself if it dies - crontab is good for this. You also have to be more flexible about temporary server or network outages with
134:
One idea I've had is to say that any bot needs approval which 1) edits at a clip too fast to reasonably check a good proportion its edits (maybe 5 per minute?), or 2) is doing a single job with more than some number of edits (maybe 1000), or 3) the operator does not respond to inquiries within 15-20
12442:
I've had various instances of editors telling me to keep SatyrBot from adding WikiProject banners to the talk page of articles. I don't know if that's valid, but that's one instance where nobots might apply. And don't we tell certain bots to archive/not archive various talk pages? Or tell sinebot
12035:
That's the problem, I'm not getting an error. I know it's hitting the FillAllFromCategory routine, as it returns "Getting category 'Category:Foo' contents...", but then it just acts as if there were no articles in the category. I added pl3.ShowTitles(); as a sanity check, and it shows no pages in
9834:
Why not change the software to make all revisions starting with "#redirect" disposable by any user during a page-move attempt, regardless of how many edits there are, or which page they redirect(ed) to, or whether they have silly little sorting templates attached to them. If there's some good stuff
7744:
Another bot owner was pulled up recently for tagging articles. Several editors reverted the bot until its operator did this himself. In practice, you are free to use your block button to block anyone you like. If you carry out your threat here on someone for reverting a bot, it is unlikely to stick
7337:
If you propose to continue adding them to the article ages not the talk pages., I wish you would take it to an RFC, to get some wider attention. This has been discussed for short periods at scattered places, without any decision, & it would be good to have it resolved. If you want to switch to
6244:
In this particular case, just redirect them. I agree, the bot-message is way too large and obnoxious and should be refactored to use fifty words or fewer. Anything that needing further explanation can be found by following some of the links. I don't think the lightning-fast reflexes do the bot much
1661:
That's the problem, I'm not getting an error. I know it's hitting the FillAllFromCategory routine, as it returns "Getting category 'Category:Foo' contents...", but then it just acts as if there were no articles in the category. I added pl3.ShowTitles(); as a sanity check, and it shows no pages in
567:
I've had various instances of editors telling me to keep SatyrBot from adding WikiProject banners to the talk page of articles. I don't know if that's valid, but that's one instance where nobots might apply. And don't we tell certain bots to archive/not archive various talk pages? Or tell sinebot
12596:
in an environment which doesn't really support multidimensional structures. We have a large number of bots which edit userpages; we have a larger number of userpages which might be edited by bots. We have to cross-reference those data sets in the most efficient manner possible. The real question
12584:
such a system, not simply using it. There are four hundred and eight accounts with the bot flag on the english Knowledge, meaning that a complete system would require at least 800 categories to be created. We can't justify not creating the categories until they are needed, otherwise we will have
12387:
A category system just creates massive overhead: the bot would have to load the entire category tree and hold it in memory, whether or not the page was ever actually called on. Clever programming could minimise the overhead, but it's still quite substantial. For userpages, I would advocate using
11453:
I don't think that your individual approval (or mine, since I'm not a BAG member) is the deciding factor. But BJ did say in the bot request that the bot would honor nobots, and I think it is a reasonable thing for this bot to do, if its purpose is mainly to notify users on their talk pages. ā€”Ā Carl
8479:
I see. I think the way around this will be to specify a format to which all Cite Doi templates conform to (in the Cite Doi documentation). Editors should then only use the template in articles which use this formatting; the citation bot can keep the formatting consistent with this. This may mean
8062:
What are the benefits in terms of the article structure? You raise the point of confusion about editing the template. I often see editors who expect to be able to edit references by clicking the 'References' link, which is sensible. I personally find it very frustrating to have to trawl through
7532:
KP why would I remove 100,000 tags that are correctly added? The tag I presume has consensus otherwise we also need an rfc for the tag, then do any of the maintenance tags have consensus they can link to? The BAG request was open for anyone to come and comment on, that is the point of the request.
7501:
In fact, please post the community consensus for uglifying article space for over 100,000 Wikiepdia articles or remove the tags. Where is the initial community consensus for adding these tags to article space? It's a simple question. Bots are required to have community consensus for their work,
7308:
Just a quick note before I go as I have just seen this section. The lists that the bot uses have not been refereshed for a few days now due to changes on the tool server. the scripts that create the lists now seem to cause lag and be killed before completing and updating the lists therefor the bot
7249:
incoming links (disambiguation pages are excluded from this count, although I'm sure this could be altered if necessary). As this task is proving to be somewhat controversial, I think that it would be a good idea if the bot were not to re-tag articles unless a set period of time has passed E.g. if
7211:
I disagree there is consensus, see the talk page linked to above. This applies to both adding the template (also as to the location/format of said template), but also on what is an orphan. If you have no defined and accepted definition, the bot would be allowed to add the tag to any article. Which
7169:
I'm pretty sure I read / was told that it wasn't... Still, Pulpit Rock does seem to show that the bot was in error somewhere along the line, though I hope Addshore will find it's with the counting, not the definition. Just a reminder to the third-party-reader that the requirements for a bot are as
7067:
Good to see development in this area. I was about to prod you to add your framework to the table, but I see you've already done soĀ ;) Still, my advice would be to (beg, borrow and) steal from the other frameworks, until you've got everything just right! I still think we should really try and merge
6987:
There have also been comments that the bots message is patronising. Anyway, it should be a simple fix, can't understand why ST47 is being so stubborn about not fixing it, he's even admited that it might be a good idea if someone fixed it, just not him/her self, which is blatently showing that they
6638:
Wow, that is one nasty attitude. So, his position seems to be that he won't comment here, because it is an "idiotic notice board" and he won't fix it or even think about it because we are all "people who do stupid things." I'm sorry he feels that way, but given his stunning refusal to even discuss
971:
I don't think that your individual approval (or mine, since I'm not a BAG member) is the deciding factor. But BJ did say in the bot request that the bot would honor nobots, and I think it is a reasonable thing for this bot to do, if its purpose is mainly to notify users on their talk pages. ā€”Ā Carl
721:
in an environment which doesn't really support multidimensional structures. We have a large number of bots which edit userpages; we have a larger number of userpages which might be edited by bots. We have to cross-reference those data sets in the most efficient manner possible. The real question
709:
such a system, not simply using it. There are four hundred and eight accounts with the bot flag on the english Knowledge, meaning that a complete system would require at least 800 categories to be created. We can't justify not creating the categories until they are needed, otherwise we will have
512:
A category system just creates massive overhead: the bot would have to load the entire category tree and hold it in memory, whether or not the page was ever actually called on. Clever programming could minimise the overhead, but it's still quite substantial. For userpages, I would advocate using
11534:
This request should not have been granted. But since there seems to be no procedure for withdrawing of erroneous approvals, chances are small that anything will happen here. In case BAG or whoever actually does review this bot's task, I suggest to at least rethink if it really makes sense to post
8079:
To address the concern about populating template space with templates which aren't used very much, there are some arguments against this. Firstly, I understand that the French (I think - maybe it was the Germans?) do something very similar with no negative consequences. Secondly, the page names
7548:
Well, you wouldn't because community consensus doesn't mean a thing to what your bot does. In addition, I remind you that you think your bot does tasks randomly and that programs that produce random results are not only possible, but par for the course for Knowledge. You should, however, remove
6795:
No. You see, the issue isn't that I'm an evil malicious bot overlord. The issue is that I really just don't feel like it. I suppose if there are any botops around who agree with you, then someone will get around to writing a patch. After all, surely all the bot ops are reading this, since I'm now
2844:
That's partly right (to my understanding). A template change should just invalidate the parser cache for the transcluding pages. They get regenerated on fetch. I disagree on your load stats though - once the page is regenerated, it stays in the parser cache, thus no more fetches. The page is then
2816:
for a second. First of all, I don't think it matters much in terms of how much they are changed; from what I understand, anything in curly brackets is not loaded until a user, loading the page, requests it. Therefore, how much the template is updated doesn't factor in. However (and I've used this
1052:
This request should not have been granted. But since there seems to be no procedure for withdrawing of erroneous approvals, chances are small that anything will happen here. In case BAG or whoever actually does review this bot's task, I suggest to at least rethink if it really makes sense to post
12641:
It doesn't seem difficult to me to maintain two overall categories plus two categories per bot, given that the number of exceptions is always going to be very low for properly designed bots. Categories are, in a way, easier for individual users than writing a file using some new syntax that they
12613:
than just adding "exclude all from all" to one file. There's no reason why we can't use a bot to generate the alternative version of the table - even just a regularly-updated list of existing bots.css pages would reduce overhead. If the updating bot checked newpage-tagged RecentChanges, and the
11542:
This project has really gone mad. Some bot operators with approvals seem to think they are on a heroic mission here and they have to be prepared to knee-jerk reject requests to stop and fix their bots. This attitude is harmful to this project. But that seems to be the norm nowadays on Knowledge.
8120:
Previewing the page, I've just realised that I've written a substantial amount in favour of the function - apologies for that! I think that it establishes, though, that there is a strong case that the function is useful in at least some circumstances. I think there are a lot of issues involved
7312:
In my opinion the bot is useful and the tags are useful. The add the categorys to the pages and the maintence tags are generally the accepted way to use these categorys. The bot is harmless, it is not deleting articles and has no real risks. It does not consume many resources at all and it works
6543:
I agree with Beeblebrox, for example, if a user wishes to post a uw-create4 warning then the bot is contradicting this, and even if they delete the bot message and replace it with their own, it will leave the user receiving the message confused, as well as making the bots edits redundant, cheers
1060:
This project has really gone mad. Some bot operators with approvals seem to think they are on a heroic mission here and they have to be prepared to knee-jerk reject requests to stop and fix their bots. This attitude is harmful to this project. But that seems to be the norm nowadays on Knowledge.
766:
It doesn't seem difficult to me to maintain two overall categories plus two categories per bot, given that the number of exceptions is always going to be very low for properly designed bots. Categories are, in a way, easier for individual users than writing a file using some new syntax that they
738:
than just adding "exclude all from all" to one file. There's no reason why we can't use a bot to generate the alternative version of the table - even just a regularly-updated list of existing bots.css pages would reduce overhead. If the updating bot checked newpage-tagged RecentChanges, and the
8296:
Formatting concerns. I don't have a problem if the bot substs the templates rather than perform a new search in order to save time, but what ends up in the article should not be templates, as the template will probably end up on multiple pages using different citation styles. With human managed
8075:
There's another major advantage in this system, which is the short length of the inline citation. A perennial problem raised by editors is that in a reference-rich area of prose, it is difficult to see the text for the references when editing the page. I think this is a valid concern, and one
6528:
I've run into this as well. When using Twinkle, very rarely I tag a CSD and uncheck the "notify user" box. Then I go to the user's page only to discover they've got the giant CSD bot message already. I usually only do this if they've repeatedly recreated the exact same article, or if there is a
3603:
I noticed none of the examples actually implement the template according to the documentation. In particular, for most of them "allow=foo" without the bot's name included should deny, "deny=FooBarBot" shouldn't match for BarBot, "{{bots|deny=Foo}} BarBot{{fact}}" shouldn't match for BarBot, and
6275:
Well if the bot's reflexes are so instant as to infallibly cause an edit conflict for the user who would otherwise be leaving a similar, less patronizing message (and indeed, a visual conflict for the person expected to read all that crap) one could argue that it's doing more harm than good. ā€”
5295:
Hrm, I don't think we should delete the by-purpose categories without some further input (perhaps another CFD). Deleting them based on subthread between 2-3 people in a multi-CFD discussion doesn't strike me as a particularly good idea. Lists and categories don't have to be mutually exclusive.
3040:, when it is doing its other edits to talk pages. That will pretty quickly fix most cases out there, without costing any extra resources at all. (SineBot substitutes the unsigneds it itself adds to talk pages.) I hope SineBot will take on this task, since I think that could keep everyone happy. 12680:
It makes no difference from the point of view of the bot whether the category page exists or not - the contents of the category can still be queried either way. So I don't see the need to create all the categories at once. But I also am not a strong proponent of the category system - a simple
8083:
If there is a valid reason to oppose the creation of templates which aren't used very much (yet), which I don't think there is (please convince me otherwise if I'm wrong), then the logical conclusion is that the template should only be used on references which are cited in a certain number of
7201:
Now without wanting to wade full-scale in on this debate, I think we can agree that 1, 3, 5 and 6 are not up for debate. That would leave 2 ("is useful") and 4 ("has consensus"). Personally, I believe there is consensus for adding the tag, and tagging is useful for the purposes of finding of
805:
It makes no difference from the point of view of the bot whether the category page exists or not - the contents of the category can still be queried either way. So I don't see the need to create all the categories at once. But I also am not a strong proponent of the category system - a simple
8053:
Now, I use this function a lot and find it incredibly useful, but will of course respect any consensus that emerges. A lot of my WP editing involves incorporating data from a new source, which will often span a number of pages. When this is the case, it is much simpler to have the citation
6500:
speedied. Further, an impersonal, unspecific notification can prove more confusing and less constructive to a good-faith author than a specific one provided by the CSD nominator (as is evidenced in my example). In my limited experience, most of the good-faith attempts at articles that meet
12662:
I suggested .css subpages because they can only be edited by the user, thus preventing vandalism. In the same way, it's just an idea. My main problem with categories is the necessity of maintaining a large tree of mostly-empty categories, since to avoid errors each bot should have existing
787:
I suggested .css subpages because they can only be edited by the user, thus preventing vandalism. In the same way, it's just an idea. My main problem with categories is the necessity of maintaining a large tree of mostly-empty categories, since to avoid errors each bot should have existing
9183:
The bot's task specifically says that jobs won't be run unless consensus exists. I am the one who sought further consensus and won't run this particular find/replace if consensus dries up (though I may replace the text with the proper trans template). Your continued disruption is noted.
8025:. And if it did get approval - or even if it's only the case that this system has in fact been discussed extensively and there is consensus in favor of it, I'd like to get a pointer to such discussion so that I can read and understand it before I start arguing that it's a mistake. -- 11515:
The bot seems to be notifying a hell of a lot of people for a single AfD. Can we stop the bot, reopen the BRFA and seek wide community input please (as this task probably affects most of the community and could do with broader input that that provided in the previous one day BRFA)?
1033:
The bot seems to be notifying a hell of a lot of people for a single AfD. Can we stop the bot, reopen the BRFA and seek wide community input please (as this task probably affects most of the community and could do with broader input that that provided in the previous one day BRFA)?
12282:
But the current system is worse. It is inherently flawed and riddled with technical problems because bots are not as smart as the wiki preprocessor. If the template is on user pages then bots need to be able to parse it as robustly as the wiki parser does. So this code should work:
407:
But the current system is worse. It is inherently flawed and riddled with technical problems because bots are not as smart as the wiki preprocessor. If the template is on user pages then bots need to be able to parse it as robustly as the wiki parser does. So this code should work:
12207:
forcing them to use the new section editing method. But the current nobots system is (mis)designed assuming that all bots download the old page text before all edits, which is an actively bad assumption because it discourages bots from using more efficient editing methods. ā€”Ā Carl
332:
forcing them to use the new section editing method. But the current nobots system is (mis)designed assuming that all bots download the old page text before all edits, which is an actively bad assumption because it discourages bots from using more efficient editing methods. ā€”Ā Carl
8179: 6676:
I think perhaps we need comment from another BAG member due to the circularity of this; CSDWarnBot was approved as a clone of another bot, which ST47 themself approved. The lack of an opt-out ability or true delay for users who wish to leave their own warnings is sub-optimal.
5710:
Well, I was drawing comparisons with the people categories. Are all biographies thrown into the top level category and then reclassified from there? No, they're either categorised or not - but as a compromise, and for the ability to easily get a list of all bots, I thought a
2221:
I doubt many bots have been converted to using API editing, and older bots that have been stable longer than api.php has existed may well still be using index.php for login as well as editing. So login through Special:UserLogin is likely to still be relatively common. ā€”Ā Carl
12718:
The bot watches the page, waits for a few seconds, then moves the thread to a subpage (by first removing it from the noticeboard so as to avoid the possibility of someone trying to put a reply and it getting lost). In order to see the redlink, you had to hit refresh at the
1785:
The bot watches the page, waits for a few seconds, then moves the thread to a subpage (by first removing it from the noticeboard so as to avoid the possibility of someone trying to put a reply and it getting lost). In order to see the redlink, you had to hit refresh at the
5238:, at least from the POV of someone who routinely looks for and requests bot work. The only way I'd find the deletion of these categories justified, is if an equivalent listing of bots by purpose would be linked from BOTREQ, and even there it wouldn't hurt to have the cats. 11734:
There probably should be. Coming in screaming, or even threatening to block / have blocked, is rarely productive. I don't think, however, that a simple essay somewhere, would do much to solve the problem. It's just something you kinda have to deal with, in my opinion.
1260:
There probably should be. Coming in screaming, or even threatening to block / have blocked, is rarely productive. I don't think, however, that a simple essay somewhere, would do much to solve the problem. It's just something you kinda have to deal with, in my opinion.
9844:
Err, drastic escalation of privilege? Turn a random user's user page into a redirect and then move your vandalism over it. Or do it with a popular article.... I agree that the double revision thing is annoying, but I'm not sure there's any good way to deal with it.
8020:
I'm less concerned about what has happened than with the bot continuing as is. And rather than argue at WP:VP or WP:TFD, I prefer the position that the bot needs to stop if in fact it never got permission to do what it is doing, and then the owner needs to
12187:
Appending sections doesn't make any sense in mainspace (and other content namespaces) because it would break layout by adding information afters stubs, categories and interwikis. If it's not for mainspace, most bot developers will ignore this possibility.
312:
Appending sections doesn't make any sense in mainspace (and other content namespaces) because it would break layout by adding information afters stubs, categories and interwikis. If it's not for mainspace, most bot developers will ignore this possibility.
12597:
is: do we divide the table up by bot, or by userpage? the Categories system is an attempt to break the table up by bot, which makes it easy for the table to be parsed by the bots which need to use it. The bots.css system breaks the table up by user,
7713:. Bots are supposed to be only for things that are so uncontroversial this could not happen. The approval of this task brings the bot-task approval process into minor disrepute, vested participants in the process blocking for this would be a disgrace. 722:
is: do we divide the table up by bot, or by userpage? the Categories system is an attempt to break the table up by bot, which makes it easy for the table to be parsed by the bots which need to use it. The bots.css system breaks the table up by user,
12836:
so it may not always be possible to tell if there's supposed to be a one-to-one mapping or not. The purpose of bots is not to enforce perfect correctness, it's to do repetitive tasks that humans are unwilling to do. The humans on the page in question
1911:
so it may not always be possible to tell if there's supposed to be a one-to-one mapping or not. The purpose of bots is not to enforce perfect correctness, it's to do repetitive tasks that humans are unwilling to do. The humans on the page in question
10775:
There's still a number of bug reports, but when editing articles this seems to be (fairly) reliable. But when you get a bug report, you kind of need to either A) turn off that change using the custom module, or B) not use the bot until AWB is fixed.
8150:
In the absence of objection, I'll consider the existing approvals - i.e. fixing broken citations and adding missing parameters - to encompass the behaviour mentioned here and re-enable the bot. Please do continue to contribute to discussion below.
4307:). It fails on degenerate cases. It's hard to catch SmackBot in the act. An alert editor can track a problem; others see errors, but mistake the damage for vandalism. We can't know how many pages are damaged before a problem is accurately reported. 8711:
make an argument that it should be renamed. But this hard-working bot seems to be simply adding geographic coordinates to articles, coordinates taken from other language Wikipedias, and it clearly states what it is doing in its edit summaries.
11114:
Now, your summary of the defaultsort/Arabic names issue is misleading: before recent changes, AWB was not inserting a DEFAULTSORT very often; when it did it never applied the "surname, forename" logic for English-named people (etc.), so it was
6605:(Spitfire's and mine). It doesn't matter how often the bot runs. If there is no grace-period programmed into the bot, there will always be the potential that the bot will run at the same time someone is in the process of working on a CSD tag. 6258:
I do like the speed--otherwise, one never knows if the bot is working at all. I too have run into problems with conflicts, but this is etter than it going too slowly. Asfor the length of the warning, yes, it definitely needs to be shortened.
11387:
I personally wouldn't require anyone to implement the current nobots system. BJ, was the bug you mentioned that this editors shouldn't have gotten a notice? It does seem odd if everyone who edited the article even once gets notified. ā€”Ā Carl
5906:- why don't we have a bot make automated edits to the page, filling in missing details (owner would be an obvious one), and making sure there is a listing - even without a listed purpose - for every newly approved bot? Your thoughts, please. 905:
I personally wouldn't require anyone to implement the current nobots system. BJ, was the bug you mentioned that this editors shouldn't have gotten a notice? It does seem odd if everyone who edited the article even once gets notified. ā€”Ā Carl
6972:
I see how this can be interpreted as a technical problem with the bot, but I think the redundancy issue is overblown. It is only redundant in cases where a user warns the page author, not in cases where no personalized warning is issued.
6996:. Also I see that ST47 has told both me and David Levy (David was making a comment about a different bot) "not to edit my talkpage again" because we "fustrate and annoy", not the most sensible way ST47 should set about resolving issues. 2601:
Thanks for your answers! On second thought, it would be a bit much to run two users (me and Legoktm) through RFA only for this minor bot feature. But what you say about the WP 1.0 bot seems interesting; I will check back once it's live.
12827:
There are a couple of issues here. One of them is that there are disagreements among different Wikipedias about what a certain word refers to in different languages. This is not a problem that can ever be completely resolved, because
6390:
Some clarification on this would be necessary. Some users might not want the bot to warn on their behalf and might make long, hand-written notices to the users whose articles they nom and in the meantime the bot templates the target.
1902:
There are a couple of issues here. One of them is that there are disagreements among different Wikipedias about what a certain word refers to in different languages. This is not a problem that can ever be completely resolved, because
12743:
Well, it's true. Some problems can't be solved by bots. Maintaining the links manually (which the editors of that page are willing to do) strikes me as preferable to a multilingual, multi-project edit war. The best solution might be
1818:
Well, it's true. Some problems can't be solved by bots. Maintaining the links manually (which the editors of that page are willing to do) strikes me as preferable to a multilingual, multi-project edit war. The best solution might be
8290: 4128:
800x600 browser window here (on a 1024x768 screen, I like to be able to see things besides my browser window so I seldom maximize). If you can figure out a way to rearrange things that doesn't force horizontal scrolling, feel free.
11694:
Yes it's not a big deal, but it would have been nice to admit that in the first place instead of labelling my post here as a "rant". Second, it seems somewhat of an irony, that it was SQL who fully protected his talk page recently
2583:
Note that once the new WP 1.0 bot system is in place, in winter 2009, you can use that to query the assessment history of an article even after it has been deleted. That is an alternative to using admin rights for the bot. ā€”Ā Carl
1212:
Yes it's not a big deal, but it would have been nice to admit that in the first place instead of labelling my post here as a "rant". Second, it seems somewhat of an irony, that it was SQL who fully protected his talk page recently
9357:, which has since faded out of existence. I was cleaning out the category while reviewing indefinitely blocked IPs. This task was run by another administrator prior to running it, who helped me with the query. As I said to you at 4493: 11918:
execfile(_filename) File "./user-config.py", line 1 {\rtf1\mac\ansicpg10000\cocoartf824\cocoasubrtf440 ^ SyntaxError: unexpected character after line continuation character
6657:
Quoted bot policy refers to violations of edit rate restrictions. I see no issue with the bot's placement of warnings on its runs, which occur only every 15 minutes. If you disagree, then fix it yourself, such is the wiki model.
1499:
execfile(_filename) File "./user-config.py", line 1 {\rtf1\mac\ansicpg10000\cocoartf824\cocoasubrtf440 ^ SyntaxError: unexpected character after line continuation character
8932:
OK, perhaps the edits aren't insignificant (they merely have the appearance of being so), this still doesn't mean you can set your bot to work doing any task you choose - you need to seek approval for each distinct task through
6898:
The problem is that the bot is placing impersonal, non-specific warnings quickly, and by doing so, is preempting human users who would place personal, specific warnings. The warnings are also ugly, but that's beside the point.
8259: 8227: 12245:
with selective exclusion. I don't like the centralised system because it's prone to vandalism and eventually we'll have to fully protect the exclusion lists and build unnecesary bureaucracy around addition/removal from them.
9776: 370:
with selective exclusion. I don't like the centralised system because it's prone to vandalism and eventually we'll have to fully protect the exclusion lists and build unnecesary bureaucracy around addition/removal from them.
2455:
Sometimes. If you're providing a page name to the server, "Image:" and "File:" are equivalent. If you're getting a page name from the server, you'll always get "File:", and if you're expecting "Image:", things will break.
3695:
I don't know if he meant people to go to his talk page or not, I just meant that when i go there he responds quickly. I find its pretty common practice to never comment on the bot talk page for any bot, but thats just me.
7105:
Regarding the City-Bahn example, it seems the bot operated correctly: it removed an interwiki link to a dab page. You later added an interwiki link to the correct page. It does not appear that anything need be done here.
9859:
That's not the entirety of the problem. As it stands right now, one can move ] ā†’ ] but not move ] ā†’ ] afterward because although the redirect has only one revision it does not point to the page you are trying to move. ā€”
9060: 3135:
Use the wikimedia IRC feed on irc.wikimedia.org. That's an IRC channel that does nothing but list the recent changes as they occur. Your bot would log into this IRC channel, receive each edit notice, and do whatever it
6575:
I will continue to place my comments here, where they belong, in this proper forum. I must say I find ST47's attitude about this entire thing very disconcerting. He actually expects the affected users to fix the bot
8526:
I believe its just bad wording, and that its a case of operators are encouraged to know the other languages. Since the advent of global bots and the like, I doubt anyone actually expects people to know each language.
12304:
was transcluded from a user box, pywikipedia would not notice it even though it would be listed as a transclusion by the API. Which is reasonable enough - nobody should expect bots to parse pages in this way. ā€”Ā Carl
11190:
at that prefix you gave me). Given the recent, shall I use the word, forum shopping, with BCB, that would be severely frowned upon if it happened to a human user or a policy, I'd wondering if we couldn't codify the
8063:
the source code to find the template to edit - sometimes a reference can be sited dozens of times in a long article, so finding the occurrence where it is cited in full can be time consuming. I actually think it is
7469:
As I have already said I am happy to take the bot to RFC but I am currently quite busy, For the time I will just disable the bot, it would not be able to be re enabled until the tool server reports are fixed anyway.
429:
was transcluded from a user box, pywikipedia would not notice it even though it would be listed as a transclusion by the API. Which is reasonable enough - nobody should expect bots to parse pages in this way. ā€”Ā Carl
153:
at that prefix you gave me). Given the recent, shall I use the word, forum shopping, with BCB, that would be severely frowned upon if it happened to a human user or a policy, I'd wondering if we couldn't codify the
11776:
I think we need to consider a more fine-tuned system. But the big problem with this is that it implies that every single type of such a bot will follow this system, and clearly not every bot will. For example, my
9402:
Human discussion on pywikipedia topic. This includes support, follow-ups to announcements, follow-ups to svn commits, and developer discussions. -- Moderate traffic (usually no more than a couple of mails a week in
8254: 4324:
Rich seems to be quite responsive to bug reports, and frankly you overreacted to the South Korea edit. I don't see anything that needs wider attention at the moment. Best would be to continue with the discussion at
1354:
I think we need to consider a more fine-tuned system. But the big problem with this is that it implies that every single type of such a bot will follow this system, and clearly not every bot will. For example, my
8144: 6862:
stores state information in a file on the computer where it runs. It saves a list of the pages that it has already issued a warning about. Having it use another such file is not exactly an insurmountable hurdle.
8837:
I think it would be a waste of resources to rename the bot's edits to another username. The bot still operates on the same python framework and we discussed extensively the way the coordinates should be done (see
8222: 6351:
Stealth mode, you mean? That might be abusable, to the extent that somebody might be relying on the bot to tell them an article of theirs is going to be deleted (don't know how many or few this might apply to). ā€”
10663:
This was a feature request... If general fixes (at least, via the normal method) are enabled, it will remove them as a general fix. I'm gonna revert this i think, as it just causes more problems than its worth.
9203:
Yes, and I even elected to delay running the task to see if a better way of making these attributions can be agreed upon (so perhaps the bot can fulfill the attribution coincident with the removal of the line).
8210: 7604:
My bad. I missed the part above where you say you're going to block editors for 100,000 taggings. So, I'll just go about my business since it doesn't apply to me, and you're not linking to who it applies to.
8237: 3767: 8067:
obvious to click an edit link beside the information that one wants to edit than it is to edit a section elsewhere in the article. However, whichever system is preferred, I think the important point is that
12851:. That resolves the problem where they complain about interwiki bots for doing what they are programmed to do, as long as they are willing to take responsibility to do what they consider right for the page. 12353: 6529:
situation where the standard tempates don't really apply. If an editor specifically does not wish to leave one of the "normal" CSD messages, I don't think an automated process should be contradicting them.
2577:
If the operator is an admin, and the bot is not making any logged admin actions (no deleting or protecting pages) then the admin might as well use their own admin account instead of making a new one for the
1926:. That resolves the problem where they complain about interwiki bots for doing what they are programmed to do, as long as they are willing to take responsibility to do what they consider right for the page. 478: 7798:
Just wondering does anyone know of a templated way I can start and RFC for this? The templates I have seen are for the people that are agaisnt the bot to create and not for the person that want to keep it.
2690:
problematic: hence the prohibition against templates in signatures, for instance. As for clogging watchlists, that would be the point of the bot flag: it will not show up in watchlists unless requested.
9715: 8242: 8205: 6616:, to wit: "Administrators may block bot accounts that operate without approval, operate in a manner not specified in their approval request, or operate counter to the terms of their approval (for example, 5694:
to add in the 'unapproved' parameter. As for a holding category, wouldn't it be more logical to simply put them in the top level category, and then periodically have someone categorise them appropriately?
2873:
You'll really need to take this up with the AWB devs, who have included template substitution in the general fix options. At the present time substitution of these template is considered a "best practice".
9300: 12586: 12349: 9278: 8174: 3977:. I just thought that the big table was rather clunky. However, it looks a lot cleaner inside the collapsible table, and I suppose it does help to divide up the process and make things easier to follow. 3091: 2338:"Image:" can be written with an upper-case "I", a lower-case "i", or a upper-case "Ä°" with a dot over it. All three are accepted by the MediaWiki software, and all three appear in Knowledge articles. -- 711: 474: 6883:
So...let me get this straight. the issue here is that the bot places warnings on user talk pages too quickly? Or is it that the warnings are garish? I can't really be sure from the discussion above.
8195: 5449:, including a status (active/inactive) parameter and integrating the AWB bot template as an option, to fit in with the category restructuring. An in-situ example showing all the parameters can be seen 2927:
I believe bots like this (atleast one of my tasks), only subst: templates which say they need to be. This avoids having to work around parsers and excess html as the template was designed without it.
12053:
All that has changed is a parameter name in the api query - can you edit the source and recompile the library? If not, you'll have to find someone who maintains the code and get them to do it. ā€”Ā Carl
9285: 1679:
All that has changed is a parameter name in the api query - can you edit the source and recompile the library? If not, you'll have to find someone who maintains the code and get them to do it. ā€”Ā Carl
12824:
Calm down. If you look at the page, you will see that they tried your "smart thing" first, and the result is what I was referring to as a "multilingual edit war". Sometimes things aren't that simple.
9306: 9289: 8643: 8232: 1899:
Calm down. If you look at the page, you will see that they tried your "smart thing" first, and the result is what I was referring to as a "multilingual edit war". Sometimes things aren't that simple.
9782:
I note that the bot didn't do anything there until almost a week after the move occurred (hopefully that was by design), which was ample opportunity for a human to undo the move. It's also not like
9294: 8621: 12606: 12345: 9964: 9312: 4227:
It would greatly help if you gave links to the issues you see and (if it's on-wiki) the discussion you've had with Rich Farmbrough. Otherwise, this is just a vague rant with nothing to comment on.
731: 470: 7549:
them because they were added without community consensus which you are still not seeking. Please be sure to notify me when you decide to get community consensus for spamming 100,000 articles. --
9606:
I just did some tests, apparently just "&bot" does not work (anymore?) when POSTing (it seems it would work when GETting, but action=edit requires a post). At minimum, "&bot=" is needed.
8628: 8215: 2195: 11613:
I've made some small changes which halved the number of notices to that article. I'm also working on adding a check for when the person last edited the article. That should be done by tomorrow.
10312:/home/tris1601/thewikipediaforum.com/pywikipedia/wikitest.py 35 site = wikipedia.getSite() 36 newpage = wikipedia.Page(site, u"User:Dottydotdot/test") 37 newpage.put(text + "<br: --> 8649: 8632: 5672:
Good work all so far. Might we split the status parameter into three rather than two: active, inactive and unapproved, so the latter two can be distinguished? Not too much of a jump, I think. -
1131:
I've made some small changes which halved the number of notices to that article. I'm also working on adding a check for when the person last edited the article. That should be done by tomorrow.
8637: 4482: 9162: 8655: 7230:
In my mind I see absolutely no debate. When dealing with bots very little should be subjective, as "counting links" would be. Being orphaned is boolean status, the article either is or isn't.
6858:
It isn't necessary to save the list on the wiki. A file in the computer where the 'bot runs is quite adequate to the task of remembering what warnings to issue in a subsequent run. The 'bot
3172:
I came across a manual transwikification yesterday. While the edit summary included image information, it didn't show on the image page on Commons. I suspect it's a malfunctioning template. -
8247: 8200: 2050: 12737: 8695:
indicates that existing bot accounts should not required to be renamed every time policy changes, and if that were the intention of that particular change it would have said so explicitly.
6913:
Then isn't the solution to just delete the warnings and add your personal warning? I'm not sure how this is a bot problem then. I'm not trying to be obtuse, just trying to see the issue.
11138:
I am in full agreement with you on the Arabic names issue. None of my links above were to that particular issue. I do not consider it a showstopper. As far as I can tell at this point,
7894:
We'll still need the bot anyway - AbuseFilter currently doesn't block accounts, it only prevents certain edits from happening, and has to be much more limited to prevent false positives.
6232: 5215: 5008: 4536: 6451:
Been following this discussion with interest, thanks all for your opinions, I agree with everything Fortis said, and that a 15 minute grace period is a good idea, if possible. I do wish
3325:
and see what IP address is reported. If that is the case, and you can have that turned off, that may well solve your problem. Otherwise, you'll just have to follow the instructions at
3873:
You need to tweak the MiszaBot template at the top of the page. I changed it from "4d" (four-day) to "7d" (seven-day) as a starting point, but you may like to increase it further. -
9034:
I realized these reverts could be because a lack of detection for these cases. Still, BRFA is a best practice that helps identify instances where the bot should not perform edits. ā€“
11119:
on articles about people. It now does, so on the English wiki (AWB never labels an article on a non-English wiki as about a person, as I have no knowledge of such wikis) it is now
5497:
parameter to be used to show that the bot is actually approved, and provide an easy way of checking. However, it would be easy to add a 'more tasks' parameter if people wanted it.
9567: 8332:
The bot, while doing its rounds, could spot pages where all other templates are in the 'citation' format and add the 'format=citation' parameter to {cite doi} where it is missing.
10291:
I agree and would add that it is more likely to get the task removed, if anything. After all, it only specifically asks for input if the WikiProject wants the redirect saved. --
8863: 8480:
that Cite Doi can rarely be used in featured articles, but it will continue to be useful in young and developing articles, which is where it is most commonly used at the moment.
2855:, once the relatively more expensive DB fetches are done to retrieve the actual template code, the same code is reused from memcache to expand each unisgned instance on the page. 9663: 3768: 8312: 7250:
the tag was removed more than 2 months ago, and the article is currently defined as an orphan (i.e. no incoming links from actual articles) re tag the article. Just a thought.
7068:
all the frameworks so only one is presented to new propective bot owners (obviously not existing ones). Maybe yours could try to finally achieve this? It looks great so far. -
6835:
That would make sense to me as well, but would require me to save the last run's contents on wiki somewhere. We all know how much trouble a single on-wiki data file can cause.
2300:
Great. That's only going to totally break every single one of my bots. I just hope the "File:" namespace doesn't have any hidden case-changing surprises like "Ä°mage:" did. --
27: 10413: 12898: 12294:
The only implementation I have seen of nobots is the pywikipedia one, and it does not support this because it does not resolve transclusions in template parameters. Also, if
6712:
are trying to leave their own messages. As I said before, there are some instances where a message of this type is inappropriate, and your bot is contradicting the wishes of
419:
The only implementation I have seen of nobots is the pywikipedia one, and it does not support this because it does not resolve transclusions in template parameters. Also, if
9560: 3459: 3321:
It might be that your hosting company has a transparent proxy set up that is making your traffic seem to be coming from 65.254.224.34; you could try having the bot download
2287: 6932:
simple fix, the check I used in the old NotifyBot was one line of code. It would take any competent programmer far less time to fix this than it took discussing it so far.
11487:
There is no consensus for running this bot task. That's the deciding factor. BAG implements consensus. And as an admin, I may block a bot that doesn't follow its approval
7761:
Until the template is deprecated removing the additions en masse is a massive waste of resources (as was the the bot in the first place, two wrongs doesn't make a right).
2671:? Yes, an extra template can't kill a single page, but whenever someone edits a heavily-used template, job queue rises dramatically, making servers scream 'omg butthurt'. 1005:
There is no consensus for running this bot task. That's the deciding factor. BAG implements consensus. And as an admin, I may block a bot that doesn't follow its approval
10713:
Also, as per the orphan bug report, the list provider being used needs changing, and that will also fix the bug (for the people that use it)... Not much work to do it =)
9218: 4148: 3452: 3359: 12400:
Is pretty easy to read by humans, easy to parse by bots, and easy to debug (redlinks = bad). Not sure how this would extend outside userspace, but how often is nobots
10832: 2704:
Note that the posts only break if the template is empty, which should never happen. I'll add in a function to replace only {unsigned| so that it discriminates, though.
525:
Is pretty easy to read by humans, easy to parse by bots, and easy to debug (redlinks = bad). Not sure how this would extend outside userspace, but how often is nobots
9326: 8168: 6832:
a valid rationale for refusing to alter behavior deemed disruptive by the community, regardless of whether the edits in question are performed manually or via a bot.
8926: 8184: 5789: 12888: 11142:
does not appear to contain any known bugs that would cause it to do significant damage when used unattended. Once a snapshot is available I will begin using it for
10436: 8906:
Those are insignificant, at one point the bot was copying coordinates from one wiki to another, I thought that he should have to go through what everyone else does.
8329:
Users who place the template in an article could specify if they wanted to use the 'citation' format by typing something like {cite doi|10.1000/1000|format=citation}
5759: 3330: 12203:
It does make sense, however, for talk pages, which are the main source of interest for the nobots system. I don't advocate forcing bot developers to follow nobots
10215: 8117:
The concern relating to the footnote information not being exactly the same as that rendered in the references section applies equally to other citation templates.
8098: 7047:
I've added an email and diff functionality. I also noticed that it may need some testing, as I found some remmnants of the delete function in the block funtionĀ ;)
4310:
SmackBot is leveraging the capabilities of AWB. I'd like to give Rich time to investigate the problem before I say more. He's been very responsive to fixing bugs.
1963: 328:
It does make sense, however, for talk pages, which are the main source of interest for the nobots system. I don't advocate forcing bot developers to follow nobots
10748:
As per the AWB bug report, i've fixed it from the other angle too - Where it was erroneously removing the tag in the first place (2 fixes are better than oneĀ ;))
10617: 9369: 9029: 8899: 8335:
The citation parameter is passed to Template:Cite doi/10.1000/1000, and overrides its default output, so that it matches the format in every article that calls it
3003: 12389: 9084:
isn't really the forum to decide on this nor is there a consensus to remove the notice before you operated it. Besides, you appear to have started removing them
7511: 3345:
That IP is from a shared hosting company, which are generally free game for hard blocking and even range blocking. I'd suggest ipblockexempt on the bot account.
2839: 514: 12181: 11285:, so maybe it would be better to wait till we have a Bot-RfC that comes to a consensus to do something, the operator refuses, and then see if the BAG responds. 7496: 7480: 7379: 6030:
The time limits are negotiable. My personal belief is no bots should run - period. They certainly shouldn't run when their owners are not online to check them.
3329:. Maybe an admin will "soften" it to anon only, or maybe the open proxy has since been closed and it can be unblocked completely (I do note the block notice at 248:, so maybe it would be better to wait till we have a Bot-RfC that comes to a consensus to do something, the operator refuses, and then see if the BAG responds. 12808:
why not just do the smart thing and fix the issue with the interwiki links acrros all projects that are effected. instead of complaining about the bot why not
11781:
delivery bot wouldn't follow it, because it's opt-in anyway, and most people who use nobots wouldn't understand that they'd have to give an exception for me.
11234: 8447: 7767: 7756: 7739: 7724: 6103:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
5603:
when the names for the 'active/inactive' categories have been finalised. Feel free to simply integrate the code, no need to merge histories or anything messy!
4899:
overdue an overhaul), although I would rename 'Failed Knowledge bot requests for approval' to 'Denied Knowledge bot requests for approval', as the template is
1883:
why not just do the smart thing and fix the issue with the interwiki links acrros all projects that are effected. instead of complaining about the bot why not
1359:
delivery bot wouldn't follow it, because it's opt-in anyway, and most people who use nobots wouldn't understand that they'd have to give an exception for me.
197: 12476:
Indeed, those were just the first three bots I could think of - don't think of them as anything more than examples. What do you think of the actual system?
12165: 11923:
Perhaps you created user-config.py with Apple's TextEdit? Maybe it created it as a rtf. Choose "Make Plain Text" from the "Format" menu and re-save the file.
7452: 5338: 4530: 1504:
Perhaps you created user-config.py with Apple's TextEdit? Maybe it created it as a rtf. Choose "Make Plain Text" from the "Format" menu and re-save the file.
601:
Indeed, those were just the first three bots I could think of - don't think of them as anything more than examples. What do you think of the actual system?
11836: 9561: 2867: 2518: 5613: 3227: 3179: 7864: 6796:
being forced to communicate on this pointless noticeboard. (If you need anything further from me, let me know on my talk page, I'm not watchlisting this.)
6249: 4498: 4487: 2450: 1807: 12815: 11999: 10365: 10054: 9864: 9854: 9839: 9829: 9518: 9071: 8738: 8284: 7278: 5584: 5411:
With regard to the AWB bot template above, would it be a good idea to add 'Knowledge bots using AutoWikiBrowser', as I'm sure it would be well populated?
4010:
That's certainly an improvement over my tables (much cleaner design). In keeping with other pages that use the I/II/III system (AfD, TfD, etc), how about
3258: 2726: 2546: 2347: 2325: 2309: 11877: 11866: 11316: 11187:
Those are good ideas, but I think they tackle the bigger problem of not being able to keep track of all the bots and all their approved tasks (look here
10227: 9921: 9504: 9048: 8034: 8015: 7996: 7974: 7924:
Oh, that's just script-assisted I would think, like his not unsubstantial(!) article creation. I'm sure he would fix it himself if you pointed it out. -
7871: 4149: 3453: 3376: 3360: 2939: 2512: 2187: 150:
Those are good ideas, but I think they tackle the bigger problem of not being able to keep track of all the bots and all their approved tasks (look here
12871: 12546: 12524: 12499: 12488: 12437: 10374: 10036: 9999:(and its various redirects): "If the category is only populated by a template and both the category and template are being proposed for deletion, go to 8853: 8725: 8001:
Getting rid of the system would take substing all the templates and them deleting them all, all we can to do is block the bot and yell at the operator.
7928: 7225: 6652: 6633: 6538: 6446: 6419: 6385: 6324: 5953: 5734: 5719: 5705: 5507: 5463: 5430: 5421: 4958: 4949: 4928: 4919: 3987: 3968: 3052: 2564: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2368: 1890: 1588: 11293: 11272: 10658: 9900: 9876: 9803: 8801: 8138: 7934: 7809: 7543: 7330: 5383: 5369: 4123: 4069: 3109: 2418: 2140: 1458: 1447: 279: 12175: 11619: 11552: 11525: 11220: 11203: 11178: 10636: 10585: 10453: 10383:
for your bot, which I think is the best. Otherwise the whole range would need to be unblocked, which I have done temporarily, to allow you to test. --
10347: 10333: 10089: 10048: 9939: 8702: 7289: 7260: 7236: 7164: 6818:
I stumbled upon this discussion when responding to a different thread (regarding another bot-related problem) on ST47's talk page (in which ST47 just
6643:
pending fixes to these problems. We shouldn't have automated processes being run by users who think anyone that has a problem with them are "stupid."
6548: 6459: 5911:
I've made an editprotected request pertaining to #2. As for bots to fill in the categories, I would go with having a bot run through all instances of
5633: 5015: 4890: 4279: 4199: 4186: 4113:
I see what you mean about the whitespace (1440x900, FF3), but having the TOC above the stats table does stop either of them from gettting 'squashed'.
3782: 3304: 3280: 3211: 3197: 1946: 671: 649: 624: 613: 562: 11956: 11941:
Great that was the problem.. once i run the login.py, Terminal asks me for my password but i cant enter it.. what ever i type nothing comes there...
11932: 11593: 11150: 11133: 10793: 10607: 10399: 10205: 9770: 8542: 8521: 8391:
My initial phrasing in this section might have been ambiguous, I've rephrased it to better express my meaning, which was - in the situations that it
7907: 7880: 7659: 7642: 7627: 7558: 7313:
withing the policies. The tags used are informative {{tl:Orphan}}. If people still want more consensus then I will be happy to take the bots task to
7242: 7082: 6515: 6491: 6408: 6356: 5685: 5676: 5479: 5406: 5397: 5268: 5253: 5227: 5209: 5024: 4562: 4412:) with known and degenerate test cases (that is, situations that SmackBot expects and those that are outside its assumptions about a normal article), 4173: 4136: 4041: 4029: 4005: 3944: 3446: 3420: 3121: 3085: 2915: 2487: 2465: 2041: 1522:
Great that was the problem.. once i run the login.py, Terminal asks me for my password but i cant enter it.. what ever i type nothing comes there...
1412: 1111: 256: 235: 12774: 12707: 12693: 12675: 12657: 12630: 12557: 12471: 12460: 12416: 12157: 12146: 11971: 11855: 11711: 11677: 11604: 11563: 11374: 11363: 11345: 11334: 11245: 10815: 10527: 10501: 10300: 10241: 9959: 9552: 9543: 8756: 8497: 8466: 8412: 8386: 8359: 7845: 7830: 7704: 7693: 7674: 7614: 7599: 7588: 7573: 7206: 7146: 6564: 6280: 6270: 4585: 3855: 3815: 3755: 3744: 3730: 3592: 3483: 2771: 2611: 2596: 2100: 1765: 1137: 1070: 1043: 183: 166: 141: 12801: 12731: 12724: 12642:
don't already know. Adding a category is a task everyone is familiar with. (As an aside, naming it shouldn't be .css since it isn't a style sheet.)
11905: 11790: 11771: 11587: 11212:
and didn't realize there was a separate section for Admins and non-Admins. Maybe a third Bot section that creates a new page in the Bot subspace?
10282: 10264: 10258: 10153: 10066: 9976: 8816: 8787: 8536: 7021: 7000: 6982: 6967: 6922: 6908: 6893: 6080: 5961: 5826: 5804: 5667: 5488: 4095: 3503: 3411: 3340: 2985: 2795: 2743: 2633: 1791: 1537: 1513: 767:
don't already know. Adding a category is a task everyone is familiar with. (As an aside, naming it shouldn't be .css since it isn't a style sheet.)
175:
and didn't realize there was a separate section for Admins and non-Admins. Maybe a third Bot section that creates a new page in the Bot subspace?
11819: 11805: 10825: 10766: 10536: 10022: 9601: 9587: 9480: 7424: 7113: 6952: 6938: 6853: 6844: 6805: 6790: 6725: 6694: 6667: 6346: 6308: 4108: 4059:
Given that no-one has said that the redesign is a bad idea, I'll be bold and implement it. Feel free to revert me if I acted with too much haste.
4054: 3795: 3489: 3157: 3103: 2949: 2681: 1849: 1552: 1436: 1311: 1300: 1229: 1195: 1122: 1081: 892: 881: 863: 852: 818: 800: 782: 755: 682: 596: 585: 541: 208: 12109: 12086: 12065: 12040: 12026: 10708: 10682: 9148: 9113: 7987:. As for why I posted here - if a bot is (apparently) doing a non-approved function, is there somewhere else that I should post about that? -- 7138: 6579:
This is not an isolated incident. He apparently hasn't been reading his own talk page. There are several different users complaining about the
6196: 5322: 5313: 4999: 4990: 4336: 4319: 4234: 3936: 3923: 3839: 3650: 3567: 3351: 2695: 2503: 2398: 2364: 2067: 1876: 1798: 1486: 1368: 1349: 1105: 12372: 12339: 11743: 11656: 11634: 11500: 11466: 11436: 11400: 10479: 9627: 9613: 8999: 8914: 7042: 4409: 3877: 3705: 3680: 3671: 3627: 2558:
There is no current way to give out individual permissions. If an admin was running the bot they could use their own account for deleted reads.
1397: 1383: 12933: 12601:. I am of the opinion that, since the bots exist to serve the users, not the other way around, our priority should be to create a system that 12317: 12256: 12220: 12198: 11143: 10572:
Use the most recent SVN version is possible, especially after a bug has been fixed. E.g., I think the commented out categories have been fixed.
10553: 10314:'''Imported from by ]", u"Testing") 38 39 wikipedia.stopme() newpage = Page{]}, newpage.put = <bound method Page.put of Page{]}: --> 10131: 9689: 9340: 9212: 9192: 9021:
Bots running unapproved tasks should not expect to be treated with the same deference as human editors, nor should they revert war with them. ā€“
7961: 7956: 7888: 7438: 7414: 7349: 7072: 6872: 6368: 6061: 6039: 6025: 5541: 4368: 3617: 3396: 1735: 1712: 1691: 1666: 1652: 726:. I am of the opinion that, since the bots exist to serve the users, not the other way around, our priority should be to create a system that 10731: 10318:, self = wikipedia:en UserBlocked: User is blocked in site wikipedia:en args = ('User is blocked in site wikipedia:en',)</small: --> 5187: 3690: 3641:
You're invited to contribute your knowledge and experience to the rewrite branch of pywikipediabot, which is doing exactly the same thing. --
3541: 3521: 2999: 1269: 1174: 1152: 1018: 984: 954: 918: 497: 464: 9945: 9927: 9890: 7855: 442: 381: 345: 323: 10163: 9042: 9010: 8980: 8954: 5194:
Please keep / instate / reinstate the purpose categories. As far as users looking for bots are concerned, it would be so incredibly useful!.
3611: 11414: 10074: 7951: 4884:
Sounds good to me, it is a effing mess. As for multitasking bots, just slap 'em into each relavent category seems perfectly logical to me.
3919:(mine) with a few modifications (admin functions, mainly). Also, as far as I know, SxWiki is not really being developed much anymore. -- 3290: 1976: 932: 12906: 10099: 7062: 5724:
No, you're right about things not being piled into the top level category. 'Knowledge bots by name' would fit, now I think about it more.
4088:
I boldly moved the TOC back to above the table, having it to the side makes the screen scroll horizontally and makes most TOC lines wrap.
12322:
Is there a ]-like system that we could use? Just throwing out ideas - I doubt there is, but am trying to think "outside the hammer". --
11915:
Sais-MacBook:~/Desktop/pywikipedia Sai$ python login.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "login.py", line 49, in <module: -->
11209: 7946:
Treves, Keren (2003). "Aragonite Formation in the Chiton (Mollusca) Girdle". Helvetica Chimica Acta 86: 1101. doi:10.1002/hlca.200390096.
3488:
The correct way to fix this problem is to fix all of the offending interwiki links; I've done this, and removed the nobots template. See
2275: 2258: 2234: 2216: 1496:
Sais-MacBook:~/Desktop/pywikipedia Sai$ python login.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "login.py", line 49, in <module: -->
447:
Is there a ]-like system that we could use? Just throwing out ideas - I doubt there is, but am trying to think "outside the hammer". --
172: 9322:
Well, a quick check of the B/RFA archives didn't turn up anything. On the plus side, it would have passed a BRFA quite easily anyway. -
8676: 6437:. In the unlikely event a "rogue admin" starts speedily deleting articles that shoudn't be, there are other ways to deal with that. ++ 4446: 4300: 12171:
Part the the reason the bot acts like it does it to make it easy for newbies: just add a section. The bot takes care of the rest. ā€”
10184: 9930:
has 262,000 entries. Seems no good reason to bother with this, and the action of the bot prevents quick move reversal, as noted above.
6135: 1761:
Part the the reason the bot acts like it does it to make it easy for newbies: just add a section. The bot takes care of the rest. ā€”
12512:
was becoming obsolete, and proposed a (to my mind) impractical solution, so I came up with my own (hopefully less impractical) idea.
7563:
I will block anybody that starts reverting the bot. Removing validly placed templates because there was no consensus to place them is
4574: 2786:
I'll retract the bit about SineBot, since I'm not about to wade through the forest looking for something I thought I may have seenĀ :)
637:
was becoming obsolete, and proposed a (to my mind) impractical solution, so I came up with my own (hopefully less impractical) idea.
10820: 10102: 9128:
Semi-automated - each manually reviewed, and as Jarry noted there is no need to seek approval for edits such as these. In my read of
3202:
so how do I block a bot? I tried the stop button but I am not n administrator. Note I am not the only one complaining about this bot.
12712: 10641:
Really? That's odd. I don't believe that DrilBot ever does that, and I don't have it deactivated in the custom module or anything. ā€“
8995: 8990: 11195:
subspace system. Like with a standard page naming format, rules of what IS a complaint, endorsing users, consensus closing, etc.
9105:
a bot issue. Firstly, those edits are within the "no approval necessary" guidelines; secondly, my reading of the situation is that
7033:
I've added your subversion repository to the #wikipedia-bag cia monitoring bot, any commits will now be broadcast in that channel.
7027: 3264: 158:
subspace system. Like with a standard page naming format, rules of what IS a complaint, endorsing users, consensus closing, etc.
11281:
13 active BAGers. Maybe some survey of them of how they'd respond to a Bot-RfC? My inspiration for this was WJB's suggestion at
5681:
And while I'm in the right mindset, might we make the default "holding category" for all bots "Knowledge bots by name" perhaps? -
3964:
It definitely needed tidying up; I did like the 1-2-3 nature of the instruction system though. Could that be preserved somehow? -
3787:
I've already got this running under my main account. I'll probably file a brfa later today, once I sort out a few other things. --
3220:
What discussion are you referring to in particular. I skimmed the talk page, but I didn't find anything that warranted blocking. -
244:
13 active BAGers. Maybe some survey of them of how they'd respond to a Bot-RfC? My inspiration for this was WJB's suggestion at
12011:
What error messages are you getting? Does the code use the api to get a cetegory list? There has been a recent interface change:
11626:
Thanks, for responding to, and fixing the bugs mentioned somewhere in this complaint. Also, thanks for staying cool on this one.
10444:
am guessing the owner had a specific reason he thought this was a good idea. Did you try contacting the bot owner about this? --
8114:
and indeed the purpose of templates. What should the minimum number of articles linking to a single-source template be, and why?
7320:
Sorry if there are a mass of typos in this message but I am typing in the dark sitting on the floor with a lapptop on a chair. --
4460: 4273: 3381:
The url has been down since last October, when the server's hard drive failed. False positives should just be reported manually.
1637:
What error messages are you getting? Does the code use the api to get a cetegory list? There has been a recent interface change:
1144:
Thanks, for responding to, and fixing the bugs mentioned somewhere in this complaint. Also, thanks for staying cool on this one.
8839: 7365: 4304: 12129: 12005: 10353: 8670: 7564: 4248: 3932:
to try to clarify the matter, but there are still large gaps. Could knowledgeable people expand it / correct the falsehoods. -
2574:
Only admins can run adminbots. You would need to run for admin first (it does not require giving out your personal information)
5898:
Run through the "active" category checking for bots who have not made contributions in X months, then move them to "inactive".
5020:
CFD has closed, generally supporting your idea. A few other thoughts/ideas were brought up that you may wish to consider. --
11723: 10176:
Apparently at pywikipediabot, they are working on it. Thanks for adding all these clarifications to the wording. -- User:Docu
9494: 6315:
I'm not sure I understand. How does me opting out prevent the bot from placing the "notice" on someone else's talk page? ++
5834: 3635: 3432: 3310: 2033: 1278: 301: 105: 6993: 6560:, I asked that further comments be left here, so if you have any opinion on what they said, please leave them below, cheers 4453: 10270: 9993: 9244: 5979:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
4016: 4012: 3974: 3163: 2754:
Just as a point of order, SineBot already subst's the unsigned template. It was probably another user who transcluded it. ā€“
1750: 1241: 97: 92: 80: 75: 70: 12939: 8009:
the master template. The bot operator should respect the outcome of any debate, if they don't then we can block and yell.
5656: 4425: 12885: 11263:
to people) rather than just dismissing "attack pages". How does one go about getting an "official" response from WP:BAG?
9755: 8513:
Good point. My view of this would be that the policy itself should be clarified, as there are in fact few true interwiki
8507: 5577: 5218:
for some rationale as to why they really wouldn't be that useful and why the current list approach is probably better. --
4523: 4285: 3821: 2161: 1960: 226:
to people) rather than just dismissing "attack pages". How does one go about getting an "official" response from WP:BAG?
11328:
How do I roll my eyes over the internet? If you would like something changed ask, don't tell me to stop running my bot.
10532:
Should be unblocked as soon as the bot-op makes clear that it's a bot and agrees not to run it without authorization. ā€“
9869:
Again, MZMcBride's example: move any non-move-protected page out of the way, then move the vandalism over the redirect.
5988: 4541: 4393: 846:
How do I roll my eyes over the internet? If you would like something changed ask, don't tell me to stop running my bot.
12723:
time this was going on. Ā :-) You can get the complete details on how it works and what safeguards are in place on the
9375: 9361:, I agree with IAR being applied to one-off tasks, but not for sustained and ongoing tasks like your checkwiki edits. ā€“ 8964: 8793: 4591: 3916: 3825: 3366: 2662:
only assume this is coming from Brion himself. Or was policy changed to encourage pointless edits that clog watchlists?
2552: 2356: 2114: 2076:
Protection wouldn't help, as an admin using Twinkle would still cause the same issue. The best place for this would be
1790:
time this was going on. Ā :-) You can get the complete details on how it works and what safeguards are in place on the
1626: 8989:
Can you remove your claim of edit waring. There was no such claim in this thread until you inserted it in the summary
8342:
I prefer option 2 (although that would be more coding for me). Would either of those solutions satisfy your concern?
3572: 3006:. It seems the result of the discussions are that most users think that we shouldn't do extra bot edits to substitute 10120: 9380: 9358: 6159: 3235: 2092: 11644: 7413:
and see if consensus exists to change the orphan tagging guidelines. Until then, Addbot may continue as approved at
6742:
ST47...I'm not sure what your issue is, but perhaps you simply want people to kowtow to you. OK. Here it goes....
3094:
containing the names and code locations. That way the rest of us could learn from the masters who have gone before.
2201:
Ugh, are there really any bots that still log in via Special:Userlogin? I thought more bot frameworks used the API.
1162: 11831: 11749: 11601: 10000: 8084:
articles (in which case it has clear advantages). This fits with the precedent of 'single-source templates' (e.g.
6482:
I would agree with this, I think immediate notification is necessary as speedies rarely last more than 5 minutes. -
6202: 6109: 5468:
Which of my 7 actively running approved BRFAs (or the additional 2 that can be run on demand) should I use for the
4973:
This standardization looks great to me. Perhaps a group CFD to get more input from those who don't watch teh BON? ā€“
1119: 11810:
I've got an idea for a more fine-tuned bots system, based somewhat on robots.txt -- I'll post a mockup tomorrow.
11728: 7579:
being threatened with a block. Oh, wait, AddShore has put the bot on hold until he gains community consensus. --
1388:
I've got an idea for a more fine-tuned bots system, based somewhat on robots.txt -- I'll post a mockup tomorrow.
12121: 10306: 8967:). I'm leaving this here as an unresolved issue. In some cases the bot (or Docu manually editing as the bot) has 8587: 7876:
It would make more sense to put a unique but meaningful line in, one that actually explained what the edit was.
7266: 6609: 5527: 4207: 3062: 2963: 2655: 288: 10461: 9088: 8762: 6928:
will clobber users and possibly even scripts by firing off the warning before they even get a chance. This is a
3416:
I'm working on setting that up on it's new server and I'll update the link with the new location when I do. --
3026:
template should be substituted. (Personally I don't have that much of a point of view on that.) So I have asked
12882: 12645:
But I would prefer to see a per-bot blacklist in any case; the idea of categories is only one proposal. ā€”Ā Carl
10785: 10650: 10599: 9353:
could arguably be called a type of userbox) , and the task of maintaining these tor templates was approved for
8457: 8303: 7751: 7719: 7668:
You're suggesting that the tagging be removed en masse, my threat stands against anybody who seeks to do that.
7491: 7447: 7374: 5244: 5200: 3333:
references a domain that is now on a different netblock). Or you could always find a better hosting company...
1957: 770:
But I would prefer to see a per-bot blacklist in any case; the idea of categories is only one proposal. ā€”Ā Carl
12225:
There's whatlinkshere: section-editing bots could load all transclusions and then ignore everything that uses
6824: 6224: 350:
There's whatlinkshere: section-editing bots could load all transclusions and then ignore everything that uses
12540: 12454: 12333: 12082:
Thanks for the help. I've tried to contact the developer to see if this can be fixed. Hopefully it can. --
11188: 9237: 7733:, amazingly I'm talking about bots here... (or really bored users with rollback) and yes, I will block them. 7212:
ties it to the lack of adherence to policy/guidelines. Here I believe the relevant guideline/policy would be
6216: 4995:
I agree - CfD is probably a good place to root out any problems so yes, I think I'll file one later today. -
3929: 2977: 2617:
Wait, not all bots can read deleted pages? Mine can, so I thought they all could. Oh, wait, it's an adminbot.
2037: 1708:
Thanks for the help. I've tried to contact the developer to see if this can be fixed. Hopefully it can. --
665: 579: 458: 151: 11111:
I've fixed the category comments bug and defaultsort apostrophes. Petition Reedy if you want a new snapshot.
8517:
bots: most simply propagate existing interwikis, so I don't see how knowing a language would really help. -
7968:
Why is this here? Seems like questions for the bot's operator... (edit: templates seem like a bad idea... )
7392:
Addbot has been stopped until the toolserver report is fixed, so the discussion here has served its purpose.
3274:
Pinged Misza on IRC. The bot seems to have stopped, if it keeps up reply here and somebody should block it.
11699: 11669:
This was clearly a misunderstanding by the operator, which he has since corrected. It's not a big deal. --
11146:
and hopefully everyone else using AWB will upgrade to it soon. Thank you again for all your hard work. --
10080:
Where was it discussed that this should be added? Not all bots have issues running in the template space. -
9721: 9695: 9669: 9085: 8776: 7094: 5691: 5600: 5547: 5436: 4348: 1613: 1322: 1217: 1187:
This was clearly a misunderstanding by the operator, which he has since corrected. It's not a big deal. --
12551:
I have no idea how your bot works but any nobots system doesn't seem like the best way to deal with that.
11916:
import wikipedia, config File "/Users/Sai/Desktop/pywikipedia/wikipedia.py", line 127, in <module: -->
11535:
lenghty notices about article deletions if the last edit of that editor on the article at hand dates back
8744: 1497:
import wikipedia, config File "/Users/Sai/Desktop/pywikipedia/wikipedia.py", line 127, in <module: -->
1249: 1053:
lenghty notices about article deletions if the last edit of that editor on the article at hand dates back
676:
I have no idea how your bot works but any nobots system doesn't seem like the best way to deal with that.
11696: 10474: 10273:, so I stepped it up a bit. I'm sick of asking for consensus on something and having no one answer me. 9059:
Those are manual edits, so this doesn't really belong here, nevertheless, the edits were conducted after
4568: 4472: 4180:
Counting the number of elements in a list isn't *that* resource intensive. How are you loading the list?
4155: 3326: 2972:
was blocked for substing unsigned also. I think that it is fine, as long as it is going at a slow rate.
2834: 2721: 1597: 1214: 9761:, so it will appear along with any of those signature-like templates that we use for links about users. 8971:
repeated the change (perhaps through programming error) even if reverted by users (usually the h3-: -->
8297:
templates it is different; humans will choose when it is stylistically appropriate to use that template.
12927: 12605:
can use easily, even those with no programming experience. Asking them to add each individual page to
11581: 9415: 6153: 6094: 5970: 3992:
Looks good to me. I don't particularly like the version with the numbers due to the table borders; IMO
3883: 3315: 3072: 1992: 1099: 730:
can use easily, even those with no programming experience. Asking them to add each individual page to
49: 21: 12920:
Since I haven't implemented this in the 7 months since you asked, I'm going to go with no, I'm not. --
8320:
Editors only use the {cite doi} template when it matches the formatting style in the relevant article.
7529:
these articles people would probably sill be complaining. I dont think it is the bot people dont like.
5843:: a hotly debated topic. Should we have them? Does anyone use them? How do we make them better filled? 4954:
I've add "Unapproved" as a sub- of "by status", for bots which have not been approved for any task. -
12036:
the pagelist. I've tried using the api via FillallFromCategoryEx as well, with the same results. --
9469:
It would be nice if you could help translating and submitting this announcement to other wikis tooĀ :)
7746: 7714: 7486: 7442: 7369: 7202:
articles that could require the creation of more inbound links, but that's just my humble opinion. -
6602: 6475: 5892: 4380: 4326: 4244: 4218: 3803: 3716: 1662:
the pagelist. I've tried using the api via FillallFromCategoryEx as well, with the same results. --
12592:
The problem we are essentially dealing with is that we need, in some manner, to complile a database
8395:
a good idea to have a single source template, should a bot be allowed to help create that template?
6183: 4388: 2858:
I just don't understand the "reduce load" argument, since I'm not able to see how it's significant.
717:
The problem we are essentially dealing with is that we need, in some manner, to complile a database
11917:
import config, login File "/Users/Sai/Desktop/pywikipedia/config.py", line 364, in <module: -->
11158: 10323: 9433: 9251: 8722: 8580: 8031: 7993: 6208: 3239: 2413: 2320: 1498:
import config, login File "/Users/Sai/Desktop/pywikipedia/config.py", line 364, in <module: -->
11846: 9451: 9257: 7437:
No, I don't think so. Addbot should hold off doing things he knows others oppose. The approval on
6171: 4243:
No problem. The gory details are at SmackBot's talk history page. Some of them have been moved to
1427: 12012: 10807: 10211: 10190: 9861: 9836: 7269:, an editor added two incoming links (after two go-arounds), and the bot still re-added the tag. 7196:
uses informative messages, appropriately worded, in any edit summaries or messages left for users
6621: 6382: 6353: 6277: 6246: 5570: 5183:
I've removed the purpose categories and renamed perlwikipedia in line with the CfD discussion. -
4516: 3676:
If that is the case, there should be a notice on the bot talk page informing users of that fact.
3409: 3225: 3177: 3145:
long-running bots. If you would like more detailed advice please feel free to contact me. ā€”Ā Carl
3048: 2607: 2407:
will work just fine. The reason "Ä°" works is that its lowercase form is "i", same as for "I". ā€”
1774: 1638: 9751:
is that you can only specify one task, even if the bot in question has twenty. I've added it to
9396: 7441:
is pretty non-credible, and Addbot should seek actual community consensus for these activities.
4432: 4299:
SmackBot does well with problems that fit its view of reality (aside from some annoying habits,
4267: 4261: 4247:. That's where he answers questions and reports his fixes. We've been discussing the problem at 2165: 12812: 12265:, a bot would need to use the API list=embeddedin rather than backlinks to get a list of pages. 12262: 11863: 11313: 10315:, text = u'You have so many things in the background that y... could possibly work?" <p: --> 10053:
In case anyone still has this debate on their watchlist, a wider discussion is taking place at
9339:
tasks (which should be given a once over by the BAG, this nullify task on the other hand...) -
8797: 8666: 7984: 5128:
Pages monitored by Knowledge bots (if it is possible to merge with "Categories owned by bots")
4829:
Pages monitored by Knowledge bots (if it is possible to merge with "Categories owned by bots")
4546: 2818: 2705: 2643: 2118: 2077: 1887: 1444: 390:, a bot would need to use the API list=embeddedin rather than backlinks to get a list of pages. 387: 276: 10690:- Reverted to prior behaviour.. Seem to be a few minor tests failing. Will sort and fix later 10111:
Agree with the change in spirit, your comment above I believe is missing a few words though: "
9835:
hidden under the heap of redirects, one could just move it somewhere else for safe-keeping. ā€”
9421:
Important announcements, e.g. breaking changes. -- Minimal traffic (one mail a month, at most)
8594: 6823:
as "whiny," "stalker-esque," "petty" and "irritating"), and I'm stunned by ST47's attitude. "
3809:
Doesn't look like a bot to me, maybe AWB or something else. Give him a barnstar or something.
12670: 12625: 12519: 12483: 12411: 12151:
Well the format of history pages changed again. Looks like it might be back to the old form.
10361: 10356:
it could be blocked from editing even if logged in? Is that right? Sorry for the questions!
10343: 10200: 9639: 9539: 9511: 9274: 8088: 7274: 7257: 7221: 5950: 5868: 5731: 5702: 5610: 5504: 5460: 5418: 5264: 5223: 4941: 4916: 4477: 4120: 4066: 4026: 3984: 3832:
of time on their hands. I suggest a polite note on their talk page pointing out the mistake.
3564: 3250: 3207: 3117: 2497: 2169: 2157: 2089: 1305:
Well the format of history pages changed again. Looks like it might be back to the old form.
795: 750: 644: 608: 536: 11698:. Of course, I do understand that he was under very tense stress in real life and with some 7709:
There'll be no blocking, BJ. Anyone who wishes to remove this tag is entitled to do so, per
7317:
I am just lacking time to start it currently. Maybe using the village pump would be quicker.
7158:
The bot really shouldn't be adding the template to any article with a single incoming link.
2525: 1216:. Of course, I do understand that he was under very tense stress in real life and with some 11995: 11981: 11597: 11268: 10789: 10654: 10603: 10062: 9935: 9168: 8688: 6820: 6786: 6721: 6648: 6629: 6534: 6511: 6496:
Which, I would argue, is as it should be. The vast majority of articles that are speedied
6472: 6442: 6320: 5358: 5318:
Just so you know, I won't be touching the "by purpose" categories for a while, at least. -
4377: 4215: 3165: 3139:
Use the API's recentchanges query to get a list of recent changes, in chunks of up to 5000.
2733:
There are at least four or five subst bots and the only rational given before was "because
1584: 1115: 231: 116: 12727:
discussion. The short of it: it's paranoid enough to make sure comments don't vanish. ā€”
10497:
for it at any rate. Most IW bots are speedily approved, but it's a process nonetheless. -
8922: 8792:
And I wouldn't call that approval for its current task. Should we have the op go to BRFA?
5450: 4100:
Now I have whitespace taking up half of my screen... If it helps IE7/Vista, 1440x900, 22"
3958:, but seeing as no-one reads that page, I thought I'd get a more meaningful response here! 3844:
JS can be run locally, too. Just because it isn't on site, doesn't mean it isn't running.
2288: 1794:
discussion. The short of it: it's paranoid enough to make sure comments don't vanish. ā€”
8: 12152: 12123: 11961:
Of course, but it just doesn't echoes it to the terminal. You just type and press enter.
11521: 11309: 11173: 10485: 10449: 10296: 10261: 10251: 9972: 9850: 9825: 9531: 9524: 9336: 8879: 8718: 8108: 8027: 7989: 7689: 7638: 7610: 7584: 7554: 7507: 6329:
Aren't you be able to optout of having the bot notify users for articles you've nommed? ā€“
5426:
I think probably yes (no need to bother CfD with that though, as it's a new category). -
5151:
Knowledge bots which are exclusion compliant (takes over from "Exclusion compliant bots")
4852:
Knowledge bots which are exclusion compliant (takes over from "Exclusion compliant bots")
3955: 2908: 2885: 2764: 2480: 2443: 2408: 2315: 1599: 1542:
Of course, but it just doesn't echoes it to the terminal. You just type and press enter.
1306: 1039: 272: 136: 12504:
That was my inspiration, yes. I can't fully see the use of it myself, but someone said
11795:
More fine-tuned system would be to blacklist each bot separately - not very convenient.
8600: 8180:
Should there be a minimum number of transcludes required before a template is permitted?
7567:. Get consensus to change how the template is used universally or leave the them alone. 2060:
by going into edit mode, just as you can, but apart from that you make a good point. --
1373:
More fine-tuned system would be to blacklist each bot separately - not very convenient.
629:
That was my inspiration, yes. I can't fully see the use of it myself, but someone said
12105:
Thanks again. The developer gave me a fix and will be updating the framework soon. --
11928: 11898: 11139: 11124: 11074: 11039: 11004: 10974: 10936: 10913: 10890: 10852: 10781: 10687: 10646: 10595: 10578: 10392: 10144: 9912: 9745: 9643: 9578: 8912: 8851: 8752: 8736: 8491: 8406: 8377: 8353: 8278: 8162: 8132: 7843: 7828: 7807: 7657: 7651:
disruptive, policy calls that canvassing, I call it semi-forum shopping, but whatever.
7625: 7541: 7478: 7328: 7142: 6904: 6245:
good as in most cases the page will be deleted by the time anyone reads the message. ā€”
6177: 6071: 5818: 5754: 5665: 5563: 5395: 4903: 4583: 4560: 4509: 4494: 4483: 4416: 4171: 4106: 4052: 3828:, so if it's anything it's "something else". My guess is that it's just someone with a 3498: 3402: 3221: 3185: 3173: 3099: 3044: 2934: 2863: 2791: 2651:
Comes along and subst's SineBot's signatures? Honestly? Did anyone talk to Slakr first?
2603: 2537: 2461: 2343: 2305: 2182: 2135: 2126: 2057: 1731:
Thanks again. The developer gave me a fix and will be updating the framework soon. --
1509: 1479: 11890:
because my pywikipedia folder is in Users/soxred93/Bots/pywikipedia. Hope this helps!
11282: 9573:
If you're editing through the API, you have to set &bot when you use action=edit.
8810:
what he thinks, and ask him to do a BRFA if he wants to add more tasks to his bot. --
7241:(Possible COI note: I gave final approval for this task) The bot should, according to 6584: 4408:
Changes should be tested against a test suite that exercises all of SmackBot's edits (
4195:
For posterity's sake, I got a suitable function from Cobi/Chris' PHP bot framework. -
3994: 1471:
because my pywikipedia folder is in Users/soxred93/Bots/pywikipedia. Hope this helps!
245: 12841:
willing to maintain their links manually. In that case, the fix is for them to apply
12798: 12536: 12450: 12329: 12143: 11950: 11707: 11674: 11652: 11548: 11496: 11432: 11359: 11322: 10520: 10085: 10044: 10018: 9735: 9475: 9231: 9129: 9106: 8963:
For the record, Docu has refused to seek further bot approval for the new tasks (see
8662: 8532: 6978: 6948: 6918: 6889: 6868: 6487: 6035: 5797: 4402: 4315: 3788: 3740: 3701: 3667: 3646: 3297: 3034: 3020: 3010: 2980: 2969: 2959: 2953: 2849: 2810: 2395: 2064: 2025: 2010: 1916:
willing to maintain their links manually. In that case, the fix is for them to apply
1873: 1531: 1297: 1225: 1192: 1170: 1066: 1014: 950: 877: 661: 575: 454: 12493:
It basically robots.txt, which has worked for years. But I still see no use for it.
12261:
I agree it's a pain to have the exclusion lists on the wiki. By the way, because of
9889:
Regarding "if this bot was approved", a simple check of the bot's userpage turns up
9163:
WP:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2009_April_13#Category:Interwiki translation templates
8845:
But it still needs to be approved by BAG. Every other bot that has a new task does.
6760:
I am but one of the peons - barely worthy of contributing to Knowledge in your eyes.
6716:
editors. Bots are supposed to assist editors, not hinder them and create more work.
6592: 618:
It basically robots.txt, which has worked for years. But I still see no use for it.
386:
I agree it's a pain to have the exclusion lists on the wiki. By the way, because of
12863: 12832:
and don't always have a one-to-one mapping in their vocabularies, and also because
12766: 12664: 12619: 12513: 12477: 12405: 11815: 11786: 10357: 10339: 10278: 10237: 10194: 10162:
Ok, let's just mention standard interwiki.py. There are others that work correctly
9956: 9907:
Personally, I find the whole idea of categorizing redirects to be a waste of time.
9897: 9873: 9814: 9800: 9786: 9623: 9610: 9597: 8770: 8699: 8692: 8617: 8547: 7913: 7502:
BAG approved this bot for this work, therefore, the community consensus exists. --
7421: 7270: 7252: 7217: 7213: 7110: 6165: 5945: 5726: 5697: 5605: 5499: 5476: 5455: 5413: 4934: 4911: 4333: 4231: 4133: 4115: 4092: 4061: 4038: 4021: 4002: 3979: 3865: 3836: 3656: 3624: 3608: 3559: 3337: 3243: 3203: 3090:
Just while I'm here wreaking havoc anyway: it would be nice to have a page such as
2529: 2404: 2086: 1938: 1907:
and don't always have a one-to-one mapping in their vocabularies, and also because
1841: 1565: 1393: 1364: 789: 744: 638: 602: 530: 10257:
And spammed it only over a hundred talk pages, using a blatantly leading question.
8121:
here, so to avoid them getting entangled I'll create sections for each one below.
4909:, and the requests are listed on the main BRFA page under 'Denied', not 'Failed'. 2293: 12845: 12787: 12748: 12507: 12425: 12229: 12136: 11991: 11759: 11421: 11264: 10758: 10723: 10700: 10674: 10469: 10219: 10058: 9931: 9762: 8684: 8680: 7399: 7283:
Looks like a bug and the bot isn't currently running. Report it to the operator.
6850: 6782: 6717: 6644: 6625: 6530: 6507: 6438: 6316: 6191: 5782: 4347:
For what it's worth, I don't think SmackBot should bother making changes such as
3866: 3848: 3584: 2734: 2668: 1920: 1862: 1823: 1580: 1337: 1290: 939: 632: 550: 354: 227: 10620:
to selectively deactivate changes... e.g., DateOrdinalsAndOf and SetDefaultSort.
9439:
automated mail is sent by bug trackers on each bug state change. -- High traffic
8779:), not really sure I'd call that a proper approval though by today's standards. 6781:
the efforts of the live, human editor. This is editing too quickly - period. ++
5216:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 February 20#Category:Knowledge bots
5054:
Knowledge bot requests for approval (empty or containing undetermined, perhaps)
4741:
Knowledge bot requests for approval (empty or containing undetermined, perhaps)
3895:
I have Wikibot, built from Kaspo's phpwikibot framework, though it's very basic.
3662:
You have to message him on his own talk page, he usually responds really fast. -
57:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
12924: 11578: 11517: 11192: 11165: 11147: 10633: 10582: 10551: 10498: 10494: 10445: 10434: 10380: 10371: 10292: 10129: 10007: 9968: 9846: 9821: 9777:
How to be worse than useless: a technical manual for bushy-tailed bot operators
9535: 9515: 9411: 9367: 9323: 9210: 9190: 9146: 9110: 9069: 9040: 9027: 9008: 8978: 8947: 8934: 8892: 8518: 8462: 8308: 7925: 7868: 7685: 7634: 7606: 7580: 7550: 7503: 7203: 7152: 7069: 7038: 6840: 6801: 6687: 6663: 6557: 6401: 6339: 6301: 6147: 6128: 6054: 6018: 5716: 5682: 5673: 5538: 5485: 5484:
It would have to be the first BRFA (AnomieBot) i.e. without the task number. -
5427: 5403: 5319: 5306: 5260: 5249: 5219: 5205: 5184: 5012: 5004:
n.b. I've made some tweaks to the grand plan (not major, just wording issues).
4996: 4983: 4955: 4925: 4885: 4361: 4196: 4181: 3965: 3946: 3933: 3874: 3750: 3725: 3511: 3439: 3373: 3113: 2900: 2877: 2756: 2644: 2472: 2435: 1096: 1035: 155: 128: 58: 17: 8927:
Knowledge:WikiProject_Check_Wikipedia#Template_with_Unicode_control_characters
6588: 5259:
work for others, I don't care if people want to spend their own time of it. --
4401:
No test runs on live articles. Testing should happen on local machine or in a
12899: 12688: 12652: 12367: 12312: 12298: 12239: 12215: 12106: 12083: 12060: 12037: 12021: 11924: 11892: 11741: 11632: 11491:
its owner is unwilling to stop and fix it after I have asked him to do so. --
11461: 11395: 10777: 10642: 10591: 10386: 10141: 9986: 9982: 9949: 9909: 9575: 9354: 8907: 8846: 8811: 8748: 8731: 8487: 8481: 8452: 8402: 8396: 8374: 8349: 8343: 8298: 8274: 8268: 8158: 8152: 8128: 8122: 8006: 7918: 7895: 7877: 7837: 7823: 7801: 7710: 7652: 7620: 7535: 7472: 7410: 7406: 7345: 7322: 7314: 7191: 7099: 7079: 7018: 6997: 6964: 6900: 6561: 6545: 6502: 6456: 6434: 6266: 6068: 5660: 5390: 5239: 5195: 5021: 4578: 4554: 4165: 4161: 4101: 4047: 3518: 3494: 3468: 3438:
I don't know too much about the specifics of this situation, but in general,
3152: 3095: 2928: 2859: 2787: 2591: 2534: 2457: 2339: 2301: 2270: 2229: 2178: 2131: 2122: 1977: 1732: 1709: 1686: 1663: 1647: 1505: 1473: 1267: 1150: 1009:
its owner is unwilling to stop and fix it after I have asked him to do so. --
979: 913: 835: 813: 777: 492: 437: 423: 364: 340: 12396:
exclude ] from ] exclude ] from ] ] ] exclude ] from all exclude all from ]
6596: 521:
exclude ] from ] exclude ] from ] ] ] exclude ] from all exclude all from ]
12794: 12552: 12531: 12494: 12466: 12445: 12432: 12324: 12140: 11987: 11964: 11942: 11872: 11850: 11766: 11703: 11670: 11648: 11614: 11558: 11544: 11492: 11428: 11369: 11355: 11340: 11339:
Well, this rant did actually include a hidden gem of a bug report. Thanks.
11329: 11287: 11239: 11214: 11197: 10566: 10533: 10509: 10460:
Hello everybody, I'm sorry if I caused you any trouble. See my reply on my
10327: 10081: 10040: 10014: 9549: 9472: 9429: 9347: 9133: 9081: 8781: 8574: 8528: 8010: 8002: 7969: 7819: 7762: 7734: 7699: 7669: 7594: 7568: 7284: 7231: 7159: 7055: 6989: 6974: 6944: 6933: 6914: 6885: 6864: 6483: 6414: 6363: 6031: 5915: 5878: 5853: 5652: 5641: 5628: 5593: 5443: 5347: 4375:
You are quite correct, and genreally it won't make white space only edits.
4311: 3810: 3777: 3736: 3697: 3663: 3642: 3534: 3478: 3389: 3346: 3294: 3275: 3192: 3027: 2974: 2738: 2626: 2559: 2507: 2392: 2251: 2243:, I thought a lot, such as pywikipedia and ClueBot classes used API login. 2209: 2061: 2019: 1869: 1576: 1545: 1523: 1453: 1431: 1344: 1294: 1221: 1188: 1166: 1132: 1076: 1062: 1010: 946: 887: 873: 858: 857:
Well, this rant did actually include a hidden gem of a bug report. Thanks.
847: 677: 656: 619: 591: 570: 557: 449: 250: 202: 177: 160: 12344:
Here's one possibility along those lines. We could set up categories like
11765:
as it disabled messages without the user knowing what they are disabling.
9447: 9265: 5154:
Knowledge bots using MediaWiki::Bot (takes over from "Perlwikipedia bots")
1343:
as it disabled messages without the user knowing what they are disabling.
469:
Here's one possibility along those lines. We could set up categories like
12852: 12755: 12247: 12189: 11901: 11811: 11796: 11782: 10559: 10486: 10274: 10233: 9953: 9894: 9870: 9797: 9710: 9684: 9658: 9619: 9607: 9593: 9457:
automated mail is sent after each pywikipedia SVN commit. -- High traffic
8766: 8696: 8372:
users doing it all by hand and using a different template for every doi.
7418: 7107: 6006:(N.B. I was the one who said 48 hours was prompt under the circumstances) 5473: 4855:
Knowledge bots using Perlwikipedia (takes over from "Perlwikipedia bots")
4330: 4228: 4130: 4089: 4035: 3999: 3833: 3621: 3605: 3334: 3076: 2672: 2125:, who is currently inactive. It's also worth mentioning that I undeleted 1927: 1830: 1482: 1389: 1374: 1360: 372: 314: 10428:
Operator will seek BRFA for tasks that have not already been approved. ā€“
9392: 9137: 5555: 3016:. (I agree on that.) But it also seems that perhaps most think that the 12728: 12172: 12135:
It would be appreciated if you could post a bug report and/or patch on
10753: 10718: 10695: 10669: 10465: 9466:-- Would be good if there was some onwiki forum as well.. -- User:Docu 9080:
It is an automated mass change that removes the notice from all pages.
8730:
Link to approval for the geocoording? It's a rather large task to IAR.
7485:
You'll refrain from automating these edits until an RfC approves then?
6361:
From the bot's user page "To opt-out, add <!--User:CSDWarnBot--: -->
3687: 3677: 3604:
specific optout values should be supported. I fixed the perl function.
3579: 2692: 1795: 1762: 1289:
It would be appreciated if you could post a bug report and/or patch on
6959:(via edit conflict) Protonk: The problem with that is the bot is then 5884:) from the "inactive" and "discontinued" sections. Should be reliable. 5077:
Denied Knowledge bot requests for approval (takes over from "Failed")
4803:
Knowledge bots by purpose (empty or containing undetermined, perhaps)
4764:
Denied Knowledge bot requests for approval (takes over from "Failed")
12921: 11575: 10546: 10429: 10124: 10037:
Knowledge:Templates for deletion#Template:R from other capitalisation
9362: 9343:
is to work on user talk pages and update transclusions of userboxen (
9205: 9185: 9141: 9064: 9035: 9022: 9003: 8973: 8939: 8884: 8807: 8608: 7034: 6836: 6797: 6679: 6659: 6553: 6452: 6393: 6331: 6293: 6142: 6120: 6046: 6010: 5761: 5298: 5117:
Knowledge bots by purpose (empty or containing undetermined, perhaps)
5108:
Inactive Knowledge Bots (takes over from "Bots not currently active")
5102:
Knowledge bots by status (empty or containing undetermined, perhaps)
4975: 4795:
Inactive Knowledge Bots (takes over from "Bots not currently active")
4789:
Knowledge bots by status (empty or containing undetermined, perhaps)
4353: 3920: 3443: 3417: 3004:
Knowledge:Village pump (policy)/Archive 57#Substitution, substitution
2173: 1093: 11755:
Actually, if supported I'd implement this (fairuse only). I dislike
10545:
I unblocked it and advised him to file an B/RFA before he runs it. ā€“
3557:, although it's hardly elegant and could probably be improved upon. 1333:
Actually, if supported I'd implement this (fairuse only). I dislike
12684: 12648: 12363: 12308: 12211: 12056: 12017: 11838: 11736: 11627: 11457: 11391: 10210:
I was just about to say that, then I ended up in an edit conflict.
7647:
I'd call starting mutliple threads in different parts of Knowledge
7340: 6261: 3148: 2966:; 2) if substing, then please subst all {unsigned} at the same time 2587: 2266: 2225: 2113:
Ah, I forgot to mention that I have linked to this discussion from
1682: 1643: 1414: 1262: 1145: 975: 909: 809: 773: 488: 433: 336: 11886:
to the correct directory. For me, before I enter the code, I type
11233:
Seeing as anything done can be undone, I've created the following
8878:
Bot still operating without approval for its task (especially the
8743:
Might take a bit of digging to find: the bot started operating on
5105:
Active Knowledge Bots (takes over from "Active bots on Knowledge")
4792:
Active Knowledge Bots (takes over from "Active bots on Knowledge")
4612:
Knowledge bot requests for approval (members are "open" requests)
4497:- Deleting Local Images that are also on Commons Task (Admin bot) 1467:
to the correct directory. For me, before I enter the code, I type
196:
Seeing as anything done can be undone, I've created the following
11235:
Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct#Use_of_bot_privileges
7048: 3527: 3382: 2619: 2244: 2202: 198:
Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct#Use_of_bot_privileges
12876:
Didn't we at some point get the even easier solution (after the
10055:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard#Need wider community input
8882:
bit), in some cases repeating the edit when reverted by users. ā€“
3904:
The old BasicBot framework (I don't think it still works though)
3721:
This page is for comments on the bot or questions about the bot.
2962:(added 31 May 2008 Stepshep): 1) still listed "under debate" on 2196:
Change in Special:UserLogin returned content on successful login
1951:
Didn't we at some point get the even easier solution (after the
12877: 12618:
interfaces, but if that's not possible, the humans should win.
12465:
Archiving is opt in and Sinebot had a cat last time I checked.
11574:
We could just, you know, ask him to do something about it... --
11164:
Well, we already had a sort of rfc/bot attempt as a subpage of
7185: 4622:
Knowledge withdrawn bot requests (also a direct subcategory of
4415:
Changes to SmackBot's ruleset (templates or bug fixes) must be
1952: 1092:
We could just, you know, ask him to do something about it... --
743:
interfaces, but if that's not possible, the humans should win.
590:
Archiving is opt in and Sinebot had a cat last time I checked.
127:
Well, we already had a sort of rfc/bot attempt as a subpage of
12793:
because they use interwiki.py and pywikipedia supports it. --
12580:
That is true, however, consider the ramifications of actually
9514:
but i'm not sure how up to date/current/correct that list is.
8707:
If this were a bot doing anything remotely controversial, one
8661:- It is a bot but does not have the word "bot" in the name. -- 7818:
Not sure what you mean by "template", but for starting an RfC
7593:
I must have missed 100k taggings, revisions and retaggings...
5234:
I've read this and this is why I'm here. These categories are
4615:
Knowledge approved bot requests (also a direct subcategory of
2051:
Automated tools leaving messages on redirected user talk pages
2040:. To view the discussion and voice your opinion, please visit 1868:
because they use interwiki.py and pywikipedia supports it. --
705:
That is true, however, consider the ramifications of actually
11101: 11094: 11087: 11080: 11066: 11059: 11052: 11045: 11031: 11024: 11017: 11010: 10994: 10987: 10980: 10963: 10956: 10949: 10942: 10923: 10900: 10879: 10872: 10865: 10858: 10338:
Aha! Cool thanks! That must mean it's not logging in right?
8291:
Should a bot be allowed to create templates for this purpose?
6963:, and the user recieving the messages will be left confused. 4636:
Knowledge expired bot requests (also a direct subcategory of
3401:
So if the URL doesn't work, then should the link be removed?
12356:
and overload the bots and nobots template so that code like
11237:
procss as a proposed process to show what I'm thinking of.
9138:
my objection above to your bot performing unauthorized tasks
7867:) for using Sam1649, which I am helpfully reposting here. - 5921:
and do the following (just a start, feel free to disagree):
5715:
category my be a good idea. Feel free to disagree though. -
4629:
Knowledge failed bot requests (also a direct subcategory of
4537:
Notice re: proposal to give BAG the ability to (de)flag bots
481:
and overload the bots and nobots template so that code like
200:
procss as a proposed process to show what I'm thinking of.
12911: 9926:
I suggest that the approval for this bot be withdrawn. The
8175:
Is the citation of sources via templates ever a good thing?
6612:
in this matter, I would like to make a formal request that
4280:
SmackBot moved tags from within the article to the very top
4264:. Some similar problems where SmackBot has tripped up are: 4251:. He explained how SmackBot works. I've also e-mailed Rich. 3266: 3068: 2002: 10506:
Thanks. Should Jigbot be unblocked now, or upon approval?
5874:
Fill just "inactive" (by adding the relevant parameter to
2355:
namespace can be written with the first letter lowercase;
6772:. Whether it's every 15 minutes or every 30, there will 6291:
Have you considered opting out of the bot's assistance? ā€“
5887:
Fill "active" as well. (Plus checks? See subpoint below.)
3322: 12681:
blacklist maintained for each bot would be fine. ā€”Ā Carl
11308:
if there is a serious issue with a bot, leave a note on
10590:
Hmm... I guess that it was just a similar bug. My bad. ā€“
10216:
Knowledge:Tools/Navigation popups/About fixing redirects
9568:
Bot edits showing up in watchlists, recent changes, etc.
9331:
More pointy threads because I object to your running D6
8965:
User_talk:D6#WP_CHECK_WP_edits:_automated_or_reviewed.3F
8326:
The template, by default, uses the 'cite journal' format
8048:
consensus first - is this the best place to gather this?
6506:
thus abating frustration and a {{db-repost}} or two. ++
4924:
I've changed it - the more logical, the better, IMHO. -
806:
blacklist maintained for each bot would be fine. ā€”Ā Carl
271:
if there is a serious issue with a bot, leave a note on
12599:
which makes it easier for individual users to manage it
11592:
I'm confused, isn't that what's been going on so far? ā€”
6754:
I bow to your mental superiority and technical prowess.
2176:
article, but have links to it after the redirect text.
1110:
I'm confused, isn't that what's been going on so far? ā€”
724:
which makes it easier for individual users to manage it
12360:
puts the page into the appropriate categories. ā€”Ā Carl
10414:
Out of scope operation and/or approval notice question
10269:
Yes, well, no one bothered to give their input when I
9359:
User talk:D6#WP CHECK WP edits: automated or reviewed?
9226: 8260:
Template:Cite doi/10.1111.2Fj.1502-3931.1990.tb01361.x
8228:
Template:Cite doi/10.1023.2FB:CLIM.0000037493.89489.3f
4706:
Knowledge bots with source code published (3 members)
3686:
a page that is not going to be watched or replied to.
3000:
User talk:Master of Puppets#Why substitute "unsigned"?
2263:
It's a configuration parameter in pywikipedia. ā€”Ā Carl
2156:
This seems to be the same as the problem described in
485:
puts the page into the appropriate categories. ā€”Ā Carl
9562:
Knowledge:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Tinucherian
9109:
establishes the consensus position perfectly well. -
8969:
reverted the users who disputed the checkwiki changes
3723:
which was pretty much unresponsive for quite a while.
3460:
Bots repeatedly replacing informatin deleted from dab
3132:
There are basically two ways to track reent changes:
9165:. Maybe the task should be cancelled. -- User:Docu 8145:
Does the bot approval include creation of new pages?
7364:
Be it noted I expressed my concern about this here,
6757:
I am a lowly edit-by-hand, non-script-jockey editor.
2314:(tangent) Case-changing surprises? Please share. ā€” 12014:. If this is the problem, it's easy to fix. ā€”Ā Carl 8864:
Bot operating without formal approval for its tasks
7941:{{cite doi|10.1007/s12052-008-0084-1}}</ref: --> 7245:, only be adding the orphan template to pages with 4150:
Knowledge:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Jarry1250
3454:
Knowledge:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Foxy Loxy
3361:
Knowledge:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Fritzpoll
1640:. If this is the problem, it's easy to fix. ā€”Ā Carl 5778:This has been offline for a good while, actually. 5472:parameter?Ā ;) Other than that, it looks ok to me. 5157:Knowledge bots running on the Wikimedia Toolserver 4933:Doesnt trouble my brain. You have my supportĀ ! -- 4858:Knowledge bots running on the Wikimedia Toolserver 4662:Knowledge bots running on the Wikimedia Toolserver 4260:The problem that triggered this "rant" of mine is 3372:Not working for me either: Operation timed out. - 3110:Category:Knowledge bots with source code published 9161:That was afterwards though. BTW are you aware of 8679:, while the "must" requirement was instituted on 8569: 8076:solution is to use less text in the article body. 7863:Above is TheHelpfulOne's rationale (as posted on 3517:Would you happen to have that function in C#? -- 2686:Indeed, very large number of templates on a page 2239:I thought that while not many frameworks use API 2042:Knowledge:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Chris G 10370:It would still get caught, even if logged in. - 8255:Template:Cite doi/10.1016.2Fj.palaeo.2009.02.017 7366:User_talk:Addshore/Archive_18#Orphan_tag_and_bot 4601:The category system, as it is. "An effing mess." 3892:Cobi has one (has also contributed to Chris G's) 2291:Canonical namespace change coming: Image: -: --> 28:Knowledge:Bot owners' noticeboard/Archive 4 12783:I'm pretty sure interwiki bots normally follow 12663:categories, whether or not they are populated. 12585:slews of problems like "OI, my userpage was in 8840:WT:GEO#Coordinates_from_other_language_versions 8223:Template:Cite doi/10.1016.2Fj.ympev.2005.08.017 7619:Is your total intent just to cause disruption? 7338:the talk pages, I dont think any would object. 7170:such (Operators should make sure that the bot): 5134:Dead Links Found by BezkingBot-Link (or delete) 4835:Dead Links Found by BezkingBot-Link (or delete) 2504:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/Kaspobot 2 2129:. Non-admins can't view deleted pages ... yet. 1858:I'm pretty sure interwiki bots normally follow 788:categories, whether or not they are populated. 710:slews of problems like "OI, my userpage was in 9530:List of bot-flagged accounts is available via 8747:, long before the current approvals system. -- 8714:Nothing to see here ... please move along ... 8211:Template:Cite doi/10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.02.011 7962:Knowledge:Bots/Requests_for_approval/DOI_bot_3 7957:Knowledge:Bots/Requests_for_approval/DOI_bot_2 7439:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/Addbot 16 7415:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/Addbot 16 7118:ok I get it now, I'll give bot another chance. 6751:If I did, I would fix it myself - but I don't. 5169:Knowledge bots with Perl source code published 5067:Withdrawn Knowledge bot requests for approval 4870:Knowledge bots with Perl source code published 4754:Withdrawn Knowledge bot requests for approval 4712:Knowledge bots with Perl source code published 11845:If you are on Tiger I'd recommend installing 11417:, where Bjweeks said to have had implemented 9946:Category:Redirects from other capitalisations 9928:Category:Redirects from other capitalisations 9891:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/BOTijo 6 9087:before you asked the editor to comment there 8238:Template:Cite doi/10.1080.2F00241160310001254 6381:from receiving notices about your actions. ā€” 5166:Knowledge bots with PHP source code published 5057:Approved Knowledge bot requests for approval 4867:Knowledge bots with PHP source code published 4744:Approved Knowledge bot requests for approval 4709:Knowledge bots with PHP source code published 4486:- Deleting Broken Redirects Task (Admin bot) 4438:Side effects of a non-deterministic algorithm 3771:: Any admins willing to take this project on? 2519:Minor change to IRC RecentChanges feed format 2359:is a perfectly good link. But the diacritic 1426:If you are on Tiger I'd recommend installing 935:, where Bjweeks said to have had implemented 12738:Resolving conflicts with article maintainers 12609:is much more time-consuming and error-prone 12354:Category:Pages that may be edited by BOTNAME 11415:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/BJBot 4 11354:Consider this bot not having my approval. -- 7952:Knowledge:Bots/Requests_for_approval/DOI_bot 7835:Seems to fail for me, I get "Login error:" 7395:If you want to argue over whether and where 6849:Not when properly labeled and maintained. ā€” 5999:Non urgent queries = Response within 3 hours 5989:Knowledge talk:Bot policy#Good communication 5969:The following discussion is preserved as an 5924:Bot hasn't edited in the last 6 months : --> 5589:I humbly recommend that an admin change the 5087:Expired Knowledge bot requests for approval 4774:Expired Knowledge bot requests for approval 3910:Edward Z. Yang's (last update February 2007) 3749:Ignore me, I was mixing ClueBot and SoxBot. 1808:Resolving conflicts with article maintainers 933:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/BJBot 4 872:Consider this bot not having my approval. -- 734:is much more time-consuming and error-prone 479:Category:Pages that may be edited by BOTNAME 11210:Knowledge:Requests for comment/User conduct 9820:uses with three or fewer revisions?Ā ;-) -- 9505:Knowledge:WikiProject Images and Media/Bots 9049:AWB operating mass edits (no general fixes) 8562:bot was approved approved with current name 8442:John Denver Smith, Michael Bob Schnellfarts 8243:Template:Cite doi/10.1126.2Fscience.1136110 8206:Template:Cite doi/10.1016/j.asd.2007.06.003 6639:this with affected users, I have to agree, 2121:, and the talk page of the deleting admin, 173:Knowledge:Requests for comment/User conduct 12754:-- do interwiki bots generally follow it? 12587:Category:Pages not to be edited by SignBot 12350:Category:Pages not to be edited by BOTNAME 11557:What part of it was a bug do you not get? 9810:Why not have another bot that responds to 7935:A separate template for each cited source? 5163:Knowledge bots with source code published 4864:Knowledge bots with source code published 4683:Various subcategories (containing members) 4164:can do that, if I get what you're saying. 4046:I'd say that's an improvement. Nice work. 2532:) will be added to the URL for new pages. 2403:In fact, namespaces are case-insensitive: 1829:-- do interwiki bots generally follow it? 1075:What part of it was a bug do you not get? 712:Category:Pages not to be edited by SignBot 475:Category:Pages not to be edited by BOTNAME 9219:Task review question ("nullify template") 9171:comment added 00:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC). 8543:DediBox range hardblocked (88.191.0.0/16) 8196:Template:Cite doi/10.1007/s704-002-8206-7 6770:it does not matter how often the bot runs 6765:There....now will you please fix the bot? 4213:Moved from Adins Noticeboard per author. 3735:SoxBot X talk page does not redirect... - 3616:I also threw together some test cases at 12910: 10003:. For a template with the same name use 8691:didn't even suggest including the word. 8317:Two possible solutions to this problem: 8233:Template:Cite doi/10.1029.2F2007GL029703 7181:does not consume resources unnecessarily 6413:Whoops, that's what I get for skimming. 6093:The above discussion is preserved as an 5962:Cross posted from Bot Policy Noticeboard 5938:Bot is listed on the AWB checkpage : --> 5097:Open Knowledge bot requests for approval 4784:Open Knowledge bot requests for approval 4019:progression of colours from light-dark? 3526:Richard0612 just said he would add one. 2001: 12607:Category:Pages not to be edited by bots 12443:to watch / not watch certain pages? -- 12346:Category:Pages not to be edited by bots 12235:and load whole pages for those who use 9731:I like this. One problem I notice with 7184:performs only tasks for which there is 6044:That's kind of the point of bots, no? ā€“ 5996:Urgent queries = Response within 1 hour 4812:Knowledge bots for template substituion 2433:Won't Image: still serve as an alias? ā€“ 732:Category:Pages not to be edited by bots 568:to watch / not watch certain pages? -- 471:Category:Pages not to be edited by bots 360:and load whole pages for those who use 14: 10354:Knowledge:Advice_to_Tor_users_in_China 10212:Don't fix redirects that aren't broken 9592:It is. Like I said, I checked that. 8444:, and all dotted and linked variants ( 8216:Template:Cite doi/10.1029/2005GL025080 7889:AbuseFilter for enwp has been enabled. 7565:cutting off the nose to spite the face 4821:Knowledge bots for newsletter delivery 4815:Knowledge bots for WikiProject tagging 4609:Knowledge bots (all bots are members) 4419:before it's released on live articles. 55:Do not edit the contents of this page. 11837:I need some one who operates bots on 8438:John D Smith, Michael B. Schnellfarts 7856:Marking deletions in the deletion log 6988:are incapable of owning this bot, as 6004:3 hours?? Even botops need to sleep. 3820:I note that LilHelpa isn't listed at 3492:, where this issue was first raised. 2998:This has also been discussed over at 2294:_File:-2008-10-07T02:35:00.000Z": --> 2289:_File:-2008-10-07T02:35:00.000Z": --> 1413:I need some one who operates bots on 10075:Interwiki bots in template namespace 8675:Note that account was registered on 8248:Template:Cite doi/10.1038.2F339532a0 8201:Template:Cite doi/10.1007/BF00220187 7822:has a nifty tool on the toolserver. 6768:What you are failing to see is that 6377:from receiving notices, not prevent 5810: 4445:Inverting upper/lower case of tags ( 3236:User_talk:OsamaK/November_2008#OKBot 2056:Actually, a non-admin user can read 36: 11312:and BAG will review the situation. 10322:It is caught under this rangeblock 9985:, I think you need to take this to 8267:were created in error deleted now. 5011:, links back to this discussion. - 4688:Dead Links Found by BezkingBot-Link 4552:Good GoodĀ :) Now get to work! :P -- 3907:GeorgeMoney's (et al) Bot Framework 3901:Foxy Loxy is developing PHPediaWiki 3822:Knowledge:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage 3715:All the bot talk pages redirect to 3092:WP:Bots/Bots with open-sourced code 2654:Edits to month-old talk posts that 275:and BAG will review the situation. 34: 12431:ever apply outside the user talk? 10569:) that the following are helpful: 10185:Bot to replace links to redirects? 9618:Hum, so it does. Thanks Anomie! 7121:Thanks. (seemed wrong at the time) 7078:and I'll add you to the project. 4654:Knowledge pages monitored by bots 4508:This task has now been withdrawn. 3945:Proposal: Redesign and cleanup of 3776:I know Python and I'm an admin... 3234:Is this the followup reactions of 2115:Knowledge:Village pump (technical) 556:ever apply outside the user talk? 35: 12950: 12834:people's use of languages differs 12589:, why did I still get notified??" 12287:{{bots|allow={{MyBotAllowList}}}} 8070:the Cite doi template is optional 7983:I've posted a note about this at 6745:I do not know how to fix the bot. 4895:Looks good to me (categories are 4809:Knowledge bots for anti-vandalism 4806:Knowledge bots for autoassessment 4680:Categories owned by bots (empty) 2357:wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard 1909:people's use of languages differs 714:, why did I still get notified??" 412:{{bots|allow={{MyBotAllowList}}}} 11100: 11093: 11086: 11079: 11065: 11058: 11051: 11044: 11030: 11023: 11016: 11009: 10993: 10986: 10979: 10962: 10955: 10948: 10941: 10922: 10899: 10878: 10871: 10864: 10857: 10419: 10001:Knowledge:Templates for deletion 8869: 8763:Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Archive_3#D6 8553: 7128: 7028:Pillar ā€“ a new PHP bot framework 6825:I really just don't feel like it 6777:own canned warning. Effectively 6600:plus the two separate complaints 6373:I understand that would prevent 5811: 5769: 5619: 5554: 5339:Template that will need changing 3548: 3293:and the mess is now cleaned up. 3289:know in the first place? Anyway 2018: 40: 12404:in other namespaces? Comments? 7267:Fred McNair (American football) 6748:I don't know how to edit a bot. 5562:some of this task with my bot. 4384:, 19:51 18 February 2009 (UTC). 4222:, 09:07 18 February 2009 (UTC). 3954:Note: This should really go on 2964:Knowledge:Template substitution 2528:, the rcid parameter (used for 529:in other namespaces? Comments? 12130:=Pywikipedia getVersionHistory 11862:is python installed on tiger? 9548:Oh, well. Wasn't that easy. ā€“ 7633:instantly and quietly away. -- 7190:carefully adheres to relevant 5796:He knows about this already -- 5089:(also a direct subcategory of 5079:(also a direct subcategory of 5069:(also a direct subcategory of 5059:(also a direct subcategory of 4776:(also a direct subcategory of 4766:(also a direct subcategory of 4756:(also a direct subcategory of 4746:(also a direct subcategory of 4452:Converting new-line to blank ( 4405:(same rule for human editors), 2892:13:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2276:22:58, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 2259:22:49, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 2235:01:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 2217:23:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2188:07:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 2080:to get it fixed on their end. 1443:is python installed on tiger? 13: 1: 12934:19:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 12902:has been completely rewritten 12182:nobots needs to be redesigned 11294:04:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 11273:11:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 11246:02:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 11221:23:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 11204:08:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 11179:08:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 9944:That's more a reason to take 8323:(more complex, but possible) 7684:I cannot even follow you. -- 5954:11:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 5835:Grand plan: Further proposals 5827:06:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 5805:06:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 5735:20:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 5720:20:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 5706:20:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 5686:09:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 5677:08:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 5668:04:12, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 5634:03:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 5614:23:07, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 5585:21:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 5542:17:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 5508:17:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 5489:13:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 5480:02:34, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 5464:22:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 5431:20:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 5422:20:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 5407:22:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 5398:16:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 5323:18:45, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 5314:18:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 5269:21:10, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 5254:00:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 5228:18:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 5210:17:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 5188:18:59, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 5025:14:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 5016:15:59, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 5000:14:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC) 4991:14:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC) 4959:13:07, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 4950:09:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 4929:09:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 4920:23:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 4891:23:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 4824:Other sub-cats as appropriate 4586:20:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 4563:20:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 4531:22:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 4369:16:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 4337:20:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 4320:16:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 4288:(open, I think, but disabled) 4235:12:37, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 4200:09:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 4137:22:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 4124:12:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 4109:12:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 4096:12:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 4070:21:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 4055:01:53, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 4042:01:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 4030:22:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 4006:22:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 3988:19:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 3969:18:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 3937:11:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 3924:18:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 3878:15:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 3856:00:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 3636:Python bot framework released 3440:don't worry about performance 3433:Bot edits to project banners? 3311:Bot Approvals Group candidacy 3212:20:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 3198:20:13, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 3180:10:53, 17 December 2008 (UTC) 3158:14:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 3122:14:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 3104:05:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 3086:17:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 3053:07:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 3030:to substitute manually added 2986:04:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 2940:21:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 2916:20:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2868:05:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2840:22:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 2796:05:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2772:17:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 2744:17:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 2727:14:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 2696:13:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 2682:11:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 2141:14:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 2101:13:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 2068:13:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1988: 1980:has been completely rewritten 1972: 1803: 1770: 1746: 1622: 1609: 1593: 1561: 1408: 1318: 1279:Pywikipedia getVersionHistory 1274: 1245: 831: 302:nobots needs to be redesigned 297: 284: 257:04:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 236:11:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 209:02:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 184:23:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 167:08:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 142:08:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 112: 12166:This page now under bot care 10123:your addition for clarity. ā€“ 9054:an account that redirects to 7679:You're not making sense. I 6479:, 13:10 3 March 2009 (UTC). 4818:Knowledge bots for archiving 4426:Design pitfalls for SmackBot 4187:04:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 4174:04:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3840:23:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 3816:23:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 3796:04:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 3783:23:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 3756:04:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3745:04:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3731:04:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3706:17:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3691:15:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3681:04:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3672:04:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3651:12:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3628:02:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3618:User:AnomieBOT/nobots test # 3612:02:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3593:22:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3568:22:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3542:21:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3522:21:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3504:12:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 3484:11:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 3447:02:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 3421:06:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 3412:18:55, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 3397:17:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 3377:15:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 3305:23:37, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 3281:21:25, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 3259:12:46, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 3228:12:13, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 2634:22:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC) 2612:09:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC) 2597:18:13, 2 November 2008 (UTC) 2565:18:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC) 2547:18:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC) 2513:06:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 2488:20:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 1751:This page now under bot care 7: 11647:response by BJ was fine? -- 10798: 10232:Ok, fair enough. Thanks. 9994:R from other capitalisation 9063:at AN. 35, 17 April 2009 ā€“ 8972:h2 "checkwiki #7" edits). ā€“ 8923:User_talk:D6#Puzzling_diff. 8508:Pan-lingual interwiki bots? 8434:Smith, JD; Schnellfarts, MB 8430:Smith, JD, Schnellfarts, MB 7405:should be used, take it to 5895:- can anything be salvaged? 5599:template to something like 5137:Pages archived by Werdnabot 4838:Pages archived by Werdnabot 4694:Pages archived by Werdnabot 4461:SmackBot- Cybernetic revolt 4410:software design and testing 4394:Test and debug for SmackBot 4274:SmackBot- Cybernetic revolt 3352:22:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 3341:22:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 3327:Knowledge:Appealing a block 3240:User_talk:Traveler100#OKBot 2571:There are two issues here: 2466:19:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 2451:15:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 2419:07:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 2399:15:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 2348:19:59, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2326:05:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2310:04:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2162:what redirects to chocolate 1165:response by BJ was fine? -- 10: 12955: 12872:17:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 12816:21:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC) 12802:06:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 12775:05:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 12732:14:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC) 12694:13:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 12676:13:09, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 12658:20:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 12631:19:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 12529:Banners on talk pages. -- 12176:15:41, 22 March 2008 (UTC) 12158:21:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 12147:01:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 12137:the Pywikipediabot tracker 12110:12:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 12087:20:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC) 12066:16:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC) 12041:16:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC) 12027:15:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC) 12006:Problem with dotnetwikibot 12000:00:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 11972:06:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 11957:05:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 11933:01:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 11906:01:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 11878:14:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11867:14:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11856:12:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11820:19:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11806:19:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11791:19:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11772:12:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11744:04:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11712:09:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11678:09:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11657:09:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11635:04:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11620:03:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11605:20:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 11588:19:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 11564:02:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11553:01:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 11526:18:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 11501:17:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 11467:17:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 11437:16:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 11401:14:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 11317:14:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 10417: 10379:You can however apply for 9756:User information templates 9553:03:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC) 9544:03:19, 25 April 2009 (UTC) 9519:06:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC) 9481:12:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 9376:Questions on existing bots 9370:13:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 9327:10:00, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 9213:17:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 9193:13:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 9149:16:47, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 9114:16:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 9072:15:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 9043:22:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 9030:16:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 9011:15:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 8981:15:16, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 8900:19:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC) 8867: 8788:08:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 8757:08:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 8739:01:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 8726:00:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 8703:13:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 8671:12:12, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 8551: 8537:17:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 8522:17:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 8467:00:19, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 8413:16:39, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 8387:16:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 8360:16:39, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 8313:16:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 8285:01:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 8139:12:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 8035:20:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 8016:14:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 7997:13:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 7975:04:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 7929:21:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 7908:04:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 7881:09:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 7872:07:52, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 7768:20:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 7757:19:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 7740:17:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 7725:16:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 7698:Bots take consensus? Heh. 7126: 6622:WP:BOT#Dealing_with_issues 6583:issue at different times: 5767: 5760:anyone have a contact for 4697:Template substitution bots 4668:Knowledge anti-vandal bots 4592:Bot categories: Grand plan 4466:Unpredictable side effects 3769:Main page protection robot 3367:ClueBot reporting URL down 3112:and it's subcategories. -- 2553:Bot reading deleted pages? 1947:17:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 1891:21:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC) 1877:06:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 1850:05:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 1799:14:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC) 1766:15:41, 22 March 2008 (UTC) 1736:12:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 1713:20:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC) 1692:16:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC) 1667:16:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC) 1653:15:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC) 1627:Problem with dotnetwikibot 1589:00:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 1553:06:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 1538:05:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 1514:01:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 1487:01:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 1459:14:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1448:14:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1437:12:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1398:19:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1384:19:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1369:19:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1350:12:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1312:21:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 1301:01:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 1291:the Pywikipediabot tracker 1270:04:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1230:09:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1196:09:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1175:09:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1153:04:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1138:03:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1123:20:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 1106:19:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 1082:02:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1071:01:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1044:18:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 1019:17:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 985:17:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 955:16:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 919:14:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 819:13:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 801:13:09, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 783:20:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 756:19:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 654:Banners on talk pages. -- 280:14:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 12558:21:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12547:21:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12525:21:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12500:21:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12489:21:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12472:21:17, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12461:21:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12438:20:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12417:20:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12373:18:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12358:{{nobots|BOT1|BOT2|BOT3}} 12340:16:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12318:13:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12257:13:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12221:13:20, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12199:13:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 11724:Opt-in instead of opt-out 11375:20:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 11364:20:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 11346:20:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 11335:19:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 10970: 10831: 10801: 10352:Actually looking at this 9381:pywikipedia mailing lists 9335:without approval for its 9002:and similar situations. ā€“ 8955:19:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 8915:18:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 8854:19:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 8817:14:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 8802:02:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 8498:17:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 8426:JD Smith, MB Schnellfarts 8169:17:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 7846:19:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 7831:03:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7810:11:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 7705:05:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7694:05:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7675:04:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7660:05:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7643:05:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7628:04:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7615:04:24, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7600:03:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7589:03:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7574:03:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7559:01:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7544:08:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 7512:08:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 7497:17:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 7481:17:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 7453:11:22, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 7425:02:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 7380:00:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 7350:23:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 7331:21:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 7290:22:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 7279:22:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 7265:It did the same thing at 7261:21:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 7243:the terms of its approval 7237:21:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 7226:21:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 7207:21:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 7165:21:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 7147:22:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 7114:01:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 7083:23:11, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 7073:17:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 7063:07:48, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 7043:22:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 7022:11:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 7001:06:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 6983:05:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 6968:05:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 6953:05:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 6939:05:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 6923:05:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 6909:04:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 6894:04:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 6873:00:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 6854:21:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 6845:21:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 6806:19:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 6791:18:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 6726:18:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 6695:17:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 6668:17:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 6653:17:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 6634:15:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 6565:05:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 6549:18:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 6539:17:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 6516:02:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 6492:15:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 6460:12:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 6447:06:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 6420:18:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 6409:18:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 6386:18:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 6369:18:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 6357:18:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 6347:18:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 6325:18:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 6309:17:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 6281:02:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 6271:23:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 6250:18:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 6136:17:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 6081:00:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 6062:23:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 6040:23:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 6026:23:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 5987:Discussion being held at 5893:Knowledge:Registered bots 5790:06:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 5402:Yes, so I've added it. - 5389:need to be on this list? 5111:Unapproved Knowledge Bots 4798:Unapproved Knowledge Bots 4677:Bots not currently active 4351:. It's a wasteful edit. ā€“ 4327:User talk:Rich Farmbrough 4249:Thank you for the message 4245:User talk:Rich Farmbrough 4219:User talk:Rich Farmbrough 3717:User talk:ClueBot Commons 1242:Opt-in instead of opt-out 893:20:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 882:20:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 864:20:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 853:19:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 683:21:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 672:21:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 650:21:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 625:21:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 614:21:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 597:21:17, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 586:21:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 563:20:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 542:20:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 498:18:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 483:{{nobots|BOT1|BOT2|BOT3}} 465:16:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 443:13:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 382:13:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 346:13:20, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 324:13:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 12915:Oh noes, the drama llama 11151:06:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 11134:22:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 10826:commented out categories 10794:23:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 10767:19:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 10732:07:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 10709:07:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 10683:06:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 10659:00:04, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 10637:23:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 10623:Deactivating "auto tag" 10608:00:04, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 10586:23:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 10554:22:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 10537:22:02, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 10528:20:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 10502:18:44, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 10480:15:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 10454:15:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 10437:15:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 10400:15:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 10375:15:08, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 10366:15:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 10348:14:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 10334:14:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 10301:14:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 10283:03:09, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 10265:02:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 10242:01:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 10228:23:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC) 10206:23:07, 10 May 2009 (UTC) 10067:03:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 10035:Discussion now moved to 9981:Per the instructions on 8005:might work, or possibly 6110:Problem bot (CSDWarnBot) 6100:Please do not modify it. 5976:Please do not modify it. 5453:Comments, improvements? 4700:WikiProject tagging bots 4691:Newsletter delivery bots 4665:Active bots on Knowledge 4648:Exclusion compliant bots 4542:Erik9bot's editing speed 3973:Short answer: yes, like 2530:new page patrolled edits 2150:#redirect ] == XYZ == ] 2017: 2006:Oh noes, the drama llama 12889:21:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 12830:languages are different 12708:{{t1|nobots}} proposal. 11882:Sai2020, make sure you 11413:You might want to read 11283:Knowledge:BN#Bot_change 10632:Should, but doesn't. -- 10307:Help with a bot please! 10218:for technical details. 10154:15:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 10132:15:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 10090:15:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 10049:15:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 10023:10:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 9977:06:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 9960:03:36, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 9940:03:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 9922:01:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 9901:01:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 9877:01:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 9865:18:54, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 9855:18:29, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 9840:18:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 9830:18:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 9804:14:28, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 9771:02:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC) 9678:{{botlinks3|Polbot|11}} 9628:03:29, 2 May 2009 (UTC) 9614:03:11, 2 May 2009 (UTC) 9602:23:46, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 9588:23:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 7731:Bot owners' noticeboard 7192:policies and guidelines 6455:would give an opinion. 5528:Wikimedia server change 5051:Knowledge bots (empty) 4738:Knowledge bots (empty) 4431:Failure to do no harm ( 4208:SmackBot must fail-safe 3331:User talk:65.254.224.34 3063:Continuous Running Bots 2667:Have you tried to read 2391:don't. Why is this? -- 2172:do not redirect to the 1964:21:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 1905:languages are different 1463:Sai2020, make sure you 931:You might want to read 289:{{t1|nobots}} proposal. 246:Knowledge:BN#Bot_change 12916: 10260:That's just dreadful. 10119:appear..." (?) I've 9952:than to stop the bot. 9704:{{botlinks3|Polbot|-}} 9410:pywikipedia-announce ( 8806:You might want to ask 7985:User talk:Citation bot 7860: 6618:by editing too quickly 6614:BOT Policy be enforced 4703:Knowledge archive bots 4454:SmackBot and templates 4447:dead link vs Dead link 3998:doesn't look too bad. 3826:has no user javascript 3323:http://whatismyip.com/ 2956:with the summary of: " 2166:User:Graham87/sandbox8 2119:Knowledge talk:Twinkle 2078:Knowledge talk:Twinkle 2007: 12914: 12390:User:Example/bots.css 11888:cd ~/Bots/pywikipedia 11871:It is but it is 2.3. 11700:recent on-wiki issues 11643:So you do think that 11208:I've been looking at 10191:WP:REDIRECT#NOTBROKEN 10113:operators must ensure 9512:Knowledge:Bots/Status 9510:Try having a look at 7859: 6362:to your talk page.". 5869:Knowledge:Bots/Status 5131:Various subcategories 4832:Various subcategories 4657:Various subcategories 4433:SmackBot damages tags 4262:SmackBot damages tags 3477:be used on articles. 2005: 1469:cd ~/Bots/pywikipedia 1452:It is but it is 2.3. 1218:recent on-wiki issues 1161:So you do think that 515:User:Example/bots.css 171:I've been looking at 53:of past discussions. 11990:seems to detect it. 11832:Extended help wanted 11750:Bot roles for nobots 10627:fix the tag removal. 9652:{{botlinks3|Polbot}} 7747:Deacon of Pndapetzim 7715:Deacon of Pndapetzim 7649:about the same thing 7487:Deacon of Pndapetzim 7443:Deacon of Pndapetzim 7370:Deacon of Pndapetzim 7095:Broken section links 5548:Grand plan in action 5148:Knowledge bot owners 4849:Knowledge bot owners 4645:Knowledge bot owners 3166:User:ImageRemovalBot 2948:@xeno, unsigned was 2524:Additionally, after 1614:Extended help wanted 1579:seems to detect it. 1323:Bot roles for nobots 10493:He needs to file a 10464:. Best regards, -- 5904:Improve status page 5692:my sandbox template 5160:Knowledge adminbots 5122:Knowledge bots for 4861:Knowledge adminbots 4674:Knowledge adminbots 4671:Autoassessment bots 4569:Intricate templates 4286:SmackBot bug report 4156:No of transclusions 3898:SQL operates SxWiki 3291:this is the culprit 2170:Talk:Snow (dessert) 2032:is currently being 12917: 12907:{{tl|bots}} change 12881:intuitive to use. 10381:IP block exemption 10325:as an open proxy. 9428:pywikipedia-bugs ( 8448:Schnellfarts, M.B. 8368:There are options 6707:(edit conflict) I 6610:clear belligerence 6556:made a comment on 5863:Filling categories 5841:Purpose categories 5764:(owner of ClueBot) 5043:Revised grand plan 4651:Perlwikipedia bots 4034:Looks good to me. 3884:PHP Bot Frameworks 3546:C# implementation 3316:IP Address blocked 3285:How about letting 2470:Ah I understand. ā€“ 2127:User talk:Antidote 2058:User talk:Antidote 2008: 1993:{{tl|bots}} change 1956:intuitive to use. 12932: 12692: 12656: 12556: 12544: 12498: 12470: 12458: 12436: 12371: 12337: 12316: 12219: 12064: 12025: 11876: 11854: 11770: 11729:Bot owner's essay 11618: 11586: 11562: 11465: 11399: 11373: 11344: 11333: 11108: 11107: 10765: 10730: 10707: 10681: 10565:I've found (with 10398: 9989:for the template 9532:Special:ListUsers 9446:pywikipedia-svn ( 8715: 8495: 8410: 8357: 8282: 8166: 8136: 8014: 7973: 7766: 7754: 7738: 7722: 7703: 7673: 7598: 7572: 7494: 7450: 7377: 7288: 7235: 7163: 7059: 6937: 6418: 6367: 6116:Moved from WP:AN. 6007: 5632: 5179: 5178: 4880: 4879: 4722: 4721: 4417:regression tested 4389:SmackBot overview 3995:this modification 3814: 3804:Unauthorized bot? 3781: 3591: 3538: 3482: 3393: 3350: 3279: 3196: 3156: 2960:Template:Unsigned 2918: 2742: 2630: 2618: 2595: 2563: 2511: 2417: 2405:ImAGe:Example.png 2324: 2274: 2255: 2233: 2213: 2048: 2047: 2000: 1999: 1987: 1986: 1815: 1814: 1782: 1781: 1758: 1757: 1690: 1651: 1634: 1633: 1621: 1620: 1608: 1607: 1573: 1572: 1457: 1435: 1423: 1422: 1348: 1330: 1329: 1286: 1285: 1257: 1256: 1250:Bot owner's essay 1136: 1104: 1080: 983: 917: 891: 862: 851: 843: 842: 817: 781: 681: 669: 623: 595: 583: 561: 496: 462: 441: 344: 309: 308: 296: 295: 124: 123: 111: 110: 65: 64: 59:current main page 26:(Redirected from 12946: 12930: 12869: 12866: 12859: 12856: 12850: 12844: 12792: 12786: 12772: 12769: 12762: 12759: 12753: 12747: 12725:bot request page 12682: 12646: 12555: 12545: 12534: 12511: 12497: 12469: 12459: 12448: 12435: 12430: 12424: 12361: 12359: 12338: 12327: 12306: 12303: 12297: 12288: 12253: 12244: 12238: 12234: 12228: 12209: 12195: 12054: 12015: 11967: 11953: 11947: 11904: 11895: 11889: 11885: 11875: 11853: 11802: 11769: 11764: 11758: 11739: 11630: 11617: 11584: 11561: 11537:more than a year 11455: 11426: 11420: 11389: 11372: 11343: 11332: 11290: 11242: 11217: 11200: 11131: 11104: 11097: 11090: 11083: 11069: 11062: 11055: 11048: 11034: 11027: 11020: 11013: 10997: 10990: 10983: 10966: 10959: 10952: 10945: 10926: 10903: 10882: 10875: 10868: 10861: 10812: 10806: 10799: 10764: 10761: 10756: 10749: 10729: 10726: 10721: 10714: 10706: 10703: 10698: 10691: 10680: 10677: 10672: 10665: 10618:custom gen fixes 10526: 10523: 10517: 10439: 10423: 10422: 10397: 10395: 10384: 10330: 10225: 10222: 10152: 10012: 10006: 9998: 9992: 9920: 9819: 9813: 9791: 9785: 9768: 9765: 9760: 9754: 9750: 9744: 9740: 9734: 9726: 9725: 9700: 9699: 9674: 9673: 9648: 9642: 9586: 9496:;) --- User:Docu 9478: 9352: 9346: 9341:Xenobot's task 2 9317: 9316: 9260: 9250: 9229: 9172: 8953: 8950: 8944: 8910: 8902: 8898: 8895: 8889: 8873: 8872: 8849: 8842:). -- User:Docu 8814: 8784: 8734: 8721: 8713: 8660: 8659: 8603: 8593: 8572: 8563: 8557: 8556: 8485: 8450: 8443: 8439: 8435: 8431: 8427: 8400: 8385: 8347: 8272: 8156: 8126: 8113: 8107: 8103: 8097: 8093: 8087: 8030: 8023:ask for approval 8013: 7992: 7972: 7840: 7826: 7804: 7765: 7750: 7737: 7718: 7702: 7672: 7655: 7623: 7597: 7571: 7538: 7490: 7475: 7446: 7404: 7398: 7373: 7325: 7287: 7255: 7234: 7214:Knowledge:Orphan 7162: 7132: 7131: 7060: 7057: 7053: 6936: 6827: 6693: 6690: 6684: 6417: 6407: 6404: 6398: 6366: 6345: 6342: 6336: 6307: 6304: 6298: 6239: 6238: 6235: 6227: 6219: 6211: 6187: 6160:deletedĀ contribs 6134: 6131: 6125: 6102: 6079: 6060: 6057: 6051: 6024: 6021: 6015: 6005: 5978: 5948: 5942: 5933: 5927: 5920: 5914: 5883: 5877: 5858: 5852: 5824: 5821: 5816: 5815: 5814: 5801: 5792: 5788: 5785: 5773: 5772: 5729: 5700: 5663: 5646: 5640: 5631: 5627: 5623: 5622: 5608: 5598: 5592: 5582: 5575: 5568: 5558: 5502: 5496: 5471: 5458: 5448: 5442: 5435:I've started an 5416: 5393: 5388: 5382: 5374: 5368: 5363: 5357: 5352: 5346: 5312: 5309: 5303: 5039: 5038: 4989: 4986: 4980: 4914: 4908: 4902: 4888: 4726: 4725: 4597: 4596: 4581: 4557: 4528: 4521: 4514: 4367: 4364: 4358: 4268:SmackBot problem 4184: 4168: 4118: 4104: 4064: 4050: 4024: 3997: 3982: 3854: 3851: 3813: 3792: 3780: 3753: 3728: 3590: 3587: 3582: 3575: 3562: 3556: 3552: 3551: 3539: 3536: 3532: 3501: 3481: 3473: 3467: 3407: 3394: 3391: 3387: 3349: 3302: 3278: 3269:archive creation 3195: 3146: 3082: 3039: 3033: 3025: 3019: 3015: 3009: 2984: 2937: 2931: 2914: 2911: 2905: 2893: 2891: 2888: 2882: 2854: 2848: 2832: 2815: 2809: 2770: 2767: 2761: 2741: 2719: 2678: 2631: 2628: 2624: 2616: 2585: 2562: 2545: 2510: 2486: 2483: 2477: 2449: 2446: 2440: 2411: 2318: 2295: 2290: 2264: 2256: 2253: 2249: 2223: 2214: 2211: 2207: 2185: 2138: 2099: 2029: 2022: 2015: 2014: 1989: 1973: 1944: 1941: 1934: 1931: 1925: 1919: 1867: 1861: 1847: 1844: 1837: 1834: 1828: 1822: 1804: 1792:bot request page 1771: 1747: 1680: 1641: 1623: 1610: 1594: 1562: 1548: 1534: 1528: 1485: 1476: 1470: 1466: 1456: 1434: 1409: 1380: 1347: 1342: 1336: 1319: 1275: 1265: 1246: 1148: 1135: 1102: 1079: 1055:more than a year 973: 944: 938: 907: 890: 861: 850: 832: 807: 771: 680: 670: 659: 636: 622: 594: 584: 573: 560: 555: 549: 486: 484: 463: 452: 431: 428: 422: 413: 378: 369: 363: 359: 353: 334: 320: 298: 285: 253: 205: 180: 163: 113: 89: 67: 66: 44: 43: 37: 31: 12954: 12953: 12949: 12948: 12947: 12945: 12944: 12943: 12942: 12909: 12904: 12867: 12864: 12857: 12854: 12848: 12842: 12790: 12784: 12770: 12767: 12760: 12757: 12751: 12745: 12740: 12715: 12713:Adding a thread 12710: 12530: 12505: 12444: 12428: 12422: 12397: 12388:something like 12357: 12323: 12301: 12295: 12286: 12249: 12242: 12236: 12232: 12226: 12191: 12184: 12168: 12132: 12127: 12008: 11984: 11965: 11951: 11943: 11920: 11893: 11891: 11887: 11883: 11842: 11834: 11798: 11762: 11756: 11752: 11737: 11731: 11726: 11628: 11424: 11418: 11325: 11288: 11240: 11215: 11198: 11161: 11125: 10840:SetDefaultSort 10833:Disable gen fix 10810: 10804: 10759: 10754: 10751: 10724: 10719: 10716: 10701: 10696: 10693: 10675: 10670: 10667: 10577:Still broke in 10562: 10521: 10510: 10507: 10490: 10440: 10427: 10425: 10420: 10416: 10393: 10385: 10328: 10319: 10309: 10254: 10223: 10220: 10187: 10140: 10077: 10010: 10004: 9996: 9990: 9908: 9817: 9811: 9789: 9783: 9779: 9766: 9763: 9758: 9752: 9748: 9742: 9738: 9732: 9713: 9709: 9705: 9687: 9683: 9679: 9661: 9657: 9653: 9650: 9646: 9640: 9574: 9570: 9565: 9527: 9507: 9476: 9391:pywikipedia-l ( 9383: 9378: 9350: 9344: 9269: 9258: 9243: 9225: 9224: 9221: 9166: 9061:this discussion 9051: 8948: 8940: 8938: 8929:. -- User:Docu 8908: 8903: 8893: 8885: 8883: 8877: 8875: 8870: 8866: 8847: 8812: 8782: 8732: 8717: 8683:, and prior to 8612: 8601: 8586: 8568: 8567: 8564: 8561: 8559: 8554: 8550: 8545: 8510: 8460: 8445: 8441: 8437: 8433: 8429: 8425: 8373: 8306: 8293: 8187: 8182: 8177: 8147: 8111: 8105: 8101: 8095: 8091: 8085: 8026: 7988: 7937: 7921: 7916: 7891: 7858: 7838: 7824: 7802: 7653: 7621: 7536: 7473: 7402: 7396: 7323: 7253: 7155: 7135: 7134: 7129: 7102: 7097: 7058:clamation point 7056: 7049: 7030: 7017:Thanks Yandman 6819: 6688: 6680: 6678: 6558:their talk page 6402: 6394: 6392: 6340: 6332: 6330: 6302: 6294: 6292: 6233: 6225: 6217: 6209: 6194: 6190: 6145: 6129: 6121: 6119: 6112: 6107: 6098: 6067: 6055: 6047: 6045: 6019: 6011: 6009: 5974: 5964: 5946: 5940: 5931: 5930:Otherwise : --> 5925: 5918: 5912: 5881: 5875: 5856: 5850: 5849:in relation to 5837: 5822: 5819: 5812: 5799: 5793: 5783: 5779: 5777: 5775: 5770: 5766: 5757: 5727: 5698: 5661: 5644: 5638: 5620: 5618: 5606: 5596: 5590: 5578: 5571: 5564: 5550: 5530: 5500: 5494: 5493:I intended the 5469: 5456: 5446: 5440: 5414: 5391: 5386: 5380: 5372: 5366: 5361: 5355: 5350: 5344: 5341: 5307: 5299: 5297: 5247: 5214:Take a look at 5203: 5180: 5044: 4984: 4976: 4974: 4912: 4906: 4900: 4886: 4881: 4731: 4723: 4602: 4594: 4579: 4571: 4555: 4549: 4544: 4539: 4524: 4517: 4510: 4502: 4491: 4480: 4475: 4459:Page blanking ( 4428: 4396: 4391: 4362: 4354: 4352: 4210: 4182: 4166: 4158: 4153: 4116: 4102: 4062: 4048: 4022: 3993: 3980: 3950: 3928:I have created 3917:wikibot.classes 3889:Chris G has one 3886: 3870: 3849: 3845: 3806: 3790: 3773: 3751: 3726: 3659: 3638: 3585: 3580: 3577: 3560: 3549: 3547: 3537:clamation point 3535: 3528: 3514: 3499: 3490:my reply at ANI 3471: 3465: 3462: 3457: 3435: 3403: 3392:clamation point 3390: 3383: 3369: 3364: 3318: 3313: 3298: 3271: 3188: 3169: 3078: 3065: 3037: 3031: 3023: 3017: 3013: 3007: 2973: 2935: 2929: 2909: 2901: 2899: 2898:was in there. ā€“ 2894:I coulda sworn 2886: 2878: 2876: 2852: 2846: 2837: 2836:Call me MoP!Ā :) 2819: 2813: 2807: 2765: 2757: 2755: 2724: 2723:Call me MoP!Ā :) 2706: 2674: 2648: 2629:clamation point 2627: 2620: 2555: 2533: 2521: 2500: 2481: 2473: 2471: 2444: 2436: 2434: 2297: 2254:clamation point 2252: 2245: 2212:clamation point 2210: 2203: 2198: 2183: 2151: 2136: 2095: 2081: 2053: 2027: 2013: 1942: 1939: 1932: 1929: 1923: 1917: 1865: 1859: 1845: 1842: 1835: 1832: 1826: 1820: 1775:Adding a thread 1546: 1532: 1524: 1501: 1474: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1376: 1340: 1334: 1263: 1244: 1146: 942: 936: 655: 630: 569: 553: 547: 522: 513:something like 482: 448: 426: 420: 411: 374: 367: 361: 357: 351: 316: 251: 203: 178: 161: 85: 41: 33: 32: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 12952: 12941: 12938: 12937: 12936: 12908: 12905: 12903: 12897: 12896: 12895: 12894: 12893: 12892: 12891: 12825: 12819: 12818: 12806: 12805: 12804: 12778: 12777: 12739: 12736: 12735: 12734: 12714: 12711: 12709: 12706: 12705: 12704: 12703: 12702: 12701: 12700: 12699: 12698: 12697: 12696: 12643: 12634: 12633: 12590: 12577: 12576: 12575: 12574: 12573: 12572: 12571: 12570: 12569: 12568: 12567: 12566: 12565: 12564: 12563: 12562: 12561: 12560: 12395: 12394: 12393: 12385: 12384: 12383: 12382: 12381: 12380: 12379: 12378: 12377: 12376: 12375: 12292: 12291: 12290: 12273: 12272: 12271: 12270: 12269: 12268: 12267: 12266: 12263:bugzilla:12971 12183: 12180: 12179: 12178: 12167: 12164: 12163: 12162: 12161: 12160: 12131: 12128: 12126: 12120: 12119: 12118: 12117: 12116: 12115: 12114: 12113: 12112: 12096: 12095: 12094: 12093: 12092: 12091: 12090: 12089: 12073: 12072: 12071: 12070: 12069: 12068: 12046: 12045: 12044: 12043: 12030: 12029: 12007: 12004: 12003: 12002: 11983: 11980: 11979: 11978: 11977: 11976: 11975: 11974: 11936: 11935: 11914: 11913: 11912: 11911: 11910: 11909: 11908: 11859: 11858: 11841: 11835: 11833: 11830: 11829: 11828: 11827: 11826: 11825: 11824: 11823: 11822: 11751: 11748: 11747: 11746: 11730: 11727: 11725: 11722: 11721: 11720: 11719: 11718: 11717: 11716: 11715: 11714: 11685: 11684: 11683: 11682: 11681: 11680: 11662: 11661: 11660: 11659: 11638: 11637: 11623: 11622: 11610: 11609: 11608: 11607: 11571: 11570: 11569: 11568: 11567: 11566: 11540: 11529: 11528: 11512: 11511: 11510: 11509: 11508: 11507: 11506: 11505: 11504: 11503: 11476: 11475: 11474: 11473: 11472: 11471: 11470: 11469: 11444: 11443: 11442: 11441: 11440: 11439: 11406: 11405: 11404: 11403: 11382: 11381: 11380: 11379: 11378: 11377: 11349: 11348: 11337: 11324: 11321: 11320: 11319: 11305: 11304: 11303: 11302: 11301: 11300: 11299: 11298: 11297: 11296: 11253: 11252: 11251: 11250: 11249: 11248: 11226: 11225: 11224: 11223: 11206: 11182: 11181: 11169: 11160: 11157: 11156: 11155: 11154: 11153: 11112: 11106: 11105: 11098: 11091: 11084: 11077: 11071: 11070: 11063: 11056: 11049: 11042: 11036: 11035: 11028: 11021: 11014: 11007: 11001: 11000: 10998: 10991: 10984: 10977: 10972: 10968: 10967: 10960: 10953: 10946: 10939: 10934: 10930: 10929: 10927: 10920: 10918: 10916: 10911: 10907: 10906: 10904: 10897: 10895: 10893: 10888: 10884: 10883: 10876: 10869: 10862: 10855: 10850: 10846: 10845: 10843: 10841: 10838: 10836: 10829: 10828: 10823: 10818: 10813: 10808:Article issues 10802: 10797: 10796: 10772: 10771: 10770: 10769: 10743: 10742: 10741: 10740: 10739: 10738: 10737: 10736: 10735: 10734: 10685: 10629: 10628: 10621: 10613: 10612: 10611: 10610: 10574: 10573: 10561: 10558: 10557: 10556: 10543: 10542: 10541: 10540: 10539: 10489: 10484: 10483: 10482: 10457: 10456: 10418: 10415: 10412: 10411: 10410: 10409: 10408: 10407: 10406: 10405: 10404: 10403: 10402: 10311:<small: --> 10310: 10308: 10305: 10304: 10303: 10288: 10287: 10286: 10285: 10253: 10250: 10249: 10248: 10247: 10246: 10245: 10244: 10186: 10183: 10182: 10181: 10180: 10179: 10178: 10177: 10169: 10168: 10167: 10166: 10165:. -- User:Docu 10157: 10156: 10135: 10134: 10108: 10107: 10106: 10105: 10104:. -- User:Docu 10093: 10092: 10076: 10073: 10072: 10071: 10070: 10069: 10033: 10032: 10031: 10030: 10029: 10028: 10027: 10026: 10025: 9904: 9903: 9887: 9886: 9885: 9884: 9883: 9882: 9881: 9880: 9879: 9807: 9806: 9778: 9775: 9774: 9773: 9728: 9727: 9703: 9702: 9701: 9677: 9676: 9675: 9651: 9649: 9638: 9637: 9636: 9635: 9634: 9633: 9632: 9631: 9630: 9569: 9566: 9564: 9559: 9558: 9557: 9556: 9555: 9526: 9523: 9522: 9521: 9506: 9503: 9502: 9501: 9500: 9499: 9498: 9497: 9486: 9485: 9484: 9483: 9470: 9464: 9462: 9460: 9459: 9458: 9455: 9442: 9441: 9440: 9437: 9424: 9423: 9422: 9419: 9406: 9405: 9404: 9400: 9387: 9382: 9379: 9377: 9374: 9373: 9372: 9329: 9319: 9318: 9220: 9217: 9216: 9215: 9200: 9199: 9198: 9197: 9196: 9195: 9176: 9175: 9174: 9173: 9156: 9155: 9154: 9153: 9152: 9151: 9121: 9120: 9119: 9118: 9117: 9116: 9094: 9093: 9092: 9091: 9090:. -- User:Docu 9075: 9074: 9056: 9055: 9050: 9047: 9046: 9045: 9032: 9018: 9017: 9016: 9015: 9014: 9013: 8984: 8983: 8960: 8959: 8958: 8957: 8918: 8917: 8868: 8865: 8862: 8861: 8860: 8859: 8858: 8857: 8856: 8832: 8831: 8830: 8829: 8828: 8827: 8826: 8825: 8824: 8823: 8822: 8821: 8820: 8819: 8804: 8719:John Broughton 8552: 8549: 8546: 8544: 8541: 8540: 8539: 8524: 8509: 8506: 8505: 8504: 8503: 8502: 8501: 8500: 8472: 8471: 8470: 8469: 8456: 8418: 8417: 8416: 8415: 8365: 8364: 8363: 8362: 8340: 8339: 8338: 8337: 8336: 8333: 8330: 8327: 8321: 8302: 8292: 8289: 8288: 8287: 8263: 8262: 8257: 8251: 8250: 8245: 8240: 8235: 8230: 8225: 8219: 8218: 8213: 8208: 8203: 8198: 8192: 8191: 8186: 8183: 8181: 8178: 8176: 8173: 8172: 8171: 8146: 8143: 8142: 8141: 8118: 8115: 8081: 8077: 8073: 8060: 8050: 8049: 8044: 8043: 8042: 8041: 8040: 8039: 8038: 8037: 8028:John Broughton 7990:John Broughton 7978: 7977: 7965: 7964: 7959: 7954: 7948: 7947: 7943: 7942: 7936: 7933: 7932: 7931: 7920: 7917: 7915: 7912: 7911: 7910: 7903: 7900: 7890: 7887: 7886: 7885: 7884: 7883: 7857: 7854: 7853: 7852: 7851: 7850: 7849: 7848: 7813: 7812: 7795: 7794: 7793: 7792: 7791: 7790: 7789: 7788: 7787: 7786: 7785: 7784: 7783: 7782: 7781: 7780: 7779: 7778: 7777: 7776: 7775: 7774: 7773: 7772: 7771: 7770: 7666: 7665: 7664: 7663: 7662: 7530: 7525: 7524: 7523: 7522: 7521: 7520: 7519: 7518: 7517: 7516: 7515: 7514: 7460: 7459: 7458: 7457: 7456: 7455: 7430: 7429: 7428: 7427: 7393: 7387: 7386: 7385: 7384: 7383: 7382: 7357: 7356: 7355: 7354: 7353: 7352: 7318: 7310: 7305: 7304: 7303: 7302: 7301: 7300: 7299: 7298: 7297: 7296: 7295: 7294: 7293: 7292: 7259: 7198: 7197: 7194: 7188: 7182: 7179: 7176: 7172: 7171: 7154: 7151: 7150: 7149: 7127: 7125: 7124: 7123: 7122: 7119: 7101: 7098: 7096: 7093: 7092: 7091: 7090: 7089: 7088: 7087: 7086: 7085: 7029: 7026: 7025: 7024: 7014: 7013: 7012: 7011: 7010: 7009: 7008: 7007: 7006: 7005: 7004: 7003: 6957: 6956: 6955: 6880: 6879: 6878: 6877: 6876: 6875: 6856: 6821:referred to me 6815: 6814: 6813: 6812: 6811: 6810: 6809: 6808: 6766: 6763: 6762: 6761: 6758: 6755: 6752: 6749: 6746: 6735: 6734: 6733: 6732: 6731: 6730: 6729: 6728: 6698: 6697: 6673: 6672: 6671: 6670: 6655: 6606: 6577: 6572: 6571: 6570: 6569: 6568: 6567: 6525: 6524: 6523: 6522: 6521: 6520: 6519: 6518: 6465: 6464: 6463: 6462: 6430: 6429: 6428: 6427: 6426: 6425: 6424: 6423: 6422: 6411: 6359: 6312: 6311: 6288: 6287: 6286: 6285: 6284: 6283: 6253: 6252: 6241: 6240: 6188: 6139: 6138: 6111: 6108: 6106: 6105: 6089: 6088: 6087: 6086: 6085: 6084: 6083: 6064: 6001: 6000: 5997: 5993: 5992: 5983: 5982: 5981: 5965: 5963: 5960: 5959: 5958: 5957: 5956: 5952: 5936: 5935: 5934: 5908: 5907: 5901: 5900: 5899: 5896: 5890: 5889: 5888: 5885: 5860: 5844: 5836: 5833: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5829: 5768: 5765: 5758: 5756: 5753: 5752: 5751: 5750: 5749: 5748: 5747: 5746: 5745: 5744: 5743: 5742: 5741: 5740: 5739: 5738: 5737: 5733: 5704: 5679: 5612: 5601:my design here 5549: 5546: 5545: 5544: 5529: 5526: 5525: 5524: 5523: 5522: 5521: 5520: 5519: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5510: 5506: 5462: 5420: 5376: 5375: 5364: 5353: 5340: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5332: 5331: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5326: 5325: 5284: 5283: 5282: 5281: 5280: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5276: 5275: 5274: 5273: 5272: 5271: 5243: 5199: 5177: 5176: 5175: 5174: 5173: 5172: 5171: 5170: 5167: 5161: 5158: 5155: 5152: 5149: 5143: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5139: 5138: 5135: 5132: 5126: 5125: 5124: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5109: 5106: 5100: 5099: 5098: 5095: 5091:Knowledge bots 5085: 5081:Knowledge bots 5075: 5071:Knowledge bots 5065: 5061:Knowledge bots 5046: 5045: 5042: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5033: 5032: 5031: 5030: 5029: 5028: 5027: 4970: 4969: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4962: 4961: 4945: 4938: 4918: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4872: 4871: 4868: 4862: 4859: 4856: 4853: 4850: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4840: 4839: 4836: 4833: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4822: 4819: 4816: 4813: 4810: 4807: 4801: 4800: 4799: 4796: 4793: 4787: 4786: 4785: 4782: 4778:Knowledge bots 4772: 4768:Knowledge bots 4762: 4758:Knowledge bots 4752: 4748:Knowledge bots 4733: 4732: 4729: 4724: 4720: 4719: 4718: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4710: 4704: 4701: 4698: 4695: 4692: 4689: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4678: 4675: 4672: 4669: 4666: 4663: 4660: 4659: 4658: 4652: 4649: 4646: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4638:Knowledge bots 4634: 4631:Knowledge bots 4627: 4624:Knowledge bots 4620: 4617:Knowledge bots 4604: 4603: 4600: 4595: 4593: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4570: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4548: 4547:New BAG member 4545: 4543: 4540: 4538: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4501: 4492: 4490: 4481: 4479: 4476: 4474: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4464: 4457: 4450: 4440: 4439: 4436: 4427: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4413: 4406: 4395: 4392: 4390: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4372: 4371: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4308: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4289: 4283: 4277: 4271: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4238: 4237: 4224: 4223: 4209: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4190: 4189: 4177: 4176: 4157: 4154: 4152: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4122: 4085: 4084: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4068: 4028: 3986: 3961: 3960: 3949: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3912: 3911: 3908: 3905: 3902: 3899: 3896: 3893: 3890: 3885: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3869: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3805: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3772: 3766: 3765: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3758: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3658: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3637: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3566: 3513: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3461: 3458: 3456: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3434: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3368: 3365: 3363: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3317: 3314: 3312: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3283: 3270: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3254: 3247: 3231: 3230: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3191:You block it. 3187: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3168: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3137: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3064: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3045:David Gƶthberg 3041: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2943: 2942: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2856: 2835: 2806:Let's look at 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2747: 2746: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2722: 2699: 2698: 2684: 2664: 2663: 2659: 2652: 2647: 2645:User:BotPuppet 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2575: 2568: 2567: 2554: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2520: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2499: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2409:Ilmari Karonen 2389:ÄØmage:Alar.png 2385:Əmage:Alar.png 2381:Ǝmage:Alar.png 2377:ƌmage:Alar.png 2373:ƍmage:Alar.png 2369:Ä°mage:Alar.png 2365:Image:Alar.png 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2316:Ilmari Karonen 2296: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2197: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2085: 2071: 2070: 2052: 2049: 2046: 2045: 2038:BAG membership 2023: 2012: 2009: 1998: 1997: 1995: 1994: 1985: 1984: 1982: 1981: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1900: 1894: 1893: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1853: 1852: 1813: 1812: 1810: 1809: 1802: 1801: 1780: 1779: 1777: 1776: 1769: 1768: 1756: 1755: 1753: 1752: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1656: 1655: 1632: 1631: 1629: 1628: 1619: 1618: 1616: 1615: 1606: 1605: 1603: 1602: 1592: 1591: 1571: 1570: 1568: 1567: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1517: 1516: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1440: 1439: 1421: 1420: 1418: 1417: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1328: 1327: 1325: 1324: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1284: 1283: 1281: 1280: 1273: 1272: 1255: 1254: 1252: 1251: 1243: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1156: 1155: 1141: 1140: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1058: 1047: 1046: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 924: 923: 922: 921: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 867: 866: 855: 841: 840: 838: 837: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 768: 759: 758: 715: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 520: 519: 518: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 417: 416: 415: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 388:bugzilla:12971 307: 306: 304: 303: 294: 293: 291: 290: 283: 282: 268: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 216: 215: 214: 213: 212: 211: 189: 188: 187: 186: 169: 145: 144: 132: 122: 121: 119: 118: 109: 108: 103: 100: 95: 90: 83: 78: 73: 63: 62: 45: 18:Knowledge:Bots 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 12951: 12935: 12929: 12926: 12923: 12919: 12918: 12913: 12901: 12890: 12887: 12884: 12879: 12875: 12874: 12873: 12870: 12861: 12860: 12847: 12840: 12835: 12831: 12826: 12823: 12822: 12821: 12820: 12817: 12814: 12811: 12810:FIX THE ISSUE 12807: 12803: 12800: 12796: 12789: 12782: 12781: 12780: 12779: 12776: 12773: 12764: 12763: 12750: 12742: 12741: 12733: 12730: 12726: 12722: 12717: 12716: 12695: 12690: 12686: 12679: 12678: 12677: 12674: 12673: 12668: 12667: 12661: 12660: 12659: 12654: 12650: 12644: 12640: 12639: 12638: 12637: 12636: 12635: 12632: 12629: 12628: 12623: 12622: 12617: 12612: 12608: 12604: 12600: 12595: 12591: 12588: 12583: 12579: 12578: 12559: 12554: 12550: 12549: 12548: 12542: 12538: 12533: 12528: 12527: 12526: 12523: 12522: 12517: 12516: 12509: 12503: 12502: 12501: 12496: 12492: 12491: 12490: 12487: 12486: 12481: 12480: 12475: 12474: 12473: 12468: 12464: 12463: 12462: 12456: 12452: 12447: 12441: 12440: 12439: 12434: 12427: 12420: 12419: 12418: 12415: 12414: 12409: 12408: 12403: 12399: 12398: 12391: 12386: 12374: 12369: 12365: 12355: 12351: 12347: 12343: 12342: 12341: 12335: 12331: 12326: 12321: 12320: 12319: 12314: 12310: 12300: 12293: 12285: 12284: 12281: 12280: 12279: 12278: 12277: 12276: 12275: 12274: 12264: 12260: 12259: 12258: 12255: 12252: 12241: 12231: 12224: 12223: 12222: 12217: 12213: 12206: 12202: 12201: 12200: 12197: 12194: 12186: 12185: 12177: 12174: 12170: 12169: 12159: 12156: 12155: 12150: 12149: 12148: 12145: 12142: 12138: 12134: 12133: 12125: 12111: 12108: 12104: 12103: 12102: 12101: 12100: 12099: 12098: 12097: 12088: 12085: 12081: 12080: 12079: 12078: 12077: 12076: 12075: 12074: 12067: 12062: 12058: 12052: 12051: 12050: 12049: 12048: 12047: 12042: 12039: 12034: 12033: 12032: 12031: 12028: 12023: 12019: 12013: 12010: 12009: 12001: 11997: 11993: 11989: 11986: 11985: 11973: 11970: 11969: 11968: 11960: 11959: 11958: 11954: 11948: 11946: 11940: 11939: 11938: 11937: 11934: 11930: 11926: 11922: 11921: 11907: 11903: 11900: 11896: 11881: 11880: 11879: 11874: 11870: 11869: 11868: 11865: 11861: 11860: 11857: 11852: 11848: 11844: 11843: 11840: 11821: 11817: 11813: 11809: 11808: 11807: 11804: 11801: 11794: 11793: 11792: 11788: 11784: 11780: 11775: 11774: 11773: 11768: 11761: 11754: 11753: 11745: 11742: 11740: 11733: 11732: 11713: 11709: 11705: 11701: 11697: 11693: 11692: 11691: 11690: 11689: 11688: 11687: 11686: 11679: 11676: 11672: 11668: 11667: 11666: 11665: 11664: 11663: 11658: 11654: 11650: 11646: 11642: 11641: 11640: 11639: 11636: 11633: 11631: 11625: 11624: 11621: 11616: 11612: 11611: 11606: 11603: 11599: 11595: 11591: 11590: 11589: 11583: 11580: 11577: 11573: 11572: 11565: 11560: 11556: 11555: 11554: 11550: 11546: 11541: 11538: 11533: 11532: 11531: 11530: 11527: 11524: 11523: 11519: 11514: 11513: 11502: 11498: 11494: 11490: 11486: 11485: 11484: 11483: 11482: 11481: 11480: 11479: 11478: 11477: 11468: 11463: 11459: 11452: 11451: 11450: 11449: 11448: 11447: 11446: 11445: 11438: 11434: 11430: 11423: 11416: 11412: 11411: 11410: 11409: 11408: 11407: 11402: 11397: 11393: 11386: 11385: 11384: 11383: 11376: 11371: 11367: 11366: 11365: 11361: 11357: 11353: 11352: 11351: 11350: 11347: 11342: 11338: 11336: 11331: 11327: 11326: 11318: 11315: 11311: 11307: 11306: 11295: 11292: 11291: 11284: 11280: 11277:I'm counting 11276: 11275: 11274: 11270: 11266: 11261: 11260: 11259: 11258: 11257: 11256: 11255: 11254: 11247: 11244: 11243: 11236: 11232: 11231: 11230: 11229: 11228: 11227: 11222: 11219: 11218: 11211: 11207: 11205: 11202: 11201: 11194: 11189: 11186: 11185: 11184: 11183: 11180: 11177: 11176: 11170: 11167: 11163: 11162: 11152: 11149: 11145: 11141: 11137: 11136: 11135: 11132: 11130: 11129: 11122: 11118: 11113: 11110: 11109: 11103: 11099: 11096: 11092: 11089: 11085: 11082: 11078: 11076: 11073: 11072: 11068: 11064: 11061: 11057: 11054: 11050: 11047: 11043: 11041: 11038: 11037: 11033: 11029: 11026: 11022: 11019: 11015: 11012: 11008: 11006: 11003: 11002: 10999: 10996: 10992: 10989: 10985: 10982: 10978: 10976: 10973: 10969: 10965: 10961: 10958: 10954: 10951: 10947: 10944: 10940: 10938: 10935: 10932: 10931: 10928: 10925: 10921: 10919: 10917: 10915: 10912: 10909: 10908: 10905: 10902: 10898: 10896: 10894: 10892: 10889: 10886: 10885: 10881: 10877: 10874: 10870: 10867: 10863: 10860: 10856: 10854: 10851: 10848: 10847: 10844: 10842: 10839: 10837: 10834: 10830: 10827: 10824: 10822: 10819: 10817: 10814: 10809: 10803: 10800: 10795: 10791: 10787: 10783: 10779: 10774: 10773: 10768: 10763: 10762: 10757: 10747: 10746: 10745: 10744: 10733: 10728: 10727: 10722: 10712: 10711: 10710: 10705: 10704: 10699: 10689: 10686: 10684: 10679: 10678: 10673: 10662: 10661: 10660: 10656: 10652: 10648: 10644: 10640: 10639: 10638: 10635: 10631: 10630: 10626: 10622: 10619: 10615: 10614: 10609: 10605: 10601: 10597: 10593: 10589: 10588: 10587: 10584: 10580: 10576: 10575: 10571: 10570: 10568: 10564: 10563: 10555: 10552: 10550: 10549: 10544: 10538: 10535: 10531: 10530: 10529: 10524: 10518: 10516: 10514: 10505: 10504: 10503: 10500: 10496: 10492: 10491: 10488: 10481: 10477: 10476: 10471: 10467: 10463: 10459: 10458: 10455: 10451: 10447: 10442: 10441: 10438: 10435: 10433: 10432: 10401: 10396: 10390: 10389: 10382: 10378: 10377: 10376: 10373: 10369: 10368: 10367: 10363: 10359: 10355: 10351: 10350: 10349: 10345: 10341: 10337: 10336: 10335: 10332: 10331: 10324: 10321: 10320: 10302: 10298: 10294: 10290: 10289: 10284: 10280: 10276: 10272: 10268: 10267: 10266: 10263: 10259: 10256: 10255: 10243: 10239: 10235: 10231: 10230: 10229: 10226: 10217: 10213: 10209: 10208: 10207: 10204: 10203: 10198: 10197: 10192: 10189: 10188: 10175: 10174: 10173: 10172: 10171: 10170: 10164: 10161: 10160: 10159: 10158: 10155: 10151: 10150: 10148: 10143: 10139:one that is. 10137: 10136: 10133: 10130: 10128: 10127: 10122: 10118: 10114: 10110: 10109: 10103: 10100: 10097: 10096: 10095: 10094: 10091: 10087: 10083: 10079: 10078: 10068: 10064: 10060: 10056: 10052: 10051: 10050: 10046: 10042: 10038: 10034: 10024: 10020: 10016: 10009: 10002: 9995: 9988: 9984: 9980: 9979: 9978: 9974: 9970: 9966: 9963: 9962: 9961: 9958: 9955: 9951: 9947: 9943: 9942: 9941: 9937: 9933: 9929: 9925: 9924: 9923: 9919: 9918: 9916: 9911: 9906: 9905: 9902: 9899: 9896: 9892: 9888: 9878: 9875: 9872: 9868: 9867: 9866: 9863: 9862:CharlotteWebb 9858: 9857: 9856: 9852: 9848: 9843: 9842: 9841: 9838: 9837:CharlotteWebb 9833: 9832: 9831: 9827: 9823: 9816: 9809: 9808: 9805: 9802: 9799: 9796:hard to use. 9795: 9788: 9781: 9780: 9772: 9769: 9757: 9747: 9737: 9730: 9729: 9723: 9720: 9717: 9712: 9707: 9706: 9697: 9694: 9691: 9686: 9681: 9680: 9671: 9668: 9665: 9660: 9655: 9654: 9645: 9629: 9625: 9621: 9617: 9616: 9615: 9612: 9609: 9605: 9604: 9603: 9599: 9595: 9591: 9590: 9589: 9585: 9584: 9582: 9577: 9572: 9571: 9563: 9554: 9551: 9547: 9546: 9545: 9541: 9537: 9533: 9529: 9528: 9520: 9517: 9513: 9509: 9508: 9495: 9492: 9491: 9490: 9489: 9488: 9487: 9482: 9479: 9474: 9471: 9468: 9467: 9465: 9463: 9461: 9456: 9453: 9452:current month 9449: 9445: 9444: 9443: 9438: 9435: 9434:current month 9431: 9427: 9426: 9425: 9420: 9417: 9416:current month 9413: 9409: 9408: 9407: 9401: 9398: 9397:current month 9394: 9390: 9389: 9388: 9385: 9384: 9371: 9368: 9366: 9365: 9360: 9356: 9355:User:KrimpBot 9349: 9342: 9338: 9334: 9330: 9328: 9325: 9321: 9320: 9314: 9311: 9308: 9305: 9302: 9299: 9296: 9293: 9291: 9287: 9283: 9280: 9276: 9272: 9267: 9264: 9261: 9256: 9253: 9249: 9246: 9242: 9239: 9236: 9233: 9228: 9223: 9222: 9214: 9211: 9209: 9208: 9202: 9201: 9194: 9191: 9189: 9188: 9182: 9181: 9180: 9179: 9178: 9177: 9170: 9164: 9160: 9159: 9158: 9157: 9150: 9147: 9145: 9144: 9139: 9135: 9131: 9127: 9126: 9125: 9124: 9123: 9122: 9115: 9112: 9108: 9104: 9100: 9099: 9098: 9097: 9096: 9095: 9089: 9086: 9083: 9079: 9078: 9077: 9076: 9073: 9070: 9068: 9067: 9062: 9058: 9057: 9053: 9052: 9044: 9041: 9039: 9038: 9033: 9031: 9028: 9026: 9025: 9020: 9019: 9012: 9009: 9007: 9006: 9001: 8998:. I speak of 8997: 8994: 8993: 8992:-- User:Docu 8991: 8988: 8987: 8986: 8985: 8982: 8979: 8977: 8976: 8970: 8966: 8962: 8961: 8956: 8951: 8945: 8943: 8936: 8931: 8930: 8928: 8924: 8920: 8919: 8916: 8913: 8911: 8905: 8904: 8901: 8896: 8890: 8888: 8881: 8855: 8852: 8850: 8844: 8843: 8841: 8836: 8835: 8834: 8833: 8818: 8815: 8809: 8805: 8803: 8799: 8795: 8791: 8790: 8789: 8786: 8785: 8778: 8775: 8772: 8768: 8764: 8760: 8759: 8758: 8754: 8750: 8746: 8742: 8741: 8740: 8737: 8735: 8729: 8728: 8727: 8724: 8720: 8710: 8706: 8705: 8704: 8701: 8698: 8694: 8690: 8686: 8682: 8678: 8674: 8673: 8672: 8668: 8664: 8657: 8654: 8651: 8648: 8645: 8642: 8639: 8636: 8634: 8630: 8626: 8623: 8619: 8615: 8610: 8607: 8604: 8599: 8596: 8592: 8589: 8585: 8582: 8579: 8576: 8571: 8566: 8565: 8538: 8534: 8530: 8525: 8523: 8520: 8516: 8512: 8511: 8499: 8496: 8493: 8489: 8483: 8478: 8477: 8476: 8475: 8474: 8473: 8468: 8464: 8459: 8454: 8449: 8446:Smith, J.D., 8422: 8421: 8420: 8419: 8414: 8411: 8408: 8404: 8398: 8394: 8390: 8389: 8388: 8384: 8383: 8381: 8376: 8371: 8367: 8366: 8361: 8358: 8355: 8351: 8345: 8341: 8334: 8331: 8328: 8325: 8324: 8322: 8319: 8318: 8316: 8315: 8314: 8310: 8305: 8300: 8295: 8294: 8286: 8283: 8280: 8276: 8270: 8265: 8264: 8261: 8258: 8256: 8253: 8252: 8249: 8246: 8244: 8241: 8239: 8236: 8234: 8231: 8229: 8226: 8224: 8221: 8220: 8217: 8214: 8212: 8209: 8207: 8204: 8202: 8199: 8197: 8194: 8193: 8189: 8188: 8170: 8167: 8164: 8160: 8154: 8149: 8148: 8140: 8137: 8134: 8130: 8124: 8119: 8116: 8110: 8100: 8099:WonderfulLife 8090: 8082: 8078: 8074: 8071: 8066: 8061: 8057: 8052: 8051: 8046: 8045: 8036: 8033: 8029: 8024: 8019: 8018: 8017: 8012: 8008: 8004: 8000: 7999: 7998: 7995: 7991: 7986: 7982: 7981: 7980: 7979: 7976: 7971: 7967: 7966: 7963: 7960: 7958: 7955: 7953: 7950: 7949: 7945: 7944: 7939: 7938: 7930: 7927: 7923: 7922: 7909: 7906: 7905: 7904: 7901: 7898: 7893: 7892: 7882: 7879: 7875: 7874: 7873: 7870: 7866: 7862: 7861: 7847: 7844: 7842: 7841: 7834: 7833: 7832: 7829: 7827: 7821: 7817: 7816: 7815: 7814: 7811: 7808: 7806: 7805: 7797: 7796: 7769: 7764: 7760: 7759: 7758: 7753: 7748: 7743: 7742: 7741: 7736: 7732: 7728: 7727: 7726: 7721: 7716: 7712: 7708: 7707: 7706: 7701: 7697: 7696: 7695: 7691: 7687: 7682: 7678: 7677: 7676: 7671: 7667: 7661: 7658: 7656: 7650: 7646: 7645: 7644: 7640: 7636: 7631: 7630: 7629: 7626: 7624: 7618: 7617: 7616: 7612: 7608: 7603: 7602: 7601: 7596: 7592: 7591: 7590: 7586: 7582: 7577: 7576: 7575: 7570: 7566: 7562: 7561: 7560: 7556: 7552: 7547: 7546: 7545: 7542: 7540: 7539: 7531: 7527: 7526: 7513: 7509: 7505: 7500: 7499: 7498: 7493: 7488: 7484: 7483: 7482: 7479: 7477: 7476: 7468: 7467: 7466: 7465: 7464: 7463: 7462: 7461: 7454: 7449: 7444: 7440: 7436: 7435: 7434: 7433: 7432: 7431: 7426: 7423: 7420: 7416: 7412: 7408: 7401: 7394: 7391: 7390: 7389: 7388: 7381: 7376: 7371: 7367: 7363: 7362: 7361: 7360: 7359: 7358: 7351: 7347: 7343: 7342: 7336: 7335: 7334: 7333: 7332: 7329: 7327: 7326: 7319: 7316: 7311: 7307: 7306: 7291: 7286: 7282: 7281: 7280: 7276: 7272: 7268: 7264: 7263: 7262: 7258: 7256: 7251: 7248: 7244: 7240: 7239: 7238: 7233: 7229: 7228: 7227: 7223: 7219: 7215: 7210: 7209: 7208: 7205: 7200: 7199: 7195: 7193: 7189: 7187: 7183: 7180: 7177: 7174: 7173: 7168: 7167: 7166: 7161: 7157: 7156: 7148: 7144: 7140: 7137: 7136: 7120: 7117: 7116: 7115: 7112: 7109: 7104: 7103: 7084: 7081: 7076: 7075: 7074: 7071: 7066: 7065: 7064: 7061: 7054: 7052: 7046: 7045: 7044: 7040: 7036: 7032: 7031: 7023: 7020: 7016: 7015: 7002: 6999: 6995: 6991: 6986: 6985: 6984: 6980: 6976: 6971: 6970: 6969: 6966: 6962: 6958: 6954: 6950: 6946: 6942: 6941: 6940: 6935: 6931: 6926: 6925: 6924: 6920: 6916: 6912: 6911: 6910: 6906: 6902: 6897: 6896: 6895: 6891: 6887: 6882: 6881: 6874: 6870: 6866: 6861: 6857: 6855: 6852: 6848: 6847: 6846: 6842: 6838: 6834: 6833: 6831: 6826: 6822: 6817: 6816: 6807: 6803: 6799: 6794: 6793: 6792: 6788: 6784: 6780: 6775: 6771: 6767: 6764: 6759: 6756: 6753: 6750: 6747: 6744: 6743: 6741: 6740: 6739: 6738: 6737: 6736: 6727: 6723: 6719: 6715: 6710: 6709:edit articles 6706: 6705: 6704: 6703: 6702: 6701: 6700: 6699: 6696: 6691: 6685: 6683: 6675: 6674: 6669: 6665: 6661: 6656: 6654: 6650: 6646: 6642: 6637: 6636: 6635: 6631: 6627: 6623: 6619: 6615: 6611: 6608:Given ST47's 6607: 6604: 6601: 6598: 6594: 6590: 6586: 6582: 6578: 6574: 6573: 6566: 6563: 6559: 6555: 6552: 6551: 6550: 6547: 6542: 6541: 6540: 6536: 6532: 6527: 6526: 6517: 6513: 6509: 6504: 6499: 6495: 6494: 6493: 6489: 6485: 6481: 6480: 6478: 6477: 6474: 6469: 6468: 6467: 6466: 6461: 6458: 6454: 6450: 6449: 6448: 6444: 6440: 6436: 6431: 6421: 6416: 6412: 6410: 6405: 6399: 6397: 6389: 6388: 6387: 6384: 6383:CharlotteWebb 6380: 6376: 6372: 6371: 6370: 6365: 6360: 6358: 6355: 6354:CharlotteWebb 6350: 6349: 6348: 6343: 6337: 6335: 6328: 6327: 6326: 6322: 6318: 6314: 6313: 6310: 6305: 6299: 6297: 6290: 6289: 6282: 6279: 6278:CharlotteWebb 6274: 6273: 6272: 6268: 6264: 6263: 6257: 6256: 6255: 6254: 6251: 6248: 6247:CharlotteWebb 6243: 6242: 6236: 6231: 6228: 6223: 6220: 6215: 6212: 6207: 6204: 6201: 6198: 6193: 6189: 6185: 6182: 6179: 6176: 6173: 6170: 6167: 6164: 6161: 6158: 6155: 6152: 6149: 6144: 6141: 6140: 6137: 6132: 6126: 6124: 6117: 6114: 6113: 6104: 6101: 6096: 6091: 6090: 6082: 6078: 6077: 6075: 6070: 6065: 6063: 6058: 6052: 6050: 6043: 6042: 6041: 6037: 6033: 6029: 6028: 6027: 6022: 6016: 6014: 6003: 6002: 5998: 5995: 5994: 5991: 5990: 5985: 5984: 5980: 5977: 5972: 5967: 5966: 5955: 5951: 5949: 5944: 5937: 5929: 5928: 5923: 5922: 5917: 5910: 5909: 5905: 5902: 5897: 5894: 5891: 5886: 5880: 5873: 5872: 5870: 5867: 5866: 5864: 5861: 5855: 5848: 5845: 5842: 5839: 5838: 5828: 5825: 5808: 5807: 5806: 5803: 5802: 5795: 5794: 5791: 5787: 5786: 5763: 5736: 5732: 5730: 5725: 5723: 5722: 5721: 5718: 5714: 5709: 5708: 5707: 5703: 5701: 5696: 5693: 5690:I've updated 5689: 5688: 5687: 5684: 5680: 5678: 5675: 5671: 5670: 5669: 5666: 5664: 5658: 5654: 5650: 5647:has an extra 5643: 5637: 5636: 5635: 5630: 5626: 5617: 5616: 5615: 5611: 5609: 5604: 5602: 5595: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5583: 5581: 5576: 5574: 5569: 5567: 5561: 5557: 5552: 5551: 5543: 5540: 5536: 5535:Squid changes 5532: 5531: 5509: 5505: 5503: 5498: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5487: 5483: 5482: 5481: 5478: 5475: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5461: 5459: 5454: 5452: 5445: 5438: 5434: 5433: 5432: 5429: 5425: 5424: 5423: 5419: 5417: 5412: 5410: 5409: 5408: 5405: 5401: 5400: 5399: 5396: 5394: 5385: 5378: 5377: 5371: 5365: 5360: 5354: 5349: 5343: 5342: 5324: 5321: 5317: 5316: 5315: 5310: 5304: 5302: 5294: 5293: 5292: 5291: 5290: 5289: 5288: 5287: 5286: 5285: 5270: 5266: 5262: 5257: 5256: 5255: 5251: 5246: 5241: 5237: 5233: 5232: 5231: 5230: 5229: 5225: 5221: 5217: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5207: 5202: 5197: 5193: 5192: 5191: 5190: 5189: 5186: 5182: 5181: 5168: 5165: 5164: 5162: 5159: 5156: 5153: 5150: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5136: 5133: 5130: 5129: 5127: 5123: 5120: 5119: 5118: 5115: 5110: 5107: 5104: 5103: 5101: 5096: 5094: 5092: 5086: 5084: 5082: 5076: 5074: 5072: 5066: 5064: 5062: 5056: 5055: 5053: 5052: 5050: 5049: 5048: 5047: 5041: 5040: 5026: 5023: 5019: 5018: 5017: 5014: 5010: 5006: 5005: 5003: 5002: 5001: 4998: 4994: 4993: 4992: 4987: 4981: 4979: 4972: 4971: 4960: 4957: 4953: 4952: 4951: 4947: 4946: 4943: 4940: 4939: 4936: 4932: 4931: 4930: 4927: 4923: 4922: 4921: 4917: 4915: 4910: 4905: 4898: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4889: 4883: 4882: 4869: 4866: 4865: 4863: 4860: 4857: 4854: 4851: 4848: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4837: 4834: 4831: 4830: 4828: 4823: 4820: 4817: 4814: 4811: 4808: 4805: 4804: 4802: 4797: 4794: 4791: 4790: 4788: 4783: 4781: 4779: 4773: 4771: 4769: 4763: 4761: 4759: 4753: 4751: 4749: 4743: 4742: 4740: 4739: 4737: 4736: 4735: 4734: 4730:My grand plan 4728: 4727: 4711: 4708: 4707: 4705: 4702: 4699: 4696: 4693: 4690: 4687: 4682: 4681: 4679: 4676: 4673: 4670: 4667: 4664: 4661: 4656: 4655: 4653: 4650: 4647: 4644: 4639: 4635: 4632: 4628: 4625: 4621: 4618: 4614: 4613: 4611: 4610: 4608: 4607: 4606: 4605: 4599: 4598: 4587: 4584: 4582: 4576: 4573: 4572: 4564: 4561: 4559: 4558: 4551: 4550: 4532: 4529: 4527: 4522: 4520: 4515: 4513: 4507: 4504: 4503: 4500: 4496: 4495:Thehelpfulbot 4489: 4485: 4484:Thehelpfulbot 4478:Squid Changes 4465: 4462: 4458: 4455: 4451: 4448: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4437: 4434: 4430: 4429: 4418: 4414: 4411: 4407: 4404: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4383: 4382: 4379: 4374: 4373: 4370: 4365: 4359: 4357: 4350: 4346: 4345: 4338: 4335: 4332: 4328: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4306: 4302: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4287: 4284: 4281: 4278: 4275: 4272: 4269: 4266: 4265: 4263: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4250: 4246: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4236: 4233: 4230: 4226: 4225: 4221: 4220: 4217: 4212: 4211: 4201: 4198: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4188: 4185: 4179: 4178: 4175: 4172: 4169: 4163: 4160: 4159: 4151: 4138: 4135: 4132: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4121: 4119: 4114: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4107: 4105: 4099: 4098: 4097: 4094: 4091: 4087: 4086: 4071: 4067: 4065: 4060: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4053: 4051: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4040: 4037: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4027: 4025: 4020: 4018: 4015: 4014: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4004: 4001: 3996: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3985: 3983: 3978: 3976: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3967: 3963: 3962: 3959: 3957: 3952: 3951: 3948: 3938: 3935: 3931: 3930:a rough table 3927: 3926: 3925: 3922: 3918: 3915:Chris G's is 3914: 3913: 3909: 3906: 3903: 3900: 3897: 3894: 3891: 3888: 3887: 3879: 3876: 3872: 3871: 3868: 3857: 3853: 3852: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3838: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3812: 3808: 3807: 3797: 3794: 3793: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3779: 3775: 3774: 3770: 3757: 3754: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3729: 3724: 3722: 3718: 3713: 3707: 3703: 3699: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3689: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3679: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3660: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3639: 3629: 3626: 3623: 3619: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3610: 3607: 3602: 3594: 3589: 3588: 3583: 3574: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3565: 3563: 3558: 3555: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3540: 3533: 3531: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3520: 3516: 3515: 3505: 3502: 3497: 3496: 3491: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3480: 3476: 3470: 3464: 3463: 3455: 3448: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3436: 3422: 3419: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3410: 3408: 3406: 3405:SchfiftyThree 3400: 3399: 3398: 3395: 3388: 3386: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3375: 3371: 3370: 3362: 3353: 3348: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3339: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3319: 3306: 3303: 3301: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3282: 3277: 3273: 3272: 3268: 3260: 3256: 3255: 3252: 3249: 3248: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3233: 3232: 3229: 3226: 3223: 3219: 3218: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3194: 3190: 3189: 3181: 3178: 3175: 3171: 3170: 3167: 3159: 3154: 3150: 3143: 3138: 3134: 3133: 3131: 3130: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3084: 3081: 3074: 3070: 3067: 3066: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3036: 3029: 3022: 3012: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2987: 2982: 2979: 2976: 2971: 2967: 2965: 2961: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2941: 2938: 2932: 2926: 2925: 2917: 2912: 2906: 2904: 2897: 2889: 2883: 2881: 2874: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2851: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2838: 2833: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2812: 2805: 2804: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2773: 2768: 2762: 2760: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2745: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2725: 2720: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2697: 2694: 2689: 2685: 2683: 2680: 2677: 2670: 2666: 2665: 2660: 2657: 2653: 2650: 2649: 2646: 2635: 2632: 2625: 2623: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2604:B. Wolterding 2600: 2599: 2598: 2593: 2589: 2582: 2576: 2573: 2572: 2570: 2569: 2566: 2561: 2557: 2556: 2548: 2544: 2543: 2541: 2536: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2522: 2514: 2509: 2505: 2502: 2501: 2498:Approved Bots 2489: 2484: 2478: 2476: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2447: 2441: 2439: 2432: 2431: 2420: 2415: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2397: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2363:a surprise: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2327: 2322: 2317: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2298: 2277: 2272: 2268: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2257: 2250: 2248: 2242: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2231: 2227: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2215: 2208: 2206: 2200: 2199: 2189: 2186: 2181: 2180: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2142: 2139: 2134: 2133: 2128: 2124: 2123:User:Mushroom 2120: 2116: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2091: 2088: 2084: 2083:~ Ameliorate! 2079: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2069: 2066: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2054: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2030: 2024: 2021: 2016: 2004: 1996: 1991: 1990: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1974: 1965: 1962: 1959: 1954: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1945: 1936: 1935: 1922: 1915: 1910: 1906: 1901: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1892: 1889: 1886: 1885:FIX THE ISSUE 1882: 1878: 1875: 1871: 1864: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1851: 1848: 1839: 1838: 1825: 1817: 1816: 1811: 1806: 1805: 1800: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1784: 1783: 1778: 1773: 1772: 1767: 1764: 1760: 1759: 1754: 1749: 1748: 1737: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1714: 1711: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1693: 1688: 1684: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1668: 1665: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1654: 1649: 1645: 1639: 1636: 1635: 1630: 1625: 1624: 1617: 1612: 1611: 1604: 1601: 1596: 1595: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1569: 1564: 1563: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1535: 1529: 1527: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1502: 1488: 1484: 1481: 1477: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1455: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1438: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1419: 1416: 1411: 1410: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1382: 1379: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1346: 1339: 1332: 1331: 1326: 1321: 1320: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1299: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1276: 1271: 1268: 1266: 1259: 1258: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1143: 1142: 1139: 1134: 1130: 1129: 1124: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1083: 1078: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1056: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1045: 1042: 1041: 1037: 1032: 1031: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 986: 981: 977: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 956: 952: 948: 941: 934: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 920: 915: 911: 904: 903: 902: 901: 894: 889: 885: 884: 883: 879: 875: 871: 870: 869: 868: 865: 860: 856: 854: 849: 845: 844: 839: 834: 833: 820: 815: 811: 804: 803: 802: 799: 798: 793: 792: 786: 785: 784: 779: 775: 769: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 757: 754: 753: 748: 747: 742: 737: 733: 729: 725: 720: 716: 713: 708: 704: 703: 684: 679: 675: 674: 673: 667: 663: 658: 653: 652: 651: 648: 647: 642: 641: 634: 628: 627: 626: 621: 617: 616: 615: 612: 611: 606: 605: 600: 599: 598: 593: 589: 588: 587: 581: 577: 572: 566: 565: 564: 559: 552: 545: 544: 543: 540: 539: 534: 533: 528: 524: 523: 516: 511: 499: 494: 490: 480: 476: 472: 468: 467: 466: 460: 456: 451: 446: 445: 444: 439: 435: 425: 418: 410: 409: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 389: 385: 384: 383: 380: 377: 366: 356: 349: 348: 347: 342: 338: 331: 327: 326: 325: 322: 319: 311: 310: 305: 300: 299: 292: 287: 286: 281: 278: 274: 270: 269: 258: 255: 254: 247: 243: 240:I'm counting 239: 238: 237: 233: 229: 224: 223: 222: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 210: 207: 206: 199: 195: 194: 193: 192: 191: 190: 185: 182: 181: 174: 170: 168: 165: 164: 157: 152: 149: 148: 147: 146: 143: 140: 139: 133: 130: 126: 125: 120: 115: 114: 107: 104: 101: 99: 96: 94: 91: 88: 84: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 60: 56: 52: 51: 46: 39: 38: 29: 23: 19: 12940:So... (Test) 12853: 12838: 12833: 12829: 12809: 12756: 12720: 12671: 12665: 12626: 12620: 12615: 12610: 12602: 12598: 12593: 12581: 12520: 12514: 12484: 12478: 12421:When should 12412: 12406: 12401: 12250: 12204: 12192: 12153: 12122:Proposal on 11963: 11962: 11944: 11799: 11778: 11536: 11520: 11488: 11286: 11278: 11238: 11213: 11196: 11174: 11159:-BOT Process 11127: 11126: 11121:mostly right 11120: 11117:mostly wrong 11116: 10752: 10717: 10694: 10668: 10624: 10547: 10512: 10511: 10473: 10430: 10387: 10326: 10271:asked for it 10201: 10195: 10146: 10145: 10125: 10116: 10115:interwikis 10112: 9914: 9913: 9793: 9718: 9692: 9666: 9580: 9579: 9363: 9337:WP:CHECKWIKI 9332: 9309: 9303: 9297: 9284: 9281: 9270: 9262: 9254: 9247: 9240: 9234: 9206: 9186: 9142: 9102: 9065: 9036: 9023: 9004: 8974: 8968: 8941: 8886: 8880:WP:CHECKWIKI 8794:98.31.12.146 8780: 8773: 8761:Approved at 8708: 8693:Common sense 8663:Anna Lincoln 8652: 8646: 8640: 8627: 8624: 8613: 8605: 8597: 8590: 8583: 8577: 8514: 8484: 8399: 8392: 8379: 8378: 8369: 8346: 8271: 8155: 8125: 8089:Bruscabrusca 8069: 8064: 8055: 8022: 7940:<ref: --> 7897: 7896: 7836: 7800: 7730: 7729:This is the 7680: 7648: 7534: 7471: 7339: 7321: 7246: 7050: 6960: 6929: 6859: 6829: 6778: 6773: 6769: 6713: 6708: 6681: 6641:shut it down 6640: 6617: 6613: 6599: 6580: 6497: 6471: 6395: 6378: 6374: 6333: 6295: 6260: 6229: 6221: 6213: 6205: 6199: 6180: 6174: 6168: 6162: 6156: 6150: 6122: 6115: 6099: 6092: 6073: 6072: 6048: 6012: 5986: 5975: 5968: 5903: 5862: 5846: 5840: 5798: 5780: 5712: 5657:Change neeed 5653:User:ShepBot 5648: 5624: 5579: 5572: 5565: 5559: 5534: 5300: 5235: 5121: 5116: 5090: 5088: 5080: 5078: 5070: 5068: 5060: 5058: 4977: 4942: 4935: 4896: 4777: 4775: 4767: 4765: 4757: 4755: 4747: 4745: 4637: 4630: 4623: 4616: 4553: 4525: 4518: 4511: 4505: 4376: 4355: 4214: 4011: 3953: 3846: 3829: 3789: 3720: 3719:which says: 3714: 3578: 3553: 3529: 3493: 3474: 3404: 3384: 3299: 3286: 3251: 3244: 3079: 2957: 2936:Ā”Talk to me! 2902: 2895: 2879: 2872: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2758: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2687: 2675: 2621: 2539: 2538: 2474: 2437: 2360: 2352: 2246: 2240: 2204: 2177: 2164:. The pages 2130: 2096: 2082: 2026: 1928: 1913: 1908: 1904: 1884: 1831: 1787: 1598:Proposal on 1544: 1543: 1525: 1377: 1356: 1307: 1054: 1038: 1006: 796: 790: 751: 745: 740: 735: 727: 723: 718: 706: 645: 639: 609: 603: 546:When should 537: 531: 526: 375: 329: 317: 249: 241: 201: 176: 159: 137: 117:-BOT Process 86: 54: 48: 12582:maintaining 10821:orphan tags 10816:DEFAULTSORT 10487:User:Jigbot 10358:dottydotdot 10340:dottydotdot 10313:<br: --> 10252:ListasBot 3 9525:Active bots 9167:ā€”Preceding 7271:Aboutmovies 7218:Aboutmovies 7175:is harmless 6576:themselves. 6234:user rights 6210:actions log 5943:parameter. 5809:ok, cool. 5537:, above. - 5359:Infobox Bot 3573:C# Improved 3265:Runaway WP: 3204:Traveler100 2737:says so." 707:maintaining 47:This is an 22:Noticeboard 11992:multichill 11847:Python 2.5 11594:Locke Cole 11265:Carcharoth 10098:There was 10059:EdJohnston 9932:EdJohnston 9708:produces: 9682:produces: 9656:produces: 9252:filter log 9130:WP:SELFREF 9107:WP:SELFREF 8874:Unresolved 8745:2004-06-13 8689:Bot policy 8685:2008-01-01 8681:2008-09-15 8677:2004-06-13 8595:filter log 8463:WP Physics 8309:WP Physics 8109:PalAss2008 8056:incredibly 7839:Ā·AddĀ§horeĀ· 7803:Ā·AddĀ§horeĀ· 7537:Ā·AddĀ§horeĀ· 7474:Ā·AddĀ§horeĀ· 7324:Ā·AddĀ§horeĀ· 6851:David Levy 6783:Arx Fortis 6718:Beeblebrox 6645:Beeblebrox 6626:Arx Fortis 6531:Beeblebrox 6508:Arx Fortis 6476:Farmbrough 6439:Arx Fortis 6317:Arx Fortis 6192:CSDWarnBot 6178:blockĀ user 6172:filterĀ log 5871:- either: 5847:Unapproved 5755:INterwikis 5250:WP Physics 5206:WP Physics 5007:CfD filed 4556:Ā·AddĀ§horeĀ· 4403:WP:SANDBOX 4381:Farmbrough 3475:should not 3186:Stop a bot 2954:WP:AWB/UTT 2034:considered 1581:multichill 1428:Python 2.5 1112:Locke Cole 228:Carcharoth 106:ArchiveĀ 10 12883:Fut.Perf. 12154:Gimmetrow 11175:Gimmetrow 11144:PascalBot 10499:Jarry1250 10462:talk page 10446:ThaddeusB 10372:Jarry1250 10293:ThaddeusB 10262:Hesperian 9969:MZMcBride 9847:MZMcBride 9822:MZMcBride 9746:Botlinks2 9664:task list 9644:botlinks3 9536:JLaTondre 9516:Peachey88 9324:Jarry1250 9111:Jarry1250 8519:Jarry1250 8185:Some data 7926:Jarry1250 7869:Jarry1250 7686:KP Botany 7635:KP Botany 7607:KP Botany 7581:KP Botany 7551:KP Botany 7504:KP Botany 7204:Jarry1250 7186:consensus 7178:is useful 7070:Jarry1250 6961:redundant 6581:very same 6498:should be 6218:block log 6184:blockĀ log 5717:Jarry1250 5683:Jarry1250 5674:Jarry1250 5553:I am now 5539:Jarry1250 5533:Also see 5486:Jarry1250 5428:Jarry1250 5404:Jarry1250 5320:Jarry1250 5261:JLaTondre 5220:JLaTondre 5185:Jarry1250 5013:Jarry1250 4997:Jarry1250 4956:Jarry1250 4926:Jarry1250 4904:BotDenied 4197:Jarry1250 3966:Jarry1250 3934:Jarry1250 3875:Jarry1250 3374:Jarry1250 3114:JLaTondre 3002:, and at 2526:rev:43067 2174:chocolate 2011:RBAG Spam 1958:Fut.Perf. 1308:Gimmetrow 138:Gimmetrow 98:ArchiveĀ 6 93:ArchiveĀ 5 87:ArchiveĀ 4 81:ArchiveĀ 3 76:ArchiveĀ 2 71:ArchiveĀ 1 12611:for them 12541:contribs 12455:contribs 12334:contribs 12107:Kbdank71 12084:Kbdank71 12038:Kbdank71 11982:New Bot? 11925:Staecker 11894:Soxred93 11779:Signpost 11140:rev 4419 11128:Rjwilmsi 11075:rev 4419 11040:rev 4400 11005:rev 4395 10975:rev 4382 10971:4.5.3.3 10937:rev 4312 10933:4.5.3.2 10914:rev 4100 10910:4.5.2.0 10891:rev 3906 10887:4.5.1.0 10853:rev 3834 10849:4.5.0.0 10778:Drilnoth 10688:rev 4400 10643:Drilnoth 10592:Drilnoth 10579:rev 4395 10424:Resolved 10388:Kanonkas 9736:Botlinks 9722:contribs 9696:contribs 9670:contribs 9448:archives 9430:archives 9412:archives 9403:average) 9393:Archives 9386:Summary: 9333:entirely 9238:contribs 8996:Softened 8813:lucasbfr 8777:contribs 8749:Carnildo 8581:contribs 8558:Resolved 8548:Bot name 8488:Smith609 8458:ĪŗĪæĪ½Ļ„ĻĪ¹Ī²Ļ‚ 8453:Headbomb 8403:Smith609 8350:Smith609 8304:ĪŗĪæĪ½Ļ„ĻĪ¹Ī²Ļ‚ 8299:Headbomb 8275:Smith609 8159:Smith609 8129:Smith609 8059:held up. 7914:reflinks 7139:FengRail 7133:Resolved 7019:Spitfire 6998:Spitfire 6965:Spitfire 6943:Gotcha. 6901:Carnildo 6779:usurping 6562:Spitfire 6546:Spitfire 6457:Spitfire 6226:flag log 6203:contribs 6154:contribs 5926:inactive 5774:Resolved 5560:Doing... 5437:overhaul 5245:ĪŗĪæĪ½Ļ„ĻĪ¹Ī²Ļ‚ 5240:Headbomb 5201:ĪŗĪæĪ½Ļ„ĻĪ¹Ī²Ļ‚ 5196:Headbomb 5022:Kbdank71 4944:Cherian 3867:WP:BLP/N 3657:SoxBot X 3519:Kbdank71 3253:Cherian 3164:Bugs in 3096:Franamax 3069:crontabs 3035:unsigned 3021:unsigned 3011:unsigned 2958:removed 2896:unsigned 2860:Franamax 2850:unsigned 2811:unsigned 2788:Franamax 2735:WP:SUBST 2669:WP:SUBST 2458:Carnildo 2340:Carnildo 2302:Carnildo 2158:bug 7304 1733:Kbdank71 1710:Kbdank71 1664:Kbdank71 1566:New Bot? 1506:Staecker 1475:Soxred93 1357:Signpost 736:for them 666:contribs 580:contribs 459:contribs 20:‎ | 12795:maelgwn 12603:editors 12532:SatyrTN 12446:SatyrTN 12325:SatyrTN 12124:WT:BRFA 11988:ClueBot 11966:Snowolf 11704:Ligulem 11671:maelgwn 11649:Ligulem 11545:Ligulem 11493:Ligulem 11429:Ligulem 11356:Ligulem 11310:WT:BRFA 11289:MBisanz 11241:MBisanz 11216:MBisanz 11199:MBisanz 11193:WP:Bots 11166:WP:Bots 10567:DrilBot 10534:Quadell 10329:MBisanz 10121:tweaked 10082:Djsasso 10045:call me 10019:call me 9815:db-move 9787:db-move 9550:Quadell 9493:Done: 9473:NicDumZ 9245:deleted 9227:Xenobot 9169:undated 8935:WP:BRFA 8783:MBisanz 8588:deleted 8529:Djsasso 8370:between 7820:RFC bot 7254:Richard 6990:Bjweeks 6975:Protonk 6945:Protonk 6915:Protonk 6886:Protonk 6865:Uncle G 6860:already 6484:Djsasso 6095:archive 6032:Exxolon 5971:archive 5947:Richard 5820:Ludwigs 5728:Richard 5713:by name 5699:Richard 5607:Richard 5573:Helpful 5501:Richard 5457:Richard 5415:Richard 5384:AWB bot 5370:AWB bot 4913:Richard 4519:Helpful 4473:Summary 4312:Mtd2006 4282:(fixed) 4276:(fixed) 4270:(fixed) 4117:Richard 4063:Richard 4023:Richard 3981:Richard 3956:WT:BRFA 3947:WP:BRFA 3737:Djsasso 3698:Djsasso 3664:Djsasso 3647:call me 3561:Richard 3073:daemons 3028:SineBot 2950:removed 1870:maelgwn 1600:WT:BRFA 1577:ClueBot 1547:Snowolf 1222:Ligulem 1189:maelgwn 1167:Ligulem 1063:Ligulem 1011:Ligulem 947:Ligulem 874:Ligulem 728:editors 657:SatyrTN 571:SatyrTN 450:SatyrTN 273:WT:BRFA 252:MBisanz 204:MBisanz 179:MBisanz 162:MBisanz 156:WP:Bots 129:WP:Bots 50:archive 12931:(st47) 12900:WP:BOT 12878:Ingria 12846:nobots 12788:nobots 12749:nobots 12508:nobots 12426:nobots 12230:nobots 12144:(talk) 11812:Ral315 11783:Ral315 11760:nobots 11585:(st47) 11579:ŹŽŹ‡É¹noɟ 11422:nobots 11148:Pascal 10634:Pascal 10625:should 10583:Pascal 10515:dokter 10224:Earwig 10214:. See 10047:Russ) 10021:Russ) 9987:WP:TFD 9983:WP:CFD 9954:Anomie 9950:WP:CFD 9895:Anomie 9871:Anomie 9798:Anomie 9767:Earwig 9711:Polbot 9685:Polbot 9659:Polbot 9608:Anomie 9313:vandal 9266:Google 8767:Angela 8697:Anomie 8656:vandal 8609:Google 8515:adding 8482:Martin 8397:Martin 8344:Martin 8269:Martin 8153:Martin 8123:Martin 8007:WP:TFD 7711:WP:BRD 7419:Anomie 7411:WP:RFC 7407:WP:VPR 7400:orphan 7315:WP:RFC 7153:Addbot 7108:Anomie 6930:really 6774:always 6503:WP:CSD 6435:WP:CSP 6379:others 5932:active 5651:. See 5474:Anomie 5379:Would 4331:Anomie 4229:Anomie 4131:Anomie 4090:Anomie 4036:Anomie 4000:Anomie 3834:Anomie 3649:Russ) 3622:Anomie 3606:Anomie 3512:Nobots 3495:Graham 3442:. -- 3335:Anomie 2970:My Bot 2831:uppets 2823:aster 2718:uppets 2710:aster 2396:(talk) 2371:work; 2179:Graham 2160:. See 2132:Graham 2065:(talk) 1978:WP:BOT 1953:Ingria 1921:nobots 1863:nobots 1824:nobots 1390:Ral315 1361:Ral315 1338:nobots 1298:(talk) 1103:(st47) 1097:ŹŽŹ‡É¹noɟ 940:nobots 633:nobots 551:nobots 355:nobots 12925:ŹŽŹ‡É¹oɟ 12922:uĒŹŒĒs 12865:ɹəəds 12858:speer 12768:ɹəəds 12761:speer 12729:Coren 12721:exact 12672:melon 12666:Happy 12627:melon 12621:Happy 12594:table 12521:melon 12515:Happy 12485:melon 12479:Happy 12413:melon 12407:Happy 12173:Coren 11576:uĒŹŒĒs 11522:inp23 11323:BJBot 10581:. -- 10466:Mercy 10394:Talk 10202:melon 10196:Happy 10041:R'n'B 10039:. -- 10015:R'n'B 10013:." -- 10008:catfd 9290:cause 9286:promo 9275:block 9134:WP:RS 9101:This 9082:WP:AN 9000:these 8709:might 8633:cause 8629:promo 8618:block 8190:Zero: 8003:WP:VP 7919:Quack 7865:THB 5 7681:can't 7100:xqbot 6992:said 6828:" is 6714:human 5800:Chris 5784:neuro 4575:Fixed 4506:Note: 3850:neuro 3791:Chris 3688:Dbiel 3678:Dbiel 3643:R'n'B 3242:? -- 3136:does. 2952:from 2693:Coren 2656:break 2292:File: 2028:Chris 1940:ɹəəds 1933:speer 1843:ɹəəds 1836:speer 1796:Coren 1788:exact 1763:Coren 1094:uĒŹŒĒs 1040:inp23 836:BJBot 797:melon 791:Happy 752:melon 746:Happy 719:table 646:melon 640:Happy 610:melon 604:Happy 538:melon 532:Happy 16:< 12799:talk 12689:talk 12653:talk 12616:both 12537:talk 12451:talk 12402:used 12368:talk 12330:talk 12313:talk 12299:bots 12240:bots 12216:talk 12141:Russ 12139:. -- 12061:talk 12022:talk 11996:talk 11952:Talk 11929:talk 11899:talk 11839:OS X 11816:talk 11787:talk 11708:talk 11702:. -- 11675:talk 11653:talk 11645:this 11549:talk 11518:Mart 11497:talk 11462:talk 11433:talk 11396:talk 11360:talk 11269:talk 10616:Use 10548:xeno 10522:Talk 10495:BRFA 10450:talk 10431:xeno 10362:talk 10344:talk 10297:talk 10279:talk 10275:Matt 10238:talk 10234:Matt 10126:xeno 10101:and 10086:talk 10063:talk 9973:talk 9967:. -- 9965:Done 9936:talk 9851:talk 9826:talk 9794:that 9741:and 9716:task 9690:task 9624:talk 9620:Matt 9598:talk 9594:Matt 9540:talk 9534:. -- 9364:xeno 9307:spam 9301:hard 9279:soft 9232:talk 9207:xeno 9187:xeno 9143:xeno 9140:. ā€“ 9132:and 9066:xeno 9037:xeno 9024:xeno 9005:xeno 8975:xeno 8949:talk 8942:xeno 8925:and 8921:See 8909:Ā§hep 8894:talk 8887:xeno 8848:Ā§hep 8808:Docu 8798:talk 8771:talk 8753:talk 8733:Ā§hep 8723:(ā™«ā™«) 8687:the 8667:talk 8650:spam 8644:hard 8622:soft 8575:talk 8533:talk 8492:Talk 8407:Talk 8354:Talk 8279:Talk 8163:Talk 8133:Talk 8065:more 8032:(ā™«ā™«) 7994:(ā™«ā™«) 7902:fold 7899:Hers 7825:Ā§hep 7752:Talk 7720:Talk 7690:talk 7654:Ā§hep 7639:talk 7622:Ā§hep 7611:talk 7585:talk 7555:talk 7508:talk 7492:Talk 7448:Talk 7375:Talk 7346:talk 7275:talk 7222:talk 7143:talk 7039:talk 7035:ST47 6994:here 6979:talk 6949:talk 6919:talk 6905:talk 6890:talk 6869:talk 6841:talk 6837:ST47 6802:talk 6798:ST47 6787:talk 6722:talk 6689:talk 6682:xeno 6664:talk 6660:ST47 6649:talk 6630:talk 6624:) ++ 6620:). ( 6603:here 6597:here 6593:here 6589:here 6585:here 6554:ST47 6535:talk 6512:talk 6488:talk 6473:Rich 6453:ST47 6443:talk 6403:talk 6396:xeno 6341:talk 6334:xeno 6321:talk 6303:talk 6296:xeno 6267:talk 6197:BRFA 6166:logs 6148:talk 6143:ST47 6130:talk 6123:xeno 6056:talk 6049:xeno 6036:talk 6020:talk 6013:xeno 5939:add 5762:Cobi 5662:Ā§hep 5625:Done 5495:brfa 5470:brfa 5451:here 5392:Ā§hep 5308:talk 5301:xeno 5265:talk 5236:good 5224:talk 5009:here 4985:talk 4978:xeno 4937:Tinu 4897:long 4580:Ā§hep 4499:BRFA 4488:BRFA 4378:Rich 4363:talk 4356:xeno 4349:this 4316:talk 4303:and 4216:Rich 4167:Ā§hep 4103:Ā§hep 4049:Ā§hep 4017:this 4013:this 3975:this 3921:Cobi 3824:and 3741:talk 3702:talk 3668:talk 3554:Done 3469:bots 3444:Cobi 3418:Cobi 3295:ŠœŠøшŠ° 3267:AN/I 3246:Tinu 3238:and 3208:talk 3153:talk 3118:talk 3108:See 3100:talk 3049:talk 2975:Lego 2930:Ā§hep 2910:talk 2903:xeno 2887:talk 2880:xeno 2864:talk 2792:talk 2766:talk 2759:xeno 2608:talk 2592:talk 2578:bot. 2482:talk 2475:xeno 2462:talk 2445:talk 2438:xeno 2414:talk 2393:Russ 2367:and 2344:talk 2321:talk 2306:talk 2271:talk 2241:edit 2230:talk 2168:and 2062:Russ 2036:for 1874:talk 1687:talk 1648:talk 1585:talk 1533:Talk 1510:talk 1480:talk 1415:OS X 1394:talk 1365:talk 1295:Russ 1293:. -- 1226:talk 1220:. -- 1193:talk 1171:talk 1163:this 1067:talk 1036:Mart 1015:talk 980:talk 951:talk 914:talk 878:talk 814:talk 778:talk 741:both 662:talk 576:talk 527:used 493:talk 455:talk 438:talk 424:bots 365:bots 341:talk 232:talk 12839:are 12685:CBM 12649:CBM 12364:CBM 12309:CBM 12248:Max 12212:CBM 12190:Max 12057:CBM 12018:CBM 11945:Ī£Ī±Ī¹ 11902:bot 11797:Max 11738:SQL 11629:SQL 11458:CBM 11392:CBM 11368:k? 10755:Ree 10720:Ree 10697:Ree 10671:Ree 10560:AWB 10221:The 10149:man 10142:Mr. 10117:not 9948:to 9917:man 9910:Mr. 9792:is 9764:The 9583:man 9576:Mr. 9348:tor 9295:bot 9259:SUL 9103:not 8937:. ā€“ 8765:by 8716:-- 8638:bot 8602:SUL 8382:man 8375:Mr. 7409:or 7341:DGG 6830:not 6375:you 6262:DGG 6097:. 6076:man 6069:Mr. 5941:AWB 5916:bot 5879:Bot 5854:Bot 5655:. ( 5642:Bot 5594:bot 5580:One 5566:The 5444:bot 5439:of 5348:Bot 4526:One 4512:The 4162:AWB 3830:lot 3581:Ree 3222:Mgm 3174:Mgm 3149:CBM 3077:Max 3071:or 2968:". 2933:ā€¢ 2688:are 2673:Max 2588:CBM 2542:man 2535:Mr. 2353:Any 2267:CBM 2226:CBM 1914:are 1683:CBM 1644:CBM 1526:Ī£Ī±Ī¹ 1483:bot 1375:Max 1264:SQL 1147:SQL 976:CBM 910:CBM 886:k? 810:CBM 774:CBM 489:CBM 434:CBM 373:Max 337:CBM 315:Max 12928:Ź‡s 12868:ɹ 12862:/ 12849:}} 12843:{{ 12797:- 12791:}} 12785:{{ 12771:ɹ 12765:/ 12752:}} 12746:{{ 12687:Ā· 12651:Ā· 12553:BJ 12539:/ 12510:}} 12506:{{ 12495:BJ 12467:BJ 12453:/ 12433:BJ 12429:}} 12423:{{ 12366:Ā· 12352:, 12348:, 12332:/ 12311:Ā· 12302:}} 12296:{{ 12254:em 12243:}} 12237:{{ 12233:}} 12227:{{ 12214:Ā· 12205:or 12196:em 12059:Ā· 12020:Ā· 11998:) 11955:) 11931:) 11897:| 11884:cd 11873:BJ 11851:BJ 11849:. 11818:) 11803:em 11789:) 11767:BJ 11763:}} 11757:{{ 11710:) 11673:- 11655:) 11615:BJ 11600:ā€¢ 11596:ā€¢ 11582:Ź‡s 11559:BJ 11551:) 11543:-- 11499:) 11489:if 11460:Ā· 11435:) 11425:}} 11419:{{ 11394:Ā· 11370:BJ 11362:) 11341:BJ 11330:BJ 11279:14 11271:) 10835:: 10811:}} 10805:{{ 10792:) 10788:ā€¢ 10784:ā€¢ 10760:dy 10725:dy 10702:dy 10676:dy 10657:) 10653:ā€¢ 10649:ā€¢ 10606:) 10602:ā€¢ 10598:ā€¢ 10525:ā€¢ 10519:ā€¢ 10508:ā€” 10478:) 10452:) 10426:ā€“ 10391:: 10364:) 10346:) 10299:) 10281:) 10240:) 10193:. 10147:Z- 10088:) 10065:) 10057:. 10011:}} 10005:{{ 9997:}} 9991:{{ 9975:) 9938:) 9915:Z- 9893:. 9853:) 9845:-- 9828:) 9818:}} 9812:{{ 9790:}} 9784:{{ 9759:}} 9753:{{ 9749:}} 9743:{{ 9739:}} 9733:{{ 9647:}} 9641:{{ 9626:) 9600:) 9581:Z- 9542:) 9450:, 9432:, 9414:, 9395:, 9351:}} 9345:{{ 9288:Ā· 9277:Ā· 8876:ā€“ 8800:) 8755:) 8669:) 8631:Ā· 8620:Ā· 8570:D6 8560:ā€“ 8535:) 8490:ā€“ 8465:} 8461:ā€“ 8440:, 8436:, 8432:, 8428:, 8405:ā€“ 8393:is 8380:Z- 8352:ā€“ 8311:} 8307:ā€“ 8277:ā€“ 8161:ā€“ 8131:ā€“ 8112:}} 8106:{{ 8104:, 8102:}} 8096:{{ 8094:, 8092:}} 8086:{{ 8011:BJ 7970:BJ 7763:BJ 7755:) 7735:BJ 7723:) 7700:BJ 7692:) 7670:BJ 7641:) 7613:) 7605:-- 7595:BJ 7587:) 7569:BJ 7557:) 7510:) 7495:) 7451:) 7417:. 7403:}} 7397:{{ 7378:) 7348:) 7285:BJ 7277:) 7247:no 7232:BJ 7224:) 7160:BJ 7145:) 7041:) 6981:) 6951:) 6934:BJ 6921:) 6907:) 6899:-- 6892:) 6871:) 6843:) 6804:) 6789:) 6724:) 6666:) 6651:) 6632:) 6595:, 6591:, 6587:, 6537:) 6514:) 6490:) 6445:) 6415:BJ 6364:BJ 6323:) 6269:) 6074:Z- 6038:) 5973:. 5919:}} 5913:{{ 5882:}} 5876:{{ 5857:}} 5851:{{ 5817:-- 5781:ā€” 5776:ā€“ 5659:) 5645:}} 5639:{{ 5629:BJ 5597:}} 5591:{{ 5447:}} 5441:{{ 5387:}} 5381:{{ 5373:}} 5367:{{ 5362:}} 5356:{{ 5351:}} 5345:{{ 5267:) 5252:} 5248:ā€“ 5226:) 5208:} 5204:ā€“ 4948:- 4907:}} 4901:{{ 4577:. 4329:. 4318:) 4305:#2 4301:#1 4170:ā€¢ 3847:ā€” 3811:BJ 3778:BJ 3743:) 3704:) 3670:) 3620:. 3586:dy 3500:87 3479:BJ 3472:}} 3466:{{ 3347:BJ 3300:13 3287:me 3276:BJ 3257:- 3210:) 3193:BJ 3151:Ā· 3120:) 3102:) 3083:em 3075:. 3051:) 3043:-- 3038:}} 3032:{{ 3024:}} 3018:{{ 3014:}} 3008:{{ 2866:) 2853:}} 2847:{{ 2827:f 2814:}} 2808:{{ 2794:) 2739:BJ 2714:f 2691:ā€” 2679:em 2610:) 2602:-- 2590:Ā· 2560:BJ 2540:Z- 2508:BJ 2506:. 2464:) 2456:-- 2387:, 2383:, 2379:, 2375:, 2361:is 2346:) 2308:) 2269:Ā· 2228:Ā· 2184:87 2137:87 2117:, 2044:. 1943:ɹ 1937:/ 1924:}} 1918:{{ 1872:- 1866:}} 1860:{{ 1846:ɹ 1840:/ 1827:}} 1821:{{ 1685:Ā· 1646:Ā· 1587:) 1536:) 1512:) 1478:| 1465:cd 1454:BJ 1432:BJ 1430:. 1396:) 1381:em 1367:) 1345:BJ 1341:}} 1335:{{ 1228:) 1191:- 1173:) 1133:BJ 1118:ā€¢ 1114:ā€¢ 1100:Ź‡s 1077:BJ 1069:) 1061:-- 1017:) 1007:if 978:Ā· 953:) 943:}} 937:{{ 912:Ā· 888:BJ 880:) 859:BJ 848:BJ 812:Ā· 776:Ā· 678:BJ 664:/ 635:}} 631:{{ 620:BJ 592:BJ 578:/ 558:BJ 554:}} 548:{{ 491:Ā· 477:, 473:, 457:/ 436:Ā· 427:}} 421:{{ 379:em 368:}} 362:{{ 358:}} 352:{{ 339:Ā· 330:or 321:em 242:14 234:) 102:ā†’ 12886:ā˜¼ 12855:r 12813:Ī² 12758:r 12691:) 12683:( 12669:ā€‘ 12655:) 12647:( 12624:ā€‘ 12543:) 12535:( 12518:ā€‘ 12482:ā€‘ 12457:) 12449:( 12410:ā€‘ 12370:) 12362:( 12336:) 12328:( 12315:) 12307:( 12289:. 12251:S 12218:) 12210:( 12193:S 12063:) 12055:( 12024:) 12016:( 11994:( 11949:( 11927:( 11864:Ī² 11814:( 11800:S 11785:( 11706:( 11651:( 11602:c 11598:t 11547:( 11495:( 11464:) 11456:( 11431:( 11398:) 11390:( 11358:( 11314:Ī² 11267:( 10790:L 10786:C 10782:T 10780:( 10776:ā€“ 10750:ā€” 10715:ā€” 10692:ā€” 10666:ā€” 10655:L 10651:C 10647:T 10645:( 10604:L 10600:C 10596:T 10594:( 10513:E 10475:āœ 10472:| 10470:ā˜Ž 10468:( 10448:( 10360:( 10342:( 10295:( 10277:( 10236:( 10199:ā€‘ 10084:( 10061:( 10043:( 10017:( 9971:( 9957:āš” 9934:( 9898:āš” 9874:āš” 9849:( 9824:( 9801:āš” 9724:) 9719:Ā· 9714:( 9698:) 9693:Ā· 9688:( 9672:) 9667:Ā· 9662:( 9622:( 9611:āš” 9596:( 9538:( 9477:~ 9454:) 9436:) 9418:) 9399:) 9315:) 9310:Ā· 9304:Ā· 9298:Ā· 9292:Ā· 9282:Ā· 9273:( 9271:ā€¢ 9268:) 9263:Ā· 9255:Ā· 9248:Ā· 9241:Ā· 9235:Ā· 9230:( 9204:ā€“ 9184:ā€“ 8952:) 8946:( 8897:) 8891:( 8796:( 8774:Ā· 8769:( 8751:( 8700:āš” 8665:( 8658:) 8653:Ā· 8647:Ā· 8641:Ā· 8635:Ā· 8625:Ā· 8616:( 8614:ā€¢ 8611:) 8606:Ā· 8598:Ā· 8591:Ā· 8584:Ā· 8578:Ā· 8573:( 8531:( 8527:- 8494:) 8486:( 8455:{ 8409:) 8401:( 8356:) 8348:( 8301:{ 8281:) 8273:( 8165:) 8157:( 8135:) 8127:( 8021:' 7878:] 7749:( 7717:( 7688:( 7637:( 7609:( 7583:( 7553:( 7506:( 7489:( 7445:( 7422:āš” 7372:( 7344:( 7273:( 7220:( 7141:( 7111:āš” 7080:] 7051:X 7037:( 6977:( 6947:( 6917:( 6903:( 6888:( 6867:( 6839:( 6800:( 6785:( 6720:( 6692:) 6686:( 6677:ā€“ 6662:( 6647:( 6628:( 6533:( 6510:( 6486:( 6441:( 6406:) 6400:( 6391:ā€“ 6344:) 6338:( 6319:( 6306:) 6300:( 6265:( 6237:) 6230:Ā· 6222:Ā· 6214:Ā· 6206:Ā· 6200:Ā· 6195:( 6186:) 6181:Ā· 6175:Ā· 6169:Ā· 6163:Ā· 6157:Ā· 6151:Ā· 6146:( 6133:) 6127:( 6118:ā€“ 6059:) 6053:( 6034:( 6023:) 6017:( 6008:ā€“ 5823:2 5649:} 5477:āš” 5311:) 5305:( 5296:ā€“ 5263:( 5242:{ 5222:( 5198:{ 5093:) 5083:) 5073:) 5063:) 4988:) 4982:( 4887:Q 4780:) 4770:) 4760:) 4750:) 4640:) 4633:) 4626:) 4619:) 4463:) 4456:) 4449:) 4435:) 4366:) 4360:( 4334:āš” 4314:( 4232:āš” 4183:Q 4134:āš” 4093:āš” 4039:āš” 4003:āš” 3837:āš” 3752:Q 3739:( 3727:Q 3700:( 3696:- 3666:( 3645:( 3625:āš” 3609:āš” 3576:ā€” 3530:X 3385:X 3338:āš” 3224:| 3206:( 3176:| 3155:) 3147:( 3116:( 3098:( 3080:S 3047:( 2983:M 2981:T 2978:K 2913:) 2907:( 2890:) 2884:( 2875:ā€“ 2862:( 2829:P 2825:o 2821:M 2790:( 2769:) 2763:( 2716:P 2712:o 2708:M 2676:S 2658:? 2622:X 2606:( 2594:) 2586:( 2485:) 2479:( 2460:( 2448:) 2442:( 2416:) 2412:( 2342:( 2323:) 2319:( 2304:( 2273:) 2265:( 2247:X 2232:) 2224:( 2205:X 2097:@ 2093:C 2090:T 2087:U 1961:ā˜¼ 1930:r 1888:Ī² 1833:r 1689:) 1681:( 1650:) 1642:( 1583:( 1530:( 1508:( 1445:Ī² 1392:( 1378:S 1363:( 1224:( 1169:( 1120:c 1116:t 1065:( 1013:( 982:) 974:( 949:( 916:) 908:( 876:( 816:) 808:( 794:ā€‘ 780:) 772:( 749:ā€‘ 668:) 660:( 643:ā€‘ 607:ā€‘ 582:) 574:( 535:ā€‘ 495:) 487:( 461:) 453:( 440:) 432:( 414:. 376:S 343:) 335:( 318:S 277:Ī² 230:( 61:. 30:)

Index

Knowledge:Bots
Noticeboard
Knowledge:Bot owners' noticeboard/Archive 4
archive
current main page
ArchiveĀ 1
ArchiveĀ 2
ArchiveĀ 3
ArchiveĀ 4
ArchiveĀ 5
ArchiveĀ 6
ArchiveĀ 10
WP:Bots
Gimmetrow
08:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:Bots
MBisanz
08:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Knowledge:Requests for comment/User conduct
MBisanz
23:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct#Use_of_bot_privileges
MBisanz
02:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Carcharoth
talk
11:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Knowledge:BN#Bot_change
MBisanz

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘