Knowledge

:Good article reassessment/guidelines - Knowledge

Source 📝

177: 52: 623: 443:
with the outcome of the discussion (whether there was consensus and what action was taken) and explain how the consensus and action was determined from the comments. A bot will remove the assessment from the GA reassessment
206:
If there are many similar articles already nominated at GAR, consider delaying the reassessment request. If an editor notices that many similar GARs are open and requests a hold, such requests should generally be
106:(GACR). GAs are held to the current standards regardless of when they were promoted. All users are welcome to contribute to the process, regardless of whether they were involved with the initial nomination. 294:
with the subpage number of the reassessment page you just created. This will display a new section named "GA Reassessment" followed by the individual reassessment discussion.
169:
and therefore are not grounds for delisting. Instability in itself is not a reason to delist an article. Potential candidates for reassessment can be found on the
345:
If discussion has stalled and there is no obvious consensus, uninvolved editors are strongly encouraged to add a new comment rather than closing the discussion.
538: 297:
Notify major contributing editors, including the nominator and the reviewer. Also consider notifying relevant active WikiProjects related to the article. The
111: 166: 375:
If a clear consensus develops among participants that the issues have been resolved and the article meets GACR, the reassessment may be closed as
365:
script on the reassessment page of the article and explain the outcome of the discussion (whether there was consensus and what action was taken).
240:
to do so, replacing ArticleName with the name of the article and n with the number of the reassessment page (1 if this is the first reassessment).
372:
Anyone may close a GAR, although discussions which have become controversial should be left for closure by experienced users or GAR coordinators.
952: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 397:
If there have been no responses to the reassessment and no improvements to the article, the editor who opened the reassessment may presume a
269:
Detail your reasons for reassessing the article and save the page. Your rationale must specify how you believe the article does not meet the
688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 173:. Delisted good articles can be renominated as good articles if editors believe they have resolved the issues that led to the delist. 732: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 362: 139: 85: 339:
Editors should discuss the article's issues with reference to the good article criteria, and work cooperatively to resolve them.
342:
The priority should be to improve articles and retain them as GAs rather than to delist them, wherever reasonably possible.
17: 200:
Check that the article is stable. Requesting reassessment during a content dispute or edit war is usually inappropriate.
270: 226: 103: 394:. Reassessments should not be closed as delist while editors are making good-faith improvements to the article. 176: 51: 276:
The page will automatically be transcluded to this page via a bot, so there is no need to add it here manually.
150: 203:
Consider raising issues at the talk page of the article or requesting assistance from major contributors.
161:, the presence of dead URLs, inconsistently formatted citations, and compliance with all aspects of the 606:
Before disputing a GAR closure, first discuss your concerns with the closing editor on their talk page.
398: 965: 127: 544:
blank the class parameter of the WikiProject templates on talk, or replace it with a new assessment
531: 483: 352:. The coordinators may attempt to steer the discussion towards resolution or make a decisive close. 348:
If discussion becomes contentious, participants may request the assistance of GAR coordinators at
221:
script on the article. Detail your reasons for reassessing the article and submit. Your rationale
565: 279: 218: 99: 79: 170: 551: 146: 263:
to the top of the article talk page. Do not place it inside another template. Save the page.
518: 470: 421: 537:
template on the article talk page, setting currentstatus to DGA (delisted good article). (
450:
If the article now meets the criteria, you can keep the article listed as GA. To do this:
8: 430: 301: 282:
the assessment on the article talk page as follows: Edit the article talk page and paste
42: 610: 580: 490: 349: 236:
notify major contributors or relevant WikiProjects. Notify these manually. You may use
123: 35: 27: 505: 457: 115: 603:
A closure should only be disputed within the first seven days following the close.
243:
Consider commenting on another reassessment (or several) to help with any backlog.
498:
If the article still does not meet the criteria, you can delist it. To do this,
194: 961: 622: 162: 158: 135: 130:— work to organize these efforts, as well as to resolve contentious reviews. 108:
Editors should prioritize bringing an article up to standard above delisting.
257: 119: 71: 967: 273:. GARs whose rationale does not include the GACR may be speedily closed. 229:. GARs whose rationale does not include the GACR may be speedily closed. 155:
only assesses whether the article meets the six good article criteria.
447:
The article either meets or does not meet the good article criteria:
145:
Good article reassessment is not a peer review process; for that use
963: 266:
Follow the bold link in the template to create a reassessment page.
327:
with the subpage number of the reassessment page you just created.
569: 558: 114:
and are concluded according to consensus. The GAR Coordinators —
613:
and ask for review from uninvolved editors and the coordinators.
609:
If discussing does not resolve concerns, editors should post at
968: 427:
at the the reassessment page of the article. Replace it with
284:{{Knowledge:Good article reassessment/''ArticleName''/''n''}} 149:. Content disputes on GAs should be resolved through normal 595:
A GAR closure should only be contested if the closure was
132:
To quickly bring issues to their notice, or make a query
225:
specify how you believe the article does not meet the
382:
After at least one week, if the article's issues are
616: 138:}} notification template, or make a comment on the 579:Add the GAR to the most recent GAR archive page. ( 307:template may be used for notifications by placing 369:GARs typically remain open for at least one week. 157:Many common problems (including not meeting the 524:template from the article talk page, if present 476:template from the article talk page, if present 390:to delisting, the discussion may be closed as 98:(GAR) is a process used to review and improve 564:remove the article from the relevant list at 217:To open a good article reassessment, use the 238:{{subst:GARMessage|ArticleName|page=n}} ~~~~ 110:Reassessments are listed for discussion 611:Knowledge talk:Good article nominations 350:Knowledge talk:Good article nominations 193:Consider whether the article meets the 14: 184:Good article reassessment instructions 153:processes. Good article reassessment 58: 511:template from the article talk page 489:template on the article talk page ( 463:template from the article talk page 286:at the bottom of the page. Replace 23: 18:Knowledge:Good article reassessment 175: 102:(GAs) that may no longer meet the 50: 24: 982: 601:otherwise procedurally incorrect. 323:with the name of the article and 290:with the name of the article and 621: 557:template from the article page ( 361:To close a discussion, use the 167:not covered by the GA criteria 13: 1: 188:Before opening a reassessment 319:on user talk pages. Replace 159:general notability guideline 7: 597:obviously against consensus 10: 987: 25: 180:Good article reassessment 96:Good article reassessment 55:Good article reassessment 590:Disputing a reassessment 357:Closing a reassessment 212:Opening a reassessment 181: 56: 271:good article criteria 227:good article criteria 195:good article criteria 179: 104:good article criteria 54: 412:Manual closing steps 334:Reassessment process 248:Manual opening steps 128:Trainsandotherthings 66:Semi-Automated Tools 309:{{subst:GARMessage| 527:add or update the 479:add or update the 182: 151:dispute resolution 57: 974: 973: 93: 92: 978: 969: 625: 617: 591: 556: 550: 536: 530: 523: 517: 510: 504: 488: 482: 475: 469: 462: 456: 438: 431:subst:GAR/result 426: 420: 399:silent consensus 358: 335: 318: 306: 300: 285: 261: 239: 232:The user script 213: 189: 59: 45: 38: 986: 985: 981: 980: 979: 977: 976: 975: 970: 964: 630: 589: 587: 586: 554: 548: 534: 532:Article history 528: 521: 515: 508: 502: 486: 484:Article history 480: 473: 467: 460: 454: 428: 424: 418: 413: 356: 333: 331: 330: 308: 304: 298: 283: 255: 249: 237: 211: 187: 185: 171:cleanup listing 163:Manual of Style 69: 49: 48: 41: 34: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 984: 972: 971: 966: 962: 960: 957: 956: 636: 635: 632: 631: 626: 620: 615: 614: 607: 604: 585: 584: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 562: 545: 542: 525: 512: 496: 495: 494: 477: 464: 445: 414: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 386:and there are 380: 373: 370: 354: 353: 346: 343: 340: 329: 328: 295: 277: 274: 267: 264: 250: 247: 246: 245: 244: 241: 230: 209: 208: 204: 201: 198: 183: 91: 90: 89: 88: 82: 68: 64: 62: 47: 46: 39: 31: 26: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 983: 959: 958: 955: 954: 950: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 858: 854: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 642: 638: 637: 634: 633: 629: 624: 619: 618: 612: 608: 605: 602: 598: 594: 593: 592: 582: 578: 571: 567: 566:good articles 563: 560: 553: 546: 543: 540: 533: 526: 520: 513: 507: 500: 499: 497: 492: 485: 478: 472: 465: 459: 452: 451: 449: 448: 446: 442: 436: 432: 423: 416: 415: 404: 401:and close as 400: 396: 395: 393: 389: 388:no objections 385: 381: 378: 374: 371: 368: 367: 366: 364: 363:GANReviewTool 359: 351: 347: 344: 341: 338: 337: 336: 326: 322: 316: 312: 303: 296: 293: 289: 281: 278: 275: 272: 268: 265: 262: 259: 252: 251: 242: 235: 231: 228: 224: 220: 216: 215: 214: 205: 202: 199: 196: 192: 191: 190: 178: 174: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 143: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 124:Chipmunkdavis 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 100:good articles 97: 87: 86:GANReviewTool 83: 81: 77: 76: 75: 73: 67: 63: 61: 60: 53: 44: 40: 37: 33: 32: 29: 19: 639: 627: 600: 596: 588: 552:good article 440: 434: 402: 391: 387: 383: 379:at any time. 376: 360: 355: 332: 324: 320: 314: 310: 291: 287: 254: 233: 222: 210: 186: 154: 144: 134:, use the {{ 131: 116:Lee Vilenski 107: 95: 94: 72:User scripts 70: 65: 547:remove the 519:GAR request 514:remove the 501:remove the 471:GAR request 466:remove the 453:remove the 422:GAR/current 321:ArticleName 311:ArticleName 288:ArticleName 147:peer review 439:. Replace 384:unresolved 302:GARMessage 280:Transclude 219:GAR-helper 80:GAR-helper 313:|GARpage= 258:subst:GAR 140:talk page 84:Closing: 78:Opening: 74:for GAR: 28:Shortcuts 628:Archives 506:GAR/link 458:GAR/link 433:|result= 234:does not 207:granted. 581:example 570:example 559:example 539:example 491:example 441:outcome 437:}} ~~~~ 435:outcome 417:Locate 317:}} ~~~~ 120:Iazyges 43:WP:GA/R 403:delist 392:delist 253:Paste 165:) are 126:, and 36:WP:GAR 444:page. 112:below 16:< 377:keep 223:must 136:@GAR 735:, 691:, 599:or 953:79 951:, 949:78 947:, 945:77 943:, 941:76 939:, 937:75 935:, 933:74 931:, 929:73 927:, 925:72 923:, 921:71 919:, 917:70 915:, 913:69 911:, 909:68 907:, 905:67 903:, 901:66 899:, 897:65 895:, 893:64 891:, 889:63 887:, 885:62 883:, 881:61 879:, 877:60 875:, 873:59 871:, 869:58 867:, 865:57 863:, 861:56 859:, 857:55 855:, 853:54 851:, 849:53 847:, 845:52 843:, 841:51 839:, 837:50 835:, 833:49 831:, 829:48 827:, 825:47 823:, 821:46 819:, 817:45 815:, 813:44 811:, 809:43 807:, 805:42 803:, 801:41 799:, 797:40 795:, 793:39 791:, 789:38 787:, 785:37 783:, 781:36 779:, 777:35 775:, 773:34 771:, 769:33 767:, 765:32 763:, 761:31 759:, 757:30 755:, 753:29 751:, 749:28 747:, 745:27 743:, 741:26 739:, 737:25 733:24 731:, 729:23 727:, 725:22 723:, 721:21 719:, 717:20 715:, 713:19 711:, 709:18 707:, 705:17 703:, 701:16 699:, 697:15 695:, 693:14 689:13 687:, 685:12 683:, 681:11 679:, 677:10 675:, 671:, 667:, 663:, 659:, 655:, 651:, 647:, 643:, 555:}} 549:{{ 535:}} 529:{{ 522:}} 516:{{ 509:}} 503:{{ 487:}} 481:{{ 474:}} 468:{{ 461:}} 455:{{ 429:{{ 425:}} 419:{{ 305:}} 299:{{ 260:}} 256:{{ 142:. 122:, 118:, 673:9 669:8 665:7 661:6 657:5 653:4 649:3 645:2 641:1 583:) 572:) 568:( 561:) 541:) 493:) 405:. 325:n 315:n 292:n 197:.

Index

Knowledge:Good article reassessment
Shortcuts
WP:GAR
WP:GA/R
Good article reassessment
User scripts
GAR-helper
GANReviewTool
good articles
good article criteria
below
Lee Vilenski
Iazyges
Chipmunkdavis
Trainsandotherthings
@GAR
talk page
peer review
dispute resolution
general notability guideline
Manual of Style
not covered by the GA criteria
cleanup listing
Good article reassessment
good article criteria
GAR-helper
good article criteria
subst:GAR
good article criteria
Transclude

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.