83:
31:
141:
public post you make requesting discussion of another user except when there is a reasonable expectation that they will see and be able to respond to your concerns in a timely fashion. Initiating a discussion at the talk page of a recently edited article would generally not require notification, but
212:
Ordinarily, the onus is on you, the person raising the issue, to notify the editor you're complaining about. In rare situations, that may not be possible. For example, if the talk page of the editor you are complaining about has been semi-protected and you do not have a registered account, you will
149:
If a covered posting does not indicate that notification has been completed, other editors should consider checking the subject's talk page for an appropriate notification, and adding one if missing. Action should not generally be taken on an issue (aside from obvious
94:
it makes sense not to do so behind that editor's back. When you nominate a page for deletion, it makes sense to let the editor who created the page know that you would like to have the page they created deleted.
142:
doing so at a noticeboard, wikiproject, or third party's talk page generally would. Friendly notification is also encouraged outside of antagonistic situations. As always, discretion and
133:
wherever appropriate. Particular notification requirements are manifestations of a broader judgment by the community that both sides of a dispute should be heard. Note also that the
107:
the subject user by posting a message on their talk page (and/or through off-wiki email, if the subject has chosen to enable that function). There are two sides to most stories, and
221:. But if you just can't wait, ask another user to notify the defendant, or indicate the notification problem in your original posting so that someone else can do it for you.
154:
and other unambiguous violations of community standards) until the subject has been notified and given a chance to explain their perspective on the matter.
183:
123:
119:
129:
These warnings, however, are not isolated, unrelated provisions applicable only to the pages containing them: editors are expected to offer the
173:
46:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
214:
122:
expects that you "inform other users and editors if they are mentioned in a posting, or if their actions are being discussed".
115:
114:
The posting directions of various administrator noticeboards expressly note the expectation of notification. For example, the
90:
Notifications of editors are mandated or recommended in some circumstances. If you are discussing another editor on a
178:
47:
51:
111:
requires the assumption that the subject of the complaint may have a valuable perspective to contribute.
237:
103:
If you begin a discussion of another user on a common notice board, it is expected that you will
17:
143:
91:
82:
98:
69:
8:
168:
151:
163:
61:
16:
For the notification system for the MediaWiki software (on which
Knowledge runs), see
193:
188:
54:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
218:
39:
130:
126:
suggests users opening an investigation "onsider notifying" all accused users.
231:
108:
86:
Updated graphics for the
Wikimedia Foundation's Notifications tool
199:
157:
213:
be unable to add a note on their talk page. See, e.g.,
229:
184:Knowledge:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
137:is not important; notification should accompany
174:Knowledge:Please do not bite the newcomers
81:
230:
217:. One answer to this, of course, is
25:
13:
52:thoroughly vetted by the community
48:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
14:
249:
179:Knowledge:Publicizing discussions
29:
206:
1:
7:
124:Sockpuppetry investigations
10:
254:
59:
23:Essay on editing Knowledge
15:
99:Discussing another editor
215:User talk:TheOldJacobite
18:Knowledge:Notifications
87:
85:
50:, as it has not been
169:Knowledge:Etiquette
116:Admin's noticeboard
164:Knowledge:Civility
118:requests that and
88:
194:Template:Talkback
189:Template:Reply to
80:
79:
245:
238:Knowledge essays
222:
210:
72:
33:
32:
26:
253:
252:
248:
247:
246:
244:
243:
242:
228:
227:
226:
225:
211:
207:
202:
160:
101:
76:
75:
68:
64:
56:
55:
30:
24:
21:
12:
11:
5:
251:
241:
240:
224:
223:
204:
203:
201:
198:
197:
196:
191:
186:
181:
176:
171:
166:
159:
156:
131:right of reply
100:
97:
78:
77:
74:
73:
65:
60:
57:
45:
44:
36:
34:
22:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
250:
239:
236:
235:
233:
220:
216:
209:
205:
195:
192:
190:
187:
185:
182:
180:
177:
175:
172:
170:
167:
165:
162:
161:
155:
153:
147:
146:are advised.
145:
140:
136:
132:
127:
125:
121:
117:
112:
110:
106:
96:
93:
84:
71:
67:
66:
63:
58:
53:
49:
43:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
208:
148:
144:common sense
138:
134:
128:
113:
104:
102:
89:
37:
38:This is an
109:good faith
219:WP:SIGNUP
200:Footnotes
152:vandalism
92:talk page
70:WP:NOTIFY
232:Category
158:See also
62:Shortcut
105:notify
135:venue
40:essay
139:any
120:ANI
234::
42:.
20:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
