5730:, generally questions at RfA should be ones you think need to be answered before you can support or oppose, and you're currently neutral, so yes, you're sort of insisting here. LU has said she'd need to consult with other editors. Your question is using as a given that she doesn't yet know what those other editors would say and can't simply not make those edits, and it's asking her to make her best guess as to what someone familiar with the situation would advise. How is that a reasonable question? And I'm not even sure what "What is your approach" means or how I'd even go about starting to answer that...are you looking for something like "I'd call them what they currently call themselves unless it's generally considered offensive, like transsexual, or unencyclopedic, like queer." or are you looking for something else? And do we need an RfC on whether queer is no longer unencyclopedic or offensive? It's just...it's a huge question, actually TWO huge questions since you're asking about two different and very specific situations to research on, think about, and compose answers to.
5033:. Not voting nay because I want to see more editors stepping up if they are interested in the mop, and I reject admin qualification inflation on general principles. But that said, there are some potential issues with the candidate and the high acceptance pct. that has developed surprises me. This is a very new editor by our usual standards with under two years experience in the community. There are some other things that make me concerned about judgment and maturity like typos on their user page, and TWA badges, when that page can be expected to be scrutinized. Kind of generic replies to question 3, and selection of the generic recall mechanism, are uninspiring ā are we seeing an unwillingness to grapple? Others have pointed out non-nuanced AfD arguments where ideally we would see, again, more grappling with issues demonstrating potential admin mindset. I agree with
4602:. Whilst this is certainly a trait which I would look for in a candidate, a user needs more than this to become an admin, more specifically, to have an ability to understand different situations which require different thoughts and approaches, something which I don't believe this use has demonstrated. The user has also only had the NPP right for less than eight months and two other rights for less than six. I don't believe this is sufficient experience to be granted the admin tools to be helping out in the areas stated in answer 1. I will mention that I have seen this user performing solid work in chess-related articles and a look at their other contributions shows they really are doing great work to build the encylopedia. Kind regards,
513:
civility are the base for any type of relationship, especially in such a diverse community. Assuming good faith, acting polite and friendly not only secures more or less smooth interactions, but also helps engaging new valuable editors who may feel lost or even scared in the beginning. āNo firm rulesā means that discussion, consensus and common sense prevail, itās not a dictatorship. The community has a set of guidelines as any endeavour should to function, but whatās crucial here is that anyone can join and help, and this what helps the project evolve. When I just started editing, I was really scared that I can unwillingly harm, but after receiving support from several editors who told me to be bold, I felt more confident to continue.
4934:
While accepting that she erred, the candidate's response refers to using male pronouns for "the time in life when Erica was male", which largely replicates her initial error and suggests a failure to learn from it. I'm also a little bit unsettled by her reference to "respect the choices people make", which is further evidence tending to suggest that her misunderstanding of trans issues persists. You might fairly ask what a proper understanding of trans issues has to do with being an administrator, to which I would respond that it's not completely irrelevant, but perhaps more troubling is that after making a mistake in good faith and being called on it, the candidate superficially accepted responsibility, without
5294:?" The candidate provided quite a lengthy answer. I am asking if there is something specific you didn't find in that answer which you still needed clarification on. On a related note, this is the second time you've asked questions in an RfA which are almost identical to questions the candidate has already answered. An RfA is a stressful experience for candidates, with seven days of multiple questions to think about and provide answers for. We try to make it less stressful by not asking them to answer questions that have already been answered.
967:
triple caution. If at some point I feel I have profound knowledge in anti-spam and UPE activities (or if anyone agrees to adopt me on these particular issues), I donāt see why I canāt contribute. While spamming is content related and I am more confident about it, dealing with undisclosed paid editing would be new to me, as I am not familiar with the procedures, so I would definitely need some time. Generally, I am willing to help out in any area, provided I gained profound knowledge in it.
1103:, though we have a rule of best thumb - refer to someone as their current pronouns, even when writing about the time before they came out - this can also vary, as personal preferences over pronoun choices and self-referential language can be influenced by, say, the time a person grew up and came out, and, for example, the language considered acceptable at the time having changed over the years, but the language used to describe their identity having stayed the same.
4263:
1237:
block experienced users without doing our best to understand them, we can just lose them. If they cared enough to spend their free time here and contribute, why canāt be spend some time to really talk to them? I believe most of the cases can be resolved by means of communication therefore I would do my best to clarify the situation and discuss it with the user trying to see their point as well. Itās all about the context and details.
4598:). Their talk page participation is also underwhelming, with only approximately 500 edits to both user talk and article talk pages. For me, this demonstrates that this user has not as much user-to-user discussion and involvement as I would expect from an admin. The user has only been at Knowledge for a little over 18 months which, while being consistently active throughout, strikes me as barely enough. As Barkeep says,
138:. I was pleased to see an editor eager to learn and who learns from mistakes. Since then I have seen an editor who wants to help others, who works hard to use tools responsibly and well, and who is unafraid to ask questions when she doesn't know something. LU has demonstrated more than sufficiently in her time here that she is here to build an encyclopedia and ready to be trusted with the administrative toolset. Best,
1111:
have not spoken about how long they have identified differently - no statements on "I always considered myself to be X", "I started identifying as X at Y age", or "when I look back, I can see that I never identified as Z" - they have also not stated a preference for how they should be referred to when speaking of the time in their life before they came out. Again - everyone else is swamped under writing about
3419:- exactly the right attitude, and a good mix of contributions (perhaps a little more Keep in AfD, intervening to rescue, for example, would be even better). Also nominated by experienced trusted figures. I note the well-articulated āneed for more experienceā point below, but think this can be over-stressed. More hands on the toolset are needed and this looks like a safe pair. Good luck!
4687:. And for a modern-day actor in an English-speaking country, I'd be surprised if they were notable but nothing but PR stuff popped up on Google. But my point is more that IME these kinds of AfDs lend themselves to short responses (whereas the POVFORK/BLP variety of AfDs require longer ones). In many cases the editor comments early on and seems to be doing their checks.
4774:. Is having good AfD stats and uncontroversial content creation our only requirement for adminship? I hate this obsession with AfD stats at RfA as all it really does is measure how good someone is at agreeing with others and dogpiling onto easy keeps/deletes. I'd prefer to see productive involvement in disputes given that admins are often called upon to resolve such.
755:
everyone can be mistaken (and itās ok to make mistakes, thatās how we learn the fastest). Basing a decision on the fact that a user is much older than me would be a very subjective approach. I have seen articles nominated for deletion by admins and saved by other users. Does it mean the admin is a bad admin? No. It just means that everyone can be mistaken.
5596:. I'd love to be doing a GAN review for a trans person who wrote the bulk of it, but such a person doesn't exist, so here I am submitting it to GA myself. The standard I set myself is: is this better than nothing? A non-trivial bar to crossāit needs to have a high degree of factual accuracy and wording sensitivity and be worth someone clicking on
5462:, unless you actually believe no one who understands those points at that level of detail should be an admin, you probably should just go to Less Unless's user talk and drop a link to something she can use to improve their understanding next time they write an article about a trans person. The question itself is asking her to provide an answer
1107:
with other editors, but ultimately, the decision on what to write and how to write it falls down to you, as everyone else is swamped under in differently articles and projects. Though you don't feel the need to lay out a precise outline before you start writing about this person, what angle do you approach it with?
1088:. I'm certain these were good faith, and that you, as a potential administrator contributing to the Women In Red project, have no wish but to improve Knowledge's diversity of outlook and content. BLPs can be difficult; though Knowledge policy does not exist to massage the egos of those it may have articles on, it
4806:. Until recall is a binding procedure, and pledges to be open to recall are binding, the first and only step to recalling an admin is convincing them to resign, which is the first and only step to removing an admin in any circumstance except for RFAR. As such, all admins are equally open, and not open to recall.
3084:
disputes as an admin. Overall, however, the editor has shown consistent good faith, an earnest willingness and competence to improve the encyclopedia, and a compelling reason for why and how the admin tools would be particularly helpful in having this user positively contribute to our encyclopedia in new ways. ā
5630:
from deletion. In both cases, I thought, "These are black women with a story to tell, we've absolutely got to keep the articles here at all cost", (realising completely that's not an argument that you can use at AfD) but also, "Am I, a straight white middle-age middle-class male, the most appropriate
5530:
in bad faith, but as I said in my
Neutral vote, it's best to clear these things up before going either way. It's a minor point to cleanup, but cleaned up I merely wanted it to be. I'm not "insisting" anything. I'm just asking for a potential administrator to consider a situation wherein they may have
5523:
potential transphobia behind a veil of deniability. I live in the UK; we're stupidly transphobic here, and everyone's favourite pasttime seems to be dunking on transgender people on
Twitter. It is not a stretch of the imagination. Maybe you think it is; it isn't, it really, really unfortunately isn't.
4962:
Many/most transgender people don't consider themselves to have "used to be male/female", in the same way most gay people don't think that they "were straight and are now gay"āit's like they were always that gender or always gay, but just didn't realise that about themselves or go public with it for a
2890:
And this person definitely drives home the point -- "Be respectful ā treat others the way you want to be treated. Everyone does the best they can. We never know the reason of a personās behavior". Someone with that attitude certainly knows what it takes to be here and will get a lot of pleasure from
2776:
Candidate has said that she will be open to recall under that standard offer. That's really all I need to know -- saved time! After all, in the unlikely chance there's a problem, we can look at various ways of addressing that -- recall being a last resort, but necessary to have. Not only that, but in
1095:
Your answer to Q.15 included "I always respect the choices people make", but as I'm sure you're aware, a person doesn't get much choice over whether they're transgender or not; the choice is, instead, how they present this to the world, with pronouns being part of this presentation. (You can think of
859:
Thank you for the question. My decision would depend on the subject of the article and specific arguments presented. SNGs should generally help determine if a subject is likely to meet the GNG, they assume the coverage exists and where specifically it is likely to be found. While in most of the cases
721:
Thank you for the question. I find it difficult at the moment to imagine a situation where I would definitely invoke IAR. The context, the details - there are so many variables that influence our decisions. Up until now the guidelines formulated by the community were quite comprehensive for me. Also,
592:
Having said that I believe being involved doesnāt necessary mean being subjective. Although COI edits are discouraged on Wiki, having an āinsiderā can help a discussion if they are willing to put their emotions aside and help by, for example, providing IRS that contain alternative points of view thus
133:
I'm really excited to be able to present Less Unless to the community as the type of editor who used to be a regular at RfA but who has been rare in recent years. Namely she just goes about competently building the encyclopedia, in ways that
Ritchie has already mentioned, and has a clear need for the
5534:
I get it, and I do not in any way think it's a stretch that tons of people do believe being trans is the choice here (rather than how one presents.) And here in the US we are also transphobic; I don't know how
Caitlyn Jenner thinks there's any possibility of getting elected as a Republican for god's
1236:
I personally feel like at many times blocking can have the opposite effect, as people who repeatedly violate civility guidelines have definitely been warned before and if that didnāt work, why the block will. Especially with those who have been here for a while and know the policies. Moreover, if we
1110:
At the same time, you're working on a BLP of a younger trans person, who has openly stated that they commonly use slurs they have reclaimed to describe themselves, but do not use the term 'queer', as they believe it to be an unreclaimed slur, and offensive when used in reference to them. Though they
927:
Thank you for the question. I agree fully, my answer looks incomplete and kind of reserved as I was petrified when I read the message. I instantly forgot all the words and it was the best I could say in that emotional state. One of my biggest priorities in life is freedom - freedom to be who you are
508:
Thank you for the question. In my opinion the five pillars are all intertwined to serve the bigger purpose. To me itās a like a car - it needs everything - an engine, gas and breaks, steering and wheels and many other parts. Take any of the components away and it just wonāt be able to do what it was
112:
One of the best things about Less Unless is sheās consistently polite, courteous and welcoming to everyone. Sheās happy to admit when she might be wrong, and is always self-reflective and looking for feedback on how to improve as a
Wikipedian. Thatās a great trait to have an administrator, and added
5143:
Though I admire Less Unless's awareness and willing to learn from experienced admins when granted the tools, the noted laissez-faire attitude to diversity issues is uninspiring, especially with
Knowledge seeing many edit wars (and civil edit conflicts) on the subject. However, relating to diversity
5078:
I donāt have hard and fast rules like that, rather would prefer to evaluate the whole package of candidate characteristics as an ensemble. Some characteristics suggest naivetĆ© and a cautious response, thatās all. A candidate should be self aware enough to know what message they are sending out with
4746:
Yes, but the point of my question wasn't Google (I don't know what LU's review process is anyway), it was what exactly is expected on clear GNG failures (which is a large bulk of what hits AfD), for which (for that specific person's AfD) I used no results on Google as an example. I would personally
3083:
shows that the user may have a compelling reason to be granted the admin tools. The lack of editing in controversial areas has led to fewer content disputes, and the lack of ability to see the editor's behavior in a prolonged content dispute provides some uncertainty regarding how they would handle
3078:
deserves to be addressed if I am going to indicate my support. I don't think that the editor's editing in non-controversial areas would result in many talk page discussions due to disputes anyway, which would reduce the number of talk page comments significantly. While the user is newer in terms of
1106:
So, my question is this: you're writing a BLP of an older trans person who has recently come out. They don't use neo-pronouns, but they do describe themselves with the older term "transsexual", and have openly spoken of the time before they came out using their previously-used pronouns. You consult
1004:
Thank you for the question. If anything like this happens, I would first of all consult with other administrators on how to act as at the moment I am not familiar with all the specifics of granting\revoking user rights. Having made one mistake (granting the rights), I would try to avoid any others,
600:
One of my principles ā if you are not well informed about a topic or biased, be careful expressing subjective opinions. It may harm everyone involved ā you, your opponent and the discussion. So, when I get involved in such situation, I ask myself if I know enough to provide thoughtful well-reasoned
250:
I think everyone who has been here at least for a while had people disagree with them. There were points of view that differed from mine ā mostly during the AfD discussions, but the communication has always been very civil and we handled it in a friendly manner. Everyone makes mistakes, Iāve always
5125:
the gender they were born as; certainly it's the case for myself, and having been out for 5 years, I've seen few identifying differently, and those themselves typically older members of the trans community.Obviously, learning about minority issues is never an open-and-shut, yes-or-no thing; it's a
5106:
brings up here, though potentially a "minor" issue to some, does, as a trans person who's seen this kind of thing before, lead me to wonder. Being transgender is something to be respected, as an immutable part of a person's identity - not a "choice".The choice is to come out, I suppose, but coming
4933:
business a bit troubling, and the candidate's response to it in Q15 not all together satisfactory. The candidateāacting in what I have zero doubt was good faith, and as part of a noble effort to counter systemic bias on
Knowledgeāmisgendered an article subject for a good portion of the article.
2758:
Q6 seemed nitpicky to me first, but it has resulted in an answer that made me support. Not because of the rollback thing, but because of the response to this type of criticism. That's exactly the type of criticism one will experience as administrator, and exactly the type of answer that is needed
5111:
the respectful, and I would say editorially correct decision, to refer to someone within their BLP with the correct, present-day pronouns, unless the article subject in question has openly stated no opposition to being referred to differently when writing of the time before they came out.There's
4618:
Aside from the usual issues with arguments that somehow
Knowledge is so hard to edit that users need years of experience, I'm curious what you think the user should've voted with on those AfDs (maybe you can give some examples of what you'd expect)? As you may know, most AfDs are obvious keep or
966:
Thank you for the question and the support. If I become a sysop I'm goint to take it slow. I want to study all the guidelines thoroughly, observe other experienced admins, ask questions I donāt feel quite confident about. To me being a sysop is a big responsibility and I will definitely act with
687:
meets the requirements for inclusion as it was not only extensively covered but sparkled a vivid discussion in the society and the government about ethics in media (legal action was taken against six newspapers, a new legislation proposed) which has changed the way such events are written about.
667:
Regretfully, we live in the world where people get murdered every day but while creating an encyclopedia, we should keep a cool head and stick to the guidelines. Is this an event that has changed the society? Has it resulted into something bigger? This particular tragic case unfortunately has no
573:
Hello! We never meet before but I think your works are great! I intend to ask this question to all admins. While we know that neutrality is one of the most important concepts in
Knowledge, how do you approach contentious situations that are on the opposite spectrum of your religious or political
450:
and Harry Styles wasnāt there. So, I took it for an act of vandalism. However, from todayās perspective it obviously looks like a hasty decision and a misuse on my part. For this past month I have been reading a lot about vandalism as I often come across problematic edits while reviewing pending
400:
Thank you for the question. I am definitely open to recall as I believe it is consistent with the core values of the community. Administrators are accountable as they are trusted with an extensive set of tools. If the community decides an administrator for certain reasons lost its trust or canāt
5522:
concern, is that a response detailing "respecting everyone's choices" can be read two completely valid ways, as I have seen both countless, witheringly countless times: a), the respondent isn't too clued up on trans issues. B), the respondent thinks being trans is a "choice", and is hedging any
1121:
Thank you for your question as now I have a chance to explain what I meant. I want to clarify this part: "When creating the article, I was using my logic that quit on me. I used āheā for the time in life when Erica presented as male, and āsheā after transition." It was my logic when I wrote the
588:
and if we drop it in favor of what one believes is true, Knowledge will turn into a battlefield for truth (philosophers alone have so many different views!). In order to avoid such or similar scenarios, the community elaborated a set of guidelines that proved its efficiency. So, for me itās the
959:
You already have my support and you are definitely passing this RFA, so congratulations in advance, however I do have a question, When you invariably become an
Administrator do you see yourself getting involved in anti spam? that is, would you be willing to combat spamming and undisclosed paid
454:
Rollback is applied for obviously malicious editing, in one's own userspace or for reverting edits by blocked users - none of which applies to this particular edit. I think the most adequate decision would be to manually revert and provide a summary explaining the reasons. Also, I would drop a
754:
When I read the reasoning of users under a deletion nomination, I donāt usually check their userpage or rights. First and foremost, itās the rationale that should be taken into account. Years of tenure is definitely an asset as a lot of knowledge comes from the details and experience, however
512:
Being a Free Online Encyclopedia ā is the purpose that every idea needs as it builds the direction, NPOV makes a logical follow-up ā an encyclopedia without neutrality is an oxymoron. Free content is at the core of the idea ā take it away and the community will change drastically. Respect and
4647:
to be fair to Willbb, I don't think it's really the "single line answers" that are their main issue - you're right that in many cases, more isn't needed. However, for someone indicating interest in AfD activity as an admin, you do want to see evidence of new thought - good 1st responders and
1190:
I am highly supportive of the accessibility focused efforts and see no reason why I would oppose helping. Basically, itās what I pretty often deal with at Clean Up. However, I would have to study the technical part of it more precisely as things like modules, scripts, functions and codes are
921:, which you fairly cited in Q3 as a mistake you made, your response to the mistake was to say that you did not intend to insult anybody; I absolutely accept that, but it strikes me as an incomplete response. Can you now explain why what you did was in error, and what you've learned from it?
813:
Thank you for the question. I will first and foremost assume good faith, definitely use my doās and donāts guide stated in Q3 and stick to the guidelines. Keeping the discussion constructive would be my main focus. If needed, I will ask for help of other users as I believe itās essential and
5386:
I count two questions about her. Obviously, the extent to which they're relevant will be decided by the participants in this RFA. Speaking only for myself, my concern was less the initial mistake--as you say, a lot of us cis-types have some history with misgendering/deadnaming/etc. trans
1232:
Generally, I donāt think admins, experienced, less experienced or IP users should be treated differently. Itās the guidelines that keep it all together, no one has a privilege, anyone can be blocked. But blocking should be the very last measure and should be supported by the broader
1125:
This whole misunderstanding made me so sad as I feel we have similar priorities and could be supportive to each other. Unfortunately the word "choices" was misleading, but I never meant that being a transgender is a choice. I hope we can work together in the future and create great
5409:
Fair. I wasn't so against your question - it seemed reasonable to ask - as I was by Ineffablebookkeeper's, which felt a bit excessive. (I think if we asked all of the current admins to answer it, with the same "locked in a room alone" criteria, 90% would probably get it "wrong")
928:
no matter what, and I always respect the choices people make. When creating the article, I was using my logic that quit on me. I used āheā for the time in life when Erica was male, and āsheā after transition. Another mistake of mine was not to check the appropriate wording.
451:
changes. Due to this I have gained a better understanding of what constitutes vandalism. At this moment I think the edit was quite ambiguous (could be good-faith, a test, even if vandalism, it wasnāt destructive) but not the case where rollback would be considered eligible.
3401:
was a slight concern looking through the archives, but the way Less handled that (not to mention it was six months ago) showed she is willing to learn from her mistakes; a trait all Wikipedians (but especially administrators) need. I wish Less the best in her adminship. ā
635:, with the "fails notability guidelines per above" rationale. If this AfD were open now, and based on the coverage of the event available now, would you still !vote 'delete'? When, if ever, is it appropriate to have a Knowledge article about this type of an event? Thanks,
5457:
I count Q19 as one which seems to insist that, having made a mistake over a year ago, Less Unless in order to gain support for getting a few extra tools now needs to prove she understands the finest details and points of how to refer to any trans person in any situation.
4904:
skeptical of any candidate who agrees to it without previously being involved in the effort to create a recall process, since it is hard to avoid the conclusion that they are simply bowing to pressure. No one who would do so to pass an RFA should be an administrator.
2698:
If all it takes is a slightly panicky thread on WT:RFA to get Ritchie and Barkeep to find some strong candidates to nominate, we can do that more often ... but seriously, a well-qualified candidate who has demonstrated good judgment and is here for the right reasons.
5576:, which while I believed was a crucial missing article, I as a white person felt very uncomfortable creating. I finally decided it was worse to have it missing and created, hoping others would improve. Was it a mistake? Did I do it wrong? I don't really know.
4727:
access and I hope you're all doing ProQuest searches in there and using any specialist search that you know is subject-relevant. BEFORE is only required for the nominator, but participants should be doing it too (at least until it's clear someone else has). ā
5387:
people--and more the fact that the candidate's response to the error (both at the time, and in this RFA a year later), while accepting that she did err, did not demonstrate that she had educated herself on what she did wrong. Indeed, they suggested that she
5230:
Note: My question (Q6) was described above as "criticism" but it was not intended as such and I apologize if it came across that way. As I indicated above, I thought Less Unless's nuanced answer was fantastic and I hope it will strengthen this RfA even more.
5116:
has pointed out, the oddity of referring to someone before having come out as "the time of so-and-so's life when they were male". Cisgender editors may struggle to grasp, having never faced gender dysphoria, the fact that for a trans person, there is often
2219:- in my view, adminship should not be as big a deal as it is, and any quality editor who comes along, like this candidate, should be supported. Temperament is the most important thing, and this editor clearly has the right attitude to be an admin.
312:
3827:
I don't remember seeing this editor previously, but the excellent responses to the questions above (especially the willingness to acknowledge and reflect on minor mistakes) and solid contribution history indicate that she will be a good admin.
5658:, thank you both. I finally came around to the idea that writing is hard, but editing is easy. If I put something out there, it makes it easier for all those non-creators out there to look at it and say, "That's not correct! I can fix that!"
4283:- 1.5 years of consistent high quality editing is sufficient tenure, if on lean side. Trusted by Ritchie333 and Barkeep49. Shows CLUE, takes advice, seeks to learn, interacts well with others. About what I look for in an admin candidate.
5126:
continual process. However, I would like to see these concerns wrapped up before casting a vote, as this will affect how the candidate may go on to treat certain articles in future, should their application for adminship be successful. --
1129:
As for the question - I would wait until someone replied because I can hardly imagine a situation where Iām the only person who could write that article if Iām a person who isnāt informed enough to do so and donāt have access to advice.
2992:
an excellent candidate; I've never seen her before, but a look at contributions and linked discussions show that she is competent/trustworthy (and especially willing to accept critical feedback) and has a reasonable need for the tools.
5504:- it's a valid question, and I'm not in any way disparaging that Less Unless made a mistake - which I pointedly note as being in good faith, as I hold no opinion that she would be unpleasant on purpose - for which she later apologised.
1720:
cited above, I particularly appreciate her ability to change her mind when new information is presented. In my view, that willingness to accept feedback is more than sufficient to assuage any "too few edits, no GAs, too new" concerns.
875:
as being a member of Cabinet, they are considered notable even if thereās not much SIGCOV. However, if a politician ran for an office but lost and all the extensive coverage is build on this process only ā a lot of users consider it a
4977:
Like how being gay isn't "a lifestyle choice", neither is being trans, so though there is still some sense in which a person is choosing to be themselves, there's also some way in which it isn't a choice at allāit's just the way they
3198:
looks like an excellent candidate. She is endorsed by Barkeep, she is consistently polite and courteous, she has done great work at Women in Red project, and she has answered all of the questions satisfactorily. Impressive candidate.
1056:
I would choose not to intervene as an involved person ā I donāt think it would be appropriate to use my admin tools as this could be perceived as misuse. Instead, I would wait for uninvolved administrators to take a look at the case.
2303:
4874:
Disagreeing with JayBeeEll to an extent on this as it should quickly be treated as an extended discussion and clerked to the talk page is where it belongs. I'd simply AGF for any candidate and reckon only if either myself or maybe
747:
As a (relatively) newer user, would you feel fully confident closing discussions involving, and potentially even blocking, users who may have many more years tenure, and hundreds of thousands of edits, than yourself on the project?
1151:
My other question is what I originally came on here to ask - accessibility. Would you, in the role of administrator and through your involvement with WIR, introduce and attempt to spread word of the basic edits and policies of the
2280:
I haven't seen them around but LU seems reflective, & prepares herself before leaping into new areas. Not convinced of the need as stated but unconcerned since passing an RFA inevitably changes the focus of your attention.
5549:
Sigh, yes, transphobia is sadly common. However, I know that for a while, my solution to "how do I manage to not screw anything up" was "don't talk about/write about/be friends with" trans people - and that's, in my opinion,
3605:- After research, I've found that this candidate has a clue and a positive attitude toward the project. Having this candidate become an admin would be a clear net-positive for the project. I'm happy to pile on my support! -
2299:
205:
having a solid experience in content creation. I will gladly help in other areas; however, I wonāt intervene where I donāt feel completely confident ā copyright and technical issues would be good examples of what is not my
596:
However, if a person feels they wonāt be able to offer objective facts based on the guidelines, or their emotional well-being may be hurt, itās better to refrain from the discussion. Therefore, it depends on context and a
355:. I also felt proud creating articles for Azerbaijan/Kazakh/Uzbek women who I feel are less represented. Apart from women's biographies I have also "adopted" Monaco-related topics after a suggestion made by EncyclopƦdius
5531:
to go down to a level of detail they might not elsewhere, as part of what I see as the candidates' clear and beneficial contributions towards diversity on Knowledge through their involvement in the Women In Red project.
4086:
Objections below are respected; however, they seem insufficient to hold back the tools, especially when good admins are needed for the project. This is an obvious no-brainer, and this candidate is a high-quality choice.
1541:
I did not recognize this username, but the record speaks for itself. Sufficient tenure. Lots of good content creation. Nothing concerning in the talk page history, and the last 500 edits look good. And the activity at
1096:
a person's presentation choices - pronouns, appearance, etc. - like a number of horses, wearing hats with 'he/him' and 'goth-femme' on them, tied to a number of posts labelled 'pronouns' and 'presentation', if it helps.)
288:
I believe how you say things is almost as important as what you say, especially in written conversation. So, try to avoid jokes, satire, or phrasing that can possibly be misperceived. Be as neutral as possible in your
201:, reviewing pending changes and clean up are among the most frequent. Being an administrator, I see myself contributing mostly to AfD and RfD closures as I feel most confident in those areas. I can be of a good use in
725:
To me IAR is not a synonym to ādo whatever you wantā rather a stimulus to be creative, express your thoughts and offer alternative ideas. If the project is not willing to at least consider new approaches, it wonāt
1328:
509:
meant for. So, I canāt say this or that particular pillar is the most important, itās the combination that creates Knowledge as we know it and makes it running. Take one pillar away and it will change everything.
1322:
986:
931:
What Iāve learned from this situation is 1) always familiarize yourself with the subject and the context; 2) consult with people who know more ā I am a huge fan of WikiProjects; 3) double/triple check.
343:- currently I am working on improving it even more to take it to GA. This was my first experience collaborating with another editor Gerda Arendt and I really enjoyed it. The others worth mentioning are
1781:
respected noms, answers to questions ok so far, peeking at a few AfD discussions seemed to show no issues. No signs not to be trusted with tools. Hopefully no skeletons and in all events good luck.
1240:
At the moment I donāt have much experience in this particular field, so I before doing anything as responsible as blocking, I would need time to acquire sufficient knowledge and get grasp of details.
4583:
AfD participation is very much underwhelming. Despite approximately 200 AfDs participated in, remarkable for the time period, they seem to nearly always be single line agreements with other !votes (
2798:- competent, civil and reflecting, from what I've seen. Definitely does not shy away from janitor-type work, and could use the sysop tools to do more of such. I think she can be trusted with them.
5687:- I wouldn't propose all admins answer it; I'm not the Transgender Inquisition, I don't have the outfit. My question was honestly just to clear up a few uncertainties, as my Neutral vote shows. --
319:
per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.
2349:
While I have not personally had any interaction with this user, her qualifications speak for themselves and, Lord knows, Knowledge needs more bold, level-headed editors like her in adminship.
3692:
Experience and range of expertise is light. Admin role needs to be bifurcated and this would be for basic admin work, staying out of the heavy and behavior-related stuff for several years.
4623:
of sourcing (i.e. blatant GNG failures). I'd like to know how one makes a High Quality Contribution (TM) when Googling the subject just gives no results except IMDb & FB/Insta/Linkedin
2777:
the vanishingly unlikely chance that the candidate gets too full of themself -- not totally unheard of, people change -- we can maybe make them think "uh-uh... maybe I better cool it."
1226:
policies? How would you handle these situations when they arise, and how would you determine that these blocks, if made, were done in a preventative measure and not a punitive measure?
5290:, yes, and did you read the answer to question 3, which is "Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it
758:
In case of a possible block though, I would most definitely seek to involve several other admins to shape a better vision of what has happened and which steps are the most adequate.
4938:
taking the effort to understand what her mistake was. I don't think all of that adds up to a reason to oppose an otherwise good candidate, but I can't quite get myself to support.
601:
opinions, if not ā is there another constructive way I can contribute (doing research, i.e), but also whether I can maintain my emotions and whether what I say helps the discussion.
887:
So, itās really tricky and all about the nuances - every case is unique. There are so many variables here, that itās quite difficult to answer the question without a specific case.
656:
in the majority of cases can be the only indicator of notability, but with articles about events or crime there are other factors that need to be taken into consideration i.e. per
593:
adding to another important requirement - due weight. In such way we will be able to provide readers with objective verifiable information presented from a variety of perspectives.
1863:
546:
Thank you for cusiosity) My username is a creative attempt of mine to combine word-play with my life motto which is āDonāt look for excusesā, unless... kidding) no unless here).
4648:
nominations are traditional, but being the first to disagree with those above, even if it puts you in the minority, so long as they're well reasoned, that's what I like to see.
3376:
Donāt take it personally ā itās not about you. Itās not a place to nurture your ego, but a community of like-minded people with a bigger purpose. Act with regard to the purpose.
574:
beliefs? (For example: Let's pretend you are Armenian and the case is about Armenian genocide, or pretend that you are conservative and the case is about liberalism) Thank you!
285:
Donāt take it personally ā itās not about you. Itās not a place to nurture your ego, but a community of like-minded people with a bigger purpose. Act with regard to the purpose.
5391:. That's not a great trait in an admin. It wasn't enough for me to oppose. It hasn't been enough for anyone else to oppose, either. But I don't agree that it's irrelevant.
4392:
Great editing at Women in Red and reading her replies to questions above shows a thoughtful, considered, reflective contributions. We need admins like Less_Unless. Yes please.
2182:
a fantastic contributer to the project (one I don't think I've seen much of before), who would be more than capable of handling the toolset. No reason to oppose. Best Wishes,
4703:
3500:
them being an admin here would be a clear net-positive for the project. User has common sense and can justify their thoughts reasonably, and has a decent wiki-philosophy.
1442:
5314:
What I am talking about how will the user deal with disputes which they have not been part of. In other words, how will the user deal with disputes between other users.
4850:
For everyone else: having looked through Hipocrite's past participation at RfA, I see that this is at least the fourth time they've offered a variation on this oppose (
2038:
seems to be a good candidate, although there appear to be some deletionist tendencies with a number of the candidate's AFD nominations, with some recent examples being
1437:
580:
Hello and thank you. The situation you described is very common as we are a very diverse community. The most frequent reasoning in such discussions in my experience is
5739:
5459:
4756:
4741:
244:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
97:
Less Unless has written over 200 articles and participated in several Women in Red contests, helpfully addressing systemic bias on Knowledge. Sheās also a regular at
4595:, to list a handful of some of the recent AfDs in which they have participated). They have nominated a few AfDs, the most recent of which resulted in a speedy keep (
360:
652:
Thank you for the question. With this particular article I would still !vote delete as the coverage in IRS in not the only prerequisite of notability in this case.
5721:
5696:
5222:
5779:
4888:
1200:
1066:
880:
and !vote delete. These types of discussions in my experience were often closed as no consensus. Another example of discussions where things get heated relate to
823:
767:
5102:; I originally jumped on here to ask a question about the candidate's approach to accessibility vis a vis templates and the promotion of understanding, but what
1115:
or something, criminally vital articles they just cannot put down. Without needing to write up the Iliad on the Talk page before yuu edit, what's your approach?
4678:
478:
165:
5757:
5342:
5327:
5303:
5281:
4657:
632:
402:
256:
5667:
4869:
4843:
4829:
5259:
5021:
5007:
4635:
1298:
5645:
5492:
2900:
1052:
Thank you for your question. As the user is new, I would definitely reach out to explain our policies regarding userspaces and offer them help. However, at
697:
5426:
5400:
5617:
998:
right to some user who has no need for it and who is not much active. Realising you did a mistake, what will you do? Will you revoke right from the user?
230:
and happy of my input there ā a little pleasure of mine is to see an article without any tags which I also try to achieve while reviewing the new ones at
5635:? Still, as Bilorv says, I'd rather at least know I had a go at doing it, instead of sitting back and thinking systemic bias is somebody else's problem.
5377:
3728:, seems perfectly qualified and uncontroversial, I do not see anything to indicate she would be anything other than entirely responsible with the tools.
1249:
1139:
1014:
976:
941:
899:
804:
735:
613:
555:
522:
464:
414:
372:
5585:
5567:
5544:
5475:
5445:
4959:
so that the candidate can actually see a bit more explicitly what the problem is, do you think the following is a fair representation of your issues?
2079:
5800:
3521:- Handful of encounters I've had with the candidate are positive, I see support from several users whose judgment I trust, and no obvious red flags.
722:
as one of the main pillars is consensus, I believe any new or alternative proposal can be brought up for discussion and accepted if proved effective.
5090:
5073:
1773:
156:
Thank you, Ritchie333 and Barkeep49. It is an honor to be nominated, and I gratefully accept. I have never edited for pay. This is my only account.
5515:
and is not something I stated. I did literally say that learning about minority issues is a "continual process", and not a "black-and-white" issue.
4603:
644:
391:
268:
Personally, I view any conflict as a possibility to understand each other better and grow. I have a set of personal do's and donāts for such cases:
176:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
890:
As a new administrator, I would refrain from closing particularly controversial discussions, but observe and consult with more experienced sysops.
5600:
of whatever else would turn up on Google. But at the end of the day, I write it or no-one does. I'd rather get shouted at for a failure, like at
3936:- Their thoughtful answers to the questions, combined with a good temperment, and content creation skills would make for an great administrator.
5204:
2507:
4522:
3140:
After spending some time looking through contributions and question answers, I'm quite impressed! I think Less Unless would make a good admin.
1122:
article a year ago, it's not what I think now. I did learn back then that gender is not what you can chose but a core part of your personality.
446:
Thank you for the question and pointing out this edit. When I rollbacked it I thought it was justified. I have checked the full lineup of the
279:
Be respectful ā treat others the way you want to be treated. Everyone does the best they can. We never know the reason of a personās behavior.
5135:
4858:
4747:
see it as a waste of time to try to write a paragraph argument in such an AfD (if even possible) when it can be summarised in two sentences.
2101:
being an admin is absolutely no big deal at all, anyone is capable of doing it and there's seldom any real risk to it. So happy to support.
5240:
3854:
1730:
1533:
3899:
2307:
2039:
1747:
1717:
252:
102:
5364:
relevant? It seems quite a lot at this point - they made a mistake in writing about a topic that admittedly is confusing for many people.
2112:
101:, thoughtfully offering good advice on numerous debates on whether or not to keep an article, even when consensus doesnāt go her way like
4105:
3737:
2753:
2063:
2043:
5507:
You state that "unless you actually believe no one who understands those points at that level of detail should be an admin" - when that
4855:
3991:
3974:
3928:
3597:
3398:
3366:
3110:
2324:
1581:
5818:
4546:
4476:
4422:
3785:
3333:
3280:
3230:
2949:
2719:
2255:
2093:
1790:
123:
4853:
4490:
4318:
4019:
3169:
2375:
2190:
2001:
1913:
1879:
1854:
867:
Generally, all SNGs note that the subject is presumed notable if it can be verified by IRS. However, in some cases itās the amount of
147:
5744:
I am worried that only 4% of her edits are on talk pages. Administrators should be very familiar with consensus and related things.
4947:
4900:. Agree with Hipocrite that the glib acceptance of recalls without the proper leg-work to make a genuine process is concerning; I am
4851:
4401:
4358:
4237:
4166:
4149:
3316:
3301:
2926:
2786:
2734:
2428:
2358:
1951:
1690:
1503:
171:
113:
to her content creation and AfD skills, gives me the fullest confidence that she will be trustworthy and responsible with the tools.
4275:
3957:
3945:
3754:
3684:
3475:
3448:
3247:
3093:
3064:
2868:
2690:
2543:
2526:
2228:
2137:
1708:
5601:
5212:, For the record, we asked Less Unless what preferred gender should be used in the nomination, and were unambiguously told āsheā.
4568:
4509:
4375:
4253:
4183:
4123:
4047:
4031:
3768:
3720:
3703:
3667:
3385:
3350:
2832:
2815:
2490:
2469:
2392:
2174:
1969:
1934:
1517:
1285:
333:
Thank you for running! As a follow-up to Q2, are there any particular articles that you are particularly proud of contributing to?
5107:
out is a relatively new concept, and transgender people have existed for far longer than 'coming out' has. Though odd to some, it
4914:
4815:
4613:
3530:
2885:
2851:
2768:
2673:
2605:
2567:
2407:
2272:
2153:
1654:
1638:
715:
Would you ever invoke IAR in an administrative capacity, and if so, what potential situation could you imagine yourself doing so?
134:
tools, for reasons she'll explain below. I first became aware of her, when she completed New Page Patrol School and asked for the
62:
5153:
4459:
4220:
4078:
3888:
3871:
3819:
3650:
3208:
3039:
3030:. Unlikely to delete the main page. Based on a reasonable search, it appears this editor can be trusted with the larger toolset.
2968:
2656:
1986:
1896:
1832:
1673:
1621:
4204:
4061:
4005:
3837:
3802:
3620:
3411:
3190:
2341:
2290:
2211:
1604:
226:. I am a regular there and received several awards such as Mary Wollstonecraft Award and Precious Award. I am also a regular at
4302:
3263:
3148:
3132:
3022:
2588:
2057:
2023:
5191:
Comment: To avoid propagation of this gender identity here I would note nom. seems to identify the gender of the candidate as
4794:
4445:
4335:
3555:
3513:
3492:
3428:
2984:
2639:
2452:
1092:
generally abide by the wishes of an article's subject when it comes to issues such as their date of birth and pronoun choices.
455:
personal message to the editor explaining why I undid their changes and offering help and assistance in case they needed any.
5048:
3572:
3005:
1807:
1380:
3079:
age, the user's edits show experience and nothing appears to be concerning to me. Additionally, the significant activity at
2859:
clear net positive - competent and willing to reflect on her contributions. The AfD votes in the oppose don't trouble me. --
3593:
3309:
based mainly on support by people whose opinions I have come to trust, and what a fairly superficial check can show. Ā· Ā· Ā·
1767:
1577:
1563:
1292:
5183:
4542:
2713:
2250:
4665:, I haven't looked into this particular case, but surely one goes beyond a Google Web search when assessing notability?
2046:. However, the candidate has proven to be willing to admit they were wrong which is a good quality in an admin. Regards
4820:
To be clear, is the substance of your vote that you oppose any candidate who indicates that they are open to recall? --
359:. Within this topic I have created many articles among which almost all the biographies of the current members of the
5775:
5753:
5592:
5323:
5277:
4145:
3297:
2916:
1432:
1352:
1278:
800:
87:
401:
perform to the benefit of the community, they should resign. If I am elected, I will list myself under the terms of
5643:
5220:
4860:), it leads to a long pointless discussion every time, and I'm sorry I started that already so please let's not. --
2523:
2503:
1706:
853:? In your opinion, would meeting an SNG but not meeting the GNG automatically merit inclusion in the encyclopedia?
121:
33:
17:
2678:
Good answers to questions and, in Ritchie's words, "consistently polite, courteous and welcoming". No concerns. ā
1084:
I hate to seemed nitpicky, but this is something I feel I have to ask. Question 15 comments on your edits over at
433:
4752:
4699:
4518:
3636:
is to support, and I see no reason to make an exception with Less Unless. Seems well qualified to wield the mop.
1966:
1762:
1463:
1218:
What are your thoughts on blocking experienced editors and content creators for repeatedly violating Knowledge's
3118:- endorsed by editors I trust, and based on what I've seen of her contributions, she is an excellent candidate.
1316:
4967:
think in terms of "I used to be a man and now I'm a woman", but some people find that idea very disrespectful.)
3895:
2403:
2332:
for meeting my minimums and no big deal. I too do not recall seeing them around but there's nothing to oppose.
5159:
5692:
5131:
4987:
Use gendered words only if they reflect the person's latest self-identification as reported in recent sources
1827:
4692:
4349:
community has shown they support and nothing leads me to oppose. Preemptive congrats for gaining the tools.
4200:
3850:
1726:
1530:
4834:
No. There are ways it can be written that make it clear the "pledgor" realizes the "pledge" is toothless.
1473:
4297:
3883:
2499:
2075:
2019:
1743:
1557:
673:
3374:
I see nothing to oppose here. Candidate seems unlikely to run with scissors, and I particularly liked "
5799:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
5717:
5563:
5422:
5373:
4748:
4710:
4695:
4514:
4441:
3509:
2635:
2107:
5250:, is there something you're trying to get at in your Q13 that wasn't dealt with in the answer to Q3?
5179:
4721:
a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search
4538:
4102:
3733:
3223:
3002:
2748:
1406:
1373:
1337:
1310:
4715:
I don't know if you mean to be implying that a normal Google search only is the full requirement of
1046:. Suppose you are the first admin looking at the AIV after the request was filed, what will you do?
5727:
5703:
5688:
5481:
5127:
3987:
3970:
3589:
3106:
2320:
1573:
1447:
1427:
1260:
1076:
72:
1042:
warning (after many user told them to not to edit other users userpage) and have been reported to
5200:
4884:
4416:
3846:
3781:
3329:
3276:
3129:
2944:
2706:
2242:
1786:
1722:
1526:
1422:
796:
684:
585:
1184:? (It would be nice to have more admins where these practices are baked in, is all(!)). Thanks!
4674:
4486:
4316:
4017:
3880:
2371:
2066:, so perhaps we should resist trying to categorise the candidate as inclusionist/deletionist. ā
1998:
1909:
1875:
1849:
1755:ā They are a fine editor and a net positive to the project. I have no reason to trust them any
1739:
1036:
303:
These are basically my guidelines in every misunderstanding and they have always worked for me.
5144:
issues, I see Less's positive and frequent WiR contributions. So, I find myself neutral here.
4498:
Good answers and the support of these noms gives me confidence you'll do great. Best of luck!
5771:
5749:
5396:
5319:
5273:
5017:
4943:
4653:
4619:
delete cases and do not require paragraph arguments, especially when we're talking about the
4397:
4233:
4162:
4141:
3699:
3313:
3293:
2921:
2782:
2731:
2422:
2354:
2102:
1947:
1686:
1499:
1272:
1245:
1196:
1135:
1062:
1010:
972:
937:
895:
819:
763:
731:
693:
609:
551:
518:
460:
447:
437:
410:
368:
161:
81:
5623:
4920:
1485:
1401:
94:, and itās nice to see prolific editors in that project offer their services for adminship.
5641:
5218:
5171:
4593:
4530:
4271:
4090:
3941:
3750:
3729:
3680:
3466:
3442:
3243:
3089:
3056:
2864:
2743:
2686:
2664:
a solid qualified wikipedian who is eager to take responsibility and do more... positive --
2539:
2224:
2130:
1704:
1366:
788:
119:
4584:
4574:
3393:. I have been impressed by the nuance and depth to the answers by Less Unless, and I echo
3255:- Qualified candidate, here for the right reasons and has a good grasp on our principles.
2315:
Very impressed by the quality of the noms, and the candidate herself seems up to the task.
1468:
1304:
292:
Itās always important to clarify things that you feel you might have not understood fully.
8:
5778:) Note: I will be taking a vacation in July and August. I won't edit during my vacation.
5756:) Note: I will be taking a vacation in July and August. I won't edit during my vacation.
5627:
5236:
4910:
4865:
4839:
4825:
4811:
4803:
4561:
4505:
4371:
4248:
4179:
4119:
3983:
3966:
3908:
3764:
3716:
3663:
3581:
3382:
3359:
3346:
3102:
2828:
2807:
2465:
2388:
2316:
2168:
1963:
1930:
1922:
1569:
1513:
672:. Another thing to remember with these types of articles is the duration of coverage per
474:
143:
45:
4688:
3397:'s words ā it's certainly something worth keeping in mind as we build the encyclopedia.
1156:
that other editors could incorporate into their average daily editing - things like the
1005:
so asking a more experienced admin(s) to help would be the best choice as I see it now.
5735:
5663:
5581:
5540:
5488:
5471:
5441:
5338:
5299:
5255:
5209:
5196:
5175:
4880:
4690:
4631:
4587:
4534:
4468:
4411:
4384:
3777:
3526:
3325:
3272:
3218:
2935:
2896:
2881:
2846:
2764:
2701:
2669:
2601:
2562:
2476:
2268:
2237:
2149:
2090:
2030:
1782:
1650:
1634:
1348:
877:
5053:
What, you can't have a TWA badge on your userpage now if you want to become an admin?
4596:
4590:
5149:
5066:
4787:
4670:
4482:
4309:
4074:
4014:
3867:
3814:
3204:
3162:
3080:
3035:
2958:
2795:
2652:
2436:- Experienced editor, don't see any reason why she cannot be trusted with the mop. -
2367:
2184:
1995:
1982:
1905:
1892:
1871:
1841:
1823:
1668:
1617:
1543:
951:
677:
339:
Thank you for the question. The most recent article that I am very satisfied with is
106:
4974:
when they are referred to by pronouns other than their currently-identifying set(s).
3538:- good work at AFD in addition to content creation work, I am happy to support. --
5767:
5745:
5610:
5392:
5358:
5315:
5287:
5269:
5247:
5113:
5103:
5013:
5000:
4971:
4954:
4939:
4930:
4734:
4716:
4684:
4666:
4649:
4393:
4350:
4230:
4196:
4158:
4132:
4059:
4001:
3833:
3798:
3407:
3310:
3289:
3184:
2911:
2778:
2728:
2629:
2416:
2350:
2337:
2286:
2204:
1943:
1682:
1599:
1495:
1268:
1241:
1192:
1131:
1085:
1058:
1006:
968:
933:
918:
909:
891:
881:
868:
815:
792:
777:
759:
727:
689:
669:
605:
547:
514:
499:
456:
406:
364:
344:
223:
202:
157:
91:
77:
5466:
do what she clearly has said she would do, and that's consult with other editors.
4694:
Fundamentally, I don't really see how those AfDs could be replied to differently.
2823:- I don't think I've encountered them before but the response to Q6 is excellent.
5655:
5636:
5213:
5058:
4779:
4293:
4267:
3954:
3937:
3746:
3676:
3633:
3457:
3434:
3239:
3126:
3085:
3050:
3018:
2860:
2679:
2583:
2535:
2516:
2220:
2120:
2071:
2052:
2015:
1699:
1551:
1160:
861:
661:
657:
640:
584:. And, indeed that may be true, but one of the most important guidelines here is
532:
490:
356:
227:
114:
5713:
5559:
5418:
5369:
5232:
4906:
4876:
4861:
4835:
4821:
4807:
4624:
4556:
4500:
4437:
4367:
4330:
4245:
4175:
4115:
4041:
4028:
3760:
3712:
3659:
3629:
3547:
3505:
3488:
3424:
3394:
3379:
3342:
2824:
2801:
2485:
2461:
2443:
2384:
2162:
1960:
1926:
1509:
1177:
872:
581:
470:
424:
382:
348:
139:
59:
5812:
5793:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
5763:
5731:
5659:
5577:
5536:
5501:
5484:
5467:
5437:
5334:
5309:
5295:
5265:
5251:
5086:
5044:
4724:
4662:
4642:
4627:
4608:
3568:
3522:
2998:
2892:
2877:
2841:
2760:
2665:
2597:
2552:
2398:
2264:
2145:
1867:
1803:
1646:
1630:
1223:
1219:
1170:
1053:
1043:
995:
884:, and the question is if technically meeting a requirement is enough to pass.
850:
846:
842:
653:
340:
257:
Wikipedia_talk:Wiki_Loves_Pride#Flag_transgender_biography_created_this_month
231:
198:
194:
190:
135:
98:
4723:(other search engines are available). Almost everyone reading this also has
4555:
I am happy to support because no significant problems have been identified.
2876:. Content creation? Building the encyclopedia? Exactly what I look for.
109:, which I didnāt even know existed, helping to fix up problematic articles.
5632:
5604:, than not try. At least that gives me some feedback and way to improve. ā
5412:(also, not particularly cis-type myself, though that isn't really relevant)
5145:
4982:
4455:
4214:
4070:
3863:
3811:
3641:
3200:
3031:
2648:
1978:
1888:
1816:
1663:
1613:
871:
that may differ depending on the subject. For example if the subject meets
565:
5631:
person to write this story?" Was I over-doing it? Was this just glorified
4989:. (In this case, use "she/her" not "he/him" throughout the given article.)
4929:. This is probably closer to a support than to an oppose, but I find the
2460:
Candidate is a valuable contributor and I trust her with the admin tools.
5651:
5605:
5535:
sake. Trans Allies for Trump could hold their meetings in a phone booth.
4995:
4729:
4192:
4056:
3997:
3829:
3794:
3607:
3403:
3178:
2333:
2282:
2199:
1590:
1210:
833:
5100:
Neutral, though could change based on what the candidate may later state
2647:
a review of their edit history and talk page gives me every confidence.
5573:
5436:
I know how I can avoid making any mistakes editing about trans people.
5054:
5034:
4775:
4284:
4228:
Top-notch editor with the skills and aptitude to become a great admin.
3256:
3141:
3119:
3014:
2578:
2236:
not familiar with their work, but I respect and trust both nominators.
2067:
2047:
2011:
2006:
Solid editor, good attitude to discussions, able to change their mind.
1547:
1153:
636:
623:
3072:
A very good candidate, though the concern brought up in opposition by
2198:: good temperament, excellent content creation, need for the tools. ā
189:
Generally, I try to contribute to different areas ā content creation,
5803:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
5709:
5684:
5555:
5414:
5365:
4432:
4327:
3540:
3501:
3484:
3420:
2978:
2623:
2615:
2437:
707:
54:
589:
guidelines we should base every discussion on, not personal beliefs.
5081:
5039:
3564:
2994:
1887:
as clearly a good candidate who you benefit from admin privileges.
1799:
1351:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
1181:
845:, how would you close an AfD where there was a tension between the
352:
325:
1358:
4963:
while. (Particularly older generations of trans people sometimes
3845:
who engages in clean up and likes tag free articles... go for it.
3793:
based on excellent nominator and candidate appears to have clue.
5602:
Talk:Pickle Rick#Problematic racism so typical of Rick and Morty
4366:
Looks fine, and the candidate has agreed to be open to recall.
4097:
2976:- No concerns. I think this candidate will do a great job. --
2840:
Another editor I've never come across. Looks acceptable to me.
222:
I am most proud of the articles created, especially within the
5333:
Aight, well, they've answered your question so it's moot now.
4212:
Well-rounded editor; will benefit the project with the tools.
2263:
yet another excellent candidate from the BK49/R333 franchise.
2062:
I don't think a real deletionist would have argued to keep at
1182:
using italics and bold where single or double quotes should be
154:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
436:ā one of the four times you've used rollback ā eligible per
1112:
1099:
Presentation might change, but identity typically doesn't.
680:
brought up by other users and I still hold to this opinion.
540:
Just curious, what is the meaning/origin of your username?
5037:
on this, but not strongly enough for an outright "nay". ā
4013:- yes, no problem, we need more admins, especially women.
1716:. Looks like a solid contributor. As a participant in the
5121:
time in their life when they consider themselves to have
4600:
she just goes about competently building the encyclopedia
502:
would you, in your opinion, remark to me most important?
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
3358:- A net positive candidate nominated by 2 trusted users
3074:
860:
SNGs are subordinated to GNG, there are exceptions like
216:
What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?
183:
What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
633:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Murder of Jaslyn Adams
403:
Knowledge:Administrators open to recall/Sample process
3907:
Competent and will be a great boon to the project. ā
3982:
Because I love piling on. Also, she does good work.
3675:- seems to be a useful addition to the admin corps.
2934:. Looks like an excellent candidate. Best of luck. ā
841:
Hello, Less. Given your stated intention to work in
3996:Excellent to see qualified people being nominated!
3271:I trust the noms; no concerns that I could find.--
4879:might answer no to the question if we ran for RFA.
676:. Having conducted such an analysis I agreed with
311:You may ask optional questions below. There is a
5810:
5572:I held off for weeks on moving to article space
4970:Many/most transgender people find it to trigger
3953:Seems sufficiently chill and trustworthy to me.
1335:Edit summary usage for Less Unless can be found
392:Category:Knowledge administrators open to recall
4191:Very happy with her answers and contributions.
1030:You are a lovely admin, keep up your good work!
251:admitted mine and learned from them, like with
1840:per noms and PMC. No risk, net positive, etc.
4307:Looks good. Best of luck in your new role! ā
4039:per nominators and the quality of her edits.
3456:for a qualified candidate. Happy to pile on.
3288:- Looks like this user would be a good admin.
2108:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!
1904:No reason to think they'd misuse the tools.
1546:justifies a "need for the tools" by itself.
1374:
2040:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Teresa Okure
1024:A newly registered user edits your userpage
103:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Teresa Okure
5292:and how will you deal with it in the future
5268:: Just asking about dealing with disputes.
4467:per noms and above. Welcome to the corp! --
2575:- Very efficient contributor and reviewer.
2064:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Tom Miranda
2044:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ture i Berg
3628:My default position for any RfA co-nom by
1870:together, feel free to help towards GA. --
1759:presented with evidence contrary to that.
1381:
1367:
53:Final (160/4/4); Closed as successful by ā
4242:Per her user talk archives; no concerns.
67:Scheduled to end 03:46, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
5590:I felt similarly when recently creating
1347:Please keep discussion constructive and
4174:Thanks for volunteering and good luck.
2534:Looks okay to me. We need more admins.
14:
5811:
5012:Yeah, that about captures it; thanks.
4857:, and of course the currently-running
4802:Pledges to be open to recall are made
4683:A quick Google is the requirement per
3216:will be a net-positive to the project.
90:)Ā ā Iāve been a longtime supporter of
4069:ā seems totally alright, good luck --
3399:Mixing up significance and notability
2515:Another Ritchie/Barkeep wombo combo!
1362:
987:2409:4054:21D:BFD1:406A:4E8F:CBD4:16D
851:subject-specific notability guideline
253:WP:Articles_for_deletion/Teresa_Okure
5554:than occasionally getting it wrong.
2727:. Not bad! Thanks for volunteering.
469:Thanks for the thoughtful response!
282:Discuss the subject, not each other.
5526:Clearly, Less Unless' response was
1388:
631:On April 27 you !voted 'delete' in
23:
3862:-- No reason for me to oppose. --
2551:Trustworthy, good work all around
1568:A fellow Barkeepian candidate! Ā ā
1191:definitely out of my comfort zone.
785:How will you deal with disputes?
24:
5830:
5819:Successful requests for adminship
5593:Fierce Femmes and Notorious Liars
3745:Can be trusted with the tools. --
3013:a good candidate. No concerns. --
864:, which is an alternative to GNG.
604:Sorry if I rambled for too long)
5357:Are all the questions regarding
5079:their userpage during an RfA. ā
4383:Sounds good, good quality edits
4261:
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
5622:I felt similarly when rescuing
3879:- Good editor, net positive. š
3047:A good candidate, no concerns.
4669:makes a very good point here.
1525:- any candidate of Barkeep's ā
683:As a comparison, this article
13:
1:
4157:. Fully qualified candidate.
1942:, good editor, net positive.
1154:accessibility manual of style
814:appropriate in our community.
105:. Sheās also participated in
3324:--- an excellent candidate.
847:general notability guideline
7:
3776:. Seems sound on policies.
390:If promoted, will you join
172:Questions for the candidate
10:
5835:
3580:- Would improve wikipedia
3483:. I don't see any issues.
1176:templates, the removal of
361:National Council of Monaco
129:Co-nomination by Barkeep49
2397:Thanks for volunteering!
1456:
1415:
1394:
1032:. But they have received
5796:Please do not modify it.
5780:22:19, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
5758:22:19, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
5740:17:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5722:16:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5697:16:41, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5668:17:56, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
5646:13:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
5618:12:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
5586:20:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5568:18:11, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5545:17:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5493:16:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5476:16:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5446:16:55, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5427:16:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5401:14:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5378:12:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5343:18:32, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
5328:18:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
5304:18:19, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
5282:17:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
5260:17:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
5241:22:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5223:09:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5205:06:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
5154:22:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
5136:16:08, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
5091:21:39, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
5074:06:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
5049:14:48, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
5022:14:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
5008:12:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
4948:03:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
4915:21:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
4889:17:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4870:12:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4844:12:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4830:12:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4816:11:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4795:05:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
4757:17:36, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
4742:12:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
4704:11:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
4679:18:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
4658:12:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
4636:00:44, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
4614:20:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
4569:01:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
4547:01:12, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
4523:22:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
4510:18:03, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
4491:17:28, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
4481:not a jerk, has a clue.
4477:13:33, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
4460:13:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
4446:09:59, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
4423:09:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
4402:09:08, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
4376:01:36, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
4359:21:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4336:15:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4319:14:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4303:13:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4276:08:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4254:06:16, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4238:04:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4221:03:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4205:01:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4184:00:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
4167:21:42, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
4150:20:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
4124:20:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
4106:16:57, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
4079:16:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
4062:15:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
4048:09:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
4032:09:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
4020:08:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
4006:03:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
3992:00:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
3975:00:50, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
3958:23:29, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
3946:23:19, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
3929:22:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
3900:16:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
3872:14:06, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
3855:10:25, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
3838:10:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
3820:10:00, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
3803:09:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
3786:02:54, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
3769:01:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
3755:00:08, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
3738:23:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3721:21:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3704:18:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3685:18:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3668:18:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3651:17:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3621:15:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3598:14:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3573:14:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3556:12:30, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3531:04:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3514:03:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3493:02:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3476:02:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3449:01:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
3429:22:43, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3412:22:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3386:22:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3367:20:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3351:20:12, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3334:19:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3317:18:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3302:18:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3281:18:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3264:17:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3248:14:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3231:14:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3209:14:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3191:14:12, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3170:13:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3161:will make a great sysop.
3149:12:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3133:12:26, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3111:10:26, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3101:Keep up the good work..
3094:08:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3065:07:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3040:07:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3023:06:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
3006:04:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
2985:04:33, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
2969:04:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
2950:04:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
2927:01:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
2901:11:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
2886:00:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
2869:00:26, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
2852:00:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
2833:00:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
2816:22:32, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2794:I've seen her around at
2787:20:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2769:20:48, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2754:19:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2735:19:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2720:19:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2691:19:11, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2674:18:36, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2657:18:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2640:17:44, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2606:17:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2589:17:29, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2568:17:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2544:17:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2527:16:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2508:16:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2491:15:33, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2470:15:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2453:15:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2429:14:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2408:14:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2393:14:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2376:13:44, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2359:13:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2342:13:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2325:13:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2308:12:09, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2291:11:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2273:11:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2256:11:30, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2229:11:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2212:10:48, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2191:10:39, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2175:10:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2154:09:49, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2138:09:43, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2113:09:39, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2094:09:02, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2080:09:06, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2058:09:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2024:08:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2002:08:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1987:08:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1970:08:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1959:. Nothing suspicious. --
1952:08:49, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1935:08:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1914:08:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1897:07:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1880:07:38, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1866:and trusted. We work on
1855:07:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1833:06:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1808:06:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1791:06:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1774:06:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1748:06:06, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1731:05:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1709:04:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1691:04:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1674:04:32, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1655:04:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1639:04:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1622:04:09, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1605:03:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1582:03:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1564:03:57, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1534:03:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1518:03:46, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
1504:02:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
1250:05:46, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
1201:05:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
1140:05:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
1075:Optional questions from
1067:04:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
1028:. Everytime they write:
1015:15:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
977:15:12, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
942:22:04, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
900:22:00, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
824:17:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
805:15:35, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
768:17:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
736:17:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
706:Optional questions from
698:15:32, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
645:12:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
614:12:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
556:08:32, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
523:08:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
479:15:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
465:15:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
432:Thanks for running. Was
415:06:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
373:05:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
166:19:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
148:17:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
124:14:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
63:04:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
3658:- Seems fine. Why not?
1798:. Qualified candidate!
1266:Links for Less Unless:
1209:Optional question from
1180:and the improvement of
985:Optional question from
950:Optional question from
908:Optional question from
832:Optional question from
776:Optional question from
685:Murder of Joanna Yeates
622:Optional question from
564:Optional question from
531:Optional question from
489:Optional question from
423:Optional question from
381:Optional question from
324:Optional question from
38:Please do not modify it
4055:āEminently qualified.
2891:their wikipedia time.
2500:Pharaoh of the Wizards
1681:Keep up the good work
5464:without being able to
5195:in the introduction.
4749:ProcrastinatingReader
4725:The Knowledge Library
4719:, but it is actually
4711:ProcrastinatingReader
4696:ProcrastinatingReader
4515:ProcrastinatingReader
3965:What's not to like?--
1629:Looks alright to me.
994:Somehow, you granted
448:Jingle Ball Tour 2016
99:Articles for deletion
34:request for adminship
4981:In terms of policy,
3563:- looks fine to me.
2910:- no issues at all.
1764:TheĀ MostĀ Comfortable
1469:Global contributions
674:WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE
5728:Ineffablebookkeeper
5704:Ineffablebookkeeper
5689:Ineffablebookkeeper
5628:Annie Yellowe Palma
5482:Ineffablebookkeeper
5460:IneffableBookkeeper
5128:Ineffablebookkeeper
4804:ad captandum vulgus
4231:Mark D Worthen PsyD
2484:- looks promising.
1589:, this seems fine.
1428:Non-automated edits
1353:their contributions
1077:Ineffablebookkeeper
996:Mass message sender
668:lasting effect per
136:reviewer permission
107:WikiProject Cleanup
5624:Ika HĆ¼gel-Marshall
3847:Paradise Chronicle
3482:
2613:enthusiastically.
2161:- no qualms here.
1723:Extraordinary Writ
1407:Edit summary usage
1355:before commenting.
1224:no personal attack
39:
5448:
5413:
5174:comment added by
5072:
4793:
4612:
4611:}} me in replies)
4533:comment added by
4333:
4108:
3647:
3596:
3480:
3341:--- No concerns.
3226:
3123:
3061:
2948:
2759:when it happens.
2622:
2586:
2480:
2300:ą²®ą²²ą³ą²Øą²¾ą²”ą²¾ą²ą³ ą²ą³ą²ą²ą³ą²£ą³
2111:
2034:
1831:
1740:TheBirdsShedTears
1544:Knowledge:Cleanup
1508:As co-nom. Best,
1482:
1481:
849:and the relevant
791:comment added by
37:
5826:
5798:
5776:My Contributions
5766:(courtesy ping)
5754:My Contributions
5707:
5613:
5512:
5435:
5411:
5359:Erica Rutherford
5324:My Contributions
5278:My Contributions
5187:
5160:General comments
5084:
5070:
5062:
5042:
5003:
4972:gender dysphoria
4958:
4931:Erica Rutherford
4791:
4783:
4737:
4714:
4646:
4606:
4601:
4566:
4564:Let's discuss it
4549:
4474:
4471:
4419:
4414:
4409:good candidate.
4331:
4312:
4289:
4265:
4264:
4252:
4236:
4217:
4138:
4135:
4104:
4100:
4093:
4044:
3925:
3920:
3913:
3817:
3646:
3644:
3639:
3616:
3613:
3610:
3588:
3586:
3552:
3551:
3545:
3544:
3471:
3462:
3439:
3364:
3298:My Contributions
3261:
3229:
3224:
3221:
3187:
3181:
3167:
3124:
3121:
3077:
3062:
3059:
3055:
3053:
2981:
2966:
2965:
2962:
2942:
2940:
2924:
2919:
2914:
2849:
2844:
2814:
2810:
2804:
2751:
2746:
2742:- Net positive.
2716:
2711:
2704:
2682:
2620:
2587:
2582:
2565:
2560:
2521:
2474:
2451:
2446:
2440:
2425:
2419:
2253:
2245:
2207:
2187:
2171:
2165:
2133:
2125:
2124:
2105:
2103:The Rambling Man
2055:
2050:
2028:
1847:
1844:
1821:
1819:
1772:
1718:Teresa Okure AfD
1671:
1666:
1597:
1560:
1554:
1423:Articles created
1383:
1376:
1369:
1360:
1359:
1340:
1332:
1291:
1175:
1169:
1165:
1159:
1086:Erica Rutherford
1041:
1035:
919:Erica Rutherford
807:
778:User:StarshipSLS
586:WP:Verifiability
345:Bessie Van Vorst
320:
5834:
5833:
5829:
5828:
5827:
5825:
5824:
5823:
5809:
5808:
5807:
5801:this nomination
5794:
5701:
5611:
5518:My concern, my
5510:
5169:
5162:
5080:
5064:
5038:
5001:
4952:
4923:
4785:
4735:
4708:
4640:
4599:
4577:
4562:
4528:
4472:
4469:
4417:
4412:
4332:ādistƦnt writeā
4310:
4301:
4285:
4262:
4243:
4229:
4215:
4136:
4133:
4098:
4091:
4042:
3921:
3914:
3909:
3815:
3759:No concerns. --
3730:Devonian Wombat
3642:
3640:
3614:
3611:
3608:
3582:
3549:
3548:
3542:
3541:
3529:
3469:
3460:
3435:
3360:
3311:Peter Southwood
3257:
3238:- Certainly. ā-
3220:Ā«Ā Gonzo fan2007
3219:
3217:
3185:
3179:
3163:
3120:
3073:
3057:
3051:
3049:
2979:
2963:
2960:
2959:
2936:
2922:
2917:
2912:
2847:
2842:
2808:
2802:
2799:
2749:
2745:Nova Crystallis
2744:
2714:
2707:
2702:
2680:
2576:
2563:
2553:
2517:
2449:
2448:
2444:
2438:
2423:
2417:
2406:
2249:
2241:
2205:
2185:
2169:
2163:
2131:
2122:
2121:
2053:
2048:
1994:- no concerns.
1852:
1845:
1842:
1817:
1760:
1669:
1664:
1591:
1558:
1552:
1550:(power~enwiki,
1488:
1483:
1478:
1452:
1411:
1390:
1389:RfA/RfB toolbox
1387:
1336:
1284:
1267:
1263:
1173:
1167:
1163:
1157:
1039:
1033:
786:
310:
174:
75:
50:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
5832:
5822:
5821:
5806:
5805:
5790:
5789:
5788:
5787:
5786:
5785:
5784:
5783:
5782:
5724:
5682:
5681:
5680:
5679:
5678:
5677:
5676:
5675:
5674:
5673:
5672:
5671:
5670:
5524:
5516:
5505:
5498:
5497:
5496:
5495:
5454:
5453:
5452:
5451:
5450:
5449:
5430:
5429:
5404:
5403:
5381:
5380:
5354:
5353:
5352:
5351:
5350:
5349:
5348:
5347:
5346:
5345:
5228:
5227:
5226:
5225:
5166:
5165:
5161:
5158:
5157:
5156:
5138:
5097:
5096:
5095:
5094:
5093:
5028:
5027:
5026:
5025:
5024:
4992:
4991:
4990:
4979:
4975:
4968:
4922:
4919:
4918:
4917:
4895:
4894:
4893:
4892:
4891:
4848:
4847:
4846:
4797:
4769:
4768:
4767:
4766:
4765:
4764:
4763:
4762:
4761:
4760:
4759:
4660:
4576:
4573:
4572:
4571:
4550:
4527:Kirbopher2004
4525:
4512:
4493:
4479:
4462:
4448:
4425:
4404:
4387:
4378:
4361:
4344:
4338:
4321:
4305:
4291:
4278:
4256:
4240:
4223:
4207:
4186:
4169:
4152:
4131:. No issues. ā
4126:
4109:
4092:P.I.Ā Ellsworth
4081:
4064:
4050:
4034:
4022:
4008:
3994:
3984:Scorpions13256
3977:
3960:
3948:
3931:
3902:
3874:
3857:
3840:
3822:
3805:
3788:
3771:
3757:
3740:
3723:
3706:
3687:
3670:
3653:
3623:
3600:
3584:TigerScientist
3575:
3558:
3533:
3525:
3516:
3495:
3478:
3451:
3431:
3414:
3388:
3369:
3353:
3336:
3319:
3304:
3283:
3266:
3250:
3233:
3211:
3193:
3177:, looks good.
3172:
3151:
3145:
3135:
3113:
3103:Powerful Karma
3096:
3067:
3042:
3025:
3008:
2987:
2971:
2952:
2929:
2905:
2904:
2903:
2871:
2854:
2835:
2818:
2789:
2771:
2756:
2737:
2722:
2693:
2676:
2659:
2642:
2608:
2591:
2570:
2546:
2529:
2510:
2493:
2472:
2455:
2442:
2431:
2410:
2402:
2395:
2378:
2361:
2344:
2327:
2317:Jackattack1597
2310:
2293:
2275:
2258:
2231:
2214:
2193:
2177:
2156:
2140:
2115:
2096:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2026:
2004:
1989:
1972:
1954:
1937:
1916:
1899:
1882:
1857:
1850:
1835:
1810:
1793:
1776:
1750:
1738:per Barkeep49
1733:
1711:
1698:as nominator.
1693:
1676:
1657:
1641:
1624:
1607:
1584:
1570:John M Wolfson
1566:
1536:
1520:
1506:
1487:
1484:
1480:
1479:
1477:
1476:
1471:
1466:
1460:
1458:
1454:
1453:
1451:
1450:
1445:
1440:
1435:
1430:
1425:
1419:
1417:
1413:
1412:
1410:
1409:
1404:
1398:
1396:
1392:
1391:
1386:
1385:
1378:
1371:
1363:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1333:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1238:
1234:
1213:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1178:false headings
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1127:
1123:
1108:
1104:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1079:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1019:
1018:
1017:
989:
982:
981:
980:
979:
954:
947:
946:
945:
944:
929:
912:
905:
904:
903:
902:
888:
885:
865:
836:
829:
828:
827:
826:
780:
773:
772:
771:
770:
756:
741:
740:
739:
738:
723:
710:
703:
702:
701:
700:
681:
665:
626:
619:
618:
617:
616:
602:
598:
594:
590:
568:
561:
560:
559:
558:
535:
528:
527:
526:
525:
510:
493:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
452:
438:WP:ROLLBACKUSE
427:
420:
419:
418:
417:
385:
378:
377:
376:
375:
349:Ottilie Baader
328:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
290:
286:
283:
280:
272:
271:
270:
269:
263:
262:
261:
260:
238:
237:
236:
235:
210:
209:
208:
207:
173:
170:
169:
168:
131:
130:
74:
71:
49:
44:
43:
42:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5831:
5820:
5817:
5816:
5814:
5804:
5802:
5797:
5791:
5781:
5777:
5773:
5769:
5765:
5761:
5760:
5759:
5755:
5751:
5747:
5743:
5742:
5741:
5737:
5733:
5729:
5725:
5723:
5719:
5715:
5711:
5708:fair enough.
5705:
5700:
5699:
5698:
5694:
5690:
5686:
5683:
5669:
5665:
5661:
5657:
5653:
5649:
5648:
5647:
5644:
5642:
5640:
5639:
5634:
5629:
5625:
5621:
5620:
5619:
5615:
5614:
5607:
5603:
5599:
5595:
5594:
5589:
5588:
5587:
5583:
5579:
5575:
5571:
5570:
5569:
5565:
5561:
5557:
5553:
5548:
5547:
5546:
5542:
5538:
5533:
5532:
5529:
5525:
5521:
5517:
5514:
5506:
5503:
5500:
5499:
5494:
5490:
5486:
5483:
5479:
5478:
5477:
5473:
5469:
5465:
5461:
5456:
5455:
5447:
5443:
5439:
5434:
5433:
5432:
5431:
5428:
5424:
5420:
5416:
5408:
5407:
5406:
5405:
5402:
5398:
5394:
5390:
5385:
5384:
5383:
5382:
5379:
5375:
5371:
5367:
5363:
5360:
5356:
5355:
5344:
5340:
5336:
5332:
5331:
5330:
5329:
5325:
5321:
5317:
5311:
5307:
5306:
5305:
5301:
5297:
5293:
5289:
5285:
5284:
5283:
5279:
5275:
5271:
5267:
5263:
5262:
5261:
5257:
5253:
5249:
5245:
5244:
5243:
5242:
5238:
5234:
5224:
5221:
5219:
5217:
5216:
5211:
5210:Djm-leighpark
5208:
5207:
5206:
5202:
5198:
5197:Djm-leighpark
5194:
5190:
5189:
5188:
5185:
5181:
5177:
5176:Kirbopher2004
5173:
5164:
5163:
5155:
5151:
5147:
5142:
5139:
5137:
5133:
5129:
5124:
5120:
5115:
5110:
5105:
5101:
5098:
5092:
5088:
5083:
5077:
5076:
5075:
5068:
5060:
5056:
5052:
5051:
5050:
5046:
5041:
5036:
5032:
5029:
5023:
5019:
5015:
5011:
5010:
5009:
5005:
5004:
4997:
4993:
4988:
4984:
4980:
4976:
4973:
4969:
4966:
4961:
4960:
4956:
4951:
4950:
4949:
4945:
4941:
4937:
4932:
4928:
4925:
4924:
4916:
4912:
4908:
4903:
4899:
4896:
4890:
4886:
4882:
4881:Djm-leighpark
4878:
4873:
4872:
4871:
4867:
4863:
4859:
4856:
4854:
4852:
4849:
4845:
4841:
4837:
4833:
4832:
4831:
4827:
4823:
4819:
4818:
4817:
4813:
4809:
4805:
4801:
4798:
4796:
4789:
4781:
4777:
4773:
4770:
4758:
4754:
4750:
4745:
4744:
4743:
4739:
4738:
4731:
4726:
4722:
4718:
4712:
4707:
4706:
4705:
4701:
4697:
4693:
4691:
4689:
4686:
4682:
4681:
4680:
4676:
4672:
4668:
4664:
4661:
4659:
4655:
4651:
4644:
4639:
4638:
4637:
4633:
4629:
4625:
4622:
4617:
4616:
4615:
4610:
4605:
4597:
4594:
4591:
4588:
4585:
4582:
4579:
4578:
4570:
4567:
4565:
4560:
4559:
4554:
4551:
4548:
4544:
4540:
4536:
4535:Kirbopher2004
4532:
4526:
4524:
4520:
4516:
4513:
4511:
4507:
4503:
4502:
4497:
4494:
4492:
4488:
4484:
4480:
4478:
4475:
4466:
4463:
4461:
4458:
4457:
4452:
4449:
4447:
4443:
4442:contributions
4439:
4435:
4434:
4429:
4426:
4424:
4421:
4420:
4415:
4408:
4405:
4403:
4399:
4395:
4391:
4388:
4386:
4385:Erik Sergeant
4382:
4379:
4377:
4373:
4369:
4365:
4362:
4360:
4357:
4356:
4355:
4348:
4345:
4342:
4339:
4337:
4334:
4329:
4325:
4322:
4320:
4317:
4314:
4313:
4306:
4304:
4299:
4295:
4290:
4288:
4282:
4279:
4277:
4273:
4269:
4260:
4257:
4255:
4250:
4247:
4241:
4239:
4235:
4232:
4227:
4224:
4222:
4219:
4218:
4211:
4208:
4206:
4202:
4198:
4194:
4190:
4187:
4185:
4181:
4177:
4173:
4170:
4168:
4164:
4160:
4156:
4153:
4151:
4147:
4143:
4139:
4130:
4127:
4125:
4121:
4117:
4113:
4110:
4107:
4103:
4101:
4096:
4095:
4094:
4085:
4082:
4080:
4076:
4072:
4068:
4065:
4063:
4060:
4058:
4054:
4051:
4049:
4046:
4045:
4038:
4035:
4033:
4030:
4026:
4023:
4021:
4018:
4016:
4012:
4009:
4007:
4003:
3999:
3995:
3993:
3989:
3985:
3981:
3978:
3976:
3972:
3968:
3964:
3961:
3959:
3956:
3955:Moneytreesšļø
3952:
3949:
3947:
3943:
3939:
3935:
3932:
3930:
3926:
3924:
3919:
3918:
3912:
3906:
3903:
3901:
3898:
3897:
3892:
3891:
3887:
3886:
3882:
3878:
3875:
3873:
3869:
3865:
3861:
3858:
3856:
3852:
3848:
3844:
3841:
3839:
3835:
3831:
3826:
3823:
3821:
3818:
3813:
3809:
3806:
3804:
3800:
3796:
3792:
3789:
3787:
3783:
3779:
3778:Airbornemihir
3775:
3772:
3770:
3766:
3762:
3758:
3756:
3752:
3748:
3744:
3741:
3739:
3735:
3731:
3727:
3724:
3722:
3718:
3714:
3710:
3707:
3705:
3701:
3697:
3696:
3691:
3688:
3686:
3682:
3678:
3674:
3671:
3669:
3665:
3661:
3657:
3654:
3652:
3649:
3648:
3645:
3635:
3631:
3627:
3624:
3622:
3618:
3617:
3604:
3601:
3599:
3595:
3591:
3587:
3585:
3579:
3576:
3574:
3570:
3566:
3562:
3559:
3557:
3554:
3553:
3546:
3537:
3534:
3532:
3528:
3524:
3520:
3517:
3515:
3511:
3507:
3503:
3499:
3496:
3494:
3490:
3486:
3479:
3477:
3474:
3473:
3472:
3465:
3464:
3463:
3455:
3452:
3450:
3446:
3445:
3440:
3438:
3432:
3430:
3426:
3422:
3418:
3415:
3413:
3409:
3405:
3400:
3396:
3392:
3389:
3387:
3384:
3381:
3377:
3373:
3370:
3368:
3365:
3363:
3357:
3354:
3352:
3348:
3344:
3340:
3337:
3335:
3331:
3327:
3326:Chiswick Chap
3323:
3320:
3318:
3314:
3312:
3308:
3305:
3303:
3299:
3295:
3291:
3287:
3284:
3282:
3278:
3274:
3270:
3267:
3265:
3262:
3260:
3254:
3251:
3249:
3245:
3241:
3237:
3234:
3232:
3227:
3222:
3215:
3212:
3210:
3206:
3202:
3197:
3194:
3192:
3188:
3182:
3176:
3173:
3171:
3168:
3166:
3160:
3156:
3152:
3150:
3147:
3146:
3143:
3139:
3136:
3134:
3131:
3128:
3125:
3117:
3114:
3112:
3108:
3104:
3100:
3097:
3095:
3091:
3087:
3082:
3076:
3071:
3068:
3066:
3063:
3060:
3054:
3046:
3043:
3041:
3037:
3033:
3029:
3026:
3024:
3020:
3016:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3004:
3000:
2996:
2991:
2988:
2986:
2983:
2982:
2975:
2972:
2970:
2967:
2956:
2953:
2951:
2946:
2941:
2939:
2938:Novem Linguae
2933:
2930:
2928:
2925:
2920:
2915:
2909:
2906:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2883:
2879:
2875:
2872:
2870:
2866:
2862:
2858:
2855:
2853:
2850:
2845:
2839:
2836:
2834:
2830:
2826:
2822:
2819:
2817:
2813:
2811:
2805:
2797:
2793:
2790:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2775:
2772:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2757:
2755:
2752:
2747:
2741:
2738:
2736:
2733:
2730:
2726:
2723:
2721:
2718:
2717:
2712:
2710:
2705:
2697:
2694:
2692:
2688:
2684:
2677:
2675:
2671:
2667:
2663:
2660:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2643:
2641:
2637:
2634:
2631:
2628:
2625:
2618:
2617:
2612:
2609:
2607:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2592:
2590:
2585:
2581:
2580:
2574:
2571:
2569:
2566:
2561:
2558:
2557:
2550:
2547:
2545:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2530:
2528:
2525:
2522:
2520:
2514:
2511:
2509:
2505:
2501:
2498:net positive.
2497:
2494:
2492:
2489:
2488:
2483:
2478:
2477:edit conflict
2473:
2471:
2467:
2463:
2459:
2456:
2454:
2447:
2441:
2435:
2432:
2430:
2426:
2420:
2414:
2411:
2409:
2405:
2400:
2396:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2379:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2362:
2360:
2356:
2352:
2348:
2345:
2343:
2339:
2335:
2331:
2328:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2314:
2311:
2309:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2294:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2279:
2276:
2274:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2259:
2257:
2254:
2252:
2246:
2244:
2239:
2238:SportingFlyer
2235:
2232:
2230:
2226:
2222:
2218:
2215:
2213:
2209:
2208:
2201:
2197:
2194:
2192:
2189:
2188:
2181:
2178:
2176:
2172:
2166:
2160:
2157:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2144:
2141:
2139:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2126:
2119:
2116:
2114:
2109:
2104:
2100:
2097:
2095:
2092:
2088:
2085:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2056:
2051:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2032:
2031:edit conflict
2027:
2025:
2021:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2003:
2000:
1997:
1993:
1990:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1973:
1971:
1968:
1965:
1962:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1938:
1936:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1900:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1883:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1868:Marita Napier
1865:
1861:
1858:
1856:
1853:
1848:
1839:
1836:
1834:
1829:
1825:
1820:
1814:
1811:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1794:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1783:Djm-leighpark
1780:
1777:
1775:
1771:
1770:
1766:
1765:
1758:
1754:
1751:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1734:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1719:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1703:
1702:
1697:
1694:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1677:
1675:
1672:
1667:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1645:
1642:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1608:
1606:
1603:
1602:
1598:
1596:
1595:
1588:
1585:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1565:
1561:
1555:
1549:
1545:
1540:
1537:
1535:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1521:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1490:
1489:
1475:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1465:
1462:
1461:
1459:
1455:
1449:
1446:
1444:
1441:
1439:
1436:
1434:
1431:
1429:
1426:
1424:
1421:
1420:
1418:
1414:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1399:
1397:
1393:
1384:
1379:
1377:
1372:
1370:
1365:
1364:
1361:
1357:
1356:
1354:
1350:
1339:
1334:
1330:
1327:
1324:
1321:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1309:
1306:
1303:
1300:
1297:
1294:
1290:
1287:
1283:
1280:
1277:
1274:
1270:
1265:
1264:
1258:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1228:
1227:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1189:
1186:
1185:
1183:
1179:
1172:
1162:
1155:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1114:
1109:
1105:
1100:
1098:
1094:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1080:
1078:
1074:
1073:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1051:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1038:
1037:uw-harrass4im
1031:
1027:
1023:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1003:
1000:
999:
997:
993:
990:
988:
984:
983:
978:
974:
970:
965:
962:
961:
958:
955:
953:
949:
948:
943:
939:
935:
930:
926:
923:
922:
920:
916:
913:
911:
907:
906:
901:
897:
893:
889:
886:
883:
879:
874:
870:
866:
863:
858:
855:
854:
852:
848:
844:
840:
837:
835:
831:
830:
825:
821:
817:
812:
809:
808:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
784:
781:
779:
775:
774:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
750:
749:
746:
743:
742:
737:
733:
729:
724:
720:
717:
716:
714:
711:
709:
705:
704:
699:
695:
691:
686:
682:
679:
675:
671:
666:
663:
659:
655:
651:
648:
647:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
627:
625:
621:
620:
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
576:
575:
572:
569:
567:
563:
562:
557:
553:
549:
545:
542:
541:
539:
536:
534:
530:
529:
524:
520:
516:
511:
507:
504:
503:
501:
498:Which of the
497:
494:
492:
488:
487:
480:
476:
472:
468:
467:
466:
462:
458:
453:
449:
445:
442:
441:
439:
435:
431:
428:
426:
422:
421:
416:
412:
408:
404:
399:
396:
395:
393:
389:
386:
384:
380:
379:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
341:Marita Napier
338:
335:
334:
332:
329:
327:
323:
322:
321:
318:
317:two questions
314:
302:
301:
300:
299:
291:
287:
284:
281:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
267:
266:
265:
264:
258:
254:
249:
246:
245:
243:
240:
239:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
215:
212:
211:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
184:
182:
179:
178:
177:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
151:
150:
149:
145:
141:
137:
128:
127:
126:
125:
122:
120:
118:
117:
110:
108:
104:
100:
95:
93:
89:
86:
83:
79:
70:
69:
68:
64:
60:
58:
57:
48:
41:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
5795:
5792:
5637:
5633:mansplaining
5609:
5597:
5591:
5551:
5527:
5519:
5508:
5463:
5388:
5361:
5313:
5291:
5229:
5214:
5192:
5170:āĀ Preceding
5168:Vote for him
5167:
5140:
5122:
5118:
5108:
5099:
5063:(please use
5030:
4999:
4986:
4983:MOS:IDENTITY
4964:
4935:
4926:
4902:particularly
4901:
4897:
4799:
4784:(please use
4771:
4733:
4720:
4671:Phil Bridger
4620:
4580:
4563:
4557:
4552:
4529:āĀ Preceding
4499:
4495:
4483:TonyBallioni
4464:
4454:
4450:
4431:
4430:Definitely.
4427:
4410:
4406:
4389:
4380:
4363:
4353:
4352:
4346:
4340:
4323:
4311:Juliancolton
4308:
4286:
4280:
4258:
4225:
4213:
4209:
4188:
4171:
4154:
4128:
4111:
4089:
4088:
4084:No problemo!
4083:
4066:
4052:
4040:
4036:
4027:. Good luck!
4024:
4015:Carlosguitar
4010:
3979:
3962:
3950:
3933:
3922:
3916:
3915:
3910:
3904:
3894:
3889:
3884:
3876:
3859:
3842:
3824:
3807:
3790:
3773:
3742:
3725:
3708:
3694:
3693:
3689:
3672:
3655:
3638:
3637:
3625:
3606:
3602:
3583:
3577:
3560:
3539:
3535:
3518:
3497:
3468:
3467:
3459:
3458:
3453:
3443:
3436:
3416:
3390:
3375:
3371:
3361:
3355:
3338:
3321:
3306:
3285:
3268:
3258:
3252:
3235:
3213:
3195:
3174:
3165:CAPTAIN RAJU
3164:
3158:
3154:
3142:
3137:
3115:
3098:
3069:
3048:
3044:
3027:
3010:
2989:
2977:
2973:
2954:
2937:
2931:
2907:
2873:
2856:
2837:
2820:
2800:
2791:
2773:
2739:
2724:
2708:
2700:
2695:
2661:
2644:
2632:
2626:
2614:
2610:
2593:
2577:
2572:
2555:
2554:
2548:
2531:
2518:
2512:
2495:
2486:
2481:
2457:
2433:
2412:
2380:
2368:Gog the Mild
2363:
2346:
2329:
2312:
2295:
2277:
2260:
2248:
2240:
2233:
2216:
2203:
2195:
2186:Lee Vilenski
2183:
2179:
2158:
2142:
2129:
2128:
2117:
2098:
2086:
2036:Weak support
2035:
2007:
1991:
1974:
1956:
1939:
1923:WP:NOBIGDEAL
1918:
1906:FeydHuxtable
1901:
1884:
1872:Gerda Arendt
1859:
1837:
1812:
1795:
1778:
1768:
1763:
1757:less, unless
1756:
1752:
1735:
1713:
1700:
1695:
1678:
1659:
1647:--- Possibly
1643:
1626:
1609:
1600:
1593:
1592:
1586:
1538:
1522:
1494:Good editor
1491:
1346:
1345:
1325:
1319:
1313:
1307:
1301:
1295:
1288:
1281:
1275:
1256:
1229:
1215:
1187:
1148:
1118:
1089:
1081:
1049:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1001:
991:
963:
956:
952:Celestina007
924:
914:
856:
838:
810:
787:āĀ Preceding
782:
751:
744:
718:
712:
649:
628:
577:
570:
543:
537:
505:
495:
443:
429:
397:
387:
336:
330:
316:
309:
247:
241:
219:
213:
186:
180:
175:
153:
132:
115:
111:
96:
92:Women in Red
84:
76:
66:
55:
52:
51:
46:
30:
28:
5768:StarshipSLS
5746:StarshipSLS
5513:t the case,
5393:Steve Smith
5316:StarshipSLS
5288:StarshipSLS
5270:StarshipSLS
5248:StarshipSLS
5114:Steve Smith
5104:Steve Smith
5014:Steve Smith
4955:Steve Smith
4940:Steve Smith
4667:Nosebagbear
4650:Nosebagbear
4453:Thumbs up.
4394:Victuallers
4298:revolutions
4159:Newyorkbrad
4029:ā sparklism
3290:StarshipSLS
3159:Less Unless
2779:Herostratus
2418:REDMAN 2019
2351:Johnnie Bob
1944:FemkeMilene
1683:Glennfcowan
1496:JaiPogo0123
1474:User rights
1464:CentralAuth
1269:Less Unless
1242:Less Unless
1193:Less Unless
1132:Less Unless
1059:Less Unless
1007:Less Unless
969:Less Unless
934:Less Unless
910:Steve Smith
892:Less Unless
878:WP:ONEEVENT
816:Less Unless
793:StarshipSLS
760:Less Unless
728:Less Unless
690:Less Unless
606:Less Unless
548:Less Unless
515:Less Unless
457:Less Unless
407:Less Unless
365:Less Unless
158:Less Unless
78:LessĀ Unless
47:Less Unless
5656:Ritchie333
5638:Ritchie333
5574:White gaze
5215:Ritchie333
4607:(please {{
4473:SandDoctor
4268:Goldsztajn
3938:Netherzone
3747:Malcolmxl5
3677:Cwmhiraeth
3634:Ritchie333
3437:Astrophobe
3240:Jack Frost
3157:. I think
3086:Mikehawk10
3081:WP:CLEANUP
3052:Acroterion
2957:Why not? -
2861:Find bruce
2796:WP:cleanup
2761:~ ToBeFree
2536:Mosesheron
2519:CaptainEek
2383:per noms.
2298:per noms.
2221:Ganesha811
1925:. Thanks.
1701:Ritchie333
1500:Talk to me
1457:Cross-wiki
1443:AfD closes
1261:Discussion
1233:community.
1026:many times
917:Regarding
678:WP:NOTNEWS
533:EpicPupper
491:EpicPupper
116:Ritchie333
73:Nomination
31:successful
5732:āvalereee
5660:āvalereee
5578:āvalereee
5552:far worse
5537:āvalereee
5485:āvalereee
5468:āvalereee
5438:āvalereee
5335:āvalereee
5296:āvalereee
5252:āvalereee
5233:DanCherek
5112:also, as
5071:on reply)
4907:Aquillion
4877:Hipocrite
4836:Hipocrite
4808:Hipocrite
4792:on reply)
4717:WP:BEFORE
4685:WP:BEFORE
4604:Willbb234
4501:Lord Roem
4418:Hurricane
4368:Tim Smith
4343:per nom.
4176:Vexations
4116:DannyS712
4043:Wario-Man
3713:Ajraddatz
3695:North8000
3643:JGHowes
3630:Barkeep49
3395:Athaenara
3380:Athaenara
3343:Keresluna
3075:Willbb234
2848:(discuss)
2825:Guettarda
2803:PJvanMill
2709:Phightins
2596:per nom.
2487:Jianhui67
2462:DanCherek
2385:AnApple47
2265:āvalereee
2164:Anarchyte
2089:per nom.
1961:BonsMans1
1927:Mike Peel
1851:(blether)
1815:per PMC.
1510:Barkeep49
1438:AfD votes
1433:BLP edits
1311:blockĀ log
960:editing?
882:WP:NSPORT
869:WP:SIGCOV
670:WP:EFFECT
500:5 pillars
471:DanCherek
434:this edit
425:DanCherek
383:Tim Smith
289:language.
224:WP:WOMRED
206:strength.
203:WP:REFUND
140:Barkeep49
5813:Category
5764:Valereee
5718:contribs
5564:contribs
5502:Valereee
5423:contribs
5374:contribs
5310:Valereee
5266:Valereee
5184:contribs
5172:unsigned
5069:|Chess}}
5067:reply to
4790:|Chess}}
4788:reply to
4663:ProcSock
4643:ProcSock
4628:ProcSock
4543:contribs
4531:unsigned
4390:Support.
4381:Support.
4364:Support.
4326:per nom
4249:aĀ·poĀ·des
4201:contribs
4146:contribs
3885:Football
3594:contribs
3523:Hog Farm
3510:contribs
3372:Support.
3003:Contribs
2893:NYC Guru
2878:NYC Guru
2843:Hawkeye7
2666:Kemalcan
2598:Corachow
2399:Levivich
2146:Pahunkat
1864:precious
1631:Link20XX
1578:contribs
1416:Analysis
1395:Counters
1279:contribs
1220:civility
1126:content.
862:WP:NPROF
801:contribs
789:unsigned
662:WP:EVENT
658:WP:CRIME
353:Amy Mack
228:WP:CLEAN
88:contribs
5598:instead
5146:Kingsif
5141:Neutral
5031:Neutral
4927:Neutral
4921:Neutral
4621:absence
4553:Support
4496:Support
4465:Support
4456:LOMRJYO
4451:Support
4428:Support
4407:Support
4351:Dreamy
4347:Support
4341:Support
4324:Support
4294:spin me
4281:Support
4259:Support
4226:Support
4216:Spencer
4210:Support
4189:Support
4172:Support
4155:Support
4129:Support
4114:LGTM --
4112:Support
4071:Vacant0
4067:Support
4053:Support
4037:Support
4025:Support
4011:Support
3980:Support
3963:Support
3951:Support
3934:Support
3905:Support
3896:sandbox
3881:Cyclone
3877:Support
3864:Dolotta
3860:Support
3843:Support
3825:Support
3812:the wub
3808:Support
3791:Support
3774:Support
3743:Support
3726:Support
3709:Support
3690:Support
3673:Support
3656:Support
3626:Support
3603:Support
3578:Support
3561:Support
3536:Support
3519:Support
3498:Support
3481:Support
3454:Support
3417:Support
3391:Support
3362:JW 1961
3356:Support
3339:Support
3322:Support
3307:Support
3286:Support
3269:Support
3259:~Swarm~
3253:Support
3236:Support
3214:Support
3201:SunDawn
3196:Support
3175:Support
3155:Support
3138:Support
3116:Support
3099:Support
3070:Support
3045:Support
3032:BusterD
3028:Support
3011:Support
2990:Support
2974:Support
2955:Support
2932:Support
2908:Support
2874:Support
2857:Support
2838:Support
2821:Support
2792:Support
2774:Support
2740:Support
2725:Support
2696:Support
2662:Support
2649:Mccapra
2645:Support
2611:Support
2594:Support
2573:Support
2549:Support
2532:Support
2513:Support
2496:Support
2482:Support
2458:Support
2434:Support
2413:Support
2381:Support
2364:Support
2347:Support
2330:Support
2313:Support
2296:Support
2278:Support
2261:Support
2234:Support
2217:Support
2196:Support
2180:Support
2159:Support
2143:Support
2132:Jungwon
2118:Support
2099:Support
2087:Support
2008:Support
1999:Snowman
1992:Support
1979:Minorax
1975:Support
1957:Support
1940:Support
1919:Support
1902:Support
1889:Bibeyjj
1885:Support
1860:Support
1838:Support
1818:Ęirefly
1813:Support
1796:Support
1779:Support
1753:Support
1736:Support
1714:Support
1696:Support
1679:Support
1660:Support
1644:Support
1627:Support
1614:Pamzeis
1610:Support
1587:Support
1539:Support
1523:Support
1492:Support
1486:Support
1448:CSD log
1286:deleted
873:WP:NPOL
597:person.
582:WP:TRUE
566:SunDawn
5652:Bilorv
5606:Bilorv
5480:Ugh, @
5389:hadn't
5362:really
4996:Bilorv
4985:says:
4936:really
4898:Oppose
4800:Oppose
4772:Oppose
4730:Bilorv
4581:Oppose
4575:Oppose
4558:Cullen
4234:(talk)
4193:Uses x
4134:python
4057:Kurtis
3998:Daniel
3923:spirit
3830:Nick-D
3795:Stifle
3550:(Talk)
3485:ā Ched
3470:apolis
3404:Sdrqaz
3225:(talk)
3180:SVcode
3058:(talk)
2964:ASTILY
2750:(Talk)
2729:Deryck
2683:Earwig
2616:KevinL
2584:(talk)
2564:(talk)
2559:iolite
2334:Ifnord
2283:Cabayi
2200:Bilorv
1846:Summit
1594:BD2412
1548:User:å
1531:(talk)
1402:XTools
1211:Oshwah
1161:transl
1054:WP:AIV
1044:WP:AIV
834:Sdrqaz
654:WP:GNG
232:WP:NPP
199:WP:RfD
195:WP:AfD
191:WP:NPP
5654:and @
5246:Hey,
5055:Chess
5035:Chess
4776:Chess
4287:78.26
4137:coder
3711:- --
3592:: -->
3378:" ā
3153:full
3144:Flalf
3122:Atsme
3015:Bduke
2923:bolly
2913:Tolly
2579:Globg
2404:hound
2068:Kusma
2012:Kusma
1996:Giant
1843:Girth
1769:Chair
1670:_IVā ā
1665:ā Vami
1349:civil
1293:count
1113:ducks
726:grow.
637:Nsk92
624:Nsk92
313:limit
16:<
5774:), (
5772:Talk
5752:), (
5750:Talk
5736:talk
5714:talk
5710:Elli
5693:talk
5685:Elli
5664:talk
5626:and
5612:talk
5582:talk
5560:talk
5556:Elli
5541:talk
5520:only
5489:talk
5472:talk
5442:talk
5419:talk
5415:Elli
5397:talk
5370:talk
5366:Elli
5339:talk
5322:), (
5320:Talk
5300:talk
5276:), (
5274:Talk
5256:talk
5237:talk
5201:talk
5180:talk
5150:talk
5132:talk
5123:been
5087:talk
5059:talk
5045:talk
5018:talk
5002:talk
4978:are.
4944:talk
4911:talk
4885:talk
4866:talk
4840:talk
4826:talk
4812:talk
4780:talk
4753:talk
4736:talk
4700:talk
4675:talk
4654:talk
4632:talk
4609:ping
4539:talk
4519:talk
4506:talk
4487:talk
4438:talk
4433:LSGH
4413:Java
4398:talk
4372:talk
4354:Jazz
4328:L3X1
4272:talk
4246:WugĀ·
4197:talk
4180:talk
4163:talk
4142:talk
4120:talk
4075:talk
4002:talk
3988:talk
3971:talk
3942:talk
3917:tree
3911:Sago
3893:š |
3868:talk
3851:talk
3834:talk
3816:"?!"
3799:talk
3782:talk
3765:talk
3751:talk
3734:talk
3717:talk
3700:talk
3681:talk
3664:talk
3632:and
3615:coxn
3590:Chat
3569:talk
3543:LuK3
3527:Talk
3506:talk
3502:Elli
3489:talk
3461:Mini
3444:talk
3425:talk
3421:SeoR
3408:talk
3347:talk
3330:talk
3296:), (
3294:Talk
3277:talk
3273:P-K3
3244:talk
3205:talk
3186:Talk
3107:talk
3090:talk
3036:talk
3019:talk
2999:Talk
2980:Dane
2945:talk
2897:talk
2882:talk
2865:talk
2829:talk
2809:talk
2783:talk
2765:talk
2687:talk
2670:talk
2653:talk
2624:L235
2602:talk
2540:talk
2504:talk
2466:talk
2439:ZLEA
2424:talk
2389:talk
2372:talk
2355:talk
2338:talk
2321:talk
2304:talk
2287:talk
2269:talk
2225:talk
2206:talk
2170:talk
2150:talk
2042:and
1983:talk
1948:talk
1931:talk
1910:talk
1893:talk
1876:talk
1804:talk
1787:talk
1744:talk
1727:talk
1687:talk
1651:talk
1635:talk
1618:talk
1574:talk
1514:talk
1338:here
1323:rfar
1305:logs
1273:talk
1246:talk
1222:and
1197:talk
1171:lang
1166:and
1136:talk
1090:does
1063:talk
1011:talk
973:talk
938:talk
896:talk
843:AfDs
820:talk
797:talk
764:talk
732:talk
708:Elli
694:talk
660:and
641:talk
610:talk
552:talk
519:talk
475:talk
461:talk
411:talk
369:talk
357:here
162:talk
144:talk
82:talk
56:xeno
5528:not
5509:isn
5193:she
5082:Bri
5040:Bri
4862:JBL
4822:JBL
4504:~ (
4470:The
4440:) (
4099:ed.
3967:agr
3927:()
3810:--
3761:JBL
3565:Deb
2995:Tol
2681:The
2621:aka
2054:Why
2010:. ā
1800:Mz7
1527:PMC
1329:spi
1299:AfD
1216:21.
1149:20.
1101:And
1082:19.
1022:18.
992:17.
957:16.
915:15.
839:14.
783:13.
745:12.
713:11.
629:10.
326:Mz7
315:of
255:or
61:at
5815::
5738:)
5720:)
5716:|
5695:)
5666:)
5616:)
5584:)
5566:)
5562:|
5543:)
5491:)
5474:)
5444:)
5425:)
5421:|
5399:)
5376:)
5372:|
5341:)
5326:)
5312::
5302:)
5280:)
5258:)
5239:)
5203:)
5186:)
5182:ā¢
5152:)
5134:)
5119:no
5109:is
5089:)
5065:{{
5061:)
5047:)
5020:)
5006:)
4994:ā
4965:do
4946:)
4913:)
4905:--
4887:)
4868:)
4842:)
4828:)
4814:)
4786:{{
4782:)
4755:)
4740:)
4702:)
4677:)
4656:)
4634:)
4626:.
4592:,
4589:,
4586:,
4545:)
4541:ā¢
4521:)
4508:)
4489:)
4444:)
4400:)
4374:)
4315:|
4296:/
4274:)
4266:--
4244:ā
4203:)
4199:ā¢
4182:)
4165:)
4148:)
4144:|
4122:)
4077:)
4004:)
3990:)
3973:)
3944:)
3890:71
3870:)
3853:)
3836:)
3801:)
3784:)
3767:)
3753:)
3736:)
3719:)
3702:)
3683:)
3666:)
3660:āā
3619:\
3571:)
3512:)
3508:|
3491:)
3447:)
3433:-
3427:)
3410:)
3383:ā
3349:)
3332:)
3315::
3300:)
3279:)
3246:)
3228:@
3207:)
3189:)
3130:š§
3127:š¬
3109:)
3092:)
3038:)
3021:)
3001:|
2997:|
2899:)
2884:)
2867:)
2831:)
2785:)
2767:)
2732:C.
2703:Go
2689:)
2672:)
2655:)
2638:)
2604:)
2556:ev
2542:)
2506:)
2468:)
2427:)
2415:.
2391:)
2374:)
2366:.
2357:)
2340:)
2323:)
2306:)
2289:)
2271:)
2227:)
2210:)
2173:)
2152:)
2123:EN
2091:VV
2078:)
2049:So
2022:)
1985:)
1977:--
1967:š¶
1964:š
1950:)
1933:)
1921:,
1912:)
1895:)
1878:)
1862:,
1826:Ā·
1822:(
1806:)
1789:)
1761:ā
1746:)
1729:)
1689:)
1653:)
1637:)
1620:)
1612:.
1580:)
1576:ā¢
1562:)
1556:,
1529:ā
1516:)
1502:)
1317:lu
1248:)
1230:A:
1199:)
1188:A:
1174:}}
1168:{{
1164:}}
1158:{{
1138:)
1119:A.
1065:)
1050:A.
1040:}}
1034:{{
1013:)
1002:A:
975:)
964:A:
940:)
925:A:
898:)
857:A:
822:)
811:A:
803:)
799:ā¢
766:)
752:A:
734:)
719:A:
696:)
650:A:
643:)
612:)
578:A:
571:9.
554:)
544:A:
538:8.
521:)
506:A:
496:7.
477:)
463:)
444:A:
440:?
430:6.
413:)
405:.
398:A:
394:?
388:5.
371:)
363:.
351:,
347:,
337:A:
331:4.
248:A:
242:3.
220:A:
214:2.
197:,
193:,
187:A:
181:1.
164:)
146:)
65:;
36:.
5770:(
5762:@
5748:(
5734:(
5726:@
5712:(
5706::
5702:@
5691:(
5662:(
5650:@
5608:(
5580:(
5558:(
5539:(
5511:'
5487:(
5470:(
5440:(
5417:(
5395:(
5368:(
5337:(
5318:(
5308:@
5298:(
5286:@
5272:(
5264:@
5254:(
5235:(
5199:(
5178:(
5148:(
5130:(
5085:(
5057:(
5043:(
5016:(
4998:(
4957::
4953:@
4942:(
4909:(
4883:(
4864:(
4838:(
4824:(
4810:(
4778:(
4751:(
4732:(
4713::
4709:@
4698:(
4673:(
4652:(
4645::
4641:@
4630:(
4537:(
4517:(
4485:(
4436:(
4396:(
4370:(
4300:)
4292:(
4270:(
4251:ā
4195:(
4178:(
4161:(
4140:(
4118:(
4073:(
4000:(
3986:(
3969:(
3940:(
3866:(
3849:(
3832:(
3797:(
3780:(
3763:(
3749:(
3732:(
3715:(
3698:(
3679:(
3662:(
3612:u
3609:t
3567:(
3504:(
3487:(
3441:(
3423:(
3406:(
3345:(
3328:(
3292:(
3275:(
3242:(
3203:(
3183:(
3105:(
3088:(
3034:(
3017:(
2961:F
2947:)
2943:(
2918:4
2895:(
2880:(
2863:(
2827:(
2812:(
2806:)
2781:(
2763:(
2715:!
2685:(
2668:(
2651:(
2636:c
2633:Ā·
2630:t
2627:Ā·
2619:(
2600:(
2538:(
2524:ā
2502:(
2479:)
2475:(
2464:(
2450:\
2445:T
2421:(
2401:/
2387:(
2370:(
2353:(
2336:(
2319:(
2302:(
2285:(
2267:(
2251:C
2247:Ā·
2243:T
2223:(
2202:(
2167:(
2148:(
2127:-
2110:)
2106:(
2076:c
2074:Ā·
2072:t
2070:(
2033:)
2029:(
2020:c
2018:Ā·
2016:t
2014:(
1981:(
1946:(
1929:(
1908:(
1891:(
1874:(
1830:)
1828:c
1824:t
1802:(
1785:(
1742:(
1725:(
1685:(
1662:ā
1649:(
1633:(
1616:(
1601:T
1572:(
1559:Ī½
1553:Ļ
1512:(
1498:(
1382:e
1375:t
1368:v
1341:.
1331:)
1326:Ā·
1320:Ā·
1314:Ā·
1308:Ā·
1302:Ā·
1296:Ā·
1289:Ā·
1282:Ā·
1276:Ā·
1271:(
1244:(
1195:(
1134:(
1061:(
1009:(
971:(
936:(
894:(
818:(
795:(
762:(
730:(
692:(
664:.
639:(
608:(
550:(
517:(
473:(
459:(
409:(
367:(
259:.
234:.
160:(
142:(
85:Ā·
80:(
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.