Knowledge

:Requests for arbitration/AndriyK - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

1620:, is a narrow one and related to a specific article rather than to this arbitration. Since you brought it here, I will just say that this was not about removal of the term from the article but about keeping the discussion about the term within a section specifically devoted to it. You insisted to bring it into the lead paragraph or even the very first line, and it is disputable whether the term belongs there. However, this ArbCom filing is not about the merit of AndriyK's or his opponents' positions in specific article disputes. This is about his behavior, particularly, frivolous page moves, bad-faith redirect creation, copyvios, using 3RR as daily "alottment" or using tricks to circumvent it, vote fraud, sockpuppetry and other mischief. If you want to accuse the compliants of this case in any policy or ethical violations, you are welcome to start 1, 2, 3 or more RfC's or even file your own ArbCom case(s). Finally, keep your remarks within your own statement, that is if you are entitled for one of which I am not sure, but I don't mind it anyway. -- 2072:
nationalistic tastes. Such example is St. Vladimir's Cathedral where for nearly two weeks he spent deleting all the relevant articles, and without prior agreement at discussions. A similar situation can be found in the Cossack article where he kept on deleting my addtions. The Holodomor is also such a case where distputable sources were included before an agreement was reached. I have numerously tried to incourage AndriyK to actually start writing articles (which he on numerous occasions claimed was his reason for coming here). My suggestion of having something simple was met with profound rudeness (and hidden behind it - lasiness) as it can be witnessed in the Drogobych and Izmail Oblast heading at his talk page. I have also reminded him that such actions could negatively skew experienced wikipedia authors and editors to develop a negative, stereotypical attitude towards Ukraine and Ukrainians. Considering that the people who he brings from Maidan forum are a marginal group of people who do not represent the Ukrainian nation as a whole.
855:
personally. He did cast the call for Ua users to support the pro-ukrainian initiative. And I (and others) did it right by voting against Russian names. And what really surprised me about Knowledge is this anti-ua flow of accuses/slandering. Just thinking logically — Ukrainian towns must have Ukrainian names. Down with some chronicles of XVI or IX centuries, or whatever era they belong to. What are they mentioned for? We're talking about contemporary Ukrainian cities/towns, and there are no CherniGOV there, only Chernihiv. That's it. And last thing - dear non Russian-speaking users! You're being made a victim of the Russian imperial chauvinism (I thought it was a lie, but certain events, including those happened in Knowledge's votes around Chernihiv, proved this danger real). Why? Because you're being told that there are such towns in Ukraine as "chernigov", "Irpen" etc. In fact there are NO SUCH TOWNS HERE. So you're being misled by these Russian English-speaking users. Decide yourself how you wanna be further. Paul Kiss
3361:'s avoiding truthful depiction of the events. It also must be noted that all the mentioned users, without exception, appear to be native in the Russian language. While this is great when people from different countries can come to Knowledge, it's not OK when people from one country gang up against a person from another nation to suppress his or her political views. If you read the original complaints, practically all of them have something to do with Ukrainian related articles. I hate to make this conclusion, but it seems almost as if the mentioned people decided to police and revert these article in favor of the Russian nationalism POV. The arbitrary deletions and source doctoring in the 2385:, but I do not have more space in the 500 words limit. I am not aware of any new articles contributed by the user and only of a very few positive contributions by him. Currently his behavior significantly decreases quality of the Ukrainian segment of Knowledge. Productive people avoid contributing articles on Ukrainian themes, AndriyK and his friends do not contribute much either spending most of their time on the revert wars. I think AndriyK should be banned from editing by reverting, blanking and changing names. Instead he should be encouraged to write new article and contribute new information to the present articles. 1606:). His desire to limit other side's editing priveleges seems nothing but another step in his revert war with the people that don't share his political views. This arbitration setup alone shows this. Instead of inviting both sides of the dispute in equal proportion, he invites almost exclusively a few allies of the revert wars here to "punish" one of his opponenta. So the people not sharing the "correct" political agenda must find out about this only by accident. A fare vote and consultations must be held prior to making any decisions in this case. Otherwise, a small group of editors will limit the neutral point of view.-- 2404:
mostly by the mass changing of names from Russian to Ukrainian versions. He sees this as an us-against-them war. He'll do it wherever he thinks he can get away with it, by any means possible, and whether it's appropriate or not. He shows little respect for the collaborative spirit of Knowledge or for other editors' feelings. His actions have wasted an enormous amount of energy and productivity, inflamed the community of editors of Ukrainian-related articles, and brought out the worst in many others including AndriyK's "foes" and "allies", to the point of being very destructive.
3093:(in Ukrainian). As for the historical tradition, the Russian variants of Ukrainian names are without doubt preferred by Russian speaking people. But does one attempt to transliterate Polish or Finnish (former parts of the Russian Empire) names from their Russian spellings? And even those speaking against AndriyK readily recognize that as a rule he made a provision for the folks comfortable with the Russian-style transliteration only creating the corresponding automatic redirects. 2270:
etc.). I can believe the first of your reverts was an honest mistake. I have doubts that plagiarizing Britannica was an honest mistake. As for the other five reverts of you, one of your sockpupet and one of AndriyK, they were malicious actions with a single purpose to stop productive work on the article. Since we are discussing AndreyK now; I am more interested with the AndiyK's revert. BTW I am not a judge, I am a plaintiff here, I do not have to be unbiased.
440:
outside forums to recruit followers and sockpuppets for voting and assistance in revert warring to circumvent the 3RR policy. User also engaged in bad faith moves and redirect creations in multiple steps making them hard to undo (thus abusing the features of wikisoftware). The user also refuses to cooperatively work on issues with which parties are in disagreement and shows lack of civility when attempts for constructive discussions are made.
1445:, and he should be required to stick to the common sense rule if his personal ethics is insufficient to give him an idea of whether a particular move would be viewed as controversial or not. Moreover, his using a wikisoftware trick to make his moved non-revertible makes me believe strongly that he knew that the moves might meet an opposition and he went ahead with them to force his POV without seeking a consensus. His 3075:
chosen “Articles of the week” out there. But he preferred not to check his facts for some reason and go right for the offence. I would not be surprised if some of the other so called “sock puppets” turned to be normal, responsible for their votes wikipedians. For his information I had never been contacted by AndriyK before I came and expressed my mind (based on facts) on the matter of Ukrainian-Latin transliteration
3090:, and while it is true not everyone in the world sticks to it, you must produce some really hard stats numbers to prove it must not be used in the Knowledge despite the fact it is official in Ukraine and as such is used by the country’s Government, commercial companies, educational institutions, etc. See also the Lviv University lections on translation theory and practice for the future diplomats 3700:
Russia. Terminology used for Ukraine was translated from Russian. Now Ukraine is independent country and we are trying to change this russified point of view on Ukraine and its history. I don’t expect that it will be easy. We are only at the beginning of our long way, but I do believe that in 10-20 years will not be discussed how to call Ukrainian cities in English (Чернігів will be Chernihiv).
3863:, I believe that AndriyK's call for help at Maidan.org is nothing blamable. After his announcement, a few new editors came to Knowledge. Some of them did not restrict their activity to voting, but started to work in English and Ukrainian Knowledge. Favouring of the growth of the community is a part of the Knowledge policy. The larger is the community the higher is the quality of the articles. 2975:. I also had no idea of these subtleties that time. So I restored his version. Then I got a message from an admin about copyright violation and did not perform any further action on the article. So I reverted the article only one time being not aware about some subtelties of copyright matters. Is my guilt so serious that it deserves to be considered by arbitration commity? 3609:, with the comment: "Removed "History_of_Russia_Ukraine_Belarus" box of links since it mostly contains history of Russia, making it biased." AndriyK simply restored that version. While he did not add any significant comment for this, this doesn't seem the reason to list it as "evidence". People forget adding comments all the time on that page. Here, for instance, 2230:. The article was protected and everybody seems to lost interest to improvement of the article. If the same effort that was put into the talk page and the revert war had been put into the article it will be a good article. Thus, the article about the man who considered to be the pioneer of Ukrainian literature is a stub, mostly due to the destructive actions of 3158:. Andriy has been told quite a few times that the historical name Chernigov should be reserved for historical purposes. He is free to use a modern Ukrainian spelling, Chernihiv, when referring to modern politics and post-1917 Ukraine. For earlier periods, the name Chernigov should be preferred, as they do in the 2004 Britannica and as proposed by 1196:'s move first and mentioned it at his talk, hoping to shame him or just to check whether he would admit or pretend that it was an "innocent" mistake (I was not sure at the time that it was a bad-faith redirect as much as I am now when I saw an entire pattern). When talking to him, I brought up that I was considering moving 1413:) were active in Ukrainian topics for a while and all of us were able to argue a Ukrainian perspective in many topics with Russian and Polish editors. Yes, Ukraine is under-represented at Knowledge, but there was little bad faith in the behavior of our neighbors and the atmosphere was mostly of respect and collaboration. 3645:
relevant articles. By protection I do not mean "lock" but rather some more strict limitation of number of reverts of these articles, like to one revert per 24h or other means that would incline the warring parties to discuss more instead of stubbornly forcing one version over another. This said I've the impression that
2755:. The East Slavic people in this area did not have the consonant "g" in their dialect. So transliteration containing "g" is deffinitely wrong. It reflects the Russian prononciation, which is irrelevant to Ukrainian cities. Still, the group of users tries to thrust Russian styled name of the sity into WP articles. 3699:
Dear wikipedians, all of you should understand what is going on. Some editors like AndriyK and others are trying to change names of cities, historical facts and so on to more common in Ukraine. It’s not a secret that in the whole world USSR was seen as Russia and Ukraine was seen only as part of this
3659:
I would like to second this statement by Lysy. In this particular orbitration case a ban or another form of punishment applied to AndriyK or any of the other parties will definitely not be viewed as just and deserved by quite a few of those involved in the dispute. Finding a sound and just compromise
3254:
It is open question when exactly the common Slavonic "o" evolved into Ukrainian "i". But even if one assumes it happened in "late Middle Ages", then at earlier times the name was prononce as "Chernihov". The East Slavic tribes that populated the territory of present-day Ukraine did not have consonant
2581:). The issue of Chernigov/Chernihiv has been a major disappointment for everybody, as we already know from other comments. If you ask me, AndriyK should be somehow restrained because of the counterproductive and, at times, disruptive nature of his edits, but this I leave to the Arbitration Committee. 2148:
used such derogatory expressions as "Russian mafia", "teenage gang", "cunning troll", "insufficiently educated", etc. At worst, the intention was to disrupt the regular process of expansion and improvement of Ukraine-related articles. The pool of Knowledge users who can effectively contribute to such
2071:
is such when even though I asked him to refrain from further changes in transliteration, he nevertheless changed them. Now writing templates is an impossible task since he somehow locked the original spelling to avoid its revert. Also is his taste for ommition of facts that do not coincide with his
1440:
since they cannot be undone without an administrative action due to the dirty tricks he used. He should be either banned from moving articles for a while or be required to propose the moves first, at least, because it is in this activity he created so much hassle and this is the activity he conducted
1098:
Also, when an article already exists uder the name he likes, he smartly creates the redirects from the name he assumes others might want to move it to and not only he creates redirects from those names, but creates them in the same subtle way (in two steps: a wrong redirect + correction). Now, that a
2364:
without consulting community changed the names of Chernigov (that happens to be the older name of the city) to Chernihiv in sixty-something articles. He wrote none of these article in almost all of them the name change was his only contribution. In all of these articles Chernigov name was used for
2269:
behavior (unless you suggest, that you and AndriyK are sockpupets of each other). I can believe that your first plagiarizing was an honest mistake (You sincerely thought that you can submit any text on a free web site as your own. Communists taught their school boys that plagiarizing is a small sin,
1392:
Second, the attempt to present this a Russian Wiki-mafia trying to gang-bang a newcomer who tried to give a Ukrainian perspective is simply wrong. Please note that of many editors that co-signed this arbitration, four are the active editors of the Ukrainian wiki-community who are active at Ukrainian
4310:
1) Should AndriyK move any page or change the content of any article to conform with his preferred usage before an agreement is reached as to a naming convention concerning historical Russian names and places he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the case of repeat offenses. After 5 blocks the
3670:
Frankly, I doubt if finding a compromise is within Arbcoms scope of action. I'd rather hope for some enforcement that would strongly suggest to everyone involved in these editwars that discussion is a better and preferred way of handling it. But above all, I think that RFC would be more appropriate
3644:
While I'm not directly involved in the edit war between Russian and Ukrainian editors on Ukraine-related articles, I've been following it closely and I tend to believe that the problem there is not going to be solved by punishing individual editor but rather calls for some sort of protection of the
3082:
They further argue, AndriyK goes for support to the Ukrainian Knowledge and Maidan. Ok, tell me please where else can you expect to find an authoritative opinion on the Ukrainian language and transliteration of the Ukrainian names if not among English speaking Ukrainian wikipedians? Let us note the
2674:
But there are smaller locations like, for instance, Kiev subway stations. Are they so famous that English language readers get used to some particular spelling? Why transliteration from Russian should be preffered over Ukrainian transliteration for subway stations in the capital of Ukraine? Why the
2014:
Bemoaning the "Russian mafia", he made an attempt to explain to forum patrons the rules of Knowledge, largely unsuccessfully, since he omitted the main principles, he urged to take care of POV, while not explaining what it means becoming an editor. And since he pointed finger at the sources of POV,
836:
Disclamer from MaryMaidan: I have read the definition of a sockpuppet, and I can assure you, AndrijK has not invented me, I do indeed exist. I am one of the administrators of the site www.maidan.org.ua (you can confirm that sending an e-mail straight to me mary@maidanua.org or to the administration
3427:
Knowledge is an apolitical encyclopedia, I suggest that you understand this as well. I know that I might write an article which is biased, but I encourage people to neutralise it, and provide more sources. AndriyK seems to follow the opposite policy of giving refernces to nationalistic sources and
2508:
I am concerned that the articles on medieval history, where one needs to be extra careful about every bit of information, may have sustained particularly heavy damage from this user's actions. Efforts of multiple editors, their productive work has been practically stalled since this edit warring
2105:
Sources whose factual information has been DISPROVED. Respectible that the same source made very many public mistakes. And why should I leave a coutry alone where I lived for five years and have many friends there, go there often, and my wife happens to come from there. I do accuse him of laziness
1776:
Andrew, I think it would save ArbComm some time and would be beneficial overall if you provided specific links to diffs, as Irpen did in his statement. Also, arbitration is not a "setup". It's the last resort at conflict resolution. I would recommend you spend a bit more time studying Knowledge
1637:
them. The diffs show it very well. The comment is relevant since it demonstrates your bias and violations of WP policies in your revert warfare. This arbitration seems to be just another level of that warfare. You mislead in your accusations just as much as you mislead in your denials of reference
2512:
User AndriyK has made rude remarks on the Maidan forum about the most respectful editors, and allowed slandering comments to editors en masse ("Russian mafia"). When other editors tried repeatedly to find common ground or a compromise with this user, he took a staunch position of a self-righteous
738:. Please do not take the fact that you are listed above as an accusation. This RfAr is not against you. If ArbComm determines that your account is not a sockpuppet one, I am ready to publicly apologize, if that would make feel you better. I have no intention of making you feel unwelcome here.— 439:
This arbitration request by users Irpen, Ezhiki and other Wikipedians that co-signed above is against user AndriyK, who on numerous occasions engaged in extreme POV pushing, disruptive behavior, personal attacks on and off Knowledge, copyright violations, and effective vote falsification by using
4047:
are guidelines which are developed and updated by community consensus. Editors will not be censured if they disregard (or are unaware of) naming conventions when creating new material. However, they must neither alter existing compliant material to make it noncompliant nor interfere when other
3150:
Mr. Ashapochka, please stop misinforming others. Four plaintiffs - Irpen, Michael Z., Sashazlv, Fisenko - are ethnic Ukrainians. Halibutt is a very respected Polish editor, whose reputation for occasional nationalism nearly cost him adminship. We represent the community who actually *edits* East
2498:
which undoubtedly substantiated which historical naming should be used in English. User:AndriyK was not able to disprove those arguments in any valid manner. However, trying to back up his position in the subsequent voting discussions, he kept claiming the opposite as if he had indeed had any
773:
Andrew, filing an RfAr is not a "personal attack", it's a right every Wikipedian (you included) has. Furthermore, this RfAr is not against the users listed above, it's against AndriyK. The only reason the users above are identified as possible sockpuppets is because of the combination of their
703:
in regards the title of the article, AndriyK is engaged in revert wars that change all internal article references from "Chernigov" to "Chernihiv". Other editors feel that this is a completely separate issue which should be dealt separately. AndriyK disagrees, and uses his "allotment" of three
3074:
calls me a “possible sock puppet of AndriyK”. He never contacted me to see if that was the case, he could verify that my Knowledge account is old enough to make such a statement sound silly, he could check it out I am an active contributor to the Ukrainian Knowledge and some of my articles were
2477:
I see two major issues about AndriyK's way of handling those moves votes: 1) forcing his point of view by bringing in voters who were in fact voting on the wrong subject, did not seem to understand the main point of the argument nor to care about it, thus effectively, rendering vote a fraud; 2)
2403:
AndriyK has come to English-language Knowledge with a political agenda, and expends great energy in pursuing it. Based on his own statements here and at the Maidan forums, I think that he feels that en.wikipedia is saturated with the "Russian mafia's" point of view, and he intends to fix this,
2359:
A Ukraine city usually has two English names: the older one, based on Russian (or old Slavonic) spelling and the newer one based on the modern Ukraine spelling. Usually the older names are still has wider usage in English (as supported by Googling), but wikipedia promotes the newer name for the
1668:
You should have added your refs there or to the ref section and not to the lead. In any case, don't waste an ArbCom space for issues unrelated to AndriyK's behavior which this is all about. You are welcome to start an RfC or an ArbCom against me or all complaints in this case if you see anyone
854:
First of all I must say that Knowledge's not my virtual home, I mean it's not the place where I spend my time online. I'm a real person, but I don't edit/add here anything everyday. But I came here to vote against Russificated names for contemporary Ukrainian towns/cities. I aint know Andriy_K
2559:
What worries me the most is not AndriyK's name change drive or attempts to adhere to "facts" per se (which are as old as Knowledge itself), but his very manner of doing this without even trying to reach consensus with the rest of the wiki-community. If I remember it right, we first met on the
3069:
Well, eleven against one, using phraseology like “sock puppets and blind followers” on every single Wikipedian who happens to support AndriyK’s standpoint, is not easy to stomach. Luckily this same fact hints us some of the dear community-members-speaking-against-AndriyK might just be in for
1222:
As for his response, he could not deny it (like he couldn't deny vote fraud earlier, always ignoring my pointing it out many times to him). One time our dialog turned especially amusing when he turned that on me and said that he learned these tricks from me (he had nothing more to say being
2513:
crusader and would not yield an inch, only pretending to negotiate. He has demonstrated inflexibility, which together with his hypocritical manner of holding discussion, his forceful behavior and cheat, made it so hard to deal with and became an uttermost disruption to normal work.
2087:
has been edited by you with multiple violations of the rules of Knowledge. You have engaged in revert wars, doctoring and erasing quotes from reputable sources on multiple occasions. Profound rudeness is to accuse editors of "laziness" while slashing and destroying valuable
503:." We are, therefore, requesting that the results of the votes are reconsidered and appropriate measures are applied to AndriyK so this kind of behavior does not repeat in future. The following is a list of possible sockpuppets (or accounts that can be treated as such per 2188:
has a quite annoying habit of working for Knowledge not by adding new articles or new information to the existing articles but by blanking information, changing the names of the geographical locations according to his POV and most importantly by initiating the revert wars.
1456:
is respectfully requested to make ArbCom decisions applicable to any anonymous or sockpuppet-like accounts that exhibit trademark immature Ukrainian nationalism through enforcing particular names over the established ones without seeking the consensus from the community.
2666:
correct "Dnieper" to "Dnipro", "Crimea" to "Krym", or "Galicia" to "Halychyna", "Dniester" to "Dnister" etc. I did not even correct "Kiev" to "Kyiv", because I see that the spelling "Kiev" is still more familiar to English speaking readers. This spelling is also used in
4110:
3) AndriyK, taking an aggressive Ukrainian nationalist position, has strongly advocated use of the Ukrainian names for historical places and persons. Without obtaining consensus regarding policy, he has repeatedly inserted his preferred usage into a number of pages
3757:
The request for arbitration looks as well-prepared attack. The group of users who submitted the request had prepared it in advance and coordinated their action to create illusion of "unanimity" of Knowledge editors. Most of the accusations are juggled and unfair.
1669:
behavior warrants it. You can express your disagreement over the applicability of "Fraud" and "frivolous" to his page moves in your own statement here, if you are entitled for one. What matters is whether the ArbCom agrees or disagrees, seeing the evidence above. --
42:
Please do not edit this page directly unless you wish to become a participant in this request. (All participants are subject to Arbitration Committee decisions, and the ArbCom will consider each participant's role in the dispute.) Comments are very welcome on the
2662:. Some geographic entities in Ukraine have been well known outside the country for a long time. Some of them have well established English spellings different from direct transliteration from Ukrainian. I respect traditions of English language. Therefore, I did 2001:
While I do not have enough confidence in my knowledge of Ukrainian language to put it on my user page, I can pretty much understand the content of his messages on Maidanua.org, he accused many editors of being part of something "very much like a teenager gang".
2985:
is not a precise copy from the source. Is there any rules how two texts have to be similar to be considered as copyright violation? I am still not aware of it. If these rules exist, it would be nice to inform all new users about them to avoid such mistakes in
2407:
I honestly wish he'd pitch in and apply his copious energy otherwise. He's counselled others that neutral point of view can be restored to many articles by adding balancing encyclopedic material, but sadly, he's applied himself this way in a very few cases.
2222:
who kept reverting to copyvio version, then decided for some reason to plagiarize Brittanica instead of wumag.kiev.ua. Finally, Andrew and his seemed to stop interfere with the article. It was probably a good time to start to work on the article, then come
1810:
In my experience, AndriyK is a highly skilled, determined, and cold-blooded revert warrior. His edits consist of little in the way of constructive editing. As he was repeatedly blocked for 3RR violatiion in the past, he evolved several sophisticated tricks
2564:
article. Right after I posted my comment, AndriyK labeled us all a "teenager gang" and "lynching mob" for simply trying to reason with him. My ensuing encounters with AndriyK made me think that he was on some name-changing rampage (e.g., see histories of
1834:, which it took me infinite pains to write almost single-handedly, from the first line to the last. AndriyK, despite having been informed about a need to consult other editors about such decisive moves, did move the article on architectural traditions of 1727:. However, in any case what does it have to do with AndriyK's behavior? If you think it is an arbitrable issue, I welcome you to start an another ArbCom re my behavior at Holodomor. You could also start with the user RfC (against me) or the article RfC ( 499:, "these newly created accounts... may be friends of a Wikipedian, or may be related in some way to the subject of an article under discussion. These accounts are not actually sockpuppets, but they are difficult to distinguish from real sockpuppets and 2432:
My biggest concern about User:AndriyK is that his activity is highly disruptive, and he has resorted to falsification of facts and misuse of information trying to force his point. Not to repeat the others' examples, I will bring just a few more below.
3117:"these newly created accounts... may be friends of a Wikipedian, or may be related in some way to the subject of an article under discussion. These accounts are not actually sockpuppets, but they are difficult to distinguish from real sockpuppets and 1204:
but I did not do that unilaterally because it is just a courtesy to warn the interested parties of any moves so that they can voice any disagreements. Interestingly, his reaction was (as I assumed it would be) an immediate creation of two redirects
774:
editing history, editing patterns, and timing of their joining of Knowledge. I very well realize that I could have misidentified a few of them and that some may indeed be (and are) real people acting on their own. However, even in this case, they
1378:. I know, it exceeded the space of 500 words but this was only because the intensity of AndriyK's warfare and fraudulent behavior was so high that it took this much space to present it to ArbCom. I would just like to add quickly the following. 2341:, who started by blanking info added by other users. The revert war continues to the present time (600 something edits) - many potentially productive people were involved. The article is almost in the same shape as it was on the tenth edit. 3070:
suppression and ostracism of this Wikipedian, who has different (and nevertheless well founded on facts) views on the Ukraine-related encyclopedic knowledge from theirs, rather than on the quest for the truth and understanding. For example
2641:
Usually names of persons are spelled exactly as in the language of the nation/ethnos they belong to. If the language uses an alphabet different from the Latin one, then transliteration is needed. The transliteration table from Ukrainian is
3713:
Your goals are understandable, but wikipedia cannot be a vehiche for doing so. Please learn the basic rules here in wikipedia and come back in "10-20" years. Meanwhile there is a huge amount of information to be contributed about Ukraine.
2295:) but published the original with the name of the author in it, with her explicit consent. Again, you misrepresent the events even though you can simply read the discussion for that article. But now you add insults to misrepresentations.-- 4145:
4) In order to obtain reinforcements AndriyK appealed to forums frequented by Ukrainians, negatively characterizing his opponents on Knowledge. Those recruited were requested to take his side in disputed votes which some of them did, see
2996:
When I saw that many WP articles about Ukraine are biased and incomplete I decided to bring attention of the Ukrainian internet community to Knowledge and invite more people to contribute to it. This was the purpose of my annoncement on
1436:. At least, with his past pattern he cannot be trusted with the article moves and he should be required to propose such drastic measures before performing them. At the same time, it is justly requested that his past bad-faith moves are 2626:
ashington. Would the behavior of user Y be considered as "POV pushing", "disruptive behavior". Would user X, if acting in good faith, have any objections against the move made by user Y? Would he start a "move war" against user Y ? In
2865:
I indeed reverted some articles "on daily basis", but this was because a group of users reverted my edits restoring wrong links, wrong spellings of Ukrainian names, as well as propaganda insertions. I ask the Arbitration Commity to
3535:. It is definitely a blatant copyvio, but might not be a plagiarism, since the source was already put to the External links section of the article by some other editor. After the paragraph was re-written in the non-copyvio form by 1382: 3455:
Regarding Irpen's denials of own edit summaries with deletions of quotes and references. It illustrates the integrity of the accusations Irpen brings forward. It also illustrates the character of revert warfare conducted by the
1289:
is that he is not a short-tempered but possibly productive fellow, but he is a cynical and experienced POV pusher and no wonder: he came from another language wikipedia, well experienced and he knew exactly what he was doing.
3573:
has been reverted at least 150 times to underline the "uncanonical" status of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Kiev Patriarchy (as opposed to Moscow Patriarchy) and to switch Ukrainian name tranliterations into Russian ones:
1997:
Since his entry AndriyK has demonstrated a pattern of distrust towards other users, instead of discussing his concerns about Ukrainian topics, he just went ahead and made mass-moves, and other potentially disagreeable edits.
3173:
form Chernigov in the late Middle Ages, when the common Slavic vowel o (cf. Lwow, Krakow, Kijow, Pskov) was transformed in Ukrainian to i (cf. Lviv, Krakiv, Kyiv). It is also worth noting that the names promoted by Andriy -
2861:
Therefore, "Do not engage in edit wars" means practically "Do not edit articles". As far as I started edit, the group of users that made statements against me (not actually all but most of them) started edit wars against
2492:: references and occurrence counts provided). As agreed, in cases where naming variations exist, the names for people, events and places in historical context should be kept the way they were written back in the time. 2024:
I think that he believes in what he does, but ignorant of Knowledge workings, and lacks trust into the usual procedures of Knowledge, which causes him to exercise his allowances left and right, which largely violates
3201:
from the article is unacceptable. I don't know why you, AndriyK and your friends refuse to discuss the matter and prefer to enforce your POV by rigging move votes. Please stop complaining and do something positive.
3096:
I am approaching my word limit for the comment, but I hope the outmost weakness of the arguments against AndriyK was shown clearly even in these 500 words (against the total of several thousands by his opponents)
2678:
There is a small river Stuhna a dozen or so kilometers from Kiev. The river is so small that probably even not all people in Ukraine know this name. How English-language readers could get used to the spelling
2218:. Irpen wrote a stub and was willing to continue to work on the article. Meanwhile, Irpen, I and many other users were trying our best to explain the Knowledge copyright requirements to Andrew Alexander (see 1900:
administrative reversal of all his article moves done in 3 steps (including those where WP:RM voting was falsified) so that the proposals to move could be discussed by everyone without the threat of bullying
3222:
changed spelling of proper names in it. Anyone can check it for herself. In lying there is no honor and no profit, Mr. Ghirlandajo, for it undermines peoples' trust in your other assertions be they true or
763:
has not tried to contact these users prior to posting their names. There was not even an attepmt to confirm the accusation of sock puppetting. This seems like a general disregard of the rules of Knowledge.
2540:
as well as edited numerous other articles without any discussions and explanations. He labels everyone who disagree with him as "Russian mafia" and is trying to use Knowledge for his own political agenda.
3891: 1854:. I fail to see any rationale behind such controversial and inflammatory actions other than deliberately stirring discord. As a result of his actions, there had been two completely identical articles - 4251: 1881:), which takes efforts of many users and quite some time to undo. Endless revert wars instigated by Andriy effectively ruined history records of many pages started or written by me and/or Irpen (e.g., 3735:
Please feel free to word out any "Russian myth" (considering that mere new spellings in a foreign language to ukrainian can certainly not be called a "russian myth") you seebeing spread by Knowledge.
3046:
I did not find in WP policies any prohibition to invite editors from outside forums. In my opinion, larger number of editors and broader diversity of opinions will improve the quality of the resours.
1583:
It must be added that User Irpen has engaged on multiple occasions in personal attacks as well as attacks against Ukrainian related articles. For instance, he has reverted multiple times the article
3141: 3043:, I did not have any intention to falsify the vote. I thought that Knowledge community may be interested to know the opinion of broader circle of people than the group of users pushing Russian POV. 1301:
bad faith potentially disagreeable moves with no discussion or in spite of discussion where other people seemed ambivalent to impose their vision on article names and kept discussing on what to do;
3288:
check. And of course Ukrainian "h" is also a secondary development which replaced PIE and Common Slavic "g" in later centuries. Anyway, you found a wrong place for discussions of this sort. Go to
2373:
of the "edited" articles. Assuming for a moment that there is a merit in using anachronistic names, Knowledge has a policy of keeping all the ambiguous things consistent with the original author.
3516:
the Arbitration Committee. The fact of the matter is that I tried to contact the author and received her permission to publish the article, which was indicated on the article's discussion page.--
1819:(his name was red-linked yesterday, but Andriy added a comment to his user page to eliminate red-linking) who assaults exactly the same pages and makes exactly the same edits as Andriy did: cf. 1815:. Most notably, he recruited ua.wiki supporters whose only contribution to this project has been endless reverting. For example, when AndriyK is close to violating 3RR, there appears a certain 495:. The result of the posts was an inflow of Ukrainian voters—enough to create an illusion of greater opposition than it otherwise would be—whose only goal was to support AndriyK’s POV. As per 3404:
While I already mentioned that filing an RfAr case is not a personal attack, but a procedure everyone is entitled to, I'll leave this with no comment. The final decision is ArbComm's anyway.—
2815:
in Russia. The article about Trubizh had title "Trubezh" therefore articles about towns at different rivers had reference to the same article. I corrected this mistake by moving Trubezh -: -->
2509:
had started back in October. Everybody is on red alert and barely trying to keep established versions of the articles, saving important bits of information lost amid the storm of reversals.
4170: 4112: 2937:
I know in person. I met before some of this people at uk-wikipedia. Some can be associated with the nicks I've seen at Internet forums. Some nicks I saw for the first time at the voting page.
1937: 716: 1381:
First of all, multiple attempts to engage him into cooperation and discussion have been made by me and by others despite his horrific badmouthing of me at Ukrainian Knowledge (even with the
2214:, without any acknowledgements of somebody else's authorship. I had to put a copyvio notice on the article. I also asked for somebody to help Andrew Alexander on the Ukrainian notice board 4151: 2654:
etc.) according to Ukrainian spelling and the transliteration table. Is there any reason to consider these moves "controvercial" or "made in bad faith"? What is the reason to revert them?
4048:
editors change material to comply with the accepted conventions. Editors who do not agree with consensus naming conventions must discuss them within the community, not disrupt them.
3775:
were on the other side. Participation of other users was not significant. Irpen and Girlandajo as more experienced users acted jointly and did not let to caught them at 3RR violation.
2474:, and the subsequent moves vote, which not only is a sad example of his bad-faith moving technique, but also a fraudulent voting campaign brought by him to help him force in his point. 4193: 4068:
1) The locus of this dispute is AndriyK's crusade regarding use of transliteration of Ukrainian language names and places for historic persons and places and the tactics he has used.
483:), which not only called for all interested Ukrainians to register Knowledge accounts and vote regarding the articles’ moves, but also classified opposing parties as "Russian mafia" ( 2067:
To be fair I am really dissapointed with AndriyK. Numerous times I was working on articles when AndriK would barge in and change everything without prior discussion. The strory with
3485:, nor did you bother to at least copy-edit the text to prevent legal problems for Knowledge. Copy-pasting large chunks of information without acknowledgements the sources is called 3229: 1469: 768: 4147: 1980: 3930: 3906: 2075: 3918: 3948: 3866:
I have to stress, that the level of articles about Ukraine is rather low, mostly because of the little number of editors. When new users come, they run into the boorishness of
1610: 3939: 3135:
Ezhiki, I gladly accept your apologies, thank you. Oh, well, RfAr isn't over yet, but nevertheless, I should know about myself even now whether I am a sock puppet or not :))).
1482:
cut the dialog he cited to destort its meaning. I found it reasonable to copy the complete context here to make it clear where I was joking and were I was speaking seriously.
849: 4140: 3316:
I provided a reference (book by Shevelev) stating that the consonant "g" was not present in the dialects of Easten Slavs that lived on the territory of present-day Ukraine.
3332: 808:. This RfAr is, among other things, an attempt to collect such evidence. So to answer your questions: one—no, I have not tried to contact these users (because the case is 729: 3076: 3966: 3586: 3460: 3373: 3206: 2175: 59: 3520: 2853:
If your aim here is to engage in endless and ultimately fruitless edit wars and reverts, you'll get plenty of it, until your childish attitude towards editing is changed.
759:
against other editors. The people who contributed to the vote should not be judged in bad faith. Many of them don't even know that they are being badmouthed in absentia.
4119:. Facing the obvious tactic of others moving back he devised a method of preventing reverts of his page moves by producing an artificial history for redirect pages, see 1578: 1495: 3562: 2299: 2274: 2058: 2018:
While he is concerned with what he cosiders monopoly on POV, what he effectively does is replacing it by another monopoly on POV, beacause he bruteforced many things.
1801: 1781: 571: 1877:
What turns AndriyK's edits to a nightmare for other editors is a wide extent of his disruptive editing. He is capable of reverting from 60 to 80 articles in an hour (
1771: 3445: 2971:
was permitted to be freely distributed. He did not understand, however, the subtle difference between free distribution in general and free distribution in terms of
2360:
modern events and the older ones for the history (especially for historical event that happen before the introducing of the modern Ukraine spelling). On October 23d
2110: 2092: 1928:, now when his case was submitted to arbitration, indicates his lack of respect for the arbitration committee and for established procedures of dispute resolution.-- 837:
admin@maidanua.org). I have not been contributing a lot to English wikipedia, as we have been busy translating one cool program into Ukrainian (see the process here
4212:
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
4127: 3987:
requires that decisions be made by a process of discussion, negotiation and compromise. When there is no existing policy one may be crafted using the procedures in
3703:
So what AndriyK is doing is very important and i will try to support him. Maybe sometimes the way he doing it is not the best way so such cases one should discuss.
2845:
Any change to the articles about Ukraine if they do not correspond the tastes of the ceratin group of people is labeled as nationalism and results in an edit war.
1913: 734:
Dear Yalovets. The only reason you were identified by my as a possible sockpuppet is because your account properties match the sockpuppet definition available at
4256:
3) Andrew Alexander, AndriyK, and MaryMaidan are warned to avoid copyright violations and to cooperate with the efforts of others to remove copyright violations.
3060: 3020:
is, in fact, not a translation of my posts but rather the opinion of some of my opponents about my posts. Unfortunatelly, English translation of all my posts is
2516: 2120: 679: 593: 3596: 3408: 3399: 3387: 3194:, and quite misleading at that. He has been told that before but refuses to discuss the matter in any meaningful way. Escalating revert wars is so much easier. 3107:
I do admit the possibility of me misidentifying a few of the accounts I listed as sockpuppets. Yours, for example, was included not because it falls under the
1793: 1424:
behavior as mass name changes in the texts of the articles from the more established names in the literature to the ones that suite AndriyK's particular taste,
824: 799: 786: 4087:
provides that "For geographic names in Ukraine, the Ukrainian National system is used. For historic reasons, many names are also presented in Russian, Polish,
3778:
In my opinion, AndriyK should not continue this silly war, but his action was provoked by Irpen and Girlandajo. In spite of his rather large number of edits,
3627: 3101: 1735: 1694: 1673: 1642: 1624: 2291:
I suggest you abstain from personal insults. First of all, I am not a "sockpuppet" of anyone nor do I have such. Second, I did not "plagiarize" anything (see
2170: 845:). Having said that, I am insisting, that the edits I have made made the articles in Knowledge more truthful, if there is such thing as thruth, of course. -- 3324: 3296: 2545: 1638:
deletions. I've seen you using your "allotment" of 3RR fairly regularly. I also disagree with your definitions of "vote fraud" and "frivolous page moves".--
3436: 861: 3320:
asserts the opposite without any reference. This demostrate the discussion style of my opponents. This is also relevant to the case under consideration.--
3130: 3086:
I do not believe the arbitration arguments against him based on his renaming activities hold any water. The official guide to transliteration can be seen
4226:, AndriyK is prohibited from moving pages, or changing the content of articles which relate to Ukrainian names, especially those of historical interest. 3284:
Andriy, don't start this again. Isn't it ridiculous to back up statements on impropriety of the spelling Chernigov with an url which features this word:
3278: 2915: 2801: 687: 601: 55: 48: 3730: 3721: 3664: 3432:. In Holodomor I believe that was your quote. In fact AndriyK has numerously said that he will ensure that Knowledge is cleansed of KGB/FSB propaganda. 2041: 1555: 1531: 1507: 742: 3739: 1988: 1365: 4286:
5) Moved pages which have become irreversible by adding to the page history of the redirect page may be moved back without the necessity of a vote at
4028:
3) A user who disrupts the functioning of Knowledge by insisting on taking action which violates consensus may be banned or their editing restricted.
2265:
Well, the arbitrage is not about your behavior but about AndriyK's. Since I had limitation on the length of my statement I was trying not to dwell on
1719:. I repeatedly objected just to your using the lead to inject all your ideas at once and requested you to use an appropriate section. See for example 1543: 1519: 846: 623: 520: 3685: 1110:. Similar redirects were created from all other Russian names and all in two steps to make sure a redirect has a history and cannot be moved over: ( 4182: 1587:, trying to erase the words "Ukrainian genocide" and the references to the findings of the US Government Commission on the Ukrainian Famine (e.g. 1213:
and BOTH were created in a similar fashion, in two steps, to make a move there impossible. Please see these histories and check them step by step:
647: 544: 2252: 2157: 1896:
As AndriyK has devised several strategies to avoid violating 3RR, I second Irpen's request for the following remedies to be applied in this case:
3214:
Oh, come on, Mr Ghirlandajo, even making your comment about me misinforming the Arbitration commity, you choose to neglect the truth, which is I
552: 44: 2215: 3707: 3126:
I do not feel I am in a position to comment on the rest of your statement. I'm sure ArbComm will take it into account when making a decision.—
2319: 2195: 1932: 1816: 1326: 663: 577: 2478:
repeatedly trying to back his position by referring to discussions which in fact, had rendered the opposite result from what he was claiming.
2354: 2008:
with quite offensive comments, he said that he reckons than he has no other choice but to use the methods of his perceived gang on Knowledge.
725:
I am a real Knowledge user, just a newbie. I currently work on my first article on Ukrainian Knowledge. Please remove me from these lists. --
610:
The official result of the vote was: "support"—14, "oppose"—20. Adjusted for possible sockpuppets, the result is: "support"—14, "oppose"—10.
3682: 3271: 2951:
listed allerged sockpuppets from one side, has "forgoten" to make simlar list of the party he supports. See, for instance, contributions of
2947:
I would ask Arbitration Commity to treat both parties equely: both group of users should be checked whether they are or are not sockpuppets.
2911: 1453: 696:
The official result of the vote was: "support"—15, "oppose"—17. Adjusted for possible sockpuppets, the result is: "support"—15, "oppose"—8.
362: 4326:
2) AndriyK shall be considered to have arrived at a consensus regarding use of Ukrainian names for historic names and places when following
3878: 2423: 3675: 3653: 2952: 1389:(a Ukrainian political activism site). I was willing to put this behind and his talk page documents my attempts to work with this editor. 671: 585: 560: 3782:
is very intolerant to opinions of other editors. He often offend them. Here are several examples of Girlandajo's comments to his edits:
3691: 2311: 1925: 1878: 2550: 2046: 2021:
He did spectacular amounts of reverts, I have just a few of those articles on my watchlist, but the reverts popped regularly every day.
1830:
It is worth noting that AndriyK seems to prefer to assault those pages that were written by me and/or Irpen. One instructive example is
2484:
have tried to remind AndriyK that the name of the modern city is not to be confused with the conventional English name for the person (
1655:
I did not move Genocide elsewhere in the article, because it was already there. There was a section called "Was Holodomor a Genocide?".
1464: 2914:
who inserted an extremly Russian Orthodox POV paragraph. I did my best to stop the edit war on the article. The details are presented
2872:
Please pay attention to the fact that I corrected obvious mistakes in the articles, while my opponents restored them again and again.
2134: 3636: 1537:
That's just ridiculous, AndriyK. However, thanks to the Wikisoftware, all the history is preserved and anyone can judge who did what!
4330:
he and the others concerned with this matter have come to an agreement and a link to the agreement placed at the foot of this page.
2394: 2389: 480:). Because the first votes cast were overwhelmingly in support of the move, AndriyK posted a message on an outside Ukrainian forum ( 3830:
makes a large number of reverts calling edits of other users "vandalism" and very rarely discuss the disagreement on talk pages.
3826:
He called me "banderovets" (a very insulting name given by Russian nationalists to Ukrainians). His edits contain a lot of POVs.
2584: 3749: 3197:
Also, the google search reveals that the spelling Chernigov is three times more popular in English than Chernihiv. Consequently,
2441: 1958:
16:16, 11 November 2005 Ghirlandajo (rv vandalism: if you continue messing the article with its talk page, you will be reported!)
1763: 1758: 3555: 2011:
He continually bullied several other users, motivating it by what he considers spreading of anti-Ukrainian propaganda by them.
1919: 448: 324: 2762:
I would like to bring your attention to the fact that correct name spelling prevents confusions. Here are two recent examples:
2344:
BTW, looking throw all these 600 edits, trying to find a positive contribution by AndriyK, I have found only a copyvio so far
2006: 1870:
from the article without contributing as much as one new line. Neither did they heed an advise to write a separate article on
3501:, it is not supported by facts. I am sorry if it offended you. Quite possible you acted in bad faith from the very beginning. 3423:
it's not OK when people from one country gang up against a person from another nation to suppress his or her political views.
1824: 1777:
policies and procedures if you intend yourself to be taken seriously in matters like this one—it would benefit both parties.—
1731:). Or you are just trying to make this page as confusing as possible by bringing as much irrelevant stuff here as you can? -- 1272:"Moving articles should be done with care in cases where you may expect disagreement since it it much more difficult to undo" 882:
uses a sneaky trick making use of the features of Wikisoftware to make a reversal of his moves burdensome, thus requiring an
713:), and is now extremely cautious not to overstep the technical limits of this policy, while definitely breaking its spirit. 4352: 4084: 3480: 1452:
As for the suspected sockpuppetry, should it be established that AndriyK uses sockpuppet accounts, a broader ruling as per
1370: 4217: 4188: 3874:, see that any constructive work is impossible, and finally have to give up, or get engaged in edit wars like AndriyK. -- 3441:
Kuban kazak, perhaps it's just your style of doctoring quotes, but I never wrote the second quote as you posted it here.--
2503: 2500: 4281: 3530: 2983: 2376: 2345: 1969: 1056: 182: 2741: 1633:
Irpen, please do not try to mislead. You have not moved the quotes and references elsewhere in the article, you bluntly
1310:
Moves by cut and paste when he could not get it his way by "Move articles" and calling those who reverted him "Vandals".
17: 3954: 2890: 2887: 2827: 2824: 817: 166: 150: 2940:
I support the request to check the voters on vote pages by technical means to exclude or confirm the allegation of
1443:
Proposing the potentially disagreeable moves before imposing them is generally considered a common sense rule anyway
3393: 2798: 2795: 2792: 2789: 2783: 1963: 1957: 1952: 1867: 1029: 1025: 711: 699:
As per results of the vote, the move was not completed. At this point of time, despite the fact that the vote was
468: 308: 2855: 2166:
Hopefully, the Arbitration Committee will find a way to insulate conscientious users from the disgraceful attack.
1564: 1279: 1264: 4038: 2738: 2482: 1351:
limiting him to 1 revert per 24 h instead of 3 (he is permanently just one step under 3 RR at several articles),
1348:
voting was falsified) so that the proposals to move could be discussed by everyone without the threat of bullying
230: 4116: 3483: 3011: 2893: 2884: 2881: 2833: 2830: 2786: 2443:, and was included into the series of History articles and the appropriate template added to it since July 2003 2228: 1903:
limiting him to 1 revert per 24 h instead of 3 (he is permanently just one step under 3 RR at several articles),
1749:
This discussion is out of place here. Anyone who is interested is welcome to check mine and others' comments at
488: 4327: 4023: 3988: 3151:
Slavic topics, not just blindly changes spelling of one or two names, and then reverts endlessly, like you do.
2780: 1236:
I learned it from you: to use different rules in different cases. As you mentioned above, I do learn fast. ;)--
1171: 1147: 909:) Correct a typo back. Thus, the redirect now has its own history and the article cannot be moved back without 214: 134: 118: 3508:
You are certainly entitled to your opinions, however, as an administrator of Knowledge, you should not try to
3274:
how much time I spent explaining you the basic things, but you showed you inability to accept any arguments.--
2782:(along with changing the spelling of Chernihiv). User Irpen reverted it back to the wrong link a minute later 2779:. Because links to disambiguation page are discauraged, I corrected the several articles, for instance this on 1812: 1725:"remove from lead what don't belong there. Hey, there are sections for that and it is discussed there already" 1315: 1163: 1155: 434: 4190: 3886: 3852:. In my opinion, he wanted to revenge himself upon AndriyK for calling him an organiser of "Russian Mafia". 2454: 2163:
was on the verge of personal offence. From that point on I deliberately abstained from direct confrontation.
1489:
I learned it from you: to use different rules in different cases. As you mentioned above, I do learn fast. ;)
945: 443: 340: 285: 262: 246: 4222:
1) Until by consensus he has agreed to a suitable and mutually agreed naming convention using the guideline
3840:, is rather polite and correct. But he rarely accept a compromise. He is a very hard and obstinate editor. 3621: 3614: 3607: 3015: 1386: 1270:
Also, interesting was how he was responding to these issues earlier. When I wrote to him long time ago that
1139: 1131: 1123: 1048: 875: 492: 465: 4044: 2318:
This is an article about a pearl of Kievan barocco architecture. Lets look into the history of the article
1080: 1076: 1073: 953: 404: 372: 356: 198: 86: 4091:". The Naming Conventions currently do not address the question of names and persons associated with the 3244:
is used in the 2004 Britannica everywhere in the article and applied to all periods of the history, while
2614:. Imagine that not a native English speaker X wrote an article about some English or American person, say 2444: 4011: 1574:. So he has tried to present my jokes as an evidence of improper behavior. A clear example of cheating.-- 1501:
If seriosly, unique and clear rules have to be established. Otherwise we'll always have such discussions.
820:
requested to check their IP addresses, but that is hard without having an RfAr in place. So here we go.—
388: 102: 3267: 3123:). Still, I am ready to publicly apologize (once this RfAr is over), if that will make you feel better. 2461: 2449:
AndriyK removed the series template from the article without making any attempt to discuss the matters (
1720: 1600: 1597: 1594: 1591: 1588: 1183: 3844:
made no useful contribution to Knowledge articles during the last month. Almost the whole activity of
3575: 3285: 3249: 2735: 2684: 2248:
mentioned to have performed a negotiation with the author of the article to pulblish it in Knowledge.--
1416:
Finally, please note that the action requested from the ArbCom will not curb the ability of AndriyK to
427: 318: 3592:
This below was interjecting into the statement made by another user. Moved to the author's section. --
3582:. The RfM has been requested by AndriyK, which seems to have acted the most mature in that conflict.-- 3083:
fact, he cannot make wikipedians vote to his benefit, they are always free to express their opinions.
2638:. A groop of users for some unknown reasons try to thrust Russian transliteration for Ukrainian names. 1874:. As a result, the article was protected by an admin from further disruptive editing by deletionists. 1005: 961: 478: 292: 4287: 4223: 4123: 3570: 2979: 2904: 2896: 2485: 2369:
action - he started a revert war that continues up to the present time, having about 500 reverts for
2312: 988: 70: 3198: 1754: 1115: 4164: 2967:
User Andrew Alexander was clearly acting in good faith. The text he coppied into the article about
1716: 997: 475: 4105: 3313:
is cheating and twist the facts making his statement against me. This is the right place to do it.
1820: 1420:
by writing articles and adding info to existing articles. Only a verdict that would disallow such
1330: 1318:
he is looking for the info on how to get on everyone's nerves without getting himself in trouble.
1108: 913:
votes that he expects to flood with sockpuppets and/or followers recruited from internet forums.
3251:. You have provided no references confirming that Chernigov is more "historical" the Chernihiv. 3237:
First, ethnicity is irrelevant to the point. Second, one cannot check the athnicity of the user.
2821: 2707: 2668: 2496: 2138: 1219:. This time he "forgot" the bracket in the first attempt and "corrected" that in the second one. 983: 705: 176: 3482:. You did not do any attempt to acknowledge the authorship of the texts until caught red-handed 2159:). My primary conclusion was that his comments were not justified. Part of the reply I got from 874:, these two moves have another peculiar feature that they share with more than a dozen of other 4078: 3927: 3902: 2687:
so famouse that English language readers got used to the Russian-styled name "Battle of the Stu
2489: 2219: 1871: 1690:
Of course you deleted all those quotes and references. Several times. Stop misleading please.--
1182:
and to make sure it is not moved back (though no one was going to) he added a blank line to it
1013: 974: 4305: 4120: 3539:
it was accepted by all the parties (BTW it was me, who was trying to protect the paragraph by
3470: 2533: 2203: 1217: 1214: 969: 921: 708: 4169:
5) Andrew Alexander, AndriyK, and MaryMaidan all disrupted removal of a copyright violation,
3915: 3660:
with help of the Arbitration Committee should serve to achieve the peace much-much better. --
3624: 3583: 3544: 3536: 3517: 3457: 3442: 3396: 3370: 3334: 2715: 2296: 2249: 2245: 2207: 2149:
articles is tiny and this provocation has diverted effort and immensely drained scarce time.
2144:
Overall, I found his remarks humiliating, at best. For instance, in describing his "rivals",
2089: 1977: 1863: 1790: 1691: 1639: 1607: 1104: 1100: 796: 779: 765: 735: 504: 496: 314: 269: 160: 144: 3477: 2753: 4063: 3856: 3179: 3040: 2832:
but he did not react and continued the revert waron other pages. I wrote one more message:
2561: 2471: 1886: 1855: 1831: 1227:
To see this hypocrisy right after your "respect your colleagues" call is rather amusing. --
512: 457: 302: 4321: 3552: 3533: 2365:
the historical events, strictly according to the convention. He did not stopped with this
2337:
and others. Everybody was adding new important information. Then on October 23, 2005 came
1304:
abuse of the Wikisoftware features to avoid move reversion to make sure his moves prevail;
411: 8: 4171:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/AndriyK/Evidence#Mass_disruptions_of_multiple_articles
4058: 3984: 3532:
by AndriyK is also a direct copy-paste of a paragraph of approximately 65 words from the
1859: 1851: 1401:, with another editor, wrote the only Ukraine-related featured article to this date (the 1040: 937: 795:. Have you tried to email those people? Have you requested to check their ip addresses?-- 224: 4241:
2) AndriyK is banned for one month from Knowledge for creating irreversible page moves.
2351:
articles it shows a kind of a sinister pattern, but lets hope it is just a coincidence.
1344:
administrative reversal of all his article moves done in 3 steps (including those where
47:, and will be read, in full. Evidence, no matter who can provide it, is very welcome at 4266: 4007: 3718: 3559: 3358: 3256: 3182:- are incorrect both in Russian and Ukrainian. The correct Ukrainian versions would be 2889:. They, however, did not accepted this temportal compromise and continued the edit war 2747: 2722:
v in their articles about the city. There is also no reason to consider the name Cherni
2529: 2528:
AndriyK has moved to "more Ukrainian" names a number of articles created by me such as
2386: 2271: 2241: 2177: 2037: 929: 208: 172: 128: 112: 3767:
Chernihiv, I believe that every war has two sides. These was AndriyK on one side and
2883:. I immediatelly accepted it and informed the most active participants of the edit war 1186: 1092: 4152:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/AndriyK/Workshop#Personal_attacks_on_outside_forum
3924: 3898: 3860: 3473: 3349:'s personal attacks and violations of Knowledge rules when e.g. deleting references, 3191: 3175: 3036: 2968: 2651: 2615: 2467: 2450: 2348: 2196: 1882: 1862:- until an admin reverted his move back to normalcy. Thereupon AndriyK and his crony 1750: 1210: 1206: 1201: 894: 890: 615: 567: 461: 334: 279: 256: 240: 3366: 3912: 3867: 3837: 3827: 3779: 3772: 3610: 3576:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=St_Volodymyr%27s_Cathedral&action=history
3433: 3354: 3350: 3317: 3310: 3293: 3231: 3203: 2846: 2537: 2414: 2334: 2322: 2107: 2060: 1973: 1946: 1929: 1910: 1803: 793:"However, simply having made few edits is not evidence of sockpuppetry on its own," 398: 366: 350: 192: 156: 140: 80: 2744: 2675:
fact that I corrected the article titles is considered as "distructive behaviour"?
2015:
his crusade aggravated many editors and in itself a serious bad-faith accusation.
1107:
he was writing, but again, in two steps to prevent the move to a name he dislikes
4194:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/AndriyK/Evidence#Rude_comments_in_edit_summary
3945: 3661: 3649:
is often more eager to compromise than some of his Russian speaking opponents. --
3170: 3143: 3098: 3062: 3024:
available. Only one message was translated into English and was published on the
2366: 2026: 1843: 1449:
that he didn't expect any disagreement, that's why should be taken into account.
1402: 1070: 631: 528: 382: 298: 96: 3091: 2775:
in Russia. Some articles had reference to the corresponding disambiguation page
1909:
possibly, ban from several articles and/or topics altogether (for some time). --
1314:
As for the revert warring, this question from him at the help-desk speaks much.
682: 596: 4300: 4236: 3936: 3306: 3289: 3155: 2772: 2425: 1603: 1032: 421: 220: 4148:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/AndriyK/Workshop#.22The_falsified_voting.22
2870:
which is hardly possible within the case entitled "Community agains AndriyK".
2622:
ashington. Native English speaker Y corrected it by moving the page to George
2460:
to be found). For this major removal, he supplied the following edit summary:
1432:
is requested, together with a single real restriction on this user, that is a
1307:
abuse of Wikisoftware features to avoid his article moved for the same reason;
1246:
You left me speechless hear. Not only you cheat but you take pride in that. --
838: 484: 481: 4346: 4122:. For non-administrators reversing such a move involves placing a request at 4092: 3973: 3715: 3159: 2817: 2812: 2808: 2167: 2122: 2048: 2033: 1990: 1398: 1357:
possibly, ban from several articles and/or topics altogether (for some time).
1099:
redirect has a history, the move over redirect cannot be made. An example is
1017: 726: 639: 536: 204: 124: 108: 54:
Arbitrators will be working on evidence and suggesting proposed decisions at
2750: 842: 690: 604: 4252:
Andrew Alexander, AndriyK, and MaryMaidan warned about copyright violations
3875: 3849: 3751: 3736: 3646: 3540: 3379:
Again, links to diffs would be helpful. I am especially interested to see
3321: 3275: 2877: 2586: 2552: 2542: 2518: 2457: 2437: 2382: 2361: 2338: 2231: 2224: 2185: 2160: 2153: 2145: 2130: 1847: 1575: 1552: 1528: 1513:
You left me speachless hear. Not only you cheat but you take pride in that.
1504: 1492: 1406: 1345: 1256: 1237: 1193: 910: 905:) Go to a redirect with an older name and damage it by adding a typo, and ( 883: 879: 330: 275: 252: 236: 3497:
caused by the lenience of the Soviet system of education to plagiarism is
1397:
contributed to Ukrainian topics probably more than any other Wiki-editor,
1276:"I just follow Knowledge Guidelines, so I do not expect any disagreement." 886:
vote, which he thinks he will be able to falsify using the above tactics.
634: 626: 531: 523: 65: 4205: 3727: 3704: 3693: 3405: 3384: 3342: 3127: 3071: 3005: 2948: 2941: 2934: 2636:
the present situation in East Slavic sector of en-Knowledge is not normal
2505:
stating, "credible sources apply modern name to all periods of history".
2411: 2396: 2330: 1778: 1394: 871: 821: 783: 760: 752: 739: 718: 710:
for examples). The user had been previously blocked for 3RR violations (
650: 547: 471: 394: 346: 188: 76: 2381:
This only a part of the pattern of destructive behavior demonstrated by
1976:
performed an astonishing number of reverts, beating many, many people.--
642: 555: 539: 4010:
requires courtesy towards other users and the assumption of good faith
3978: 3871: 3845: 3841: 3833: 3768: 3726:
But it can be used to spread russain myths. Strange, very strange... --
3617: 3593: 3486: 3346: 3087: 2706:
v as established English spelling. All English language encyclopedias (
2647: 2643: 2326: 2292: 2141:, one of the most popular fora among the Ukrainian Internet community. 2068: 1835: 1768: 1732: 1670: 1621: 1571: 1540: 1516: 1479: 1471: 1461: 1410: 1362: 1247: 1228: 863: 666: 655: 580: 378: 92: 3959: 3476:
is a blatant copying and pasting 678 words from somebody else's work
3341:
I'd like to direct your attention to my comments made above regarding
1953:
16:30, 11 November 2005 Ghirlandajo m (restored deletions by a racist)
4001: 3672: 3650: 3638: 3365:
article strike particularly by its cynicism. To come here after that
3362: 2955: 2791:
and other users that made the above statesments against supported him
2574: 2566: 2106:
because I am yet to see a respecitble piece of work submitted by him.
2084: 1890: 1728: 1617: 1584: 1197: 1179: 1175: 1088: 978:(note discussion and number of red link voters or 2-3 edit voters), ( 674: 658: 588: 563: 417: 3286:
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9023842?query=Chernigov&ct=
1964:
07:47, 11 November 2005 Ghirlandajo m (huh, lost your medkit again?)
782:(please refer to the policy quote available in my statement above).— 3029: 2880:
was trying to mediate the dispute and proposed a temporal solution
2578: 2570: 4271:
4) Ghirlandajo is warned to avoid incivility or personal attacks.
2807:
There are two different rivers thousand or more kilometers apart:
1970:
22:11, 21 November 2005 Ghirlandajo m (rvv another revert warrior)
3154:
The proper name for the city of Chernigov should be discussed on
2711: 1839: 3309:. Now I just try to demonstrate to the Arbitration Commity that 2440:, the article which has been in the working since 19 March 2002 2133:'s remarks about Knowledge users and articles that he posted on 2129:
As a native Ukrainian speaker, I had a chance to closely follow
1376:
My statement above is a simple documenting of AndriyK's behavior
3613:
sticks the Russian history box back in with no comment at all:
3190:. Therefore, AndriyK's preferred names should be classified as 2776: 2768: 2606:
Most of moves I made were related to mere spelling corrections.
2083:
Could the Ukrainian nation be left alone at least? The article
1759:
Talk:Holodomor#Holodomor_Investigation_Commission_Unproven_Bias
1065:
His earlier fraud included multiple moving by cut and paste: (
4128:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/AndriyK/Evidence#Move fraud
3579: 3035:
When I invited people to express their opinion about renamind
2466:
2) AndriyK's renaming of the articles about two Rus' princes,
2005:
In one message, where he scrutinized the edits of other users
1028:(restored by an admin who cleaned it up on his own initiative 897:) are done in the following bad faith three steps procedure: ( 856: 456:
On October 27, 2005, AndriyK unilaterally moved the articles
2593:
Below are my comments to the accusations reised against me.
1336:
I respectfully request the ArbCom to consider the following
3816:(rv demented racist who was blocked yesterday but returned) 3801:(stop pushing laughable nationalism, or you will be banned) 2972: 3430:
Due to the Soviet and Modern Russian policy of covering up
3025: 2730:
v. In fact, English language sources apply the name Cherni
870:
Additionally to the vote fraud listed in the statement by
3079:
and explicitly pointed to it from my “Chernihiv” votes.
2631:
situation it would be normal cooperation of wikipedians.
1340:
in addition or in place of whatever ban is appropriate:
1255:
You don't like of other people bahave like you? Why? :)--
3049:
I am sorry, if my activity damaged Knowledge in any way.
2992:
My annoncement at maidan.org.ua and "Vote falsification"
4141:
AndriyK's appeal to the Ukrainians and personal attacks
3479:(almost entire content of the webpage) and 50 words of 3357:'s wanton doctoring and deletion of reputable sources, 3353:'s personal attacks and out-of-control revert warring, 3199:
total elimination of the well-established historic name
2998: 2694:
Ukrainian city Chernihiv is indeed known both as Cherni
2211: 1192:
Interesting was to see his reaction when I noticed the
3892:
Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (5/0/0/0)
3255:"g" in their dialects. (See book by Shevelov cited in 1715:
There alway was and still is a section in the article
3897:
Accept; I've seen enough to give this one a hearing.
3855:
Concerning the voting about renaming of the articles
2618:, but misspelled the title as, for instance, George 2216:
Portal:Ukraine/New article announcements#October 2005
1062:
Please note an identical pattern in all these moves.
1008:(sensible move but still in same bad faith manner), ( 916:
This is the list of articles moved in such fashion: (
4095:, the historical predecessor of Russia and Ukraine. 3549:
Andriy VLASENKO, Viktor KYRKEVYCH and Serhiy KARDASH
1789:
Thanks at least for not calling me a "sockpuppet".--
1570:
pharse, reflecting my true opinion was not cited by
1525:
You don't like of other people bahave like you? Why?
1000:(moved further later and his harm thus corrected), ( 2788:. But it did not help. He continued the revert war 1938:
Comments of other users to the statement by party 3
704:reverts per article almost on the daily basis (see 487:). English translations of the posts are available 3248:is just mentioned as the Russian name of the city 3218:moved a single article in the en:Knowledge, and I 2895:. Similarly they did not accept any compromise on 778:fall under the definition of a sockpuppet, as per 3813:(rv moron who was blocked yesterday but returned) 3240:Please do not misinform the Arbitration commity. 3111:definition of a sockpuppet, but rather under the 2930:I have only one account at en-wikipedia: AndriyK. 2910:The edit war on this article was started by user 2876:My opponents did not accept any compromise. When 1602:, he then accused me of "extreme nationalism" on 889:ALL of his moves starting from October 24, 2005 ( 751:Would like to add to this, that the statement of 507:definition above) used to skew the vote results: 474:posted requests to have the articles moved back ( 4344: 2137:. Some of the remarks were also cross-posted on 4187:6) Ghirlandajo has sometimes been discourteous 3792:(rvv foolish ukrainization of russophone towns) 1020:caused by an admin cleaning it up on his own, ( 4311:maximum block shall be increased to one year. 3970:(vote counts and comments are there as well) 3623:, with a disruptive comment "rv vandalism".-- 3556:Talk:St Volodymyr's Cathedral#Recent Edit war 3272:Portal talk:Ukraine/New article announcements 2820:, and correcting the referens in the article 2785:. I pointed it out at the Irpen's talk page: 2321:. The article was started on June 7, 2005 by 4183:Rudeness and personal attacks by Ghirlandajo 4085:Knowledge:Naming conventions#Ukrainian names 3580:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Improv#RFM 3493:. My hypothesis that your behavior might be 3428:politising the articles, as do you Andrew - 2702:v. But there is no reason to consider Cherni 2347:. Together with his pushing for Copyvios in 3819:(rv shameless POV-pushing by a banderovets) 3606:revert away from the edit by AndriyK here: 2933:None of the people in the list compiled by 2525:(Please limit your statement to 500 words) 2055:(Please limit your statement to 500 words) 1174:. Similarly, he took and existing redirect 1035:for three edits by AndriyK at 8:09-8:10), ( 839:http://www2.maidan.org.ua/n/mova/1132045021 485:http://www2.maidan.org.ua/n/free/1130025302 3578:. The article is curently undergoing RfM: 3369:and demand "justice" seems flat obscene.-- 3262:The most blatant lie is that we allegigly 51:. Evidence is more useful than comments. 1434:ban to move articles and create redirects 843:http://maidan.org.ua/index.php/PledgeBank 717:Other users comments to the statement by 453:Please limit your statement to 500 words 4335:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4316:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4295:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4276:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4261:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4246:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4231:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4200:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4177:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4159:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4135:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4100:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4073:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4053:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4033:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4018:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 3996:Passed 7-0, 04:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 1761:. But most importantly, please see this 1438:undone for further review and discussion 1297:his behaviour shown above, it includes: 1031:, note move time Oct 28, 8:09 and check 3848:was directed to personal conflict with 3268:Talk:Chernihiv# Chernihiv vs. Chernigov 3010:"English translations of the posts ... 2227:and restored the copyvio version again 1717:Holodomor#Was_the_Holodomor_genocide.3F 1616:Dear Andrew Alexander. The issue about 14: 4345: 1383:use of the B-word next to my Wiki-name 816:accusing them of anything). Two—yes, 3620:puts the box back in yet once again: 2325:. It robustly grew by the efforts of 2076:Comments to the statement by party 6 1945:A few "spicy" comments by "unbiased" 1470:Comment to the statement by party 2 ( 1325:or just recruited blind followers is 58:and voting on proposed decisions at 3602:Introvert, the box was removed just 2849:made it very clear on my talk page: 2829:. I pointed it out at Irpen's talk: 2210:put a blatant copyvio from the site 1393:portal and in the Ukrainian topics. 4282:Reversal of irreversible page moves 4115:) and moved a number of pages, see 3810:(rv edits by another Polish zombie) 3681:I support Lysy's proposal as well. 2156:and analyzed some of his comments ( 1755:Talk:Holodomor#Changes_by_alexander 1333:what a productive account this is. 23: 3798:(rvv a new piece of polish idiocy) 3795:(rvv idiotic Moldovan nationalism) 3762:Concerning this silly renaming war 3026:English version of the site Maidan 2646:. I corrected several names (e.g. 1972:-- that warrior wasn't as strong. 1185:so that the redirect would have a 1172:Principality of Novgorod-Severskiy 1148:Principality of Novgorod Severskiy 804:You are right, it's all about the 435:Statement by complaining witnesses 24: 18:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration 4364: 4218:Restrictions on AndriyK's editing 4043:4.2) The Knowledge guidelines on 3789:(rvv a new attack by banderovtsy) 2826:. User Irpen reverted my changes 1223:embarrassed). Check this dialog: 1164:Principality of Novgorod-Seversky 1156:Principality of Novgorod Seversky 3786:(rvv attack by Polish Mafia :))) 3554:from the accusation in POV. See 3266:. It's enough to have a look at 2562:Talk page of the Russkaya Pravda 2192:Let us look for a few examples: 1723:of mine supplied with a summary 30:on 01:54 (UTC), 28 November 2005 3292:and discuss the issue there. -- 3142:Comment of statement by party ( 1132:Novgorod-Severskiy Principality 1124:Novgorod Severskiy Principality 1103:entry created as a redirect to 38:on 04:20, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 4328:Knowledge:How to create policy 4039:Role of the Naming Conventions 3989:Knowledge:How to create policy 3028:. Please find the translation 2671:in the corresponding article. 2481:Many editors including myself 1549:This is precisely what I mean. 1140:Novgorod Seversky Principality 1091:was cut and pasted twice, see 13: 1: 4024:Disruptive user may be banned 3949:00:03, 27 November 2005 (UTC) 3940:23:14, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 3931:23:02, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 3919:22:59, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 3907:22:51, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 3731:07:55, 28 November 2005 (UTC) 3722:05:52, 28 November 2005 (UTC) 3708:09:12, 27 November 2005 (UTC) 3686:20:54, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 3676:20:20, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 3665:19:59, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 3654:17:55, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 3628:05:25, 28 November 2005 (UTC) 3587:07:16, 27 November 2005 (UTC) 3563:22:05, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 3521:23:05, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 3461:05:50, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 3446:00:21, 27 November 2005 (UTC) 3437:14:54, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 3409:15:43, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 3400:05:44, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 3388:02:27, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 3374:21:21, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 3325:01:05, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 3297:18:23, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 3279:16:38, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 3207:10:04, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 3131:15:54, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 3102:14:25, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 2767:There are to different towns 2734:v to all periods of history: 2726:v more "historical" as Cherni 2546:03:58, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 2390:08:52, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 2355:Silly Chernihiv/Chernigov war 2300:22:32, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 2275:10:59, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 2253:09:25, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 2206:starts with AndreyK's friend 2171:02:53, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 2111:14:44, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 2093:05:12, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 2042:06:59, 27 November 2005 (UTC) 1981:09:14, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 1933:09:50, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1914:08:44, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 1794:02:57, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1782:01:59, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1772:06:11, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 1736:05:04, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 1695:04:48, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 1674:09:23, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1643:09:05, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1625:08:10, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1611:04:21, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 1579:15:24, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1556:18:04, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1544:18:03, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1532:18:01, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1520:17:59, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1508:17:56, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1496:17:55, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1465:08:29, 27 November 2005 (UTC) 1366:21:43, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 850:23:39, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 825:15:31, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 800:06:06, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 787:01:53, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 769:04:51, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 743:01:53, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 730:02:39, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 3879:19:34, 9 December 2005 (UTC) 3740:22:50, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 3597:21:15, 9 December 2005 (UTC) 3406:Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 3385:Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 3264:refuse to discuss the matter 3128:Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 1779:Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 822:Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 784:Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 740:Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 7: 4353:Knowledge arbitration cases 4012:Knowledge:Assume good faith 3955:Temporary injunction (none) 3383:personal attacks revealed.— 2835:, but no reaction followed. 1906:personal attacks probation, 1354:personal attacks probation, 876:page moves made by the user 857:http://paulkiss.forever.kz/ 10: 4369: 3469:For the record. Your edit 3165:The modern Ukrainian form 2800:. (More details are given 2685:Battle of the Stuhna River 2463:("Correcting spellings"). 1387:slander campaign at Maidan 1274:, he responded cynically: 1057:Battle of the Stugna River 4288:Knowledge:Requested moves 4224:Knowledge:Naming conflict 4124:Knowledge:Requested moves 2816:Trubizh, creating a stub 2718:) use the spelling Cherni 2486:Talk:Mikhail of Chernihiv 2244:"forgot" to mention that 1924:In my opinion, AndriyK's 1006:Mongol invasion of Russia 3804:(rvv islamic propaganda) 3571:St Volodymyr's Cathedral 2980:St Volodymyr's Cathedral 2905:St Volodymyr's Cathedral 2897:St Volodymyr's Cathedral 2868:treat both sides equelly 2313:St Volodymyr's Cathedral 1926:continued revert warring 1441:using unethical tricks. 1321:The most typical of his 878:. When moving articles, 566:(also tried to vote for 3965:All numbering based on 2822:Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi 2708:Encyclopedia Britannica 2669:Encyclopedia Britannica 2551:Statement by party 12 ( 2517:Statement by party 11 ( 2424:Statement by party 10 ( 2152:I tried to reason with 1821:Dovbuzh's contributions 1418:contribute to Knowledge 1116:Principality of Severia 962:yet another subway line 812:against them, and I am 3807:(rvv a lunatic vandal) 3569:It must be noted that 3305:I discussed enough at 3230:Comment to comment by 2490:Talk:Oleg of Chernihiv 2395:Statement by party 9 ( 2220:Talk:Ivan Kotlyarevsky 2176:Statement by party 8 ( 2121:Statement by party 7 ( 2059:Statement by party 6 ( 2047:Statement by party 5 ( 1989:Statement by party 4 ( 1872:Ukrainian architecture 1802:Statement by party 3 ( 1267:for complete context. 998:Vsevolod Svyatoslavich 862:Statement by party 2 ( 3887:Preliminary decisions 3545:User:Andrew Alexander 3537:User:Andrew Alexander 3345:'s personal attacks, 3335:User:Andrew Alexander 3188:Mikhailo of Chernihiv 3119:are treated similarly 3061:Statement by party ( 2963:"Copyright violation" 2716:Columbia Encyclopedia 2585:Statement by party ( 2495:Here is a discussion 2436:1) AndriyK's editing 2246:User:Andrew Alexander 2208:User:Andrew Alexander 1864:User:Andrew Alexander 1428:(if established) and 1105:Siverian Principality 1101:Severian Principality 901:) Move the article, ( 780:Knowledge:Sock puppet 736:Knowledge:Sock puppet 680:User:Serghiy Riabovil 594:User:Serghiy Riabovil 505:Knowledge:Sock puppet 501:are treated similarly 497:Knowledge:Sock puppet 444:Statements by parties 293:Supporters of AndriyK 71:Complaining witnesses 4306:Enforcement by block 4165:Copyright violations 3857:Mikhail of Chernihiv 3822:(rv a revert maniac) 3333:Statement by party ( 3180:Mikhail of Chernihiv 3041:Mikhail of Chernihiv 2982:(a small paragraph) 2660:Geographic locations 2472:Mikhail of Chernigov 2456:: no statement from 2212:http://wumag.kiev.ua 1887:Mikhail of Chernihiv 1868:delete some sections 1856:Russian architecture 1832:Russian architecture 1751:Talk:Holodomor#Kuban 1566:). As you see, the 1454:Zivinbudas precedent 1026:Russian architecture 984:Mikhail of Chernigov 841:and the resulf here 513:Mikhail of Chernihiv 470:). Later this day, 458:Mikhail of Chernigov 3985:Knowledge:Consensus 3766:Chernigov<-: --> 2978:My contribution to 2139:pravda.com.ua forum 1920:Addendum by party 3 1860:Architecture of Rus 1852:Architecture of Rus 1478:I must stress that 1329:. One can see from 954:another subway line 449:Statement by Ezhiki 4322:Proof of agreement 4267:Ghirlandajo warned 4079:Naming conventions 4045:naming conventions 4008:Knowledge:Civility 3967:/Proposed decision 3923:Accept, as above. 3671:than RFAr here. -- 3367:reference massacre 3359:User:Alex Bakharev 3257:Ukrainian Language 2418:2005-11-23 22:30 Z 2242:User:Alex Bakharev 2178:User:Alex Bakharev 1813:to eschew the rule 1014:Igor Svyatoslavich 989:another VOTE FRAUD 791:Please read this: 60:/Proposed decision 4214: 4113:links to evidence 4106:AndriyK's crusade 3870:and obstinacy of 3861:Oleg of Chernihiv 3836:, in contrast to 3495:an honest mistake 3491:indisputable fact 3474:Ivan Kotlyarevsky 3192:original research 3184:Oleh of Chernihiv 3176:Oleg of Chernihiv 3169:evolved from the 3056:(To be continued) 3037:Oleg of Chernihiv 2969:Ivan Kotlyarevsky 2652:Severyn Nalyvaiko 2616:George Washington 2598:"Bad faith moves" 2534:Severyn Nalyvaiko 2468:Oleg of Chernigov 2419: 2349:Ivan Kotlyarevsky 2197:Ivan Kotlyarevsky 1883:Oleg of Chernihiv 1371:Addendum by Irpen 1331:his contributions 1211:Ukrainian colonel 1207:Ukrainian Colonel 1202:Ukrainian colonel 970:Oleg of Chernigov 895:Severyn Nalyvaiko 891:Severyn Nalivaiko 755:is nothing but a 688:User:Loreley-rein 616:Oleg of Chernihiv 602:User:Loreley-rein 568:Oleg of Chernihiv 462:Oleg of Chernigov 270:Nominal defendant 4360: 4210: 4064:Locus of dispute 4059:Findings of fact 3868:User:Ghirlandajo 3838:User:Ghirlandajo 3828:User:Ghirlandajo 3780:User:Ghirlandajo 3773:User:Ghirlandajo 3625:Andrew Alexander 3611:User:Ghirlandajo 3584:Andrew Alexander 3518:Andrew Alexander 3458:Andrew Alexander 3443:Andrew Alexander 3397:Andrew Alexander 3371:Andrew Alexander 3355:User:Kuban kazak 3351:User:Ghirlandajo 2847:User:Ghirlandajo 2612:Names of persons 2451:talk:Kievan Rus' 2417: 2335:User:Kuban kazak 2323:User:Ghirlandajo 2297:Andrew Alexander 2250:Andrew Alexander 2234:and his friend. 2090:Andrew Alexander 2061:User:Kuban kazak 1978:Andrew Alexander 1974:User:Ghirlandajo 1947:User:Ghirlandajo 1804:User:Ghirlandajo 1791:Andrew Alexander 1692:Andrew Alexander 1640:Andrew Alexander 1608:Andrew Alexander 1447:cynical response 1200:he created to a 1016:, see also the 797:Andrew Alexander 766:Andrew Alexander 315:Andrew Alexander 66:Involved parties 4368: 4367: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4343: 4342: 4324: 4308: 4303: 4284: 4269: 4254: 4239: 4220: 4208: 4185: 4167: 4143: 4108: 4081: 4066: 4061: 4041: 4026: 4004: 3981: 3976: 3962: 3957: 3894: 3889: 3755: 3697: 3642: 3339: 3235: 3171:Old East Slavic 3148: 3144:User:Ashapochka 3067: 3063:User:Ashapochka 2811:in Ukraine and 2771:in Ukraine and 2634:Unfortunatelly 2602:transliteration 2591: 2557: 2523: 2430: 2401: 2379: 2357: 2316: 2200: 2182: 2127: 2078: 2065: 2053: 1995: 1940: 1922: 1844:Imperial Russia 1808: 1476: 1403:Hero of Ukraine 1373: 1071:Russkaya pravda 972:followed by a 868: 757:personal attack 722: 632:User:Ashapochka 624:User:MaryMaidan 529:User:Ashapochka 521:User:MaryMaidan 464:to new titles ( 451: 446: 437: 414: 412:Neutral comment 295: 272: 73: 68: 39: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4366: 4356: 4355: 4340: 4338: 4337: 4323: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4307: 4304: 4302: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4283: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4268: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4253: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4238: 4237:AndriyK banned 4235: 4234: 4233: 4219: 4216: 4207: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4184: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4166: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4142: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4107: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4080: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4065: 4062: 4060: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4040: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4025: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4003: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3980: 3977: 3975: 3972: 3961: 3960:Final decision 3958: 3956: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3942: 3933: 3928:(spill yours?) 3921: 3909: 3893: 3890: 3888: 3885: 3883: 3824: 3823: 3820: 3817: 3814: 3811: 3808: 3805: 3802: 3799: 3796: 3793: 3790: 3787: 3764: 3763: 3754: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3696: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3668: 3667: 3641: 3635: 3633: 3631: 3630: 3590: 3567: 3566: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3512:the facts and 3503: 3502: 3465: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3425: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3338: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3314: 3307:Talk:Chernihiv 3300: 3299: 3290:Talk:Chernihiv 3234: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3156:Talk:Chernihiv 3147: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3124: 3066: 3059: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3047: 3044: 3033: 3002: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2976: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2945: 2938: 2931: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2901: 2900: 2874: 2863: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2805: 2764: 2763: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2692: 2676: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2639: 2608: 2607: 2590: 2583: 2556: 2549: 2522: 2515: 2429: 2426:User:Introvert 2422: 2400: 2393: 2378: 2375: 2356: 2353: 2315: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2199: 2194: 2181: 2174: 2135:maidanua forum 2126: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2077: 2074: 2064: 2057: 2052: 2045: 1994: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1967: 1960: 1955: 1950: 1939: 1936: 1921: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1907: 1904: 1901: 1807: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1628: 1627: 1604:Talk:Holodomor 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1546: 1534: 1522: 1510: 1498: 1475: 1468: 1430:revert warring 1372: 1369: 1359: 1358: 1355: 1352: 1349: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1305: 1302: 1261: 1260: 1242: 1241: 867: 860: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 748: 747: 746: 745: 721: 715: 694: 693: 685: 677: 669: 661: 653: 648:User:Paul kiss 645: 637: 629: 608: 607: 599: 591: 583: 575: 558: 550: 545:User:Paul kiss 542: 534: 526: 450: 447: 445: 442: 436: 433: 432: 431: 413: 410: 409: 408: 392: 376: 360: 344: 328: 312: 294: 291: 290: 289: 271: 268: 267: 266: 250: 234: 218: 202: 186: 170: 154: 138: 122: 106: 90: 72: 69: 67: 64: 34: 26: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4365: 4354: 4351: 4350: 4348: 4341: 4336: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4329: 4317: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4296: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4289: 4277: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4262: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4247: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4232: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4225: 4215: 4213: 4201: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4195: 4191: 4189: 4178: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4160: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4153: 4149: 4136: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4129: 4125: 4121: 4118: 4114: 4101: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4094: 4090: 4086: 4074: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4054: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4046: 4034: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4019: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4009: 3997: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3990: 3986: 3971: 3969: 3968: 3950: 3947: 3943: 3941: 3938: 3934: 3932: 3929: 3926: 3922: 3920: 3917: 3914: 3910: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3895: 3884: 3881: 3880: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3864: 3862: 3858: 3853: 3851: 3847: 3843: 3839: 3835: 3831: 3829: 3821: 3818: 3815: 3812: 3809: 3806: 3803: 3800: 3797: 3794: 3791: 3788: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3781: 3776: 3774: 3770: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3753: 3750:Statement by 3741: 3738: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3729: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3720: 3717: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3706: 3701: 3695: 3692:Statement by 3687: 3684: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3674: 3666: 3663: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3652: 3648: 3640: 3637:Statement by 3634: 3629: 3626: 3622: 3619: 3615: 3612: 3608: 3605: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3595: 3589: 3588: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3572: 3564: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3531: 3529:The addition 3528: 3527: 3522: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3481: 3478: 3475: 3471: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3463: 3462: 3459: 3447: 3444: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3435: 3431: 3426: 3424: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3410: 3407: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3398: 3394: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3336: 3326: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3298: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3277: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3260: 3258: 3252: 3250: 3247: 3243: 3238: 3233: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3205: 3200: 3195: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3172: 3168: 3163: 3161: 3160:user:Mikkalai 3157: 3152: 3145: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3129: 3125: 3122: 3120: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3100: 3094: 3092: 3089: 3084: 3080: 3078: 3073: 3064: 3058: 3057: 3048: 3045: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3017: 3013: 3007: 3003: 3000: 2999:maidan.org.ua 2995: 2994: 2993: 2990: 2984: 2981: 2977: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2961: 2956: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2943: 2939: 2936: 2932: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926:"Sockpuppets" 2924: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2908: 2906: 2903: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2891: 2888: 2885: 2882: 2879: 2875: 2873: 2869: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2848: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841:"Rewert wars" 2839: 2834: 2831: 2828: 2825: 2823: 2819: 2818:Trubezh River 2814: 2813:Trubezh River 2810: 2809:Trubizh River 2806: 2803: 2799: 2796: 2793: 2790: 2787: 2784: 2781: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2754: 2751: 2748: 2745: 2742: 2739: 2736: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2677: 2673: 2672: 2670: 2665: 2661: 2658: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2640: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2630: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2610: 2609: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2599: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2588: 2582: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2563: 2554: 2548: 2547: 2544: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2526: 2520: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2504: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2473: 2469: 2464: 2462: 2459: 2455: 2452: 2447: 2445: 2442: 2439: 2434: 2427: 2421: 2420: 2416: 2413: 2405: 2398: 2392: 2391: 2388: 2384: 2374: 2372: 2368: 2363: 2352: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2314: 2301: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2276: 2273: 2268: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2254: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2233: 2229: 2226: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2198: 2193: 2190: 2187: 2179: 2173: 2172: 2169: 2164: 2162: 2158: 2155: 2150: 2147: 2142: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2124: 2123:User:Sashazlv 2112: 2109: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2094: 2091: 2088:references.-- 2086: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2073: 2070: 2062: 2056: 2050: 2049:User:Halibutt 2044: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2030: 2028: 2022: 2019: 2016: 2012: 2009: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1992: 1982: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1968: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1959: 1956: 1954: 1951: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1935: 1934: 1931: 1927: 1915: 1912: 1908: 1905: 1902: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1894: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1875: 1873: 1869: 1866:attempted to 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1828: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1805: 1795: 1792: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1780: 1774: 1773: 1770: 1766: 1765: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1737: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1696: 1693: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1675: 1672: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1644: 1641: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1598: 1595: 1592: 1589: 1586: 1581: 1580: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1563:(Copied from 1557: 1554: 1550: 1547: 1545: 1542: 1538: 1535: 1533: 1530: 1526: 1523: 1521: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1509: 1506: 1502: 1499: 1497: 1494: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1481: 1473: 1467: 1466: 1463: 1458: 1455: 1450: 1448: 1444: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1426:sockpuppeting 1423: 1419: 1414: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1399:User:Sashazlv 1396: 1390: 1388: 1385:) and a loud 1384: 1379: 1377: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1356: 1353: 1350: 1347: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1339: 1334: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1319: 1317: 1309: 1306: 1303: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1296: 1291: 1288: 1283: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1268: 1266: 1259: 1258: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1240: 1239: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1224: 1220: 1218: 1215: 1212: 1208: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1190: 1188: 1184: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1106: 1102: 1096: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1072: 1068: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1049:Trubezh river 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 990: 985: 981: 977: 976: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 946:a subway line 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 919: 914: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 887: 885: 881: 877: 873: 865: 859: 858: 852: 851: 848: 844: 840: 826: 823: 819: 815: 811: 807: 803: 802: 801: 798: 794: 790: 789: 788: 785: 781: 777: 772: 771: 770: 767: 762: 758: 754: 750: 749: 744: 741: 737: 733: 732: 731: 728: 724: 723: 720: 714: 712: 709: 706: 702: 697: 692: 691:Contributions 689: 686: 684: 683:Contributions 681: 678: 676: 675:Contributions 673: 670: 668: 667:Contributions 665: 662: 660: 659:Contributions 657: 654: 652: 651:Contributions 649: 646: 644: 643:Contributions 641: 640:User:Yalovets 638: 636: 635:Contributions 633: 630: 628: 627:Contributions 625: 622: 621: 620: 618: 617: 611: 606: 605:Contributions 603: 600: 598: 597:Contributions 595: 592: 590: 589:Contributions 587: 584: 582: 581:Contributions 579: 576: 573: 569: 565: 564:Contributions 562: 559: 557: 556:Contributions 554: 553:User:Mari Ana 551: 549: 548:Contributions 546: 543: 541: 540:Contributions 538: 537:User:Yalovets 535: 533: 532:Contributions 530: 527: 525: 524:Contributions 522: 519: 518: 517: 515: 514: 508: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 479: 476: 473: 469: 466: 463: 459: 454: 441: 429: 426: 423: 419: 416: 415: 406: 403: 400: 396: 393: 390: 387: 384: 380: 377: 374: 371: 368: 364: 361: 358: 355: 352: 348: 345: 342: 339: 336: 332: 329: 326: 323: 320: 316: 313: 310: 307: 304: 300: 297: 296: 287: 284: 281: 277: 274: 273: 264: 261: 258: 254: 251: 248: 245: 242: 238: 235: 232: 229: 226: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 174: 173:Alex Bakharev 171: 168: 165: 162: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 142: 139: 136: 133: 130: 126: 123: 120: 117: 114: 110: 107: 104: 101: 98: 94: 91: 88: 85: 82: 78: 75: 74: 63: 61: 57: 52: 50: 46: 40: 37: 32: 29: 19: 4339: 4334: 4325: 4315: 4309: 4294: 4285: 4275: 4270: 4260: 4255: 4245: 4240: 4230: 4221: 4211: 4209: 4199: 4186: 4176: 4168: 4158: 4144: 4134: 4109: 4099: 4093:Kievian Rus' 4088: 4082: 4072: 4067: 4052: 4042: 4032: 4027: 4017: 4005: 3995: 3982: 3964: 3963: 3925:Mindspillage 3899:Kelly Martin 3882: 3865: 3854: 3850:User:AndriyK 3832: 3825: 3777: 3765: 3756: 3702: 3698: 3669: 3647:User:AndriyK 3643: 3632: 3603: 3591: 3568: 3548: 3541:User:AndriyK 3513: 3509: 3498: 3494: 3490: 3464: 3454: 3429: 3422: 3380: 3340: 3263: 3261: 3253: 3245: 3241: 3239: 3236: 3219: 3215: 3196: 3187: 3183: 3166: 3164: 3153: 3149: 3118: 3116: 3115:definition ( 3112: 3108: 3095: 3085: 3081: 3068: 3055: 3054: 3021: 3009: 2991: 2962: 2925: 2878:User:Piotrus 2871: 2867: 2852: 2840: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2703: 2699: 2698:v and Cherni 2695: 2688: 2680: 2663: 2659: 2635: 2628: 2623: 2619: 2611: 2601: 2597: 2592: 2587:User:AndriyK 2558: 2553:User:KNewman 2527: 2524: 2519:User:Fisenko 2511: 2507: 2494: 2480: 2476: 2465: 2458:User:AndriyK 2448: 2435: 2431: 2409: 2406: 2402: 2383:User:AndriyK 2380: 2370: 2362:User:AndriyK 2358: 2343: 2339:User:AndriyK 2317: 2266: 2232:User:AndriyK 2225:User:AndriyK 2201: 2191: 2186:User:AndriyK 2184:I find that 2183: 2165: 2161:User:AndriyK 2154:User:AndriyK 2151: 2146:User:AndriyK 2143: 2131:User:AndriyK 2128: 2066: 2054: 2031: 2023: 2020: 2017: 2013: 2010: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1962: 1923: 1895: 1876: 1848:Soviet Union 1829: 1817:user:Dovbush 1809: 1775: 1762: 1748: 1724: 1634: 1582: 1567: 1562: 1548: 1536: 1524: 1512: 1500: 1488: 1477: 1459: 1451: 1446: 1442: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1415: 1409:and myself ( 1407:user:Fisenko 1391: 1380: 1375: 1374: 1360: 1337: 1335: 1327:user:Dovbush 1322: 1320: 1313: 1294: 1292: 1286: 1284: 1275: 1271: 1269: 1262: 1254: 1245: 1243: 1235: 1226: 1225: 1221: 1194:Peter Mogila 1191: 1167: 1159: 1151: 1143: 1135: 1127: 1119: 1111: 1097: 1084: 1066: 1064: 1061: 1052: 1044: 1041:Petro Mohyla 1036: 1021: 1018:deletion log 1009: 1001: 993: 987: 986:followed by 979: 973: 965: 957: 949: 941: 938:Southern Buh 933: 925: 917: 915: 906: 902: 898: 888: 869: 853: 835: 813: 809: 805: 792: 775: 756: 700: 698: 695: 664:User:Dovbush 613: 612: 609: 578:User:Dovbush 510: 509: 500: 455: 452: 438: 424: 401: 385: 369: 353: 337: 321: 305: 282: 259: 243: 227: 211: 195: 179: 163: 147: 131: 115: 99: 83: 53: 41: 35: 33: 27: 25: 4301:Enforcement 3694:User:Gutsul 3489:. It is an 3456:accusers.-- 3434:Kuban kazak 3392:Read here: 3343:User:Ezhiki 3318:Ghirlandajo 3311:Ghirlandajo 3294:Ghirlandajo 3232:Ghirlandajo 3204:Ghirlandajo 3072:User:Ezhiki 3006:User:Ezhiki 2949:User:Ezhiki 2942:User:Ezhiki 2935:User:Ezhiki 2912:Kuban kazak 2683:na? Is the 2438:Kievan Rus' 2397:User:Mzajac 2331:User:Mzajac 2240:"Unbiased" 2108:Kuban kazak 1930:Ghirlandajo 1911:Ghirlandajo 1395:User:Mzajac 1323:sockpuppets 1075:, repeated 1033:deleted log 761:User:Ezhiki 753:User:Ezhiki 719:User:Ezhiki 572:wrong place 472:User:Mzajac 157:Kuban kazak 141:Ghirlandajo 36:Case Closed 28:Case Opened 3974:Principles 3946:Neutrality 3937:➥the Epopt 3872:User:Irpen 3846:User:Irpen 3842:User:Irpen 3834:User:Irpen 3769:User:Irpen 3662:ashapochka 3618:User:Irpen 3499:my opinion 3487:Plagiarism 3347:User:Irpen 3099:ashapochka 2953:User:Greka 2691:na River"? 2648:Ivan Bohun 2530:Ivan Bogun 2327:User:Irpen 2293:Plagiarism 2069:Kiev Metro 1836:Kievan Rus 1480:User:Irpen 1472:User:Irpen 1422:disruptive 1411:user:Irpen 1287:conclusion 975:VOTE FRAUD 864:User:Irpen 847:MaryMaidan 672:User:Fofka 656:User:Adv94 586:User:Fofka 561:User:Lom81 299:Ashapochka 3979:Consensus 3639:User:Lysy 3560:abakharev 3363:Holodomor 3246:Chernigov 3242:Chernihiv 3167:Chernihiv 3109:technical 2644:available 2575:Severians 2567:Drevlyans 2387:abakharev 2272:abakharev 2085:Holodomor 1891:Chernihiv 1729:Holodomor 1721:this edit 1618:Holodomor 1585:Holodomor 1295:summarize 1285:The main 1198:Polkovnyk 1180:Chernihiv 1176:Chernigov 1089:Siverians 922:Nalyvayko 221:Introvert 56:/Workshop 49:/Evidence 45:Talk page 4347:Category 4206:Remedies 4117:Move log 4002:Civility 3944:Accept. 3913:James F. 3911:Accept. 3113:extended 2579:Motorins 2571:Vyatichs 2367:WP:Point 2168:Sashazlv 2027:WP:POINT 1991:Gnomz007 1825:Andriy's 1764:Reminder 1338:remedies 806:evidence 727:Yalovets 428:contribs 405:contribs 389:contribs 373:contribs 357:contribs 341:contribs 325:contribs 309:contribs 286:contribs 263:contribs 247:contribs 231:contribs 215:contribs 205:Sashazlv 199:contribs 183:contribs 167:contribs 151:contribs 135:contribs 125:Gnomz007 119:contribs 109:Halibutt 103:contribs 87:contribs 3935:Accept 3876:Yakudza 3752:Yakudza 3737:Circeus 3616:. Then 3514:mislead 3322:AndriyK 3276:AndriyK 3008:calles 2986:future. 2712:Encarta 2543:Fisenko 2499:proof 2412:Michael 2204:history 1879:example 1840:Muscovy 1635:deleted 1576:AndriyK 1553:AndriyK 1529:AndriyK 1505:AndriyK 1493:AndriyK 1257:AndriyK 1238:AndriyK 1187:history 1093:history 880:AndriyK 331:Yakudza 276:AndriyK 253:KNewman 237:Fisenko 4192:, see 4126:, see 3916:(talk) 3728:Gutsul 3705:Gutsul 3683:Buchik 3421:Quote: 2777:Galich 2773:Galich 2769:Halych 2629:normal 2538:Putivl 2377:Resume 1278:. See 1079:, and 872:Ezhiki 818:I have 395:Gutsul 363:Buchik 347:Ilya K 189:Mzajac 77:Ezhiki 3771:and 3716:mikka 3594:Irpen 3551:from 3220:never 3216:never 3004:What 2034:Gnomz 1823:with 1769:Irpen 1733:Irpen 1671:Irpen 1622:Irpen 1572:Irpen 1541:Irpen 1517:Irpen 1462:Irpen 1363:Irpen 1346:WP:RM 1248:Irpen 1229:Irpen 930:Bohun 911:WP:RM 884:WP:RM 570:in a 379:Adv94 93:Irpen 16:< 4150:and 4089:etc. 3903:talk 3859:and 3673:Lysy 3651:Lysy 3547:and 3510:hide 3270:and 3223:not. 3186:and 3088:here 3077:here 3039:and 3030:here 3016:here 3014:and 3012:here 2973:GFDL 2916:here 2802:here 2600:and 2536:and 2371:each 2267:your 2202:The 1858:and 1846:and 1767:. -- 1568:bold 1527::)-- 1316:Here 1280:this 1265:this 1263:See 1216:and 1209:and 1081:here 1077:here 707:and 701:only 493:here 491:and 489:here 460:and 422:talk 418:Lysy 399:talk 383:talk 367:talk 351:talk 335:talk 319:talk 303:talk 280:talk 257:talk 241:talk 225:talk 209:talk 193:talk 177:talk 161:talk 145:talk 129:talk 113:talk 97:talk 81:talk 4083:2) 4006:2) 3983:1) 3719:(t) 3558:). 3472:of 3259:). 3022:not 2862:me. 2679:Stu 2664:not 2470:, 1893:). 1850:to 1827:. 1405:), 1293:To 1244:... 1166:, ( 1158:, ( 1150:, ( 1142:, ( 1138:) 1134:, ( 1126:, ( 1118:, ( 1083:, ( 1051:, ( 1043:, ( 992:, ( 964:, ( 956:, ( 948:, ( 940:, ( 932:, ( 924:, ( 814:not 810:not 614:On 511:On 62:. 4349:: 4290:. 4154:. 4130:. 3991:. 3905:) 3543:, 3395:-- 3381:my 3202:-- 3178:, 3162:. 3097:-- 3018:"' 2907:: 2886:, 2797:, 2752:, 2749:, 2746:, 2743:, 2740:, 2732:hi 2728:hi 2724:go 2720:hi 2714:, 2710:, 2704:go 2700:go 2696:hi 2650:, 2577:, 2573:, 2569:, 2532:, 2502:, 2488:, 2453:, 2446:. 2415:Z. 2333:, 2329:, 2040:) 2029:. 1889:, 1885:, 1842:, 1838:, 1757:, 1753:, 1599:, 1596:, 1593:, 1590:, 1551:-- 1539:-- 1515:-- 1503:-- 1491:-- 1460:-- 1361:-- 1282:. 1189:. 1178:→ 1170:) 1162:) 1154:) 1146:) 1130:) 1122:) 1114:) 1095:. 1087:) 1069:) 1059:. 1055:) 1053:15 1047:) 1045:14 1039:) 1037:13 1024:) 1022:12 1012:) 1010:11 1004:) 1002:10 996:) 982:) 968:) 960:) 952:) 944:) 936:) 928:) 920:) 893:→ 776:do 764:-- 619:: 574:). 516:: 477:, 467:, 4111:( 3901:( 3604:1 3565:. 3337:) 3146:) 3121:" 3065:) 3032:. 3001:. 2957:. 2944:. 2918:. 2899:. 2892:, 2804:) 2794:, 2737:, 2689:g 2681:g 2624:W 2620:V 2589:) 2555:) 2521:) 2428:) 2410:— 2399:) 2180:) 2125:) 2063:) 2051:) 2038:? 2036:( 2032:– 1993:) 1949:. 1806:) 1474:) 1168:8 1160:7 1152:6 1144:5 1136:4 1128:3 1120:2 1112:1 1085:2 1067:1 994:9 980:8 966:7 958:6 950:5 942:4 934:3 926:2 918:1 907:3 903:2 899:1 866:) 430:) 425:· 420:( 407:) 402:· 397:( 391:) 386:· 381:( 375:) 370:· 365:( 359:) 354:· 349:( 343:) 338:· 333:( 327:) 322:· 317:( 311:) 306:· 301:( 288:) 283:· 278:( 265:) 260:· 255:( 249:) 244:· 239:( 233:) 228:· 223:( 217:) 212:· 207:( 201:) 196:· 191:( 185:) 180:· 175:( 169:) 164:· 159:( 153:) 148:· 143:( 137:) 132:· 127:( 121:) 116:· 111:( 105:) 100:· 95:( 89:) 84:· 79:(

Index

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration
Talk page
/Evidence
/Workshop
/Proposed decision
Ezhiki
talk
contribs
Irpen
talk
contribs
Halibutt
talk
contribs
Gnomz007
talk
contribs
Ghirlandajo
talk
contribs
Kuban kazak
talk
contribs
Alex Bakharev
talk
contribs
Mzajac
talk
contribs
Sashazlv

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑