3042:
traditionally passed down from parent to child are ended by force. The end of the soviet oppression means the freedom once again of people to practice the exercise of their sovereign culture without interference - and this very much includes outside acceptance of the words used for self-identification. For this panel to deny recently freed peoples the unquestioned right to insist on the terms of self-identity over the objections of outsiders when they have not themselves felt the loss of their own cultural heritage by the violent suppression of speech - and without fully contemplating and understanding the full force and effect of their decision is less than fully civilized. Imagine grandchildren to whom you cannot speak because a foreign government has made it a crime to teach them their mothers tongue. The Arbcom today has brought shame on the body of members; it has shamefully made this instrument of freedom a party to cultural extermination. (see also
1556:, etc. As for placenames, while there is no doubt that they should usually be called by their Ukrainian names in the modern context as well as the article names should be Ukrainian, the usage in the historical context should reflect the prevailing usage in the English language academic literature. Our Naming Conventions guidelines, both current and proposed, do recognize the difference between what's to be chosen for the article titles and what's to be chosen in the text, with the latter being sometimes context dependent. Whether the prevalence of Chernigov in medieval contexts is fair or not or whether this is "correct" or not is not for the Knowledge to decide. Knowledge should simply reflect the English usage. If the usage is unfair, incorrect, pro-Russian, etc. this should be addressed by an academic community which writes academic books. Encyclopedia, because it is a
2041:, then he comes here and demands a punishment for it. I am therefore very discouraged to continue contributing to that article or any other article for that matter. Many Ukrainian editors that came to Knowledge felt the same way. Please see the statement of Yakudza, for example. I am also quite able to recieve any types of warnings and other types of punishements for that mistake made by a few newbies including myself. I am only amazed that Irpen gets away with many other violations described on the evidence page of this proceeding, erasing whole chapters in the
3173:
he had over 1000 edits in
Ukrainian Knowledge. His "invention" of the trick contrasts with his pretending that he didn't know how WP works. I always wondered myself why some moves over redirects were possbile and some weren't and I had no idea that the secret is in history. And I am around the WP long enough (not that I ever wanted to make an irreversible move myslef). Then came AndriyK with detailed knowledge that allowed him to impose his moves over consensus.
1996:, I encourage the readers to find some "evidence" to the accusations he makes of "other violations" I am accused of such as "erasing whole chapters", "ignoring the naming convention", "personal attacks" and "overall attitude towards Ukrainian editors." He forgets to specify how many "Ukrainian editors", and I am one of them btw, share his perception about my "attitude". He "forgets to explain" his pasting from Britannica to the article and to give
63:). I admit that the page does not conform the prescribed format. If it make difficult the normal flow of the process, it would be resonable to ask all parties to rearange their own comments according to the format. If comments of one party is moved by another user, it falls out of context. Such cases should be avoided, in my opinion. (I am sorry, if I placed this request in a wrong place. My experience is not sufficient yet.)--
821:
state that the issue of the in-text usage is context dependent and is totally separate from the titles of the articles devoted to the geographic locations. AndriyK forces modern
Ukrainian names for events and people of the medevial time. No one objects to the modern titles for the locations articles. The dispute is only the specific context dependent usage and all conventions recognize the difference between these two issues. --
1903:. I also had no idea of these subtleties that time. So I restored his version. Then I got a message from an admin about copyright violation and did not perform any further action on the article. So I reverted the article only one time being not aware about some subtelties of copyright matters. Is my guilt so serious that it deserves to be considered by Arbitration Committee?
1773:: Lysy, how does your mentioning of this at, as you correctly put it, "not Ghirlandajo's RfA" is relevant? It only shows that the trick invented by AndriyK is tempting to use and that AndriyK should be punished for the huge disruption he caused by his multiple moves so that whoever else is tempted to follow on his footsteps would be warned about the serious consequences.
3008:(actually not a Russian name which would have been Petr or Pyotr) move is borderline: confirmed by google hits, but disconfirmed by google books and Britannica. There was a discussion at talk he could join rathern than do a move with a dirty trick, that made further discussion useless. He cites only the examples (Bohun, Nalyvaiko) where no one actually complained.
3050:) AndriyK should not need to rely on an asterisk to defend his native tongue against the russianized consensus - he and his language ought to be extended the full courtesy and protection of the ArbCom umbrella - instead he and his language are exposed to additional ignominious and inhumane treatment by the unappreciative citizens of the free west.
1173:
would certainly provide the translation. I could also provide other citations from his personal attacks at the Maidan forum but, again, it is not his personal attacks but his cheating and revert warring is the reason of this arbitration. Getting me upset by a rude user is not a reason to spend so much time of so many people on this page. --
3258:)), I respectfully request an ArbCom to investigate the sockpuppetry allegations brought to this Arbitration earlier, and if proven, issue a broader remedy for any newbie and/or anon account that express the immature Ukrainian nationalism through making the edits that reduce to nomenclature substitutions as per ArbCom Zivinbudas decision.
849:, a project that was triggered by this particular conflict. In no way is this an excuse for other disruptive actions of any party but is mentioned here only to demonstrate that both editors have the potential for work together in a positive manner on the controversial issue. This said, I never doubted that Irpen had this capability. --
1210:: I am curious myself to see what AndriyK means when accusing me in using of an "extremely foul and vulgar language". I am hesitant to translate into English of what he was writing on the talk pages of the users at Ukrainian Knowledge trying to recruit followers. These words seem to me as totally unusable in public places. --
2643:: This is purely a meritorical content dispute. Considering the one's own self edits neutral and accusing the opposing party in a POV is older than Knowledge. Since it would be highly unusual for arbitrators to get into such particular content dispute, this entry at workshop seems to me like a waste of everyone's time (see
811:(these moves cannot be reversed by users because of how they were made) and a ruling that would prevent the user from going on the spree to disrupt dozens of articles at a time. OTOH, if the ArbCom has time and desire to get into these meritorical disputes and decide each of them, I certainly have no objection. --
1584:
special case, it needs to be noted that the current convention on
Ukrainian names exists without that special case right now. Of course, it's easier to convince a few people here than to convince the whole Ukrainian community of Knowledge editors (however small and dwindling after this proceeding is over).--
2210:
has one of the best written
English and the most knowledgeable of many editors I've seen, his contributions are massive, but he is often overconfident in his knowledge and too bothered to explain his changes politely, especially if he already has an opinion of the person he has conflict with. While I
3172:
OTOH, AndriyK, as an experienced
Wikipedian, couldn't have been unaware that an important part of our policies is the spirit in which they're made. These page moves and name substitution in the articles violate anything even close to the Knowledge spirit. Before starting to actively edit the en-wiki
1583:
The expression "modern russian states" sounds as misplaced in relation to
Ukraine as the expression "modern italian states" would sound to France or Spain. Better yet, "modern french states" in relation to Italy. While I am not against expanding the naming convention to include Kievan Rus names as a
802:
However, please note that while I would very much welcome the ArbCom members getting themselves involved in deciding on the matter which follows from ambiguity of our guidelines that allow bad-faith interpretation, this question may be left to the editors who will be carving the improved guidelines.
784:
The speculations of what East Slavic language was and how it would transliterate into a modern
English is entirely irrelevant. The only thing that matters is whether there is a prevailing usage in English L texts where the name of the place is used in a particular historical context. That Britannica
93:
Arbcom guidelines as well as repeated reminders from ArbCom members did not change the behavior of some parties to interject their thoughts into the middle of other people's statements. I moved them away from the wrong place only to preserve them on one hand but to ensure the guidelines are followed
1803:
article's move that following the
Ghirlandajo's move, was moved by a bunch of editors using tricks and cut'n'paste, was cleaned up by Mikkalai with the histories merged. Now there is a civilized discussion on the talk page on how we will call the article. The problem with AndriyK's moves is that he
1695:
ashington" the user X moved it back. Then user X being supporeted by users X1,X2,...,XN demonstrated similar behavior on several other articles. User Y realized that user X and his frends do not accept any reason, but found the way to "fix" the articles on their right places. Would you blame user Y
1172:
This is rather mild compared to the extremely foul and vulgar language the AndriyK used to recruit the followers and
Ukrainian wiki. I don't think what he said is quotable but if quoting of foul language is allowed and ArbCom members would like to see the translation of the language AndriyK uses, I
3015:
past
October 24 have to be reverted based on the fact of the dirty trick he used. Then, we can move several articles again (Invasion, Nalyvaiko, Bohun..) but in normal way with no history damage, discuss some other moves further (Mogila/Mohyla) and leave some articles alone until the English usage
1679:
I indeed created artificial histories of redirect pages. May be this was not the best way to avoid the "move wars", but I did not see a better one. At list, it is not forbidden by WP policies, to my best knowlege. This at least forced my opponents to stop using their "brutal force" and discuss the
2681:
repeatedly reverting names of Ukrainian entities (e.g. subway lines and stations) to Russian transliteration. To prevent this, AndriyK had to create artificial edit histories of redirect articles. Nonetheless Kuban kazak found the trick how to avoid the restrictions of WP software and moved the
2036:
Irpen as usual twists the truth. It wasn't only him who added new images and text to the article. I personally added a portrait of Kotlyarevsky. I also spent quite a lot of time obtaining a permission from the author of the original text (published on a free web site) to publish it in Knowledge.
1145:
5) On the Ukrainian forum, AndriyK, in addition to describing opposing Russian language editors (who may very well live in Ukraine) as a "Russian mafia", described "User Irpen is a very cunning, ingenious, and stubborn troll." ("Користувач Irpen - дуже хитрий, винахідливий і наполегливий троль."
820:
To the Lysy's comment below about an improved naming convention being right now crafted, it should be noted that the imprefectness of the current convention and the improved version being prepared are in no way the excuses for AndriyK's actions. Both the current and the future convention clearly
2123:
I'm quite surprized to discover this section here, because AndriyK is the subject of the present arbitration, not me and because my responses were quite symmetrical to AndriyK's insults. He was the first to style Russian editors in his summaries "Russian mafia", "teenage gang", "cunning troll",
115:
I would like to thank User Irpen for tidying up the section with my statement for me. The interfering comment by Andrew Alexander was certainly put awkwardly and against the guidelines. It seems that once the comment is moved out, it'd be easy enough to adjust it so that it falls back into the
2045:
article, openly ignoring the Knowledge naming convention on Ukrainian names, many personal attacks and overall attitude towards several Ukrainian editors. Just recently I was accused of "russophobia" because I dared to mention that Stalin Russia destroyed two major ancient cathedrals in Kiev -
1945:
edit summary. The article had to be protected. After it was unprotected, there were only a couple of edits: an addition of image by myself, categorization by Alex Bakharev. So, it is pretty much still the same small stub I wrote. Both fervent supporters of an extended article did not have any
3041:
It is clear from my reading here that the ArbCom suffers from a deficit in their collective understanding of language as a weapon of imperialism. In the Soviet Union, languages were exterminated by force and fear - which means that histories, poetry, puns and many other forms of literature
951:
so that all relevant points of view could be considered. (There are also many related controvercies between Orthodox Churches concerning "canonical territory", which church is "mother" and which is "daughter" and so on.) There is no reason to repeat this discussion at every point where
1293:
I do not think editing Knowledge is possible if for every infringement on other people's POV, you would risk learning some new names for yourself. Substract his boldness to accuse editors and patronizing attitude and his behavior becomes tolerable, add some patience, you get a good
573:) should be under a transliteration of their official Ukrainian name, I am not sure we have a policy or how historical figures and places associated with the Kievian Rus should be styled. Ideally this would be worked out among the parties, but a bad atmosphere seems to prevail. See
46:
1757:
The example that you provided does not involve the trick that you and AndriyK were exercising. As for good faith, are you saying, that you applied the trick in good faith ? What for then ? Irpen explained to me that your guilt was lesser because you've applied it only once.
1812:
and voting). Before you move the article, when you can reasonably expect a disagreement, propose it first at the article's talk. The names there are for a reason. The reason may be wrong. There is talk to discuss that rather than imposing your views on the community.
1612:
7) AndriyK, taking an aggressive Ukrainian nationalist position has strongly advocated use of the Ukrainian names for historical places and persons. Without obtaining consensus regarding policy he has repeatedly inserted his preferred usage into a number of pages
1291:, I can not help but interpret it as bad faith accusation plus citation of several sources which technically did not say anything on the subject (they were about Kievan Rus' Architecture and not a word about relation to Russia and Ukraine which was the subject).
2368:
I urge everyone interested to actually click on the links offered by AndriyK and take a look at the allegations and the context of the above comments. When AndriyK reverts 60 articles one after another in no time, the "mass cleanup" is exactly what has to be
2300:
makes a large number of reverts calling edits of other users "vandalism" and very rarely discuss the disagreement on talk pages. Particularly he intolerant to new editor. When new users come, they run into the boorishness of User:Ghirlandajo and obstinacy of
1399:
In my opinion, the most reasonable compromise whould be using Ukrainian transliteration if the entity was located (created, took place) on the territory of present-day Ukraine and similarly Russian and Belarusian transliteration for Russia and Belarus.
2312:
Yakudza, you already pasted the same stuff verbatim on my RfC and elsewhere three times! I'm tired of disputing these points with you. Please don't mislead arbitrators, at least. Banderovets is the self-appelation of supporters of the Uke nationalist
97:
The claim of AndriyK that he lacks experience in things and should be given some leeway as a newbie is just ridiculous. His knowing in details of the Wikisoftware features and using them to force his POV on the community obviously proves otherwise.
2000:
to the pages when he was accused of Russophobia. It would be instructive to see what actually was said by him. In any case please make sure to actually check links he provides or will (if) provide rather than take his accusation at the face value.
618:) did not have the consonant "g" in its dialect.(This consonant is still not very common in modern Ukrainian). Therefore, if one would try to reproduce in English the city name how it was prononced at the time of Kievan Rus, one would get "Cherni
2569:
1332:
while it provides "For geographic names in Ukraine, the Ukrainian National system is used. For historic reasons, many names are also presented in Russian, Polish, etc.", does not address the question of names and persons associated with the
1054:. The result of the posts was an inflow of Ukrainian voters—enough to create an illusion of greater opposition than it otherwise would be—whose only goal was to support AndriyK’s POV." An actual translation of one post is available at
936:). For instance, Protestant Churches are "uncanonical" from the point of view of Catholic Church and Orthodox Churches. Catholic Church and Orthodox Churches were considering each other "uncanonical" for a long time in the past, etc.
543:. The modern Ukrainian transliteration, Chernihiv, is somewhat anachronistic as applied to men who predate use of the language in its present form. There is also a history of use of Chernigov in English during Russian domination
416:
1) The locus of this dispute revolves around the independence of Ukraine and specifically around the development of Ukrainian Orthodox churches independent of the Russian Orthodox Church, see this example of strongly POV edit
1741:
what he thinks about this trick, and received no reply. Actually the tactic invented by AndriyK, while still not prohibited officially, is gaining footing. An example from today's move of the same article by another editor:
2683:
997:
several times. It also looks very strange that the POV of Russian Orthodox Church, that presently has nothing to do with Patriarch Filaret, is presented, but the POV of Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Kyivan Patriarchy, that is
1543:
The locus of the dispute is that to certain historical events, places, persons the Russian version of the name made it to the English L academic literature. As such, they are called by the Russian name in the contexts of
3176:
That said, I find the most important, the remedy that would warn against further page moves (with or without the dirty trick) without a proper discussion, as I proposed to AndriyK earleir many times (see again, his
2471:, taking an aggressive Russian nationalist position, were trying to replace the names of Ukrainian geographic locations with their transliteration from Russian. This often resulted in wrong and confusing links .
606:
to the names of ancient cities located in modern Ukraine? According to phonologicals studies (for instance, G.Y. Shevelov (1979). A Historical Phonology of the Ukrainian Language, Heidelberg: Carl Winter Verlag.
2390:
applied the edit comment "mass cleanup after a maniac on another spree" 9 times. This would explain some "tension". Is there some rule in Knowledge that allows insulting other editors in some specific "context"?
1417:
It is different than saying that Germany and Austria are german states. Germans and Austrians (as well as a part of Switzerland) belong to the same ethnos and, as Irpen already mentioned below, speak the same
699:
ov". But I do not see any reason, why transliteration from Russian should be prefered for the name of a Ukrainian city. Why Knowledge should be different in spelling from other English language encyclopedias?
67:
1845:
626:
v" (the written language was quite different from the spoken one, therefore what was written with "o" could well be prononced with "i"). What is definitelly known, the city name could not be prononced as
1242:
comparable to unquoatable slang of AndriyK. Unless something comes up soon, this stuff needs removed. If AndriyK has anything to say about foul and vulgar language, however, please make sure it goes to
116:
context — I see no need in any extra discussion over this simple matter. I am sorry about the added commotion, I recognize that I could have helped avoid it by clearing the inserted comment earlier. -
34:
here and development of proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies. Anyone who edits should sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they have confidence in on
3124:. My edits were reverted. Irpen simulated active discussions, but did not accept any reasons, did not demonstrate any willingness to reach a compromise. He also continuously misinformed other users.
2668:
634:
Russian prononiation became relevant only in the second half of 18th century. (It was used by administration, although the majority of the population always remained Ukrainian) Therefore, applying
466:
1.1) The locus of this dispute is AndriyK's crusade regarding use of transliteration of Ukrainian language names and places for historical russian persons and places and the tactics he has used.
2888:
I indeed tried to do my best to prevent violation of Knowledge policy. May be the way I found was not the best one. But indeed, it did not contradict to existing policies. Where did Irpen found
2620:
1870:
1614:
989:
did not belong to Russian Orthodox Church and was the leader of another church (they could "defrock" and "excommunicate" the Pope with equal success :) ). But this information was removed by
30:
This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. It provides for suggestions by Arbitrators and other users and for comment by arbitrators, the parties and others. After the analysis of
2559:
2416:, taking an aggressive Russian nationalist position, has distorted information in Knowledge article to represent places located in Ukraine, Belarus etc. as if they were located in Russia.
2992:
The "Ukrainian names" section of naming convention AndriyK cites above is primarily about transliteration when the name to use is clear and the "use English" rule is the primary one. Of
3169:
to this editor. Whether the word from the arbitrators (but without ban) would be enough warning for him despite his not heeding to the past warnings, is for the arbitrators to decide.
2602:
2343:
2108:
1200:
1042:), which not only called for all interested Ukrainians to register Knowledge accounts and vote regarding the articles’ moves, but also classified opposing parties as "Russian mafia" (
1367:
I really don't get this, but understand the bad feeling. It is no different than saying that Germany and Austria are german states, but it has been changed in the proposed decision.
2075:
672:. (This spelling is also used in other articles of Britannica, where likely less attention was paid to the correct spelling of the city name than in the primary article). Encarta
2870:
clearly states: "For geographic names in Ukraine, the Ukrainian National system is used". Using Russian transliteration for subway lines/stations clearly violates this policy. But
594:
The Old East Slavic language used Cyrillic alphabet. Therefore one needs transliteration rules how the Old East Slavic "Чернигов" should be converted into English. If one uses the
2778:
2321:
2151:
795:. As shown above, other encyclopedias use both versions and in the appropriate context they use Chernigov with substantial margin. And not only other encyclopedia. Look at this
1514:
To the arbitrator's comment just posted "I really don't get this..." the way to avoid the ambiguity is to say: "the historical predecessor of all modern East Slavic nations:
2651:
1526:." The difference with DE/AT is that unlike Germans and Austrians, modern East Slavic nations speak different languages despite all three nations claim the lineage to the
35:
2421:
1588:
2191:
2172:
1684:
1621:. Facing the obvious tactic of others moving back he devised a method of preventing reverts of his page moves by producing an artificial history for redirect pages, see
3054:
2053:
874:
3) Examination of recent edit warring by AndriyK and Ghirlandajo shows a pattern of removing the opposing point of view together with inserting their own point of view
752:
The Arbitration Committee clearly is not able to decide which spelling should be used for each city/town/river, but it would be very helpfull to establish some general
1032:
574:
2476:
2220:
2239:
1899:
was permitted to be freely distributed. He did not understand, however, the subtle difference between free distribution in general and free distribution in terms of
1495:
1425:
2802:
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
1629:
2644:
124:
1762:
1752:
1728:
3063:
2896:
2647:). If, on the other hand, the Arbitrators are willing to decide on the merit on this article's content dispute, I am sure all parties would have no objection. --
1459:
1251:. AndriyK already made a section for allegedly rude edit summaries by other users. Even if there were any, what does this have to do with this section anyway? --
1941:
who by then could not have been unaware of the copyright rules with his Knowledge experience. His revertion to copyvio version was supplied with an inflamatory
1303:
1177:
2924:
1564:
1140:
825:
815:
763:
102:
1834:
853:
2021:
1255:
1214:
2615:
policy trying to use Knowledge for propaganda of his extremely conservative Russian Orthodox POV. His extremely POV edit started an edit war on the article
1852:
1817:
2177:
As for my rude retort in the second case, it was prompted by AndriyK's dissimulating his edit as "rv", although he didn't revert in that particular case.
2164:
or elsewhere. All I want is to keep the historical names - St Vladimir's Cathedral, Chernigov, etc - mentioned at least *once* in the text of the article.
1780:
1036:
421:
3112:
I am not an experienced editor. I did some edits during a short period of time a year ago or so. I returned in the beginning of October 2005 and ran into
1808:"Moving articles should be done with care in cases where you may expect disagreement since it it much more difficult to undo (usually requires listing at
1548:
even though the places are sometimes located in modern Ukraine or the persons are claimed by the Ukrainian nation at least as much as by the Russian one:
1271:
I think that his personal attacks and the underlying attitude is the primary motivation for RfA, this is what makes any kind of dialog largely impossible.
3218:
2981:. Some of them were already being discussed and no one attempted to complain anyway), most of them were not or at least doubtful. The most basic rule of
714:
My opponents often refer to Old East Slavic/Old Slavonic language, therefore I found it reasonable to explain the situation to the Arbitration Committee.
515:
60:
31:
1990:
1005:
To stop the edit war, I proposed to keep the version of my opponents with the POV tag on top of it, but they continued the edit war by removing the tag.
496:
It's not true. I did not change transliteration of Russian persons and places. All my spelling corrections were concerning Ukrainian persons and places.
1371:
1039:
where it is alleged, "Because the first votes cast were overwhelmingly in support of the move, AndriyK posted a message on an outside Ukrainian forum (
477:
2211:
agree that it is inappropriate when Ghirlandajo gets on his high horse, but from what I've seen AndriyK has matched and even beaten him in rudeness. –
1643:
2914:"creating artificial histories is not forbidden by the present Knowledge policies" and "I did it to prevent violation of the existing policy" is the
792:), plenty of other ref books do so too. The American Heritage® Dictionary speaks about Chernigov Principality in the very article of Chernihiv city
435:
2509:
1978:
2140:
1488:
932:"Uncanonicity", if looking neutraly, is nothing else as just an opinion of a group of Churches about Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Kiev Patriarchy (
3211:
2850:
2987:"...use the most commonly used English version of the name for the article, as you would find it in other encyclopedias and reference works."
1483:
The case of Belarus is altogether different. Russian is a state language here, and Russian spellings are used officially. See my comments on
846:
371:
2139:) It's a pity that nobody paid attention to his insults during this arbitration. I don't defend incivility here. If my responses were rude,
1031:
a revert by Irpen with the comment "this article should be protected until the falisfied voting is overturned" point (maybe) to the vote at
3281:
not only before but even after his insults here and at outside forums. He chose to always bite the hand extended to him, see for instance
2252:
is very intolerant to opinions of other editors. He often offend them. Here are several examples of Ghirlandajo's comments to his edits:
893:
875:
41:
2982:
2306:
1967:
article from where it is yet to be removed (I promised myself to get back to UA L after this ArbCom, because it was damaged too badly).
48:
21:
2009:
are not hidden and are easy to check by anyone who is interested to see the facts on the ground. It would be more difficult to check
1864:
890:
887:
884:
881:
878:
1722:
1607:
1024:
796:
737:
v in the article about the city (i.e. in the article entitled "Chernihiv") and applies this name to all periods of history. "Cherni
2706:. I take no position regarding the action of Kuban kazak's "avoiding the restriction of WP software" and I did not follow most of
1719:
2305:, see that any constructive work is impossible, and finally have to give up, or get engaged in edit wars like AndriyK. See also:
2296:
He called me "banderovets" (a very insulting name given by Russian nationalists to Ukrainians). His edits contain a lot of POVs.
1323:
968:
and others) insist that "uncanonicity" should be mentioned each time when Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Kiev Patriarchy is mentioned.
1776:
It is relevant since Ghirlandajo signed as a party of this RFA, and one of the complaints of it, was of using the move trick. --
986:
974:
925:
845:
had since positively and extensively collaborated towards a consensus on both modern and historic context naming guidelines at
1804:
uses the trick only because he knows that it would likely be opposed by a community. When I wrote to him about that early on:
1746:
1743:
2795:
411:
3128:
has immediatly taken Irpen's side in the dispute and did not even try to understand my reasons and start a fair discussion.
2989:
I am sorry if the fact that in some cases these names are closer to Russian than to Ukrainian makes someone loose his sleep.
2843:
There is no need to ban me. Simple warning would be sufficient. Just say me: "Do not do it anymore", and I will never do it.
2867:
2678:
1329:
805:
The main issue of this arbitration is not whether Cherigov, Chernihiv, Vladimir or Volodymyr should be used in the articles
2081:
1278:
799:
in google (where "prince" is added to the city to restrict the usage to the Rus' time). The difference is 30000+ vs 1000-.
529:
418:
2047:
786:
676:
461:
1738:
956:
is mentioned. Indeed, no one speaks about "uncanonical" at each mentioning of any Protestant Church. But my opponents (
948:
17:
2185:
2182:
2866:
Neither of my moves violated the existing Knowledge policy, while reverting of them did it in most cases. The policy
2038:
2014:
1737:? Had I moved 12 articles that you should denounce me here before arbitrators? Seriously, ten days before that move,
611:
1289:
3199:
to restrict his right to revert to whatever number per article per day or per week that ArbCom considers reasonable
544:
3282:
3158:
3036:
I second that the desired result can be equally obtained with a firm warning instead with less collateral damage.
2807:
2337:
2156:
I'd like to point out that the first example cited here is strange, because it was me who started the article on
1718:
While it is not Ghirlandajo's RfA, it can be noted that the same move trick has been used by AndriyK's opponent:
807:. There are hundreds of articles and hundreds of similar disputes and ArbCom cannot possibly decide on them all.
673:
268:
217:
2993:
2714:
that he purposefully created the artificial histories of the redirect articles. This has been characterized as "
2340:
1931:
1618:
1087:
1047:
869:
3224:
2943:
2738:
2527:
2521:
2137:
2131:
2083:
1147:
1091:
1051:
2837:
Please pay attention that creating artificial histories is not forbidden by the present Knowledge policies.
2670:
1560:, should simply reflect the prevailing usage rather than be used to promote some changes in terminology. --
1191:
I would like to bring attention of the Arbitration Committee to extremely foul and vulgar language used by
3390:
3350:
3244:
2963:
2758:
2168:, on the other hand, insists on deleting all mention of these spellings as if they didn't exist at all. --
2037:
Irpen essentially behaves less then friendly in this dispute. First he admits that the publication was an
539:(as opposed to Chernigov) was another bone of contention. These historical figures are connected with the
2619:. AndriyK tried to find a compromise to stop the edit war, he proposed mediation to resolve the dispute (
1734:
1096:
is, in fact, not a translation of my posts but rather the opinion of some of my opponents about my posts.
2677:
16) User Kuban kazak, taking an aggressive Russian nationalist position, neglected the Knowledge policy
262:
222:
2010:
1971:
742:
670:
638:
transliteration to the time of Kievan Rus as well to the later period up to 18th century is definitely
3430:
3252:
2971:
2877:
Which policy encaurages using Russian transliteration for the names of clearly Ukrainian persons like
2766:
2327:
174:
3231:
2950:
2745:
2616:
2157:
1997:
1937:
to which some people with even less understanding of the matter responded. One of the responders was
1625:
790:
2524:
2518:
2407:
2134:
2128:
2161:
3117:
646:
1963:
He also added the text from the very same work in the same magazine, and again verbatim, to the
94:
on another side. If all interjections have to me deleted or moved to talk, I would welcome that.
3286:
2515:
2125:
2006:
2002:
1916:
1895:
Andrew Alexander was clearly acting in good faith. The text he coppied into the article about
1622:
809:
The issue at hand is, mainly, overturning the bad-faith article moves done with a sneaky trick
139:
3237:
2956:
2751:
2710:
conflict except making some general statements at the article's talk. However, this entry is
2381:
2050:
2031:
1993:
1950:
1920:
1585:
1578:
1285:
730:
654:
645:
Let's looks at the modern English usage. All new editions of English language encyclopedias (
179:
2454:
1664:
except the fact that I tried to oppose the trully agressive Russian nationalist position of
3001:
1033:
Talk:Mikhail_of_Chernihiv#Requested_move:_Mikhail_of_Chernihiv.E2.86.92Mikhail_of_Chernigov
532:
1687:, imagine that after the native English speaker Y had corrected the article title "George
745:
my assertion. I also admitted using the spelling "Chernigov" in other Britanica articles.
8:
3051:
1871:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/AndriyK/Evidence#Mass_disruptions_of_multiple_articles
1848:, will inform the community about its view on the spirit and the letter of such moves. --
973:
The information about defrocking and excommunication clearly belong to the article about
785:
uses Chernihiv exclusively is just a plain lie and the detailed analysis is presented in
520:
2) A subtheme of the dispute is use of Ukrainian names such as St Volodymyr's Cathedral (
122:
3195:
I find it equally important in view of AndriyK's revert spree and using the 3RR rule as
3071:
2812:
1) AndriyK is banned for one month from Knowledge for creating irreversible page moves.
1869:
8) Andrew Alexander, AndriyK and MaryMaidan disrupted removal of a copyright violation,
1421:
Could you please add also Belarus at the corresponding place in the proposed decision?--
376:
2216:
1964:
1299:
690:
521:
3292:
3270:
3162:
2937:
2882:
2732:
1896:
1549:
1288:, which was pretty much OK in terms of civility, suddenly AndriyK kicks in with this
977:. But here again presenting only POV of Russian Orthodox Church clearly violates the
741:
v" is mentioned in this article only as the Russian name of the city. One can easily
608:
536:
1924:
might have been acting in good faith posting the magazine article for the first time
3398:
3355:
3296:, from where, I hope, he would not start deleting. This speaks about the attitudes!
3121:
2871:
2608:
2565:
2468:
2464:
2413:
2318:
2297:
2249:
2207:
2188:
2169:
2148:
2117:
1749:
1673:
1665:
1640:
1492:
1471:
1433:
1404:
1368:
1233:
1196:
994:
965:
961:
474:
432:
1439:
The state status of Russian language in Belarus does not change the fact that the
687:
336:
301:
271:
contemplates fair expression of all significant points of view regarding a topic.
227:
2187:
that such outbursts of emotion are to be avoided, and I had to agree with him. --
1107:
available. Only one message was translated into English and was published on the
3315:
2314:
1696:
for "dirty trick" if he created an artificial history of redirect page "George
117:
108:
1960:
to this very article verbatim could not have been possibly made in good faith.
1043:
1040:
793:
3043:
2212:
2201:
1933:
I wrote myself from scratch, Andrew Alexander posted a message to the forum:
1624:. For non-administrators reversing such a move involves placing a request at
1440:
1393:
1334:
1295:
1267:
2874:
moved the several articles back to Russian names when I tried to correct it.
1830:"I just follow Knowledge Guidelines, so I do not expect any disagreement. --
943:
policy. I proposed to discuss the "uncanonicity" issue in the article about
693:
3102:
3093:
3060:
2930:
2893:
2856:
2847:
2829:
2725:
2472:
2417:
2236:
2165:
2144:
2101:
1938:
1889:
1831:
1809:
1654:
1484:
1456:
1422:
1384:
1185:
1074:
912:
838:
760:
704:
588:
540:
490:
64:
3000:
and other princely moves, the Slavic tribes moves and an especially gross
2107:
Links to other examples of Ghirlandajo rudeness can be found on the page
575:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/AndriyK#Silly_Chernihiv.2FChernigov_war
3125:
2178:
1974:(I later removed it). No way he didn't know what he was doing by then. --
1281:
1274:
1226:: So, it's been a while. Do we get any links at the evidence page to the
1081:
921:
Mentioning of "uncanonicity" of Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Kiev Patriarchy
1238:? We've seen there some summaries that went over the top all right, but
3141:
3113:
3106:
2921:
2908:
2878:
2860:
2775:
2707:
2703:
2648:
2640:
2460:
2387:
2363:
2333:
2302:
2018:
1975:
1909:
1849:
1814:
1770:
1669:
1561:
1545:
1527:
1509:
1354:
1252:
1229:
1223:
1211:
1207:
1192:
1174:
1167:
990:
957:
842:
822:
812:
777:
746:
708:
99:
86:
56:
2846:
I kindly ask arbitrators to consider an alternative way (see below).--
1928:
reinserting it well after the copyright problems were explained to him
59:
moved a comment of Andrew Alexander to another place on the page (see
3031:
2916:
2889:
2042:
1777:
1759:
1725:
850:
615:
528:
as contrasted to Russian names such as St Vladimir's Cathedral, see
3047:
1112:
1055:
47:
Something should be done to prevent messing up of comments on the
1280:, after some discussion of remaining dispute the changes between
3289:
and all of his talk, actually. Perhaps, whoever has time, please
2339:
even after the inapropriateness of such behavior was pointed out
1523:
1515:
1448:
1444:
1410:
I never heard the term "modern russian states" (with "states" in
1350:
1342:
726:
725:
v exclusively. I asserted the following: Britannica (as well as
650:
562:
3395:
Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis
3076:
2) AndriyK is warnet to avoid creating irreversible page moves.
2920:
in its prime! Details are in my comments to the next section. --
2834:
I copied this proposal from the decission page to comment on it.
3192:. (That would allow discussion of page moves by the community).
1519:
1452:
1346:
953:
944:
933:
570:
551:
547:
2568:
was blanking comments of other users about his rude behavior (
1630:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/AndriyK/Evidence#Move_fraud
1037:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/AndriyK#Statement_by_Ezhiki
3098:
Just say me: "Do not do it anymore", and I will never do it.
1396:
is the historical predecessor of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus.
431:
This is a very poor summary which misses the point entirely.
3273:
by many editors (myself, MichaelZ and Kuban kazak included)
3150:
and if banned for how long, it is important to note that he
3130:
What could I learn about Knowledge spirit in this situation?
2560:
Blanking comments of other users on this page by Ghirlandajo
2612:
2286:(rv demented racist who was blocked yesterday but returned)
2271:(stop pushing laughable nationalism, or you will be banned)
1900:
978:
940:
566:
1935:"Help defend from vandals the article about Kotlyarevsky?"
1108:
661:
v in their articles about the city and apply this name to
1553:
1390:
I do not understand what are "all modern russian states".
2645:
Knowledge talk:Requests for arbitration/AndriyK/Workshop
985:
that "defrocking" and "excommunication" took place when
1970:
Similarly, AndriyK pasted a copyvio text much later to
787:
Talk:Chernihiv#Britannica.27s_use_in_historical_context
1919:
of Ivan Kotliarevsky's article is worth a look! While
2840:
I did it to prevent violation of the existing policy.
1926:, he was warned repeatedly not to do it while he was
3180:
I find it equally important to have the remedy that
2013:(because he censors it) but still possible from the
682:
v". There are a lot of other sources applying Cherni
1046:). English translations of the posts are available
422:
Talk:St Volodymyr's Cathedral ownership controversy
789:. Encarta uses Chernigov in medieval context (see
669:v" is mentioned as the Russian name in Britannica
2283:(rv moron who was blocked yesterday but returned)
3148:no positions on whether AndriyK should be banned
3016:evolves so that we will document it in Knowledge
939:Presenting of only one POV clearly violates the
924:Controversial defrocking and excommunication of
598:transliteration, then one indeed becomes "Cherni
3190:based on the fact that the dirty trick was used
2262:(rvv foolish ukrainization of russophone towns)
2080:9) Ghirlandajo has sometimes been discourteous
1930:. When I replaced his copyvio text with a stub
3059:I would agree that a ban is far too severe --
2603:Ignoring Knowledge NPOV Policy by Kuban kazak
2514:13) AndriyK has sometimes been discourteous (
1946:interest to write a single word on their own.
847:Knowledge:Naming conventions/Geographic names
749:did not have any reason to blame me for lies.
695:). Well, there are also sources using "Cherni
614:.), the tribe that populated Chernihiv area (
3188:by any admin regardless of the merit simply
3167:many attempts of many editors to talk reason
2868:Knowledge:Naming conventions#Ukrainian names
2679:Knowledge:Naming conventions#Ukrainian names
2336:uses edit summaries to offend his opponents
2076:Rudeness and personal attacks by Ghirlandajo
1330:Knowledge:Naming_conventions#Ukrainian_names
526:Патріарший кафедральний собор св. Володимира
2289:(rv shameless POV-pushing by a banderovets)
1662:"aggressive Ukrainian nationalist position"
1228:extremely foul and vulgar language used by
1044:http://www2.maidan.org.ua/n/free/1130025302
894:Talk:Patriarch Filaret (Mykhailo Denysenko)
2307:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Ghirlandajo
1700:ashington" to protect the name of "George
1148:User_talk:Irpen#Discussion_on_maidanua.org
546:(This also involves the Ukrainian city of
3159:Ukrainian nationalism section at his talk
1691:ashington" by moving the page to "George
1353:. (proposed correction of the wording by
1035:. The sequence of events is discussed at
561:While it is obvious to me that places in
2719:
2510:Rudeness and personal attacks by AndriyK
1247:first. Also note, this section title is
678:do not even mention the spelling "Cherni
3275:to talk to AndriyK in neutral and even
2772:) is the main topic of this arbitration
2712:nothing but a self-admission by AndriyK
1337:which is the historical predecessor of
1086:"English translations of the posts ...
14:
3184:be it by AndriyK or by anyone else be
3182:each and every move with a dirty trick
2724:Employing this deplorable practice by
1277:took his time and went to the library
1002:by Patriarch Filaret, is not be there.
381:1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
918:There are two points of the dispute:
837:It may be worth mentioning that both
2979:Mongol invasion..., Bohun, Nalyvaiko
2342:. Please find the further evidence
2317:? Aren't you one of his admirers? --
1249:"Personal attacks on outside forums"
565:(other than obvious exceptions like
2564:14)During the arbitration process,
2280:(rv edits by another Polish zombie)
1617:) and moved a number of pages, see
686:v to all periods of history (e.g.
602:ov". But what is the reason to use
42:Motions and requests by the parties
27:
3360:1) {text of proposed enforcement}
3004:move are totally out of question.
2268:(rvv a new piece of polish idiocy)
2265:(rvv idiotic Moldovan nationalism)
1443:was the historical predecessor of
1109:English version of the site Maidan
949:History of Christianity in Ukraine
721:assert that Britannica uses Cherni
28:
18:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration
3471:
3120:policy. Than I ran into ruidness
2259:(rvv a new attack by banderovtsy)
2124:"insufficiently educated", etc. (
1141:Personal attacks on outside forum
2256:(rvv attack by Polish Mafia :)))
1341:all modern East Slavic nations:
1056:http://eng.maidanua.org/node/429
341:1) {text of proposed principle}
306:1) {text of proposed principle}
232:1) {text of proposed principle}
3263:urge every party to take a look
2718:" by Arbitrator Fred Bauder in
2682:articles to the Russian names (
269:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
3157:. See evidence and the end of
1111:. Please find the translation
516:Ukrainian versus Russian names
175:Proposed temporary injunctions
13:
1:
3320:1) {text of proposed remedy}
3064:01:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
3055:04:43, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
2925:18:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
2897:21:09, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
2851:17:28, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
2779:01:20, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
2652:01:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
2322:19:01, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
2240:18:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
2221:19:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
2192:17:59, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
2173:17:58, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
2152:17:46, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
2054:22:55, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
2022:23:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
1979:03:13, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
1853:20:27, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
1826:AndriyK cynically responded:
1781:18:26, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
1763:18:26, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
1753:18:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
1729:21:08, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
1683:To continue the example from
1644:16:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
1589:23:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
1565:00:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
1496:14:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
1460:14:59, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
1426:13:48, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
1372:00:19, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
1304:18:55, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
1256:20:37, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
1215:21:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
1178:09:27, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
854:00:16, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
826:23:58, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
816:09:12, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
764:17:57, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
554:during Russian domination.)
478:16:58, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
436:16:58, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
125:01:26, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
103:09:18, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
68:19:40, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
2671:Knowledge:Naming conventions
2181:presently pointed out to me
2141:I already brought my apology
1660:Is there any evidence of my
7:
3291:go and read through entire
2039:"honest good faith mistake"
1989:to what's added just below
1835:21:09, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1818:20:43, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1735:Knowledge:Assume good faith
1704:ashington" from distortion?
1240:no foul and vulgar language
981:policy. I tried to add the
10:
3476:
3116:completely neglecting the
2929:While few of the moves by
1339:all modern russian states.
675:and Columbia Encyclopedia
1972:St. Volodymyr's Cathedral
1955:an entire paragraph from
1626:Knowledge:Requested moves
657:) use the spelling Cherni
525:
372:Proposed findings of fact
3436:Comment by Arbitrators:
3404:Comment by Arbitrators:
3364:Comment by Arbitrators:
3324:Comment by Arbitrators:
3080:Comment by Arbitrators:
2816:Comment by Arbitrators:
2690:Comment by Arbitrators:
2627:Comment by Arbitrators:
2617:St Volodymyr's Cathedral
2576:Comment by Arbitrators:
2533:Comment by Arbitrators:
2483:Comment by Arbitrators:
2428:Comment by Arbitrators:
2350:Comment by Arbitrators:
2274:(rvv islamic propaganda)
2160:and I never moved it to
2158:St Volodymyr's Cathedral
2088:Comment by Arbitrators:
1876:Comment by Arbitrators:
1636:Comment by Arbitrators:
1364:Comment by Arbitrators:
1199:in their edit summaries
1154:Comment by Arbitrators:
1061:Comment by Arbitrators:
899:Comment by Arbitrators:
558:Comment by Arbitrators:
470:Comment by Arbitrators:
428:Comment by Arbitrators:
385:Comment by Arbitrators:
345:Comment by Arbitrators:
310:Comment by Arbitrators:
275:Comment by Arbitrators:
236:Comment by Arbitrators:
188:Comment by Arbitrators:
148:Comment by Arbitrators:
73:Comment by Arbitrators:
49:Requests for arbitration
3118:Knowledge:Verifiability
2162:St Vladimir's Cathedral
2011:Andrew Alexander's talk
1236:in their edit summaries
1099:English translation of
647:Encyclopedia Britannica
218:Proposed final decision
3186:automatically reverted
2977:) were sensible (like
2277:(rvv a lunatic vandal)
2007:Talk:Ivan Kotlyarevsky
2003:Article's edit history
1432:Comment to comment of
1403:Comment to comment of
1025:"The falsified voting"
947:and/or in the article
733:) uses spelling Cherni
663:all periods of history
3202:In view of suspected
3153:was warned many times
2382:user:Andrew Alexander
2032:User:Andrew Alexander
1994:user:Andrew Alexander
1921:user:Andrew Alexander
1579:User:Andrew Alexander
1286:User:Andrew Alexander
1201:(Please see Evidence)
870:Point of view editing
731:Columbia Encyclopedia
655:Columbia Encyclopedia
420:and archived talk at
263:Neutral point of view
3445:Comment by parties:
3413:Comment by parties:
3391:Analysis of evidence
3373:Comment by parties:
3351:Proposed enforcement
3333:Comment by parties:
3155:against moving pages
3089:Comment by parties:
3002:Russian architecture
2825:Comment by parties:
2699:Comment by parties:
2636:Comment by parties:
2585:Comment by parties:
2542:Comment by parties:
2492:Comment by parties:
2475:corrected the mess (
2437:Comment by parties:
2420:corrected the mess (
2359:Comment by parties:
2292:(rv a revert maniac)
2097:Comment by parties:
1885:Comment by parties:
1865:Copyright violations
1739:I asked Tony Sidaway
1650:Comment by parties:
1380:Comment by parties:
1163:Comment by parties:
1070:Comment by parties:
983:factural information
908:Comment by parties:
584:Comment by parties:
533:Mikhail of Chernihiv
486:Comment by parties:
444:Comment by parties:
394:Comment by parties:
354:Comment by parties:
319:Comment by parties:
284:Comment by parties:
245:Comment by parties:
197:Comment by parties:
157:Comment by parties:
82:Comment by parties:
3454:Comment by others:
3422:Comment by others:
3382:Comment by others:
3342:Comment by others:
3307:Comment by others:
3025:Comment by others:
2787:Comment by others:
2660:Comment by others:
2594:Comment by others:
2551:Comment by others:
2501:Comment by others:
2446:Comment by others:
2399:Comment by others:
2231:Comment by others:
2067:Comment by others:
1715:Comment by others:
1599:Comment by others:
1315:Comment by others:
1132:Comment by others:
1016:Comment by others:
834:Comment by others:
507:Comment by others:
453:Comment by others:
403:Comment by others:
363:Comment by others:
328:Comment by others:
293:Comment by others:
254:Comment by others:
223:Proposed principles
206:Comment by others:
166:Comment by others:
131:Comment by others:
3431:General discussion
3269:documented at the
3105:to the comment by
2859:to the comment by
1965:Ukrainian language
1324:Naming conventions
707:to the comment of
36:/Proposed decision
3293:user talk:AndriyK
3287:Challenge section
2883:Severyn Nalyvaiko
2804:
2796:Proposed remedies
2774:, as I see it. --
2720:AndriyK's crusade
2684:links to evidence
2621:links to evidence
2570:links to evidence
2477:links to evidence
2422:links to evidence
2328:Rudeness of Irpen
1897:Ivan Kotlyarevsky
1615:links to evidence
1608:AndriyK's crusade
1550:Yaroslav the Wise
987:Patriarch Filaret
975:Patriarch Filaret
926:Patriarch Filaret
550:which was styled
537:Oleg of Chernihiv
473:A better summary
3467:
3257:
3255:
3247:
3240:
3214:
3122:User:Ghirlandajo
3013:all of his moves
2976:
2974:
2966:
2959:
2933:
2872:User:Kuban kazak
2800:
2771:
2769:
2761:
2754:
2728:
2609:User:Kuban kazak
2566:User:Ghirlandajo
2469:User:Ghirlandajo
2465:User:Kuban kazak
2414:User:Ghirlandajo
2408:Sneaky vandalism
2386:It appears that
2298:User:Ghirlandajo
2250:User:Ghirlandajo
2208:User:Ghirlandajo
2118:User:Ghirlandajo
2051:Andrew Alexander
1951:Andrew Alexander
1674:User:Kuban kazak
1666:User:Ghirlandajo
1586:Andrew Alexander
1472:User:Ghirlandajo
1434:User:Ghirlandajo
1273:Recent example:
1234:User:Ghirlandajo
1197:User:Ghirlandajo
527:
462:Locus of dispute
412:Locus of dispute
120:
3475:
3474:
3470:
3469:
3468:
3466:
3465:
3464:
3433:
3401:
3393:
3358:
3353:
3318:
3253:
3245:
3227:
3217:
3212:
3074:
2972:
2964:
2946:
2936:
2931:
2810:
2798:
2767:
2759:
2741:
2731:
2726:
2675:
2605:
2562:
2512:
2457:
2410:
2330:
2078:
1867:
1844:The ArbCom, by
1733:And what about
1610:
1326:
1143:
1027:
872:
518:
464:
414:
379:
374:
339:
304:
265:
230:
225:
220:
182:
177:
142:
118:
53:
44:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
3473:
3462:
3460:
3459:
3458:
3457:
3451:
3450:
3449:
3448:
3442:
3441:
3440:
3439:
3432:
3429:
3428:
3427:
3426:
3425:
3419:
3418:
3417:
3416:
3410:
3409:
3408:
3407:
3400:
3397:
3392:
3389:
3388:
3387:
3386:
3385:
3379:
3378:
3377:
3376:
3370:
3369:
3368:
3367:
3357:
3354:
3352:
3349:
3348:
3347:
3346:
3345:
3339:
3338:
3337:
3336:
3330:
3329:
3328:
3327:
3317:
3314:
3313:
3312:
3311:
3310:
3304:
3303:
3302:
3301:
3299:
3298:
3297:
3271:AndriyK's talk
3259:
3200:
3193:
3178:
3174:
3170:
3138:
3137:
3136:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3132:
3086:
3085:
3084:
3083:
3073:
3072:AndriyK warned
3070:
3069:
3068:
3067:
3066:
3057:
3052:Benjamin Gatti
3039:
3038:
3037:
3028:
3022:
3021:
3020:
3019:
3018:
3017:
3009:
2998:..of Chernihiv
2990:
2927:
2905:
2904:
2903:
2902:
2901:
2900:
2899:
2886:
2875:
2844:
2841:
2838:
2835:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2819:
2809:
2808:AndriyK banned
2806:
2797:
2794:
2793:
2792:
2791:
2790:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2674:
2673:by Kuban kazak
2667:
2666:
2665:
2664:
2663:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2654:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2604:
2601:
2600:
2599:
2598:
2597:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2561:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2548:
2547:
2546:
2545:
2539:
2538:
2537:
2536:
2511:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2505:
2504:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2486:
2456:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2434:
2433:
2432:
2431:
2409:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2396:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2392:
2391:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2329:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2315:Stepan Bandera
2294:
2293:
2290:
2287:
2284:
2281:
2278:
2275:
2272:
2269:
2266:
2263:
2260:
2257:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2175:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2077:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2063:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2024:
1981:
1968:
1961:
1949:Additionally,
1947:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1866:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1799:The mess with
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1681:
1677:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1639:A dirty trick
1609:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1447:as well as of
1430:
1429:
1428:
1419:
1415:
1397:
1391:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1360:
1325:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1311:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1292:
1272:
1270:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1097:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1003:
971:
970:
969:
930:
929:
928:
922:
905:
904:
903:
902:
871:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
859:
858:
857:
856:
831:
830:
829:
828:
818:
800:
781:
780:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
750:
715:
643:
632:
622:ov" or "Cherni
604:modern Russian
596:modern Russian
581:
580:
579:
578:
517:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
504:
503:
502:
501:
499:
498:
497:
483:
482:
481:
480:
463:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
450:
449:
448:
447:
441:
440:
439:
438:
413:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
400:
399:
398:
397:
391:
390:
389:
388:
378:
375:
373:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
360:
359:
358:
357:
351:
350:
349:
348:
338:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
325:
324:
323:
322:
316:
315:
314:
313:
303:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
290:
289:
288:
287:
281:
280:
279:
278:
264:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
251:
250:
249:
248:
242:
241:
240:
239:
229:
226:
224:
221:
219:
216:
214:
212:
211:
210:
209:
203:
202:
201:
200:
194:
193:
192:
191:
181:
178:
176:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
163:
162:
161:
160:
154:
153:
152:
151:
141:
138:
137:
136:
135:
134:
128:
127:
113:
112:
111:
95:
91:
90:
89:
79:
78:
77:
76:
52:
45:
43:
40:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3472:
3463:
3456:
3455:
3453:
3452:
3447:
3446:
3444:
3443:
3438:
3437:
3435:
3434:
3424:
3423:
3421:
3420:
3415:
3414:
3412:
3411:
3406:
3405:
3403:
3402:
3396:
3384:
3383:
3381:
3380:
3375:
3374:
3372:
3371:
3366:
3365:
3363:
3362:
3361:
3344:
3343:
3341:
3340:
3335:
3334:
3332:
3331:
3326:
3325:
3323:
3322:
3321:
3309:
3308:
3306:
3305:
3300:
3295:
3294:
3288:
3284:
3280:
3278:
3272:
3268:
3267:many attempts
3264:
3260:
3256:
3251:
3248:
3243:
3239:
3236:
3233:
3230:
3226:
3223:
3220:
3215:
3209:
3205:
3201:
3198:
3194:
3191:
3187:
3183:
3179:
3175:
3171:
3168:
3164:
3163:his talk page
3160:
3156:
3154:
3149:
3146:While I take
3145:
3144:
3143:
3139:
3131:
3127:
3123:
3119:
3115:
3111:
3110:
3108:
3104:
3100:
3099:
3097:
3096:
3095:
3091:
3090:
3088:
3087:
3082:
3081:
3079:
3078:
3077:
3065:
3062:
3058:
3056:
3053:
3049:
3045:
3044:russification
3040:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3029:
3027:
3026:
3024:
3023:
3014:
3011:Not most but
3010:
3007:
3003:
2999:
2995:
2991:
2988:
2984:
2980:
2975:
2970:
2967:
2962:
2958:
2955:
2952:
2949:
2945:
2942:
2939:
2934:
2928:
2926:
2923:
2919:
2918:
2913:
2912:
2910:
2906:
2898:
2895:
2891:
2887:
2884:
2880:
2876:
2873:
2869:
2865:
2864:
2862:
2858:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2849:
2845:
2842:
2839:
2836:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2827:
2826:
2824:
2823:
2818:
2817:
2815:
2814:
2813:
2805:
2803:
2789:
2788:
2786:
2785:
2780:
2777:
2773:
2770:
2765:
2762:
2757:
2753:
2750:
2747:
2744:
2740:
2737:
2734:
2729:
2721:
2717:
2713:
2709:
2705:
2701:
2700:
2698:
2697:
2692:
2691:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2685:
2680:
2672:
2662:
2661:
2659:
2658:
2653:
2650:
2646:
2642:
2638:
2637:
2635:
2634:
2629:
2628:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2622:
2618:
2614:
2611:neglects the
2610:
2596:
2595:
2593:
2592:
2587:
2586:
2584:
2583:
2578:
2577:
2575:
2574:
2573:
2571:
2567:
2553:
2552:
2550:
2549:
2544:
2543:
2541:
2540:
2535:
2534:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2528:
2525:
2522:
2519:
2516:
2503:
2502:
2500:
2499:
2494:
2493:
2491:
2490:
2485:
2484:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2448:
2447:
2445:
2444:
2439:
2438:
2436:
2435:
2430:
2429:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2423:
2419:
2415:
2401:
2400:
2398:
2397:
2389:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2361:
2360:
2358:
2357:
2352:
2351:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2345:
2341:
2338:
2335:
2323:
2320:
2316:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2304:
2299:
2291:
2288:
2285:
2282:
2279:
2276:
2273:
2270:
2267:
2264:
2261:
2258:
2255:
2254:
2253:
2251:
2241:
2238:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2230:
2229:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2209:
2206:
2205:
2203:
2202:User:Gnomz007
2199:
2193:
2190:
2186:
2183:
2180:
2176:
2174:
2171:
2167:
2166:User: AndriyK
2163:
2159:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2135:
2132:
2129:
2126:
2122:
2121:
2119:
2115:
2110:
2106:
2105:
2103:
2099:
2098:
2096:
2095:
2090:
2089:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2082:
2069:
2068:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2055:
2052:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2029:
2023:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2004:
1999:
1995:
1991:
1988:
1987:
1985:
1982:
1980:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1966:
1962:
1959:
1958:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1929:
1925:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1913:
1911:
1907:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1893:
1891:
1887:
1886:
1884:
1883:
1878:
1877:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1854:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1838:
1836:
1833:
1828:
1827:
1825:
1820:
1819:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1805:
1802:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1782:
1779:
1775:
1774:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1761:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1751:
1747:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1727:
1723:
1720:
1717:
1716:
1714:
1713:
1708:
1703:
1699:
1694:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1658:
1656:
1652:
1651:
1649:
1645:
1642:
1638:
1637:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1620:
1616:
1601:
1600:
1598:
1597:
1590:
1587:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1566:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1497:
1494:
1490:
1489:Talk:Vitsebsk
1486:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1473:
1469:
1461:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1437:
1436:(see below).
1435:
1431:
1427:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:(see above).
1406:
1402:
1401:
1398:
1395:
1392:
1389:
1388:
1386:
1382:
1381:
1379:
1378:
1373:
1370:
1366:
1365:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1358:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1331:
1317:
1316:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1290:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1276:
1269:
1265:
1257:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1241:
1237:
1235:
1231:
1225:
1221:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1176:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1162:
1161:
1156:
1155:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1149:
1134:
1133:
1131:
1130:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1093:
1089:
1083:
1079:
1078:
1076:
1072:
1071:
1069:
1068:
1063:
1062:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1018:
1017:
1015:
1014:
1009:
1004:
1001:
996:
992:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
967:
963:
959:
955:
950:
946:
942:
938:
937:
935:
931:
927:
923:
920:
919:
917:
916:
914:
910:
909:
907:
906:
901:
900:
898:
897:
896:
895:
891:
888:
885:
882:
879:
876:
863:
862:
861:
860:
855:
852:
848:
844:
840:
836:
835:
833:
832:
827:
824:
819:
817:
814:
810:
806:
801:
798:
794:
791:
788:
783:
782:
779:
775:
765:
762:
758:
757:
755:
751:
748:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
713:
712:
711:(see below).
710:
706:
702:
701:
698:
694:
691:
688:
685:
681:
677:
674:
671:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
641:
640:anachronistic
637:
633:
630:
625:
621:
617:
613:
612:3-533-02787-2
610:
605:
601:
597:
593:
592:
590:
586:
585:
583:
582:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
559:
557:
556:
555:
553:
549:
545:
542:
538:
534:
530:
523:
509:
508:
506:
505:
500:
495:
494:
492:
488:
487:
485:
484:
479:
476:
472:
471:
469:
468:
467:
455:
454:
452:
451:
446:
445:
443:
442:
437:
434:
430:
429:
427:
426:
425:
423:
419:
405:
404:
402:
401:
396:
395:
393:
392:
387:
386:
384:
383:
382:
365:
364:
362:
361:
356:
355:
353:
352:
347:
346:
344:
343:
342:
330:
329:
327:
326:
321:
320:
318:
317:
312:
311:
309:
308:
307:
295:
294:
292:
291:
286:
285:
283:
282:
277:
276:
274:
273:
272:
270:
256:
255:
253:
252:
247:
246:
244:
243:
238:
237:
235:
234:
233:
215:
208:
207:
205:
204:
199:
198:
196:
195:
190:
189:
187:
186:
185:
168:
167:
165:
164:
159:
158:
156:
155:
150:
149:
147:
146:
145:
133:
132:
130:
129:
126:
123:
121:
114:
110:
106:
105:
104:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
81:
80:
75:
74:
72:
71:
70:
69:
66:
62:
58:
50:
39:
37:
33:
23:
19:
3461:
3394:
3359:
3319:
3290:
3285:, the whole
3276:
3274:
3266:
3262:
3249:
3241:
3234:
3228:
3221:
3208:sockpuppetry
3207:
3203:
3196:
3189:
3185:
3181:
3166:
3152:
3151:
3147:
3129:
3109:(see below)
3103:User:AndriyK
3094:User:AndriyK
3075:
3012:
3006:Peter Mogila
3005:
2997:
2986:
2983:our policies
2978:
2968:
2960:
2953:
2947:
2940:
2915:
2863:(see below)
2857:User:AndriyK
2830:User:AndriyK
2811:
2801:
2799:
2763:
2755:
2748:
2742:
2735:
2723:
2715:
2711:
2676:
2606:
2563:
2513:
2473:User:AndriyK
2458:
2455:Broken links
2418:User:AndriyK
2411:
2331:
2295:
2248:
2145:user:AndriyK
2102:User:AndriyK
2079:
2062:
2015:page history
1984:Additionally
1983:
1956:
1954:
1942:
1939:user:AndriyK
1934:
1927:
1923:
1917:edit history
1890:User:AndriyK
1868:
1846:its decision
1829:
1807:
1800:
1701:
1697:
1692:
1688:
1685:my statement
1661:
1655:User:AndriyK
1611:
1557:
1485:Talk:Polatsk
1441:Kievian Rus'
1411:
1394:Kievian Rus'
1385:User:AndriyK
1359:
1338:
1335:Kievian Rus'
1327:
1310:
1248:
1244:
1239:
1227:
1219:
1186:User:AndriyK
1144:
1104:
1103:my posts is
1100:
1085:
1028:
999:
982:
913:User:AndriyK
873:
808:
804:
753:
738:
734:
722:
718:
705:User:AndriyK
696:
683:
679:
666:
662:
658:
639:
635:
628:
623:
619:
603:
599:
595:
519:
491:User:AndriyK
465:
415:
380:
340:
305:
266:
231:
213:
183:
143:
54:
29:
3140:Comment by
3126:User:Mzajac
3101:Comment by
3092:Comment by
3030:Comment by
2907:Comment by
2855:Comment by
2828:Comment by
2716:dirty trick
2702:Comment by
2639:Comment by
2380:Comment by
2362:Comment by
2319:Ghirlandajo
2200:Comment by
2189:Ghirlandajo
2179:User:Ezhiki
2170:Ghirlandajo
2149:Ghirlandajo
2116:Comment by
2100:Comment by
2030:Comment by
1953:'s posting
1908:Comment by
1888:Comment by
1769:Comment by
1750:Ghirlandajo
1676:and others?
1653:Comment by
1641:Fred Bauder
1577:Comment by
1508:Comment by
1493:Ghirlandajo
1470:Comment by
1405:Fred Bauder
1383:Comment by
1369:Fred Bauder
1282:User:Mzajac
1275:User:Mzajac
1266:comment by
1206:comment by
1184:Comment by
1166:comment by
1082:User:Ezhiki
1073:Comment by
995:Ghirlandajo
966:Kuban kazak
962:Ghirlandajo
911:Comment by
776:Comment by
703:Comment of
587:Comment by
541:Kievan Rus'
489:Comment by
475:Fred Bauder
433:Fred Bauder
107:Comment by
85:Comment by
3254:edit count
3238:block user
3204:vote fraud
3165:documents
3114:User:Irpen
2973:edit count
2957:block user
2879:Ivan Bohun
2768:edit count
2752:block user
2708:Kiev Metro
2461:User:Irpen
2334:User:Irpen
2303:User:Irpen
2109:"Evidence"
1957:Britannica
1670:User:Irpen
1546:Kievan Rus
1528:Kievan Rus
1230:User:Irpen
1193:User:Irpen
797:comparison
754:principles
747:User:Irpen
709:User:Irpen
57:User:Irpen
3246:block log
3232:checkuser
3197:allotment
2994:his moves
2965:block log
2951:checkuser
2917:Hypocrisy
2890:Hypocrisy
2760:block log
2746:checkuser
2669:Ignoring
2143:, unlike
2043:Holodomor
1558:reference
1491:, etc. --
1418:language.
665:. "Cherni
616:Siverians
522:Ukrainian
119:Introvert
109:Introvert
32:/Evidence
3399:Template
3356:Template
3316:Template
3277:friendly
3225:contribs
3161:. Also,
3048:Ems Ukaz
2944:contribs
2739:contribs
1619:Move log
1294:editor.–
1268:Gnomz007
1245:evidence
1220:addendum
377:Template
337:Template
302:Template
228:Template
180:Template
140:Template
61:Evidence
20: |
3213:Dovbush
3061:Chazz88
2932:AndriyK
2894:AndriyK
2848:AndriyK
2727:AndriyK
2722:entry.
2237:Yakudza
1832:AndriyK
1524:Ukraine
1516:Belarus
1457:AndriyK
1449:Ukraine
1445:Belarus
1423:AndriyK
1351:Ukraine
1343:Belarus
1084:calles
1075:AndriyK
839:AndriyK
761:AndriyK
727:Encarta
651:Encarta
636:Russian
627:"Cherni
589:AndriyK
563:Ukraine
65:AndriyK
22:AndriyK
3177:talk).
2996:, all
2985:reads
2467:, and
1680:issue.
1628:, see
1522:, and
1520:Russia
1453:Russia
1412:plural
1349:, and
1347:Russia
1000:headed
954:UOC-KP
945:UOC-KP
934:UOC-KP
892:, see
717:I did
571:Odessa
552:Galich
548:Halych
3142:Irpen
3107:Irpen
2922:Irpen
2909:Irpen
2861:Irpen
2776:Irpen
2704:Irpen
2649:Irpen
2641:Irpen
2388:Irpen
2369:done.
2364:Irpen
2213:Gnomz
2019:Irpen
1998:links
1976:Irpen
1910:Irpen
1850:Irpen
1815:Irpen
1810:WP:RM
1771:Irpen
1562:Irpen
1510:Irpen
1355:Irpen
1296:Gnomz
1253:Irpen
1224:Irpen
1212:Irpen
1208:Irpen
1175:Irpen
1168:Irpen
1080:What
991:Irpen
958:Irpen
843:Irpen
823:Irpen
813:Irpen
778:Irpen
743:check
100:Irpen
87:Irpen
16:<
3283:this
3219:talk
3206:and
3046:and
3032:Lysy
2938:talk
2733:talk
2613:NPOV
2607:15)
2459:12)
2424:).
2412:11)
2344:here
2332:10)
2147:. --
2017:. --
2005:and
1915:The
1901:GFDL
1801:that
1778:Lysy
1760:Lysy
1748:. --
1726:Lysy
1724:. --
1721:and
1451:and
1284:and
1232:and
1195:and
1113:here
1092:here
1090:and
1088:here
1052:here
1050:and
1048:here
993:and
979:NPOV
941:NPOV
851:Lysy
841:and
729:and
631:ov".
609:ISBN
569:and
567:Kiev
535:and
184:1)
144:1)
51:page
3279:way
3265:at
2892:?--
2881:or
2686:).
2623:).
2479:).
2049:.--
1992:by
1943:rvv
1554:Kyi
1455:.--
1357:.)
1328:6)
1222:by
1105:not
1101:all
1029:4)
719:not
267:1)
55:1)
3261:I
2911::
2572:)
2529:)
2526:,
2523:,
2520:,
2517:,
2463:,
2346:.
2219:)
2204::
2184:,
2136:,
2133:,
2130:,
2127:,
2120::
2104::
1986::
1912::
1892::
1813:--
1758:--
1745:,
1672:,
1668:,
1657::
1632:.
1552:,
1518:,
1487:,
1474::
1414:).
1387::
1345:,
1302:)
1203:.
1188::
1150:.
1094:"'
1077::
964:,
960:,
915::
889:,
886:,
883:,
880:,
877:,
759:--
756:.
739:go
735:hi
723:hi
692:,
689:,
684:hi
680:go
667:go
659:hi
653:,
649:,
624:hi
591::
531:.
524::
493::
424:.
98:--
38:.
3250:·
3242:·
3235:·
3229:·
3222:·
3216:(
3210:(
2969:·
2961:·
2954:·
2948:·
2941:·
2935:(
2885:?
2764:·
2756:·
2749:·
2743:·
2736:·
2730:(
2217:?
2215:(
2111:.
1839:.
1837:"
1821:,
1702:W
1698:V
1693:W
1689:V
1613:(
1530:.
1300:?
1298:(
1115:.
697:g
642:.
629:g
620:h
600:g
577:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.