Knowledge:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politics

8027:). Merely being an internet shitposter does not mean that one is automatically non-notable. Nor does the coverage have to focus on the article subject as an individual versus their posts. Some of the stuff here could probably be cut down, but the above voters are mischaracterizing the state of the sources. There is substantial, in-depth coverage from reliable sources as multiple commentators noted in the previous, much more attended AfD found. Full, standalone articles including those from Rolling Stone, Business Insider, The Messenger, Techdirt should be sufficient to for notability purposes by themself, even if we cast aside the Indian news outlets that are possibly less reliable. Then there is the multi-paragraph introduction to the Buzzfeed News interview (which is exclusive to the article subject), multiple articles that devote a paragraph or two to her posts/their fallout (e.g. Mary Sue, NBC, The Advocate, Rolling Stone, Snopes, Vox), and an interview that technically does do some factchecking (Vox), which combined should be enough to meet 4337:- If Knowledge was around in the late 1980s or 1990s then this magazine\political tendency would easily meet notability criteria - it was an active political group and it managed to get a good number of the British left to contribute, including Tony Benn, Ralph Miliband and Hilary Wainwright. The person "that became important decades after his involvement with the group" was the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom - and it's not unusual that large articles like Keir Starmer's will tend to have "sub articles". The basic argument for suppressing pages about movements that were notable once was that they didn't last - but even though I'd argue that Starmer's not the only reason we should keep the article, his political development as currently the most powerful single person in the UK is a sufficient reason. (It should also be noted that "half the sources are internal, misses out that there are currently 11 external sources, so it seems externally notable). 7676:: Just to note, I do not think JUNIPER's other publicised things (her suspension and the Snickers dick vein meme/hoax) represent anything notable, certainly not to the extent of goblin mode. The Snickers dick vein hoax had a Knowledge page which was subsequently merged with several other articles before eventually redirecting back to JUNIPER's, which makes its lack of notability for Knowledge standards apparent. Its just an internet meme, not every internet meme is notable just for being popular or having an internet-culture website write an article on it. If that were true, Chris-Chan would have had a Knowledge page long ago. Same goes for her suspension, not very notable and lacked sustained coverage, and most coverage it got was not focused on her specifically. 11653:, which I take to be the same organisation given that one of the the best links given by Soman is to the same organisation magazine for both. There seems to be the perennial problem of that source not being independent, but it seems likely that Soman or another editor might be able to fix that if they do their best to search out independent news sources in Turkish which would be more difficult for us non-Turkish speakers. With an organisation of this age I have to believe that they exist, and as Soman says, the criteria is that sources exist, not that they are cited currently in an article. I see no point keeping this clearly inferior article though, when a better one on the same topic exists. 7655:: As I have become more experienced here, I am more open to a deletion. I knew this would come eventually, because it was never properly addressed in the other two AfD's. The article hinges on goblin mode for notability a bit, but it should be kept in mind that she created/popularized other memes, and had added notability after her suspension. That's not just one event. Still, this article could easily be deleted and separate memes and events go to their own parent articles, simply referencing her. Junlper herself does only have a few articles about her, so I'm open to any outcome. 357: 7861:, I usually hate deleting articles but I feel that it should be done here. A good portion of the sources (Business Insider, The Focus, tweets, Forbes contributors) are unreliable; Outlook India and News 18 have been known to publish misleading articles in the past. Some others (Vox, Buzzfeed News) are interviews and therefore can't be used to establish notability. From what I've read in previous deletion discussions, Ms Junlper, has expressed wishes that this article be deleted. 8393:. The ideas of "No continued coverage" or "no lasting effect" is readily shown to be wrong by the second source, a 2023 academic book discussing the topic over multiple pages. In addition, we currently have multi-language coverage. "Video conference" should not suggest unimportance given the scope and period - event included 500 political parties and 10,000 individual representatives and was conducted in 2021 when China was still quite protective on COVID19 matters. 14556:#2. As always, city councillors are not automatically notable enough for Knowledge articles just because they exist, and have to show evidence that they should be seen as special cases of significantly more nationalized notability than the norm -- but this is showing nothing of the sort, and instead is trending in the direction of trying to promote his post-council business as a mortgage agent, and is referenced entirely to the type of 9617:. This is not identical to the sovereign nations group, but as long as the party remains aspirational, and the article simply instead lists constitutent members that are parties that form the group, the reader would be better served by having this all in one place. Should this become an actual party it is almost certain that reliable sources would cover it as such and at that point it would merit its own article. We are not there yet. 31: 13945:. Bkissin already pointed out the issue with the third reason, and the fourth...you're going to have to expand on that, because I don't see how being a "software entrepreneur" proves notability. As for the first reason, yes it's true that some unelected candidates get a WP page, but that doesn't mean *all* unelected candidates get a page. If Begich loses the 2024 race, will people still be searching his name in 10 years? 9982: 9934: 9884: 406: 9964: 9927: 9919: 9877: 9869: 116: 9814:. Articles saying what the AfD intends to do are not sufficient to write an article about a party that does not exist yet. The information is not irrelevant but a reader is poorly served in having to locate and read an article about a party that has not yet come into existence when this information would be better placed on the page about the group and the page about the AfD. 6122:' notability criteria. The articles cited mention Florida Carry only in passing or in one sentence, and do not maintain the focus upon the organization for the source to be considered significant. However, while I was looking over the references cited, I noticed that Florida Carry apparently authored House Bill 463, which was passed in 2012. The article in question: 10288:, there remain no reliable secondary sources covering this. If the party were registered, we might presume notability, but until that happens, it is entirely possible that registration would be withdrawn and it would never be notable. If there were reliable secondary sources significantly covering the party, then it would pass GNG. At this stage neither is true. 8076:. Normally I'd raise an eyebrow over a third nomination in a year but the first two were misfires so it is fair enough to raise it again. That said, I think Patar knight has it right. She makes it over the line for Notability. There are multiple sources covering her for multiple things. Yes, some of those things are silly but that's not what matters. -- 9100: 13970:) on the 25th of September. Just... strikes me as odd to undelete it only to renom for deletion. I apologize if I missed this one needing to stay in drafts - I likely still would have looked up the info seeing the flag and all, but I would have also notified someone and asked about moving it back to drafts if that's where it should be. 1562: 3846:. These keep getting made and inevitably end up back here. There's no point in salting because eventually they will have to get made. Once sourcing becomes available for the actual election this can be redirected to the election article and then redirected back to the Assembly article after the election. Regards, -- 8006:" phrase and Snickers dick vein stuff in early 2022 and her Twitter ban in late 2023. Junlper was central to both events, so the third prong of BLP1E also does not apply. Having given multiple interviews, hosting a podcast, and making shitposts that have collectively gotten millions of views means that she is not a 10240:

project). It has already been pointed out that the existence of pages for EP groups and European parties bearing the same names and containing potentially overlapping information is a standard in the specific context of European politics. Deleting the page for merely procedural reasons would be a mistake to me.--

15618:

Historical and Cultural Significance: Daniel Ruiz II holds the distinction of being the first Latino to serve as Chief of Staff to an Arizona Governor. This alone represents a noteworthy milestone in Arizona’s political history, reflecting the increasing diversity in state leadership roles and making

10302:

There is no European political party at this point, as registration is pending, but there is a political alliance, as has already been pointed out several times. Sure, there may need to be further sources, but this shortcoming does not seem to warrant (in the eyes of almost all contributors here) the

10239:

It has already been pointed out that it is a separate entity from the correspondent EP group, with its own separate leadership and membership. It has already been pointed out that the party has been officially registered as party, and is therefore a legal entity on its own (and not just the idea of a

7744:

despite reliable source coverage. However, the bar for inclusion of individuals does not require them to be responsible for multiple things that meet Knowledge's notability guidelines, only significant coverage of them and/or their work in reliable sources. For example, Junlper's suspension would not

7136:

You may disagree politically with the group but describing them as engaging in propaganda is rather misleading. Irrespective of that, the motives of an organisation do not negate otherwise credible claims to notability. You have also failed to acknowledge the other sources, including books, providing

5912:

Minimal article on a state branch. The Australian Democrats were never significant in state level politics in Queensland and this article is little more than excess detail about the foundation of the branch, a list of federal Senators from the state and obscure points of Queensland company law. State

2948:

There is consensus the New York Post is generally unreliable for factual reporting, especially with regard to politics, particularly New York City politics. A tabloid newspaper, editors criticise its lack of concern for fact-checking or corrections, including examples of outright fabrication. Editors

15626:

Broader Media Recognition: As noted in the specific citations from reliable sources provided, Daniel Ruiz II has been the subject of media coverage related to his role in shaping Arizona's policies. His involvement in major state initiatives, including economic development and crisis management, has

13401:

that aren't support for notability at all, and of the just four hits that come from real GNG-worthy media, two are just death reportage from the local media in her hometown; one is just a short blurb about her winning a minor award that isn't highly notable enough to clinch an instant "she's notable

7423:

it documents a notable political initiative in Andhra Pradesh, India, which played a significant role in the 2019 state elections. The program, introduced by the YSR Congress Party, has had substantial media coverage and political impact, making it relevant and notable within the context of regional

7121:

Lacks independent and reliable sources that establish its notability. Most sources referenced, such as Venezuelanalysis or Liberation News, are clearly partisan and closely tied to political ideologies that align with the subject, which undermines their neutrality. IMHO, organizations that engage in

6758:

It is when one of the other voting suggestions is “redirect to a list of parties” - there is an actual process to forming a political party in NZ, with steps and criteria to follow, none of which he managed to achieve. It’s like calling a lemonade stand your kids make a “company” because they drew a

16430:

Kais Saied is the president of Tunisia, and the president's visit to China in 2024 has brought diplomatic relations to the level of a "strategic partnership", meaning that future communication between the two sides will no longer be limited to the central government, but can be decentralized to the

16343:

and as such, notability is an extremely big deal. I linked an independent English language source (2024 China-United States Exchange Foundation) under External links. I also linked a Brookings Institution commentary under External Links. They're building valuable contacts in a world that seems to

14669:

I don't particularly think a redirect to the hockey team is needed. Despite the article saying that he "is" the owner of the team, he actually only owned it for a few months in 2014 before selling it to other owners again, so I don't think owning a minor hockey league team for a brief time 10 years

10226:

The more my research on the party progresses, the more I am convinced that it should be deleted. And it's obvious since the article is primarily based on primary sources and has a problem of original research as I have already pointed out with the relevant tag. Meanwhile, those in favour of keeping

9405:

Just like at the national level, European parties are extra-parliamentary entities, while political groups are entities that operate only within the confines of the (European) Parliament. Membership is different, leadership is different, rules are different, roles are different, names and logos are

6600:

The article is jocular about it. The party itself really had no impact. The commercial airport at Whenuapai has always been a terrible proposal unlikely to go through (estimated to cost around a billion just to move the military operations and other reasons relating to national defence that I can't

15630:

Daniel Ruiz II is a notable figure both historically and politically. His role as the first Latino Chief of Staff in Arizona and his comparability with other individuals in similar roles who have retained Knowledge pages underscore his notability. I respectfully request that his page be maintained

9891:

page, but it cannot tell us about this party as an entity, because it doesn't exist yet. This does not significantly describe the party. It does not tell us what the party is. It cannot even tell us the party will definitely come into being. Knowledge is a lagging indicator of notability and so an

9074:

A forum program by him invited deputy ministers had received coverage on newspaper headline. His nickname always mentioned after the channel name 'BBK Network' in interviews of figures, such as this one with a movie director. Despite on significant coverage, his channel seems not less notable than

7887:

for Outlook India is primarily about hidden content, which is almost certainly not the case here, though the article subject is only mentioned in passingare multiple other sources that are far more reliable and in-depth. The previous deletion discussion happened amidst her ongoing controversy over

6773:

Based on the information that this organization appears to be a single person who never registered it as a political party, if the organization is not notable, then I do not think the redirects to "Single-issue politics" or "List of political parties in New Zealand" would be appropriate. While the

3225:

The mayor of New York City is the most prominent mayoral position in the United States. The spouse/partner of the mayor is treated like that of a state's governor. Have there been discussions about the notability of a governor's significant other? I would apply them to the First Lady of NYC if so.

12531:

as this article claims he was the service director. However that article lusts others as directors, not this subject. Possibly the article creator mixed two different people up, I don’t know. Anyway we are left with a biostub in which the claim to notability is not supported by the single source.

6527:

to List of political parties. I feel the inclusion anywhere else would be undue given how little there is about it. Whilst the Whenuapai air base has been a recurring topic in NZ politics, this party had no impact on it and there is an IP edit that suggests the founder of the party (and it's only

9987:

Forum voor Democratie (FVD) heeft zich, ondanks afwezigheid in het Europees Parlement, aangesloten bij de nieuwe rechtse politieke beweging Europe of Sovereign Nations. Deze beweging is opgericht door de Duitse partij Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), die eerder werd uitgesloten van de fractie

8637:

This group received some coverage when it first launched in 2018, but that's mainly a function of having a good publicist. Since 2018, they've received very little in-depth coverage. There's some in-depth coverage of its leadership, but most articles I could find only mention BEA in passing. An

5734:

It was created in 2022 actually and has over 30 interviews from different sources including from Al Jazeera, CNN, NPR, ABC News, Axios, etc listed. Quick search shows there are even more not even mentioned on the page. This meets notable standards. I say keep and rename, although the article is

2967:

I'm not positive the subject of Tracey Collins falls under "politics". You said yourself she is a low-profile individual. I get that this is all tangentially related to politics but the tone of that article does not seem slanted or biased in a political way. I think the RfC does not apply here.

9992:

Forum for Democracy (FVD) has joined the new right-wing political movement Europe of Sovereign Nations, despite its absence in the European Parliament. This movement was founded by the German party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), which was previously excluded from the Identity and Democracy

6401:

Political party that existed for less than a year and advocated for a single issue. Only limited coverage, and it all appears to be from 2008, except for a single article about "the stranger parties of NZ's past and present" from 2018. This seems similar to how political candidates may receive

14560:

local coverage that's merely expected to always exist for all city councillors in their local media, except for a single brief glancing namecheck of his existence in a national newspaper article about somebody else, which isn't support for notability and doesn't even support the sentence it's

9685:

There are not two legal entities at this time. Even if there were, the different legal entities are not the reason for having an article page. Both entities would need to be independently notable. At this stage the party is not independently notable. If and when it becomes a reality, and when

9530:, I'm curious about your deletion nomination. How can the presence of a related article on Knowledge be considered "abusive"? Abusive to who? It's just after looking at thousands of AFD discussions, it's an argument I've never come across before and I'd like to know what you meant. Thank you. 8168:

same reasoning as Hyperbolick. I went into this thinking I’d vote delete going off everyone else’s comments / this being the third? Fourth? Deletion attempt… but there are an absolute ton of reliable secondary sources. I still think it’s ridiculous that news outlets etc are paying her and her

7939:

I've addressed the sourcing in my comment below, but in respect to interviews from reliable sources, it depends on factors such as the split between interview/non-interview content (i.e. a detailed introductory section vs. jumping straight to questions) and how probing the questions are (i.e.

16408:

The more I'm thinking about it, the more it makes sense. The two countries have diplomatic relations, but they seem very minimal. Documenting the visit in that article would help provide a clearer picture to the readers - especially because my keep vote is based more on the fact that I think

16373:. I can see a benefit for having a summary of the event merged into the China-Tunisia relations article, (lack of analysis by secondary sources leaves this article as mostly a summary of what each government said about the event) but I view that more as an editorial decision than an AFD one. 6927:

requires that sources establishing notability need to be "completely independent of the article subject" and reliable. I could only find pro-Venezuelan-government sources about this organization. I find it dubious whether these sources establish notability, therefore I am nominating this for

15622:

Impact and Influence: As noted on the page and in news sources, during his tenure, Ruiz oversaw critical initiatives under Governor Doug Ducey’s administration, playing a central role in shaping policy decisions and managing key aspects of state governance. His influence extended beyond the

5287:

violation). Attempt to find reliable sources showed no notable coverage in terms of news coverage. Some results appear on Google Scholar but from those I was able to access in English there are few mentions and those appeared trivial and more to do with outside organisations such as SYRIZA.

6187:- Most references to the organization are minor, and the majority of the sources are merely links to the bills that they supported. Their actions are also somewhat irrelevant considering the activities of larger organizations that likely made a much larger impact on the bills in question. 11093:

No consensus here yet. Just a point of information, an AFD closer can not close a discussion with a decision to "Move" an article because that is an editing decision. So, if you want to Move this article, "vote" Keep and then have a Move discussion afterwards on the article talk

10257:

There are two different organizations: a European political party and a European parliamentary group. I see absolutely no point in deleting the party page. I see the problems that this page has, but even they are not a reason for deleting. It's like deleting an article about the

13754:. The result of the previous discussion was a redirect to the page for the 2022 election; at this point, it makes more sense to redirect to the 2024 page since Begich is now in a one-on-one race with the incumbent, unlike in 2022 when there was another Republican in the race. 11124:

Northern Territory general election are misplaced. "Next" is used in election article titles when the date of the next election is uncertain. However, Northern Territory has fixed-term parliaments and the next election must take place in 2028, so the current title is correct.

10351:

and that it is a separate legal entity from the group are not, by themselves, a valid argument to keep an article on Knowledge. The question here is whether the party meets our notability guidelines for a standalone article, or whether the sourced material is better off being

7615:). Most information about JUNIPER could be added to that page. JUNIPER herself is not very notable. Many of the sources used as references mention her only in passing (usually because she responded to a more prominent person's post online) or are primarily about goblin mode. 15623:

day-to-day operations of the Governor's office, as Chief of Staff is a role vital to executing state policy and managing crisis responses. His leadership, particularly in a state as politically dynamic as Arizona, underscores the importance of documenting his contributions.

16751:

I'm not denying they would meet NPOL if elected, but they don't right now. Routine election coverage of candidates is expected and doesn't really count towards anything. I would support a draftification that can be reverted if they win, but right now they are not notable.

9704:

is not yet endowed with European legal personality, but it is indeed registered as an association in Germany and exists as such. And, although notability is more subjective, the two entities are indeed independently notable, as they do not have the same members and roles.

8045:, the previous AfD seemed to indicate that she was indifferent to it being kept, and she may not be eligible for such a deletion because she is a public figure, though if she has indicated a preference now, that is worth noting. If the article is not kept, then the proper 2949:

consider the New York Post more reliable before it changed ownership in 1976, and particularly unreliable for coverage involving the New York City Police Department. A 2024 RfC concluded that the New York Post is marginally reliable for entertainment coverage; see below.

6986:

in books. I'll have a more thorough look later. I'm unsure how and on what basis you can characterise particular media sources as "pro-Venezuelan-government". What media sources which are "anti-Venezuelan-government" and are they acceptable to establish notability?

14109:. Nothing has changed since the previous AfD to justify recreation. I would also recomend that the redirect article then be locked from editing to avoid a backdoor recreation either as a puff piece for the Begich campaign or a smear page for the Peltola campaign.-- 15614:

Both of these individuals have pages with far less detail regarding their accomplishments or their impact on public policy. This sets a clear precedent for retaining the page for Ruiz, who has had an equally, if not more, significant role in Arizona's political

9751:

The party does exist. Proof can be found in Handelsregister Berlin under registration number VR 41308. It just has not yet been registered as European Political Party by the APPF. I agree that secondary sources were missing from the article and have added some.

6508:- basically one guy who got fewer than 300 votes the one time he stood for election. it is an idiosyncrasy of NZ politics that anyone who can scrape up a deposit can say they are a party even if their unregistered "party" is basically a laptop and a printer. 4496:

Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. The sole reference is what the individual said in January 2024 when he said he was forming the party. Then this article was created Feb 10th They lost the election receiving 1,635 votes.

5881: 4081:: No significant coverage outside of some heavily promotional articles. The author of the Village Sun pieces is not exactly an independent source since he is a member of another local organization that campaigns for Democrats (see the note at the bottom of 4282:

are about its connection with someone that became important decades after his involvement with the group. As such, I'm proposing it for deletion; I'm not sure whether the articles on the IRMT or Starmer himself would be more appropriate redirect targets.

1201: 13584:: I added sources from radio Canada, and also found out that a beer was named after her after her death to honour her community enngagement. Her role as president of the STENOQ trade union for teachers also appears in a 1996 history book about the region 5252: 6585:

NCAaWAP seems notable enough for a list of unsuccessful parties, particularly since they've been outrageously successful in preventing that airport being built! If consensus firms around the parties list, then I'll change my proposed redirect target.

3405: 1497:

This is a non-notable entity. The article contains not a single third party source establishing its notability. It a small group of individuals who set up a website. Knowledge should not be promoting non-notable groups with little to none relevance.

15670:: First hispanic chief of staff is barely notable, the Blue Cross position isn't notable. I don't see what's changed in the three months since last AfD. Sourcing used is simply confirmation of various positions, no different than any other person. 7925:: non-notable person, all sources are either unreliable or interviews (which usually aren't counted as references), article is written like a personal blog or a Knowledge parody. The person has done nothing to be included in an online encyclopedia. 9125: 6370: 3689: 3646: 3593: 7749:

and should not have its own page, but the reliable sources that did cover it lend to her own notability. The latest article discussing her suspension in any amount of depth was NBC in January 2024. Since she went viral in February 2022 for the

2589: 2354: 2119: 574: 7013:

or other party-affiliated sites. I do not mean that all "pro-Venezuelan-government" do not establish notability – I expressed myself poorly. I doubt that specific sources establish notability because of their partisanness, with SIRS mandating

13386:

as having any strong claim to passing notability criteria for local politicians or activists. As always, neither city councillors nor activists are automatically entitled to have Knowledge articles just because they existed, and have to show

10121:

Relisting. Also, arguments like "oppose per nom" makes no sense because if you oppose this article's deletion, then how can you agree with the nominator that it should be deleted? It would be helpful if participants used the standard words,

10846: 16240: 9511:, a party and a European parliamentary group are different, there is also seperate articles for the ECR group and the ECR party, I can understand the arguments to delete this page since the ESN is small but we should be consitent on it -- 8284: 1122: 1022: 6644:

this is such a nothingburger I really don't think it even qualifies for merging. Maybe a merge to the single-issue politics page as per previous comment could make sense, but this is such a tiny thing I think it would be undue there.

1466: 12355:

as he’s an unsuccessful candidate, and he doesn’t look like a GNG pass either. The sources are either self-published, an interview, or about the Volt party and its positions rather than in-depth independent coverage of the subject.

11845:

Only one reference on the page and it's a dead link to a bio of her from the government organization she works for. A quick search shows a decent amount of articles about and by a South African woman named Rachel Adams regarding AI

11356: 9272: 7997:

clearly does not apply here as the nominator and others suggest. To have an individual article, BLP1E's first prong only requires reliable sources to discuss article subjects in the context of more than one event, not more than one

6774:

redirect I suggested to Whenuapai may be acceptable as there are a few mentions in newspapers, given the discussion since I filed this AfD, that is probably excessive as well. I now think simply deleting is the most appropriate. –

3436:

This is a very strangely titled article that discusses several minor territorial adjustments to France's borders with three different countries. The only sources in the article were published by the French government, meaning that

6893: 12205:(youth council); normally, such councilors are the council's committee chairperson on youth and sports. However, she was unseated recently and this has caused controversy if that was even allowed. So her notability is on this 5838: 10505: 5071:

Then could you please rewrite the article, citing this textbook and other reliable sources if you think the page is worth something? Because otherwise there is no point in keeping it in its current (miserable) shape really.

3174:

for such purposes: “ There is consensus that the New York Post … are considered to be marginally reliable sources for entertainment coverage, including reviews, but should not be used for controversial statements related to

16731:, the election is uncontested (Green Party didn't field a nominee) and less than a month away. The position of Shadow Senator is a federal position, equivalent to a senator. There's also a decent amount of coverage already 4465: 1158: 8606: 3520: 4221: 763: 12496: 2040: 1914: 14220: 15270: 5209: 3362: 13351: 5515: 443: 14822: 13966:: I honestly don't feel right voting on it one way or the other, given that the reason I looked into him at all was the "expand this section" flag that was on the article. That said, the article was just undeleted ( 12081: 13711: 12972: 12672: 5875: 17164: 15520: 4942: 2811: 6087: 11814: 8901: 6327: 3588: 1195: 15899:, as this was nominated for deletion 22 minutes after being converted from a redirect to an article. Also noting that the redirect's creator was notified, not the person who converted it to an article (pinging 15016: 14517: 12320: 7281: 5246: 4643: 16620: 15814: 12200:

has been mostly nondescript until recently. Elections are in May 2025, and this early, politicians are jockeying for positions. Ibay is a councilor representing the youth as the city president of the Manila

3957: 3399: 7001:

As for the Google Books results, it seems most are either citations of VSC, or trivial mentions. That was my first glance on the search results, but I do not deny there may be books that provide substantial

14703:. He owned a minor league hockey team for a few months: that’s not the big deal it’s asserted. I’m an hockey fan, FWIW. He is not automatically notable as a small city council member, as discussed above by 7576: 7053:

the breadth of trade union endorsements gives a good indication of the organisation's widespread support within the labour movement (including the largest UK unions). A small sample of reporting over time:

9658:

This is absolutely not the best solution. These are two distinct legal entities, with different members, different leaders, and different roles. There is no reason to merge these two articles. Even if the

7448: 2546: 2311: 2076: 531: 10385:

What sources do we have that discuss the party and provide us information from which an article about this part can be written? We need significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, per

6364: 3683: 943: 5811: 5806: 17018:. I prefer this over draftification, since if the subject is not ultimately found to be notable, they're still mentioned on the target article and so we have no reason not to have a redirect here. -- 11508:- again, lack of references is not on its own a criteria for deletion. The article as it exist right now doesn't fully explain the nature of the group. TÜM-İGD is the youth wing of the TKP (1920) (ex 2583: 2348: 2113: 568: 5815: 5366:

In the Greek sources I have looked at, there is nothing worthwhile. Although the party is old, it has never been influential outside its own area, so there is not enough coverage. A mention by name

1131: 1126: 8412:: I'm not sure how notable the book source cited is, as it's not an online reference. I can bring up news coverage of the event in 2021. Sourcing is largely in academic journals, into 2023 at least 7888:

the Twitter ban and seemed to indicate that she was indifferent about the page staying. Given that things have quieted down for her since then, do you have an updated statement from her on this? --

13201:: I struck out my previous !vote. She is the most likely candidate to be elected, the by-election is in a couple of weeks, and I think draftify would be the best option until the by-election date. 3519:(of which this article claims to be an "appendix", a rather odd concept on enwiki). I don't see any original research issues here: in addition to the references given, there are also references in 1135: 9719:

The page is about a party (that does not exist) and not about a precursor association. But again, what we need are secondary sources discussing the party. We don't have any, so this does not meet

437: 10840: 10803: 5798: 16234: 3272:

And yet, we don't see evidence of that with RS going into Collins as a person, just passing mentions in articles about Adams. McCray served in the role, Collins has avoided it, it would seem. –

1563:"արևմտյան հայաստանի հանրապետության" -site:"www.parliament-wa.info/" -site:"parliament-wa.info/" -site:"https://citizenship-western-armenia.info/" -site:"western-armenia.eu" -"Western Armenia TV" 16197: 8278: 5182: 5177: 3335: 3330: 1118: 431: 1016: 17034: 17015: 16937: 16912: 16344:

be exploding, "Although there is no visible alienation between Tunisia and the European Union, the gradual distancing between Tunisia and the United States has become increasingly apparent."

8241: 5186: 3339: 1460: 979: 11350: 9266: 5057:

New Federalism is not a rarely used term, appearing in American history and government textbooks (e.g. "We The People" from McGraw Hill). Should the page be rewritten? Maybe. Deleted? No.

6300: 6295: 5169: 3619: 3614: 3322: 6720:

Not even notable enough to go on a list of failed parties - given that it was never actually a registered party, just a name the one dude gave himself to look better on a ballot form.

9229: 6304: 3623: 1423: 6887: 10426: 3127:. An article about a person is an article about a person, even if the motivation for writing the article was the person's relationship. NOTINHERITED isn't about discrediting sourcing 425: 206: 15619:

Ruiz a pioneering figure in the Latino community. His tenure in this high-profile position is emblematic of broader societal changes and deserves recognition for its historic value.

11313: 6287: 6123: 6118:

From the sources provided by the article and my own research, I have come to the conclusion that Florida Carry as an organization has not received significant media coverage as per

3606: 2519: 2514: 2284: 2279: 2049: 2044: 1317: 504: 499: 16431:

level of provincial and municipal cooperation, with direct cooperation in trade and military affairs as well. The same applies to direct cooperation in trade and military matters.

10499: 414: 16736: 13668: 13615: 5922: 4459: 2523: 2288: 2053: 508: 16075:. While we have a large number of first spouse articles, I don't think most, and not Bob Eaves, meet GNG. A couple of assigned statewide initiatives would make GNG meaningless.-- 8600: 3131:

that person, but discrediting the idea that someone is automatically notable for their relationship. That said, there's just not enough sources about Collins directly to support

17121: 17068: 16778:

I think the coverage is decent as is, what reason is there to get rid of the article of a person who has a 99.9999% chance of being elected into office just before an election?

15477: 15424: 13902: 8675: 5010: 4215: 9737:

You are free to change "party" to "alliance" or "political alliance" in the title of the page. However, there seems to be a rather strong consensus against deleting this page.

6571:

Didn't notice that. Many of those parties listed are not notable by Knowledge's standards. If there is no suitable place to redirect/mention it at then deletion would be best.

5785: 757: 16997:: Draft or redirect, the election is coming up shortly. Wouldn't be notable if they don't win the election, based on what I'm seeing. Not fussed either way, probably !draft. 15157:- I can find two minor mentions in articles about the 2020 earthquake, every other source I can see is using this Knowledge article to source their information. Not notable. 14893: 14106: 14023: 13994: 13751: 13742:

Non-notable congressional candidate. All coverage is election-related or passing mentions. Doesn't meet NPOL and I don't see how he meets GNG either. This page was previously

12490: 4756: 3523:

and the detailed articles linked from it. Notability of the subject as a whole isn't in doubt either, though perhaps the information could be summarised as part of the merge.

3042: 2506: 2271: 2036: 1908: 491: 15972: 14214: 3446: 1105: 246:. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps: 17468:

Further, he has been an attorney for 45 years and has had offices in Milwaukee, Detroit, St. Louis, Kansas City, and Memphis. His website, darrellcastle.com is highly rated.

15264: 6850: 5584:

I am relatively new to wiki-editting, but happy to make any proper edits to avoid deletion. Just message me with some guided assistance and I will be happy to make changes.

2928:

I see a NY Post article with her as the main focus as well as a People article and a few others. Sure, this page is going to be brief but it's still notable enough to keep.

156: 13345: 6131:

If better coverage can be found of Florida Carry as an organization or its actions, then there would be a stronger case for cleaning up the article instead of deleting it.

5509: 1554:

Hmm.. looks like I found 60 seemingly ok sources that seem to be OK. 59 if you strike out Artsakh Public TV (which is clearly talking about football), and 58 if you remove

14816: 13558: 12153: 12075: 10776: 10771: 5802: 5307: 4260:

doesn't give much more detail other than it being the short-lived British section of the IRMT, and gestures at a couple other organisations it may have been connected to.

4256:

magazine itself, making up more than half of the cited sources. Then I noticed quite a few citations were to self-published wordpress blogs, which wasn't encouraging. The

13705: 12966: 12666: 9887:

The article discusses their plans, and why they are in a hurry to do this - to access funding - but it confirms no such party exists. This information is current for the

5896: 17158: 16170: 16165: 15514: 11509: 10780: 10462: 10284:

But there is not a political party as it hasn't yet been registered as a political party. Registration is pending. But even if we take the pre-registered association as

7452: 4936: 3445:. The topic is also far too broad, as it would include every single "minor" French border adjustment since the end of the Napoleonic Wars. That type of article would be 2805: 1245: 10630:

and thus redirected there. It wasn't accurate since there are/were other coalitions before and after. I wouldn't mind a WP:BROADCONCEPT article or maybe something like

6081: 5863: 3461: 3309: 16304: 16174: 14141: 11808: 8895: 8214: 8209: 5740: 1216: 258:

to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the

15947: 15010: 14511: 13954: 13936: 13087:

You may be correct in that the creation of the article was premature as it fails WPNPOL, though I would suggest delaying any deletion process for two weeks until the

12314: 7275: 5267: 4637: 16614: 14402:, being nice, or getting a county-level award, or running and losing for office, is not evidence enough for notability. I see two sources, both local, which are not 14076: 10763: 8218: 8156: 7913: 7849: 5575: 3258:

I disagree. The New York press has historically covered the First Lady of New York with the same interest as if she were the wife of the governor of New York State.

1183: 952: 947: 614: 368: 269:

to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

17296: 15808: 6415: 5234: 5122:

This is a very poor and rambling essay filled with unfocused detours and things that ended up having absolutely no force (45's executive order is the equivalent of

3951: 3420: 17476: 16157: 15988: 7533: 7479: 7474: 5173: 4422: 3734: 3326: 2633: 2398: 2163: 956: 610: 12770:. How was this article not nominated at the time of creation? Candidacy does not inherently make someone notable. Also, thanks to TheSlumPanda for nominating it. 11039:

Deleting an article does not prevent it from being recreated when more sources emerge. Having to be remade again is a given and is not a reason against deletion.

7570: 6274: 3578: 3387: 16696: 12002: 9202: 9197: 8563: 8201: 7444: 6505: 5794: 5786: 5331: 5299: 1396: 1391: 363: 10889: 6759:

logo on the front - unless they legally incorporate, not a company. Don’t register as a party, not a party. Not a party, can’t be listed on a list of parties.

6447:: I couldn't find articles showing lasting impact other than an article that justifiably says their lasting impact is the absence of a commercial airport there 5156: 13906: 10580: 9206: 6385: 6192: 5585: 4178: 3704: 1400: 1313: 1114: 1106: 939: 199: 15934: 9912: 2982:

Neither the NY Post nor People would have published those if not for her relationship to Eric Adams, hence NOTINHERITED and the connection to NYC politics. –

15874: 15870: 15572: 15331: 14280: 13775: 13486:- Bearcat makes a good case for deletion here. Being on the board of UQAT is not notable, most of the sources are from the applicant's death. However, while 11855: 11286: 11281: 7348: 6957: 6352: 6291: 5857: 5736: 5294:

Given that the International they are now affiliated to is non-notable (International Standpoint) there looks to be no obvious redirect target, so proposing

4760: 4708: 4316: 4312: 3671: 3610: 1066: 853: 720: 464: 17295:, As a presidential nominee, Castle did better than any other Constitution Party candidate in both of his runs, winning nearly 200k votes each time. He was 12112:

Local politician with no inherent notability. Only one reliable source cited; others are IMDB, a self-described blog, and something that cites wikipedia. —

8763: 8642:

that refers to organization's recent activity," which they said "addresses the issue" I had. There's only one problem: the NYT article in question is about

7898: 7879:. The Focus/Forbes contributor sources have now been removed, and the tweets are only used when the tweets are discussed in the article or under acceptable 2604: 2493: 2369: 2258: 2134: 2023: 589: 478: 17333: 13813: 13561:

for a start? I expect we could find much more about her union activities in support of women if we had better access to the French-language Quebec press.--

11464: 11290: 9457: 9189: 9005: 8729: 8667: 6949: 6152: 5934: 5339: 5319: 4520: 4304: 4046: 3782: 3750: 2677: 2673: 2649: 2438: 2434: 2203: 2199: 1871: 1383: 885: 626: 17310: 16011: 15962: 12527:

This bio stub is supported by a single source, but that source doesn’t substantiate the claims in the article. I was originally going to redirect this to

10956: 8797: 2571: 2336: 2101: 1177: 556: 16803: 16288: 15158: 14177: 13855: 13830: 13137: 13126: 12453: 11889: 11658: 11244: 9836: 8687: 8170: 7433: 7032:

On the second glance, these mentioned sources do not seem to indicate notability for other, more sound reasons, so my remark about them is kind-of moot.

6760: 6721: 6665:. Single person single issue party. Was never registered to contest elections and only the founder contested a seat under that tikcet (without success). 5361: 5228: 5165: 5157: 4026: 3822: 3318: 3310: 2850:

from her famous boyfriend. "de facto first lady of NYC" is not a factoid that confers notability. The NYT piece cited is a brief mention of her, and the

1509: 459: 16971:

We have arguments to Delete, Draftify, Keep and Redirect this article which, at this point, means that there is no consensus to do any of those actions.

16125:

Based on the above discussion; he appears to be very active in education initiatives. There is significant coverage, although some of the sources are …

15098: 10038: 9311: 8655: 8336: 7312:

Looks like a complete advertisement. Complete promotional, appears to be a political advertisement done in favour of a political party and its leader.

5853: 17229: 16692: 16300: 15999: 15576: 15335: 15227: 15072: 15068: 14897: 14584: 14276: 14118: 14097: 14014: 13779: 13441: 13224: 13047: 12724: 12553: 12377: 12161: 12129: 11885: 11273: 10861: 10081: 10055: 7870: 6463: 5593: 3489: 3381: 2510: 2275: 1529: 1261: 881: 495: 349: 17398: 16255: 14035: 16418: 16403: 16382: 15912: 15886: 14670:

ago is enough to warrant a redirect: he's not a terribly likely search term on that basis per se, and in the incredibly unlikely event that somebody

13983: 10828: 8299: 6823: 6818: 6495: 6475: 5820: 5472: 5191: 5030: 4018: 3088: 1982: 1173: 192: 16734: 16222: 15145: 15124: 11396: 8178: 7055: 5951: 5744: 5224: 3215: 1140: 1037: 17285: 17237: 16787: 16773: 16746: 16144: 14779: 13055: 12849: 12748: 12740: 12038: 11011: 10916: 10905: 9495: 9168: 8993: 8703: 8266: 8160: 7793: 7685: 7668: 7374: 7344: 7084:

Being significantly supported by the labor movement does not imply notablity; coverage is required. As for the sources you provided, respectively:

6961: 6827: 6283: 6275: 5942: 5903: 5579: 3878: 3602: 3579: 3054: 1098: 13887: 10991: 10750: 10399: 10312: 10197: 9784: 9746: 9732: 9714: 9695: 9680: 9603: 9448: 9415: 9035: 8107:

Relisting. This looked like a unanimous Delete but there are two recent Keep arguments that should be responded to but those seeking a Deletetion.

6346: 5378: 3830: 3665: 3377: 1481: 1004: 869: 660: 17263: 15369: 13743: 13610: 12929: 12870: 12828: 12629: 12218: 11666: 11195: 10435: 10430: 10013:

This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using

9009: 8981: 8699: 7950: 7632: 6937: 6483: 6160: 5666: 5112: 4790: 4094: 4022: 3344: 3148: 2891: 2016: 1990: 1350: 1329: 919: 902: 275: 262:

as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.

180: 16482: 16065: 16047: 15976: 13763: 13308: 12757: 11371: 11252: 11231: 11164: 11141: 10938: 10744: 9287: 7983: 7719: 7146: 6580: 6566: 5832: 5725: 5699: 5203: 5150: 5022: 4271:

on Google Scholar, I likewise only found biographies of Starmer. I haven't been able to find significant coverage of the group/magazine itself.

1739: 1725: 1705: 1448: 1223: 17063: 17038:

per asilvering. Standalone article is not indicated at this point of time, and the article can be created later if and when notability arises.

16444: 16312: 15580: 15419: 15343: 14901: 14608: 14300: 13787: 12557: 11949: 10564: 10439: 9483: 8448: 7917: 7853: 7336: 7027: 6996: 6810: 6783: 6742: 6537: 6196: 6176: 6164: 5640: 5624: 5348:-I'm wondering if someone cam look for Greek-language reliable sources? The organization has been around for 50 years and was once part of the 5274: 5089: 5066: 5046: 4899: 4720: 3481: 3473: 3046: 2768: 2689: 2669: 2565: 2450: 2430: 2330: 2215: 2195: 2095: 1978: 1517: 1152: 1086: 893: 550: 151: 17429: 15658: 15166: 13402:

because she won this award" freebie all by itself for a person who's otherwise this poorly sourced; and the last one doesn't mention her name

11979: 11338: 11071: 11034: 10380: 9254: 9065: 8188: 8063: 7768: 6517: 6309: 5983: 5411: 3628: 3114: 3080: 2709: 2470: 2235: 1546: 834: 17480: 17352: 16308: 16138: 16084: 14634: 14588: 13783: 13445: 13112: 13091:

as Tudehope may be elected, and would then warrant the existence of a page as is the practice with other NSW Parliamentary members including

12785: 12703:

This person does not qualify for a standalone Knowledge page because he lost the election and he is not a member of the respective assembly.

12381: 11915: 11412: 10965: 10767: 10321: 9653: 9626: 9589: 9503: 9339: 9327: 8348: 8146: 8085: 7819: 7111: 7079: 6768: 6753: 6624: 6610: 6595: 6342: 6044: 5715:

How is the organisation notable. It was created in 2002 and there is virtually no coverage on it, outside a few interviews with Kahlenberg.

5608: 5327: 4977:

about a term so rarely used that it appears to have meant something different every time it was used, with no discernible concept behind it.

4745: 4704: 4540: 4508: 4363: 4072: 3808: 3774: 3661: 3555: 3504: 3485: 3427: 2883: 2665: 2657: 2502: 2494: 2426: 2418: 2267: 2259: 2191: 2183: 2032: 2024: 1810: 1790: 1078: 487: 479: 172: 58: 17460: 17374: 16732: 15640: 11700: 11637: 10607: 10183: 10095: 9520: 9400: 9383: 9374: 8402: 8382: 7969: 7934: 7131: 7063: 6908: 4817: 4346: 3855: 3532: 3356: 926: 16516: 16316: 16161: 16113: 15679: 14913: 13465: 13249: 13210: 13191: 13051: 12728: 12170: 12157: 11923: 11771: 11476: 11048: 10688: 10657: 10643: 10595: 10587: 10422: 9307:. The existence of a second article is abusive, all the more so if it offers the reader nothing different or new in terms of information. 9083:

watches it. Although most matters were attached to the channel, but as shown those news articles, his name was always directly referred to.

8858: 8356: 7834: 7785: 7733: 7700: 7411: 7041: 6973: 6657: 6435: 5612: 4840: 4528: 4395: 4390: 4328: 4038: 3762: 3572: 3050: 2920: 2903: 2528: 2487: 2293: 2252: 2058: 1966: 1761: 889: 634: 513: 66: 14326: 13477: 13171: 13149: 11608: 11108: 10822: 10297: 9770: 9761: 9644: 9564: 8424: 7059: 6875: 6729: 6402:

limited coverage during an elecetion but are not considered notable. The article creator has reverted an attempt to redirect this page to

5828: 4292: 3295: 3281: 3267: 3253: 3235: 3196: 2561: 2326: 2091: 1670: 1364: 1304: 546: 16840: 16328: 16216: 15592: 15401: 15319: 15056: 14973: 14720: 14687: 14660: 14600: 14474: 13570: 13552: 13522: 13503: 13457: 12569: 12393: 12277: 12141: 11544: 11457: 11424: 10364: 9686:

secondary sources then discuss it, that would be when there should be a page. Until then, it is detail that should be on the group page.

9355: 9351: 8536: 8531: 8502: 8205: 7644: 7238: 6674: 6456: 6321: 5869: 5777: 4600: 4399: 4119: 3640: 2661: 2422: 2187: 1273: 224: 146: 136: 17047: 17027: 16899: 16353: 14292: 12188: 10520: 9176: 8260: 7177: 6392: 6268: 6230: 5564: 3711: 3023: 3009: 2991: 2960: 2937: 2698:

this is too soon, and I couldn't find anything notable about the upcoming elections that would warrant a separate article this far out.

2459:

this is too soon, and I couldn't find anything notable about the upcoming elections that would warrant a separate article this far out.

2224:

this is too soon, and I couldn't find anything notable about the upcoming elections that would warrant a separate article this far out.

1370: 17233: 17006: 16814: 16577: 16030: 15339: 14872:

indicate that while very accomplished, this individual would receive run of the mill coverage of a typical mayor in the United States.

13891: 12809: 12712: 11575: 11500: 10249: 10231: 10156: 9550: 9541: 9432: 8540: 6739: 6615:

Apologies for my attempt at jocularity. I'm happy to follow the consensus on redirect target, waiting to see if any other views emerge

4480: 4151: 4146: 2645: 2410: 2175: 1148: 998: 250: 14415: 14386: 14361: 14344: 10785: 10719: 10544:

dab page where this could be merged, and I can't find other WP pages listing left-wing coalitions. (2) Maybe there is potential for a

10487: 10216: 9937:

The same issue as above. The article is about plans, and the desire to access funding. It confirms that the party does not exist yet.

9892:

article about something that does not exist should not exist. There are existing articles where this information should be discussed.

8621: 7844:

I agree this person is not notable. Has not accomplished anything substantial. Looks more like a personal blog than a serious article

6710: 5199: 4994: 2540: 2305: 2070: 1189: 525: 17446: 17367: 17217: 16928: 16179: 15771: 15710: 12541: 11847: 11550: 10818: 8121: 5240: 4447: 4382: 4236: 4155: 3914: 2977: 2843: 2611: 2376: 2141: 1442: 693: 688: 596: 168: 74: 16949: 16885: 16212: 14701:

Many tens of thousands of people in North America do the same, including several of my family members who are not notable in any way

13909:, because it makes him useful as a prototypical example of the kind of majority-preferred candidate who loses such an election (see 11260: 10279: 8965: 8588: 8486: 8223: 7324: 6983: 3352: 3286:

If I were to guess, she has been deliberately low profile during his administration due to the concerns raised during the campaign.

1730:

Have you even read the article? Please review the sources section. In addition, a simple google search yielded 117,000,000 results.

778: 14881: 14264: 13395:#2 level for local politicians hinges on the depth and range of reliable source coverage, not on merely verifying that she existed. 12511: 12121: 11851: 11332: 11151: 11059: 11022: 10759: 10751: 9248: 9193: 8523: 8256: 6140: 5674: 4203: 3393: 1929: 1844: 1839: 1387: 961: 697: 16369:. The coverage and arguments provided by Maile to me, indicate that this event is likely to be notable (but not guaranteed) under 16271:

There is no indication of notability for this visit. The sources are almost entirely government press releases and should be more

14235: 7122:

propaganda should be approached with circumspection, as their primary function is to distort reality to serve specific interests.

5824: 5195: 4801:. I am unable to see anything notable about the subject in the article, and a web search didn't turn up anything non-promotional. 4692: 4682:. Promo article for a BLP. References are profiles, about us pages, blog entries and an interview. No indication of significance. 3240:

The significant others of Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg were not treated akin to first ladies of a state. De Blasio's wife,

2871: 994: 745: 16985: 16720: 16153: 16145: 15560: 15285: 14150: 14145: 13079: 12478: 12426: 12421: 10944: 10797: 9211: 7469: 4138: 1896: 1848: 1405: 1144: 17306: 16191: 15858: 14202: 13410:

win a city council seat in the election that it's "sourcing", and thus isn't a demonstration of her notability. (And meanwhile,

13366: 10868: 8639: 5682:

on the organization and could be trimmed, and coverage on Kahlenberg is in the context of coverage about Atidna. There's enough

5530: 1438: 17225: 16688: 16296: 16262: 15866: 15568: 15327: 15252: 15200: 15195: 15064: 14889: 14837: 14580: 14272: 14154: 13771: 13437: 13429: 13043: 12720: 12549: 12430: 12373: 12149: 12096: 11881: 11873: 11513: 11404: 11295: 11277: 10897: 10572: 10227:

make no effort to substantiate the notability of the article on the basis of Knowledge's policy. Probably because they can't.

9862: 9319: 9001: 8973: 8695: 8663: 8344: 8235: 8197: 8189: 7781: 7332: 6945: 6869: 6317: 6148: 5930: 5632: 5604: 5315: 5002: 4752: 4700: 4516: 4300: 4010: 3770: 3742: 3636: 3469: 3038: 2879: 2641: 2406: 2171: 1974: 1253: 1074: 877: 680: 622: 228: 141: 123: 17: 15309:. UPE advert. Gas man No indication of significance. Refs are press-release, profiles, passing mentions, and x of y articles. 14572: 13941:

That second reason doesn't make sense. You're arguing that the election is notable, not that Begich *himself* is notable. See

13726: 13333: 13035: 12987: 12687: 12365: 11328: 9911:

RedaktionsNetzwerk Deutschland - AfD plant Gründung von neuer europäischer Partei (AfD plans to establish new European party)

9244: 8306: 6358: 5497: 3677: 3348: 1748:, but because I'm not sure how many of these are actually about Western Armenia and how many are just about Armenia, it's not 973: 17409: 17383: 17179: 16960: 16493: 16095: 15690: 15535: 15381: 15204: 14804: 12063: 11677: 11619: 11586: 11177: 11082: 10699: 10668: 10557: 10336: 10110: 9047: 8774: 8461: 8096: 7386: 7159: 6685: 6403: 6205: 5963: 5757: 5445: 5440: 5391: 4957: 2826: 1831: 1044: 935: 927: 13693: 12954: 12791: 12654: 10648:

if we create an article, it should start with 1991 before this the line would become more blurry i think with PSI & PCI

9223: 6797: 6102: 4002: 2536: 2301: 2066: 1417: 521: 17315: 17146: 15502: 14752: 14747: 14563:

Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a lot more sourcing and substance than this.

14137: 12413: 12011: 12006: 11829: 10481: 9667:, it would deserve its own page as a political alliance, of which there are many -- as it would still be distinct from the 8916: 6832: 6744:. In my view, the name is verifiable and that should be the end of it. Notability is lacking which is why I support merge. 6313: 5449: 4924: 3632: 2793: 2577: 2342: 2107: 1488: 562: 78: 16867:

the election. Right now, on the page, there are four sources, two are routine coverage, one is an endorsement, and one is

15603:

Comparable Knowledge Entries: Many individuals who have held comparable or similar positions as Chief of Staff, including

15031: 14532: 12335: 11307: 11150:

since the previous election cycle is over and there is now verifiable information about the next. In terms of naming, the

9977:

They aspire to be like Fox news or CNN and rely heavily on comment. I am not sure if they are considered reliable or not.

7624: 7296: 6865: 6069: 4658: 4441: 391: 380: 17532: 16680: 16635: 15187: 14756: 13641: 13636: 12902: 12897: 12602: 12597: 12528: 12015: 11796: 11378: 10444: 9872:

Tagesschau is a German national news programme/service hosted by a public service broadcaster. Independent and reliable.

9701: 9660: 9294: 9185: 9177: 8883: 8582: 8152: 7909: 7845: 5571: 1379: 1371: 830: 299: 15829: 14998: 14499: 14088:

nightmare of a page here. That being said, he has a 50/50 chance of being elected as a member of a new minority caucus.

13281: 13276: 12302: 10409: 9846: 7263: 4625: 4197: 3972: 3438: 2532: 2297: 2062: 517: 17472: 17094: 17089: 16602: 15450: 15445: 14005:. There are plenty of software entrepreneurs who are not notable, so I don't see that as a valid notability criteria. 13645: 13535:

establishes the permanent significance of her work as a union organizer, considering that her union work is referenced

12906: 12606: 11529: 11517: 11160: 10793: 10553: 8059: 7946: 7894: 7764: 7715: 7010: 6814: 5913:& territory branches of Australian parties should only exist when the party was a significant force at that level. 5432: 5085: 4990: 4872: 4867: 3843: 2741: 2736: 1643: 1053:

This is a planned election for a second-tier local government authority scheduled for nearly two years away. A case of

739: 344:

for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

303: 16187: 15796: 13285: 12861:. The degree of significance of the subject and of role as politician is not enough to warrant a page on the subject. 12472: 10834: 10477: 9219: 7591: 6844: 4404: 3939: 2243:

Indeed too soon for this. Far too soon. (However, this too could perhaps be recreated once these elections draw nigh.)

1890: 17465:

Darrell has a weekly podcast "the CastleReport.us". He has over 1000 podcasts with followers from all over the world.

17304: 17258: 17098: 16835: 16228: 15454: 15364: 15093: 14739: 14629: 14321: 14196: 13808: 11998: 11959: 11944: 11910: 11269: 11261: 10986: 9668: 9632: 9614: 9478: 9304: 9030: 8724: 8545: 8377: 8231: 8169:

shitposting so much attention, but they are, so… Rolling Stone profile is what pushed it well over the edge for me.

7814: 7369: 6915: 6017: 6012: 5661: 5283:

General failure to demonstrate notability. Article purely sourced from its own website and then International (CWI) (

4876: 4785: 4437: 4067: 3803: 3109: 3075: 2745: 2011: 1636:

Also, I even question whether or not these are actual reliable sources, or if this even says a word about notability.

655: 15246: 13420:

Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced much, much better than this.

11562: 10456: 8578: 8272: 7558: 4160: 2478:

This is indeed too soon. Far too soon. (The page could be recreated once the elections are in the offing, however.)

969: 13932: 13628: 13327: 12889: 12589: 11744: 11739: 10952: 10789: 9546:

I picked the wrong word. I meant excessive (too much)- two articles on the same subject. Sorry if I confused you.

8831: 8826: 6021: 5491: 4193: 3014:

Written in relation to Adams. It's not crystal balling to say she'd remain low profile without the relationship. –

1010: 702: 16460:

and lacks proper coverage, absolutely no reason for it to have its own article independently of the main subject.

16183: 14798: 13268: 12435: 12057: 11556: 9841: 4369: 3000:

You’re Crystal Balling with that claim. An alternate timeline is unknowable. The point is that they were written.

1853: 1413: 735: 17329: 17081: 16783: 16742: 15654: 15437: 14946: 14941: 14447: 14442: 14159: 14072: 13950: 13851: 13759: 13687: 12948: 12648: 12468: 12250: 12245: 11748: 11136: 10527: 9775:

For an opinion, no, but for fact? How is a register not a good source for the fact that something is registered?

8835: 8651: 8227: 7908:. A random shitposter on Twitter should not get a Knowledge article. This is the very definition of non-notable. 7866: 7211: 7206: 6562: 4859: 4573: 4568: 4416: 3541: 3516: 2728: 1886: 1454: 341: 243: 239: 17140: 15600:

I believe the page merits retention due to several key factors demonstrating Ruiz's significance and notability.

15496: 15209: 14192: 11303: 9957: 8557: 8510: 4918: 4487: 2787: 965: 16550: 16545: 16414: 16378: 16024: 16007: 15984: 15958: 15930: 15242: 14950: 14451: 13868: 13290: 12254: 11688:

Can we get any further opinions about this possible merge? Would a redirect be appropriate instead of deletion?

11602: 11344: 10631: 9363: 9260: 8628: 7215: 6063: 6004: 5454: 4577: 4172: 3442: 1300: 54: 14761: 13323: 12400: 12020: 11790: 10452: 9956:

ThePostOnline (NL) FVD sluit zich aan bij Europe of Sovereign Nations (FVD joins Europe of Sovereign Nations)

9215: 8877: 5487: 4243: 4125: 1409: 714: 17537: 16554: 15744: 15739: 14992: 14794: 14493: 13650: 13237: 13088: 12911: 12794:

to the NPP editor who marked this article as reviewed, which is the reason this article wasn’t taken to AfD.

12611: 12447: 12296: 12053: 11731: 11650: 11452: 10549: 10051: 8818: 7257: 6806: 6798: 6738:

which says that at the time it was an unregistered party name. But we have the NZ Herald saying it's a party

5349: 4619: 4386: 3887: 3882: 1865: 785: 17103: 16919:, things happen between now and election day and as of right now Jain remains an unelected private citizen. 16596: 15459: 14171: 13967: 13683: 13494:

that would be something toward notability, but otherwise it doesn't seem to meet the guidelines of WP:NPOL.

12944: 12644: 12518: 11539: 11299: 9922:

RDN is the news network for Madsack Media Group which has political control but is independent from the AfD

6840: 4881: 2750: 1936: 1655: 667: 17508: 17136: 15790: 15748: 15492: 15221: 15052: 14933: 14434: 14242: 14124: 13898: 12237: 10017: 8527: 7198: 6881: 6491: 6471: 6026: 4914: 4560: 3933: 3891: 2783: 1525: 15292: 13302: 11753: 8840: 6059: 5466: 5291:

Article has been appropriately maintenance tagged for several years now yet improvement has not appeared.

4082: 1818: 17125: 16581: 16537: 16453: 16432: 16391: 16366: 16201: 15775: 15481: 15231: 15174: 14977: 14955: 14783: 14773: 14478: 14456: 14181: 13928: 13672: 13418:

win are supported by the primary sourcing rather than GNG-worthy analysis about her work on the council.)

13391:-worthy coverage and analysis about their work to validate its significance — the notability test at the 13373: 13312: 12933: 12633: 12457: 12281: 12259: 12042: 12032: 11786: 11775: 11317: 10948: 10807: 10634:(the latter would have the problem that multiple coalition compete, in 2018 there were three coalitions) 10466: 10418: 10410: 9888: 9436: 9233: 8873: 8862: 8567: 8320: 8245: 7664: 7552: 7537: 7506: 7501: 7429: 7242: 7220: 6854: 6331: 6048: 5842: 5537: 5476: 5213: 4903: 4604: 4582: 4426: 4182: 4142: 3918: 3650: 3366: 3211: 3135:

at this point. Add to that the ongoing legal issues around Adams will likely mean this bio will run into

2772: 2550: 2315: 2080: 1875: 1427: 1162: 983: 724: 535: 295: 16559: 14988: 14844: 14489: 13662: 12923: 12623: 12292: 12103: 7754:

tweet, that is almost two years of reliable source coverage, which seems enough to avoid deletion under

7253: 6836: 5570:

Hi Scope creep, I am the one who created the article. I have no financial relationship with the subject

4615: 2859: 1650:(actually, this source can fit into the article. didnt even know about it until now. gonna add it rq.), 17325: 17115: 16779: 16738: 16592: 15753: 15731: 15471: 14068: 13946: 13847: 13755: 13733: 13117:

IE - Deleting a page only for it to be rewritten an republished in a fortnight. Keep the page for now.

12994: 12694: 10493: 8647: 8042: 7862: 7510: 5918: 5335: 5303: 4893: 4412: 3896: 3874: 2916:, these souces do not justify a separate article since she does not have even an informal public role. 2762: 684: 17186: 16863:

already, including a bit about how a candidate's article was not put into mainspace until he actually

15786: 15542: 14869: 13593: 11858:) but this seems to be a completely different woman who just happens to share a name and nationality. 10448: 8553: 6038: 5735:

lengthy. It is probably better to split into two articles, one about Kahlenberg and one about Atidna.

4964: 4453: 3929: 2833: 16476: 16410: 16374: 16020: 16003: 15980: 15954: 15926: 15908: 15900: 15882: 14726: 14674:

searching for his name on that basis, the team's article would come up in the list of search results

13220: 13122: 13108: 12214: 11985: 11765: 10171: 8945: 8852: 8751: 8594: 8472:

Relisting. So, participants, do you believe the existing sources are sufficient for establishing GNG?

8437: 7515: 6443: 6109: 5589: 5546:

BLP that reads like an organisation article. Lots of interview and profiles, passing mentions. Fails

4168: 4090: 1835: 1346: 1325: 337: 17488: 14967: 14468: 12271: 11836: 10616: 8923: 8413: 7548: 7232: 5419: 4594: 4252:

When I stumbled across this article, I was quickly struck by how many of the cited sources were the

4209: 710: 95: 16571: 16440: 16409:

secondary sources analysing this event are more likely going to exist in the near future than not.

15038: 14539: 14084:

for now. The usual outcome is outright deletion, in similar cases, and is arguably more so in this

13600: 13398: 12876: 12576: 12443: 12417: 12342: 10376: 10308: 10259: 10179: 10047: 9780: 9742: 9710: 9676: 9664: 9599: 9444: 9428: 9411: 9359: 9156: 7979: 7493: 7303: 5357: 5126:

in presidential form and had no true force of law). More appropriate as a dic-def than an article.

4665: 4408: 4378: 4370: 1861: 751: 16642: 15765: 14167: 12484: 11154:

indicates that elections can be called early? Has something changed on a constitutional level? --

8549: 7690:

The example you chose is something of an exception. It is a BLP issue and not a notability issue.

3908: 1902: 17281: 17053: 16457: 16435:

for sure, I think it could be worth significantly upgrading the content, and I will add it soon.

15836: 15409: 15217: 15191: 15048: 14208: 13490:, if sources could be found that talk about her as the first Haitian city councilor of Val d'Or, 13245: 13206: 13187: 11566:, etc, etc. Most of coverage is coverage on various protests of the group over the past years. -- 10740: 8940:. The sources in the article are tabloid coverage of his engagement (excluded for notability per 8754:. It should go without saying that this organization cannot inherit notability from its members. 8519: 8511: 8316: 7320: 6487: 6467: 4164: 3979: 1521: 826: 314: 70: 15258: 15108: 13298: 11708: 10166:

it's a legally distinct entity with separate membership and structural organization. If we have

7527: 5462: 706: 16053: 15846: 15162: 14769: 13339: 13167: 13145: 12845: 12736: 12708: 12439: 12028: 11975: 11662: 11248: 11007: 10627: 10545: 9164: 8989: 8961: 8759: 8174: 7884: 7660: 7598: 7425: 7142: 6992: 6764: 6725: 6606: 6576: 6533: 5503: 5436: 5081: 4986: 4274:

Given all this, I'm unconvinced that this group/publication is independently notable. Its only

4134: 4126: 3826: 3207: 2847: 1857: 1094: 1062: 17308: 16275:

for independent notability. The page should be deleted and perhaps parts merged into the main

14865: 14810: 14406:. I would not oppose userfying if the closing admin thinks he could be notable in the future. 14163: 13658: 12919: 12619: 12069: 10552:, but the notability of the topic is unclear: There is no interwiki link (including Italian); 4846: 2715: 17394: 17253: 17111: 16868: 16830: 16061: 15854: 15467: 15359: 15213: 15088: 14743: 14624: 14316: 14048: 13803: 13699: 13255: 12960: 12660: 11939: 11905: 11718: 10981: 9473: 9025: 8719: 8498: 8444: 8398: 8372: 8142: 8081: 7809: 7364: 6513: 5914: 5656: 5123: 4889: 4780: 4504: 4062: 3798: 3439:

there is no indication that these minor border changes have received any significant coverage

3104: 3070: 2758: 2006: 1735: 1701: 676: 668: 650: 17152: 16871:. Searching on Google doesn't yield much that can be added. They don't seem to pass NPOL or 15508: 13589: 13294: 11120:

Neutral on keeping the article, but just wanted to say that the suggestions of moving it to

6034: 5991: 5458: 4930: 2799: 17362:

per reliable sources in this discussion and in article. If not kept, all content should be

17043: 17023: 16916: 16512: 16461: 16042: 15922: 15904: 15878: 15636: 14920: 14765: 14648: 14421: 14399: 13632: 13216: 13118: 13104: 12893: 12866: 12824: 12593: 12224: 12210: 12202: 12024: 11761: 11696: 11633: 11191: 9723:. When it actually becomes a party, that is likely to change. But to date we have nothing. 9577: 8848: 8793: 7965: 7930: 7880: 7075: 6172: 6136: 6075: 5695: 5108: 4359: 4086: 3851: 3277: 3249: 3019: 2987: 2956: 2899: 2867: 2685: 2629: 2446: 2394: 2211: 2159: 1827: 1819: 1808: 1723: 1507: 1342: 1321: 1054: 861: 845: 17471:

He was the Constitution Party VP nominee in 2008 and their Presidential nominee in 2016.

14963: 14464: 13654: 13272: 12915: 12615: 12267: 11802: 11243:

as per Nate, too soon - recreate much closer to the date when it’s not just speculation.

8889: 8805: 7228: 4590: 8: 17107: 17085: 17002: 16799: 16567: 16524: 16436: 15675: 15650: 15463: 15441: 15004: 14909: 14505: 14288: 14133: 14125: 13826: 12409: 12401: 12308: 12197: 11472: 11222: 11131: 11044: 10934: 10603: 10541: 10395: 10372: 10318: 10304: 10293: 10245: 10228: 10193: 10175: 10077: 10034: 9807: 9776: 9767: 9738: 9728: 9706: 9691: 9672: 9650: 9622: 9595: 9585: 9547: 9499: 9440: 9407: 9380: 9335: 9308: 8743: 8683: 8420: 7975: 7974:

Delete, subject is non notable and is article is just riding off the "goblin mode" thing

7831: 7755: 7698: 7269: 7127: 6696:

Relisting as we have three different Redirect/Merge target articles being suggested here.

6558: 5620: 5375: 5353: 5284: 5141: 5018: 4885: 4863: 4716: 4631: 4536: 4342: 4034: 3821:

Too soon. As per The9Man - too much guesswork at this stage, not enough solid coverage.

3758: 3552: 3502: 3459: 3181:

a longtime precedent that we almost always delete articles about education administrators

3141: 2754: 2732: 2706: 2467: 2232: 1693: 1651: 102: 42: 17207:. Routine coverage, interviews, profiles, election news. No indication of signficance. 16608: 15761: 10881:. Article only has one source, and it does not say anything about the election in 2028. 8493:

Yes for me, and I also incorporated the 2023 academic source identified by Oaktree b's.

8015:

With BLP1E out of the way, the analysis turns to the coverage in reliable sources (i.e.

7875:

Business Insider is marked as generally reliable for culture topics such as this one at

7185: 6030: 4547: 3904: 17456: 17449:. There is significant coverage, but it's mostly related to his presidential campaign. 17424: 17320: 17277: 16370: 16324: 15802: 15718: 15183: 15175: 14056: 13473: 13241: 13202: 13183: 11757: 10736: 10683: 10653: 10639: 10212: 10091: 9861:

Tagesschau - AfD will Europäische Partei gründen (AfD wants to found a European party)

9516: 9396: 9370: 8844: 7740:

I agree with you that the Snickers dick vein probably should not have its own page per

7316: 7107: 7037: 7023: 6969: 6933: 6779: 6431: 6411: 6008: 5062: 5040: 4324: 4288: 3945: 3594:

Articles for deletion/Next Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election (2nd nomination)

3528: 3180: 3136: 1786: 1296: 1232:

Non-notable youth council of a non-notable barangay in Surigao City. Redirecting as an

849: 799: 306:

etc.) related to Politics. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except

87: 14959: 14460: 12263: 8956:

search, but given the language barrier happy to revise my opinion if SIGCOV is found.

7523: 7224: 4586: 1647: 242:. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at 17503: 17348: 16924: 16895: 16563: 16349: 16272: 16134: 16080: 15896: 15588: 15556: 15141: 15120: 14877: 14716: 14683: 14656: 14596: 14568: 14411: 14395: 14382: 14357: 14340: 14114: 14093: 14010: 14002: 13566: 13548: 13518: 13499: 13453: 13425: 13163: 13141: 12841: 12732: 12704: 12565: 12537: 12389: 12361: 12137: 12117: 11971: 11735: 11448: 11420: 11392: 11155: 11067: 11030: 11003: 10926: 10910: 10883: 10878: 9985:

The article is about the FVD (Forum voor Democratie) joining the ESB. All we have is

9160: 9080: 9061: 8985: 8957: 8822: 8755: 8324: 8054: 7941: 7889: 7759: 7729: 7710: 7681: 7640: 7620: 7564: 7138: 6988: 6602: 6572: 6546: 6529: 5428: 5420: 5073: 4978: 4115: 3721: 3568: 3291: 3263: 3231: 3192: 3157: 2913: 2621: 2386: 2151: 1689: 1269: 1241: 1090: 1058: 606: 50: 15757: 11967: 11530:

https://bianet.org/haber/students-take-the-streets-on-30th-anniversary-of-yok-133750

11520:). It's a nationwide movement, that is notable in its own right. I note material on 10735:. As a broad-concept article there would need to be better prose and some sources. 9806:

Here is my analysis of the 3 new sources you added. They do not change my view. Per

3900: 3861: 17242: 17210: 17204: 16945: 16819: 16656: 16399: 16284: 16057: 15850: 15348: 15312: 15306: 15077: 14937: 14735: 14727: 14708: 14613: 14438: 14403: 14305: 14031: 13792: 12804: 12780: 12241: 12184: 11994: 11986: 11928: 11894: 11534: 10970: 10537: 10275: 9757: 9640: 9560: 9462: 9152: 9014: 8953: 8949: 8747: 8708: 8494: 8440: 8394: 8361: 8332: 8138: 8077: 8029: 7798: 7746: 7741: 7607:

Lacks notability. The only significantly notable thing associated with JUNIPER is "

7353: 7202: 7067: 7006: 6749: 6670: 6620: 6591: 6542: 6509: 6452: 6243: 5731: 5718: 5683: 5645: 5557: 5551: 4808: 4769: 4732: 4685: 4675: 4564: 4275: 4051: 3787: 3166: 3093: 3059: 2943: 2855: 2851: 2483: 2248: 1995: 1959: 1946: 1731: 1697: 639: 324: 17172: 16628: 16248: 15822: 15528: 15278: 15024: 14830: 14525: 14228: 13719: 13359: 12980: 12680: 12504: 12328: 12089: 11822: 11364: 10854: 10626:

when there was a coalition of left-wing parties in Sicily which eventually became

10513: 9280: 8909: 8614: 8292: 7584: 7519: 7289: 6901: 6378: 6095: 5889: 5523: 5260: 4950: 4651: 4473: 4229: 3965: 3697: 3413: 2819: 2597: 2362: 2127: 1922: 1642:

Pressenza also allowed the Consul(ate) of Western Armenia in Argentina covers the

1474: 1209: 1030: 771: 582: 17343:- besides being on the ballot in multiple states, there is significant coverage. 17039: 17019: 16541: 16508: 16108: 16034: 15632: 13979: 13624: 13601: 12885: 12877: 12862: 12820: 12585: 12577: 11958:

She doesn't "work for a government organization", she's an elected member of the

11692: 11629: 11571: 11495: 11187: 10359: 8789: 8133:. We reckon notability by coverage, yes? seems to exist here. If anything, merge 8034: 7994: 7961: 7926: 7612: 7172: 7071: 6188: 6168: 6132: 6126: 5710: 5691: 5679: 5104: 4836: 4355: 3847: 3241: 3005: 2973: 2933: 2681: 2625: 2442: 2390: 2385:

Deleted in August via PROD, not eligible for CSD. Does not satisfy exemptions in

2207: 2155: 1800: 1757: 1715: 1666: 1499: 857: 46: 13264: 13256: 7458: 3187:, or we need to address the issues that would be raised. Please don’t go there. 17196: 17077: 17054: 16998: 16860: 16795: 16652: 15735: 15671: 15646: 15433: 15410: 15112: 14905: 14861: 14700: 14557: 14553: 14370: 14284: 14260: 14252: 14085: 13910: 13841: 13822: 13487: 13392: 13159: 13158:

Premature creation, Knowledge is not the place for campaign advertising. Fails

13004: 12858: 12837: 12767: 12752: 12352: 12165: 11963: 11713: 11468: 11210: 11126: 11040: 10930: 10599: 10391: 10289: 10241: 10189: 10073: 10030: 9824: 9724: 9687: 9618: 9581: 9527: 9331: 9076: 8941: 8937: 8679: 8416: 8046: 7691: 7123: 6924: 6554: 6119: 5946: 5616: 5129: 5014: 4855: 4847: 4712: 4532: 4338: 4030: 3754: 3546: 3493: 3450: 2724: 2716: 2700: 2461: 2226: 2150:

Deleted in July via PROD, not eligible for CSD. Does not satisfy exemptions in

1541: 914: 897: 285: 11525: 11521: 2620:

Deleted in May via PROD, not eligible for CSD. Does not satisfy exemptions in

17526: 17419: 17200: 16872: 16768: 16715: 16675: 16320: 15302: 14857: 14374: 13998: 13917: 13872: 13469: 13388: 13074: 13030: 13010: 11596: 11434: 10732: 10678: 10649: 10635: 10621: 10584: 10561: 10387: 10208: 10087: 9852: 9720: 9700:

This is objectively false: there are indeed two separate legal entities. The

9512: 9392: 9366: 8933: 8433: 8024: 8020: 8016: 8007: 7876: 7706: 7103: 7088: 7033: 7019: 6965: 6929: 6775: 6653: 6549:, I notice the section on that list specifically notes that it should be for 6427: 6407: 6262: 6247: 6000: 5992: 5687: 5547: 5100: 5058: 5034: 4828: 4679: 4320: 4284: 4107: 4103: 3989: 3524: 3273: 3245: 3184: 3176: 3161: 3132: 3015: 2983: 2952: 2917: 2895: 2863: 1954: 1950: 1782: 1359: 1292: 1283: 1233: 795: 164: 15631:

and preserved as an important documentation of Arizona’s political history.

11207:

TOOSOON and page recreation in 2027 when it's appropriate is not that hard.

10731:. This isn't a disambiguation page, and it doesn't really qualify as an SIA 1648:

an article on how Artsakh is legally part of the Republic of Western Armenia

17344: 16920: 16891: 16345: 16130: 16126: 16076: 15584: 15552: 15137: 15133: 15116: 14873: 14712: 14704: 14679: 14652: 14592: 14564: 14549: 14407: 14378: 14353: 14336: 14110: 14089: 14064: 14060: 14044: 14006: 13942: 13562: 13544: 13514: 13495: 13449: 13421: 13383: 13096: 13092: 12561: 12533: 12385: 12357: 12206: 12133: 12113: 11859: 11727: 11719: 11438: 11416: 11388: 11063: 11026: 11025:. No point in deleting the page when it will only need to be remade again. 9057: 8814: 8806: 7725: 7705:

Besides the obvious BLP issues, any Chris Chan article might qualify for a

7677: 7636: 7616: 7497: 5367: 4974: 4736: 4279: 4264: 4111: 3993: 3725: 3564: 3287: 3259: 3227: 3188: 3171: 1265: 1237: 219:

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to

8415:, where it's discussed as part of China's larger influence in the world. 6735: 17450: 17371: 16941: 16877: 16395: 16340: 16280: 15608: 15604: 14929: 14921: 14430: 14422: 14027: 13240:. Premature creation, Knowledge is not a home for political advertising. 12795: 12771: 12233: 12225: 12180: 10929:. Thought about a redirect but I really couldn't find a suitable target. 10267: 10167: 9753: 9636: 9556: 8739: 8328: 8134: 8050: 8003: 7751: 7608: 7194: 7186: 6745: 6666: 6616: 6587: 6553:

parties. I would expect a non-notable party be ineligible for inclusion?

6448: 4804: 4556: 4548: 3206:

Every article about her is directly tied to her relationship with Adams.

2479: 2244: 1685: 473: 17300: 16533: 16525: 16276: 16105: 14052: 13975: 13883: 11567: 11487: 10356: 9995:

That is not significant coverage from which an article can be written.

9766:"Handelsregister Berlin" is a primary source, so not suitable for WP. 7830:

as a person is not notable. I agree with the reasoning of nomination.

7169: 4832: 3124: 3001: 2969: 2929: 1753: 1684:. There is a plethora of sources online about this topic. It surpasses 1681: 1662: 17035:

2024 United States Shadow Senator election in the District of Columbia

17016:

2024 United States Shadow Senator election in the District of Columbia

16938:

2024 United States Shadow Senator election in the District of Columbia

16913:

2024 United States Shadow Senator election in the District of Columbia

16890:

I also wouldn't be opposed to draftifying the article until November.

10371:

A clearer consensus? Seems pretty clear to me when reading the page..

6506:

List_of_political_parties_in_New_Zealand#Parties_that_never_held_seats

3589:

Articles for deletion/Next Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election

2942:

I commented on those. They do not establish notability. Have you seen

15727: 15719: 15551:

Does not appear to have gained notability since previous deletion. —

14256: 13215:

This makes sense and reiterates the point I made earlier. Thank you.

13100: 13007:

as an unelected candidate; routine coverage is unhelpful for NBASIC.

10263: 8643: 6734:

Does it really matter if it's a non-registered party? Sure, there's

3870: 3862: 14404:

the three reliable sources with significant coverage that we require

13916:

Past work in Alaska politics (as a high-profile Republican from the

13882:

Substantial media coverage of his 2022 campaign, similar to that of

13846:

do you think the article should be deleted or made into a redirect?

8429:

Thank you for spotting. We should incorporate more journal articles.

1627: 1623: 360:

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

17272:

due to notability issues. If there is an appropriate article, then

16976: 16754: 16701: 16661: 15701: 15392: 13060: 13016: 11387:

Google scholar has no sources and neither does the Turkish article

11099: 10710: 10147: 9532: 8477: 8151:

Goblin mode itself should also probably be nominated for deletion.

8112: 7402: 6701: 6251: 6221: 5974: 5768: 5402: 37: 13513:: She was an important union player, pushing for women's rights.-- 3244:, has independent sourcing directly about her, not her husband. – 16794:

Just a comment, a Republican did file and will be on the ballot.

13588:

published by the Institut Québécois de Recherche sur la Culture.

7489: 7459: 6404:

Whenuapai#Reverting to Military Aerodrome and recent developments

1661:

I wonder if that makes Western Armenia available for notability?

1338: 605:

Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY, does not meet WP:SALAT as it is too trivial

14377:. Not much extra sourcing found beyond what is in the article. 13406:, and is here solely to verify via her absence from it that she 13382:

Biography of a smalltown municipal councillor and activist, not

8002:

event. Here, the three biggest are clearly the creation of the "

1568: 405: 238:

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at

8432:

Current book academic source I referred to is from the notable

3720:

I don't see much change since the last AfD. It still a case of

3441:

outside of the relevant documents themselves. Aside from that,

1580: 1236:

would be a bad idea since this is not a plausible search term.

17498: 16339:- Kais Saied is the President of Tunisia. This is an official 14107:

2024 United States House of Representatives election in Alaska

14024:

2024 United States House of Representatives election in Alaska

13995:

2024 United States House of Representatives election in Alaska

13752:

2024 United States House of Representatives election in Alaska

12209:, but this is not the last time we'd see her as a politician. 12179:

Articles of members of city councils of major cities are kept.

9967:

TPO is a Dutch news website. Privately owned but independent.

6216:

Relisting. I'd like to hear from more editors on this subject.

1619: 17412: