549:
that will be, several people have taken the opportunity to make statements as well as take part in the threaded discussion. The actual discussion section does lack structure - I had considered replicating the workshop structure to encourage specific comments, but the discussions I started about that didn't get many comments. JohnWBarber did set up a more structured discussion, and I've recently posted to the talk page encouraging the participants to self-organise the page to keep discussion more focused and easier to follow (this would normally be the role of the clerks and arbitrators, but with the volume of discussion seen here, some self-organisation by the participants is needed). (2) The period of comment for the CU and OS appointments has closed now. I'd like to thank all those that commented, either on-wiki or by e-mail. I'll try and post an update on this at the arbitration noticeboard tomorrow, though the schedule is still currently as given in previous notices.
205:). The case has been technically open: although the evidence and workshop pages have remained closed, no proposals were posted on the proposed decision page and participants were prevented from further discussing their case on the case pages. Up until last week, participants were discussing the case on the proposed decision talk page, but an arbitrator stated that further discussion should not take place on this page until a proposed decision was posted. Instead, general discussion was directed to a
449:
117:
107:
33:
127:
87:
137:
97:
548:
A brief comment on two points here: (1) the climate change case proposed decision talk page is not a completely unstructured discussion. The page in fact includes an innovation not seen in previous cases, namely a separate section for statements to be made. Though it remains to be seen how successful
511:
415:, the Community has until 23:59 on 25 August 2010 (UTC) to comment on, or make further comments on candidates being actively considered for appointment to CheckUser and Oversight positions. Time is running out as the commenting period is soon going to close. The Committee made a second
90:
110:
563:
To add to that, for those who are curious, as of the report date, there were about 2680 words in statements while there was 17,236 words in unstructured discussion. As of this timestamp, the figure for statements has less than doubled to :
130:
100:
140:
387:
334:
192:
on July 19 (five weeks ago), arbitrators have not formally set any specific target date to post a proposed decision. However, requests for updates from arbitrators have received several responses (see previous
206:
229:
416:
213:
338:
354:
526:
73:
575:
346:
342:
280:
278:
276:
274:
272:
270:
268:
266:
264:
262:
260:
258:
256:
254:
252:
250:
248:
246:
244:
241:
239:
237:
235:
233:
488:
483:
436:
427:
409:
326:
322:
318:
202:
198:
120:
500:
286:
181:
365:
473:
369:
558:
478:
466:
243:), a large number of concerns were expressed about the proposed decision by many different users, including participants and non-participants (examples:
382:
169:
460:
52:
41:
189:
180:
This case resulted from the merging of several
Arbitration requests on the same topic matter into a single case, and the failure of a related
364:, relate to individual editor conduct and individual editor topic bans, and these have been supported by at least 8 out of 10 arbitrators. A
644:
67:
531:
538:
21:
619:
515:
614:
609:
588:
357:
requiring all named parties to make no more than half of their total number of edits to the race and intelligence topic.
329:), the case moved to the proposed decision phase. The decision that was proposed by the drafting arbitrator of the case,
604:
360:
Several proposals by other arbitrators are being voted on; a number of these proposals, most of which were drafted by
341:). Since then, 9 out of 10 active arbitrators opposed the remedies that Coren proposed and drafted – these included a
368:
and a remedy concerning evidence sub-pages have each also received a similar level of support from the
Committee. A
285:
403:
185:
157:
599:
448:
46:
32:
17:
394:
from all physics-related pages, topics and discussions. The topic ban is set to expire in August 2011.
168:
349:
which required all sources used in race and intelligence articles to be independent, secondary, and
232:- as of the date of this report, while appreciation or praise was incorporated in a few responses (
571:
625:
554:
8:
522:
361:
163:
567:
391:
217:
150:
550:
298:
313:
on articles related to race and intelligence. Following a number of delays (see
188:
were put in place when this arbitration commenced. Since the workshop phase was
306:
638:
375:
310:
419:
for the
Community to submit their comments during this commenting period.
398:
350:
302:
565:
4000 words while the figure for discussion has more than tripled to : -->
225:
221:
330:
536:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
636:
230:significant quantity of unstructured discussion
68:Proposed decision of climate change case posted
372:has received some support from arbitrators.
160:opened no cases this week, leaving two open.
148:
209:that was specially created for this case.
337:among participants and non-participants (
228:was posted for this case. This sparked a
539:
366:standard discretionary sanctions scheme
14:
637:
587:Explore Knowledge history by browsing
343:reminder to all editors about sources
51:
645:Knowledge Signpost archives 2010-08
27:
447:
297:This case concerns accusations of
53:
31:
28:
656:
521:These comments are automatically
404:CheckUser and Oversight positions
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
532:add the page to your watchlist
13:
1:
507:
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
576:05:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
559:02:26, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
10:
661:
390:to impose a topic ban on
184:to make headway. Special
386:: A motion was recently
207:general discussion page
529:. To follow comments,
452:
440:"Arbitration report" →
36:
451:
287:Race and intelligence
158:Arbitration Committee
35:
525:from this article's
432:"Arbitration report"
489:Features and admins
311:control the content
182:request for comment
516:Discuss this story
495:Arbitration report
484:WikiProject report
453:
333:, sparked several
303:disruptive editing
65:Arbitration report
42:← Back to Contents
37:
540:purging the cache
501:Technology report
355:topic restriction
214:proposed decision
47:View Latest Issue
652:
628:
543:
541:
535:
514:
497:
471:
463:
456:
439:
431:
351:reliable sources
347:source probation
186:rules of conduct
153:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
660:
659:
655:
654:
653:
651:
650:
649:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
624:
622:
617:
612:
607:
602:
595:
584:
583:
545:
537:
530:
519:
518:
512:+ Add a comment
510:
506:
505:
504:
493:
464:
459:
457:
454:
443:
442:
437:
434:
429:
408:As reported in
406:
401:
378:
370:motion to close
295:
178:
166:
154:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
658:
648:
647:
623:
618:
613:
608:
603:
598:
597:
596:
586:
585:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
566:60,000 words.
520:
517:
509:
508:
503:
498:
491:
486:
481:
476:
474:News and notes
470:
461:23 August 2010
458:
446:
445:
444:
435:
426:
425:
424:
422:
405:
402:
400:
397:
396:
395:
383:Speed of light
377:
374:
317:coverage from
294:
284:
197:coverage from
177:
170:Climate change
167:
165:
162:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
54:23 August 2010
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
657:
646:
643:
642:
640:
627:
621:
616:
611:
606:
601:
593:
591:
577:
573:
569:
562:
561:
560:
556:
552:
547:
546:
542:
533:
528:
524:
513:
502:
499:
496:
492:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
468:
462:
455:In this issue
450:
441:
433:
423:
420:
418:
414:
413:
393:
389:
385:
384:
380:
379:
373:
371:
367:
363:
358:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
292:
288:
283:
281:
279:
277:
275:
273:
271:
269:
267:
265:
263:
261:
259:
257:
255:
253:
251:
249:
247:
245:
242:
240:
238:
236:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
210:
208:
204:
200:
196:
191:
187:
183:
175:
171:
161:
159:
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
590:The Signpost
589:
494:
467:all comments
421:
411:
410:last week's
407:
381:
362:Roger Davies
359:
314:
296:
290:
212:Recently, a
211:
194:
179:
173:
155:
626:Suggestions
568:Ncmvocalist
523:transcluded
479:In the news
392:Brews ohare
307:tag-teaming
218:Newyorkbrad
216:drafted by
151:Ncmvocalist
551:Carcharoth
299:incivility
164:Open cases
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2010-08-23
620:Subscribe
527:talk page
199:August 16
639:Category
615:Newsroom
610:Archives
592:archives
430:Previous
412:Signpost
353:, and a
335:concerns
315:Signpost
203:August 9
195:Signpost
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
339:example
327:July 12
319:June 28
291:Week 12
174:Week 11
111:Twitter
388:passed
376:Motion
323:July 5
305:, and
226:Rlevse
224:, and
222:Risker
190:closed
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
605:About
399:Other
331:Coren
282:).
16:<
600:Home
572:talk
555:talk
438:Next
417:call
345:, a
201:and
156:The
141:Digg
564:-->
309:to
149:By
76:—
641::
574:)
557:)
428:←
325:,
321:,
301:,
220:,
594:.
570:(
553:(
544:.
534:.
469:)
465:(
293:)
289:(
176:)
172:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
