240:. The program would allow experienced users to apply for access to a specific tool or set of related tools currently accessible only to administrators, such as blocking or deleting pages. Successful applicants would receive that set of tools on a short term, probationary basis. Early support for the proposal was strong, with many of the initial opposers having struck their votes after their concerns were responded to by Dcoetzee, but later input was less supportive, leaving a significant yet tenuous plurality in favour of the idea.
388:
166:
117:
107:
33:
127:
87:
137:
97:
343:, which allows for attack pages to be speedy deleted, applies to redirects; specifically redirects from disparaging nicknames of the subjects of the target articles. The prevailing view is that CSD G10 does apply, but that some disparaging nicknames are themselves notable, and should not be subject to speedy deletion.
281:, would allow users to choose to watch a specific page, but not its corresponding discussion page, or vice versa. The idea was brought up before in both 2005 and 2008, on each occasion with minimal community feedback. Support and opposition for the current proposal are roughly split at the time of writing.
292:
that would allow users to mark a specific item in their watchlist as "read". Under this proposal, after a change is marked as "read", the next time the watchlist was viewed, that change, and all changes made to the same page that took place before the edit marked as "read", would not show up in the
252:
that the template used when project members rejected submissions was too negative, and had the potential to discourage future contributors. A good portion of the discussion dealt with the balance between a desire to give personalized responses to each submitter and the massive volume of submissions
332:
to allow
Checkusers to reveal the identity of accounts that are suspected of being, as phrased by proposer, "corporate propagandists". The idea met with overwhelming opposition before being closed with a statement that the proposal was invalid because it ran contrary to Knowledge's privacy policy,
453:
110:
329:
90:
375:
thanks Jayron32 and Chzz). Further submissions are needed for this issue to be viable, so we ask readers to make suggestions either in the comments below or at the village pump, where details of what is being sought are available. The
130:
100:
140:
557:. :-) Thanks to the Signpost staff for helping to get the attention of the community on this important matter. Your short summary appears to be quite accurate, and indeed is the best summary I've seen so far.
531:
243:
367:
for 2011 comes out on
December 26, and we are planning on running a special issue of the discussion report that week detailing the most important discussions of the year. A thread was started at the
73:
468:
294:
194:
590:
546:
523:
561:
437:
427:
274:
120:
442:
347:
432:
258:
412:
182:
336:
285:
215:
507:
417:
405:
607:
200:
515:
399:
264:
52:
41:
156:
659:
322:
473:
249:
358:
368:
480:
301:
that would add a "show changes since last visit" function to the watchlist. This function is already built into MediaWiki, as the
67:
21:
634:
457:
629:
624:
254:
209:
619:
554:
325:
at the village pump. The noticeboard is designed to assist editors that work in files in coordinating their activities.
350:
of the discussion report, was closed on
November 28 with a consensus that the tool be developed as an opt-in feature.
253:
that AfC receives. As a result of the thread, the background color to the template in question was lightened, and
188:
233:
229:
614:
387:
46:
32:
17:
305:
option, and is enabled on
Commons and Meta already. The proposal has received strong support thus far.
218:
to implement block templates that automatically update to reflect when a user is no longer blocked
581:
540:
640:
8:
519:
270:
534:
now, along with continuing to tinker with the drafts linked above. Comments welcome. :)
567:
371:
seeking suggestions, however it has thus far only received two comments (for which the
150:
536:
503:
464:
204:
223:
Discussions covered in the main body of the discussion report are not listed here.
340:
333:
and that only the
Wikimedia Foundation has the power to alter the privacy policy.
308:
278:
232:
was started on
November 28 seeking consensus to begin a three-month trial of the
346:
The proposal to integrate a user status display into
Knowledge, covered in the
313:
Disclosure: the author of this report proposed the File namespace noticeboard.
653:
558:
318:
289:
237:
191:
about creating binding solutions to intractable content disputes through RfCs
499:
298:
495:
302:
293:
watchlist. The idea received some discussion before branching off into a
491:
244:
Discussion about a template used by WikiProject
Articles for creation
197:
about enabling multilingual search results for registered
Wikipedians
380:
is grateful for any assistance, and we thank you in advance.
553:
Well now I know where all the new people came from on
269:
Three proposals were recently put forth to modify the
478:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
185:
to rename the tab title from "discussion" to "talk"
212:on the purpose and future of the Portal namespace
651:
490:Regarding watchlist suggestions: there's also
148:
492:Bug 5875 - Group similar pages in watchlist
359:Suggestions needed for end-of-year edition
265:Multiple proposals to tweak the watchlist
597:==Suggestions for the special edition==
481:
248:Concern was raised on the talk page of
14:
652:
157:Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
68:Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
51:
660:Knowledge Signpost archives 2011-12
530:About the AfC template work: we're
27:
555:Knowledge talk:Tool apprenticeship
386:
164:
53:
31:
28:
671:
606:is written by editors like you –
463:These comments are automatically
250:WikiProject Articles for creation
203:about deprecating or maintaining
337:Clarification from the community
288:was made later that same day by
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
474:add the page to your watchlist
339:has been sought as to whether
13:
1:
321:has been created after being
591:12:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
562:12:01, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
547:22:22, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
524:21:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
508:20:23, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
449:
277:, written on November 30 by
259:exploring friendlier options
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
10:
676:
319:File namespace noticeboard
312:
255:WikiProject user warnings
566:Why thank you good sir.
514:I may agree with you. --
317:A new noticeboard, the
471:. To follow comments,
391:
363:The last issue of the
236:program, developed by
169:
36:
390:
303:$ wgShowUpdatedMarker
168:
35:
537:Steven Walling (WMF)
467:from this article's
261:for AfC templates.
234:tool apprenticeship
230:request for comment
458:Discuss this story
438:Arbitration report
428:WikiProject report
392:
170:
42:← Back to Contents
37:
588:
532:discussing a test
482:purging the cache
443:Technology report
423:Discussion report
330:proposal was made
65:Discussion report
47:View Latest Issue
667:
643:
587:
582:
579:
545:
543:
485:
483:
477:
456:
433:Featured content
410:
402:
395:
174:
171:
167:
153:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
675:
674:
670:
669:
668:
666:
665:
664:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
639:
637:
632:
627:
622:
617:
610:
600:
599:
583:
576:
572:
568:
541:
535:
487:
479:
472:
461:
460:
454:+ Add a comment
452:
448:
447:
446:
403:
400:5 December 2011
398:
396:
393:
361:
314:
311:
286:second proposal
267:
246:
226:
225:
224:
221:
178:
177:
172:
165:
163:
159:
154:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
54:5 December 2011
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
673:
663:
662:
638:
633:
628:
623:
618:
613:
612:
611:
602:
601:
598:
596:
595:
594:
593:
574:
570:
550:
549:
527:
526:
511:
510:
462:
459:
451:
450:
445:
440:
435:
430:
425:
420:
415:
413:News and notes
409:
397:
385:
384:
383:
382:
360:
357:
356:
354:
352:
351:
344:
334:
326:
310:
307:
295:third proposal
275:first proposal
271:user watchlist
266:
263:
245:
242:
222:
220:
219:
213:
207:
198:
192:
186:
179:
175:
162:
161:
160:
158:
155:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
672:
661:
658:
657:
655:
642:
636:
631:
626:
621:
616:
609:
605:
592:
589:
586:
580:
578:
565:
564:
563:
560:
556:
552:
551:
548:
544:
538:
533:
529:
528:
525:
521:
517:
513:
512:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
488:
484:
475:
470:
466:
455:
444:
441:
439:
436:
434:
431:
429:
426:
424:
421:
419:
416:
414:
411:
407:
401:
394:In this issue
389:
381:
379:
374:
370:
366:
355:
349:
345:
342:
338:
335:
331:
327:
324:
320:
316:
315:
306:
304:
300:
296:
291:
287:
282:
280:
276:
273:feature. The
272:
262:
260:
256:
251:
241:
239:
235:
231:
217:
214:
211:
208:
206:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
180:
152:
151:Sven Manguard
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
604:The Signpost
603:
584:
569:
422:
406:all comments
377:
372:
369:village pump
364:
362:
353:
283:
268:
247:
227:
176:Discussions
173:Centralized
641:Suggestions
496:mw:Bugzilla
465:transcluded
418:In the news
348:last issue
279:Fred Gandt
205:WP:PORNBIO
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2011-12-05
635:Subscribe
516:Katarighe
469:talk page
654:Category
630:Newsroom
625:Archives
608:join in!
559:Dcoetzee
378:Signpost
373:Signpost
365:Signpost
323:proposed
309:In brief
290:Czarkoff
238:Dcoetzee
216:Proposal
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
577:anguard
500:Sumanah
341:CSD G10
299:Edokter
111:Twitter
257:began
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
620:About
16:<
615:Home
585:Wha?
573:ven
542:talk
520:talk
504:talk
141:Digg
494:in
297:by
210:RfC
201:RfC
195:RfC
189:RfC
183:RfC
149:By
76:—
656::
539:•
522:)
506:)
498:.
328:A
284:A
228:A
575:M
571:S
518:(
502:(
486:.
476:.
408:)
404:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
