Knowledge

:Knowledge Signpost/2020-03-29/Discussion report - Knowledge

Source 📝

110: 130: 303: 90: 120: 36: 140: 100: 189:. The original rationale for its creation was that the creation of the namespace would make it easier to locate AfC submissions and review them for issues. Initially, the RfC called for the elimination of userspace drafts, but the RfC was changed early on to continue allowing userspace drafts. Before the creation of draftspace, drafts were stored in userspace (as many still are today), or subpages of 150: 243:); others saw the geonotice as in line with the Wikimedia movement's goals. There were also complaints that this controversial geonotice had not been put up for discussion in a more frequently visited page like the village pump (in fact, the author of this column didn't even know the geonotice request board existed until he wrote this paragraph). 273:(such as President of the United States) has been controversial for a long time and led to many edit wars. Opponents of MOS:JOBTITLES argue that it is confusing and does not have the support of the community, while supporters point towards its consistency with the style guides of reputable English-language sources. 212:
after he came "to the conclusion that draft space is a failure, and for the most part is something that is used as a holding ground for G13 since the majority of the content is unsalvageable." As such, he supports eliminating draftspace and returning AfC to a model of userspace submissions. Opponents
238:
be allowed to contain political advocacy? This RfC was caused by the addition of a geonotice saying, "Please send email asking the US government to require open access to federally supported research." A wide majority of users have opposed using geonotices for any political advocacy (though some
439: 408: 213:
of draftspace argue that drafts are less likely to be seen and improved by editors, and so they just end up getting deleted after they are abandoned by their creators. Other users support keeping draftspace because it reduces the burden placed on
143: 113: 207:
currently going on the village pump does not contain any specific policy proposals, but rather seeks to start a discussion on whether the draft namespace should be reformed or eliminated. The section was created by
197:. Today, draftspace is used for AfC as well as for incubating articles that were created in mainspace but weren't quite ready for primetime (for example, because they didn't have enough references to meet the 153: 133: 103: 76: 231: 250:, there is an ongoing discussion on how to improve the process of deprecating and blacklisting consistently unreliable sources. The proposals concern text to be added to 247: 397: 357: 337: 70: 123: 392: 377: 290: 281: 327: 266: 372: 382: 367: 342: 332: 347: 320: 362: 314: 55: 44: 387: 186: 510: 420: 204: 427: 93: 172: 21: 486: 481: 476: 471: 194: 182: 455: 218: 466: 302: 49: 35: 17: 190: 217:(who are already severely backlogged), and keeps poorly written content and content from editors with a 412: 492: 8: 235: 255: 209: 163: 224: 178: 251: 240: 504: 270: 259: 214: 198: 30:
Rethinking draft space: Plus: geonotices, reliable sources, and job titles.
239:
suggested an exception for issues that directly affect Knowledge, such as
262:
explaining the requirements for a source to be deprecated or blacklisted.
271:
the section of the Manual of Style on the capitalization of job titles
185:(AfC) submissions, after the idea was endorsed by the community in 221:
out of mainspace, where they would be visible to more readers.
181:
namespace was created in 2013 as a centralized location for
451:
Get the latest headlines on your user page – just add
425:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try 502: 161: 436:No comments yet. Yours could be the first! 187:a request for comment on the village pump 267:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Biography 428: 205:The "Rethinking draft space" discussion 14: 503: 54: 29: 511:Knowledge Signpost archives 2020-03 27: 301: 56: 34: 28: 522: 248:the reliable sources noticeboard 173:Draft space: success or failure? 148: 138: 128: 118: 108: 98: 88: 195:Knowledge:Articles for creation 421:add the page to your watchlist 13: 1: 404: 199:general notability guideline 18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost 7: 191:Knowledge:Article Incubator 10: 527: 232:the policy village pump 306: 71:Rethinking draft space 39: 456:Signpost-subscription 305: 294:"Discussion report" → 183:Articles for Creation 38: 418:To follow comments, 219:conflict of interest 286:"Discussion report" 215:new page patrollers 413:Discuss this story 398:On the bright side 358:Arbitration report 338:WikiProject report 307: 45:← Back to Contents 40: 429:purging the cache 393:News from the WMF 378:From the archives 353:Discussion report 68:Discussion report 50:View Latest Issue 518: 495: 460: 454: 432: 430: 424: 411: 328:From the editors 325: 317: 310: 293: 285: 166: 152: 151: 142: 141: 132: 131: 122: 121: 112: 111: 102: 101: 92: 91: 62: 60: 58: 526: 525: 521: 520: 519: 517: 516: 515: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 491: 489: 484: 479: 474: 469: 462: 458: 452: 448: 447: 442: 440:+ Add a comment 437: 434: 426: 419: 416: 415: 409:+ Add a comment 407: 403: 402: 401: 373:Recent research 318: 313: 311: 308: 297: 296: 291: 288: 283: 277: 276: 227: 175: 168: 167: 160: 159: 158: 149: 139: 129: 119: 109: 99: 89: 83: 80: 69: 65: 63: 53: 52: 47: 41: 31: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 524: 514: 513: 490: 485: 480: 475: 470: 465: 464: 463: 450: 449: 446: 445: 444: 443: 438: 435: 417: 414: 406: 405: 400: 395: 390: 385: 383:Traffic report 380: 375: 370: 368:Community view 365: 360: 355: 350: 345: 343:Special report 340: 335: 333:News and notes 330: 324: 312: 300: 299: 298: 289: 280: 279: 278: 275: 274: 263: 244: 226: 223: 174: 171: 170: 169: 157: 156: 146: 136: 126: 116: 106: 96: 85: 84: 81: 75: 74: 73: 72: 67: 66: 64: 61: 48: 43: 42: 33: 32: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 523: 512: 509: 508: 506: 494: 488: 483: 478: 473: 468: 457: 441: 431: 422: 410: 399: 396: 394: 391: 389: 386: 384: 381: 379: 376: 374: 371: 369: 366: 364: 361: 359: 356: 354: 351: 349: 346: 344: 341: 339: 336: 334: 331: 329: 326: 322: 316: 315:29 March 2020 309:In this issue 304: 295: 287: 272: 268: 264: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 242: 237: 233: 229: 228: 222: 220: 216: 211: 206: 202: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 165: 155: 147: 145: 137: 135: 127: 125: 117: 115: 107: 105: 97: 95: 87: 86: 78: 59: 57:29 March 2020 51: 46: 37: 23: 19: 352: 348:In the media 321:all comments 210:TonyBallioni 203: 176: 94:PDF download 493:Suggestions 164:Pythoncoder 144:X (Twitter) 236:geonotices 82:Share this 77:Contribute 22:2020-03-29 487:Subscribe 234:: should 505:Category 482:Newsroom 477:Archives 363:In focus 284:Previous 225:In brief 134:Facebook 124:LinkedIn 114:Mastodon 20:‎ | 388:Gallery 252:WP:RSPI 260:WP:RSN 258:, and 256:WT:SBL 154:Reddit 104:E-mail 472:About 179:Draft 16:< 467:Home 292:Next 241:SOPA 201:). 177:The 265:On 246:On 230:On 193:or 162:By 79:— 507:: 459:}} 453:{{ 282:← 269:: 254:, 461:. 433:. 423:. 323:) 319:(

Index

Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
2020-03-29
The Signpost
← Back to Contents
View Latest Issue
29 March 2020
Contribute
PDF download
E-mail
Mastodon
LinkedIn
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Pythoncoder
Draft
Articles for Creation
a request for comment on the village pump
Knowledge:Article Incubator
Knowledge:Articles for creation
general notability guideline
The "Rethinking draft space" discussion
TonyBallioni
new page patrollers
conflict of interest
the policy village pump
geonotices
SOPA
the reliable sources noticeboard
WP:RSPI

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.