1192:
every proposal which might have made a real difference. Some were awful and deserved to fail (PROD style adminship was a terrible idea) but others were not given a chance or rejected over nitpicks without giving ideas a chance to grow. The problem with RfA is not the process, it's the community, writ large (and I include myself in that group, I'm no better than anyone else). There's no easy fix for that. Everyone has different standards for RfA candidates, ranging from reasonable to utterly absurd. Candidates are rightfully scared to come forward after seeing several RfAs go down in flames, and even successful candidates are scarred by the process. There's no way in hell I'd run for RfA now, even if I were qualified (I'm obviously not based on my edit count, though there used to be a time that 6,000 edits was enough to pass). I wish I could say I had the answers, but I don't, not at all. I'm as lost as everyone else. This problem won't go away, we will have to deal with it again sometime down the road, and when we do we will regret not acting sooner.
1252:, both good points. I think part of the issue is that editors aren't willing enough to try out trials of new things. One could start an RfC directly proposing a change or one could start an RfC proposing we conduct a trial of that change, and I suspect the result would not differ that much, even though the trial option would be a lot safer. I also think closers could do more to err on the side of experimentation with a trial as a kind of middle ground when a proposal is on the border between succeeding and no consensus. This is especially true when the discussion has an exasperated "I'm not sure this is precisely the right solution but we've got to try
178:
110:
130:
652:
1097:
the website but don't actually entitle you to anything, legally... is the same as the monetary value of a few random bits of paint on a canvass. For my part, I am a little bit concerned that Wales is willing to give this elitist attention-seeking the time of day, and I also don't think he's been public about where the money goes. If it goes to non-profits then at least scamming a moron out of half a million dollars is relatively better than partnering with Big Tech or
90:
120:
36:
140:
944:
the
Brooklyn Bridge. In any practical sense of the word you can lose an NFT, just like people lose bitcoins all the time. Perhaps you might prefer "misplaced and unable to access them" but it's the same thing.You can destroy an NFT simply by wiping the memory from the right computer. Can an NFT be copied? You can copy the photo of the Brooklyn Bridge and sell another NFT on it. Sounds like copying to me.
100:
150:
788:. In the meantime if he could sell some kind of token for $ 600,000 it proves his momma didn't raise no fool (EDIT: and after going back and checking his article here in case he was raised by wolves or something and I was off-base about his mother, turns out she was much more of an influence on Jimbo and his path towards forming Knowledge than is commonly known).
103:
1119:
The modern art industry in the sense of a scam, and a great way to launder money(?). I'm not sure I'd even be satisfied with the money going to non-profits - not when the impact on the environment is considered. Look, kids, I'm donating money to help you - don't mind the fact that the energy for this
943:
There are some misconceptions here. 1st:what are you actually buying? What does the bundle of rights called an NFT actually include. As I understand it, you could issue an NFT for a photo of the
Brooklyn Bridge, but this would give the buyer no more rights than if you just told him that he was buying
1210:
a change of a policy or a procedure. If there was such a way, then some of
Barkeep49's suggestions could be given a trial run. Since there are not that many RfAs, the trial couldn't really be timed, but limiting the trial by amount of RfAs could work. For example, running an RfA procedure change for
1096:
People miss the woods for the trees when discussing NFTs: what they are is a modern art industry. That should be the starting position, and then the monetary value of "edits" to reconstructed websites that might look something like how
Knowledge once did and that abstractly symbolise something about
524:
Highlights from the balance sheet include $ 209 million in current assets – of which $ 87 M were in cash or cash equivalents and $ 117 M was in short-term investments. Total assets amount to $ 240 M, which includes $ 20 M of long-term investments and only $ 10 M in property and equipment. Note that
445:
This year's seven represented the lowest number of new administrators appointed in one year since 2003, when the RfA process began. The previous low was ten, in 2019; the all-time high was 408, in 2007. There are currently 1,066 administrators, with only 463 considered active (having made more than
922:
It's all fun and games until the music stops and the your left without a chair holding a worthless gif of a monkey. But, there are some things can have lasting value. The NFT for the computer is a certificate of authenticity and ownership that can never be lost (well it could if the keys are lost)
528:
Total support and revenue was $ 163 M, which mostly comes from $ 153 M in donations and contributions. Total expenses were $ 112 M, which include $ 68 M for wages and salaries, $ 10 M for awards and grants, and $ 12 million for professional services as well as other categories. This resulted in an
1229:
English
Knowledge's consensus-based decision-making traditions hamper all major changes as consensus doesn't scale up. So all RfCs ought to be judged within this context. There was a failure to adopt new RfA procedures, but I think there was progress in getting more editors willing to try a very
1191:
Commenting on the RfA reform process itself, as a participant in all stages I am going to come right out and call it a near total failure. Barkeep49 did an excellent job attempting to get the community to figure out how to improve the issues with the process, but the community at large shot down
876:
for tech bros. They create an impression that you can get rich quick via supposedly valuable "unicorns" but the only value you can get from one is if you can sell it for a higher price to someone else. In other words, a classic pyramid scheme. There are only so many people in the world gullible
1338:. That leaves six, or one every other month. We elected more arbitrators in 2021 than administrators! Any potential administrator waiting for the community to change its expectations to conform with theirs should refocus their efforts on trying harder to conform to what the community expects.
742:
143:
210:
595:
is looking for new members and advisors. Candidates may apply
January 1-31 at affcom@lists.wikimedia.org or the link above. Endorsements and comments on the candidate are also welcome. If you want to work with international user groups, this is what you are looking
113:
877:
enough to spend money on that, and eventually the bubble will burst and whoever is holding NFTs at that point loses out. If $ 600k for this NFT is low, I'm glad it is, because it is a sign that people are starting to wake up from this unsustainable craze.
559:
Note that anonymous donors are excluded from the totals and this report is not formally audited. The
English language campaign, which covers Australia, Canada, Ireland, the UK, the US, and New Zealand, contributes almost half of all donations. –
70:
153:
133:
493:
1319:
The low RfA numbers may have been in part a byproduct of RfA reform discussion. If I were an admin hopeful, I'd probably wait until the discussion's resolution before trying to proceed. Here's hoping for good numbers in 2022.
518:
1230:
different system. (Sure, there are many examples of processes that we'll regret not changing earlier. Unless we change the decision-making process, though (another future regret), reaching agreement is inevitably slow.)
1288:, you echo my thoughts entirely and I've already made very similar comments. I will add that it's just possibe that this long debate process may even have had a further chilling effect on the enthusiasm to be an admin.
482:
828:
Knowledge also open-sourced knowledge ,' Santos said, adding that the website has also gone through similar stages as cryptocurrency. 'There’s a lot of parallels. We’ve gone through this phase of crypto as a
962:
IMHO, if there is some tangible object attached to these NFTs (e.g., a paper or solid certificate of some kind) they will always have some value. Assuming the worst -- this is just the
Internet version of a
778:
434:. There were only four unsuccessful results, with the most spectacular RfA being that for Eostrix who gained 123 supports against only one oppose and two neutrals before being blocked as a sockpuppet. (See
459:
The general health of the administrator community, as demonstrated by the figures above, appears to be low. In an effort to fix these problems, a process of RfC-based reform began earlier this year (see
206:
835:
He also said that he was "shocked" at the low price and had been prepared to pay "$ 2.5 million or more," considering that there is "so much emotional and historical attachment attached to
Knowledge."
477:
472:
1186:
967:-- the tangible objects will become collectable items that commemorate a silly fad of the distant past. If no such tangible object exists, well, how many suckers are born every minute again? --
797:
881:
867:
1201:
1158:
1114:
1013:
847:
1164:
489:
1347:
1314:
514:
232:
attacks and their association with a large number of other scams). Other criticisms of the NFT sale include objections to the idea of Wales trying to create a type of ownership, or
1329:
1224:
1297:
76:
1239:
1133:
917:
757:
938:
584:
976:
701:
388:
1033:
957:
899:
461:
123:
1065:
817:, a decentralized autonomous organization most commonly known for buying the one-of-kind WuTang album . 'I bought it because I think it’s priceless,' Santos said.
237:
188:
711:
696:
676:
1366:
1274:
1335:
1089:
721:
706:
639:
630:
435:
611:
508:
1304:
The section on admin elections was originally closed as "unsuccessful," not no consensus. It was corrected to no consensus following the discussion at AN.
691:
256:
686:
669:
30:
Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements: Wrapping up 2021 with a pair of auctions, activity surrounding administrators, and an audit.
1382:
726:
247:
were $ 150,000 for the iMac and $ 600,000 for the NFT, according to Wales. The more commonly reported prices of $ 187,500 and $ 750,000 include the
663:
55:
44:
822:
The bidder, who was initially anonymous, told
Blockworks that he spent almost $ 1 million on the collectible because it was 'emblematic of Web3.'
716:
731:
1249:
1231:
1177:
The close review for RfA proposal 8B took place at AN, not ANI. You've got the discussion linked properly, but the text afterwards says ANI.
454:
205:
auction house. The NFT included a reconstructed website based on how the Knowledge website appeared to him after its first edit, which Jimbo
213:
that the original timestamp of his reconstructed "first edit" was a couple minutes after a separate edit previously recorded as the first.
1434:
236:, of a freely-licensed work − "Hello, World!" − whereas Knowledge is dedicated to breaking down barriers to public access to knowledge. A
762:
352:
Our special thanks for a job well done go to the arbitrators who have completed their arbitration service and declined to run again.
1020:
Any cryptocurrency-related project has had problems with false promises and vaporware. I haven't seen anything but promises so far.
802:
1070:
I actually tried to get this right when composing the article. My understanding is the blockchain used for this particular NFT is
769:
93:
21:
1410:
746:
268:
923:
and never destroyed or copied. You could store the computer at the Smithsonian and still sell the NFT around frictionless. --
404:
For the sixth month this year, there were no successful RfAs in December, with only seven new administrators chosen all year:
1405:
1400:
492:
involving an express method of selecting admins via secret ballot, was closed with a controversial "no consensus" and a
1395:
603:
399:
1098:
384:
will retain these permissions, which she received before becoming an arbitrator, to work in areas which require them.
1078:
unless I'm misreading the first paragraph of the article. If you can show me this is incorrect, I will correct it. ☆
274:
1197:
1182:
784:
Good for Jimbo. I hope the computer ends up in the Smithsonian some day, kind of like one of the artifacts in
533:
1125:
1390:
1154:
904:
Of course NFTs are going somewhere. It just a question of whether they get there faster or slower than the
651:
49:
35:
17:
536:, released in October, breaks down contributions across several categories. Across continents donors in
591:
1285:
1193:
1178:
583:: The Research & Technology Fund hopes to award at least six grants of up to $ 50,000 each. See
1121:
615:
619:
886:
NFTs aren't going anywhere though - especially with GME going full force with them next year. –
913:
240:
discussion grappled with this issue, as well as its implications for the Wikimedia Movement.
201:", as well as his personal iMac which he used during the early days of Knowledge, through the
497:
224:, an extremely energy-intensive method of recording transactions, and because they depend on
529:
increase in net assets by $ 51 M, raising total net assets to $ 231 M as of June 30, 2021.
1416:
1026:
950:
793:
198:
8:
375:
371:
233:
1220:
995:
893:
878:
861:
574:
194:
1140:
If you pardon my French, adapting a contemporary Mexican Spanish insult into English:
177:
1343:
1305:
1293:
972:
909:
753:
622:– were both recognized by the Affiliations Committee for a one-year renewable period.
346:
296:
1235:
1107:
1058:
1006:
931:
248:
1021:
945:
789:
607:
568:
448:
393:
262:
167:
1049:
843:
225:
299:. Five other editors were elected for the first time, all for two-year terms:
1428:
1362:
1325:
1245:
1216:
1129:
1085:
1075:
1045:
887:
855:
468:). The 2021 RfA reform ended with the passing of a modest list of proposals:
217:
1334:
It's a stretch to claim seven new admins this year when one of them already
1339:
1289:
1143:
968:
244:
1149:
1102:
1053:
999:
924:
905:
202:
229:
221:
483:
7D, to unbundle "autopatrolled" from the default administrator toolkit
1262:
839:
814:
517:
was posted by the Wikimedia Foundation on December 15, as well as a
1357:
1321:
1172:
1080:
1071:
964:
562:
502:
163:
1211:
four or five RfAs would have shown if it was a good change or not
873:
813:"Prominent Web3 investor Santiago Santos purchased the NFT for
478:
6C, to set up a formal process for administrative action review
333:
congratulates all these recently elected arbs, and also thanks
285:
279:
414:
209:
as him typing as "Hello, World!" before erasing it. However,
380:
313:
71:
Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements
418:
362:
358:
307:
992:
NFTs are controversial because they require proof of work
422:
335:
291:
430:
341:
301:
295:) were again elected to two-year terms on the committee
410:
406:
354:
1353:
retired/vanished and requested removal of permissions
426:
994:- this is inaccurate. Search on "proof of stake" in
525:
we're leaving out several of the smaller categories.
325:
366:
767:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
319:
612:Wikimedia Community of Saint Petersburg User Group
193:In a controversial move, Jimmy Wales auctioned an
515:audited Fiscal Year 2020-2021 financial statement
1426:
779:"Jimbo's Strawberry iMac and non-fungible token"
238:recent Wikimedians in Residence Exchange Network
581:Research grant applications due January 3, 2022
189:Jimbo's Strawberry iMac and non-fungible token
1120:NFT is why you're experiencing blackouts...--
161:
1052:, depending on the particular blockchain? —
216:NFTs are controversial because they require
1099:scamming people in poverty by lying to them
509:WMF's audited financial statements released
1336:moved without leaving a forwarding address
805:managed to find out more about the buyer:
549:Australia and New Zealand – $ 5.6 million
349:for their participation in the election.
1165:"Requests for Adminship 2022 and beyond"
585:Wikimedia Research & Technology Fund
1206:Knowledge doesn't have a formal way of
770:
14:
1427:
455:Requests for Adminship 2022 and beyond
54:
29:
446:30 edits in the last two months). –
1435:Knowledge Signpost archives 2021-12
27:
650:
387:See more coverage in this issue's
255:See also coverage in this issue's
176:
56:
34:
28:
1446:
906:mother of all speculative bubbles
752:These comments are automatically
540:North America gave $ 89.6 million
473:5A, to revise Standard Question 1
490:8B, the "admin elections" scheme
228:(controversial for their use in
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
98:
88:
1383:putting together the next issue
1040:Am I right in saying that NFTs
269:Eight newly elected arbitrators
763:add the page to your watchlist
587:for more complete information.
552:South America – $ 1.05 million
13:
1:
1367:19:58, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
1348:19:36, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
1330:19:59, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
1315:14:38, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
1298:23:38, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
1275:03:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
1240:00:00, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
1225:23:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
1202:21:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
1187:21:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
1159:14:30, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
1115:11:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
1090:18:46, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
1066:11:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
1034:16:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
1014:05:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
958:16:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
939:05:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
918:17:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
900:14:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
882:01:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
872:NFTs are simply a version of
868:21:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
848:21:45, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
798:21:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
604:Paiwan Wikimedians User Group
220:in order to be recorded on a
185:Is it live, or is it Memorex?
1134:16:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
738:
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
977:19:03, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
854:$ 600,000 does seem low. –
498:administrators' noticeboard
400:Requests for Adminship 2021
370:will also relinquish their
10:
1451:
534:2020-21 Fundraising Report
521:for its interpretation.
297:in this year's elections
543:Europe – $ 45.9 million
1142:hahaha Jimbo you're a
760:. To follow comments,
655:
606:, which is located in
592:Affiliations Committee
181:
39:
654:
494:review of the closure
180:
38:
1286:Trainsandotherthings
1194:Trainsandotherthings
1179:Trainsandotherthings
756:from this article's
546:Asia – $ 7.8 million
519:FAQ published by WMF
199:first Knowledge edit
1122:Ineffablebookkeeper
1074:, which implements
234:artificial scarcity
996:Non-fungible_token
747:Discuss this story
702:Arbitration report
656:
643:"News and notes" →
389:Arbitration Report
243:The final auction
182:
45:← Back to Contents
40:
1272:
1260:
771:purging the cache
555:Africa – $ 61,999
50:View Latest Issue
1442:
1419:
1381:needs your help
1360:
1312:
1273:
1270:
1269:
1267:
1258:
1176:
1110:
1083:
1061:
1029:
1011:
1004:
993:
953:
936:
929:
896:
890:
864:
858:
774:
772:
766:
745:
674:
666:
664:28 December 2021
659:
642:
635:"News and notes"
634:
571:
565:
505:
451:
433:
396:
383:
369:
344:
338:
328:
322:
316:
310:
304:
294:
288:
286:Opabinia regalis
282:
280:Worm That Turned
265:
226:cryptocurrencies
211:some pointed out
207:recalled in 2019
170:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
102:
101:
92:
91:
62:
60:
58:
57:28 December 2021
1450:
1449:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1415:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1386:
1375:
1374:
1356:
1306:
1290:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
1263:
1261:
1257:
1170:
1167:
1157:
1108:
1079:
1059:
1032:
1027:
1007:
1000:
991:
956:
951:
932:
925:
894:
888:
879:feminist (talk)
862:
856:
781:
776:
768:
761:
750:
749:
743:+ Add a comment
741:
737:
736:
735:
712:Deletion report
697:Recent research
677:From the editor
667:
662:
660:
657:
646:
645:
640:
637:
632:
626:
625:
600:New user-groups
577:
567:
561:
511:
501:
457:
447:
415:Ashleyyoursmile
405:
402:
392:
379:
353:
340:
334:
324:
318:
312:
306:
300:
290:
284:
278:
271:
261:
249:buyer's premium
191:
186:
183:
172:
171:
160:
159:
158:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
83:
80:
69:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1448:
1438:
1437:
1414:
1409:
1404:
1399:
1394:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1377:
1376:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1332:
1317:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1227:
1166:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1153:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1068:
1050:proof of stake
1038:
1037:
1036:
1024:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
948:
870:
851:
850:
836:
833:
832:
831:
824:
819:
807:
806:
800:
780:
777:
751:
748:
740:
739:
734:
729:
724:
722:Traffic report
719:
714:
709:
707:By the numbers
704:
699:
694:
689:
684:
682:News and notes
679:
673:
661:
649:
648:
647:
638:
629:
628:
627:
624:
623:
597:
588:
576:
573:
557:
556:
553:
550:
547:
544:
541:
510:
507:
486:
485:
480:
475:
456:
453:
401:
398:
273:Three veteran
270:
267:
190:
187:
184:
175:
174:
173:
157:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
85:
84:
81:
75:
74:
73:
72:
68:News and notes
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1447:
1436:
1433:
1432:
1430:
1418:
1412:
1407:
1402:
1397:
1392:
1384:
1380:
1368:
1364:
1359:
1354:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1318:
1316:
1313:
1311:
1310:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1284:
1283:
1276:
1268:
1266:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1228:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1174:
1169:
1168:
1160:
1156:
1151:
1147:
1145:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1104:
1100:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1082:
1077:
1076:proof of work
1073:
1069:
1067:
1063:
1062:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1046:proof of work
1043:
1039:
1035:
1030:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1005:
1003:
997:
990:
978:
974:
970:
966:
961:
960:
959:
954:
947:
942:
941:
940:
937:
935:
930:
928:
921:
920:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
902:
901:
897:
891:
885:
884:
883:
880:
875:
871:
869:
865:
859:
853:
852:
849:
845:
841:
837:
834:
830:
825:
823:
820:
818:
816:
811:
810:
809:
808:
804:
801:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
782:
773:
764:
759:
755:
744:
733:
730:
728:
725:
723:
720:
718:
715:
713:
710:
708:
705:
703:
700:
698:
695:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:
680:
678:
675:
671:
665:
658:In this issue
653:
644:
636:
621:
617:
614:– located in
613:
609:
605:
601:
598:
594:
593:
589:
586:
582:
579:
578:
572:
570:
564:
554:
551:
548:
545:
542:
539:
538:
537:
535:
530:
526:
522:
520:
516:
506:
504:
499:
495:
491:
484:
481:
479:
476:
474:
471:
470:
469:
467:
465:
452:
450:
443:
441:
439:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
397:
395:
390:
385:
382:
381:KrakatoaKatie
378:permissions.
377:
373:
368:
364:
360:
356:
350:
348:
343:
337:
332:
327:
321:
315:
314:Donald Albury
309:
303:
298:
293:
287:
281:
276:
266:
264:
259:
258:
252:
250:
246:
245:hammer prices
241:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:proof of work
214:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
179:
169:
165:
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
105:
97:
95:
87:
86:
78:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
1379:The Signpost
1378:
1352:
1308:
1307:
1264:
1253:
1212:
1207:
1141:
1106:
1057:
1041:
1008:
1001:
933:
926:
910:Phil Bridger
827:
821:
812:
803:This website
786:Warehouse 13
785:
692:In the media
681:
670:all comments
599:
590:
580:
558:
531:
527:
523:
512:
487:
463:
458:
444:
437:
403:
386:
351:
331:The Signpost
330:
272:
257:In the media
254:
253:
242:
215:
192:
94:PDF download
1417:Suggestions
1213:empirically
1146:and foolish
754:transcluded
687:Serendipity
575:Brief notes
419:Less Unless
363:Newyorkbrad
359:David Fuchs
308:Enterprisey
144:X (Twitter)
1355:(WP:BN) ☆
1208:trying out
1022:Smallbones
946:Smallbones
790:Randy Kryn
610:, and the
423:Trialpears
336:Guerillero
292:Beeblebrox
230:ransomware
222:blockchain
203:Christie's
168:Smallbones
82:Share this
77:Contribute
22:2021-12-28
1411:Subscribe
1254:something
1028:smalltalk
952:smalltalk
838:Regards,
815:PleasrDAO
758:talk page
727:Crossword
488:Proposal
431:Blablubbs
376:checkuser
372:oversight
342:Thryduulf
302:Wugapodes
277:members (
1429:Category
1406:Newsroom
1401:Archives
1256:" vibe.
1246:Andrybak
1217:andrybak
1132:}} me!)
1072:Ethereum
1044:require
965:pet rock
889:The Grid
857:The Grid
633:Previous
466:coverage
464:Signpost
462:earlier
440:coverage
438:Signpost
436:earlier
411:TJMSmith
407:Hog Farm
355:Casliber
197:of the "
134:Facebook
124:LinkedIn
114:Mastodon
20: |
1340:wbm1058
1309:Calidum
969:llywrch
874:LuLaRoe
829:scam.'"
717:Gallery
620:Florida
496:at the
427:BusterD
347:Banedon
1250:Isaacl
1232:isaacl
1150:Gouleg
1103:Bilorv
1054:Bilorv
998:. --
732:Humour
618:, not
616:Russia
608:Taiwan
602:: The
345:, and
326:Cabayi
323:, and
275:ArbCom
154:Reddit
104:E-mail
1396:About
1155:hound
1152:🛋️ /
1128:) ({{
1002:Green
927:Green
367:SoWhy
16:<
1391:Home
1363:talk
1344:talk
1326:talk
1294:talk
1265:Sdkb
1259:{{u|
1236:talk
1221:talk
1215:. —
1198:talk
1183:talk
1144:naco
1130:ping
1126:talk
1109:talk
1101:. —
1086:talk
1060:talk
973:talk
914:talk
895:talk
863:talk
844:talk
840:HaeB
794:talk
641:Next
596:for.
566:, –
532:The
500:. –
429:and
391:. –
374:and
365:and
320:Izno
289:and
166:and
1358:Bri
1322:BDD
1248:, @
1173:Bri
1081:Bri
1048:or
1042:can
898:)
866:)
513:An
442:).
195:NFT
164:Bri
162:By
79:—
1431::
1365:)
1346:)
1328:)
1320:--
1296:)
1271:}}
1238:)
1223:)
1200:)
1185:)
1113:)
1088:)
1064:)
975:)
916:)
908:.
846:)
796:)
631:←
425:,
421:,
417:,
413:,
409:,
361:,
357:,
339:,
329:.
317:,
311:,
305:,
283:,
260:–
251:.
1385:.
1361:(
1342:(
1324:(
1292:(
1244:@
1234:(
1219:(
1196:(
1181:(
1175::
1171:@
1148:-
1124:(
1105:(
1084:(
1056:(
1031:)
1025:(
1009:C
971:(
955:)
949:(
934:C
912:(
892:(
860:(
842:(
826:'
792:(
775:.
765:.
672:)
668:(
569:S
563:B
503:B
449:S
394:S
263:S
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
