290:(NFCC) policy permits its use only when no free alternative is available, and ensures it does not supplant the original market role of the material. Usage should be minimal, involving the fewest items and only essential portions, ideally in low resolution to prevent copyright issues. Non-free content must have been previously published with permission, be encyclopedic, significantly enhance the article, and comply with Knowledge's media policy. Non-free content must be used in at least one article, and is not permitted on disambiguation pages. Each use requires a detailed description page that includes the source, copyright information, an appropriate tag, and a clear rationale specific to each article.
360:
130:
150:
581:
110:
283:, meaning it may only be used if the article specifically discusses the photo or the latter significantly assists in depicting the event. The debate arose from the argument that the image could not be justified under fair use, as it was not essential for understanding the article on the assassination attempt and it was not discussed in it. It was also noted that fair use might be applicable if an article about the photograph itself existed.
1110:). This is why the Commons file was deleted: It was a file for which no valid license can be provided and that's the end of it, there's no fair use discussion to be had there. An average reader will not understand the difference between the Commons and the English Knowledge, and will probably be curious as to why one project deleted when another did not (the answer is pretty banal, and as such, it should be demystified). Regards—
140:
36:
160:
120:
717:
1123:
795:
123:
192:
170:
318:. On Knowledge, decisions are made through consensus and the quality of arguments, not by vote count. Attempting to influence the outcome by notifying individuals, especially those with established opinions, is considered inappropriate and undermines the consensus process. Given the forum's varied viewpoints, it remains debatable whether canvassing occurred.
535:
With the discussion comprising approximately 200,000 bytes and the image approximately 18,000 bytes, the discussion is around eleven times the size of the image. Among roughly two hundred comments, many supported retaining the content — but many lacked detailed reasoning, or based their rationales on
230:
rapidly spread across media platforms worldwide. It was uploaded to
Knowledge and a discussion subsequently was opened about whether the image aligns with its image use policy. This discussion was shared across multiple online platforms, encouraging broad participation; including, but not limited to,
478:
The prevailing sentiment of comments based on image policy favoured deletion, reflecting a rigorous adherence to NFCC and fair use guidelines. Despite acknowledging the photograph's historical value, many editors emphasized compliance with copyright policies. The debate significantly shifted when an
90:
418:
Some editors argued that including the image infringed copyright laws and
Knowledge's policies on non-free content. They contended that the photograph served primarily as a visual aid rather than a crucial element of the article, thereby failing to meet fair use criteria. Concerns were raised about
1016:
Since the discussion started, Trump raised fist photographs was made (and kept in AFD), for which NFCC#1 would also be true. Multiple !votes were later changed to that effect. As such, the image now meets all criteria for being kept, but only for the photographs article. There is consensus against
699:
belief about how internet law works. First, the server location is entirely irrelevant under internet law, and second, Knowledge's servers are located around the globe (including the
Netherlands, France, Singapore, and Brazil). My suggestion would be to say, "To protect the assets of the Wikimedia
163:
321:
Recent Trump-related debates on
Knowledge have seen significant participation from new accounts, with some politically-influenced votes lacking detailed policy reasoning. It has also been noted that some of these new accounts appear to be highly knowledgeable about Knowledge policy. Whilst it is
913:
Huh? When you wrote, "The prevailing sentiment leant towards deletion", how are you measuring "prevailing sentiment"? Are you saying the arguments for deletion were stronger? That is your right to write, but that would turn this piece from news to opinion, and it should be marked as such (the
133:
651:
835:
Yes, "delete" was in the lead for the first few hours, but it wasn't a huge margin (I think at most, it was in the lead by 6 votes). Within 5 hours, it was tied. "Keep" took the lead after 7 hours and then maintained it for the remaining 5 days. And the keeps would certainly say
173:
940:. Me saying "The debate significantly shifted" is based on the discussion shifting significantly after the article about the photo was created. The report is a thousand-word summary, it's not meant to be a detailed account; I'd be way past my word count, if it was!
153:
278:
regarding whether its inclusion on
Knowledge complied with the site's image use policy. At the time the discussion began, there was no dedicated article for the photograph. Due to the copyright restrictions on this photo, it fell under
298:
The discussion focused exclusively on whether the image met the NFCC requirements, not on its cultural or historical significance. Comments not supported by policy were to be given less weight by the closer of the discussion.
255:(AP) when he captured the photograph, is consistently credited alongside the AP, indicating a joint agreement. At the time, his camera was connected to a hotspot, enabling the photograph to be immediately sent to his editors.
474:
to the AP or Vucci to seek permission for a free licence. It was proposed that the image could warrant its own article if it achieved independent notability, which would align better with NFCC criteria.
847:
When an article was first created about 11 hours into the discussion, the "keeps" were ahead by 39-26 and that didn't change. The debate did not shift significantly after the creation of the article.
466:
that the photograph's inclusion would not adversely affect the photographer's commercial interests, given that the photographer himself posted the photograph on his own social media accounts.
938:
This is not a discussion on how significant or iconic the photo is, but rather how it satisfies NFCC. Comments unsupported by policy will be given less weight by the closer of this discussion
399:
for the event and the article. Supporters emphasized that the photograph's extensive media coverage and its role in enhancing understanding justify its inclusion under fair use provisions.
777:
996:
the article was created. Also, as pointed out by
Cryptic, when the article was created, it was immediately turned into a redirect. What you wrote is just not borne out by the facts.
338:. Editors are generally expected to use only one account to maintain accountability and trust, though there are legitimate reasons for having multiple accounts. A Google search for
96:
419:
respecting the photographer's rights and the potential commercial impact. Others recommended removing the image in accordance with
Knowledge's policies and fair use standards,
666:
247:
grants photographers exclusive rights to their original works upon creation. However, photographs taken by an employee within the scope of their employment are classified as '
528:
500:
914:
Discussion Report is news, not opinion, right?). And when you wrote, "The debate significantly shifted", what are you referring to? What shifted, and from what to what?
805:
was created by
Hallucegenia, as the report says. Levivich created theirs ten hours after Hallucegenia, as you have confirmed in your comment. This is not about any page
30:
Internet users flock to
Knowledge to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo: Iconic photograph, invalid fair use exemption criterion #3a claimant, or both?
143:
615:
567:
1130:. I think it's more informative now. I'll note that I also use writing these reports to teach myself policy, and I didn't even know Commons had a different policy!
741:
We started a conversation about this in the
Newsroom but it wasn't quite figured out in time for publication. Glad a knowledgeable reader helped clarify this. ☆
887:. The report is gives more weight to policy-based arguments because the policy-based arguments were given more weight by the closer; I'm assuming in line with
610:
251:'. In these cases, the employer, rather than the photographer, typically holds the copyright and all associated exclusive rights. Evan Vucci, employed by the
625:
598:
1143:
1067:. I'll note that this was probably unnecessary as it's made clear throughout the report that non-policy comments were given less weight by the closer.
1080:
1054:
1032:
1005:
983:
953:
923:
908:
862:
259:
permit limited use of copyrighted photographs without permission for purposes such as criticism, commentary, news reporting, education, and research.
826:
635:
407:
is available, with many proposing that a dedicated article on the photograph could support its continued use. Additionally, the photograph was later
831:
I don't want to speak for Cryptic, and different observers may of course come to different conclusions, but I disagree with the article saying that
630:
592:
55:
44:
736:
1114:
776:
nearly ten hours later, and then, seeing an article had already been attempted, effectively history-merged Hallucegenia's attempt into his own.
240:
787:
640:
620:
752:
709:
1209:
458:
that the widespread availability of the original image and low resolution of this file support its fair use under Knowledge's guidelines.
671:
881:
Recent Trump-related debates on Knowledge have seen significant participation from new accounts, with some politically-influenced votes
334:
accounts. Sockpuppetry on Knowledge involves misusing multiple accounts to deceive or manipulate, such as by disrupting discussions or
766:
678:
113:
780:
215:
21:
256:
1185:
1157:
1107:
851:
1180:
1175:
700:
Foundation in the United States, the Knowledge community adheres to US copyright law.", or something along these lines. --
287:
1170:
960:
And when you wrote, "The debate significantly shifted", what are you referring to? What shifted, and from what to what?
244:
655:
523:
Multiple editors preferred keeping the image but only for its own article, per NFCC#8. Since the discussion started,
391:
value. It was generally agreed upon that a low resolution and cropped format mitigated potential commercial impact;
412:
833:
The prevailing sentiment leant towards deletion, reflecting a rigorous adherence to NFCC and fair use guidelines.
201:
Non-free images are permitted solely for use within articles on Knowledge, and not projectspace pages like this
845:
The debate significantly shifted when an article specifically about the photograph was created by Hallucegenia.
802:
773:
758:
524:
223:
206:
1165:
580:
427:
due to copyright issues as supporting this stance. However, it is important to note that Wikimedia Commons
49:
35:
17:
342:
reveals that discussions on the assassination attempt attracted attention on various websites, including
302:
Within twelve minutes of the discussion being initiated, it was posted to a members-only forum thread on
1103:
1038:
929:
512:
504:
488:
480:
471:
463:
455:
447:
443:
420:
408:
404:
396:
388:
311:
271:
263:
374:
was compared to the photo taken by Vucci. The use of this photo is allowed on Knowledge and on
359:
307:
293:
1191:
387:
Supporters of the photograph's inclusion on Knowledge cited its significant historical and
234:
779:
The reason the two versions appear similar is that they both reused content from the main
531:), for which NFCC#1 would also be true. Multiple !votes were later changed to that effect.
8:
1137:
1111:
1074:
1048:
1026:
977:
947:
902:
888:
820:
770:
730:
467:
335:
275:
91:
Internet users flock to Knowledge to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
1001:
919:
892:
858:
459:
435:
323:
928:
As I mentioned, I measured "prevailing sentiment" against the 'Note to newcomers' box
723:. I fixed the wording by essentially paraphrasing what's written in the link. Thanks.
693:"Knowledge hosts its servers in the United States, placing it under US jurisdiction."
662:
484:
424:
315:
243:
in servers located in the United States and is maintained in accordance with US law.
1102:
about how the Commons' policy differs from that of the English Knowledge insofar as
428:
252:
191:
869:
On Knowledge, decisions are made through consensus and the quality of arguments,
850:(My source for vote counts, which isn't 100% accurate, is the vote history tool:
496:
439:
371:
1131:
1068:
1042:
1020:
988:
Yes, and that's factually untrue. The debate did not shift from delete to keep
971:
941:
896:
814:
724:
705:
688:
508:
451:
331:
303:
280:
183:
536:
political views rather than Knowledge policies, resulting in their dismissal.
1203:
1060:
997:
915:
854:
762:
748:
492:
400:
392:
379:
327:
248:
1065:
The prevailing sentiment of comments based on image policy favoured deletion
784:
367:
219:
314:
of a banner at the top of the discussion, which is usually used to deter
267:
885:
based their rationales on political views rather than Knowledge policies
970:. This suggests that the debate shifted away from leaning to deletion.
840:
votes reflected "a rigorous adherence to NFCC and fair use guidelines".
227:
1011:
701:
516:
743:
933:
351:
895:, and the 'Note to newcomers' box at the top of the discussion.
1100:
previous removal from Wikimedia Commons due to copyright issues
347:
551:
4chan threads are typically auto-pruned after a few hours, so
877:
Comments not supported by policy were to be given less weight
343:
1019:; not someone who is writing a thousand-word summary of it.
966:, and the final sentence of that same paragraph starts with
716:
340:
site: "trump" "wikipedia" after:2024/07/12 before:2024/07/16
270:
two hours after it was taken. Twenty-three minutes later, a
765:, not Hallucegenia. Hallucegenia's version, initially at
772:
was quickly redirected. Levivich independently created
691:, interesting story! One minor correction: The sentence
442:
advocated for retaining the photograph, emphasizing its
1010:
This is a discussion you should have with the closer,
511:. The main discussion about the image was eventually
519:with consensus to keep the image, stating in part:
676:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
403:suggested that the image should remain on the site
411:by an anonymous IP user to images captured at the
1201:
1037:I do see what you mean. As a result, I have now
964:The prevailing sentiment leant towards deletion
479:article specifically about the photograph was
181:
1014:, where they said in their closing argument
1104:that project categorically rejects fair use
330:, this can also suggest the possibility of
813:which was created first by Hallucegenia.
767:Photograph of Donald Trump after shooting
68:File:The alleged photo trump fist etc.png
962:, the paragraph in question starts with
1108:as required by the Wikimedia Foundation
992:the article was created; that happened
781:Attempted assassination of Donald Trump
679:
205:article. The actual image can be found
14:
1202:
867:I respectfully disagree with you, per
695:expresses a widely-held, but actually
54:
29:
1210:Knowledge Signpost archives 2024-07
27:
1017:also using it in the main article.
579:
358:
354:, further stimulating discussion.
306:, a site known for discussing and
231:those unfamiliar with the policy.
56:
34:
28:
1221:
661:These comments are automatically
1121:
968:The debate significantly shifted
793:
715:
413:assassination of John F. Kennedy
190:
168:
158:
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
672:add the page to your watchlist
555:is a better site to search on.
545:
470:questioned the possibility of
13:
1:
774:Trump raised fist photographs
759:Trump raised-fist photographs
525:Trump raised fist photographs
1098:Hello. Please add a note at
1041:more details to the report.
647:
324:treat newcomers with respect
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
1158:delivered to your talk page
507:on the grounds that it was
370:after the assassination of
10:
1226:
423:its previous removal from
397:provided essential context
1144:18:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
1115:02:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
1081:21:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
1063:, I've now changed it to
1055:20:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
1033:20:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
1006:20:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
984:20:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
954:20:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
924:19:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
909:19:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
863:18:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
827:13:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
799:Not done – please clarify
788:13:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
753:17:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
737:13:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
710:10:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
509:unlikely to be successful
444:potentially-iconic status
288:non-free content criteria
405:until a free alternative
216:attempted assassination
669:. To follow comments,
584:
533:
363:
39:
843:I also disagree with
721:Partially implemented
583:
521:
378:because it is in the
362:
308:criticizing Knowledge
272:discussion was opened
38:
803:page about the photo
665:from this article's
310:. This prompted the
572:"Discussion report"
505:procedurally closed
257:Fair use exceptions
241:stores its database
222:on 13 July 2024, a
656:Discuss this story
585:
364:
214:Shortly after the
45:← Back to Contents
40:
871:not by vote count
809:, it's about the
680:purging the cache
616:News from the WMF
606:Discussion report
425:Wikimedia Commons
328:assume good faith
88:Discussion report
50:View Latest Issue
1217:
1194:
1153:Want the latest
1140:
1134:
1129:
1125:
1124:
1077:
1071:
1051:
1045:
1029:
1023:
980:
974:
950:
944:
905:
899:
823:
817:
797:
796:
746:
733:
727:
719:
683:
681:
675:
654:
603:
595:
588:
571:
556:
549:
434:Editors such as
341:
281:non-free content
266:to Knowledge by
253:Associated Press
245:US copyright law
194:
186:
172:
171:
162:
161:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
62:
60:
58:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1190:
1188:
1183:
1178:
1173:
1168:
1161:
1150:
1149:
1138:
1132:
1122:
1120:
1075:
1069:
1049:
1043:
1027:
1021:
978:
972:
948:
942:
903:
897:
821:
815:
794:
761:was created by
742:
731:
725:
685:
677:
670:
659:
658:
652:+ Add a comment
650:
646:
645:
644:
596:
591:
589:
586:
575:
574:
569:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
550:
546:
529:and kept in AFD
395:argued that it
384:
383:
372:John F. Kennedy
366:Photo taken by
356:
339:
296:
237:
195:
188:
187:
180:
179:
178:
169:
159:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
103:
100:
89:
85:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1223:
1213:
1212:
1189:
1184:
1179:
1174:
1169:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1152:
1151:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1057:
1035:
956:
848:
841:
756:
755:
739:
660:
657:
649:
648:
643:
638:
633:
628:
623:
618:
613:
611:News and notes
608:
602:
590:
578:
577:
576:
566:
565:
564:
558:
557:
543:
542:
538:
468:Lordseriouspig
450:significance.
429:does not allow
385:
365:
357:
304:Wikipediocracy
295:
294:Stop the count
292:
276:Di (they-them)
262:The image was
236:
233:
212:
211:
197:
196:
189:
177:
176:
166:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
105:
104:
101:
95:
94:
93:
92:
87:
86:
82:
79:
76:
73:
70:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1222:
1211:
1208:
1207:
1205:
1193:
1187:
1182:
1177:
1172:
1167:
1159:
1156:
1145:
1141:
1135:
1128:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1082:
1078:
1072:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1056:
1052:
1046:
1040:
1036:
1034:
1030:
1024:
1018:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
987:
986:
985:
981:
975:
969:
965:
961:
957:
955:
951:
945:
939:
935:
931:
927:
926:
925:
921:
917:
912:
911:
910:
906:
900:
894:
890:
886:
882:
878:
874:
872:
866:
865:
864:
860:
856:
852:
849:
846:
842:
839:
834:
830:
829:
828:
824:
818:
812:
808:
804:
800:
792:
791:
790:
789:
786:
782:
778:
775:
771:
768:
764:
760:
754:
750:
745:
740:
738:
734:
728:
722:
718:
714:
713:
712:
711:
707:
703:
698:
694:
690:
682:
673:
668:
664:
653:
642:
639:
637:
634:
632:
629:
627:
624:
622:
619:
617:
614:
612:
609:
607:
604:
600:
594:
587:In this issue
582:
573:
554:
548:
544:
541:
537:
532:
530:
526:
520:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
476:
473:
469:
465:
461:
460:Jason211pacem
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
436:Lewis Hulbert
432:
430:
426:
422:
416:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
381:
380:public domain
377:
373:
369:
361:
355:
353:
349:
345:
337:
336:vote-stacking
333:
329:
325:
322:important to
319:
317:
313:
309:
305:
300:
291:
289:
284:
282:
277:
273:
269:
265:
260:
258:
254:
250:
249:work for hire
246:
242:
235:America first
232:
229:
225:
221:
217:
210:
208:
202:
199:
198:
193:
185:
175:
167:
165:
157:
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
106:
98:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
1154:
1126:
1099:
1097:
1064:
1015:
993:
989:
967:
963:
959:
937:
889:WP:CONSENSUS
884:
880:
876:
870:
868:
844:
837:
832:
810:
806:
798:
757:
720:
696:
692:
686:
626:In the media
605:
599:all comments
593:22 July 2024
552:
547:
539:
534:
522:
485:Hallucegenia
477:
472:reaching out
433:
417:
386:
376:The Signpost
375:
368:Mary Moorman
320:
301:
297:
286:Knowledge's
285:
261:
238:
226:captured by
220:Donald Trump
213:
204:
200:
114:PDF download
57:22 July 2024
1192:Suggestions
1160:each month?
893:WP:NOTAVOTE
883:, and per
811:actual page
663:transcluded
389:educational
164:X (Twitter)
783:article. —
540:References
527:was made (
501:discussion
499:, and the
497:LilianaUwU
448:historical
440:Vivaporius
431:fair use.
332:sockpuppet
316:canvassing
239:Knowledge
228:Evan Vucci
224:photograph
102:Share this
97:Contribute
22:2024-07-22
1186:Subscribe
1133:Svampesky
1112:Alalch E.
1070:Svampesky
1044:Svampesky
1022:Svampesky
973:Svampesky
943:Svampesky
898:Svampesky
816:Svampesky
726:Svampesky
697:incorrect
689:Svampesky
667:talk page
636:Crossword
489:nominated
464:contended
452:Alalch E.
312:placement
184:Svampesky
1204:Category
1181:Newsroom
1176:Archives
1155:Signpost
1061:Levivich
998:Levivich
936:reading
916:Levivich
855:Levivich
763:Levivich
631:Obituary
570:Previous
487:, later
462:further
409:compared
401:Mhatopzz
393:Coulomb1
264:uploaded
203:Signpost
154:Facebook
144:LinkedIn
134:Mastodon
20: |
785:Cryptic
493:deleted
481:created
994:before
930:placed
879:, per
875:, per
801:. The
641:Humour
553:4plebs
513:closed
503:being
491:to be
456:argued
454:later
421:citing
350:, and
348:Reddit
268:Bremps
174:Reddit
124:E-mail
1171:About
1039:added
990:after
838:their
807:title
621:Essay
344:4chan
16:<
1166:Home
1139:talk
1127:Done
1076:talk
1050:talk
1028:talk
1012:Soni
1002:talk
979:talk
949:talk
920:talk
904:talk
859:talk
822:talk
749:talk
732:talk
706:talk
702:Gnom
517:Soni
446:and
438:and
326:and
207:here
74:GFDL
71:JPxG
958:On
932:by
853:.)
744:Bri
687:Hi
515:by
495:by
483:by
274:by
218:of
182:By
99:—
83:300
1206::
1142:)
1079:)
1053:)
1031:)
1004:)
982:)
952:)
934:Ca
922:)
907:)
891:,
861:)
825:)
769:,
751:)
735:)
708:)
568:←
415:.
346:,
1136:(
1106:(
1073:(
1059:@
1047:(
1025:(
1000:(
976:(
946:(
918:(
901:(
873:.
857:(
819:(
747:(
729:(
704:(
684:.
674:.
601:)
597:(
382:.
352:X
209:.
80:0
77:0
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
