1385:! I have never heard of him and have never had any interaction with him before and yet I was targeted by this user! More than that, a team that aims to make Knowledge bigger, better and more accurate every day (of which I am member), was also the target of his attacks! He blatantly lied by claiming that we are vandalizing pages, which is not true! Quite the contrary, today our made the 1st Act, creating a new article and edited the other related ones to make them in accordance, using primary and many secondary sources as reference for it! Also, everybody can see our historic of contribution before that, always to improve Knowledge! I don't know if he got scared with the name of the team, that use words like "revolutionize", but that is just to create an impact to make our group grow and achieve our goal, which is to
886:), canvassed talkpage comments and more trolling on my talkpage (including from another editor involved in the off-wiki stuff). Given this is happening off-wiki and taking into consideration outing rules, how can/should it be reported? Can social media posts be linked to to demonstrate what is happening? No criticism of Arbcom members who are volunteers and have real life commitments, but in my experience emails to Arbs often aren't responded to quickly (or at all in some cases), so I think there needs to be a way to report this on-wiki. Cheers,
97:
362:
1206:
for the other ones the topic-ban was partly there in case there wasn't enough for site ban as happened with
DemocraticLuntz? I'm aware that a topic ban could and probably would be part of any successful appeal. Also that all the others who received both technically could appeal them both at the same time (although I suspect doing so would probably harm their chances of the site ban appeal succeeding).
973:"Starting in 2026 and checked yearly afterwards, this designation expires on 1 January if no sanctions have been logged in the preceding 2 years." Am I missing something or shouldn't this mean either 2027 or that would it expire in 2026 if no additional sanctions are recorded? (Otherwise, the 2026 check doesn't make sense to me since these four sanctions would be noted.) --
1162:
Looking at it again, it looks to me like some otherwise levelheaded editors let themselves get swept up into the whole "major change without discussion first" accusations. It wasn't really a major change, it was one infobox template vs. another. Barely even a bold move unless you happen to be someone
695:
This page is for discussing announcements relating to the
Arbitration Committee. Editors commenting here are required to act with appropriate decorum. While grievances, complaints, or criticism of arbitration decisions are frequently posted here, you are expected to present them without being rude or
1102:
This is part of the issue – the off-wiki campaigning was ultimately successful in changing virtually every article (probably somewhere between 50 and 100) they wanted to, either by edit warring or canvassed talkpage consensuses (one of which overrode a previous RfC). The latest bout has seen several
1205:
I don't follow arbcom cases that closely so forgive me if the answer to this is obvious but why wasn't
Talleyrand6 topic banned? I did look at the proposed decision and didn't see a definite answer. Was it because they were already blocked and it seemed clear they weren't going to be unblocked; but
1056:
And now it makes sense why the word "logged" is used instead of issued, which I didn't pick up on until now. Thank you for the clarification. I just didn't consider enough that there is a difference between a sanction that comes directly from a case and a sanction that comes from enforcement.
1075:
This explains the bizarreness that was going on at South
African general elections in May/June. I was chasing edit wars for days on ~ten articles over an infobox. It was crazy, the level of passionate participation over a not-that-major change at multiple not-that-prominent articles, but the
1032:
doesn't have arbcom's sanctions.) So while perhaps the wording could be clarified, to my read, the wording already means that the sanctions would expire in 2026 if no additional/admin sanctions are issued. Although on a related note, does this mean CTOP expires if admins are making new page
881:
Separately, one matter that wasn't addressed in the outcome – how should we deal with future disruption of this kind, particularly the off-wiki canvassing? One of the now-banned editors has been at it again, resulting in disruption on
Georgian election articles (see e.g.
1033:
restrictions but not issuing any editor sanctions? Was this intended? If new page restrictions count as sanctions, can an admin "renew" a page restriction which they feel is still needed for the purpose of keeping CTOP in place? Also does a warning count as a sanction?
1140:
Also, re the last point, numerous editors (some of whom are fairly longstanding) enthusiastically joined in the disruption and have not faced any consequences. I personally don't think this should be tolerated, but again the question is how to deal with them.
821:, thanks for clarifying that, although the more I think about it the more it seems overly-broad. By my read this means every single election in the history of the human race that was not supranational is now designated as a CT. Now, the case is called
1076:
participants seemed plausible, few were brand new, I figured they were all members of some wikiproject who all just happened to have the same opinion that the new infobox was "ugly". And in the end, what I now realize were meatpuppets got
1177:
There was a large amount of disruption on French election articles that went well beyond the infobox matter and involved blindly reverting a wide range of changes, including properly referencing and correcting election results tables.
779:
As worded "the results of any national or sub-national election" would be any election result that is national or below, not just one level below. That would include the results from state, county, and town/municipal elections
907:
Can't do much to really stop a banned user, but ECP should probably be enough to stop most of the canvassed edits? And if someone is showing up again and again in the topic area in a disruptive way, that's what AE is for.
947:
I am not sure this is enough – for example, you've protected the
Georgian election article, but in the state that the offline canvassers wanted it. IMO action needs to include rollbacking to the pre-canvassing state.
843:
I agree it is very broad, but unfortunately so was the scope of the disruption, which wasn't limited to the level of government, geography, nationality, or timeframe. Narrowing the scope to one level below national,
1220:
Talleyrand6 wasn't topic-banned because their ArbCom-confirmed block (now siteban) made it moot. The others weren't blocked at the time of the case, which is why both topic and sitebans were on the table for them.
716:
What is a "sub-national election"? Does that specifically mean "elections exactly one level down from national", or more generally "any election below national level", which basically means "all elections"?
1382:
708:
781:
1047:
Your read of the timing is correct. As for warnings and page restrictions, I personally think they are included. The intention is that the CT should only be around if it is being used. --
935:
1333:
1163:
passionate about infoboxes. But there was so much gnashing of teeth from the meatpuppets that all I can think is it made usually levelheaded editors just kind of get caught up in it.
699:
732:
1029:
583:
696:
hostile. Comments that are uncivil may be removed without warning. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions.
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
1103:
Georgian election articles changed to the canvassers' desired state. While the editors driving it can be blocked, their meatpuppets still succeed. How do we stop this?
620:
452:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
700:
385:
1313:
614:
1424:
1398:
1295:
1438:
1377:
Hello, unfortunately I believe here is my only option to be heard for measures to be taken against that user! I was the target of an attack by the user @
870:
1269:
765:
1360:
744:
578:
1232:
857:
831:
610:
1246:
1066:
1042:
1010:
996:
982:
1051:
964:
942:
1452:
1215:
1194:
1172:
1157:
1133:
1119:
902:
552:
1097:
402:
921:
809:
572:
417:
395:
62:
866:: Very few articles are entirely under the CT, just the parts on the results of the election. The politics and campaign are CT-free. --
653:
605:
543:
462:
390:
80:
1307:
568:
1327:
883:
679:
548:
558:
538:
421:
1429:
This is premature given that the ANI thread was just opened. Participate there and have the ANI thread resolved somewhat first.
563:
476:
457:
526:
825:
and 99.99% of
Wikipedians have not seen any of the evidence, so maybe this was intentional, but it seems overly broad to me.
597:
488:
1443:
I have blocked CrazyLoverFutbolLoko for one week for disruptive editing, including factionalism and battleground behavior.
1372:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
521:
17:
1464:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1349:
DNFTT. Filed in the wrong place anyway. An established, uninvolved editor is welcome to bring a case if th ey see merit.
447:
376:
1407:
The other user involved in the dispute (which I was uninvolved in until the ANI thread) has already been warned for
1189:
1152:
1114:
959:
897:
760:
513:
353:
76:
848:
governments, or elections within the last 200 years wouldn't have covered all of the disruption, for example. -
1394:
499:
442:
72:
749:
I assume it means all elections (although it begs the question whether supranational elections are in scope).
738:
Yeah, I have to agree, the meaning of this should be clarified, to do otherwise invites wiki-lawyering at AE.
1301:
1264:
1227:
1088:. Also wondering if the editors involved should be notified of this finding, for their own future reference.
785:
434:
987:
If no sanctions are recorded between the close of the case and 1 January 2026, the designation will expire.
1341:
829:
742:
672:
484:
382:
494:
412:
340:
1355:
1282:
917:
533:
323:
1390:
930:: Any admin can protect pages as a CT action. CUs can block accounts based on off wiki evidence (per
721:
includes a discussion of the results of the New York State
Assembly elections. Does this mean that
1259:
1222:
1242:
1081:
931:
863:
838:
826:
739:
665:
1408:
1062:
1006:
978:
1383:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Group of WP:NOTHERE editors "banding together"
1417:
1350:
1288:
372:
41:
48:
1300:
Indeed. That user page, however accurate, is merely trolling, and they should be blocked.
8:
1448:
1434:
1211:
1184:
1147:
1109:
1038:
954:
892:
755:
1275:
1253:
1238:
1168:
1129:
1093:
1019:
992:
792:
would not be a contentious topic, though the results of elections he was in would be.
729:
33:
1124:
ECP maybe? That would cut some of it down, probably. Like this new entry here below.
1058:
1002:
974:
1412:
1378:
1048:
1028:
which intended for sanctions and restrictions issues by admins under CTOP. (E.g.
1025:
939:
867:
853:
805:
788:, as examples. The contentious topic covers election results, so the entirety of
1444:
1430:
1207:
1179:
1142:
1104:
1034:
949:
927:
913:
887:
795:
789:
750:
722:
718:
1030:
Knowledge:Arbitration enforcement log/2022#Conduct in deletion-related editing
637:
319:
1164:
1125:
1089:
988:
845:
774:
726:
96:
641:
1085:
1001:
Ah, with both replies I now get it. Thank you for the clarification. --
1237:
personally i think number 57 should be stripped of his admin privileges
325:
849:
816:
801:
909:
361:
1024:
AFAIK, sanctions and restrictions issued by arbcom aren't logged at
639:
321:
800:
The wording of the CT would not cover supranational elections. -
642:
725:
is now a CT? I would hope not. This could use clarifying.
643:
326:
1387:
make
Knowledge bigger, better and more accurate every day
784:
or regional, department/canton, and municipal elections
701:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical elections
65:, including clarification of the specifics of notices.
79:. To report a violation of a Committee decision, see
90:
1328:Changes to the CheckUser team, September 2024
673:
334:This page has archives. Sections older than
680:
666:
81:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
75:. For information on the Committee, see
14:
63:formal announcements by the Committee
1368:The following discussion is closed.
453:Clarification and Amendment requests
25:
18:Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee
936:the procedure from this 2022 motion
23:
24:
1474:
338:may be automatically archived by
1460:The discussion above is closed.
360:
95:
77:Knowledge:Arbitration Committee
61:This page is for discussion of
1453:01:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
1439:01:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
1425:01:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
1399:01:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
1361:02:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
1314:14:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
1296:15:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1270:06:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1247:02:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1233:18:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1216:14:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1195:16:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1173:16:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1158:16:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1134:16:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1120:15:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1098:12:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1067:05:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1052:13:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1043:12:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1011:05:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
997:12:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
983:07:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
965:15:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
943:13:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
922:06:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
903:01:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
871:07:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
858:23:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
832:21:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
810:02:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
766:01:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
745:23:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
733:23:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
73:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests
13:
1:
1084:should be reviewed. Pinging
584:Conflict of interest reports
71:To request arbitration, see
7:
413:Search archived proceedings
10:
1479:
1342:Attack by user SirMemeGod
458:Arbitrator motion requests
68:What this page is not for:
31:
1462:Please do not modify it.
1370:Please do not modify it.
1405:Non-arbitrator comment:
1389:! Thank you very much!
1080:ownership. I wonder if
693:Behaviour on this page:
341:Lowercase sigmabot III
58:What this page is for:
1335:Original announcement
710:Original announcement
654:Track related changes
514:Arbitration Committee
354:Knowledge Arbitration
1391:CrazyLoverFutbolLoko
823:Historical elections
782:in the United States
463:Enforcement requests
391:Guide to arbitration
1371:
864:Just Step Sideways
839:Just Step Sideways
827:Just Step Sideways
740:Just Step Sideways
485:Contentious topics
383:Arbitration policy
1423:
1369:
1274:It seems we have
1023:
934:) if they follow
690:
689:
657:
625:
495:General sanctions
443:All open requests
373:About arbitration
348:
347:
89:
88:
1470:
1422:
1420:
1415:
1358:
1353:
1291:
1290:ADroughtOfVowels
1285:
1276:another partisan
1267:
1257:
1230:
1192:
1187:
1182:
1155:
1150:
1145:
1117:
1112:
1107:
1017:
962:
957:
952:
932:WP:BLOCKEVIDENCE
900:
895:
890:
842:
820:
799:
778:
763:
758:
753:
682:
675:
668:
656:
651:
644:
623:
579:Clerk procedures
571:
529:
500:Editor sanctions
477:Active sanctions
435:Open proceedings
405:
364:
350:
349:
343:
327:
99:
91:
51:
44:
26:
1478:
1477:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1418:
1413:
1409:WP:BATTLEGROUND
1374:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1356:
1351:
1344:
1330:
1289:
1287:
1283:
1265:
1251:
1228:
1190:
1185:
1180:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1115:
1110:
1105:
1026:Knowledge:AELOG
960:
955:
950:
898:
893:
888:
836:
814:
793:
772:
761:
756:
751:
705:
686:
652:
646:
645:
640:
630:
629:
628:
617:
600:
590:
589:
588:
575:
567:
555:
530:
525:
516:
506:
505:
504:
479:
469:
468:
467:
437:
427:
424:
409:
401:
379:
339:
328:
322:
104:
55:
54:
47:
40:
36:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1476:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1427:
1375:
1366:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1343:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1329:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1281:
1261:Jéské Couriano
1235:
1224:Jéské Couriano
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1054:
1015:
1014:
1013:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
924:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
860:
790:Walter Gladwin
770:
769:
768:
723:Walter Gladwin
719:Walter Gladwin
714:
713:
704:
698:
688:
687:
685:
684:
677:
670:
662:
659:
658:
648:
647:
638:
636:
635:
632:
631:
627:
626:
618:
613:
608:
602:
601:
596:
595:
592:
591:
587:
586:
581:
576:
566:
561:
556:
551:
546:
541:
536:
531:
524:
518:
517:
512:
511:
508:
507:
503:
502:
497:
492:
481:
480:
475:
474:
471:
470:
466:
465:
460:
455:
450:
445:
439:
438:
433:
432:
429:
428:
426:
425:
420:
415:
410:
400:
393:
388:
380:
375:
369:
366:
365:
357:
356:
346:
345:
333:
330:
329:
324:
320:
318:
315:
314:
309:
269:
229:
189:
149:
106:
105:
100:
94:
87:
86:
85:
84:
69:
66:
59:
53:
52:
45:
37:
32:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1475:
1463:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1410:
1406:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1373:
1362:
1359:
1354:
1337:
1336:
1332:
1331:
1315:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1305:
1304:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1286:
1277:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1268:
1263:
1262:
1255:
1254:Hthompson2000
1250:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1239:Hthompson2000
1236:
1234:
1231:
1226:
1225:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1204:
1196:
1193:
1188:
1183:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1118:
1113:
1108:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1074:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1053:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1031:
1027:
1021:
1020:edit conflict
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
999:
998:
994:
990:
986:
985:
984:
980:
976:
972:
966:
963:
958:
953:
946:
945:
944:
941:
937:
933:
929:
925:
923:
919:
915:
911:
906:
905:
904:
901:
896:
891:
885:
880:
879:
872:
869:
865:
861:
859:
855:
851:
847:
840:
835:
834:
833:
830:
828:
824:
818:
813:
812:
811:
807:
803:
797:
791:
787:
783:
776:
771:
767:
764:
759:
754:
748:
747:
746:
743:
741:
737:
736:
735:
734:
731:
728:
724:
720:
712:
711:
707:
706:
702:
697:
694:
683:
678:
676:
671:
669:
664:
663:
661:
660:
655:
650:
649:
634:
633:
622:
619:
616:
612:
609:
607:
604:
603:
599:
594:
593:
585:
582:
580:
577:
574:
570:
565:
562:
560:
557:
554:
550:
547:
545:
542:
540:
537:
535:
532:
528:
523:
520:
519:
515:
510:
509:
501:
498:
496:
493:
490:
486:
483:
482:
478:
473:
472:
464:
461:
459:
456:
454:
451:
449:
448:Case requests
446:
444:
441:
440:
436:
431:
430:
423:
419:
416:
414:
411:
408:
404:
399:
397:
394:
392:
389:
387:
384:
381:
378:
374:
371:
370:
368:
367:
363:
359:
358:
355:
352:
351:
342:
337:
332:
331:
317:
316:
313:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
103:
98:
93:
92:
82:
78:
74:
70:
67:
64:
60:
57:
56:
50:
46:
43:
39:
38:
35:
30:
28:
27:
19:
1461:
1404:
1386:
1376:
1367:
1334:
1308:
1306:
1303:SerialNumber
1302:
1280:
1279:
1260:
1223:
1077:
1059:Super Goku V
1003:Super Goku V
975:Super Goku V
822:
715:
709:
692:
691:
406:
398:
335:
109:
101:
1431:– robertsky
1411:behavior.
1379:Sir MemeGod
1357:Mississippi
418:Ban appeals
396:Noticeboard
1082:that close
1049:Guerillero
940:Guerillero
868:Guerillero
624:(pre-2016)
611:Statistics
544:Procedures
1445:Cullen328
1208:Nil Einne
1078:consensus
1035:Nil Einne
928:Number 57
796:Number 57
786:in France
549:Elections
34:Shortcuts
1165:Valereee
1126:Valereee
1090:Valereee
989:Primefac
918:contribs
775:RoySmith
727:RoySmith
102:Archives
1419:MemeGod
846:Western
621:Reports
559:History
539:Members
534:Contact
522:Discuss
386:(CU/OS)
336:10 days
42:WT:AC/N
1258:Why? —
1181:Number
1144:Number
1106:Number
1086:Czello
951:Number
889:Number
752:Number
730:(talk)
703:closed
564:Clerks
422:Report
49:WT:ACN
1309:54129
1266:v^_^v
1229:v^_^v
938:. --
850:Aoidh
817:Aoidh
802:Aoidh
598:Audit
16:<
1449:talk
1435:talk
1395:talk
1352:Star
1243:talk
1212:talk
1169:talk
1130:talk
1094:talk
1063:talk
1039:talk
1007:talk
993:talk
979:talk
914:talk
910:Elli
884:here
854:talk
806:talk
615:Talk
606:Talk
573:Talk
553:Talk
407:Talk
377:Talk
1414:Sir
1381:at
489:Log
1451:)
1437:)
1397:)
1278:.
1245:)
1214:)
1171:)
1132:)
1096:)
1065:)
1057:--
1041:)
1009:)
995:)
981:)
920:)
916:|
856:)
808:)
311:51
307:50
305:,
303:49
301:,
299:48
297:,
295:47
293:,
291:46
289:,
287:45
285:,
283:44
281:,
279:43
277:,
275:42
273:,
271:41
267:40
265:,
263:39
261:,
259:38
257:,
255:37
253:,
251:36
249:,
247:35
245:,
243:34
241:,
239:33
237:,
235:32
233:,
231:31
227:30
225:,
223:29
221:,
219:28
217:,
215:27
213:,
211:26
209:,
207:25
205:,
203:24
201:,
199:23
197:,
195:22
193:,
191:21
187:20
185:,
183:19
181:,
179:18
177:,
175:17
173:,
171:16
169:,
167:15
165:,
163:14
161:,
159:13
157:,
155:12
153:,
151:11
147:10
145:,
141:,
137:,
133:,
129:,
125:,
121:,
117:,
113:,
1447:(
1433:(
1393:(
1284:W
1256::
1252:@
1241:(
1221:—
1210:(
1191:7
1186:5
1167:(
1154:7
1149:5
1128:(
1116:7
1111:5
1092:(
1061:(
1037:(
1022:)
1018:(
1005:(
991:(
977:(
961:7
956:5
926:@
912:(
899:7
894:5
862:@
852:(
841::
837:@
819::
815:@
804:(
798::
794:@
777::
773:@
762:7
757:5
681:e
674:t
667:v
569:+
527:+
491:)
487:(
403:+
344:.
143:9
139:8
135:7
131:6
127:5
123:4
119:3
115:2
111:1
83:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
