571:, with the time span identified inside of parentheses similar to a disambiguation term. This is not about a "Foo" that existed only between 1753 and 1892 that needs to be distinguished from other Foos that existed during other periods of time, but rather about the period of the history of Foo from 1753 to 1892. The time spans look like disambiguation terms, but that's not what they areย โ instead, they are a fundamental part of the identification of the topic. This is not about a topic called "History of Foo", it is a
226:
170:
138:
849:. However, NCUE is a more general titling guideline that is not about the titles of works specifically. For more topically focused guidance, your best bet is probably to look up the titling guideline for the relevant category of work and identify the most appropriate section therein. For instance,
959:
Should the use of the multiplication sign (ร) in article titles be utterly avoided? Given that the guideline clearly points out to avoid the use of characters not found on a standard keyboard, I interpret that it includes the multiplication sign as well. However, and although I know about
740:
a caret be used in an article title? The answer here is, basically, it depends. Generally, titles aim to describe their subject in the plainest
English possible: that is to say, non-alphanumeric characters are generally avoided, and stylizations are generally removed (for instance, we use
749:). For that reason, there's often not a compelling reason to use a caret in an article title. However, there are occasional exceptions; for instance, if the title of a work uses a caret, and that caret is used in the majority of independent sources discussing the work (see
611:, was rejected. There is a substantial number of articles that use this convention, but I am not aware of anywhere that documents it as an accepted article naming convention on Knowledge. Should this convention be described somewhere in
557:
822:
Is there a guideline about article titles for foreign works of art: books, films, paintings, etc. Especially in the cases when there is no "official" or commonly used
English translation or if there are several English translations.
566:
discussion that was just closed, it was concluded that there is a well-established and widely used naming convention for "subarticles" that cover particular time spans within a larger history topic, using names like
674:, inserting "Articles that cover an interval of the history of a longer-duration topic are often entitled as their main overall topic suffixed with a parenthesized indication of the time period, such as
624:
189:
608:
568:
604:
514:
600:
498:
494:
490:
679:
671:
631:
152:
52:
886:
576:
912:
756:
If there's a specific article where you'd like to use a caret in the title, let us know what it is and we can give more specific advice.
148:
838:
87:
665:
647:
946:
930:
880:
809:
792:
769:
874:
870:
765:
643:
510:
506:
502:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
776:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
147:
on
Knowledge. Policies have wide acceptance among editors and are considered a standard for all users to follow. Please review
695:
93:
968:
with several articles that include the sign in their titles. My doubt about this arises from a discussion I started in the
588:
722:
831:
1018:
596:
675:
592:
584:
580:
144:
988:
798:
33:
854:
82:
972:'s talk page. Personally I would prefer to keep the sign, but I wanted to know more opinions on the matter.
921:), I guess it's harmless since it's pointing to the right target, but you're welcome to RfD it if you want.
926:
866:
761:
639:
208:
177:
965:
544:
207:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
73:
850:
204:
817:
705:
185:
563:
181:
37:
918:
I think I've taken care of the
Chauhan issue (caused by sockpuppet hijinks). As for the redirect (
732:
to use the caret in an article title? The answer here is yes; it's not one of the characters that
969:
922:
862:
757:
635:
994:
I see no practical problem with using a multiplication sign if there's a redirect that uses an
961:
954:
196:
156:
111:
890:
691:
661:
620:
746:
942:
908:
842:
653:
118:
8:
846:
827:
733:
200:
63:
861:
features a brief discussion on how to handle non-English names for works of visual art.
1010:
897:
does not. Could somebody knowledgeable please look into resolving this? There is also
742:
103:
78:
919:
984:
750:
59:
527:
687:
657:
616:
937:
903:
802:
785:
715:
858:
558:
Naming convention for "subarticles" of histories, with time spans in parentheses
824:
784:, which like you said that it is used in the majority of independent sources.
523:
180:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the
English Knowledge
1000:
225:
837:
The closest thing to a unified guideline about this topic would probably be
980:
612:
979:-related articles that include the division symbol in the titles as well.
605:
Talk:History of the United States (1776โ1789)#Requested move 16 June 2024
529:
976:
169:
151:
before making any substantive change to this page. Always remember to
853:
and the following section address titling guidance for foreign books;
525:
841:(WP:NCUE), which includes sections on how to approach topics with
607:. The suggestion to rename these to remove the parentheses, as in
894:
143:
The project page associated with this talk page is an official
797:
Could you also take a look at this discussion I open first at
530:
898:
711:
137:
781:
893:
character between the second "a" and the "n", the article
195:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
601:
History of the People's
Republic of China (1989โ2002)
728:
There are two possible questions here. First: is it
615:
or in some other naming convention description? โโ โโ
219:
28:
847:no common English translation in the first place
634:would be a good place to include such guidance?
632:Knowledge:Naming conventions (numbers and dates)
975:P.S: I also have another question now with the
575:of the entire history of Foo. Examples include
538:This page has archives. Sections older than
734:the MediaWiki software prohibits from titles
774:The article I want to create with caret is
630:This proposal seems sensible to me - maybe
839:Knowledge:Naming conventions (use English)
799:Knowledge:Help desk#Caret in article title
714:can be use in titling an article or not?
577:History of the United States (1776โ1789)
881:Zero-width non-joiner in article title
548:when more than 5 sections are present.
855:WP:NCFILM#Non-English language films
603:. The RM discussion can be found at
164:
132:
15:
736:. However, the second question is:
36:for discussing improvements to the
13:
14:
1030:
542:may be automatically archived by
609:History of Foo from 1753 to 1892
589:History of France (1900โpresent)
224:
168:
136:
53:Click here to start a new topic.
1019:08:30, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
989:07:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
947:22:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
931:22:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
913:22:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
843:competing English translations
597:History of Germany (1945โ1990)
149:policy editing recommendations
1:
875:13:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
851:WP:NCBOOKS#Title translations
832:21:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
780:, the debut extended play of
684:episodes (seasons 15โpresent)
676:History of Canada (1960โ1981)
593:History of Russia (1894โ1917)
585:History of Canada (1960โ1981)
581:History of Poland (1918โ1939)
209:contentious topics procedures
50:Put new text under old text.
7:
810:14:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
793:14:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
770:14:21, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
723:10:40, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
58:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
1035:
696:20:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
569:History of Foo (1753โ1892)
101:
1011:
753:), it may be appropriate.
625:23:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
211:before editing this page.
88:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:Skip to table of contents
666:18:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
648:13:38, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
205:normal editorial process
21:
970:Pluto: Urasawa x Tezuka
192:as a contentious topic.
859:MOS:ART#Article titles
818:Tiltes of works of art
706:Caret in article title
545:Lowercase sigmabot III
515:Precision and accuracy
201:standards of behaviour
153:keep cool when editing
83:avoid personal attacks
891:zero-width non-joiner
573:timespan-based subset
182:article titles policy
197:purpose of Knowledge
955:Multiplication sign
923:Extraordinary Writ
863:ModernDayTrilobite
857:covers films; and
805:98๐๐ธ๐ถ๐ด๐๐ธ๐๐
788:98๐๐ธ๐ถ๐ด๐๐ธ๐๐
758:ModernDayTrilobite
718:98๐๐ธ๐ถ๐ด๐๐ธ๐๐
636:ModernDayTrilobite
487:Archives by topic:
178:contentious topics
94:dispute resolution
55:
552:
551:
503:Naming conflict 1
216:
215:
188:, which has been
163:
162:
131:
130:
74:Assume good faith
51:
27:
26:
1026:
1017:
1015:
1009:
1005:
997:
940:
906:
807:
790:
720:
547:
531:
228:
220:
172:
165:
140:
133:
121:
114:
29:
16:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1007:
1001:
999:
995:
962:WP:OTHERCONTENT
957:
936:
902:
883:
820:
803:
786:
716:
708:
560:
543:
532:
526:
233:
199:, any expected
186:Manual of Style
127:
126:
125:
124:
117:
110:
106:
99:
69:
12:
11:
5:
1032:
1022:
1021:
956:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
882:
879:
878:
877:
819:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
795:
754:
707:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
564:requested move
559:
556:
554:
550:
549:
537:
534:
533:
528:
524:
522:
519:
518:
513:
501:
491:Common names 1
489:
482:
481:
477:
437:
397:
357:
317:
277:
235:
234:
229:
223:
214:
213:
173:
161:
160:
141:
129:
128:
123:
122:
115:
107:
102:
100:
98:
97:
90:
85:
76:
70:
68:
67:
56:
47:
46:
43:
42:
41:
38:Article titles
25:
24:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1031:
1020:
1016:
1014:
1006:
1004:
993:
992:
991:
990:
986:
982:
978:
973:
971:
967:
966:this category
963:
948:
944:
939:
934:
933:
932:
928:
924:
920:
917:
916:
915:
914:
910:
905:
900:
896:
892:
888:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
848:
844:
840:
836:
835:
834:
833:
830:
826:
811:
808:
806:
800:
796:
794:
791:
789:
783:
779:
778:
773:
772:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
752:
748:
744:
739:
735:
731:
727:
726:
725:
724:
721:
719:
713:
697:
693:
689:
685:
683:
677:
673:
669:
668:
667:
663:
659:
655:
654:WP:NCDURATION
651:
650:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
628:
627:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
565:
555:
546:
541:
536:
535:
521:
520:
517:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
483:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
237:
236:
232:
227:
222:
221:
218:
212:
210:
206:
202:
198:
193:
191:
187:
183:
179:
174:
171:
167:
166:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
139:
135:
134:
120:
116:
113:
109:
108:
105:
95:
91:
89:
86:
84:
80:
77:
75:
72:
71:
65:
61:
60:Learn to edit
57:
54:
49:
48:
45:
44:
39:
35:
31:
30:
23:
20:
18:
17:
1012:
1002:
974:
964:, I noticed
958:
885:The article
884:
821:
804:
787:
775:
737:
729:
717:
709:
681:
572:
561:
553:
539:
486:
485:
230:
217:
194:
175:
32:This is the
889:contains a
747:Toys "ะฏ" Us
745:instead of
743:Toys "R" Us
688:BarrelProof
658:BarrelProof
652:Perhaps in
617:BarrelProof
157:don't panic
977:Ed Sheeran
938:Paradoctor
904:Paradoctor
901:redirect.
751:WP:TITLETM
190:designated
998:instead.
825:Altenmann
682:One Piece
672:this diff
203:, or any
104:Shortcuts
96:if needed
79:Be polite
34:talk page
1003:Remsense
935:Thanks.
887:Chauhaโn
871:contribs
766:contribs
730:possible
680:List of
644:contribs
231:Archives
112:WT:TITLE
64:get help
981:Xexerss
895:Chauhan
686:." โโ โโ
540:60 days
738:should
656:? โโ โโ
599:, and
155:, and
145:policy
828:: -->
712:caret
710:Does
613:WP:AT
562:In a
119:WT:AT
92:Seek
40:page.
985:talk
943:talk
927:talk
909:talk
899:this
867:talk
829:talk
782:ARrC
777:Ar^c
762:talk
692:talk
678:and
670:See
662:talk
640:talk
621:talk
184:and
176:The
81:and
996:โจxโฉ
845:or
1008:โฅ
987:)
945:)
929:)
911:)
873:)
869:โข
823:--
801:?
768:)
764:โข
694:)
664:)
646:)
642:โข
623:)
595:,
591:,
587:,
583:,
579:,
509:,
505:,
497:,
493:,
479:61
475:60
473:,
471:59
469:,
467:58
465:,
463:57
461:,
459:56
457:,
455:55
453:,
451:54
449:,
447:53
445:,
443:52
441:,
439:51
435:50
433:,
431:49
429:,
427:48
425:,
423:47
421:,
419:46
417:,
415:45
413:,
411:44
409:,
407:43
405:,
403:42
401:,
399:41
395:40
393:,
391:39
389:,
387:38
385:,
383:37
381:,
379:36
377:,
375:35
373:,
371:34
369:,
367:33
365:,
363:32
361:,
359:31
355:30
353:,
351:29
349:,
347:28
345:,
343:27
341:,
339:26
337:,
335:25
333:,
331:24
329:,
327:23
325:,
323:22
321:,
319:21
315:20
313:,
311:19
309:,
307:18
305:,
303:17
301:,
299:16
297:,
295:15
293:,
291:14
289:,
287:13
285:,
283:12
281:,
279:11
275:10
273:,
269:,
265:,
261:,
257:,
253:,
249:,
245:,
241:,
62:;
1013:่ฎบ
983:(
941:(
925:(
907:(
865:(
760:(
690:(
660:(
638:(
619:(
511:3
507:2
499:3
495:2
271:9
267:8
263:7
259:6
255:5
251:4
247:3
243:2
239:1
159:.
66:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
