81:
63:
32:
627:
Okay, so this very large inelligible chunk of text gets in my way, and I sort of just can't do anything. Also, I don't have a sane build environment (parameters are not being inherited from parent nodes), and I don't have a terminal. I can't really write anything. Does anyone speak like VB at least?
299:
You're either drawling on, a bot, or stuck in cyberspace. The 2nd two of these things are not safe at the moment, b/c your reality is broken. The first, however, is simply obfuscating the information contained within the words you have put down in cyberink. Please edit, reword, rework, and get to,
143:
I clicked on the incomplete tag (stating that the articel was not yet rated) and was redirected here. I was hoping that I would find information on how to construct and add the rating tag but it is not listed here, nor do I see any obvious links to an article that describes the process.
760:). At this point, I just want to join it to the project, or at the least make sure you're aware of it. Whether it's Stub or Start, I don't know; I'm not very experienced as a Knowledge editor (i.e. two of my references are blacklisted and one of them (TimeToast) is unreliable.)
464:
I don't see the benefit of keeping the long list of completed reassessment requests here. If someone wants to track down past assessments, they're visible in the edit history. Plus, when you complete a reassessment, filling out that table is just one more thing to do.
785:
Okay, this is starting to look like a scrapbook or something with, as is usual, soul and barriers to entry. Mmmm... please generate logfiles, and then have crawlers crawl over the log files instead of whatever they were crawling over. Mmmm...
417:
The "WikiProject
Computing" template links to a non-existent anchor on this page labeled "Quality scale." This is equivalent to the "Grades" section of the article. I'm not sure how to proceed, so someone else can take care of this.
499:
I found the history very useful for calibrating my own assessments. It also is encourages auditing the work of other reviewers. I would prefer the table be restored though I am not opposed to trimming some of the older assessments.
359:
I do wish someone would answer these questions, since I needed an answer to many of these. Anyway, since no one answered the question of joining up, and I added and filled out the WikiProject
Computing Template for an article
239:
How are the importance levels of articles decided? For example, would it be fair to say that complimentary terms would be of equal importance, or does the topic of each and people's opinion take precedence? -
654:
Shouldn't these include criteria relating to important historical advances? To call the article describing "the first complete and fully operational regular electronic digital stored program computer" (
231:
No I really mean that. Could you please define decltype. I didn't see it as the whamo first fucking thing on its discussion page. You guys really aren't trying to solve this problem, are you.
528:
532:
518:
I made some other changes to the page. I asked reviewers to include the assessment decision in the edit summary, which should make it easier to audit the work of other reviewers.
562:
To help, open the talk pages and use the browser Find command to check for multiple categories matching "importance computing". If you find any, edit the WikiProject
Computing
468:
It also adds a lot of content to the page, and this page is loaded any time someone clicks a quality or importance link from tens of thousands of article talk pages. --
193:
280:
553:
It's working. Many unassessed pages disappearing off the list just by loading or purging the talk page. It's introduced some new conflicts – pages that have popped
404:
390:
266:
761:
348:
643:
622:
492:
442:
778:
769:
692:
677:
639:
618:
453:
292:
218:
204:
477:
337:
Any member of WP:Computing is free to assess. As for others, as long as the assessment is in good faith, I personally don't see anything wrong with it.
427:
331:
606:
544:
509:
312:
588:
782:
153:
774:
696:
688:
681:
673:
667:
635:
614:
449:
288:
214:
200:
322:
Is there a designated group of users who assess articles? Can any editor attempt to asses an article they come by using the outlined criteria?
176:
373:
743:
720:
255:
I can't give a general answer to this. I decide on a case-by-case, and just leave it blank if I'm unable to assess the subject's importance
249:
296:
222:
208:
225:) Yeah, this still makes no sense. As you can see, the problem has not been immediately or expediently fixed through your assumption.
803:
798:
459:
308:
For me this is not quite clear - below the mark - which would be at the top of the list - or way below at the end of the list. --
272:
105:
17:
317:
303:
808:
88:
68:
748:
412:
535:, causing it to think mis-identify them as being changed. I'll start seeing what I can do about fixing it. --
43:
271:
That said, ReactOS is an
Operating System, so by your importance rankings, it should be top, and not low.
649:
138:
765:
684:
Suggesting this article be given the lowest rating on the
Knowledge Discussion Pages rating scale.
531:
is supposed to give a daily list of assessment changes across the project. Ours is useless because
276:
104:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
527:
I'm also interested in reviewing the work of other reviewers – including on a wider scale. This
756:
I started an article for the historic 4T Intel 1103 DRAM chip (it was previously a redirect to
725:
400:
369:
101:
702:
488:
423:
379:
Hi Old Man. Per your request, I have answered the questions above to the best of my ability.
364:), I will do what Logical Premise did and join up in rating articles under this WikiProject.
49:
646:), that's not bad. Ordering of elements in the sets which lead to the decision tree itself?
354:
245:
171:
8:
739:
716:
149:
663:
386:
344:
262:
234:
189:
158:
570:
parameters to match. (Also check visually to make sure the quality assessments match.)
396:
365:
327:
484:
419:
241:
576:
735:
712:
602:
505:
145:
792:
659:
584:
540:
473:
438:
381:
339:
309:
257:
184:
323:
750:
731:
708:
598:
597:
These look like useful tools. I've added them to the project page. --
501:
97:
580:
536:
469:
434:
433:
I added a span tag to fix this, like the importance section had. --
93:
80:
62:
199:
What? This makes no sense. Humor would obviously get in the way.
182:
Yes, you can simply add yourself to the list of participants.
655:
757:
533:
some articles are listed in multiple assessment categories
699:
Broken sound card broken sound card broken sound card!
658:) of low importance seems somewhat perverse to me. --
92:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
790:
557:to the list – but I'm working through them.
575:You can regenerate the log immediately by
42:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
14:
791:
456:) Requesting the internet be fixed.
31:
29:
25:
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Computing
730:Please review your B assessment of
707:Please review your B assessment of
48:It is of interest to the following
23:
24:
820:
300:with less advocacy of red goats.
86:This page is within the scope of
804:NA-importance Computing articles
799:Project-Class Computing articles
79:
61:
30:
460:List of completed reassessments
114:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing
177:22:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
154:18:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
117:Template:WikiProject Computing
13:
1:
744:00:59, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
721:00:59, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
668:15:34, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
607:14:53, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
589:03:25, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
545:22:00, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
510:15:36, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
493:19:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
478:00:26, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
108:and see a list of open tasks.
770:06:33, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
443:18:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
281:22:19, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
7:
783:23:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
697:23:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
682:23:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
644:23:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
631:Please define immediately.
623:23:01, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
297:23:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
250:15:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
223:23:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
209:22:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
10:
825:
332:05:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
318:Group of users who assess?
313:16:44, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
428:18:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
395:Thank you for your help!
74:
56:
577:running the bot manually
304:Leave new requests below
146:Stephen Charles Thompson
405:20:43, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
391:11:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
374:11:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
349:11:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
267:11:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
228:Please defun declytpe.
194:11:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
163:Can we just join up? --
809:All Computing articles
413:Grades / Quality Scale
102:information technology
568:computing-importance=
89:WikiProject Computing
650:Importance criteria
139:Syntax/Usage of Tag
120:Computing articles
44:content assessment
136:
135:
132:
131:
128:
127:
816:
734:. Thank you.
711:. Thank you.
569:
565:
384:
342:
260:
187:
175:
168:
122:
121:
118:
115:
112:
83:
76:
75:
65:
58:
57:
35:
34:
33:
26:
824:
823:
819:
818:
817:
815:
814:
813:
789:
788:
762:Featherwinglove
754:
728:
705:
652:
567:
566:and subproject
563:
483:Fair point. --
462:
415:
380:
357:
338:
320:
306:
256:
237:
183:
169:
164:
161:
141:
119:
116:
113:
110:
109:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
822:
812:
811:
806:
801:
753:
747:
727:
726:Questionable B
724:
704:
701:
687:
672:
651:
648:
612:
611:
610:
609:
592:
591:
572:
571:
559:
558:
550:
549:
548:
547:
522:
521:
520:
519:
513:
512:
496:
495:
461:
458:
448:
446:
445:
414:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
356:
353:
352:
351:
319:
316:
305:
302:
286:
285:
284:
283:
273:24.241.229.253
236:
233:
197:
196:
160:
157:
140:
137:
134:
133:
130:
129:
126:
125:
123:
106:the discussion
84:
72:
71:
66:
54:
53:
47:
36:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
821:
810:
807:
805:
802:
800:
797:
796:
794:
787:
784:
780:
776:
772:
771:
767:
763:
759:
752:
746:
745:
741:
737:
733:
723:
722:
718:
714:
710:
703:Questioinable
700:
698:
694:
690:
685:
683:
679:
675:
670:
669:
665:
661:
657:
647:
645:
641:
637:
632:
629:
625:
624:
620:
616:
608:
604:
600:
596:
595:
594:
593:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
573:
561:
560:
556:
552:
551:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
525:
524:
523:
517:
516:
515:
514:
511:
507:
503:
498:
497:
494:
490:
486:
482:
481:
480:
479:
475:
471:
466:
457:
455:
451:
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:
430:
429:
425:
421:
406:
402:
398:
394:
393:
392:
388:
383:
378:
377:
376:
375:
371:
367:
363:
350:
346:
341:
336:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
315:
314:
311:
301:
298:
294:
290:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
268:
264:
259:
254:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
232:
229:
226:
224:
220:
216:
211:
210:
206:
202:
195:
191:
186:
181:
180:
179:
178:
174:
173:
167:
156:
155:
151:
147:
124:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
90:
85:
82:
78:
77:
73:
70:
67:
64:
60:
59:
55:
51:
45:
41:
37:
28:
27:
19:
773:
755:
749:New Article
729:
706:
686:
671:
653:
633:
630:
626:
613:
554:
467:
463:
447:
416:
397:Some Old Man
366:Some Old Man
362:Polygon Mesh
361:
358:
355:Any Answers?
321:
307:
287:
238:
230:
227:
212:
198:
170:
165:
162:
142:
87:
50:WikiProjects
40:project page
39:
634:Hmm, yeah (
564:importance=
485:Eraserhead1
420:HoCkEy PUCK
793:Categories
751:Intel 1103
242:Jimmi Hugh
235:Importance
159:Joining up
736:Rlsheehan
732:I Am Rich
713:Rlsheehan
709:I Am Rich
111:Computing
98:computing
94:computers
69:Computing
775:Mmkstarr
689:Mmkstarr
674:Mmkstarr
660:TedColes
636:Mmkstarr
615:Mmkstarr
450:Mmkstarr
382:decltype
340:decltype
310:Krischik
289:Mmkstarr
258:decltype
215:Mmkstarr
201:Mmkstarr
185:decltype
324:Paulish
172:Premise
166:Logical
100:, and
46:scale.
656:EDSAC
491:: -->
38:This
16:<
779:talk
766:talk
758:DRAM
740:talk
717:talk
693:talk
678:talk
664:talk
640:talk
619:talk
603:talk
599:Kvng
585:talk
579:. --
541:talk
506:talk
502:Kvng
489:talk
487:<
474:talk
454:talk
439:talk
424:talk
401:talk
387:talk
370:talk
345:talk
328:talk
293:talk
277:talk
263:talk
246:talk
219:talk
205:talk
190:talk
150:talk
581:Pnm
537:Pnm
529:log
470:Pnm
435:Pnm
795::
781:)
768:)
742:)
719:)
695:)
680:)
666:)
642:)
621:)
605:)
587:)
555:on
543:)
508:)
500:--
476:)
441:)
426:)
403:)
389:)
372:)
347:)
330:)
295:)
279:)
265:)
248:)
221:)
207:)
192:)
152:)
96:,
777:(
764:(
738:(
715:(
691:(
676:(
662:(
638:(
617:(
601:(
583:(
539:(
504:(
472:(
452:(
437:(
422:(
399:(
385:(
368:(
360:(
343:(
326:(
291:(
275:(
261:(
244:(
217:(
213:(
203:(
188:(
148:(
52::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
