Knowledge talk:WikiProject Golf/Archive 15

1782:-2021. • Current Men’s Golf Olympic Gold Medalist (one-year only). • The top 50 players from the Official World Golf Ranking through The Honda Classic (Monday, February 28, 2022). • The top 10 players from the 2021-22 FedExCup Points List through The Honda Classic. • The winner of the previous year’s Bridgestone SENIOR PLAYERS Championship. • The leading points winner from the 2020-21 Top 25 Korn Ferry Tour Regular Season Points List and points earned in the Korn Ferry Tour Finals and the leading points winner from the 2021 Korn Ferry Tour Finals. • If necessary to complete a field of 144 players, PGA TOUR members from the 2021-22 FedExCup Points List below 10th position though The Honda Classic (February 28, 2022), in order of their positions on such list. 7051:

rating" which is the total number of points to be allocated to all the players (although it might be slightly different, eg if more players make the cut). The winner gets about 17% of this, although again this will vary a little depending on the minimum number making the cut. I'm assuming that we'll be adding the winner's points to our tables. Adding the "field rating" would be an option although it is not at all comparable to the old numbers and might be a confusing thing to add mid-season. Either way our OWGR headers in these table ought to say what we're doing.

3844: 3629: 2989: 906:

while logged-out) – those changes clearly did not have consensus and should probably be reverted. As can be seen everywhere, df has high regard for their own opinion and very little regard for verifiability. I will also say this: if the sub-section is staying in the pro wins section, the entire discussion is pointless and they should all just remain within "other wins"; i.e. it only makes sense to split them out if they are not being counted as pro wins. To me, it makes little sense to include things like

3936: 3798: 3709: 3589: 3365: 3330: 3295: 3057: 2955: 2748: 2713: 2678: 2529: 2479: 2454: 31: 2193:

1960s/1970s (its wiki page says 1929) and the tour did some serious historical revisionism in the late 1980s retroactively counting a lot of early events as PGA Tour-level. So these tournaments may have been in fact a bunch of unrelated, isolated events that were only retroactively given PGA Tour status until the late 1980s. This all may be misleading to the reader. I don't know much about early 20th century golf, however, and would like to hear other thoughts.

4437: 3244: 2627: 2504: 3890: 3669: 3023: 7076:), although it has had to be extended - previously the table only went to 60th. Add these up from 1st to 65th ie 100+60+40+32+...+1.36+1.32=581.42. So the winner will get 398.58063/5.8142=68.55296. Clearly more than 65 might make the cut but (as I understand it, might be wrong) the 68.55296 will stay the same and the total number of points allocated will be slightly more that the 398.58063 it's supposed to be. 109:. Couples seems to have won more of these events than any golfer I have heard of so I thought it would be a good place to start. However, I know this is a new category that doesn't seem to be firmly defined yet. Other members may have some issue with some of the events I deemed to be an "exhibition" so I am bringing it up here. If anyone would like to make revisions to his page please do so. 677:

exhibition is sort of obvious. To me, when it is a standalone event, it is usually a small event, usually with only a handful of golfers, usually pretty famous, and it is often made-for-TV. They are first and foremost "exhibiting" their great talents to the audience and the competitive aspect seems secondary. Some other times it is before the tournament proper (sort of like a pro-am).

1312:

inclusion/exclusion from pro wins (I'm guessing this is what you're really angling for, since merely splitting from other wins would be pointless); for example, many sources describe small field invitation tournaments such as the Hero as exhibitions. I'm pretty sure I've seen World Cups and early Masters Tournaments described this way too, particularly in contemporary sources.

1327:

other respected sports broadcasters referencing the above event the Taylor Made Driving Relief as a charity exhibition event. I can add links to support. I would like the TaylorMade Driving Relief removed from the professional wins section as it is clearly defined as a charity exhibition. Rather like "The Match" which is much the same with it's two man team exhibition format

2285:

articles. But as noted here the events were retroactively considered PGA Tour events, the date of the start of the tour is debatable and the tour's record-keeping is somewhat shoddy so sourcing these articles is difficult and would agree Kronish Sports is not an ideal source. Would not be opposed to their deletion if that is the consensus.

1754:• Winners of PGA TOUR cosponsored or approved tournaments, whose victories are considered official since the last played PLAYERS Championship. • The top 125 players from the 2020-21 FedExCup Points List. • Winners of the Masters Tournament from the years 2017-2021. • Winners of THE PLAYERS Championship and The Open Championship from 7071:

The fine detail of the new system is difficult to work out, but the one area that is (relatively) clear is the way the "field ranking" converts to the points the players get. The "field ranking" is meant to be total number of points allocated to all the players in the event. The system is broadly the

5324:

The trouble is that WP:DATELIST is so ambiguous and poorly written, that basing policy on it, is never going to work, even ignoring the fact that it was never discussed before being added to the MOS. If you want all chronological lists to be in forward order I suggest a properly discussed addition to

5222:

Yes, that's an example of how to create a timeline using templates here on Knowledge, but chronological lists can also be tabulated. If you're excluding tables from being chronological lists just because they don't fit your narrow interpretation of the MOS, then I think you're being incredibly dense.

4882:

There's no rush to change them all. I changed this one because I was researching the tournament for work and noticed it was "wrong". I'm not sure "readers would be most interested in the recent tournaments" is a good enough reason to fly in the face of the MOS, no matter how much disdain you have for

1878:

edition played on the Stadium Course at TPC Sawgrass". This was then changed back. Don't know what other RS say, but the media guide agrees with it being the 40th (see page 132) and that the 2020 Players was "cancelled". This means 2020 edition is not counted, and so for instance Matsuyama's round of

1001:

Wow - thank you very much for the responses. This changes my whole perception of the conversation. I had no idea that the "Exhibition Wins" and "Challenge Matches" subcategories were pretty much singularly created by individual dictate (and a vandal at that) and not consensus. Given this information,

127:

I know Couples is considered to be the 'King of the Silly Season' but I don't really know what wins you would consider as exhibitions and what wins are professional victories. His PGA Tour profile lists all of these wins as 'Additional victories' but it is a real grey area trying to categorize events

6486:

has been published. The winners' table is clearly incomplete; if anyone has any missing information please add it. In addition, I have very little specific information about the event after it transformed into a more "amateur" event in the mid-1970s. If anyone has anything valuable please publish it

5235:

It's clear that the golf tables are not "Timelines". So common sense would tell us that WP:DATELIST, which directs to a section called "Timelines", does not apply to the golf tables. Anyway this whole discussion demonstrates that basing any actions on the last sentence in this section would not be a

4152:

Agree 100%. It came up awhile back in the snooker area. Someone added "Mark" (I think) since both players were called Mark. Interestingly the same editors who add the flags for future rounds thought that adding "Mark" was "silly", but for some reason couldn't see the inconsistency in their argument.

1831:

Yep, the media guide is the better source and we should follow that. For information, in addition to the source given in the article (which obviously has the criteria in the wrong order), I also used a 3rd party news article but that in hindsight was possibly (probably) extrapolated from criteria in

7091:

Although the field ranking reduced to 390.66675 (because of late withdrawals) the 5.8142 ratio remained the same, so 390.66675/5.8142=67.19183 to the winner. Those below 65th got 1.28%,1.24%,1.20%,1.16% and so the total points given out was actually 393.94536 (ie 4.88%*67.19183=3.27896 more than it

5793:

In general though it just seems extremely rare that pro golfers officially retire from the sport. Again, I cannot recall a single retirement ceremony for a golfer. In women's golf it may be a little more common there because some formally retire to have children. But even there it still seems rare.

5355:

from 2018 where the poster finishes with "It would be helpful for this MOS page either to state this latitude for lists within articles, or to rule it out more clearly if reverse-chronological order is no longer acceptable". Seems to me that it's you who's seeing this sentence as crystal clear when

4304:

Most men's majors back to about 1980 have these, but in earlier years usage is more haphazard (the earliest is in the 1936 Open). Personally I don't find these at all useful and the style is dominating relative to its importance. Succession boxes were popular in the early days of Knowledge but have

2819:

Yeah, the results module doesn't really lend itself to matchplay golf – it's more suited to simple scorelines. I'd have liked to just have one set of results in the matrix, as it's a single round-robin, but I couldn't manage to make it so it was clear who won without a mass of explanatory text. The

2025:

Dropping wins of Caribbean or Latin America wins is one thing, but missing high profile wins or playoff losses like the Hope or Crosby tournaments are ridiculous. An early 90's PGA Tour guide book (I think they are all available online now.) was riddled with playoff record mistakes. Not one or two,

1994:

The PGA Tour as a reliable source makes me want to laugh sometimes. A few years ago as noted on this page, Billy Casper's win total had dropped from 51 to 48 and his playoff record from 8-8 to 8-7. Well, his 3 missing wins (Two of them the Bob Hope Desert Classic) are back but his 1968 playoff loss

1845:

I have updated the criteria & exemptions in our article per the media guide, but haven't reordered them. While doing it I remembered that Stenson was not originally in the field when it was announced, only for him to be added a few hours later when he was apparently still eligible from his 2016

1628:

On page 7 they list the full "1972 Tour Schedule" which includes all of the "official events" for that year's PGA Tour as well as a number of minor events (e.g. Little Crosby Pro-Am, Mini-Nelson Satellite, Caribbean Tour events). I was thinking about adding all of these minor events to our seasonal

1415:

At first glance, it certainly needs a heavy duty scythe taking to it. All needs to be consolidated into two or three paragraphs about each of amateur and pro careers. Her junior career, in particular, is far too detailed and includes local and club competitions that are not really worthy of mention

1326:

No it is actually the host broadcaster Sky Sports who actually co-sanctioned and co hosted the event with the PGA. They called it an exhibition event. So i think in fairness they would know what type of tournament they were showing wouldn't you agree ?. I have a link to prove this I have more from

1005:

However, I implied at the very bottom of this talk page that if a pro golfer won any event that was covered by the national newspapers ("a reliable third-party source") it should be included in Professional Wins section. Therefore, I think these "exhibition wins" (or whatever you want to call them)

761:

To me, an "exhibition" is generally a non-competitive affair where pros are principally showing off their skills for a (paying) audience, who may even participate at some point, with little regard for their score. In days gone by, with paltry tournament prizes, many pros made their living this way.

6982:

With the update of the OWGR website and new points system, they seem to be calculating 1st place points up to 5 decimal points. My question is in terms of displaying points in tour schedule pages: are we best to summarise the points to either a) nearest whole number, b) maybe 2/3 decimal points. I

5831:

My own issue here is that it's so ill-defined. Ochoa retired in 2010 but "made a limited return to competitive golf in 2012", although we still have 2010 in the infobox. Bobby Jones retired in 1930 but played in the Masters after that for many years. Unless we can firm up on what it actually means

5479:

Most importantly, I am not sure if the tournament is notable enough. On Trove, you can find a lot of stuff on the event during Bennetts career, from the mid- to late-1970s. But that's about it. A lot of top Australian golfers played during this era but I'm not sure about before or after. If anyone

4739:

only applies to list articles. The page WP:DATELIST appears on just talks about lists in general. But all that is beside the real point, which is, what is the benefit of ordering the list in reverse, and do any benefits outweigh the consistency that would be brought by having all lists in the same

4406:

I've removed them all from the men and women's majors. Not done the seniors as yet. I've created a new navbox for the women's majors along the lines of the long-standing men's one (above). Personally I think this gives more useful navigation that the succession boxes; seems to me that readers will

4377:

I have changed this navbox so that it is "auto-expanded" (you might need to "purge" to see it auto-expanded) and it seems to me that the succession boxes largely duplicate this navbox. My proposal is that we remove the succession boxes. Currently we don't have an equivalent navbox for the women or

2079:

I aslo find the find line of the PGA Tour pages dubious e.g. "The 2021–22 PGA Tour is the 107th season of the PGA Tour, and the 55th since separating from the PGA of America." The first year of the PGA Tour seems a bit ambiguous to me, and something perhaps that shouldn't be included in the intro.

5687:

Given the information, I think we should get rid of it. This retirement date line doesn't seem particularly applicable to golf. Golfers can play golf forever and rarely formally retire. (I have never heard of a golfer holding a retirement ceremony.) I suspect this parameter exists within the golf

4065:

I've cobbled something together. Needs a bit of tuning. 1. Do we need the tables to be a consistent width? 2. Does someone lose 1 up or lose 1 down or even lose by 1 hole? 3. How to handle Casey's CON. Perhaps a footnote would be better. 4. I haven't bothered at this stage with ties for position.

2908:

As there are only three games, I'd be tempted to get rid of separate tables and combine them. i.e. instead of a W D L column have Game 1, Game 2, Game 3. So Robert MacIntyre's columns would be "Tied vs DJ", "Won vs KN (2 & 1)", "Tied vs AL", and then the points column of "2". That is assuming

905:

Unfortunately, the earlier discussion was never closed after I suggested a possible conclusion. The fact exhibition sub-sections have popped-up on some (but not all) articles (and not been reverted) is most likely simple avoidance of further disruptive edit-warring by DooksFoley147 (almost always

164:

For an event to qualify as an "exhibition win" on Knowledge do we need reliable third-party sources for each event that specifically references "exhibition"? Just browsing the internet now, it looks like many of the skins games are referred to as exhibitions in newspaper reports. I don't think it

7050:

Point of clarification: In the old system there was a "strength of field" (which no one talked about) which was converted into an event ranking which was what the winner got (and which was the number commonly talked about). The others got 60%, 40% etc of this. In the new system there is a "field

5101:

with no discussion and the edit summary "OK, this may seem obvious, but adding that timelines should be earliest-to-latest chronological order (e.g. WP:SALORDER) - WP:CHRONO should specifically mention this as well." which seems to imply that the sentence was only intended to apply to timelines.

1396:

Here we go 1- Much of the sections on her golfing from 2005 to 2015 is unreferenced. 2- There is a unreferenced mention of her winning a tournament in Windsor but the win isn't in her pro wins sections. 3- Do we need this much detail in an article. She was the top amateur and has 3 professional

1295:

Well it looks like The match were exhibition events after all and not added as Other wins on players resumes. I have found nearly 20 third party sources that list the TaylorMade Driving Relief as an exhibition event. How many do I need to add here to get it removed from the Other wins section ?.

7006:

for the events. I'd have thought that 2 decimal places was more than sufficient (eg 68.55). I guess we ought to follow what reliable source do, but currently we've no indication there and maybe we've got to lead not follow, at least for a short while. I'm planning a rewrite of the OWGR article,

6343:

is about the tournament from 1956 to 1988 but there were other tournaments by that name before World War Two. Some editors tried to edit the old tournaments into the 56 tournament history. That pretty much ended after I put a reference into the article saying the inaugural event was 1956. I did

5567:

In the infobox, there is a "Retired" date line. I wasn't sure to use the date they retire as a touring professional or as a club professional. The infobox seems to focus far more on tournament golf however they don't usually fully retire from the golf industry until the club pro work stops. Any

5081:

from 2018 which notes earlier discussions. "However, the linked page is specifically for stand-alone lists" "The words "such as timelines" could be interpreted as limiting the rule to stand-alone lists." And why is WP:DATELIST in a section called "Timelines" if it applies to all lists, not just

2284:

As the creator of the early "PGA Tour" articles regarding the 1910s and 1920s, I agree with most of the commenters here. There are well-sourced Knowledge pages for the tournaments and golfers of the period and I thought these pages would match the style guidelines of the current PGA Tour season

2192:

Most importantly, though, I think these pages may be examples of original research. Basically, these pages seem to imply that each year there was a discrete unit of events under the auspices of some coherent tour. I'm not necessarily sure of that. An independent PGA Tour did not exist until the

1207:

Nobody including the PGA Tour or any other site are including wins in "The Match" or the Taylor made driving for relief as professional Wins. They are classed as exhibition Wins sourced by Sky Sports who covered the the Taylormade event, and I ask you to check out a BBC article on the Brookes v

494:

I wasn't really involved in the original discussion from this summer so I don't know much about it. I will definitely defer to consensus though. However, I have noticed that "Exhibition Wins" was defined as a legitimate category on Knowledge - at least within the "Professional Wins" sections of

4868:

Sources use both and I have little personal preference for either. However, I think most readers would probably be looking to see the most recent first, especially for current tournaments. Most of all though, I'm unconvinced that there is a compelling reason to change (even if it is agreed the

5307:, the consensus of a small group such as this WikiProject cannot override the wider consensus that resulted in the creation of the MOS as it exists. If you disagree with the MOS, perhaps a discussion should happen there about adding some exceptions to it, but until then it should be followed. 676:

I have a few things to say. At one end, I'm a bit surprised there is so much confusion about the definition of an "exhibition." I've been familiar with the word in reference to minor golf (and tennis) tournaments since I was a little boy and to me, at least instinctively, the idea of what an

7072:

same as previously except that points are now allocated to all those who make the cut. As an example for the St Jude this week the field ranking is 398.58063 and the cut is 65 and ties. They're still using the old percentages (100 for 1st, 60 for 2nd, 40 for 3rd, ... 2.5 for 50th etc - see

4756:. The argument for reverse ordering has always been that (for existing events) readers are more interested in recent events that those from many years ago and so its more useful to them to present this information first. Clearly that argument doesn't hold for old events, and articles like 617:

Is anyone able to provide reliable sources that discuss "exhibition" status of events and/or a list of what does and doesn't qualify as one? If not, we shouldn't be inventing such a categorisation and arbitrarily deciding what goes in it. Also, are these events actually being included as

1311:

How many of these sources define what is meant by "exhibition"? I'd guess none. You need to look at this holistically instead of crusading against the inclusion of one or two events. Using the criteria "widely described as an exhibition (by RS)" would be a terrible means of determining

4774:

I'm not sure what you mean by "not a 'list' in the sense intended at MOS:LIST". And yes, I too remember there was a provision for lists being displayed in reverse order, but I don't seem to be able to find that in any MOS guidelines any more, so I assume it's been deprecated. –

4969:

Unfortunately when people keep bringing up irrelevant guidelines, it behoves me to restate the case. And yet again, what is the point of the MOS if not for it to be followed? If you think the MOS is wrong or needs exceptions applying to it, take it up on the MOS talk page. –

4215:

The PGA Championship really doesn't mesh well with Knowledge guidelines. It's obvious that they invite the top 100 (and a bit beyond), usually at two different cutoff dates, and invite the Ryder Cup captains. But until they make those official categories, our hands are tied.

646:

Do they list all such events, or just those the tour has an interest in, or just recent ones, or just for players who have (or their agents have) lobbied to get them included (like Snead used to)? For example, widely reported challenge matches from earlier eras, e.g.

146:

You seem to be implying that "Professional wins" and "Exhibition wins" are mutually exclusive categories. I don't think so. We already started putting the "Exhibition wins" subheading within the "Professional wins" section. (We started doing this with the pages of

4684:

at the time, which clearly states that chronological lists should be presented with the earliest entry at the top. No exceptions are given for that, and no actual rationale was given for going against it either. The only arguments I saw were tantamount to

4121:

Side note: I am vehemently opposed to putting flags in the next round of the bracket before the player is determined. To me that seems about as useful as putting "Kevin" in the next round of the bracket if Kevin Na and Kevin Kisner are playing each other.

402:

Without checking, I thought "challenge matches" (as opposed to tournaments) was the distinction that we were making. An "exhibition" match/event is not something we cannot adequately define as we do not have reliable sources to say what is and isn't one.

6544:

that says that Vines won in 1973. I believe your information and used your date (these newspaper reports from the era make little mistakes all the time). However, if you have a third-party source for Vines' second win (e.g. McCormack) that would be

6893:. I was shocked and somewhat saddened it was him. He is one of our best contributors and has helped me out a lot. However, I have been planning to propose these pages for deletion for awhile so I am still going ahead. I feel like the pages fail 6316:

Basically I was wondering if either of these events are notable. For the earlier one, I think so, even if it was held only once, as it looks like it was PGA Tour-level. With the more recent one, not so sure. Wondering what other people thought.

5909:

I'd be inclined to get rid of the parameter. In the relatively rare event of a player announcing their retirement, it's more effective to add a section to their article to cover the subject and provide a reference, as has been done for

2232:

That particular page is mirroring one from the PGA Tour Stat Inquiry System, which may not exactly be intended for public use (there is a way to get into it, but I'm hesitant to share it here because I don't want them to close it off).

1911:

With regards to Matsuyama's 63, the tour may no longer consider it a Players Championship record (judging by the media guide), but that doesn't necessarily mean it gets scrubbed from the TPC Sawgrass books. Unless you have a source(s)?

4987:

As discussed before, keep it as is (most recent tournament first). I find MOS unclear myself. As a note, other sporting pages do reverse order as well, including ones which have recently passed a "featured article" review process e.g.

1598:, the runner-up in the 1935 event was Colonel Chauncey Griggs. I included the military title in the table. However, I have noticed that we have taken out military titles in other pages. For example, Lieutenant H.M. Ballinghall won the 1587:(starting on page 143) did not have the scores from the match play era or the runner-ups from the stroke play era. I did some research and found some of the missing info but not a ton. If anyone can add anything that would be great. 196:

Yes I get that but it’s hard to define the difference between an exhibition and a professional tournament. I would say the skins games probably are exhibitions, but I think any of the stroke play wins should be kept as ‘Other wins’.

721:

Lastly though, when you search for "golf exhibition" on the search engines you will find a lot of references (probably thousands) to specific tournaments as "exhibitions." Perhaps, this is enough to confirm the validity of the

4245:

Yes, it would be clearer to readers if we simply said the field was the top-n with about 30 no-hopers (club pros + ex-winners) and then listed the rest. But they persist with this strange qualification system for some reason.

1944: 6464:"City of Cairns Amateur Golf Week began all the way back in 1965 as a professional event known as the City of Cairns Open. However after 1974 it became an amateur event ..." so probably after 1974 it was a more minor event. 5311:

only applies if ignoring the rule actually improves the encyclopaedia. As things stand, having a small group of chronological tables displayed in reverse order hinders the encyclopaedia by detracting from its consistency. –

1713:

I intend to make similar edits to other PGA Tour calendars from this era. If anyone has any reservations about what I'm doing please let me know. In addition, if you like what I'm doing, please make similar edits to these

509:, you say that "Exhibition Wins" was not a category we could "adequately define." But didn't we already do that, as evidenced on the pages of McIlroy and Johnson that I just mentioned? I genuinely just want clarification. 2399:

seem to have the functionality needed (with a bit of customising), and enable easier entering of results and reordering of tables. Here is an example of what can be produced from these modules using last year's Pool A:

6069:, a relatively simple task. Probably most of the other golfer articles have the retired parameter but not set (ie just "retired="). These should be deleted too, but clearly there a lot more of those (perhaps 4,000).. 6847: 2804:

Indeed, the group part is not very reader or editor-friendly. We'd lose the day-by-day details with your top table, but honestly I'm not sure that's a great loss. So I'd support a simplified table for the results.

6883: 4004:

I like the last one too. Surnames are preferable to initials. Days 1 2 3 very clear. Pld could go, but not worried either way. We lose the "schedule" aspect (unless we add "vs Hadwin") but that's no big deal IMO.

5325:

the MOS would be the way forward. Chronological lists with other orderings (eg ordered by winners name) would be an issue, but personally I don't see that having lists in reverse chronological order is an issue.

6926:

and I agree with this idea. So I feel like to have a good consensus for merge and delete. However, administrators feel like not enough users have responded for consensus. It would be nice if other members like

4839:

says "Lists may be found within the body of a prose article, or as a stand-alone article". These guidelines plainly apply not just to standalone list articles but also to lists found within prose articles. –

791:

I don't think we are coming close to a resolution and I don't want this to drag on forever. Below, I have written a couple simple questions. I think simple answers to these questions will help us finalize the

1192:

The Match is not a professional event and neither are the others mentioned they are not listed by any source as a professional win either. It is crazy some of the events that you guys are even talking about.

5959:

for your response. It seems clear that this parameter should be deleted. Could someone please provide me with a link with instructions on how to delete an infobox parameter? I will then attempt to delete

3164:

I agree. Initials can cause issues, plus it loses the Win/Tie/Loss detail. Here's an option along the lines of the snooker format, but with column headers, borders (which could be removed) and less MOS

4928:

What makes more sense is not really germane to this discussion. The only relevant policy on this states that lists should run from oldest to newest. There is no provision for reverse order any more. –

4573:

and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

959:

Yeah I think I'd agree re the exhibition subsections. With those exhibition events should we move them back into other wins or just remove them completely? I would say removing would make more sense.

1748:

Not sure where the Player Championship eligibility requirements are sourced from, but there seems to be several differences in the media guide (in bold below). Is the media guide wrong or wikipedia?

6282:

I was looking to make a page for this event, in the area of the country where I now live. It appears there are two totally separate events, one held in the 1930s and another modern one. I have this

6228:

I know the event has only inconsistently used the phrase "Club Professional" but I think it would be best if we included it. Right now the title looks way too similar to the major championship, the

1523:

Agree. Personally, I wouldn't want to get into maintaining any such list and don't see them as being particularly encyclopedic, however top-ten does have some significance; top-twenty, not so much.

6842: 6433:

it says that Bob Taylor won the 1973 City of Cairns Open and Vines won again the following year. In addition, it looks like some variation of this event was going through the 1980s. According to

6232:, an event of an entirely different level of competitiveness. This may be confusing to the reader. And if we pursue this path I know we will have to change the redirect but I think it's worth it. 5635:

Most American players don't "retire" until they've lost PGA Tour status and don't think they can get it back. There have been European players who retired when still exempt on the European Tour (

6653:, and many others. I find this arrangement completely unnecessary as counting the seasonal wins is not that hard (golfers rarely win more than one or two events in a season). I'm not sure what 4705:

applies here. "Chronological lists, such as timelines, should be in earliest-to-latest chronological order. See Knowledge:Stand-alone lists § Chronological ordering." seems to imply that, like

2044: 1749: 1558: 5352: 5078: 6175: 5339:

The MOS already says that all chronological lists should be in forward order. I'm struggling to see where the ambiguity is, whereas you guys seem to be bending over backwards to find it. –

6294:

it says he won this event (no citation however) under PGA Tour wins. I believe I also saw a victory noted on the page of a contemporaneous golfer a while back however I can't find it now.

5006:

Addendum. Looks like Johnny Owen's table was changed to chronological when it became a featured article, and there has been edit warring to change it back since. It was also discussed on

6243: 102:

I noticed we haven't really utilized the new "Exhibition wins" subheading. We did for the TaylorMade event, the event that precipitated the original discussion, but that seems to be it.

6370:

for your comments. I think I'll make a page for the earlier event but not the later one. Does anyone else know anything about the earlier one? I could only find info on the 1930 event.

2262:

I'm sure there is much that can be verified but not the existence of a coherent tour at this time, so I'd say these articles probably need to head to AFD. Kronish Sports is clearly a

1948: 6866: 6213: 4628: 1696:

I do think, however, some minor changes need to be made to the calendars. First off, we clearly need citations so I included a citation from the 1972 PGA Tour Media Guide for the

4689:. The fact that most golf articles go latest to earliest is not a good reason for this one to do the same, especially when someone was willing to put in the legwork to fix it. – 4196:

article. As often it seems to be difficult to find a decent source for the entry criteria. I've put something together based on previous years and Rob Bolton's weekly article at

546:

Also, you mentioned that "Challenge Matches" were the most important category created during the conversation. If this is so, how do we begin to categorize Couples' "Other wins"?

6908: 6181: 1832:

previous season(s). However, the PGA Tour's "Inside the Field" would imply the criteria are not applied in the order listed in the media guide, although there are anomalies.

1360:

I have evidence to suggest that this event was a charity exhibition and I want it removed from the professional wins section. So where do I need to go to make that happen ?.

1223:

Where does it say they are "exhibition" matches? Give us some links from reliable sources. I know it's your style to use vague statements but Knowledge needs more than that.

5639:

comes to mind). But there are countless examples all around the world of players retiring and then coming back, or retiring except for a few tournaments they still played.

5536:. Given the scattershot of information, I don't think I will create a page for this event. (In addition, its fundamental notability is questionable.) Once again, thank you. 4647: 2266:, and therefore cannot be a reliable source unless the author is a renowned expert, which in this case does not appear to be the case (do we even know who the author is?). 4913:

I would agree with Wjemather’s most recent point and as a reader of these pages myself, feel more interest and makes more sense to me in seeing most recent winners first.

4462: 2214:

I have been aware of this site, although this is not an area I know anything about. It couldn't in any sense be regarded as a reliable source, certainly not in this area.

2094:

Yes, they are dubious. At the very least, such claims need to be qualified (as they are in the European Tour season articles, although that could also be better/clearer).

1336: 1305: 5116:

Because not all lists have a chronological element. If you're going to put a list in chronological order, it should be from oldest to newest, not the other way around. –

4922: 1369: 6062: 3203: 2586: 2426: 1217: 1202: 120: 6212:). Various sponsors over the years MacGregor, Wilson, Glenmuir. Some events held in the Republic of Ireland so the title needs to reflect that. Plenty of sources, eg: 2008:

Many players have gained and lost wins (and other records) as a result of the tour's arbitrary re-evaluations, particularly during the 1980s; I tried unravelling them

1332: 1301: 5586:

Personally I'd be in favour of simply deleting the parameter from the infobox. Pretty sure its not widely used and ill-defined in any case. When do golfers "retire"?

5297: 5000: 4674: 626: 6193: 5142:

You're going to have to define timeline for me then, because I'm not sure how a table whose contents are in chronological order is anything other than a timeline. –

4329: 1636:

and I had a discussion about this matter on his talk page. We did not come to consensus which is why I bring it up here. All members are free to contribute. Thanks!

1436:

it needs proper referencing. You can't just claim positive accomplishments, just like you can't not negative happenings, without backing it up with reliable sources.

1365: 1241:

Some people seem to think that if an event doesn't form part of an official tour schedule, then it has to be an exhibition. Just simply not the case or true at all.

1154: 5755:

Although their are lots of golfers that never retire, some do retire in their prime or later and I see no reason that the fact can't be noted in the infobox, e.g.

1687:

Ok, it looks like consensus is that we don't include these "minor" events in the PGA Tour calendars (unless they were part of the money list). I think that's fine.

6336:

The same name for separate golf tourneys is not uncommon. In most cases it is when the tournament is named after a place but not always. Look at this edit of mine

6268: 5737: 2391:

The tables for the pool stages are fairly cumbersome and somewhat unfriendly to editors wanting to update them, so I've been looking for a more elegant solution.

2375: 2337: 1481: 1134: 372: 6861: 4447:

has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the

1354: 1320: 1284: 1020: 594: 285: 206: 182: 137: 5447: 4895:

I have no "disdain" for MOS but even if I did, such feelings would be irrelevant. Please stick to the point(s) in question rather than making personal remarks.

1383: 1058:

I have placed all of wins (that I'm aware of) that were labeled exhibition wins in the "Other wins" subcategory. I have done this specifically for the pages of

6590: 6515: 6387: 6357: 5721: 4633: 3539: 2118: 1505: 1148: 930: 879: 770: 743: 708:

that references exhibitions a lot and may be the closest reliable third-party source for a definition that we can find (he seems to define it as "match golf").

411: 6889:

I would like to note that the instructions advised me to contact the author of the page and notify him/her of the proposed deletion. I did and noticed it was

5805: 5772: 2045:

https://pgatourmedia.pgatourhq.com/static-assets/page/files/tours/2022/pgatour/theplayerschampionship/eventMediaGuide/THE%20PLAYERS%202022%20Media%20Guide.pdf

1750:

https://pgatourmedia.pgatourhq.com/static-assets/page/files/tours/2022/pgatour/theplayerschampionship/eventMediaGuide/THE%20PLAYERS%202022%20Media%20Guide.pdf

1704:

was not an official PGA Tour win until 2002. (Fwiw, wiki's European Tour's seasonal calendars include nearly identical information about the American majors.)

968: 663: 641: 457: 6641:

I have noticed that we have been tabulating the year-by-year wins of early 20th century PGA Tour golfers. For example, see the Professional wins sections of

5186:”, which implies that timelines are a form of chronological list, and that such lists can take several forms, including as tables, which is the case here. – 4387: 3145: 1734: 1678: 4821:

Well spotted. However I still think that, while the MOS is crystal clear about "list articles", the situation for other articles is not clear from the MOS.

2034: 2020: 2003: 1920: 1857: 1444: 1424: 6833: 6501: 6473: 6157: 6118: 6078: 6039: 6007: 5889: 5841: 5699: 5595: 5579: 5553: 5523: 4935: 4424: 3999: 3159: 2223: 1263:

If we have a reliable third-party source for someone's victory in a professional event, isn't that enough for inclusion in the "Professional wins" section?

1232: 97: 5024:

Of course, we do use "forward" order for biographies (eg lists of wins), it's only for the tournament articles that we use "reverse" order. So we satisfy

4877: 3121:

I think I prefer the snooker format. I'm not a huge fan of using initials like this, especially when Max Homa and Mackenzie Hughes are in the same group.

2890: 2877: 2274: 2102: 2056: 1906: 1840: 1762:• Winners of the World Golf Championships-Mexico Championship from 2019-2021. • Winners of the World Golf Championships-Dell Technologies Match Play from 1250: 6204:(or similar), but it's not clear if that was ever an official title. The event started in 1973, seemingly as a way of selecting a team for the inaugural 5980: 5474:

the event is still going on. But again, no overarching source on Google. If I cannot find an overarching source I will probably not try to create a page.

4977: 4964: 4903: 4890: 2351:

It would be nice if other people responded. You can just quickly copy and paste your thoughts above to the deletion page. Should only take a few seconds.

1811: 1793: 5625: 5608: 5019: 4416: 4401: 4179: 4101: 4059: 4014: 2859: 2846: 2828: 2814: 2089: 1989: 1976: 1959: 1647: 1531: 1166: 5430: 5412: 5319: 5072: 4696: 1551: 5678: 5663: 5037: 4255: 4240: 4166: 4115: 2257: 2074: 1938: 1826: 6875: 5377: 5365: 5346: 5334: 5245: 5230: 5217: 5193: 5177: 5149: 5137: 5123: 5091: 5056: 4847: 4830: 4816: 4800: 4782: 4769: 4747: 4730: 2306: 2207: 2149: 1965: 1546: 5942: 5111: 1613: 4791:

consist of a heading followed by a number of bullet points. What we've got at the Byron Nelson article is something completely different, a table.

4467: 4449: 2320:. In addition, this is my first "bundle" deletion proposal so I may have screwed up some things. If you could fix any minor issues that'd be great! 3757:

If we merge into one table, I think the match results would be clearer in their own columns, as in your first example; something like this maybe:

4263: 3114: 2179: 2175: 6453: 6214:

https://pgagbi.bluegolf.com/bluegolf/pgagbi22/event/pgagbi22237/agendas.htm?type=1&stype=12&hagenda=aab6ae8f-b7fd-4f3b-8c26-174ede1d6b94

6955: 6751: 3984: 2796: 2182:). Overall, I like this idea (and have even contributed a little to these pages) but I think this user might be jumping the gun a little bit. 1569: 7073: 6718: 5495: 4322: 4146: 4044: 3752: 3094: 2918: 6969: 5462:

who won the event in 1976. In addition he had several other top results in the event during the 1970s. However, I have a few reservations:

4487: 4209: 7045: 6939:

responded on the deletion page's thread. Even if you disagree with this apparent consensus I would appreciate it if you briefly responded.

6827: 6329: 4075: 1595: 7032: 5420: 1774:

and 2019. • Winners of The Genesis Invitational from 2020-2022. • Winners of the Arnold Palmer Invitational presented by Mastercard from

817:. I was not involved in it but I believe editors came to the conclusion that "Challenge Matches" was a legitimate category. Is this true? 4869:

section of MOS applies, it is not a hard and fast rule); and there is no reason at all for a single article to be changed in isolation.

1847: 2865: 1409: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 7060: 7016: 1654:

I think I added all the satellite tournaments that counted in the money list a while back. I'm not sure the rest are worth including.

1951:. And we all know what the tour is like for rewriting it's own history... Either way, it needs to be sourced and explained properly. 1743: 1602:

in 1905 and 1906. I originally included his title when I created the page but it was then deleted. Any information would be helpful.

1599: 6803: 1892: 690:

That being said, when I search for "golf exhibition" (in any variation) on the internet I can't find much of a definition. Even our

4709:, it related to list articles. The article at issue here is not a list article, it just uses a table to display information and so 4315: 1517: 1466: 6441:, Mark Nash won the 1983 City of Cairns Open. I was wondering if this was all the same event. Any help would be much appreciated. 6992: 7101: 7085: 6813: 6668: 5669:

and even if they've lost PGA Tour status, they're thinking they might make a comeback on the seniors tour in a few years time.

5562: 2164: 1086:. If anyone is aware of any other golfer's page where the exhibition category exists, please move those wins into "Other wins." 6697: 5065:

In what way is the MOS unclear? It states that lists should go in chronological order, with no provision for reverse order. –

6201: 5794:

And in men's golf it is almost nonexistent. Overall, I think this parameter is irrelevant to our sport and should be deleted.

5763:. If a golfer never retires, then the field simply doesn't get filled. If they un-retire, simply delete the retirement year. 2153: 6797: 6631: 4624: 1328: 1297: 6434: 6414: 6402: 1619: 1500:. I don't think there's any way we'd want to be maintaining a weekly top 20 list in these articles or anywhere else (per 1361: 5471: 6197: 4718: 2834: 2189:

being used is from a website called Kronish sports. I have never heard of it before and I'm not sure if it's reliable.

1209: 1194: 1625: 6222: 4443: 4425: 6337: 1898:

FWIW, I agree. 48th and 40th and Matsuyama's round don't count. Now back to our regularly scheduled programming.....

6879: 4650:

for reference. The question is, should golf tournament winner lists go from most recent to earliest or vice versa?

2169: 2145: 6306: 6298: 6283: 5208:

per event", which clearly our tables don't. So on that basis they can't be "lists of dated events, or timelines".

1849:). Makes me think the tour made a bit of a hash of it this year, publishing conflicting criteria/exemption lists. 695: 4620: 4339: 4287: 1574: 47: 17: 1817:

The reference is given (ref 2) but it lacks clarity in certain aspects. The media guide list seems much better.

1430: 1375:

You are equating "called an exhibition by someone" with "not a professional win"; there is no such equivalence.

7066: 6461: 6422: 4601: 1981:

Does anyone have source(s) for the tour scratching the 2020 tournament and Matsuyama's record from the books?

1583:. For the table, most of the information is there but I'm still missing a decent amount from two columns. The 6819:

Always makes me chuckle when tours bang on about history and then insist on rewriting it on a regular basis.

6786: 6189: 6185: 6148:

I've deleted all the ones where the parameter was set. I haven't deleted any where the parameter is not set.

5652: 5426: 5401: 5286: 4663: 4585: 4229: 4187: 4135: 4033: 3134: 2246: 1667: 6612: 1457:

Does anyone here know if the two WGC tournaments that aren't on the schedule this season will be returning?

6914:

I have been advised by administrators for more opinions about this proposed deletion. On the deletion page

6219: 6216: 5995: 5688:

infobox because it exists in the infobox for other sports (where an unambiguous retirement date is common).

4268:

Currently we have a few hundred "succession boxes" at the bottom of our major championship articles, eg in

2386: 2009: 1537: 7074:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220325020926/http://www.owgr.com/archive/Web/WorldRankingPointsBreakdown.pdf

6676:

I assume the year and then the number of wins in that year in brackets is what you're on about, e.g. 1914

6657:

says about this but, to me, these parenthetical wins totals seems like a total distraction to the reader.

6309:

that states that Geoffrey Sisk, a notable local pro, won the event that year. It also says on the page of

6740:

reverted these changes due to lack of consensus. If we could get consensus either way that would be nice.

6396: 5007: 4680:

I notice that no consensus was ever actually reached at that previous discussion. You rightly brought up

6536:

for your additions. I noticed in your sandbox you had Vines winning again in 1974. However, I have this

6770: 6200:

but that title is already used as a redirect to the US event. In the media it was sometimes called the

5458:

I was thinking about making a page for this event. I recently created a page for the Australian golfer

2909:

that was the order he played them obviously (you can't tell the order of games from the tables above).

1967:

The 48th staging of the Players Championship ...). Perhaps best to simply remove it for 2021 and 2022.

922:, etc., but the latter never seem to be included in pro win lists and the former sometimes seem to be. 165:

will be hard finding primary sources for most of Couples' victories that were, in my mind, exhibitions.

38: 6769:

It seems like the Cazoo Classic may have been, like the Hero Open, dissociated from the English Open.

6617: 814: 4757: 1629:

calendars (which already include the "official" events). I wanted to know what other people thought.

6188:) officially (and confusingly) called the PGA Professional Championship. We already have an article 5511: 5467: 1006:

should be included in the "Other wins" subcategory as long as we have a reliable third-party source.

6313:

that he won the 2000 Cape Cod Open. (There doesn't appear to be a working citation for it though.)

5453: 5304: 4581: 4478:

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to

4473: 4458: 1208:

Bryson match which clearly states the exhibition nature of that event. People need to look around.

6562:

Lastly, do you have a good sense that the 73 and 74 events were part of the tour's Order of Merit?

2293:

for your forthright response. It seems clear that these pages should be headed to deletion by now.

6349:

The modern tournament gets its own article. The older events a separate one. If they are notable.

5503: 5202: 5162: 4350: 4269: 1580: 1462: 6983:

think the full 5 decimal points seems a bit much, but please let me know your thoughts. Thanks.

6848:

Talk:List of golfers with most Champions Tour major championship wins#Rename or apply criteria?‎

5010:. I dunno, I like it how it is, seems like a question bigger than one article or even just golf 6951: 6904: 6747: 6714: 6664: 6586: 6497: 6449: 6383: 6325: 6264: 6239: 6114: 6035: 5994:

There is a clear consensus to remove this parameter and I have made the appropriate request at

5976: 5885: 5801: 5733: 5695: 5575: 5549: 5491: 5443: 4365: 4307: 4280: 3110: 2371: 2333: 2302: 2203: 2114: 1730: 1643: 1609: 1343: 1280: 1213: 1198: 1130: 1016: 875: 739: 590: 368: 281: 178: 116: 5466:

I cannot find an overarching source that lists the winners for this event. According to links

5429:

recently from golf journalist Shane Ryan. He participated briefly in the discussion about the

4081:

My suggestions: 1. Would probably look better with consistent column widths. 2. Lose down (or

2026:

but dozens. The PGA Tour poor history of recordkeeping has been going on for 35 years or more.

6988: 6809: 6693: 6277: 5353:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Lists/Archive 7#Chronological order, for lists within articles

5079:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Lists/Archive 7#Chronological order, for lists within articles

4918: 4542: 4360: 4355: 4295: 4193: 2392: 1487: 1477: 1389: 1246: 964: 637: 453: 202: 133: 5514:

which says that Bradley Burns won it for the 7th time. Seems to be mainly a domestic event.

5433:

page we were thinking about deleting. (I was barely involved and don't know much about it.)

1943:

I didn't find anything to suggest sources favouring one over the other when searching, e.g.

1766:, 2019 and 2021. • Winners of the World Golf Championships-FedEx St. Jude Invitational from 6310: 5613: 4643: 4562: 1865: 228: 5236:

sensible way forward. I know that Knowledge is crazy at times, but surely not that crazy.

2186: 2148:

for a proposal to replace the current golf notability guideline in the wake of the recent

8: 6483: 6354: 6344:

similar corrections to articles on the Byron Nelson, Houston Open, and a few LPGA events.

5914:. Also, the parameter appears to be used inconsistently - for example, it's not used at 5718: 5605: 4570: 4454: 2396: 2031: 2000: 1903: 1441: 1406: 5923: 5008:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Boxing/Archive_9#Fight_record_tables

4197: 7092:

should be. Doesn't quite work out exactly because of the rounding to 5 decimal places)

7028: 6977: 6537: 6196:

might be a suitable name (based on the PGA article name). Until 2007 it was called the

5768: 5636: 5507: 5388:

Don't we already have consensus that ignoring the guideline improves the encyclopedia?

5155: 5046: 4736: 4706: 4702: 4681: 4597: 3995: 3334: 2717: 2533: 2317: 1458: 6843:

Talk:List of golfers with most LPGA major championship wins#Rename or apply criteria?‎

4835:

Okay, I guess we'll have to disagree on that point then, since the second sentence of

1799:

Also Recent winners of the Tour Championship (2018) is in wiki and not the media guide

6947: 6900: 6780: 6743: 6710: 6660: 6582: 6493: 6445: 6379: 6321: 6260: 6235: 6110: 6031: 5972: 5881: 5797: 5729: 5691: 5646: 5571: 5545: 5487: 5439: 5395: 5280: 5042: 5025: 5015: 4996: 4657: 4532: 4483: 4223: 4129: 4111: 4055: 4027: 3748: 3128: 3106: 3090: 2914: 2873: 2367: 2329: 2298: 2240: 2199: 2110: 2085: 2052: 1888: 1807: 1789: 1726: 1661: 1639: 1605: 1559:

Talk:Chronological list of men's major golf champions#Requested move 12 February 2022

1501: 1276: 1126: 1012: 871: 850:. This clearly implies that "Exhibition Wins" is a legitimate category. Is this true? 815:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Golf/Archive_12#TM_Driving_Relief

735: 586: 364: 277: 174: 112: 339:, would you like to respond to create consensus? Any help would be much appreciated. 6999: 6984: 6932: 6805: 6764: 6689: 6229: 6061:

Yes, from the infobox. However we have 285 articles which used this parameter (see

5875: 5374: 5343: 5316: 5227: 5190: 5146: 5120: 5069: 5053: 4974: 4932: 4914: 4887: 4844: 4813: 4779: 4744: 4714: 4693: 4609: 3894: 3673: 3248: 3027: 2631: 2508: 2316:

I just proposed that these pages should be deleted. Please see this deletion page:

1701: 1584: 1542:

There is a discussion underway regarding the titles of the following two articles:

1473: 1242: 960: 704: 691: 633: 449: 257: 198: 129: 6223:

https://web.archive.org/web/20020628132827/http://www.pga.info/articles.asp?id=197

5506:

which say its been going since 1951 for the W. L. "Birdie" Heron Trophy, although

4752:

Seems to me that the table at issue here is not a "list" in the sense intended at

1758:-2019 and 2021. • Winners of the U.S. Open and PGA Championship from 2016-2021. • 1452: 223:

Not sure why the "stroke play" distinction is so important to you. On the page of

7097: 7081: 7056: 7012: 6894: 6884:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Great Britain and Ireland PGA Cup golfers

6636: 6469: 6205: 6153: 6107:, I noticed you've been manually deleting the other ones. How many more are left? 6074: 6003: 5837: 5674: 5621: 5591: 5519: 5361: 5330: 5241: 5213: 5173: 5133: 5107: 5087: 5033: 4826: 4796: 4765: 4726: 4566: 4412: 4383: 4251: 4205: 4162: 4071: 4010: 3155: 2842: 2810: 2219: 2070: 1972: 1934: 1880: 1822: 1513: 1398: 1228: 1162: 1071: 4721:(which IS a list article) we use forward order per WP:DATELIST and WP:SALORDER. 4393:

I agree. This really isn't the purpose of succession boxes anyway. Remove them.

1778:-2022. • Winners of the Memorial Tournament presented by Workday from the years 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

7039: 6963: 6923: 6855: 6821: 6792: 6625: 6603: 6533: 6509: 6430: 6367: 6350: 6340: 5871: 5714: 5658: 5601: 5407: 5292: 4958: 4953: 4897: 4871: 4669: 4605: 4395: 4235: 4173: 4153:

As always it's a matter of whether we can be bothered to make a fuss about it (

4141: 4095: 4039: 3978: 3940: 3713: 3533: 3299: 3140: 3061: 2884: 2853: 2822: 2790: 2682: 2458: 2268: 2252: 2158: 2096: 2062: 2027: 2014: 1996: 1983: 1953: 1914: 1899: 1851: 1834: 1673: 1633: 1563: 1525: 1437: 1418: 1402: 1377: 1348: 1314: 1142: 1067: 924: 847: 764: 657: 620: 504: 500: 445: 405: 253: 152: 5098: 309:

It doesn't look like other WikiProject Golf editors are inclined to respond...

7024: 6928: 6737: 6654: 6410: 6066: 5933: 5915: 5911: 5764: 5756: 5308: 5270: 4941: 4686: 4593: 4479: 4429: 4154: 3991: 3935: 3797: 3708: 3588: 3364: 3329: 3294: 3056: 2954: 2747: 2712: 2677: 2528: 2478: 2453: 2290: 2263: 2139: 1697: 1591: 1433: 1390: 1063: 843: 813:

There was a conversation last year about events like this. The link is here:

6998:

The new "strokes gained" system is starting, as advertised a year ago. See:

6462:

https://www.cairnsgolfclub.com.au/10-golf/2-city-of-cairns-amateur-golf-week

3548:

Yeah happy with that. Still feel we could combine into one table though e.g.

655:, etc., are not included. Also, I'm really thinking of independent sources. 6936: 6774: 6680: 6650: 6646: 6426: 5760: 5640: 5459: 5389: 5274: 5011: 4992: 4949: 4651: 4552: 4378:

seniors but personally I think a navbox for these is a better way forward.

4217: 4123: 4107: 4051: 4021: 3802: 3744: 3738:

L v Wiesberger (3 & 1); L v Hadwin (4 & 3); L v Kisner (3 & 1)

3593: 3122: 3100: 3086: 2959: 2910: 2869: 2234: 2174:

I noticed that a user recently created some early PGA Tour calendars (e.g.

2081: 2048: 1884: 1803: 1785: 1655: 1075: 1059: 839: 699: 496: 334: 224: 148: 106: 7003: 6421:, there was a City of Cairns Open in 1970. I have a secondary source that 6186:

https://www.pga.info/news/cort-and-higgins-tied-at-the-top-at-slaley-hall/

5269:

I guess I'd like to know why MOS says what it does. Without knowing that,

4171:

Absolutely. Such nonsense should be reverted... but not edit-warred over.

5616:"retired" in 1930 but played in the Masters until 1948. Nonsense really. 5371: 5340: 5313: 5224: 5187: 5143: 5117: 5066: 5050: 4989: 4971: 4929: 4884: 4841: 4810: 4776: 4741: 4690: 4639: 4486:. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 3848: 3633: 2993: 1079: 762:

Many of the events being grouped in here would not fit that description.

632:

I believe the PGA Tour profiles list these wins as ‘other wins’ as well.

105:

A few minutes ago I created an "Exhibition wins" subheading category for

6220:

https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=Qg01AAAAIBAJ&pg=4129%2C2669254

6217:

https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=pJVAAAAAIBAJ&pg=6237%2C2060446

5128:

But, as we've seen, some lists are chronological but are not timelines.

7093: 7077: 7052: 7008: 6915: 6890: 6642: 6465: 6291: 6254: 6149: 6104: 6070: 6025: 5999: 5833: 5670: 5617: 5587: 5533: 5515: 5357: 5351:

However, it's not just us. You've also not answered the points made at

5326: 5237: 5209: 5169: 5129: 5103: 5083: 5029: 4822: 4792: 4761: 4735:

I don’t think a reference to a related policy necessarily implies that

4722: 4580:, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at 4408: 4379: 4247: 4201: 4158: 4067: 4006: 3151: 2838: 2806: 2215: 2066: 1968: 1930: 1818: 1509: 1224: 1158: 249: 5198:

However "For lists of dated events, or timelines, use one instance of

2318:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/1916_PGA_Tour

4710: 4516: 4495: 1879:

63 isn't included in the lowest rounds at Sawgrass records (it is in

1770:-2021. • Winners of the World Golf Championships-HSBC Champions from 6802:

Not necessarily as I read this article from the tour the other day.

231:

categorized as an exhibition even though it was a stroke play event.

5953: 5928: 5158:

says "For lists of dated events, or timelines, use one instance of

4836: 4806: 4788: 4753: 3369: 3243: 2752: 2626: 2503: 2483: 1929:

Yes. Seems that most sources are calling the current one the 48th.

1083: 6302: 5926:

who retired from the LPGA but is playing again at senior events.

248:

It would be good to hear from other WikiProject Golf members like

6919: 6507:

I've referenced Bob Taylor (1973), and added Graeme Bell (1972).

6413:

won the 1966 City of Cairns Open. Four years later, according to

6209: 5512:

https://postcourier.com.pg/history-made-65th-ip-new-britain-open/

4305:

gone out of fashion, navboxes being preferred in many cases, eg:

3889: 3668: 3022: 6918:

ultimately proposed to merge these pages to the main page (i.e.

5918:

where there's a section about "Close of playing career", and it

4713:

applies and I can't see anything there about such ordering. See

4337: 3618:

T v Hadwin; W v Weisburger (5 & 4); W v Johnson (3 & 1)

7002:

which shows that Rory is currently number 1 in this list. See:

4200:. If anyone knows of something better please include it there. 3843: 3628: 2988: 1594:

do we add military titles in these golf articles? According to

1140:

And, unsurprisingly, disruptive IDHT editing by DF147 resumes.

6867:

Link for proposed pages for deletion: lists of PGA Cup golfers

5870:

It seems like most of us are against this parameter. Do users

5504:

http://www.australiangolfheritage.org.au/objectofthemonth.html

3990:

Like this one the best. Don't think we need the "Pld" column.

1632:

In addition, as full disclosure, I would like to mention that

6961:

Sorry, but that doesn't accurately reflect what I have said.

6182:

Professional Golfers' Association (Great Britain and Ireland)

6176:

PGA Professional Championship (British+Irish) - article title

2882:

Ah, it's a shame there wasn't more input to that discussion.

3698:

W v Johnson (3 & 1); L v Kisner (5 & 4); T v Hadwin

2851:

That would certainly be an improvement on what we have now.

2047:) has the 18 holes record score. Matsuyama is not included. 6297:

In addition, there is a modern event. The modern event was

6063:

Category:Pages using infobox golfer with unknown parameters

2107:

Speaking of revisionist history... see the section below...

2061:

True, but ideally we should be using secondary sources per

1497: 1493: 1157:) but that doesn't seem to stop him editing as an IP user. 6401:

I was looking to make a page for this event. According to

1964:

I looked for "48th" and found mostly this years stuff (eg

1153:

Indeed. DF147 and his alter-ego Kentbobo are now blocked (

6194:

PGA Professional Championship (Great Britain and Ireland)

5370:“Everyone else” might be an exaggeration on your part. – 4617:

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.

4528:

It will work on a variety of links, including those from

1700:

calendar. In addition, in the notes column, I noted that

1508:

but I only do that because of some comments in the past.

1155:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/DooksFoley147/Archive

4646:, it looks like it's time to revisit this topic. Here's 1760:

Winner of the FedExCup from the 2018/19-2020/21 seasons.

838:

We have an "Exhibition Wins" subheading on the pages of

6290:

that is previewing the 1930 event. On the wiki page of

5273:

seems to apply since we have a longstanding consensus.

2864:

FYI, this was suggested and demonstrated previously at

5878:

have opinions? I would like to come to consensus soon.

4504:

John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.

1624:

I recently came across old PGA Tour Media Guides like

1506:

List of male golfers who have been in the world top 10

6065:, more than I was expecting). I'll delete them using 6024:

Looks like the parameter has been deleted. Thank you

4809:

specifically names tables as a valid type of list. –

4407:

most likely be interested in other majors that year.

4198:

https://www.pgatour.com/fantasy/major-qualifiers.html

4106:

I think that looks way better than before. Good job!

2065:

to "avoid novel interpretations of primary sources".

5508:

https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/251037609

3658:

T v Kisner; W v Johnson (4 & 3); T v Weisburger

4584:. Questions, comments and requests can be made at 2012:but didn't manage to account for several changes. 6876:List of Great Britain and Ireland PGA Cup golfers 6305:is the tournament's homepage. I have this a 1994 5431:List of men's major championships winning golfers 3099:My two cents: I like this table above created by 1552:List of men's major championships winning golfers 694:doesn't have "exhibition" in it. I did find this 7000:https://www.owgr.com/strokes-gained-world-rating 5436:Anyway, I thought it may be of some interest... 1547:Chronological list of men's major golf champions 6192:for the corresponding US event so I'm thinking 3150:Yes. I think the use of initials is a problem. 1472:Pretty sure they're not from my understanding. 4634:Chronological ordering of winner lists (again) 4323: 3197: 2580: 2420: 1002:I think these subheadings should be scrapped. 128:like this with few/no sources to back it up. 6429:won the 1971 Cairns Open. On the sandbox of 6736:I began deleting these parentheses however 4490:. The idea is that it takes something like 5182:That very link says “Chronological lists, 4330: 4316: 3204: 3190: 2866:Talk:2019 WGC-Dell Technologies Match Play 2587: 2573: 2427: 2413: 6613:Talk:Greg Norman#PIF investment portfolio 5028:, which is specifically for biographies. 1600:South African Amateur Championship (golf) 1590:I also have one more small question: per 260:and I are coming close to a resolution... 6882:in a bundle. The deletion page is here: 6353:, is the complaint department really on 5717:, is the complaint department really on 5604:, is the complaint department really on 5154:It's not me that need to define it, but 4760:from the 1920s often use forward order. 4468:User script to detect unreliable sources 2820:points table seems to work well though. 2156:, for comments and suggestions. Thanks. 2030:, is the complaint department really on 1999:, is the complaint department really on 1902:, is the complaint department really on 1870:Someone changed the 2022 Players to be " 1440:, is the complaint department really on 1405:, is the complaint department really on 618:"professional wins" by the wider world? 7004:https://www.owgr.com/this-week-s-events 6834:Lists of golfers with "most" major wins 4952:. You've stated your case, please stop 4264:Succession boxes in major championships 1492:I've reverted a couple of additions at 1397:victories but her article sadly dwarfs 14: 6838:Please see the following discussions: 6618:Talk:LIV Golf#PIF Investment portfolio 6608:Please see the following discussions: 6257:, What name did you ultimately choose? 5356:everyone else sees ambiguities in it. 4488:39th most imported script on Knowledge 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4883:it, but let's see what others say. – 4717:which used reverse order. However in 4311: 3184: 2567: 6202:PGA Club Professionals' Championship 5832:I'd still be keen to get rid of it. 5713:Golfer retirement ceremony= funeral. 5096:The phrase was added 29 August 2015 3227: 3222: 3217: 3212: 3181: 3176: 3169: 2610: 2605: 2600: 2595: 2564: 2559: 2445: 2442: 2439: 2436: 1995:at the Bing Crosby is still missing. 444:That's what I was sort of thinking @ 25: 6301:in 1992 by a man named Jim Gaquin. 5421:It appears we have made the news... 2837:which uses a side-by-side approach 2152:. I have started discussion on the 23: 6198:PGA Club Professional Championship 5568:advice would be much appreciated. 5510:says it started in 1953. See also 4719:List of PGA Championship champions 4578:not a script to be mindlessly used 4085:) or by holes, not up. 3. Conners 2835:2020 Championship League (ranking) 1579:I recently created a page for the 1504:). I do maintain a top 10 list at 98:Fred Couples and "Exhibition Wins" 24: 7113: 4510:and turns it into something like 4444:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Sports 4426:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Sports 1744:Player Championship qualification 6880:List of American PGA Cup golfers 6180:I'm looking for a title for the 5480:has any info please let me know. 4435: 4088: 3934: 3888: 3842: 3796: 3707: 3667: 3627: 3587: 3363: 3328: 3293: 3242: 3177: 3055: 3021: 2987: 2953: 2746: 2711: 2676: 2625: 2560: 2527: 2502: 2477: 2452: 2146:Knowledge:WikiProject Golf/NGOLF 29: 5049:is the only relevant policy. – 4740:order regardless of context? – 1401:who has 88 tour wins. Thoughts? 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Golf 6487:on the tournament's wiki page. 5563:Question about retirement date 4561:The script is mostly based on 4340:Men's major golf championships 4093:with an explanatory footnote. 3228: 2611: 1874:Players Championship, and the 13: 1: 7023:Agree on two decimal places. 6190:PGA Professional Championship 4586:User talk:Headbomb/unreliable 2833:One option is something like 1735:05:41, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1679:08:40, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 1648:06:21, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 1614:14:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC) 1570:09:06, 12 February 2022 (UTC) 1532:18:12, 10 February 2022 (UTC) 1518:06:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC) 1321:10:12, 31 December 2021 (UTC) 1306:21:51, 30 December 2021 (UTC) 1167:11:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC) 1149:10:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC) 1135:22:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC) 771:22:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC) 744:20:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC) 664:13:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC) 642:11:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC) 627:11:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC) 595:06:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC) 458:19:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC) 412:17:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC) 373:01:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 286:18:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC) 207:07:04, 12 November 2021 (UTC) 183:19:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 138:17:46, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 121:04:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 7007:unless anyone else is keen. 5996:Template talk:Infobox golfer 4082: 4050:Looks like we have a winner 3965:Lost to Wiesberger 3 & 1 3397:Advanced to knockout stage; 3223: 3218: 2780:Advanced to knockout stage; 2606: 2601: 1482:17:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC) 1467:13:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC) 1445:20:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC) 1434:biography of a living person 1425:14:46, 6 February 2022 (UTC) 1410:14:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) 1384:10:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC) 1370:01:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC) 1355:12:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC) 1337:11:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC) 1285:20:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC) 1251:17:34, 2 December 2021 (UTC) 1233:09:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC) 1218:07:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC) 1203:07:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC) 1021:05:49, 6 December 2021 (UTC) 969:19:57, 4 December 2021 (UTC) 931:19:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC) 880:20:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC) 7: 7102:08:35, 15 August 2022 (UTC) 7086:06:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC) 7061:15:44, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 7046:12:44, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 6970:07:39, 12 August 2022 (UTC) 6956:20:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC) 6773:only shows the 2021 event. 4701:It's not at all clear that 3213: 2868:22:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC) 2596: 1620:updating PGA Tour calendars 914:, etc. and not things like 10: 7118: 7033:17:41, 9 August 2022 (UTC) 7017:14:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC) 6993:09:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC) 6922:) and delete these lists. 6184:'s "flagship tournament" ( 4629:16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC) 4621:MediaWiki message delivery 4471: 4417:16:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC) 4402:11:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC) 4388:08:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC) 4256:06:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC) 4241:17:20, 28 March 2022 (UTC) 4210:14:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC) 4180:08:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC) 4167:07:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC) 4147:02:24, 26 March 2022 (UTC) 4116:09:18, 24 March 2022 (UTC) 4102:08:18, 24 March 2022 (UTC) 4076:07:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC) 4060:22:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 4045:18:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 4015:15:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 4000:15:19, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 3985:13:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 3753:12:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 3540:11:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 3160:06:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 3146:05:24, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 3115:04:54, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 3095:22:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC) 2919:21:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC) 2891:11:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 2878:22:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC) 2860:12:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC) 2847:11:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) 2829:11:23, 22 March 2022 (UTC) 2815:11:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC) 2797:10:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC) 2376:21:57, 24 March 2022 (UTC) 2338:04:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 2307:02:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC) 2275:12:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC) 2258:07:57, 18 March 2022 (UTC) 2224:06:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC) 2208:07:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC) 2165:14:18, 24 March 2022 (UTC) 2119:07:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC) 2103:12:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC) 2090:19:32, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 2075:19:31, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 2057:19:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 2035:18:51, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 2021:18:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 2004:18:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 1990:18:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 1977:18:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 1960:17:58, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 1939:16:48, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 1921:18:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 1907:16:15, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 1893:15:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC) 1858:12:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC) 1841:16:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC) 1827:16:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC) 1812:16:28, 11 March 2022 (UTC) 1794:16:18, 11 March 2022 (UTC) 6909:03:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC) 6862:11:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC) 6828:10:50, 24 July 2022 (UTC) 6814:05:33, 22 July 2022 (UTC) 6798:22:16, 21 July 2022 (UTC) 6752:03:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC) 6719:20:14, 14 July 2022 (UTC) 6698:19:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC) 6669:18:51, 14 July 2022 (UTC) 6632:08:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 6474:20:49, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 6454:20:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 6439:the Sydney Morning Herald 6419:the Sydney Morning Herald 6388:15:56, 27 June 2022 (UTC) 6358:19:44, 24 June 2022 (UTC) 6330:19:13, 24 June 2022 (UTC) 6269:15:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC) 6244:17:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC) 6158:18:37, 24 June 2022 (UTC) 6119:17:06, 24 June 2022 (UTC) 6079:04:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 6040:01:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 6008:04:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC) 5981:23:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC) 5943:13:56, 11 June 2022 (UTC) 5600:FWIW, I agree with Nigej. 4758:Glasgow Herald Tournament 4463:20:12, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 4346: 4292: 4285: 4277: 3971:Lost to Kisner 3 & 1 3830:Beat Weisburger 5 & 4 3786: 3765: 3577: 3559: 3411: 3361: 3326: 3291: 3240: 2940: 2937: 2934: 2931: 2788:Thoughts please. Thanks. 2744: 2709: 2674: 2623: 2525: 2500: 2475: 2450: 2408: 7037:Agree; 2dp makes sense. 6591:15:43, 9 July 2022 (UTC) 6516:10:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC) 6502:04:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC) 5890:22:12, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 5842:05:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 5806:04:59, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 5773:17:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC) 5738:22:12, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 5722:15:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC) 5700:07:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC) 5679:20:11, 4 June 2022 (UTC) 5664:19:14, 4 June 2022 (UTC) 5626:18:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC) 5609:18:54, 4 June 2022 (UTC) 5596:18:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC) 5580:15:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC) 5554:15:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC) 5532:Thank you for the links 5524:06:12, 3 June 2022 (UTC) 5496:05:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC) 5448:05:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC) 5413:20:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 5378:09:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC) 5366:04:29, 27 May 2022 (UTC) 5347:21:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 5335:20:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 5320:19:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 5298:02:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 5246:19:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC) 5231:16:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC) 5218:09:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC) 5194:09:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC) 5178:04:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC) 5150:22:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 5138:20:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 5124:19:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 5112:08:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 5092:08:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 5073:19:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC) 5057:19:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC) 5038:16:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC) 5020:15:29, 18 May 2022 (UTC) 5001:17:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4978:01:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 4965:22:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC) 4936:19:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC) 4923:12:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4904:13:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4891:12:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4878:12:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4848:12:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4831:12:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4817:09:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4801:08:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4783:08:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4770:07:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4748:06:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4731:06:44, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4697:06:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4675:03:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 4582:User:Headbomb/unreliable 4502:. Accessed 2020-02-14. ( 4474:User:Headbomb/unreliable 3968:Lost to Hadwin 4 & 3 3922:Lost to Kisner 5 & 4 3783: 3780: 3777: 3774: 3771: 3762: 3574: 3571: 3568: 3565: 3562: 3556: 2943: 2928: 2170:early PGA Tour calendars 2043:p38 of the media guide ( 698:by the legendary golfer 227:we have his wins at the 4648:the previous discussion 4270:2022 Masters Tournament 3833:Beat Johnson 3 & 1 1581:Minnesota State Amateur 1575:Minnesota State Amateur 1561:to contribute. Thanks. 256:. It doesn't seem like 4524:. Accessed 2020-02-14. 4281:2021 Open Championship 3919:Beat Johnson 3 & 1 3876:Beat Johnson 4 & 3 3072:Loss vs DJ (4 & 3) 3069:Loss vs BW (3 & 1) 3038:Loss vs KK (5 & 4) 4644:AT&T Byron Nelson 4576:Do note that this is 4366:The Open Championship 4296:2022 PGA Championship 4194:2022 PGA Championship 4188:2022 PGA Championship 3035:Win vs DJ (3 & 1) 3004:Win vs DJ (4 & 3) 2970:Win vs BW (5 & 4) 2393:Module:Sports results 2264:self-published source 42:of past discussions. 6311:Jeff Julian (golfer) 5726:Lol... kind of true. 5614:Bobby Jones (golfer) 4950:learn the difference 4944:. And again, MOS is 4020:I think that works. 3075:Loss vs DJ (3&1) 2387:WGC Match Play pools 1538:Notice of discussion 1342:The time for you to 229:Lough Erne Challenge 7067:Technical diversion 6484:City of Cairns Open 6397:City of Cairns Open 6208:(forerunner of the 5168:per event, thus:". 4642:'s recent edits at 4288:Major Championships 2973:Win vs DJ (3&1) 2397:Module:Sports_table 1626:this one from 1972. 6542:The Canberra Times 5637:Robert-Jan Derksen 4942:using common sense 4484:predatory journals 4480:unreliable sources 5938: 5305:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS 5184:such as timelines 5077:See for instance 5043:MOS:CHRONOLOGICAL 5026:MOS:CHRONOLOGICAL 4517:Article of things 4496:Article of things 4374: 4373: 4302: 4301: 3975: 3974: 3742: 3741: 3527: 3526: 3521: 3520: 3390: 3389: 3084: 3083: 2773: 2772: 2550: 2549: 2434:Results of \ vs. 1346:passed long ago. 912:TM Driving Relief 653:Monday Night Golf 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 7109: 7042: 6966: 6874:I am nominating 6858: 6824: 6795: 6789: 6783: 6777: 6771:The history page 6628: 6538:secondary source 6512: 6230:PGA Championship 5956: 5939: 5936: 5931: 5924:Annika Sörenstam 5661: 5655: 5649: 5643: 5454:New Britain Open 5410: 5404: 5398: 5392: 5295: 5289: 5283: 5277: 5207: 5201: 5167: 5161: 5100: 4961: 4900: 4874: 4787:The examples at 4715:PGA Championship 4672: 4666: 4660: 4654: 4618: 4613: 4557: 4551: 4547: 4541: 4537: 4531: 4519: 4505: 4439: 4438: 4398: 4356:PGA Championship 4332: 4325: 4318: 4309: 4308: 4275: 4274: 4238: 4232: 4226: 4220: 4176: 4144: 4138: 4132: 4126: 4098: 4090: 4084: 4042: 4036: 4030: 4024: 3981: 3939: 3938: 3895:Bernd Wiesberger 3893: 3892: 3879:Tied Weisburger 3847: 3846: 3801: 3800: 3760: 3759: 3712: 3711: 3674:Bernd Wiesberger 3672: 3671: 3632: 3631: 3592: 3591: 3554: 3553: 3536: 3406: 3405: 3400: 3396: 3374: 3368: 3367: 3339: 3333: 3332: 3304: 3298: 3297: 3253: 3249:Robert MacIntyre 3247: 3246: 3230: 3225: 3220: 3215: 3206: 3199: 3192: 3179: 3174: 3173: 3170: 3143: 3137: 3131: 3125: 3060: 3059: 3028:Bernd Wiesberger 3026: 3025: 2992: 2991: 2958: 2957: 2926: 2925: 2887: 2856: 2825: 2793: 2783: 2779: 2757: 2751: 2750: 2722: 2716: 2715: 2687: 2681: 2680: 2636: 2632:Robert MacIntyre 2630: 2629: 2613: 2608: 2603: 2598: 2589: 2582: 2575: 2562: 2557: 2556: 2532: 2531: 2509:Robert MacIntyre 2507: 2506: 2482: 2481: 2457: 2456: 2429: 2422: 2415: 2406: 2405: 2271: 2255: 2249: 2243: 2237: 2161: 2099: 2017: 1986: 1956: 1917: 1854: 1837: 1702:The British Open 1676: 1670: 1664: 1658: 1566: 1528: 1421: 1380: 1351: 1317: 1145: 927: 767: 705:The Boston Globe 692:Glossary_of_golf 660: 623: 507: 408: 337: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 7117: 7116: 7112: 7111: 7110: 7108: 7107: 7106: 7069: 7044: 7040: 6980: 6978:New OWGR points 6968: 6964: 6895:Knowledge:NLIST 6869: 6860: 6856: 6836: 6826: 6822: 6793: 6787: 6781: 6775: 6767: 6639: 6630: 6626: 6606: 6514: 6510: 6482:A page for the 6431:User: Wjemather 6399: 6280: 6206:Diamondhead Cup 6178: 5954: 5934: 5929: 5659: 5653: 5647: 5641: 5565: 5456: 5423: 5408: 5402: 5396: 5390: 5293: 5287: 5281: 5275: 5205: 5199: 5165: 5159: 5097: 5045:is irrelevant. 4963: 4959: 4948:policy; please 4902: 4898: 4876: 4872: 4805:Section 5.5 of 4670: 4664: 4658: 4652: 4636: 4616: 4592: 4555: 4549: 4545: 4539: 4535: 4529: 4515: 4503: 4476: 4470: 4450:discussion page 4440: 4436: 4433: 4400: 4396: 4375: 4370: 4342: 4336: 4298: 4283: 4266: 4236: 4230: 4224: 4218: 4192:I've created a 4190: 4178: 4174: 4157:and all that). 4142: 4136: 4130: 4124: 4100: 4096: 4040: 4034: 4028: 4022: 3983: 3979: 3933: 3887: 3841: 3795: 3706: 3666: 3626: 3586: 3538: 3534: 3528: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3372: 3362: 3337: 3327: 3302: 3292: 3251: 3241: 3210: 3141: 3135: 3129: 3123: 3054: 3020: 2986: 2952: 2889: 2885: 2858: 2854: 2827: 2823: 2795: 2791: 2786: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2755: 2745: 2720: 2710: 2685: 2675: 2634: 2624: 2593: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2526: 2501: 2496:Lost 2 & 1 2493:Lost 2 & 1 2476: 2451: 2433: 2389: 2273: 2269: 2253: 2247: 2241: 2235: 2185:First off, the 2172: 2163: 2159: 2154:talk page there 2142: 2101: 2097: 2019: 2015: 1988: 1984: 1958: 1954: 1919: 1915: 1881:TPC at Sawgrass 1868: 1856: 1852: 1839: 1835: 1746: 1674: 1668: 1662: 1656: 1622: 1577: 1568: 1564: 1540: 1530: 1526: 1490: 1455: 1423: 1419: 1399:Kathy Whitworth 1394: 1382: 1378: 1353: 1349: 1344:WP:DROPTHESTICK 1319: 1315: 1147: 1143: 1072:Charlie Bolling 929: 925: 769: 765: 662: 658: 625: 621: 505: 410: 406: 335: 100: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 7115: 7105: 7104: 7068: 7065: 7064: 7063: 7048: 7038: 7035: 7020: 7019: 6979: 6976: 6975: 6974: 6973: 6972: 6962: 6945: 6941: 6940: 6868: 6865: 6854: 6851: 6850: 6845: 6835: 6832: 6831: 6830: 6820: 6766: 6763: 6762: 6761: 6760: 6759: 6758: 6757: 6756: 6755: 6741: 6727: 6726: 6725: 6724: 6723: 6722: 6708: 6687: 6686: 6685: 6684: 6638: 6635: 6624: 6621: 6620: 6615: 6605: 6602: 6601: 6600: 6599: 6598: 6597: 6596: 6595: 6594: 6580: 6570: 6569: 6568: 6567: 6566: 6565: 6564: 6563: 6553: 6552: 6551: 6550: 6549: 6548: 6547: 6546: 6534:User:Wjemather 6523: 6522: 6521: 6520: 6519: 6518: 6508: 6491: 6488: 6477: 6476: 6398: 6395: 6394: 6393: 6392: 6391: 6374: 6373: 6372: 6371: 6361: 6360: 6346: 6345: 6341:Pensacola Open 6279: 6276: 6275: 6274: 6273: 6272: 6258: 6248: 6247: 6233: 6177: 6174: 6173: 6172: 6171: 6170: 6169: 6168: 6167: 6166: 6165: 6164: 6163: 6162: 6161: 6160: 6133: 6132: 6131: 6130: 6129: 6128: 6127: 6126: 6125: 6124: 6123: 6122: 6108: 6090: 6089: 6088: 6087: 6086: 6085: 6084: 6083: 6082: 6081: 6050: 6049: 6048: 6047: 6046: 6045: 6044: 6043: 6029: 6015: 6014: 6013: 6012: 6011: 6010: 5987: 5986: 5985: 5984: 5970: 5964: 5963: 5962: 5961: 5946: 5945: 5906: 5905: 5904: 5903: 5902: 5901: 5900: 5899: 5898: 5897: 5896: 5895: 5894: 5893: 5879: 5855: 5854: 5853: 5852: 5851: 5850: 5849: 5848: 5847: 5846: 5845: 5844: 5818: 5817: 5816: 5815: 5814: 5813: 5812: 5811: 5810: 5809: 5795: 5782: 5781: 5780: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5775: 5746: 5745: 5744: 5743: 5742: 5741: 5727: 5724: 5706: 5705: 5704: 5703: 5689: 5682: 5681: 5633: 5632: 5631: 5630: 5629: 5628: 5564: 5561: 5560: 5559: 5558: 5557: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5537: 5527: 5526: 5482: 5481: 5476: 5475: 5455: 5452: 5422: 5419: 5418: 5417: 5416: 5415: 5386: 5385: 5384: 5383: 5382: 5381: 5380: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5264: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5260: 5259: 5258: 5257: 5256: 5255: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5249: 5248: 5203:Timeline-event 5163:Timeline-event 5114: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5060: 5059: 4985: 4984: 4983: 4982: 4981: 4980: 4957: 4911: 4910: 4909: 4908: 4907: 4906: 4896: 4870: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4860: 4859: 4858: 4857: 4856: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4852: 4851: 4850: 4635: 4632: 4619:Delivered by: 4526: 4525: 4522:Deprecated.com 4508: 4507: 4500:Deprecated.com 4469: 4466: 4455:WikiCleanerMan 4434: 4432: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4394: 4372: 4371: 4369: 4368: 4363: 4358: 4353: 4347: 4344: 4343: 4335: 4334: 4327: 4320: 4312: 4300: 4299: 4294: 4291: 4284: 4279: 4265: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4189: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4172: 4119: 4118: 4104: 4094: 4063: 4062: 4018: 4017: 4002: 3977: 3973: 3972: 3969: 3966: 3963: 3958: 3955: 3952: 3949: 3946: 3941:Dustin Johnson 3931: 3927: 3926: 3923: 3920: 3917: 3912: 3909: 3906: 3903: 3900: 3885: 3881: 3880: 3877: 3874: 3871: 3866: 3863: 3860: 3857: 3854: 3839: 3835: 3834: 3831: 3828: 3825: 3820: 3817: 3814: 3811: 3808: 3793: 3789: 3788: 3787:Match results 3785: 3782: 3779: 3776: 3773: 3770: 3764: 3740: 3739: 3736: 3731: 3728: 3725: 3722: 3719: 3714:Dustin Johnson 3704: 3700: 3699: 3696: 3691: 3688: 3685: 3682: 3679: 3664: 3660: 3659: 3656: 3651: 3648: 3645: 3642: 3639: 3624: 3620: 3619: 3616: 3611: 3608: 3605: 3602: 3599: 3584: 3580: 3579: 3576: 3573: 3570: 3567: 3564: 3561: 3558: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3543: 3542: 3532: 3525: 3524: 3519: 3518: 3515: 3512: 3509: 3506: 3502: 3501: 3498: 3495: 3492: 3489: 3485: 3484: 3481: 3478: 3475: 3472: 3468: 3467: 3464: 3461: 3458: 3455: 3451: 3450: 3447: 3444: 3441: 3438: 3434: 3433: 3430: 3427: 3424: 3421: 3417: 3416: 3413: 3412:Match details 3410: 3403: 3393: 3391: 3388: 3387: 3384: 3381: 3378: 3375: 3360: 3357: 3353: 3352: 3349: 3346: 3343: 3340: 3325: 3322: 3318: 3317: 3314: 3311: 3308: 3305: 3300:Dustin Johnson 3290: 3287: 3283: 3282: 3280: 3278: 3276: 3274: 3272: 3270: 3267: 3266: 3263: 3260: 3257: 3254: 3239: 3236: 3232: 3231: 3226: 3221: 3216: 3211: 3209: 3208: 3201: 3194: 3186: 3183: 3180: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3162: 3148: 3082: 3081: 3076: 3073: 3070: 3067: 3062:Dustin Johnson 3052: 3048: 3047: 3042: 3039: 3036: 3033: 3018: 3014: 3013: 3008: 3005: 3002: 2999: 2984: 2980: 2979: 2974: 2971: 2968: 2965: 2950: 2946: 2945: 2942: 2939: 2936: 2933: 2930: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2883: 2852: 2821: 2789: 2776: 2774: 2771: 2770: 2767: 2764: 2761: 2758: 2743: 2740: 2736: 2735: 2732: 2729: 2726: 2723: 2708: 2705: 2701: 2700: 2697: 2694: 2691: 2688: 2683:Dustin Johnson 2673: 2670: 2666: 2665: 2663: 2661: 2659: 2657: 2655: 2653: 2650: 2649: 2646: 2643: 2640: 2637: 2622: 2619: 2615: 2614: 2609: 2604: 2599: 2594: 2592: 2591: 2584: 2577: 2569: 2566: 2563: 2551: 2548: 2547: 2545: 2542: 2541:Won 2 & 1 2539: 2536: 2523: 2522: 2519: 2517: 2516:Won 2 & 1 2514: 2511: 2498: 2497: 2494: 2491: 2489: 2486: 2473: 2472: 2469: 2466: 2463: 2461: 2459:Dustin Johnson 2448: 2447: 2444: 2441: 2438: 2435: 2432: 2431: 2424: 2417: 2409: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2388: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2365: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2311: 2310: 2295: 2294: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2267: 2227: 2226: 2171: 2168: 2157: 2141: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2108: 2095: 2077: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2013: 1982: 1952: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1913: 1867: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1850: 1833: 1829: 1801: 1800: 1745: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1724: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1682: 1681: 1634:User:Wjemather 1621: 1618: 1576: 1573: 1562: 1555: 1554: 1549: 1539: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1524: 1489: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1454: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1429:I have started 1417: 1393: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1376: 1358: 1357: 1347: 1329:178.167.247.64 1324: 1323: 1313: 1298:31.200.190.146 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1236: 1235: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1141: 1124: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1068:Dustin Johnson 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1010: 1007: 1003: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 923: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 848:Dustin Johnson 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 763: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 669: 668: 667: 666: 656: 619: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 584: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 501:Dustin Johnson 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 404: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 268: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 233: 232: 214: 213: 212: 211: 210: 209: 189: 188: 187: 186: 169: 168: 167: 166: 159: 158: 157: 156: 153:Dustin Johnson 141: 140: 99: 96: 93: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7114: 7103: 7099: 7095: 7090: 7089: 7088: 7087: 7083: 7079: 7075: 7062: 7058: 7054: 7049: 7047: 7043: 7036: 7034: 7030: 7026: 7022: 7021: 7018: 7014: 7010: 7005: 7001: 6997: 6996: 6995: 6994: 6990: 6986: 6971: 6967: 6960: 6959: 6958:Oogglywoogly 6957: 6953: 6949: 6946: 6943: 6942: 6938: 6934: 6930: 6925: 6921: 6917: 6913: 6912: 6911: 6910: 6906: 6902: 6898: 6896: 6892: 6887: 6885: 6881: 6877: 6872: 6864: 6863: 6859: 6849: 6846: 6844: 6841: 6840: 6839: 6829: 6825: 6818: 6817: 6816: 6815: 6811: 6807: 6804: 6800: 6799: 6796: 6790: 6784: 6778: 6772: 6765:Cazoo Classic 6753: 6749: 6745: 6742: 6739: 6738:User:Tewapack 6735: 6734: 6733: 6732: 6731: 6730: 6729: 6728: 6720: 6716: 6712: 6709: 6707:Yes, exactly. 6706: 6705: 6704: 6703: 6702: 6701: 6700: 6699: 6695: 6691: 6682: 6679: 6675: 6674: 6673: 6672: 6671: 6670: 6666: 6662: 6658: 6656: 6652: 6648: 6644: 6634: 6633: 6629: 6619: 6616: 6614: 6611: 6610: 6609: 6592: 6588: 6584: 6581: 6578: 6577: 6576: 6575: 6574: 6573: 6572: 6571: 6561: 6560: 6559: 6558: 6557: 6556: 6555: 6554: 6543: 6539: 6535: 6531: 6530: 6529: 6528: 6527: 6526: 6525: 6524: 6517: 6513: 6506: 6505: 6504:Oogglywoogly 6503: 6499: 6495: 6492: 6489: 6485: 6481: 6480: 6479: 6478: 6475: 6471: 6467: 6463: 6459: 6458: 6457: 6456:Oogglywoogly 6455: 6451: 6447: 6442: 6440: 6436: 6432: 6428: 6424: 6420: 6416: 6412: 6411:Randall Vines 6408: 6404: 6389: 6385: 6381: 6378: 6377: 6376: 6375: 6369: 6365: 6364: 6363: 6362: 6359: 6356: 6352: 6348: 6347: 6342: 6338: 6335: 6334: 6333: 6332:Oogglywoogly 6331: 6327: 6323: 6318: 6314: 6312: 6308: 6304: 6300: 6295: 6293: 6289: 6285: 6278:Cape Cod Open 6270: 6266: 6262: 6259: 6256: 6252: 6251: 6250: 6249: 6245: 6241: 6237: 6234: 6231: 6227: 6226: 6225: 6224: 6221: 6218: 6215: 6211: 6207: 6203: 6199: 6195: 6191: 6187: 6183: 6159: 6155: 6151: 6147: 6146: 6145: 6144: 6143: 6142: 6141: 6140: 6139: 6138: 6137: 6136: 6135: 6134: 6120: 6116: 6112: 6109: 6106: 6102: 6101: 6100: 6099: 6098: 6097: 6096: 6095: 6094: 6093: 6092: 6091: 6080: 6076: 6072: 6068: 6064: 6060: 6059: 6058: 6057: 6056: 6055: 6054: 6053: 6052: 6051: 6041: 6037: 6033: 6030: 6027: 6023: 6022: 6021: 6020: 6019: 6018: 6017: 6016: 6009: 6005: 6001: 5997: 5993: 5992: 5991: 5990: 5989: 5988: 5982: 5978: 5974: 5971: 5968: 5967: 5966: 5965: 5958: 5957: 5950: 5949: 5948: 5947: 5944: 5941: 5940: 5932: 5925: 5921: 5917: 5916:Jack Nicklaus 5913: 5912:Graham DeLaet 5908: 5907: 5891: 5887: 5883: 5880: 5877: 5873: 5869: 5868: 5867: 5866: 5865: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5861: 5860: 5859: 5858: 5857: 5856: 5843: 5839: 5835: 5830: 5829: 5828: 5827: 5826: 5825: 5824: 5823: 5822: 5821: 5820: 5819: 5807: 5803: 5799: 5796: 5792: 5791: 5790: 5789: 5788: 5787: 5786: 5785: 5784: 5783: 5774: 5770: 5766: 5762: 5758: 5757:Graham DeLaet 5754: 5753: 5752: 5751: 5750: 5749: 5748: 5747: 5739: 5735: 5731: 5728: 5725: 5723: 5720: 5716: 5712: 5711: 5710: 5709: 5708: 5707: 5701: 5697: 5693: 5690: 5686: 5685: 5684: 5683: 5680: 5676: 5672: 5668: 5667: 5666: 5665: 5662: 5656: 5650: 5644: 5638: 5627: 5623: 5619: 5615: 5612: 5611: 5610: 5607: 5603: 5599: 5598: 5597: 5593: 5589: 5585: 5584: 5583: 5582:Oogglywoogly 5581: 5577: 5573: 5569: 5555: 5551: 5547: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5541: 5535: 5531: 5530: 5529: 5528: 5525: 5521: 5517: 5513: 5509: 5505: 5501: 5500: 5499: 5498:Oogglywoogly 5497: 5493: 5489: 5485: 5478: 5477: 5473: 5469: 5465: 5464: 5463: 5461: 5451: 5450:Oogglywoogly 5449: 5445: 5441: 5437: 5434: 5432: 5428: 5414: 5411: 5405: 5399: 5393: 5387: 5379: 5376: 5373: 5369: 5368: 5367: 5363: 5359: 5354: 5350: 5349: 5348: 5345: 5342: 5338: 5337: 5336: 5332: 5328: 5323: 5322: 5321: 5318: 5315: 5310: 5306: 5302: 5301: 5300: 5299: 5296: 5290: 5284: 5278: 5272: 5247: 5243: 5239: 5234: 5233: 5232: 5229: 5226: 5221: 5220: 5219: 5215: 5211: 5204: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5192: 5189: 5185: 5181: 5180: 5179: 5175: 5171: 5164: 5157: 5153: 5152: 5151: 5148: 5145: 5141: 5140: 5139: 5135: 5131: 5127: 5126: 5125: 5122: 5119: 5115: 5113: 5109: 5105: 5099: 5095: 5094: 5093: 5089: 5085: 5080: 5076: 5075: 5074: 5071: 5068: 5064: 5058: 5055: 5052: 5048: 5044: 5041: 5040: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5027: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5017: 5013: 5009: 5005: 5004: 5003: 5002: 4998: 4994: 4991: 4979: 4976: 4973: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4962: 4955: 4951: 4947: 4943: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4934: 4931: 4927: 4926: 4925: 4924: 4920: 4916: 4905: 4901: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4889: 4886: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4875: 4867: 4849: 4846: 4843: 4838: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4828: 4824: 4820: 4819: 4818: 4815: 4812: 4808: 4804: 4803: 4802: 4798: 4794: 4790: 4786: 4785: 4784: 4781: 4778: 4773: 4772: 4771: 4767: 4763: 4759: 4755: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4746: 4743: 4738: 4734: 4733: 4732: 4728: 4724: 4720: 4716: 4712: 4708: 4704: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4695: 4692: 4688: 4683: 4679: 4678: 4677: 4676: 4673: 4667: 4661: 4655: 4649: 4645: 4641: 4631: 4630: 4626: 4622: 4614: 4611: 4607: 4603: 4599: 4595: 4589: 4587: 4583: 4579: 4574: 4572: 4568: 4564: 4563:WP:RSPSOURCES 4559: 4554: 4544: 4534: 4523: 4518: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4489: 4485: 4481: 4475: 4465: 4464: 4460: 4456: 4453:. Thank you. 4452: 4451: 4446: 4445: 4431: 4427: 4418: 4414: 4410: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4399: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4367: 4364: 4362: 4359: 4357: 4354: 4352: 4349: 4348: 4345: 4341: 4333: 4328: 4326: 4321: 4319: 4314: 4313: 4310: 4306: 4297: 4290: 4289: 4282: 4276: 4273: 4271: 4257: 4253: 4249: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4239: 4233: 4227: 4221: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4181: 4177: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4164: 4160: 4156: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4145: 4139: 4133: 4127: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4105: 4103: 4099: 4092: 4087:"Beat Casey ( 4080: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4043: 4037: 4031: 4025: 4016: 4012: 4008: 4003: 4001: 3997: 3993: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3982: 3970: 3967: 3964: 3962: 3959: 3956: 3953: 3950: 3947: 3945: 3942: 3937: 3932: 3929: 3928: 3924: 3921: 3918: 3916: 3913: 3910: 3907: 3904: 3901: 3899: 3896: 3891: 3886: 3883: 3882: 3878: 3875: 3872: 3870: 3867: 3864: 3861: 3858: 3855: 3853: 3850: 3845: 3840: 3837: 3836: 3832: 3829: 3826: 3824: 3821: 3818: 3815: 3812: 3809: 3807: 3804: 3799: 3794: 3791: 3790: 3769: 3761: 3758: 3755: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3737: 3735: 3732: 3729: 3726: 3723: 3720: 3718: 3715: 3710: 3705: 3702: 3701: 3697: 3695: 3692: 3689: 3686: 3683: 3680: 3678: 3675: 3670: 3665: 3662: 3661: 3657: 3655: 3652: 3649: 3646: 3643: 3640: 3638: 3635: 3630: 3625: 3622: 3621: 3617: 3615: 3612: 3609: 3606: 3603: 3600: 3598: 3595: 3590: 3585: 3582: 3581: 3555: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3541: 3537: 3530: 3529: 3523: 3516: 3513: 3510: 3507: 3504: 3503: 3499: 3496: 3493: 3490: 3487: 3486: 3482: 3479: 3476: 3473: 3470: 3469: 3465: 3462: 3459: 3456: 3453: 3452: 3448: 3445: 3442: 3439: 3436: 3435: 3431: 3428: 3425: 3422: 3419: 3418: 3414: 3408: 3407: 3404: 3385: 3382: 3379: 3376: 3371: 3366: 3358: 3355: 3354: 3350: 3347: 3344: 3341: 3336: 3331: 3323: 3320: 3319: 3315: 3312: 3309: 3306: 3301: 3296: 3288: 3285: 3284: 3281: 3279: 3277: 3275: 3273: 3271: 3269: 3268: 3264: 3261: 3258: 3255: 3250: 3245: 3237: 3234: 3233: 3207: 3202: 3200: 3195: 3193: 3188: 3187: 3175: 3172: 3171: 3163: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3147: 3144: 3138: 3132: 3126: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117:Oogglywoogly 3116: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3102: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3080: 3077: 3074: 3071: 3068: 3066: 3063: 3058: 3053: 3050: 3049: 3046: 3043: 3040: 3037: 3034: 3032: 3029: 3024: 3019: 3016: 3015: 3012: 3009: 3006: 3003: 3000: 2998: 2995: 2990: 2985: 2982: 2981: 2978: 2975: 2972: 2969: 2966: 2964: 2961: 2956: 2951: 2948: 2947: 2927: 2924: 2921: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2892: 2888: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2857: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2826: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2794: 2768: 2765: 2762: 2759: 2754: 2749: 2741: 2738: 2737: 2733: 2730: 2727: 2724: 2719: 2714: 2706: 2703: 2702: 2698: 2695: 2692: 2689: 2684: 2679: 2671: 2668: 2667: 2664: 2662: 2660: 2658: 2656: 2654: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2644: 2641: 2638: 2633: 2628: 2620: 2617: 2616: 2590: 2585: 2583: 2578: 2576: 2571: 2570: 2558: 2546: 2543: 2540: 2537: 2535: 2530: 2524: 2520: 2518: 2515: 2512: 2510: 2505: 2499: 2495: 2492: 2490: 2487: 2485: 2480: 2474: 2470: 2467: 2464: 2462: 2460: 2455: 2449: 2430: 2425: 2423: 2418: 2416: 2411: 2410: 2407: 2401: 2398: 2394: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2366: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2319: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2292: 2291:User:Ben76266 2288: 2287: 2286: 2276: 2272: 2265: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2256: 2250: 2244: 2238: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210:Oogglywoogly 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2188: 2183: 2181: 2180:1920 PGA Tour 2177: 2176:1916 PGA Tour 2167: 2166: 2162: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2109: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2100: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2078: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2036: 2033: 2029: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2018: 2011: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2002: 1998: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1987: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1957: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1927: 1922: 1918: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1877: 1873: 1859: 1855: 1848: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1838: 1830: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1752: 1751: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1725: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1703: 1699: 1698:1972 PGA Tour 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1680: 1677: 1671: 1665: 1659: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650:Oogglywoogly 1649: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1635: 1630: 1627: 1617: 1616:Oogglywoogly 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1588: 1586: 1582: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1560: 1553: 1550: 1548: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1533: 1529: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1488:World top 20s 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459:Johnsmith2116 1446: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1392: 1391:Leona Maguire 1385: 1381: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1362:178.167.155.9 1356: 1352: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1322: 1318: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1205: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1146: 1139: 1138: 1137:Oogglywoogly 1136: 1132: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1064:Darren Clarke 1061: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1011: 1008: 1004: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 970: 966: 962: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 932: 928: 921: 917: 913: 909: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 881: 877: 873: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 849: 845: 844:Darren Clarke 841: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 816: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 772: 768: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 745: 741: 737: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 707: 706: 701: 697: 693: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 665: 661: 654: 650: 645: 644: 643: 639: 635: 631: 630: 629: 628: 624: 596: 592: 588: 585: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 508: 502: 498: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 459: 455: 451: 447: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 413: 409: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 374: 370: 366: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 338: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 287: 283: 279: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 270: 269: 259: 255: 251: 247: 246: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 230: 226: 222: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 208: 204: 200: 195: 194: 193: 192: 191: 190: 184: 180: 176: 173: 172: 171: 170: 163: 162: 161: 160: 154: 150: 145: 144: 143: 142: 139: 135: 131: 126: 125: 124: 123:Oogglywoogly 122: 118: 114: 110: 108: 103: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 7070: 6981: 6948:Oogglywoogly 6901:Oogglywoogly 6899: 6888: 6873: 6870: 6852: 6837: 6801: 6768: 6754:Oogglywoogly 6744:Oogglywoogly 6721:Oogglywoogly 6711:Oogglywoogly 6688: 6681:Western Open 6677: 6661:Oogglywoogly 6659: 6651:Jug McSpaden 6647:Walter Hagen 6640: 6637:MOS question 6622: 6607: 6593:Oogglywoogly 6583:Oogglywoogly 6541: 6494:Oogglywoogly 6446:Oogglywoogly 6443: 6438: 6435:this article 6427:Vic Bennetts 6418: 6415:this article 6406: 6403:this article 6400: 6390:Oogglywoogly 6380:Oogglywoogly 6322:Oogglywoogly 6319: 6315: 6296: 6288:Boston Globe 6287: 6281: 6271:Oogglywoogly 6261:Oogglywoogly 6246:Oogglywoogly 6236:Oogglywoogly 6179: 6121:Oogglywoogly 6111:Oogglywoogly 6042:Oogglywoogly 6032:Oogglywoogly 5983:Oogglywoogly 5973:Oogglywoogly 5952: 5927: 5919: 5892:Oogglywoogly 5882:Oogglywoogly 5808:Oogglywoogly 5798:Oogglywoogly 5761:Lorena Ochoa 5740:Oogglywoogly 5730:Oogglywoogly 5702:Oogglywoogly 5692:Oogglywoogly 5634: 5572:Oogglywoogly 5570: 5566: 5556:Oogglywoogly 5546:Oogglywoogly 5488:Oogglywoogly 5486: 5483: 5460:Vic Bennetts 5457: 5440:Oogglywoogly 5438: 5435: 5427:this article 5424: 5268: 5183: 4986: 4945: 4940:MOS advises 4912: 4637: 4615: 4590: 4577: 4575: 4571:WP:CITEWATCH 4560: 4543:cite journal 4527: 4521: 4514:John Smith " 4509: 4499: 4494:John Smith " 4477: 4448: 4442: 4441: 4376: 4303: 4293:Succeeded by 4286: 4267: 4191: 4120: 4086: 4064: 4019: 3976: 3960: 3943: 3925:Tied Hadwin 3914: 3897: 3868: 3851: 3822: 3805: 3803:Kevin Kisner 3767: 3756: 3743: 3733: 3716: 3693: 3676: 3653: 3636: 3613: 3596: 3594:Kevin Kisner 3531:Any better? 3522: 3196: 3189: 3107:Oogglywoogly 3105: 3098: 3085: 3078: 3064: 3044: 3030: 3010: 2996: 2976: 2962: 2960:Kevin Kisner 2922: 2907: 2787: 2579: 2572: 2419: 2412: 2390: 2378:Oogglywoogly 2368:Oogglywoogly 2340:Oogglywoogly 2330:Oogglywoogly 2309:Oogglywoogly 2299:Oogglywoogly 2283: 2200:Oogglywoogly 2198: 2195: 2191: 2184: 2173: 2143: 2121:Oogglywoogly 2111:Oogglywoogly 1875: 1871: 1869: 1866:2020 Players 1802: 1784: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1753: 1747: 1737:Oogglywoogly 1727:Oogglywoogly 1640:Oogglywoogly 1638: 1631: 1623: 1606:Oogglywoogly 1604: 1589: 1578: 1556: 1541: 1491: 1456: 1395: 1359: 1325: 1294: 1287:Oogglywoogly 1277:Oogglywoogly 1210:77.75.244.29 1206: 1195:77.75.244.29 1191: 1127:Oogglywoogly 1076:Russ Cochran 1060:Rory McIlroy 1023:Oogglywoogly 1013:Oogglywoogly 919: 916:Shell's WWoG 915: 911: 907: 882:Oogglywoogly 872:Oogglywoogly 840:Rory McIlroy 746:Oogglywoogly 736:Oogglywoogly 703: 700:Walter Hagen 696:1925 article 652: 649:Shell's WWoG 648: 616: 597:Oogglywoogly 587:Oogglywoogly 503:. Also, for 497:Rory McIlroy 375:Oogglywoogly 365:Oogglywoogly 288:Oogglywoogly 278:Oogglywoogly 225:Rory McIlroy 185:Oogglywoogly 175:Oogglywoogly 149:Rory McIlroy 113:Oogglywoogly 111: 107:Fred Couples 104: 101: 78: 43: 37: 6985:Jimmymci234 6933:Jimmymci234 6871:Hello all, 6806:Jimmymci234 6690:Jimmymci234 6604:Discussions 6444:Thank you, 5876:Jimmymci234 5156:WP:DATELIST 5082:Timelines? 5047:WP:DATELIST 4990:Johnny Owen 4954:bludgeoning 4915:Jimmymci234 4737:WP:DATELIST 4707:WP:SALORDER 4703:WP:DATELIST 4682:WP:DATELIST 4472:Main page: 4351:The Masters 4278:Preceded by 3873:Tied Kisner 3849:Adam Hadwin 3827:Tied Hadwin 3634:Adam Hadwin 2994:Adam Hadwin 2150:NSPORTS RFC 2144:Please see 1596:this source 1585:main source 1557:Please see 1474:Jimmymci234 1243:Jimmymci234 1080:Bob Charles 961:Jimmymci234 792:discussion. 634:Jimmymci234 450:Jimmymci234 258:Jimmymci234 199:Jimmymci234 130:Jimmymci234 36:This is an 6891:User:Nigej 6782:pʰiːnyːmyː 6776:pʰeːnuːmuː 6643:Jim Barnes 6532:Thank you 6368:...William 6366:Thank you 6351:...William 6292:Jim Barnes 6255:User:Nigej 5951:Thank you 5715:...William 5648:pʰiːnyːmyː 5642:pʰeːnuːmuː 5602:...William 5425:I noticed 5397:pʰiːnyːmyː 5391:pʰeːnuːmuː 5282:pʰiːnyːmyː 5276:pʰeːnuːmuː 4659:pʰiːnyːmyː 4653:pʰeːnuːmuː 4225:pʰiːnyːmyː 4219:pʰeːnuːmuː 4131:pʰiːnyːmyː 4125:pʰeːnuːmuː 4029:pʰiːnyːmyː 4023:pʰeːnuːmuː 3483:2 & 1 3449:2 & 1 3401:Eliminated 3130:pʰiːnyːmyː 3124:pʰeːnuːmuː 3103:the most. 3041:Tied vs AH 3007:Tied vs BW 3001:Tied vs KK 2967:Tied vs AH 2784:Eliminated 2538:Lost 2 dn 2465:Lost 1 dn 2443:MacIntyre 2289:Thank you 2242:pʰiːnyːmyː 2236:pʰeːnuːmuː 2028:...William 1997:...William 1900:...William 1846:Open win ( 1714:calendars. 1663:pʰiːnyːmyː 1657:pʰeːnuːmuː 1502:WP:NOSTATS 1438:...William 1403:...William 1009:Thoughts?? 336:pʰeːnuːmuː 90:Archive 17 85:Archive 16 79:Archive 15 73:Archive 14 68:Archive 13 60:Archive 10 7041:wjemather 6965:wjemather 6924:Wjemather 6857:wjemather 6823:wjemather 6627:wjemather 6511:wjemather 6355:the roof? 6286:from the 5872:Wjemather 5719:the roof? 5606:the roof? 4960:wjemather 4899:wjemather 4873:wjemather 4711:MOS:TABLE 4397:wjemather 4361:U.S. Open 4175:wjemather 4097:wjemather 3980:wjemather 3535:wjemather 3508:MacIntyre 3463:MacIntyre 3440:MacIntyre 3335:Adam Long 2923:Example: 2886:wjemather 2855:wjemather 2824:wjemather 2792:wjemather 2718:Adam Long 2534:Adam Long 2488:Won 1 up 2471:Won 2 up 2270:wjemather 2160:wjemather 2098:wjemather 2032:the roof? 2016:wjemather 2001:the roof? 1985:wjemather 1955:wjemather 1916:wjemather 1904:the roof? 1853:wjemather 1836:wjemather 1565:wjemather 1527:wjemather 1442:the roof? 1420:wjemather 1407:the roof? 1379:wjemather 1350:wjemather 1316:wjemather 1144:wjemather 926:wjemather 908:The Match 766:wjemather 722:category. 659:wjemather 622:wjemather 506:wjemather 446:Wjemather 407:wjemather 254:Wjemather 7025:Tewapack 6929:Tewapack 6853:Thanks, 6623:Thanks. 6320:Thanks, 5922:used at 5765:Tewapack 5484:Thanks! 4837:MOS:LIST 4807:MOS:LIST 4789:MOS:LIST 4754:MOS:LIST 4594:Headbomb 4567:WP:NPPSG 4533:cite web 3992:Tewapack 3578:Results 3392:Source: 3370:Kevin Na 2775:Source: 2753:Kevin Na 2552:Source: 2484:Kevin Na 2437:Johnson 2196:Thanks, 1416:at all. 1084:Bob Tway 6944:Thanks, 6937:Phinumu 6920:PGA Cup 6579:Thanks, 6490:Thanks, 6407:the Age 6299:founded 6210:PGA Cup 5969:Thanks, 5012:Jopal22 4993:Jopal22 4638:Due to 4428:has an 4108:Jopal22 4052:Jopal22 3766:Player 3745:Jopal22 3560:Player 3497:Johnson 3457:Johnson 3423:Johnson 3165:issues: 3101:Jopal22 3087:Jopal22 2941:Game 3 2938:Game 2 2935:Game 1 2932:Player 2911:Jopal22 2870:Jopal22 2364:Thanks, 2082:Jopal22 2063:WP:PSTS 2049:Jopal22 1885:Jopal22 1883:page). 1804:Jopal22 1786:Jopal22 1723:Thanks, 1592:WP: MOS 1432:. As a 1123:Thanks, 583:Thanks, 39:archive 6935:, and 6794:fiɲimi 6788:ɸinimi 6655:WP:MOS 6545:great. 6339:. The 6067:WP:AWB 5660:fiɲimi 5654:ɸinimi 5409:fiɲimi 5403:ɸinimi 5309:WP:IAR 5294:fiɲimi 5288:ɸinimi 5271:WP:IAR 4687:WP:OSE 4671:fiɲimi 4665:ɸinimi 4640:PeeJay 4237:fiɲimi 4231:ɸinimi 4155:WP:3RR 4143:fiɲimi 4137:ɸinimi 4041:fiɲimi 4035:ɸinimi 3768:(seed) 3505:Mar 26 3488:Mar 26 3471:Mar 25 3454:Mar 25 3437:Mar 24 3420:Mar 24 3415:Score 3185:Player 3142:fiɲimi 3136:ɸinimi 2568:Player 2254:fiɲimi 2248:ɸinimi 2187:source 1675:fiɲimi 1669:ɸinimi 1082:, and 846:, and 7094:Nigej 7078:Nigej 7053:Nigej 7009:Nigej 6916:Nigej 6540:from 6466:Nigej 6460:see: 6437:from 6425:that 6417:from 6405:from 6150:Nigej 6105:Nigej 6071:Nigej 6026:Nigej 6000:Nigej 5937:(alk) 5834:Nigej 5671:Nigej 5618:Nigej 5588:Nigej 5534:Nigej 5516:Nigej 5502:See: 5358:Nigej 5327:Nigej 5238:Nigej 5210:Nigej 5170:Nigej 5130:Nigej 5104:Nigej 5084:Nigej 5030:Nigej 4823:Nigej 4793:Nigej 4762:Nigej 4723:Nigej 4409:Nigej 4380:Nigej 4338:2022 4248:Nigej 4202:Nigej 4159:Nigej 4089:conc. 4068:Nigej 4007:Nigej 3763:Rank 3557:Rank 3517:Tied 3500:1 up 3466:Tied 3432:2 up 3409:Date 3182:Seed 3152:Nigej 2929:Rank 2839:Nigej 2807:Nigej 2565:Seed 2544:Tied 2521:Tied 2513:Tied 2468:Tied 2446:Long 2216:Nigej 2140:NGOLF 2067:Nigej 1969:Nigej 1931:Nigej 1819:Nigej 1510:Nigej 1453:WGC's 1225:Nigej 1159:Nigej 250:Nigej 16:< 7098:talk 7082:talk 7057:talk 7029:talk 7013:talk 6989:talk 6952:talk 6905:talk 6878:and 6810:talk 6748:talk 6715:talk 6694:talk 6665:talk 6587:talk 6498:talk 6470:talk 6450:talk 6423:says 6384:talk 6326:talk 6307:link 6303:Here 6284:link 6265:talk 6253:Hey 6240:talk 6154:talk 6115:talk 6075:talk 6036:talk 6004:talk 5977:talk 5886:talk 5838:talk 5802:talk 5769:talk 5734:talk 5696:talk 5675:talk 5622:talk 5592:talk 5576:talk 5550:talk 5520:talk 5492:talk 5472:here 5470:and 5468:here 5444:talk 5362:talk 5331:talk 5303:Per 5242:talk 5214:talk 5174:talk 5134:talk 5108:talk 5088:talk 5034:talk 5016:talk 4997:talk 4956:it. 4919:talk 4827:talk 4797:talk 4766:talk 4727:talk 4625:talk 4569:and 4548:and 4482:and 4459:talk 4413:talk 4384:talk 4252:talk 4206:talk 4163:talk 4112:talk 4072:talk 4056:talk 4011:talk 3996:talk 3898:(52) 3852:(38) 3806:(32) 3784:Pts 3772:Pld 3749:talk 3677:(52) 3637:(38) 3597:(32) 3575:Pts 3563:Pld 3514:Long 3494:beat 3477:beat 3474:Long 3443:beat 3429:Long 3426:beat 3351:1.5 3316:1.5 3156:talk 3111:talk 3091:talk 3031:(52) 2997:(38) 2963:(32) 2944:Pts 2915:talk 2874:talk 2843:talk 2811:talk 2734:1.5 2699:1.5 2395:and 2372:talk 2334:talk 2303:talk 2220:talk 2204:talk 2115:talk 2086:talk 2071:talk 2053:talk 2010:here 1973:talk 1949:49th 1945:49th 1935:talk 1889:talk 1876:40th 1872:48th 1823:talk 1808:talk 1790:talk 1780:2018 1776:2019 1772:2018 1768:2018 1764:2018 1756:2016 1731:talk 1644:talk 1610:talk 1514:talk 1498:WWGR 1496:and 1494:OWGR 1478:talk 1463:talk 1366:talk 1333:talk 1302:talk 1281:talk 1247:talk 1229:talk 1214:talk 1199:talk 1163:talk 1131:talk 1017:talk 965:talk 876:talk 740:talk 638:talk 591:talk 499:and 454:talk 369:talk 282:talk 252:and 203:talk 179:talk 151:and 134:talk 117:talk 6791:→ ‎ 6785:→ ‎ 6779:→‎ 6678:(1) 6103:Hi 5960:it. 5874:or 5657:→ ‎ 5651:→ ‎ 5645:→‎ 5406:→ ‎ 5400:→ ‎ 5394:→‎ 5375:Jay 5372:Pee 5344:Jay 5341:Pee 5317:Jay 5314:Pee 5291:→ ‎ 5285:→ ‎ 5279:→‎ 5228:Jay 5225:Pee 5191:Jay 5188:Pee 5147:Jay 5144:Pee 5121:Jay 5118:Pee 5070:Jay 5067:Pee 5054:Jay 5051:Pee 4975:Jay 4972:Pee 4946:not 4933:Jay 4930:Pee 4888:Jay 4885:Pee 4845:Jay 4842:Pee 4814:Jay 4811:Pee 4780:Jay 4777:Pee 4745:Jay 4742:Pee 4694:Jay 4691:Pee 4668:→ ‎ 4662:→ ‎ 4656:→‎ 4591:- 4553:doi 4430:RFC 4234:→ ‎ 4228:→ ‎ 4222:→‎ 4140:→ ‎ 4134:→ ‎ 4128:→‎ 4038:→ ‎ 4032:→ ‎ 4026:→‎ 3944:(1) 3915:1.5 3823:2.5 3717:(1) 3694:1.5 3614:2.5 3399:(E) 3395:(A) 3373:(E) 3359:28 3338:(E) 3324:61 3321:T2 3303:(E) 3286:T2 3252:(A) 3238:41 3229:Pts 3178:Pos 3139:→ ‎ 3133:→ ‎ 3127:→‎ 3065:(1) 3045:1.5 2977:2.5 2782:(E) 2778:(A) 2756:(E) 2742:28 2721:(E) 2707:61 2704:T2 2686:(E) 2669:T2 2635:(A) 2621:41 2612:Pts 2561:Pos 2440:Na 2251:→ ‎ 2245:→ ‎ 2239:→‎ 1672:→ ‎ 1666:→ ‎ 1660:→‎ 920:MNG 702:in 7100:) 7084:) 7059:) 7031:) 7015:) 6991:) 6954:) 6931:, 6907:) 6897:. 6886:. 6812:) 6750:) 6717:) 6696:) 6667:) 6649:, 6645:, 6589:) 6500:) 6472:) 6452:) 6409:, 6386:) 6328:) 6267:) 6242:) 6156:) 6117:) 6077:) 6038:) 6006:) 5998:. 5979:) 5955:PK 5930:PK 5920:is 5888:) 5840:) 5804:) 5771:) 5759:, 5736:) 5698:) 5677:) 5624:) 5594:) 5578:) 5552:) 5522:) 5494:) 5446:) 5364:) 5333:) 5244:) 5223:– 5216:) 5206:}} 5200:{{ 5176:) 5166:}} 5160:{{ 5136:) 5110:) 5090:) 5036:) 5018:) 4999:) 4921:) 4829:) 4799:) 4768:) 4729:) 4627:) 4608:· 4604:· 4600:· 4588:. 4565:, 4558:. 4556:}} 4550:{{ 4546:}} 4540:{{ 4538:, 4536:}} 4530:{{ 4520:" 4498:" 4461:) 4415:) 4386:) 4272:: 4254:) 4208:) 4165:) 4114:) 4091:)" 4083:dn 4074:) 4058:) 4013:) 3998:) 3930:4 3884:3 3838:2 3792:1 3781:T 3778:L 3775:W 3751:) 3703:4 3663:3 3623:2 3583:1 3572:T 3569:L 3566:W 3511:vs 3491:Na 3480:Na 3460:vs 3446:Na 3386:1 3383:2 3380:0 3377:1 3356:4 3348:1 3345:1 3342:1 3313:1 3310:1 3307:1 3289:1 3265:2 3262:0 3259:2 3256:1 3235:1 3158:) 3113:) 3093:) 3051:4 3017:3 2983:2 2949:1 2917:) 2876:) 2845:) 2813:) 2769:1 2766:2 2763:0 2760:1 2739:4 2731:1 2728:1 2725:1 2696:1 2693:1 2690:1 2672:1 2648:2 2645:0 2642:2 2639:1 2618:1 2374:) 2336:) 2305:) 2222:) 2206:) 2178:, 2117:) 2088:) 2073:) 2055:) 1975:) 1947:, 1937:) 1891:) 1825:) 1810:) 1792:) 1733:) 1646:) 1612:) 1516:) 1480:) 1465:) 1368:) 1335:) 1304:) 1283:) 1249:) 1231:) 1216:) 1201:) 1165:) 1133:) 1078:, 1074:, 1070:, 1066:, 1062:, 1019:) 967:) 918:, 910:, 878:) 842:, 742:) 651:, 640:) 593:) 456:) 448:. 371:) 284:) 205:) 181:) 155:.) 136:) 119:) 64:← 7096:( 7080:( 7055:( 7027:( 7011:( 6987:( 6950:( 6903:( 6808:( 6746:( 6713:( 6692:( 6683:? 6663:( 6585:( 6496:( 6468:( 6448:( 6382:( 6324:( 6263:( 6238:( 6152:( 6113:( 6073:( 6034:( 6028:. 6002:( 5975:( 5935:T 5884:( 5836:( 5800:( 5767:( 5732:( 5694:( 5673:( 5620:( 5590:( 5574:( 5548:( 5518:( 5490:( 5442:( 5360:( 5329:( 5240:( 5212:( 5172:( 5132:( 5106:( 5086:( 5032:( 5014:( 4995:( 4917:( 4825:( 4795:( 4764:( 4725:( 4623:( 4612:} 4610:b 4606:p 4602:c 4598:t 4596:{ 4506:) 4457:( 4411:( 4382:( 4331:e 4324:t 4317:v 4250:( 4204:( 4161:( 4110:( 4070:( 4054:( 4009:( 3994:( 3961:0 3957:0 3954:3 3951:0 3948:3 3911:1 3908:1 3905:1 3902:3 3869:2 3865:2 3862:0 3859:1 3856:3 3819:1 3816:0 3813:2 3810:3 3747:( 3734:0 3730:0 3727:3 3724:0 3721:3 3690:1 3687:1 3684:1 3681:3 3654:2 3650:2 3647:0 3644:1 3641:3 3610:1 3607:0 3604:2 3601:3 3224:L 3219:T 3214:W 3205:e 3198:t 3191:v 3154:( 3109:( 3089:( 3079:0 3011:2 2913:( 2872:( 2841:( 2809:( 2607:L 2602:T 2597:W 2588:e 2581:t 2574:v 2428:e 2421:t 2414:v 2370:( 2332:( 2301:( 2218:( 2202:( 2113:( 2084:( 2069:( 2051:( 1971:( 1933:( 1887:( 1821:( 1806:( 1788:( 1729:( 1642:( 1608:( 1512:( 1476:( 1461:( 1364:( 1331:( 1300:( 1279:( 1245:( 1227:( 1212:( 1197:( 1161:( 1129:( 1015:( 963:( 874:( 738:( 636:( 589:( 452:( 367:( 280:( 201:( 177:( 132:( 115:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Golf/Archive 15 - Knowledge

Index