3186:; that is also an individual sport. I fail to see how use in golf tables is different than that. The guideline itself explains why it is useful. This information, for certain sports, is also useful in infoboxes. The MOSICON guideline used to basically say they were OK for nationality fields -- just forbidden for any location or other non-nationality field since people assume on seeing them they are for nationality -- then a a year or so ago, someone saw fit to change that, a substantial change with little consensus gathered, then others go around trying to enforce their new rule. I can understand some editors may not like them, perhaps colored by experiences elsewhere, and I'd agree that use in general infoboxes even for nationality fields in many types of infoboxes is not a good idea, but they are standard in coverage of certain sports and not a problem there (plus, there are plenty of reliable sources to determine the flags). Trying to inject flags in contexts where they are not usually seen can be distracting and problematic yes, but that does not mean those problems exist everywhere, and trying to apply a broad guideline which is helpful in some cases can be harmful in others. The example I gave above is not at all contentious or problematic; the field is for their sporting and representative nationality, and there are sometimes unique cases where there is more than one flag. If there are multiple flags in that field, the article should explain why. Tennis is basically the same; I know there have been some editors trying to remove the infobox flag on
3470:-- flags are probably out of place, thus the guideline. Even for many sports where the vast majority of players are from one country, it's not typically used in media coverage, so it's not even an overall "sportspeople" idea. For certain sports though -- the situation is different. This is why MOSICON is a guideline, not absolute law. The flag is there because it's the sporting nationality, which is usually (but not always) where they are born. If you are talking about a specific field of "Born" or "Residence" and not "Nationality", that is different. Yes, I disagree with the guideline in the context of golf, and several others sports. You appear to be under the impression that there can never be any disagreements with the usual guidelines, and whatever is written in MOSICON must be followed everywhere with no exceptions. That is not what guidelines are there for. There is a specific reason to ignore the general guidance in this case, I feel (as have many other editors here over the years, and editors for several other sports). Yes, Knowledge would be lacking compared to other golf media coverage by not including the flags.
3343:
by nationality disputes elsewhere on
Knowledge, I can completely understand. But, in some areas, such concerns really don't crop up since they are in such commonplace use elsewhere. In fact, I'd say there has been more problems with the flag vs no flag debate than nationality issues ;-) (title of the Open Championship article aside). I understand the distinction you're trying to make, but it's not that simple -- it's not that Watson "won it for America", but it certainly could be "Watson just the second American winner in the last five years". The nationality aspect is always there in golf -- if isomeone from a country which hasn't won before wins, that would be a big topic -- say, an Australian finally winning the Masters, which would be huge news after all the close calls they've had over the years (Greg Norman in particular). And I'm not so sure skiing is all that different -- they compete and qualify as individuals. Countries do have national organizations to help with training and logistics sure, but I think they compete as individuals.
3783:
Secondly, the concept is fairly important in golf and completely standard in golf coverage. A similar situation exists in a number of other sports, so it's not golf-only. This is not OTHERSTUFFEXISTS at all -- it is just a situation where the flags are called for, even as part of the infobox, as an exception to the normal case. It's not even all sports, but it's also not just golf either. A general guideline on "sportspeople" doesn't even cover it -- such things are not typical in coverage of
American football, etc. but they are in a number of sports which are more international in nature. They are not there just because we like the cosmetics -- they are there because it's basically standard in golf coverage. Knowledge is supposed to reflect the general prevailing opinions in a neutral point of view -- barring the flags in infoboxes would actually stand out a bit compared to other golf coverage; i.e. it can seem that Knowledge is trying to push a point of view that others shouldn't be using the flags either.
2179:, amongst others. But I'm not entirely convinced by the use of the current tournament's histories as a better source; it wouldn't be unheard of for a current organising committee to only consider the "tournament" to have started when they took over, even if it was essentially a continuation of something longer running. The best way to judge might be if anyone can find contemporary news reports, which would likely state whether the tournaments in 1968 and 1946 were considered "new" or continuations at the time. I'd be inclined to go with whatever they showed, but appreciate it might be hard tracking down the sources. The most important thing, to be honest, is not whether we have one article or two, but keeping all the information somewhere; so if we decide to start the history from the later date for any tournament, making sure we create articles for the previous incarnation(s). It looks like William has got on top of that side of things, which is good.
2551:
nationality is relevant there). First, the flags don't really indicate qualification for nationality based-tournaments. All they really indicate is that one player scored more points than another player who they may or may not be competing against for a spot. The flags don't really reveal anything about qualification except that they presumably scored points toward qualification, which is something intrinsic to the win and not clarified by the flag. Secondly, scoring points is not always the only way to qualify for some of these tournaments. As I'm sure you know, the Ryder Cup allows captain's picks where the captain could presumably choose any player he wishes. I am aware that not all nationality-based tournaments have this structure but I think it's a fairly weak position to insist that these flags remain on the names of players defeated in tournaments in a "wins" table in the articles of
1133:
is what it is commonly known as there, generally as a disambiguation from the U.S. Open (which was also officially known as the Open
Championship or the National Open Championship for decades, I'm pretty sure, I think into the 1960s). Naturally, there are edit wars from time to time over the names, but given that we are the "home" wiki for the US, UK, and all other English-speaking countries, we would divide the usage as equitably as possible when there are regional discrepancies by following those guidelines. Similarly, as you note, there is a need to disambiguate "PGA Championship" from the UK or Ireland perspective due to those other tournaments, and "US Masters" as well due to the old British Masters and European Masters tournaments. For you... what is the tournament commonly known as in Finland? That would seem to be the best answer, to me.
3348:
different true -- they try more for greater international participation, limiting the number from a country, rather than just using the top N skiers in the rankings (much like, say, the U.S. Open primarily uses the World Golf
Rankings to determine who qualifies). Something like the "medal count" at the Olympics is not official either, but common in Olympics coverage, thus it shows up on Knowledge articles too. My point is just because a national aspect is not specifically part of the competition, doesn't mean the topic doesn't exist and should not be mentioned. Really, sporting is one of those areas which is a safer outlet for nationalistic fervor; it's usually more fun than harmful. And I do think the flags add something, not just that they do no harm ;-)
3102:
nationality is relevant, then every time a golfer or country is mentioned in any table in any article that relates to golf, there needs to be a nationality flag there. Also, that's what the golf sources do. The corollary to that argument is, to quote
Clindberg, "It's a good idea to be more familiar with the sport of golf before claiming to know what is best for golf articles." The first argument is questionable and the corollary clearly goes against the spirit of the encyclopedia. I shouldn't have to pass a test on golf history in order for you to deem me (or anyone else) worthy to contribute my opinion here. No one has ignored the point about nationality-based tournaments.
3443:. In the case that got me involved, the golfer was born in the US and an editor insists that using the flag icon, in the box marked nationality, is proper. In this case the "discouraged doesn't mean prohibited" doesn't apply because the MOS uses a specific example of how "sportspeople" infoboxes shouldn't use the flag. Golf is a sport, right? Shouldn't means should not, right? Why does golf feel it needs to be special and exempt? Do you see flags as the norm in NFL player infoboxes? NASCAR drivers? NBA players? No. Are those articles lacking because they don't have a little flag icon in the infobox? No, because the flag brings noting substanative to the article.
3757:
nationality is well established, and that is what is being illustrated, *not* the birth place. Obviously there is going to be a strong correlation between that and where they are born, but it is not the same thing. It's also not something that
Knowledge is making up their own rules for. The guideline says to not use flags on fields which document the actual birth place (town, etc.) for good reason -- flags imply nationality. In this case however, it is explicitly a field for sporting nationality. If they were born somewhere else but their sporting nationality has changed, then this field gets updated. That does happen, though obviously it's rare.
3280:
my mind that's flatly incorrect. You are accusing some editors of filibustering, when really, that type of use has been standard practice across many sports on
Knowledge basically forever, and the MOSICON guideline did not prevent that at all, until perhaps recently -- that looks from afar like a few editors basically deciding they don't like flags *at all*, and trying to remove them entirely, changing the guideline well beyond its original intent without much consensus (or possibly just misreading it), and claiming it's the *law* that everyone else must now follow. The use of flags in the coverage of
3001:
Cup, Presidents Cup, Women's World Cup of Golf, Walker Cup, etc.). Golf coverage virtually always includes them, even on individual player bio pages. Knowledge's coverage would be the worse off without them. If they were actually valueless, then all the other major media outlets would not use them either, but they basically *all* do. Again, it's a good idea to be more familiar with the sport of golf before claiming to know what is best for the related articles. The MOS is a *guideline*, not a policy let alone a law like a speed limit; there are always going to be exceptions. By
3837:
Cup. Even for amateur golfers, there are a number of tournaments where eligibility is based on nationality as well, or the teams are broken down by country, so it's which team are they *eligible* for. The fact if they play or not is not really material; they are always competing to play in those tournaments but they only qualify based on how well they play, the result of which does not change their sporting nationality. There is a correlation to where they were born, obviously, so that usually will determine the sporting nationality. But it's not necessarily the same.
3285:
we have here. You claim there is a distinction between golf and other sports like tennis or skiing; I don't see it. Really, if there is resistance to removing this type of flag from multiple sporting communities on
Knowledge, that would seem to indicate a wide consensus to use them in sporting contexts, and the guideline should really reflect that. If you feel it should be changed, fine, state your reasons -- but most every reason I've seen (flags are contentious, flags distract from more relevant information) I don't think apply at all in these sporting contexts.
2491:). Ethnic conflicts in South Asia and the Balkans tend to breed the worst kinds of edit warriors, those who fight day and night to impose their version of how they see the world on the encyclopedia. That's why MOSFLAG exists: to prevent the use of superfluous flags that have no real purpose. If someone wants to know the nationality of the golfer that another golf beat in a tournament, they can go to that golfer's article to find out. If that golfer doesn't have an article, then one should be written. There's no reason to put a flag next to every name in a golf table.
2819:
well-entrenched, and
Knowledge should be no different. MOSICON is definitely well-intentioned, and Knowledge should not be introducing flags into areas they are not typically used (which is most cases), but neither should it be imposing itself as law in situations where flags do make sense. The exceptions in their guideline used to be more explicit, but people have changed the wording with little consensus in order to obscure that. As with any case where there is a broad rule, there are places where exceptions make sense, and this is one of them.
3300:
relevance that nationality has on the event in question in the table). My views are also probably colored by my experiences witnessing nationalist disputes in other areas of
Knowledge, something that admittedly does not frequently spill into sports articles in the encyclopedia. We're essentially debating two sides of the same coin: you say they're not really doing any harm, so leave them in; I say that the potential that they could do harm exists and I think they're not really adding anything useful, so why not take them out?
3228:? Can you understand the distinction between nationality-based tournaments like the Ryder Cup and just plain tour events? Do you realize that just because material in an article hasn't been challenged it is not the result of consensus? And the only reason consensus never changes is because editors who work in all areas of the encyclopedia are filibustered by Wikiproject editors working in their own walled garden areas who feel that they can ignore site-wide policies and guidelines and create their own
31:
838:
they play for. Various competitions slice geographical team makeup in different ways. For example, in some competitions Great Britain & Ireland are one team, and in others England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, and Northern Ireland are separate teams (and some competitions have changed team membership over time). Stephen Ames is a special case, of someone who emigrated, and has represented teams based on two different de-facto nationalities. That doesn't occur too often.
2833:(e/c - I agree with Clindberg) Golfers are not among the examples of articles in which flags are expressly forbidden. Discussions have taken place at the MOS talk page, but they have stalled, last time I looked. Golf is not the only example of a WikiProject that uses flags. The MOS needs rewriting, and until then, the least antagonistic thing to do is to leave flags where have existed for a long time, but not to add them to pages where they have not existed before.
3967:
someone is born overseas (say like the Bruce Willis example in the guideline), then where they are born would not be the sporting nationality, I'd think. If someone has actually represented two nations during their career, that may provide enough reliable sourcing to have both countries in the infobox, but there's always going to be at least one, which can generally be determined by doing to the pga.com profile or similar.
4092:
so it's different. Are you arguing that the MOSICON guideline says the golfer infobox can't have a "Nationality" field at all, or are you arguing that the infobox can have such a field, and it can have the text "United States" in the field, but it's just that the associated flag cannot be there unless the golfer has actually participated in a team tournament? If the latter, how does that make any sense at all?
3310:
organization and a normal tour event where it would be silly, e.g., to say that Bubba Watson won it for America. I've tried several times to explain the distinction that I'm making and I don't know if I can make it any clearer than that. My inability to communicate that to you in a way that you can understand must be related to the way that we perceive sporting events differently.
3267:. That's basically what I said above. The guideline was originally about removing flags from inline text, and attaching them to just about every location-based bit of text in an article -- there were bad abuses, and the guideline makes sense. But the use in tables, the subject of this entire section, is fully in line with the guideline and removing them is actually
3190:, for example, from time to time. Some editors may not like them, yes, but there is hardly a consensus to removee them in these sporting-nationality contexts -- rather they have been this way in tennis/golf/etc. articles for years, so trying to change the guideline to force all these other pages to change is really going against long-term consensus on those pages.
1050:), which says he was a notable golf course designer and journalist - a google search seems to back up notability. He made no major appearances in cricket, but did play for Buckinghamshire at a minor level. Given that I don't follow golf and therefore would have no idea what I'd be on about, I was wondering whether someone here could create the article? Thanks.
3415:
indicate nationality. Thus, there was always the sense that using them for nationality was OK in specific circumstances -- not general bios, but things like sportspeople's representative nationality, particularly when it is commonplace in media coverage of said sport and there is an abundance of reliable sources to back it up. The strict prohibition came
2788:
consensus on how to manage it was reached. As long as they reflect a golfer's representative nationality, not legal nationality, I think that a measured use of flags is fine. Also, subnational flags satisfy the MOS in the case of golf, where the terms English / Irish / Scottish etc are widespread - like football, but unlike motorsport for example.
2710:, subsection "Use of flags for sportspersons", quote "Subnational flags (e.g., England rather than UK) are traditionally used in some sports, and should not be changed to the national flag without consensus." Golf is one of those sports. If you don't know enough about golf to know this, then frankly you shouldn't be editing golf articles. The
3912:
whether they have competed or not. The distinction in the guideline may make sense for some sports, not sure, but doesn't for golf. The argument has not been over the existence of the field -- the question is really if flags should be used next to the country name or not. In golf coverage, that is absolutely typical, and would be
3419:, after a conversation between 2-3 editors, and to my knowledge never got any buy-in or consensus from any of the groups actually using them for years. They may have assumed that was always the "rule", but I don't think lots of editors agreed. Trying to then enforce a fairly unilateral change like that is going to be contentious.
2070:. I'm talking about media guidebooks and the tournament's own website. The media covering these tournaments has also recognized both tournaments history going to the years I mentioned above. Tewapack seems to think he knows the Milwaukee tournament better than the Milwaukee News Journal that reported in 2007 said it started in 1968.
2734:'s website www.theopen.com. They started adding historical leaderboards in 2008 or 2009. The first efforts did not list players' nationalities and often only had an initial instead of a first name. As these leaderboards have been updated over the years, obviously by more research, they have added more first names and countries,
3489:
incumbent on those deviating from it to justify why. Thus far, none of you have come up with a reason I buy. Triathletes are international in nature and they don't use flags in the infobox either. I find it difficult to believe that many English speakers will need a little flag to clue them in on which country the US is.
1871:; I know the basics about golf, but I don't know why Knowledge editors would say someone "Monday-qualified for an event" as opposed to "qualified for an event on Monday" or simply "qualified for an event". Its clear from Google there's a reason for this wording; here are some examples already in articles:
3981:
I don't have a lot more to add at this stage, as Carl Lindberg has more or less argued exactly my views since my last contribution. What I would add is that this isn't just a Ryder Cup thing (otherwise we'd have lots of Euro flags), there is an explicitly national competition for professional golfers
3966:
for that list in the first place -- every one of those has a United States sporting nationality. Ames moved to Canada and became a citizen during his playing career; that is relatively odd but it does seem to have given him the ability to represent either country. Thus, two countries mentioned. If
3381:
I guess it is worth separating this discussion. My concern has been with the use of flags in the infobox of individual golfers, not with the win/loss tables. Saying "golf isn't specifically prohibited" or "discouraged doesn't mean prohibited" isn't a valid argument. Why, specifically, should flags be
2895:
The notion that "golfers aren't specificially prohibited" is off-base. The speed limit sign doesn't specify you either, but it still applies to you. The exemptions are what need specified in a case like this and golfers certainly aren't listed as exempt. Still, the basic question remains: How does it
2857:
What does adding a flag to a golfer`s infobox truly add to the article? I ended up here because I removed a flag from the infobox of a lower level PGA pro. He's not representing the US, not on a "national team" and we're not talking about any sort of national championship. He just happened to be born
2486:
The reason that I believe that flags shouldn't be included in these tables is that they add a negligible amount of information while creating another opportunity for nationalist conflict. Luckily, golf is most popular in parts of the world that tend not to overlap with the worst nationalist conflicts
2410:
as an example, the wins table includes his individual round scores, total score, to-par score, margin of victory, and who he beat (second place finishers). That is essentially the top of the each tournament's leaderboard without going overboard and including the runner-ups scores and other transitory
2208:
I know because I caddied for him in the event. In those days, professional golfers could not bring their regular tour caddies to the four "major" events. I believe that was because it was considerd an unfair advantage for the handful of players who could afford to pay for regular caddies to accompany
4110:
You don't give a damn what I'm arguing, so why pretend that you do? It's clear that you and some of your buddies have decided that golfers are so special that they are to be exempted from the standard that the majority of sports adhere to. Continuing this is pointless, not because I'm incorrect, but
4091:
It also doesn't change the fact that the sporting nationality just happens to be the same as the country they were born in, which is the usual case. Birthplace is a different field, and flags should not be used there, which is per the guideline. But this is a Nationality field, not birth location,
3469:
I guess we can agree to disagree. It depends on the circumstances of the sport to me. Golf, tennis, skiiing, Formula 1, and other more international sports do tend use flags in the infoboxes, as the field is more important in that context than for the typical person. Most bio infoboxes on wikipedia
3414:
has the flag. The point is that it's a common element in golf coverage; if it was truly useless, other media outlets wouldn't bother using them either. The guidelines had always stated to avoid use of flags for birth and death locations (and residence); that I strongly agree with, as flags tend to
3319:
I respect the fact that the points that I and others have made haven't generated any consensus that the flags should be removed and I'm not going to go on a massive spree of removing them from golf tables. This will be my last comment in this thread and I appreciate the opportunity to share my view.
3309:
Also, just to clarify one point, I'm not saying that there is a distinction between golf and other sports like tennis or skiing. I'm saying there's a distinction between a skiing world cup event where the competitors are de facto representing their country under the auspices of their national skiing
3101:
I have yet to see anyone clearly respond to the question, "What is the purpose of the flags in tables that don't directly relate to nationality-based tournaments?" The argument for inclusion of the flags seems to be that because a small number of golfers compete in a few tournaments every year where
2803:
The MOS strongly discourages them and when citing exceptions, none of them support using them. This discussion should be taking place at the MOS talk page because a small group can't declare themselves exempt from the MOS because they have a "consensus". Why should golfer infoboxes not be consistant
2387:
By that argument, we should use every piece of information in the tables including individual scores for each round or, e.g. in the case of the Volvo Chinese Open (your second included link), each golfer's progress toward the "Race to Dubai." Obviously, that information is not included in the tables
2140:
Please stop and wait for a consensus to be reached before changing or creating other articles. I feel that the articles can be written to include the older tournaments as before with text added stating that the current sponsors only consider tournaments from a given date. Let's have others weigh in.
1660:
Hello! I'm user from Latvian Knowledge. I really want to write some articles about the most known golfers in Latvian language, but I don't know about whom should I write about. So could somebody tell me please who could be considered the most famous and greatest players (current and all-time) – some
1166:
Still, I gotta say that despite British Open is a UK tournament, I think it's an internationally significant event. There are many international users at English Knowledge. I understand, that national events' articles use language typical to that country, but I think that internationally significant
3528:
a flag to recognise nationality, but for many, me included, it is much quicker to glance at the flag to establish nationality than to have to locate text. And as has been pointed out, using flags to denote player nationality is standard practice in all other golfing literature outside of Knowledge;
3342:
Fair enough :-) If I may also respectfully say, nuances like "team events are OK but individual events are not" probably don't belong on the general MOSICON guidelines. Each sport can have its own nuances that way, and that seems to be getting a little too detailed there. Yes, for people scarred
3284:
sports is commonplace and basically standard, in and outside of Knowledge. I can understand why the general guideline would discourage flags in the infoboxes of say CEOs of companies, but the guideline has numerous references to a sportsperson's sporting nationality being exceptions, which is what
3279:
team-based either, no more than golf -- every example I gave above was involving individual competitors not on teams), and that aspect is definitely relevant in almost any regular tour event, whether it be U.S.-based, European, or other. You are saying it's not, like it should be obvious -- but to
3223:
rationale. I'm fully aware that my efforts here will be ultimately futile as no matter what anyone says, the pro-flag editors that exist in all of the sports Wikiprojects will dig in their heels and refuse to acknowledge policy-based arguments. Do you realize that in the first two examples you list
3182:, for example, the flags make that jump out very quickly, *much* better than text would, and it does it in a much more space-efficient manner -- I can get a quick impression of how Americans did overall, and focus on individuals. A canonical example of appropriate use on the MOSICON page itself is
3000:
Yes, they are representing the U.S. in a way. While an individual sport, there are national ramifications even at the individual events (it's a constant topic of discussion), and there are team events as well -- some where the sporting nationality will determine which teams they qualify for (Ryder
2918:
exceptions or prohibitions, not both - that's one of the MOS's many problems. There's nothing to say which takes precedent. As for your last question, you'd best ask someone who really wants to keep them. I'm more someone who keeps an eye out for occasions where MOSFLAG and other similar guidelines
2787:
that claims that flags are "unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many" was added to the MOS arbitrarily and with no consensus that could later be produced in a very long discussion about it a while back. Restructuring of the MOS was deemed desirable by most, but no
2630:
In golf, England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are separate countries. Just the way it is -- same with soccer/football. The first "international" golf matches were those between Scotland and England. If there are other subnational divisions which typically field their own teams in group
1981:
2- Wire to wire Masters winners. The Craig Wood and 2008 Masters article both cited Wood in 41, Palmer in 60, Nicklaus in 72, Floyd in 76, and Immelman in 08 as the only ones to do it. If Immelman, who was tied after 18 holes is included as a wire to wire, Seve Ballesteros in 1980 and Arnold Palmer
1608:
Thank you. Unfortunately I didn't see Jane out there - final pairing was covered by a man and I didn't see her with Catriona's pairing neither. We should've arranged this that you'd texted me with info which group she's doing on course commentary with when this is known from the tv coverage. As for
1561:
Thank you! I like the changes and corrections (it was well after midnight when I was finishing it). Now we'll how soon and how it is reviewed. Should you guys need photos for the wiki article as well then please let me know - I will try to find relevant ones within those taken during the tournament
1132:
guidelines -- since the tournament is a UK tournament, we use the title it is most commonly known as in that country (and British English spelling in the article), and mention any other commonly-used names from other places. In U.S.-centric articles, I would use "British Open" in the text, as that
4211:
For the benefit of editors unfamiliar with golf and golf coverage, I've compiled the following table. It summarizes how "golfing nationality" is used by the top professional golf tours world-wide. I've included, from the official tour websites, players lists, player profiles, and leaderboards, and
3911:
Yes, it does happen -- so they get two, and there should be article text to explain that. Arguably Canada should come first, since that is the current one. Again, the concept exists in golf regardless of whether they have actually competed in the tournament. We are documenting that concept, not
3488:
I am talking about it being in the infobox solely because he was born in the US. Not "representing" the US on some team, just born here. I know there can be disagreement (and you saying I am not aware of it is insulting), which is why I'm hear discussing it! But the guideline already exists. It is
2876:
You're not alone in holding those views, and that's one side of the argument. Of course there are those with various opposing views, and that's why it's not clear cut. I've never seen a discussion about flags that didn't get heated and protracted. It's definitely one of those Knowledge issues that
2696:
True but when Paul Lawrie won the 1999 Open Championship he was called the first Scottish golfer to win it since. Or when Catriona Matthew won the 2009 Women's British Open winner, she was labeled the first Scottish winner of the tournament. The golfing media does it. Again I don't care one way or
2651:
How about Chi Chi Rodriguez? Chi Chi, who was born in Puerto Rico, represented the United States in the 1973 United Ryder Cup but is often listed with Puerto Rican flag. Yes Chi Chi represented PR in the World Cup but Puerto Ricans pay some US taxes. There are articles here that have him as US and
2569:
The flags are commonplace in golf coverage; Knowledge should be no different. MOSFLAG allows their use in sporting contexts where it is common (i.e. Knowledge should not use flags in contexts were normal media coverage does not -- coming up with the flags to use would be original research, but in
837:
There will generally be one country, with that country determining membership on teams in international competition -- for example, we should not be adding the European flag to all golfers which competed on the European team in the Ryder Cup; rather their de-facto nationality determines which team
685:
infoboxes should be wrong -- fix the guideline. Basically every golf outlet associates the flags with golfers when broadcasting events or when profiling golfers; we should be no different. It does represent a "national team" of a sort already, though actually wording it that way implies there are
680:
to say "Flag icons should never be used in the birth and death information in a biographical article's introduction and/or infobox, as flags imply citizenship and/or nationality", so someone has been tweaking the text with different meanings now. Basically, any reading of MOSFLAG which says flags
3990:
to get in the events, which is the point. If a golfer has a successful season, a user may well want to check which team they'd be on should they manage to qualify. And the distinctions are most definitely used by the golf authorities regardless of whether a player has actually represented a team,
3836:
Yes, sporting nationality. For example, any member of the PGA tour is going to be eligible for one of the Ryder Cup or Presidents Cup teams -- either U.S., Europe, or "International". Their sporting nationality will determine which one -- it's not a choice. Similar for the LPGA and the Solheim
3756:
I'm sorry, but no. There are some eligibility expectations that exist for stuff like the Ryder Cup, Presidents Cup, etc. regardless of whether they have actually participated or not. They players cannot choose which side of such teams they are going to play for. The concept of golf's sporting
3580:
Now you are basically arguing that little flag pictures are bad no matter the context. If that's the case, MOSICON should forbid icons in almost all circumstances, because the text is better. Normally they are discouraged because they may bring undue attention to the field -- however, in golf's
3347:
left the U.S. Ski team for a while and created his own, but he'd still have the American flag on the related articles when he competed, and be counted in the "USA" stats. They do keep track of nationalities and tally up the points there too, but it's mostly an individual event. The Olympics are
3299:
I think we're just going to have to agree to disagree on the overall issue and, as a result, the current status quo will stand. You do raise some cogent points and, additionally, I'm of the opinion that flags should not be removed from all golf tables but on a case-by-case basis (depending on the
2456:
To Tewapack: In your Hale Irwin example, you state, "I'm claiming the nationality of 'who' he beat is pertinent and thus not a MOSFLAG violation." You then failed to state why it's pertinent (I could also question why who he beat is included at all unless he won in a playoff, but I'm not going to
2224:
The long bermuda rough at Tanglewood was wet and particularly difficult (most players had to hit a wedge back into the fairway), partly because there were several inches of rain in the preceding few days and partly because the major tournaments were "set up" to avoid anything like Johnny Miller's
3131:
Further, my understanding of IAR is much different from the use cited earlier. From my point of view, IAR is for avoiding unnecessary bureaucracy. This is not the case here. Myself and other editors have shown that nationality flags can be a contentious and difficult issue (even Clindberg's post
2212:
That worked well for most venues, because there were plenty of experienced caddies at private clubs and the few public courses (like Pebble Beach and Pinehurst in the U.S. and the courses in England and Scotland) where major tournaments were held. Tanglewood, however, was a rarity for a major: a
1091:
about whether the name of British Open shouldn't be translated, and which name to use, British Open or The Open Championship? One opinion was not to use the Open, because it's too British way to call that tournament. I agree about that, but on the other hand I'd like to use the same name than in
3777:
They would represent the United States in the Ryder Cup, etc., if they managed to qualify -- that is what that field means. Their sporting nationality doesn't change just because they qualified for a Ryder Cup team or finished one spot out in the rankings (or were a captain's pick or not). The
2520:
What I found utterly bizarre is this tendency in golf articles to put flags next to ANYTHING that possibly could take a flag, such as next to a country name. What understanding are you possibly adding by putting an American flag next to "United States" in a table? It is incredibly redundant and
2216:
To handle this, the call went out for volunteers and I came out of caddy "retirement" (at age 32, I had not caddied for fifteen years), and many decided to take up caddying for this event. We went through a couple of training sessions and then had one heck of an exciting "bag draw" to see which
2112:
Three other examples are Juli Inkster's playoff record at WP is listed at 6-4 not 6-3 as the LPGA has it. Doug Sanders playoff loss to Jack Nicklaus at the 1970 British Open is included in his playoff record at WP while the PGA Tour still omits it. George Archer article says he took 94 putts at
4513:
I hope from this information editors can see that 1) yes there is such a thing as "golfing nationality" 2) flags are used widely by the tours to represent nationality, with and without the country name associated with it, and 3) England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are used not Great
4076:
The example I am talking about here DOES only represent where they were born. Just because you guys decided to drop it to a box labelled "nationality" doesn't change the fact that the guy was born in the US, never represented the US and doesn't even list a notable tournament outside of the US.
3782:
why things are in the guideline in the first place -- in most situations, a flag would call out undue attention to the nationality, and friction can result, that sort of thing. That situation really doesn't exist in golf, so the reason for it being in the guideline doesn't really apply here.
2818:
The guidelines have always included exceptions where they make sense, like this. The discussion has taken place there many times. A small group of editors at MOSICON should also not be attempting to change long-term usage such as this. Flags as part of media coverage of particular sports is
2220:
I drew Jim Ferrier, who had won the tournament in 1947 and had a lifetime exemption as a result. Jim did not make the cut, but caddying for him was a great experience and he later helped me get onto some great courses that I might not have otherwise played, including Cypress Point and Riviera.
2122:
A heads up, I've made three separate articles for the Milwaukee tournaments that aren't the U.S. Bank/GMO. The one that ran from 1955 to 1961 had a sponsor change in 1960 but media reports said the 1959 winner was defending champ. The other two Milwaukee area pro golf tournaments have separate
513:
flag ought to appear in his biographical infobox (for other reasons), but I see no issue with a flag icon next to his name in a list or table of tournament results—per the style so commonly used in golf's reliable sources. My confusion is irrelevant, as it would be original research for us to
3397:
It is their representative nationality -- some people will recognize the flags a lot faster than the text, and it is a significant element with golfer bios -- there is a reason to make it noticeable. And yes, "discouraged doesn't mean prohibited" is a valid argument -- that is a very general
3821:
those who can't be bothered to shift their gaze. It doesn't clear up anything. It only shows he happened to be born in the US. The fact is, the "sporting nationality" of the majority is not in question. Making a big deal about it with your "shiny object" makes what was not an issue into one.
2100:
Why tewapack is taking a stand here when in other cases when the pro tours have been proven wrong, and articles have been edited to reflect information that contradicts a pro golf tour but is proven through multiple sources to be correct, is beyond me. If you're asking me for examples- Check
1996:
Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:Golf will have interest in putting on events (on and off wiki) related to women's roles in golfing. We've created an event page on English Knowledge (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the inspiration to
2550:
To Crunch: I understand your point about the Ryder Cup, but I disagree with it in player's articles for two reasons (I'm agnostic about it in most tournament articles and actually think that the flags should remain in Ryder Cup articles and similar nationality-based tournaments because the
1844:, which completes my mini-project to get an article for all notable people who played cricket for Buckinghamshire. I know little about golf, so my ability to make a good article about Steel is limited. I thought I'd post here to so people who know more than I do about golf can expand it.
675:
The flags are not being used to represent locations of birth, residence, or death. The association of a golfer with a nationality has a long history in golf circles; we should just be reflecting that. Also, per usual convention, England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are separate
4308:
3623:
If I misinterpreted your argument, I'm sorry. But I would also ask you don't put words in my mouth, because I have argued none of those three things. But if you are going to miscategorize my arguments as being those reasons and those reasons only, this discussion won't get anywhere.
1773:. So, I need to know do you want more current golfers, more golfers from the past, or a mixture. It is rather hard to dig up information on the older ones, but I could give you a helping hand on that if need be. Just tell me what you want, and I will be more than willing. See,
318:
field which is in breach of MOSFLAG namely "Do not use flags to indicate locations of birth, residence, or death." I know that members of the project will argue that it is the sporting nationality that is being represented so I propose we make a field along the lines of the
3132:
above mine indicates that it's problematic). Some editors contend that these flags are NOT an improvement to the encyclopedia, so IAR really has no place here. Concerning the exceptions to policy issue, that's already been discussed: the exception is that flags are allowed
4017:
Nightlist? It is that lack of attention that leads you to think golfers are somehow exempt. Just because some other project decided their athletes were special and exempt compared to the majority of the sports doesn't grant you license to do the same. In other words,
3986:, which follows the nationalities we've been using here (with the exception of Ireland/Northern Ireland, which is standard golf media use). And it absolutely doesn't matter whether a player has actually been in one of those events yet, or ever will - they are all
4514:
Britain or United Kingdom. I hope that this makes clear why 1) it is appropriate for the infobox golfer template to have a "Nationality" field, 2) flags and country name are appropriate for such field, and 3) sub-national flags are the standard for UK golfers. -
1790:
and you will quickly be able to discern the reason, why I am suggesting her. I love your enthusiasm for wanting to make golf biographies more prominent on the Latvian language Knowledge. I could give you more, so just ask here or go to my talk page for quicker
2411:
info. So the table includes what tournament's he won, how he won (scores, etc), and who he beat. I'm claiming the nationality of "who" he beat is pertinent and thus not a MOSFLAG violation. What is included on tournament pages varies from a simple winners list (
551:
The MOS is somewhat flexible in this matter and does not apply an outright ban. Flags add useful information in a way that if used sensibly can supplement the text. They tend to give a quick overview of the nationality spread in a way that text could never do.
3554:(ie tennis players using it) is not a valid reason. The lack of representing the US DOES matter since that is one of the listed exemptions. Clearly is matters or it wouldn't have been listed as an exemption. This notion of needing a little picture because you
1627:
No problem. Your photos have been a great contribution to Knowledge. Without them there would be almost no photos of women pros. I look forward to seeing any new photos you have from Carnoustie. I've seen the photos of Caroline Masson and Yani Tseng already.
1243:. These templates provide an external link to the official organization web page for that player. He started converting articles to use these templates and I've completed all the PGA Tour ones and the OWGR ones for the top 100 ranked players. I also created
3398:
guideline, and in most cases adding flags can easily inject some nationalism issues where they don't belong, but there are also going to be areas where that aspect is really not a concern. If you want to pick an example, let's go with Luke Donald. His
1768:
Oh, I see! I will most certainly be able to tell you a great multitude. I thought you were wanting latvian golfers, which sadly since golf is not as a global game as tennis there's not many if any prominent latvian golfers like tennis players such as
2604:
in most cases. (If the flag is for somebody who's actually playing on a "national" team, I could live with it, but my understanding is that most golf events aren't split into national teams). Does WikiProject Golf have any written guidelines on these
4111:
because the numbers won't allow common sense to prevail over the desire to decorate your boxes with tiny icons. Maybe one day a bigger part of the community will realize that your little kingdom has declared itself independent of the guidelines.
2738:, the default country seems to be GBR. The further back in time one looks, less players are listed as ENG, SCO, WAL, NIR and the more are listed as GBR, but there is almost always a mix of usage. They even list non-British people as British,
3561:
can find it a fraction of a second faster in a confined area than you can find a word is pretty weak. Hell, let's get rid of text completely and illustrate the articles with pics and stick figures. That would save us from those pesky words.
932:
726:
If you read the article, you would see that he has dual citizenship and has represented both countries in international competition. The infobox is meant to be a snapshot of the article - for details you have to actually read the article.
2959:
I don't know what part of my post you didn't understand. I don't give a toss about the pros and cons of flags. I wonder why people who are losing an argument, or just don't like an argument, always accuse the other side of wikilawyering?
962:. The photo itself seems to be mislabled by a Pvt pauline from Holland. I'm relativley new to wikipedia. Should I just delete the picture, or should I tell the original uploader about their mistake? Advice would be greatly appreciated.
2457:
shift the goalposts). Why does the nationality of the player who finished behind him need to be listed in Knowledge tables beyond the fact that golf scoring tables outside the encyclopedia tend to have little flags next to each player?
2388:
in the articles about tournaments or in the articles about individual golfers. The purpose of all these tables is to record tournament wins, not to resemble the leaderboards. Further, the standard that we're supposed to follow is the
4335:
3529:
there is no reason for WP to differ from this practice. Triathletes may not use flags, but tennis players do, as do snooker players, so it quite clearly isn't a recommendation that is actually adhered to across WP generally.
588:
I am disagreeing with your propsal of course. That's because if there's a field called "national team" the flags will disappear against the names of most golfers, since most of them aren't associated with a national team.
2441:
In addition, nationality is pertinent for players on major tours (PGA, LPGA) who are earning points in tournaments that determine their qualification for nationality-based tournaments, like the Ryder Cup and Solheim Cup.
1785:
all have articles in your language, but on the English Knowledge we would call those articles stubs and in dire need of expansion. I would say if you want to start an article on a currently famous golfer, I would advise
3520:. Most will never achieve that, but all will try to, which is why the nationality is relevant. So if we assume nationality is relevant, the issue is whether flags should be included in the nationality line. I agree with
2346:
Can you please explain to me how the nationality is pertinent to the purpose of the table? Is there some obscure golf rule that I've never heard of where your nationality allows you to trim a stroke or win a tournament?
1151:
Thanks for a great answer. That explained a lot. In Finland British Open is the commonly used name, on the other hand the Knowledge article has a translated name. We have to discuss about this in Finnish Knowledge.
420:, the country is shown as England, despite there being no such thing as "English nationality". Per policy, Knowledge should simply reflect what reliable sources show, and don't attempt to interpret the meaning. —
2714:, the highest level of professional golf in Europe, uses England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, not Great Britain or United Kingdom, just look at the "Players by country" drop down menu on their web site
1509:
Hi I am currently attending WBO at Carnoustie with a media pass and taking photos there. The goal is to create wikinews articles for each round. I've already attempted to create one for the final qualifying round
488:
Then why is Trinidad and Tobago also used on his article? And you said "...represents the "Country", of the player, whatever that means" so obviously it confuses you to because I don't know what it means either.
815:
was brought up in discussion and this golfer has 2 flags in his infobox. So what is the consensus with this project in regard to the use of flags in infobox when the golfer has played for more than one country?
2039:, claiming that the tournament histories should only start with the current version of these events. This is despite the fact that the older events are included in the PGA Tour's own histories of these events,
3507:
The fact that he doesn't currently represent the US on a team doesn't matter; attempting to qualify for such teams is a part of every golf event. All professional golfers have the opportunity to qualify for a
2858:
in the US. How does that flag enhance the article or creat more understanding? It's nothing more than bling. If this were some Olympic thing or something like that, it would seem different to me. This isn't.
2674:" is not only absurd at face value - countries are countries, and they're generally not run to the whim of golfers - but it's also directly contradicted by the source on the article I mentioned. Have a look;
391:
I am not saying use National team, as I said along the lines of it and I'm open to suggestions. Curious are you actually saying that the reason flags are used here is to denote the nationality of the player?
3991:
otherwise the whole basis of the points lists for the Ryder and Presidents Cups would be flawed. One other thing - Nightlist, it's a bit rich to discount the point that tennis players use flags because of
3057:
As a golf editor who's done a great deal of work on articles, I don't care one way or another about the flags. I will point out. The LPGA has flags up for which country a player represents and in this
3813:"Sporting nationality"? Really? Again, I came here initially because a golfer who has never represented the US and has never even played in a notable tournament outside of the US has it in his infobox
2570:
this case there are plenty of references). MOSFLAG certainly used to allow this, and if it no longer does, it should be changed back. Use of flags in a golfing context is not remotely controversial.
3075:
Yes, distinctions between Scottish/English/Welsh/Northern Irish is typical in golf -- the UK flag is basically never used. Candie Kung may be an interesting case -- she is not eligible for the U.S.
323:
field to ensure that no readers are confused as to what the flag is representing. I am proposing it here as the template doesn't get much traffic the last post on the talk was myself back in March.
3247:
The MOSICON guideline says they are useful in the tables. Always has. If you are reading it differently, then the rest of that guideline needs to be fixed. The guideline says, right at the top:
460:
No, I'm saying that "Country" is the best name for that field, because that's how it's described in golf's reliable sources (they don't call it "Nationality" or "National team"). If I click on
3178:
In some contexts, nationality flags can be contentious, yes. Generally not in golf, tennis, and other certain sports where they are common. If I'm interested to see how Americans did in the
2113:
Heritage one year, the PGA Tour record books say 95. All cases are backed up with references from reliable sources if necessary and Tewapack was aware of what I did with the Sanders article.
2332:, under "Appropriate use", this applies "In lists or tables, flag icons may be relevant when the nationality of different subjects is pertinent to the purpose of the list or table itself."
4133:
to disallow the flags in this circumstance. I haven't seen one yet. The reasoning on the MOSICON page (while it makes good sense in many cases) doesn't really apply here, in my opinion.
213:
4048:
Oh, knew there was something else. The suggestion that the flags just represent birthplace - no they don't, Clindberg is correct on the question of players born overseas. See for example
3962:, it doesn't mean their nationality is unknown just because they didn't qualify (and the person who finishes 8th doesn't suddenly become American because they did). The point is who is
1082:
2783:
It should be noted that flags of this type, even in cases where they are "discouraged", are not forbidden, especially where there is a strong precedent for using them. Also the part of
262:
has died. Haven't seen any vandalism in recent edits, just some good faith unencyclopaedic edits that needed to be reverted. More watchers may be needed as the news spreads. Regards,
3265:
They can be aids to navigation in very long lists of countries: the flag of the individual country one is looking for may 'stand out' to the eye more immediately than the name itself
2071:
2109:
and compare what the articles have the tournaments named and what the LPGA Tour does. Tewapack was well aware of the changes I made, because I told him. No objection to them either.
2797:
811:
As most if not all articles on golfers have flags in the infobox, is the consensus that all the flags that the player has represented appear in the infobox, see above section were
2167:
Only just noticed this one. It's a tricky issue. The tour's designation and history of tournaments is certainly eccentric, at best, which is why we have separate articles for the
3696:
Of course it matters if the player hasn't represented the country, as he can possibly play for someone else so as such the flag is only being used to represent their birthplace.
856:
is another article that has 2 flags in the infobox has she competed for America? Or is it in breach of MOSFLAG on 2 counts, flags in infobox and not using to denote nationality.
273:
2308:
1291:
1122:
3241:
3275:
been consensus on that guideline, unless some folks are trying to change that recently. Golf is an inherently international sport, like tennis or skiing or 9-ball (which are
2322:
1352:
2751:
1800:
1755:
1729:
1032:
250:
3995:. I'm well aware of that argument, albeit its politer version, but the tennis players point was only brought up in response to your own parallel one regarding triathletes.
1275:
347:. Golfers rarely compete for a "national team", but nationality is still very significant for this sport. Pretty much every reliable source you will see for golf (e.g.
195:
1609:
wikinews articles it seems that it's gonna end up as a single article covering entire championship, but I'll tackle this when I get back home tomorrow. Off topic: I saw
4022:. And yes, I brought up triathletes to show that everyone in this "sporting nationality" situation doesn't decide they are special cases and start declaring themselves
3437:
The guidelines had always stated to avoid use of flags for birth and death locations (and residence); that I strongly agree with, as flags tend to indicate nationality
1594:
Great work. If you happen to have any photos of golfers who are now broadcasters, can you post them? For example, Jane Crafter. I'm working on her article right now.--
2088:
Another point- The Houston Golf Association, which runs the Shell Houston Open, at its website says it has been conducting pro golf tournaments in Houston since 1946.
1514:) but so far it hasn't been accepted. I'll be trying to start one for the first round myself but if anyone wants to kick in then I'll be happy to pass along. Thanks,
1948:
dealing with formatting and linking from the overall team event article (Solheim Cup, Presidents Cup, Ryder Cup, etc.) to individual articles for each year's event.
3253:
They are useful in articles about international sporting events to show the representative nationality of players (which may differ from their legal nationalities).
2123:
articles. There is nothing in the media to acknowledge one had anything to do with the other. Houston needs the same done for the pre 1946 tournaments. I'll do it.
3061:, Catriona Matthew is listed as Scottish not British. On the other hand Candie Kung, A Taiwanese immigrant to the United States, has a Taiwan flag on her LPGA page
2616:
rather than English/Scottish/Welsh. Did Dai Rees carry a Welsh passport or pay Welsh income tax? If not, why insist on putting him in a Welsh national pigeonhole?
2242:
367:
to do with "national teams". I would support a change in the infobox field label from "Nationality" to "Country", since this aligns better with what the RS use. —
3357:
Does WikiProject Golf actually have any rules or guidelines written down anywhere which recommend/encourage widespread use of flags or which otherwise opt-out of
2987:
2969:
2936:
2905:
2886:
2813:
1901:
167:
4212:
noted how each tour uses country/nationality, flags, and both to describe players. The links are to the player lists, sample profiles, and recent leaderboards.
3831:
2950:
2842:
178:
4173:
Apologies for my mistake Niteshift, that was careless on my behalf. I still don't think it excuses your belligerent tone throughout this discussion, however.
4142:
4120:
4101:
3868:
3846:
3792:
3673:
3655:
3633:
3618:
3594:
3498:
3479:
3452:
3428:
3263:
as a prime example of appropriate use, which is exactly what we are doing on most golf articles. In the original MOSICON guideline, it was worded this way:
3046:
3022:
2867:
2828:
2270:
1523:
1200:
3370:
3329:
3294:
3199:
3145:
3096:
3070:
2701:
2691:
2665:
2640:
2579:
1826:
4182:
4168:
2771:
2625:
2436:
2401:
2382:
2356:
2300:
2150:
2127:
2077:
1176:
1161:
1142:
977:
It isn't the first time that user has mislabeled a picture, but deletion is overkill. Besides, all pvt.pauline has done here is cropping, the original is
944:
927:
3976:
3949:
3929:
3894:
3766:
2341:
1110:
Of course I understand that The Open Championship and PGA Championship are the official names of those tournaments, but those name are a bit misleading.
904:
has info on "Mission Hills Haikou" and say 2 courses are open. (Maybe this is the big one, has opened, but only with 2 of the expected 22 courses ready.)
871:
847:
695:
4086:
4035:
3571:
3538:
2941:
No, exemptions are listed. If not exempted, it's not allowed. Your wiki-lawyering aside, how about the basic question: How does it enhance the article?
2564:
1939:
993:
792:
772:
756:
736:
2451:
1864:
1498:
721:
598:
583:
561:
529:
504:
483:
455:
435:
407:
382:
4004:
1965:
1504:
661:
647:
623:
296:
4269:
2188:
2010:
1920:
1637:
1622:
1603:
1589:
1571:
1556:
1542:
356:
3711:
3037:
The MOS says thing like national teams or Olympics. Just being born in the US and playing in a tournament doesn't "represent" the US in a real way.
1986:
4134:
4093:
3968:
3921:
3838:
3784:
3758:
3665:
3625:
3586:
3521:
3471:
3420:
3286:
3191:
3088:
3014:
3013:
is policy as well. To me, this is an example where a well-intentioned guideline is trying to be enforced to a point where it breaks common sense.
2820:
2632:
2571:
1134:
839:
687:
2065:
190:
4069:
3219:
I notice that once again, the basic question of why these flags need to be in the tables has been sidestepped, this time with a variation of the
1822:
2361:
The standard in golf reporting is to use the nationality (usually just a flag) with the golfer in leaderboards for tournaments, see examples at
1853:
971:
3391:
1997:
participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here:
1466:
1099:
calls that tournament as British Open Championship. We have also the same situation with PGA Ch'ship. It's arranged by the PGA of America, and
4377:
1059:
123:
3136:
To me, that means the information that the table is trying to communicate, not that the table deals with a golf issue so it must have flags.
2056:
128:
111:
1978:
1- Sergio Garcia isn't tied for the most top 10s in major championship by someone who hasn't won one. Harry Cooper and Ed Dudley have more.
1253:
and converted all the appropriate articles. More of these templates need to be created and articles converted. This is the list I envision:
1023:. I just want you all to discuss it here to come up with a consensus for your project rather than two editors having an edit war. Thanks,
2754:
to name two. The wikipedia articles are generally much better researched with regards to nationality than www.theopen.com. So this site is
1905:
2927:. If there was a real consensus to get rid of flags, then the MOS would just forbid them, straight. But that consensus has never existed.
2675:
2609:
1830:
999:
338:
2743:
2679:
2246:
1684:
I cannot help you on this, which makes me feel humiliated by the fact I could not think of just a mere one. The only golfer I know is
1077:
243:
89:
4523:
831:
81:
76:
64:
59:
2032:
4372:
3859:
And since most will never be on those teams, making this mass exception for the many (ie any old pro) versus the few is backwards.
2366:
1910:
3439:" That is exactly what were are talking about here. This section has NOTHING to do with tournaments etc. I don't care about that.
1191:
I created this and under your guidelines for notablity she won a professional event. So, is this article notable or not, and why?
1678:
3416:
879:
1796:
1725:
1196:
1028:
209:
2661:
I don't care either way about whether the flags should be in player or tournament boxes. Just they be consistent if they are.!
2296:
Next thing this guy will say is that Gary Player's caddy didn't drop a ball in the rough at the 71st hole of the British Open.
2213:
relatively new public course where virtually every golfer either rode in a cart or carried their own clubs; i.e., no caddies.
4291:
3260:
3183:
2064:
Tewapack conveniently fails to point out that the tournaments themselves do not recognize the tournaments in Milwaukee's case
1012:
1007:
Hello Knowledge golf community, I just wanted to draw your attention to color changes by this user on the following Navboxes
223:
Is anyone interested in improving the article on Dr. Alister MacKenzie ? I would like to collaborate with someone on this.
3087:. On the other hand, she may be eligible to represent the United States at the Olympics when golf is brought back in 2016.
2373:
Tour events for this week. Win tables are essentially extractions from these leaderboards, hence nationality is pertinent.
2091:
The HGA has been affiliated with the tournament from the get go, the PGA Tour hasn't. The PGA Tour wasn't formed till 1968.
1998:
761:
284:
103:
1991:
1982:
in 64 must also be counted. They were tied at the 18 hole marks but had solo possession of the lead the rest of the way.-
1398:
The other issue to be decided is the format of the text that the template produces. Currently they produce the following:
2102:
2028:
1970:
3079:
team (unless they change the rules), so the sporting nationality may be tougher. She did play on the Asian team in the
935:
looks like it. Huge, with only two courses open. But, it sure doesn't look like 1.5x the size of Manhattan, as claimed.
2238:
311:
150:
777:
Thanks, so if you represent more than one country all the flags are used, is that the consensus used by this project?
287:. Do we think this warrants inclusion in the project? Or is there already an article on the phenomenon that I missed?
3817:
because he happened to be born in the US. It's a decoration dude, nothing more than digital bling. It doesn't "help"
3002:
2631:
events, then sometimes the subnational flags would be used. Go to the PGA player page etc. to find the correct one.
2600:
Personally, I agree that the flags should be removed; they place undue emphasis on nationality. They're also against
1897:
1792:
1721:
1192:
1046:
I have compiled a list of notable Buckinghamshire cricketers. While compiling the list I came across Donald Steele (
1024:
205:
4206:
2106:
2036:
1751:
1674:
1511:
278:
172:
154:
4367:
1337:
1205:
1008:
283:
The New York Times ran on article today (09 May 2011) on Alternative-rules golf or "Flogton", which can be found
47:
17:
2047:. I ask that he refrain from editing other articles in this manner until a consensus is reached here. Opinions?
4421:
1933:
1367:
949:
3934:
You said above "Their sporting nationality doesn't change..." so how can you have two sporting nationalities?
1951:
106:
page you have instructions about using standardized navbox templates. Actually they are not in use, and usual
3411:
2258:
2015:
1738:
It seems that You have misunderstood me. I was thinking world famous and greatest golfers, not from Latvia.--
525:
479:
431:
378:
360:
97:
4264:
2261:. I also couldn't find any reference to Ferrier playing in newspapers from the time (google news archives).
3376:
3179:
2225:
final round of 63 to win the U.S. Open the year before (Hale Irwin won the Open in 1974 at four over par).
1849:
1247:
1055:
1020:
440:
So you agree Country is an incorrect field. Not knowing Stephen Ames why is a Canadian flag shown for him?
239:
1577:
1128:
For English Knowledge, which serves all English-speaking countries, I (and many other editors) follow the
2172:
1426:
3920:
attention to the field, which is really the only aspect that the MOSICON guideline is trying to cover.
2205:
Jim played in the 1974 PGA at Tanglewood in Clemmons, NC. (His article incorrectly lists him as "DNP.")
1815:
Hi, I uploaded a few pics of hybrids and cavity-backs, and a driving range. The files can be found here:
201:
3220:
2416:
1047:
252:
38:
632:
I agree Crunch but try remove a flag from any golfers infobox and see how long before it is reverted.
4019:
3992:
3606:
3551:
1810:
1322:
1307:
1184:
1016:
301:
218:
4259:
2914:
There are examples cited of special prohibitions, and golf isn't one of them. Sure, there should be
4355:
3382:
exempted and allowed in the personal info box? What do they add to the article besides decoration?
3229:
2715:
1858:
1260:
940:
923:
412:
I'm saying it represents the "Country", of the player, whatever that means. For Stephen Ames, the
292:
137:
130:
4433:
4330:
2978:
of exemptions are listed. Therefore your claim of "If not exempted, it's not allowed" is garbage.
2254:
1547:
I'm not very experienced with wikinews articles but I made some edits. I hope they are helpful. --
568:
Wiz what are you disagreeing with because your comment makes no sense to what is being discussed.
4342:
4164:
4159:
I'd also like to associate myself with Carl Lindberg's comments - he explains it extremely well.
3983:
3517:
2983:
2965:
2932:
2882:
2838:
2793:
1845:
1530:
1389:
1344:
1217:
1100:
1051:
1043:
885:
465:
363:, etc.) clearly display player nationalities—along with those dreaded little flags!—and this has
307:
268:
4480:
4384:
4286:
2006:
1835:
901:
806:
146:
4416:
4399:
4026:
exempt. Is that saying other crap exists? Or is it really saying it doesn't exist everywhere?
1512:
http://en.wikinews.org/18_players_complete_the_field_for_the_2011_Ricoh_Women%27s_British_Open
914:
There is conflicting info on which is the largest, this one or the sister project in Shenzhen.
4116:
4082:
4031:
3864:
3827:
3651:
3614:
3567:
3494:
3448:
3387:
3042:
2946:
2901:
2863:
2809:
2731:
1282:
1072:
3778:
concept is well established, just as it is in certain other sports. Basically... there are
3524:
that they impove navigation considerably on the infoboxes; there may not be many people who
2279:
I don't know about Ferrier but this guy is wrong on two other counts in what he wrote above.
1863:
Someone should create an article (or a redirect) explaining the meaning and significance of
4470:
3959:
3059:
2719:
2234:
2209:
them to tour events. Having to take local caddies was considered a leveler on that factor.
1747:
1670:
1374:
1227:
1104:
1064:
1037:
967:
893:
889:
468:, his biographical article explains precisely why the Canadian flag is next to his name. —
227:
186:
1720:. Any of these great editors will be eager to assist you if they can think of any golfer.
1688:, which she is an American of Latvian decent. I would advise you to seek out the help of
8:
4138:
4097:
3972:
3925:
3842:
3788:
3762:
3669:
3629:
3590:
3475:
3424:
3407:
3366:
3325:
3290:
3237:
3195:
3141:
3092:
3018:
2824:
2727:
2687:
2636:
2621:
2575:
2560:
2397:
2352:
2200:
1443:
I'd like to reach a consensus on the format. My suggestion would be something like this:
1138:
936:
919:
843:
691:
288:
119:
4475:
4394:
4313:
4242:
2723:
4519:
4458:
4160:
2979:
2961:
2928:
2878:
2834:
2789:
2767:
2608:
There's also a separate problem; applying subnational labels to players. For instance,
2432:
2378:
2337:
2318:
2266:
2176:
2146:
2052:
2044:
2040:
1929:
1462:
1172:
1157:
1118:
1095:
We must remember, that the Open is really quite a British way to call that tournament,
768:
732:
263:
4453:
4441:
3403:
3065:
3062:
4463:
3944:
3889:
3706:
3399:
3358:
2784:
2707:
2601:
2329:
2002:
1916:
1709:
1578:
http://en.wikinews.org/Caroline_Masson_makes_history_and_leads_Women%27s_British_Open
1185:
866:
826:
787:
751:
716:
642:
611:
594:
578:
557:
519:
499:
473:
450:
425:
402:
372:
333:
158:
141:
4389:
1103:
calls it US PGA Championship. Britain and Ireland's PGA have their own PGA Ch'ship,
1088:
4112:
4078:
4027:
3860:
3823:
3647:
3610:
3563:
3490:
3444:
3383:
3038:
2942:
2897:
2859:
2805:
2447:
2068:
1961:
1896:
I think the average reader would benefit from a wikilink on this subject. Thanks.
1868:
1782:
1717:
1661:
5–10 (if more users could tell me diffrent players then it would be much better).--
1633:
1618:
1599:
1585:
1567:
1552:
1538:
1519:
1494:
1129:
853:
657:
619:
259:
235:
4509:
Choose "Select a report" from the Volvo China Open and select "Round 4 Scoreboard"
4350:
416:
shows his country as Canada, which is clearly different from his birthplace. For
4298:
2924:
2412:
1740:
1663:
1655:
1329:
989:
963:
182:
107:
2001:. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place!
1412:
1213:
created three templates for use in the "External links" section of golfer bios:
982:
652:
Most people probably aren't aware of the policy. I don't even agree with it. --
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4485:
4281:
4178:
4065:
4053:
4000:
3534:
3513:
3362:
3321:
3233:
3137:
3084:
3080:
3067:
2920:
2919:
are used to try and enforce concepts that aren't technically enforceable - per
2747:
2698:
2683:
2662:
2617:
2556:
2393:
2348:
2297:
2184:
2124:
2074:
2020:
1983:
1875:
1770:
1697:
1685:
1382:
1298:
162:
115:
3064:
even though Candie says she is a US citizen and doesn't have dual citizenship.
2672:
In golf, England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are separate countries
2228:
Lee Trevino won by one stroke over Jack Niclaus as Jack bogied the last hole.
1432:
4515:
4500:
English language version of links not working at the time I constructed table
4362:
4320:
4303:
4254:
3187:
3010:
2763:
2739:
2711:
2428:
2420:
2389:
2374:
2333:
2314:
2262:
2142:
2048:
1925:
1889:
1774:
1701:
1689:
1610:
1458:
1416:
1359:
1267:
1237:
1168:
1153:
1114:
1000:
955:
764:
728:
4411:
4057:
3007:
they are best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply
2682:. Presumably The Open's website is considered a reliable source on golfers?
2370:
1531:
http://en.wikinews.org/Meena_Lee_leads_2011_Women%27s_British_Open_with_a_65
1167:
events' articles should use neutral language. But that's just my opinion. --
4428:
4049:
3935:
3880:
3876:
3697:
2612:- even though the manual of style rules it out and the source says they're
2488:
2168:
1841:
1065:
959:
857:
817:
812:
778:
742:
707:
703:
633:
590:
569:
553:
515:
514:
speculate why the PGA TOUR decided to list his "country" as only Canada. —
490:
469:
461:
441:
421:
417:
413:
393:
368:
324:
4237:
1533:) - pls have a look and corrects/expand if you feel it is needed to, thx,
1422:
1402:
4406:
4325:
3344:
3076:
2443:
1957:
1945:
1882:
1816:
1778:
1705:
1693:
1629:
1614:
1595:
1581:
1563:
1548:
1534:
1515:
1490:
1210:
653:
615:
231:
4247:
2362:
2286:
1-Nicklaus didn't make bogey at the 72nd hole of the 74 PGA Championship
978:
741:
In what capacity did he represent Trinidad, what competition was it in?
348:
4276:
2678:
made golfers into "English", "Welsh", "Scottish" &c yet the source
2407:
1787:
1314:
985:
3605:
put words in my mouth. Thus far, your supporting reasons have been 1)
888:
is currently under construction and located in Hainan. I just started
4448:
4174:
4061:
3996:
3530:
3509:
2180:
1713:
1436:
1096:
1840:
Hi. I've created an article on the golfer and golf course designer
352:
4232:
2424:
2024:
1481:
1477:
1451:
1447:
1406:
4497:
click on a letter, or use the "Players by Country" drop down menu
2089:
2289:
2- Hale Irwin shot seven over not four over at the 1974 US Open
1019:. I have no earthly ideal why the editor has not even touched
908:
896:. I'm not sure if the latter is a different place. Some facts:
3916:
to omit them. In this particular situation, it does not draw
3646:
Ok, so you don't think they look pretty. 1 and 2 still apply.
3361:? I asked before but it might have got lost in the avalanche.
2253:
This account is not consistent with the PGA's media guide for
907:
The website says Mission Hills Haikou is 15 minutes away from
2974:
Furthermore, the list of exemptions is not exhaustive - i.e.
762:
Stephen Ames#Trinidad & Tobago national team appearances
1395:
Any comments on the names I've suggested or others needed?
140:
by adding new articles or creating articles for redlinks.--
110:
is much better for those. You can also share your thoughts
3609:, 2)It makes it easy for the lazy and 3) It looks pretty.
2758:
a reliable source when it comes to golfing nationalities
1083:
British Open or the Open and PGA or US PGA Ch'ship (golf)
3601:
That isn't what I am arguing and I'll thank you to not
2309:
All the little tiny flag icons on win/losses need to go
892:
to represent it. But, I'm confused. I just moved it to
2175:, but only one for the much-travelled and multi-named
981:. Go to the picture discussion at either that page or
1472:
The templates looks good. I suggest using the format:
179:
Knowledge:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Women's Sport
3134:
when they are pertinent to the purpose of the table.
2415:), expanded table with total score and prize money (
1817:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/Category:Golf_equipment
2877:may never really be resolved one way or the other.
2652:
others where he is PR.(Yes I've reverted the later)
911:, just like the media says of Mission Hills Hainan.
3958:. In other words, if someone finishes 9th on the
3559:too lazy to shift your eyes a fraction of an inch
2896:enhance the article aside from being some bling?
1921:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Marshes Golf Club
196:Golf's Early Major Championship: The Western Open
1975:Some golf editors have two sets of facts wrong.
1489:The use of possessive form seems unnecessary. --
2697:the other just that the articles be consistent.
1885:Monday-qualified into the AT&T Championship
1878:was a Monday qualifier who won a PGA Tour event
1613:today at the course and we had a short chat :)
314:at present golf pages display flags beside the
181:. Your opinions and your advice are welcome. --
114:. I suggest removing the introductions aswell.
3956:just because they participated in a tournament
1892:Monday-qualified for the Navistar LPGA Classic
4129:I'd like to know if there is actually a good
3249:Repeated use of an icon in a table or infobox
918:So, does anyone know what the real story is?
3879:played for 2 countries? So it does happen.
3441:This is solely about the golfer bio infobox
1952:Talk:Solheim_Cup#Links_to_individual_events
4060:(German born in the then Czechoslovakia).
2067:of prior to 1968 and Houston prior to 1946
958:is incorrect. The picture obviously shows
3954:The sporting nationality does not change
1944:A discussion in currently in progress on
884:Hello golfers. The sister project of the
614:flags should not be used in infoboxes. --
1505:2011 Women's British Open - help needed
686:actual teams when there really aren't.
14:
2392:, not the standard in golf reporting.
1919:is at AfD. You may wish to comment at
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3261:List of WPA World Nine-ball champions
3184:List of WPA World Nine-ball champions
1956:Please weigh in with your opinion. --
1071:Somebody might expand this further,♦
25:
4506:Order of Merit list, no player list
2103:Damon Runyon Cancer Fund Tournament
2029:U.S. Bank Championship in Milwaukee
1562:and the preceding practice rounds.
1529:wikinews article on the 1st round (
1301:(uses different url format than ET)
1285:(uses different url format than ET)
310:along the lines of what is used in
23:
312:Template:Infobox ice hockey player
24:
4534:
1089:a discussion at Finnish Knowledge
706:article being used to represent?
3226:nationality actually is relevant
2313:They're in violation of WP:MOS.
1911:Marshes Golf Club article at AfD
676:"nationalities". The guideline
29:
3255:That's what the guideline says
2107:Moss Creek Women's Invitational
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Golf
3960:American Ryder Cup points list
2217:player each caddy would have.
2023:has removed older events from
1966:23:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
1940:15:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
1906:21:19, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
13:
1:
4056:(Swede born in Finland), and
1854:21:32, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
361:European Tour player profiles
306:I propose making a change to
4052:(American born in Germany),
3180:2012 Alpine Skiing World Cup
2027:tournament histories of the
2011:21:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
1987:02:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
1013:U.S. Open Golf Championships
880:World's largest golf complex
258:In case anyone hasn't heard
7:
2419:), to full winner's score (
2173:BMW Championship (PGA Tour)
1971:Contrary to popular opinion
1831:12:40, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
1801:20:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
1793:SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow?
1756:07:52, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
1730:22:37, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
1722:SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow?
1679:12:58, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
1576:Second round note is here:
1427:Official World Golf Ranking
1193:SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow?
1025:SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow?
886:worlds largest golf complex
251:Death of Seve Ballesteros/
206:SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow?
10:
4539:
4183:21:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
4169:22:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
4143:15:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
4121:15:44, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
4102:14:50, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
4087:01:11, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
4070:22:39, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
4036:01:11, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
4005:22:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3977:22:07, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3950:21:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3930:20:37, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3895:19:00, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3869:18:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3847:18:25, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3832:17:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3793:14:45, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3767:14:45, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3712:10:12, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3674:20:37, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3656:18:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3634:18:32, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3619:17:16, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3595:14:45, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3572:11:27, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3539:09:24, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
3499:23:14, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
3480:21:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
3453:19:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
3429:18:26, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
3392:15:24, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
3371:12:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
3330:15:58, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
3295:14:00, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
3271:the guideline. That has
3242:12:57, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
3200:07:29, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
3146:01:25, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
3097:20:49, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
3071:20:05, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
3047:14:29, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
3023:19:52, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
2988:21:46, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
2970:21:43, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
2951:14:29, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
2937:19:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
2906:19:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
2887:19:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
2868:18:59, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
2843:18:54, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
2829:18:46, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
2814:17:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
2798:20:18, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
2772:19:56, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
2718:. Same with women's golf,
2702:16:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
2692:15:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
2666:12:58, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
2641:14:02, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
2626:12:48, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
2580:14:02, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
2565:03:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
2452:00:27, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
2437:22:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
2417:Sea Pines Heritage Classic
2402:19:47, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
2383:15:23, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
2357:15:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
2342:14:55, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
2323:15:15, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
2271:19:51, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
2247:17:49, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
2189:21:37, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
2151:19:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
2128:16:43, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
2078:15:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
2057:14:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1638:01:09, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
1003:changing color on navboxes
702:What are the flags on the
253:Severiano Ballesteros Sota
244:00:59, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
214:17:06, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
191:22:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
168:19:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
136:Feel free to help fill in
2760:if they are listed as GBR
2301:17:01, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
2072:Thrilling ride remembered
1999:WikiWomen's History Month
1992:WikiWomen's History Month
1623:21:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
1604:16:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
1590:23:35, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
1572:05:26, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
1557:00:14, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
1543:23:41, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
1524:20:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
1499:07:15, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
1467:04:39, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
1201:16:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
1177:19:36, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
1162:16:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
1143:11:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
1123:08:24, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
1078:17:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
1060:13:19, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
1033:23:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
994:18:17, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
983:this one and make a note
972:15:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
954:The photo in the article
945:04:03, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
928:03:46, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
872:15:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
848:20:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
832:19:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
357:European Tour leaderboard
124:16:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
2487:on Knowledge (excluding
793:17:52, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
773:17:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
757:09:30, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
737:03:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
722:15:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
696:15:20, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
662:11:47, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
648:11:28, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
624:11:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
599:13:18, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
584:09:53, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
562:09:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
530:01:21, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
505:01:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
484:01:05, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
464:' name from a page like
456:00:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
436:00:44, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
408:23:40, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
383:23:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
339:22:49, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
279:Alternative Golf/Flogton
200:What do you think about
173:Your opinions and advice
138:Template:Student athlete
131:Template:Student athlete
4524:16:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
4343:PGA Tour of Australasia
3516:team, and also for the
1390:World Golf Hall of Fame
1345:PGA Tour of Australasia
1206:External link templates
466:2006 Masters Tournament
308:Template:Infobox golfer
297:15:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
274:09:18, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
3984:World Cup (men's golf)
2680:calls them all British
1338:AustralasiaTour player
1009:The Open Championships
950:Concerns About a Photo
681:are inappropriate for
177:A recently discussion
2804:with all the others?
2732:The Open Championship
2259:1974 PGA Championship
2016:Older PGA Tour events
1368:LadiesEuroTour player
1283:European Seniors Tour
98:Standardized navboxes
42:of past discussions.
4471:Ladies European Tour
4385:Tour de las Américas
3417:less than a year ago
3377:Flags in the infobox
2720:Ladies European Tour
1375:Ladies European Tour
1292:ChallengeTour player
1105:BMW PGA Championship
894:Mission Hills Haikou
890:Mission Hills Hainan
349:PGA TOUR leaderboard
3221:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
2726:, and amateur golf
2423:), and runners-up (
1353:CanadianTour player
1248:SunshineTour player
1092:English Knowledge.
1021:Masters Tournaments
4020:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
3993:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
3607:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
3552:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
3412:European Tour page
3410:has the flag, his
3406:has the flag, his
3402:has the flag, his
2177:Booz Allen Classic
1846:AssociateAffiliate
1052:AssociateAffiliate
4491:
4490:
3230:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS
2670:The notion that "
2237:comment added by
1917:Marshes Golf Club
1811:New pics of clubs
1276:EuroSrTour player
1186:Brittany Johnston
509:I do not believe
353:PGA TOUR profiles
302:Template proposal
247:
230:comment added by
219:Alister MacKenzie
166:
95:
94:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
4530:
4215:
4214:
3947:
3942:
3892:
3887:
3709:
3704:
2249:
1938:
1888:Later that year
1869:Monday qualifier
1865:Monday-qualified
1859:Monday qualifier
1783:Annika Sorenstam
1743:
1666:
1454:'s official site
1387:
1381:
1372:
1366:
1357:
1351:
1342:
1336:
1327:
1323:JapanTour player
1321:
1312:
1308:AsianTour player
1306:
1296:
1290:
1280:
1274:
1265:
1259:
1252:
1246:
1242:
1236:
1232:
1226:
1222:
1216:
1075:
1017:PGA Championship
869:
864:
854:Annika Sorenstam
829:
824:
790:
785:
754:
749:
719:
714:
645:
640:
581:
576:
502:
497:
453:
448:
414:PGA TOUR profile
405:
400:
336:
331:
271:
260:Seve Ballesteros
246:
224:
144:
73:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
4538:
4537:
4533:
4532:
4531:
4529:
4528:
4527:
4299:Japan Golf Tour
4209:
3945:
3936:
3890:
3881:
3707:
3698:
3581:case, it's not
3379:
2413:Atlanta Classic
2311:
2232:
2203:
2018:
1994:
1973:
1923:
1913:
1861:
1838:
1813:
1741:
1664:
1658:
1507:
1423:Trevor Immelman
1413:Trevor Immelman
1403:Trevor Immelman
1385:
1379:
1370:
1364:
1355:
1349:
1340:
1334:
1330:Japan Golf Tour
1325:
1319:
1310:
1304:
1294:
1288:
1278:
1272:
1263:
1261:EuroTour player
1257:
1250:
1244:
1240:
1234:
1230:
1224:
1220:
1214:
1208:
1189:
1085:
1073:
1069:
1040:
1005:
952:
882:
867:
858:
827:
818:
809:
788:
779:
752:
743:
717:
708:
643:
634:
579:
570:
500:
491:
451:
442:
403:
394:
345:Strong disagree
334:
325:
304:
281:
269:
256:
225:
221:
198:
175:
134:
108:Template:Navbox
100:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4536:
4511:
4510:
4507:
4504:
4503:Animated flags
4501:
4498:
4489:
4488:
4483:
4478:
4473:
4467:
4466:
4461:
4456:
4451:
4445:
4444:
4439:
4436:
4431:
4425:
4424:
4419:
4414:
4409:
4403:
4402:
4397:
4392:
4387:
4381:
4380:
4375:
4370:
4365:
4359:
4358:
4353:
4348:
4345:
4339:
4338:
4333:
4328:
4323:
4317:
4316:
4311:
4306:
4301:
4295:
4294:
4289:
4284:
4279:
4273:
4272:
4267:
4262:
4257:
4251:
4250:
4245:
4240:
4235:
4229:
4228:
4225:
4222:
4219:
4208:
4207:Standard usage
4205:
4204:
4203:
4202:
4201:
4200:
4199:
4198:
4197:
4196:
4195:
4194:
4193:
4192:
4191:
4190:
4189:
4188:
4187:
4186:
4185:
4157:
4156:
4155:
4154:
4153:
4152:
4151:
4150:
4149:
4148:
4147:
4146:
4145:
4124:
4123:
4054:Jarmo Sandelin
4046:
4045:
4044:
4043:
4042:
4041:
4040:
4039:
4038:
3902:
3901:
3900:
3899:
3898:
3897:
3872:
3871:
3852:
3851:
3850:
3849:
3810:
3809:
3808:
3807:
3806:
3805:
3804:
3803:
3802:
3801:
3800:
3799:
3798:
3797:
3796:
3795:
3775:
3774:
3773:
3772:
3771:
3770:
3769:
3733:
3732:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3727:
3726:
3725:
3724:
3723:
3722:
3721:
3720:
3719:
3718:
3717:
3716:
3715:
3714:
3694:
3693:
3692:
3691:
3690:
3689:
3688:
3687:
3686:
3685:
3684:
3683:
3682:
3681:
3680:
3679:
3678:
3677:
3676:
3659:
3658:
3639:
3638:
3637:
3636:
3575:
3574:
3514:Presidents Cup
3502:
3501:
3460:
3459:
3458:
3457:
3456:
3455:
3378:
3375:
3374:
3373:
3354:
3353:
3352:
3351:
3350:
3349:
3335:
3334:
3333:
3332:
3314:
3313:
3312:
3311:
3304:
3303:
3302:
3301:
3217:
3216:
3215:
3214:
3213:
3212:
3211:
3210:
3209:
3208:
3207:
3206:
3205:
3204:
3203:
3202:
3161:
3160:
3159:
3158:
3157:
3156:
3155:
3154:
3153:
3152:
3151:
3150:
3149:
3148:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3113:
3112:
3111:
3110:
3109:
3108:
3107:
3106:
3105:
3104:
3103:
3085:2008 Lexus Cup
3055:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3051:
3050:
3049:
3026:
3025:
2997:
2996:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2990:
2972:
2954:
2953:
2939:
2909:
2908:
2890:
2889:
2871:
2870:
2850:
2849:
2848:
2847:
2846:
2845:
2781:
2780:
2779:
2778:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2748:Bill Shankland
2704:
2656:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2606:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2594:
2593:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2505:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2492:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2463:
2462:
2461:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2310:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2291:
2290:
2287:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2274:
2273:
2231:Jon Anderson
2202:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2110:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2021:User:WilliamJE
2017:
2014:
1993:
1990:
1972:
1969:
1912:
1909:
1894:
1893:
1886:
1879:
1876:Fred Wadsworth
1860:
1857:
1837:
1834:
1821:many birdies!
1812:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1771:Ernests Gulbis
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1733:
1732:
1686:Natalie Gulbis
1657:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1506:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1486:
1485:
1474:
1473:
1456:
1455:
1441:
1440:
1430:
1420:
1410:
1393:
1392:
1377:
1362:
1347:
1332:
1317:
1302:
1299:Challenge Tour
1286:
1270:
1218:PGATour player
1207:
1204:
1188:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1164:
1146:
1145:
1084:
1081:
1068:
1063:
1039:
1036:
1004:
998:
997:
996:
951:
948:
937:Anna Frodesiak
920:Anna Frodesiak
916:
915:
912:
905:
881:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
808:
807:Flag consensus
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
699:
698:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
627:
626:
604:
603:
602:
601:
565:
564:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
386:
385:
303:
300:
289:Justintbassett
280:
277:
255:
249:
220:
217:
197:
194:
174:
171:
133:
127:
99:
96:
93:
92:
87:
84:
79:
74:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4535:
4526:
4525:
4521:
4517:
4508:
4505:
4502:
4499:
4496:
4495:
4494:
4487:
4484:
4482:
4479:
4477:
4474:
4472:
4469:
4468:
4465:
4462:
4460:
4457:
4455:
4452:
4450:
4447:
4446:
4443:
4440:
4437:
4435:
4432:
4430:
4427:
4426:
4423:
4420:
4418:
4415:
4413:
4410:
4408:
4405:
4404:
4401:
4398:
4396:
4393:
4391:
4388:
4386:
4383:
4382:
4379:
4376:
4374:
4371:
4369:
4366:
4364:
4363:Canadian Tour
4361:
4360:
4357:
4354:
4352:
4349:
4346:
4344:
4341:
4340:
4337:
4334:
4332:
4329:
4327:
4324:
4322:
4321:Sunshine Tour
4319:
4318:
4315:
4312:
4310:
4307:
4305:
4302:
4300:
4297:
4296:
4293:
4290:
4288:
4285:
4283:
4280:
4278:
4275:
4274:
4271:
4268:
4266:
4263:
4261:
4258:
4256:
4255:European Tour
4253:
4252:
4249:
4246:
4244:
4241:
4239:
4236:
4234:
4231:
4230:
4226:
4223:
4220:
4217:
4216:
4213:
4184:
4180:
4176:
4172:
4171:
4170:
4166:
4162:
4161:Bretonbanquet
4158:
4144:
4140:
4136:
4135:Carl Lindberg
4132:
4128:
4127:
4126:
4125:
4122:
4118:
4114:
4109:
4108:
4107:
4106:
4105:
4104:
4103:
4099:
4095:
4094:Carl Lindberg
4090:
4089:
4088:
4084:
4080:
4075:
4074:
4073:
4072:
4071:
4067:
4063:
4059:
4055:
4051:
4047:
4037:
4033:
4029:
4025:
4021:
4016:
4015:
4014:
4013:
4012:
4011:
4010:
4009:
4008:
4007:
4006:
4002:
3998:
3994:
3989:
3985:
3980:
3979:
3978:
3974:
3970:
3969:Carl Lindberg
3965:
3961:
3957:
3953:
3952:
3951:
3948:
3943:
3941:
3940:
3933:
3932:
3931:
3927:
3923:
3922:Carl Lindberg
3919:
3915:
3910:
3909:
3908:
3907:
3906:
3905:
3904:
3903:
3896:
3893:
3888:
3886:
3885:
3878:
3874:
3873:
3870:
3866:
3862:
3858:
3857:
3856:
3855:
3854:
3853:
3848:
3844:
3840:
3839:Carl Lindberg
3835:
3834:
3833:
3829:
3825:
3820:
3816:
3812:
3811:
3794:
3790:
3786:
3785:Carl Lindberg
3781:
3776:
3768:
3764:
3760:
3759:Carl Lindberg
3755:
3754:
3753:
3752:
3751:
3750:
3749:
3748:
3747:
3746:
3745:
3744:
3743:
3742:
3741:
3740:
3739:
3738:
3737:
3736:
3735:
3734:
3713:
3710:
3705:
3703:
3702:
3695:
3675:
3671:
3667:
3666:Carl Lindberg
3663:
3662:
3661:
3660:
3657:
3653:
3649:
3645:
3644:
3643:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3635:
3631:
3627:
3626:Carl Lindberg
3622:
3621:
3620:
3616:
3612:
3608:
3604:
3600:
3599:
3598:
3597:
3596:
3592:
3588:
3587:Carl Lindberg
3584:
3579:
3578:
3577:
3576:
3573:
3569:
3565:
3560:
3557:
3553:
3550:
3549:
3548:
3547:
3546:
3545:
3544:
3543:
3542:
3541:
3540:
3536:
3532:
3527:
3523:
3522:Carl Lindberg
3519:
3515:
3511:
3506:
3505:
3504:
3503:
3500:
3496:
3492:
3487:
3486:
3485:
3484:
3483:
3482:
3481:
3477:
3473:
3472:Carl Lindberg
3468:
3467:
3466:
3465:
3464:
3463:
3462:
3461:
3454:
3450:
3446:
3442:
3438:
3434:
3433:
3432:
3431:
3430:
3426:
3422:
3421:Carl Lindberg
3418:
3413:
3409:
3405:
3401:
3396:
3395:
3394:
3393:
3389:
3385:
3372:
3368:
3364:
3360:
3356:
3355:
3346:
3341:
3340:
3339:
3338:
3337:
3336:
3331:
3327:
3323:
3318:
3317:
3316:
3315:
3308:
3307:
3306:
3305:
3298:
3297:
3296:
3292:
3288:
3287:Carl Lindberg
3283:
3278:
3274:
3270:
3266:
3262:
3258:
3254:
3250:
3246:
3245:
3244:
3243:
3239:
3235:
3231:
3227:
3222:
3201:
3197:
3193:
3192:Carl Lindberg
3189:
3188:Roger Federer
3185:
3181:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3174:
3173:
3172:
3171:
3170:
3169:
3168:
3167:
3166:
3165:
3164:
3163:
3162:
3147:
3143:
3139:
3135:
3130:
3129:
3128:
3127:
3126:
3125:
3124:
3123:
3122:
3121:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3117:
3100:
3099:
3098:
3094:
3090:
3089:Carl Lindberg
3086:
3082:
3078:
3074:
3073:
3072:
3069:
3066:
3063:
3060:
3056:
3048:
3044:
3040:
3036:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3032:
3031:
3030:
3029:
3028:
3027:
3024:
3020:
3016:
3015:Carl Lindberg
3012:
3008:
3004:
2999:
2998:
2989:
2985:
2981:
2980:Bretonbanquet
2977:
2973:
2971:
2967:
2963:
2962:Bretonbanquet
2958:
2957:
2956:
2955:
2952:
2948:
2944:
2940:
2938:
2934:
2930:
2929:Bretonbanquet
2926:
2922:
2917:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2907:
2903:
2899:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2891:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2879:Bretonbanquet
2875:
2874:
2873:
2872:
2869:
2865:
2861:
2856:
2855:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2851:
2844:
2840:
2836:
2835:Bretonbanquet
2832:
2831:
2830:
2826:
2822:
2821:Carl Lindberg
2817:
2816:
2815:
2811:
2807:
2802:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2795:
2791:
2790:Bretonbanquet
2786:
2773:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2745:
2741:
2740:Walter Travis
2737:
2733:
2730:. Now to the
2729:
2725:
2721:
2717:
2713:
2712:European Tour
2709:
2705:
2703:
2700:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2689:
2685:
2681:
2677:
2673:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2664:
2660:
2659:
2658:
2657:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2642:
2638:
2634:
2633:Carl Lindberg
2629:
2628:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2599:
2598:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2572:Carl Lindberg
2568:
2567:
2566:
2562:
2558:
2554:
2549:
2548:
2547:
2546:
2545:
2544:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2539:
2538:
2537:
2536:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2513:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2490:
2485:
2484:
2483:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2434:
2430:
2426:
2422:
2421:Frys.com Open
2418:
2414:
2409:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2386:
2385:
2384:
2380:
2376:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2339:
2335:
2331:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2320:
2316:
2302:
2299:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2288:
2285:
2284:
2278:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2272:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2229:
2226:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2210:
2206:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2129:
2126:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2111:
2108:
2104:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2090:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2079:
2076:
2073:
2069:
2066:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2013:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1989:
1988:
1985:
1979:
1976:
1968:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1954:
1953:
1949:
1947:
1942:
1941:
1937:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1922:
1918:
1908:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1891:
1890:Lexi Thompson
1887:
1884:
1880:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1870:
1866:
1856:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1833:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1819:
1818:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1789:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1775:Jack Nicklaus
1772:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1757:
1753:
1752:Contributions
1749:
1745:
1744:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1676:
1675:Contributions
1672:
1668:
1667:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1611:User:Mudforce
1607:
1606:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1487:
1484:official site
1483:
1479:
1476:
1475:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1453:
1449:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1439:official site
1438:
1434:
1431:
1429:official site
1428:
1424:
1421:
1419:official site
1418:
1417:Sunshine Tour
1414:
1411:
1409:official site
1408:
1404:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1396:
1391:
1384:
1378:
1376:
1369:
1363:
1361:
1360:Canadian Tour
1354:
1348:
1346:
1339:
1333:
1331:
1324:
1318:
1316:
1309:
1303:
1300:
1293:
1287:
1284:
1277:
1271:
1269:
1268:European Tour
1262:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1249:
1239:
1229:
1219:
1212:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1187:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1165:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1135:Carl Lindberg
1131:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1111:
1108:
1106:
1102:
1101:European Tour
1098:
1093:
1090:
1080:
1079:
1076:
1067:
1062:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1035:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1002:
995:
991:
987:
984:
980:
976:
975:
974:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
956:Chris DiMarco
947:
946:
942:
938:
934:
930:
929:
925:
921:
913:
910:
906:
903:
899:
898:
897:
895:
891:
887:
873:
870:
865:
863:
862:
855:
851:
850:
849:
845:
841:
840:Carl Lindberg
836:
835:
834:
833:
830:
825:
823:
822:
814:
794:
791:
786:
784:
783:
776:
775:
774:
770:
766:
763:
760:
759:
758:
755:
750:
748:
747:
740:
739:
738:
734:
730:
725:
724:
723:
720:
715:
713:
712:
705:
701:
700:
697:
693:
689:
688:Carl Lindberg
684:
679:
674:
671:
670:
663:
659:
655:
651:
650:
649:
646:
641:
639:
638:
631:
630:
629:
628:
625:
621:
617:
613:
610:According to
609:
606:
605:
600:
596:
592:
587:
586:
585:
582:
577:
575:
574:
567:
566:
563:
559:
555:
550:
547:
546:
531:
527:
524:
521:
517:
512:
508:
507:
506:
503:
498:
496:
495:
487:
486:
485:
481:
478:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
458:
457:
454:
449:
447:
446:
439:
438:
437:
433:
430:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
410:
409:
406:
401:
399:
398:
390:
389:
388:
387:
384:
380:
377:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
342:
341:
340:
337:
332:
330:
329:
322:
321:National team
317:
313:
309:
299:
298:
294:
290:
286:
276:
275:
272:
267:
266:
261:
254:
248:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
193:
192:
188:
184:
180:
170:
169:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
132:
129:New template
126:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
91:
88:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
72:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
4512:
4492:
4429:OneAsia Tour
4227:Leaderboard
4210:
4130:
4050:Marco Dawson
4023:
3987:
3963:
3955:
3938:
3937:
3917:
3913:
3883:
3882:
3877:Stephen Ames
3818:
3814:
3779:
3700:
3699:
3602:
3582:
3558:
3555:
3525:
3440:
3436:
3380:
3281:
3276:
3272:
3268:
3264:
3259:. It cites
3256:
3252:
3248:
3225:
3218:
3133:
3006:
2975:
2915:
2782:
2759:
2755:
2735:
2671:
2613:
2552:
2521:unnecessary.
2489:The Troubles
2312:
2239:184.2.76.184
2233:— Preceding
2230:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2207:
2204:
2169:Western Open
2019:
2003:SarahStierch
1995:
1980:
1977:
1974:
1955:
1950:
1943:
1924:
1915:The article
1914:
1895:
1862:
1842:Donald Steel
1839:
1836:Donald Steel
1820:
1814:
1739:
1710:Boddefan2009
1662:
1659:
1508:
1457:
1442:
1433:Cristie Kerr
1397:
1394:
1209:
1190:
1112:
1109:
1094:
1086:
1070:
1066:Drive (golf)
1041:
1038:Donald Steel
1006:
960:Lucas Glover
953:
931:
917:
883:
860:
859:
820:
819:
813:Stephen Ames
810:
781:
780:
745:
744:
710:
709:
704:Stephen Ames
682:
677:
672:
636:
635:
607:
572:
571:
548:
522:
510:
493:
492:
476:
462:Stephen Ames
444:
443:
428:
396:
395:
375:
364:
344:
327:
326:
320:
315:
305:
282:
264:
257:
226:— Preceding
222:
199:
176:
142:TonyTheTiger
135:
101:
70:
43:
37:
4407:Korean Tour
4221:Player list
4113:Niteshift36
4079:Niteshift36
4028:Niteshift36
3875:What about
3861:Niteshift36
3824:Niteshift36
3648:Niteshift36
3611:Niteshift36
3585:attention.
3564:Niteshift36
3491:Niteshift36
3445:Niteshift36
3408:Masters bio
3384:Niteshift36
3345:Bode Miller
3077:Solheim Cup
3039:Niteshift36
2943:Niteshift36
2898:Niteshift36
2860:Niteshift36
2806:Niteshift36
2255:Jim Ferrier
2201:Jim Ferrier
1946:Solheim Cup
1898:67.101.6.72
1883:Rod Spittle
1791:assistance.
1779:Tiger Woods
1718:Michfan2123
1228:LPGA player
1211:User:777sms
1074:Dr. Blofeld
1044:my userpage
1042:Hello. On
418:Luke Donald
316:Nationality
202:this source
36:This is an
4277:Asian Tour
4058:Alex Čejka
3359:WP:MOSFLAG
3068:...William
3003:definition
2785:WP:MOSFLAG
2708:WP:MOSFLAG
2699:...William
2663:...William
2602:WP:MOSFLAG
2408:Hale Irwin
2330:WP:MOSFLAG
2298:...William
2125:...William
2075:...William
1788:Yani Tseng
1742:Edgars2007
1665:Edgars2007
1315:Asian Tour
1087:I started
964:Aviator569
612:WP:MOSFLAG
183:Geneviève
159:WP:CHICAGO
90:Archive 10
4449:LPGA Tour
4434:(country)
3518:World Cup
3404:ESPN page
3363:bobrayner
3322:Chillllls
3257:right now
3234:Chillllls
3138:Chillllls
2684:bobrayner
2676:this edit
2618:bobrayner
2557:Chillllls
2555:players.
2394:Chillllls
2349:Chillllls
1881:In 2010,
1698:WilliamJE
1437:LPGA Tour
1130:WP:ENGVAR
116:Pelmeen10
82:Archive 5
77:Archive 4
71:Archive 3
65:Archive 2
60:Archive 1
4516:Tewapack
4233:PGA Tour
3964:eligible
3914:atypical
3819:the lazy
3400:PGA page
3083:through
2976:examples
2925:WP:CREEP
2764:Tewapack
2429:Tewapack
2425:KLM Open
2375:Tewapack
2367:European
2334:Tewapack
2315:Jtrainor
2263:Tewapack
2235:unsigned
2171:and the
2143:Tewapack
2049:Tewapack
2025:PGA Tour
1934:contribs
1926:Eastmain
1823:Fpedraza
1702:Hietanbs
1690:Tewapack
1482:PGA Tour
1478:John Doe
1459:Tewapack
1452:PGA Tour
1448:John Doe
1407:PGA Tour
1169:August90
1154:August90
1115:August90
1097:PGA Tour
1001:Frietjes
765:Tewapack
729:Tewapack
673:Disagree
608:Disagree
549:Disagree
526:contribs
480:contribs
432:contribs
379:contribs
240:contribs
228:unsigned
4481:country
4476:country
4390:neither
4356:country
4351:country
4336:country
4314:neither
4309:neither
4304:neither
4287:country
4282:country
4224:Profile
4024:special
3982:in the
3939:Mo ainm
3884:Mo ainm
3780:reasons
3701:Mo ainm
3269:against
3224:above,
2921:WP:BURO
2614:British
2406:Taking
2257:or the
1984:William
1656:Golfers
1480:at the
1450:at the
1435:at the
1425:at the
1415:at the
1405:at the
902:website
861:Mo ainm
821:Mo ainm
782:Mo ainm
746:Mo ainm
711:Mo ainm
637:Mo ainm
591:WizOfOz
573:Mo ainm
554:WizOfOz
516:Andrwsc
494:Mo ainm
470:Andrwsc
445:Mo ainm
422:Andrwsc
397:Mo ainm
369:Andrwsc
365:nothing
328:Mo ainm
265:220.101
163:WP:FOUR
39:archive
4493:Notes
4131:reason
3988:aiming
3815:solely
3664:Nope.
3273:always
3011:WP:IAR
2916:either
2605:flags?
2444:Crunch
2369:, and
2031:and ,
1958:Crunch
1781:, and
1716:, and
1706:NapHit
1694:Crunch
1630:Crunch
1615:Wmigda
1596:Crunch
1582:Wmigda
1564:Wmigda
1549:Crunch
1535:Wmigda
1516:Wmigda
1491:Crunch
1015:, and
909:Haikou
683:golfer
654:Crunch
616:Crunch
511:either
232:Rogala
3946:~Talk
3918:undue
3891:~Talk
3708:~Talk
3583:undue
3510:Ryder
2553:other
2371:Asian
1383:WGHOF
986:Paaln
868:~Talk
828:~Talk
789:~Talk
753:~Talk
718:~Talk
644:~Talk
580:~Talk
501:~Talk
452:~Talk
404:~Talk
335:~Talk
16:<
4520:talk
4486:flag
4464:flag
4459:flag
4454:flag
4442:flag
4422:flag
4417:both
4412:both
4400:flag
4395:flag
4378:flag
4373:flag
4368:flag
4331:both
4326:both
4292:flag
4270:flag
4265:both
4260:both
4248:flag
4243:both
4238:both
4218:Tour
4179:talk
4175:EJBH
4165:talk
4139:talk
4117:talk
4098:talk
4083:talk
4066:talk
4062:EJBH
4032:talk
4001:talk
3997:EJBH
3973:talk
3926:talk
3865:talk
3843:talk
3828:talk
3789:talk
3763:talk
3670:talk
3652:talk
3630:talk
3615:talk
3591:talk
3568:talk
3535:talk
3531:EJBH
3526:need
3495:talk
3476:talk
3449:talk
3425:talk
3388:talk
3367:talk
3326:talk
3291:talk
3282:many
3251:and
3238:talk
3196:talk
3142:talk
3093:talk
3081:2005
3058:case
3043:talk
3019:talk
2984:talk
2966:talk
2947:talk
2933:talk
2923:and
2902:talk
2883:talk
2864:talk
2839:talk
2825:talk
2810:talk
2794:talk
2768:talk
2762:. -
2752:1939
2746:and
2744:1940
2728:here
2724:here
2716:here
2688:talk
2637:talk
2622:talk
2610:this
2576:talk
2561:talk
2448:talk
2433:talk
2398:talk
2379:talk
2353:talk
2338:talk
2328:Per
2319:talk
2267:talk
2243:talk
2185:talk
2181:EJBH
2147:talk
2105:and
2053:talk
2045:here
2043:and
2041:here
2037:here
2035:and
2033:here
2007:talk
1962:talk
1930:talk
1902:talk
1850:talk
1827:talk
1797:talk
1748:Talk
1726:talk
1714:EJBH
1671:Talk
1634:talk
1619:talk
1600:talk
1586:talk
1568:talk
1553:talk
1539:talk
1520:talk
1495:talk
1463:talk
1238:OWGR
1197:talk
1173:talk
1158:talk
1139:talk
1119:talk
1056:talk
1048:here
1029:talk
990:talk
979:here
968:talk
941:talk
933:This
924:talk
900:The
852:The
844:talk
769:talk
733:talk
692:talk
678:used
658:talk
620:talk
595:talk
558:talk
520:talk
474:talk
426:talk
373:talk
293:talk
285:here
270:talk
236:talk
210:talk
187:talk
120:talk
112:here
104:this
4438:n/a
4347:n/a
3603:lie
3556:are
3512:or
3277:not
2756:not
2750:in
2742:in
2736:but
2706:In
2427:).
2390:MOS
2363:PGA
1867:or
155:BIO
102:In
4522:)
4181:)
4167:)
4141:)
4119:)
4100:)
4085:)
4068:)
4034:)
4003:)
3975:)
3928:)
3867:)
3845:)
3830:)
3791:)
3765:)
3672:)
3654:)
3632:)
3617:)
3593:)
3570:)
3537:)
3497:)
3478:)
3451:)
3427:)
3390:)
3369:)
3328:)
3293:)
3240:)
3232:?
3198:)
3144:)
3095:)
3045:)
3021:)
3009:.
3005:,
2986:)
2968:)
2949:)
2935:)
2904:)
2885:)
2866:)
2841:)
2827:)
2812:)
2796:)
2770:)
2722:,
2690:)
2639:)
2624:)
2578:)
2563:)
2450:)
2442:--
2435:)
2400:)
2381:)
2365:,
2355:)
2340:)
2321:)
2269:)
2245:)
2187:)
2149:)
2055:)
2009:)
1964:)
1932:•
1904:)
1852:)
1829:)
1799:)
1777:,
1754:)
1728:)
1712:,
1708:,
1704:,
1700:,
1696:,
1692:,
1677:)
1636:)
1628:--
1621:)
1602:)
1588:)
1580:,
1570:)
1555:)
1541:)
1522:)
1497:)
1465:)
1388:-
1386:}}
1380:{{
1373:-
1371:}}
1365:{{
1358:-
1356:}}
1350:{{
1343:-
1341:}}
1335:{{
1328:-
1326:}}
1320:{{
1313:-
1311:}}
1305:{{
1297:-
1295:}}
1289:{{
1281:-
1279:}}
1273:{{
1266:-
1264:}}
1258:{{
1251:}}
1245:{{
1241:}}
1235:{{
1233:,
1231:}}
1225:{{
1223:,
1221:}}
1215:{{
1199:)
1175:)
1160:)
1152:--
1141:)
1121:)
1113:--
1107:.
1058:)
1031:)
1011:,
992:)
970:)
943:)
926:)
846:)
771:)
735:)
694:)
660:)
622:)
597:)
560:)
528:)
482:)
434:)
381:)
359:,
355:,
351:,
295:)
242:)
238:•
212:)
189:)
165:)
122:)
86:→
4518:(
4177:(
4163:(
4137:(
4115:(
4096:(
4081:(
4064:(
4030:(
3999:(
3971:(
3924:(
3863:(
3841:(
3826:(
3787:(
3761:(
3668:(
3650:(
3628:(
3613:(
3589:(
3566:(
3533:(
3493:(
3474:(
3447:(
3435:"
3423:(
3386:(
3365:(
3324:(
3289:(
3236:(
3194:(
3140:(
3091:(
3041:(
3017:(
2982:(
2964:(
2945:(
2931:(
2900:(
2881:(
2862:(
2837:(
2823:(
2808:(
2792:(
2766:(
2686:(
2635:(
2620:(
2574:(
2559:(
2446:(
2431:(
2396:(
2377:(
2351:(
2336:(
2317:(
2265:(
2241:(
2183:(
2145:(
2051:(
2005:(
1960:(
1936:)
1928:(
1900:(
1848:(
1825:(
1795:(
1750:/
1746:(
1724:(
1673:/
1669:(
1632:(
1617:(
1598:(
1584:(
1566:(
1551:(
1537:(
1518:(
1510:(
1493:(
1461:(
1195:(
1171:(
1156:(
1137:(
1117:(
1054:(
1027:(
988:(
966:(
939:(
922:(
842:(
767:(
731:(
690:(
656:(
618:(
593:(
556:(
523:·
518:(
477:·
472:(
429:·
424:(
376:·
371:(
291:(
234:(
208:(
204:?
185:(
161:/
157:/
153:/
151:C
149:/
147:T
145:(
118:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.