3313:. I've been called "queer" as a slur more times than I care to count. I'm hardly alone in this. It's hurtful, even if "reclaimed". The viewers of this article can be divided into three nebulous groups: those unfamiliar with the topic or otherwise opinion-less, those pro-LGBT, and those anti-LGBT. For the first camp, such a title encourages them using a (ex-)slur, which could bring back bad memories were it to be used when talking to someone who was called it when younger. For those in the second camp, it is perhaps affirming, perhaps neutral, and perhaps insulting. Those affirmed would nonetheless be affirmed to an equal extent by the term LGBT+, unless they're genderqueer (which I'm sorry for, but any acronym must necessarily exclude some or include too many). For those in the third camp, it's a validation of the slur as something to be said frequently, rather than something cruel. The name change allows those moving (or stuck) backwards to use it in the original sense, and, when called out, claim it isn't meant to be hurtful and one is misunderstanding them. Though the title of an enwiki project is hardly a clincher, I've heard "it's even on Wikipeda" WRT to other things far too many times. An additional excuse should not be given.
4731:, so there's that), but I do use use queer community often. But also, externally, I am aware of several policies, including at governments or workplaces, where strong encouragement of using "LGBTQ...." is used to address the community, which I think is often done linguistically for whatever their motivations may be, which we don't have to question, so I don't think we could just go and appear to lead the charge in Knowledge and retitle our main central article of LGBTQ (and its subordinate many articles) to use queer instead. For the Wikiproject, I wouldn't be fully opposed to queer personally, but I think for recognizability of people who are not aware of the interchangable nature and use with LGBTQ(+), I think if we have the Wikiproject match (with the addition of the + for the liberty that project space titling gives us over article space) the article, it will be easier for some editors who may not be as involved as some of us are, since we do want to encourage editors with all sorts of experience. (Hope this all made some sense to provide insight into my thinking)
2682:
of the term for a moment, which I believe makes it obvious why we need to do this exceedingly carefully, consider a hypothetical category like "LGBT writers in 1860s
America". If we change this to "LGBTQ writers in 1860s America", we would be applying contemporary terminology to a historical context where it wasn't used. I believe we need to be cautious and consider the implications very carefully. I suggest we review how the transition from LGBT to LGBTQ in category names and article titles might affect historical accuracy or context-specific usage and consider developing guidelines for when to use LGBT vs LGBTQ, especially in historical or specific communities contexts. This would also encourage editors to discuss changes on talk pages for articles where the terminology shift might be contentious, which would probably be very fruitful discussions.
1648:'s call of caution and more extensive discussion before proceeding with mass renaming. Distinct communities, like lesbians, require careful consideration that a brief, limited-participation discussion simply cannot provide. Lesbians, for instance, have a rich, complex history and a distinct identity that could be inadvertently obscured by blanket renaming; usage requires careful consideration. Similar concerns likely exist for other groups as well. Each sub-community may want to discuss how they are represented and categorized on Knowledge. Is there not a mechanism to democratize mass edits? I'm fairly new and trying to get caught up but curious how Knowledge typically handles such large-scale updates? I had hoped it was in a way that ensured all perspectives were very carefully considered.
4251:. "Queer studies" is the term used pretty much universally in academia; "LGBTQ", with or without the plus, is the most common term in English now (and has been for a while — we deliberately waited for this to be clearer and not a temporary blip before making the change on the main article). Yes, "queer" is a reclaimed slur that a few people dislike; a lot of people under 50 had "gay" used as a slur against them more often than "queer", myself included. Now it is a term that is often used as an umbrella descriptor, both to encompass many identities and for people whose identity is more complicated than just "gay" or "lesbian". We had the conversation about whether or not "queer" is unacceptable as an encyclopædic term in the
4634:
4377:
4835:
and include all relevant groups, the acronym grows very long. For example, LGBTQIA+ is notably missing 2s (two spirit). I understand and appreciate the desire to be fully inclusive, but enumeration of all possibilities eventually results in something unwieldy. While that's more of an issue in everyday speech, and
Knowledge is not frequently a spoken medium, that's not to say that Knowledge is never a spoken medium, or that the rules of concision should not apply to the written word. Instead of the lettersoup approach, let's use the already extant term which encompasses that entire span of diversity.
6583:
5789:
1125:
1107:
1135:
2227:
appreciate that you think the word has been widely reclaimed, the historical context and varying acceptance of the term across different demographics and regions should be carefully considered when applying broad changes. If you think this is as careful as
Knowledge is capable of being, you almost certainly know better than I do. I'm trying to get up to speed on how this process works but I feel obligated to at least say something at the moment because I know people who don't want the label attached to them. Thanks for hearing me out.
2863:
6559:. After working on it, off and on for over a year (since March 2023), I finally decided to publish it. It was a long-time coming. I admit the page isn't perfect, but any comments on methods of improving it would be fully welcome. I posted a little about that on that article's talk page, but I thought I'd post here as well. It was only fitting for me to recreate the page since I was the one who created all the other pages in the first place some years ago... Just thought I'd give you all a heads up!
2201:, so we do sometimes have terms that some people may take personal offence with. So with this, we follow and represent the wide worldwide consensus view (and often lag behind it in by many years, such as was the case here), which has now shown that LGBTQ has overtaken LGBT as the widely used term for the wider community and as such, we follow this. A large majority of the community has embraced and reclaimed queer and it was specifically added to the acronym by the community to signify this.
770:
752:
56:
1896:, so there must be a strong policy based reason of why the community consensus that was based in support of the points raised in last years review and the now followed strong support this year would not reflect the policies of en-wiki (which personally as the opener of the RM and supporter last years, I do think that the move request was proper and well grounded in our policies and backed by the data and the community to support it, even if only 20 people voted for it).
826:
2871:
70:
112:
1201:
631:
5833:
5821:
5637:
84:
680:
662:
2981:
98:
690:
42:
600:
6273:) as a temporary workaround pending a true fix to the enforced 1-to-1 linking situation, which is responsible for all of the problems. (I have used cross-wiki rd's for a few years, and they work fine.) We should not waste precious editor time here at Knowledge trying to solve individual manifestations of the B&C problem here, when we could all be doing something more productive. They should get their own house in order. Cheers,
21:
1211:
3596:... but I'm not sure my personal preferences for acronym (I like my letter being present) should push the project name to be that long. I'm in preference of the Q and + slightly over other options because it's in line with increased LGBTQ usage and implies a broader acronym with the plus. Absent that, I think we should stay at LGBT, and the other options I prefer less than just not moving in the first place, though I'm not
4670:. In all of those discussions, yes, you have made me aware that I missed the comment period of the original move discussion. I get that part. I am arguing that 1) queer much more popular than LGBTQ and 2) Knowledge uses queer/LGBTQ interchangably. It would make me delighted if someone showed evidence of me being incorrect, and I do not consider that recent move discussion that I missed as evidence.
6529:
6496:
6433:
6394:
5610:
3544:"Indian" as in Indian Health Service, Indian Law, and the term frequently used by activists: "NDN" is also an example, although I don't believe there is an assertion that the term has been entirely reclaimed and can be used uncritically by non-native people as a descriptor. It is an example of a slur being used in an academic context, however.
3890:- I think aligning with the name of the main article is important, though so is precisely defining the scope. LGBTQ matches the main article (which itself was moved based on that being the predominant term in common usage), but LGBTQ+ more clearly conveys that identities such as asexual, aromantic, and intersex are included in the scope.--
2966:
1881:, which itself conceded that at this point in time, there is no good policy reason not to move it, other than people opposing it because they personally don’t like it (be it for old historic context or other reasons, which are of course valid personal opinions, but not basis for move arguments, which are policy based).
4810:- "LGBTQ" is succinct, and fits with the move of the LGBT page to LGBTQ. I'm not sure if the + being in the name is entirely necessary, but I would be fine with it as well. LGBT is the older, less preferred version of the acronym nowadays, and LGBT+ just sounds a bit strange, since most people don't say that.
2612:
information is organized and accessed. We should probably consider cases where RSes use different terms for the same concept, the potential impact on individuals or croups who may not identify with the term, and as someone else said, Knowledge's global audience and how terms are interpreted cross-culturally.
1674:, not to the popular vote. The discussion exists to establish what name most closesly matches Wikipedias guidelines; not what feels the most right/comfortable/sensitive/inclsuve to the most people (this is how you get 15-character monstrosities). Those things are important, but Knowledge is not the place to
1733:
know, because this topic attracts more disruptive edits than usual, sometimes there are tighter guidelines so that things are less likely to get disruptive".) You probably got that template sent your way because you edited the
Detransition talk page (but not because of anything specific you said there).
5158:
I have mixed thoughts about renaming LGBT to LGBTQ for different reasons. On one hand, I understand that LGBTQ is more used than LGBT currently as it would be more inclusive towards anyone who are part of the umbrella and with the "studies" that shows that LGBTQ is common than LGBT. But on the other
4905:
provides some future-proofing as well, so we're not having to update the title every few years when new letters get added. On a personal note, I identify as queer and I do not understand why LGB is able to get three letters but we assume T as able to single-handedly cover the vast diversity of gender
4834:
so as to render "Queer
Studies". While it might have been a slur once, the term has been reclaimed and repurposed, and now does a much better job of covering the idea of sexual and gender diversity than the now lengthening lettersoup approach. The trouble with the lettersoup is that to do it justice,
4722:
Re 1) the math on ngrams is a little funky where if you use just "LGBTQ" it doesn't actually include sub-ordinates, which is why you need to (technically) first do an addition of "LGBT+LGBTQ+LGBTI+LGBTQIA+...." if you wanted it to queer accurately. I don't dispute that the term queer is quite common,
3800:
The current abbreviation is fine. It already includes everyone. A plus can be added to make that more explicit, though I don't consider it necessary. As StarTrekker said, "LGBT" is the long-established abbreviation and the one with the highest name recognition and I don't see why we should prefer one
3774:
3196:
No one is required to participate. Those participating here are doing it because they think it's important enough to spend this much time on. If you don't, it's fine, don't participate, but sniping from the peanut gallery is the opposite of helpful and is arguably disruptive. Please, no more comments
2505:
While I agree the BLPCAT shouldn't be used to "protect bigots", it does raise valid questions about how we categorize individuals who explicitly reject certain terms. This deserves thoughtful discussion, not dismissal. Knowledge typically takes a nuanced, context-specific approach to terminology. Why
2321:
Thank you for explaining the
Knowledge policies. I appreciate the need for policy-based decisions rather than personal opinions. However, I find it frankly insulting to suggest that objections to this change might be part of some "concerted move by a small minority of editors to challenge any article
4748:
Ngrams math doesn't appear to take co-occurances into consideration. So if you're adding/subtracting, you're adding/subtracting the total occurrences available, not from a subset. (I couldn't find a way to manage broad co-occurances.) For the data from above, LGBTQ+LGBT+(queer--) is the same as just
2589:
2. The whole point of the RM closure was that, actually, there is evidence that LGBTQ is the more common name among RSes. There has been a significant shift towards that term in the last decade or so, which we noticed over a year ago and specifically delayed so we could have more time to monitor the
2411:
This is an obvious misapplication of BLPCAT, which is intended to protect subjects from being outed, libeled, or having their religion/gender/sexuality described incorrectly. It does not exist to protect bigots from being grouped together with people they don't like—which, in this case, includes not
4416:
and people are coming to the article for information about the social context of the queer gender and sexual identity, not for etymological information that "queer" meant "odd" in the 16th century or that it was a slur until the 1990s. We have articles for the other parts of L,G,B, and T, which are
3841:
Honestly I'd rather that the term "LGBT" wouldn't be a list of identities and rather something like SGM (Sexual and Gender
Minority), but it is what it is and everyone know what LGBT is. So with that in mind I'd prefer LGBT+ or LGBTQ+ as it doesn't suggest an end to a list, but shows there are more
3413:
To add, what I think is actually happening is you are going into conversations with people using the term queer *correctly* and not as a slur, telling them it's a slur, and then being corrected. Am I wrong? It has been reclaimed for over 40 years. It is now an academic and umbrella term to refer to
3328:
It seems to me that people wanting to use a slur will do so regardless of its status on wikipedia. Someone using anything as an excuse is just an asshole. I generally think that most people either fall into the "call people slurs" category or not, and our page's name doesn't move them from one into
2716:
Thank you for the response but I disagree with what you said. The concept of homosexuality existed in the 19th century but qu**r meant something entirely different at that time. Qu**r is appropriated hate speech that could presently be used to describe people who would be considered heteronormative
2681:
Thanks for the response. I understand that
Knowledge generally uses the most specific categories possible but my concern is slightly different. It's not about the specificity of categories, but about the terminology used within those categories. For instance, dispensing with the problematic history
2226:
I understand the need to follow global consensus and reprint "widely accepted terms", especially as language evolves. My concern is less about personal offense and more about ensuring that our articles accurately reflect the nuanced experiences and identities they're attempting to describe. While I
1899:
Lacking a formal filing of a move review, with this note here, we should slowly focus on moving forward instead, which is why I raised the point here to begin with to discuss strategies of the follow up rename. This here is not be the right place to re-litigate the move if someone wants to formally
1761:
Thinking about it a bit more, things like retaining generational (historical context) and cultural differences could be worth spending the time to discuss and factor in on a more granular level. Even the language itself could be valuable to preserve. I will think about it more though, as it is very
1714:
across such a broad range of articles must require more extensive review and discussion than this? While adding "characters" might seem straightforward, it could have an impact on whether the article represents the specific community appropriately or not. Would you like me to give you some examples
4515:
Yes, but we decided to use LGBTQ as the article titles and the queer equivalents redirect to those articles that is the most common terms used by RS and people both within the community, as well as more colloquially - you don't hear
Presidents talking about the queer community or queer rights, but
4119:
I can't tell you whether you should or shouldn't remove your vote and frankly most people can't (or shouldn't) unless it's egregious. I was putting in response to your vote a comment on why I felt it should be disregarded by whoever closes this discussion. Do as you want, but this is a forum and I
3640:
I'd agree that people now are better off in many cases than people 100 years ago. That just didn't look like what you were saying when explaining "gay" as originating in an in-group with worse experiences who would be disrespected if you didn't reclaim it and "queer" as originating in an out-group
1550:
I placed the notification here to ensure that there is wider awareness for those that may not have seen the move discussion (or the many before it that lead to it), but at this point, it appears absolutely appropriate to now follow suit with the sub article as the same argument for the move of the
4936:
Right, the "trans" part of "transgender" is typically in reference to the transitioning process or the process of moving from one (typically assigned) gender to another. That is not a label everyone can identify under, because it implies a movement from one form to another. For some of us, we are
2611:
In regard to reflecting language used by reliable sources, I agree that our primary goal should be to reflect that language, but we should be cautious about how we apply this principle, especially with evolving terminology. While category terms don't necessarily imply agreement, they do shape how
2581:
1. "Might inadvertently make a stance" is still a little vague. But the point is that we're not making a stance at all; we're reflecting the language used by RSes. Ignoring RSes is more likely to look like taking a stance than summarising what they say, since that's an active choice to go against
1757:
What was in my mind at the time of writing was how different the experience of the term is for men (from my point of view as a woman, I can't hope to speak about it). Masculinity sure seems tied up in it from my point of view but that's as far as I'd be willing to guess. I've always been proud of
4726:
Re 2/3/4 (as the argument goes a bit hand in hand) - I personally don't disagree that we as community members, not just talking about the editing community, but also as a member of the queer community myself, that if I'm talking about my community will use them often interchangeably (though more
3630:
I'm not talking about whether some groups were discriminated against more or less. I'm saying the average LGBT+ anglophone with an internet connection is much better off than the average LGBT+ person 100 years ago, whether homosexual, transgender, intersex, asexual, nonbinary, xenogender, or any
3318:
There's a crucial difference between being called "gay" as opposed to "queer". The former was used by members of the group it insulted as a descriptive word before it became a slur. To refuse reclamation would be to disrespect their (largely much worse) experiences. The latter originated with an
3240:
identities and the inclusion in the now most widely accepted term, but also use our community preference of adding the + to be explicitly inclusive of other parts of the community, which is partially supported by the fact that LGBTQ+ is also on a steep upwards trend since 2015 as I linked above.
3239:
I propose that we combine the two factors that LGBTQ has clearly and strongly overtaken LGBT, which is fully supported by the data and acknowledges our community's acceptance and reclamation (if we didn't, especially when we now do so for the article space, then that would be hypocrisy) of Queer
2619:
I appreciate your agreement with my vaguely remembered point; we could develop guidelines for when to use more specific subcategories (like "transgender rights" instead of general "LGBTQ rights") or potentially create a process for reviewing and approving exceptions to the general categorization
2574:
You'll also note I didn't accuse you, personally, of anything. I said there has been a pattern of activity that has been undertaken by a small number of editors (largely stirred to action by the RM from LGBT to LGBTQ, at least this time), and that that was reason for each of us to be specific in
2243:
I don't think changing category names erases things within those categories. Broad words are obviously broader than narrow words, and I think that's self-evident. You don't lose nuance just because an article on, say, lesbians suddenly says "Part of our LGBTQ series" instead of "Part of our LGBT
1732:
For what it's worth, you got the contentious topics advisory because you happened to edit a page that's related to something that's been deemed a contentious topic by the
Arbitration Committee, not because you seemed contentious while editing there. (It was more of a way to say "hey, just so you
3443:
If I were so ardently opposed to the term, I wouldn't have opened this RM. I'm not so much an idiot as to fail to realize the likely outcome is LGBTQ+. People can use it in the reclaimed sense and I won't say anything; only because this discussion centers about its acceptance do I point out its
4115:
We don't usually care about peoples' "qualifications" or personal identities when editing on Knowledge. Your edits and contributions are what are important, and most people stay pretty anonymous. Plus, being an MD doesn't really directly translate to editing skills so bringing it up isn't very
2615:
I totally acknowledge the recent move request closure and observed shift towards LBGTQ usage. To ensure transparency and maintain NPOV, we could document this shift in relevant articles, citing specific studies or analyses that demonstrate the trend. Alternatively, we could consider creating a
2169:
I appreciate the extensive discussion that led to the decision to move the main article to LGBTQ, and I understand the rationale behind wanting to update related sub-articles for consistency. Regardless, I remain concerned about the potential of a broad change causing us to overlook the unique
1474:
That discussion had nowhere near enough participation to justify a mass move. Before reacting to 20 people who discussed the issue for 10 days without referencing past conversations or recruiting multicultural perspective, let's give people more time to react. You are suggesting making several
1519:
You make it sound like it was some random move - it wasn't. It was the result of multiple years of discussion with the language evolving over time and away from the old LGBT to now the move inclusive LGBTQ, based on hard and supported data. Many of the people that were part of this years move
2501:
I appreciate the discussion but I'm concerned that we're moving away from the core issues and policy considerations. While LGBTQ may be becoming more common overall, it may not be the most common name in all contexts or for all sub-communities. We should be open to nuanced application where
4783:. I realize those longer versions are not likely to receive anything close to consensus for now. However, as someone whose identity falls outside the four-letter version, I strongly disagree with those who said that LGBT already includes everyone, and including Q+ has become common in RS.
4333:
guideline, a WikiProject is "a group of editors interested in collaborating on a specific topic", and that group defines the scope of the WikiProject. Anyone is welcome to start collaborating at any time; there is no need to formally become a member. But, because this was advertised at
2548:
You’re right, it’s not. I wrongly assumed precision was part of capturing “encyclopedic” knowledge. I see how we’re not actually trying to capture “truth” though so precision isn’t relevant to the argument. It’s about representing the body of published work accurately. That feels very
2261:
While it's true that changing "LGBT" to "LGBTQ" might seem minor, it can have broader implications. For some individuals and communities, particularly those who have been labeled queer pejoratively, I don't think it's fair to say it has no material impact on the content of the article
4279:. Only commenting to say this should be a discussion among WikiProject members. A move in articlespace has no bearing on the name or scope of a WikiProject, and I don't see why it needs non-member input. So I guess that's my !vote as a +1 to whatever to consensus is among members. —
4078:
One great thing about Knowledge is that you can't actually demand personal information about other people to determine if you like their opinions (and you've already stated that being a medical doctor has nothing to do with queer people, so unsure how that's a "qualification" for
3230:(which does show that LGBT is on a clear downward trend, while both LGBTQ and LGBTQ+ are on a steep upwards trend, with LGBTQ itself having overtaken LGBT several years ago) as the article space does with regards to following the data and a good amount of the community would have
2170:
historical and cultural contexts of specific communities within the LGBTQ+ umbrella. Appending a term that even a few people consider hate speech without careful consideration seems exceedingly unwise. Many pages have already been moved though so I see that this is a moot point.
5232:
If you don't mind me asking, how did you find this discussion? You've done nothing wrong even if this was linked from an external site, but I will have to place a message on top providing an overviewof the rules if that is the case. If you just monitor this page or came from
5477:
In regards to this article, yes. Don't get me wrong, here, for the record I have zero opinion on what the commonname for all of Knowledge is. My opinion only has to do with whether this RM means every use of the term needs to therefore also change. That needs broader input.
1293:
5986:
To my ear, "LGBT in ..." is odd. LGBT and its variants tend to be used as an adjective in formal communication: LGBT rights, LGBT people, LGBT community, etc. We do have a significant number of "LGBT in" uses in article titles. Searching for , I get these articles:
4906:
identities within the community. Q provides that extra level of inclusion for community members who do not necessarily identify as "transitioning", because some of us have not transitioned so much as we are just existing outside of any pre-defined boxes of gender.
3777:), but I think the LGBTQ+ construction is the most inclusive in what this WikiProject tries to cover (and isn't that the point?). Unlike the articles, we can let the name of the WikiProject be purely descriptive of what subjects the WikiProject aims to cover. ~
5779:
4750:
2667:. That is the default of how we do categorization for pretty much this reason. Most categories do roll up into a tree structure that users can move up through, but in general, we do always categorize Article subjects in the most specific categories already :)
5181:
As for data and studies for which acronym is more common is not always reliable, for example a quick google search for "lgbt" has around 530,000,000 results while "lgbtq" has around 383,000,000 results. The Ngram for the terms is not really reliable as both
4998:
6268:
at Wikidata, and awaits a more permanent solution at Wikidata. It is not up to Knowledge to fix Wikidata's problems. In the spirit of lending a helping hand, though, we could use wd links to redirects where feasible and helpful, which Wikidata now supports
1715:
of how that's the case? I'm happy to do so, but I just got a "contentious topic" warning message so I don't want to come off too aggressively. I understand feelings can run high when discussing these topics. Another reason to have a very careful discussion.
2571:, I know you'd made previous comments but you didn't cite any policy or concrete examples before I prompted. You made what seemed to me to be vague comments so I asked for clarification so we could address any specific, policy-based concerns that you had.
5162:
LGBT has a lot of acronyms so reading an article where LGBT and other similar acronyms like LGBTQ, LGBT+, LGBTQ+ etc. Appearing in the same sentence can be confusing to some. Not to mention some Knowledge pages still uses the four letter acronym such as
4217:, there's no formal procedure to verify your qualifications on enwiki. I believe there was once even a dubious proposal to ban all mentions of user credentials. Even if there were a process, for better or worse experts are afforded no extra weight. See
4648:
You compare LGBTQ to (queer - LGBTQ), but shouldn't the comparison be (LGBTQ-queer) versus (queer-LGBTQ)? Sources say "queer" without saying LGBTQ, but there are no sources which use LGBTQ without also using queer. Queer is the most common ngram term,
3271:) have moved toward using LGBTQ+. Given the upward trend, and the broad scope of this project, I think the plus is important for inclusivity. It is probably what things are moving toward, and I don't want to run through this process again in two years.
5128:
LGBTQ+: This lists the most groups. The plus includes all people falling under the broad umbrella of gender and sexual minorities and the Q makes explicit queer and questioning are included. Affirms a once negative term as something good and to be
2339:
I'm suggesting these points merit deeper consideration as widespread change is implemented. A more granular approach is taken for nearly every other topic I've dug into on this site. Why wouldn't it be the approach for topics as important as this?
1432:
3383:
If you are trying to engage in conversation with and debate people who use slurs against you then you are already making a mistake, the issue does not lie with them having yet another "excuse" when these people will simply make up their own.
1500:
I do think it would be sensible to run a discussion on this talkpage as to whether this project should rename to "WikiProject LGBTQ Studies". Personally I'd much rather we include the Plus so we don't have to do this all again in three years.
5124:
LGBT+: The plus includes all people falling under the broad umbrella of gender and sexual minorities, rather than just those identifying as queer. It does not include a reclaimed slur, which could be alienating to those who remember it as a
1862:) supporting the move to LGBTQ, as well as ngram having released new data from previous up to 2019 (which LGBTQ had already overtaken LGBT, but only just, at the time) to the new dataset now going to 2022 which now overwhelmingly shows that
3870:. Matching the title of the actual article is what's most important. It annoys me to no end IRL when I come upon "LGBTQ+" or variations, since "Queer" and the plus sign serve the exact same purpose of being catch-alls (no one identifies as
4433:, but no equivalent for "queer". Can someone please prove me wrong by linking to the comparable article which describes queer people, queer community, or queer identity? We should do the following moves to combine the top-level titles for
2585:
Now, I agree that we shouldn't say "X is LGBTQ" when X has very clearly said they don't want to use the term to refer to themselves (at least, within reason). But that doesn't seem to me to be what we're doing. An LGBTQ category is just a
6264:
5827:
5195:
Imo, I feel like keeping LGBT as the title is fine the way it is but I also agree with LGBTQ+ being the title would be better if you to be more inclusive. LGBT/LGBTQ+ or anything similar could also work as a title if it were possible.
2593:
3. Precision is a fair point, and I agree with you that there will need to be exceptions. But this is something that can be addressed on a case by case basis because there will never be a blanket solution that does justice to everyone.
6573:
5912:
In either cases, there will be two separate Wikidata items, and interwiki links will rely on redirections. This way the Wikidata anthology is clean and articles about roughly the same topic in different languages are still visible.
5263:
5249:
4527:
can be expanded on the identity part, but that doesn't mean we don't already have an article on it. Many people identify as queer not strictly as the identity, but as the umbrella and both are valid and shouldn't be invalidated or
3379:
To be clear, I am disagreeing that using an academic term that has a history as a reclaimed slur is "a validation of the slur as something to be said frequently" and that it "allows those moving backwards to use it in the original
3227:
6102:"LGBT in" is an option but there are others : LGBT people in, LGBT community in, Sexual and gender minorities in, Sexual and gender diversity in... As long as it's easy to see that the article is the most general one it's fine :)
5659:
4142:, no, you don't need to delete your opinion. (It's not a vote, it's a discussion, and the closer looks primarily at reasoning, not at numbers on one side or the other.) Please, both of you, stop making life harder for the closer.
2509:
I suggest we move away from categorizing each other's arguments and instead focus on how we can implement this change in a way that respects our core policies and the diversity of the communities we're attempting to write about.
2397:, or you take those categories off, and this is a decision that is going to have to be made on a page by page basis. Who knows, maybe there's only a handful like Grimes and it is no big deal to fix up, but it bears consideration.
1325:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1289:
1285:
1281:
6471:
I made this shortcut because LGBTQIA is commonly used (e.g. when you type it on the IPhone the rainbow flag emoji, transgender flag emoji, and transgender symbol emoji appear as recommended emojis to substitute for the acronym).
2419:
It's not necessary that we bend our terminology or our categorization system in order to accomodate the hate-filled ramblings of transphobes. Is there a more compelling example, ideally one which doesn't address its readers as
3641:
with presumably less bad experiences who would be vindicated if you did, in the context of your broader !vote discussing your relative opposition to options that include the Q versus those that don't. A "that's an outgroup,
6224:+ some people are acting individually or are so isolated they only manage to find one or two connections (in their niche), yet they act with agency and have visibility and significance to be featured in articles like this.
2470:
for a common and encyclopedic grouping, given their unifying struggles), is automatically a BLP violation solely because our Foo person is a vocal bigot who despises their more radical peers who stoop to calling themselves
5430:
Apologies if that sentence is a mouthful (my teachers always told me to make shorter sentences, but my brain is wired to produce long long sentences, so sometimes it can get hard for people to follow my train of thought).
1853:
and was at a tentative “it looks like LGBTQ is getting there, but let’s wait a little longer for more data to confirm”, which now a year later has come with the worldwide scholar field continuing an increase in the use of
5120:
LGBTQ: now the most common term per Google Scholar and Ngrams. Can be considered more inclusive due to the Q including those who identify as queer and questioning. Affirms a once negative term as something good and to be
6134:
IMHO identarian approach is not favored by many who are primarily queer and/or fluid. Sexual diversity could bring another set of issues like including straight people that have non-normative/'vanilla' sexual practices.
3950:"Gay" has been an insult for many younger people in a way that "queer" hasn't. "Gay and lesbian" have also been described as exclusive or undesirable terms by, for example, some African Americans (those who advocate for
6385:
3770:
785:
aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Knowledge. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this page, or visit the
4820:
3484:
is commonly used by disabled people, for one. But whether or not similar examples exist in other cases is probably irrelevant. For our purposes, what matter is that the initialism is used in this situation by RSes.
4536:
this RM discussion from last year, where someone suggested to move it to "LGBT (initialism)", basically the same that you are proposing. As I already pointed out in point 2 - the common term is LGBTQ, for example
6520:
4900:
as in queer studies. Queer is the generally accepted academic term, and LGBTQ has increased in popularity over time to accommodate members of our community who do not neatly fit in the LGBT bracket. I think the
4727:
often in those cases fully to LGBTQIA+ as I prefer explicit inclusion of the letters and do not like to just be a "+" myself, being one of the "A"s of LGBTQIA (and incidentally I'm the author of the article on
5281:
ngram, which will have LGBTQ versus LGBT ignoring whether they use + or not. This one shows that LGBT has been going downwards since 2017 and LGBTQ has overtaken it in 2019 and continues with a much steeper
3441:
To add, what I think is actually happening is you are going into conversations with people using the term queer *correctly* and not as a slur, telling them it's a slur, and then being corrected. Am I wrong?
3398:
if someone is saying "it's even on Wikipeda" to you "far too many times" after they call you a slur intentionally I don't mean to be disrespectful but I think you are simply engaging with the wrong people.
2366:
Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief (or lack of such) or orientation in question
2212:. Our articles continuously evolve and can be improved based on RS of course, but again, it does mean that sometimes we do have terms that some people of the population may take some personal offense with.
1349:
6323:
5271:
It shows that LGBTQ and LGBTQ+ have been on a steep upwards trend. It shows that LGTQ has been on a downward since 2015, and that LGBT+ has shown a very small adoption (likely by people that oppose the
3680:
Queer is the umbrella term used in academics that fits this project best, and the + allows for a broader inclusion of people who don't identify as L, G, B, T, or Q such as intersex or other minorities.
3659:
That was my bad for not being more clear. I'm using ingroup to refer to anyone who is LGBT+ and outgroup anyone who is not. "Queer" came from the opressors, not the oppressed is another way to put it.
5931:
Thanks for raising this. A related issue came up a while ago that highlighted our LGBT country-related articles could use a review and some organizning/cleanup. I think the ideal structure is to have
4406:
We do not even have a Knowledge article for the concept "queer", because LGBTQ equivalents have always been sufficient to communicate everything that any editor has wanted to say. The article titled "
2155:
has already helped with starting the category moves, which can be performed by bot-moves through the speedy move procedures for categories and following the same sub-topic consistent naming policies.
6550:
2281:
The problem is that vague concern is not a valid reason (especially if unsourced or not backed up by policy). We work based on WP policy and our decisions should reflect that. Knowledge also doesn't
2322:
with queer in the title." This implication of conspiracy or bad faith is unwarranted and dismissive of genuine concerns. I've already explained my reason for raising the concern multiple times here.
4509:
4048:
You're coming into wikiproject LGBT studies and directly stating that you're making a vote out of ignorance. We have articles you can read to learn more before voting. I find that irresponsible.
2506:
should this topic be treated any differently? Your comparison lacks the key piece of context here: this used to be hate speech and is still considered hate speech by some people in the community.
1414:
3362:
I agree, and actually supported the idea of the camps being static ("For those in the third camp" not "For those currently in the third camp or who will be moved as a result of a name change").
2698:
I don't think most of those letters were applicable back then. IIRC lesbian would have been sapphic or homosexual, gay homosexual, and transgender hermaphroditic (if they were even described).
5697:
6607:
6487:
6419:
6342:
5809:
6643:
Hi, all! I work over in New Page Patrol and came across this article. It had a lot of copyvio issues that have now been redacted, but it needs a lot of clean up. Your help is appreciated!
4396:. The majority of arguments here are based on popularity and say that LGBTQ is more popular than LGBT, which is true, but "queer" is much more popular than LGBTQ by all identified metrics.
3448:
If you are trying to engage in conversation with and debate people who use slurs against you then you are already making a mistake... I think you are simply engaging with the wrong people.
1520:
discussion were also part of last years and have followed the trend and the discussions closely. And as was outlined in the move discussion that now concluded in support of the move, even
6414:
5814:
1465:
2463:
6545:
4849:
2S is slightly controversial, and the + (and maybe the Q) is intended to include everything else, just like the rainbow flag. Anecdotally, "LGBT..." is more recognizable than "Queer".
6568:
6452:
4542:
1345:
6358:
4062:
Want me to remove it? I think “+” covers anything I don’t know about personally. Knowledge is not where I get my medical information from…sorry. What are your qualifications again?
1754:
Hope your brain gets a chance to rest! Thank you very much for taking the time to explain. It came from a user account so I thought it wasn't automated; apologies for the confusion!
1383:
5844:
Hello ! With several editors of LGBT projects across languages we're working on cleaning Wikidata to have a better understanding of missing articles and translation opportunities.
5643:
1588:
I am not disputing the validity of the arguments for the past move, but also, that brief discussion is not a summary or reflection of the whole discourse. I just opposed a move at
5350:
1740:, but it sounds like you might have a specific example in mind where you are concerned adding the Q could be an issue. If you do, would you mind sharing an example of your own? -
1681:
Frankly I don't understand how this change could meaningfully impact the L, G, B, or T's, considering we're strictly adding further characters which don't have to apply to them. –
1892:
for the now worldwide more common LGBTQ acronym won’t be strong enough for that. A move review also can’t be initiated just because of personal disagreement with the outcome per
1610:
It sounds more like you want to reopen the RM discussion so you can have your say on a result you disagree with, rather than apply a local consensus on different articles beyond
4517:
4170:(to both of you) In this pseudonymous environment, editors' claims of expertise are not usually verifiable, and subject-matter expertise is not required for editing or !voting.
2074:
5793:
5781:
4652:
You say "we decided to use LGBTQ as the article titles", but you know that I missed the the move discussion comment period, as you have joined me in my attempts to appeal with
4538:
1456:) across the entirety of Knowledge, it will take some time and help from people, including some pages will require extra permissions that some members of the project may have.
5630:
2070:
6465:
4303:
Welcome to WikiProject LGBT studies! We're a group of editors who aim to improve Knowledge's coverage of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT), and queer studies topics.
4082:
And yes, I think if you're unwilling to learn more about queer studies which is the goal of this project then you shouldn't be voting about the name of it out of ignorance.
3370:
I stated the same thing, except divided the people who don't call others slurs qua slurs into two. If you disagree with me, there are plenty of points I made to engage with.
6515:
1710:
True consensus requires input from a wider ranger of editors and stakeholders, especially given the scale of the changes being proposed. Properly applying the guidelines of
6341:
Hi, Raising this here as I’m not sure how many people are watching the template page for the Wikiproject - can someone with template editing permissions please answer the
4816:
4556:, so again, we use the overall common term used externally and internally and even the lead sentence at queer studies shows it is used interchangably with LGBTQ studies -
2582:
consensus to make the point we'd prefer to make ourselves. In this case, however, category terms don't imply agreement with those category terms by the things within them.
2029:
6161:. Check also the discussion linked in that AfD, which carries links for RfD of Brazil, which links to RfD of Russia and RM of USA, and AfD of Israel. I also just created
5925:
2025:
899:
5654:
3610:-y? Gatekeepy? I'd probably have kept my feelings on that to myself except that I feel like bringing it up in a discussion of this nature is a bit unproductive, a la a
2651:
As for your question on guidelines on more specific categories - that is the default Knowledge wide guideline, so we are going to already be covered. You can check out
2204:
This isn't to say that we don't acknowledge that some people may not like the term, which is why the history of it is extensively discussed at the other main article -
4757:
1002:
171:
5580:
That was a mistake (one I just repeated on another page today, at that). The proposed move would not affect the capitalization of studies, which should be lowercase.
2258:
Thank you for your input. I understand your point about category names not directly impacting article content. However, I believe the issue is more nuanced than that.
1493:
Are you're saying we need to review that closure (understandable; 10 days is fairly short) or open an RfC for mass-renaming articles with "LGBT" in the name? I think
4824:
2065:
2056:
2047:
2038:
5278:
4032:
Are you familiar with medical specialties? I’m a trained pathologist but I’m not a pediatric endocrinologist or a DSD expert. What are your qualifications again?
5951:
5187:
5183:
4700:"Queer community" is a lot more common than "LGBTQ community", this is what we are discussing. I would like someone to show evidence otherwise, if I am mistaken.
2061:
2052:
2043:
2034:
1863:
4685:, I do not read the consensus as being opposed to the move, just that people are opposed to making changes before the new article is established. It seems that
1914:
Thanks for posting about this here. In terms of moving pages, here's some I know of (and have significantly contributed to) which should be moved to new names:
1707:, I understand that it's about more than personal preferences or comfort levels but there is real cultural identity that is at risk of being lost in my opinion.
6699:
6694:
5955:
1220:
2483:
verifiably Foo, and therefore, Foo, Bar, or Baz, and we don't need to adjust or rename our hierarchy just because they feel gruntled by the latter two terms –
271:
5031:, i think queer has been reclaimed enough, though i am part of the younger generation. In general, if sourcing is using it, we should be up with the times.
2616:
separate article/section for the evolution of LGBTQ+ terminology in academic and popular discourse. This would probably require frequent maintenance though.
1580:
Yes, I would like an RfC. I think that if there are to be 100k+ edits then it is fair to base that off an RfC rather than a 10-day, 20 person conversation.
6704:
5905:
5889:
5419:
I didn't say the closer of the MR said so, I said (or tried to say) that the close of the MR affirmed that proper procedures were followed in the original
3368:
I generally think that most people either fall into the "call people slurs" category or not, and our page's name doesn't move them from one into the other.
2988:
4508:
You forgot to subtract articles using queer without LGBT or LGBTQ mentioned, which shows it's much closer as the terms are often used in the same texts -
3645:
experiences are worse" sentiment is the one that came through for me. If that's not what you meant to convey then I apologize for misunderstanding you. -
2334:
Precision - In some cases, using "LGBTQ" instead of "LGBT" may be less precise, especially for historical articles or when discussing specific sub-groups.
849:
4138:, you were the one who started this not-very-useful sidebar. Whoever closes this doesn't need you to point out anything about other people's opinions. @
6623:
6368:
5229:
5210:
5197:
2101:
1079:
924:
874:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
6587:
6575:
2462:
I assume that VIR is arguing in good faith, but I'm not compelled by their argument—that implicitly categorizing someone who identifies as Foo within
1888:
if they do believe that there is a policy based reason against it, but personal opinion to maintain a now outdated non inclusive term on the basis of
6221:
6207:
4972:
4615:
3955:
3753:
3486:
2595:
2308:
2245:
2097:
1449:, as the administrator who concluded the move noted, all sub-categories, templates and articles can now follow suit and should be migrated to LGBTQ.
1418:
1397:
1157:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
6380:
5681:
4198:
Oh how do I get verified? Happy to do that. I’ll see if I can find out more in the help section but wanted to ask in case you knew who to message.
2328:
WP:NPOV - Universally applying "LGBTQ" might inadvertently take a stance on the reclamation of "queer" that isn't universally held by all subgroups.
4662:
2660:
1401:
1043:
73:
6401:
6387:
3819:
is that LGBT is NOT the term that is most highly used anymore, as LGBTQ has overtaken it as the most used term, so that argument is pretty shaky.
5859:
5852:
5556:
5040:
2331:
WP:COMMONNAME - While "LGBTQ" may be becoming more common overall, it may not be the most common name in all contexts or for all sub-communities.
1993:
1984:
1975:
1966:
6262:
Leave everything as it is, do not artificially link articles with names different in meaning. This is just the 1,089,237th manifestation of the
6062:
Is there appetite for moving the articles? I'd prefer either "people" or "community". The dab pages and redirect pages can stay where they are.
6714:
6684:
6154:
4457:
4448:
3908:- Until I learn more about the MOGAI community and xenogenders, I think these options cover everyone without using reappropriated hate speech.
2910:
2638:
Alternatively, we could consider creating a separate article/section for the evolution of LGBTQ+ terminology in academic and popular discourse.
2011:
2002:
1989:
1980:
1971:
1962:
1930:
1393:
1267:
1262:
2441:
1859:
1855:
1803:
6179:
6097:
5117:
LGBT: the status quo and traditional term. Describes the historical groups in the Anglosphere. Is concise. Does not include a reclaimed slur.
4288:
3158:
2906:
2020:
2007:
1998:
1939:
1926:
1790:, as I think notifying only this project and not all projects that will be affected by a mass-renaming of categories could be interpreted as
1374:
6655:
5769:
5755:
5741:
5110:
To prevent the request from getting too lengthy or unconsciously biased, I'll briefly summarize the arguments I'm aware of in favor of each:
5020:
4799:
2406:
1718:
I think the changes need to reflect the usage across different contexts in this case but I'm also new here so I'm happy to just let it go.
6689:
6631:
4512:
shows that queer is not used more in isolation, it often co-occurs with LGBT or LGBTQ (or any of the other permutations of the initialism).
3423:
3408:
3173:
2083:
2016:
1948:
1935:
1794:, especially on a move as impactful as this, and I'd say that's valid grounds for a move review with more independent eyes on it to judge.
1639:
1514:
1148:
1112:
101:
6481:
6111:
6075:
5888:
trust the name, which is the simplest, current situation : when both "LGBT rights in X" and "LGBT in X" exists on non-English Wikipedias,
4270:
3699:
Actually that is an excellent point that you mentioned that I forgot above - the scientific field that focuses on us as a group is called
5098:
4844:
4681:. The article is designed for discussion of the term, and is not the place for identity discussion. From the move discussion you linked,
4532:. Also note that Your proposal to separate the article into a "LGBTQ (term)" concept was already attempted last year and was declined in
4129:
4107:
4091:
4073:
4057:
4043:
4027:
4013:
3663:
3654:
3635:
3553:
3476:
3454:
3393:
3374:
3338:
3206:
2794:
2521:
2496:
2457:
2079:
1944:
1833:
1771:
1749:
1727:
1694:
1657:
845:
115:
6536:
6522:
5574:
5241:
4761:
4351:
4321:
4193:
3539:
3354:
2909:
within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the
2560:
2543:
6674:
6144:
5205:
4915:
4884:
4151:
3510:
3494:
2728:
2711:
2702:
2631:
2603:
2351:
2316:
2276:
2253:
2092:
206:
87:
5254:
5153:
4860:
4740:
4573:
4370:
4209:
4179:
3712:
2809:
2774:
2164:
2121:
2108:
Among many others... I don't know if I should put in moves for each page individually (which could get cumbersome), or if I should do
1605:
1560:
1488:
6709:
6679:
6125:
6071:
5584:
5072:
4980:
4605:
3191:
2088:
591:
4946:
4931:
4658:
4623:
3963:
3945:
3828:
3151:
2818:
2693:
2676:
2238:
2221:
2181:
1909:
1524:
and was just waiting for that final data point to support our policy-based rename of the main article per our Knowledge policies of
6363:
6233:
5981:
5445:
Okay, just wanted to make sure you weren't arguing that the endorsement of the close didn't mean the term was now the common name.
5311:
5295:
4920:
T stands for just "transgender", not "transitioning" or "everything not mentioned". That said, I agree with your LGBTQ+ reasoning.
3143:
5487:
5472:
5454:
5440:
5414:
5081:. The google graphs above were particularly convincing for me, and I am generally more fond of it as an umbrella term personally.
6215:
5620:
5602:
4413:
5760:
I am currently working on my graduate coursework and lab rotations, but I will look to help expand it when I get the chance! ;3
5548:
5394:
5380:
3728:
variations out there in recent years, but LGBT has been the standard for decades, it reeks of recentism to want to change it to
2914:
6315:
6282:
6116:
What about "LGBT identities in X country". In Spanish, we have "Sexual diversity in x country", which is another option. Best--
5950:
With that in mind, I think the "trust the name" option above is preferable in the long-term; we can work to fill the gaps like
5862:
we talk about demography, media visibility, activism, etc which are not strictly "rights". The separation is even clearer with
5562:
4184:
I'll knock it off, sorry. My point about the *reasoning* for the vote stands but even I can see I'm getting carried away here.
2664:
1667:
1543:
And many sub-pages themself have had move requests over the years, which always followed that they will be moved once the main
1226:
892:
5972:
I think I'd prefer "community" over "people" just as a sidenote but no strong opinions otherwise. Thanks for working on this!
5967:
5561:
If my experience and memory serve, the convention for WikiProject names is to use sentence case after "WP:WikiProject", as in
6257:
6245:
4294:
1232:
212:
5336:
5137:
2620:
scheme? I appreciate that several people are already working on redirects/cross-references to help enhance discoverability.
6669:
6166:
4753:
3856:
3179:
3165:
2148:
I just am holding off another day or so for the community to see the note here and then was going to start with page moves.
787:
777:
757:
599:
5685:
4682:
4533:
2707:
Similarly, we call the inhabitants of many ancient cultures by modern English names with little relation to the original.
5519:
5366:
4330:
2962:
1359:
917:
6270:
5839:
5722:
2958:
2112:
of these in batches (like all the Lists of animated series pages together). Your thoughts on this would be appreciated.
6443:
6425:
3296:
3093:
2877:
2851:
2492:
2437:
2393:
Now either you categorize their sexuality in a way they don't identify with (indeed, strongly oppose), in violation of
1867:
1690:
1635:
1589:
1510:
1214:
988:
714:
704:
667:
156:
45:
5847:
One thing that happens regularly is that articles by country have "rights" in their name in en:. Compare for instance
4717:
4499:
3997:
3690:
3625:
3300:
2608:
Thank you for your detailed response and for clarifying the context of your previous comments. I really appreciate it.
1850:
1521:
6556:
6328:
5507:
5353:, affirming that proper procedures were followed in line with our policies to support the data that LGBTQ is now the
5218:
5104:
5053:
4745:(Newcomer, still exploring/wandering, not planning on putting in an opinion here, but this discussion caught my eye.)
3741:
3606:: I think defining certain letters being discussed here as an outgroup whose experiences just aren't as bad feels...
2997:
1532:. Now follows, just as the closing administrator has noted in the close that sub-articles follow as is our policy of
1379:
1363:
906:
5858:
The issue is that "LGBT rights in country" is not conceptually the same thing as "LGBT in country". For instance in
4678:
3936:
here is not and has never been possible. I don't see why it being a reclaimed term would make it desirable to try.--
3919:
3810:
3761:
3581:
3323:
2846:
6085:
5222:
5178:
LGBT/LGB has been around longer than other acronyms and almost all of the terms have the same four letters in them.
4841:
3790:
3027:
2918:
1864:
LGBTQ is on a steep uptrend with a strong lead since 2019 and LGBT is on a clear downward trend in usage since 2017
6503:
6489:
4441:
then move our best content on the subject to that location. LGBT and LGBTQ should both be merged to just "queer".
3154:, it was discussed whether this WikiProject should be moved, but the dissent indicates a discussion is necessary.
2986:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
1238:
6612:
6162:
5510:
move discussion at the portal that just concluded and was closed by an admin, who has completed the portal move.
4633:
3899:
3786:
3249:
1957:
1254:
953:
4403:" has referred to "LGBTQ community", which demonstrates that Knowledge editors never distinguished the concepts.
3878:
3752:
as per others. It's consistent and it reflects common usage (and it's forward-thinking, in the case of the Q+).
3164:
Imagine if we did something productive instead of debating to add or not add a single letter to a project space
69:
3929:
1953:
152:
5794:
Talk:Kevin Spacey § Kevin Spacey sexual misconduct allegations spun off into another article without consensus
5782:
Talk:Kevin Spacey § Kevin Spacey sexual misconduct allegations spun off into another article without consensus
5746:
It feels like a topic area that will definitely merit a Knowledge article and should be helped and developed.
4815:
Ultimately, I don't have strong opinions as to which one I prefer, but I know others might think differently.
4779:(at least) - I largely agree with Purplewowies above and would prefer LGBTQIA+ or perhaps a version including
2265:
My concern is about applying this change universally without careful consideration to its history as a slur.
1333:
6651:
6067:
6000:
5172:
3098:
2945:
2886:
2837:
articles are not great. Can someone improve them? Ideally, but not necessarily, someone who speaks Romanian?
2376:
1029:
201:
4361:(status quo). Anecdotally speaking, this is far and away the most common acronym in verbal conversations.
6617:
This article seems like it needs a lot of attention. Also some minor edit warring. Any help is appreciated
5895:
Downside is that you might not be aware that more general articles exist (for instance that the content of
5036:
4342:, and I would invite the closer to consider how much weight that should be given per the above guideline.--
2656:
1921:
1675:
995:
838:
642:
5877:
However, sometimes article on en: are called LGBT rights, but actually have a broader scope, for instance
4869:
people in the acronym would be largely unrecognisable to English-language readers in most of the world. —
5995:
5765:
5737:
3851:
3013:
2186:
Just as I noted on your talk page the other day, we have specific goals and policies on Knowledge and we
1917:
1547:
article moves, which now the time has come as it has unequivocally overtaken the old less inclusive LGBT.
881:
192:
4582:
here, mainly because I think cis-het readers — and especially second language readers — will understand
4308:
So arguably, if we're saying that the project should match the name of the field it is scoped to as per
97:
2282:
1878:
266:
6591:
3430:
Though the title of an enwiki project is hardly a clincher, I've heard "it's even on Wikipeda" WRT to
2761:"moves per consensus that they are subtopics, so should follow the lead of the main article LGBTQ per
2295:
in the title, I think we need to be especially sure that objections are policy-based and not based on
111:
6477:
6081:
5848:
5525:
5460:
5420:
5049:
4393:
4376:
4252:
3842:
identities beyond just LGBT or LGBTQ. I prefer LGBT+ over LGBTQ+ because it keeps it short and sweet
3231:
3214:
3127:
2902:
2870:
2402:
2387:
1889:
1799:
1442:
970:
6343:
Template talk:WikiProject LGBT studies#Edit Request, 15 September 2024 - Update link to Portal:LGBTQ
6304:
lot of articles in en: are titled with the detailed concept while actually talking about the general
4723:
I just tried to make the point that the term often co-occurs alongside one of the variation of LGBT.
83:
6719:
6644:
6636:
6295:
6121:
6063:
5904:
trust the content : when both "LGBT rights in X" and "LGBT in X" exists on non-English Wikipedias,
5867:
5168:
5142:
Also note that while many style guides prefer Q+, GNgrams does not differentiate between Q+ and Q.
3169:
2383:
1817:
984:
867:
4520:
as the term, so it would be misleading if we suddenly changed articles without following the data.
3360:
It seems to me that people wanting to use a slur will do so regardless of its status on wikipedia.
1156:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
5032:
5016:
4793:
2933:
2881:
2590:
trends further, which gives an even clearer picture now that it's even more the case than before.
2244:
series" (just an example I've made up). It has no material impact on the content of the article.
1618:
we're absolutely not going to do that). Post-mortem discussions of the RM should occur either at
1061:
4399:
Knowledge has always used the term "queer" and "LGBT" interchangeably. For example, since 2002 "
3465:
I'm not having any luck finding other slurs we use in a similar way. Do you have any examples?
3260:
2291:
As there has been a concerted move by a small minority of editors to challenge any article with
251:
6564:
5977:
5936:
5761:
5733:
5728:
I'm new to editing, I did notice a lot of citations needed with that article. That being said,
5693:
4712:
4558:
Queer studies, sexual diversity studies, or LGBTQ studies is the study of topics relating to...
4494:
4309:
4189:
4125:
4087:
4053:
4023:
3993:
3843:
3686:
3650:
3621:
3549:
3419:
3404:
3389:
3334:
3292:
3059:
2804:
2770:
2488:
2433:
2382:
This page currently has 3 direct "LGBT" categories, and more implied by category hierarchy (ie
2117:
1745:
1686:
1631:
1600:
1506:
1483:
1140:
5259:
Actually it can as someone pointed out in the initial move. And I linked it above in my vote.
2757:
I agree, having RM discussion for each of these articles would be cumbersome. I support doing
2659:, that it is already categorized only in the most specific categories, which in that case are
2640:- We already have a lot of content on the history and evolution of the term at the article at
614:
237:
55:
6637:
6627:
6438:
6376:
6291:
6287:
Yes, redirects are good and what's what I'm already doing and didn't wait on your approval :)
5863:
5528:
that there really isn't a need to relitigate this for the third time. We should be going for
5307:
5214:
5201:
5149:
4927:
4878:
4856:
4599:
4312:, then it has actually enjoyed the support for the inclusion of Queer for the past 18 years.
4264:
4112:
I'm changing my tone because I didn't realize you'd only been here a month. Firstly, welcome.
3737:
3611:
3533:
3350:
2652:
2540:
2325:
While I'm still learning about Knowledge policies, a few that seem potentially relevant are:
2304:
2198:
1885:
1838:
The issue that happened with the ABC News was that the move was based on a shaky argument on
1623:
1405:
1036:
782:
648:
230:
4666:
244:
6473:
6211:
5878:
5802:
5617:
5581:
5529:
5424:
5354:
5333:
5251:
5238:
5134:
5092:
5002:
4976:
4694:
4619:
4222:
4204:
4102:
4068:
4038:
4008:
3988:
If you don't know enough about intersex or asexual people why are you voting on this here?
3959:
3914:
3806:
3757:
3660:
3632:
3577:
3505:
3490:
3471:
3451:
3371:
3320:
3155:
3043:
3017:
2842:
2815:
2762:
2723:
2708:
2699:
2688:
2626:
2599:
2555:
2516:
2467:
2452:
2398:
2346:
2312:
2271:
2249:
2233:
2176:
2138:
2133:
moves per consensus that they are subtopics, so should follow the lead of the main article
1846:
1795:
1791:
1767:
1723:
1711:
1704:
1671:
1653:
1533:
1525:
1205:
942:
1551:
main article applies to why the sub-articles are now outdated with LGBT instead of LGBTQ.
8:
6421:
6131:
6117:
6035:
6015:
5650:
4963:
does specifically exclude people, even with it's broadest reading. You'd at least need a
4339:
4281:
4175:
3782:
3607:
3002:
2765:. Glad to hear another anime is helping with category moves as that is surely important.
2300:
2187:
1870:(which isn't the appropriate venue to re-litigate this either) as this is worldwide data.
1663:
1015:
1009:
713:-related issues on Knowledge. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
182:
41:
5351:
Knowledge:Move_review/Log/2024_September#c-Paine_Ellsworth-20240909222700-LGBTQ_(closed)
3773:(which, by a huge margin, is the most common term for the "X studies" construction; cf.
3499:
That's a really great place to look for examples; I wish I had thought of that. Thanks!
6461:
6447:
6299:
6278:
6052:
5896:
5871:
5751:
5718:
5570:
5565:. So I don't understand why this proposal has capitalized "Studies" in it. Accident?
5483:
5450:
5410:
5357:
for us. So just adding this as a further note here for the closer of this to consider.
5010:
4942:
4911:
4785:
4147:
3954:
instead), so no term will be entirely free of contention. That's why we defer to RSes.
3572:
for me. shorter and succinct while still including diverse categories carries the day.
3202:
3049:
2922:
2288:
Can you direct us to any specific examples of policy that would support your objection?
1874:
1529:
1494:
222:
197:
1845:
Whereas the move that occurred from LGBT to LGBTQ was based on the stronger basis for
6560:
6540:
6511:
6412:
6354:
6177:
6093:
6020:
6010:
5990:
5973:
5963:
5689:
5673:
5661:
5515:
5468:
5436:
5390:
5362:
5291:
4736:
4705:
4569:
4487:
4366:
4347:
4317:
4185:
4135:
4121:
4083:
4049:
4019:
3989:
3941:
3895:
3824:
3708:
3682:
3646:
3617:
3545:
3415:
3400:
3385:
3330:
3288:
3245:
2980:
2797:
2766:
2672:
2484:
2429:
2368:. If you don't have individuals using "LGBTQ" about themselves, you shouldn't either.
2217:
2160:
2152:
2113:
1905:
1741:
1682:
1645:
1627:
1626:. I don't think the current form of your argument is likely to overturn the result. –
1593:
1575:
1556:
1502:
1476:
1461:
931:
856:
178:
6311:
6107:
5921:
5828:
m:Community Wishlist Survey 2019/Wikidata/Solution to the ‟Bonnie and Clyde” problem
3319:
outgroup, and to use it is to vindicate them. Copied from my !vote on the other RM.
3281:
1873:
So there is no good policy argument at this point against the move, which is why it
1274:
6595:
6588:
Talk:Harper Steele § Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 September 2024
6576:
Talk:Harper Steele § Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 September 2024
6372:
6253:
6229:
6140:
6025:
5539:
5376:
5063:
4872:
4593:
4258:
4218:
3875:
3733:
3527:
3139:
2535:
2394:
2357:
2205:
2142:
2129:- no we shouldn't need RM discussion for each of these articles and instead can do
1839:
1615:
1537:
1279:
Translate articles from other languages into English, such as these articles from:
1134:
1124:
1106:
980:
964:
3366:
I agree, and never claimed otherwise. I merely stated another excuse isn't ideal.
2479:
Baz. They're not being miscategorized or labelled against their will because they
6158:
5797:
5702:
5590:
5086:
4836:
4688:
4553:
4467:
4400:
4214:
4199:
4139:
4097:
4063:
4033:
4003:
3909:
3802:
3573:
3500:
3466:
3012:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
2838:
2718:
2683:
2655:
for the details - basically the gist of this guideline is that if a topic is say
2641:
2621:
2568:
2550:
2511:
2447:
2341:
2266:
2228:
2209:
2171:
1893:
1823:
1763:
1719:
1678:. Instead we hope that the majority of independent reliable sources get it right.
1649:
1153:
1050:
6056:
6048:
6040:
6005:
5646:
5598:
5325:
5301:
5143:
4921:
4850:
4335:
4276:
4171:
3778:
3450:
They almost certainly should be blocked, but not everything is so cut and dry.
3344:
3187:
3147:
2758:
2130:
1367:
1022:
6590:, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Also part of the discussion
6453:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 24 § Template:WP LGBTQIA
5593:
can you please correct the capitalization of 'Studies' in the original post? –
4659:
speedy renaming of thousands of articles based on the original move discussion
4478:
The title of the Knowledge article which is the topic of this WikiProject is "
1866:. All of these negate some of the points that Blueraspberry claimed above and
610:
6663:
6457:
6274:
6088:
a year and a half-ago, also on the basis that the title was missing a noun.--
6030:
5747:
5714:
5710:
5566:
5479:
5446:
5406:
5082:
4938:
4907:
4549:
4479:
4298:
4143:
4096:
so I should delete my vote then? Just want to make sure I’m doing this right
3925:
3700:
3198:
2372:
1528:
which came and as such, the new move discussion of this year now passed in a
1453:
1258:— Help improve new and old articles as part of the annual Wiki Pride Project.
975:
5266:
between the 4 terms - LGBT (without +), LGBTQ (without +), LGBT+ and LGBTQ+.
4305:
But for some reason the WikiProject title was just never updated since then.
2834:
6507:
6405:
6350:
6346:
6335:
6170:
6089:
5959:
5703:
5677:
5665:
5511:
5503:
5464:
5432:
5402:
5386:
5358:
5287:
5006:
4732:
4728:
4611:
4579:
4565:
4463:
4362:
4343:
4313:
4116:
helpful for a discussion unless you're say editing an article on pathology.
3937:
3891:
3820:
3704:
3268:
3241:
3077:
3065:
3033:
2668:
2213:
2191:
2156:
1901:
1583:
1552:
1457:
695:
6307:
6241:
6103:
5917:
5672:
I recently began discussions about adding media depiction sections to the
6249:
6225:
6136:
5729:
5644:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Task forces/Person § Tony Leondis
5535:
5372:
5164:
5059:
4430:
4426:
3703:
or LGBTQ studies, which futher strengthens the case for LGBTQ+ or LGBTQ.
2361:
825:
6345:
edit request to update the WikiProject to the now updated new title for
5832:
5820:
5636:
615:
6551:
Finally created a new(ish) article on LGBTQ themes in Western animation
5463:
stands, which was based on a consensus that LGBTQ is the common name.--
5329:
4866:
4780:
4637:
Sources say "queer" without saying "LGBTQ"; the reverse does not happen
4523:
Queer is both an identity, as well as an umbrella term, the article at
3521:
2416:
but all gender and sexual minorities beyond lesbian, gay, and bisexual.
1619:
1421:
to discuss proposals for featured articles, deletions, moves, and more.
1067:
769:
751:
6620:
5939:
article for each country, with more specific subtopics (most commonly
5892:
articles in en: will be linked to articles specifically about rights.
5713:
and thought I would bring it here for any feedback and input. thanks.
4697:, which I think is a great outline of what needs to be at LGBTQ/queer.
4018:
You're a medical doctor who doesn't know enough about intersexuality?
3119:
2645:
1736:
I don't have strong feelings right now on this section's actual topic
5594:
5234:
3928:
has been an explicitly stated core part of the wikiproject's mandate
3183:
2824:
2296:
3142:
and similar (which does not apply to projectspace). Though the move
1445:
move discussion which ended up with the main article being moved to
5385:
Ah my bad, thanks for the correction, struck and corrected inline.
4548:
Yes, but this WikiProject is not just about the scholarly field of
4529:
4338:, there are several editors whose !vote is their only ever edit to
679:
661:
612:
20:
6450:. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
6302:. Conceptually they are two topics, one general one detailed, and
709:, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
4583:
4422:
4418:
4002:
I’m bisexual and a medical doctor. What are your qualifications?
1332:
Or look at translating some of the Spanish country articles from
1210:
6402:
Talk:Gender self-identification#Requested move 20 September 2024
6388:
Talk:Gender self-identification#Requested move 20 September 2024
4959:
may or may not include pan people, depending on who you ask. So
3592:- Look, if we were using my pet version of the acronym, it'd be
2127:
I don't know if I should put in moves for each page individually
5881:
does not only speak about rights but also history and culture.
4677:
article establishes that the article is for etymology, as with
2830:
1703:
like the same thing sometimes. Thank you for making me look up
6528:
6495:
6432:
6393:
3724:
as is. I really don't see the need for change here, there are
2575:
relation to policy. I didn't say you were one of those people.
1437:, all sub-articles (including the Wikiproject) can follow suit
1273:
Translate from English to other languages by becoming part of
616:
5342:
4674:
4587:
4524:
4471:
4453:
4444:
4438:
4434:
4408:
3816:
3264:
3135:
2360:
implications once the category changes percolate down to eg.
2134:
1849:, which as was outlined in the RM was already trending there
1738:(this is because my brain is fried from doing coding all day)
1699:
I see, thank you for explaining. Consensus and democracy can
1611:
1544:
1446:
1434:
710:
6290:
But the issue does not come from Wikidata, as I stated with
5884:
There are two options that require nothing from your side :
4955:
also can't be said to stand for intersex, ace/aro, etc, and
4293:
True, though the scope of the Project has actually included
3434:
far too many times. An additional excuse should not be given
3006:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
6594:
whether to keep the subjects former name or to exclude it.
6537:
Talk:LGBT rights in Canada#Requested move 19 September 2024
6523:
Talk:LGBT rights in Canada#Requested move 19 September 2024
5732:
would be a great addition to the notable trans poets list!
5631:
Whoops I posted to an unwatched subpage of this WikiProject
5190:
have different results on which term is more commonly used.
4653:
4301:(in line with the name of the actual academic field) -: -->
3131:
2075:
List of animated series with LGBTQ characters: 2020–present
6404:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. --
4654:
_LGBTQ_move" title="Special:PermanentLink/1244168329": -->
2071:
List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2020–present
6539:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
6506:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
5423:
RM, which itself centered on the policy for the move on
2066:
List of animated series with LGBTQ characters: 2015-2019
2057:
List of animated series with LGBTQ characters: 2010-2014
2048:
List of animated series with LGBTQ characters: 2005-2009
2039:
List of animated series with LGBTQ characters: 2000-2004
2030:
List of animated series with LGBTQ characters: 1990–1999
1592:; could I invite you to respond to my opposition there?
1522:
last years discussion was already trending towards LGBTQ
5009:, I oppose titling the WikiProject as "Queer studies".
3436:
was about Covid-19, not slurs, but your point is valid.
3364:
Someone using anything as an excuse is just an asshole.
2897:
2062:
List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2015-2019
2053:
List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2010-2014
2044:
List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2005-2009
2035:
List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2000-2004
2026:
List of animated series with LGBT characters: 1990–1999
1758:
being Q but I don't think that's everyone's experience.
1670:—the titles of articles are subject to guidelines like
1475:
hundred thousand edits and that is too much, too fast.
3138:, several articles and categories have been moved per
6621:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Gender_dysphoria_in_children
5660:
Discussions about adding media depiction sections to
5405:, where did the closer say it's now the common name?
4865:
2S is also very specific to North America; including
4667:
_LGBTQ" title="Special:PermanentLink/1244912921": -->
6446:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
6186:
Like others, I think it's missing a word. I support
4392:"Queer" is the most popular term for the concept by
3815:
Well, the reason, as was also outlined in the RM of
3769:
Honestly my personal preference would have been for
2534:
Where do you get precision from? It isn't a policy.
1152:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1130:
685:
147:
5908:
articles in en: will be linked to general articles.
4683:
Talk:LGBTQ/Archive_3#Requested_move_20_October_2023
4534:
Talk:LGBTQ/Archive_3#Requested_move_20_October_2023
4255:and I don't especially think it needs rehashing. —
3232:
preferred even in the initial move request of LGBTQ
5796:, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.
5085:is also the name of our article on this subject. ~
4120:had the opinions of the readers in mind as well.
3263:, that several LGBTQ+ journalistic organizations (
3197:on whether or not the discussion is worth having.
2102:List of LGBTQ characters in modern written fiction
5508:Portal talk:LGBTQ#Requested move 8 September 2024
5056:. Good luck to the closer sorting out this mess.
5054:Portal talk:LGBTQ#Requested move 8 September 2024
4663:my examination of sources for the "queer" article
2549:counterintuitive when talking about this topic.
2098:List of LGBT characters in modern written fiction
1590:Talk:LGBT_community#Requested_move_27_August_2024
1003:Knowledge requested photographs of gender studies
6661:
6504:Talk:LGBT pride#Requested move 24 September 2024
6490:Talk:LGBT pride#Requested move 24 September 2024
5947:) spun off into their own articles as warranted.
4590:, which is more of an in-group term, I think. —
4380:"queer" is the most popular term for the concept
3234:that we could explicitly add the + to be LGBTQ+.
3226:- Since a WikiProject doesn't need to adhere as
2661:Category:Transgender rights in the United States
5860:fr:Situation des personnes intersexes en France
5853:fr:Situation des personnes intersexes en France
5427:, which is why the move happened to begin with.
1994:History of LGBTQ characters in animation: 1990s
1985:History of LGBTQ characters in animation: 2000s
1976:History of LGBTQ characters in animation: 2010s
1967:History of LGBTQ characters in animation: 2020s
159:and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
6371:. Please join there if you'd like to comment.
5371:Small correction: the closer is not an admin.
2795:Knowledge:Move_review/Log/2024_September#LGBTQ
2012:List of LGBTQ characters in radio and podcasts
2003:History of LGBTQ characters in animated series
1990:History of LGBT characters in animation: 1990s
1981:History of LGBT characters in animation: 2000s
1972:History of LGBT characters in animation: 2010s
1963:History of LGBT characters in animation: 2020s
6700:NA-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
6695:Project-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
5815:"LGBT rights in country" vs "LGBT in country"
5345:was just closed as endorsed by an uninvolved
4679:Talk:Queer/Archive_2#Italicisation_of_'queer'
4516:rather they use the LGBTQ(IA+) community, or
3026:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
2996:among Knowledge contributors. Knowledge has
2021:List of animated series with LGBTQ characters
2008:List of LGBT characters in radio and podcasts
1999:History of LGBT characters in animated series
1940:Netflix and LGBTQ representation in animation
1931:LGBTQ representation in children's television
1884:Anyone is of course welcome to file a formal
1786:
5459:The endorsement of the close means that the
4327:+1 to whatever to consensus is among members
4295:queer since 2006 when the scope was expanded
3280:as a positive umbrella term for forty years.
2084:List of animated films with LGBTQ characters
2017:List of animated series with LGBT characters
1949:Disney and LGBTQ representation in animation
1936:Netflix and LGBT representation in animation
1927:LGBT representation in children's television
1787:_LGBTQ_move" title="User talk:Dekimasu": -->
1433:Now that the main article has been moved to
1166:Knowledge:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
6705:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
6047:There are also three disambiguation pages:
2080:List of animated films with LGBT characters
1945:Disney and LGBT representation in animation
1812:I'd even say it's not enough participation
1452:As this is a large volume of articles (see
1169:Template:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
6586:You are invited to join the discussion at
5792:You are invited to join the discussion at
5688:. Your comments would be welcome. Thanks.
3000:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
2876:It has been proposed in this section that
2375:, a right-wing gay man in England who has
2093:Lists of LGBTQ figures in fiction and myth
850:Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
833:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
5506:has been renamed, following the separate
2089:Lists of LGBT figures in fiction and myth
1080:Gender studies articles needing attention
925:Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
641:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
6535:There is a requested move discussion at
6502:There is a requested move discussion at
6400:There is a requested move discussion at
5526:Talk:LGBTQ#Requested move 14 August 2024
5421:Talk:LGBTQ#Requested_move_14_August_2024
5050:Talk:LGBTQ#Requested move 14 August 2024
4693:already drafted what I was imagining at
4632:
4375:
3020:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
1443:Talk:LGBTQ#Requested_move_14_August_2024
4967:in there if you aren't also adding the
4414:Knowledge:Knowledge is not a dictionary
2377:vocally opposed usage of the word queer
6662:
4817:2601:246:5C80:65F0:DC75:D72A:B7E2:91C3
4412:" is about the term, not the concept.
2665:Category:Transgender rights by country
1270:if you are interested in translation.
6715:Requested moves with protected titles
6685:NA-importance Gender studies articles
6364:The catch-22 of non-binary categories
4552:, but also the social aspects of the
4462:(any of the top LGBTQ articles, like
3801:of the countless newer variations. --
3106:WikiProject LGBT studies (status quo)
2814:Opened RM for the wikiproject below.
1360:new articles containing LGBT keywords
2975:
2857:
2446:Is this really good faith? Sheesh.
1191:
796:Knowledge:WikiProject Gender studies
630:
628:
624:
34:
6690:WikiProject Gender studies articles
6202:in any given country and therefore
6198:because there may be more than one
5958:to ensure comprehensive coverage.--
3099:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBTQ Studies
2887:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBTQ Studies
2648:. Feel free to add to it of course.
2475:, and the notion that one can even
1788:I've asked the closer to reconsider
799:Template:WikiProject Gender studies
647:It is of interest to the following
13:
6527:
6494:
6392:
4668:my late comments on the LGBTQ page
4543:LGBTQ community vs queer community
3094:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies
2878:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies
2717:from a 19th century perspective.
1851:even at last years move discussion
1149:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
846:Unassessed Gender studies articles
727:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies
14:
6731:
6675:WikiProject LGBT studies articles
6557:LGBTQ themes in Western animation
6271:m:Wikidata:Sitelinks to redirects
5840:m:Wikidata:Sitelinks to redirects
4673:I disagree, the talk page of the
3118:Any of the other names listed at
2901:will list this discussion on the
2464:Category:Foo, Bar, and Baz people
1146:This page is within the scope of
989:Women's education in Saudi Arabia
730:Template:WikiProject LGBT studies
6710:Knowledge pages with to-do lists
6680:NA-Class Gender studies articles
6581:
6431:
6086:LGBT people in the United States
5831:
5819:
5787:
5635:
5608:
3146:, it will likely be closed as a
2979:
2869:
2861:
2197:This includes that Knowledge is
1842:from an existing disambiguation.
1209:
1199:
1133:
1123:
1105:
824:
768:
750:
688:
678:
660:
629:
598:
172:Click here to start a new topic.
110:
96:
82:
68:
54:
40:
19:
15:
6456:until a consensus is reached.
6163:LGBT in Mexico (disambiguation)
6155:nominated Poland for discussion
5709:Came across this article while
5563:WP:WikiProject Military history
3276:Queers like me have been using
2852:Requested move 6 September 2024
2356:Off the top of my head there's
1958:LGBTQ themes in anime and manga
1879:one oppose in the RM called out
1816:. I'm having war flashbacks to
1668:WP:Knowledge is not a democracy
1497:applies to most of those cases.
1172:Sexology and sexuality articles
6656:02:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
6632:21:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
6608:07:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
6569:18:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6546:18:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6516:19:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
6482:01:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
6466:00:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
6415:23:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
6381:19:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
6369:Discussion at the Village Pump
6359:05:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
6316:07:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
6283:22:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
6258:10:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
6234:09:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
6216:06:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
6180:22:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
6157:, it should be a redirect per
6145:10:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
6126:03:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
6112:22:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
6098:16:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
6076:16:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
5982:16:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
5968:15:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
5926:15:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
5810:00:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
5770:09:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
5756:09:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
5742:07:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
5723:11:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5621:22:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
5603:20:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
5585:22:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
5575:16:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
5549:13:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
5520:01:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
5488:10:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5473:17:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
5455:16:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
5441:15:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
5415:15:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
5395:15:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
5381:10:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
5341:The Move Review of LGBT -: -->
5099:06:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
5073:05:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
5041:03:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
5021:20:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
4981:08:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4947:16:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
4932:16:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
4916:16:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
4885:09:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
4861:15:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
4845:15:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
4825:23:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
4800:13:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
4762:00:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
4741:21:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
4718:21:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
4624:06:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
4606:08:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
4574:23:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
4500:22:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
4371:19:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
4352:12:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
4322:19:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
4289:18:05, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
4271:09:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
3732:of the countless alternatives.
3554:17:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
3540:08:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
3207:17:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
3192:16:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
3174:00:18, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
3102:– The options are as follows:
2190:the global consensus based on
1954:LGBT themes in anime and manga
1441:Per the recent outcome of the
140:
1:
6080:I would support those moves.
6001:History of LGBT in journalism
5866:, which is the equivalent of
5698:16:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
5655:15:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
5524:And I think between that and
5367:23:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
5337:16:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
5312:16:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
5296:16:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
5255:16:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
5242:16:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
5206:17:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
5173:List of LGBT rights activists
5154:16:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
5138:16:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
4999:Google Books Ngram's ordering
4210:20:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
4194:20:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
4180:19:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
4152:22:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
4130:20:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
4108:20:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
4092:19:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
4074:19:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
4058:19:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
4044:19:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
4028:19:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
4014:19:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
3998:18:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
3964:15:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
3946:13:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
3932:, avoiding widespread use of
3920:10:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
3900:02:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
3879:20:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
3857:17:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
3829:17:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
3811:16:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
3791:16:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
3762:20:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3742:19:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3713:18:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3691:17:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3664:17:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3655:17:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3636:16:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3626:16:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3582:16:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3511:09:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
3495:09:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
3477:09:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
3455:19:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3424:19:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3409:19:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3394:19:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3375:19:09, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3355:18:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3339:18:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3324:16:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3301:17:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3250:16:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3159:16:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3016:on the part of others and to
2847:21:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
2819:16:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
2810:21:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
2775:19:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
2729:09:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
2712:01:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
2703:01:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
2694:01:03, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
2677:00:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
2632:00:03, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
2604:19:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2561:13:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2544:13:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2522:00:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
2497:18:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2458:18:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2442:18:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2407:13:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2352:11:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2317:11:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2277:10:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2254:10:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2239:17:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
2222:17:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
2182:17:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
2165:17:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
2122:16:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
1413:— See recent changes on the
1160:and see a list of open tasks.
169:Put new text under old text.
6613:Gender Dysphoria in Children
5557:On capitalization of Studies
4539:LGBTQ rights vs queer rights
4331:WP:WikiProject Council/Guide
4253:LGBT → LGBTQ move discussion
4225:22:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC
3594:WikiProject LGBTQIA+ studies
3283:Knowledge is allowed to say
2913:). Please base arguments on
2657:Transgender rights in the US
1922:Pets and the LGBTQ community
1392:— Explore articles that are
701:This page is of interest to
7:
6670:Project-Class LGBT articles
5996:History of LGBT in policing
5332:. Feel free to add others.
4329:I agree with this. Per the
2206:Queer#Origins_and_early_use
1918:Pets and the LGBT community
1910:03:47, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
1834:02:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
1804:09:48, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
1772:02:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
1750:02:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
1728:23:27, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
1695:22:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
1658:22:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
1640:18:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
1606:17:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
1561:17:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
1515:16:55, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
1489:16:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
1466:15:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
177:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
135:
10:
6736:
6265:‟Bonnie and Clyde” problem
6169:that deserve attention. --
5532:names to avoid confusion.
4221:for a longer explanation.
3115:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies
778:WikiProject Gender studies
220:
6306:. That's the issue here.
6082:LGBT in the United States
5849:Intersex rights in France
4394:Google Books Ngram Viewer
3112:WikiProject LGBT+ studies
3109:WikiProject LGBTQ studies
2642:LGBTQ#History_of_the_term
2379:and regards it as a slur.
2210:LGBTQ#History_of_the_term
1868:in the other sub-topic RM
1662:That mechanism is called
1118:
971:Brannon Masculinity Scale
810:
763:
673:
655:
207:Be welcoming to newcomers
6444:redirects for discussion
6426:Redirects for discussion
6334:needs to update link to
6329:WikiProject LGBT studies
6296:fr:Droits LGBT en France
6246:LGBT (rights) in Croatia
5874:has no equivalent here.
5868:fr:Droits LGBT en France
5188:lgbt/lgbtq in small caps
5169:Timeline of LGBT history
4655:asking the closing admin
2307:(even if well meaning).
1818:ABC News (United States)
1334:Wikiproyecto:LGBT/Países
1266:— Add your name to the
1215:WikiProject LGBT studies
985:Michael Kaufman (author)
705:WikiProject LGBT studies
157:WikiProject LGBT studies
129:
5899:is not translated here)
5237:, feel free to ignore.
5159:hand, there are some :
4751:The lines are the same.
3930:from the very beginning
3058:; accounts blocked for
3028:single-purpose accounts
2998:policies and guidelines
2578:To address your points:
2426:attention-seeking twerp
2208:and in move brevity at
1644:I strongly agree with @
802:Gender studies articles
6532:
6499:
6397:
5184:LGBT/LGBTQ in all caps
4638:
4381:
4310:WP:LGBTQ#About WP:LGBT
3520:is another, like with
2917:, and keep discussion
1540:) sub-article titling.
1163:Sexology and sexuality
1141:Human sexuality portal
1113:Sexology and sexuality
202:avoid personal attacks
6638:Generation Z and LGBT
6531:
6498:
6396:
6349:. Thanks in advance.
6292:LGBT rights in France
6059:. And many redirects.
5952:LGBT people in France
5864:LGBT rights in France
5618:Sincerely, Dilettante
5582:Sincerely, Dilettante
5502:The related portal -
5334:Sincerely, Dilettante
5252:Sincerely, Dilettante
5239:Sincerely, Dilettante
5223:few or no other edits
5135:Sincerely, Dilettante
4636:
4578:I have to agree with
4379:
4223:Sincerely, Dilettante
3661:Sincerely, Dilettante
3633:Sincerely, Dilettante
3604:Personal side comment
3452:Sincerely, Dilettante
3414:the queer community.
3372:Sincerely, Dilettante
3321:Sincerely, Dilettante
3261:my analysis in the RM
3156:Sincerely, Dilettante
2816:Sincerely, Dilettante
2792:Move review requested
2709:Sincerely, Dilettante
2700:Sincerely, Dilettante
2371:First example I see,
1676:WP:right great wrongs
1255:Wiki Loves Pride 2024
900:/Sexuality and gender
790:for more information.
775:This page is part of
717:or contribute to the
592:Auto-archiving period
6645:Significa liberdade
6220:I fully agree with @
5956:LGBT people in Spain
5879:LGBT rights in Spain
5264:differentiated ngram
5225:outside this topic.
4695:User:Maplestrip/LGBT
3228:strictly to the data
2946:requested move/dated
2934:subst:requested move
2915:article title policy
2911:closing instructions
2905:current discussions
1406:flagged for cleanup.
1030:Gender studies stubs
6448:redirect guidelines
6442:has been listed at
6439:Template:WP LGBTQIA
6422:Template:WP LGBTQIA
6064:Firefangledfeathers
6036:LGBT in New Zealand
6016:LGBT in Puerto Rico
5461:original RM outcome
3608:Oppression Olympics
3289:RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️
3144:has been challenged
3010:by counting votes.
2989:not a majority vote
2485:RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️
2430:RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️
2301:motivated reasoning
2283:WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS
1683:RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️
1628:RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️
1503:RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️
1380:unassessed articles
1268:List of Translators
1016:History of feminism
6533:
6521:Requested move at
6500:
6488:Requested move at
6398:
6386:Requested move at
6300:fr:LGBTI en France
6188:LGBTQ people in...
6053:LGBT in California
5945:LGBT history in...
5906:LGBT rights in XXX
5897:fr:LGBTI en France
5890:LGBT rights in XXX
5872:fr:LGBTI en France
5349:experienced user:
5033:Bluethricecreamman
4639:
4586:more readily than
4382:
3952:same-gender-loving
3267:) and stylebooks (
2412:only the identity
1890:WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT
1390:Improve an article
1384:assessment changes
1244:Updated 2024-09-12
643:content assessment
213:dispute resolution
174:
6648:
6206:is more neutral.
6194:is preferable to
6165:. There are some
6021:LGBT in Guatemala
6011:LGBT in Australia
5991:LGBT in Argentina
5941:LGBT rights in...
5762:Just-A-Trans-Girl
5674:Non-binary gender
5662:Non-binary gender
5226:
4882:
4603:
4268:
4241:
4240:
3615:
3537:
3437:
3259:. I'll reiterate
3091:
3090:
3087:
3014:assume good faith
2974:
2973:
2969:
2952:
2882:renamed and moved
2151:Another admin - @
1814:for the RM itself
1430:
1429:
1415:project watchlist
1382:or review recent
1375:Assess an article
1342:Create an article
1188:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1095:
1092:
1091:
1088:
1087:
745:
744:
741:
740:
623:
622:
193:Assume good faith
170:
125:
124:
33:
32:
6727:
6646:
6605:
6600:
6585:
6584:
6543:
6441:
6435:
6410:
6333:
6327:
6175:
6026:LGBT in Colombia
5835:
5823:
5807:
5800:
5791:
5790:
5639:
5616:
5612:
5611:
5547:
5304:
5208:
5146:
5095:
5089:
5088:Maplestrip/Mable
5071:
5013:
5012:BluePenguin18 🐧
5001:to conform with
4924:
4883:
4876:
4875:
4853:
4798:
4796:
4792:
4788:
4749:entering queer.
4715:
4710:
4692:
4604:
4597:
4596:
4497:
4492:
4286:
4284:
4269:
4262:
4261:
4207:
4202:
4105:
4100:
4071:
4066:
4041:
4036:
4011:
4006:
3978:Extended content
3974:
3973:
3917:
3912:
3854:
3849:
3846:
3601:
3538:
3531:
3530:
3508:
3503:
3474:
3469:
3428:
3347:
3101:
3085:
3073:
3057:
3041:
3022:
2992:, but instead a
2983:
2976:
2954:
2949:
2937:
2928:
2900:
2889:
2873:
2865:
2864:
2858:
2807:
2802:
2726:
2721:
2691:
2686:
2629:
2624:
2558:
2553:
2538:
2519:
2514:
2455:
2450:
2388:English LGBT men
2349:
2344:
2274:
2269:
2236:
2231:
2192:reliable sources
2179:
2174:
2141:- specifically
1829:
1826:
1603:
1598:
1587:
1579:
1486:
1481:
1378:— Help classify
1368:LGBTQ categories
1344:— See requested
1329:
1245:
1213:
1203:
1202:
1192:
1174:
1173:
1170:
1167:
1164:
1143:
1138:
1137:
1127:
1120:
1119:
1109:
1102:
1101:
981:Media and gender
893:Deletion sorting
828:
821:
820:
812:
811:
804:
803:
800:
797:
794:
772:
765:
764:
754:
747:
746:
735:
734:
731:
728:
725:
698:
693:
692:
691:
682:
675:
674:
664:
657:
656:
634:
633:
632:
625:
617:
603:
602:
593:
254:
247:
240:
233:
148:
143:
138:
114:
100:
86:
72:
58:
44:
35:
23:
16:
6735:
6734:
6730:
6729:
6728:
6726:
6725:
6724:
6720:Requested moves
6660:
6659:
6641:
6615:
6601:
6596:
6582:
6579:
6553:
6541:
6526:
6493:
6474:DarknessGoth777
6437:
6429:
6406:
6391:
6366:
6339:
6331:
6325:
6171:
5937:WP:BROADCONCEPT
5933:LGBT people in
5817:
5803:
5798:
5788:
5785:
5707:
5670:
5633:
5609:
5607:
5559:
5533:
5302:
5144:
5107:
5093:
5087:
5057:
5011:
4937:just queer :)
4922:
4871:
4870:
4851:
4794:
4790:
4786:
4784:
4713:
4706:
4686:
4592:
4591:
4554:LGBTQ community
4495:
4488:
4468:LGBTQ community
4401:queer community
4282:
4280:
4257:
4256:
4242:
4205:
4200:
4103:
4098:
4069:
4064:
4039:
4034:
4009:
4004:
3979:
3915:
3910:
3868:anything longer
3852:
3847:
3844:
3526:
3525:
3506:
3501:
3472:
3467:
3345:
3217:
3097:
3075:
3063:
3047:
3031:
3018:sign your posts
2970:
2943:
2931:
2903:requested moves
2896:
2885:
2874:
2862:
2854:
2827:
2805:
2798:
2724:
2719:
2689:
2684:
2627:
2622:
2556:
2551:
2536:
2517:
2512:
2453:
2448:
2422:body mutilators
2399:Void if removed
2384:English gay men
2347:
2342:
2272:
2267:
2234:
2229:
2177:
2172:
1827:
1824:
1796:Void if removed
1601:
1594:
1581:
1573:
1484:
1477:
1439:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1362:may need to be
1358:— If in scope,
1280:
1219:
1200:
1171:
1168:
1165:
1162:
1161:
1154:human sexuality
1139:
1132:
1084:
1074:Needs attention
801:
798:
795:
792:
791:
732:
729:
726:
723:
722:
694:
689:
687:
619:
618:
613:
590:
260:
259:
258:
257:
250:
243:
236:
229:
225:
218:
188:
155:for discussing
145:
139:
134:
12:
11:
5:
6733:
6723:
6722:
6717:
6712:
6707:
6702:
6697:
6692:
6687:
6682:
6677:
6672:
6640:
6635:
6614:
6611:
6578:
6574:Discussion at
6572:
6555:It's entitled
6552:
6549:
6525:
6519:
6492:
6486:
6485:
6484:
6428:
6418:
6390:
6384:
6365:
6362:
6338:
6322:
6321:
6320:
6319:
6318:
6288:
6260:
6238:
6237:
6236:
6184:
6183:
6182:
6151:
6150:
6149:
6148:
6147:
6132:Freddy eduardo
6118:Freddy eduardo
6100:
6060:
6057:LGBT in Poland
6049:LGBT in Russia
6045:
6044:
6043:
6041:LGBT in Canada
6038:
6033:
6028:
6023:
6018:
6013:
6008:
6006:LGBT in Mexico
6003:
5998:
5993:
5984:
5970:
5948:
5910:
5909:
5902:
5901:
5900:
5837:Courtesy link:
5830:
5825:Courtesy link:
5816:
5813:
5784:
5780:Discussion at
5778:
5777:
5776:
5775:
5774:
5773:
5772:
5706:
5701:
5669:
5658:
5641:Courtesy link:
5632:
5629:
5628:
5627:
5626:
5625:
5624:
5623:
5558:
5555:
5554:
5553:
5552:
5551:
5542:
5500:
5499:
5498:
5497:
5496:
5495:
5494:
5493:
5492:
5491:
5490:
5428:
5399:
5398:
5397:
5339:
5321:
5320:
5319:
5318:
5317:
5316:
5315:
5314:
5285:
5284:
5283:
5274:
5273:
5268:
5267:
5257:
5246:
5245:
5244:
5193:
5192:
5191:
5179:
5176:
5132:
5131:
5130:
5126:
5122:
5118:
5112:
5111:
5106:
5105:Other Comments
5103:
5102:
5101:
5075:
5066:
5043:
5023:
4989:
4988:
4987:
4986:
4985:
4984:
4983:
4891:
4890:
4889:
4888:
4887:
4828:
4827:
4812:
4811:
4802:
4773:
4772:
4771:
4770:
4769:
4768:
4767:
4766:
4765:
4764:
4754:173.73.134.222
4746:
4724:
4703:
4702:
4701:
4698:
4671:
4650:
4631:
4630:
4629:
4628:
4627:
4626:
4608:
4562:
4561:
4546:
4521:
4513:
4503:
4502:
4484:
4483:
4476:
4475:
4474:
4460:
4451:
4404:
4397:
4389:
4388:
4374:
4373:
4356:
4355:
4354:
4324:
4306:
4283:Rhododendrites
4273:
4239:
4238:
4237:
4236:
4235:
4234:
4233:
4232:
4231:
4230:
4229:
4228:
4227:
4226:
4196:
4168:
4167:
4166:
4165:
4164:
4163:
4162:
4161:
4160:
4159:
4158:
4157:
4156:
4155:
4154:
4117:
4113:
4080:
3981:
3980:
3977:
3972:
3971:
3970:
3969:
3968:
3967:
3966:
3902:
3881:
3859:
3833:
3832:
3831:
3793:
3764:
3744:
3718:
3717:
3716:
3715:
3694:
3693:
3672:
3671:
3670:
3669:
3668:
3667:
3666:
3612:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
3584:
3563:
3562:
3561:
3560:
3559:
3558:
3557:
3556:
3542:
3515:
3514:
3513:
3463:
3462:
3461:
3460:
3459:
3458:
3457:
3445:
3438:
3411:
3381:
3357:
3315:
3314:
3304:
3303:
3273:
3272:
3253:
3252:
3236:
3235:
3216:
3213:
3212:
3211:
3210:
3209:
3194:
3180:115.189.88.238
3166:115.189.88.238
3126:Following the
3124:
3123:
3120:LGBTQ#Variants
3116:
3113:
3110:
3107:
3089:
3088:
2984:
2972:
2971:
2953:
2927:
2893:
2892:
2868:
2866:
2853:
2850:
2826:
2823:
2822:
2821:
2812:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2785:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2780:
2779:
2778:
2777:
2755:
2754:
2753:
2752:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2747:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2714:
2653:WP:CATSPECIFIC
2649:
2646:LGBTQ#Variants
2617:
2613:
2609:
2591:
2587:
2583:
2579:
2576:
2572:
2565:
2564:
2563:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2507:
2503:
2417:
2391:
2380:
2369:
2337:
2336:
2335:
2332:
2329:
2323:
2305:WP:POV pushing
2289:
2286:
2263:
2259:
2202:
2199:WP:NOTCENSORED
2195:
2149:
2146:
2145:for subtopics.
2106:
2105:
2104:
2095:
2086:
2077:
2068:
2059:
2050:
2041:
2032:
2023:
2014:
2005:
1996:
1987:
1978:
1969:
1960:
1951:
1942:
1933:
1924:
1900:challenge it.
1897:
1886:WP:move review
1882:
1871:
1843:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1759:
1755:
1734:
1716:
1708:
1679:
1624:WP:Move review
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1548:
1541:
1517:
1498:
1438:
1431:
1428:
1427:
1423:
1422:
1419:article alerts
1411:Review changes
1408:
1387:
1371:
1364:project-tagged
1356:Tag an article
1353:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1330:
1277:
1259:
1250:
1247:
1197:
1195:
1186:
1185:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1177:
1175:
1158:the discussion
1145:
1144:
1128:
1116:
1115:
1110:
1098:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1090:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1083:
1082:
1070:
1057:
1046:
1032:
1018:
1005:
991:
960:
949:
938:
927:
913:
902:
888:
877:
875:/Collaboration
863:
852:
832:
830:
829:
817:
816:
808:
807:
805:
793:Gender studies
773:
761:
760:
758:Gender studies
755:
743:
742:
739:
738:
736:
700:
699:
683:
671:
670:
665:
653:
652:
646:
635:
621:
620:
611:
609:
608:
605:
604:
262:
261:
256:
255:
248:
241:
234:
226:
221:
219:
217:
216:
209:
204:
195:
189:
187:
186:
175:
166:
165:
162:
161:
160:
146:
144:
141:Skip to bottom
136:Skip to bottom
132:
127:
123:
122:
120:
108:
106:
94:
92:
80:
78:
66:
64:
52:
50:
38:
31:
30:
28:
27:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
6732:
6721:
6718:
6716:
6713:
6711:
6708:
6706:
6703:
6701:
6698:
6696:
6693:
6691:
6688:
6686:
6683:
6681:
6678:
6676:
6673:
6671:
6668:
6667:
6665:
6658:
6657:
6653:
6649:
6639:
6634:
6633:
6629:
6625:
6622:
6618:
6610:
6609:
6606:
6604:
6599:
6593:
6589:
6577:
6571:
6570:
6566:
6562:
6558:
6548:
6547:
6544:
6538:
6530:
6524:
6518:
6517:
6513:
6509:
6505:
6497:
6491:
6483:
6479:
6475:
6470:
6469:
6468:
6467:
6463:
6459:
6455:
6454:
6449:
6445:
6440:
6436:The redirect
6434:
6427:
6423:
6417:
6416:
6413:
6411:
6409:
6403:
6395:
6389:
6383:
6382:
6378:
6374:
6370:
6361:
6360:
6356:
6352:
6348:
6344:
6337:
6330:
6317:
6313:
6309:
6305:
6301:
6297:
6293:
6289:
6286:
6285:
6284:
6280:
6276:
6272:
6267:
6266:
6261:
6259:
6255:
6251:
6247:
6243:
6239:
6235:
6231:
6227:
6223:
6219:
6218:
6217:
6213:
6209:
6205:
6201:
6197:
6193:
6189:
6185:
6181:
6178:
6176:
6174:
6168:
6164:
6160:
6156:
6152:
6146:
6142:
6138:
6133:
6129:
6128:
6127:
6123:
6119:
6115:
6114:
6113:
6109:
6105:
6101:
6099:
6095:
6091:
6087:
6084:was moved to
6083:
6079:
6078:
6077:
6073:
6069:
6065:
6061:
6058:
6054:
6050:
6046:
6042:
6039:
6037:
6034:
6032:
6031:LGBT in Chile
6029:
6027:
6024:
6022:
6019:
6017:
6014:
6012:
6009:
6007:
6004:
6002:
5999:
5997:
5994:
5992:
5989:
5988:
5985:
5983:
5979:
5975:
5971:
5969:
5965:
5961:
5957:
5953:
5949:
5946:
5942:
5938:
5934:
5930:
5929:
5928:
5927:
5923:
5919:
5914:
5907:
5903:
5898:
5894:
5893:
5891:
5887:
5886:
5885:
5882:
5880:
5875:
5873:
5869:
5865:
5861:
5856:
5854:
5850:
5845:
5842:
5841:
5838:
5834:
5829:
5826:
5822:
5812:
5811:
5808:
5806:
5801:
5795:
5783:
5771:
5767:
5763:
5759:
5758:
5757:
5753:
5749:
5745:
5744:
5743:
5739:
5735:
5731:
5727:
5726:
5725:
5724:
5720:
5716:
5712:
5705:
5700:
5699:
5695:
5691:
5687:
5683:
5679:
5675:
5667:
5663:
5657:
5656:
5652:
5648:
5645:
5642:
5638:
5622:
5619:
5615:
5606:
5605:
5604:
5600:
5596:
5592:
5588:
5587:
5586:
5583:
5579:
5578:
5577:
5576:
5572:
5568:
5564:
5550:
5545:
5544:
5537:
5531:
5530:WP:CONSISTENT
5527:
5523:
5522:
5521:
5517:
5513:
5509:
5505:
5501:
5489:
5485:
5481:
5476:
5475:
5474:
5470:
5466:
5462:
5458:
5457:
5456:
5452:
5448:
5444:
5443:
5442:
5438:
5434:
5429:
5426:
5425:WP:COMMONNAME
5422:
5418:
5417:
5416:
5412:
5408:
5404:
5400:
5396:
5392:
5388:
5384:
5383:
5382:
5378:
5374:
5370:
5369:
5368:
5364:
5360:
5356:
5355:WP:COMMONNAME
5352:
5348:
5344:
5340:
5338:
5335:
5331:
5327:
5323:
5322:
5313:
5309:
5305:
5299:
5298:
5297:
5293:
5289:
5286:
5280:
5276:
5275:
5270:
5269:
5265:
5261:
5260:
5258:
5256:
5253:
5250:
5247:
5243:
5240:
5236:
5231:
5228:
5227:
5224:
5220:
5216:
5212:
5207:
5203:
5199:
5194:
5189:
5185:
5180:
5177:
5174:
5170:
5166:
5161:
5160:
5157:
5156:
5155:
5151:
5147:
5141:
5140:
5139:
5136:
5133:
5127:
5123:
5119:
5116:
5115:
5114:
5113:
5109:
5108:
5100:
5096:
5090:
5084:
5083:Queer studies
5080:
5079:Queer Studies
5076:
5074:
5069:
5068:
5061:
5055:
5051:
5047:
5044:
5042:
5038:
5034:
5030:
5024:
5022:
5018:
5014:
5008:
5004:
5003:WP:COMMONNAME
5000:
4996:
4990:
4982:
4978:
4974:
4970:
4966:
4962:
4958:
4954:
4950:
4949:
4948:
4944:
4940:
4935:
4934:
4933:
4929:
4925:
4919:
4918:
4917:
4913:
4909:
4904:
4899:
4895:
4892:
4886:
4880:
4874:
4868:
4864:
4863:
4862:
4858:
4854:
4848:
4847:
4846:
4843:
4840:
4839:
4833:
4830:
4829:
4826:
4822:
4818:
4814:
4813:
4809:
4803:
4801:
4797:
4789:
4782:
4778:
4775:
4774:
4763:
4759:
4755:
4752:
4747:
4744:
4743:
4742:
4738:
4734:
4730:
4725:
4721:
4720:
4719:
4716:
4711:
4709:
4708:Bluerasberry
4704:
4699:
4696:
4690:
4684:
4680:
4676:
4672:
4669:
4664:
4660:
4656:
4651:
4647:
4646:
4645:
4644:
4643:
4642:
4641:
4640:
4635:
4625:
4621:
4617:
4613:
4609:
4607:
4601:
4595:
4589:
4585:
4581:
4577:
4576:
4575:
4571:
4567:
4564:
4563:
4559:
4555:
4551:
4550:Queer studies
4547:
4544:
4540:
4535:
4531:
4526:
4522:
4519:
4514:
4511:
4507:
4506:
4505:
4504:
4501:
4498:
4493:
4491:
4490:Bluerasberry
4486:
4485:
4481:
4480:queer studies
4477:
4473:
4469:
4465:
4461:
4459:
4455:
4452:
4450:
4446:
4443:
4442:
4440:
4436:
4432:
4428:
4424:
4420:
4415:
4411:
4410:
4405:
4402:
4398:
4395:
4391:
4390:
4387:
4384:
4383:
4378:
4372:
4368:
4364:
4360:
4357:
4353:
4349:
4345:
4341:
4337:
4332:
4328:
4325:
4323:
4319:
4315:
4311:
4307:
4304:
4300:
4299:Queer studies
4296:
4292:
4291:
4290:
4285:
4278:
4274:
4272:
4266:
4260:
4254:
4250:
4244:
4243:
4224:
4220:
4216:
4213:
4212:
4211:
4208:
4203:
4197:
4195:
4191:
4187:
4183:
4182:
4181:
4177:
4173:
4169:
4153:
4149:
4145:
4141:
4137:
4133:
4132:
4131:
4127:
4123:
4118:
4114:
4111:
4110:
4109:
4106:
4101:
4095:
4094:
4093:
4089:
4085:
4081:
4077:
4076:
4075:
4072:
4067:
4061:
4060:
4059:
4055:
4051:
4047:
4046:
4045:
4042:
4037:
4031:
4030:
4029:
4025:
4021:
4017:
4016:
4015:
4012:
4007:
4001:
4000:
3999:
3995:
3991:
3987:
3986:
3985:
3984:
3983:
3982:
3976:
3975:
3965:
3961:
3957:
3953:
3949:
3948:
3947:
3943:
3939:
3935:
3931:
3927:
3926:queer studies
3923:
3922:
3921:
3918:
3913:
3907:
3903:
3901:
3897:
3893:
3889:
3885:
3882:
3880:
3877:
3873:
3869:
3860:
3858:
3855:
3850:
3840:
3834:
3830:
3826:
3822:
3818:
3814:
3813:
3812:
3808:
3804:
3799:
3794:
3792:
3788:
3784:
3780:
3776:
3775:another ngram
3772:
3771:queer studies
3768:
3765:
3763:
3759:
3755:
3751:
3745:
3743:
3739:
3735:
3731:
3727:
3723:
3720:
3719:
3714:
3710:
3706:
3702:
3701:Queer studies
3698:
3697:
3696:
3695:
3692:
3688:
3684:
3679:
3673:
3665:
3662:
3658:
3657:
3656:
3652:
3648:
3644:
3639:
3638:
3637:
3634:
3631:other group.
3629:
3628:
3627:
3623:
3619:
3613:
3609:
3605:
3599:
3595:
3591:
3585:
3583:
3579:
3575:
3571:
3565:
3564:
3555:
3551:
3547:
3543:
3541:
3535:
3529:
3523:
3519:
3516:
3512:
3509:
3504:
3498:
3497:
3496:
3492:
3488:
3483:
3480:
3479:
3478:
3475:
3470:
3464:
3456:
3453:
3449:
3446:
3442:
3439:
3435:
3433:
3427:
3426:
3425:
3421:
3417:
3412:
3410:
3406:
3402:
3397:
3396:
3395:
3391:
3387:
3382:
3378:
3377:
3376:
3373:
3369:
3365:
3361:
3358:
3356:
3352:
3348:
3342:
3341:
3340:
3336:
3332:
3327:
3326:
3325:
3322:
3317:
3316:
3312:
3306:
3305:
3302:
3298:
3294:
3290:
3286:
3282:
3279:
3275:
3274:
3270:
3266:
3262:
3258:
3255:
3254:
3251:
3247:
3243:
3238:
3237:
3233:
3229:
3225:
3219:
3218:
3208:
3204:
3200:
3195:
3193:
3189:
3185:
3181:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3171:
3167:
3163:
3162:
3161:
3160:
3157:
3153:
3150:endorse. On
3149:
3145:
3141:
3137:
3133:
3129:
3121:
3117:
3114:
3111:
3108:
3105:
3104:
3103:
3100:
3095:
3083:
3079:
3071:
3067:
3061:
3055:
3051:
3045:
3039:
3035:
3029:
3025:
3021:
3019:
3015:
3009:
3005:
3004:
2999:
2995:
2991:
2990:
2985:
2982:
2978:
2977:
2968:
2964:
2960:
2957:
2951:
2947:
2941:
2935:
2926:
2924:
2920:
2916:
2912:
2908:
2904:
2899:
2891:
2888:
2883:
2879:
2872:
2867:
2860:
2859:
2856:
2849:
2848:
2844:
2840:
2836:
2832:
2820:
2817:
2813:
2811:
2808:
2803:
2801:
2800:Bluerasberry
2796:
2793:
2790:
2789:
2776:
2772:
2768:
2764:
2763:WP:CONSISTENT
2760:
2756:
2730:
2727:
2722:
2715:
2713:
2710:
2706:
2705:
2704:
2701:
2697:
2696:
2695:
2692:
2687:
2680:
2679:
2678:
2674:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2647:
2643:
2639:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2630:
2625:
2618:
2614:
2610:
2607:
2606:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2592:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2577:
2573:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2559:
2554:
2547:
2546:
2545:
2542:
2539:
2533:
2523:
2520:
2515:
2508:
2504:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2494:
2490:
2486:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2469:
2468:WP:COMMONNAME
2465:
2461:
2460:
2459:
2456:
2451:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2418:
2415:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2404:
2400:
2396:
2392:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2378:
2374:
2373:Darren Grimes
2370:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2350:
2345:
2338:
2333:
2330:
2327:
2326:
2324:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2314:
2310:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2290:
2287:
2284:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2275:
2270:
2264:
2262:unilaterally.
2260:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2237:
2232:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2200:
2196:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2180:
2175:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2147:
2144:
2140:
2139:WP:CONSISTENT
2136:
2132:
2128:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2096:
2094:
2090:
2087:
2085:
2081:
2078:
2076:
2072:
2069:
2067:
2063:
2060:
2058:
2054:
2051:
2049:
2045:
2042:
2040:
2036:
2033:
2031:
2027:
2024:
2022:
2018:
2015:
2013:
2009:
2006:
2004:
2000:
1997:
1995:
1991:
1988:
1986:
1982:
1979:
1977:
1973:
1970:
1968:
1964:
1961:
1959:
1955:
1952:
1950:
1946:
1943:
1941:
1937:
1934:
1932:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1919:
1916:
1915:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1898:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1869:
1865:
1861:
1857:
1852:
1848:
1847:WP:COMMONNAME
1844:
1841:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1792:WP:CANVASSING
1789:
1785:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1760:
1756:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1712:WP:COMMONNAME
1709:
1706:
1705:WP:COMMONNAME
1702:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1677:
1673:
1672:WP:COMMONNAME
1669:
1665:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1604:
1599:
1597:
1596:Bluerasberry
1591:
1585:
1577:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1549:
1546:
1542:
1539:
1535:
1534:WP:CONSISTENT
1531:
1527:
1526:WP:COMMONNAME
1523:
1518:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1499:
1496:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1487:
1482:
1480:
1479:Bluerasberry
1473:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1454:Category:LGBT
1450:
1448:
1444:
1436:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1388:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1372:
1369:
1366:and added to
1365:
1361:
1357:
1354:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1340:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1278:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1269:
1265:
1264:
1260:
1257:
1256:
1252:
1251:
1249:
1246:
1243:
1240:
1237:
1234:
1231:
1228:
1225:
1222:
1218:
1216:
1212:
1207:
1196:
1194:
1193:
1190:
1176:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1150:
1142:
1136:
1131:
1129:
1126:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1108:
1104:
1103:
1081:
1077:
1075:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1063:
1058:
1055:
1053:
1052:
1047:
1045:
1041:
1039:
1038:
1033:
1031:
1027:
1025:
1024:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1011:
1006:
1004:
1000:
998:
997:
992:
990:
986:
982:
978:
977:
976:Holy Virility
972:
969:
967:
966:
961:
958:
956:
955:
950:
947:
945:
944:
939:
936:
934:
933:
928:
926:
922:
920:
919:
914:
911:
909:
908:
903:
901:
897:
895:
894:
889:
886:
884:
883:
878:
876:
872:
870:
869:
864:
861:
859:
858:
853:
851:
847:
843:
841:
840:
835:
834:
831:
827:
823:
822:
819:
818:
814:
813:
809:
806:
789:
784:
780:
779:
774:
771:
767:
766:
762:
759:
756:
753:
749:
748:
737:
733:LGBT articles
720:
716:
712:
708:
707:
706:
697:
686:
684:
681:
677:
676:
672:
669:
666:
663:
659:
658:
654:
650:
644:
640:
636:
627:
626:
607:
606:
601:
597:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
268:
264:
263:
253:
249:
246:
242:
239:
235:
232:
228:
227:
224:
214:
210:
208:
205:
203:
199:
196:
194:
191:
190:
184:
180:
179:Learn to edit
176:
173:
168:
167:
164:
163:
158:
154:
150:
149:
142:
137:
133:
131:
128:
126:
121:
119:
118:
113:
109:
107:
105:
104:
99:
95:
93:
91:
90:
85:
81:
79:
77:
76:
75:Collaboration
71:
67:
65:
63:
62:
57:
53:
51:
49:
48:
43:
39:
37:
36:
29:LGBT studies
25:
22:
18:
17:
6642:
6619:
6616:
6602:
6597:
6580:
6561:Historyday01
6554:
6534:
6501:
6451:
6430:
6424:" listed at
6407:
6399:
6367:
6347:Portal:LGBTQ
6340:
6336:Portal:LGBTQ
6303:
6263:
6203:
6199:
6195:
6191:
6187:
6172:
5974:Sock-the-guy
5944:
5940:
5932:
5915:
5911:
5883:
5876:
5857:
5846:
5843:
5836:
5824:
5818:
5804:
5786:
5708:
5704:Trans poetry
5690:Historyday01
5678:Pansexuality
5671:
5666:Pansexuality
5640:
5634:
5613:
5560:
5540:
5504:Portal:LGBTQ
5346:
5277:Here is the
5262:Here is the
5078:
5064:
5045:
5026:LGBTQ+ : -->
5025:
4993:LGBTQ+ : -->
4991:
4968:
4964:
4960:
4956:
4952:
4902:
4897:
4893:
4837:
4831:
4806:LGBTQ+ : -->
4804:
4776:
4729:Aromanticism
4707:
4557:
4545:, and so on.
4518:LGBTQ rights
4489:
4464:LGBTQ rights
4458:LGBTQ (term)
4449:queer (term)
4407:
4385:
4358:
4326:
4302:
4275:Saw this at
4246:LGBTQ+ : -->
4245:
4186:Sock-the-guy
4136:Sock-the-guy
4122:Sock-the-guy
4084:Sock-the-guy
4050:Sock-the-guy
4020:Sock-the-guy
3990:Sock-the-guy
3951:
3933:
3904:
3887:
3883:
3871:
3861:
3837:LGBTQ+ : -->
3835:
3798:LGBTQ+/LGBTQ
3795:
3766:
3747:LGBTQ+ : -->
3746:
3729:
3725:
3721:
3683:Sock-the-guy
3675:LGBTQ+ : -->
3674:
3647:Purplewowies
3642:
3618:Purplewowies
3603:
3597:
3593:
3587:LGBTQ+ : -->
3586:
3568:LGBTQ+ : -->
3566:
3546:Sock-the-guy
3517:
3481:
3447:
3440:
3432:other things
3431:
3429:
3416:Sock-the-guy
3401:Sock-the-guy
3386:Sock-the-guy
3367:
3363:
3359:
3331:Sock-the-guy
3310:LGBTQ+ : -->
3307:
3284:
3277:
3256:
3221:LGBTQ+ : -->
3220:
3188:𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝
3130:of the page
3125:
3092:
3081:
3069:
3060:sockpuppetry
3053:
3042:; suspected
3037:
3023:
3011:
3007:
3001:
2993:
2987:
2955:
2939:
2929:
2894:
2875:
2855:
2828:
2799:
2791:
2767:Historyday01
2637:
2502:appropriate.
2480:
2476:
2472:
2425:
2421:
2413:
2365:
2292:
2188:WP:SUMMARIZE
2153:HouseBlaster
2126:
2114:Historyday01
2109:
1877:as even the
1822:
1821:
1813:
1742:Purplewowies
1737:
1700:
1664:WP:consensus
1646:Bluerasberry
1595:
1576:RoxySaunders
1478:
1471:
1451:
1440:
1410:
1389:
1373:
1355:
1341:
1263:Translations
1261:
1253:
1248:
1241:
1235:
1229:
1223:
1204:
1198:
1189:
1147:
1073:
1072:
1060:
1059:
1049:
1048:
1044:/translation
1035:
1034:
1021:
1020:
1008:
1007:
994:
993:
974:
963:
962:
952:
951:
941:
940:
930:
929:
916:
915:
905:
904:
891:
890:
880:
879:
866:
865:
855:
854:
837:
836:
788:project page
776:
724:LGBT studies
718:
715:project page
703:
702:
696:LGBTQ portal
668:LGBT studies
649:WikiProjects
639:project page
638:
595:
265:
151:This is the
116:
102:
88:
74:
60:
59:
46:
6624:HenrikHolen
6373:Nosferattus
6244:just moved
5805:(trout me!)
5730:Danez Smith
5300:Ah, sorry.
5230:Mangolemonz
5221:) has made
5211:Mangolemonz
5198:Mangolemonz
5165:Portal:LGBT
5028:LGBT+ : -->
5027:LGBTQ : -->
4992:LGBTQ : -->
4873:OwenBlacker
4805:LGBTQ : -->
4610:Well put, @
4594:OwenBlacker
4431:transgender
4427:bisexuality
4297:to include
4259:OwenBlacker
4248:LGBT+ : -->
4247:LGBTQ : -->
3924:Given that
3845:Dimensional
3838:LGBTQ : -->
3836:LGBT+ : -->
3797:LGBT+ : -->
3749:LGBT+ : -->
3748:LGBTQ : -->
3677:LGBT+ : -->
3676:LGBTQ : -->
3589:LGBTQ : -->
3569:LGBTQ : -->
3567:LGBT+ : -->
3528:OwenBlacker
3329:the other.
3308:LGBT+ : -->
3223:LGBT+ : -->
3222:LGBTQ : -->
2967:direct move
2959:current log
2930:Please use
2537:Doug Weller
2362:LGBT People
1530:WP:SNOWBALL
1495:WP:SNOWBALL
1417:, or visit
1350:LGBT people
1346:LGBT topics
1275:Wiki99/LGBT
1056:edit to see
959:edit to see
948:edit to see
937:edit to see
912:edit to see
887:edit to see
868:Collaborate
862:edit to see
815:To-do list:
783:WikiProject
130:Skip to TOC
26:WikiProject
6664:Categories
6222:Lewisguile
6208:Lewisguile
5799:Spinixster
5711:patrolling
5591:Dilettante
5330:Talk:LGBTQ
5324:Notifying
5077:I support
4994:LGBT : -->
4973:Lewisguile
4867:two-spirit
4838:CaptainEek
4807:LGBT : -->
4689:Maplestrip
4616:Lewisguile
4215:ViolanteMD
4140:ViolanteMD
3956:Lewisguile
3803:Un assiolo
3796:LGBT : -->
3754:Lewisguile
3614:argument.)
3588:LGBT : -->
3574:lizthegrey
3522:Dyke March
3487:Lewisguile
3309:LGBT : -->
2994:discussion
2963:target log
2839:Polygnotus
2835:Răzvan Ion
2636:Regarding
2596:Lewisguile
2569:ViolanteMD
2386:is inside
2309:Lewisguile
2246:Lewisguile
1875:snowballed
1764:ViolanteMD
1720:ViolanteMD
1650:ViolanteMD
1620:Talk:LGBTQ
1310:Portuguese
1206:To-do list
1068:Riot grrrl
943:Notability
719:discussion
252:WT:LGBTQIA
6647:(she/her)
6324:Template
6200:community
6196:community
5916:Thanks !
5647:Folly Mox
5303:Aaron Liu
5235:Talk:LGBT
5145:Aaron Liu
5129:embraced.
5121:embraced.
5005:. As per
4923:Aaron Liu
4877:(he/him;
4852:Aaron Liu
4598:(he/him;
4263:(he/him;
4219:WP:EXPERT
4172:Funcrunch
3905:LGBT: -->
3866:LGBT: -->
3726:countless
3532:(he/him;
3346:Aaron Liu
3343:I agree!
3152:this page
3140:WP:CONSUB
3050:canvassed
3044:canvassed
3003:consensus
2950:directly.
2586:category.
2395:WP:BLPCAT
2358:WP:BLPCAT
2143:WP:CONSUB
1840:WP:PTOPIC
1616:WP:CONSUB
1538:WP:CONSUB
1314:Ukrainian
1037:Translate
223:Shortcuts
215:if needed
198:Be polite
153:talk page
103:Resources
6598:cyberdog
6458:jlwoodwa
6275:Mathglot
6190:I think
6159:wp:2DABS
6072:contribs
5870:, while
5748:Aszx5000
5715:Aszx5000
5567:Dicklyon
5480:Valereee
5447:Valereee
5407:Valereee
5279:agnostic
5219:contribs
4939:Mintopop
4908:Mintopop
4144:Valereee
3734:★Trekker
3444:history.
3257:+1 to Q+
3199:Valereee
3184:𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝
3082:username
3076:{{subst:
3070:username
3064:{{subst:
3054:username
3048:{{subst:
3038:username
3032:{{subst:
2919:succinct
1894:WP:MRNOT
1302:Japanese
882:Copyedit
781:. This
267:Archives
238:WT:LGBTQ
183:get help
117:Showcase
6542:ASUKITE
6508:Raladic
6408:MikutoH
6351:Raladic
6173:MikutoH
6090:Trystan
5960:Trystan
5512:Raladic
5465:Trystan
5433:Raladic
5403:Raladic
5387:Raladic
5359:Raladic
5326:WP:CENT
5288:Raladic
5007:Raladic
4997:as per
4795:Shalott
4733:Raladic
4612:Raladic
4580:Raladic
4566:Raladic
4530:othered
4423:lesbian
4419:gay men
4363:Useight
4344:Trystan
4340:WT:LGBT
4336:WP:CENT
4314:Raladic
4277:WP:CENT
3938:Trystan
3892:Trystan
3874:queer.
3821:Raladic
3787:they/it
3705:Raladic
3598:against
3380:sense."
3242:Raladic
3046:users:
2907:subpage
2759:WP:BOLD
2669:Raladic
2214:Raladic
2157:Raladic
2131:WP:BOLD
1902:Raladic
1825:Liliana
1584:Raladic
1553:Raladic
1458:Raladic
1402:popular
1326:Chinese
1322:Swedish
1318:Russian
1298:Italian
1290:Spanish
1282:Catalan
1239:refresh
1227:history
965:Orphans
918:Infobox
857:Cleanup
596:30 days
231:WT:LGBT
89:Editing
6250:Zblace
6226:Zblace
6204:people
6192:people
6137:Zblace
6055:, and
5680:pages
5536:Ahecht
5373:Nardog
5060:Ahecht
4894:LGBTQ+
4777:LGBTQ+
4714:(talk)
4665:, and
4649:right?
4584:LGBTQ+
4496:(talk)
4429:, and
3888:LGBTQ+
3876:Mach61
3867:+: -->
3862:Q: -->
3853:(talk)
3848:Fusion
3767:LGBTQ+
3600:them.
3215:!Votes
3182:This.
2956:Links:
2831:Gay 45
2825:Gay 45
2806:(talk)
2364:, per
1762:late!
1602:(talk)
1485:(talk)
1472:Oppose
1306:Polish
1294:French
1286:German
1062:Verify
1051:Update
907:Expand
839:Assess
645:scale.
245:WT:GAY
5935:as a
5668:pages
5347:admin
5343:LGBTQ
5282:rise.
5125:slur.
5046:LGBTQ
4995:LGBT+
4898:Queer
4832:Queer
4808:LGBT+
4675:queer
4588:Queer
4525:Queer
4510:ngram
4472:queer
4454:LGBTQ
4445:queer
4439:queer
4435:LGBTQ
4409:queer
4386:Queer
4206:nteMD
4201:Viola
4104:nteMD
4099:Viola
4079:you).
4070:nteMD
4065:Viola
4040:nteMD
4035:Viola
4010:nteMD
4005:Viola
3934:queer
3916:nteMD
3911:Viola
3906:LGBT+
3884:LGBTQ
3865:: -->
3864:: -->
3863:: -->
3817:LGBTQ
3643:these
3590:LGBT+
3507:nteMD
3502:Viola
3473:nteMD
3468:Viola
3311:LGBTQ
3285:queer
3278:queer
3265:NLGJA
3136:LGBTQ
3024:Note:
2938:. Do
2923:civil
2725:nteMD
2720:Viola
2690:nteMD
2685:Viola
2628:nteMD
2623:Viola
2557:nteMD
2552:Viola
2518:nteMD
2513:Viola
2466:(the
2454:nteMD
2449:Viola
2414:queer
2348:nteMD
2343:Viola
2297:straw
2293:queer
2273:nteMD
2268:Viola
2235:nteMD
2230:Viola
2178:nteMD
2173:Viola
2135:LGBTQ
1856:LGBTQ
1614:(per
1612:LGBTQ
1545:LGBTQ
1447:LGBTQ
1435:LGBTQ
1404:, or
1398:vital
1324:, or
1233:watch
1023:Stubs
1010:Split
996:Photo
932:Merge
711:LGBTQ
637:This
272:Index
211:Seek
6652:talk
6628:talk
6592:here
6565:talk
6512:talk
6478:talk
6462:talk
6377:talk
6355:talk
6312:talk
6308:Léna
6279:talk
6254:talk
6242:Léna
6230:talk
6212:talk
6167:here
6141:talk
6122:talk
6108:talk
6104:Léna
6094:talk
6068:talk
5978:talk
5964:talk
5954:and
5943:and
5922:talk
5918:Léna
5851:and
5766:talk
5752:talk
5738:talk
5734:JATG
5719:talk
5694:talk
5686:here
5684:and
5682:here
5676:and
5664:and
5651:talk
5614:Done
5599:talk
5595:Vipz
5571:talk
5543:PAGE
5541:TALK
5516:talk
5484:talk
5469:talk
5451:talk
5437:talk
5411:talk
5391:talk
5377:talk
5363:talk
5328:and
5308:talk
5292:talk
5248:See
5215:talk
5202:talk
5186:and
5175:etc.
5150:talk
5094:chat
5067:PAGE
5065:TALK
5052:and
5048:per
5037:talk
5029:LGBT
4977:talk
4961:LGBT
4951:The
4943:talk
4928:talk
4912:talk
4879:Talk
4857:talk
4821:talk
4787:Lady
4758:talk
4737:talk
4620:talk
4600:Talk
4570:talk
4470:) →
4437:and
4367:talk
4359:LGBT
4348:talk
4318:talk
4265:Talk
4249:LGBT
4190:talk
4176:talk
4148:talk
4126:talk
4088:talk
4054:talk
4024:talk
3994:talk
3960:talk
3942:talk
3896:talk
3872:just
3839:LGBT
3825:talk
3807:talk
3783:talk
3758:talk
3750:LGBT
3738:talk
3722:Keep
3709:talk
3687:talk
3678:LGBT
3651:talk
3622:talk
3578:talk
3570:LGBT
3550:talk
3534:Talk
3518:Dyke
3491:talk
3482:Crip
3420:talk
3405:talk
3390:talk
3351:talk
3335:talk
3246:talk
3224:LGBT
3203:talk
3170:talk
3148:SNOW
3132:LGBT
3128:move
2942:use
2921:and
2843:talk
2833:and
2829:The
2771:talk
2673:talk
2663:and
2644:and
2600:talk
2541:talk
2428:s? –
2424:and
2403:talk
2313:talk
2250:talk
2218:talk
2161:talk
2137:per
2118:talk
2110:some
1906:talk
1860:LGBT
1858:(vs
1800:talk
1768:talk
1746:talk
1724:talk
1701:feel
1654:talk
1557:talk
1462:talk
1394:core
1348:and
1221:edit
1208:for
1078:see
1042:see
1028:see
1001:see
954:NPOV
923:see
898:see
873:see
848:and
844:see
200:and
61:Talk
47:Home
6603:958
6248:.
5272:Q).
4896:or
4466:or
4287:\\
3886:or
3779:F4U
3730:one
3287:. –
3134:to
3078:csp
3074:or
3066:csm
3034:spa
3008:not
2940:not
2898:bot
2884:to
2880:be
2481:are
2473:Bar
2303:or
2100:to
2091:to
2082:to
2073:to
2064:to
2055:to
2046:to
2037:to
2028:to
2019:to
2010:to
2001:to
1992:to
1983:to
1974:to
1965:to
1956:to
1947:to
1938:to
1929:to
1920:to
1828:UwU
1622:or
6666::
6654:)
6630:)
6567:)
6514:)
6480:)
6464:)
6379:)
6357:)
6332:}}
6326:{{
6314:)
6281:)
6256:)
6232:)
6214:)
6153:I
6143:)
6124:)
6110:)
6096:)
6074:)
6070:/
6051:,
5980:)
5966:)
5924:)
5855:.
5768:)
5754:)
5740:)
5721:)
5696:)
5653:)
5601:)
5573:)
5534:--
5518:)
5486:)
5471:)
5453:)
5439:)
5413:)
5393:)
5379:)
5365:)
5310:)
5294:)
5217:•
5209:—
5204:)
5171:,
5167:,
5152:)
5097:)
5058:--
5039:)
5019:)
5017:💬
5015:(
4979:)
4971:.
4945:)
4930:)
4914:)
4859:)
4823:)
4791:of
4781:2S
4760:)
4739:)
4661:,
4657:,
4622:)
4614:.
4572:)
4541:,
4482:".
4456:→
4447:→
4425:,
4421:,
4369:)
4350:)
4320:)
4192:)
4178:)
4150:)
4128:)
4090:)
4056:)
4026:)
3996:)
3962:)
3944:)
3898:)
3827:)
3809:)
3789:)
3785:•
3760:)
3740:)
3711:)
3689:)
3681::
3653:)
3624:)
3616:-
3580:)
3552:)
3524:—
3493:)
3422:)
3407:)
3392:)
3353:)
3337:)
3299:)
3297:📝
3295:•
3293:💬
3269:AP
3248:)
3205:)
3190:)
3172:)
3096:→
3084:}}
3072:}}
3062::
3056:}}
3040:}}
3030::
2965:•
2961:•
2948:}}
2944:{{
2936:}}
2932:{{
2925:.
2895:A
2845:)
2773:)
2675:)
2602:)
2495:)
2493:📝
2491:•
2489:💬
2477:be
2440:)
2438:📝
2436:•
2434:💬
2405:)
2315:)
2299:,
2252:)
2220:)
2163:)
2120:)
1908:)
1820:.
1802:)
1770:)
1748:)
1726:)
1693:)
1691:📝
1689:•
1687:💬
1666:.
1656:)
1638:)
1636:📝
1634:•
1632:💬
1559:)
1513:)
1511:📝
1509:•
1507:💬
1464:)
1400:,
1396:,
1320:,
1316:,
1312:,
1308:,
1304:,
1300:,
1296:,
1292:,
1288:,
1284:,
987:·
983:·
979:·
973:·
594::
588:79
586:,
584:78
582:,
580:77
578:,
576:76
574:,
572:75
570:,
568:74
566:,
564:73
562:,
560:72
558:,
556:71
554:,
552:70
550:,
548:69
546:,
544:68
542:,
540:67
538:,
536:66
534:,
532:65
530:,
528:64
526:,
524:63
522:,
520:62
518:,
516:61
514:,
512:60
510:,
508:59
506:,
504:58
502:,
500:57
498:,
496:56
494:,
492:55
490:,
488:54
486:,
484:53
482:,
480:52
478:,
476:51
474:,
472:50
470:,
468:49
466:,
464:48
462:,
460:47
458:,
456:46
454:,
452:45
450:,
448:44
446:,
444:43
442:,
440:42
438:,
436:41
434:,
432:40
430:,
428:39
426:,
424:38
422:,
420:37
418:,
416:36
414:,
412:35
410:,
408:34
406:,
404:33
402:,
400:32
398:,
396:31
394:,
392:30
390:,
388:29
386:,
384:28
382:,
380:27
378:,
376:26
374:,
372:25
370:,
368:24
366:,
364:23
362:,
360:22
358:,
356:21
354:,
352:20
350:,
348:19
346:,
344:18
342:,
340:17
338:,
336:16
334:,
332:15
330:,
328:14
326:,
324:13
322:,
320:12
318:,
316:11
314:,
312:10
310:,
306:,
302:,
298:,
294:,
290:,
286:,
282:,
278:,
274:,
181:;
6650:(
6626:(
6563:(
6510:(
6476:(
6460:(
6420:"
6375:(
6353:(
6310:(
6298:/
6294:/
6277:(
6269:(
6252:(
6240:@
6228:(
6210:(
6139:(
6130:@
6120:(
6106:(
6092:(
6066:(
5976:(
5962:(
5920:(
5764:(
5750:(
5736:(
5717:(
5692:(
5649:(
5597:(
5589:@
5569:(
5546:)
5538:(
5514:(
5482:(
5467:(
5449:(
5435:(
5409:(
5401:@
5389:(
5375:(
5361:(
5306:(
5290:(
5213:(
5200:(
5148:(
5091:(
5070:)
5062:(
5035:(
4975:(
4969:Q
4965:+
4957:B
4953:T
4941:(
4926:(
4910:(
4903:+
4881:)
4855:(
4842:⚓
4819:(
4756:(
4735:(
4691::
4687:@
4618:(
4602:)
4568:(
4560:.
4365:(
4346:(
4316:(
4267:)
4188:(
4174:(
4146:(
4134:@
4124:(
4086:(
4052:(
4022:(
3992:(
3958:(
3940:(
3894:(
3823:(
3805:(
3781:(
3756:(
3736:(
3707:(
3685:(
3649:(
3620:(
3602:(
3576:(
3548:(
3536:)
3489:(
3418:(
3403:(
3388:(
3349:(
3333:(
3291:(
3244:(
3201:(
3186:(
3178:@
3168:(
3122:.
3086:.
3080:|
3068:|
3052:|
3036:|
2890:.
2841:(
2769:(
2671:(
2598:(
2567:@
2487:(
2432:(
2401:(
2390:)
2311:(
2285:.
2248:(
2216:(
2194:.
2159:(
2116:(
1904:(
1798:(
1766:(
1744:(
1722:(
1685:(
1652:(
1630:(
1586::
1582:@
1578::
1574:@
1555:(
1536:(
1505:(
1501:–
1460:(
1386:.
1370:.
1352:.
1336:.
1328:.
1242:·
1236:·
1230:·
1224:·
1217::
1076::
1065::
1054::
1040::
1026::
1013::
999::
968::
957::
946::
935::
921::
910::
896::
885::
871::
860::
842::
721:.
651::
308:9
304:8
300:7
296:6
292:5
288:4
284:3
280:2
276:1
269::
185:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
