112:
of how it works took me deep into the bowels of the foreign-language
Internet. I think Knowledge could be a great place to put this information in a standardized form (i.e., the cone-valve chest, the slider chest, and the pitman chest all explained in the same place, using the same terminology, with the same sort of diagrams). This would allow for easy comparison of designs and would make it easy for organ instructors to educate their students (my own professors asked me to forward them a link to the information on the cone-valve chest!).
65:
930:
overtones both. Ophecleide is starting to make a comeback in organ building, but it was primarily a turn-of-the-century (1900) "Can You Top This?" device. It required an enormous organ and an enormous room to absorb it's tone in balance to the rest of the instrument. While what I have written applies to both 16' and 32' pitches of these stops, it is primarily about the 32' pitch stops. My apologoies if I posted this in the wrong place, and again - thanks for asking!
583:
1010:
1397:
1315:
1147:
773:
714:
1265:
1199:
123:. Please provide feedback! They're still missing some types of windchests and key actions with which I'm not familiar enough to describe. I think one necessary addition would be schematics, preferably drawn on a bias so you can see how all the parts interconnect in three dimensions. I myself couldn't do that, though I could probably throw together a head-on schematic of a windchest.
360:
organ related articles currently tagged. I can't see what harm assessing them will do. Regarding it being a collaboration; indeed, that's the whole point, but someone's have to start (again) somewhere, and hopefully more people will join in. Anyhow, now I have listed some areas that could use some attention, and I hope others will chime in. Kind regards,
530:
consisting of two unequal halves that both feature the same two basic musical ideas, an imitative dotted-rhythm tune, and a leaping eighth-note form, which is also in imitation, initiated by the pedals." It might be helpful if a few measures of musical notation were included as an illustration of this. Ger Tzedek (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
549:
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on
Knowledge struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for
529:
I want to suggest that some illustration of musical notation be included in the articles on classical music. For example, in the
Analysis section of the article on Bach's "Fantasia and Fugue in C minor, BWV 537" there is a sentence that reads, "The fantasia of the piece is quite lush and very ornate,
489:
Now there's an idea! I used to subscribe to an old mailing list called pipeorg-l. That's an ell, not a one. Looks like it's still extant. Ha ha, my name is still up there, but I no longer receive mailings. From what I remember of the group, there are quite a few people who would probably respond to a
359:
Hence why I listed the assessments last after suggestions for improvements/additions of articles. I agree 100% with you that the articles are the most important by far, but I disagree that we (I for now) should refrain from assessing/categorizing altogether - after all there are "only" about 800 pipe
279:
article itself is in pretty good condition thanks in large part to the work by members of this project. It's still not a FA, but it's a GA which is fine. However, there are still many other pipe organ related articles that could be significantly improved, and articles to be created. Just on top of my
111:
As I've been studying over the last several months, I found it very difficult to locate information on two specific areas: windchest design and key action design. Windchest design information is particularly elusive; my search for a schematic of the cone-valve chest and an understandable explanation
240:
and will, per your advice, advertise on the Music project as well. Regarding the tagging of articles, I find it helps getting an overview of the project as well as discovering new articles to include and improve, but of course you are right that improving articles themselves is what really matters.
684:
and looking at it I have seen discussion on the merit or level of focus on Peter
Williams on the page. I still see quite a few references in there and I was hoping to get some opinions from this project on whether or not that's excessive or would be considered more balanced? Please reply on the GA
398:
I have written to all participants of the project (except those that have not been active on
Knowledge for years) letting them know of the revival attempt. I haven't contacted others though. By the way, regarding assessments, I will stop assessing any more articles for now until more members have
1294:
is a bit problematic. It’s badly under-sourced and is continually growing with organ scholars adding themselves etc.. Personally I think each cathedral article should include a list of organists instead as that would be easier to source and maintain (some already do) but it doesn’t look like this
399:
chimed in, and if there is a general consensus not to assess, needless to say I will respect that. I will, however, of course continue to add more relevant articles to the project when I come by them, by tagging their talk page, but I will refrain from assessing quality/importance. Kind regards,
598:
is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating
929:
I am a lifelong organist and organ scholar. The edit is correct as I wrote it (and thank you for keeping it in good faith). Bombarde is much fundamental, and some overtones. Posaune is some fundamental, and much overtones. Ophecleide is voiced to bring out the maximum fundamental and train of
1295:
list is going anywhere so it needs some work. What do we think about removing all the organ scholars? Sources are often unavailable for them so when correctly sourced we’d only ever have a partial list of scholars, and they’re invariably not notable upon appointment. --
340:
It's important to remember that WikiProjects are collaborations — you need to work with other people. I'd advise you not to start any categorization that you can't finish — or indeed assessments. Don't build sandcastles in the air! Best regards.
1036:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
320:
Finally, in order to get an overview of the project I have set up the assessment-system, which provides a nice overview of all pipe organ related articles. Since the template was deactivated it still doesn't list all articles that has been
550:
the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please
202:
I have now created the assessment-system (setting up categories, templates, etc.). I haven't tried that before, but it seems to work - though there may be something missing still. Please help assessing Pipe organ related articles, thanks.
217:
I'd strongly recommend (1) advertising (on the Music project etc.) and (2) working on articles instead of the bureaucratic stuff (assessments, talk page marking etc.) until you have at least half a dozen collaborators. Hope this helps.
823:
1060:
on the
Netherlands Knowledge since 2010, there has been no article here on the English-language Knowledge. I drafted one a few weeks ago but this has been declined on notability grounds. The article now sits in the draft area:
884:
My impression was that the
Bombarde usually has less fundamental tone and more upper harmonics than the Posaune (as other French reed stops generally have more overtones than English/German reeds); however on both
504:
Good idea. I used to subscribe to that list too, but am no longer active and thus cannot post. If any active members of that list reads this it would be great if you would post to the list about this project.
1117:
Fred Swann's bio was promoted to Good
Article on December 29, 2020, and will be highlighted in the "Did You Know?" feature on the Main Page tonight, beginning at 7 pm Eastern Time (00:00 20 January UTC).
290:
Speaking of pipe organ articles, the category only lists 59. Certainly there are many more notable pipe organs that could have an article for themselves, or a larger mention on the church/venue-article.
635:
874:
653:
1040:
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page.
956:, concerning the organ in the church there. Could someone have a look, please, because although I thought it worthy of mention, I don't really know what I am talking about here. Thanks --
283:
I have started a mini-project to add and/or improve specifications to articles about specific pipe organs or articles about a venue containing a notable organ. See for example
675:
135:
161:
1046:
700:
603:! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
436:
413:
That's good. I've made a new section for former and inactive members and moved some of the people no longer on WP to there. Another project worth contacting would be
167:
Hopefully this project can be brought back to life, but if it hasn't within a couple of months then I would support making a taskforce under WP Musical
Instruments.
1238:
670:
911:
1173:
1301:
965:
740:
120:
116:
1138:
284:
237:
941:
187:
I will try to revive this project, but of course I can't do it alone. Please join me in the effort to bring WikiProject PipeOrgan back to life! Kind regards,
705:
999:
879:
17:
1341:
799:
1033:
1017:
1001:
1255:
572:
947:
919:
531:
1219:
448:
430:
408:
393:
369:
354:
250:
231:
176:
130:
1459:
1227:
1132:
629:
1423:
1286:
1108:
514:
212:
82:
78:
499:
480:
1471:
1458:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
1306:
764:
1280:
648:
544:
376:
1374:
and just wanted to make sure I got all the organ jargon correct. Please tell me if I explained or used organ terminologies wrong. Thanks,
465:
Better still, can anyone attract organ enthusiasts into becoming WPians? Perhaps emails to local organ societies in anglophone countries?
1447:
562:(Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.)
1388:
1077:
624:
994:
1022:
145:
137:
1166:
539:
1291:
733:
271:
what I had in mind with this "revival" attempt, so I'm going to post my ideas here. Feel free to add your own input and ideas.
1082:
681:
334:
861:
592:
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that
196:
1412:
898:
658:
610:
106:
792:
1383:
1334:
1462:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
1416:
310:
1415:. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion
1333:. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion
1165:. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion
791:. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion
732:. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion
577:
953:
552:
1246:
which may come within the scope of this WikiProject. Any input you could give would be gratefully received.
644:
115:
So, with all this in mind, I have written up two draft articles that I have placed in the project sandbox:
985:
describes him as "a leading participant in the revival of the classical organ tradition in North
America."
556:
and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my
268:
666:
1404:
1322:
1154:
1026:
970:
780:
721:
1439:
1357:
1189:
937:
815:
756:
609:
To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to
297:
43:
1162:
1073:
890:
600:
594:
582:
1051:
961:
844:
524:
435:
Thanks! I've posted on the WP Classical Music talk page, and the "revival" is not mentioned on
651:. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
36:
1042:
886:
662:
313:- A lot of important organ works are missing. There are for example no articles about any of
95:
1371:
1158:
1139:
1062:
952:
Hi organ-lovers, A couple of months ago I added a bit to the article on Esquelbecq and its
535:
293:
50:
8:
1379:
1296:
990:
933:
894:
729:
725:
706:
424:
387:
348:
225:
155:
127:
851:. This would change the current consensus that there should be no primary topic between
1069:
260:
28:
901:) to say the reverse. Was wondering if anyone could give some clarification on this. -
1229:
978:
971:
957:
870:
903:
693:
599:
easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested,
510:
495:
444:
404:
365:
330:
246:
208:
192:
182:
172:
1467:
1083:
852:
840:
825:
620:
568:
557:
474:
304:
314:
1375:
1276:
1251:
1243:
986:
419:
382:
343:
287:. Many articles are missing specifications, or they are not properly formatted.
220:
150:
144:
This project sees relatively little activity. Should it become a taskforce of
91:
1433:
1420:
1408:
1389:
1365:
1351:
1338:
1183:
1170:
1091:
856:
833:
809:
796:
750:
737:
64:
1326:
1307:
1210:
1123:
1099:
866:
788:
784:
765:
414:
613:. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
686:
506:
491:
440:
400:
361:
326:
265:
242:
204:
188:
168:
639:, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for
236:
Thanks for the advice. I have already advertised the revival-attempt on
97:
1463:
1455:
1449:
616:
564:
467:
276:
1330:
1272:
1247:
93:
1068:
Would anyone else care to chip in to get it over the finish line?
374:
Have you contacted any music editors? Have you contacted the past
307:
are nothing more than a stub, and there are many others like that.
1370:
Hello everyone! I wrote an article about an organ builder named
1396:
1314:
1146:
772:
713:
98:
848:
829:
1057:
437:
Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost/2012-01-02/WikiProject report
1090:
Hello, I've done more work on this article and have just
1430:
To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude
1348:
To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude
1180:
To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude
806:
To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude
747:
To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude
676:
GA nomination of Toccata and Fugue in D minor, BWV 565
238:
Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost/Newsroom/WikiProject desk
380:? Updating the participants list would be helpful. --
1021:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
58:
1034:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Pipe organ
126:Anyway, please leave any and all thoughts below! —
680:Greetings, I am doing the Good Article review of
300:. The list needs to be significantly extended.
649:Category:Culture of Atlantic City, New Jersey
880:Tonal characteristics of Posaune vs Bombarde
1015:A discussion is taking place as to whether
146:Knowledge:WikiProject Musical Instruments
977:Hello. I have just created a stub about
636:Category:Boardwalk Hall Auditorium Organ
630:Category:Boardwalk Hall Auditorium Organ
1292:List of musicians at English cathedrals
1287:List of musicians at English cathedrals
14:
859:. Feel free to join the discussion at
682:Toccata and Fugue in D minor, BWV 565
545:Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject PipeOrgan
1413:Samuel Wesley (composer, born 1766)
1023:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
296:is very small, not to speak of the
24:
1407:discussion has been initiated for
1395:
1325:discussion has been initiated for
1313:
1157:discussion has been initiated for
1145:
783:discussion has been initiated for
771:
724:discussion has been initiated for
712:
611:Knowledge:WikiProject X/Newsletter
581:
136:Should this become a taskforce of
25:
1482:
1263:
1197:
1056:Although Nicholas Danby has had
1008:
63:
948:"Mesotonic" organ at Esquelbecq
311:Category:Compositions for organ
1448:Good article reassessment for
1032:The page will be discussed at
800:13:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
13:
1:
1384:11:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
1256:13:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
995:07:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
966:07:38, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
671:04:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
431:02:52, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
409:13:31, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
394:13:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
370:13:20, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
355:13:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
335:11:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
251:12:20, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
232:00:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
213:15:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
197:14:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
177:13:32, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
1342:10:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
1281:16:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
1244:Entertainment Reference Desk
1220:17:18, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
1174:05:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
1133:14:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
875:17:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
839:There is a proposal to make
645:Category:Music of New Jersey
625:16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
540:21:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
7:
942:03:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
922:07:54, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
912:20:27, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
573:22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
560:. Thank you for your time!
515:14:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
500:19:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
481:11:53, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
449:10:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
10:
1487:
1302:14:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
1261:
893:, the page was edited (by
741:22:15, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
107:Windchests and key actions
26:
1472:13:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1392:listed at Requested moves
1310:listed at Requested moves
1142:listed at Requested moves
1078:15:25, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
768:listed at Requested moves
709:listed at Requested moves
701:21:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
659:Categories for discussion
1424:09:30, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
1109:15:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
1047:23:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
1025:or whether it should be
981:, whose obituary in the
685:review page. Thank you.
553:review the proposal here
298:List of pipe organ stops
162:01:48, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
131:18:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
1242:has been raised at the
1163:T. Frederick H. Candlyn
891:Ophicleide (organ stop)
1400:
1318:
1150:
824:2017 proposal to make
776:
717:
586:
578:WikiProject X is live!
1442:for this WikiProject.
1399:
1360:for this WikiProject.
1317:
1228:Potentially relevant
1192:for this WikiProject.
1149:
920:User talk:Sonicwave32
918:Response copied from
887:Bombarde (organ stop)
828:the primary topic of
818:for this WikiProject.
775:
759:for this WikiProject.
716:
585:
1372:Charles Brenton Fisk
1159:T. Frederick Candlyn
1140:T. Frederick Candlyn
1063:Draft:Nicholas Danby
862:Talk:Organ (anatomy)
654:the category's entry
294:Category:Organ stops
285:Category:Pipe_organs
1094:as a Good Article.
730:Notre-Dame de Paris
726:Notre Dame de Paris
707:Notre Dame de Paris
138:Musical Instruments
1401:
1319:
1299:
1151:
777:
718:
587:
121:/Windchest designs
117:/Organ key actions
1460:reassessment page
1443:
1361:
1297:
1216:
1193:
1129:
1105:
1018:Portal:Pipe organ
1002:Portal:Pipe organ
979:Robert N. Cavarra
972:Robert N. Cavarra
923:
909:
819:
760:
661:page. Thank you.
563:
303:Articles such as
104:
103:
16:(Redirected from
1478:
1437:
1436:|deny=RMCD bot}}
1429:
1355:
1354:|deny=RMCD bot}}
1347:
1271:(a while back!)
1267:
1266:
1215:
1213:
1208:
1205:
1201:
1200:
1187:
1186:|deny=RMCD bot}}
1179:
1128:
1126:
1121:
1104:
1102:
1097:
1045:
1012:
1011:
917:
908:
906:
813:
812:|deny=RMCD bot}}
805:
754:
753:|deny=RMCD bot}}
746:
698:
690:
663:RevelationDirect
589:Hello everyone!
561:
479:
477:
472:
427:
422:
390:
385:
351:
346:
228:
223:
158:
153:
99:
67:
59:
53:
46:
39:
21:
1486:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1453:
1431:
1411:to be moved to
1394:
1368:
1349:
1329:to be moved to
1312:
1289:
1270:
1269:
1264:
1234:
1211:
1209:
1198:
1196:
1181:
1161:to be moved to
1144:
1124:
1122:
1100:
1098:
1088:
1084:Frederick Swann
1054:
1041:
1013:
1009:
1006:
975:
950:
904:
882:
853:Organ (anatomy)
841:Organ (anatomy)
837:
826:Organ (anatomy)
807:
787:to be moved to
770:
748:
728:to be moved to
711:
694:
688:
678:
632:
580:
547:
527:
475:
468:
466:
425:
420:
415:Classical music
388:
383:
349:
344:
317:'s organ works!
305:Symphonic organ
263:
226:
221:
185:
156:
151:
142:
109:
100:
94:
72:
57:
56:
49:
42:
35:
31:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1484:
1452:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1440:Article alerts
1405:requested move
1393:
1387:
1367:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1358:Article alerts
1323:requested move
1311:
1305:
1298:Pontificalibus
1288:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1262:
1233:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1190:Article alerts
1155:requested move
1143:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1087:
1086:— Good Article
1081:
1053:
1052:Nicholas Danby
1050:
1007:
1005:
1000:Nomination of
998:
974:
969:
949:
946:
945:
944:
934:Melos Antropon
931:
927:
926:Hi Sonic Wave:
924:
895:Melos Antropon
881:
878:
836:
822:
821:
820:
816:Article alerts
781:requested move
769:
763:
762:
761:
757:Article alerts
722:requested move
710:
704:
677:
674:
641:dual upmerging
631:
628:
579:
576:
546:
543:
526:
525:Music notation
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
490:call to arms.-
484:
483:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
325:Kind regards,
323:
322:
318:
308:
301:
291:
288:
281:
262:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
184:
181:
180:
179:
141:
134:
128:Cor anglais 16
108:
105:
102:
101:
96:
92:
90:
87:
86:
74:
73:
68:
62:
55:
54:
47:
40:
32:
27:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1483:
1474:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1451:
1441:
1435:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1409:Samuel Wesley
1406:
1398:
1391:
1390:Samuel Wesley
1386:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1359:
1353:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1316:
1309:
1304:
1303:
1300:
1293:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1240:
1231:
1221:
1218:
1217:
1214:
1204:
1195:
1194:
1191:
1185:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1148:
1141:
1134:
1131:
1130:
1127:
1116:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1106:
1103:
1093:
1085:
1080:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1070:Feline Hymnic
1066:
1064:
1059:
1049:
1048:
1044:
1043:North America
1038:
1035:
1030:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1019:
1003:
997:
996:
992:
988:
984:
980:
973:
968:
967:
963:
959:
955:
943:
939:
935:
932:
928:
925:
921:
916:
915:
914:
913:
910:
907:
900:
899:50.108.18.122
896:
892:
888:
877:
876:
872:
868:
864:
863:
858:
857:Organ (music)
854:
850:
846:
845:primary topic
842:
835:
834:Organ (music)
831:
827:
817:
811:
804:
803:
802:
801:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
774:
767:
758:
752:
745:
744:
743:
742:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
715:
708:
703:
702:
699:
697:
692:
691:
683:
673:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
655:
650:
646:
642:
638:
637:
627:
626:
622:
618:
614:
612:
608:
604:
602:
597:
596:
595:WikiProject X
590:
584:
575:
574:
570:
566:
559:
555:
554:
542:
541:
537:
533:
516:
512:
508:
503:
502:
501:
497:
493:
488:
487:
486:
485:
482:
478:
473:
471:
464:
463:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
433:
432:
429:
428:
423:
416:
412:
411:
410:
406:
402:
397:
396:
395:
392:
391:
386:
379:
378:
373:
372:
371:
367:
363:
358:
357:
356:
353:
352:
347:
339:
338:
337:
336:
332:
328:
319:
316:
312:
309:
306:
302:
299:
295:
292:
289:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:
272:
270:
267:
252:
248:
244:
239:
235:
234:
233:
230:
229:
224:
216:
215:
214:
210:
206:
201:
200:
199:
198:
194:
190:
178:
174:
170:
166:
165:
164:
163:
160:
159:
154:
148:? Regards. --
147:
139:
133:
132:
129:
124:
122:
118:
113:
89:
88:
85:
84:
80:
76:
75:
71:
66:
61:
60:
52:
48:
45:
41:
38:
34:
33:
30:
19:
1454:
1438:, or set up
1402:
1369:
1356:, or set up
1327:Edward Heath
1320:
1308:Edward Heath
1290:
1237:
1235:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1188:, or set up
1152:
1120:
1119:
1114:
1096:
1095:
1092:nominated it
1089:
1067:
1058:this article
1055:
1039:
1031:
1016:
1014:
1004:for deletion
982:
976:
958:Frans Fowler
951:
902:
883:
860:
838:
814:, or set up
789:Chapel Royal
785:Chapel royal
778:
766:Chapel royal
755:, or set up
719:
695:
687:
679:
652:
640:
634:
633:
615:
606:
605:
601:check us out
593:
591:
588:
551:
548:
528:
469:
418:
381:
377:participants
375:
342:
324:
315:César Franck
264:
219:
186:
149:
143:
125:
114:
110:
77:
69:
44:WT:PipeOrgan
983:Denver Post
266:User:W0lfie
1456:Pipe organ
1450:Pipe organ
1366:Fact-check
1239:A question
1230:WP:REFDESK
532:Ger Tzedek
277:Pipe organ
261:What to do
1376:Carpimaps
1331:Ted Heath
1212:JGHowes
1125:JGHowes
1101:JGHowes
987:Zigzig20s
954:Talk page
905:Sonicwave
558:talk page
29:Shortcuts
1421:RMCD bot
1339:RMCD bot
1268:Resolved
1236:Hi all.
1232:question
1203:Not done
1171:RMCD bot
797:RMCD bot
738:RMCD bot
269:asked me
183:Reviving
70:Archives
37:WT:ORGAN
1115:Update:
1027:deleted
867:Zzyzx11
657:on the
321:tagged.
507:Danmuz
492:W0lfie
476:(talk)
441:Danmuz
401:Danmuz
362:Danmuz
327:Danmuz
243:Danmuz
205:Danmuz
189:Danmuz
169:Danmuz
1464:Z1720
849:Organ
832:over
830:Organ
617:Harej
607:Note:
565:Harej
421:Klein
384:Klein
345:Klein
280:head:
222:Klein
152:Klein
51:WT:PO
1468:talk
1434:bots
1417:here
1380:talk
1352:bots
1335:here
1277:talk
1273:MIDI
1252:talk
1248:MIDI
1184:bots
1167:here
1074:talk
991:talk
962:talk
938:talk
897:and
889:and
871:talk
855:and
843:the
810:bots
793:here
751:bots
734:here
667:talk
647:and
621:talk
569:talk
536:talk
511:talk
496:talk
470:Tony
445:talk
426:zach
417:. --
405:talk
389:zach
366:talk
350:zach
331:talk
275:The
247:talk
227:zach
209:talk
193:talk
173:talk
157:zach
119:and
1419:. —
1337:. —
1169:. —
847:of
795:. —
736:. —
696:-US
689:MPJ
643:to
1470:)
1432:{{
1403:A
1382:)
1350:{{
1321:A
1279:)
1254:)
1182:{{
1153:A
1076:)
1065:.
1029:.
993:)
964:)
940:)
873:)
865:.
808:{{
779:A
749:{{
720:A
669:)
623:)
571:)
538:)
513:)
498:)
447:)
439:.
407:)
368:)
341:--
333:)
249:)
218:--
211:)
195:)
175:)
81:,
1466:(
1378:(
1275:(
1250:(
1072:(
989:(
960:(
936:(
869:(
665:(
619:(
567:(
534:(
509:(
494:(
443:(
403:(
364:(
329:(
245:(
207:(
191:(
171:(
140:?
83:2
79:1
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.