User talk:Jimbo Wales: Difference between revisions

3069:

would have been avoided. Since you raise the issue (somewhat passive-aggressively), I will oblige you with an explanation. When I stated that I was a new editor, that was indeed true. What's also true is that a week or so prior to my first edit as Minor4th, I had created another account -- and someone off wiki was able to identify the real person behind the handful of edits, presumably from information on the user page and the subject I was interested in editing. I have a particular need for anonymity that I will not go into. I abandoned that account and created this one. I have not used the other account since I created this one and don't intend to. My first edits with this account were on the Indian Child Welfare Act, a subject I'm interested in as a practitioner in the field. At the time GregJackP was in the middle of an overhaul of the article, and I offered to collaborate. As it turns out, we have similar interests. I don't know if GregJackP is also a lawyer, but he clearly has a strong interest in legal articles. I found him to be helpful and patient, and I have always found him to be thoughtful in his edits and articulate in his expression of his views. I have essentially followed him around wikipedia, and because of our similar interests we have sometimes edited in the same areas and on the same articles. Our participation on Don Martin and the related drama, however, was coincidental. I responded to an RfC posted on the legal/government/politics noticeboard about the Don Martin lawsuit, with no intention to hang around the article further. Regrettably, however, I was drawn into the drama by responding to various attacks by NineteenNightmares. And here we are today. As far as your comment on the quality of my edits and my proficiency on Knowledge....all I can say is thank you very much. Peace.

2705:

interesting read to parents today, indeed, one source suggests it has timeless observations. But today she can suffer a good faith AfD because we have no immediate reference points for pop culture of the 19th century available to us anymore. Radio dramas of the 1920s are old, but not yet so old, so some living persons can recall their notability, and probably have passed on their memories to children and grandchildren who might edit wikipedia in 2010. But Christine Terhune Herrick first made a splash way back in 1885, and though she remained well known for some time, those who would remember her rise to popularity are all long dead, and the memories passed on about her outside books are consequently weaker. I wonder, who was the Christine Terhune Herrick of 1650? Or 300 B.C.? These people existed and were notable at the time, but are long forgotten, and may be permanently lost if no historical record of them exists. But if there are sources, we can make that information available. People can find that knowledge and draw new parallels from the past to the present and to the future, insights we cannot foresee. That is the potential of wikipedia.</off naive soapbox: -->

4052:

worth- there is a well-recognized problem in Knowledge of Admins being rude, or at best curt, with their responses and many do not see a need to explain their decisions; when confronted with a "wrong" by another user other admins often come to their protection with "this is a non-issue, drop it" and inflict harsh incivility (one AN/I complaint against an admin even rose to the point of harrassment by other admins against the accuser to the point that some had to come back and apologize for their collective behavior and admit that behavior at AN/I by most of them was over the line even though they still agreed the original complaint was unfounded against the original admin), this is natural and happens in many facets of real life, those of a common position often have to protect each other in order to get others to protect them in the future (a quid pro quo if you will, its why a congressman from Albany, NY may vote for a pork project in a district in Sante Fe, NM, he can then reasonably expect a vote for his pork in return with no real discussions ever taking place, this is poli sci 101 stuff).

260::Actually, I hadn't seen it until just now! Thank you for showing it to me. My response is quite simple: the story is absolutely scandalously idiotic, and Jana Winter, the author, should be fired from her job. The story is idiotic nonsense from top to bottom. As in the statement from Sue Gardner, we have longstanding policies that deal with this very effectively, and there is zero evidence for any of the sensationalist and negative claims put forward about Knowledge. Much of what she writes is simply transparently idiotic: that some message board has hundreds of links to Knowledge ought to be no surprise, no matter what the content of the message board. That pedophiles think we are bigots for not allowing them to advocate here is no shocker, but neither is it evidence that we are a haven for pedophiles. Jana Winter is a disgrace to the professional of journalism, full stop, and I will complain about her at the highest levels possible. 2807:

did not agree with their arguments on the article we were AfDing, and the article was evetually scrapped. If you have the time, I would suggest you look through this scenario's entirety and you will discover the truth. I'd also say a quick look at the admin's User page should put your mind at ease if you are indeed putting any sort of substance behind these unfounded accusations. I'm afraid the admin will leave Wiki, and honestly even though the admin did not always agree with any one of us, the admin was fair minded and there were other admins involved as well. Responsibility for the ugliness of this thing does not in any way fall on this person, and in fact, the admin did whatever the admin could to try and guide the discussion and answer policy questions. When this group didn't like it, they would argue against the admin even to the point of making this ridiculous notification on

3907:

assocation) are baseless pipedreams designed to make him look like a victim and everyone who doesn't agree with him to be unreasonable cads. He and his group reported me for attacks when they could not silence my opposition to the piece in other ways, reported the admin who came in to "break it up," and has gone around with a general bent on harrassing anyone who doesn't agree with him. I questioned whether he was a sock (did not accuse) because his edits were nearly identical to all the later-discovered sock accounts that were created by the BLP subject himself. Talk about disengeneous! Also, I've refrained from answering all the charges leveled against me because it is a huge waste of time and I have better things to do. If we were involved in a dispute resolution, it would be easy, easy, easy to break down

4445:. It failed for those articles in that the level of vandalism was totally disproportionate to the one or two good edits that were accepted so editors were spending all their time reverting vandalism instead of accepting revisions. Likewise, it made it extremely difficult for established editors to make good edits. However, there are many articles on which it appears to be working or at least the benefits are, so far, outweighing the costs. "Stick to pending changes protection at all costs" is the wrong approach, but evaluating each on its merits as we're currently doing, seems the right approach to me. Clinging onto PC on articles where it's clearly not working is just daft, but it has the potential to bring great benefits by opening articles up while keeping vandalism out of the live version. 4228:

are simply too many bad apples among the admin corp and the occasional good apple that is simply pushed over the edge, that their attitude and actions drive away good editors. It is not the incivility of other editors, it is the incivility of admins and their abuse of power that is the main problem when it comes to civility. Can we please talk about what can/may be done to alleviate this problem? Unfortunately I know it wont go anywhere, we cant even get a consistent and impartial procedure to desysop, why would expect any action on something simple like telling admins to "be nice" or get sanctioned? Regular editors are consistently sanctioned and blocked for not being courteous, we are all completely equal, there is no lesser standard for admins.

4647:

we have longstanding policies that deal with this very effectively, and there is zero evidence for any of the sensationalist and negative claims put forward about Knowledge. Much of what she writes is simply transparently idiotic: that some message board has hundreds of links to Knowledge ought to be no surprise, no matter what the content of the message board. That pedophiles think we are bigots for not allowing them to advocate here is no shocker, but neither is it evidence that we are a haven for pedophiles. Jana Winter is a disgrace to the professional of journalism, full stop, and I will complain about her at the highest levels possible.

2666:

of to be given reviewer and rollback without asking for them. All I wanted to do was to make Wiki a better place, to write good articles in an area that had few, and to build an on-line encyclopedia. If this was a paid job, there isn't enough money to make me want to work in an environment where that type of admin can do that to people without being called on it. Wiki has a policy that "Administrators are expected to respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Knowledge-related conduct and administrator actions and to justify them when needed" yet she won't respond and not one admin will call her on it. Why should I put up with it?

3489:(ec)Did I? I didn't even pay attention if I did, because its not about me. The article was kept, because notable content always wins out in the long run, no matter who claims its not notable in a given AfD. (Uchitel was originally deleted and then subject to a super drama AfD six months ago. Then it came back, went to AfD again, and was kept. The sourcing kept improving as editors actually did constructive work on it.). If you are going to descend into battles over the the small number of AfDs that deal with potentially marginal BLPs, you need a thick skin. But even most marginal BLPs AFDs are not contentious.-- 3806:

doing that, every comment has been that it was the inappropriate place to take it, without looking at the underlying conduct or our concerns. It is also curious that of those commenting on the RfC, half of those saying to leave it alone and go away are from Australia (which seems like a high percentage to me, based on the number of total users/admins by country) - not that there could be any off-line canvasing. In a conversation with another admin, I was told that it "it is best to not pursue even the most justified grievances"

2691:

have reviewer rights, so its resume puff at best, let's not go crazy about such "credentials".) You can cite policies about civility all day long, but the fact is, just like in real life, some people are mean. There's no true bosses here, so you have to fend for yourself to a great extent. If not a single person will call someone on their behavior, you either aren't articulating your point of view well enough, or you need to just move on to something else, so you can enjoy things.

2997:

sock-puppetry when people without globalized logins get logged out in half an hour while they're editing and end up submitting under an IP. Nor do I think that it is right to impose any great punishment nor the stigma of "sock puppetry" on irate blocked editors who edit as IPs only to protest the injustice of a block without deception, though I can understand shutting up the IP address with a block if they get annoying enough. The concept of "sock puppetry" should be limited to

1566: 2929:. The accusation remains unresolved and Sarah will not explain why she made the accusation or what evidence supports it, despite polite requests for an explanation. When trying to resolve the issue, Greg has continually been told by other admins to drop it or that he is using the wrong process, and there remains a refusal to address the underlying issue of the accusations by Sarah. She has not responded to the RfC. Please see the discussion here: 1535: 71: 4085:(which I certified as well), I requested that one of the other participants please request that the Sarah (the admin in question) engage in a civil and calm discussion with Greg and me so that we could put the issue to bed and get back to editing. Greg supported my request, but interestingly, the requests have sat there all day unanswered. This RfC is posted at the top of the admin noticeboard. 3593:), but with the process. I have a little different outlook than some of the above posters, not that I think they they are wrong, but everyone perceives things differently (which is just the nature of being human). To get at the process, I do believe that the underlying matter needs to be looked at however, not for action, but to understand the dynamics. I'll try to summarize it concisely below: 300::At the same time, I note with some happiness that the story is receiving exactly as much pickup and discussion in the general media that it deserves: zero. Real reporters will look at the story, look at our policies, ask real questions, and realize there is no story here. (In fact, if there is a story here, it is simply about how low Fox News has sunk.) --] (]) 16:55, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 2772:

like this, not so much for the purpose of direct intervention - that's not usually what I do, although I can help try to mediate a conflict now and then - but from the perspective of policy. That is, I like to ask: what went wrong here and how can situations like this be avoided in the future? But first I need to know what happened. Diffs are always welcome. :-) --

4168:. She accused me of socking for Don Martin, insinuated in one of your diffs that she had evidence, and when asked to explain she chased us off her talk page and has refused to address the accusation. Meanwhile, you and several other admins and editors have piled on with the "drop it" chorus. Perhaps you should participate in the open RfC discussion. 3912:

this person's part, and yet he will trot that out like a billy club everytime he has a disagreement with someone. Please check this person's posts, they have been going around the site tagging and harrassing a good number of people and I've wondered actually when the supes were going to get around to doing something about it. Cheers!

3945:

don't want to admit. ("Move along, nothing to see here") I don't care if anyone supports it or not, Jimbo asked for more info, and I gave it to him. He has the right to know what is going on. Other than that, I am just here long enough to see if he needed anything else. But thanks for emphasizing my point for me.

4022:

resolve this, by acting as a go between or just talking to both parties. Instead, it became apparent that editors are on their own, and the admins will focus on where it should be filed, any mistakes on the part of the editors, etc. What resources exist to help the editor? There is no one to go to for help.

4874:"Knowledge has become home base for a loose worldwide network of pedophiles..." using "chat rooms" and "message boards". But these chat rooms and message boards are all somewhere or another else, because Knowledge doesn't encourage people to get together and bias an article toward their point of view. 4608:

Hi Jimbo. I would ask to stimulate and stimulate the use of alternative (alt=...) text on images in the Knowledge and Global projects. In Knowledge in Portuguese is difficult. My son is visually impaired and want to read the texts. My Wiki-pt adjustments are being reversed. I'm stop edits now. Please

4266:

Indeed. There is no doubt a very different standard for admin behavior compared to editor behavior, different sanctions, different process for dealing with it. In fact, as you said there is not a process for dealing with poor admin behavior -- editors are just told to drop it and are chastised for

4227:

Yes, yes, Sarah did this, someone else did that, to be frank nothing is going to be accomplished by continuing to talk about it because there is no method for dealing with it anyways. Can we get to the heart of the underlying problem that affects all of Knowledge? There are many of us that feel there

4060:

My idea of what should be done- If admins want to continue to make decisions and have additional tools that can be abused to the detriment of other editor's enjoyment then they need to be held accountable outside of their peers. An unfortunate number of Wikipedians see our policies as laws and Admins

2996:

wrong. Lots of people start out editing Knowledge as "anonymous IPs" (to be oxymoronic) before they get an account! And no matter how much certain people want to puff up the definition of "sock puppetry", I refuse to accept that there's anything wrong with that. Nor do I think it's fair to call it

2665:

Milowent, primarily because no one will stand up to her. If Wiki can't come up with some way to effectively control the bully admin-type (since other admins don't seem to have the cajones to do so), why should I stick around? I have no desire to be an admin, but apparently was thought highly enough

4992:

Where FOX and I agree is that Knowledge is open to pedophiles. That's what you get when you make an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. If they want to start a 💕 where everyone has to present an identification card and fingerprints and get run through the FBI and local police databases before they

4646:

Actually, I hadn't seen it until just now! Thank you for showing it to me. My response is quite simple: the story is absolutely scandalously idiotic, and Jana Winter, the author, should be fired from her job. The story is idiotic nonsense from top to bottom. As in the statement from Sue Gardner,

3355:

Actually, I really don't care at this point if I am blocked or banned or whatever else. GregJackP said he was retiring, so following him around won't be an issue in any event, but thanks anyway for your advice. If he stays, then I will likely continue to edit in the same areas. You take care as

3068:

DVdm, thank you for noticing my edits. Perhaps your observation is the reason Sarah thought I was a sock (although inexplicable why she would think I was a sock for Don Martin). If she had simply stated her observations and given me an opportunity to address them, much of this ensuing discussion

2633:

Incidentally, as I stated on the RfC in question -- Greg has been my mentor and was the person who got me excited about wiki in the first place. I don't have a high edit count or long time participation, just a couple of months, but if Greg is discouraged and disillusioned enough to leave, then so

2592:

As long as you allow this type of behavior to be tolerated, you will lose good editors who won't put up with that type of treatment. Most of us have other things we can do, and we don't need the BS. Again, I'm sure I won't be missed, but you might want to ask yourself how many leave without saying

3867:

Bidgee, it was an assumption of bad faith on my part (intentionally) along the same lines as the one Sarah made. I was just curious if I would get questioned about it, while no one questions an admin on similar comments. Why is that? It is also why I said "off-line" - I know that she hasn't done

3822:

process, no one that will guide them or advise them. As a consequence, you're losing editors that you should be encouraging to stay. In my case, it's not worth the time or effort to deal with that type of individual. I'm also sure that I am partially at fault here, but without an open discussion

3817:

It is apparent that one is not to question, in any way an admin, and that other admins are going to stonewall any question or concern about a bullying admin - and there is no way to get past it. Even Arbcom consists of admins. There is no avenue for addressing behavior or concerns without running

3156:

So either file an SPI or be quiet. Make sure and ask for a checkuser, and you can check the IP's with the dates and times of near simultaneous edits and determine that a) we don't use the same computer, b) we're not in the same location, c) our style of writing is different, and d) we also edit in

2899:

Just to clarify a minor point in the above: the request was for a three month block, and Sarah argued that other sanctions should be tried first, as well as arguing that the support votes were coming from involved users. Otherwise the RFC/U seems to have the best summary of GregJackP's concerns. It

2806:

of us for creating such a hostile article environment. The same admin also refused to lift my 24 hour ban that the same complaintants here created by mischaracterizing the dispute (how's that for civility?). Anyway, this one is a good egg and was fair to everyone. The real problem is that the admin

4658:

At the same time, I note with some happiness that the story is receiving exactly as much pickup and discussion in the general media that it deserves: zero. Real reporters will look at the story, look at our policies, ask real questions, and realize there is no story here. (In fact, if there is a

4051:

While I must admit the beginning of this long drawn out discussion was highly interesting at first I quickly got disenchanted with the bickering and only skimmed the last 1/3 of the thread's posts. These are my observations on admin abuse and how it affects a Wikipedian's experience for what it is

4021:

When an editor complains about an admins actions, there is nowhere for them to get help. The other admins all circle the wagons, and stonewall. The suggestions of "drop it" is not appropriate nor helpful. This entire matter could have been resolved so easily if just one admin had offered to help

3944:

Spartaz, can you not read? I'm leaving. I don't care what happens, I just thought that Jimbo should know that good editors are being treated poorly and deciding it is not worth it. That is what my initial post here was about. From the above comments, I would say that it is a problem that admins

3934:

In case you didn't notice the list of current RFCs is shown at the top of AN so you are bound to get traffic from there. I'm also curious why you are here? Isn't an RFC enough for you or are you planning to take this to every board and page on wikipedia until you find enough people to support you.

3911:

Aside from getting a bit angry at this editor's obviously outrageous behavior, I've done nothing wrong here and came to edit with intent to clean up Wiki because I saw the banner advertising the program this year while I was here as a reader. There has been nothing but assumptions of bad faith on

2704:

that went a little like this: "I find articles like that fascinating sometimes. Here is this woman who was known to millions of homemakers in the late 19th century -- she was literally a household name to many. She wrote about raising her son in 1913 in "The Boy and I," which would probably be an

2690:

If you're not enjoying yourself, by all means leave. Mean people are everywhere in real life too, but leaving the Earth is not as easy. If you care about Knowledge and its goals, you should stay. Being an admin is a thankless job anyway from all I've seen; editing is much more fun. (And even I

4984:

have the right to fair and unbiased coverage, and I don't mean the FOX News variety. It is easy for snide commentators to suggest that an encyclopedia shouldn't mention disturbing things like NAMBLA, but I bet that no matter what FOX thinks there are probably millions and millions of mothers who

3051:

Perhaps you could explain further? All I see is that it looks like he downloaded Twinkle and started playing with it to leave a bunch of those ugly little "authoritative-sounding" speedy delete messages. I don't blame him, I blame the tool... (also to me "new here" doesn't necessarily mean "my

2922:

I think there is a more fundamental issue than any of that (which is a bit POV-y). Sarah (an admin) made a number of accusations and criticisms against Greg, not the least of which was an insinuation that a Greg (and I) were additional sockpuppets for Dmartinaus after an SPI with CU had already

2771:

Well, so this is very interesting to me, as I certainly don't like to see anyone with 6,000 edits have such a bad experience. But without diffs or something approaching an NPOV explanation of what happened here, it's hard for me to even get started looking into it. I try to look into situations

2580:

I'm a good editor with over 6,000 edits, 2 GAs, another getting close to GA, and a 4th that might have gone to FA. I do most of my article work in Native American case law and statutes, an area that few are working on or in. I've been on Knowledge since 2006, but lurked for a good while before I

4061:

as police/judges, if this is how they wish to be seen then a "civilian review board" needs to be established of ONLY non-admins to review impartially any and ALL claims put forth to them. If we are more empowered and feel things will at least get looked at fairly the average user will be happier.

4027:

At this point it is no longer productive to discuss this. I don't care - I'm leaving. Jimbo, I answered your question on what happened, but if I stick around, the focus will be on the specific complaint instead of the process and policy problems. So I'm leaving, but will be happy to answer any

3805:

Without any other resources, and without any guidance on how to proceed, I initiated an RfC, believing from the information on the RfC and AN/I pages that the RfC was the less confrontational, as I did not want any sanctions (which the RfC page said it was a "non-binding, informal process"). On

3527:

I've been accused of socking in the past but I don't get offended by it, I just tell them to take it to SPI as I've got nothing to hide but the fact is they never list it. I'm sure Sarah never meant any harm and is infact over the drama but I think everyone needs to move along as going over same

2584:

I'm leaving because I'm not going to participate in a system where an admin can make innuendos, assume bad faith, be rude and misstate facts (i.e. lie), and refuse to talk to editors that attempt to resolve the issue. In fact, she tells them to go away, in rude terms, and refuses to discuss the

5021:

In summary, I feel that FOX, apparently having found no legal support for claims that Knowledge distributes child pornography, is now criticizing us because we allow the description of well-known pedophiles and pedophile political organizations. But it's all too clear that pretending the issue

3887:

It's funny you accuse an Admin not assuming good faith but then you intentionally assume bad faith (The idea is that even if someone ABF (intentional or not), you AGF). Sarah is not an Admin who would intentionally assume bad faith nor intentionally do off-line canvassing and the fact is she is

3157:

different subject areas, despite having similar interests in (some) legal article issues. If you have evidence, submit a case. Otherwise, you're just assuming bad faith on our part and getting close to making personal attacks (i.e., "Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence.").

2573:

This doesn't mean a hill of beans as far as the viability of Knowledge, nor do I imagine that anyone will much care. You have a problem with your admin system when an admin can make inappropriate comments, mistate facts, violate several policies, refuse to talk to editors trying to resolve the

3906:

general statements that on the surface, make the accused look very bad, when in fact he himself has been the one attacking editors and supes because his article got deleted. I've been chastised to be civil here and I will. However, the "attacks" staged upon me by this editor (and others in his

3246:

Knowledge (like Knowledge Review's censorship crusade...). If you're prohibiting people from making friends here or agreeing with the people they agree with, that's a whole new level of nuttiness. Personally I think that this whole Sesame street circus sockpuppet meatpuppet duck and all is a

2614:

If you leave, you let the bad guys win. Why not stay and kick some ass? Knowledge has no monopoly on BS. "Admins" are like hall monitors in elementary school, they are just like everyone else, so don't elevate them to the point where they "become" wikipedia in your eyes. You are wikipedia

4310:

I thought it was supposed to be for 2 months. An administrator has decided that it has failed and has shut it down, at least for the Barack Obama article. Is this legal? I thought your decision was to let it go for 2 months? Or should you do a "General McChrystal" on that too independent

2581:

started to edit. I've engaged in numerous debates, won some and lost some, and loved the consensus process. Until now - I have never been treated so rudely by an admin. I won't be editing any more, nor will I be fighting at the university I work at about the reliability of Knowledge.

4267:

insulted as wrong-minded for bothering admins. This abuse of power and we/them mentality will continue to disenfranchise content editors. (see Greg's initial post on this thread) and keep potential new editors away. Have you thought about the citizen review board in any more detail?

4528:, just with the link and text changed. The way it is, it looks like it is in a different position on all computers, but with topicon, you can use "icon_nr=x", which makes it go in the spot you choose, and it makes it so that a row of icons looks pretty much the same on any computer. ~~ 3852:

Why worry about where someone lives? It has nothing to do with the issue at hand (I'm not having a go at you GregJackP but the comment you made really doesn't help). Also there is no canvassing going on. I have been watching this dispute and noted the reverts made on Sarah's page.

4367:

Flagged revisions should have been used in combination with s-protection, not instead of it. That was the problem. Really, the problem is that the foundation isn't just implementing it globally on every article and saying here it is, this part of the service we're providing.

4395:

articles. Part of this trial is to figure out what sorts of article Pending Changes is right for, and as we figure that out, it will be used on certain articles where it will be apparent it isn't the best solution, and a different form of protection will be used instead.

4993:

are allowed to edit... let them start their own and see how that works out for them. But I think it is important for us not to pretend that Knowledge is "child-safe" — that's just not possible, unless you can trust your children not to arrange meetings with pedophiles.

4480:

Can I take your non-response as a "go ahead"? Or did you just miss my question? Here it is again, in case you missed it: Would you mind if I changed your guestbook icon to work with the topicon template? If I'm being annoying by asking this again, I apologize. ~~

2801:

Jimbo, please do not judge the admin being referred to here without taking about two weeks to go through all the posts to deconstruct it. It is a very confusing discussion to try to understand. This admin not only came into a very contentious room, but chastised

3845:

It is also curious that of those commenting on the RfC, half of those saying to leave it alone and go away are from Australia (which seems like a high percentage to me, based on the number of total users/admins by country) - not that there could be any off-line

3434:

That summary is what everyone is butthurt over? Jeebus christmas. Who really cares if someone questions whether someone else is a sock? If you're not a sock, say so, and move on. Unless one is proven to be a sock, this kind of idle speculation happens

3981:, I went on to warn him that his images had no - copyright tags of any kind and were in danger of being deleted. That particular editor continued to create what I would describe as chaos as evidenced above. I suggested AN/I as a question posed to JNW 63: 2811:

Talk page. I believe they also tried to report the admin in an official capacity for discplinary purposes, as they did me, but it was laughed away by the preciding admin. It seems they want to involve you since the standard approach didn't work.

2723:

Didn't mean to imply that reviewer/rollback were important - just to say I didn't care one way or another and one day they just appeared. Thank you for your kind words, most here have been that way, and a pleasure to work with. Good luck.

3035:, he says "I am new to editing wikipedia, so I will take some time looking around and familiarizing myself." From where I am standing, it looks like he took 1 day to become a professional in a mere two hours. I find this extraordinary. 4305: 4409:

I think what Prodego said is accurate. It's a bit like semi-protecting an article that autoconfirmed users are edit warring on and then saying that semi-protection is a failure. It's not a logical conclusion from the evidence.

3726:(not true, everyone that was mentioned in the diffs was notified, including her and others who were likely to disagree with my position), unilaterally stated that there was no threat to contact the media about the BLP subject 2970:. I must say that I am really astonished when I see your highly advanced editing skills, which you seem to have acquired in less than one week. This is truly amazing. Surely you must have been around in read-only mode for a 4386:

article was removed from PC because the amount of vandalism was too great to justify reviewing the revisions to the article, and semiprotection was restored. Another article which similarly had semiprotection reenabled was

4718:

Where do they get the idea to write such bollocks? It's obvious to anyone with half a brain (so that excludes most Fox News viewers) that that story is, at best, a gross over-exaggeration and at worst a work of fiction.

3247:

disgrace to Knowledge, and would miss any operation that even cursorily invoked the black art of "planning" — I think we should openly allow all editors to have multiple accounts and adjust ourselves to that reality.

280::I do not mind stories critical of Knowledge - lords knows there are plenty of sensible criticisms that people can and do make. What I do mind is deeply irrational character assassination based on absolute untruths. 2574:

issue, and basically bully editors. In this case, at least 4 separate editors pointed out what she was doing was wrong - and she continued. Not a single admin that participated in the discussions stepped forward.

4985:

have never heard that word, and if someone in the apartment building tells them over the washing machine that there's a guy in their floor in NAMBLA, they should be able to look it up here and see what that means.

3415:

What also hurt in that AfD and also its article is that the socks were not clearly discerned until the AfD was just about complete and could be viewed as a Keep. Unsupported claims should never be made in an AfD.

341:::Likewise. Regardless, their viewers will believe it and will be detrimental to Knowledge's rep. There's already been like 3 4chan threads on it already.  – ] ]] 20:02, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 334:::Likewise. Regardless, their viewers will believe it and will be detrimental to Knowledge's rep. There's already been like 3 4chan threads on it already.  – ] ]] 20:02, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4652:

I do not mind stories critical of Knowledge - lords knows there are plenty of sensible criticisms that people can and do make. What I do mind is deeply irrational character assassination based on absolute

2870:, who supported the deletion, acknowledged that NN has a civility problem but she opposed the proposed block because she said that most of the supporters of the proposal were involved in a dispute with NN 4940:, said that "These Knowledge articles, edited and shared by pedophiles, are nothing but guideposts to get them aroused". I think that a brief examination of any of these articles refutes this outright. 4773:(on their part).. Yea I see that but I don't know if that statement merits nearly enough weight vs. the rest of the article, ya know? They mention it in the beginning... and then go on about how we 4885:. Note that the grand international pedophile conspiracy here consists of — at most — six votes. Anybody on Earth can sign up for an account and have a vote like that. And I'm not convinced 15: 5045: 2856: 4755:

Isn't their statement contained in the article? Like where it says "Sue Gardner, executive director of Wikimedia Foundation, Knowledge's parent organization, said in a statement..."--

4320: 3984:

and I was somewhat surprised in the resulting thread added there, however I also supported a block in hopes of finally cooling 19Nightmares down. This affair is unfortunate...

490: 4326:

Flagged revisions/Pending changes hasn't been shut down - it was found not to work on that article, so it was removed from there. It is, however, active on other articles. -

4554:

Wow, I'm really sounding stuffy, aren't I? I seem to always talk like that to people I've never talked to before... I must do something to stop this! Erm... FORTY-TWO! ~~

4525: 2835: 1526: 202: 137: 4012:

requires an admin to respond to queries on why the did something on Wiki, and there is a clear decision by Arbcom stating the same thing, this is no longer about what

3902:

Bidgee, this editor has made absolutely ludicrous accusations towards me regardless of fact for weeks, provided NO diffs, provided no evidence and generally will make

3473:

and its AfD went. Talk about beat up? You were taking some major league shots as an editor trying to save an article. I've seen punching dummies take less hits. ----

2568: 3978:'s talk page. As JNW is one of the best visual arts editors in wikipedia with more than 40,000 edits, I was shocked by the personal attack and issued this warning: 3660:

My next comment after I realized she was upset was to try and clear it up and make sure that she knew that I was not trying to insult her nor impugn her integrity (

4706:....it would be more credible.... in any case, what they've written is sensationalist drivel - I doubt there are a significant number of pedophiles on Knowledge. 2563: 2545: 400: 3799:. On templating her for not AGF, an admin immediately came to my talk page and wanting to know if I was trying to provoke someone and that I needed to back off 3439:

the time. It should not dissuade editors who like to actually write articles from writing articles. Don Martin is barely notable at best, let's all move on.--

4882: 4118:

Perhaps other participants are reluctant to volunteer to request Sarah to engage in discussion, because Sarah kindly asked you to leave her alone a few times:

3684: 3674: 2845: 4689:

Likewise. Regardless, their viewers will believe it and will be detrimental to Knowledge's rep. There's already been like 3 4chan threads on it already. –

3818:

the risk of putting a target on your own back - a number of editors told me that I was right, but crazy to pursue this. There is no help for editors in the

240:

Did you see ? I'm sure you probably have. I think it's just terrible.. everything. Thanks for your time  – ] ]] 19:46, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

233:

Did you see ? I'm sure you probably have. I think it's just terrible.. everything. Thanks for your time  – ] ]] 19:46, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

2966:

Hi Minor4th, I accidentally stumbled on this thing. Being a bit curious about this "insinuation that Greg (and you) were sockpuppets...", I had a look at

3118:

You are welcome. Still overwhelmingly astonished about the switfness of your learning how to effectively use everything meta-Knowledge has to offer, and

3225:

make some case here. Not me. I have no interest in getting you blocked/banned whatsoever. Just giving some advice. Take it or ignore it. Take care too.

2781: 3601: 2890: 2607: 3763: 5044:

I've picked up your comment at an AfD about whether we have enough info on someone to write a reasonable bio, I've had similar thoughts myself. See

4909: 3613: 3605: 3760: 3757: 3747: 3744: 3732: 3730: 3727: 3724: 3721: 3708: 4340: 2821: 149: 93: 3653:

comments to be "disingenuous" - a word I probably shouldn't have used but was meant in the form of the definition to mean "not frank or open."

3556:

Who said I wasn't watching? AfD's can be a mine field and infact some can turn out quite nasty, part of everyones different opinions and ideas.

3823:(instead of the "Move on, nothing to see here" from the admins), I have know way of knowing how to correct them. So I'll "move on." Regards, 3657:

took offense at this (which can be understandable) and stated that it was "really insulting of my integrity as an editor and an administrator."

31: 28: 3921: 3741: 3001:. And as long as Knowledge is open to "anonymous" edits, we must always allow for the possibility that pseudonymous editors have made them. 4119: 3661: 3658: 4785: 4764: 4750: 4668: 2924: 2796: 4733: 2923:

confirmed various socks. When asked for an explanation, she refused to provide one and told us to go away and stay off her talk page.

4913: 4459: 4287: 4105: 3993: 3643: 3518: 3482: 3464: 3425: 3410: 3311: 2873:

GregJackP was offended by comments made by Sarah which he interpreted as accusation of socking, and he complained to her about it, see

2747:

to a shed a tear in response to my inspirational speech and declare your undying love and renewed commitment for wikipedia. oh well.--

462: 4713: 4697: 4684: 3498: 3448: 3288: 2955: 2756: 2738: 2718: 2680: 2624: 72: 4595: 4569: 4543: 4511: 3959: 3939: 3579: 2654: 111: 3897: 3882: 3862: 3642:

reviewed the AfD and reclosed as delete. Several editors asked him to reconsider and he self-initiated a DRV to check on consensus

3565: 3551: 3537: 5062: 5000:

A specific claim that they make is that "Knowledge can be accessed unfiltered in public schools across the country". I interpret

4417: 4362: 4237: 2913: 2593:

a word? All it would have taken is for one admin to step forward and point out her (and I'm sure my) faults. Just one. Regards,

2553: 427: 4502:

Sorry, I overlooked it. I'm afraid I don't really understand the question. :) It sounds fine to me, but what does it mean? :-)--

3326: 3237: 3171: 5031: 4222: 4188: 4148: 3723:, that no diffs were provided (not true, 19 diffs were posted), stated that I only notified users that would support my position 3376: 3151: 3089: 2983: 145: 89: 2967: 4377: 4335: 4079:

Camelbinky, you have hit the nail squarely on the head as far as what the real issue is. I like your proposal, but see here:

325::Fox News is less accurate than Knowledge on balance, but I fear to find if any of it is true.--] (]) 19:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 318::Fox News is less accurate than Knowledge on balance, but I fear to find if any of it is true.--] (]) 19:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 5073: 4404: 3681: 468: 100: 3256: 3061: 3044: 3010: 2787:

Jimbo, it happens more than Knowledge can probably stand. This topic on your talkpage is resonating on other talkpages. ----

4980:

The broader issue here: do pedophiles have the right to unbiased coverage on Knowledge? It is a misleading question. The

4813:

Nigam said Knowledge is making a conscious choice to abandon its responsibility by hosting an online haven for pedophiles.

4610: 1534: 174: 3209:

Hi Greg. Of course I'm sure that an SPI based on IP, location and style would turn out negative. Nevertheless, looking at

4629: 3979: 3616:

was blocked for 2 weeks and the socks blocked indef. The AfD was initially closed as keep in a process tainted by socks.

3029: 1578: 486: 3972: 3678: 3509:

Then why did you keep interceding in the AfD? And who was the editor who really save it? It was not editors plural. ----

4618: 3397:

Concur, and that's just the tip of the iceberg. Admins will often do what Minor has cited. Drop it is not good policy.

4957: 3738: 2505: 2502: 2499: 2491: 2488: 2485: 2482: 2479: 2476: 2473: 2470: 2467: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2452: 2449: 2446: 2443: 2440: 2437: 2434: 2431: 2428: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2416: 2413: 2407: 2402: 2397: 2392: 2387: 2382: 2377: 2372: 2367: 2362: 2357: 2352: 2347: 2342: 2337: 2332: 2327: 2322: 2317: 2312: 2307: 2302: 2297: 2292: 2287: 2282: 2277: 2272: 2267: 2262: 2257: 2252: 2247: 2242: 2237: 2232: 2227: 2222: 2217: 2212: 2207: 2202: 2197: 2192: 2187: 2182: 2177: 2172: 2167: 2162: 2157: 2152: 2147: 2142: 2137: 2132: 2127: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 962: 958: 954: 950: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 167: 4850: 4815:“It’s nothing more than a company that is choosing to ignore the worst kind of exploitation in the world,” he said. 4640: 3800: 3797: 3794: 3791: 3788: 2901: 4496: 2122: 2117: 2112: 2107: 2102: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2077: 2072: 2067: 2062: 2057: 2052: 2047: 2042: 2037: 2032: 2027: 2022: 2017: 2012: 2007: 2002: 1997: 1992: 1987: 1982: 1977: 1972: 1967: 1962: 1957: 1952: 1947: 1942: 1937: 1932: 1927: 1922: 1917: 1912: 1907: 1902: 1897: 1892: 1887: 1882: 1877: 1872: 1867: 1862: 1857: 1852: 1847: 1842: 1837: 1832: 1827: 1822: 1817: 1812: 1807: 1802: 1797: 1792: 1787: 1782: 1777: 1772: 1767: 1762: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1742: 1737: 1732: 1727: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1692: 1687: 1682: 1677: 1672: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 858: 854: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 618: 614: 610: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 178: 5090: 4355: 1667: 1662: 1657: 1652: 1647: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1627: 1622: 1617: 1612: 1607: 1602: 1597: 1592: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 3778: 3772: 3769: 3766: 3735: 3664: 4965: 4742:

gets paid $ 2M a year? But I digress. I think such a report merits a statement from the WMF, in my opinion. –

3297:

The passive-aggressive behavior is mind-boggling. Maybe I should just commit seppuku now and be done with it.

2874: 413: 365: 4070: 3982: 3810: 3807: 3691: 5039: 4046: 3917: 3837: 2817: 2634:

am I. I was a part of the same incidents that he is speaking of and I echo his concerns and disappointment.

457: 386: 156: 107: 4524:

template, becuause it makes it easier to have it line up and whatnot. It would pretty much look the same as

3025:

lots of people start out editing Knowledge as "anonymous IPs" (to be oxymoronic) before they get an account!

5057: 4210: 4166: 4137: 4134: 4131: 4128: 4125: 4122: 3775: 2927: 2709:

So, if you leave, what will you be depriving us of? Perhaps just some drama, but perhaps something more.--

4871:

I think anyone can see that FOX is badly biased here, but I suppose it can't hurt to go over the details.

4953: 4937: 3790:

and was told to drop it, without being asked about the matter in detail, just from a cursory quick check

3749:

and since one of these editors is an attorney, I feel confident that he is able to recognize a "threat").

2535: 1584: 448: 3134:

puppet master as far as you possibly can. Surely you do not want to risk getting blocked/banned for the

2900:

should, I guess, also be noted that GregJackP's issue with lack of support from admins stemmed from the

2701: 4475: 481: 390: 2697: 4614: 3968: 3913: 3717: 3670: 3620: 2852: 2813: 2696:

What could be lost if you don't stay? No one knows. Following the recent AfD (nom. withdrawn) of

5049: 4623: 5046:

Knowledge talk:Biographies of living persons#Do we have enough information to write a biography?

3609: 5084: 4929: 4702:

Fox News should probably run an article about the fact that most Wikipedians are members of an

4675:

Fox News is less accurate than Knowledge on balance, but I fear to find if any of it is true.--

4632:? I'm sure you probably have. I think it's just terrible.. everything. Thanks for your time – 2081: 4893:

FOX News could come up with. At this point I think it is fair to ask whether they are merely

4949: 4760: 4728: 4603: 4454: 3547: 3514: 3478: 3460: 3421: 3406: 3284: 2792: 163: 66: 4083: 4008:

I think all the discussion here is missing the main point. While there is no question that

3542:

You weren't there for the show. Even I was scared and I hadn't participated in the AfD. ----

2933: 2881:, and was disappointed that admins who participated on that discussion did not fault Sarah. 4842:

Wow, really? I know what that guy is saying, but I think it's blown out of proportion. –

4382:

The pending changes is system isn't the ideal solution for all articles. In this case, the

4233: 4165:

You forgot the most important diff and the reason for my participation in this discussion:

4066: 4009: 2586: 3242:

You know, I thought the "meatpuppet" policy at least was limited to human recruiting from

8: 4961: 4848: 4783: 4748: 4695: 4638: 4392: 4353: 4041: 4029: 3989: 3954: 3877: 3832: 3306: 3279:

Wow, sad to the bullying continue here. Why not shoot Daffy now and be done with it? ----

3166: 2886: 2733: 2675: 2602: 438: 3967:

As way of explanation of my role, my first encounter with this entire episode came when

5067: 4710: 4680: 4281: 4182: 4099: 3632: 3494: 3444: 3370: 3083: 2949: 2932:. There have been ongoing instances of incivility by Sarah, including edit summaries: 2752: 2714: 2648: 2620: 453: 4422:

As it happens, I'm the admin who protected Obama, but there have been other examples-

5078: 4925: 4703: 4414: 434: 4306:

Flagged Revisions has failed according to an administrator and it has been shut down

4756: 4720: 4660: 4521: 4503: 4446: 4080: 3893: 3858: 3612:) was initiated by me and the clerk determined that a CU was needed. As a result, 3561: 3533: 2930: 2773: 409: 16: 4738:

It wouldn't bother me if they didn't have an army of mindless followers. You know

3317:

Perhaps I should have avoided commenting on this. Looks like a wasps' nest. Sigh.

4770: 4331: 4316: 4229: 4062: 3639: 3590: 2909: 4777:

have a neutral point of view on pedophilia... bla bla bla you know the rest. –

4843: 4778: 4743: 4690: 4633: 4344: 4218: 4144: 4034: 3985: 3947: 3870: 3825: 3688: 3543: 3510: 3474: 3470: 3456: 3417: 3402: 3322: 3299: 3280: 3233: 3214: 3210: 3159: 3147: 3040: 2979: 2882: 2841: 2788: 2726: 2668: 2595: 2879: 2514: 1545: 5027: 4933: 4707: 4676: 4269: 4170: 4087: 3711: 3628: 3490: 3440: 3358: 3252: 3071: 3057: 3006: 2937: 2748: 2710: 2636: 2616: 1565: 4209:

The first diff I provided included the reason. When asked to explain, Sarah

2855:

who supported deleting the article of incivility and opened a discussion at

2518: 1549: 47: 4439: 4435: 4427: 4411: 4397: 4383: 3936: 3819: 3707:

Those supporting a block had "a vested interest in silencing an opponent"

4373: 4016:

did or did not do. The problem is that the system and process is flawed.

3889: 3854: 3557: 3529: 3600:

There has been an on-going issue with a BLP article and subsequent AfD (

2520: 1550: 358:

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting

4948:

N.B. I owe some responsibility for this particular rhetoric as I moved

4917: 4889:

of those six voters are necessarily pedophiles anyway. And that's the

4739: 4581: 4555: 4529: 4482: 4327: 4312: 4013: 3753: 3697: 3654: 3650: 3586: 2905: 2867: 3888:

currently busy on other matters (as she has stated on her talk page).

4214: 4140: 3318: 3229: 3143: 3036: 2975: 5023: 4028:

other questions that you have if you'll just leave a message on my

3975: 3398: 3248: 3053: 3002: 2516: 1547: 4921: 4431: 4369: 3868:

anything on-line. Anyway, thanks for making my point for me.

3809:

and to "back off very quickly when I challenge certain people"

4968:

proposal. I regret that this facilitated FOX's abuse, but it

3608:) became involved and used several socks. An SPI without CU ( 2844:

who also supported keeping the article filed an investigation

2521: 1551: 4659:

story here, it is simply about how low Fox News has sunk.) --

4423: 4388: 2838:

discussion, a user supporting keeping the article used socks

5022:

doesn't exist has never done anything to protect children.

5001: 4609:

help...help. Congratulations, Knowledge is good for world.

4972:

the better name for the article given its current content.

3649:

During the DRV, I made a statement that I believed one of

4082:. Incidentally, on the RfC regarding Greg's complaints 2830:

I will try to summarize the dispute as I understood it:

4391:. The PC trial has not failed - it is still enabled on 3673:

began to throw out baseless accusations, was warned by

4883:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Marthijn Uittenbogaard

2846:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Dmartinaus/Archive

54: 3646:. The result of the DRV was to endorse his decision. 3796:, one non-admin suggested a note or uw-agf template 3619:

During this period, a user that supported deletion,

1559: 404: 4729: 4455: 3756:was being unnecessarily confrontational and unfair 3469:BTW, Milowent - I shouldn't have to remind you how 2992:argument keeps turning up in discussions and it's 4901:the news as is their custom, or whether they are 3734:(the subject of the article felt it was a threat 2569:How just 1 bully admin can drive out good editors 3716:Stated that she believed the users mentioned by 2988:I don't understand the overall controversy, but 2851:Users who supported keeping the article accused 416:, where you can send them messages and comments. 3774:, her response was comments like "Martin Gang" 3771:, or asking why she was doing/saying something 3752:Several editors pointed out that they believed 4032:. I'll check it from time to time. Regards, 3585:Jimbo, my concern is no longer the issue with 3124:have essentially followed him around wikipedia 3700:came to the AN/I and immediately stated that: 2529:This page has archives. Sections older than 2496:This manual archive index may be out of date. 4916:, who — they say — speaking of the articles 5016:public school in the country. Who's right? 3227:(Added some emphasis in my previous remark) 4721: 4447: 3780:and the like, deleting without responding. 3644:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2010 June 18 2585:reasoning for her actions, as required by 379:There are also active user talk pages for 2743:Hmm, your last comment was when you were 1683:Late September 2006 – Early November 2006 3528:ground isn't going to get you anywhere. 3787:I requested admin help on my talk page 3625:User talk:Jimbo Wales#Mission Statement 2203:September 13, 2012 – September 27, 2012 3624: 2974:long time? If not, congratulations! - 2539:when more than 2 sections are present. 2043:September 4, 2011 – September 25, 2011 1623:September 9, 2005 – September 24, 2005 3604:), where the subject of the article ( 2213:September 24, 2012 – October 20, 2012 2088:December 15, 2011 – December 30, 2011 2078:December 10, 2011 – December 16, 2011 2063:November 11, 2011 – November 24, 2011 2048:September 26, 2011 – October 19, 2011 1693:Late November 2006 – December 8, 2006 4806: 3935:Its time for some perspective guys. 3793:, one admin said no help was needed 3635:issues and received a 24-hour block. 2393:December 31, 2013 – January 14, 2014 2243:December 24, 2012 – January 12, 2013 2228:November 17, 2012 – December 5, 2012 2223:October 29, 2012 – November 19, 2012 2208:September 26, 2012 – October 5, 2012 2198:August 29, 2012 – September 13, 2012 2113:February 7, 2012 – February 25, 2012 2108:January 28, 2012 – February 12, 2012 2073:December 3, 2011 – December 14, 2011 2068:November 24, 2011 – December 6, 2011 2058:November 4, 2011 – November 12, 2011 1978:January 16, 2011 – February 10, 2011 1973:December 21, 2010 – January 17, 2011 1968:December 6, 2010 – December 22, 2010 1963:November 21, 2010 – December 6, 2010 1958:November 8, 2010 – November 21, 2010 1948:September 13, 2010 – October 6, 2010 1943:August 28, 2010 – September 14, 2010 1893:January 22, 2010 – February 22, 2010 1888:December 22, 2009 – January 25, 2010 1708:Mid January 2007 – Mid February 2007 372: 351: 194: 80: 46: 4956:in the course of discussions about 2103:January 17, 2012 – January 30, 2012 2093:December 27, 2011 – January 9, 2012 2053:October 16, 2011 – November 5, 2011 2038:August 30, 2011 – September 7, 2011 1698:December 9, 2006 – Mid January 2007 393:. Please choose the most relevant. 201: 190: 155: 143: 136: 125: 99: 87: 13: 2218:October 9, 2012 – October 31, 2012 2123:February 27, 2012 – March 18, 2012 2098:January 9, 2012 – January 18, 2012 1953:October 6, 2010 – November 8, 2010 1898:February 22, 2010 – March 17, 2010 1603:August 28, 2004 – December 8, 2004 350: 348:Revision as of 16:55, 26 June 2010 146:Revision as of 16:55, 26 June 2010 90:Revision as of 16:17, 26 June 2010 35: 5102: 4958:Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition 4398: 2533:may be automatically archived by 2118:February 19, 2012 – March 4, 2012 2033:August 21, 2011 – August 31, 2011 2028:August 14, 2011 – August 23, 2011 1983:February 6, 2011 – March 19, 2011 1618:July 26, 2005 – September 9, 2005 1608:December 9, 2004 – March 23, 2005 1593:October 28, 2001 – April 12, 2004 5072:You have been brought up on ANI 4905:using purely hallucinatory data. 3680:. This was later moved to AN/I 3356:well and thanks for your reply. 2878:GregJackP opened a RFC on Sarah 2193:August 7, 2012 – August 30, 2012 1938:August 4, 2010 – August 28, 2010 1598:April 16, 2004 – August 23, 2004 1564: 1533: 428:Click here to start a new topic. 3623:(see Mission Statement section 2143:April 18, 2012 – April 26, 2012 2138:April 12, 2012 – April 18, 2012 2133:March 31, 2012 – April 13, 2012 2023:July 26, 2011 – August 15, 2011 1993:March 26, 2011 – April 22, 2011 1988:March 16, 2011 – March 26, 2011 1933:July 22, 2010 – August 23, 2010 1908:April 11, 2010 – April 24, 2010 1883:November 20 – December 21, 2009 1823:November 10 – December 10, 2008 1713:Mid February 2007– Feb 25, 2007 1703:From December 22, 2006 blanking 4966:Commons:Commons:Sexual content 4275: 4271: 4176: 4172: 4093: 4089: 4036: 3949: 3872: 3827: 3638:The closing admin of the AfD, 3364: 3360: 3301: 3161: 3077: 3073: 2968:your 50 earliest contributions 2943: 2939: 2728: 2670: 2642: 2638: 2597: 2549: 2408:January 30 – February 10, 2014 2378:November 28 – December 5, 2013 2348:September 24 – October 6, 2013 2188:July 25, 2012 – August 9, 2012 2128:March 17, 2012 – April 2, 2012 1903:March 17, 2010 – April 9, 2010 1843:January 26 – February 10, 2009 1833:December 25 – January 16, 2009 1828:December 5 – December 25, 2008 1788:January 30 – February 28, 2008 1773:December 2 – December 16, 2007 1763:September 14 – October 7, 2007 1758:August 17 – September 11, 2007 1613:March 23, 2005 – July 24, 2005 1: 4844: 4779: 4744: 4691: 4634: 4345: 3909:every one of his accusations. 3737:, as well as 4 other editors 2999:actual deceptive manipulation 2363:October 28 – November 6, 2013 2333:August 28 – September 4, 2013 2183:July 19, 2012 – July 29, 2012 2173:June 26, 2012 – July 12, 2012 2168:June 18, 2012 – June 28, 2012 2018:July 16, 2011 – July 26, 2011 1998:April 22, 2011 – May 16, 2011 1928:June 26, 2010 – July 22, 2010 1913:April 23, 2010 – May 12, 2010 1878:October 4 – November 20, 2009 1838:January 15 – January 27, 2009 1818:October 4 – November 12, 2008 1778:December 15 – January 4, 2008 1768:October 28 – December 1, 2007 425:Put new text under old text. 346: 307: 296: 287: 276: 267: 256: 247: 129: 4356: 4311:adminstrator who did that? 3710:, which could be failure to 2178:July 3, 2012 – July 22, 2012 2163:June 4, 2012 – June 20, 2012 2148:April 26, 2012 – May 6, 2012 2013:July 1, 2011 – July 15, 2011 2008:June 10, 2011 – July 1, 2011 1923:June 4, 2010 – June 26, 2010 1793:February 28 – March 11, 2008 1783:January 4 – January 30, 2008 18:Browse history interactively 7: 4954:simulated child pornography 4938:Simulated child pornography 4520:I want to make it fit with 3720:could very well be puppets 3666:). I received no response. 3217:, I think that, unless you 2863:3 month block was proposed. 2158:May 19, 2012 – June 9, 2012 2003:May 17, 2011 – June 9, 2011 1918:May 10, 2010 – June 4, 2010 1873:August 26 – October 3, 2009 1848:February 8 – March 18, 2009 1718:From March 2, 2007 blanking 433:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 10: 5107: 5010:be accessed unfiltered in 2153:May 2, 2012 – May 22, 2012 1658:April 2006 – late May 2006 192: 127: 5091:01:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 5063:19:55, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 5032:03:51, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 4903:making it up from scratch 4851:20:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4786:20:44, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4765:20:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4751:20:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4734:20:17, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4730:Penny for your thoughts? 4714:20:05, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4698:20:02, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4685:19:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4669:16:55, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 4641:19:46, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4619:17:37, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4596:15:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 4570:04:12, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 4544:03:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 4512:10:38, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4497:05:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4460:19:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4456:Penny for your thoughts? 4418:19:15, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4405:06:35, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4378:06:22, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4363:06:17, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4336:06:06, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4321:05:16, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4288:19:00, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4238:16:18, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4223:10:53, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4189:09:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4149:08:22, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 4106:23:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 4071:22:07, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 4047:11:48, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 3994:17:48, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3960:17:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3940:17:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3922:16:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 3898:17:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3883:17:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3863:17:22, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3838:16:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3566:15:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3552:15:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3538:15:40, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3519:15:48, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3499:15:45, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3483:15:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3465:15:26, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3449:15:20, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3426:14:16, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3411:14:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3377:20:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3327:21:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3312:20:49, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3289:20:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3257:16:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 3238:20:40, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3221:from each other, someone 3172:20:15, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3152:20:02, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3090:19:45, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3062:06:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 3045:17:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 3011:16:48, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2984:14:39, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2956:14:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2914:14:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2891:13:06, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2822:01:55, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 2797:13:40, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2782:12:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2757:06:34, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2739:06:23, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2719:06:06, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2698:Christine Terhune Herrick 2681:05:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2655:05:27, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2625:05:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2608:04:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 1868:July 12 – August 25, 2009 1813:July 26 – October 4, 2008 1753:July 13 – August 17, 2007 1628:September – December 2005 463:Be welcoming to newcomers 305: 294: 285: 274: 265: 254: 245: 212: 209: 142: 86: 4881:Specific example given: 4664: 4507: 3969:User:Nineteen Nightmares 2853:User:Nineteen Nightmares 2777: 2412:Archives not yet dated: 2318:July 31 – August 4, 2013 2273:March 28 – April 6, 2013 1798:March 9 – April 18, 2008 1733:March 11 – April 3, 2007 175:Extended confirmed users 5004:to mean that Knowledge 4891:most compelling example 4130:, and without comment: 2700:, I had a conversation 2313:June 27 – July 30, 2013 1863:June 10 – July 11, 2009 1803:April 18 – May 30, 2008 1668:July 2006 – August 2006 1638:January – February 2006 366:Start a new talk topic. 85: 4930:Sexual objectification 3849: 3677:and I initiated a WQA 2536:Lowercase sigmabot III 2303:May 27 – June 16, 2013 2288:April 25 – May 8, 2013 2283:April 19 – May 3, 2013 2082:Stop Online Piracy Act 1853:March 18 – May 6, 2009 1808:May 30 – July 27, 2008 1678:Most of September 2006 458:avoid personal attacks 5040:Enough info for a BLP 4950:simulated pornography 4580:So is that a yes? ~~ 3842: 3687:at the suggestion of 3669:Also during the DRV, 2564:Template:Fix bunching 2555:(Manual archive list) 2546:Template:Fix bunching 2343:September 11–22, 2013 1748:June 9 – July 4, 2007 1738:April 2 – May 2, 2007 1688:Most of November 2006 1527:Auto-archiving period 401:Template:Fix bunching 3120:assuming that indeed 2388:December 25–30, 2013 2373:November 20–27, 2013 2338:September 5–10, 2013 2258:February 11–28, 2013 2238:December 15–28, 2012 1858:May 5 – June 9, 2009 1743:May 3 – June 7, 2007 1648:February 2006, cont. 4962:PROTECT Act of 2003 4704:internet hate group 3924:Nineteen Nightmares 3914:Nineteen Nightmares 3718:Nineteen Nightmares 3671:Nineteen Nightmares 3621:Nineteen Nightmares 3126:", I advise you to 2824:Nineteen Nightmares 2814:Nineteen Nightmares 2403:January 25–29, 2014 2398:January 15–24, 2014 2383:December 6–24, 2013 2368:November 7–19, 2013 2358:October 17–27, 2103 2253:February 1–10, 2013 2248:January 13–31, 2013 2233:December 2–15, 2012 102:Nineteen Nightmares 4476:Follow-up question 3401:isn't either. ---- 3219:actively stay away 3128:actively stay away 3052:very first edit") 3015:Wnt, you say that 2353:October 7–16, 2013 2328:August 13–27, 2013 1663:May 24 – July 2006 469:dispute resolution 430: 153: 97: 5093: 4964:arising from the 4926:Child sex tourism 4823: 4822: 3329: 3228: 2848:against that user 2561: 2560: 2556: 2543: 2542: 2498:Future archives: 2323:August 4–12, 2013 2268:March 17–27, 2013 1558: 1557: 449:Assume good faith 426: 398: 397: 371: 370: 345: 195:→‎Fox News report 144: 88: 68: 5098: 5087: 5081: 5077: 5060: 5056: 5052: 4846: 4807: 4781: 4746: 4731: 4725: 4693: 4636: 4593: 4590: 4587: 4584: 4567: 4564: 4561: 4558: 4541: 4538: 4535: 4532: 4494: 4491: 4488: 4485: 4457: 4451: 4402: 4360: 4351: 4286: 4279: 4273: 4187: 4180: 4174: 4104: 4097: 4091: 4055: 4044: 4039: 4038: 4003: 3998: 3957: 3952: 3951: 3929: 3880: 3875: 3874: 3835: 3830: 3829: 3602:Donald G. Martin 3375: 3368: 3362: 3332: 3316: 3309: 3304: 3303: 3226: 3174: 3169: 3164: 3163: 3088: 3081: 3075: 3023:wrong and that " 2954: 2947: 2941: 2761: 2736: 2731: 2730: 2683: 2678: 2673: 2672: 2653: 2646: 2640: 2610: 2605: 2600: 2599: 2554: 2550: 2538: 2522: 2308:June 17–30, 2013 2278:April 6–19, 2013 2263:March 1–16, 2013 1728:March 5–11, 2007 1568: 1560: 1552: 1538: 1537: 1528: 405: 382:User:Jimbo Wales 373: 352: 199: 198: 197: 185: 171: 152: 134: 133: 132: 120: 115: 96: 69: 60: 59: 57: 52: 50: 42: 39: 21: 19: 5106: 5105: 5101: 5100: 5099: 5097: 5096: 5095: 5085: 5079: 5070: 5058: 5054: 5050: 5042: 4908:Fox News cites 4769:Ha, talk about 4626: 4624:Fox News report 4606: 4591: 4588: 4585: 4582: 4565: 4562: 4559: 4556: 4539: 4536: 4533: 4530: 4492: 4489: 4486: 4483: 4478: 4393:several hundred 4359: 4308: 4268: 4169: 4086: 4042: 4035: 4033: 3955: 3948: 3946: 3878: 3871: 3869: 3833: 3826: 3824: 3685:Giftiger wunsch 3675:Giftiger wunsch 3582: 3357: 3307: 3300: 3298: 3167: 3160: 3158: 3070: 2936: 2904:on his talk. - 2734: 2727: 2725: 2676: 2669: 2667: 2635: 2603: 2596: 2594: 2571: 2534: 2523: 2517: 2508: 2298:May 18–30, 2013 2080:(RFC about the 1723:March 2–5, 2007 1588: 1573: 1554: 1553: 1548: 1525: 475: 474: 444: 394: 342: 335: 326: 319: 310: 301: 290: 281: 270: 261: 250: 241: 234: 225: 220: 205: 200: 193: 191: 189: 188: 187: 183: 181: 161: 159: 154: 148: 140: 138:← Previous edit 135: 128: 126: 124: 123: 122: 118: 105: 103: 98: 92: 84: 83: 82: 81: 79: 78: 77: 76: 75: 74: 65: 61: 55: 53: 48: 45: 43: 40: 38:Content deleted 37: 34: 29:← Previous edit 26: 25: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 5104: 5069: 5066: 5041: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5019: 5018: 5017: 4995: 4994: 4989: 4988: 4987: 4986: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4974: 4942: 4941: 4910:Hemanshu Nigam 4906: 4876: 4875: 4869: 4868: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4860: 4859: 4858: 4857: 4856: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4821: 4820: 4817: 4811: 4805: 4804: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4800: 4799: 4798: 4797: 4796: 4795: 4794: 4793: 4792: 4791: 4790: 4672: 4671: 4655: 4654: 4649: 4648: 4625: 4622: 4611:189.65.177.161 4605: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4598: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4515: 4514: 4477: 4474: 4473: 4472: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4463: 4462: 4357: 4307: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4074: 4073: 4057: 4056: 4054: 4053: 4024: 4023: 4018: 4017: 4005: 4004: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3997: 3996: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3850: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3803: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3750: 3714: 3702: 3701: 3696:At this point 3694: 3667: 3647: 3636: 3617: 3595: 3594: 3581: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3522: 3521: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3471:Rachel Uchitel 3452: 3451: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3331: 3330: 3292: 3291: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3066: 3065: 3064: 2959: 2958: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2894: 2893: 2876: 2871: 2864: 2849: 2842:User:GregJackP 2839: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2760: 2759: 2707: 2693: 2692: 2685: 2684: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2628: 2627: 2570: 2567: 2559: 2558: 2541: 2540: 2528: 2525: 2524: 2519: 2515: 2513: 2510: 2509: 2497: 2495: 2494: 2410: 2405: 2400: 2395: 2390: 2385: 2380: 2375: 2370: 2365: 2360: 2355: 2350: 2345: 2340: 2335: 2330: 2325: 2320: 2315: 2310: 2305: 2300: 2295: 2293:May 6–19, 2013 2290: 2285: 2280: 2275: 2270: 2265: 2260: 2255: 2250: 2245: 2240: 2235: 2230: 2225: 2220: 2215: 2210: 2205: 2200: 2195: 2190: 2185: 2180: 2175: 2170: 2165: 2160: 2155: 2150: 2145: 2140: 2135: 2130: 2125: 2120: 2115: 2110: 2105: 2100: 2095: 2090: 2085: 2075: 2070: 2065: 2060: 2055: 2050: 2045: 2040: 2035: 2030: 2025: 2020: 2015: 2010: 2005: 2000: 1995: 1990: 1985: 1980: 1975: 1970: 1965: 1960: 1955: 1950: 1945: 1940: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1915: 1910: 1905: 1900: 1895: 1890: 1885: 1880: 1875: 1870: 1865: 1860: 1855: 1850: 1845: 1840: 1835: 1830: 1825: 1820: 1815: 1810: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1780: 1775: 1770: 1765: 1760: 1755: 1750: 1745: 1740: 1735: 1730: 1725: 1720: 1715: 1710: 1705: 1700: 1695: 1690: 1685: 1680: 1675: 1670: 1665: 1660: 1655: 1650: 1645: 1640: 1635: 1630: 1625: 1620: 1615: 1610: 1605: 1600: 1595: 1589: 1582: 1581: 1575: 1574: 1569: 1563: 1556: 1555: 1546: 1544: 1543: 1540: 1539: 477: 476: 473: 472: 465: 460: 451: 445: 443: 442: 431: 422: 421: 418: 417: 396: 395: 378: 376: 369: 368: 364: 355: 349: 344: 343: 340: 338: 336: 333: 331: 328: 327: 324: 322: 320: 317: 315: 312: 311: 308: 306: 303: 302: 299: 297: 295: 292: 291: 288: 286: 283: 282: 279: 277: 275: 272: 271: 268: 266: 263: 262: 259: 257: 255: 252: 251: 248: 246: 243: 242: 239: 237: 235: 232: 230: 227: 226: 223: 221: 218: 215: 214: 211: 207: 206: 182: 173: 172: 157: 141: 117: 116: 101: 70: 64: 62: 44: 36: 27: 23: 22: 14: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5103: 5094: 5092: 5088: 5082: 5075: 5065: 5064: 5061: 5053: 5047: 5033: 5029: 5025: 5020: 5015: 5014: 5009: 5008: 5003: 4999: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4991: 4990: 4983: 4979: 4978: 4973: 4969: 4967: 4963: 4959: 4955: 4951: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4939: 4935: 4934:Child erotica 4931: 4927: 4923: 4919: 4915: 4911: 4907: 4904: 4900: 4896: 4892: 4888: 4884: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4877: 4873: 4872: 4870: 4852: 4849: 4847: 4841: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4837: 4836: 4835: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4830: 4829: 4828: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4824: 4818: 4816: 4812: 4809: 4808: 4789: 4788: 4787: 4784: 4782: 4776: 4772: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4762: 4758: 4754: 4753: 4752: 4749: 4747: 4741: 4737: 4736: 4735: 4732: 4726: 4724: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4712: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4696: 4694: 4688: 4687: 4686: 4682: 4678: 4674: 4673: 4670: 4666: 4662: 4657: 4656: 4651: 4650: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4639: 4637: 4631: 4621: 4620: 4616: 4612: 4604:Accessibility 4597: 4594: 4579: 4578: 4577: 4576: 4571: 4568: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4545: 4542: 4527: 4523: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4513: 4509: 4505: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4495: 4461: 4458: 4452: 4450: 4444: 4441: 4437: 4433: 4429: 4425: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4416: 4413: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4403: 4401: 4394: 4390: 4385: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4375: 4371: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4361: 4354: 4352: 4349: 4342: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4333: 4329: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4318: 4314: 4289: 4285: 4284: 4280: 4278: 4274: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4239: 4235: 4231: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4220: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4207: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4199: 4190: 4186: 4185: 4181: 4179: 4175: 4167: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4135: 4132: 4129: 4126: 4123: 4120: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4107: 4103: 4102: 4098: 4096: 4092: 4084: 4081: 4078: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4072: 4068: 4064: 4059: 4058: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4045: 4040: 4031: 4026: 4025: 4020: 4019: 4015: 4011: 4010:WP:NOTPERFECT 4007: 4006: 3995: 3991: 3987: 3983: 3980: 3977: 3973: 3970: 3966: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3958: 3953: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3938: 3933: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3910: 3905: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3895: 3891: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3881: 3876: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3851: 3848: 3847: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3836: 3831: 3821: 3816: 3811: 3808: 3804: 3801: 3798: 3795: 3792: 3789: 3786: 3785: 3779: 3776: 3773: 3770: 3767: 3764: 3761: 3758: 3755: 3751: 3748: 3745: 3742: 3739: 3736: 3733: 3731: 3728: 3725: 3722: 3719: 3715: 3713: 3709: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3692: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3679: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3665: 3662: 3659: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3584: 3583: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3508: 3507: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3453: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3433: 3432: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3395: 3378: 3374: 3373: 3369: 3367: 3363: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3310: 3305: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3277: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3245: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3173: 3170: 3165: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3091: 3087: 3086: 3082: 3080: 3076: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3032: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2957: 2953: 2952: 2948: 2946: 2942: 2934: 2931: 2928: 2925: 2921: 2920: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2877: 2875: 2872: 2869: 2865: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2847: 2843: 2840: 2837: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2810: 2805: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2737: 2732: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2694: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2682: 2679: 2674: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2656: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2645: 2641: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2609: 2606: 2601: 2590: 2588: 2587:WP:NOTPERFECT 2582: 2578: 2577: 2566: 2565: 2557: 2552: 2551: 2548: 2547: 2537: 2532: 2527: 2526: 2512: 2511: 2507: 2504: 2501: 2493: 2490: 2487: 2484: 2481: 2478: 2475: 2472: 2469: 2466: 2463: 2460: 2457: 2454: 2451: 2448: 2445: 2442: 2439: 2436: 2433: 2430: 2427: 2424: 2421: 2418: 2415: 2411: 2409: 2406: 2404: 2401: 2399: 2396: 2394: 2391: 2389: 2386: 2384: 2381: 2379: 2376: 2374: 2371: 2369: 2366: 2364: 2361: 2359: 2356: 2354: 2351: 2349: 2346: 2344: 2341: 2339: 2336: 2334: 2331: 2329: 2326: 2324: 2321: 2319: 2316: 2314: 2311: 2309: 2306: 2304: 2301: 2299: 2296: 2294: 2291: 2289: 2286: 2284: 2281: 2279: 2276: 2274: 2271: 2269: 2266: 2264: 2261: 2259: 2256: 2254: 2251: 2249: 2246: 2244: 2241: 2239: 2236: 2234: 2231: 2229: 2226: 2224: 2221: 2219: 2216: 2214: 2211: 2209: 2206: 2204: 2201: 2199: 2196: 2194: 2191: 2189: 2186: 2184: 2181: 2179: 2176: 2174: 2171: 2169: 2166: 2164: 2161: 2159: 2156: 2154: 2151: 2149: 2146: 2144: 2141: 2139: 2136: 2134: 2131: 2129: 2126: 2124: 2121: 2119: 2116: 2114: 2111: 2109: 2106: 2104: 2101: 2099: 2096: 2094: 2091: 2089: 2086: 2083: 2079: 2076: 2074: 2071: 2069: 2066: 2064: 2061: 2059: 2056: 2054: 2051: 2049: 2046: 2044: 2041: 2039: 2036: 2034: 2031: 2029: 2026: 2024: 2021: 2019: 2016: 2014: 2011: 2009: 2006: 2004: 2001: 1999: 1996: 1994: 1991: 1989: 1986: 1984: 1981: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1971: 1969: 1966: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1956: 1954: 1951: 1949: 1946: 1944: 1941: 1939: 1936: 1934: 1931: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1909: 1906: 1904: 1901: 1899: 1896: 1894: 1891: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1881: 1879: 1876: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1859: 1856: 1854: 1851: 1849: 1846: 1844: 1841: 1839: 1836: 1834: 1831: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1806: 1804: 1801: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1791: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1781: 1779: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1769: 1766: 1764: 1761: 1759: 1756: 1754: 1751: 1749: 1746: 1744: 1741: 1739: 1736: 1734: 1731: 1729: 1726: 1724: 1721: 1719: 1716: 1714: 1711: 1709: 1706: 1704: 1701: 1699: 1696: 1694: 1691: 1689: 1686: 1684: 1681: 1679: 1676: 1674: 1671: 1669: 1666: 1664: 1661: 1659: 1656: 1654: 1651: 1649: 1646: 1644: 1643:February 2006 1641: 1639: 1636: 1634: 1631: 1629: 1626: 1624: 1621: 1619: 1616: 1614: 1611: 1609: 1606: 1604: 1601: 1599: 1596: 1594: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1580: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1567: 1562: 1561: 1542: 1541: 1536: 1532: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 964: 960: 956: 952: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 485: 483: 479: 478: 470: 466: 464: 461: 459: 455: 452: 450: 447: 446: 440: 436: 435:Learn to edit 432: 429: 424: 423: 420: 419: 415: 411: 407: 406: 403: 402: 392: 388: 384: 383: 377: 375: 374: 367: 363: 361: 356: 354: 353: 347: 339: 337: 332: 330: 329: 323: 321: 316: 314: 313: 309: 304: 298: 293: 289: 284: 278: 273: 269: 264: 258: 253: 249: 244: 238: 236: 231: 229: 228: 224: 222: 219: 217: 216: 208: 204: 196: 180: 176: 169: 165: 160: 151: 147: 139: 131: 113: 109: 104: 95: 91: 73: 58: 51: 41:Content added 33: 30: 20: 5080:NeutralHomer 5071: 5043: 5012: 5011: 5006: 5005: 4981: 4971: 4947: 4902: 4898: 4894: 4890: 4886: 4814: 4774: 4722: 4628:Did you see 4627: 4607: 4479: 4448: 4442: 4440:Selena Gomez 4436:Taylor Swift 4428:Adolf Hitler 4399: 4384:Barack Obama 4347: 4309: 4282: 4276: 4270: 4183: 4177: 4171: 4100: 4094: 4088: 3964: 3908: 3903: 3844: 3843: 3436: 3371: 3365: 3359: 3243: 3222: 3218: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3122:you merely " 3119: 3084: 3078: 3072: 3030: 3024: 3020: 3019:argument is 3016: 2998: 2993: 2989: 2971: 2950: 2944: 2938: 2860: 2829: 2808: 2803: 2770: 2744: 2649: 2643: 2637: 2591: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2572: 2562: 2544: 2530: 1633:January 2006 1570: 1530: 480: 399: 381: 380: 359: 357: 4757:Cube lurker 4723:HJ Mitchell 4661:Jimbo Wales 4504:Jimbo Wales 4449:HJ Mitchell 3633:WP:CIVILITY 2774:Jimbo Wales 1673:August 2006 410:Jimbo Wales 362:at the end. 203:Next edit → 158:Jimbo Wales 150:view source 94:view source 32:Next edit → 5068:You on ANI 4918:Pedophilia 4443:inter alia 4230:Camelbinky 4063:Camelbinky 4014:User:Sarah 3971:left this 3846:canvasing. 3640:Balloonman 3544:moreno oso 3511:moreno oso 3475:moreno oso 3457:moreno oso 3455:Nope! ---- 3418:moreno oso 3403:moreno oso 3281:moreno oso 3130:from your 2902:discussion 2868:User:Sarah 2789:moreno oso 1653:March 2006 130:→‎Response 4653:untruths. 4211:explained 4037:GregJackP 3986:Modernist 3950:GregJackP 3873:GregJackP 3828:GregJackP 3689:Modernist 3614:Dmarinaus 3606:Dmarinaus 3302:GregJackP 3162:GregJackP 3140:Take care 3138:reasons. 2883:Sole Soul 2729:GregJackP 2671:GregJackP 2598:GregJackP 471:if needed 454:Be polite 414:talk page 213:Line 150: 210:Line 150: 4960:and the 4914:SSP Blue 4771:WP:UNDUE 4740:this guy 4708:Claritas 4677:Milowent 4030:talkpage 3976:User:JNW 3580:Response 3491:Milowent 3441:Milowent 3399:Bullying 3027:" =: --> 2749:Milowent 2745:supposed 2711:Milowent 2617:Milowent 2576:Not one. 1571:Archives 482:Archives 439:get help 408:This is 168:contribs 112:contribs 56:Wikitext 5059:Windows 4982:readers 4899:biasing 4895:skewing 4412:Deskana 4400:Prodego 4350:delanoy 4341:Failure 4043:Boomer! 3965:Comment 3956:Boomer! 3937:Spartaz 3879:Boomer! 3834:Boomer! 3308:Boomer! 3215:WP:DUCK 3211:WP:MEAT 3168:Boomer! 3132:alleged 3028:In his 2861:30 days 2735:Boomer! 2677:Boomer! 2604:Boomer! 387:commons 179:Founder 5051:Fences 4936:, and 4922:NAMBLA 4775:should 4432:Eminem 4415:(talk) 4283:• talk 4184:• talk 4101:• talk 3890:Bidgee 3855:Bidgee 3712:WP:AGF 3629:WP:NPA 3627:) had 3558:Bidgee 3530:Bidgee 3372:• talk 3085:• talk 3021:always 2994:always 2951:• talk 2866:Admin 2834:At an 2650:• talk 2615:too.-- 2531:1 days 1531:1 days 184:14,481 67:Inline 49:Visual 5055:& 5007:can't 4845:Tommy 4780:Tommy 4745:Tommy 4692:Tommy 4635:Tommy 4424:Bible 4389:4chan 4328:Bilby 4313:RIPGC 4272:Minor 4173:Minor 4090:Minor 3820:WP:DR 3754:Sarah 3698:Sarah 3655:Sarah 3651:Sarah 3587:Sarah 3361:Minor 3223:could 3136:wrong 3074:Minor 3031:first 2940:Minor 2906:Bilby 2639:Minor 1585:index 1579:Index 491:Index 487:Index 467:Seek 186:edits 121:edits 119:1,426 5086:Talk 5076:. - 5074:here 5028:talk 5002:CIPA 4897:and 4761:talk 4681:talk 4665:talk 4630:this 4615:talk 4526:mine 4522:this 4508:talk 4374:talk 4358:adds 4332:talk 4317:talk 4234:talk 4219:talk 4215:DVdm 4145:talk 4141:DVdm 4067:talk 3990:talk 3918:talk 3904:very 3894:talk 3859:talk 3631:and 3610:here 3591:talk 3562:talk 3548:talk 3534:talk 3515:talk 3495:talk 3479:talk 3461:talk 3445:talk 3422:talk 3416:---- 3407:talk 3323:talk 3319:DVdm 3285:talk 3253:talk 3234:talk 3230:DVdm 3213:and 3148:talk 3144:DVdm 3058:talk 3041:talk 3037:DVdm 3033:edit 3017:this 3007:talk 2990:this 2980:talk 2976:DVdm 2972:very 2910:talk 2887:talk 2859:. A 2818:talk 2809:your 2793:talk 2778:talk 2753:talk 2715:talk 2702:here 2621:talk 456:and 391:meta 389:and 360:~~~~ 164:talk 108:talk 5024:Wnt 5013:any 4952:to 4912:of 4887:any 4277:4th 4178:4th 4127:, 4095:4th 3974:at 3683:by 3437:all 3366:4th 3249:Wnt 3244:off 3079:4th 3054:Wnt 3003:Wnt 2945:4th 2935:. 2857:ANI 2836:AFD 2804:all 2644:4th 2506:186 2503:185 2500:184 2492:183 2489:182 2486:181 2483:180 2480:179 2477:178 2474:177 2471:176 2468:175 2465:174 2462:173 2459:172 2456:171 2453:170 2450:169 2447:168 2444:167 2441:166 2438:165 2435:164 2432:163 2429:162 2426:161 2423:160 2420:159 2417:158 2414:157 1523:251 1519:250 1515:249 1511:248 1507:247 1503:246 1499:245 1495:244 1491:243 1487:242 1483:241 1479:240 1475:239 1471:238 1467:237 1463:236 1459:235 1455:234 1451:233 1447:232 1443:231 1439:230 1435:229 1431:228 1427:227 1423:226 1419:225 1415:224 1411:223 1407:222 1403:221 1399:220 1395:219 1391:218 1387:217 1383:216 1379:215 1375:214 1371:213 1367:212 1363:211 1359:210 1355:209 1351:208 1347:207 1343:206 1339:205 1335:204 1331:203 1327:202 1323:201 1319:200 1315:199 1311:198 1307:197 1303:196 1299:195 1295:194 1291:193 1287:192 1283:191 1279:190 1275:189 1271:188 1267:187 1263:186 1259:185 1255:184 1251:183 1247:182 1243:181 1239:180 1235:179 1231:178 1227:177 1223:176 1219:175 1215:174 1211:173 1207:172 1203:171 1199:170 1195:169 1191:168 1187:167 1183:166 1179:165 1175:164 1171:163 1167:162 1163:161 1159:160 1155:159 1151:158 1147:157 1143:156 1139:155 1135:154 1131:153 1127:152 1123:151 1119:150 1115:149 1111:148 1107:147 1103:146 1099:145 1095:144 1091:143 1087:142 1083:141 1079:140 1075:139 1071:138 1067:137 1063:136 1059:135 1055:134 1051:133 1047:132 1043:131 1039:130 1035:129 1031:128 1027:127 1023:126 1019:125 1015:124 1011:123 1007:122 1003:121 999:120 995:119 991:118 987:117 983:116 979:115 975:114 971:113 967:112 963:111 959:110 955:109 951:108 947:107 943:106 939:105 935:104 931:103 927:102 923:101 919:100 412:'s 385:on 5089:• 5083:• 5048:. 5030:) 4970:is 4932:, 4928:, 4924:, 4920:, 4819:” 4810:“ 4763:) 4727:| 4683:) 4667:) 4617:) 4583:Hi 4557:Hi 4531:Hi 4510:) 4484:Hi 4453:| 4438:, 4434:, 4430:, 4426:, 4410:-- 4376:) 4368:-- 4343:. 4334:) 4319:) 4236:) 4221:) 4213:. 4147:) 4139:. 4136:, 4133:, 4124:, 4121:, 4069:) 3992:) 3920:) 3896:) 3861:) 3777:, 3768:, 3765:, 3762:, 3759:, 3746:, 3743:, 3740:, 3729:, 3564:) 3550:) 3536:) 3517:) 3497:) 3481:) 3463:) 3447:) 3424:) 3409:) 3325:) 3287:) 3255:) 3236:) 3150:) 3142:. 3060:) 3043:) 3009:) 2982:) 2926:, 2912:) 2889:) 2820:) 2795:) 2780:) 2755:) 2717:) 2623:) 2589:. 1529:: 1521:, 1517:, 1513:, 1509:, 1505:, 1501:, 1497:, 1493:, 1489:, 1485:, 1481:, 1477:, 1473:, 1469:, 1465:, 1461:, 1457:, 1453:, 1449:, 1445:, 1441:, 1437:, 1433:, 1429:, 1425:, 1421:, 1417:, 1413:, 1409:, 1405:, 1401:, 1397:, 1393:, 1389:, 1385:, 1381:, 1377:, 1373:, 1369:, 1365:, 1361:, 1357:, 1353:, 1349:, 1345:, 1341:, 1337:, 1333:, 1329:, 1325:, 1321:, 1317:, 1313:, 1309:, 1305:, 1301:, 1297:, 1293:, 1289:, 1285:, 1281:, 1277:, 1273:, 1269:, 1265:, 1261:, 1257:, 1253:, 1249:, 1245:, 1241:, 1237:, 1233:, 1229:, 1225:, 1221:, 1217:, 1213:, 1209:, 1205:, 1201:, 1197:, 1193:, 1189:, 1185:, 1181:, 1177:, 1173:, 1169:, 1165:, 1161:, 1157:, 1153:, 1149:, 1145:, 1141:, 1137:, 1133:, 1129:, 1125:, 1121:, 1117:, 1113:, 1109:, 1105:, 1101:, 1097:, 1093:, 1089:, 1085:, 1081:, 1077:, 1073:, 1069:, 1065:, 1061:, 1057:, 1053:, 1049:, 1045:, 1041:, 1037:, 1033:, 1029:, 1025:, 1021:, 1017:, 1013:, 1009:, 1005:, 1001:, 997:, 993:, 989:, 985:, 981:, 977:, 973:, 969:, 965:, 961:, 957:, 953:, 949:, 945:, 941:, 937:, 933:, 929:, 925:, 921:, 917:, 915:99 913:, 911:98 909:, 907:97 905:, 903:96 901:, 899:95 897:, 895:94 893:, 891:93 889:, 887:92 885:, 883:91 881:, 879:90 877:, 875:89 873:, 871:88 869:, 867:87 865:, 863:86 861:, 859:85 857:, 855:84 853:, 851:83 849:, 847:82 845:, 843:81 841:, 839:80 837:, 835:79 833:, 831:78 829:, 827:77 825:, 823:76 821:, 819:75 817:, 815:74 813:, 811:73 809:, 807:72 805:, 803:71 801:, 799:70 797:, 795:69 793:, 791:68 789:, 787:67 785:, 783:66 781:, 779:65 777:, 775:64 773:, 771:63 769:, 767:62 765:, 763:61 761:, 759:60 757:, 755:59 753:, 751:58 749:, 747:57 745:, 743:56 741:, 739:55 737:, 735:54 733:, 731:53 729:, 727:52 725:, 723:51 721:, 719:50 717:, 715:49 713:, 711:48 709:, 707:47 705:, 703:46 701:, 699:45 697:, 695:44 693:, 691:43 689:, 687:42 685:, 683:41 681:, 679:40 677:, 675:39 673:, 671:38 669:, 667:37 665:, 663:36 661:, 659:35 657:, 655:34 653:, 651:33 649:, 647:32 645:, 643:31 641:, 639:30 637:, 635:29 633:, 631:28 629:, 627:27 625:, 623:26 621:, 619:25 617:, 615:24 613:, 611:23 609:, 607:22 605:, 603:21 601:, 599:20 597:, 595:19 593:, 591:18 589:, 587:17 585:, 583:16 581:, 579:15 577:, 575:14 573:, 571:13 569:, 567:12 565:, 563:11 561:, 559:10 557:, 553:, 549:, 545:, 541:, 537:, 533:, 529:, 525:, 521:, 517:, 513:, 509:, 505:, 501:, 497:, 493:, 489:, 437:; 177:, 166:| 110:| 5026:( 4759:( 4711:§ 4679:( 4663:( 4613:( 4592:8 4589:7 4586:8 4566:8 4563:7 4560:8 4540:8 4537:7 4534:8 4506:( 4493:8 4490:7 4487:8 4372:( 4370:B 4348:. 4346:J 4330:( 4315:( 4232:( 4217:( 4143:( 4065:( 3988:( 3916:( 3892:( 3857:( 3812:. 3802:. 3693:. 3663:, 3589:( 3560:( 3546:( 3532:( 3513:( 3493:( 3477:( 3459:( 3443:( 3420:( 3405:( 3321:( 3283:( 3251:( 3232:( 3146:( 3056:( 3039:( 3005:( 2978:( 2908:( 2885:( 2816:( 2791:( 2776:( 2751:( 2713:( 2706:" 2619:( 2084:) 1587:– 1583:– 555:9 551:8 547:7 543:6 539:5 535:4 531:3 527:2 523:1 519:G 515:F 511:E 507:D 503:C 499:B 495:A 484:: 441:. 170:) 162:( 114:) 106:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.