Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

6208:

own behavior. More significant than his blocks in 2006 is the fact that he was not blocked at all for a long period of time and thus seems to be showing signs of improvement. Usually the default here at Knowledge seems to be to forget past indiscretions if improvement is shown. Admittedly Giovanni seems to be slipping back into pushing the 3RR boundaries in the last couple of months so presumably some kind of action should be taken. I agree with Mastcell above that a 6-month (that seems good for starters, it could easily be extended) 1RR probation might be the way to go. This would allow Giovanni to continue to make good contributions (which we want) but prevent him from edit warring. If he continued to edit war while on probation longer blocks would be put into effect. That seems by far the best solution to me as I don't think Giovanni is just a problem user and I don't think it's impossible for him to reform his behavior. Incidentally, Giovanni's block log is a bit deceptive and, although unacceptable, not as bad as it seems if you just glance at it. For example all of the apparent blocks from July 6-10 in 2006 (there were 13 of them) seem to revolve around one issue and involve a classic case of wheel warring. In the end Giovanni was not blocked, so what appears to be 13 blocks could actually be viewed as none (or 1 which was contested). In total it seems Giovanni was blocked about 10 times in 2006 (which is no good obviously) and 3 times so far in 2007.--

9032:) is a favorite of race-haters - and appears to be false. It underlines what I commented earlier - race-hatred is a real problem, and Knowledge will incite still more of it, unless we are ruthless about keeping it out. We'd never accept "The Jews are viewed with suspicion by XXXXX because of accusations of XXXXX" except in an article that makes clear how very nasty this stuff is. We should similarly steer well clear of allowing accusatory/discriminatory statements about other "groups" to appear. In fact, we should avoid labeling anyone as belonging a group. Or not belonging to a group, as we do when we allow the race-haters to imply that being Scottish is an alternative to being British. In this example, the "problem" is tiny - but it's still important to deny these race-haters a platform. And the principle of not labeling people (unless it is really, really necessary) holds good always. (Sorry if the above really belongs at some policy-discussing page, but reminding people is necessary at pages like this as well). 2346:...), as the article was at that point being moved around by at least one more admin; we were all trying to clean up the mess, and eventually, after Circus protected the article from moves (thanks!), we were able to do so. My primary concern here was not moving the article into any name that I thought was better, but to fix the n-th redirects and other navigational problems created by the move war. Considering the disruption caused by his actions - not for the first time - I see no reason why Ghirla shouldn't be treated as any other user who is responsible for a 3RR violation and a move war. He is an experienced editor and should now much better then to carry out an obviously controversial move without discussion and then on top of everything engage in a move war. Last but not least, trying to deflect the criticism of his person by turning on another editor, removing other editor's post in its entirety ( 8911:

scottish people identify with english cultural symbols. Its like calling George Bush a Connecticutur rather than an american. While its true he is both, the latter is more appropriate for an encylopedic article. While scotland is a nation, it is not a sovereign nation, there is a significant difference. Bottom line is someone born in the UK is British. Consider as well that many people born in Scotland/Ireland/Wales and England will at one time or another live part of their life in another constituant country of the UK, so what sub-nationality one identifies with is really down to their own personal choice. You could argue its not their choice and its determined by the location of their birth, but i'm sure General Wellington would have disagreed, ;)

9055:

asking quick enforcement of such a policy. So it looks like we have no actual policy or guideline after all... I'll try to propose one in RFC or Pump/Policy, Knowledge is becoming a total mess and a laughingstock with respect to nationalities, apparently everybody is too scared of ethnic terrorists to move, but we need something on that topic. It's not just the British thing, have a look from the Categories to articles about Canadian people (lots of "Canadian" deleted in favor of just "Quebec" or "Quebecois"), or Belgian people (most of them have erased "Belgian" and replaced it with "Flemish" or "Walloon", the two subnations that hate each other). I haven't even looked into Basque, Breton, Corsican, and the like...

12020:. I've been involved with this for a few weeks now and this seems to be the latest aspect of this situation. I've brought this here, as is often my wont, because my actions in blocking this IP for a while have been called into question by the IP. I acknowledge 3 months is a while but there is nothing (in my view) worthwhile coming from that IP, (it was used by Guivon, the latest sock manifestation of Velebit/Purger, and the IP itself, and that's it) and collateral damage strikes me as unlikely even if the IP is a Verizon address. Logged in users are not prevented from editing, and users without IDs can write the unblock-en-l list if they wish. As always I welcome review of my actions. ++ 5161:), I was astounded to see his prior block log. He appears to have one of the most extensive histories of unrepentant edit warring I've encountered, and his behavior in the last few days is not the kind of behavior that indicates that we should expect any improvement in the future after adding one more block to the over 20 previous blocks and block extensions he's had. I've given him a 48 hour block, to match his adversary-in-warring's block, but if there are no objections, I think we should recognize that this is an incorrigible case, and extend that to indefinite. And we need to get better at removing these time-sinks before it goes on so long. 8678:

changes would mean a massive overhaul of all Irish, Welsh and Scottish articles about people living in the last 300 years, and woud eliminate a lot of clear information by obscuring it behind the broad term 'United Kingdom'. The history of scotland is clear at its' article, and the ssame goes for UK. Readers want to know Connery's Scottish, not 'A citizen of the United Kingdom, being born in the subservient nation-state of Scotland' "Sean Connery is a scottish actor'. bam, done. Be CLEAR. Knowledge is not censored for political correctness like that. Observing self-description in the text, and the British(Scottish) in the infobox is enough.

6889:. Both users have reverted very recently after the protection, and both know better then this. We all know at least some moderate english, and we should be mature enough to discuss matters on the talk pages. When both of your blocks expire I hope you two can resolve this dispute. There are options such as mediation. Please do not resort to silly reverting again, but instead discuss the changes, your change is not likely to stick unless you get others to agree anyway. Anyone else editing this article should keep this in mind, being disruptive is being blockable. There are better ways to resolve your editorial disputes. —— 6584:. I'm all for encouraging useful edits and productive behavior, but when a user's long term effect is to decrease the productivity of other editors by more than the net value of his or her own contributions, eventually external solutions become necessary. We hope that dispute resolution and short term blocks solve the problem. Sometimes that doesn't work and then we're left with a difficult dilemma. Yes, the options at hand here are limited and crude. Let us all recall that Giovanni33 placed himself and us in this difficult position, and he should reasonably expect that consequences are at hand. 6700:

mirror that one with the same admin seeking a course of action without regard to community consensus. We have three things at work: 1) This ANI which appears headed to same as the last one (i.e. overturned by a single admin) 2) Durova's noble attempt to negotiate appropriate behaviour and 3) community consensus from the CSN. Option 2 is obviously the most favourable. Option 1 is not acceptable the second time around and one way to ensure that is option 3. Community consensus is an important gauge that an admin should be weighing when deciding to shorten or overturn a block. --

12461:(I'm not sure if this is the right place to post; if not, feel free to move the discussion to someplace more appropriate, but please notify me.) One of the issues seems to be (at least in the case of the second link) the fact that the IW links are kept on a transcluded subpage (along with other documentation). Apparently, this confuses the bot. This may be bad practice, I don't know, but it certainly simplifies life when dealing with a protected template. The other issue, where it moves the IW links outside of the noinclude tags appears to simply be a bug in the bot. 4110:"I visit Knowledge each day and go through and read portions of that I am interested in." -- And do you do so stealthily, not making edits, but just watching over a particular user to try and dig up dirt on them? No, I didn't think so. That's creepy and a clear demonstration of bad faith, especially when it's followed with a completely false reporting of events (going so far to claim I was "recruiting meatpuppets" and "canvasing"). As for "daily", the conversation was on the evening of the 11th, and it gets reported on Knowledge midday on the 12th. -- 8343:: My opinion is that the above commentator should have either self-disclosed that he is from Scotland and a member of Wikiproject Scotland (cf. his user page), or abstained from a conflict of interest. And as far as I remember Knowledge doesn't recognize or endorse non-sovereign nations, an encyclopedia is descriptive. Is there a new policy that says we now should use "Scot" or "Quebécois" or "Flemish" or "Texan" or "Basque" or "Breton" as nationalities? I would like to see the references or archive of the debate that legifered that. — 8542:: I forgot to mention that in that sort of cases, I'm always careful to have both the infobox say "Nationality: British (Scottish)" and the lead section say "John Doe is a British something from Scotland", thus there is both the encyclopedic sovereign nation, and the accurate sub-nation. But this is never enough for ethnic warriors, that simply delete all instances of "British" or "UK", such as the case above -- to me this is unencyclopedic and not a content dispute. And it seems to be the same everywhere. Our article about 7422:: "Ignore all rules" is not an invitation to use Knowledge for purposes contrary to that of building a 💕." That last statement is why we are here; to make a 💕. Anyways, the only higher person you might even convince to change the policy is Jimbo Wales himself, but he has been trying to cut down on our reliance on images that do not meet the Board's definition of freedom. So, in this case, you wish to use a photo of a living person. Well, if you look on the Flickr website, there are non-screenshot photos of the person. 1668:(unindent) I looked back through his/her contribution history (which is a little scary) and he looks to have tried to get help with his sig back in November 2006. I'm sure there are other issues at play here, but is it possible that he changed his sig at some point and just never got it right (looks like his name didn't have traditional characters in it early on). I'm not sure she/he knows enough english to be helped. Btw, she added back the quotes to the Obama page, but it's still unclear what she wants. . . 7341:"? You see why this requires someone with a sufficiently big stick to just lay down the law? I'm not only getting policy referrals, instead of people just saying that they think that policy is more important than article quality, but it's not even consistent policy! Every doc I've been pointed to eventually says -- or points to an article that says -- that exceptions are permitted, that fair use is permitted and that "If a rule prevents you from working with others to improve or maintain Knowledge, ignore it." 8959:

have its own national identity saying someone is scottish is ethnic not national. Scots are a race like aryans or kurds are a race. Likwise the english are a race, does living in england make someone english? of course not. Likewise for scotland. The nationality of the english, welsh, scots and n.irish is British, as it is for any other UK citizen. By all means add to the article he was born in scotland but its not his nationality. His nationality is british like every UK citizen.

5058:

admins and this is because this discussion belongs on the article's talk page, not ANI. This isn't an admin issue; it's an editorial dispute. You could have resolved the dispute yourself by using another reference, which you had because I emailed them to you last month. Now, please stop edit warring when it is clearly established there is no consensus for what you want to add to the article. Even people who agree with you in principle have told you two to stop because there is

3797:" the article, says the person who has made 631 edits compared to my 18,** who continually rolled back changes without addressing them on talk (the archives are full of dangling threads ending with me asking why you hadn't responded), and you who continually claimed an academic concensus as justification without ever citing it. You claim problems with my cites, and yet you continually ignored (and still ignore) requests to back up your concensus claims with 9072:

changed (and how far is it before such madness happens, if we let it slip?). It just means we need a policy so as to be able to clean the nationality fields of those unencyclopedic articles, and ban the ethnic warriors who'd revert again. Also, the difference between "Nationality: British" and "Nationality: Scottish" isn't what you call "nitpicking". No dictionary or encyclopedia use your "Nationality: Scottish"; this point, too, is never addressed.

2703:

the entire edit history of Digwuren and Suva, from their first edit in the project. In the first months, you will hardly find anything but reverts. Nobody seems to care about the amount of disruption they bring to the Eastern Europe-segment of the project but, when I make two page moves and two reverts, they are somehow joined together and declared in violation of 3RR. Since such a report has no chance of being taken seriously on

8195:

habits, don't bother us with facts". This also refers to editors born as late as the 1980s or even early 1990s, helpfully trying to educate persons who witnessed only few live broadcasts of football games - for example the last nine editions of an obscure thing called "FIFA World Cup final", in which one team with two names happened to be involved five times. BTW, did someone somewhere mention "sour grapes" yet? --

3022:"classical" revert. But let us not go into these technicalities. If you find it helpful to survey two-year-old block-logs, you will certainly notice that the first block was for "inciting a 3RR violation by another user" (and was lifted with an apology from the blocking admin on my talk page), and another was a result of Bonaparte's sock-farm antics. So your reading of my block log is disconnected from reality. -- 3332:. I think saying "disturbing how widespread and facile abuse of admin privileges has grown." - is a bit of an exaggeration. Its a redirect, nobody was deleting real content. Should we start an RFAR to get some people desysopped over this? I think not, just let the RFD run its course and stop screaming "Admin Abuse!" whenever an admin does something you disagree with. The proper venue for this should have been 4683:

I've told him before that it would be better to use a different article as the source but he apparently feels using the Marr article for a benign tidbit (that JH's family call him Jack and that his mother raised him) is critical. If he was serious about this, instead of just forum shopping and desperately trying to include a link to that particular article in the main bio, he'd simply use another source.

5819:

parole or something similar and that as well as other options should be considered. I don't think El C is ignoring consensus since there is none. Rather the indef block was far too drastic of a measure to take on an established user, particularly since the admin who indef blocked him did so after only a couple of people had commented here and did so less than 90 minutes after the thread was started.--

6264:

record of blocks documenting such behavior. In the case of Giovanni, it seems that yet another short term block may be as futile as the last dozen blocks. I've seen other editors merit indefinite blocks with behavior and block logs not nearly as egregious as that of this particular editor. Any block, whether indefinite, long or even short could hardly be considered arbitary in this particular case.

6941:, they have been revert warring on multiple articles for many weeks. Both parties have had plenty of warnings and they know this behaviour is not on, to give another warning would be meaningless. Brendan says in his complaint above that, "a lower threshold for blocking would exist if edit-warring resumes", so there's no excuse for then going off and doing just that, even if it was "only twice". 12573:(which should either be fixed, or it will soon become a "former" FA). In this case the destroyed part is not in the "References" section, but in the middle of the article (footnotes to a large table). (This article was even one of those listed already during the approval process, with the comment "I made 25 edits, but the robot has worked fine".) Somebody also explained the technical detail in 10370:, a dedicated vandalism fighter with a *EUPHENISM ALERT* wide definition of "vandal" and apparent anger issues. */EUPHENISM ALERT* CBFan has blanked Kingdom's ill-thought-out RFA while hurling abuse at it, removed things from Kindom's user page for being "stupid", left a message on Kingdom's talk page saying that he won't "have to keep deleting" his comments if he uses a spell checker, and 1804: 5844:

an arbitrary number, and was simply chosen as a limit). We are much better off without such a user on Knowledge. Even if there's a mass of consecutive blocks and unblocks, Giovanni33's block log is extensive and solely 3RR blocks. Users who constantly edit war should be excised from the project long before their block log gets to Giovanni33's length, or Nixer's length as mentioned below.—

12835: 11237: 11057: 10835: 9981: 9112: 9137:, he created that account specially to stalk his "enemy" summerthunder. he has not done anything constructive to wikipedia, other than stalking that summerthunder person. and he always uses that account whenever he thinks that his stalkee summerthunder is back online. so someone should ban this faker's account, he definitely has some other accounts which is against wikipedia's rules. -- 2321:

Ghirla also should not have moved the article more than once after it was undone, as the very fact that someone disagreed with his edits meant that he should take it to discussion. I don't really think the 24 hour block of Ghirla is called for though. It isn't really doing anything preventing him from editing from 24 hours when more productive editing could be taking place.

1816:(though it seems the motivation was not in fact racism, but simply because it was an available picture of twins, the use of a picture of living people to illustrate it was certainly in bad taste) - he had some difficulty communicating this objection, leading to accusations of vandalism etc which understandably left him with negative feelings about the wikipedia community -- 7426:. Of course, we cannot use that photo since it is copyrighted. But, you can ask the uploader and see if he can put it under a CC license. Emailing her website is a good option too. But, we just cannot use any ol' photo of her because she is still alive and from what I can tell, she is getting lots of work, so it will be possible to obtain a free photo pretty darn easily. 3723:

I was adding cites all over the place, and Durova was reverting my edits almost every time, half of the time without any explanation and while leaving the sections on the talk page that I started asking why dangling -- the whole time defending their actions (when defended at all) by claiming an academic concensus which was never referenced, despite repeated requests. --

5006:

people. The Arbitration Committee aren't gods. Jimbo has a lot of important stuff to do. Taking up the time of these people with long, obsessive, self-indulgent tirades against wicked users, editors and wikibureaucrats isn't going to earn you any bonus points. It might be a lot of trollish fun, but it gets you nowhere except to the land of high blood pressure. --

9190:, would it? To anyone concerned, there is personal information on my regular account. I created this one to participate in the ST sock-bopping shenanigans, which incurred onto some articles i edit. I'm cool with my personal info being visible on site amongst collaborators, but all in all i'd rather not leave a calling card with where i live, etc, to some others. 6299:

the door when they've started to take up too much time...whatever the POV and wherever their editing takes place. If Giovanni has an editor that he's warring with then that editor needs some attention also. But that doesn't mean Giovanni needs to be released from any responsibility, it just means someone needs to shine the light in other directions as well.

2382:. You should be ashamed of yourself, Piotrus. There are still people who remember how you wheel warred to unblock Molobo which - amid your protestations - was eventually banned from Knowledge for a year. After His year-long block expired in June, the guy instantly resumed his disruptive activities in the project, with your full encouragement and support. -- 7901:, with his point of view defeated, per consensus and common name. Today he has started to unilaterally change references from West Germany to Germany, on hundreds of articles. These edits are so destructive that I would consider them vandalism. He needs to be stopped, and the edits need to be undone, and quickly, if possible. Thanks for your time. 9304:) we have had an edit war with one side having three editors (one 2006 account, one brand new account, one IP) re-making changes which we had a dispute over and eventual consensus on earlier this year. The article has had what we believe was a problem with it being a minor target of some long term vandals in the past. 2809:. I tried to move the article once, to fix the broken links, and ended up moving a redirect anycase. I find your attempts to portay me as a villain here quite unconstructive. It was Ghirla who move warred against comments and moves of several (4? more?) editors; it is quite clear who is the disruptive party here.-- 8585:

and diplomatic choice of words isn't Knowledge's concern. And the original "Nationality: British (Scottish)" had it covered anyway for full information, so the reader is even free to decide. Doing otherwise would be as unencyclopedic as writing "Nationality: Texan". Not all readers are from the UK or the U.S.

12351:. The first change causes the interwiki links to be included on all transcluded pages, while the second change removed valid interwiki links intended for the main template and inserted other interwiki links that should have been wrapped in a noinclude section to avoid being included on the main template. -- 9063:

separatism. As long as it's sourced, I wouldn't be bothered by some infoboxes telling "British (Scottish)", "Canadian (Quebec)", "Belgian (Flemish)", or even "Spanish (Basque)". We just need to keep it to actual territories and forbid racial/ancestry things such as "German (Turkish)" or "French (Jewish)".

10392:, attempted to run for adminship just so he/she can "be a cop", and additionally violated 3RR twice. Luckily, the Crash article has got protection applied to it for now so any repeated edits in there should be less of an issue for now, but if anything pops up I'll approach the user and talk to him/her. 12789:

because to her they are all the same. When asked on her page to discuss these changes on the talk pages of the articles she has responded beligerently, and has already violated 3RR on Child modeling (erotic). Could an admin step in and aprise her of how things are done on wikipedia? PLease understand

12325:

More eyes on the article could not hurt, however there are a group of excellent Knowledge editors who are already attempting to clean up the article. Real77 claims to be working for Anna Wilding but is doing nothing but trashing the article's talk page and making the article as ugly as possible. My

10377:

of the latter's "literary difficulty." I happen to have a speech impediment, and the last item was the kind of thing that I got to listen to growing up. I can tell you that if I were in Kingdom's shoes, I'd be hard pressed indeed to obey anything that CBFan told me to do. This, IMHO, gives him enough

9058:

To ThuranX: I think that having a lead section say that "Sean Connery is a British actor from Scotland" is hardly the pejorative apocalypse you're writing about; the "clear information" you ask is precisely both terms, not a single one; the objective facts of British passport, U.N. representation, or

9054:

First, I need to apologize for how this turned into a long debate: as explained above, I honestly believed that in 2007 we had a WP:SOMETHING policy or guideline or arbitration precedent about such a simple encyclopedic topic as nationality fields, and I thus believed that WP:ANI was a good place for

8863:

Well said - there are real issues over how to treat nationality in articles, but Knowledge is riddled with "ethnic labelling" of very divisive kinds. It attracts race-haters and gives them far more of a platform than they have outside of the encyclopedia. We should not be providing any such platform,

8318:

My view is that it is acceptable to use Scottish as a nationality; I also feel that that is preferable. Therefore it's more of a content dispute than unencyclopedic, IMO. I don't feel the abuse of the minor edit checkbox is deliberate, perhaps just contact him saying 1) instead of waring, it could be

6274:

I wouldn't exactly say this is arbitrary, maybe a little hasty but hardly surprising that editors are starting to consider longer term blocks in this case. There isn't a "right" to edit here you know, and if someones editing becomes agitated enough it starts to be a waste of time to keep dealing with

6178:

Those were all done. He pledged 2RR 6 weeks ago. He was blocked for 2 weeks only 3 weeks ago but it was reduced by El_C. He has simply not taken any of this to heart. Admins who have reduced his block have done neither him nor the project a good service. Even now, they seem to believe Giovanni33

5543:

Doesn't seem logical to me. Giovanni33 went about a year without block, despite being an active editor the whole time (I checked). If after this he were to go another decade without doing anything blockworthy I doubt anyone would then be advocating indefinite block over a 3RR violation or the like. A

5455:

I have not looked into the matter to know who is who, I just tend to favour trying things if there is some hope of redemption. Would your feelings about imposing an indef block on G be the same if the other "side" were also subject to the same probation instead of indef blocked? If so, then this is a

5372:

Sure it does. One can see that sort of thing proposed and sometimes implemented via the Community sanction board. If an admin commutes the block, with that proviso, and no other admin changes it, it's done. As for Molobo et al, we're not perfect, but if sockpuppetry is identified and clearly evident,

5099:

It's sad that situations like this make referencing of articles impossible. I started from the top of the article, referencing text that others had written. I added probably 15 or so references, not just the ones that 'Skyring'/'Prester'/'Sarah' didn't like. Prior to this ANi, nobody had contacted me

4890:

As far as know people have only been removing one source and that is the Marr article which (as I've been telling you for weeks now) many people consider to be an attack article. If people have been removing other sources, which is what you seem to be claiming, please cite diffs. Please stop flinging

4820:

shows an impressive dedication to this task. This most recent effort has been discussed at great length and no concensus for insertion found. Lester's complaints that references are being removed revolves around his replacement of a good source for non-contentious material - the childhood nickname of

4656:

If you just want to source the statement, "leaving his mother to take care of John (or "Jack" as he was known in the family)," then why don't you use a different article which most people do not consider to be an attack piece on a living person? If Prester and Pete are reverting up to six times a day

4049:

Right. Because your interpretation of the policy is inherently correct, and mine is inherently wrong, right? The whole conflict was over what constitutes SYN. Declaring your stance as inherently right, and that I am "unwilling to comprehend", is exactly why we needed dispute resolution in the first

3722:

Being belligerent enough to drive editors off of articles is nothing to be proud of, Durova. And concerning an editor who had just gone through a painful affair in her life at the time, not that difficult, to be quite honest. As an addendum, anyone who checks the history of the article can see that

3531:

Might I ask how my behavior is similar to Ideogram's? I'm not asking that you stop debating. I've just noticed that the users involved have become increasingly hostile, and suggested that all parties involved should take a quick break to regain composure so that intelligent debate may resume. Perhaps

3275:

I, for my own part, will appreciate if you refer me to the process by which you have received the tools. I see that you have been editing for several months already but I can see your name neither in the user rights log or user rename log. It is annoying to see so many sysops whose qualifications for

2702:

It's not the first time that you defend "cool-down" blocks of established contributors made without prior conversation or warning on IRC advice, with a taunting block summary like "you aren't getting that courtesy, etc." If you search for "tendentious and unilateral" editing, you are welcome to check

2543:

I appreciate your concern about the title. You were sadly silent when Digwuren started a thread titled "Irpen persisting in using a deletion board for personal attacks" at this very board recently (must have moved to the archives now.) True enough he was quickly shown the door here at that time. Next

1811:

to illustrate the concept of "doppleganger" - He considered it racist because the subjects are black (though, no comment on whether he would think the same if a picture where the subjects were white had been used instead), and handicappist because either he considers being a twin to be a disability,

12892:

I noticed last night that the merge template had no image, but assumed someone was noodling with it, and it would be back in the AM. It's not. As the images often work as a shorthand for regulars who might gloss over the text of templates like that, can we get it back soon? thanks you. Example here:

12326:

concern at this point is that because he claims to be working for Ms. Wilding, he is making her look awful with his edits, particularly his talk page ranting which is largely incomprehensible. This sounds reasonable, though, blocking until a user agrees to not make any more legal threats. Thanks.

12184:

by the standards of our current fair-use doctrine or else face quick deletion, regardless of how "fixable" and otherwise-valid those rationales may be? I know this has been discussed to death, but Betacommand's bot is starting to paint with such wide, nitpicking brushstrokes that we could soon lose

12038:

Nah, I wouldn't worry about collateral damage. 99.9% of addresses out there have no edits, and the ones that are multi-user addresses are usually quite obvious. This one isn't it. You would have been quite appropriate to block the thing for 1 year, and a hard block at that, especially given that the

11193:

Hi, can somebody please help me with this image? This is taken from the Hungaryan National Széchényi Library. What i have to do, that others stop tagging it? It is public. I also wrote to the library management (just 4 sure) .. but probably they will write back in hungaryan, so no big sense. thanks

8515:

Sean Connery would give his nationality as Scottish, I'm sure. I don't believe Graeme Garden does. He is not prominently identified with nationalist causes, and is not strongly identified with Scottishness. I'd wager that a decent proportion of his fan base are not really aware he's a Scot, since

8176:

Look, people accept that the official name was never West Germany. People accept that "West Germany" is rarely used in Germany itself. People accept that the DFB and the national team are - officially - unchanged since reunification. People accept that English-speaking people often refer to the West

8089:

Matthead, Just stop. You've shopped this issue to multiple forums. You got the same answers each time: This is En.Knowledge, and as such, reflects En Language use. You don't like that. We get it. You want it changed. We get it. It's not going to change. Find other ways to contribute to wikipedia, or

7544:

I've recently had an encounter with a user who announced that he was quitting Knowledge over a single post I made; I am told that he reappeared a few days later under a new username. So maybe this person will do the same? As BSF suggested above, he could always contact Ms Hamilton's publicity people

6722:

I think that admins are more inclined to take unilateral action based on input here than on CSN. For example, Durova blocked very quickly based on evidence here. Likewise, El_C seems inclined to unblock based on his interpretation of fairness rather than consensus. This approach has its merits as

6680:

What makes this discussion here any different than one that will be started at CSN? Starting a vote (which is what it always ends up being at CSN) isn't going to solve anything. There's enough discussion here to gauge consensus that we don't need bulleted points with '''endorse''' or '''oppose''' to

6207:

I think an indefinite block is far too draconian. Giovanni most definitely has a tendency to edit war and that is not good. But I disagree that he is merely a POV warrior. He has made good contributions here, and strikes me as quite rational and open to suggestions, be they on article content or his

5764:

Have not examine in detail. I have not seen anything regarding socks other then what happened very long ago, over 11 months. The 3RR reports were not false, the cited point of them was he was also involved in them. As for stalking, if you are reffering to your below items, there was no disruption is

5712:

went 9 months and was not blocked, but has been blocked now another 4/5 times in the last 2.5 months...that on top of his abuse of sock accounts previously and his more than a dozen previous blocks, all for edit warring. If he isn't indefinitely blocked and someone shorthens his block and he resumes

5074:

I made the comments here that I have because I feel matters are being misrepresented. If that is a misuse of ANI, then I'm certainly not the only one guilty of that. An exclusive attack on me in respect of that, shows bias, an absence of good faith, incivility and newcomer biting. I, as a relatively

4760:

then on to the RfC (which I started, by the way, so I find it hilarious that some opposing editors have accused me of being a sock puppet and questioned whether my comments meet the RfC; talk about wikilawyering...). You will find a majority of editors making favourable comments for at least a brief

4741:

What?? There is no consensus to include that material; that's why I deleted it. All I removed was the twaddle about Howard's father. There is absolutely no consensus to include that material, I don't understand how you can even claim that. The fact that it is removed multiple times a day is proof of

4088:

As for your site, how do you know he's watching your site daily? Wouldn't he have brought up the discussion as soon as it occurred, as opposed to days after it ended? What's wrong with visiting a site on a daily basis in the first place? I visit Knowledge each day and go through and read portions of

3772:. Rei's approach was to raise a variety of different points simultaneously and repeat them in various combinations, disregarding feedback. I tried addressing those points in a variety of ways, I requested prioritization and focus, but this individual would not engage in encyclopedic collaboration. 3606:

whatever it is, is being deleted out of process, such as: CSD "A7 does not apply here!" (I don't know what CSD criteria was used, nor if its even an argument over a speedy deletion, nor do I really care). All I do know is continued revertwarring here is going to lead to blocks, so discuss the issue,

3293:

the username Maxim through the CHU/U process (much as I did with my own). The log is unclear but that's not Maxim's fault - my own log has a similar problem (my original name was my current with "78" at the end), it's to do with the fact the history doesn't migrate. Note I have absolutely no opinion

2683:

Ghirla moved the page 3 times today in the span of less than an hour without making any mention of it on the article's talk page. This is what prompted Suva to contact an administrator through IRC (how is there anything wrong with that?) and Golbez just happened to be the one to look into the issue,

10355:

Since writing the original message, he has since performed three edits on the Crash article in the space of an hour, and is still insisting to keep the image no matter how objectionable it is. Considering that he/she tried to apply for adminship in the past as well, I'm convinced about this user's

9071:

is an English actor" where they delete the word "British" on sight everytime it's inserted) doesn't make it right nor a point; for instance, if all our articles about Muslim subjects were dated using the Muslim calendar, that still wouldn't make it right or encyclopedic, just massively needed to be

8910:

Where someone is born does not identify their nationality. Scotland does definately have a national identitiy within the UK, but many English people identify with scottish national/cultural symbols like tartans, kilts and bagpipes etc, without themselves actually being scottish, and vice versa many

8837:

Many people's primary identification is with the UK, not with a constituent nation. You are wrong to presume that someone who was born in Scotland is Scottish. Billy Connolly is known as a Scottish comedian, Ronnie Corbett is not, nor is Graeme Garden. Putting people into an ethnic box is POV. Many

8584:

Scotland isn't a sovereign nation. Readers of an encyclopedia expect "Nationality" to give them the sovereign nation, the U.N. member, the passport -- which is UK/British. There is no Scotland at the U.N., and no Scot passport. This is unencyclopedic, and playing on words, the UK's internal affairs

8213:

Insulting all the editors of Knowledge as being too young to 'get it' is lame. It's quite simple, it's been explained over and over again. At this point, all I can see is some sort of bizarre POV thing going on. You ignore EVERYONE, and repeatedly declare YOU are right, and YOU are the only one who

7167:

is a policy. You will need to convince enough people to override the consensus there, and that involves using convincing arguments, not repeating personal attacks such as "by sense". Law has nothing to do with those cases where Knowledge policy is stricter than law. In other language Wikipedias,

6732:

There is no consensus to indef-block ... there are two distinct groups of users who want different outcomes. A lot of admins have expressed disquiet about jumping straight to an indef block, and I think that the current situation is saying that we as a group stuffed up over the past year and failed

6298:

Arbcom and RFC are not the only routes to long terms blocks, in fact I'd bet all the money in my pocket that more long term/indef blocks were done without Arbcom or RFC involvement than with their involvement. And as far as taking two to tango you're right. Consistent edit warriors need to be shown

6263:

I also object to arbitrary banings of long time users. Established users should be given a chance to improve or correct their behavior and should only be permanently banned after a long period of ignoring the rules, incivility, edit warring, pov pushing, tenditious edition and with a corresponding

5843:

is that he's edit warring with someone. Honestly, we do not need users like him who disrupt the project in the long run by constantly pushing their own point of view in their edits and causing drama by constantly gaming the system by feeling that he's entitled to X amount of reverts a day (three is

5754:

I don't think any of the other editors were nearly as disruptive as Giovanni33: Stalking, using socks, evading blocks, filing false 3RR reports, and whatnot. Other editors have already stated that Giovanni33 appears to be stalking John Smith's. Giovanni33 appears to be a user, whose major purpose

5722:

There was a block in June that was overturned. Another in August, then this one. So prior to this he had 1 in about a year. YOu also should have acknowledged how many of those blocks in the past you were involved in as the block admin, then later seemed to bump into Giovanni again while not one. So

5505:

Just a procedural comment - Rather than unblocking and re-blocking for the original duration I might suggest leaving a note to the user of your intent to remove the block after the original duration has expired. Avoids further cluttering the block log and reduces the possibility of wheel-warring by

4843:

We need to separate issues here. The issue of contentious text in the article ("copra") has nothing to do with the deletion of references for non-contentious text. We are talking about references being deleted for non-disputed text. I, more than anyone else, over the past few months have called for

4682:

I agree, it does go both ways. However, Lester knows full well that a lot of people consider that article an attack article. Two weeks ago I emailed him a whole lot of articles he could use instead to reference that statement but instead he insists on using the one article that is most contentious.

4203:

The original research was under a section titled "Inaccuracies in survival advice." That is to say, you had sources that said "not x," you had the television show in which Bear said "x," and you therefore inappropriately synthesized the material into a section that effectively says "Bear is wrong."

3909:

you will clearly see how I was trying to do this the correct way. Anyhow, if you think Rei is talking about an edit war, don't put my name into this. It's clear enough to see that I created the discussion to prevent any conflicts when editing the article. You're assuming bad faith on me, when I did

3084:

Irpen, I don't think you are well-served to argue the concept of "blocks in perpetuity" (debunked by ArbCom on many an occasion) with a user specializing in "Pokémon species". I'm not a Pokémon species, thankfully. There are about 2000 administrators, the vast majority of which are clueless, to put

3011:

You've been blocked for 3RR twice before, one time it was undone. And the word was sought, and many admins agreed with my decision; in the end, I decided there were too many extenuating factors to continue having my name on the block. That does not mean you get to either resume being disruptive, or

2759:

Mostly agree with everything Eagle said, including that 3RR is not an entitlement. One can be blocked for under 3RR revert warring in general? Is this what happened? Because it was said that it was a 3RR violation block. Next, we are not discussing the "whatever issues" that belong to talk here. We

2561:

Irpen, if I had abused my admin powers in the past, I'd have lost the admin status. That never happened. Yes, some people - yourself included - were unhappy about my actions. But the community saw no need to take any action - so please stop slandering me with your accusations that I abused my admin

12483:

This bot was running September 5. and 6. and managed to mess up citations on more than 500 articles (by substituting "fn/fnb" tags with "ref/note" in such a way that the notes are messed up). In addition to ordinary articles, also User pages, Archived pages and Knowledge Guidelines were messed up.

10346:

received a 24-hour lock relating to a dispute relating to the change of header image (the one in which he/she keeps insisting on changing has been rejected for reasons relating to an improper fair use rationale and failure on the acceptable image content criterion), but after the lock was done the

9389:

was created and immediately started editing the same exact changes into the article. They hit 3 reverts on the 12th and I warned them; if they were a sock of Shanebb that would have been a 3RR violation. Shanebb continued editing in the same pattern right after I 3RR warned CheckLips. CheckLips

8601:

And sorry for asking another, but I would really like to know what are our policies or guidelines or arbitration cases about this topic? When I posted this, I only expected an admin to brandish a WP:SOMETHING that would lay down the law on the matter -- not a POV discussion about whether someone's

8405:

So IMO both are conflict of interest, yet he didn't self-disclose it. Especially since he's advocating something that's never done in any dictionary or encyclopedia I've ever seen, that is replacing "British" with "Scottish" for the nationality field. How am I trying "to intimidate another editor"

8194:

that a city/club moved from "West Germany" in 1989 to "Germany" in 1991, skipping the 1990 season in the process, too. I have encountered so many ridiculous mistakes and misuses on Knowledge that I have decided to tackle this problem, which mainly consists of the attitude "we've gotten used to our

6308:

Completely agree that Giovanni shouldn't be "released from any responsibility" - but that does not necessary mean he should get an indefinite block just because few admins has lost patience with him. To be honest, it makes me question the integrity of the admin population if they make such severe

6284:

We have the Arbcom and editor review at RfC. Decisions become arbitrary when an admin gets a bee in their bonnet and can't be bothered to go through the proper channels. Be honest - if you don't think they did the job properly last year when they didn't ban him just say so. Other editors have been

5818:

Sorry, but I do not at all see a consensus here for an indef block, particularly since the discussion is ongoing. In addition to El C's objection above I objected below and I also see objections from Proabivouac, Chaser, Lar, HongQiGong, and CBDunkerson. Several folks have proposed a long-term 1RR

5444:

Sorry, no, I object to having this longstanding edit war 'solved' by effectively siding with/against one of the two main participants. I'm going to be unblocking and reimposing Dmcdevit's original block. If you're going to seek probation, fine, or if you're going to be issuing concrete ultimatums,

5057:

There was no "scramble" to do anything. I simply replaced the Marr article with one you and I both already had in an attempt to put an end to this ridiculous edit warring. It has nothing to do with you and Brendan misusing ANI. You might have noticed that your complaints have been ignored by other

5015:

Lester, that is an editorial issue, not administrative. If you find someone has broken a reference while editing, fix it and if the same person breaks one again, just tell them; they most likely don't realise they are doing it. This only becomes an administrative issue if you are claiming policies

4288:

And who are these "outside opinions", apart from Someguy1221 who weighed in just minutes ago? If you'll check the talk page, you'll notice that the is quite blank (it was interrupted by someone who started a section for the specific purpose of attacking me). I welcome outside opinions, and I've

3150:

Ghirlandajo, I apologize if my comment seemed insulting. I meant what I said in the most literal sense: that you had been blocked before; I did not mean to imply whether you deserved it or not, just that it happened. This was due partially to my partial misreading of your previous statement, and I

3112:

Three out-of-process deletions of pages are "nothing wrong", while "cool-down" blocks of established contributors made without prior conversation or warning on IRC advice, with a taunting block summary like "you aren't getting that courtesy, etc." are perfectly consistent with our blocking policy,

2963:

From what I've seen, the block is definitely justified. Move wars are far more disruptive than edit wars. From what I can tell by looking through the splintered move history, Ghirla moved the page multiple times and was reverted by multiple editors. When you get reverted multiple times by multiple

2320:

Getting back on subject, I do believe Piotrus' deletion of the page in question to engage in moving the page again may have indeed been inappropriate, as he was using admin tools to make way for the move to his preferred version of the article, then followed by a revert of Ghirla's edits. But yes,

2309:

Swatjester, please stay on topic. My "crusade" has nothing to do with this. Violation is unclear. If allegation was brought in plain view, we could have discussed it and see its merit. This is exactly why it was snitched at IRC, to achieve the block rather than give the matter a due consideration.

9000:

Personally I think this has been brought up in the right place. The user who brought it to our attention skipped the usual process of actually getting an edit war underway by bringing the matter up before it got that far, but it would have ended up as an edit war without some kind of intervention

8958:

Knowledge is an encylopedia, surely it is therefore a venue for nitpicking? Its being discussed here as this is where it has arisen for various reasons, there is no need to take it to the village pump because its really quite an open and shut case. Scotland is not a sovereign nation. While it may

8864:

even in those cases where we think we're reflecting genuine differences. This is a problem that will get worse as en-WP attracts more and more members of minorities - some of their grievances will undoubtedly be genuine - but others will simply be malicious. Articles don't need it - objecting to "

8072:

and a map, and then tell which team, if any, should be called "West German". How come that the peaceful access of a state to the FRG in 1957 is overlooked by you while the peaceful access of five states to the FRG in 1990 is treated as a bigger deal than the border changes between the World Wars?

7962:

in which many revealed both ignorance and Anti-German attitude). Links to this POV article had been planted in over 200 articles, a number which was reduced by me recently. It is ArtVandelay13 (and others) who makes many destructive POV-pushing edits that go against consensus by reverting like in

7725:

may i suggest you give him a small 2nd level warning about changing your comment (give a proper reference) and hopefully that'll be the end of it. if you havn't submitted any previous warnings, there is no room for sanction. p.s. best i'm aware "gun freak" and "freak" are not on the same level of

7374:

Everyone is quoting Knowledge policies except the ones that say that the encyclopedic content is more important than the policies! Is the intent really that community consensus should enable putting policy ahead of article quality? Seriously, what is it going to take to get the policy out of this

6628:

was his pledge 6 weeks ago on a 3RR/edit warring transgression that went unblocked. A few weeks later, he was blocked again for edit warring with a different editor on a different article. That block was reduced by El_C. This weeks edit war was with yet a different editor, a different blocking

6153:

All due respect though, why were more extensive blocks (as in months-long or year-long block) not considered before jumping to an indefinite block? Or how about a 1 revert/article/week enforcement? I agree that his continued edit warring is a serious matter, there's no question about that. But

4864:

Skyring(Pete) is suggesting that it's OK to delete references because he didn't like the newspaper article that was used for the reference, and he suggests I should have found a different one. Let me turn that around. Why didn't Skyring put some effort into finding a reference himself? That's the

4772:

What rubbish. Since the start of the year I've made two reverts of the "copra" link, one administrative revert after blocking people for a 3RR violation, a couple of vandalism reverts, and a couple of edits swapping references. You, on the other hand, seem to have restored the "Copra" text in one

4755:

Twaddle indeed. Sarah, you and the rest of the minority of editors that oppose any plantation inclusion (however brief) keep denying consensus without ever explaining what your interpretation of consensus actually is in this instance. Go through the reams of conversation, starting in the archived

3553:

The underlying problem is the failure of folks to take lessons from what's going on this noticeboard. Each month we have longish threads revolving around drama blocks made purposefully to inflame a situation rather than defuse it. Each time it turns out that they serve no useful purpose, and each

2679:

Who cares how the issue is brought to an administrators' attention? Just because it's IRC which you obviously have something against does not make the later block completely invalid. Like I stated at Ghirla's talk page, there's no difference if this was brought up towards an administrator at AN3,

2581:

Desysopping requires severe and systematic abuse, Piotrus. You know that perfectly. Your rarely use your admin tools as unlike some admins, you write a lot. That itself is a good thing. I view your editing habits, while in part problematic, separately from your admin habits. They have some common

1846:

With no disrespect to the user, it looks like neuro damage to me, like someone that's been in a really bad car accident at some point. Someone I knew at school went like this, one quirk which is similar to this person is repetition of similar or inverted forms, eg the "complex" bit in the diff. I

9708:

I noticed he and the IP were exchanging nasty comments, reported the IP, and warned him, because the way I saw it, he was being just as nasty as the troll. However, I noticed that the troll was goating him, so I didn't report him instantly. I was trying to stop the trolling on both sides. If you

8677:

Scotland maintains a distinct national identity. That it's part of a bigger thing doesn't negate that it's a nation. It's article says it's a nation. It calls itself a nation, and maintains a national archives distinct from that of the UK archives and distinct of English Archives. Demanding such

8190:

It has to be accepted that "West German(y)" is an informal name which might be used for additional information, but never in lieu of a correct name - surely not in an encyclopedia, unless it aspires to mirror the sloppiness of mainstream media like tabloid newspapers. While it is okay to mention

7995:

as well as their formal titles. The appropriate English language names for both countries are established in the principle WP articles, and therefore those conventions are to be followed. Ultimately, consensus is against you - multiple editors are reverting you and you are in the minority in the

6936:

I support the block of both parties. I reviewed this report myself last night and thought both parties should be blocked given the gaming and the very clear warning they were given not to resume edit warring once the protection expired, but I didn't respond to the report myself because of my own

6100:

Instead of taking that incident as a warning, he's continued the exact same behavior that's gotten him in trouble many times in the past. I have to agree with Dmcdevit, Durova, etc etc that it's time to stop enabling this kind of editing. I'm not really impressed with the excuse that "others are

5037:

I wish to report that the deletion of references has stopped. I think the mere mention of the incident on the ANi has resulted in it stopping. There has also been a scramble to replace references with alternate ones. So I'm happy if this has resulted in a change in behaviour from those involved.

4874:

The article lists a number of biographies of John Howard. Has done for a long time. Page 9 of the Barnett/Goward book includes the material about John Howard and his mother that you are getting upset about. Kindly stop wasting everyone's time with contrived wikilawyering. You have shown yourself

3514:. I'd like to inform you that, in Knowledge, we discuss issues robustly and openly, and there is no way we'll stop doing that until some sort of conclusion is reached. The matter at hand is frivolous deletion of three pages. I don't see how it qualifies as a "realm of personal attacks", sorry. -- 11812:

In response to your general point, an admin should know (and almost invariably does) when an action could be construed as controversial, and knows they have the option to seek an outside opinion before acting. From what you have outlined above, it may have been appropriate for Lexicon to do so.

7982:

This is the English language Knowledge, and the common English name for The Federal Republic of Germany until 1990 was West Germany, as opposed to East Germany for the The German Democratic Republic. Of course term West Germany was unknown within the Federal Republic, since they term the nation

6699:

Giovanni33's last block in August was discussed on AN/I. An admin pretty much unilaterally decided to reduce the block. G33 was in an edit war with a different user on a different article and the block was made originally by a different admin than the ones here. The discussion here appears to

5618:

He does deserve an extended block, but an indefinite block is the end-all-be-all block. So how about a less arbitrary process in imposing it? Maybe other avenues need to be explored, from months-long blocks to a one-year block. But an indefinite block? It would be nice if there was a formal

5556:

a year ago... when he was being blocked on a weekly basis? He has gotten better, but since he has not achieved perfection he should be banned entirely? Such an approach seems to suggest that a user can never 'recover' from bad behaviour... it is just a cumulative tally leading to their eventual

4861:

Recently published articles about John Howard's early life often contain a references to the "copra" issue. The most recent best-selling biography of Howard mentions the copra issue. Are the people above suggesting that it's OK to delete any references about any subject matter sourced from that

3361:

The matter is not so trivial as you try to represent it here. The page was protected from recreation, although nobody tried to recreate it, as far as I know. Furthermore, it was deleted rather controversially, from the second attempt, when the main contributor was away from the project. I don't

2719:

Here is my thoughts, folks were editing disruptively, nobody can deny that. Moving a page 3 times (and presumably having someone else or another group moving it back at least 2 times) is disruptive. Folks, we all know the English language, we all know how to talk to each other using the English

2641:

Ghirlandajo was doing more then moving the article :he was changing the content so that it was completely different from the previous article with his stated justification being the new title, while making it impossible to restore original title by creatng a disamb page with the same name. This

2349:- what Suva well described as 'trying to hijack an ANI discussion') is certainly not what we expect from our editors. PS. I have no idea how IRC is related to this discussion, I was certainly not using it today - why do I feel it's another attempt to turn this 'off topic'? PPS. I find the title 8645:

Of course Scotland is a nation (especially as far as international sports bodies are concerned) and a historical kingdom - the United Kingdom originally being those of England and Scotland. Also, there are sufficient cultural, legal and educational differences to establish separate identities.

8177:

German team as simply Germany. But you have to accept that, in English, "West Germany" is the most common name for the country, and its teams, by an overwhelming majority, up to and including th most official records and most mainstream media. The English language Knowledge has to reflect this.

5095:

Broken references/links/missing reference holes were an admin issue, not a content issue, as I had no power to stop it. If I hadn't listed it for ANi, there would still be broken things and holes in the article. The activity has stopped since I listed it on the ANi, so I guess the players know

5005:

So fix it. If I somehow broke a reference, then I didn't do it intentionally. As noted in my edit summaries, I was cleaning out the copra, which you keep on inserting without consensus. Look, here's some advice which took me a lot of pain to find out for myself. Administrators are just regular

4646:

It's not a dispute about the content of the article text. It's about repeated deleting of references. References are being deleted from paragraphs in the article that are not in dispute, just because the reference newspaper story also mentions the disputed subject (Copra plantations). So we're

4015:

Lol? I wanted to avoid the dispute resolution because no reasonable person wants to go through it. People looking to get into long, drawn-out arguments might want to, but I would much rather settle the dispute on the talk page with the involved editors. I think this is a much better and easier

3707:

then she crossed that line also). She finally left the topic after two editors pointed out to her how thoroughly unacceptable these methods were: among other things she had misidentified the author of her leading source. I find it disappointing, but certainly not surprising, that her conduct

3698:

I dealt with Rei briefly in late '05 to early '06 and her MO was to edit war while referring to (but never actually citing) a few marginal sources. The POV she advocated had been originally proposed by a nonspecialist three quarters of a century earlier and thoroughly rejected by the academic

3563:

I was not requesting that anyone get blocked in order to cool down. I was suggesting that people take the time to cool down on their own accord. If you feel that my posts were useless, however, than I shall simply refrain from continuing in this discussion. That's all you really needed to say.

3154:

With that out of the way, I do not see how my preference in editing Pokemon species articles has anything to do at all with my ability to comprehend an explanation, nor what it has to do with my standing as a Wikipedian editor at all. I can't blame you for losing your cool like that, given the

2654:

Who "hijacked" the page is a separate issue, Suva, and it's not Ghirla who "hijacks" and "owns" not just this page but a set of them created in a rabid spree. There was no 3RR either. Your choice to act through IRC is deplorable. There is an AN3 for a good reason where the accused may face the

2474:

for who is running the well-organized campaign against the wikipedia contributors. As you can see Piotrus was "gunning" for Ghirla for years and for me for several months. I am looking forward for your appreciation of our "managing to be productive" while being subject to such a meticulous and

2444:

Vecrumba, when you, as it seemed called the editors who disagree with you "schumtz" repeatedly, I did raise the issue. This is not the same as calling some statement bullshit. You explained at that very thread later that by schmutz you meant the situation, not people. I never said a word after

2413:

yet let slide Ghirla's "bullshit" and unsourced allegations of editor misconduct and collusion with not a peep. And don't you and Ghirla tire of your permanent campaign against Piotrus? Really, he's not going to roll over and play dead for you. And he manages to be productive despite your best

12491:

I can see no effort to clean up the "vandalized" articles. User Alpta has archived the discussions on his userpage, after stating, "I will have to pass this robot task onto another operator. I thought that this was a simple "find and replace" robot task. The templates might have to be updated

2213:

Wait what? The only "IRCer" here is Golbez (until now, zomg). From what I've read just now (on this page), Ghirlandajo was editting tedentiously and unilaterally moved a page without any discussion on its talk page. In addition to that, Ghirla replaced Suva's thread concerning his actions at

2069:

Ghirlandajo opposed the current article and without any discussion changed its title, while creating a stub that made it impossible to change it back to the previous name. Then he started to change and delete content of the article, justifyng it by the new title saying "its not about Soviets

5924:

running up 20/30 blocks for 3RR before anyone takes any serious action other than a day's enforced wikibreak? For one thing, many admins do not implement 3RR blocks in an escalating manner, so it seems, and just continue to add on another 24 hours of enforced wikibreak to the block log. This

3021:

I assure you that I was never blocked for 3RR, I generally pursue the policy of 1RR, and I could never imagine that two page moves could be bundled together with two ordinary edits to represent it as a 3RR violation. I still don't understand how one could count a page move as identical to a

9062:

To JzG/Guy: about "British (Scottish) is OK, if a bit weaselly", I believe that no peace will come if we just try to impose the sovereign citizenship only, and also that it's often accurate and useful to mention subnationalities or local ethnies that have their own identity or a history of

6309:

decisions based simply because they've lost patience. Something should be done about Giovanni, yes. But an indef block on an editor without going through ArbCom? I would disagree with that even for editors that I dislike. It's not like Giovanni was vandalising or making legal threats.

3237:

I infer as much, but I can't find where the redirect was nominated for deletion. I am told that Digwuren replaced the redirect with {{db|recreation of deleted article}}, in an effort to mislead the administrators. It's a pity that they did not care to check the veracity of his assertions.

9066:

To Figaro: you can't rewrite the article's edit history, you didn't "commented that Graeme Garden was born in Scotland", you deleted thrice the word British in "Nationality: British (Scottish)". And the fact that most Knowledge articles are currently owned by ethnic warriors (such as our

8223:

You can't reduce the entire English-speaking world to "tabloid newspapers" - Knowledge is an encyclopedia, and should aspire to accuracy, and that does not mean disagreeing with FIFA and the IOC over who won its tournaments. NB the error with that Rummenigge article is nothing to do with

5937:

I'm concerned that this scenario will lead to an increase in block shopping either here or on IRC, but otherwise I'm all for it. Nixer's case is quite instructive, as it took me more than a year to have him sent away from Knowledge for good. Another case that needs to be recalled here is

3001:

It never hurts to have a word with another wikipedian before rushing to press the button, especially when he has never been blocked for 3RR before. There was neither warning nor 3RR report. I will question the wisdom of anyone who approves IRC-prompted blocks of established contributors.

5925:

seems...strange. Perhaps a system whereby after 7 non-overturned blocks for edit-warring/3RR, a bot automatically leaves a note here informing us that this is so? Then we can decide what action to take, rather than letting unrepentant edit warriors get away with it time and time again.

11675:

I believe all these put toghether raises the question of how ethical it is for an administrator, who as been involved with a user in a number of disputes, to block the user following a personal request by another editor, without consulting any other admin or leaving any notes on AN/I.

7290:

Not when the policy exists to keep Knowledge compliant with copyright law. If there were no other picture, you'd have a good fair use rationale, but being that a free picture exists, even if it doesn't show her in the act of acting, would make it difficult to sustain using fair use as

2724:

is an upper limit on disruption, if you read it closely it will note exactly that, you are not entitled to 3 reverts. Now my suggestion here is the lot of you go and discuss whatever issue set this off on the talk pages, and remember we are all trying to write a good encyclopaedia. ——

7079:

What the legal team has left out is that I believe other Knowledge policies, including WP:IGNORE, Use Common Sense and "don't follow rules mindlessly", support showing an actor acting. Are you an admin? Who do you report to in the Knowledge hierarchy? I wish to file an appeal with

3074:

Well, lot's of things matter and block log cannot tell the full story. The unfair or abusive block that brought an apology or a desysopping equally stay in the log forever. Just an additional reason to not use blocks on the whim AND to check the wider context than the block log.

2270:

I have been at wiki IRC half a year ago maybe two times, Irpen, didn't use IRC since then. What happened here was Ghirlandajo forcefully naming article to change its content, and blocking restoration of its original name. He was blocked just for 3RR as result. Not even disruption

3628:

Canvassing on Knowledge talk pages to edit war articles is a bad thing. Likewise, I would assume canvassing on other Web sites to edit war on Knowledge articles would also be a bad thing. If I am right, are there ramifications for those who do? To be more specific, I've removed

10387:

I see what you're getting at, but even after several explanations on various Wiki morales to him he/she still insisted to do certain bits of stuff around here. The image isn't the only issue - sometimes he/she applies false information to pages, has a potential sockpuppet with

4575:

Both editors go up to 3 deletions per day, which is not enough for 3RR. I have warned both editors, in the edit summary window, as well as on their talk pages, but the reference deleting continues. I request administrator assistance for 2 reasons: To revert the current edit by

8489:

this to be the case). Anyway, the fact that we have disagreement between us still points to a content dispute. My stance remains that this is mainly an unfortunate misunderstanding of good-faith edits, and that it can be sorted out on the talk page of the article in question.

7093:

I do not wish to get a free image license; I'm not against the idea in general, but this has become much more important than the issue of the one image. The anti-fair-use people are saying we can't use an entire broad category of images to which, by both sense and law, we are

6004:

Just clarify the situation about Nixer he was not banned until I caught him abusing his socks and even then I doubt he would have been banned if he hadn't used them to evade his previous blocks. In fact, Zoe's indef block was overturned by Sir Nick despite his huge block log.

3035:. It does not matter who is "at fault" when you are blocked for 3RR. If you are blocked, that means that an administrator has reviewed the case and determined that you have violated the policy. It has nothing to do with who was right, who was wrong, and who used sockpuppets. 12803:

While assuming good faith, it's interesting that a new user is using edit summaries well and has gone right up to 3RR but stopped without a 3RR warning, isn't it? I don't usually follow these articles so I don't know their histories well, but this person may be wearing new

3668:

Canvassing is inappropriate regardless of where it's done, on or off-wiki. The same is true of harassment and personal attacks. I don't know about consequences — since there doesn't seem to be any substantive harm now, but a polite reminder would probably be a good idea.

7098:. This requires a ruling from the highest possible level. If the highest people at Knowledge really support the other point of view, then fine, I'm out of here, but I need to hear that to believe it. I remain convinced that the anti-fair-use people are misinterpreting. -- 2403:

Apparently bullshit is not as offensive as schmutz. I have not seen anything disruptive from Molobo. Actually, with the ban of Vlad Fedorov, our side (if there is such a thing, really, just editors who prefer to cite sources, not opinions as fact) would appear to be up by

2511:

by a newly registered account in English Knowledge. Enough is enough. I'm surprised at the facile attitude of our sysops who refuse to investigate the defiant avoidance of the block on Molobo's part, preferring to persecute myself on the urging of IRC regulars like Suva.

5293:

Most of it's from last year, when he was by all accounts (and by his own admission) completely disruptive. I only took a small look at the recent dispute centered around MTUS, but it didn't seem at all obvious to me that he was wrong about content, or conducting himself

4429:

Finding references for each sentence in a Knowledge article can be an extremely time consuming task. For someone to just remove the references from a biography, just because they didn't like the way a news report treated some other subject, is to me an act of vandalism.

8484:

I really don't think the fact that I am a member of the project makes any difference when I have disclsed the more important point, that I am biased because I belive that it should state he is Scottish (as apposed to the fact that my nationality/project affinity merely

6723:

well as detractions but it highlights the difference between the two noticeboards. CSN is geared towards achieving consensus while AN/I is geared towards solving problems requiring immediate admin intervention and is primarily consultative, not consensus based. --

8664:

Seems fairly straightforward to me as there is clearly a British identify, all be it there are scottish and welsh etc. subcultural identies. But many scottish/irish/welsh/english people identifiy primarily as british - infact most probably do, and culture is largely

4846:

Now, after that hard work, imagine how I feel when some people take it upon themselves to start deleting those references. The deleted references are not from some flat-earth quackery website. The deleted references were all from major Australian newspapers, such as

4544: 2684:

find what he saw as a 3RR violation, and block Ghirlandajo. Suva also brought this up here, but Ghirlandajo removed it claiming a "massive edit conflict" which occurred twenty minutes after Suva made his/her post to ANI, and was well before Ghirlandajo was blocked.—

12728:

as well, it is quite old, I forgot all about it until I saw Nwwaew's message. Thanks a lot, sorry for the extra work. If you do not want to do it, I can take care of them later (hopefully correctly, and I hope 'later' is soon), but I need some sleep at the moment.

3532:"personal attacks" is not the right phrase, but this is getting nowhere if Piotr suddenly takes everything offensively and you shoot every messenger that does not particularly support your stance. This has nothing at all to do with the deleted pages at this point. 1973:

Thank you for your personal attack. I just saw Allied Occupation of Europe in my watchlist again, and my bullshit detector went off. If it were someone else who would have done something like that, I would have acted exactly the same. No need to get personal here.

12113:

The problem is that it's too far down in the history for oversight, and there are too many revisions that need to be zapped. So I've done two things - I've deleted the suggester's edit, and I've courtesy blanked the section. This way it doesn't show up on Google.

9560:

Including the IP? I was threatened with the promise she'd harass me through my talk page as an anon, and my talk page is semi-protected because of BlackStarRock sockpuppets, leaving WODUP as the only other possible victim since he was the one with the banhammer.

4983:

The end result here, and this is what the complaint is about, is that breaking references makes the online Knowledge article look bad. Look at all the broken and missing references linked above. Is this good? No. This is why I referred the issue for Administrator

4028:, even if it does appear on other articles. As for the person who Rei claims is "daily watching" her, Fredrick Day simply came across a discussion on Rei's Web site that is easily found simply by clicking on "recent changes" on the side of her Web site. Cheers. ~ 2665:

I DID report it to AN/I, but it apparently got deleted. I didn't count the reverts, as I only reverted him once. And yes, discussion is important. You just don't retask actively edited page which is in the scope of several wikiprojects and being worked towards GA

5377:, it usually gets blocked once we find it. I am sure, however, there are unidentified socks out there editing peacefully after having turned a new leaf... and that's fine by me. For the record I'd support such a parole in this case. But then I'm a big softie. ++ 5340:

I looked at only the discussion on Korean War, not the reverts, so I don't contest what you say. Only that Giovanni seemed reasonable and his general contention that the book is revisionism (though I might personally be inclined to agree with it) seems sound to

11128:. Warning was given after 1st edit. It would seem reasonable to completely remove all evidence if this is possible. I don't know if this is the correct place as reporting problems is so fragmented and difficult on WP and as it's not now a current incident the 7892:

is in the process of making a large number of highly destructive edits that go against consensus, both on WP and in the English speaking world in general. It's widely accepted that between 1945 and 1990, the Federal Republic of Germany was known in English as

11669:

Also note, Taprobanus gave Lexicon a barnstar a few days before the first "warning", Iwazaki has never been blocked on Knowledge for any reason before (he has been contributing since July 2006) and Lexicon hasn't blocked a user on Knowledge since the 13th of

8872:" is idiotic. Pandering to it in the encyclopedia encourages bitterness and violence. (On this last example I've had another look - consensus in Talk is for use of "British Isles" but nobody is prepared to confront the angry and stop them damaging articles). 6775:

If not an indef block than at the very least something more than just a day or two. He may not have 'been a problem for nine months', but he still has an extensive history of being blocked for this sort of thing. Someone somewhere has to put their foot down.

12189:

fair-use content. We're talking about images uploaded in good faith by editors who added good -- but not lawyer-perfect -- fair-use rationales, the imperfections of which have nothing to do with the prima facie legitimacy of the images' use on Knowledge.

4941:(Melbourne), and they all made some reference to "copra". The broken/missing references were making the Wiki article look bad. Sometimes the anchor reference would be deleted, leaving all the downstream ones broken. It probably happened 20-30 times or more. 9580:

blocked the underlying IP, there would have been a note to that effect in the block log. The IP can't be blocked for longer than 24 hours though, so s/he may show up later. There really isn't anything we can do about that until they make themselves known.

6249:

Just for the record I also object to the arbitrary banning of a long time editor. The double standards shown here and the clutching at straws smack of a kangaroo court. If there is a problem with an editor then that is what the RfC and RfAr channels for.

2533:

Piotrus, you did abuse the admin tools in the past. Unblocking your friends rightfully blocked for disruption is one of ways. Polish names issues is another one. But I agree that those happened in relatively remote past. This incident refreshed those old

7897:, even if its official name never changed and even if the name was less widely used in Germany itself. The same also applies to its national sporting teams. Matthead believes that we should simply refer to the teams as Germany, and we debated this issue 3686:, and has attempted to put in OR numerous times in an attempt to prove that the show is "fake," going so far as to start her own wiki in an attempt to accomplish that goal. It is obvious that she will go to extraordinary means to accomplish this goal. -- 8691:

True, but not truly relevant. British (Scottish) is OK, if a bit weaselly, but I've never heard Garden identify himself as Scottish and the only time I met him his accent was barely discernible. (aside: TBT is much shorter than he looks on the radio).

8005:

The football team remained the same in 1990. The "common English" separation into pre-1990 "West German nft" and post-1990 "German nft" is artificial, and not backed up by any serious source. It is informal, like calling the early-1950s Hungarian nft

4425:

have been deleting references about other aspects of the Australian Prime Minister's life, because somewhere in those newspaper articles is a mention of the Howard's copra plantations. The deleted references were all from major Australian newspapers.

1734:

That would also explain the concern with others signing their comments. For the sighted, it is a simple thing to click on the history tab and see who made the edit. On the other hand, if you have to have it read to you, what an ordeal that must be.

12565:

Thank you for pointing to WP:AWB. I am not familiar with that tool, but as far as I could see, that tool gives rather limited assistance. Still every single article has to be manually edited and checked. And the list of messed-up articles is already

4508:

had added a few minutes before. The subject of the text has nothing to do with "copra". Some time later, after my complaints, he returned to the article and added a different reference, though the replacement didn't adequately cover all the subject

3937:

wanting to get information into Knowledge that happened to be something I had already been defending on the article (but had stopped while awaiting outside comments). I told Tasco O that I had been avoiding putting that sort of stuff in because I

9473:

After editting the page myself and seeing Shanebb's edits to the talk page to my response and undoing some of my edits to the article itself, I have indefinitely blocked him for a long span of tedentious editting, skewing of POV, and overall edit

6571:

where it can be archived as a case study in how to address a difficult but established editor. My own position on the matter is that editors do not earn a get out of jail free pass or a license to edit war by crossing some threshold and becoming

6101:

doing it too", and letting him evade responsibility for his behavior again is just enabling more of the same. The only special or unequal treatment I'm seeing here is that people are still making excuses for a guy with his record of edit-warring,

5326:

reverts of the same user, across multiple articles in a short time span without any intervening discussion could be less obvious that he is "conducting himself poorly." Two of those articles have not even seen edits to their talk pages in months.

4583:

The "copra plantation" info is currently the subject of an RfC. Regardless of what anyone thinks of the RfC or "copra plantation" info, the deletion of other references on other subject matter is a separate matter, and a wilful act of vandalism.

12138:

Deleting the vandal's edit but allowing page versions that contain the libel to exist violates the GFDL and will probably implicate the wrong person or IP as the vandal who did the libel. However, removing the libel from the live view is kosher.

7022:

Images that simply show what living people look like are replaceable non-free content and cannot be used. I recommend that Geno contact Ms. Hamilton's management and request that they provide a free image. There is a great guide to doing so at

6598:

BTW I've posted an unblock offer to Giovanni33's user talk page. Basically I'm asking him to put together some proposal for lesser sanctions. I'll propose that to the community on his behalf and if the community accepts it I'll lift the indef.

4928:

All of the diffs I cited (above) resulted in broken and missing references, which were showing up as missing holes in the Reference section. Sometimes there were holes resulting from more than one reference missing, but they were all either from

4580:(as I want to stay out of this edit war); and to help stop this deletion of references (maybe a user block would allow those editors to cool off, and give the other editors a break from having to continually repair broken or deleted references). 3247:

Just because you disagree with an admin doesn't mean their abusing their tools. If I looked from your point of view, you're abusing your edit rights and should be banned off the project. So think twice before throwing allegations of admin abuse.

5222:

I'm so glad to see DMC back on this noticeboard with the threads like this one that I would definitely support an indef block. In a similar vein last year, Dmcdevit imposed a one-year block on Molobo, who nevertheless continued editing from his

5082:

then the RfC. Between them, a majority of editors making favourable comments for at least a brief inclusion of the plantation fact is evident (including me, Lester2, Shot info, Aussieboy, hamiltonstone, Peter Ballard, Lord Chao and Hornplease).

3201:(who apparently read IRC more often than ANI) persist in deleting the redirect which has never been nominated for deletion (neither was the article it linked to). It is disturbing how widespread and facile abuse of admin privileges has grown. -- 12621:

Andranikpasha, I checked your images, they seem to be wrongly tagged. Also, as far as I know, we cannot have images that are even free for non-commercial use. I don't think we should be able to keep the ones that are free for say informational

4513: 8046:

German football teams that competed in FIFA sanctioned matches and tournaments (and played against each other?) The fact that the current national team retains the title of one of those entities does not mean that the former owner of the name

7298:

Finally, I'm not sure what would happen if the board of trustees said it was OK, they don't involve themselves in the writing of the encyclopdia or editorial matters. Knowledge works by consensus, there's no single higher power to appeal to.

6285:

allowed to walk away from accounts with clouds hanging over them but Gio is stuck with a long history that comes back to haunt him. One person doesn't edit war by themselves and perm banning someone for reporting 3RR is breathtakingly unfair.

12412:

Oh~ I am sorry. I run "interwiki.py -continue -autonomous". what happen? I stopped my interwiki bot. It is a bot program's error? I use pywikipedia bot SVN. version is new. what happen?? I am not programmer. I don't know why, how, etc. :( --

12168:

just popped up on my watchlist. It is an image into which actual work was put into setting up a fair-use rationale (valid and perfectly defensible, by the way), but whose rationale was still imperfect per the current fair-use guidelines.

7294:

As far as the intersection of seemingly contradictory policies, that's where you need consensus to figure out the best way to proceed. Consensus can obviously change, but I've always found consensus here to be toward using a free image when

4160:

Thanks again for the input, Someguy1221! One minor difference with your presentation: the had no "Bob is wrong" section, or at least had the goal of not having a "Bob is wrong" section (wording changes welcomed). Does that still fit your

11813:

However, I am not personally well-versed in the finer details, nor have we heard from Lexicon here hence I pass no judgement. So, with regard to your specific point, if you feel this merits further examination you may wish to head over to

8594:, thus displaying contempt for the point made and showing that he's not in for discussion but for ethnic warring. For centuries people have been ready to die for a piece of fabric, today they're ready to be banned for a word on Knowledge, 4084:

policy and the rest of the Knowledge community. I've explained to you why what I removed entailed improper synthesis, but you've ignored it; you've been unwilling to comprehend it. Already, third party editors on the talk page agree with

2257:

You are being mistaken, Ryulong. Golbez was not the only party who discussed this over IRC. Someone brought it up to IRC while this board is available. And there is a 3RR board, rather than an IRC channel, designated for 3RR allegations.

1859: 7953:

eras of Emperor Wilhelm, Weimar Republic, and Hitler. Its history continued after WW2, as accepted by FIFA in 1950, as well as in 1990 when the separate East Germany disappeared. Some people have pushed their view by trying to establish

5789:

first commented that he would restore the original 48 hour block, a consensus has formed that this indefinite block is appropriate. However, I am concerned that El_C has decided to ignore consensus based on this edit to Giovanni's talk

3455:

Piotr's attempt to derail discussion of his out-of-process deletions to his favourite subject of civility is pathetic. There's no denying that he deleted a valid page to make a point. Abuse is abuse, and he should face the consequences.

2028:, Eastern Europe was "occupied" while Western Europe was "liberated", although there was no material difference between the two. The page is a farrago of tenuously related or totally disconnected events, such as the Soviet liberation of 4970:, and the SMH / Age article came up at the top of the list. Skyring(Pete) suggests (above) that a better reference would have been Page 9 of an offline book written by Barnett/Goward (author 'Goward' is a member of John Howard's staff). 12163:

I didn't jump into the previous Betacommandbot rows because the bot was doing painful, but necessary, work in clearing out images with grossly incomplete fair-use rationales, images with a real possibility being liabilities. However,

9698:

None of what he's said to you seems to approach a personal attack... sharp criticism isn't a personal attack. On the other hand, your use of "you will be blocked" templates on regulars is generally something interpreted as being rude.

8180:

This clearly isn't going to get through to Matthead, so I'd say to the admins that the sheer number of edits are difficult for mere users to revert, and it's difficult to see that Matthead can be stopped mere debate and conversation.

4098:

UBeR, I don't know how many times I have to mention this, but you are not the ultimate arbitrer of Knowledge and all of its policies. When there is a disagreement over policy, which is what this is between us, the correct response is

2498:

Molobo's editing may be described as a never-ending nightmare. The guy was known as a tool to ram your POV into the articles, but that does not excuse his sockpuppetry (see his talk page for details). During the time of the block, his

8156:

Stop this, everyone uses West Germany in the english talking sense. Talking about something in post-1990 and saying Germany, ppl will probably think you're referencing Germany as a whole, and not just West Germany. ps. re-instate the

5358:

How about an alternative sanction of revert parole limiting him to 1 revert per day with explanation on the talk page? I'm not sure the community technically has the power to implement paroles, but if the alternative is an indefinite

5234:. Since his block evasion was given a free pass by admins and he did not face any consequences (see his talk page for details), I assume that Giovanni33 will be allowed to proceed in the same fashion. This is rather disheartening. -- 7681:

I don't see any recent edits to Griot's Talk page which mention you whatsoever. The latest ones that have anything to do with you are over three weeks old, and consisted of changing a section heading (which I don't agree with).

6822:

by massive non-consensual reverts of David Hicks page. Numerous editors have reverted his changes (up to 3 a day without substantive justification or talkpage discussion, using Edit Summaries that mispresent the edit and/or prior

1762:

I'm blind and use a screen reader - using Knowledge effectively with a screen reader can be very difficult if one does not understand much about the technology. The closest thing to a support group for users like that is probably

6629:

admin and a different article. If the 2RR pledge didn't mean anything and his blocks keep getting reduced, why is their a belief that anything other that a long period of quiet reflection will produce a change in behaviour? --

9517:

as an anon. editor, because I responded to his/her complaining that we wouldn't put editorial warnings on a page separate from her talk page Isn't there a way to block whatever IP she's using temporarily in case she goes after

2471: 6562:

I'd have no objection to trying a lesser sanction such as a topic ban or 1RR. I am also quite willing to evaluate the behavior of other parties this editor may have edit warred with. Note that I do not automatically buy into

2337:

move and move war it caused, was a mess with triple redirects, talk page separated from article page, and other issues. In fact what I moved was no longer the article but - as far as I can tell - a redirect (it seems I moved a

6756:

I don't think dispute resolutions have worked in the case of Giovanni33 or would work now. Would be nice if he would change his ways, but after this many blocks and disruption, I doubt it. I have to support the indef block.

6066:

after his disruptive behavior finally exhausted community patience and at least one very good editor had been blocked for breaking 3RR when he cleaned up after him. I'm all for assuming good faith but there is such a thing as

5524:, gaming 3RR and block evasion. He did previously agree to cease using sock accounts and went almost a year and was not blocked. However, since June he seems to have resumed his old ways, aside from the sockpuppeting issues.-- 4865:

difference between sincerely working to improve Knowledge and vandalism. The act of repeatedly deleting existing article references is vandalism, Knowledge breaks down if it is allowed to continue, and it should be stopped. --

3708:

appears to have deteriorated since then. Of course I recuse myself from direct intervention, but I urge other sysops to bear in mind that this offsite canvassing occurs within the context of longstanding disruptive behavior.

4379: 1992:

And why, exactly, is Suva not in good standing? Is there a community sanction against him or was he blocked recently for edit warring? Are complaints about him usual in AN/I? Is he pointlessly pushing personal pro-Sovet POV?

10412:

In the Controversies section, someone has tampered with the article, removing the links to the articles written Monica Sjöö and Rabbi Yonassan Gershom, which now contain only the links the the Knowledge articles about them.

2890:

Sigh indeed. What kind of intimate connection do you see between the Soviet liberation of Bornholm in 1945 and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 that justifies your insistance on their coverage in the same article?

12077:. I removed this, but the content is still in the page history. This case would be an open-and-shut oversight case if it was caught early enough, but I do not know what to do now that the libel is deep in the page history. 10351:

are the exact same person as well given they seem to think alike, and we would also bear in mind that the latter user received a block for a week on counts of trolling (possible block evasion if they ARE the same person?).

8978:

I don't see any personal attacks. I see some contentious editong during a content dispute, and an editor who brought the issue up for wider discussion, but at the wrong place. Not everything you don't like on here is a PA.

5415:

Nod. It does hardly ever work, yes but that doesn't mean I don't favour trying things short of indef block for people that have made contributions. I also agree (see below) that some evenhandedness would be good, although

12155: 9201:

It is perfectly acceptable to track an indef blocked user who abuses multiple accounts to circumvent their indefinite block. In fact, it's encouraged. We need more people to do this, and if they feel they need to use

2052:

proclaimed the page a good and neutral article and arbitrarily deleted the disambiguation page to make his point. Against the background of never-ending concerns about his misuse of admin tools for POV-pushing, Piotrus

11630:

On both occasions, the comments in question were those Iwazaki made calling Taprobanus a "contributor to racist websites". It has been previously proven here on AN/I that Taprobanus has contributed to websites such as

6105:

issues, and blocks. I'm opposed to undoing the indefinite block; at the very least, if the block is overturned, a 6-month or 1-year 1RR probation needs to be in effect that, if violated, leads to an indefinite block.

2015: 7518:

Geno has apparently quit over this, according to his userpage. I don't get it - people don't react this way when a paragraph of their text is deleted, why such an extreme reaction to removal of a single image usage?

4761:

inclusion of the plantation fact (including me, Lester2, Shot info, Aussieboy, hamiltonstone, Peter Ballard, Lord Chao and Hornplease), yet you, Skyring, Prester John and on occasion BInguyen, keep reverting. Why? --

9087:(assuming that the UK flag was a needless additional divisiveness with an ethnic warrior). I am however afraid that such compromises may be seen as weaknesses, as warriors are wont to do, so maybe it'll get worse... 8838:

editors could tell you this - I was born in England but I'm not English (but I am British). I know of others who were born in England but are strongly Welsh. Unless you know how people self-identify you cannot say.

12631:(instead of saying that it is also published on your geocities site, you should tell us where you got that photo. I don't think you were alive, at least not old enough to attend that event and take a photo in 1921) 5175:

I endorse an indefinite block. This should have happened a long time ago. This is unfortunate, because Giovanni has an outstanding work ethic, but he just cannot stop edit warring and trying to game the system.

12068: 10232:

During the past year and a half, the users have been warned by other editors many times, in edit summaries, on the article talk page, and on several of the user talk pages, which the users apparently don't read.

4449:. Notice at the bottom of the diff page, 'Reference #5' is missing. At first you could think the breaking of this reference could have been by accident, but then half an hour later he comes back to do it again... 4799:

A comment was posted about 9 hours ago that indicated that some editors were of a similar opinion, there is no suggested wording. Given this there isnt any consensus on wording to claim that there is erroneous.

12172:

This image will have no problem beating its 7-day execution deadline, because it is on a high-traffic article on many active users' watchlists. What is going to happen, though, to all the images with usable,

9059:

UK embassies aren't addressed; and if you invoke Readers, the NPOV is to give them both "British" and "Scotland" and let them decide which piece or pieces of information is useful to them, since both are true.

7199:

Please clarify something for me. Are you saying that the Board of Trustees couldn't come in here and say, "Of course, in-character images are allowed." and have the result that you people stop reverting these

9758:

to user talk pages. He is trying to warn them. He was told many times to stop and persists, and he even reverted one of my changes. He is also reverting good faith edits and also he's trying to "block" them.

7336:

If the Board "don't involve themselves in the writing of the encyclopdia or editorial matters" and "there's no single higher power to appeal to" is the case, then what is the relevance of "The highest level

4433: 9264:

Inspector Lee, you may want to consider dropping a small note on your talk page to that affect. Not too much information, just that this is a secondary account used in a manner permitted by the sock policy.

896: 132: 120: 12081: 4479: 12208: 4915:

has swapped one of my original references for a different one that suitably covers the topic. I've got no complaint about that. My complaint was about the other examples where references were just deleted.

3189: 861:

Closed discussions are usually not archived for at least 24 hours. Routine matters might be archived more quickly; complex or controversial matters should remain longer. Sections inactive for 72 hours are

3942:

want an edit war and I knew that UBeR and Fredrick Day would start one if I put it back. This all comes right on the heels of Frederick Day lying about me trying to reference BearWiki on the article. --

1847:

could probably find emails from that person on one of my old hard drives to compare. Mostly they are still high-functioning but the bits related to communication, both inbound and outbound, are impaired.

8743:). It was when James VI of Scotland also became James I of England that England and Scotland were united under a single monarchy (i.e. under the one crown). The other three countries which make up the 3212: 2115: 1983:

Suva, you are not an editor in good standing to expect replies from me every time you come up with a slur. This has become pretty routine, and I wonder where our civility police is lurking these days. --

1899: 927: 922: 8306:

Since those ethnic conflicts degenerate so quick, an external opinion is wished from someone who can enforces Knowledge's rules about encyclopedic (i.e. sovereign nations, not provinces or sub-states).

6422:

I agree with what Sophia has said as well. I don't think an indef is the right way to go here. I'd support some sort of revert restrictions if that is considered necessary but an indef is way too much.

136: 116: 8011: 1565:

I went to his talk page, and couldn't make heads or tails of it. Does anyone think he/she is copying a message someone left for them at one time? And what's with that warning at the top of the page?

128: 816: 10693:, given the other good edits by the user, that they are not clear what the tags are for or what is required to have them removed. Perhaps you could explain to him/her on his/her talk page? ➔ This is 8718:

I am unimpressed that I have been specifically named here as causing an 'Ethnic war abuse incident' because I commented that Graeme Garden was born in Scotland (he was, after all, born in Scotland!).

6875: 2283:

Irpen, take your anti-IRC crusade elsewhere. The facts are clear. Ghirlandajo broke policy. He got blocked. That's what happens. Stop bringing your anti-IRC crusade into this and fogging up things.

11504:. I respectfully request, that as this editor has continued to add this information after being warned, and continued to sockpuppet (surprise! brand new editor comes along and readds the material: 10471:

User has been repeatedly warned on this, including at least one "final warning", and doesn't seem to care. I've removed yet another copyvio image he uploaded and have now blocked him for 24 hours.

6799: 4350:

This doesn't appear to be the kind of problem that needs immediate administrative intervention. Rei has expressed an interest in editing the Joan of Arc article again so I've stated how I think

8018:

team was not Hungarian, the pre-1990 German team is called "West German" and claimed to be something different, just because East Germany vanished. Current use by said multiple editors violates

6557: 5078:

Meanwhile, regarding comments on consensus, and to set the record straight about my edits, interested parties to this matter are again encouraged to go through the talkpage volumes, starting in

10559: 8395:

defines it as contributing "in order to promote the interests of other individuals, companies, or groups" -- Scots are an ethnic group, and this user has identified as a Scot on his user page.

7898: 7138:

Even that page says "permits the upload of copyrighted materials that can be legally used in the context of the project, regardless of their licensing status." How is that against fair use? --

5089: 4735: 3987:

I've wanted to solve this peacefully and get the dispute over whether the edit in question is SYN resolved through getting outside input. And all I've gotten in return is personal attacks. --

2796:

Agreed. For the record, Piotrus, you moved warred as well, and used the amdin button to enable yourself to do it. And, the main issue. Are there 4 reverts here? Is the 24-hr block justified? --

12724:

The editor seems to be blocked indef (not related to image tagging). He was checking this site, maybe he can contact someone, otherwise we won't be able to get response from him. Please check

11319:

had about fourteen fair-use images on their userpage. I blanked the page, and began wading through the images, ten of which which are undoubtedly copyright violations and improperly licensed:

3319:

Please refrain from veiled threats and address the issue at hand. Was the deleted page's content reasonably close by content to the originally deleted page to justify the speedy deletion? --

7251:(Let me clarify, my position is not that we should be able to place in-character pictures due to policy; I've just been pointing out that the policies are contradictory. My position is that 6434: 4119:

Here's an outside input: UBeR is right. I read through the discussion on the article talk page, and it's quite clear that what content you wish to add violates the spirit and the letter of

6653:

And that's really not necessary. Why should it matter which board is used to discuss this action? It's already a full discussion here, and bringing to CSN will only start an AFD mentality.—

5533:

My patience is exhausted anyway. If this isn't he incident that leads to Giovanni33's indefinite block, the next one will be. I don't see why we should put ourselves through another round.

3699:

mainstream. In six weeks she failed to contribute even one reference other than OR musings upon previously cited primary source material and her talk posts were in consistent violation of

9441:

Independent admin review appreciated. Do you sense socks as well? Should we ask for Checkuser? I want to AGF but this article's history has had periodic persistent abuse, so I'm wary.

7726:

insult. if you've submitted other warnings, may i suggest you link them here. otherwise, i note to you not to search vengence here on wikipedia... that is not the purpouse of the project.

4773:

form or another somewhere around 20 times in the last two or three weeks. And it isn't just myself, Peter and Prester, as you claim, who don't agree with you restoring the copra material.

12495:

Have reverted or fixed a handful of the articles myself, but it's a tedious task, especially when other edits are done later - and also I don't want to touch Archived pages or Userpages.

10603: 6671:

It's a different question. Solving an incident is one thing, indefintely blocking an editor is another. Durova requested it and it's her name on the block log. Please respect that. --

5042: 4588: 11622: 12505:

A malfunctioning bot can do a lot harm, and bot operators should always be prepared to (and able to) clean up/revert the bot's actions - which has not happened in the case of AlptaBot.

10539: 9269: 7959: 12509: 11511: 5398:

has been edit warring all over the place as well, almost exclusively with Giovanni33, and has 7 blocks of his own. If we were going to go that route, might want to note the failure of

12478: 7545:& get them to release an image under a free license -- or try to take a picture of her himself & upload that. As long as those are viable alternatives, arguing that we should 6097: 9036: 3801:

cite. I've been kind enough to not throw allegations around at other people and not to assume bad faith. But someone who's made 20 times as many edits to the article as me telling

3594:

Ok, folks, arguing (read: pointing fingers at who is in the wrong) is not going to solve the underlying issues. If one feels that things are being deleted out of process, please see

10316: 9141: 7660:

as a "hysterically paranoid info-deleting professor" on my talk page, so if justice is doled out evenly on Knowledge I expect that he will now suffer the same consequences for this

4844:

other Wikipedians to find references for the John Howard article, but few people responded to that request. A reasonable proportion of the article's references were found by myself.

3290: 3819:** -- Pull up the page history, modify the number of results to 5000 (which gets you back to the first edit), copt the contents to a file, and "grep -c " for "Durova (" vs "Rei (". 3554:

time the same guys say the same things about cool-down blocks, the superiority of IRC communications over such outdated noticeboards as AN3, etc. This is really boring. (Shrug). --

2942:

JzG, this is not a Piotrus - Ghirla conflict. I did not block him, I did not report him... I was just dragged into it by Ghirla complaining about me being in the neighborhood :) --

2407:

So sad that editors toil at their editor-denouncing-and-accusing cottage industry instead of making any positive contributions. I thought we were here to help edit an encyclopedia.

11410: 11395: 9075:

For the record, the edit war has continued after this discussion: Figaro reverted again so as to delete "British" (and also delete the infobox and replace it with a made-up table)

8917: 8671: 11656: 9123: 10574: 9954: 6148: 9963: 8876: 12032: 8138: 7064: 4080:

dispute countless times. I understand the policy well. I've discussed the policy with many administrator and may lay editors. My position on SYN is the one represented by the

1699:

Actually I think this user might be blind and is using some screen reading software. That would partly explain the copying of system- and error messages into the edit window.

871: 849: 9445: 6439:

I'm sorry if this is a mistake. But Giovanni33 appears to have been stalking John Smith's and deliberately engaging in revert-wars, even in articles he's not familiar with.

4089:

that I am interested in. Is this wrong, or does it entail stalking users? No. Like I said, your discussion was easily found by any user visiting it just once. Get over it. ~

12881: 11649: 10482: 9101: 6647: 5657:

Just to note since no one is admitting it. Dheyward, Tom harrison, and MONGO were all involved in "incidents" on an article with Giovanni33. They disagree with his edits to

4816:

Skyring comments: Lester2's contributions since his recent appearance in Knowledge is focussed on inserting negative material into the John Howard article - a glance at his

3363: 2629:

found the 3RR violation. Ghiralandajos actions of retasking the article without even slightest hint of discussion anywhere were clearly against the principles of wikipedia.

2625:

It was me who brought it up. It's standard procedure when you see significant disruption. I didn't ask any blocks, 3RR or otherwise, I just asked for administrative advice.

2080: 2037: 1925:

Wow, that's really a nice attempt to deflect a 3RR block - not the first time I have seen this done by involved users. I am glad to see that this time it didnt' work well.--

1878: 9246: 7625:. It is particularly immature considering this is regarding a conflict that was resolved several months ago. The following edits were made where the user refers to me as a 6337:

I agree with SOPHIA here. I do not think the banning of Giovanni33 was the right decision. It appears that there is not a consensus here, I hope our voices are recognized.

6173: 6126:

The others should be looked at, but there's no doubt in my mind that G33 has earned an indefblock. Worthy contributors are subject to the same rules as everybody else. --

5833: 4668:

That goes both ways. If an article is beign used as a reference for material that belongs in the article, it should only be removed if it is replaced by another reference.

4374: 3716: 12091: 11838: 11624:

Note, on that occasion Taprobanus directly posted on Lexicon's talk page asking him to comment on the report, instead of simply leaving it up to uninvolved administrators.

9585: 9275:

Ok, I put something on my talkpage to that effect today. Going after ST has been fun, but I may try extending my field of permabanned possible targets as I have the time.

8498: 7905: 6794: 6592: 5812: 5665: 4767: 1757: 83: 32: 10465: 9279: 9007: 8983: 8682: 8026:. It often creates a mess, like a town and team being called West German in 1989 and German in 1991, with 1990 being left out, see my example at the RfD (link below). -- 6491: 5608: 3662: 1778: 11814: 11533: 11524: 11405: 10799: 8965: 8949: 8348: 8331: 7911:

Most of his edits seem to be being reverted by other editors, though in some places he's made the edit twice, and may be approaching 3RR. I'll leave a note at his page.

7686: 6324: 11595: 10806: 9935: 9468: 9179: 9096: 8551: 8312: 7049: 6121: 6074: 5570: 5561: 5537: 5195: 4875:

capable of good wikiwork and excellent research. There are a tonne of non-controversial articles that cry out for attention. I've praised you for excellent work on the

3418:

I simply asked above to refrain from from threats. In what way is this an attack? Please stick to the issues at hand and do not switch the subject to the civility. ---

3298: 11542: 11487: 11461: 9868: 9155: 8084: 8059: 8037: 8000: 7539: 6358: 6112: 6087: 5769: 5759: 5749: 5740: 4807: 3242: 3232: 2970:"If you seem to be the only person who feels that the article should be the way that you have made it, perhaps it is better the way everyone else thinks it should be." 1999: 1656: 1612: 1180: 1175: 1170: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1145: 1140: 1135: 1128: 1123: 1118: 1113: 1108: 1103: 1098: 1093: 1088: 1083: 12854: 10267: 9835: 9194: 8576: 8206: 8185: 7221:

Also, I've made the arguments that refer to Knowledge policy, and you guys have just ignored them in favor of other Knowledge policies that support your position. --

7102: 6854:

Brendan.lloyd - "Prester John, please refrain from DELETING references, use more detailed Edit Summaries & justify your reverts on the talkpage; please avoid 3RR"

6279: 6239: 5638: 2061: 1851: 10858: 10326: 10297: 9228: 8243: 8131: 8107: 7915: 6995: 6737: 6303: 6293: 5727: 5717: 5399: 5107: 4869: 4829: 2752: 2303: 12821: 12108: 12060: 12043: 11603: 11599: 11447: 11266: 9600: 9571: 9555: 9536: 8658: 8444: 8224:

reunification, they had simply missed a year by accident, listing 1989-90 as 1990-91 and missing 1991-92. Otherwise, the FRG/GER distinction is entirely accurate.

7796:

This place is becoming a fucking kindergarten. Do I get any credit for actually writing and editing articles? Or is this just a place for bitching and carrying on?

7756: 7736: 7017: 6371: 6222: 5999: 5345: 5335: 5301: 5288: 5238: 5169: 3933:

for themselves what they're calling "Canvassing" and "meatpuppets" and see for themself that their description of what happened is a complete fabrication. Tasco O

3370: 3006: 2736: 2516: 2421: 2327: 1837:

I've taken a somewhat detailed look at his contribs, and it looks like apart from incoherent talk page comments, it's mostly redirects from dubious misspellings. --

1725:

I got that impression when I encountered him some time ago - is there any kind of support group here for that sort of thing that he could be put in contact with? --

1595: 12290: 12143: 11799: 11713: 11495: 11420: 11385: 11380: 10552: 9992: 9237: 9219: 9210: 8842: 6929: 6913: 6780: 6416: 6341: 6183: 5857: 5651: 4897: 4779: 4748: 3580: 3558: 3548: 3518: 3501: 3171: 3117: 3107: 3051: 2895: 2856:

Is blocking any attempt to restore original title and original content by creating a disamb page that makes it impossible to change the title "sneaky and dirty"?--

2711: 2386: 2126: 2036:. I removed irrelevant passages about Mongolia and Afghanistan, started passages about Greece, Italy, and France, and moved the page to the more appropriate title 1968: 358: 12355: 9720: 9703: 7225: 7178: 7142: 7117: 6549: 6520: 5279: 5252: 4790: 4638: 3690: 3026: 3016: 2996: 2619: 2104: 2091: 2074: 1841: 1820: 12330: 11793: 11177: 8467: 8411: 8367: 8319:

taken to the talk page, and 2) since the content is disputed, it is no longer apropriate to use the minor edit checkbox when changing it, with a guiding link to

8171: 7553: 6906:

After an unblock request I reviewd the BL block IMHO appeared unnecessary as he had only edited the article twice in the last two days, so I have unblocked him.

5528: 5456:

case where the community hasn't endorsed the probation approach and that is that. if not, shoud it be tried? Who are the key players besides G that need this? ++

5133: 4651: 3460: 3280: 3267: 3089: 3079: 2371: 2166: 2135: 1884:

Without any consensus what so ever. The decision was never discussed at talk page. Also he created Soviet occupation disambiguation page to prevent moving back.

1798: 1729: 1070: 10699: 10289: 10277: 9826: 9812: 9783: 8218: 8151: 8094: 7977: 6704: 6694: 6675: 6666: 6202: 5510: 5481:

is not a defense. The block and checkuser history here was eminently worthy of a ban and I would gladly review and address other parties' behavior separately.

5449: 4620: 3205: 2659: 2314: 2262: 1987: 1978: 1686: 12656: 11640: 11023: 10916: 10819: 10389: 10378:

benefit of the doubt for another request from what is clearly an unrelated party. Other than his insistence on this image, Kingdom seems to be well-meaning. --

10360: 10348: 9434:

There has been a little discussion on the talk page (Shanebb primarily, but the others each contributed once). The overall effect of the three of them has my

8430:

I don't see the problem with using Scotland as country of birth, etc., but the nationality of anyone born in the UK is British, and should be stated as such.

6947: 6727: 6717: 5794: 5262: 5177: 5052: 5010: 4883: 4607: 4198: 4127: 3918: 3623: 2764: 2633: 2198: 2151: 2057:. Hilarious. Do we need deletion process for Eastern Europe-related page, when Piotrus is always here to judge what is to be deleted and what is to be kept? -- 1720: 546: 12299: 11832: 11041: 10708: 10396: 10382: 9921: 7481: 7432: 5506:

giving time for any consensus to form one way or the other (rather than someone re-imposing the indefinite block and that being reverted and whatnot else). --

4463:

strikes again, and deletes the same reference further down the article, even though the text has a different subject matter and is nothing to do with "copra".

3892: 3618: 3356: 2883: 2860: 2610: 1939: 12756: 12662: 12551: 12542: 12470: 12249: 12222: 11400: 11221: 10683: 10114: 10046: 8654:

simply cities in the United Kingdom, or are they areas of England and Scotland (and more to the point, does Scotland help fix the area in the readers mind)?

8612: 6768: 6633: 6607: 5745:

Surely not, about as disruptive as those who edit warred with him. He could not have done it alone, so is there a motion to indef ban all of those people? --

5367: 5068: 5022: 4988: 4663: 3485:

here. Let's calm down, take a breather, and return as ice cubes. This debate won't get anywhere should everyone stray into the realm of personal attacks :).

3422: 3391: 2937: 2851: 2832: 2823: 2800: 2783: 2697: 2586: 2576: 2548: 2249: 2231: 1569: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1368: 1363: 1358: 1353: 1348: 1343: 1338: 1333: 1328: 1323: 1196: 1074: 952: 883: 617: 12596: 12452: 12133: 11790: 11787: 11212: 6937:

recent disputes with both of them, but particularly Brendan Lloyd. Brendan and Prester are very disruptive, POV edit warriors and aside from the dispute at

5432: 5410: 5215: 2275: 1961: 12899: 12644: 12581: 12560: 12519:

help? Either way, yes, the bot operator is responsible for any messups, but the discussion on the operator's talk page wasn't "removed", it was the nasty

12498:

AlptaBot was blocked for a short period. It is now back running, doing other tasks, hopefully better knowing what it is doing this time. But complaints on

11687: 11390: 11323: 11013: 10427: 10417: 9735: 9487: 9276: 9216: 9191: 9130: 9102: 8940:

has personally attacked me by his public discussion of me in both this forum and in his edit summary of his reversal of my edit on Graeme Garden's article.

8705: 8636: 8529: 7520: 7112: 7059: 6983: 6871: 6620: 5085: 4763: 4731: 4009: 3947: 3834:. I have consistently taken the initiative to seek community feedback and review. Large numbers of edits are normal when an editor raises a page from an 3323: 2956: 2646: 1916: 1302: 1297: 1292: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1272: 1267: 1262: 1257: 1250: 1245: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1205: 12405: 12382: 8820: 6402:

Your comment assumes that being an incorrigible edit warrior is somehow not as bad as being a vandal. I don't think that's true. Hard-core edit-warriors,

5489: 5389: 3858: 3825: 3780: 3727: 3673: 2707:, it is submitted on IRC (where most administrative decision-making has been done of late). This is a sign of the times and where Knowledge is heading. -- 2674: 2208: 12690: 12650: 12276: 11344: 10987: 9700: 9391: 7259: 6096:

I'm going to add my voice to those endorsing an indefinite block. Enough is enough, really. This guy was let off the hook last time because he was being

5661:. As for endorse or not, I do not for the reasons noted above, 1 block in a year seems to suggest they are doing very well on the road to improvement. -- 5658: 4711: 4700: 4689: 4677: 3329: 1187: 504: 303: 11507:), that someone would start at very least start blocking the sockpuppets, if not the base account for continuing to edit war and add libelous material. 7379: 7375:

discussion and replace it with the quality of the article? Once again, this requires someone with a sufficiently big stick to just lay down the law. --

7303: 6396: 5500: 5468: 4825:. As Sarah points out above, replacing the contentious source with one that is not disputed solves the problem. Lester's complaint here is contrived. -- 4330: 4255: 4208: 4114: 4093: 4071: 4032: 124: 12684: 12319: 7860:

Couldn't care less! Couldn't care less about the quality of contributions to this project? Or what? Hey fella, are you an administrator or a busybody?

5048:

Funny man. What's happened is that we've cleaned up all your attempts to introduce material without consensus, and restored the original references. --

2410:

To Irpen, I am sorry to see you have utterly descended into the trenches. You threaten me, creating an entire article talk page section over "schmutz"

1314: 1192: 12349: 10975:. Could these accounts please be indef blocked, as has all the others? If check user needs to be done, that's cool. I already tried reporting this at 5929: 1953: 12634: 11645: 11618: 11019: 10488: 8262: 7744: 7574: 6268: 3362:

believe it's a solid reason to protect the page from recreation. Please point to the community consensus that there should never be an article about

3155:

circumstances, but I would appreciate it if you would not demean me or any other user because of the subject matter that we choose to edit. Regards,

2615:

I agree with your general point: Knowledge's policy of blocking may be quite disruptive. Unfortunately, MediaWiki doesn't have anything better. :-(

2194:

and replaced it with this one. This kind of article hijacking is not of good taste. And removing complaints about himself on AN/I is not one either.

1058: 1053: 1048: 1043: 1038: 1033: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1013: 1006: 1001: 996: 991: 986: 981: 976: 971: 966: 961: 11576: 10504: 9576:

The default settings for blocks (when blocking a username) is to block the underlying IP for 24 hours and block account creation. If this block had

6258: 5862: 3805:

that I'm trying to own it, and trying to war, when the vast majority of my contributions were on talk trying to resolve the issue? Give me a break.

11796: 11758: 11627:

Yesterday, Lexicon blocked Iwazaki for 48hr for alleged "personal attacks", following another direct posting by Taprobanus on Lexicon's talk page.

11501: 11290: 11009: 9879: 9349: 7525: 6988: 6429: 395: 262: 12738: 12718: 9897: 12921: 11769: 11538:

I knew Knivesout8 was a sock. As soon as it was created he attacked an admin and pushed pov on that article. Glad it was proven and action taken.

10680: 10571: 10548: 10528: 10512: 10489: 10423:

Since I have corrected the links, further discussion of the problem can wait till one of the administrators familiar with this article are back.

10323: 8402:

also defines it as " articles while involved with organizations that engage in advocacy in that area", and he's a member of WikiProject Scotland.

8196: 8141: 8074: 8073:

These had no effect on the naming of the DFB team in English - or should "Huns nft" and "Krauts nft" be used for the 1910s and 1920s, maybe? --

8027: 7967: 7889: 7882: 7036: 6880: 6135: 2616: 2163: 2148: 2123: 1957: 1744: 948: 879: 536: 12311:

and cleanup any unsourced statements, as this is the article the user appears to have a problem with (though from what I can tell, they want to

11198: 5079: 4757: 4251:, outside opinions already agree with me. What else do you want? The policy is concrete, my interpretation has been supported by many people. ~ 2582:

issues that have to do with your concept of ethical conduct but, unlike your editing, your admin activity is generally not my major concern. --

12336: 12308: 11229: 11069: 7881: 7513: 7419: 1672: 499: 5765:

seems, so it was not "wikistalking." I am not really here to argue their points, just state that edit warring is not a single person thing. --

2745: 12924: 12578: 12506: 12259: 11772: 10768: 9973: 9693: 8363:

Point of order: Possible POV pushing should not be labeled COI. Please don't use COI allegations to intimidate another editor. Thanks. -

7876: 7847: 7813: 7787: 7719: 7675: 3652: 3650: 3273: 3195: 2347: 2192: 1906: 12794: 12177:, fair-use rationales, whose placement on obscure articles means many of their deletion-taggings won't be discovered until it's too late? 12431: 12074: 11338: 11205: 8546:

is a laughingstock because "British" and "United Kingdom" are systematically erased from it. Surely we have a policy about that in 2007? —

7861: 7828: 7797: 7657: 7569: 7562: 7507:

Everything mentioned there is going to be mentioned here; she is alive, she is working still, so it will be easy to get a free photograph.

5141: 3843: 3286: 1559: 1532: 11136: 9514: 7964: 6381:

At the very least, something as severe as an indef block should go through ArbCom. Gio might be an edit warrior, but he's not a vandal.

3655: 1803:

In trying to make sense of it, I managed to track down the "extremely racist, extremely handicappist, policy page, about vandalism." - he

1767:

but I suspect English is not this user's native language. I've left a message at the talk page anyway and I'll see what I can do to help.

12725: 10131: 10063: 8069: 6117:

However completely ignoring that others are doing it to just leaves the same situation for the next person. You cannot edit war alone. --

3094:

How is attacking 847 people indiscriminately helping anything? You're unblocked now, and there's nothing wrong done by anyone else here.—

1435: 565: 338: 180: 12346: 10342:

The user had already been filed here before for 3RR issues and an edit conflict, but sadly the dispute has not been solved. The article

12215: 11517:

Knivesout8 and Jumanjisalvo blocked indefinitely, IP blocked for a month with account creation disabled. Anything besides those three?

10870: 10716: 9285: 7864: 7831: 7800: 7030: 7024: 6900: 6476: 6129: 5959: 5583:

I am uninvolved with this user. I think the indef block was valid. How many edit warring block do we give a person? Enough is enough. (

3576: 3544: 3497: 3167: 3047: 2720:

language, so use the discussion pages rather then mindlessly undoing each other. Please note that being disruptive is being blockable,

1738: 1309: 575: 494: 343: 5793:

Restoring Giovanni's original block would be wildly inappropriate. The community has spoken, and Giovanni has worn out his welcome.

5496:

I just want parity. I only know of them two; but this dispute has been going on for over a year now, so a resolution is long overdue.

3975:. In the process, I've been repeatedly slandered (at one point, someone even started a thread with the specific purpose of bashing me 2544:

time you ask him for his "valuable input" in the articles on which you edit war, please mention that the issue of ANI thread names. --

2204:

OK, we are starting to understand what happened as known IRCers who chose to block shop at IRC are starting to pop up here at last. --

917: 11284: 9594:, which was banned by arbcom for a year for harassment, as both usernames follow the formula pronoun-positive verb-electric pokemon. 9408: 6709:

The discussion here will be more indicative of community consensus than the notice board. A more diverse group edit here than there.

6026: 4323: 3198: 540: 11621:, but apart from saying "warned", Lexicon failed to reply to any of the subsequent postings questioning the validity of the warning. 8588:

There is nothing on the talk page because the incriminated user first changed it without edit summary and concealed as a minor edit

17: 9730: 8903: 6865:

the Hicks page earlier, stating a lower threshold for blocking would exist if edit-warring resumes. Less than thirty minutes after

4409:

The two editors apparently have a sensitivity to news reports that the parents of Australian Prime Minister John Howard once owned

2866: 2411: 323: 5723:

actually considering the block this year to stick was in August, and his last one prior was September 2006, its been 11 months. --

4326:

made a (recent) comment about what would be considered SYN that I'm trying to get cleared up. So, we might have two comments. --

2837:

Oh, I certainly agree with the last part of your comment - although I am afraid we would disagree on who those parties would be.--

12846:. I am the editor who initiated the AfD, but I now believe it should be administratively closed out due to new info provided by 10928: 10433: 10339:

I wrote this up at another admins' noticeboard; turns out that I was at the wrong one. I'll paste it here to get your attention.

10332: 10195: 9831:

I didn't block him because it seems possible he's acting in good faith. But I did apply a nail-studded solid hickory clue stick.

9348:

were what started this and by themselves not particularly problematic. However, in the middle of it, on Sept 12, brand new user

7827:

Before you scold me, have a look at what I've written and look as well at what the wound-up ball of pettiness has done for Wiki.

7042: 6141: 5689: 4247:

and came across the first listing (as of Sept. 12), so I suggest you stop making such specious claims about Fredrick Day. As for

1887:

The page was under active editing, in the scope of several wikiprojects working towards GA status, and this kind of hijacking to

1750: 666: 436: 10374: 7646:

He has also added a link on his user page that points directly to my talk page in an apparent attempt at starting more trouble:

6354:, yet there is nobody calling for his head. Considering who gets singled out for a ban, this is obviously completely one-sided. 2964:

people, that should usually raise a red flag that should warn you to stop as you may be doing something against consensus. From

10738: 10404: 10214: 9495: 9366: 7055: 3978:), and just today have discovered that one of them seems to be daily tailing me to other websites to try and dig up dirt on me. 1497: 943: 659: 431: 353: 225: 12391:

that said: "Non-administrators can report misbehaving bots to Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.", generated by

12286:

as an individual has the right to control his or her reptutation and,name and likeness through themselves or third parties."

11987: 10366:

I ask for another attempt at a gentle explanation before any other action is taken. Kingdom has been the particular target of

8051:

the national team at the expense of the other. Again, and more importantly, it is the custom and practice of referring to the

12687:(wrong tag, aznavour was born in 1924, he seems to be about five years old in that picture, it is definitely not before 1923) 12307:

User has been blocked indefinitely (or until they agree to not make any more legal threats). Someone should probably go over

10609: 8927:

for discussion there in a civilized manner, instead of being taken to this incidents section of the noticeboard on this page.

8406:

when I'm adding this information he concealed? And how come he gets a free pass on not disclosing this in the first place? —

5806: 5189: 2054: 592: 333: 272: 11552: 8516:

his accent is not at all strong. Apart from the Hamish and Dougal bit, of course, but then Barry Cryer is from Yorkshire...

8463:

as Scottish (and he self-identifies as such as well), for example, so that's why we have him described as such in the lead.

149: 12913: 12887: 11362: 11086: 10527:

was most likely out of line when he made the comment, but in his defense this comes after a month of trying to reason with

10371: 10149: 10125: 10081: 10057: 9325: 6998:

as well, but believes that a lack of "response" (in his favour) indicates to him that there is consensus to add the image.

4821:

John Howard etc. - with a source that also includes contentious material, namely the business dealings of Howard's father,

4020:, I've supported going through the dispute resolution, and so far the outside opinions tend to agree with my position that 3598:

and argue the case there. Feel free to argue about the underlaying issue, but no need to point fingers, instead argue over

2642:

blocks any attempt to resotre previous tittle. Such action seems disruptive-I would like to know how to clean this mess ?--

2041: 671: 411: 328: 10791: 5394:

The problem with such restrictions is that it becomes a tool for others to game in edit wars, if handed out unevenly. And

5231: 2504: 12909: 11981: 11701:

by another admin who has never been involved in such disputes ? Have you forgoten that Iwazaki was warned multiple times

10864: 10827: 9878: 9745: 9637: 8239: 8158: 7955: 7934: 7164: 5953: 3294:

on the actual debate here (the number 10 and the words "foot" and "pole" come to mind) but I saw a need to clarify here.

1440: 531: 456: 311: 242: 8591:, then after I changed it back with full rationales he simply reverted again as minor edit without any counter-rationale 5228: 4966:(Melbourne) for citation is because I thought they were reliable, and easily accessed. For example, I Googled the terms 4475:. This edit serves no other purpose but to delete the existing reference. Again, the subject of the text is not "copra". 2972:

Piotrus happened to be one of the reverters. Admin tools are usually required to clean up page move issues; that's what

2508: 12075:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge:Articles_for_creation/2006-07-30&diff=158169551&oldid=158166219

11368: 11350: 10631: 9900:, Melodymee keeps adding copyrighted and potentially defamatory content to articles, including such claims that she is 9679: 9671: 9506: 9402: 7586: 6625: 6218: 6020: 5995:: a knowledgable editor, but also an incredibly stubborn revert warrior who was simply impossible to get along with. -- 5888: 5829: 5791: 644: 639: 624: 461: 451: 416: 287: 10667: 9950:. None of her edits have any proper sources that I see. I conclude stalker; I am going to indef block the account. 6567:, so please provide evidence to examine below this post. I'll also respectfully request that this discussion move to 5103:

Is this a new thing in Knowledge, or is there precedent, that "consensus" must be sought for what references are used?

3113:

eh? Sorry, our attitudes seem to be too different to be reconciled. Everyone is entitled to his delusions, I guess. --

12827: 12570: 11356: 11308: 10520: 10508: 8933: 6083:

Agree strongly. Probably needs a new noticeboard instead of here, though. This proposal deserves serious discussion.

4504:

here we see Prester John perform an edit which leaves the online text unchanged, but just deletes the reference that

2188: 1870: 649: 582: 478: 471: 421: 12282:

I found the template to tag the user, but other than that, what, if anything. Is there a notice board for this? "

9161: 1784: 12266: 12257: 12097: 11564: 11332: 11314: 11126: 11029: 10922: 10458: 10191: 9845: 9715: 9688: 6515: 6391: 6319: 6168: 5683: 5633: 4729:

Yes, by me, because you deleted the content to which it refers in spite of talkpage consensus for its inclusion. --

909: 796: 282: 247: 12790:

I don´t mind if the articles get merges or changed, but I want to see that happen after discussion and consensus.

11861: 11735: 11733: 11731: 11625: 11570: 10967:

are making unsourced edits (providing "documentation" in the edit summaries). I believe them to be sockpuppets of

3959: 2079:

What you call "stub" was a full-fledged disambiguation page which referred our readers to such disparate pages as

12938: 11302: 11296: 10732: 10333: 10257: 10017: 10012: 9889: 9360: 9174: 5732:

Are his year-long disruptive revert-warring acceptible if the 3RR was technically not violated? I have evidence

4067:

There's a world of difference between checking out a website and watching it daily to dig up dirt on someone. --

1491: 1445: 683: 634: 587: 446: 368: 257: 173: 12547:

AWB may help. I also left a note on his talk page to address the concerns and fix the bot or it'll get shutdown.

11945: 11903: 7834: 7806: 7771: 7636: 6866: 5755:

is to stalk another user. Can you say the same about the other editors you are referring to, SevenOfDiamonds?--

4879:

article, for instance. Can we please see more solid additions to our encyclopaedia and less epic discussions? --

4817: 3910:

not have any intention to create an edit war. I suggest to the administrator to read the source of this problem

12485: 12395: 11999: 10972: 10556: 10536: 10188: 10021: 9800: 9771: 7942: 1808: 754: 570: 514: 466: 385: 348: 94: 43: 11124: 10793: 10455: 10452: 10449: 10173: 10105: 9085: 9082: 9079: 9076: 8592: 8589: 8293: 8291: 8192: 5619:

process to determine that this is the right decision. I'm bringing this up because despite his behaviour, he

3032: 12614: 12425: 12005: 11855: 11278: 11080: 10900: 10249: 9912: 9414: 9319: 5989: 3965: 3883: 3272:

You are very welcome to demonstrate that I was "abusing my edit rights and should be banned off the project".

785: 390: 378: 373: 12284:

If Wikpedia is not going to play ball with 3rd aprty verifable issues then this shall be referred to lawyers

10302:

Before there's a number of posts on this issue, it's a Commons issue, and the developers are looking at it.

10137: 10069: 9915: 9675: 9667: 9426: 6852: 6847: 6842: 6837: 6831: 6828: 6826: 6824: 6056: 5224: 5202:

It's going to be hard to find an admin who's never blocked him to provide an independent review of that :-)

4954:

The purpose of an inline reference is to verify a single fact from a reliable source. The reason I used the

4570: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4554: 4539: 4535: 4531: 4527: 4523: 4501: 4491: 4472: 4452: 4445: 2500: 2379: 12752: 12734: 12714: 12608: 12537: 12524: 11939: 11897: 11594:

on Knowledge since at least November last year. He has repeatedly made uncivil comments to Iwazaki such as

11477: 11437: 11256: 10888: 10671: 10669: 10663: 10237: 10224: 10194:

which have been used for the past 18 months by Aaron Klein and his cohorts to try to control his wikipedia

10167: 10099: 10004: 9631: 9081:, then tried compromise #1 by adding the additional info he wanted but this time inside the regular infobox 9005: 8963: 8915: 8669: 7867: 7012: 5977: 2828:

There are several disruptive parties here, Piotrus. And some of those parties act sneaky and play dirty. --

1812:

or because of the (by no means obvious from the picture itself) fact that one of the subjects suffers from

1764: 766: 654: 524: 316: 12800:

I'm watching, and I left note on her talk page. I have to go for a few hours but I'll be back later today.

12017: 11607: 10958: 6044: 5707: 12917: 12117: 11327: 11183: 10894: 10762: 10675: 10625: 10343: 10248:

about something in the book, etc. Request appropriate (72 hrs? 1 week?) blocks as a fair consequence, a

10026: 9804: 9775: 9384: 7946: 7938: 7580: 5983: 5882: 5695: 3251: 1520:

I think the original block was probably not so far off base - this seems like a lot of gibberish to me.

1515: 867: 519: 199: 10946: 10677: 10673: 10665: 9905: 6534: 4498:

change some article text, but scroll to the bottom of the page and you'll again find missing references.

4448:

Skyring(Pete) changed some article information, but also deleted a reference called <"Age_Copra": -->

2147:. I'm trying to figure out how it works. If you know, you're welcome to go ahead and not wait for me. 12851: 11879: 11529:

Well goodness, glad to see Knowledge actually works: someone blocked for sockpuppetry and POV pushing!

11110: 10876: 10750: 10547:

In the interest of full-disclosure, I have also been involved in the content dispute and have reported

10245: 10241: 9420: 9372: 9343: 7715:

and a rehashing of a conflict that was resolved not weeks (when he made the change), but MOTNHS ago. --

6971: 6050: 5965: 3377:

Irpen, please refrain from attacking editors who actually try to enforce some civility here. Thanks, --

1503: 863: 441: 267: 252: 237: 207: 166: 11963: 11921: 10661: 9661: 6465: 6455: 6450: 6351: 3682:

has consistently needed to be put in check due to some strange personal vendetta that she has against

3285:

Bit confusing, but by checking his earliest edits to the project his username was Evilclown93, RfA is

12447: 12057: 12029: 11993: 11098: 10882: 10655: 9951: 9542:

Already blocked as I was entering a reminder to avoid attacks. I do concur with the block however. --

9442: 8015: 7610: 6198:

Endorse, a true POV warrior. But it seems like an admin is objecting it will have to be next time. -

6032: 5971: 5918: 5800: 5596: 5465: 5445:

that's also fine, but in such instances, too, we need evenhandedness. Parity over posturing, please.

5429: 5386: 5183: 5123:

to help you understand a lot of "BLPisms" outside of the context of Australian Politicians. Enjoy!

4956: 4931: 4849: 4105:

repeatedly insist that I'm right and you're wrong and personally attack the person you disagree with.

4005: 3976: 2084: 2033: 426: 277: 10038: 9649: 7937:) himself concedes above that "West Germany" was only an informal name for the (BTW still existing) 5149:

Having just blocked this user for continuing an edit war across several pages for several days (see

4244: 3906: 12628: 11873: 11606:(about an IP from Ohio, while Iwazaki is from Japan) and made senseless, unproven allegations like 11481: 11441: 11273: 11260: 10952: 10643: 10462: 10119: 10051: 9564: 9529: 9331: 9033: 8873: 7843:

is simply more trouble making name calling after multiple warnings. User should be blocked ASAP! --

7598: 6038: 5906: 5701: 5311: 3761: 1952:

After your latest outburst of admin abuse, I'm on no speaking terms with you. The IRC incident was

760: 612: 12087:

I replaced the libel with a note that the libel was removed, but it is still in the page history.

9084:, then compromise #2 by removing the Flagicon from the infobox's "Nationality: British (Scottish)" 1479:

Can anyone make any sense out of this user's page or talk page, signature, or the user's edits?

12816: 12778: 12702: 11975: 11957: 11915: 11639:, both extremely racist websites, and repeatedly cited them in controversial Knowledge articles. 10934: 10756: 10580: 9739: 9378: 9293:

I'm involved in this dispute, so per admin conflict of interest policy I'm floating this here...

9002: 8960: 8912: 8666: 8235: 7928: 7692:

That's what I am talk about. He changed the title of a section that I WROTE that originally said

7523: 7115: 7062: 6986: 5947: 1509: 1474: 10143: 10075: 7641: 7629:

and even altered my own words to make it look as though I was actually referring to myself as a

12762: 12653:(wrong tag again, and for informational use only. We should be able to find a free alternative) 12387:

I've left a note there referring to this discussion. I was merely following the instruction at

11415: 10940: 10304: 9914:

and also that the subjects of certain articles have contacted her about "fixing" said articles.

9500: 9396: 8924: 8491: 8432: 8324: 8068:

German football teams that competed in FIFA sanctioned matches and tournaments. Please look at

6953: 6734: 6214: 6014: 5825: 5307: 5150: 4787: 3914:. Any person with a brain can read that I am not part of Rei's idea of a "possible" edit war.-- 3295: 1848: 1458: 826: 629: 189: 9940:

Plenty of sources say other things than what she's claiming about JJ Abrams and Gail Berman -

7338: 7108: 12904: 12577:(later automatically archived, because the page owner created the page with auto-archiving). 12165: 12040: 11663: 11530: 11508: 11458: 11104: 10779: 10744: 9337: 9243: 8055:

as West Germany in the English Language Knowledge. Please conform to the existing standards.

6862: 6155: 5558: 5507: 3227: 2182: 1864: 1651: 1590: 12073:

In this diff, Sam Wightkin, a victim of libel, wants his attack entry removed in this diff:

11671: 11648:'s claims in a number of separate places of an AFD discussion, including in the nomination ( 11567: 9682:. I think that constitutes a personal attack. I tried at WP:AIV but they said to try here. — 8103:, and it was their name - not a nickname nor a racial slur, and you cannot rewrite history. 7835:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Griot&diff=158106329&oldid=157974569

7807:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Griot&diff=157934985&oldid=157934285

7772:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Griot&diff=157902521&oldid=157900464

7637:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Griot&diff=153021407&oldid=153021211

6733:

to resolve this appropriately. My views are broadly in line with those expressed by Sophia.

4351: 3930: 3911: 2769:

For the record, I think move wars are regarded as more disruptive then normal revert wars.--

2087:

which you, Piotrus, and Digwuren preferred to bundle together, for reasons unknown to me. --

12295:

This be the place. There's no NLT noticeboard, thankfully! Keep us posted on his response.

11746: 10796: 9917:

Even if this is all true, not a single source has been cited to support the claims made. --

9713: 9686: 9655: 9301: 8923:

How the country of birth should be represented in an infobox should have been taken to the

8227: 6974:) repeatedly adds a non-free image of the actress to the article's infobox in violation of 6511: 6387: 6315: 6164: 6118: 5766: 5746: 5724: 5677: 5662: 5629: 5584: 3993: 3753: 3328:

Technically no, it was just a redirect. I've undeleted it and nominated it for deletion at

2503:

continued editing, in defiance of our rules on block evasion. Anyone is welcome to compare

2289: 1460: 74: 10034: 7477:

Please see the Linda Hamilton Talk Page for why this still does not address the issue. --

5315: 5121: 4891:

around accusations of vandalism. By definition, editing in good faith is never vandalism.

4786:

This article came off protection fairly recently, I think it may have to go back on it :/

2470:

And please no ridiculous accusation on "campaigns against Piotrus". You may want to check

8: 12156: 11867: 11092: 11037: 10726: 10649: 10286: 10264: 9883: 9832: 9612: 9354: 9172: 9152: 8655: 8569: 8099:

It doesn't matter how illogical the different name appears to you Matthead, the fact is,

8056: 7997: 7604: 6918:

Gnangarra has re-instated the two blocks. (Gnangarra unblocked Prester John as well). ——

6910: 6407: 6300: 6276: 6084: 5912: 5867:

As a side note, I'm getting slightly annoyed at the sight of people like this fellow and

4804: 4243:(edit conflict)OK, Rei, so you have no evidence that he did anything other than click on 1838: 1817: 1726: 1636: 1485: 830: 602: 509: 203: 69: 12647:(it should be fine being a logo, but it is orphaned now, will be deleted if it stays so) 11143:

I've removed the edits from the history. If he does something similar again, give him a

10444:

Tom13014 has added copied and pasted material from news articles and political sites to

10155: 10087: 8090:

better yet, go to De.Knowledge, and contribute there. That's a good solid WP, enjoy it.

2976:

is for (among other things). If it was any other admin, would they be accused of abuse?

1994: 1905:

This section was deleted by Ghirlandajo and replaced with the below topic about Piotrus

722: 12809: 12678: 12242: 12201: 12140: 12088: 12078: 11970: 11951: 11909: 11653:, I can say that this has long since ceased to fulfill the requirements WP:LIST and ... 11583: 11521: 11165: 11120: 11049: 10253: 9856: 9797: 9768: 9752: 9709:

don't think he attacked me, fine, you can close the disscusion. Thanks for your time! —

9643: 9523: 9452: 9187: 8736: 8732: 8557: 8231: 8199: 8182: 8166: 8144: 8104: 8077: 8030: 7970: 7958:

as a separate article, a POV-fork which was replaced by the proper redirect again (see

7924: 7902: 7868:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Griot&diff=prev&oldid=158226806

7683: 7561: 7423: 7175: 6236: 5894: 5407: 5395: 5332: 5319: 5166: 5158: 3901:

Me "planing" and edit/revert war. You are making false accusations. As you can read in

3850:

to meticulously undo the damage of one of the site's most insidious long term vandals.

3566: 3534: 3487: 3344: 3157: 3037: 2984: 2920:

For the love of Jimbo, can't Piotrus and Ghirla leave each other alone? Neither of you

2299: 1794: 1774: 1537:

This is the user's signature - everything within and including the outside brackets:

715: 707: 607: 363: 90: 39: 12439: 12345:

is misbehaving. It's incorrectly inserting/removing interwiki links on templates. See

11706: 11662:), inferring that he created the article and therefore it should now be deleted as he 10030: 9988:

protected article until 29 Sep--semiprotected, blocked the two anon IPs for one week.

6442:

The most prominent example I've seen is the following revert-warring by Giovanni33 in

4657:

combined, who are they reverting against?? Why aren't their opposition reported here?

4289:

been trying to get them for a long time. Instead, all I've gotten is your assertions.

3962: 3842:

and it is no secret that two highly disruptive editors were active at that page. See

3732:

Anyone who wishes to is welcome to read the article talk archives. Rei's attempts to

12874: 12786: 12419: 12362: 11849: 11573: 11147: 11074: 10695: 10637: 9932: 9582: 9496: 9481: 9313: 9266: 8839: 8805: 7592: 6819: 6815: 6809: 6801: 6688: 6660: 6487:

status, whereas Giovanni33 appeared from nowhere there just to revert John Smith's.--

6410:

are, in the long run, far more damaging to the project than run-of-the-mill vandals.

6209: 6071: 5900: 5851: 5820: 5567: 5534: 4601: 4546: 4495: 4481: 4418: 4395: 4380: 3879: 3687: 3384: 3101: 2949: 2876: 2844: 2816: 2776: 2691: 2569: 2364: 2243: 2225: 2215: 2021: 1932: 1874: 1713: 27: 9168:

user accounts. As long as the account isn't being used improperly, it's allowed. --

6461:

This appears to be in response to the following, and similar edits by John Smith's:

6367:

has done something wrong you can post a notice here, or at CSN or RfC or ArbCom. --

5075:

new participant, am guided by the examples that others, including admin users, set.

12696: 12668: 12534: 12520: 12375: 11933: 11891: 11761: 11473: 11433: 11374: 11252: 10968: 10008: 9960: 9918: 9625: 9234: 8945:

Knowledge is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a venue for nitpicking and slurs.

8789: 8756: 7873: 7844: 7810: 7784: 7716: 7672: 7418:

The problem is that "Ignore all rules" won't work here, especially point 5 of what

7008: 6403: 6355: 6338: 6102: 5996: 5364: 5342: 5298: 5276: 5235: 4553:(Scroll to reference section at bottom of page to see what references are missing) 4522:(Scroll to reference section at bottom of page to see what references are missing) 4414: 4124: 3571: 3555: 3539: 3515: 3492: 3457: 3367: 3277: 3239: 3216: 3202: 3162: 3114: 3086: 3042: 3023: 3003: 2892: 2749: 2708: 2513: 2383: 2178: 2119: 2111: 2088: 2058: 1984: 1965: 1913: 1860: 1679: 1640: 1609: 1579: 10322:

Yeah, I noticed it earlier. It doesn't look like the problems solved yet, though.

9927:

I can find nothing on google except ourselves and a mirror - and a rather strange

9390:

came back after 24 hrs, and the back and forth continued a bit, with an IP editor

7762:

The user Griot has ignored your warning and undone your revert and changed it to:

2606:

in first place. I reverted him once, and as he ignored my revert, I reported him.

2218:

with this thread to complain about Piotrus fixing Ghirla's purposeful disruption.—

12843: 12805: 12638: 12574: 12499: 12466: 12371: 12269: 12124: 10619: 10567: 9710: 9683: 9591: 9549: 9068: 8543: 8320: 8299: 8264: 7820: 7780: 7709: 7661: 7619: 6975: 6943: 6777: 6506: 6425: 6382: 6310: 6159: 5876: 5672: 5624: 5142: 5064: 5018: 4893: 4775: 4744: 4707: 4696: 4685: 4659: 3869:

I'm going to add this article to my watch list. I could have sworn there was an

3700: 3258: 2334: 2284: 1813: 11702: 9670:

Calton about a trolling war he was having with 66.35.127.0 and he replied to me

5566:

Do it now or wait till next time. Of course I probably said that last time too.

4694:

I've changed it myself to a non-copra source and now I wait with bated breath...

3961:, while I tried to solve the problem peaceably by starting a request for comment 2973: 2044:, there should be some article about the phenomenon). I was rudely reverted by 1895:

or even mention on talk page is the rudest thing I have ever seen on wikipedia.

12763: 12327: 12287: 12273: 11828: 11710: 11677: 11132:

is inappropriate, if not please can you send it to the correct place - Thanks.

11033: 11005: 10997: 10812: 10787: 10721: 10473: 10283: 10261: 9947: 9435: 9297: 9287: 9169: 8777: 8773: 8744: 8464: 8364: 8283: 8023: 7653: 7534: 7508: 7427: 6965: 6954: 6920: 6907: 6891: 6763: 6068: 5126: 4801: 4631: 4625: 3967:

in order to avoid the aforementioned prospective edit war. I'll repeat: I let

3870: 3745: 3609: 3482: 2727: 2323: 1608:

Careful Moe, that little greek character there might be considered vandalism.

1555: 1544: 1528: 1480: 812: 12641:

is a living person, a singer, so we should be able to find a free alternative)

7792:

User Griot still doesn't seem to get it. His response to your SECOND warning:

7642:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Griot#What_if_I_am_a_gun_freak.3F_So_what.3F

5284:

Yes. His history of edit-warring is ridiculous. Way into double figures, FFS.

1456: 12932: 12847: 12516: 12232: 12191: 12053: 12025: 11518: 11454: 11159: 11154: 11133: 11129: 11116: 10993: 10979:, and they said they don't deal with this. If this is not the correct place, 10976: 10771: 10690: 10445: 10438: 10434: 10393: 10357: 10207:

21 anons since March 2006; 4 registered between March 2006 and January 2007.

9850: 9819: 9794: 9765: 9463: 9457: 9203: 9165: 9148: 9138: 9134: 8869: 8801: 8700: 8694: 8631: 8625: 8602:

fans would considerer him this or that. Is this an encyclopedia or a fanzine?

8524: 8518: 8399: 8392: 8275: 8161: 8019: 7950: 7749: 7729: 7712: 7664: 7622: 7546: 6979: 6858: 6724: 6701: 6672: 6644: 6630: 6568: 6538: 6530: 6498: 6480: 6412: 6368: 6180: 6108: 5926: 5648: 5461: 5425: 5417: 5403: 5382: 5328: 5285: 5259: 5210: 5204: 5162: 5154: 4673: 4617: 4505: 4456: 4363: 4359: 4248: 4120: 4077: 4017: 4001: 3887: 3847: 3831: 3794: 3769: 3765: 3757: 3749: 3733: 3704: 3638: 3595: 3511: 3338: 3333: 2978: 2965: 2932: 2926: 2721: 2704: 2417: 1789: 1769: 1669: 1566: 12502:

are again quickly archived or removed with comments like "remove trolling".

11505: 9001:(and consequently would have ended up here) eventually, one way or another. 6982:. He says an admin must rule on the usage, would appreciate a look, thanks. 5016:

are being broken or that someone is doing it deliberately (i.e. vandalism).

4862:

biography, just because it also mentions "copra" somewhere else in the book?

3607:

take it to the relevant forums (read: not here), and discuss! Thank you. ——

3213:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Allied occupation of Europe (2nd nomination)

2602:

He didn't have any right to hijack and retask the page without consensus or

775: 12896: 12863: 12415: 12316: 11844: 11815:

Knowledge:Requests for comment/User conduct#Use of administrator privileges

11784: 11780: 11776: 11765: 11754: 11750: 11742: 11738: 11591: 11579: 11557: 11553: 10405: 9823: 9596: 9475: 9308: 9225: 9092: 8980: 8937: 8679: 8608: 8547: 8460: 8407: 8344: 8308: 8215: 8128: 8091: 7912: 7894: 7550: 6849:

Bless sins - "rv, mass removal of content; the article seems fine as it is"

6682: 6654: 6546: 6542: 6488: 6484: 6265: 6199: 5845: 5840: 5756: 5737: 5521: 5104: 5049: 5039: 5007: 4985: 4906: 4880: 4876: 4866: 4838: 4826: 4822: 4648: 4613: 4595: 4585: 4577: 4515: 4460: 4435: 4422: 4399: 4384: 4081: 4025: 4021: 3915: 3874: 3839: 3737: 3683: 3646: 3634: 3630: 3380: 3095: 2945: 2872: 2840: 2812: 2772: 2685: 2565: 2360: 2237: 2219: 2159: 2144: 2045: 2025: 1928: 1702: 1683: 12699:(wrong tag, the photo is from 30's, not before 1923, most likely not free) 12048:

I was the checkuser that investigated this IP, if that wasn't clear. :) ++

11617:

In July he gave Iwazaki a "warning" based on a previous AN/I complaint by

9944: 9941: 4459:

had kindly repaired the broken anchor reference, but a few minutes later

3764:

to bring impartial opinions to the article, then brought the page through

3744:

by six weeks. All of Rei's citations had to be reverted as violations of

907: 12791: 12770: 12748: 12730: 12710: 12548: 12528: 12102: 12069:

Victim of libel wants some libel removed, but that could violate the GFDL

11928: 11886: 11539: 11468: 11428: 11247: 11218: 11209: 10984: 10983:

tell me the appropriate place that can resolve this quickly. Thank you. -

10816: 10783: 10705: 10532: 10274: 10000: 9989: 9908: 9620: 9613: 8946: 8891: 8865: 8817: 8785: 8271: 8007: 6999: 6938: 6886: 6805: 6788: 6710: 6601: 6586: 6286: 6251: 5483: 5360: 5246: 5117: 5100:

to say what are appropriate references for this article and what are not.

4403: 4388: 4368: 4355: 3852: 3774: 3741: 3710: 3013: 2857: 2643: 2626: 2272: 2132: 2118:. "Soviet occupation" is a common name for, well, Soviet occupations. 2101: 2071: 1909: 12860:

Done. As the nominator, you can usually withdraw a nomination yourself.

12401:. If that instruction is inappropriate, perhaps it should be changed. -- 12180:

Is our new standard for image deletion that fair-use rationales must be

11426:

Could an admin take care of these images and possibly the user? Thanks!

7618:

This user has made recent edits to his talk page that constitute a very

6576:: a critical view of that thesis would argue it's a fancy way of saying 5713:

his usual behavior than the situation needs to be presented to arbcom.--

206:. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see 12782: 12590: 12462: 12388: 12366: 12342: 11195: 10614: 10524: 10516: 10493: 10424: 10414: 10379: 10367: 9543: 9519: 9207: 9120: 8809: 8573: 6154:

imposing an indefinite block without going through a formal process of

5714: 5525: 4912: 3670: 3419: 3320: 3076: 2829: 2797: 2761: 2748:. There was no response whatsoever, only reverts and IRC complaints. -- 2656: 2583: 2545: 2311: 2259: 2205: 2100:

Ghirla has been blocked for a 3RR violation on the page in question. --

7163:

As I explained to you on your Talk page, there is no "higher level".

4362:

if conflict resumes and I'm quite willing to progress to user conduct

3656:

talk:Man vs. Wild#Criticism.2C_fakeness_and_what_they_don.27t_tell_you

3654:

have since been arguing with me and others on the talk page (see e.g.

3336:

to complain about the deletion, not ANI to complain about the admins.

3215:, which choose to delete the article (instead now it's a redirect). — 759:

If the issue concerns a specific user, try discussing it with them on

12774: 12557: 12402: 12352: 12296: 12219: 11818: 11779:

has some extent warned by other users at the AFD of the subject whom

11001: 10775: 9901: 8797: 7478: 7376: 7256: 7222: 7139: 7099: 6961: 6885:

I have blocked both Brendan.lloyd and Prester John for disruption of

6758: 6617: 5786: 5497: 5477: 5446: 4487:

Prester John has, to a lesser extent, also been deleting references:

4252: 4205: 4090: 4029: 3659: 2671: 2630: 2607: 2195: 1975: 1896: 1549: 1522: 202:. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the 10660:

has been constantly removing tags from wrestling-related pages, see

10500: 8646:

However, forget individuals and consider (for instance) cities. Are

8127:

The editor is now moving for page deletions to accord with his POV.

6505:

over there. And please, anybody can give anybody else a Barnstar.

2475:

well-organized campaign by Piotrus. --09:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

12773:

see contribution list) without discussing them. She is redirecting

12769:

This user has been making irritating changes to several articles (

12049: 12021: 11698: 11697:

Are you forgeting that Iwazaki asked for a block review. Which was

11596:"okay, this is the last time I'm going to bother responding to you" 9928: 9841: 8906:

of being irish because he was born in ireland, he famously replied

8781: 8647: 8561: 8287: 7652:

At the end of the original conflict, I was blocked for 24 hours by

7300: 6364: 6347: 5457: 5421: 5378: 5258:

Aaaaaand endorsed. Time-wasting like this should not be tolerated.

4669: 4327: 4195: 4111: 4068: 3997: 3988: 3944: 3902: 3822: 3724: 3679: 3642: 3366:, and that any attempts at starting one are patently disruptive. -- 2029: 12556:

How are the notes messed up? I'm not sure I'm seeing the problem.

8772:

To be honest, I can't really see what the problem is. After all,

7671:

on his talk page, months after this conflict had been resolved. --

11188: 9028:

I regret to tell you that the earlier quotation from Wellington (

8908:"Jesus was born in a stable, but it doesn't mean he was a horse!" 8813: 8748: 8651: 4962: 4937: 4855: 3958:

Also, let it be known that UBeR tried to avoid dispute resolution

11709:. It seems that Lexicon is more than justified for that block! 8459:

It depends on the situation. I think most people would describe

5733: 4441:

Skyring(Pete) has been the most prolific deleter of references:

3151:

admit that I did come in with a bias due to the first few posts.

2869:

would explain why admin intervention was needed, indeed. Sigh.--

8565: 3736:

the article led to page protection and delayed progress toward

2049: 1578:

He seems to contradict his own rule about clear signatures.. —

1461: 158: 12159:

tagging fair-use images with imperfect rationales for deletion

5544:

decrease in the number and frequency of blocks is evidence of

1462: 11632: 8793: 8752: 7996:

discussions. You should now cease your unilateral revisions.

6472: 6443: 4410: 1964:. It's a pity that you could not resist joining the crowd. -- 11115:

has twice made potentially defamatory comments in breach of

10852: 10347:

user has kept changing it. I'm also curious if the user and

7111:, specifically addressing non-free images of living people. 5941: 3873:

ticket about this article somewhere but I can't find it. ---

12745: 10786:). Same edit pattern: deleting cleanup tags and comment on 10570:. Legal threats are not tolerated whatsoever on Knowledge. 7941:

between 1949 and 1990, as well as for sport teams like the

6008: 12479:

500 articles messed up by AlptaBot (and no cleanup effort)

7825:(→Boo hoo hoo! My feelings got hurt! And I mean hurt bad!) 3481:

Okay, it's time to settle down. All parties have lost our

2055:

stoops to out-of-process deletion of a disambiguation page

72:

to this revision, which may differ significantly from the

10910: 6446:(and the only edits ever by Giovanni33 in that article): 5400:

Knowledge:Requests for mediation/Mao: The Unknown Story 2

3846:

for a description of one of them. It is no violation of

2131:

can somebody restore the original name to the article ?--

12726:

Talk:Greek_War_of_Independence#Images_of_revolutionaries

11636: 10161: 10093: 8137:"The editor" has requested the deletion of the redirect 6541:

is not just any editor; he is one of the leaders in the

5420:

and therefore there's no implied promise of fairness. ++

4705:...And the old source was restored three minutes later. 4016:

solution. Seeing as how you are unwilling to comprehend

3964:

and dropping the addition of the section I was defending

12771:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Milk-maid

12265:

Contentious and difficult user is making legal threats.

9788:

He just put a vandalism waning on my user talk page...

9522:

after she finds that my talk page is semi'd because of

8295:. To me that's not content dispute, but unencyclopedic. 8201: 8146: 8079: 8032: 7972: 6346:

I find it telling that Giovanni33's political opposite

2110:"Allied occupation of Europe" is a fiction invented by 12894: 12850:(see Articles for Deletion/Todor Skalovski). Thanks. 12617:, the ones I thought were 'most free' became tagged): 12569:

As an example of messed-up notes, se Featured Article

10795:) without discussion or repairing the tagged problem. 6643:

I opened this on the CSN noticeboard as suggested. --

4123:. Box says X, John says Y; therefore, Bob is wrong. 3276:

adminship are difficult of impossible to ascertain. --

12341:

Apparently this is where I'm supposed to report that

11839:

Velebit, Purger, Guivon, et al, and IP 71.252.83.230

7949:. The team was and is called Germany even during the 7694:

San Francisco isn't as homogeneous as you wish it was

6844:

Bless sins - Undid revision 157511776 by Prester John

5552:, when he is being blocked infrequently, when we did 10499:

An ongoing content dispute has resulted in one user

9119:

It's clear this is nothing to be concerned with. --

8812:

all have their country listed in their infoboxes as

7704:

and making it look as though I was calling myself a

7647: 5870: 5736:

of his revert-warring involving possible stalking.--

12492:manually too. Alpta 04:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)" 11644:In this case, Iwazaki's comment was in response to 11204:hmm. Not sure. we don't have a PD-Hungary tag (see 10704:

If he continues after being told this, report here.

10356:welfare here. But please, do something about this. 6612:Thanks, Durova. Again, I am open to any proposals, 5839:All I ever hear about Giovanni33 on this board and 5659:

Allegations of state terrorism by the United States

3194:Despite my complaint about Piotr's escapade above, 2355:

I have never been found guilty of admin tools abuse

2236:

Make that "moved the article three separate times"—

1682:? Both user & talk pages are truly ... odd. -- 1543:which comes out like this, including the brackets: 11749:are well known of the attacks and harassments of 10215:Talk:Aaron Klein/Archive 1#Single purpose accounts 8731:Scotland is still a country within its own right ( 8270:Ethnic edit war brewing after disruptive edits by 4468:Earlier in the same day he was at it yet again... 4402:have been repeatedly deleting references from the 10298:Images (especially flags) not displaying properly 3703:(if unfounded accusations of homophobia count as 3658:). So far though, edit wars have been avoided. ~ 12930: 11604:"comment on what is clearly Iwazaki's IP voting" 11502:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Knivesout8 11496:Sockpuppetry to add libelous info on John McCain 9133:definitely has some other accounts, look at his 8792:have their country listed in their infoboxes as 8191:"West" here or there, it is ridiculous to insist 4194:Perhaps this should be moved to the article? -- 908: 807:When starting a discussion about an editor, you 11189:http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Molter_Karoly.jpg 9959:Thanks, she was starting to get on my nerves -- 8286:(sovereign nation, U.N. member, passport) with 7253:the articles are more important than the policy 5557:banishment even if they continually improve. -- 5548:... why would we indefinitely block Giovanni33 4076:I know I'm right because I've been involved in 2357:, and such slander should not appear on ANI. -- 12625:The following are the images uploaded by you: 11705:? Including other Personal attacks on editors 7783:behavior that deserves disciplinary action! -- 4647:getting deleted references all over the place 3830:Raw edit count is meaningless to establishing 3624:Canvassing to edit war through other Web sites 2746:the only one who attempted to start discussion 1697:"Please do respect my disability access need." 870:. Editors unable to edit here are sent to the 793:Do not report breaches of personal information 12361:Actually, this is something better posted at 11679: 8936:to make personal attacks on another editor. 6558:A clarification from the indef blocking admin 6406:violators, and people who refuse to work via 174: 12665:(for informational and educational use only) 11768:identifying the user with Rajsingha and AFD 11745:are ridiculous. Those who are familiar with 11206:Knowledge:Image_copyright_tags/Public_domain 10767:appears to be yet another sockpuppet of the 10240:has increased, removing citations, adding a 9162:WP:SOCK#Legitimate uses of multiple accounts 8904:Arthur Wellesley, the 1st Duke of Wellington 7858:(→Mom, Dad, It Hurts! Can I Borrow the Gun?) 4594:Can you summarize this in 30 words or less?— 3844:User:Durova/Complex vandalism at Joan of Arc 2024:is obviously to "prove" that, at the end of 795:on this highly visible page – instead go to 11659:I created it a year ago, it (now) has to go 10236:Klein has a book due out this month. Anon 6839:Mdhowe - "revert vandalism" by Prester John 6435:Evidence of possible stalking by Giovanni33 2333:Few points. The related page, after Ghirla 82:Revision as of 16:06, 16 September 2007 by 11563:As amply demonstrated by these incidents, 11245:Images deleted, The Evil Spartan thanked. 10221:25 so far updated on the active talk page 9030:"born in a stable doesn't make me a horse" 8623:We should go with their self-description. 6497:Right. Take a look the recent history of 5116:What I suggest is that you back away from 4545:Earlier deletion of the same reference by 4514:Earlier deletion of the same reference by 2680:ANI, AIV, VP, IRC, AIM, SL, ICQ, MSN, etc. 181: 167: 18:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 8042:Post World War 2 and pre 1991 there were 8012:Category:Nicknamed groups of soccer teams 7748: 7728: 3602:whatever it is should not be deleted, or 3085:it mildly, but only one Ghirla so far. -- 1540:] Please do ] your ] on your ]. ] ]-]] 12842:Can an admin. please delete the AFD for 12218:. Let's discuss this in one place. Thx. 10225:Talk:Aaron Klein#Single purpose accounts 10211:16 documented in detail in January 2007 9590:Might want to check it against the user 8900:(he was, after all, born in Scotland!)." 8890:In response to the following comment by 8298:Conceals all his changes under abuse of 8014:. While nobody would claim that the pre- 7768:Somebody Hurt My Feelings! Mommy! Daddy! 7549:is not the best action in this case. -- 5647:Indefinite block. Long time coming. -- 1678:Maybe this person is trying to recreate 923:Review of the RfA discussion-only period 53: 12746:#Improper licensing on about ten images 12214:I've already started a thread about it 10282:Thank you, & for the bonus semi. — 9818:Wow, that IP needs a block, take it to 9105:is fake, and has several other accounts 7987:anyway, but the DDR was referred to as 7058:, despite the requested admin opinion. 6869:, Prester John resumed edit warring. -- 6098:"ganged up on because of his politics." 5120:and start to be involved at other BLPs 2924:comes out of your fights looking good. 150: 81: 14: 12931: 12337:Wybot mishandles iw links on templates 11230:Improper licensing on about ten images 10805:I knew that username was suspicious. 10519:for a comment made in an edit summary 9215:Thanks! Beat socks with socks, i say! 8556:I don't see any discussion of this at 5316:3 more reverts here in the last 3 days 5127: 5080:John Howard's secret ancestry revealed 4758:John Howard's secret ancestry revealed 4632: 3381:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2946:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2873:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2841:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2813:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2773:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2566:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2361:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2191:) also removed my complaint about him 1929:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 755:these tips for dealing with incivility 699:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 9974:COI SPA disruption on Aaron Klein bio 9242:Hey, what's up? Is there work to do? 6179:is the victim, not the community. -- 2290: 162: 50: 31: 11608:"the last vote by the IP address is 6786:I've opened an arbitration request. 6062:was also not community banned until 5314:(and another a couple of days ago), 4612:I think I can summarize it in two: " 2143:Apparently, the process for that is 2042:Category:Allied occupation of Europe 200:discussion, request, and help venues 152:Purge the cache to refresh this page 23: 12615:User Talk:Andranikpasha#your images 12039:checkuser turned down the request. 11773:Requests for mediation/AMG Chemmani 11600:"reply to yet another non-argument" 11467: 11427: 11246: 9206:to do, that's a legitimate use. -- 8932:Also, it is supposed to be against 8159:West Germany national football team 7956:West Germany national football team 7945:which is fielded since 1908 by the 7165:Knowledge:Non-free content criteria 2353:to be quite offensive and untrue - 2351:Piotrus abusing admin tools (again) 2016:Piotrus abusing admin tools (again) 844:you cannot currently edit this page 842:You are not autoconfirmed, meaning 811:leave a notice on their talk page; 145: 114: 12744:I moved this message from section 11064:edits removed, user already warned 10717:New sockpuppet of blocked Float954 10372:outright mocked Kingdom's spelling 8898:Graeme Garden was born in Scotland 8780:both have their country listed as 7698:What if I am a gun freak? So what? 7648:http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Griot 5125: 4630: 146: 103: 58: 12950: 12571:City status in the United Kingdom 11457:. I'll do the dirty work though. 11018:Both blocked as definite socks. 8263:Ethnic war brewing, and abuse of 6533:appears to have been preceded by 5671:He hasn't had 1 block in a year, 5520:Giovanni33 has a long history of 3012:to misrepresent the situation. -- 2322: 2294: 2158:I believe I've achieved filing a 2122:'s actions were most disruptive. 68:. The present address (URL) is a 12833: 12231:Alrighty; I'll see you there. 12098:Knowledge:Requests for oversight 12018:User_talk:71.252.83.230#User_Lar 11235: 11055: 10833: 9979: 9844:, for ignoring notices and then 9731:Guy with good faith edits but... 9110: 9078:– so I have restored the article 5402:and escalate it to arbitration. 5297:And what happened to that RfC/U? 3211:I believe they were refering to 188: 12589: 12244: 12233: 12203: 12192: 12118: 11822: 11819: 11771:of his bio on wikipedia at the 11681: 11411:Image:Scientist is teaching.gif 11396:Image:Big town small people.jpg 11171: 11166: 11160: 11158: 10590: 10588: 10586: 10584: 10582: 10334:User:Kingdom of crash and spyro 10311: 9862: 9857: 9851: 9849: 8439: 7989:"Ostdeutschland" (East Germany) 7700:, clearly referring to me as a 6503:John Smith's stalked Giovanni33 3350: 3345: 3339: 3337: 3252: 2990: 2985: 2979: 2977: 684:Category:Knowledge noticeboards 12925:16:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12900:15:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12882:14:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12855:14:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12822:15:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12810: 12795:13:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12757:09:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12739:09:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12719:20:34, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 12597:13:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12582:12:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12561:11:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12552:11:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12543:09:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12510:08:57, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12486:Special:Contributions/AlptaBot 12471:08:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12453:08:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12406:08:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12383:08:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12356:08:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12331:07:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12320:07:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12300:06:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12291:06:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12277:06:29, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12272:what I do now, tag it, what? 12250:06:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12223:06:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12209:06:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12144:07:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12134:02:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12109:02:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12101: 12092:02:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12082:02:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12061:01:57, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12044:01:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 12033:01:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11833:06:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11800:15:29, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11714:06:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11688:01:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11543:11:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11534:01:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11525:01:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11512:00:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11488:03:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11462:00:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11448:23:59, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 11267:03:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11222:11:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 11213:20:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 11199:19:50, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 11178:19:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 11137:19:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 11042:20:56, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 11014:20:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10988:19:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10820:20:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10807:18:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10800:18:24, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10709:20:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10700:18:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10684:18:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10604:18:18, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10575:18:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10566:Block indefinitely please per 10560:18:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10540:18:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10503:. These statements were made 10483:18:29, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10466:18:01, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10428:19:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10418:17:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10397:21:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10383:20:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10361:12:42, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10327:15:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10317:11:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10305: 10290:03:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 10278:15:54, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 10268:11:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9993:15:54, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9964:09:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9955:09:07, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9936:08:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9922:07:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9869:20:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9836:04:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9827:04:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9813:04:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9784:03:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9721:12:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9704:03:29, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9694:03:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9601:13:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 9586:15:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9572:02:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9562: 9556:02:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9537:02:34, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9527: 9488:04:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 9469:23:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 9446:23:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 9280:22:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9270:14:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 9247:22:04, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 9238:21:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 9229:21:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 9220:21:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 9211:21:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 9195:21:01, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 9180:20:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 9156:20:47, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 9142:20:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 9124:22:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 9097:13:25, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 9050:Various comments and answers: 9037:09:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 9008:18:16, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8984:17:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8966:16:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8950:11:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8918:09:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8877:08:38, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8843:07:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8821:07:03, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8706:23:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8683:21:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8672:21:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8659:21:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8637:20:17, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8613:20:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8577:19:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8552:19:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8530:19:24, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8499:19:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8468:19:07, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8445:19:07, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8433: 8412:13:25, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 8368:16:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8349:19:01, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8332:18:36, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8313:18:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 8244:09:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 8219:03:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 8207:03:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 8186:19:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8172:18:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8152:15:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8132:14:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8108:09:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 8095:01:57, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 8085:01:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 8060:23:03, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8038:15:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 8001:13:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 7978:12:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 7943:Germany national football team 7916:23:04, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7906:17:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7877:07:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 7865:07:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 7848:06:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 7832:19:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 7814:22:39, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7801:21:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7788:19:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7757:18:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7753: 7737:18:01, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7733: 7720:17:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7687:17:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7676:17:04, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7554:07:49, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 7540:04:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 7526:03:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 7514:21:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 7482:09:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 7433:09:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 7380:00:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 7304:00:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 7260:00:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 7226:23:39, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7179:23:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7168:there are no non-free images, 7143:23:39, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7118:23:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7103:23:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7065:23:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7050:16:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 7018:16:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6989:16:06, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6948:08:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 6930:08:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 6914:05:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 6901:05:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 6876:08:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6795:05:33, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 6787: 6781:01:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 6769:05:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6738:10:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6728:06:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6718:06:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6711: 6705:06:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6695:05:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6676:05:17, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6667:05:16, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6648:05:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6634:07:38, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6621:03:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6608:01:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6600: 6593:01:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6585: 6550:23:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6521:23:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6492:18:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6430:04:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6417:00:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6397:23:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6372:23:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6359:23:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6352:block log almost as outrageous 6342:22:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6325:23:42, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6304:23:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6294:22:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6287: 6280:22:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6269:22:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6259:22:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6252: 6240:22:57, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6223:20:08, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6203:18:07, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6184:23:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6174:16:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6149:16:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6122:16:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6113:16:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6088:16:04, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 6075:08:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 6000:20:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5930:15:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5858:04:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 5834:21:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5813:21:08, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5770:19:27, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5760:19:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5750:19:01, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5741:18:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5728:18:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5718:18:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5666:16:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5652:15:39, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5639:15:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5609:14:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5598: 5588: 5571:14:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5562:13:58, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5538:13:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5529:12:45, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5511:12:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5501:11:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5490:13:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5482: 5469:11:36, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5450:10:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5433:11:36, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5411:10:36, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5390:10:24, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5368:09:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5346:11:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5336:10:36, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5302:09:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5289:09:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5280:09:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5263:09:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5253:09:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5245: 5239:08:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5216:08:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5196:07:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5170:07:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5134:08:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 5108:05:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 5090:04:42, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 5069:04:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 5053:03:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 5043:03:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 5023:04:42, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 5011:03:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4989:03:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4898:01:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4884:01:42, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4870:21:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4830:17:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4808:13:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4791:08:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4780:07:52, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4768:07:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4749:10:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4736:10:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4712:10:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4701:10:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4690:09:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4678:09:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4664:09:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4652:05:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4639:05:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4621:05:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4608:05:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4589:04:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 4375:20:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 4367: 4331:23:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4256:22:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4209:23:17, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4199:22:58, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4128:22:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4115:22:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4094:21:57, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4072:15:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4033:05:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 4010:02:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 3948:02:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 3919:23:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3893:18:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3859:22:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3851: 3826:16:07, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 3781:04:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 3773: 3728:02:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 3717:03:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3709: 3691:01:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3674:01:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3663:00:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3645:and someone who he canvassed ( 3619:09:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3581:07:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3559:07:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3549:06:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3519:06:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3502:06:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3461:06:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3423:06:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3392:05:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3371:06:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3357:03:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3324:01:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3299:07:09, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3281:06:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3268:01:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3243:00:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3233:00:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3228: 3223: 3220: 3217: 3206:00:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3172:06:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3118:06:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3108:06:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3090:06:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3080:02:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3052:01:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 3027:23:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 3017:23:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 3007:23:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2997:23:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2957:22:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2938:22:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2896:00:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2884:22:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2861:22:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2852:22:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2833:22:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2824:22:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2801:22:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2784:22:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2765:22:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2753:23:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2737:22:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2712:06:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2698:22:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2675:22:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2660:22:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2647:22:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2634:22:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2620:22:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2611:22:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2587:06:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2577:05:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2549:02:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2517:08:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 2422:03:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 2387:07:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2372:22:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2328:22:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2315:22:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2304:22:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2276:22:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2263:21:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2250:21:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2232:21:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2209:21:53, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2199:21:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2167:01:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2152:22:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2136:21:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2127:21:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2105:21:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2092:21:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2075:21:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2062:21:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2000:07:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 1988:06:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 1979:04:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 1969:23:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1940:22:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1917:21:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1900:20:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1852:06:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 1842:16:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 1821:14:01, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 1799:12:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 1779:02:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 1758:01:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 1730:00:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 1721:23:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1687:21:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1673:09:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1657:08:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1652: 1647: 1644: 1641: 1613:08:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1596:08:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1591: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1570:08:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1560:08:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1533:08:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 13: 1: 11651:As the author of this article 10610:User removing tags from pages 10182:The anons above are two of 25 9822:. YOu'll get a faster reply. 9067:international laughingstock " 8282:For nationality, he replaces 7853:User Griot responds to Admin: 7043: 7037: 7031: 6483:for bringing that article to 6142: 6136: 6130: 5795: 5602: 5418:wikipedia is not a government 5178: 3793:That's rich. I'm trying to " 3678:It should be also noted that 3190:More out-of-process deletions 2291: 1793: 1773: 1751: 1745: 1739: 304:Biographies of living persons 12888:Merge Template has no image? 12817: 12586:Give me 12 hours to fix it. 12414: 12125: 12116: 9931:which links to a fan forum. 9789: 9760: 9482: 9476: 9431:joining in briefly as well. 9307:The edits of long-term user 8290:(neither of them) every day 6921: 6892: 6689: 6683: 6661: 6655: 6475:article, where John Smith's 5852: 5846: 5807: 5586: 5375:accompanied by bad behaviour 5190: 4602: 4596: 4358:apply. I'll open a content 3610: 3259: 3250: 3102: 3096: 2760:are discussing the block. -- 2744:All this is true, and I was 2728: 2692: 2686: 2244: 2238: 2226: 2220: 1787:. Make of it what you will. 1765:wikipedia talk:accessibility 7: 12705:(for informational purpose) 11157:if he still does not stop. 10828:New Ron liebman sockpuppets 10344:Crash Bandicoot (character) 9948:JJ Abrams fan site bio info 8902:well, when someone accused 8868:is the biggest lake in the 8492: 8325: 7947:German Football Association 7939:Federal Republic of Germany 7823:behavior from user Griot : 6924: 6895: 6471:I have been monitoring the 5801: 5184: 3613: 3510:Your conduct reminds me of 3364:Allied occupation of Europe 2731: 2655:allegations and respond. -- 2285: 2081:Allied occupation of Europe 2038:Allied occupation of Europe 1879:Allied occupation of Europe 30:of this page, as edited by 10: 12955: 12831: 12671:(can you prove that it is 12315:content, not remove). --- 11633:http://www.tamilnation.org 11406:Image:Really cool moon.jpg 11233: 11053: 10831: 10501:threatening to sue another 10448:numerous times. Examples: 9977: 9108: 8323:would be more apropriate. 7841:wound-up ball of pettiness 7743:revert and notice given - 5475:I will not wheel war, but 5308:3 reverts in under an hour 5275:gets blocked indefinitely? 4628:I believe is also valid. 3033:The block log does not lie 1454: 1431: 1426: 1308: 1186: 1064: 942: 705: 672:Discussions for discussion 101: 56: 12828:Removal of AFD nomination 12693:(this one should be fine) 12629:Image:AndranikOzanian.jpg 11655:), and in other replies ( 10256:deterrent and relief for 9748:) is persistently adding 9147:The very first edit from 8540:Important additional note 8070:1954 World Cup qualifiers 8064:In the 1950s, there were 8016:1956 Hungarian Revolution 7339:has already ruled on this 7109:has already ruled on this 6830:and are aggressively POV 5623:a valuable contributor. 5312:2 more reverts here today 5271:for breaking WP:3RR, and 4968:Howard Dulwich Hill house 4957:The Sydney Morning Herald 4932:The Sydney Morning Herald 4850:The Sydney Morning Herald 4480:Most recent deletions of 4434:Most recent deletions of 4387:deleting references from 4024:should not be allowed on 3971:, and and tried to get a 2085:Soviet war in Afghanistan 2034:Soviet war in Afghanistan 1441:Sockpuppet investigations 789:demonstrating the problem 680: 555: 487: 404: 296: 215: 196: 12703:Image:Shushimassacre.jpg 11657:I made the mistake when 10691:Consider the possibility 10557:Man It's So Loud In Here 10537:Man It's So Loud In Here 10273:resovled, see tag above. 7885:and Germany/West Germany 6960:Sorry for the trouble - 6501:. It would appear that 4502:19:32, 11 September 2007 4492:15:39, 12 September 2007 4473:03:31, 12 September 2007 4453:02:05, 13 September 2007 4446:01:37, 13 September 2007 4103:(what I have done), not 3762:Knowledge:Article review 3756:. I opened two content 2668:without discussion first 2414:efforts to bog him down. 1629:Not just vandalism, but 928:ArbCom election RFC 2024 872:/Non-autoconfirmed posts 850:/Non-autoconfirmed posts 364:Scalable vector graphics 198:Knowledge's centralized 51:16:06, 16 September 2007 12916:to evade his block, as 12779:Child modeling (erotic) 12613:I am copying this from 11421:Image:Lego starwars.jpg 11416:Image:Bottled water.jpg 11386:Image:People change.gif 11381:Image:Very Big Baby.jpg 11217:Solved by another user. 10192:Single-purpose accounts 9515:threatened to harass me 9204:single purpose accounts 8572:of the United Kingdom. 4571:17:58, 1 September 2007 4567:06:21, 2 September 2007 4563:15:39, 4 September 2007 4559:22:38, 5 September 2007 4555:00:16, 6 September 2007 4540:16:28, 2 September 2007 4536:01:39, 3 September 2007 4532:04:44, 6 September 2007 4528:05:07, 6 September 2007 4524:05:37, 6 September 2007 4204:That is not allowed. ~ 4101:bring in outside inputs 3639:inappropriate synthesis 3289:and two weeks later he 1889:totally different topic 1310:Arbitration enforcement 208:formal review processes 12939:Knowledge noticeboards 11602:, left edit sums like 11586:) has had a number of 9186:Hey, this wouldn't be 8925:Knowledge:Village pump 7174:. And they survive. 5863:There should be a rule 5151:Mao: The Unknown Story 5096:they're being watched. 1635:Better add "ε" to the 910:Centralized discussion 898:Start a new discussion 868:Lowercase sigmabot III 797:Requests for oversight 248:Centralized discussion 12852:Watchingthevitalsigns 12657:Image:AznavourArm.jpg 12396:Emergency-bot-shutoff 12185:a large chunk of our 11637:http://www.sangam.org 11328:Over The Band's Music 10846:The following users: 10780:User:Dsjgfwutvgeyxg U 10679:. Is a block needed? 7708:. This is clearly an 6867:protection was lifted 6565:it takes two to tango 5267:Wait, so G33 reports 5145:: patience exhausted? 4107:(what you have done). 938:Noticeboard archives 783:Be brief and include 776:recently active admin 667:WikiProject proposals 566:Committee noticeboard 515:Personal restrictions 500:Contributor copyright 339:Neutral point of view 12663:Image:Hovhshiraz.jpg 12609:improper ? licencing 12268:It's not clear from 11747:Sri Lankan Civil War 11466:Definitely. Thanks! 11401:Image:Poster sim.jpg 11373:, who also uploaded 10811:Report all this per 10531:over the content of 10189:Conflict of interest 9952:Georgewilliamherbert 9443:Georgewilliamherbert 9286:WP:DUCK (or not) on 8784:. In the same way, 8741:James VI of Scotland 8733:Mary, Queen of Scots 7107:"The highest level" 6681:show us what to do.— 4818:contribution history 4352:WP:NPOV#Undue weight 3754:WP:NOT#Not a soapbox 1785:this is the response 1695:From the talk page: 918:Administrator recall 741:behavioral problems. 739:chronic, intractable 625:Requests for comment 541:Requests for comment 505:Edit warring and 3RR 495:Conflict of interest 297:Articles and content 12679:Image:Hunchak20.jpg 12645:Image:Asalagerb.jpg 11391:Image:H o m e r.jpg 11324:Image:Kdoggydad.jpg 11274:You Have Gotta Rock 11184:Molter Karoly image 11153:and then report to 10971:, who recently was 10769:previously reported 10463:Proper tea is theft 10390:User:Espio's da man 10349:User:Espio's da man 10242:gossip column quote 9911:is Abrams's mother, 9513:This user has just 9453:bat puppet detector 9034:PalestineRemembered 8874:PalestineRemembered 8596:nihil nove sub sole 8570:constituent country 6574:established editors 6477:received a barnstar 6466:19:13, 5 March 2007 6456:19:38, 6 March 2007 6451:19:09, 6 March 2007 5522:tendentious editing 3969:them have their way 3836:unencyclopedic tone 2505:this edit by Molobo 939: 772:Just want an admin? 121:← Previous revision 12691:Image:Sedahoka.gif 12651:Image:Aznavour.jpg 12523:that archived it ( 11707:warned by an Admin 11500:Is now confirmed: 11121:Stephanie Flanders 9945:IMDB bio on Abrams 9942:IMBD bio on Berman 9840:He was blocked by 9188:User:SummerThunder 9003:WikipedianProlific 8961:WikipedianProlific 8913:WikipedianProlific 8896:"I commented that 8737:James I of England 8667:WikipedianProlific 8558:Talk:Graeme Garden 7776:This is certainly 7764:Ouch! That Hurt's 6994:He's discussed it 6820:disruptive editing 6802:disruptive editing 6158:seems excessive. 5320:2 reverts in a day 5306:I'm not sure that 5159:Great Leap Forward 4516:User:Skyring(Pete) 4461:User:Skyring(Pete) 4436:User:Skyring(Pete) 4423:User:Skyring(Pete) 2418:Pēters J. Vecrumba 1954:Suva's retaliation 1552: 1525: 937: 767:dispute resolution 525:Contentious topics 324:Dispute resolution 312:Questions on media 12787:Child pornography 12697:Image:Shu1930.jpg 12685:Image:Knarazn.jpg 12669:Image:Hunch20.jpg 12446: 12438: 12430: 12424: 12363:User talk:WonYong 12247: 12206: 12129: 11831: 11783:is relating with 11757:is nearly warned 11485: 11445: 11375:Image:Monkey2.jpg 11269: 11264: 11012: 10492:threatens to sue 10408:article tampering 10309: 9570: 9535: 9467: 9455:is working fine. 8806:Tim Brooke-Taylor 8704: 8635: 8528: 8494:Blood Red Sandman 8437: 8327:Blood Red Sandman 8246: 8230:comment added by 7993:"Westdeutschland" 7656:for referring to 7538: 7512: 7431: 7056:problem continues 7016: 6816:User:Prester John 6810:User:Prester John 6767: 6616:there is parity. 6519: 6395: 6323: 6221: 6172: 5832: 5811: 5637: 5227:, let alone from 5225:self-professed IP 5214: 5194: 4547:User:Prester John 4496:User:Prester John 4482:User:Prester John 4419:User:Prester John 4396:User:Prester John 4381:User:Prester John 4022:original research 4012: 3996:comment added by 3891: 3631:original research 3263: 3031:Indeed you have. 2936: 2501:self-professed IP 2301: 2216:Soviet occupation 2022:Soviet occupation 1875:Soviet occupation 1807:the inclusion of 1637:list of bad words 1558: 1548: 1531: 1521: 1468: 1467: 906: 905: 875: 866:automatically by 733:This page is for 691: 690: 520:General sanctions 359:Resource requests 344:Original research 12946: 12880: 12877: 12871: 12837: 12836: 12819: 12814: 12635:Image:Arme80.jpg 12593: 12541: 12540: 12521:User:ClueBot III 12450: 12444: 12442: 12436: 12434: 12428: 12422: 12400: 12394: 12381: 12378: 12246: 12243: 12240: 12205: 12202: 12199: 12131: 12127: 12123: 12120: 12107: 12105: 12041:The Evil Spartan 12009: 11967: 11925: 11883: 11827: 11824: 11821: 11762:User:Tariqabjotu 11684: 11683: 11531:The Evil Spartan 11509:The Evil Spartan 11486: 11471: 11459:The Evil Spartan 11453:Think you want: 11446: 11431: 11372: 11345:deleted contribs 11318: 11291:deleted contribs 11265: 11250: 11244: 11239: 11238: 11176: 11173: 11170: 11162: 11152: 11146: 11114: 11087:deleted contribs 11065: 11059: 11058: 11004: 10969:User:Ron liebman 10963: 10962: 10929:deleted contribs 10913: 10905: 10904: 10871:deleted contribs 10855: 10843: 10837: 10836: 10766: 10739:deleted contribs 10659: 10632:deleted contribs 10600: 10598: 10596: 10594: 10592: 10479: 10478: 10375:after being told 10313: 10310: 10307: 10246:an uncited claim 10178: 10177: 10132:deleted contribs 10110: 10109: 10064:deleted contribs 10042: 10024: 9995: 9983: 9982: 9867: 9864: 9861: 9853: 9811: 9810: 9805:Report a mistake 9782: 9781: 9776:Report a mistake 9757: 9751: 9665: 9638:deleted contribs 9569: 9568: 9534: 9533: 9484: 9478: 9461: 9438:sense tingling. 9430: 9409:deleted contribs 9388: 9367:deleted contribs 9347: 9326:deleted contribs 9244:Scabbers the Rat 9164:allows for such 9151:. Interesting. 9126: 9114: 9113: 8934:Knowledge policy 8790:Griff Rhys Jones 8757:Northern Ireland 8698: 8629: 8522: 8496: 8441: 8438: 8435: 8329: 8225: 8204: 8169: 8164: 8149: 8082: 8035: 7975: 7754: 7752: 7734: 7732: 7667:of calling me a 7614: 7587:deleted contribs 7547:ignore the rules 7537: 7532:shrugs shoulders 7511: 7430: 7047: 7045: 7039: 7033: 7006: 7003: 6926: 6923: 6897: 6894: 6793: 6791: 6761: 6715: 6691: 6685: 6663: 6657: 6606: 6604: 6591: 6589: 6509: 6385: 6313: 6291: 6256: 6212: 6162: 6146: 6144: 6138: 6132: 6061: 6060: 6027:deleted contribs 6011: 5994: 5993: 5960:deleted contribs 5944: 5923: 5922: 5889:deleted contribs 5873: 5854: 5848: 5823: 5809: 5803: 5799: 5797: 5711: 5690:deleted contribs 5627: 5604: 5600: 5592: 5590: 5488: 5486: 5251: 5249: 5229:newly registered 5208: 5192: 5186: 5182: 5180: 5131: 5129: 4636: 4634: 4604: 4598: 4373: 4371: 3991: 3973:outside opinions 3877: 3857: 3855: 3779: 3777: 3715: 3713: 3615: 3612: 3574: 3569: 3542: 3537: 3495: 3490: 3389: 3387: 3355: 3352: 3349: 3341: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3254: 3230: 3225: 3222: 3219: 3165: 3160: 3104: 3098: 3045: 3040: 2995: 2992: 2989: 2981: 2954: 2952: 2930: 2881: 2879: 2849: 2847: 2821: 2819: 2781: 2779: 2733: 2730: 2694: 2688: 2574: 2572: 2420: 2369: 2367: 2342:, and deleted a 2326: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2293: 2287: 2246: 2240: 2228: 2222: 1997: 1937: 1935: 1797: 1777: 1755: 1753: 1747: 1741: 1719: 1716: 1710: 1654: 1649: 1646: 1643: 1593: 1588: 1585: 1582: 1554: 1527: 1519: 1498:deleted contribs 1463: 1318: 1200: 1188:Edit-warring/3RR 1078: 956: 940: 936: 899: 888: 887: 860: 854: 834: 725: 718: 696: 695: 354:Reliable sources 288:User permissions 268:Main Page errors 263:Interface admins 253:Closure requests 183: 176: 169: 160: 159: 156: 154: 133:Newer revision → 111: 109: 107: 98: 77: 75:current revision 67: 66: 64: 62: 52: 48: 47: 12954: 12953: 12949: 12948: 12947: 12945: 12944: 12943: 12929: 12928: 12907: 12890: 12875: 12864: 12861: 12844:Todor Skalovski 12840: 12839: 12834: 12830: 12767: 12755: 12737: 12717: 12681:(same as above) 12659:(same as above) 12639:Armen Grigoryan 12611: 12575:User Talk:Alpta 12533: 12527: 12500:User talk:Alpta 12481: 12469: 12440: 12432: 12398: 12392: 12376: 12369: 12339: 12263: 12175:but not perfect 12161: 12130: 12103: 12071: 11973: 11931: 11889: 11847: 11841: 11646:User:Taprobanus 11561: 11498: 11330: 11276: 11242: 11241: 11236: 11232: 11186: 11150: 11144: 11072: 11066: 11063: 11061: 11056: 11052: 10914: 10909: 10908: 10856: 10851: 10850: 10844: 10841: 10839: 10834: 10830: 10797:Gordonofcartoon 10724: 10719: 10617: 10612: 10579:Blocked indef. 10497: 10476: 10474: 10442: 10410: 10337: 10300: 10206: 10187: 10117: 10113: 10049: 10045: 10015: 9999: 9996: 9987: 9985: 9980: 9976: 9894: 9790: 9761: 9755: 9749: 9733: 9718: 9691: 9623: 9617: 9554: 9511: 9394: 9352: 9311: 9291: 9177: 9127: 9118: 9116: 9111: 9107: 9069:Charlie Chaplin 8544:Charlie Chaplin 8388:Please clarify: 8268: 8202: 8167: 8162: 8147: 8080: 8053:Bonner Republic 8033: 7991:and the BRD as 7973: 7887: 7713:personal attack 7665:personal attack 7623:personal attack 7572: 7566: 7479:Geno Z Heinlein 7420:it doesn't mean 7377:Geno Z Heinlein 7257:Geno Z Heinlein 7223:Geno Z Heinlein 7140:Geno Z Heinlein 7100:Geno Z Heinlein 7029: 7001: 6958: 6883: 6818:is engaging in 6813: 6789: 6602: 6587: 6578:double standard 6560: 6535:this discussion 6437: 6363:If you believe 6128: 6119:SevenOfDiamonds 6012: 6007: 6006: 5945: 5940: 5939: 5874: 5869: 5868: 5865: 5767:SevenOfDiamonds 5747:SevenOfDiamonds 5725:SevenOfDiamonds 5675: 5663:SevenOfDiamonds 5484: 5247: 5147: 5143:User:Giovanni33 4911:I'm happy that 4756:talkpage topic 4614:content dispute 4551: 4520: 4485: 4439: 4413:plantations in 4393: 4369: 3853: 3775: 3711: 3626: 3596:deletion review 3572: 3567: 3540: 3535: 3493: 3488: 3390: 3385: 3379: 3264: 3192: 3163: 3158: 3043: 3038: 2955: 2950: 2944: 2882: 2877: 2871: 2850: 2845: 2839: 2822: 2817: 2811: 2782: 2777: 2771: 2575: 2570: 2564: 2415: 2378:This screed is 2370: 2365: 2359: 2114:and previously 2040:(since we have 2018: 1995: 1956:for my remarks 1938: 1933: 1927: 1882: 1814:Aplastic anemia 1737: 1714: 1703: 1700: 1634: 1633: 1483: 1477: 1475:User: Hopiakuta 1469: 1464: 1459: 1450: 1312: 1190: 1068: 946: 944:Administrators' 934: 933: 932: 912: 897: 877: 876: 857: 856: 855: 841: 837: 824: 821: 802: 761:their talk page 742: 730: 729: 728: 721: 714: 710: 692: 687: 676: 593:False positives 551: 483: 400: 349:Pending changes 334:Fringe theories 292: 222:Administrators 211: 192: 187: 148: 144: 143: 142: 141: 140: 125:Latest revision 113: 112: 104:→‎Block evasion 102: 99: 88: 86: 73: 59:→‎Block evasion 57: 54: 37: 35: 20: 12: 11: 5: 12952: 12942: 12941: 12914:129.129.128.64 12906: 12903: 12889: 12886: 12885: 12884: 12832: 12829: 12826: 12825: 12824: 12801: 12766: 12764:User:Milk-maid 12761: 12760: 12759: 12751: 12733: 12722: 12721: 12713: 12708: 12707: 12706: 12700: 12694: 12688: 12682: 12676: 12666: 12660: 12654: 12648: 12642: 12632: 12623: 12610: 12607: 12606: 12605: 12604: 12603: 12602: 12601: 12600: 12599: 12595: 12567: 12545: 12480: 12477: 12476: 12475: 12474: 12473: 12465: 12456: 12455: 12410: 12409: 12408: 12338: 12335: 12334: 12333: 12305: 12304: 12303: 12302: 12262: 12256: 12255: 12254: 12253: 12252: 12226: 12225: 12160: 12157:Betacommandbot 12154: 12153: 12152: 12151: 12150: 12149: 12148: 12147: 12146: 12122: 12070: 12067: 12066: 12065: 12064: 12063: 12011: 12010: 11968: 11926: 11884: 11840: 11837: 11836: 11835: 11809: 11808: 11807: 11806: 11805: 11804: 11803: 11802: 11764:for harassing 11721: 11720: 11719: 11718: 11717: 11716: 11664:didn't like it 11590:disputes with 11560: 11551: 11550: 11549: 11548: 11547: 11546: 11545: 11497: 11494: 11493: 11492: 11491: 11490: 11424: 11423: 11418: 11413: 11408: 11403: 11398: 11393: 11388: 11383: 11378: 11234: 11231: 11228: 11227: 11226: 11225: 11224: 11194:for your help 11185: 11182: 11181: 11180: 11140: 11139: 11054: 11051: 11048: 11047: 11046: 11045: 11044: 10965: 10964: 10906: 10832: 10829: 10826: 10825: 10824: 10823: 10822: 10788:Salamis Island 10718: 10715: 10714: 10713: 10712: 10711: 10611: 10608: 10607: 10606: 10577: 10564: 10563: 10562: 10496: 10487: 10486: 10485: 10441: 10432: 10431: 10430: 10409: 10403: 10402: 10401: 10400: 10399: 10336: 10331: 10330: 10329: 10299: 10296: 10295: 10294: 10293: 10292: 10230: 10229: 10219: 10202: 10183: 10180: 10179: 10115:192.118.11.120 10111: 10047:192.118.11.112 10043: 9978: 9975: 9972: 9971: 9970: 9969: 9968: 9967: 9966: 9893: 9877: 9876: 9875: 9874: 9873: 9872: 9871: 9833:Raymond Arritt 9732: 9729: 9728: 9727: 9726: 9725: 9724: 9723: 9716: 9689: 9616: 9611: 9610: 9609: 9608: 9607: 9606: 9605: 9604: 9603: 9548: 9510: 9494: 9493: 9492: 9491: 9490: 9298:Conch Republic 9290: 9288:Conch Republic 9284: 9283: 9282: 9262: 9261: 9260: 9259: 9258: 9257: 9256: 9255: 9254: 9253: 9252: 9251: 9250: 9249: 9184: 9183: 9182: 9175: 9166:single purpose 9153:Raymond Arritt 9109: 9106: 9100: 9089: 9088: 9073: 9064: 9060: 9056: 9048: 9047: 9046: 9045: 9044: 9043: 9042: 9041: 9040: 9039: 9017: 9016: 9015: 9014: 9013: 9012: 9011: 9010: 8991: 8990: 8989: 8988: 8987: 8986: 8971: 8970: 8969: 8968: 8953: 8952: 8942: 8941: 8929: 8928: 8888: 8887: 8886: 8885: 8884: 8883: 8882: 8881: 8880: 8879: 8852: 8851: 8850: 8849: 8848: 8847: 8846: 8845: 8828: 8827: 8826: 8825: 8824: 8823: 8778:Billy Connolly 8774:Ronnie Corbett 8765: 8764: 8763: 8762: 8761: 8760: 8745:United Kingdom 8724: 8723: 8722: 8721: 8720: 8719: 8711: 8710: 8709: 8708: 8686: 8685: 8662: 8661: 8656:LessHeard vanU 8643: 8642: 8641: 8640: 8639: 8616: 8615: 8605: 8604: 8603: 8599: 8586: 8537: 8536: 8535: 8534: 8533: 8532: 8508: 8507: 8506: 8505: 8504: 8503: 8502: 8501: 8475: 8474: 8473: 8472: 8471: 8470: 8452: 8451: 8450: 8449: 8448: 8447: 8423: 8422: 8421: 8420: 8419: 8418: 8417: 8416: 8415: 8414: 8403: 8396: 8389: 8377: 8376: 8375: 8374: 8373: 8372: 8371: 8370: 8354: 8353: 8352: 8351: 8335: 8334: 8304: 8303: 8296: 8284:United Kingdom 8267: 8261: 8260: 8259: 8258: 8257: 8256: 8255: 8254: 8253: 8252: 8251: 8250: 8249: 8248: 8247: 8178: 8125: 8124: 8123: 8122: 8121: 8120: 8119: 8118: 8117: 8116: 8115: 8114: 8113: 8112: 8111: 8110: 8057:LessHeard vanU 7998:LessHeard vanU 7919: 7918: 7886: 7880: 7818: 7804: 7803: 7760: 7759: 7740: 7739: 7690: 7689: 7616: 7615: 7565: 7560: 7559: 7558: 7557: 7556: 7535:User:Zscout370 7509:User:Zscout370 7505: 7504: 7503: 7502: 7501: 7500: 7499: 7498: 7497: 7496: 7495: 7494: 7493: 7492: 7491: 7490: 7489: 7488: 7487: 7486: 7485: 7484: 7454: 7453: 7452: 7451: 7450: 7449: 7448: 7447: 7446: 7445: 7444: 7443: 7442: 7441: 7440: 7439: 7438: 7437: 7436: 7435: 7428:User:Zscout370 7397: 7396: 7395: 7394: 7393: 7392: 7391: 7390: 7389: 7388: 7387: 7386: 7385: 7384: 7383: 7382: 7357: 7356: 7355: 7354: 7353: 7352: 7351: 7350: 7349: 7348: 7347: 7346: 7345: 7344: 7343: 7342: 7319: 7318: 7317: 7316: 7315: 7314: 7313: 7312: 7311: 7310: 7309: 7308: 7307: 7306: 7296: 7292: 7291:justification. 7275: 7274: 7273: 7272: 7271: 7270: 7269: 7268: 7267: 7266: 7265: 7264: 7237: 7236: 7235: 7234: 7233: 7232: 7231: 7230: 7229: 7228: 7210: 7209: 7208: 7207: 7206: 7205: 7204: 7203: 7202: 7201: 7188: 7187: 7186: 7185: 7184: 7183: 7182: 7181: 7154: 7153: 7152: 7151: 7150: 7149: 7148: 7147: 7146: 7145: 7127: 7126: 7125: 7124: 7123: 7122: 7121: 7120: 7086: 7085: 7084: 7083: 7082: 7081: 7072: 7071: 7070: 7069: 7068: 7067: 6957: 6955:Linda Hamilton 6952: 6951: 6950: 6934: 6933: 6932: 6882: 6879: 6856: 6855: 6850: 6845: 6840: 6812: 6798: 6784: 6783: 6772: 6771: 6753: 6752: 6751: 6750: 6749: 6748: 6747: 6746: 6745: 6744: 6743: 6742: 6741: 6740: 6641: 6640: 6639: 6638: 6637: 6636: 6559: 6556: 6555: 6554: 6553: 6552: 6524: 6523: 6469: 6468: 6459: 6458: 6453: 6436: 6433: 6420: 6419: 6379: 6378: 6377: 6376: 6375: 6374: 6334: 6333: 6332: 6331: 6330: 6329: 6328: 6327: 6247: 6246: 6245: 6244: 6243: 6242: 6228: 6227: 6226: 6225: 6196: 6195: 6194: 6193: 6192: 6191: 6190: 6189: 6188: 6187: 6186: 6156:WP:Arbitration 6091: 6090: 6085:Raymond Arritt 6081: 6080: 6079: 6078: 6077: 5864: 5861: 5837: 5836: 5783: 5782: 5781: 5780: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5775: 5774: 5773: 5772: 5655: 5654: 5616: 5615: 5614: 5613: 5612: 5611: 5576: 5575: 5574: 5573: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5442: 5441: 5440: 5439: 5438: 5437: 5436: 5435: 5356: 5355: 5354: 5353: 5352: 5351: 5350: 5349: 5348: 5295: 5265: 5242: 5241: 5219: 5218: 5199: 5198: 5146: 5140: 5139: 5138: 5137: 5136: 5111: 5110: 5101: 5097: 5072: 5071: 5055: 5032: 5031: 5030: 5029: 5028: 5027: 5026: 5025: 5013: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4993: 4992: 4991: 4976: 4975: 4974: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4947: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4921: 4920: 4919: 4918: 4917: 4916: 4888: 4887: 4886: 4863: 4860: 4845: 4837:Response from 4833: 4832: 4813: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4797: 4796: 4795: 4794: 4793: 4752: 4751: 4727: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4720: 4719: 4718: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4703: 4692: 4550: 4543: 4519: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4499: 4484: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4450: 4438: 4432: 4392: 4378: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4245:recent changes 4228: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4108: 4086: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4035: 3982: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3896: 3895: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3637:that violated 3633:material from 3625: 3622: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3577:t Review Me!!! 3545:t Review Me!!! 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3505: 3504: 3498:t Review Me!!! 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3378: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3256: 3191: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3168:t Review Me!!! 3152: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3048:t Review Me!!! 2961: 2960: 2959: 2943: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2870: 2838: 2810: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2770: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2681: 2677: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2623: 2622: 2613: 2604:any discussion 2598: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2563: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2408: 2405: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2358: 2318: 2317: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2234: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2108: 2107: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2017: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1926: 1920: 1919: 1881: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1690: 1689: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1632:SPAM VANDALISM 1631: 1630: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1573: 1572: 1476: 1473: 1471: 1466: 1465: 1457: 1455: 1452: 1451: 1449: 1448: 1443: 1438: 1432: 1429: 1428: 1424: 1423: 1418: 1413: 1408: 1403: 1398: 1393: 1388: 1383: 1378: 1372: 1371: 1366: 1361: 1356: 1351: 1346: 1341: 1336: 1331: 1326: 1320: 1319: 1306: 1305: 1300: 1295: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1275: 1270: 1265: 1260: 1254: 1253: 1248: 1243: 1238: 1233: 1228: 1223: 1218: 1213: 1208: 1202: 1201: 1184: 1183: 1178: 1173: 1168: 1163: 1158: 1153: 1148: 1143: 1138: 1132: 1131: 1126: 1121: 1116: 1111: 1106: 1101: 1096: 1091: 1086: 1080: 1079: 1062: 1061: 1056: 1051: 1046: 1041: 1036: 1031: 1026: 1021: 1016: 1010: 1009: 1004: 999: 994: 989: 984: 979: 974: 969: 964: 958: 957: 935: 931: 930: 925: 920: 914: 913: 904: 903: 891: 890: 858: 840: 839: 838: 822: 805: 803: 801: 800: 790: 781: 780: 779: 769: 763: 757: 748:Before posting 744: 732: 727: 726: 719: 711: 706: 704: 701: 700: 694: 689: 688: 681: 678: 677: 675: 674: 669: 664: 663: 662: 657: 652: 647: 642: 637: 627: 622: 621: 620: 615: 613:Reference desk 610: 605: 597: 596: 595: 590: 580: 579: 578: 573: 568: 559: 557: 553: 552: 550: 549: 544: 534: 529: 528: 527: 522: 517: 507: 502: 497: 491: 489: 485: 484: 482: 481: 476: 475: 474: 469: 464: 459: 454: 449: 439: 434: 429: 424: 419: 414: 412:History merges 408: 406: 402: 401: 399: 398: 393: 391:Titleblacklist 388: 383: 382: 381: 376: 366: 361: 356: 351: 346: 341: 336: 331: 329:External links 326: 321: 320: 319: 314: 306: 300: 298: 294: 293: 291: 290: 285: 280: 275: 270: 265: 260: 255: 250: 245: 240: 235: 234: 233: 228: 219: 217: 213: 212: 197: 194: 193: 186: 185: 178: 171: 163: 84: 70:permanent link 33: 22: 21: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 12951: 12940: 12937: 12936: 12934: 12927: 12926: 12923: 12919: 12915: 12911: 12910:84.73.140.109 12905:Block evasion 12902: 12901: 12898: 12895: 12883: 12878: 12872: 12870: 12868: 12859: 12858: 12857: 12856: 12853: 12849: 12848:User:Nuttah68 12845: 12823: 12820: 12815: 12813: 12807: 12802: 12799: 12798: 12797: 12796: 12793: 12788: 12784: 12780: 12776: 12772: 12765: 12758: 12754: 12750: 12747: 12743: 12742: 12741: 12740: 12736: 12732: 12727: 12720: 12716: 12712: 12709: 12704: 12701: 12698: 12695: 12692: 12689: 12686: 12683: 12680: 12677: 12675:before 1923?) 12674: 12670: 12667: 12664: 12661: 12658: 12655: 12652: 12649: 12646: 12643: 12640: 12636: 12633: 12630: 12627: 12626: 12624: 12620: 12619: 12618: 12616: 12598: 12594: 12592: 12587: 12585: 12584: 12583: 12580: 12576: 12572: 12568: 12564: 12563: 12562: 12559: 12555: 12554: 12553: 12550: 12546: 12544: 12539: 12536: 12532: 12531: 12525: 12522: 12518: 12514: 12513: 12512: 12511: 12508: 12503: 12501: 12496: 12493: 12489: 12487: 12472: 12468: 12464: 12460: 12459: 12458: 12457: 12454: 12449: 12443: 12435: 12427: 12421: 12417: 12411: 12407: 12404: 12397: 12390: 12386: 12385: 12384: 12379: 12373: 12368: 12364: 12360: 12359: 12358: 12357: 12354: 12350: 12347: 12344: 12332: 12329: 12324: 12323: 12322: 12321: 12318: 12314: 12310: 12301: 12298: 12294: 12293: 12292: 12289: 12285: 12281: 12280: 12279: 12278: 12275: 12271: 12267: 12261: 12258:Legal threat 12251: 12248: 12241: 12239: 12238: 12230: 12229: 12228: 12227: 12224: 12221: 12217: 12213: 12212: 12211: 12210: 12207: 12200: 12198: 12197: 12188: 12183: 12178: 12176: 12170: 12167: 12158: 12145: 12142: 12141:Jesse Viviano 12137: 12136: 12135: 12132: 12128: 12121: 12112: 12111: 12110: 12106: 12099: 12095: 12094: 12093: 12090: 12089:Jesse Viviano 12086: 12085: 12084: 12083: 12080: 12079:Jesse Viviano 12076: 12062: 12059: 12055: 12051: 12047: 12046: 12045: 12042: 12037: 12036: 12035: 12034: 12031: 12027: 12023: 12019: 12014: 12007: 12004: 12001: 11998: 11995: 11992: 11989: 11986: 11983: 11980: 11977: 11972: 11971:71.252.83.230 11969: 11965: 11962: 11959: 11956: 11953: 11950: 11947: 11944: 11941: 11938: 11935: 11930: 11927: 11923: 11920: 11917: 11914: 11911: 11908: 11905: 11902: 11899: 11896: 11893: 11888: 11885: 11881: 11878: 11875: 11872: 11869: 11866: 11863: 11860: 11857: 11854: 11851: 11846: 11843: 11842: 11834: 11830: 11826: 11825: 11816: 11811: 11810: 11801: 11798: 11794: 11791: 11788: 11786: 11782: 11778: 11774: 11770: 11767: 11763: 11759: 11756: 11752: 11748: 11744: 11740: 11736: 11734: 11732: 11729: 11728: 11727: 11726: 11725: 11724: 11723: 11722: 11715: 11712: 11708: 11704: 11700: 11696: 11695: 11694: 11693: 11692: 11691: 11690: 11689: 11686: 11685: 11673: 11672: 11667: 11665: 11661: 11660: 11654: 11652: 11647: 11642: 11641: 11638: 11634: 11628: 11626: 11623: 11620: 11615: 11613: 11612:you, Iwazaki" 11611: 11605: 11601: 11597: 11593: 11589: 11585: 11584:Osgoodelawyer 11581: 11577: 11574: 11571: 11568: 11565: 11559: 11555: 11544: 11541: 11537: 11536: 11535: 11532: 11528: 11527: 11526: 11523: 11520: 11516: 11515: 11514: 11513: 11510: 11506: 11503: 11489: 11483: 11479: 11475: 11470: 11465: 11464: 11463: 11460: 11456: 11452: 11451: 11450: 11449: 11443: 11439: 11435: 11430: 11422: 11419: 11417: 11414: 11412: 11409: 11407: 11404: 11402: 11399: 11397: 11394: 11392: 11389: 11387: 11384: 11382: 11379: 11376: 11370: 11367: 11364: 11361: 11358: 11355: 11352: 11349: 11346: 11343: 11340: 11337: 11334: 11329: 11326:(uploaded by 11325: 11322: 11321: 11320: 11316: 11313: 11310: 11307: 11304: 11301: 11298: 11295: 11292: 11289: 11286: 11283: 11280: 11275: 11270: 11268: 11262: 11258: 11254: 11249: 11223: 11220: 11216: 11215: 11214: 11211: 11207: 11203: 11202: 11201: 11200: 11197: 11191: 11190: 11179: 11175: 11174: 11169: 11163: 11156: 11149: 11142: 11141: 11138: 11135: 11131: 11127: 11125: 11122: 11118: 11112: 11109: 11106: 11103: 11100: 11097: 11094: 11091: 11088: 11085: 11082: 11079: 11076: 11071: 11068: 11067: 11043: 11039: 11035: 11032:) as well. — 11031: 11028: 11025: 11021: 11017: 11016: 11015: 11011: 11007: 11003: 10999: 10995: 10992: 10991: 10990: 10989: 10986: 10982: 10978: 10974: 10970: 10960: 10957: 10954: 10951: 10948: 10945: 10942: 10939: 10936: 10935:nuke contribs 10933: 10930: 10927: 10924: 10921: 10918: 10912: 10907: 10902: 10899: 10896: 10893: 10890: 10887: 10884: 10881: 10878: 10877:nuke contribs 10875: 10872: 10869: 10866: 10863: 10860: 10854: 10853:Lizat dejesus 10849: 10848: 10847: 10842:Both blocked. 10821: 10818: 10814: 10810: 10809: 10808: 10804: 10803: 10802: 10801: 10798: 10794: 10792: 10789: 10785: 10781: 10777: 10773: 10772:User:Float954 10770: 10764: 10761: 10758: 10755: 10752: 10749: 10746: 10743: 10740: 10737: 10734: 10731: 10728: 10723: 10710: 10707: 10703: 10702: 10701: 10698: 10697: 10692: 10688: 10687: 10686: 10685: 10682: 10678: 10676: 10674: 10672: 10670: 10668: 10666: 10664: 10662: 10657: 10654: 10651: 10648: 10645: 10642: 10639: 10636: 10633: 10630: 10627: 10624: 10621: 10616: 10605: 10602: 10601: 10578: 10576: 10573: 10569: 10565: 10561: 10558: 10554: 10553:3RR violation 10550: 10549:Eurominuteman 10546: 10545: 10544: 10543: 10542: 10541: 10538: 10534: 10530: 10529:Eurominuteman 10526: 10522: 10518: 10514: 10513:Eurominuteman 10510: 10506: 10502: 10495: 10491: 10490:Eurominuteman 10484: 10481: 10480: 10470: 10469: 10468: 10467: 10464: 10460: 10456: 10453: 10450: 10447: 10446:Bruce Golding 10440: 10439:Bruce Golding 10436: 10435:User:Tom13014 10429: 10426: 10422: 10421: 10420: 10419: 10416: 10407: 10398: 10395: 10391: 10386: 10385: 10384: 10381: 10376: 10373: 10369: 10365: 10364: 10363: 10362: 10359: 10353: 10350: 10345: 10340: 10335: 10328: 10325: 10321: 10320: 10319: 10318: 10315: 10314: 10291: 10288: 10285: 10281: 10280: 10279: 10276: 10272: 10271: 10270: 10269: 10266: 10263: 10259: 10255: 10251: 10247: 10243: 10239: 10234: 10228: 10226: 10220: 10218: 10216: 10210: 10209: 10208: 10205: 10199: 10197: 10193: 10190: 10186: 10175: 10172: 10169: 10166: 10163: 10160: 10157: 10154: 10151: 10148: 10145: 10142: 10139: 10136: 10133: 10130: 10127: 10124: 10121: 10116: 10112: 10107: 10104: 10101: 10098: 10095: 10092: 10089: 10086: 10083: 10080: 10077: 10074: 10071: 10068: 10065: 10062: 10059: 10056: 10053: 10048: 10044: 10040: 10036: 10032: 10028: 10023: 10019: 10014: 10010: 10006: 10002: 9998: 9997: 9994: 9991: 9965: 9962: 9958: 9957: 9956: 9953: 9949: 9946: 9943: 9939: 9938: 9937: 9934: 9930: 9926: 9925: 9924: 9923: 9920: 9916: 9913: 9910: 9906: 9903: 9899: 9896:As I said in 9891: 9888: 9885: 9881: 9870: 9866: 9865: 9860: 9854: 9847: 9843: 9839: 9838: 9837: 9834: 9830: 9829: 9828: 9825: 9821: 9817: 9816: 9815: 9814: 9809: 9808: 9806: 9802: 9799: 9796: 9786: 9785: 9780: 9779: 9777: 9773: 9770: 9767: 9754: 9747: 9744: 9741: 9737: 9736:77.248.185.43 9722: 9719: 9714: 9712: 9707: 9706: 9705: 9702: 9697: 9696: 9695: 9692: 9687: 9685: 9681: 9677: 9674:and, after I 9673: 9669: 9663: 9660: 9657: 9654: 9651: 9648: 9645: 9642: 9639: 9636: 9633: 9630: 9627: 9622: 9619: 9618: 9615: 9602: 9599: 9598: 9593: 9589: 9588: 9587: 9584: 9579: 9575: 9574: 9573: 9567: 9566: 9559: 9558: 9557: 9553: 9552: 9551:yak, yak, yak 9547: 9546: 9541: 9540: 9539: 9538: 9532: 9531: 9525: 9521: 9516: 9508: 9505: 9502: 9498: 9489: 9485: 9479: 9472: 9471: 9470: 9465: 9460: 9459: 9454: 9451:I think your 9450: 9449: 9448: 9447: 9444: 9439: 9437: 9432: 9428: 9425: 9422: 9419: 9416: 9413: 9410: 9407: 9404: 9401: 9398: 9393: 9386: 9383: 9380: 9377: 9374: 9371: 9368: 9365: 9362: 9359: 9356: 9351: 9345: 9342: 9339: 9336: 9333: 9330: 9327: 9324: 9321: 9318: 9315: 9310: 9305: 9303: 9299: 9294: 9289: 9281: 9278: 9277:Inspector Lee 9274: 9273: 9272: 9271: 9268: 9248: 9245: 9241: 9240: 9239: 9236: 9233:Near funny. 9232: 9231: 9230: 9227: 9223: 9222: 9221: 9218: 9217:Inspector Lee 9214: 9213: 9212: 9209: 9205: 9200: 9199: 9198: 9197: 9196: 9193: 9192:Inspector Lee 9189: 9185: 9181: 9178: 9173: 9171: 9167: 9163: 9159: 9158: 9157: 9154: 9150: 9149:User:Tuand029 9146: 9145: 9144: 9143: 9140: 9136: 9132: 9131:Inspector_Lee 9125: 9122: 9104: 9103:Inspector_Lee 9099: 9098: 9094: 9086: 9083: 9080: 9077: 9074: 9070: 9065: 9061: 9057: 9053: 9052: 9051: 9038: 9035: 9031: 9027: 9026: 9025: 9024: 9023: 9022: 9021: 9020: 9019: 9018: 9009: 9006: 9004: 8999: 8998: 8997: 8996: 8995: 8994: 8993: 8992: 8985: 8982: 8977: 8976: 8975: 8974: 8973: 8972: 8967: 8964: 8962: 8957: 8956: 8955: 8954: 8951: 8948: 8944: 8943: 8939: 8935: 8931: 8930: 8926: 8922: 8921: 8920: 8919: 8916: 8914: 8909: 8905: 8901: 8899: 8893: 8878: 8875: 8871: 8870:British Isles 8867: 8862: 8861: 8860: 8859: 8858: 8857: 8856: 8855: 8854: 8853: 8844: 8841: 8836: 8835: 8834: 8833: 8832: 8831: 8830: 8829: 8822: 8819: 8815: 8811: 8807: 8803: 8802:Michael Palin 8799: 8795: 8791: 8787: 8783: 8779: 8775: 8771: 8770: 8769: 8768: 8767: 8766: 8758: 8754: 8750: 8746: 8742: 8738: 8734: 8730: 8729: 8728: 8727: 8726: 8725: 8717: 8716: 8715: 8714: 8713: 8712: 8707: 8702: 8697: 8696: 8690: 8689: 8688: 8687: 8684: 8681: 8676: 8675: 8674: 8673: 8670: 8668: 8660: 8657: 8653: 8649: 8644: 8638: 8633: 8628: 8627: 8622: 8621: 8620: 8619: 8618: 8617: 8614: 8610: 8606: 8600: 8597: 8593: 8590: 8587: 8583: 8582: 8581: 8580: 8579: 8578: 8575: 8571: 8567: 8564:says it is a 8563: 8559: 8554: 8553: 8549: 8545: 8541: 8531: 8526: 8521: 8520: 8514: 8513: 8512: 8511: 8510: 8509: 8500: 8497: 8495: 8488: 8483: 8482: 8481: 8480: 8479: 8478: 8477: 8476: 8469: 8466: 8462: 8458: 8457: 8456: 8455: 8454: 8453: 8446: 8443: 8442: 8429: 8428: 8427: 8426: 8425: 8424: 8413: 8409: 8404: 8401: 8397: 8394: 8390: 8387: 8386: 8385: 8384: 8383: 8382: 8381: 8380: 8379: 8378: 8369: 8366: 8362: 8361: 8360: 8359: 8358: 8357: 8356: 8355: 8350: 8346: 8342: 8339: 8338: 8337: 8336: 8333: 8330: 8328: 8322: 8317: 8316: 8315: 8314: 8310: 8301: 8297: 8294: 8292: 8289: 8285: 8281: 8280: 8279: 8277: 8276:Graeme Garden 8273: 8266: 8245: 8241: 8237: 8233: 8232:ArtVandelay13 8229: 8222: 8221: 8220: 8217: 8212: 8211: 8210: 8209: 8208: 8205: 8200: 8198: 8193: 8189: 8188: 8187: 8184: 8183:ArtVandelay13 8179: 8175: 8174: 8173: 8170: 8165: 8160: 8155: 8154: 8153: 8150: 8145: 8143: 8139: 8136: 8135: 8134: 8133: 8130: 8109: 8106: 8105:ArtVandelay13 8102: 8098: 8097: 8096: 8093: 8088: 8087: 8086: 8083: 8078: 8076: 8071: 8067: 8063: 8062: 8061: 8058: 8054: 8050: 8045: 8041: 8040: 8039: 8036: 8031: 8029: 8025: 8021: 8017: 8013: 8009: 8004: 8003: 8002: 7999: 7994: 7990: 7986: 7981: 7980: 7979: 7976: 7971: 7969: 7965: 7961: 7957: 7952: 7951:German Empire 7948: 7944: 7940: 7936: 7933: 7930: 7926: 7925:ArtVandelay13 7923: 7922: 7921: 7920: 7917: 7914: 7910: 7909: 7908: 7907: 7904: 7903:ArtVandelay13 7900: 7896: 7891: 7890:User:Matthead 7884: 7883:User:Matthead 7879: 7878: 7875: 7870: 7869: 7866: 7863: 7859: 7855: 7854: 7850: 7849: 7846: 7842: 7839:Calling me a 7837: 7836: 7833: 7830: 7826: 7822: 7816: 7815: 7812: 7808: 7802: 7799: 7795: 7794: 7793: 7790: 7789: 7786: 7782: 7779: 7774: 7773: 7769: 7767: 7758: 7755: 7751: 7745: 7742: 7741: 7738: 7735: 7731: 7724: 7723: 7722: 7721: 7718: 7714: 7711: 7707: 7703: 7699: 7695: 7688: 7685: 7684:Corvus cornix 7680: 7679: 7678: 7677: 7674: 7670: 7666: 7663: 7659: 7655: 7650: 7649: 7644: 7643: 7639: 7638: 7634: 7632: 7628: 7624: 7621: 7612: 7609: 7606: 7603: 7600: 7597: 7594: 7591: 7588: 7585: 7582: 7579: 7576: 7571: 7568: 7567: 7564: 7555: 7552: 7548: 7543: 7542: 7541: 7536: 7533: 7530: 7529: 7528: 7527: 7524: 7522: 7521:Videmus Omnia 7516: 7515: 7510: 7483: 7480: 7476: 7475: 7474: 7473: 7472: 7471: 7470: 7469: 7468: 7467: 7466: 7465: 7464: 7463: 7462: 7461: 7460: 7459: 7458: 7457: 7456: 7455: 7434: 7429: 7425: 7424:is an example 7421: 7417: 7416: 7415: 7414: 7413: 7412: 7411: 7410: 7409: 7408: 7407: 7406: 7405: 7404: 7403: 7402: 7401: 7400: 7399: 7398: 7381: 7378: 7373: 7372: 7371: 7370: 7369: 7368: 7367: 7366: 7365: 7364: 7363: 7362: 7361: 7360: 7359: 7358: 7340: 7335: 7334: 7333: 7332: 7331: 7330: 7329: 7328: 7327: 7326: 7325: 7324: 7323: 7322: 7321: 7320: 7305: 7302: 7297: 7293: 7289: 7288: 7287: 7286: 7285: 7284: 7283: 7282: 7281: 7280: 7279: 7278: 7277: 7276: 7263: 7261: 7258: 7254: 7249: 7248: 7247: 7246: 7245: 7244: 7243: 7242: 7241: 7240: 7239: 7238: 7227: 7224: 7220: 7219: 7218: 7217: 7216: 7215: 7214: 7213: 7212: 7211: 7198: 7197: 7196: 7195: 7194: 7193: 7192: 7191: 7190: 7189: 7180: 7177: 7176:Corvus cornix 7173: 7172: 7166: 7162: 7161: 7160: 7159: 7158: 7157: 7156: 7155: 7144: 7141: 7137: 7136: 7135: 7134: 7133: 7132: 7131: 7130: 7129: 7128: 7119: 7116: 7114: 7113:Videmus Omnia 7110: 7106: 7105: 7104: 7101: 7097: 7092: 7091: 7090: 7089: 7088: 7087: 7078: 7077: 7076: 7075: 7074: 7073: 7066: 7063: 7061: 7060:Videmus Omnia 7057: 7053: 7052: 7051: 7048: 7046: 7040: 7034: 7026: 7021: 7020: 7019: 7014: 7010: 7005: 7004: 6997: 6993: 6992: 6991: 6990: 6987: 6985: 6984:Videmus Omnia 6981: 6977: 6973: 6970: 6967: 6963: 6956: 6949: 6946: 6945: 6940: 6935: 6931: 6928: 6927: 6917: 6916: 6915: 6912: 6909: 6905: 6904: 6903: 6902: 6899: 6898: 6888: 6878: 6877: 6874: 6873: 6872:Brendan Lloyd 6868: 6864: 6860: 6853: 6851: 6848: 6846: 6843: 6841: 6838: 6836: 6835: 6834: 6832: 6829: 6827: 6825: 6821: 6817: 6811: 6807: 6803: 6797: 6796: 6792: 6782: 6779: 6774: 6773: 6770: 6765: 6760: 6755: 6754: 6739: 6736: 6731: 6730: 6729: 6726: 6721: 6720: 6719: 6716: 6714: 6708: 6707: 6706: 6703: 6698: 6697: 6696: 6692: 6686: 6679: 6678: 6677: 6674: 6670: 6669: 6668: 6664: 6658: 6652: 6651: 6650: 6649: 6646: 6635: 6632: 6627: 6624: 6623: 6622: 6619: 6615: 6611: 6610: 6609: 6605: 6597: 6596: 6595: 6594: 6590: 6583: 6579: 6575: 6570: 6566: 6551: 6548: 6544: 6540: 6539:User:Nihonjoe 6536: 6532: 6531:Bruce Cumings 6529:The edits in 6528: 6527: 6526: 6525: 6522: 6517: 6513: 6508: 6504: 6500: 6499:Bruce Cumings 6496: 6495: 6494: 6493: 6490: 6486: 6482: 6481:User:Nihonjoe 6478: 6474: 6467: 6464: 6463: 6462: 6457: 6454: 6452: 6449: 6448: 6447: 6445: 6440: 6432: 6431: 6428: 6427: 6418: 6415: 6414: 6409: 6405: 6401: 6400: 6399: 6398: 6393: 6389: 6384: 6373: 6370: 6366: 6362: 6361: 6360: 6357: 6353: 6349: 6345: 6344: 6343: 6340: 6336: 6335: 6326: 6321: 6317: 6312: 6307: 6306: 6305: 6302: 6297: 6296: 6295: 6292: 6290: 6283: 6282: 6281: 6278: 6273: 6272: 6271: 6270: 6267: 6261: 6260: 6257: 6255: 6241: 6238: 6234: 6233: 6232: 6231: 6230: 6229: 6224: 6220: 6216: 6211: 6206: 6205: 6204: 6201: 6197: 6185: 6182: 6177: 6176: 6175: 6170: 6166: 6161: 6157: 6152: 6151: 6150: 6147: 6145: 6139: 6133: 6125: 6124: 6123: 6120: 6116: 6115: 6114: 6111: 6110: 6104: 6099: 6095: 6094: 6093: 6092: 6089: 6086: 6082: 6076: 6073: 6070: 6065: 6058: 6055: 6052: 6049: 6046: 6043: 6040: 6037: 6034: 6033:nuke contribs 6031: 6028: 6025: 6022: 6019: 6016: 6010: 6003: 6002: 6001: 5998: 5991: 5988: 5985: 5982: 5979: 5976: 5973: 5970: 5967: 5966:nuke contribs 5964: 5961: 5958: 5955: 5952: 5949: 5943: 5942:Eiorgiomugini 5936: 5935: 5934: 5933: 5932: 5931: 5928: 5920: 5917: 5914: 5911: 5908: 5905: 5902: 5899: 5896: 5895:nuke contribs 5893: 5890: 5887: 5884: 5881: 5878: 5872: 5860: 5859: 5855: 5849: 5842: 5835: 5831: 5827: 5822: 5817: 5816: 5815: 5814: 5810: 5808:Contributions 5804: 5798: 5792: 5788: 5771: 5768: 5763: 5762: 5761: 5758: 5753: 5752: 5751: 5748: 5744: 5743: 5742: 5739: 5735: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5726: 5721: 5720: 5719: 5716: 5709: 5706: 5703: 5700: 5697: 5694: 5691: 5688: 5685: 5682: 5679: 5674: 5670: 5669: 5668: 5667: 5664: 5660: 5653: 5650: 5646: 5643: 5642: 5641: 5640: 5635: 5631: 5626: 5622: 5610: 5606: 5594: 5582: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5572: 5569: 5565: 5564: 5563: 5560: 5555: 5551: 5547: 5542: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5536: 5531: 5530: 5527: 5523: 5512: 5509: 5504: 5503: 5502: 5499: 5495: 5491: 5487: 5480: 5479: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5471: 5470: 5467: 5463: 5459: 5454: 5453: 5452: 5451: 5448: 5434: 5431: 5427: 5423: 5419: 5414: 5413: 5412: 5409: 5405: 5401: 5397: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5388: 5384: 5380: 5376: 5371: 5370: 5369: 5366: 5362: 5357: 5347: 5344: 5339: 5338: 5337: 5334: 5330: 5325: 5321: 5317: 5313: 5309: 5305: 5304: 5303: 5300: 5296: 5292: 5291: 5290: 5287: 5283: 5282: 5281: 5278: 5274: 5270: 5269:somebody else 5266: 5264: 5261: 5257: 5256: 5255: 5254: 5250: 5240: 5237: 5233: 5230: 5226: 5221: 5220: 5217: 5212: 5207: 5206: 5201: 5200: 5197: 5193: 5191:Contributions 5187: 5181: 5174: 5173: 5172: 5171: 5168: 5164: 5160: 5156: 5155:Bruce Cumings 5152: 5144: 5135: 5132: 5130: 5122: 5119: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5109: 5106: 5102: 5098: 5094: 5093: 5092: 5091: 5088: 5087: 5086:Brendan Lloyd 5081: 5076: 5070: 5067: 5066: 5061: 5056: 5054: 5051: 5047: 5046: 5045: 5044: 5041: 5036: 5024: 5021: 5020: 5014: 5012: 5009: 5004: 5003: 5002: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4997: 4990: 4987: 4984:intervention. 4982: 4981: 4980: 4979: 4978: 4977: 4969: 4965: 4964: 4959: 4958: 4953: 4952: 4951: 4950: 4949: 4948: 4940: 4939: 4934: 4933: 4927: 4926: 4925: 4924: 4923: 4922: 4914: 4910: 4908: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4899: 4896: 4895: 4889: 4885: 4882: 4878: 4873: 4872: 4871: 4868: 4858: 4857: 4852: 4851: 4842: 4840: 4835: 4834: 4831: 4828: 4824: 4819: 4815: 4814: 4809: 4806: 4803: 4798: 4792: 4789: 4785: 4784: 4783: 4782: 4781: 4778: 4777: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4766: 4765: 4764:Brendan Lloyd 4759: 4754: 4753: 4750: 4747: 4746: 4740: 4739: 4738: 4737: 4734: 4733: 4732:Brendan Lloyd 4713: 4710: 4709: 4704: 4702: 4699: 4698: 4693: 4691: 4688: 4687: 4681: 4680: 4679: 4675: 4671: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4662: 4661: 4655: 4654: 4653: 4650: 4645: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4637: 4635: 4627: 4624: 4623: 4622: 4619: 4615: 4611: 4610: 4609: 4605: 4599: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4590: 4587: 4581: 4579: 4573: 4572: 4568: 4564: 4560: 4556: 4548: 4542: 4541: 4537: 4533: 4529: 4525: 4517: 4507: 4506:User:Grahamec 4503: 4500: 4497: 4493: 4490: 4489: 4488: 4483: 4474: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4462: 4458: 4457:User:Grahamec 4454: 4451: 4447: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4437: 4431: 4427: 4424: 4420: 4416: 4412: 4407: 4405: 4401: 4397: 4390: 4386: 4382: 4377: 4376: 4372: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4332: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4257: 4254: 4250: 4246: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4210: 4207: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4197: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4129: 4126: 4122: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4113: 4109: 4106: 4102: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4092: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4070: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4041: 4034: 4031: 4027: 4023: 4019: 4014: 4013: 4011: 4007: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3990: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3977: 3974: 3970: 3966: 3963: 3960: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3949: 3946: 3941: 3936: 3932: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3920: 3917: 3913: 3908: 3905:'s talk page 3904: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3894: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3876: 3872: 3868: 3860: 3856: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3824: 3820: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3782: 3778: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3726: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3714: 3706: 3702: 3692: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3672: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3651: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3621: 3620: 3617: 3616: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3582: 3579: 3578: 3575: 3570: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3557: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3547: 3546: 3543: 3538: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3520: 3517: 3513: 3512:User:Ideogram 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3503: 3500: 3499: 3496: 3491: 3484: 3480: 3479: 3462: 3459: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3424: 3421: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3393: 3388: 3382: 3376: 3372: 3369: 3365: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3354: 3353: 3348: 3342: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3322: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3300: 3297: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3279: 3274: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3266: 3262: 3255: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3241: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3231: 3226: 3214: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3204: 3200: 3197: 3173: 3170: 3169: 3166: 3161: 3153: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3119: 3116: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3105: 3099: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3088: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3078: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3053: 3050: 3049: 3046: 3041: 3034: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3025: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3015: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3005: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2994: 2993: 2988: 2982: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2962: 2958: 2953: 2947: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2934: 2929: 2928: 2923: 2919: 2918: 2897: 2894: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2880: 2874: 2868: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2859: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2848: 2842: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2831: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2820: 2814: 2808: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2799: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2785: 2780: 2774: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2763: 2758: 2754: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2735: 2734: 2723: 2713: 2710: 2706: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2695: 2689: 2682: 2678: 2676: 2673: 2669: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2658: 2648: 2645: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2632: 2628: 2621: 2618: 2614: 2612: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2588: 2585: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2573: 2567: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2550: 2547: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2518: 2515: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2473: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2423: 2419: 2412: 2409: 2406: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2388: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2368: 2362: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2345: 2341: 2336: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2325: 2316: 2313: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2302: 2298: 2288: 2277: 2274: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2261: 2251: 2247: 2241: 2235: 2233: 2229: 2223: 2217: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2207: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2197: 2193: 2190: 2187: 2184: 2180: 2168: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2134: 2129: 2128: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2106: 2103: 2099: 2093: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2073: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2060: 2056: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2020:The point of 2001: 1998: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1977: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1941: 1936: 1930: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1898: 1894: 1893:any consensus 1890: 1885: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1869: 1866: 1862: 1853: 1850: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1840: 1836: 1822: 1819: 1815: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1791: 1786: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1766: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1756: 1754: 1748: 1742: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1717: 1711: 1709: 1707: 1698: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1671: 1658: 1655: 1650: 1638: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1614: 1611: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1597: 1594: 1589: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1571: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1557: 1551: 1546: 1541: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1524: 1517: 1514: 1511: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1496: 1493: 1490: 1487: 1482: 1472: 1453: 1447: 1444: 1442: 1439: 1437: 1434: 1433: 1430: 1425: 1422: 1419: 1417: 1414: 1412: 1409: 1407: 1404: 1402: 1399: 1397: 1394: 1392: 1389: 1387: 1384: 1382: 1379: 1377: 1374: 1373: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1347: 1345: 1342: 1340: 1337: 1335: 1332: 1330: 1327: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1316: 1311: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1299: 1296: 1294: 1291: 1289: 1286: 1284: 1281: 1279: 1276: 1274: 1271: 1269: 1266: 1264: 1261: 1259: 1256: 1255: 1252: 1249: 1247: 1244: 1242: 1239: 1237: 1234: 1232: 1229: 1227: 1224: 1222: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1212: 1209: 1207: 1204: 1203: 1198: 1194: 1189: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1177: 1174: 1172: 1169: 1167: 1164: 1162: 1159: 1157: 1154: 1152: 1149: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1139: 1137: 1134: 1133: 1130: 1127: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1117: 1115: 1112: 1110: 1107: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1097: 1095: 1092: 1090: 1087: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1076: 1072: 1067: 1063: 1060: 1057: 1055: 1052: 1050: 1047: 1045: 1042: 1040: 1037: 1035: 1032: 1030: 1027: 1025: 1022: 1020: 1017: 1015: 1012: 1011: 1008: 1005: 1003: 1000: 998: 995: 993: 990: 988: 985: 983: 980: 978: 975: 973: 970: 968: 965: 963: 960: 959: 954: 950: 945: 941: 929: 926: 924: 921: 919: 916: 915: 911: 902: 901: 900: 893: 892: 889: 885: 881: 873: 869: 865: 852: 851: 845: 836: 832: 828: 819: 818: 814: 810: 798: 794: 791: 788: 787: 782: 777: 773: 770: 768: 764: 762: 758: 756: 752: 751: 749: 746: 745: 743: 740: 737:incidents or 736: 724: 720: 717: 713: 712: 709: 703: 702: 698: 697: 693: 686: 685: 679: 673: 670: 668: 665: 661: 660:Miscellaneous 658: 656: 653: 651: 648: 646: 643: 641: 638: 636: 633: 632: 631: 628: 626: 623: 619: 616: 614: 611: 609: 606: 604: 601: 600: 598: 594: 591: 589: 586: 585: 584: 581: 577: 574: 572: 569: 567: 564: 563: 561: 560: 558: 554: 548: 545: 542: 538: 535: 533: 530: 526: 523: 521: 518: 516: 513: 512: 511: 508: 506: 503: 501: 498: 496: 493: 492: 490: 486: 480: 477: 473: 470: 468: 465: 463: 460: 458: 455: 453: 450: 448: 445: 444: 443: 440: 438: 435: 433: 430: 428: 425: 423: 420: 418: 415: 413: 410: 409: 407: 405:Page handling 403: 397: 394: 392: 389: 387: 384: 380: 377: 375: 372: 371: 370: 367: 365: 362: 360: 357: 355: 352: 350: 347: 345: 342: 340: 337: 335: 332: 330: 327: 325: 322: 318: 315: 313: 310: 309: 307: 305: 302: 301: 299: 295: 289: 286: 284: 281: 279: 276: 274: 271: 269: 266: 264: 261: 259: 256: 254: 251: 249: 246: 244: 241: 239: 236: 232: 229: 227: 224: 223: 221: 220: 218: 214: 209: 205: 201: 195: 191: 184: 179: 177: 172: 170: 165: 164: 161: 157: 155: 153: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 105: 96: 92: 87: 80: 79: 76: 71: 60: 45: 41: 36: 29: 19: 12908: 12891: 12866: 12865: 12841: 12811: 12768: 12723: 12672: 12612: 12588: 12529: 12504: 12497: 12494: 12490: 12482: 12340: 12312: 12309:Anna Wilding 12306: 12283: 12264: 12236: 12235: 12195: 12194: 12186: 12181: 12179: 12174: 12171: 12162: 12115: 12072: 12015: 12012: 12002: 11996: 11990: 11984: 11978: 11960: 11954: 11948: 11942: 11936: 11918: 11912: 11906: 11900: 11894: 11876: 11870: 11864: 11858: 11852: 11817: 11785:User:Lustead 11781:User:Iwazaki 11777:User:Iwazaki 11766:User:Lustead 11755:User:Iwazaki 11751:User:Iwazaki 11743:User:Lexicon 11739:User:Iwazaki 11730:The attacks 11678: 11674: 11668: 11658: 11650: 11643: 11629: 11616: 11609: 11587: 11582:(previously 11562: 11556:'s block of 11499: 11425: 11365: 11359: 11353: 11347: 11341: 11335: 11311: 11305: 11299: 11293: 11287: 11281: 11271: 11243: 11192: 11187: 11167: 11164: 11107: 11101: 11095: 11089: 11083: 11077: 11026: 10980: 10966: 10955: 10949: 10943: 10937: 10931: 10925: 10919: 10897: 10891: 10885: 10879: 10873: 10867: 10861: 10845: 10759: 10753: 10747: 10741: 10735: 10729: 10720: 10694: 10652: 10646: 10640: 10634: 10628: 10622: 10613: 10581: 10498: 10472: 10443: 10411: 10406:Alice Bailey 10354: 10341: 10338: 10303: 10301: 10235: 10231: 10222: 10212: 10203: 10200: 10184: 10181: 10170: 10164: 10158: 10152: 10146: 10140: 10134: 10128: 10122: 10102: 10096: 10090: 10084: 10078: 10072: 10066: 10060: 10054: 9933:Secretlondon 9929:live journal 9895: 9886: 9858: 9855: 9792: 9791: 9787: 9763: 9762: 9742: 9734: 9658: 9652: 9646: 9640: 9634: 9628: 9595: 9577: 9563: 9550: 9544: 9528: 9512: 9503: 9497:ILikePikachu 9456: 9440: 9433: 9423: 9417: 9411: 9405: 9399: 9392:68.115.107.3 9381: 9375: 9369: 9363: 9357: 9340: 9334: 9328: 9322: 9316: 9306: 9295: 9292: 9263: 9224:Not funny. 9135:contribution 9128: 9090: 9049: 9029: 8907: 8897: 8895: 8889: 8840:Secretlondon 8740: 8693: 8663: 8624: 8595: 8555: 8539: 8538: 8517: 8493: 8486: 8461:Sean Connery 8431: 8340: 8326: 8305: 8269: 8126: 8100: 8065: 8052: 8048: 8043: 7992: 7988: 7984: 7931: 7895:West Germany 7888: 7871: 7857: 7856: 7852: 7851: 7840: 7838: 7824: 7817: 7805: 7791: 7777: 7775: 7765: 7763: 7761: 7747: 7727: 7705: 7701: 7697: 7693: 7691: 7668: 7651: 7645: 7640: 7635: 7630: 7626: 7617: 7607: 7601: 7595: 7589: 7583: 7577: 7531: 7517: 7506: 7252: 7250: 7170: 7169: 7095: 7028: 7000: 6968: 6959: 6942: 6919: 6890: 6884: 6870: 6857: 6814: 6785: 6735:Orderinchaos 6712: 6642: 6613: 6581: 6577: 6573: 6564: 6561: 6507:Hong Qi Gong 6502: 6470: 6460: 6441: 6438: 6424: 6421: 6411: 6383:Hong Qi Gong 6380: 6311:Hong Qi Gong 6288: 6262: 6253: 6248: 6210:Bigtimepeace 6160:Hong Qi Gong 6127: 6107: 6072:EconomicsGuy 6063: 6053: 6047: 6041: 6035: 6029: 6023: 6017: 6009:Jacob Peters 5986: 5980: 5974: 5968: 5962: 5956: 5950: 5915: 5909: 5903: 5897: 5891: 5885: 5879: 5866: 5838: 5821:Bigtimepeace 5784: 5704: 5698: 5692: 5686: 5680: 5656: 5644: 5625:Hong Qi Gong 5620: 5617: 5568:Tom Harrison 5553: 5549: 5545: 5535:Tom Harrison 5532: 5519: 5476: 5443: 5396:John Smith's 5374: 5323: 5272: 5268: 5243: 5203: 5148: 5124: 5084: 5077: 5073: 5063: 5060:no consensus 5059: 5034: 5033: 5017: 4967: 4961: 4955: 4936: 4930: 4907:User:Lester2 4904: 4892: 4877:Lyall Howard 4859:(Melbourne). 4854: 4848: 4839:User:Lester2 4836: 4823:Lyall Howard 4788:Orderinchaos 4774: 4762: 4743: 4730: 4728: 4706: 4695: 4684: 4658: 4643: 4629: 4582: 4578:User:Skyring 4574: 4552: 4521: 4486: 4467: 4440: 4428: 4408: 4400:User:Skyring 4394: 4385:User:Skyring 4349: 4104: 4100: 4026:Man vs. Wild 3972: 3968: 3939: 3934: 3838:template to 3835: 3818: 3802: 3798: 3697: 3688:Tao of tyler 3684:Man vs. Wild 3635:Man vs. Wild 3627: 3608: 3603: 3599: 3593: 3565: 3533: 3486: 3346: 3343: 3296:Orderinchaos 3249: 3193: 3156: 3036: 2986: 2983: 2969: 2925: 2921: 2806: 2726: 2718: 2667: 2653: 2624: 2603: 2597: 2354: 2350: 2343: 2339: 2319: 2282: 2256: 2185: 2177: 2130: 2109: 2070:anymore". -- 2046:User:Piotrus 2026:World War II 2019: 1892: 1888: 1886: 1883: 1867: 1849:Orderinchaos 1788: 1768: 1736: 1705: 1704: 1696: 1667: 1547: 1542: 1539: 1536: 1512: 1506: 1500: 1494: 1488: 1478: 1470: 1427:Other links 1065: 895: 894: 859: 847: 843: 823:You may use 808: 806: 804: 792: 784: 771: 747: 738: 734: 731: 682: 630:Village pump 618:New articles 583:Edit filters 562:Arbitration 488:User conduct 273:Open proxies 230: 190:Noticeboards 151: 147: 28:old revision 25: 24: 12920:he would. - 12260:User:Real77 11020:Paul frisz‎ 10784:User:Skarth 10533:Translation 10260:editors. — 10001:Aaron Klein 9961:Closedmouth 9919:Closedmouth 9909:Gail Berman 9898:this report 9614:User:Calton 9526:trolling? - 9235:Someguy1221 8866:Lough Neagh 8786:Terry Jones 8274:at article 8272:User:Figaro 8226:—Preceding 8101:it happened 8008:Golden Team 7985:Deutschland 7874:BillyTFried 7845:BillyTFried 7811:BillyTFried 7785:BillyTFried 7766:Soooo Much! 7717:BillyTFried 7696:to now say 7673:BillyTFried 7563:User:Griot 6939:David Hicks 6887:David Hicks 6806:David Hicks 6800:Persistent 6356:Zurishaddai 6339:Zurishaddai 5546:improvement 5343:Proabivouac 5299:Proabivouac 5277:Proabivouac 5118:John Howard 4905:Reply from 4417:. However, 4404:John Howard 4389:John Howard 4125:Someguy1221 3992:—Preceding 3742:Joan of Arc 2627:User:Golbez 2179:Ghirlandajo 2120:Ghirlandajo 2112:Petri Krohn 1996:Sander Säde 1877:article to 1861:Ghirlandajo 1805:objected to 1610:Someguy1221 846:. Instead, 576:Enforcement 532:Sockpuppets 437:Importation 396:Translation 308:Copyrights 243:Bureaucrats 108:new section 63:new section 26:This is an 12783:Pedophilia 12566:available. 12389:User:Wybot 12343:User:Wybot 12187:legitimate 12000:page moves 11958:page moves 11916:page moves 11874:page moves 11619:Taprobanus 11363:block user 11357:filter log 11309:block user 11303:filter log 11105:block user 11099:filter log 11050:Defamation 10953:block user 10947:filter log 10911:ChadsPlace 10895:block user 10889:filter log 10790:articles ( 10757:block user 10751:filter log 10650:block user 10644:filter log 10525:Nihil novi 10517:Nihil novi 10494:Nihil novi 10457:. Warned 10168:block user 10138:filter log 10100:block user 10070:filter log 9711:Ignatzmice 9684:Ignatzmice 9656:block user 9650:filter log 9592:Iloveminun 9520:User:WODUP 9421:block user 9415:page moves 9379:block user 9373:page moves 9338:block user 9332:page moves 9129:This user 8810:Bill Oddie 8214:knows it. 7960:discussion 7605:block user 7599:filter log 6778:HalfShadow 6545:project.-- 6051:block user 6045:filter log 5984:block user 5978:filter log 5913:block user 5907:filter log 5702:block user 5696:page moves 5673:Giovanni33 5359:block...-- 4913:User:Sarah 4415:New Guinea 3935:came to me 3641:policies. 2805:I did not 1809:this image 1510:block user 1504:page moves 835:to do so. 831:ANI-notice 817:not enough 774:Contact a 599:Questions 479:Undeletion 472:Miscellany 457:Categories 432:Protection 12912:is using 12775:Pederasty 12673:published 12328:KP Botany 12288:KP Botany 12274:KP Botany 12006:block log 11964:block log 11922:block log 11880:block log 11797:ShalpherX 11711:Watchdogb 11666:anymore. 11610:obviously 11482:E-mail me 11474:Talk Page 11442:E-mail me 11434:Talk Page 11369:block log 11315:block log 11261:E-mail me 11253:Talk Page 11111:block log 11034:Wknight94 10959:block log 10901:block log 10776:User:Dikd 10763:block log 10722:PKIOPADDE 10656:block log 10308:LIMINATOR 10284:Athaenara 10262:Athaenara 10174:block log 10106:block log 9902:JJ Abrams 9880:Melodymee 9753:vandalism 9662:block log 9474:warring.— 9427:block log 9385:block log 9350:CheckLips 9344:block log 9170:Flyguy649 8798:Eric Idle 8739:was also 8465:Badagnani 8436:LIMINATOR 8365:Jehochman 7654:Isotope23 7611:block log 7295:availabe. 7038:seriously 7025:this page 6978:, citing 6976:WP:NFCC#1 6863:protected 6614:providing 6582:hypocrisy 6537:. Also, 6408:consensus 6404:WP:BATTLE 6237:^^James^^ 6137:seriously 6103:WP:BATTLE 6057:block log 5990:block log 5919:block log 5787:User:El_C 5708:block log 5478:tu quoque 5128:Shot info 4633:Shot info 4406:article. 4161:criterea? 3564:Regards, 2974:WP:CSD#G6 2562:powers.-- 2534:memories. 2509:this edit 2324:Cowman109 2162:request. 1839:Random832 1818:Random832 1746:seriously 1727:Random832 1680:WP:BJAODN 1516:block log 1481:Hopiakuta 1066:Incidents 778:directly. 708:Shortcuts 645:Proposals 640:Technical 603:Help desk 588:Requested 547:Vandalism 537:Usernames 510:Sanctions 462:Templates 452:Redirects 379:Whitelist 374:Blacklist 283:Oversight 258:Education 231:Incidents 204:dashboard 12933:Category 12922:GnuTurbo 12838:Resolved 12812:Krakatoa 12426:contribs 12270:WP:Legal 12237:Dynaflow 12196:Dynaflow 12013:(et al) 11982:contribs 11940:contribs 11898:contribs 11856:contribs 11519:Picaroon 11478:Contribs 11438:Contribs 11339:contribs 11285:contribs 11272:I found 11257:Contribs 11240:Resolved 11148:uw-biog4 11081:contribs 11060:Resolved 11030:contribs 10923:contribs 10865:contribs 10838:Resolved 10733:contribs 10681:Davnel03 10626:contribs 10572:Davnel03 10568:WP:LEGAL 10515:against 10394:Freqrexy 10358:Freqrexy 10324:Davnel03 10238:activity 10126:contribs 10058:contribs 9984:Resolved 9904:'s wife, 9890:contribs 9746:contribs 9717:contribs 9690:contribs 9632:contribs 9507:contribs 9436:WP:DUCKy 9403:contribs 9361:contribs 9320:contribs 9176:contribs 9139:Tuand029 9115:Resolved 8796:— while 8782:Scotland 8648:Coventry 8562:Scotland 8487:suggests 8321:WP:MINOR 8300:WP:MINOR 8288:Scotland 8265:WP:MINOR 8240:contribs 8228:unsigned 8197:Matthead 8163:Chandler 8142:Matthead 8075:Matthead 8028:Matthead 7968:Matthead 7935:contribs 7899:recently 7750:Jaakobou 7730:Jaakobou 7581:contribs 7096:entitled 7013:contribs 6972:contribs 6859:Mastcell 6725:DHeyward 6702:DHeyward 6673:DHeyward 6645:DHeyward 6631:DHeyward 6516:Contribs 6413:MastCell 6392:Contribs 6369:DHeyward 6365:User:TDC 6348:User:TDC 6320:Contribs 6235:Agreed. 6219:contribs 6181:DHeyward 6169:Contribs 6109:MastCell 6021:contribs 5954:contribs 5927:Moreschi 5883:contribs 5830:contribs 5684:contribs 5649:DHeyward 5634:Contribs 5621:has been 5404:Dmcdevit 5329:Dmcdevit 5286:Moreschi 5260:Moreschi 5232:accounts 5163:Dmcdevit 4644:Summary: 4618:Carnildo 4006:contribs 3994:unsigned 3931:can read 3701:WP:CIVIL 2807:move war 2617:Digwuren 2380:bullshit 2344:redirect 2340:redirect 2189:contribs 2164:Digwuren 2149:Digwuren 2124:Digwuren 2030:Bornholm 1891:without 1873:) moved 1871:contribs 1670:R. Baley 1567:R. Baley 1492:contribs 1315:archives 1193:archives 1071:archives 949:archives 880:archives 874:subpage. 864:archived 650:Idea lab 608:Teahouse 571:Requests 447:Articles 317:Problems 95:contribs 85:GnuTurbo 44:contribs 34:GnuTurbo 12918:he said 12897:ThuranX 12416:WonYong 12317:RockMFR 12182:perfect 11845:Velebit 11680:snowolf 11670:August. 11592:Iwazaki 11588:content 11580:Lexicon 11558:Iwazaki 11554:Lexicon 11070:Caoimin 10998:WP:RFCU 10813:WP:SOCK 10696:REDVEЯS 10477:Radecki 10250:WP:TEND 10018:protect 10013:history 9824:ThuranX 9793:Cheers, 9764:Cheers, 9701:W.marsh 9676:replied 9583:Natalie 9477:Ryūlóng 9309:Shanebb 9302:history 9267:Natalie 9226:WAVY 10 9093:Komusou 8981:ThuranX 8938:Komusou 8814:England 8749:England 8735:' son, 8680:ThuranX 8665:shared. 8652:Brechin 8609:Komusou 8548:Komusou 8408:Komusou 8345:Komusou 8341:Comment 8309:Komusou 8216:ThuranX 8129:ThuranX 8092:ThuranX 8024:WP:NPOV 7913:ThuranX 7821:incivil 7781:incivil 7778:further 7710:incivil 7662:incivil 7620:incivil 7551:llywrch 7200:images? 6823:editors 6684:Ryūlóng 6656:Ryūlóng 6547:Endroit 6489:Endroit 6266:Dman727 6200:Merzbow 6069:WP:DUCK 5847:Ryūlóng 5757:Endroit 5738:Endroit 5645:Endorse 5601:') : (' 5294:poorly. 5105:Lester2 5040:Lester2 5035:Update: 4986:Lester2 4963:The Age 4938:The Age 4867:Lester2 4856:The Age 4649:Lester2 4597:Ryūlóng 4586:Lester2 4509:matter. 4494:we see 4455:we see 4391:article 4324:User:JS 3929:Anyone 3916:Tasco 0 3760:and an 3758:WP:RFCs 3746:WP:NPOV 3647:Tasco 0 3568:You Can 3536:You Can 3489:You Can 3291:usurped 3159:You Can 3097:Ryūlóng 3039:You Can 2687:Ryūlóng 2335:POINTed 2239:Ryūlóng 2221:Ryūlóng 2116:deleted 2048:who on 1684:llywrch 1446:Backlog 833:}} ~~~~ 813:pinging 723:WP:AN/I 417:Mergers 216:General 12869:dokter 12792:Jeffpw 12579:Oceanh 12549:Rlevse 12530:x42bn6 12517:WP:AWB 12515:Would 12507:Oceanh 12245:babble 12204:babble 12126:(talk) 12104:Durova 11929:Guivon 11887:Purger 11703:before 11699:denied 11540:Rlevse 11469:Nwwaew 11455:WP:PUI 11429:Nwwaew 11248:Nwwaew 11219:Rlevse 11210:Rlevse 11155:WP:AIV 11130:WP:AIV 11119:about 11117:WP:BLP 10994:WP:SSP 10985:Ebyabe 10981:please 10977:WP:AIV 10973:banned 10817:Rlevse 10706:Rlevse 10551:for a 10275:Rlevse 10022:delete 9990:Rlevse 9820:WP:AIV 9668:warned 9621:Calton 8947:Figaro 8892:Figaro 8818:Figaro 8568:and a 8566:nation 8400:WP:COI 8393:WP:COI 8020:WP:NOR 8010:, see 7171:period 7002:Seicer 6980:WP:IAR 6881:Blocks 6790:Durova 6713:Sophia 6603:Durova 6588:Durova 6569:WP:CSN 6350:has a 6289:Sophia 6254:Sophia 5997:Ghirla 5785:Since 5485:Durova 5361:Chaser 5318:, and 5248:Durova 5244:Done. 5236:Ghirla 4742:this. 4626:Gaming 4370:Durova 4364:WP:RFC 4360:WP:RFC 4249:WP:SYN 4121:WP:SYN 4078:WP:SYN 4050:place. 4018:WP:SYN 3940:didn't 3854:Durova 3848:WP:OWN 3832:WP:OWN 3795:WP:OWN 3776:Durova 3770:WP:FAC 3766:WP:GAC 3752:, and 3750:WP:NOR 3734:WP:OWN 3712:Durova 3705:WP:NPA 3556:Ghirla 3516:Ghirla 3458:Ghirla 3368:Ghirla 3334:WP:DRV 3278:Ghirla 3260:(talk) 3240:Ghirla 3203:Ghirla 3115:Ghirla 3087:Ghirla 3024:Ghirla 3014:Golbez 3004:Ghirla 2966:WP:3RR 2893:Ghirla 2858:Molobo 2750:Ghirla 2709:Ghirla 2705:WP:AN3 2644:Molobo 2514:Ghirla 2384:Ghirla 2295:Jester 2273:Molobo 2133:Molobo 2102:Golbez 2089:Ghirla 2072:Molobo 2059:Ghirla 2050:T:TDYK 1985:Ghirla 1966:Ghirla 1910:Cyrius 1790:Graham 1770:Graham 1708:dokter 1197:search 1075:search 953:search 884:search 735:urgent 716:WP:ANI 635:Policy 422:Splits 12818:Katie 12806:socks 12749:Deniz 12731:Deniz 12711:Deniz 12591:Alpta 12484:(see 12463:Xtifr 12448:email 12433:count 12367:EVula 12119:Maxim 11988:count 11946:count 11904:count 11862:count 11196:Elmao 10774:(aka 10615:Donco 10425:Kwork 10415:Kwork 10380:Kizor 10368:CBFan 10254:WP:EW 10144:WHOIS 10076:WHOIS 10039:views 10031:watch 10027:links 9907:that 9801:Lover 9772:Lover 9565:Jéské 9545:JodyB 9530:Jéské 9464:Help! 9300:(see 9208:Haemo 9160:(EC) 9121:Haemo 8794:Wales 8753:Wales 8701:Help! 8632:Help! 8574:RJFJR 8525:Help! 8140:. -- 8066:three 7862:Griot 7829:Griot 7819:More 7798:Griot 7706:FREAK 7702:FREAK 7669:FREAK 7658:Griot 7631:FREAK 7627:FREAK 7570:Griot 7255:. -- 7080:them. 7044:folks 6944:Sarah 6922:Eagle 6911:garra 6893:Eagle 6543:WP:JA 6479:from 6473:Japan 6444:Japan 6426:Sarah 6143:folks 5871:Nixer 5841:WP:AN 5796:Pablo 5790:page. 5734:below 5715:MONGO 5526:MONGO 5211:Help! 5179:Pablo 5065:Sarah 5019:Sarah 4894:Sarah 4805:garra 4776:Sarah 4745:Sarah 4708:Sarah 4697:Sarah 4686:Sarah 4660:Sarah 4616:". -- 4411:Copra 4082:WP:OR 3840:WP:FA 3738:WP:FA 3671:Haemo 3611:Eagle 3420:Irpen 3386:talk 3321:Irpen 3253:Maxim 3199:folks 3077:Irpen 2951:talk 2933:Help! 2878:talk 2846:talk 2830:Irpen 2818:talk 2798:Irpen 2778:talk 2762:Irpen 2729:Eagle 2657:Irpen 2584:Irpen 2571:talk 2546:Irpen 2507:with 2445:that. 2366:talk 2312:Irpen 2260:Irpen 2206:Irpen 2160:WP:RM 2145:WP:RM 1934:talk 1908:. -- 1783:Well 1752:folks 1639:.. — 827:subst 786:diffs 753:Read 556:Other 467:Files 427:Moves 386:Style 16:< 12876:Talk 12785:and 12777:and 12622:use. 12558:El_C 12538:Mess 12535:Talk 12526:). 12467:tälk 12441:logs 12420:talk 12403:PEJL 12372:talk 12353:PEJL 12348:and 12297:El_C 12220:El_C 12216:here 12166:this 12096:Try 12016:See 11994:logs 11976:talk 11952:logs 11934:talk 11910:logs 11892:talk 11868:logs 11850:talk 11829:talk 11635:and 11351:logs 11333:talk 11297:logs 11279:talk 11134:John 11093:logs 11075:talk 11038:talk 11024:talk 11010:Desk 11006:Talk 11002:ST47 11000:? -- 10941:logs 10917:talk 10883:logs 10859:talk 10745:logs 10727:talk 10689:No. 10638:logs 10620:talk 10521:here 10509:here 10507:and 10505:here 10461:. -- 10459:here 10437:and 10258:npov 10244:and 10162:http 10156:RBLs 10150:RDNS 10120:talk 10094:http 10088:RBLs 10082:RDNS 10052:talk 10035:logs 10009:talk 10005:edit 9884:talk 9846:this 9740:talk 9680:here 9672:here 9644:logs 9626:talk 9597:Will 9501:talk 9397:talk 9355:talk 9314:talk 8808:and 8788:and 8776:and 8755:and 8747:are 8650:and 8302:tag. 8236:talk 8203:O 8168:talk 8148:O 8081:O 8034:O 8022:and 7974:O 7929:talk 7593:logs 7575:talk 7054:The 7027:. -- 7009:talk 6996:here 6966:talk 6962:Geno 6908:Gnan 6861:had 6764:talk 6759:Aude 6626:This 6618:El_C 6512:Talk 6388:Talk 6316:Talk 6275:it. 6215:talk 6165:Talk 6039:logs 6015:talk 5972:logs 5948:talk 5901:logs 5877:talk 5826:talk 5802:Talk 5678:talk 5630:Talk 5599:Stop 5498:El_C 5447:El_C 5185:Talk 5050:Pete 5008:Pete 4960:and 4881:Pete 4853:and 4827:Pete 4802:Gnan 4674:talk 4421:and 4398:and 4383:and 4356:WP:V 4354:and 4322:ED: 4253:UBeR 4206:UBeR 4091:UBeR 4030:UBeR 4002:talk 3912:here 3907:here 3871:OTRS 3768:and 3740:for 3660:UBeR 3483:cool 3287:here 3196:some 2922:ever 2867:that 2865:Ah, 2672:Suva 2631:Suva 2608:Suva 2472:here 2404:two. 2292:SWAT 2196:Suva 2183:talk 2083:and 2032:and 1976:Suva 1962:here 1960:and 1958:here 1897:Suva 1865:talk 1715:Talk 1556:talk 1550:Tvoz 1529:talk 1523:Tvoz 1486:talk 1436:Talk 1181:1167 1176:1166 1171:1165 1166:1164 1161:1163 1156:1162 1151:1161 1146:1160 1141:1159 1136:1158 1129:1157 1124:1156 1119:1155 1114:1154 1109:1153 1104:1152 1099:1151 1094:1150 1089:1149 1084:1148 848:use 809:must 765:Try 369:Spam 238:Bots 226:Main 137:diff 131:) | 129:diff 117:diff 91:talk 40:talk 12781:to 12374:// 12370:// 12313:add 12050:Lar 12022:Lar 11820:Dei 11760:by 11741:on 11737:by 11575:, 11522:(t) 11480:) ( 11476:) ( 11440:) ( 11436:) ( 11259:) ( 11255:) ( 11172:man 11161:Mr. 10996:or 10523:. 10511:by 10201:25: 10196:bio 9863:man 9852:Mr. 9842:CBM 9578:not 9524:BSR 9458:Guy 9296:On 8816:. 8695:Guy 8626:Guy 8560:. 8519:Guy 8049:was 8044:two 7966:-- 7770:. 7301:VxP 7032:But 7011:) ( 6925:101 6896:101 6833:): 6808:by 6804:of 6580:or 6301:RxS 6277:RxS 6217:| 6131:But 6064:way 5828:| 5595:? ( 5559:CBD 5554:not 5550:now 5508:CBD 5458:Lar 5422:Lar 5379:Lar 5341:me. 5324:all 5205:Guy 4935:or 4670:JPD 4328:Rei 4196:Rei 4112:Rei 4085:me. 4069:Rei 3998:Rei 3989:Rei 3945:Rei 3903:Rei 3888:WRE 3875:J.S 3823:Rei 3821:-- 3799:any 3725:Rei 3680:Rei 3643:Rei 3614:101 3604:how 3600:why 3351:man 3340:Mr. 3330:RFD 2991:man 2980:Mr. 2927:Guy 2732:101 2722:3RR 2416:— 1740:But 1421:341 1416:340 1411:339 1406:338 1401:337 1396:336 1391:335 1386:334 1381:333 1376:332 1369:331 1364:330 1359:329 1354:328 1349:327 1344:326 1339:325 1334:324 1329:323 1324:322 1303:487 1298:486 1293:485 1288:484 1283:483 1278:482 1273:481 1268:480 1263:479 1258:478 1251:477 1246:476 1241:475 1236:474 1231:473 1226:472 1221:471 1216:470 1211:469 1206:468 1059:365 1054:364 1049:363 1044:362 1039:361 1034:360 1029:359 1024:358 1019:357 1014:356 1007:355 1002:354 997:353 992:352 987:351 982:350 977:349 972:348 967:347 962:346 815:is 655:WMF 442:XfD 278:VRT 49:at 12935:: 12879:• 12873:• 12862:— 12808:. 12488:) 12451:) 12399:}} 12393:{{ 12380:// 12365:. 12234:-- 12193:-- 12100:. 12052:: 12024:: 11775:. 11753:. 11682:D4 11676:-- 11614:. 11598:, 11578:, 11572:, 11569:, 11566:, 11208:. 11168:Z- 11151:}} 11145:{{ 11123:– 11062:– 11040:) 10840:– 10782:, 10778:, 10599:te 10597:ai 10595:hw 10593:et 10591:tl 10589:os 10585:an 10583:Ry 10555:. 10535:. 10475:AK 10454:, 10451:, 10312:JR 10287:✉ 10265:✉ 10198:. 10037:| 10033:| 10029:| 10025:| 10020:| 10016:| 10011:| 10007:| 9986:– 9859:Z- 9848:. 9795:Je 9766:Je 9756:}} 9750:{{ 9699:-- 9678:, 9666:I 9486:) 9483:竜龍 9117:– 9095:@ 9091:— 8894:, 8804:, 8800:, 8759:). 8751:, 8611:@ 8607:— 8550:@ 8440:JR 8410:@ 8398:* 8391:* 8347:@ 8311:@ 8307:— 8278:: 8242:) 8238:• 7872:-- 7809:-- 7746:. 7633:: 6757:-- 6693:) 6690:竜龍 6665:) 6662:竜龍 6514:- 6485:FA 6390:- 6318:- 6213:| 6167:- 5856:) 5853:竜龍 5824:| 5805:| 5632:- 5607:) 5605:') 5603:Go 5597:(' 5589:== 5587:1 5460:: 5424:: 5381:: 5363:- 5322:, 5310:, 5273:he 5188:| 5157:, 5153:, 5083:-- 5062:. 5038:-- 4676:) 4606:) 4603:竜龍 4584:-- 4569:, 4565:, 4561:, 4557:, 4538:, 4534:, 4530:, 4366:. 4008:) 4004:• 3803:me 3748:, 3669:-- 3456:-- 3347:Z- 3238:-- 3106:) 3103:竜龍 3075:-- 3002:-- 2987:Z- 2968:: 2891:-- 2696:) 2693:竜龍 2670:. 2512:-- 2310:-- 2271:-- 2258:-- 2248:) 2245:竜龍 2230:) 2227:竜龍 1795:87 1775:87 1735:-- 1718:• 1712:• 1701:— 1545:] 1195:, 1073:, 951:, 882:, 825:{{ 750:: 123:| 119:) 106:: 93:| 61:: 42:| 12867:E 12753:C 12735:C 12715:C 12637:( 12445:• 12437:• 12429:• 12423:• 12418:( 12377:☯ 12058:c 12056:/ 12054:t 12030:c 12028:/ 12026:t 12008:) 12003:· 11997:· 11991:· 11985:· 11979:· 11974:( 11966:) 11961:· 11955:· 11949:· 11943:· 11937:· 11932:( 11924:) 11919:· 11913:· 11907:· 11901:· 11895:· 11890:( 11882:) 11877:· 11871:· 11865:· 11859:· 11853:· 11848:( 11823:z 11795:. 11792:, 11789:, 11484:) 11472:( 11444:) 11432:( 11377:) 11371:) 11366:· 11360:· 11354:· 11348:· 11342:· 11336:· 11331:( 11317:) 11312:· 11306:· 11300:· 11294:· 11288:· 11282:· 11277:( 11263:) 11251:( 11113:) 11108:· 11102:· 11096:· 11090:· 11084:· 11078:· 11073:( 11036:( 11027:· 11022:( 11008:· 10961:) 10956:· 10950:· 10944:· 10938:· 10932:· 10926:· 10920:· 10915:( 10903:) 10898:· 10892:· 10886:· 10880:· 10874:· 10868:· 10862:· 10857:( 10815:. 10765:) 10760:· 10754:· 10748:· 10742:· 10736:· 10730:· 10725:( 10658:) 10653:· 10647:· 10641:· 10635:· 10629:· 10623:· 10618:( 10587:P 10306:E 10252:/ 10227:) 10223:( 10217:) 10213:( 10204:* 10185:* 10176:) 10171:· 10165:· 10159:· 10153:· 10147:· 10141:· 10135:· 10129:· 10123:· 10118:( 10108:) 10103:· 10097:· 10091:· 10085:· 10079:· 10073:· 10067:· 10061:· 10055:· 10050:( 10041:) 10003:( 9892:) 9887:· 9882:( 9807:) 9803:( 9798:t 9778:) 9774:( 9769:t 9743:· 9738:( 9664:) 9659:· 9653:· 9647:· 9641:· 9635:· 9629:· 9624:( 9561:- 9509:) 9504:· 9499:( 9480:( 9466:) 9462:( 9429:) 9424:· 9418:· 9412:· 9406:· 9400:· 9395:( 9387:) 9382:· 9376:· 9370:· 9364:· 9358:· 9353:( 9346:) 9341:· 9335:· 9329:· 9323:· 9317:· 9312:( 8703:) 8699:( 8634:) 8630:( 8598:. 8527:) 8523:( 8434:E 8234:( 7932:· 7927:( 7613:) 7608:· 7602:· 7596:· 7590:· 7584:· 7578:· 7573:( 7262:) 7041:| 7035:| 7015:) 7007:( 6969:· 6964:( 6766:) 6762:( 6687:( 6659:( 6518:) 6510:( 6394:) 6386:( 6322:) 6314:( 6171:) 6163:( 6140:| 6134:| 6059:) 6054:· 6048:· 6042:· 6036:· 6030:· 6024:· 6018:· 6013:( 5992:) 5987:· 5981:· 5975:· 5969:· 5963:· 5957:· 5951:· 5946:( 5921:) 5916:· 5910:· 5904:· 5898:· 5892:· 5886:· 5880:· 5875:( 5850:( 5710:) 5705:· 5699:· 5693:· 5687:· 5681:· 5676:( 5636:) 5628:( 5593:) 5591:2 5585:( 5466:c 5464:/ 5462:t 5430:c 5428:/ 5426:t 5408:t 5406:· 5387:c 5385:/ 5383:t 5365:T 5333:t 5331:· 5213:) 5209:( 5167:t 5165:· 4909:: 4841:: 4672:( 4600:( 4549:: 4526:, 4518:: 4000:( 3890:) 3886:/ 3884:C 3882:/ 3880:T 3878:( 3649:) 3573:' 3541:' 3494:' 3383:| 3229:ε 3224:e 3221:o 3218:M 3164:' 3100:( 3044:' 2948:| 2935:) 2931:( 2875:| 2843:| 2815:| 2775:| 2690:( 2568:| 2363:| 2286:⇒ 2242:( 2224:( 2186:· 2181:( 1931:| 1914:✎ 1912:| 1868:· 1863:( 1749:| 1743:| 1706:E 1653:ε 1648:e 1645:o 1642:M 1592:ε 1587:e 1584:o 1581:M 1553:| 1526:| 1518:) 1513:· 1507:· 1501:· 1495:· 1489:· 1484:( 1317:) 1313:( 1199:) 1191:( 1077:) 1069:( 955:) 947:( 886:) 878:( 853:. 829:: 820:. 799:. 543:) 539:( 210:. 182:e 175:t 168:v 139:) 135:( 127:( 115:( 110:) 100:( 97:) 89:( 78:. 65:) 55:( 46:) 38:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents - Knowledge

Index