527:
that even St. Augustine declared the priests of Mithra worshiped the same deity as they did.2 Mithra was born on the 25th of
December, called "Birthday of the Unconquered Sun," which was finally taken over by Christians in the 4th century A.D. as the birthday of Christ.3 Some said Mithra sprang from an incestuous union between the sun god and his own mother, just as Jesus, who was God, was born of the Mother of God. Some claimed Mithra's mother was a mortal virgin. Others said Mithra had no mother, but was miraculously born of a female Rock, the petra genetix, fertilized by the Heavenly Father's phallic lightning.4 Mithra's birth was witnessed by shepherds and by magi who brought gifts to his sacred birth-cave of the Rock.5 Mithra performed the usual assortments of miracles raising the dead, healing the sick, making the blind see and the lame walk, casting out devils. As a Peter, son of the petra, he carried the keys of the kingdom of heaven6 His triumph and ascension to heaven were celebrated at the spring equinox (Easter), when the sun rises toward its apogee. Before returning to heaven, Mithra celebrated a Last Supper with his twelve disciples, who represented the twelve signs of the zodiac. In memory of this, his worshipers partook of a sacramental meal of bread marked with a cross.7 This was one of seven Mithraic sacraments, the models for the Christian's seven sacraments. 8 It was called mized, Latin missa, English mass. Mithra's image was buried in a rock tomb, the same sacred cave that represented his Mother's womb. He was withdrawn from it and said to live again.9 Like early Christianity, Mithraism was an ascetic, anti-female religion. Its priesthood consisted of celibate men only. 10 Women were to enter Mithraic temples.11 The women of Mithraic families had nothing to do with the men's cult, but attended services of the Great Mother in their own temples of Isis, Diana, or Juno.12 To eliminate the female principle from their creation myth, Mithraists replaced the Mother of All Living in the primal garden of paradise (Pairidaeza) with the named Sole Ceated. Instead of Eve, this bull was the partner of the first man. All creatures were born from the bull's blood. Yet the bull's birth-giving was oddly female-imitative. The animal was castrated and sacrificed, and its blood was delivered to the moon for magical fructification, the moon being the source of woman's magic lunar "blood of life" that produced real children on earth.13 Persians have been called the Puritans of the heathen world. They developed Mithraism out of an earlier Aryan religion that was not so puritanical or so exclusively male-oriented.14 Mithra seems to have been the Indo-Iranian sun god Mitra, or Mitravaruna, one of the twelve zodiacal sons of the of the Infinity-goddess Aditi. Another of Aditi's sons was Aryaman, eponymous ancestor of "Aryans," whom the Persians transformed into Ahriman, the Great Serpent of Darkness, Mithra's enemy.15 Early on, there seems to have been a feminine Mithra. Herdotus said the the Persians used to have a sky-goddess Mitra, the same as Mylitta, Assyria's Great Mother. 16 Lydian combined Mithra with his archaic spouse Anahita an androgynous Mithra-Anahita, identified with Sabazious-Anaitis, the Serpent and Dove of Anatolian mystery cults.17 Anahita was the Mother of Waters, traditional spouse of the solar god whom she bore, loved and swallowed up. She was identified with the Anatlian Great Goddess Ma. Mithra was naturally coupled with her, as her opposite, a spirit of fire, light and the sun.18 Her "element', water overwhelmed the world in the primordial flood, when one man built an ark and saved himself, together with his cattle, according to Mithraic myth19 The story seems to have been based on the Hindu Flood of Manu, transmitted through Persia and Babylonian scriptures to appear in late, rather corrupt version in the Old Testament. What began in water would end in fire, according to Mithraic eschatology. The great battle between the forces of light and darkness in the Last Days would destroy the earth with its upheavals and burnings. Virtuous ones who fallowed the teachings of the Mithraic priesthood would join the spirits of light and be saved. Sinful ones who followed other teachings would be cast into hell with Ahriman and the fallen angels. The Christian notion of salvation was almost wholly a product of this Persian eschatology, adopted by Semitic eremites and sun-cultists like the Essenes, and by the Roman military men who thought the rigid discipline and the vivid battle-imagery of Mithraism appropriate for warriors. Under emperors like Julian and Commodus, Mithra became patron of Roman armies. 20 After extensive contact with Mithraism, Christians also began to describe themselves as soldiers for Christ; to call their savior light of the World. Helios the Rising Sun, and Sun of Righteousness; to celebrate their feats on Sun-day rather than the Jewish Sabbath; to claim their savior's death was marked by an eclipse of the sun; and to adopt the seven Mithratic sacraments. Like Mithraists, Christians practiced baptism to ascend after death through the planetary spheres to the highest heaven, while the wicked (anabaptized) would be dragged down to darkness.21 Mithra's cave-temple on the Vatican Hill was seized by Christians in 376 A.D. 22 Christian bishops Rome pre-empted even the Mithraic high priest's title of Pater Patrum, which became Papa, or Pope.34 Mithraism entered into many doctrines of Manichean Christianity and continued to influence its old rival for over a thousand years.24 The mithraic festival of Epiphany, marking the arrival of sun-priests or Magi at the Saviors birthplace, was adopted by the Christian church only as late as 813 A.D. 25 It is probable that Christianity emphasized common features that attracted Mithra followers, perhaps the crucifix appealed to those Mithra followers who had crosses already branded on their foreheads. In art, the halo was a well-known depiction of Mithra, a true sun god, but which also depicts Christ in the same way. However, the similiarities were an embarrassment, and differences such as star gazing were persecuted as heresy. Trypho wrote that âJustin Martyr declared that in a certain cave near BethlehemâŠMary brought forth the ChristâŠthose who presided over the mysteries of Mithras were stirred up by the devil to say that in a place called among them a cave, they were initiated by themâ (LXXVIII). Tertullian seems to have feared the parallels between Mithraism and Christianity the most, demonizing Mithraism as a perverted truth planted by the devil. References 1. Legge 2. 271; Angus, 168 2. Reiach, 73 3. J.H. Smith, D.C.P., 146; Campbell, M.I.,33 4. de Riencourt, 135. 5. H. Smith, D.C.P., 146; Campbell, M.M., 131. 6. H Smith, 129 7. Hooke, S.P.,89; Cumont,M.M.,160. 8. James,250. 9. H,Smith, 130,201 10. Legge 2, 261. 11.Lederer.36. 12 Angus, 205. 13. Campbell, Oc.M., 204 14. Knight, D.W.P., 63. 15 O'Flaherty, 339. 16. Larousse, 314 17. Cumont,M.M., 17. 18. Cumont, O.R.R.P.,54,65. 19. Cumont, M.M., 138 20. Cumont, M.M., 87-89. 21. Cumont,M.M., 144-45. 22. J.H.Smith, D.C.P., 146 23. H. Smith, 252. 24. Cumont, O.R.R.P., 154. 25. Brewter,55
523:âThe resemblances between the two churches were so striking as to impress even the minds of antiquityâ (Cumont, 193). From their common Zoroastrian sources, Mithraism first held that all souls pre-existed in the ethereal regions, and inhabited a body upon birth. Life then becomes a great struggle between good and evil, spirit and body, the children of light versus the children of darkness (identical to Pythagoreanism). All souls were to be judged by Mithra (represented as a bull) with the Elect going to heaven, and the earthly and evil being annihilated in a great battle. Mithraism divided the human race into three classes: the spiritual Elect, the wicked, and those who try to be good but can't seem to overcome evil. The Elect go straight to heaven, while the good-intentioned wait until judgment to be resurrected, where the wicked will be destroyed. Both Christianity and Mithraism prided themselves in brotherhood and organized their members as church congregations. Both religions purified themselves through baptism, and each participated in the same type of sacrament, bread and wine. Mithra was born in a cave; a cave is likewise the setting for the nativity of Jesus in the widely-read and influential Gospel of James, which though not canonical is the earliest surviving document attesting the veneration of Mary and claiming her continuing virginity. Both nativities were celebrated on December 25th, and each savior was visited by shepherds with gifts. Both Mithraism and Christianity considered Sunday their holy day, despite early Christianity observing the Jewish Sabbath for centuries. Many have noted that the title of Pope is found in Mithraic doctrine and seemingly prohibited in Christian doctrine. The words Peter (rock) and mass (sacrament) have original significance in Mithraism. Both Mithraism and early Christianity considered abstinence, celibacy, and self-control to be among their highest virtues. Both had similar beliefs about the world, destiny, heaven and hell, and the immortality of the soul. Their conceptions of the battles between good and evil were almost identical, with Christianity adopting millennial epochs that were integral to Mithraism from Zoroastrianism. âThey both admitted to the existence of a heaven inhabited by beautiful onesâŠand a hell peopled by demons situate in the bowels of earth.â (Cumont, 191) Both religions placed a flood at the beginning of history, and both believed in revelation as key to their doctrine. Both awaited the last judgment and resurrection of the dead after the final conflagration of the world. Christ and Mithra were both referred to directly as the "Logos" (Larson 184). When inducted into the degree of Leo, he was purified with honey, and baptised, not with water, but with fire, as John the Baptist declared that his successor would baptise. After this second baptism, initiates were considered "participants," and they received the sacrament of bread and wine commemorating Mithra's banquet at the conclusion of his labors (Larson 190). Mitrha was perceived as the the persian savior, whose cult was the leading rival of Christianity in Rome, and was more successful than Christianity for the first four centuries of the "Christian" era. In 307 A.D. the emperor officially designated Mithra "protector of the Empire."1
1684:, is a bit outdated but a classic revelation of pagan antecedents of biblical myths and miracles. Edwin Johnson, 1887, Antiqua mater. A Study of Christian Origins. English radical theologian identified the early Christians as the Chrestiani, followers of a good (Chrestus) God who had expropriating the myth of Dionysos Eleutherios ("Dionysos the Emancipator"), to produce a self-sacrificing Jesus. Gerardus Bolland, 1907, De Evangelische Jozua. Philosopher at Leiden identified the origin of Christianity in an earlier Jewish Gnosticism. In 1907 Pope Pius X took action and condemned the Modernists who were "working within the framework of the Church". An anti-Modernist oath was introduced in 1910. Arthur Drews, 1910, Die Christusmythe (The Christ Myth). 1910, Die Petruslegende (The Legend of St Peter). 1924, Die Entstehung des Christentums aus dem Gnostizismus (The Emergence of Christianity from Gnosticism). Alexander Hislop, 1916, The Two Babylons. Exhaustive exposure of the pagan rituals and paraphernalia of Roman Catholicism. Edward Carpenter, 1920, Pagan and Christian Creeds. Elaborated the pagan origins of Christianity. John J. Jackson, 1938, Christianity Before Christ, Drew attention to the Egyptian precedents of Christian belief. Herbert Cutner, 1950, Jesus: God, Man, or Myth? Mythical nature of Jesus and a summary of the ongoing debate between mythicists and historicizers. Pagan origins of Christ discussed. Georges Ory, 1961, An Analysis of Christian Origins. Guy Fau, 1967, Le Fable de Jesus Christ. John Allegro, 1970, The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross. 1979, The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Christian Myth. Max Rieser, 1979, The True Founder of Christianity and the Hellenistic Philosophy. Christianity started by Jews of the Diaspora and then retroactively set in pre-70 Palestine. Christianity arrived last, not first, in Palestine â that's why Christian archeological finds appear in Rome but not in Judea until the 4th century. Gerd LĂŒdemann, 1998, The Great Deception: And What Jesus Really Said and Did. 2002, Paul: The Founder of Christianity. 2004, The Resurrection Of Christ: A Historical Inquiry. After 25 years of study German professor concluded Paul, not Jesus, started Christianity. Alvar Ellegard, 1999, Jesus One Hundred Years Before Christ. Christianity seen as emerging from the Essene Church of God with the Jesus prototype the Teacher of Righteousness. Timothy Freke, Peter Gandy, 1999, The Jesus Mysteries. 2001, Jesus and the Lost Goddess : The Secret Teachings of the Original Christians. Examines the close relationship between the Jesus Story and that of Osiris-Dionysus. Jesus and Mary Magdalene mythic figures based on the Pagan Godman and Goddess. Burton Mack, 2001,The Christian Myth: Origins, Logic, and Legacy. Social formation of myth making. Tom Harpur, 2005, The Pagan Christ: Recovering the Lost Light. Canadian New Testament scholar and ex-Anglican priest re-states the Christianity, it was clear, had not fallen from heaven but was a man-made production.
4184:
opinions. It would be fascinating to see poll on a broad range of basic questions. That would give us some hard data from which to assess where the consensus positions are. But even this would have weaknesses. The matters that I bring forward are not really in the category for super specialized knowledge. They are not, for example, things like the controversial issues in historical Jesus research project like the issue regarding status of the Gospel of Peter, i.e. whether it contains early and independent tradition, or whether all of it is late and wholly dependent on the canonical gospels? In this matter, even biblical scholars themselves are challenged by others as not being expert enough with the required specialized knowledge for these questions, but they still speak on them with authority. So should we give credence only to the consensus among experts? If so, who decides who is on the list of these acceptable experts? Again, the topics I raise, on the other hand are of such a general nature with weak language (âinfluencedâ, âdeveloped along side ofâ, etc) that certainly a professor of
Humanities is expert enough of an to speak on the question with enough authority. Likewise, the Jewish scholar I noted is even more so. Itâs strange to discount him on the basis that his specialty is not with Christian history, per se. bu that of Jewish history. Christianity is an offshoot of Judaism, and esp. in this matter dealing with the origins of Christianity the expertise in Judaism is one and the same as that of Christian history for this periodâthey cross and lap over each other for this areas, and have just as much authority as an expert. And, I suggest that in the absence of reliable statistical data you cannot claims with any assurance at all what the consensus views are, much less discount my scholars as obscure as evidence that what I say is inaccurate, esp. when you fail to cite any scholars with specific refutations of my contributions. I note that you removed everything once again, and Iâll go back and make further changes to incorporate them since they are part of the very breif summary sections on history and origins but not so brief as they are only stubs.
491:
a prime example of an Essene.â Enough said. The
Gnostics: This one needs some wiggle words. From the linked Wiki article: âThe ultimate foundational elements of gnosticism are pre-Christian. That said, the exact origins of Gnosticism are a subject of dispute amongst scholars: some think Gnosticism is fundamentally pagan in origin, but has adopted a Christian veneer; others trace its origin to Judaism; yet others think it derives from Jesus, and is a development of his teaching that is arguably as valid as the orthodox one. Most scholars accept that orthodox Christianity and its canonical texts do not predate the Gnostic movement, but emerged alongside it, out of some of the same sources. Many Gnostic sects were made up of Christians who embraced mystical theories concerning the nature of Jesus or the Christ which was increasingly at variance with the teachings of orthodox Christian faith as it developed.: Next, Dionysus: According to Martin A. Larson in The Story of Christian Origins (1977) and the American scholar Camille Paglia, a 'disciple of the Cambridge School of Anthropology,â and the wiki page itself, this mystery cult is likewise linked. Infact Paglia writes succinctly about pagan mystery religion and Christianity, and I quote, âChristianity was a development of Dionysian mystery religion which paradoxically tried to suppress nature in favor of a transcendental other world." 13. Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson (New York: Random House, 1991) 25.
973:
Platonists," tr. E.S. Haldane and
Frances H. Simson (University of Nebraska Press; Bison Books Edition 1995). Jonas, Hans (1958, 2001). The Gnostic Religion: The Message of the Alien God and the Beginnings of Christianity (Boston: Beacon Press). Layton, Bentley (1987). The Gnostic Scriptures (Doubleday: The Anchor Bible Reference Library). Plato. Laws, tr. Trevor J. Saunders, in Plato: Complete Works, ed. John M. Cooper (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing 1997). Plato. Timaeus, tr. Donald J. Zeyl, in Plato: Complete Works. Plotinus. The Enneads, tr. A.H. Armstrong, in 7 volumes (Harvard: Loeb Classical Library 1966). Ricoeur, Paul. The Conflict of Interpretations (Northwestern University Press 1974). Rudolph, Kurt. Gnosis: The Nature and History of Gnosticism, tr. Robert McLachlan Wilson (Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark Ltd. 1984). Segal, Robert A. (ed.) The Gnostic Jung (Princeton University Press 1992). Barnstone, Willis (1984 ed.) The Other Bible (Harper San Francisco). Bultmann, Rudolph (1956). Primitive Christianity in its Contemporary Setting (New York: Meridian Books). Fideler, David (1993). Jesus Christ, Sun of God: Ancient Cosmology and Early Christian Symbolism (Wheaton, Illinois: Quest Books). Pagels, Elaine (1975). The Gnostic Paul: Gnostic Exegesis of the Pauline Letters (Philadelphia: Trinity Press). Williams, Michael Allen. Rethinking "Gnosticism": An Argument For Dismantling A Dubious Category (Princeton University Press 1996).
3917:"In addition to Gnostic, Jewish, and and Pauline Christianity, there were many other versions of Christianity being taught. Often, there would be a number of conflicting Christianities being propagated within a single city. After the destruction of Jerusalem by the Roman Army in 70 CE, the Jewish Christian movement was largely dissipated. Gnostic leaving Pauline and Gnostic Christianity as the dominant groups. Gentiles within the movement took over control of the former movement. The Roman Empire recognized Pauline Christianity as a valid religion in 313 CE. Later in that century, it became the official religion of the Empire. Church authority became concentrated among the five bishops or patriarchs located in Alexandria, Antioch, Constantinople, Jerusalem and Rome. Gnostic Christianity was severely persecuted, both by the Roman Empire and the Pauline Christian churches. It was almost exterminated, but is experiencing rapid growth today. With the expansion of Islam throughout the Middle East during the seventh century CE, power became concentrated in Constantinople and Rome. These two Christian centers gradually grew apart in belief, and practice. In 1054 CE, a split was formalized between the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches; their leaders excommunicated each others. The split remains in effect today. Efforts are being made to heal the division. However, they are making little progress."
968:
Hundred Years, Vol. I of The
Christian Centuries: A New History of the Catholic Church, ed. L. J. Rogier, et al. (London and New York, 1964). E. R. Dodds, Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety (Cam- bridge and New York, 1965). Louis Duchesne, Early History of the Christian Church..., trans. Claude Jenkins (from the 4th French edition), 3 vols. (London, 1920-24). W. H. C. Frend, The Donatist Church... (Oxford and New York, 1952). A. H. M. Jones, Constantine and the Conversion of Europe (London, 1948; New York, 1949). J. N. D. Kelly, Early Christian Creeds, 2nd ed. (London and New York, 1960); idem, Early Christian Doctrines, 4th ed. (London, 1968). D. Knowles, Christian Monasticism (New York and Toronto, 1969). M. J. Lagrange, Histoire ancienne du Canon du Nouveau Testament (Paris, 1933). Has Lietzmann, A History of the Early Church, trans. B. L. Woolf, 4 vols. in 2 (New York, 1961). A. Momigliano, ed., The Conflict be- tween Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century (Oxford and New York, 1963). James M. Robinson, A New Quest of the Historical Jesus (London and Naperville, Ill., 1959). Albert Schweitzer, Von Reimarus zu Wrede: eine Geschichte der Leben-Jesu-Forschung (1906), trans. Mont- gomery as The Quest of the Historical Jesus (London, 1910). The Middle Ages. A. Fliche, La RĂ©forme grĂ©gorienne et la ReconquĂȘte chrĂ©tienne, 1057-1125, Vol. 8 of Histoire de
2931:
large body of people with nothing to lose, and ideologists who are smart enough to exploit them. The institutions with power in France at the time, the
Monarchy, the Church and the nobles, caused the revolution - read the Wiki page. The Enlightenment came to the whole of Europe but only in France did it errupt into widespread bloody violence. No where did it lead to persecution of Christians by non Christians on the grounds of theology (no other non Christian body had enough power to do this). To use this as a "resufacing of persecution" is misleading. Previous to this, as you agree, there were isolated (ultimately failed) attempts to see off the new challenge of Christianity. From around the 4th century to the end of the 18th century Christianity of one form or another completely dominated Europe, branding any other religion (especially the older indigenous ones) heretical. These religions were then persecuted to nonexistence. It's hard to represent this fairly and in the style of an encyclopedia which is why I have never added to the "persecuted by Christians" list and will not until I am sure I can present it in a balanced way that will survive the editorship of this page.
854:"With an estimated 2.3 billion adherents, Christianity is arguably the world's largest religion. Its origins are intertwined with Judaism, with which it shares much sacred text and early history, specifically to Tanakh (the Hebrew Bible), which many Christians call the Old Testament.1 The early Christians heavily relied on the Koine Greek Alexandrine text of the Hebrew Bible commonly refered to in the west as the Septuagint. Christianity is considered an Abrahamic religion, along with Judaism and Islam (see Judeo-Christo-Islamic). While initially Christianity grew out of Judaism (using Jewish scriptures as justification of their own teachings and scriptures), the major Christian doctrines are beleived to have also emerged out of the mystery teachings that existed in Greece and the Middle East around 2000 years ago. Early Christian fathers such as Clement of Alexander and Origen mention the continuity between Greek philosophy, especially Plato, the inner mystery teachings, and Christianity. Other scholars such as Camille Paglia have noted that Christianity was a development of the Dionysian mystery religion.
3908:
but that is not NPOV. I don't think this is deliberate. To quote the site again, "Many
Christians are aware of their own denomination's current beliefs, but are unfamiliar with the history of those beliefs, or of the teachings of other denominations. Many Christians have never been taught how their own denomination's beliefs developed down through the centuries." I want to quote from this site to prove my point, that a lot of what Giovanni states is widely accepted facts and not as Star put its--"contentious, not generally accepted) POV." Below are stated as generally accepted facts. In their words,"It is not a simple task to write about Christianity. There are on the order of 1,500 different Christian faith groups in North America which promote many different and conflicting beliefs. Further, many groups believe that they alone are the "true" Christian church and that all of the others are in error. As a result, one cannot write an introduction or a history of Christianity that is acceptable to all faith groups. The following is supported by historical evidence and is probably agreeable to most."
958:"Judaism: Practice & Belief 63BCE - 66CE" Minneapolis: Fortress Schiffman, Lawrence H. 1991. "From Text to Tradition: A History of Second Temple & Rabbinic Judaism". Ktav Publishing House Smith, Enid S., Ph.D., 1959, The Essenes Who Changed Churchianity The Essenes are an important part of H. Rider Haggard's Pearl-Maiden: A Tale of the Fall of Jerusalem. Bentley Layton's introduction to The Gnostic Scriptures, a translation of the texts found at Nag Hammadi. Layton, Bentley, ed. The Gnostic Scriptures ISBN 0385478437 Pagels, Elaine, The Gnostic Gospels Robinson, James M., ed. The Nag Hammadi Library in English ISBN 0060669357 Robinson, James M., 1979 "The discovery of the Nag Hammadi codices," in Biblical Archaeology vol. 42, pp206â224. The definitive account of the discovery of the Nag Hammadi cache. The Gnostic Scriptures: A New Translation with Annotations (Garden City: Doubleday & Co., 1987), Peake's Commentary on the Bible, Matthew Black and H.H. Rowley, ed., Revised edition, NY:Nelson 1982, section 607b. Gibbon: The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
3183:(and when they did occur they attracted even more condemnation, e.g. by Voltaire). The Revolution proclaime freedom of conscience and religion, but it took some time for them to realise that this included Catholics as well (in fact, most didn't realise at all, it was Napoleon's realpolitik that opened the way to the concordat). Jews, as individuals, were granted individual civic rights (first the Sephardi, then the Ashkenazi), but under the famous motto: "To them as individuals everything, to them as a people nothing". This has nothing to do with sympathy for the Jews and religion in general and anyway was an early measure when the anti-Christian mood wasn't as strong as later. (And note, anti-Christian is not anti-religion - Robespierre tried to introduce a "Cult of the Supreme Being", others dedicated temples to "Reason". It is persecution of Christians we are talking about, not of all religions.
858:
speculation that
Christian beliefs were influenced by Mithraism which was assimilated by state-sponsored Christianity before being diposed of in name. According to Martin A. Larson, in The Story of Christian Origins (1977), Mithraism and Christianity derived from the same sources, originally from the savior cult of Osiris. The basic church hierarchy developed in the first century and it is fairly probable that they emphasized common features to attract followers. In doing so many of these mystery teachings were brought out into the open, and redressed with often a literal interpretation. Such a veritable potpourri of religious ideas combined from Judaic monotheism, Persian dualism, eastern otherworldliness and asceticism, and the various mystery teachings makes the origins of Christian doctrine one whose complexity continues to shroud it in mystery."
2510:
historically, that the
Episcopal Church in the USA was styled "The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America" was because, at the Revolution, there was no Established Church (as there was in England) and the Roman Catholic Church would also be "competing" on American soil. The name was chosen to distinguish the episcopal Church that was Roman from the episcopal Church that was Protestant-of-Rome. In addition, although Luther's 95 Theses gave further and catalytic impetus to the Reform movements that were welling-up on the European Continent, Luther's movement was by no means first. The Moravians had beat him to the punch. Moreover, unlike the Zwinglian, Calvinist, and other Reformers, Luther (with whose movement the Moravians eventually joined) steadfastly maintained that the churches that were joining with his movement
2958:"accusations" was probably not the best way to put it. I certainly didn't think you accused me. I meant this bundle of "grievances" laid at the church's doorstep, provided here by you but certainly not originated by you. And the "glorification" referred to a common understanding that revolutions and uprisings are always and entirely good (unless of course when they aren't) and authority is always bad. I agree, I too can relate to such a romantic sympathy for the rebel and to the joy of seeing a tyrant fall (I especially like accounts of Robespierre's fall) (Question remaines what is a tyrant and what is merely a ruler - I don't think Louis XVI was a tyrant in any way). There are two sides to the story. I thought I detected this common understanding in some of your comments. If I am wrong I gladly take it back.
1237:
the
Sadducees, and the Scribes are excoriated in the most bitter terms and that the tyranny exercised by them over the dissident Essenes is described in full detail. We know that about 104 B.C. the Essenes became a secret cult, went underground as it were, and forbade its members to discuss any of its beliefs with outsiders. We know also that about 70 B.C. the Teacher of Righteousness, the Essene leader, appeared in the temple in Jerusalem, where he denounced the authorities, and that, as a result, he was executed, probably by crucifixion; and that his followers therafter declared that he had risen from the grave on the third day, ascended to heaven, and would send a great messiah before the end of the generation to conduct the Last Judgement and inaugurate the Kingdom of the Saints on earth."
894:
the ones I mention--the mystery cults--are the ones believed by many scholars to be the ones that did that in development of what became known as Christian religious ideas. I do not make the claim that scholarship is uniform or difinitive in these matters, nor that in some cases its little more than speculation. But, the consensus has it that these influences are probable and they offer the best explanation to date for an understanding of the historical development from a naturalist historical perspective of the religious conceptions and doctrines under light. Do you propose an alternative theory that you'd like to include, or do you just not want any such discussion to be presented, which I might add is an essential part in understanding any line of philosophy, religious or otherwise.
1537:
literalising bits and pieces from the wash of gospels, parables and 'wisdom' statements, much of which had originated within the Gnostics; they torched the rest as heresy. The losers, exiled and persecuted, with their property taken, their sacred literature banned and destroyed, were condemned as heretics. A sample of that scripture was preserved in a cave at Nag Hammadi. See J.M. Robinson (Ed.), The Nag Hammadi Library (Leiden, 1984) During the 1st century CE there were at least three distinct divisions within the Christian movement: the Jewish Christians, Pauline Christians (followers of St. Paul), and Gnostic Christians (people who believed that salvation came through secret knowledge). Each believed themselves to be the true church, and were highly critical of the other two.
699:
at least say that "some/many/most scholars/critics/Christians/whoever think that..." in places that now say things like "...doctrines are believed..." for instance. Using passive voice to avoid attributing an idea or opinion to anyone at all is one example of "weasel words," something that can be hard to avoid. But atributing the idea, and in general using active voice instead of passive, is a good way to strengthen any article. Other parts of the above are clearly speculation, but speculation by whom? For instance, "it is fairly probably that..." and the final line saying that the potpourri of ideas explains the confusion etc. Other theories also explain the confusion, so why list only this one without attributing it to anyone in general or in particular?
558:. The Jews did too, until they first tried a couple other Greek translations, then finally managed to revive widespread use of a Hebrew Bible. My next object to the paragraph quoted at the top of this section is the idea that a church hierarchy eventually emerged, and pulled together various ideas in order to broaden Christianity's appeal. It is well known that the basic church structure was established in the first century and maintained as Christianity expanded. Cumont's work on Mithraism is nearly 100 years old; today it seems more likely that many of Mithraism's features actually postdate Christianity's, making it more likely that it was Mithraism that borrowed from Christianity. Further, as I've already pointed out in
1104:
based at Qumran in the Judean desert. The Baptist and the Essenes had a shared interest in priestly matters and a priestly Messiah and a shared focus on Isaiah 40:3. Both parties adhered to Spartan diets and ascetical behaviour. Similar interests in sacramentology also link the Baptist to the Essenes (in that Johnâs water rite was comparable to Qumran ablution rights). Of the three main Jewish sects, John the Baptistâs eschatological orientation is closest to the Essene position. ---citations 38] See B. Witherington IIIâs article on John the Baptist in the âDictionary of Jesus and the Gospelsâ IV Josephus, War 2.120; 1QS 5.2; 1QS 8.14; Damascus Rule 12.13-14 specifies how to eat locusts and honey."
2246:
identify any victim of Christian persecution on the persecutions list that KHM03 thinks is not justified. This seems a reasonable request and it is very noticeable that he failed to identify even one. It is not clear whether you are denying the activities of the Inquisition, or institutional Church anti-semitism, the extermination of the Cathars, the judicial killing of people like Brno, or what? Just for once, lets hear some specifics from you - I think many people will be very interested to hear exactly what you are denying and why. Go on - apply the same standards to yourself as you apply to everyone you don't agree with.
3114:
as a corrupt institution at least in 18th century France. For many Protestants today that's an important distinction, but most Catholic and Orthodox Christians would say it's either a misleading or entirely false distinction. If a government were to announce, "You can be a Christian as long as you're not affiliated with this specifically named church," Protestants would for the most part easily switch denominations and be fine if theirs were targeted, but Catholics and Orthodox would be for the most part stuck, as were the nuns in France. Sophia, please correct me if I've misstated your position in any way.
1533:
themselves also for the uneducated masses in vulgarised versions of gnostic doctrines dressed up in allegory. These were written down and circulated, and subsequently enacted in pageants and plays. These Christian leaders of the mid-2nd century concocted fables, each styled the "one true gospel of the Lord", with which they made a bid for a more universal leadership. The more ambitious strove for an independent, even millenarian church; some achieved high position within the Catholic hierarchy. Gnosticism's free spirited speculations on the divine had thrived in the Pax Romana of the Antonine emperors.
771:
Based upon what I have read it certainly is not the prevailing thought of "scholars" that these three "religions" were the forefather of Christianity. To swallow that pill, the underlying premise is that Jesus was simply a fabrication, a melding of different religions of the day; however, the individual was not historical. That is the prevailing thought of several of the scholars cited above. Does it belong in the article? YES. However, it must be balanced with all of the scholars who oppose this research. It will be a long article, a little on the dry for most, but it will be accurate.
2887:
beliefs. The purpose of the Revolution was to overthrow the institutions that the people saw as oppressing them - that included the Monarchy, the nobles and the Church. We introduce new and worry definitions of persecution (as well as opening a can of worms) if we class anyone who reacts against an authority that leaves them powerless and starving a "persecutor". That is why I object to its inclusion. I have no axe to grind or Church history to defend. I am genuinely surprised that this is proving so controversial which is why I am concerned at the heavy number of RC editors on this page.
1400:
method. Proof of the resurrection came from pagan antecedents, other heroes "risen from their graves." He said Jesus had been invisible, except to the few with "powers." Ofcourse, we know he was excommunicated and condemned as a heretic. Do you need references for these widely known facts? I never made any such claim about the hardliner, Tertullian, who by the way defected to the Montanists cult and was thus branded a heretic himself. I did mention, Clement of Alexandria who had a pagan background and was also strongly influenced by Greek philosophy and succeeded by Origen.
2462:
distinction between the Continental Reform tradition of Calvin, Zwingli, Knox, the anabaptists, et al, and the specifically anti-Roman reforms of the Catholic Church whcih were undertaken in England and in the Nordic countries which followed Luther. I have tried now a few times to createa separate category for Anglicans and Lutherans (as have others before me) after the so-called "Catholic," category, but some partisan with, likely, either an Evangelical or a Traditionalist Roman Catholic POV repeatedly removes my/our contributions. Please stop doing this.
650:). While initially Christianity grew out of Judaism (using Jewish scriptures as justification of their own teachings and scriptures), the major Christian doctrines are beleived to have also emerged out of the mystery teachings that existed in Greece and the Middle East around 2000 years ago. Early Christian fathers such as Clement of Alexander and Origen mention the continuity between Greek philosophy, especially Plato, the inner mystery teachings, and Christianity. Other scholars such as Camille Paglia have noted that Christianity was a development of the
4082:
a craving for the miraculous and supernatural created ever new superstitions, under the form of relic-worship from old pagan forms of belief. In the name of the Christian faith reason and research were condemned, Greek philosophy and literature were exterminated, and free thinking was suppressed." This is a perfect example of the problems we're having here. First, it's inaccurate. Secondly, the supporting citations are from obscure figures who are not historical authorities. But when one accepts obscure scholarship, problems arise.
3957:"Gnostics believe that they have secret knowledge about God, humanity and the rest of the universe of which the general population was unaware. It became one of the three main belief systems within 1st century Christianity, and was noted for three factors which differed from the two other branches of Christianity: Novel beliefs about Gods, the Bible and the world which differed from those of other Christian groups. Tolerance of different religious beliefs within and outside of Gnosticism. Lack of discrimination against women.
239:
esoteric teachings, all of which have been shown to have contributed to the doctrines found in Christianity. Each section on Wiki has a section with references making this point. Its fair to mention each one here. My approach was to mention them all as being roots of the Christian religion's origins. These are statments of facts according to modern scholarship on the questions. Again what we see is simply reverting all my work because its secular in nature and not from a Christian point of view (note its not anti-Christian).
2725:
Revolution Europe as in the grip of a dechristianisation program is a generalisation and POV? The UK certainly never had such problems. The only references I can find to it relate specifically to France. France is NOT Europe and there is no evidence that it was part of a Europe wide resugence. The sentence as it currently stands implies a) that it was wide spread and b) that it was the restart of some previous Europe wide dechristanisation agenda. I would like to see specifics and references for both of these areas.
784:
in the Bible. But, the bible is a book of faith and so the historical Jesus is probably quite different than the Christian one which incorporates myths that are part of the religious faith and consitent with its origins as described. No disrespect intended, ofcourse. However, this issue of the historcity of Jesus need not be mentioned here, since the title says Jesus "according to the New Testiment" which is a book of faith. Moreover, there are already many articles devoted to this issue alone:
2906:
The Church didn't cause any starving of the general populace. I agree that some of those involved thought as you think now and these saw King and Church as oppressive. It's not are business to worry about whether someone because of our definitions (and they are not new) may no longer rebel against authority. I am not picking sides right now regards the political event called French Revolution, but WP should neither adhere to the (sadly all too common) glorification of the revolution.
679:
the open, and redressed in often a literal interpretation. The early church was called "catholic", which means universal. It claimed to be for all, and combined many of the elements of its forrunners: Judaic monotheism, Persian dualism, eastern otherworldliness and asceticism, and various mystery teachings. Such a veritable potpourri of religious ideas explains the often complicated and confusing similarities Christian doctrine share with a variety of pagan teachings." updated
1126:âThe Essenes were Pythagoreans who encased their pagan religious synthesis, which Jesus absorbed, in a Jewish entegument, which he rejected, although He considered Himself one of the prophets of Yahweh; but he incorporated a definitely Buddhist element, not found among the Essenes. In the Gospel, therefore, we find a synthesis of Osirian-Dionysiac soteriology, Zoroastrian eschatology, Buddhist ethics and renunciation, Pythagorean communism, and the Essenic Parousia. (416-17)â
1357:(March 2, 1897 â January 15, 1994) was an American populist freethinker and religion scholar specializing in theological history and the Essenes. Originally from a fundamentalist Evangelical background , his writings ranged from...to a disquisition on the similarities among the cults of Osiris, Dionysus, Mithras and Jesus. He earned a PhD from the University of Michigan with a thesis on the unorthodoxies of Milton, whom he found to have rejected the doctrine of the Trinity .
4049:
Nussbaum, and Julia Kristeva. Its without question tht Paglia is a recognized authority and she write very well on the subject at hand and in no way comparable to your mailman. Also, I have brough in many, many other authorities with agree with Paglia. The problem you have is that these are all non-Christian authorities who are willing to go outside of the box imposed by Church orthodoxy, hence they are not deserving mention anymore than your mailman. But such is pure POV.
4170:
determine when there is a consensus? Who is to judge who qualifies as a a suitable authority enough for me to use here? It seems you limit this to only Christians? At least that is the only ones you have cited. I have cited an abundance of scholars, but to you they are âobscure.â You keep saying my claims are inaccurate, etc, but you failed to cite any scholar that you have which supports your claims. Please quote them, even if they are Christians, that make your case?
3089:
of persecuting because of real or alleged crimes that doesn't change the fact that they persecuted those standing by their convictions. The Roman Emperors (Nero, and most since Traian) considered the Church a criminal organisation and "being a Christian" a crime. Did the revolutionaries ask the Carmelites whether they committed any crimes? No, they told them give up their way of life (which is one of many ways of serving God, but it was the one these women had chosen).
4063:
narrow confines of their religious adherence. However, such folks wonât even talk about this area, and their exclusion of it is noteworthy of their bias. Iâll be happy to include some of the scholars aby names as examples, if you prefer for the points. I would even be willing to state that it is disputed by relgious biblical scholars, as well. The point here is that suppression of non-chritian orthodoxy pertient to the subject does not promote neutrality, it kills it.
4040:
Anthropology,â influenced the teaching of humanities in American academe itself, advocating that comparative religion, art history and the close reading of canonical literature be brought to the center of education, with greater attentiveness toward chronology and facts in the student's approach to history. In addition to having written five books, she continues to write articles and reviews for popular media and scholarly journals, such as her long article,
851:
Judaic monotheism, Persian dualism, eastern otherworldliness and asceticism, and the various mystery teachings makes the origins of Christian doctrine one whose complexity continues to shroud it in mystery." The idea im trying to communicate in the sentence is that the origins are complex and are often not understood or known, even among practioners. Ofcourse, I want to do it with NPOV language. The section in whole as it currently stands for further scrutiny:
3898:
don't think anyone where would disgree with their NPOV mission, "We try to describe all viewpoints on controversial religious topics objectively and fairly." I think they do a great job at neutrality by including all points of view and separate what is commonly accepted by most scholars with elements that are disuted, listing the alternative views. They are a model to be emulated for this encylopeida not only for their NPOV but also becaue its well referenced.
2180:
very noticeable that you fail to identify even one. Are you denying the activities of the Inquisition, or institutional Church anti-semitism, the extermination of the Cathars, the judicial killing of people like Brno, or what? Just for once, lets hear some specifics from you - I think many people will be very interested to hear exactly what you are denying and why. Give it a try - just for once. We can can all see how dedicated you are to academic rigor.
3965:
POV--its not historical fact. Historical fact is that there were many. Its POV to say that these others were not really Christians. Infact, that is what many churches today say of the Catholic Church that its not really Christian but Pagan. Well these are POV's. Much of what Giovanni has argued for is historical fact and thefore I will try to work it in the history/origins section much in the same way that www.religioustolerance.org goes.
288:
this before but it somehow got lost down the line. I will reinsert it now. As for your qualifications on the New Testament: I am well aware of the issue, but speaking as a historian, I cannot agree with on your conclusions that the NT is more doubtful than many other historical sources. Of course, we have do Quellenkritik and consider alternative sources as well, but the NT's books are still the most reliable sources on that complex.
1519:"Jewish practices", familiarity with the Greek "mystery religions" led the Gnostics to copy their style. Within an inner circle of adepts a secret "higher Wisdom" was passed orally from Master to Initiate. Their claim to authority rested on earlier holy men, apostles and sages, who, it was said, had entrusted arcane knowledge to their favourite disciples, the founders of the gnostic sects, hence being a mystery cult religion.
1656:
considered him a spirit "undefiled by matter" but how far must a modern man stretch to use this as a basis for doubting Jesus' historicity, and how it such "evidence" able to refute the evidence from historical person who historically state that they historically spoke with a historical Jesus. And again, it is contentious whether these who "had NO belief in a flesh and blood Jesus" should be considered Christians at all.
2982:
persecuted into extinction (though there have been some instances, e.g. Charlemagne's Saxon War or the "Wendish crusade", both controversial at their time) but rather were superceded by Christianity. Some have complaint about to many "pagan remnants" lingering on in popular religion. I don't think the complaint is very fitting but it can only be made because these "older indigenous" religions were not just stamped out.
731:
Christianity, if any borrowing between them took place at all. Regarding gnosticism, it's at least as likely that gnosticism borrowed a few Christian names to attach to its aeons without really changing its ideas, as Christianity borrowed from gnosticism. Most 'gnostic Christians' tried to reject Judaism's influence, strongly suggesting that they were'nt well connected or descended from any of Jesus' Jewish followers.
1267:. While initially Christianity grew out of Judaism (using Jewish scriptures as justification of their own teachings and scriptures), the major Christian doctrines are believed to have also emerged out of the mystery teachings that existed in Greece and the Middle East around 2000 years ago. Early Christian fathers such as Clement of Alexander and Origen mention the continuity between Greek philosophy, especially
2337:
anything to suggest that the goal was to "exterminate" them; the goal was conversion. There is also the question of religious versus secular motivations there as well, as it resulted in quite a bit of land changing hands. The heretication site purports to be well researched, but contains a number of inaccuracies; many of its "good" facts seem to be presented so as to deliberately mislead the reader.
3923:"Christendom has not been a unified movement throughout most of its history. With the possible exception of a few years circa 31 CE, from the execution of Jesus to the conversion of Paul, there have always been at least two competing faith groups which seriously, devoutly, thoughtfully and prayerfully believed themselves to be true Christianity. A broad overview of Christian history follows:
991:
yourself killed, tortured or banished; these people were not marketers, in fact much of their appeal came from choosing death rather than compromise of their beliefs. Most surviving records of the mystery religions have those religions being condemned by orthodox Christians, not admired. And as I've said before, the dates suggest that any borrowing was from Christianity into Mithraism.
262:
reverting the whole section, and getting rid of everything? As it stands now, the supresion of secular thought, and the current language--ironically lacking the very same neutral language regarding Jesus that you say makes my contribution NPOV, is what we have now, and thus is NPOV. FOr example, my inclusion of the word "purported" in "centered on the stories it teaches about the
333:
states it as a fact, now changed to "believed to be by some scholars," "influenced," etc. Let the reader go to those links and learn from themselves these undisputed elements in the formation of the origin in Christianities teachings. To supress this can only be an example of an anti-historical stance. Btw, The NT is a book of faith and not a reliable historical source.
3961:
This day is also the Day of Judgment in that only those who have entered the Path of Transfiguration and are being reborn can return to the Treasury of Light." 2 The movement and its literature were essentially wiped out before the end of the 5th century CE by mainline Christianity heresy hunters. Its beliefs are currently experiencing a rebirth throughout the world."
1146:"Judaism: Practice & Belief 63BCE - 66CE" Minneapolis: Fortress Schiffman, Lawrence H. 1991. "From Text to Tradition: A History of Second Temple & Rabbinic Judaism". Ktav Publishing House Smith, Enid S., Ph.D., 1959, The Essenes Who Changed Churchianity The Essenes are an important part of H. Rider Haggard's Pearl-Maiden: A Tale of the Fall of Jerusalem.
517:
However, Larson believes that the Essenes were Jewish Pythagoreans, whose members not only gave birth to Christianity as Essenes, but were directly influenced by Zoroastrian doctrine as Pythagoreans. And that Mithraism, an established but exclusive sect devoted to social justice, was assimilated by state-sponsored Christianity before being disposed of in name.
1555:
authors themselves, such as Livy, tell of the importation of "foreign gods" during times. Judaism, too, was receiving converts and in some cases actively evangelizing. The New Testament reflects a class of people referred to as 'believers in God' who are thought to be Gentile converts; Philo of Alexandria makes explicit the duty of Jews to welcome converts.
4089:
respected Jewish Encylopedia written by the American scholar Kaufmann Kohler. See, here we have a religious scholar, but the reason why this reglious authority will be rejected is not because he is not scholarly but because he is not a Christian one. Kaufmann is Jewish, was the president of the Hewbrew College in Cincinatti. His writings include
2824:. I said previously that the editors of this page rightly demand specifics and details. I also stand by the comment that a sentence of such general nature would not (rightly) have stood unchallenged by the most active editors on this page if it had been anti Christian. The term "resurfaced" implies that Europe was previously anti Christian. The
1095:"John the Baptist, Saint." EncyclopĂŠdia Britannica. 2006. EncyclopĂŠdia Britannica Premium Service. 20 Jan. 2006 You yelling there is no historical evidence doesnt make it so. Can you site a respected source that makes such a false clai as you contend? As for supporting my claims, that is easy do do and refutes your innacurate statments here.
1574:
made a presentation for the educated classes of the beliefs of Christians, often coupled with an attack on the beliefs and practices of the pagans. Other writings had the purpose of instructing and admonishing fellow Christians. Many writings of this period, however, succumbed to destruction from the Early Catholic Church as heretical.
1210:
Larson writes, "Christian have always held that their creed was a single, unique, miraculous, and supreme revelation without predecessor or outside contributor. But the fact is that nothing could be further from the truth; Christianity is a composite of doctrines, teachings, and ideologies which have forerunners in previous religions,
270:....is reverted. By your own logic, if you're consistent, is POV. Surely you are aware of that the Xian teaching about the life and actions of Jesus are highly doubtful as historical, and thus should be qualified with appropriate language accordingly. But, I guess this is pro-Christian so we see the double standard being enforced.
747:"There is much speculation that Christian beliefs were influenced by Mithraism which was assimilated by state-sponsored Christianity before being diposed of in name. According to Martin A. Larson, in The Story of Christian Origins (1977), Mithraism and Christianity derived from the same sources, originally from the savior cult of
3931:
oppress, exile or exterminate both Pagans and Gnostic Christians. Church authority had became concentrated in the five bishops or patriarchs located in Alexandria, Antioch, Constantinople, Jerusalem and Rome. Although they were officially given equal status, the Bishop of Rome was considered the first among the equals. 3
2360:
in the US and Europe. Many of the leading abolitionists were not only practicing Christians, but in most cases cited their faith as a reason for opposing slavery. True there were Christians arguing for the continuance of slavery also, but to claim that Christianity as a whole was on the side of slavery is just plain wrong.
1717:
but his bias gets the better of him in many cases. How about a mainstream secular historian on these questions? I have provided already too many above, which do support my claims. About the Larson book, try again. You should be able to search for author and you can see all his books, along with reviews.
4220:
True about religoustolerance.org, however I note that like our own very dear site here which is also created by regular folks, I found the information to be reliable, and NPOV--even more so. The good thing is that they cite references, so we can rely on those references, which are valid for Knowledge
4123:
Paglia is, as you say, a professor of humanities. But that doesn't make her an expert or authority on Christian history. My concern is not POV -- there are authorities and experts who are far from orthodox whose work I accept in various fields (Marcus Borg, for instance, in "Jesus research"...well,
4088:
I disagree. Its not inaccurate. Its very accurate. Please make your case that this is not accurate. Also, these scholars are historical authorities. Make your case why there work and creditials are not worthy to be considered authoritative. The above passage, is infact taken from an encylopeia in the
4055:
3. The repeated use of the phrase "Many scholars" is troubling. First, it leads the reader to believe that these "out there" views (re: mystery religions) are mainstream and generally accepted (which is completely untrue). Second, it saves us from having to "name names". Why not name a few mainstream
4018:
1. I don't mind mentioning the importance of Greek philosophy (esp. Plato) on Christian theological development, but the section about "continuity" is poorly worded (from a grammatical standpoint) and doesn't make clear what that continuity is; there are also some elements of discontinuity (is that a
3088:
I don't think that Christianity was incidental as the campaign was directed against Christianity (in the only version existing in France, the RCC). People were persecuted because of their adherence to the Church and Christianity. If the persecutors considered the Church a criminal organisation worthy
3014:
there were real examples of treason, and that some of the Catholics who were persecuted would not have been persecuted (or at least not to that extent) had it not been for the crimes of their fellow Catholics. Nevertheless, it is a fact that Catholics were persecuted in England at that time; we don't
2981:
In the final part of your post you are mixing up two things: heresies and pagan religions. Heresies, as false doctrines within Christianity, were persecuted, but they were mostly not "older indigenous" religions (exceptions surfacing in the few witch trials of the Middle Ages). These were not so much
2905:
The Church was not attacked in the Revolution because of what you say but because of Enlightenment ideology and because the new rulers thought it proper to rob the Church of her property in order to solve the budget problems (while they at the same proclaimed the inviolability of their own property).
2890:
As for Christian martyrs. They were generally in the 1st wave of Christians to Europe, when Christianity would have been seen as new and a challenge to the established authorities. Once they had dominance the only widespread persecutions of Christians in Europe, for theological reasons, were by other
2749:
The sentence, at least according to my understanding or intention, does not say that there was a Europe wide persecution (though some measures were not restricted to France), but it says (or wants to say) that after centuries of Christian dominance, during which there was no persecution of Christians
2745:
Does it matter whether the Church was "immoral" or "corrupt" - and I sincerly challenge that observation in this general version, especially in regard to "crimes") and especially not as the reason for the persecution - the Church was not persecuted because of any (alleged) immorality, but because it
2653:
Other groups believe themselves to hold the Catholic and Apostolic faith, reformed of Roman "abuses" and consider themselves to be both Catholic and Protestant. These groups include Reformed, Evangelical, Charismatic, and Pentecostal; Presbyterians, Baptists, Methodists, and Anabaptists. And how on
2316:
When was there any large scale persecution of Atheists or Deists by Christian? Granted, an Atheist would have been persecuted in the 13th century, if taken seriously, but there were no atheists around. To have persecution we need a potential persecutor and and a potential persecutee at the same place
1759:
Its ok if there are things which are contenttious among scholars. One need only mention that fact, not exclude it all together, esp. when its vaulable. I'll take a look at the section again and I did see opportunities to make it shorter. Also, state which parts now exist in the seciton that you think
1716:
I'm familiar with Alister McGrath, having read one of his books, and I was not impressed by it. For those who don't know he is the Director of the Oxford Centre for Evangelism and Apologetics at Wycliffe Hall. He is one of the most widely read and influential Christian writers of a conservative bent,
1704:
accepted/mainstream/acknowledged authorities? Justo Gonzales is a pretty good "recent" authority, pretty well respected. Alister McGrath is a good one, too, though he's more "theology" as opposed to "strict history". There are others, of course. Citing some mainstream figures might help, though.
1655:
This is indeed striking: There is evidence for the historical (yes, human) existence of Jesus. It is established beyond any reasonable doubt and only a few extremists still deny it. Certainly the existence of Jesus was not contented (let alone "ferocious"ly) in antiquity. True, Gnostics and Docetists
1573:
In the second century conventionally educated converts began to produce two kinds of writings that help us understand the developing shapes of Christianity - works aimed at a broad audience of educated non-Christians and works aimed at those who considered themselves inside the Church. The Apologists
1532:
The cults vied with each other for acolytes, with some groups committed to asceticism and the denial of all "pleasures of the flesh" and others to indulgence, in which sex, revelry, etc were encouraged. The exclusivity of mystery cult meant that gnosticism was intrinsically elitist, but they marketed
1447:
Christian writers in the empire scrambled to use Greek logic and the style of the sophists to defend Christianity. The Jewishness of the faith was purged and they took comfort in noting similarities between their own ideas and pagan myths. So while the Church defeated paganism, but it could be argued
1214:
If these facts were widely known, the authority of the Church or the churches would be drastically reduced. For this reason the reigning churches are determined to show that there is little or no similarity between Essenism and original Christianity. Or they prefer simply to ignore the whole thing as
1076:
False claim. There is historical evidence. Its a fact that John the Baptist is widely regarded as an Essene. By whom, you ask? By scholars looking at the evidence. Just go check any other encylopeida and it says as much. For example, the entry for JOHN THE BAPTIST in the respected Jewish Encylopedia
967:
The Early Church. N. H. Baynes, âConstantine the Great and the Christian Church,â Proceedings of the British Acad- emy, 15 (1929), 341-443. Henry Chadwick, The Early Church, Vol. I of The Pelican History of the Church (Harmondsworth, 1967; London, 1968). Jean DaniĂ©lou and Henri Marrou, The First Six
939:
which paradoxically tried to suppress nature in favor of a transcendental other world." 13. Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson (New York: Random House, 1991) 25. Mithranism: This can be found both in Ernest Renan, in The Origins of Christianity, and
922:
I'd say being a member is pretty good indication of influence, eh? The Gnostics, also linked Wiki article: âThe ultimate foundational elements of gnosticism are pre-Christian. That said, the exact origins of Gnosticism are a subject of dispute amongst scholars: some think Gnosticism is fundamentally
893:
Yes, these are all seperate schools of thought. No one is saying they are identical. Otherwise why would they have different names. That would be assinine. What it does say is that there is a influence of from these schools of thought, as is often the case is the evolution of ideas, and in particular
783:
Hi Strom Rider. I'd be interested to see a reputable published scholar that discounts these attributed influences of early Christianity. I find it to be the prevailing thought among secular scholarship on the question, as cited. I agree that it raises questions about the stories of Jesus as described
345:
Despite the changes of language my work is simply reverted on the pretext of POV. I wonder what next will be the rationale to advance a purely religious perspective, suppressing valuable understandings from secular scholarship regarding the origins of this religion. It appears too tabboo to entertain
287:
wording issues. "Purported" on the other hand is one of them weasel words, which seem neutral but in fact imply that what is being said is not only not necessarily true but in fact false. Another way to make the first sentence NPOV would be an addition like "as recounted in the New Testament". We had
4183:
I am willing to bet that there are consensus positions among scholars on a few basic issues but if this claim were challenged, how would I demonstrate it? The standard method in scholarly writing is to fill our footnotes with references pro and con on a given position. But this counts only published
4093:
I understand that adherents to the Christian Church won't like what this passage its an accurate assessment of the school of Christian thought that was ultimately triumphant and helps explain the terror and persecution the Christians imposed on others, culminated in the worst period of human history
4081:
5. "The resulting orthodoxy emphasised blind faith, which "renders the impossible possible "(Mark ix. 23, 24), produced a thnking that deprecated learning, as was shown by Draper ("History of the Conflict between Science and Religion") and by White ("History of the Warfare of Science with Theology")
3964:
As you can see, these gives support for Giovanni's submissions and I vote that they be included, since it appears to be historical true facts: there was NOT one Christianity. There were several. Sure, each church believes itself to be the one and true and only chruch but that is just their dogma and
3930:
4th century CE: The Roman Emperor Theodosian issued a series of decrees to "suppress all rival religions, order the closing of the temples, and impose fines, confiscation, imprisonment or death upon any who cling to the older religions." 2 The church used the power of the state to begin programs to
3907:
What I do find interesting is that they list among those things that are widely accepted many of the same claims that Giovanni is making here but which others are saying is either not accurate or POV. I think to them it is POV becaue they are pusing their own brand and understanding of Christianity,
3676:
That is true. I gave references for this. They did emerge. Fact. They emerged out of different influences. Fact. Some of these influences were the various mystery teachings. Fact according to most scholars. I'll concede to a language change here to reflect that we are not sure 100%, such as the word
3658:
I disgaree IMHO. Its better on top right after the overview since it flows logically into the chart that shows the origins from Early Christianity, and ties in nicely with my origins of for the ideas of early Christianity. Also, I think is important and one of the most neglected (supressed) elements
3133:
As for the Catholic/Orthodox-Prostestant divide on this. Freedom of religion in my book means that the believer is free to pratice his religion as he understands it and hence this definition can be as broad or narrow as he thinks fit (including or not including Church structure). Hence, surpression
3113:
I think that perhaps Sophia may be trying to make distinction between someone being persecuted for their individually held, personal religious beliefs and expressions, and being persecuted for being a member of the Church, the outwardly visible, formal organization of Christians, which she describes
3067:
My point is that their Christianity was incidental to their persecution, they were persecuted for belonging to a powerful institution. I would not (and have never attempted to) argue with their place on the RC wiki page but that it is unrepresentative to put this on the all encompassing Christianity
2886:
I'm sure the Nuns were wonderful people but they were guilotined for being Nuns - not Christians, for being part of a hierarchy that left the general populace starving and disaffected. The churches were full of wealth while the people starved - that is why they were a target, not for their religious
2851:
Hello, SOPHIA. I'm a bit puzzled by your objections to the inclusion of the French Revolution. You say that Catholics were persecuted because they were corrupt and immoral, and that "if it had been any other religion committing the same crimes they would have suffered the same fate." What crimes did
2841:
Again I ask you, Sophia: Are Catholics not Christians? If they are, what we have here is a state persecution of Christians (and these were Catholics, but there had been no other Christians in the land since Louis XIV). The term "resurfaced" does not imply, IMHO, what you think it does. Also, my edit
2753:
As for your observation, before I overhauled the persecution section it basically said: "Christians were sometimes persecuted by the Romans, but only because they were stupid, or camp, or deserved, but maybe they weren't even persecuted. Christians however persecuted a lot, all the time, ending with
2509:
That is both smug and lacking in comprehension of the name. But because of the smugness of people like you, the American Anglicans made "The Episcopal Church in the United States of America" an official alternative name some decades ago, and now use that name in all official documents. The reason,
2475:
Actually, as a Lutheran I object to what you're trying to do (though I wasn't involved in reverting it here.) Lutherans are certainly Protestants. The differences between the Lutheran and Anglican churches and the other Protestant churches could perhaps be dealt with some other way, but don't try to
1554:
And, Christianity was not the only religion seeking and finding converts in the 1st century. Modern historians of the Roman world give interest to the mystery religions or mystery cults beginning in the last century of the Roman Republic and increasing during the centuries of the Roman Empire. Roman
1443:
Nonsense. The disparagment of things Jewish by Romans authorities will hardly lead to a de-judification by another groups persecuted by the same authorities. The reason for the growing gulf is the relative numbers of Jewish and Gentile Christians and the formation of Rabbinical Judaism as definitely
1346:
You say he "is largely discredited by mainstream historians" I challenge you to back up your claim, or else withdrawl it. The same goes for those who smeared Gibbon. Also, this particular book of his is not hard to find at all, just out of print. You can get it at Amazon. But, it is well-researched,
1236:
We know also from the Scrolls as well as from many passages in the New Testament that both the Essenes and Jesus were bitterly opposed to the Jewish authorities, especially the religious. There can be little doubt that the Scrolls now crumbling into dust include many passages in which the Pharisees,
1103:
John the Baptist â B. Witherington III writes a list of points connecting John the Baptist with the Essene community at Qumran. The Essenes frequently adopted orphans; it is likely that John was orphaned at an early age. John spent his adolescence in the Judean wilderness; the Essenes were locally
990:
I challenge the use of Origen and Tertullian to support the idea that mystery religions were incorporated into Christianity. I also dispute the idea that the church hierarchy "emphasized common features to attract followers." For the first few centuries, being a church hierarch was a good way to get
883:
Again, untrue, and you have failed to make a case for your contentions. I have already cited sources, above. The original had sources, too, with links. Apparently they are simply ignored. Meanwhile you revert the additions, even though they are currently being improved on the main page by many users
850:
I have made further changes to improve the section, based on Wesley's helpful comments. In particular, notice that the Catholic word use is removed, and some sections reworded. I'm not sure about the last sentence I reworked to wrap it up: "Such a veritable potpourri of religious ideas combined from
743:
Thank you Mika and Wesley for making this better. And, thanks everyone else for not instantly reverting but allowing this to be improved. We are making progress. In light of Wesley's comments regarding the current thinking of Mithraism, I have made further changes. The current text change now reads:
698:
Thank you for addressing those, Mika. Another general concern that I think others have already raised is the use of passive voice to express opinions or speculation, without attributing that speculation to anyone. Not every such sentence needs a full footnote to a book and page number, but it should
539:
Anon user (Giovanni)is correct in my view. On what basis are this contributions now being supressed? He has met earlier objections, it seems to me. Consensus might not be possible here as a result of the heavily pro-Christian editors here, but what matters is consensus in the secular academic world,
516:
I left out the last mystery cult, Mithranism. This can be found both in Ernest Renan, in The Origins of Christianity, and Martin A. Larson, in The Story of Christian Origins (1977), which states that Mithraism and Christianity derived from the same sources, originally from the savior cult of Osiris.
490:
Therapeutae--its stated a fact on the Wiki article as the âForerunners of early Christian monastic orders.â This is not disputed. Next, the Essenes: âThe Essenes were a religious sect of Judaism, of which it is Jesus was thought to be a member of, and which John the Baptist is widely regarded to be
4039:
This is an amazing stance you have on trying to knock down Paglia and Iâm interested on what basis you can possibly maintain it. Last time I checked my mailman was not a published university professor in the Humanities. Paglia is. Infact this American scholar, a 'disciple of the Cambridge School of
3998:
Thanks, Mika for your words of support. I think the truth shall prevail as facts are stubborn things. They dont go away. I have added the section after doing a lot of work to it based on these comments, my own above, and those of critics. I found some areas of weakness where my critics were correct
3950:
In any large city of the Roman Empire, there were often religious leaders from each of these three movements -- and probably more -- teaching their own conflicting views on Christianity. Although the Jewish Christian and Gnostic movements were eventually scattered and/or exterminated, the successor
3934:
6th century CE: Only Pauline Christianity had survived in the Mediterranean area, in the form of a deeply divided Catholic church. Gnostic Christianity had been suppressed; Jewish Christianity had died out. There were independent Christian groups in Egypt, India and elsewhere which were not part of
3568:
The phrase "came to importance" just doesn't sound right. I didn't edit that, although I think it needs to be changed more than the things I did change. But I wasn't quite sure enough of the background to the Ecumenical movement to be able to think of an absolutely appropriate substitute. Depending
3440:
Following the appearance of more sockpuppets, I have semi-protected the page, which means that IPs and newly-registered users can't edit. As I said, I don't want to lock out genuine contributors. I'll be going to bed in about twenty minutes from now. Should I unprotect then? Zach, will you still be
3303:
I have made the best non personal, academic case that I can for the position that Christians were not persecuted during the French Revolution. The French Roman Catholic Church suffered a violent and bloody backlash after centuries of persecution of other faiths - you admit there were no Protestants
3293:
I mention POV only in relation to perspectives on this article about all denominations of Christianity. Yes I have a POV but that does not include allegiance to any particular version of history. I will not take part in a discussion that begins to get very personal - of the "why can't you just face
3040:
I'm not sure what the relevance is of your claim that it was not "persecution of Christians by non Christians on the grounds of theology". I have objected in the past to a redefinition of "persecution" to include things like uncharitable remarks made against a group, or job discrimination. But once
2998:
SOPHIA, you seem to admit that the Carmelite martyrs of CompiĂšgne were good, innocent people who did not deserve the death penalty, and that they were executed for being nuns, but you don't accept that as religious persecution. Surely the execution of nuns is a form of religious persecution? At the
2720:
link will show. This page is about Christanity not just the RC church. The RC church in France at that time, was corrupt and immoral. If it had been any other religion committing the same crimes they would have suffered the same fate. It is only called Decristianisation because at that time, the RC
2668:
As for Anglicans: they started (if we take Edward or Elizabeth) as a Protestant Church, but later though about a via media developed and in the 19th Century Anglo-CAtholicism emerged. You may include a note to Anglicanism that states that it is not solely Protestant, but that doesn't mean it should
2645:
Anglicanism and Lutheranism: This category includes those Communions which contend that they continue to hold the Catholic and Apostolic faith, reformed of Roman "abuses." Hence, they consider themselves to be both Catholic and Protestant. These groups separated from the Roman Catholic Church under
2514:
Catholic, but that they were strongly anti-papist and hence, Protestant of Rome. This distinction is true of the Lutheran movement and of the Anglican movement. Lutherans and Anglicans are Protestant of Rome, but hold that they adhere to the (true) Catholic faith. Presbyterians, Anabaptists, the
2391:
Sophia, we are talking about persecution here. I myself wouldn't call Gallileo's case persecution, but of course others might disagree. But what you state about Champillion, if accurate, is far from being persecution. Or are we to include somewhere that scientists persecuted scientists, because the
2359:
Some of their historical statements are just laughably vague or inaccurate. To take merely one example, there is a whole section on the 'historical Christian support of slavery'. Saying that simply ignores historical facts. Christians were in fact at the forefront of the abolitionist movement, both
2355:
It is obvious that the only agenda of this site is to attack Christians - not to present a fair or accurate assessment. In each section something is written only if they can find something bad to say about Christians. If there is a section where they can find nothing bad about Christians, then they
2179:
The HR site in question gives a pretty well reasoned case, and I think clearly shifts the onus of proof. A previous editor has asked for anyone to identify any victim of Christian persecution on the persecutions list that you (KHM03) think is not justified. This seems a reasonable request and it is
2051:
are not acceptable as sources, except on the rare occasion that a well-known person, or a known professional journalist or researcher in a relevant field, has set up such a website. Remember that it is easy for anybody to create a website and to claim to be an expert in a certain field, or to start
1545:
Back to my original point, there is overwhelming scholarly work extant that demonstrates the incorporation of these ideas of the Christians from Gnosticism and from various amalgamations of Jewish ideas in combination with Stoicism, Orpheism and Dionyseanism Gnosticism which all were in development
1312:
The basic church hierarchy developed in the first century and it is fairly probable that they emphasized common features to attract followers. In doing so many of these mystery teachings were brought out into the open, and redressed with often a literal interpretation. Such a veritable potpourri of
944:
However, Larson believes that the Essenes were Jewish Pythagoreans, whose members not only gave birth to Christianity as Essenes, but were directly influenced by Zoroastrian doctrine as Pythagoreans. And that Mithraism, an established but exclusive sect devoted to social justice, was assimilated by
831:
Now, regarding the real Jesus (I mean the one that lived and preached in the 1st century) it is reasonable to look at the sources avaiable. We will get at a "historical Jesus" - this is not identical with the "real Jesus", as the historical craft will not necesarily answer all questions and tell as
706:
Regarding the word "catholic," you have the right definition, but not necessarily the right conclusion drawn from the literal definition. At least some early fathers used the word "catholic" to describe the faith or set of doctrines that they taught, particularly Irenaeus, and to differentiate them
678:
which was assimilated by state-sponsored Christianity before being diposed of in name. The basic church hierarchy developed in the first century and it is fairly probable that they emphasized common features to attract follower. In doing so many of these same mystery teachings were brought out into
457:
ANON, are you representing that there are similarities between Christianity and other groups, or that the others were the "ancestor/father" of Christianity. I can support the Greek/Plato connection for early Christain beliefs, but I would strongly resistant that Christianity was the product of the
431:
If the objection stated here was one of lanugage use, and I make the changes addressing the objected language, then this constitutes an agreement I was willing to make. I see no ohter objections stated, so as I could remedy those or discuss them. Therefore the changes I effected were the results of
332:
I agree its not logical regarding the quoting of Acts for when the word "Christians" first appears. I didnt add that, it was part of the original article, which I left unchanged. I've removed that in my most recent edit that restores the earlier information while addressing the use of language that
261:
It is the dominant theory that the majority hold to as factual. Infact, I do not know one reputable scholar who would deny these xian precursors. However, if your issues are that minor, i.e. only language such as "may," then why not make those word choice adjustments as you suggest here, instead of
4169:
Your objections about consensus raise an underlying question: how do we know what the scholarly consensus is on a given issue? You imply that most professional biblical scholars are in disagreement with the conclusions of the academics I have cited. Well, how do you know this to be true? How do we
3331:
The position of the editors of this page seems to be that any Christian denomination with wealth and power can persecute others (including other Christians) to nonexistence (without mention in the article), and yet when the evitable backlash occurs they become "persecuted Christians" (which can be
3192:
for helping me clarify my point. Yes you are right, my point is that they were targeted for belonging to an institution that had enormous wealth and power - the French RC Church. If they had been non wealthy and non powerful they would have been left alone - I am unaware and can find no records of
3182:
The Church was defenseless against the French state as well, as the king was held captive. Intolerance, though part of the reason why Enlightenment writers had a dislike for the Church, are not directly a reason for the revolution. Persecutory measures by the Church were seldom in the 18th century
3061:
Your example above (the rape) is invalid to this dicussion as we are not talking about a few isolated incidents by individuals but of a national institute, with international backing that possessed great wealth and power and was overthrown. Real crimes were committed against real people but was it
2913:
You are right about persecution of Christians by Christians, but that it why I wrote resurfaced: Christians were persecuted by the pagan state until 324. After that they were only "intra-Christian persecutions" (except in Persian or Islamic territory) until the French Revolution, which again had a
2664:
I agree with KHM, if we cannot call Lutherans Protestants, who is left as Protestant. The only people I know who may object to such a classification are extreme Protestants who think Lutherans too moderate. But that is their POV - the truth is that Lutherans started the Reformation (that is not to
2584:
I'm fine with splitting Anglicans and Lutherans from the other Protestant churches as you have now done (and in fact I prefer it), as long as the meaning of the word "Protestant" is not obscured or redefined. BTW. I took out the "C.E." because the Knowledge Manual of Style prescribes no suffix for
2380:
The problem with finding cases of organised persecution by Christians of Athiests is always difficult as they are, by definition, not a single group. If persecution did occur, there is no central office to record it (and keep those records safe) or group of faithful followers to take up the cause.
2374:
Galileo was not the only academic called to account for his work. For example Champillon, whilst excavating in Egypt, had to supress clear archaeological evidence that contradicted Biblical chronology under RC church instructions. Less than 200 years ago, in the church controlled west, no academic
2245:
I think the site clearly shifts the onus of proof. I'm not sure what the point about original research is. Simply compiling a list is hardly original research. As long as each item on the list can be confirmed by authoritative sources, where's the problem? A previous editor has asked for anyone to
2193:
Problem, Mr Objective, is that the "Christian sites", as you call them, identify as such, while the "Human rights site" hides behind pretenses of objectivity, declaring alleged facts (and indeed they are mostly quite the opposite of facts) without sources or argument, and basically is nothing more
1995:
Re KHM03 comments above. I can see from your profile that as a Church Elder you are obviously best placed to judge neutrality. Also I hadn't realised that external links were supposed to be neutral and free of Povs. Thanks for the info. I'm just about to delete links which are obviously biased and
1941:
Suppression of sourced criticism does not make for neutrality. That is absurd. Why are inclusion of facts relevant to the topic not allowed? The only "POV here is the truth--the historical record. Now if you claim that the record itself is bias thats another matter, however it seems you are saying
1627:
In addition, Constantine instituted use of the Chi-Rho symbol, representative of Christianity, also alleged by some scholars to have had use as an obeloi for "auspicious" thus serving both Christian and non-Christian purpose simultaneously. Thus, we can see the effect of Mithranism on Christianity
1622:
In fact, Constantine was quite uninvolved in any Christmas date. Eastern and Western Churches still disagree on the proper date (25 December or 6 January). The December date was a reference to the winter solistice symbolism. There's nothing Mithraic about it. Both usages of the date go back to the
1523:
That is all true for the Gnostics. Whether they should be considered a Christian heresy or some pre-Christian religion putting on Christian clothes is debated. But nonetheless they were fought by the Church and denounced as unchristian. And Christianity as we have it is what came to us through the
1518:
Many early Christians migrated to Rome in the wake of the Jewish war, including Valentinus, Marcion, and Cerdo, established a school in which the new theology was taught. These were regarded as the gnostic leaders, who openly proclaimed that all things Jewish should be discarded. Having jettisoned
1412:
I noticed there was a changed made my Mika responding to one of your objections. Specifically that the church heiarchy was established already in the 1st century. Can you support this? I don't think its true. Maybe not until the 4th century with Christianity becoming the State religion would I say
1084:
and preacher; flourished between 20 and 30 C.E.; fore-runner of Jesus of Nazareth and originator of the Christian movement. Of his life and character Josephus ("Ant." xviii. 5, § 2)..." The Encylopeadiea Britannica states, "As a young man John lived...as part of a Jewish monastic community such as
248:
On the contrary, this is not the consensus about origins of Christianity. At best, as I said before, it is one theory, though how widely it is held today is another matter. But you worded it as it would be factual and uncontroversial, e.g. "the major Christian doctrines emerged ..." - no "may have
4201:
Hi, Mika, and welcome! Just two things. First, I'm sorry about the semiprotection. I have unprotected several times, but each time, the vandalism starts again. I'm going to try again now, but if it starts again, I may have to reprotect. In any case, since you are now a registered user, you should
4025:
Thanks, Iâll work on addressing this point. Its better if you leave it on the main page so that others can have a chance at editing with improvements in the grammer. No sense to keep taking it down each time so in effect im the only one working on it. Putting the POV tag is good enough; we should
3960:
A belief that salvation is achieved through relational and experiential knowledge. In the words of The Gnostic Apostolic Church, humanity needs to be awakened and brought "to a realisation of his true nature. Mankind is moving towards the Omega Point, the Great day when all must graduate or fall.
3897:
However, other poitns are certainly widely accepted as facts, and I think can be stated as facts. I disagree with Star1977 list of what he thinks are not generally accepted and thus POV if stated as a fact. For example, one source that I respect is the well known site www.religioustolerance.org I
2724:
I am seriously concerned that the accuracy of statements in this page are only challenged when they are critical of Christianity. Editors fly out of the woodwork rightly demanding proof, details and specifics in the case of anti statements. Am I the only one who thinks that describing post French
2336:
Someone asked for specific objections to the list of persecutions; here are some. The Spanish Inquisition was mainly under the control of the Spanish monarchy, not the Church. Prosecutions were generally carried out by secular authorities. Regarding the Cathars, my limited reading has yet to find
2175:
The reason for removing the Human rights weblink was given by KHM03 as its alleged bias & PoV. Now either external sites are expected to be neutral or they're not. If they're not then this link should be reinstated. If they are, then all of the blatently pro-Christian links will have to go. I
1971:
Well that is your POV/Claim. If you say that its inaccurate, not worthwhile, etc, then please make your case. This countries that engage in human rights violations calling Amnesty International POV. Human rights have objective universal standards and the record of Christianity is very poor by ANY
1777:
I'm not a big fan of the list of "people persecuted by Christians," or whatever it may be, but I can live with it (if it is correct). However, I would mention something about it being the medieval Roman Catholic church that did so (or specific others, where appropriate), instead of the simplistic
1646:
Timothy Freke, Peter Gandy Jesus and the Goddess (Thorsons, 2002) J.R. Porter, The Lost Bible (Duncan Baird, 2001) Maxwell Staniforth, Early Christian Writings (Penguin, 1978) L. Boyle, St. Clements, Rome (Collegio San Clemente, 1989) Jean Ritchie, The Secret World of Cults (Harper Collins, 1991)
1559:
Sure Christians were not the only one. No one claimed that. Mystery cults certainly are an interesting subject, but what is contentious here is the extreme claim that "Christianity began existing as a variety of mystery cults". Practically every word in this sentence is contentious on its own and
1536:
Other Christian sects, opposed to them, who argued for unquestioning faith and a blind acceptance of dogma, also were political sought sought accommodation with the caesars. Increasingly they compromised with traditional paganism and expropriated its iconography. They also further vulgarising and
869:
I disagree with the entire "mystery religion" thing. Aside from the fact that it's inaccurate (reason enough to not include it), it's unsourced. Clement & Origen commenting on Greek philosophy is not an endorsement on their part of the "mystery religion" theory...that's a separate school of
526:
That fact that Christians appeared to have copied many details of the Mithraic mystery-religion, was was explained by Christians with the argument that the devil had anticipated the true faith by imitating it before Christ's birth. Some resemblance between Christianity and Mithraism were so close
471:
Yes, the scholarship clearly backs up my contentions that the mystery cults were the forerunners of the early Christians. This information is suppressed by Christians--but it is true nonetheless. And, I did include references. The âweasle wordsâ (if I understand the the term) were the very things
4062:
If these âout thereâ views are not generally accepted then please cite your sources that make this claim, since you claim its completely untrue. I have already cited the many scholars who do support this view. Its only âout thereâ from the persepctive of relgious devotees who are boxed in by the
4032:
2. Camille Paglia is no more an authority deserving mention than my mailman. No reason at all to mention her. Why not bring in some recognized authorities and see what they think? The truth is that they disagree with Paglia. Again, no need to mention her or her POV, which is barely academic (re:
3887:
From my readings, I have found that while some of Giovanni's statements are contentious points in scholarship in that they apper to be asserted by a minority of biblical scholars throught the ages (probably because most such specialists have do have a pro-christian bias and a minority are from a
3691:
Fact. This is really undisputed as far as I know, except from dogmatic faith which is blind to facts anyway. They insist there was only one "true" Christianity and all others are not really Christians. This is pure POV and has no place here. See Mika's comments below that quotes from some of the
2930:
Accusation is a strong emotive word that really does not belong here. I, for my part, am trying to have an academic discussion about the definitions of persecution. I have not glorified the Revolution or said the Church deserved what happened to it. A revolution can only take place if you have a
2909:
But be that as it may, it has no bearing on our actual conflict. Christians (and yes, nuns are Christians too (and they are not part of the hierarchy)) were persecuted, clergy, layman and religious people killed, their worship supressed, an entire province of France was depopulated. You say they
2351:
It is attempting something entirely unreasonable - namely it is taking a late twentieth century definition of 'human rights' and applying it to an organisation's record over 2000 years. Not only is that unreasonable, but frankly no organisation or group would stand up to such scrutiny. Atheists,
2241:
On the contrary Str1977 the site in question looks to me to be well researched and to contain many good objective references, including many to the bible and other religious sources. I don't know if it purports to be objective, but I'm not sure that's relevent. As I said before, if we remove all
1840:
I too seem to detect a concerted effort here by the faithful to minimise any observations, however facual, that show the Church in a less than glorious light, and I also agree with the observation that the there is a heavy bias in the demands for citations by those editors who are very obviously
1650:
What is striking is the sheer variety of Christianities that proliferated from the very earliest date and a far from universal set of beliefs, including very basic things such as either in a human Jesus or a resurrected one. The evidence of Jesus's 'human existence', far from being confirmed and
1404:
That might be the case (though "open minded" is no useful concept here), but it in no way supports what you wrote. Yes, Origen and Clement pointed out similarities (but also differences) to Greek culture and philosophy to make Christianity respectable. In a way, theology in the original sense is
1399:
Regarding, Origen, (one of the more open minded fathers) he wrote hundreds of books trying to harmonize Christian thought with Greek philosophy, to create a synthesis of Christianity and Platonism basically. Allegorical interpretation of scripture and parallels drawn from Greek mythology was his
1360:
Larson's lifelong body of work reconstructs a complete story of Christian origins and its theological controversies, detailing Christian evolution from beginning to now. This includes the synthesis of ideas, deities and personalities that historically gave favor to Christianity against religious
1209:
Its funny that scholars which are known and respected are cited they said to be not good sources, yet no backing of these false claims are given. The same was done with Gibbon, whose autoritative resarch is very well respected and has not be discredited in the least. But I understand why: As Dr.
972:
Dillon, John (1977). "Numenius of Apamea" in The Middle Platonists (Cornell University Press). Filoramo, Giovanni. A History of Gnosticism, tr. Anthony Alcock (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers 1990, 1992). Hegel, G.W.F. "The Gnostics" in Lectures on the History of Philosophy, vol 2. "Plato and the
962:
CHRISTIANITY IN HISTORY General. F. L. Cross, The Oxford Dictionary of the Chris- tian Church (Oxford and New York, 1957). Adolf von Harnack, Outlines of the History of Dogma, 3rd ed. trans. Neil Buchanan, 7 vols. (London, 1894-99). K. S. Latourette, A History of the Expansion of Christianity, 7
770:
I have been reading various articles on Dionysus, Osiris, and Mithraism as it relates to Christianity for most of the day. My conclusion is that this article will turn into a rather lenthy discussion with references to the respective historians and their views on the evolution of Christianity.
238:
This is being reverted because its said that is being presented as fact. But it IS fact. Name some reputable scholarship which would deny the below connections in the origin and development of what became Christianity. I suggest you click on each link of the mystery cults listed along with their
4238:
I've semiprotected again (sigh). But, unlike the other times, when I went to edit the page to add the semiprotected template, I got a message saying that it had been protected so that only admins could edit it. I checked to see if I had accidentally selected full protection, but I hadn't. Can a
4138:
Kaufmann may be a very well respected scholar of Judaism...I've no idea. But that doesn't make him an authority on Christian history. Can you cite some more mainstream, acknowledged experts? If the perspective is as accurate and as prevalent and as accepted as you claim, that couldn't be too
4048:
in winter 2003. In September 2005, she was named one of the "Top 100 Public Intellectuals" in the world, in a list compiled jointly by editors of the journals "Foreign Policy" and "The Prospect" (UK). The list, which included only 10 women, also included feminist thinkers Germaine Greer, Martha
3999:(see above) and made those changes. If there are other and further issues, we can iron those out as well. This history and origins section, as it stands now, I think is very well done, in no small part thanks to the very critics who probably rather not see any such topic explicated at all. hehe
3926:
1st century CE: There were at least three distinct divisions within the Christian movement: the Jewish Christians (led by Jesus' brother James, with Jesus' disciples, and their followers), Pauline Christians (followers of St. Paul) and Gnostic Christians (people who believed that salvation came
3643:
Yes, I originally only stated the Hewebrew Bible, but this change was made in response to an objection by Wesley. It fits in very well with starting my section of the origins since Judiasm comprises the bulk of the influences of the early Christians, infact it was little more than just a Jewish
3278:
Another interesting thought, taken from Edmund Burke. The revolutionaries accused Catholics of intolerance. Burke said that the grand-children of those who had murdered the Hugenots in 1572 (the mob of Paris, directed by the government) now took revenge on behalf of these Hugenots and massacred
3027:
members of a minority group committed a crime â let's say a group of black youths gang raped a white woman in a country where most people were white â and in the five years following that, hundreds of black people had their land and goods seized by the government, dozens were thrown into prison
2803:
You are right that the FR was a secular revolt. It also had a totalitaristic approach and wanted to remake France according its ideas (most visible in Saint-Just). Opposing views had no place in the new France. That is the philosophical basis for this persecution (and part of that was the first
1457:
Similarly for the early battles with Marcion and Valentinius and Montanus, perhaps even as early as Simon Magus. This corruption was not always necessarily intentional; although, in some cases, it was and teachers of "error" brought in these "pollutions deceitfully in order to escape detection.
957:
Dr Constantine Scouteris, "The Therapeutae of Philo and the Monks as Therapeutae according to Pseudo-Dionysius": comparing the Therapeutae with the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy Golb, Norman. 1985. "Who Wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls? The Search for the Secret of Qumran". Scribner Sanders, E.P., 1992.
3196:
That is all beside the point. There was a persecution of Christians (namely RCs, Protestants were not avaiable "thanks" to Louis XIV), even under an explicite anti-Christian banner. Other religions don't matter either. Or are you saying that Nero did not persecute Christians because he did not
2967:
The Enlightenment was a movement in the whole of Europe and some traits are common to every country but only in France did it have such a distinct anti-Christian bent (Emperor Joseph II and the Bavarian minister Montgelas were giving the Church a hard time too, but it didn't result in outright
1742:
article which deals with this stuff in greater detail. I edited out most of the controversial/disputed elements, incoroprating the rest into the text. If we want to expand more than a very basic overview (particularly with material which is disputed in academia), we ought to revisit the main
1145:
Dr Constantine Scouteris, "The Therapeutae of Philo and the Monks as Therapeutae according to Pseudo-Dionysius": comparing the Therapeutae with the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy Golb, Norman. 1985. "Who Wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls? The Search for the Secret of Qumran". Scribner Sanders, E.P., 1992.
934:
which was increasingly at variance with the teachings of orthodox Christian faith as it developed." Dionysus: According to Martin A. Larson in The Story of Christian Origins (1977) and the American scholar Camille Paglia, a 'disciple of the Cambridge School of Anthropology,â and the wiki page
3149:
The use of Nero persecuting the Christians is interesting as Nero had power and an army at his disposal and the Christians had neither wealth nor power. Their religious beliefs were a direct challenge to his status as a god like emperor and historical records show they were persecuted by him.
2445:
On the contrary, Stalin did target people for various reasons and you cannot always so easily separate the various reasons - politics, econimics, ideology, religion, mere rivalry. Stalin did institute a anti-Jewish campaign late in his life. But if you don't "like" Stalin than take Lenin, who
1595:
He was, as all Emperors before him, head of the Roman state cult. Since Aurelian there was also the cult of "Sol invictus", which can be described as a slimmed down version of Mithras. But how do these official functions (which were more or less dropped in the following years) have to do with
1475:
Blind faith, which renders the impossible possible (Mark ix. 23, 24), produced a thnking that deprecated learning, as was shown by Draper ("History of the Conflict between Science and Religion") and by White ("History of the Warfare of Science with Theology"). A craving for the miraculous and
1431:
Also, that in doing so they adopted many of the others beliefs and doctrines, even as they destroyed them, afterwards? There is no contradiction between the two notiong. The theological controversies you could say had a "polluting effect." The Apostasy as a very gradual process; in process of
562:, many of the alleged similarities listed at that article are simply not true of Christianity at all; an example is the suggestion that Christianity started out being anti-female or even exclusively male. Many of the saints and martyrs from the early period, were women, including evangelists.
500:
I hope these suffice as adequate sourced material. Somehow I know no matter what I do, prove, or change, the Christian slant will supress all secular scohlarship as POV if it counters their religious conception which is ahistorical at its core. To shed too much light on historical context and
3129:
In fact that's somethin a left-wing politician in the 1905 separation hearings argued: "In France we guarantee freedom of conscience, but not freedom of religion. Someone may believe what he likes, but he is not guaranteed adherence to a certain corporation." (Paraphrased from memory) That's
1832:
I have just restored the persecutions list. I think it is interesting and believe many others will too. Is anyone denying any of the categories mentioned? If so, no doubt citations can easily be provided. Just list the ones doubted - persanally I can't even guess which ones might be in doubt
1703:
I can't seem to find Larson or his book on Amazon.com...could you provide an ISBN number? It could be that I'm just not searching properly. I still see that his work was way out of the mainstream and not accepted by most mainstream scholars. Could you "back up" his claims from other, more
1389:
Wesley, I don't believe that Jesus was an Essene either. At most I said he was influenced by them, and that John the Baptist is widely regarded to have been an Essense. This is all I said, so I agree with your Fredrikson quote. Also, my contributions never even made the claim that any one in
3096:
And no, we don't include Catholics persecuted under Elizabeth etc. here, as they were persecuted by other Christians. Yes, I consider them martyrs of the faith (but that's my Catholic POV), but they can and are included in the "persecution by Christians" section (under "dissenting Christian
2461:
I believe it is inaccurate to lump together Anglicanism and Lutheranism simply under the heading "Protestants," along with the numerous other denominations that were either offshoots of these two reform movements within the Church catholic, or were started by particular leaders. There is a
2721:
church wealded enormous power was the biggest land owner. In actual fact it was anti all religions. For something to be NPOV the frame of reference must be taken into account. A popular name for an event is not necessarily a historically accurate and complete description of the occurances.
857:
In its early years, what came to be called Christianity may have existed as a variety of mystery cults, limited to a small number of people and expounding esoteric teachings. Most scholarship believes these to included the Nasseni, Essenes,Therapeutae, Gnostics, Dionysus, and there is much
2863:
You also seem to object to the inclusion of the French Revolution persecution of Catholics because this page "is about Christanity not just the RC church". I hope you're not implying that Catholic are not Christians. If they are, and they were persecuted, then Christians were persecuted.
730:
Again about Mithraism, I believe current thinking place their texts no earlier than mid second century, while the gospels and other Christian stories of Christ's birth etc. date no later than the end of the first century. Therefore it's more likely that Mithraism borrowed some ideas from
2352:
Americans, Italians, Asians or People with Blue Eyes; none would look good if what they did 1000 years ago was judged by the standards of today. Likewise a Knowledge from 1000 years ago would undoubtedly condemn 21st century Western society for what they perceived as horrendous crimes.
1484:
This medieval Christianity tended to find bliss in ignorance, because knowledge and belief seemed incompatible (Lecky, "History of European Morals from Augustus to Charlemagne," ii. 203-210; idem, "History of the Rise and Influence of the Spirit of Rationalism in Europe," i. 1-201).
3210:
page it must be shown that they were persecuted for being Christians rather than the unfortunate victims of a backlash against an institution the taught poverty and humility yet wealded enormous wealth and power. An institution that had not granted religious freedom to others.
3036:
attempt to conjure up the devil with the motive of harming their enemies? If groups of innocent people have their property confiscated and are imprisoned or executed, then that is persecution regardless of whether or not other people in the same category have committed crimes.
2392:
colleagues of Copernicus almost bullied him into not publishing his book (and would have succeeded would it not have been for his confessor) and Gallileo was opposed by his colleagues (while supported by the Church). I don't think that is persecution, but you seem to disagree.
1432:
defending the received "truth," the Church became sullied by the engagements with its opponents both outside and within the Church. To reject errors, specific arguments were designed which were effective against the opposition but which contained imbalances and exaggerations.
903:
But, again, I will cite my sources, which would suffice alone, but on top of that I'll include dozens of other sources which support these claims. And, I will re-insert the section so that it can continue to be improved by myself and others, and keep the NPOV tag until this is
346:
such knowlege for if followers of the faith understand the historical basis for their beliefs it my harm their faith? This type of POV pushing that suppresses knowlege is in keeping with the type of religious intolerance we seen in history, but is no place for an encylopedia.
1426:
Yes, I would deny that. Yes, Christian congegrations existed apart from one another and hence there were some differences. There were also other groups who claimed Christ and held various doctrines, e.g. the Gnostics but then it's the issue how broad Christianity should be
1117:
The Essene-Christian Faith (1989, 273 pp.) by Larson is a thorough and scholarly review of the development of the Essene movement within Judaism, of the Teacher of Righteousness (ca. 95 - ca. 69 B.C.), and of his close parallel, Jesus, who he is states is also probably an
3569:
on the extent to which ecumenism existed before becoming important, and the level of importance it achieved, I'd suggest: started, flourished, developed, blossomed, was established, etc. But I'd rather leave the lexical choice to someone who knows more about the subject.
1578:
You are right about the writers, but not "many writings of this period, however, succumbed to destruction from the Early Catholic Church as heretical" - the most of what is lost was just lost and not intentionally destroyed. Origen, yes, was frowned upon, but you can't
3255:(Sunday), abolishing the Sabbath, and forbidding any public display of the Christian Cross, and the proposal of two alternate religions. This doesn't sound like a victory of Huguenots over Roman Catholics, but more like a victory of atheists over Christians. Like the
1546:
as well at roughly the same time as Christianity. Many followers of this movement (Valentinius being one of the most well-known) were also Christians, and taught a synthesis of the two belief systems. This of course resulted in major controversy in the early church.
1508:
Many cardinal "Christian" beliefs, including belief in a sacrificial Jesus, had been widespread for centuries before the Christians appeared. The evidence shows clearly that the Christians took over pre-existing beliefs and sacraments rather than introduced new ones.
2395:
As for the atheists - if there is no evidence then it's not our business to make such claims anyway. Yes, Atheism is an old hat, but it had been out of use of a couple of (saner) centuries. Not because it was violently surpressed but because of its own deficencies.
1394:
The Essenes are no mystery cult and any influence on Christianity (sure various Jewish sects influenced each other) mut be before the year 66. And remember, you did not claim "influence" but you claimed "may have existed as a variety of mystery cults" (in the newest
3041:
groups of innocent people are thrown into prison and exectuted, not for crimes, but for belonging to a particular group, then it is persecution, regardless of whether or not they have intellectual discussions with their executioners about the two natures of Christ.
1836:
Incidentally, many of these persecutions were detailed in an external web-link on human rights. There is something more than suspicious in removing a link that makes a case, then reverting material consistent with that case on the grounds that it is not supported!
3551:
I did a rewrite of the history section, as I didn't like the style and also felt some things missing, mainly: the origins and separation from Judaism, the theological debates (heresies), monasticism, scholasticism, the relationship of the two powers and ecumenism.
1476:
supernatural created ever new superstitions, under the form of relic-worship from old pagan forms of belief. In the name of the Christian faith reason and research were condemned, Greek philosophy and literature were exterminated, and free thinking was suppressed.
714:
Regarding the much later section about the list of persecutions, it's particularly important to note that the persecution of pagans and Jews was a two-way street for quite a while, especially in Alexandria. The pagans also had a brief 'revival' during the reign of
3614:
No, but its common practice to mention the scolarly discussion regarding the subject matter, not to argue theories (I dont do that). To exclude this subject matter is POV. Only the Christian churces and their advocates want to exclude this topic, and have done so
1801:
The list was flawed, as some groups were not persecuted by Christians at all, some to no large extent and some were pseudo-groups. And not of those that were persecuted by Christians were persecuted by the Catholic Church or specifically by the Catholic Church.
1028:
specifically states "Knowledge articles should not use other Knowledge articles as sources. Wikilinks are not a substitute for sources." In other words, Giovanni cannot use WP articles to back up his assertions, although he can use sources cited in other
1452:
Believers coming from a Greek background, such as Justin Martyr, used their intellectual heritage to explain the faith. The result is theology. It is utterly inadequate to put this into a narrow X vs. Y framework. Christians didn't become pagans by doing
321:
from being a dominant theory. Were they an influence? Probably. But they were not nearly as important as the proposed edit implies. There is also no "pro-Christian" standard being applied; the proposed changes are wholly inaccurate, pure and simple.
3308:
I never said that the RCC in France (or anywhere) was spotless (though it was Louis XIV who kicked out the Hugenots, rightly considering such a move to be popular (so no protests) but also increasingly interfered into Church matters (Jesuits, Jansenists
914:(1977), Osiris was the first savior, and all soteriology in the region borrowed this religion, directly and indirectly, including Mithraism and Christianity, from an Osirian-Dionysian influence. Therapeutae--its stated a fact on the Wiki article as the â
1421:
Let me explain fully my understandings, in a synopsis, if you will. This might be long but please bear with me. Do you deny that the first three centuries there was a plethora of Christian "cults" that vied with each other and their pagan adversaries?
1303:
which was assimilated by state-sponsored Christianity before being diposed of in name, according to Martin A. Larson, in The Story of Christian Origins (1977), Mithraism and Christianity derived from the same sources, originally from the savior cult of
3706:
Ok, i agree here. I think this should be changed. Instead of saying existed as, it should state that it emerged along side and with "a vareity of mystery cults," many of which converted into Christitans and helped to influence its developing ideas and
870:
thought. Paglia and Larson? If we're going to make this kind of claim, if it is true and supported by "most scholarship" (also completely untrue...and unsourced), surely there are dozens of mainstream historians we could cite. Let's do that first.
3322:
I do not claim that Roman Catholics are not Christians (I do not have a POV on this) but some other groups that would describe themselves as Christian would dispute this. Since this is a page about Christianity as a whole this should be born in mind.
1600:
However, he was also interested in creating unity for the sake of ease of governance, and to this end involved himself in a dispute between Christian groups over Arianism, summoning the First Council of Nicaea; this Council produced the Nicene Creed.
3914:"Historians speak of many Christian faith groups teaching conflicting views of Jesus, God, morality, religious obligations, etc. Men and women led house churches. No central authority existed; the congregations were almost completely decentralized."
3636:"The early Christians heavily relied on the Koine Greek Alexandrine text of the Hebrew Bible commonly refered to in the west as the Septuagint." is a true statement but no way to start the history section. I even doubt it needs to be included at all.
3092:
No doubt the revolutionaries were exploiting the dire need of the populace but what did persecution and genocide help in that respect (yes, those killed no longer starve, but ...), especially since the starving and the persecuted might be the same
4128:
field, but not in terms of, say, Reformation history or Marxist economics. Related fields to Jesus research? Possibly. But he's not expert in all of them. Paglia isn't an accepted authority in Christian history. You and I can't change that.
832:
anything we'd like to know, but at least it will provide a solid basis. The nEw Testament happens to be the best source for the where, when and what of Jesus. I object to dismissing the NT as a sources only to fuill the "void" with speculation.
442:
The objections were concerning your theory that Christian doctrine came from mystery religions. There was no agreement regarding the addition of your theory; you added it anyway and claimed agreement. There was / is no agreement. It was the
282:
I can't see that it is the dominant theory, at least not this extreme version you included. As for my issues, they are not only wording and NPOV, as I don't think your version is accurate at all. But if I suppose that for a moment, there are
1897:
Yes. Frankly, I don't care for the approach it takes. Yes, I believe that Christians have persecuted people. But an unsubstantiated list which contains so many groups...doesn't seem quite fair. I'd like to see either academic support for
3792:. Likewise with the Essense. As the Sons of Light, this reflected an influence from Zoroastrianism via their parent ideology of Pythagoreanism. According to Larson, both the Essenes and Pythagoreans resembled thiasoi, or cult units of the
2977:
As for resurfacing: the FR set the model for modern-day persecutions, either attempted (Commune) or implemented (Lenin). Ideas of religious tolerance, also furthered by the Enlightenment, mostly kept these urges in check, but it did set a
2301:
Animists (unless subsumed under "pagans"), Zoroastrians; worshippers of Greek, Roman, Egyptian, Norse and Celtic gods (unless subsumed under pagans); Manichaeans, Gnostics and other Dualists (unless subsumed under "so-called "Heretics"");
501:
material basis for a belief system is to demysify it and bring understanding for how these ideas were formed. Such is counter to the devine, inspired nature that Christian faith depends on--thus its supressed and evidence of POV pushing.
1564:
After the decree of Theodosius in 391, and subsequent suppression, many Mithraeums were converted into Christian churches (such as Notre-Dame du Taur, and the Church of San Clemente); these were often dedicated to the archangel Michael.
1313:
religious ideas combined from Judaic monotheism, Persian dualism, eastern otherworldliness and asceticism, and the various mystery teachings makes the origins of Christian doctrine one whose complexity continues to shroud it in mystery.
1162:
And in regard to Essenes, I have run into a disagreement on another article, and from what I hear (I haven't yet been able to look into it) this article is not quite up to standard. Certainly the passage Giovanni quoted is at least very
1039:
Where to begin, apart from this being atrocious grammar. First, "was thought to be a member of" and "widely regarded to be" â by whom? Unatributed speculation is no basis for concluding that this is historical fact. In fact, there is
3858:
things that are disputed (e.g. "In its early years, there was not one Christianity"). Even if we firmly believe that something is true, it's against Knowledge policy to state it as fact if it's disputed. That may be the hardest part of
571:
It would greatly facility discussion if all the anon users would use registered usernames, so that we can address you by name rather than number. (For instance, which anon user is "Giovanni", and how do you know which IP Giovanni used,
297:
Yes, I noticed the word "purported", and had problems with it. Also, I find it illogical to imply that just because the word "Christians" first appears in Acts 11:26, Christianity first appeared then. People, things, and concepts exist
2910:
deserved it - that is a monstrous view but you are free to adhere to it (and before my overhaul the Roman persecution section said the same: that Christians deserved it) - but your POV is no basis of excluding this act of persecution.
1841:
influenced by their own Christian beliefs. As someone has noted earlier not a single citation has been offered for pro-Christian statements or for the removal of statements that are less than lauditary to the record of Christianity.
3755:
I'm afraid you are the one that has it wrong. Dionysus was pagen, yes, and Christianity was a development of it, at least according to many scholars. It is also a god of mystery religious rites, such as those practiced in honor of
3721:
Fact with greater clarifcation needed, perhapds. Since there was no one Christianity there was no one central chuch heiarchy to consolidate ideas and dinfine itself clearly. This happened in the 4th century. Before then it was very
2807:
But the objective of my edit was not to discuss this all in breadth but to state that persecution of Christians after a long hiatus reappeared in the French Revolution (and later persecutions by totalitarian states all follow this
2804:
genocide of modernity, in the Vendee). In France this lingered on way into the 20th century, though never again in the form of long-term direct persecution (the Commune was too short for that and 1905 didn't venture to go that far).
1282:
In its early years, what came to be called Christianity may have existed as a variety of mystery cults, limited to a small number of people and expounding esoteric teachings. Most scholarship believes these to included the Nasseni,
657:
In its early years, what came to be called Christianity may have existed as a variety of mystery cults, limited to a small number of people and expounding esoteric teachings. Most scholarship believes these to included the Nasseni,
1972:
standard of human rights. This information is being suppressed as POV only, which is an abuse of the notion of neutrality. To suppress sourced criticism is not NPOV. Please make your case if think link is not factually accurate.
1617:
For example, he moved the date of celebration of Jesus' birth to December 25th (since this was the celebration date for the birth of Mithras and Bacchus, and also the date of other winter solstice festivals such as Saturnalia).
1632:
Note, you just said "alleged by some scholars to have had use as" and then you turn it into "we can see the effect of Mithranism on Christianity directly". How about XP being the initial letters of XPISTOS? Too absurd a theory?
3178:
guaranteed religious freedom for all for the first time, where that freedom did not impact on others. For example Jews were only granted French citizenship after the Revolution - hardly the work of an "anti religion" regime.
2985:
I agree with you presenting information in a balanced way and I certainly could imagine including the FR passage in a ranting/POV way. But this is unacceptable here on WP or elsewhere and I don't think that I have done this.
2746:
wasn't in line with the revolutionaries' ideologies - I wouldn't think of sifting through the groups persecuted by Christians and decided who deserved it and who didn't and hence who should be included or not in this article.
2115:
Wiping out work of agreed changes from the talk page, without justification or any participatin on the talk page, despite notice, and over and over is a vandalism. My summary is accurate. 64.121.40.153 00:26, 17 January 2006
1651:
agreed by early Christians, was a matter of ferocious contention. Many Christians between the 1st - 4th century had NO belief in a flesh and blood Jesus; it was offensive to some particular interpretations of the divine.
3352:
That argument only works if a) Catholics are not Christians (which you didn't subscribe to) or b) one set of Christians persecuted another set of Christians and hence the issue was not Christianity. Neither is the case
3298:
Sophia, I am sorry if you feel attacked, but I must remind you that you suggested that opposition to your view was based on "religious loyalties of the editors which is POV". Let me assure you that nothing was intended
2781:
I personally don't know much about the persecution of Christians during the French Revolution, though I've always thought that was a very "secular" revolt, if not altogether atheist. I may be wrong of course, and plead
2750:
by non-Christians, this phenomenon resurfaced with the French Revolution. The "in Europe" means that it resurfaced in Europe (as opposed to the Islamic world, Japan, China) but it did not resurface everywhere in Europe.
3073:
Allowing loose and questionable definitions of persecution to stand will benefit nobody as everyone with a horror story will feel thay can add to the list. This is obviously an emotive subject so NPOV is all the more
2313:"proto-scientists" are no group and the alleged cases are mostly spurious or better subsumed under either heretic or witch. It boils down to one case: Gallilei, who was neither proto or warrants a note all by himself.
2052:
an "expert group", "human rights group", church, or other type of association. Several million people have created their own blogs in the last few years. They are not regarded as acceptable sources for Knowledge. See
4202:
find that you're able to edit semiprotected pages quite soon. I'm not sure how many days it takes. The other thing is that Knowledge does not share your high opinion of the Religioustolerance.org website. Please see
2728:
For this page to have any credibility the same standards must be applied to all. The discussions above show that such generalisations would not have survived the mainly RC editors of this page if the tables had been
1663:
To be true to what you said earlier about paganisation and de-judification you would have to consider those that didn't think a "flesh and blood Jesus ... offensive" as closer to the original. But somehow you don't.
2216:
aka "Mr Objective" -- As I stated previously, I have no doubt that there has been persecution by Christians of other groups. What I asked for was, rather than an unsupported list, that we come up with sources (see
2102:, your recent edit summary claimed "rv vandalism/suppression of agreed changes in talk page"...but there was no vandalism and no agreed changes on the talk page. Please watch your summaries for accuracy. Thanks...
948:
Francis Legge, Forerunners and Rivals of Christianity, From 330 B.C. to 330 A.D. (1914), reprinted as two volumes bound as one, University Books New York, 1964. LC Catalog 64-24125. The Therapeutae and Christianity
380:, your recent edit summary claimed "rv vandalism/suppression of agreed changes in talk page"...but there was no vandalism and no agreed changes on the talk page. Please watch your summaries for accuracy. Thanks...
1466:
Eventually one particular faction insinuated itself into the political establishment the instituted obedience of Church leaders and a conformity of thought. But this was closer to teh 4th century than the 1st, no?
458:
others. Also, what are you defining as Christianity? Is that 4th century Christianity or that taught by Christ? I see a distinction between the two; without any intended offense to our traditional Christians.
1527:
Ah, and "Many early Christians migrated to Rome" - yes, but many early Christians already were in Rome ... and they reacted sooner (Valentinus) or later (Marcion) to these heresiarchs ... and not in a positive
1513:
Belief in Jesus widespread before Jesus? Concepts in mystery cults and in Christianity are incompatible, these other "sacrificial lambs" were never historical person. And your clear evidence is contentious at
3878:
Hi. This is Mika, and I disagree. I have been following with some interst Giovanni's arguments, and looking up his references. I've been reading and learning a lot and wish to thank him for his contributions.
2628:
consider them Protestant. The same is true of Anglicans. So let's try and move on...but, by all means, on the articles for these groups, say something about some folks' objections to the Protestant label.
2624:. They formed, at least in part, out of a protest against Rome. If some Lutherans don't like the label (and mots that I know don't care one way or the other), that's not the issue...historians and scholars
432:
the ostensive agreement from this page. Your quick review is perhaps too quick. My comments are accurate. If not please be specific with other problems that have been stated which have escaped my attention.
1390:
particular was an Essense per se, only that the Essene mystery teachings were among these mystery cults which influenced the development of what emerged as Christianity. And, I said this is widely accepted.
754:
I agree with your comments about use of passive voice vs an active voice with attribution. I'll go back and see what I can do to correct this and I hope others can continue to improve this section as well.
3214:
Sorry, but your bias shows through your comments. All these things are beside the point. After centuries we had a non-Christian state persecuting Christians under the banner of "dechristianisation". Period.
2267:
So, another pro-Christian advocate who has missed the point entirely about objectivity and who fails to cite a single concrete example to support accusations of innacuracy. This is really not good enough.
1327:
Incidentally, in doing some research, Larson's book (which is hard to find nowadays) is largely discredited by mainstream historians. Not a very authoritative or well thought of source for information.
1623:
natural fact of the solistice. There are even recent theories that the date was originally Christian and copied by paganism. I don't believe that but it illustrates the difficulties in finding causation.
835:
I not with gladnesss, Giovanni, that you intend no disrespect and I believe you. I just wanted to point this out. I agree, that the issues of the "historical Jesus" need not be discussed in our context.
3357:
I will bow out of this discussion at this point as I have nothing to new add and as I said previously I do not like the emotive, personal and totally inappropriate language that is starting to be used.
1902:
list of that type, or just leave it, and keep up the link to the appropriate articles. I don't see a list, after all, which states that "Christians have been persecuted by Muslims, atheists..." etc.
4091:
Backwards or Forwards: Lectures on Reform Judaism, Jewish Theology Systematically and Historically Considered, Heaven and Hell in Comparative Religion, and the Origins of the Synagogue and the Church.
3134:
of the Church is persecution. The French measures also didn't target only the institution - yes, you were not harmed if you kept your mouth shut, but if a believer protested he was targetted as well.
1867:
Let's do this way since I assume you can't possibly doubt all of the list. You let me know just one that can't easily be justified by a good academic reference, and I'll remove the whole list myself!
3056:
Do I take it that you are advocating the repression of medieval Catholics in England should be added to the list of persecutions against Christianity even though it was committed by other Christians?
2381:
Athiesm is a very old idea but as stated above there were none in the 13th century as they would not have survived. Bearing in mind the diversity of today's belief systems this in itself is telling.
472:
that were said to be required to make my inclusion acceptable and NPOV. Ironic that now they are used to suppress it, yet again. Please tell me which âweasle wordsâ you object to and we can fix them.
3153:
Nero persecuted Christians in Rome as a scapegoat to remove any rumours that he had set Rome on fire, and not because they denied him worship. Of course, that didn't increase his sympathy for them.
1613:
Nonsense. Sol invictus was no "main competitor" - it was Aurelian's attempt to create such unity through a slimmed down Mithras. But it did not yield success. And differences needed no mitigation.
1694:
I've made serveal changes to the contentious elements in the passage, and have reposted it. Please do no revert without talking aobut my latest changes, and contributions here in the talk page.
1417:
Read the New Testament (Matthew, letters to Timotheus, to Titus), read the letter of Saint Ignatius. The church hierarchy is clearly visible throughout the second and especially the 3rd century.
1379:. I still wonder, have you mentioned a citation where Origen or Tertullian connect Christianity with the 'inner mystery' religions favorably? I may well have missed it in the bulk text above.
3944:
16th century to the present time: Protestantism fragmented into more than a dozen families of denominations, and thousands of individual faith groups -- over 1,000 in North America alone.
822:
That, Giovanni, is one of the problems often encountered in such discussions. YOu say the Bible is a book of faith, and you are right: it is. But it is also a historical work in two senses:
390:
Wiping out work of agreed changes from the talk page, without justification or any participatin on the talk page, despite notice, and over and over is a vandalism. My summary is accurate.
2347:
Mr Objective seems to have stopped posting here when I asked for his evidence. However, since he asked, let's examine the reasons why the heretication site is actually far from objective.
1361:
competitors such as Mithraism, which lacked a human founder and barred the general public, or Manichaeism, which lacked a deified founder. He summarizes the exposition of this story..."
2964:
The revolution was in fact a boundle of revolutions: a rebellion of starving masses in Paris, a crisis of the political system, and some ideologists making the best of it for their cause.
1184:
I will be a able to address all these points later today, and further make changes to the language to reflect consensus. Sorry, I've been a little too busy to take care of this yesterday.
1448:
that in the process it became subtly sympathetic with the opponent, and susceptible to incorporating attitudes and traditions which may have foreign to the biblical faith at one time.
540:
which Giovanni's inclusions reflect. If your lack of consensus is based on legitimate objections, please state them. Otherwise, I vote that this souced knowlege no longer be supressed.
4106:
It is a very brief overview only. Iâve checked the other languages article on Christianity and this is of comparable length. This is ont too lengthy, esp. considering its illumination.
2974:
Of course, the reasons for the persecution were not entirely religious, but a bundle of religious, policial, economic, social issues, but the same can be said for earlier persecutions.
1375:
from Paula Fredrikson saying Jesus was not an Essene (or Pharisee, or member of several other groups), and another bit by Jaroslav Pelikan simply discussing his role as a Jewish Rabbi
4100:
6. Finally, the piece offered by Giovanni is simply too lengthy. We need a brief overview...History of Christianity can give a lengthier treatment. KHM03 11:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
2871:
been persecution of Christians in European countries prior to the French Revolution, hadn't there? Didn't many countries martyr the Christians before Christianity became established?
1132:
Francis Legge, Forerunners and Rivals of Christianity, From 330 B.C. to 330 A.D. (1914), reprinted as two volumes bound as one, University Books New York, 1964. LC Catalog 64-24125.
4277:
No, you semi-protected it perfectly, and since they are still around, I'd say it wouldn't hurt to leave it with SEMI for now. You can see some discussion of the "Protected message"
920:
The Essenes were a religious sect of Judaism, of which it is Jesus was thought to be a member of, and which John the Baptist is widely regarded to be a prime example of an Essene.â
3166:
lists religious intolerance as one of the main causes of the Revolution. This was due to persecution of other faiths and other Christian denominations by the French RC Church (see
481:
About citing sources---I did. Notice that each of the mytery cults I listed links to Wiki, and each of the respective articles substanciates the point. But, Iâll list them here:
2566:
You can't just make words mean whatever you want them to mean. This word has a clear definition and is in common usage. Any attempt to implicitly change that invariably violates
719:
during which he tried to favor both pagans and Jews over Christians. If a detailed list of such is necessary, it should include both directions; such detail might be better in a
3367:
I am saddened that it ends this way but I can't help it. Believe me some of the things you said were not very gentle either, be it to other editors or to Christians in general.
825:
1) it gives the history of the people of Israel (of course seen from their perspective and through the lens of faith - and not all books of the Bible are concerned with history)
3822:
Not exclusively Gnostic, at all. I touched on all the influences that scholarship is thinks to have played a role in the development of Chrisitian ideas, and I state as much.
3340:
Banning PUBLIC displays of the cross and the word "Sunday" over a period of 6 years is the best example of exclusively Christian discrimination that has come forward so far.
828:
2) it is a historical source just like other sources. Of course we need to do Quellenkitik but I object to any singeling out of the Biblöe as something different or inferior.
591:
I worked on the entry to address all of your points, Wesley. Let me know if you have any other objections. Btw, Giovanni lists his name above and is .40.153 My name is Mika.
3951:
to Pauline Christianity survived, and became the established church. However, it later split into thousands of Christian faith groups with competing beliefs and practices.
3259:, they were apparently content to promote any religion or no religion at the expense of Christianity, so it's not surprising that Jews enjoyed greater freedom at this time.
2646:
the 16th-century influences of the European Continental Reformation, the English Reformation, or both. Also included in this grouping are the Moravians and the Lusitanians.
2258:
The heretication site isn't even close to objective, or even factually correct. Given the thousands of sites about Christianity there are out there we can do much better.
2713:
I've twice removed references to persecution of Christians during the French Revolution and still think the sentence has no place in this section as it currently stands.
2446:
originated a vicious persecution of the Russian Orthodox Church. Compared with him, the later Stalin relented a bit (though of course Stalin had been Lenin's hench man).
2306:
Some notes about the groups mentioned. We don't need to argue about Jews, pagans, heretics (including all subsections), witches as they are already included in the text.
3097:
denominations and denominational strife"). The current distinction between the two section is a bit questionable in that regard, but I guess it's the best way to put it.
3595:
This is the general article on Christianity with a short historical overview. It should give a brief overview of the history of Christianity from the origins until now.
1958:
It's a POV, unbalanced, inaccurate link. You're acting as if it's unbiased historic fact. There are many valid critiques of Christianity; this link isn't worthwhile.
1139:
Vermes, Geza and Martin D. Goodman, eds. The Essenes according to the Classical Sources. Sheffield: Oxford Centre for Postgraduate Hebrew Studies and JSOT Press, 1989.
953:
Vermes, Geza and Martin D. Goodman, eds. The Essenes according to the Classical Sources. Sheffield: Oxford Centre for Postgraduate Hebrew Studies and JSOT Press, 1989.
3193:
the organised persecution of Protestants (or any other Christian denominations) during the Revolution - can anyone give examples? For that matter any other religions?
2434:
I think the big difference here is that Stalin didn't target people on the basis of their religion or lack thereof. He targeted people on the basis of their politics.
2194:
than a statement of bigotry that doesn't even realise that any criticism they might make is only possible because of the influence of Christianity in the first place.
249:
emerged", no "scholars argue" etc. That is clearly against Knowledge's NPOV policy. Also, calling those that disagree with your edits names does not help anyone here.
3622:
The conflict with Islam is a most important feature for world history in general and for the history of Christianity in particular. There's absolutely no removing it.
2493:
Apparently the Anglicans agree, since the full name of their church in the United States appears to be the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America
2424:
Stalin would be the outstanding example. Up to 100 million Russians died either directly or indirectly due to his actions or policies. Many of these were Christians.
3248:
2825:
2717:
2552:
a member or follower of any of the western Christian Churches that are separate from the Roman Catholic Church in accordance with the principles of the Reformation.
138:
3344:
No, no. We had destruction of monasteries, confiscation and desecration of basilicas, killings of clerics, religious, laypeople, ... and the genocide in the Vendee.
716:
144:
2134:
most recent edit summary ("rv vandalism/suppression of agreed changes in talk page") is quite misleading, as the edit before did not at all fit the definition of
3938:
1054 CE: The great schism formally divided Christendom into two main groups: Roman Catholicism in western Europe, and the Eastern Orthodox churches in the east.
2856:
commit? Eleven nuns, three lay sisters, and two servants were guillotined; they sang hymns at the scaffold. They don't sound very corrupt to me. There's even an
2021:
Yes, the double-standard is glaring. Pro-religious links are allowed to stand, which are clearly POV, yet nothing that could pur the church in a negative light.
2842:
was neither anti-Christian nor pro-Christian but just stating a simple fact, neither justifying nor dramatising or exaggerating or downplaying the persecution.
576:? I honestly can't tell who you think is correct.) It would also help if you would assume good faith and discuss the edits themselves, not your fellow editors.
3803:
You are confusing the conflict of early Christianity with Gnosticism etc. (2nd and 3rd century) with the time of Christianity's legalization and establishment.
2143:
2123:
2077:
2003:
1870:
1847:
1440:
This is because the relious movments were part of the political landscape. For example with the defeat of the Jews in 135 everything Jewish to be distanced.
3608:
It is not meant as a platform to argue theories, even valid ones. But without arguing them, especially since they are contentious, it becomes even more POV.
3535:
2778:. Our Roman Catholic sisters and brothers - at least on this article - are fine editors who do good work. So let's give them the benefit of the doubt here.
1249:
This is taken from "An Update on the Dead Sea Scrolls by MARTIN A. LARSON (Paper Presented to the Eighth International Revisionist Conference) Vol. No1 2001
3748:" - now, I don't know the Nasseni, but the Essenes were no mystery cult at all, the Gnostics are they one you are talking about and Dionysus is a pagan god.
1550:
There are scholarly works and debate on a influence of Christianity by mystery cults and vice versa. But what you claim as consensus is an extreme position.
3100:
And finally, I don't think it is a loose definition of persecution. Mutatis mutandis, there was persecution of Christians by the state in 303 and in 1793.
1760:
is in dispute among scholarship with some citations that show this. That would help and we can make the appropriate language adjustments to reflect that.
4239:
fully-registered non-admin (sorry to be so patronizing!) let me know if you still see "edit this page"? There might be some kind of software bug. Thanks.
3044:
And if we agree that there were Christian martyrs in Europe prior to the French revolution, then it's perfectly appropriate to use the word "resurfaced".
3986:
3175:
2271:
2249:
2213:
2183:
688:
680:
573:
541:
141:
1857:
If you wish to include the list, can you give a specific academic citation to support it? Newspaper article, book, etc.; please let us know. Thanks...
1259:
I move the contentious paragraphs here, as they are not only inaccurate and heavily POV, but also out of place in the current structure of the section:
2971:
As I said before, my edits don't want to say that there was persecution all over Europe - and Ann, whom I asked to have a look, agreed with my wording.
2708:
2604:
2518:
2465:
2170:
1915:
Can we also agree that the link labelled "The record of the Christian Churches in the development of Human Rights" has no place in a neutral article.
2293:
Jews; Moslems; Pagans; Cathars; so called "Heretics"; Schismatics; Apostates; Humanists, Pantheists, Deists, Atheists and others; so called "Witches"
2785:
My personal view is that the persecution section is so contentious here, and we have at least two other articles which deal with the subject, so if
3888:
secular point of view). But, this is not itself reason to exclude them from here---merely change the language to reflect this. I'll try to do that.
2494:
1942:
that merely mentioning this record is itself, which puts the church in a non-favorable light is what you object to as "NPOV." That is POV pushing.
1605:
True, but nothing sinister here. Why did he choose Christianity to create unity ... and why did he stick with it despite the rising Arian conflict?
3506:
3315:
Even a backlash persecution is persecution. Should we say there was no persecution of pagan cults after the 4th century because it was a backlash.
3050:
2917:
Facts are facts. You can chant "They deserved it, they deserved it!" all day long in front of your mirror, but that shouldn't govern our article.
2880:
2654:
earth can we say that Lutheranism separated itself from the Lutheran Reformation? No, the whole thing is POV and inaccurate, and needs changed.
3462:
3447:
3219:
I voice my original concerns that the lack of perspective shown in this discussion is due to the religious loyalties of the editors which is POV.
2601:
I think you have POV "issues" about this and that your complaints have to do with your biases. I don't think you ought to be a Knowledge editor.
2289:
I still oppose the inclusion of the entire list, but let us for the moment adhere to the link provided as a source. It gives the following list:
153:
150:
147:
2310:
Zoroastrians have absolutely no place in here, as there has been no persecution (even if for lack of oppurtunity) of Zoroastrians by Christians.
4291:
4272:
4257:
4203:
1005:
758:
I did not make the changes to the Persecution section below, but your comments make sense to me. Maybe someone else can work on that section.
4069:
4. As stated previously, the "mystery religions" thing was way overstated. Mention it as an influence and move on...no need to overstate it.
3377:
2620:
Whether or not Anglicans or Lutherans are offended by the "Protestant" label is irrelevant on WP. They're Protestant. They arose during the
2368:
2284:
2274:
2262:
2252:
2186:
1890:
4282:
1048:
historical evidence that either Jesus or John the Baptist was an Essene. It's an interesting hypothesis, but basically speculation based on
624:
4262:
Thanks, LV. Should I unprotect in the meantime? I don't want to lock out genuine contributors? And I note that he/she has moved (again) to
4225:
3581:
Maybe "...came to prominence"? I think that "importance" is a little too subjective a word, "prominence" is easier to document and verify.
2435:
935:
itself, this mystery cult is likewise linked. Infact Paglia writes succinctly about pagan mystery religion and Christianity, and I quote, â
350:
122:
110:
4245:
3981:
I request unprotection so I can continue to make edits here. I have before but I was doing so without registering my own account. Thanks.
3488:
3477:
3435:
3400:
2846:
2764:
2400:
2330:
1792:
My reason for deleting the list was simply that it was a lot of accusations with no citation whatsoever...just an unsubstantiated list.
808:
797:
505:
3869:
3361:
3104:
2921:
2836:
2733:
1408:
BTW. Origen was branded a heretic not for those things you mention here, and in fact this verdict became universal only centuries later.
4233:
3585:
3078:
2895:
1541:
Very nice "free spirited gnostics" vs. the blind faith. I never knew that faith was blind. Or that wild speculations were a good thing.
2429:
1609:
Constantine mitigated some differences between orthodox Christianity and its main competitor, the official religion of Sol Invictus.
326:
126:
106:
3844:
3538:
2607:
2574:
2521:
2500:
2488:
2064:
1989:
1962:
1932:
1906:
1861:
1188:
840:
367:
274:
118:
3388:
3336:
Where did you get the idea from that we don't mention this in the article. Have you read the second part of the persecution section.
2902:
Sophia, even if your accusations were true in general, it still doesn't justify persecution and it doesn't justify leaving them out.
2450:
2324:
The last two items are worded as questions because they are genuine questions. If you can provide such instances, then bring it on.
2198:
1985:
Any academic citations? Or just a flawed website? Please cite your claims, and then we can proceed with the discussion...thanks...
1436:
Sure there were influences - but they go both ways: one can emphasize similarities or differences. But that is not what you claimed.
1383:
995:
3665:
Finally here are some statements or should I say pronouncement where a (contentious, not generally accepted) POV is declared fact:
2385:
1976:
1946:
1844:
Let's up the standards of academic scholarship, and stop trying to impose personal beliefs. Whgat good can anyone imagine it does?
1826:
1263:
The early Christians heavily relied on the Koine Greek Alexandrine text of the Hebrew Bible commonly refered to in the West as the
1159:
JHC, I agree with you on the use of Knowledge articles. Another WP article might be just as flawed as Giovanni thinks this here is.
1012:
874:
627:
The early Christians heavily relied on the Koine Greek Alexandrine text of the Hebrew Bible commonly refered to in the west as the
580:
436:
394:
3810:
Nope, I'm not confusing it, im connecting the struggle with its absorbtion. The two, as I have argued, are not mutually exclusive.
3028:
without trial, a few were executed on false charges, would you agree that black people were being persecuted? Do you dismiss the
1919:
447:
of your proposal which was opposed, not merely the wording. If you wish to add that theory, obviously, gain consensus. Thanks...
1817:
1796:
707:
from the hodge-podge of various other religions that bore no more similarity to Christianity than to use some of the same names.
462:
4188:
4156:
4143:
4133:
3429:
Should I semi-protect the page? I'm going to bed in the next few minutes, and I don't want to lock out good-faith contributors?
3424:
3413:
2468:
1764:
1721:
1078:
3138:
2990:
2814:
2665:
say that they were the first Reformers - we have Reformers on either side, before Luther, and also strictly Catholic Reformers)
2480:
Protestants. Look up Protestant in the OED if you don't believe me. It is not productive to try to redefine words to mean what
2438:
2150:
on talk pages by typing four tildes like this ~~~~. It makes it easier for people coming later to read the discussion. Thanks.
308:
3371:
3283:
3232:
3223:
3118:
2944:
2589:
2341:
3529:
3263:
3159:
2793:
2675:
2456:
2233:
2011:
1806:
1332:
1169:
3382:
Whoever keeps on adding it please stop. There is no "one true religion" and that statement introduces POV. Please stop now.
1880:
I think that's what KHM03 is saying... provide a "good academic reference" for the list... then it might be okay. Also, see
1688:
1365:
1253:
981:
862:
764:
533:
363:
I did not claim POV. I claimed unsourced accusations and wiggle words, both of which are significantly different from POV.
337:
243:
4251:
No, you are right, it is a software bug. It is in the process of being fixed. I'll see if I can find the bugzilla query. --
3989:
2418:
2106:
691:
683:
544:
2961:
I don't need to read the Wiki page on the FR (except for editing purposes) as this historian knows the issues well enough.
2703:
2658:
2633:
1149:
And there is a lot more. Am I the only one providing references and citations to back up my claim here? It would seem so.
1059:
775:
4278:
3816:
Maybe you should consider editing on Gnosticism, since what you put forth is referring almost exclusively to Gnosticism.
3406:
3007:
examples) most of those executed were priests. But it was still a persecution of Catholics. And it's true that in a very
2375:
could publish evidence that proved the Biblical timeline wrong, without fear of loss of funding or institutional support.
2156:
1698:
932:
Many Gnostic sects were made up of Christians who embraced mystical theories concerning the nature of Jesus or the Christ
3699:"may have existed as a variety of mystery cults, limited to a small number of people and expounding esoteric teachings."
1873:
1850:
4212:
3602:
Excatly what my contributions do. Its a very very brief touching on the historical origins of the beliefs and practices
3575:
3000:
2320:
When was there any large scale persecution of Muslims by Christians (apart from the expulsion of the Moors from Spain)?
3927:
through secret knowledge). Each believed themselves to be the true church, and were highly critical of the other two.
2025:
1668:
1637:
1319:
964:
292:
253:
1583:
It was during this period church government began to take on a hierarchical form that matched the Roman government.
738:
4152:
is a brief overview, pointing the reader to the History article, where these ideas have more room for development.
1786:
1751:
1708:
1500:
451:
425:
408:
384:
2229:
editor) can provide citations for each of the groups on the lengthy list, then I'd support its inclusion. Thanks...
86:
37:
2515:
Reformed Free Churches, etc. make no such claim. This is why Lutherans and Anglicans belong in their own category
1372:
974:
4115:
4003:
3519:
2857:
2758:
As for the language issue, I will ask someone to have a look into whether my sentence says what it wants to say.
2405:
2041:
421:, and myself all opposed your proposed changes, and only you supported them. Please be more accurate. Thanks...
233:
2280:
Insults won't get you anywhere. Maybe you should explain why you think this attack site is actually objective.
3832:
3559:
3348:
No examples of the murder of any one of a religious group other than Roman Catholic have been given (so far).
2165:
2092:
2088:. Please do so, and cease the pointless reverts until we all as a community can reach a consensus. Thanks...
1996:
devotional, and will continue to do so for as long as you insist on deleting links you do not happen to like.
4221:
purposes here. The information you prested from that site, as far as I know, are not diputed among scholars.
3828:
I know you won't agree with my points on the content, but at least consider the problems of form. Thank you,
3714:"The basic church hierarchy did not fully establish itself until perhaps as late as the 4th century with ..."
3062:
because of their Christianity or their association with a wealthy Church that stood by whilst people starved?
2484:
want them to mean, and I can't see how an attempt to implicitly redefine a word like this can ever be NPOV.--
1647:
John Riches, The World of Jesus (Cambridge University Press, 1990) Colin Wilson, The Occult (Grafton, 1988)
3969:
3796:
mysteries. Similiaries between both of these mystery cults and Christianity is evidence of their influences.
3629:
The most important feature? Wow. What makes it so important? If you want to keep it I'm fine with with that.
2297:
That is not congruent with what various editors have inserted, based on the link. The link is missing out:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
1376:
75:
26:
4206:, where it says that that site should never be used to source information in Knowledge articles. Cheers.
2126:
deletion of other links, as protest against deletion of the heretication link seems to be a violation of
2007:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
3511:
I just semi-protected again. If those people who are watching this article would please keep an eye on
4270:
4243:
4210:
3867:
3591:
Dear Giovanni, apart from any disputed about the content of your edits, consider the following points:
3573:
3486:
3460:
3445:
3433:
3398:
3048:
2878:
2688:
Since the Reformation, Christianity is usually represented as being divided into three main branches...
2154:
2053:
306:
2084:. Also, I'm not sure you're doing a whole lot here to work with the community. You've been asked to
2940:
Challenges to your POV are not accusations and it is worrying that you see this debate in that light.
2695:
That's fair...and also accurate. This isn't to say there aren't other branches of the tree (such as
1822:
KHM03, if got three words for you: Soft! Ware! Bug! I am sorry about that and have repaired the bug.
1772:
793:
317:
is absolutely correct; the theory that "mystery religions" were the roots of Christian doctrines is
1215:
if it did not exist It would be virtually impossible to do this if all the Scrolls were published.
1034:"The Essenes were a religious sect of Judaism, of which it is Jesus was thought to be a member of
3840:
Your welcome, and yes, I'll consider the problems of form and address those in my lastest edits.
3546:
3228:
Why is it that you can't the facts as they stand. I suspect it has do with bias of another kind.
2037:
1739:
720:
2789:
there is challenged, best to get rid of it, whether it's favorable or opposed to Christianity.
2535:
You admit that Lutherans and Anglicans are "Protestant of Rome", and yet you tried to move them
1347:
relevant, interesting information. It is also cited in other similar studies, by other scholars.
959:
2621:
2221:) to support those claims. None were offered, which means that inclusion of the list could be
1591:
The Emperor Constantine I was, like emperors before him, high priest of the Mithraic religion.
1496:
Quite true (though I personally am not in total agreement with the "Great Ox" on this point).
4019:
word?) between Christian theology and Greek philosophy, so we ought not overstate the issue.
2414:
listing all the people who have been persecuted by atheists. I think it would be pretty long.
4267:
4240:
4207:
3864:
3570:
3483:
3457:
3442:
3430:
3395:
3045:
2875:
2151:
1783:
1136:
950:
646:
608:
418:
303:
2036:
It's not necessary to resort to a POV complaint to remove the heretication link. Check out
1999:
940:
Martin A. Larson,in The Story of Christian Origins (1977), which states that Mithraism and
785:
82:
33:
3669:"the major Christian doctrines also emerged, in part, out of the various mystery teachings
3651:
IMHO the history section is better placed further down, next to the "persecution" section.
8:
4286:
4252:
3769:
3294:
facts" type. When reasoned arguments break down there is nothing to be gained by anyone.
3256:
2427:
2135:
2080:(unless you're one and the same)...regarding my status as ordained clergy, please review
1885:
923:
pagan in origin, but has adopted a Christian veneer; others trace its origin to Judaism.
61:
3768:
mysteries, he wears the "bassaris" or fox-skin, symbolizing new life. His own rites the
3841:
3312:
But all true or untrue accusations cannot remove the fact that there were persecutions.
3304:
left but you blame Louis XIV - did the RC Church stand up for their fellow Christians?
3029:
2242:
external links that anyone finds biased, then we'll not have many external links left.
2131:
2099:
2073:
2022:
1973:
1943:
1685:
1362:
1250:
1185:
1150:
978:
927:
and its canonical texts do not predate the Gnostic movement, but emerged alongside it,
859:
805:
761:
632:
600:
530:
502:
433:
391:
377:
347:
334:
271:
240:
4124:
the Jesus Seminar in general). I would accept Borg (for instance) as an authority in
942:
Christianity derived from the same sources, originally from the savior cult of Osiris.
3279:
others who can hardly be blamed for crimes committed 200 years before the were born.
3207:
3163:
3016:
2699:), but this is the way Christian denominational families are "usually represented".
2415:
2365:
2281:
2259:
1916:
1142:
954:
114:
21:
4075:
Ok, Iâll re-work it to tone down this point where appropriate as futher compromise.
2539:
of the Protestant category? How does that make any sense? In any event, my copy of
2142:
agreed on the talk page. (This was written before edit conflict with KHM03.) Also,
1779:
1354:
1037:, and which John the Baptist is widely regarded to be a prime example of an Essene.
965:
http://jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=280&letter=G&search=gnosticism
789:
772:
459:
3952:
4222:
4185:
4112:
4000:
3945:
3918:
3468:
2127:
1761:
1718:
1695:
1299:, and while there is much speculation that Christian beliefs were influenced by
884:
in accordance with specifics raised here--- and already had the dispute heading.
404:
acted appropriately. Please be more accurate in your edit summaries. Thanks...
4263:
3860:
3512:
3472:
3453:
3419:
3383:
3011:
3008:
2874:
Anyway, I've looked at the language carefully, and I don't see any hidden POV.
2586:
2571:
2567:
2497:
2485:
2425:
2218:
2085:
1881:
1272:
1056:
1025:
975:
http://www-relg-studies.scu.edu/facstaff/murphy/courses/sctr026/therapeutae.htm
559:
3319:
I do not dispute that unjust murders were carried out by the Revolutionaries.
977:
from the Religious Studies Department Secr 26 Gender & Early Christiany
3985:
05:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC) This can be verfied by looking at my ip address
2853:
2821:
2775:
2222:
2147:
2081:
620:
1587:
There was a Church hierarchy in the first century (at least in some places).
3829:
3556:
3368:
3280:
3229:
3203:
3135:
3101:
2987:
2918:
2843:
2829:
2811:
2761:
2672:
2447:
2397:
2327:
2207:
2195:
2161:
Again...there were no "agreed changes". Please be more careful...thanks.
2061:
1823:
1803:
1665:
1634:
1316:
1166:
837:
615:, with which it shares much sacred text and early history, specifically to
414:
401:
364:
314:
289:
250:
4042:"Cults and Cosmic Consciousness: Religious Vision in the American 1960s",
3737:
3582:
3526:
3516:
3410:
3358:
3260:
3220:
3115:
3075:
2941:
2892:
2833:
2771:
2730:
2382:
2338:
1743:
history article, and not go overboard here, on an article which seems to
1480:
We have heard this song before, only it doesn't become truer by repition.
1380:
1288:
992:
735:
724:
708:
700:
663:
577:
563:
1271:, the inner mystery teachings, and Christianity. Other scholars such as
4153:
4140:
4130:
3982:
3966:
3777:
3761:
3020:
2790:
2700:
2655:
2630:
2230:
2162:
2103:
2089:
1986:
1959:
1929:
1903:
1858:
1814:
1793:
1748:
1705:
1497:
1329:
1264:
1080:(article by the esteemed scholar Kaufmann Kohler) describes him as an "
1009:
969:
871:
801:
628:
555:
448:
422:
405:
381:
323:
2561:
of or relating to any of the Protestant Churches or their members etc.
4056:
historians who can support this theory? That's not asking for much.
3171:
3167:
2696:
1300:
1053:
675:
3659:
in understanding Christianity so therefore should be make promiment.
3162:. For the Catholics quite the reverse, in fact the wiki page on the
3789:
3765:
3745:
3741:
1296:
1292:
1276:
671:
667:
651:
3251:, measures taken against Christians including abolishing the word
550:
My first objection is minor, namely that the early Christians did
3785:
3773:
3757:
3733:
2411:
1284:
918:.â This does not even appear to be disputed. Next, the Essenes: â
659:
636:
612:
3566:
In the 20th century, the Ecumenical movement came to importance.
3555:
Any suggestions for further improvements are of course welcome.
2225:, which is obviously frowned upon at Knowledge. But if you (or
1462:
Yeah, but these four fellows were excomunicated sooner or later.
3793:
3781:
3189:
2048:
1305:
945:
state-sponsored Christianity before being disposed of in name.
748:
616:
554:
use the "Hebrew Bible," they almost exclusively used the Greek
4045:
3941:
1517 CE: Martin Luther triggered the Protestant Reformation.
3418:
There are two socks already blocked, expect more to show up.
2356:
just write "N/A". That's not presenting an objective picture.
1268:
960:
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/cgi-local/DHI/dhi.cgi?id=dv1-49
640:
267:
4012:
I restored the information with some more changes per below.
937:
Christianity was a development of Dionysian mystery religion
3780:
of a local Greek nature deity and a more powerful god from
2638:
The other thing is that the current version is very POV.
66:
4148:
Also, the entire article may not be too lengthy, but this
3732:"Most scholarship believes these to included the Nasseni,
1405:
Greek philosophy applied to the revealed sources of faith.
1137:
http://www.askwhy.co.uk/christianity/0120PhiloJudaeus.html
951:
http://www.askwhy.co.uk/christianity/0120PhiloJudaeus.html
158:
64:
to this revision, which may differ significantly from the
3249:
Dechristianisation of France during the French Revolution
2826:
Dechristianisation of France during the French Revolution
2718:
Dechristianisation of France during the French Revolution
2176:
don't care which it is, but let's be clear either way.
4033:
Christian history) and completely non-authoritative.
1569:
In what way does that relate to our issue. Not at all.
1444:
apart from Christianity. Hence, people had to choose.
1275:
have noted that Christianity was a development of the
3684:"In its early years, there was not one Christianity"
3158:
Pre revolutionary France was a different matter see
2999:
time when Catholics were persecuted in England (see
3176:
Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen
1489:
Oh, Thomas Aquinas had some other thoughts on this.
619:(the Hebrew Bible), which many Christians call the
3482:I have just unprotected, and am going to bed now!
1682:Bible Myths and their Parallels in Other Religions
1143:http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/asbook.html
1129:I also cite the following sources of scholarhsip:
955:http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/asbook.html
4266:. I've done a lot of indefinite blocks recently!
4044:published in the classics and humanities journal
3854:I agree, especially about the problem of stating
3564:I'm happy with your rewrite except for this bit:
2738:Sorry, Sophia, but your points don't make sense.
3953:http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_divi1.htm
2716:The reference is misleading as a glance at the
2364:I can go on, but I think that will do for now.
1734:of the additions are "contentious". It's also
925:Most scholars accept that orthodox Christianity
3946:http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_true.htm
3919:http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_intr.htm
1353:A bit about him since you tarnished his name.
916:Forerunners of early Christian monastic orders
3467:I'll try to be here, but I am also watching
3327:They might, but that is their (extreme) POV.
2410:I think it might be fun to add a section to
3776:) Many scholars believe that Dionysus is a
2914:non-Christian state persecuting Christians.
1212:with a proximate source in the Essene cult.
798:Cultural and historical background of Jesus
2754:a bogus list." - You didn't speak up then.
2709:Persecution the French Revolution and NPOV
2476:tell us we aren't Protestant. We were the
2171:Persecutions list & External web links
3772:were the most secretive of all (See also
74:Revision as of 04:20, 23 January 2006 by
47:
3534:I'd check on that, someone resemi'd it
3174:for example). The post Revolution 1789
2681:Also, the section contains the phrase:
1413:that it had its orthodoxy formulated.
1004:On the Mithraism influence, please see
73:
14:
1052:ritual and theological similarities.
3160:Status of religious freedom in France
3015:say that they deserved it because of
44:
25:
970:http://www.iep.utm.edu/g/gnostic.htm
95:
52:
17:
2742:Are Roman Catholics not Christians?
611:. Its origins are intertwined with
135:
104:
4234:Have I protected or semiprotected?
4009:I restored the earlier version...
1471:And what "faction" should that be?
723:or other such sub-article though.
136:
4307:
3515:, that would be great. Thanks.
3394:That user has just been blocked.
2867:As for "resurfaced", well, there
2832:(ie anti RC) not anti Christian.
1135:The Therapeutae and Christianity
910:According to Martin A. Larson in
60:. The present address (URL) is a
3471:(my baby is on the front page).
3032:on the grounds that some people
2860:about them at French Knowledge.
929:out of some of the same sources.
631:. Christianity is considered an
607:is arguably the world's largest
400:There were no "agreed changes";
3764:at Eleusis near Athens. In the
3023:. Let's put it this way â if a
4287:
4253:
3692:sources I have used and cited.
2854:Carmelite martyrs of CompiĂšgne
2800:KHM03, thanks for the flowers.
1886:
912:The Story of Christian Origins
13:
1:
3677:"may have been, or probably."
3409:strikes me as a little odd.
2457:Denominations of Christianity
2014:) 23:59,16 January 2006 (UTC)
1747:threaten to be too lengthy.
4292:15:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
4273:15:41, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
4258:15:37, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
4246:15:35, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
4226:01:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
4213:18:18, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
4189:04:20, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
4157:02:00, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
4144:01:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
4134:01:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
4116:01:16, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
4004:10:22, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
3990:05:22, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
3970:04:48, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
3870:00:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
3845:08:58, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
3833:16:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
3728:Other inaccuracies include:
3586:01:02, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
3576:21:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3560:19:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3539:18:23, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
3530:16:25, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3520:03:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3489:02:06, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3478:01:50, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3463:01:16, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3448:01:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3436:00:59, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3425:00:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3414:00:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3401:00:24, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3389:00:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3372:19:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3362:18:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3284:17:19, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3264:17:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3233:17:14, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3224:16:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3139:14:00, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3119:13:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3105:11:10, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3079:10:47, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
3051:10:19, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
2991:10:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
2945:10:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
2922:08:49, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
2896:08:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
2881:01:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
2847:15:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2837:12:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2815:12:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2794:12:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2765:12:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2734:11:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2704:15:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2676:15:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2659:11:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2634:11:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2608:06:57, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2590:06:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2575:06:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2522:06:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2501:06:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2489:06:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2469:04:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2451:11:04, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
2439:06:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
2430:10:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
2419:15:55, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2401:15:33, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2386:10:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
2369:18:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2342:17:32, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2331:15:46, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2285:14:55, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2275:14:50, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2263:14:42, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2253:14:22, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2234:12:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2199:11:53, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2187:11:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2166:00:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2157:00:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2107:00:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2093:00:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2065:00:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
2026:00:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
1990:23:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1977:23:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1963:23:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1947:23:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1933:22:55, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1920:22:54, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1907:21:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1891:21:17, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1874:21:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1862:20:59, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1851:20:55, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1827:19:03, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1818:18:52, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1807:18:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1797:18:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1787:18:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
1765:14:03, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1752:13:11, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1722:13:56, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1709:03:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1699:12:39, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1689:11:43, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1680:Thomas William Doane, 1882,
1669:13:30, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1638:13:16, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1560:utterly false when combined.
1501:13:23, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1384:03:08, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1366:00:31, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1333:12:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
1320:11:16, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
1254:01:48, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
1189:23:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
1170:19:52, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
1060:19:10, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
1013:17:29, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
996:17:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
982:17:50, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
875:11:41, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
863:11:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
841:11:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
809:11:35, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
776:10:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
765:09:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
739:05:47, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
692:05:11, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
684:05:38, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
581:04:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
545:02:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
534:01:47, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
506:01:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
463:00:39, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
452:00:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
437:00:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
426:00:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
413:A quick review reveals that
409:00:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
395:00:26, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
385:00:17, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
368:00:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
351:00:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
338:23:57, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
327:16:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
309:11:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
293:11:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
275:10:49, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
254:10:25, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
244:10:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
7:
3332:mentioned in the article).
2585:dates in the current era.--
1778:designation "Christian." -
1628:directly, in this regard.
963:vols. (New York, 1938-45).
24:of this page, as edited by
10:
4312:
3197:persecute the Jews either.
2054:Knowledge:Reliable sources
1928:I would agree with that.
93:
50:
3378:"It's the true religion."
3202:For this to stand on the
794:Names and titles of Jesus
3130:preposterous, of course.
2669:form a group of its own.
4094:known as the Dark Ages.
2543:defines Protestant as:
2406:Persecution by Atheists
2138:, and the changes were
2038:Knowledge:Verifiability
1813:Why'd you restore it?
1740:History of Christianity
721:History of Christianity
234:Origins of Christianity
139:Template:Talkheaderlong
3644:sect(s) for some time.
2622:Protestant Reformation
2047:Personal websites and
1730:From what I can read,
717:Justinian the Apostate
302:they are given names.
145:Template:Mainpage date
45:04:20, 23 January 2006
4285:. Hope this helps. --
3452:He has moved over to
3206:page rather than the
2056:for more information.
1738:too long; there is a
647:Judeo-Christo-Islamic
601:2.3 billion adherents
266:life, and actions of
164:Archived discussions
2820:I am fully aware of
786:Historicity of Jesus
3770:Dionysian Mysteries
3525:Removed it again.
3507:Semiprotected again
3257:Julian the Apostate
2828:states that it was
654:mystery religion.
599:"With an estimated
111:â Previous revision
3863:policy to accept.
3030:Salem Witch Trials
1643:Further refences:
1021:Couple of points:
633:Abrahamic religion
4281:(near bottom) or
3476:
3423:
3405:I warned first.
3387:
3208:Roman Catholicism
3164:French Revolution
3017:Anthony Babington
2317:at the same time.
2302:proto-scientists.
2223:original research
2124:194.145.131.156's
2122:I might add that
2015:
2002:comment added by
1773:Persecutions list
1279:mystery religion.
574:User:69.107.7.138
142:Template:FormerFA
96:ââHistory rewrite
53:ââHistory rewrite
4303:
4289:
4255:
3475:
3422:
3386:
2072:Anonymous users
1997:
1888:
1355:Martin A. Larson
790:Historical Jesus
123:Newer revision â
101:
99:
98:
90:
69:
67:current revision
59:
58:
56:
55:
46:
42:
41:
4311:
4310:
4306:
4305:
4304:
4302:
4301:
4300:
4236:
3549:
3547:History rewrite
3509:
3469:Hero of Ukraine
3380:
2711:
2459:
2408:
2210:-- well stated.
2173:
2148:sign your posts
2144:194.145.131.156
2132:64.121.40.153's
2078:194.145.131.156
2042:Dubious sources
2004:194.145.131.156
1871:194.165.180.131
1848:194.165.180.131
1775:
1045:
236:
231:
161:
134:
133:
132:
131:
130:
115:Latest revision
103:
102:
94:
91:
80:
78:
65:
51:
48:
31:
29:
12:
11:
5:
4309:
4299:
4298:
4297:
4296:
4295:
4294:
4264:Evangelicalism
4235:
4232:
4231:
4230:
4229:
4228:
4198:
4196:
4195:
4194:
4193:
4192:
4191:
4176:
4175:
4174:
4173:
4172:
4171:
4162:
4161:
4160:
4159:
4146:
4136:
4110:
4109:
4108:
4107:
4098:
4097:
4096:
4095:
4079:
4078:
4077:
4076:
4067:
4066:
4065:
4064:
4053:
4052:
4051:
4050:
4030:
4029:
4028:
4027:
4026:avoid reverts.
4016:
4015:
4014:
4013:
3996:
3995:
3994:
3993:
3975:
3912:
3911:
3910:
3909:
3902:
3901:
3900:
3899:
3892:
3891:
3890:
3889:
3882:
3881:
3880:
3879:
3873:
3872:
3851:
3850:
3849:
3848:
3826:
3825:
3824:
3823:
3814:
3813:
3812:
3811:
3805:
3804:
3800:
3799:
3798:
3797:
3750:
3749:
3726:
3725:
3724:
3723:
3722:decentralized.
3716:
3715:
3711:
3710:
3709:
3708:
3701:
3700:
3696:
3695:
3694:
3693:
3686:
3685:
3681:
3680:
3679:
3678:
3671:
3670:
3663:
3662:
3661:
3660:
3653:
3652:
3648:
3647:
3646:
3645:
3638:
3637:
3633:
3632:
3631:
3630:
3624:
3623:
3619:
3618:
3617:
3616:
3606:
3605:
3604:
3603:
3597:
3596:
3589:
3588:
3548:
3545:
3544:
3543:
3542:
3541:
3536:209.103.214.50
3513:Evangelicalism
3508:
3505:
3504:
3503:
3502:
3501:
3500:
3499:
3498:
3497:
3496:
3495:
3494:
3493:
3492:
3491:
3454:Evangelicalism
3407:Their response
3403:
3379:
3376:
3375:
3374:
3355:
3354:
3346:
3345:
3338:
3337:
3329:
3328:
3317:
3316:
3313:
3310:
3301:
3300:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3271:
3270:
3269:
3268:
3267:
3266:
3240:
3239:
3238:
3237:
3236:
3235:
3217:
3216:
3215:
3200:
3199:
3198:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3156:
3155:
3154:
3144:
3143:
3142:
3141:
3131:
3124:
3123:
3122:
3121:
3108:
3107:
3098:
3094:
3090:
3086:
3082:
3081:
3070:
3069:
3064:
3063:
3058:
3057:
2996:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2983:
2979:
2975:
2972:
2969:
2965:
2962:
2959:
2956:
2950:
2949:
2948:
2947:
2935:
2934:
2933:
2932:
2925:
2924:
2915:
2911:
2907:
2903:
2899:
2898:
2888:
2818:
2817:
2809:
2805:
2801:
2797:
2796:
2783:
2779:
2774:, please read
2770:First of all,
2756:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2710:
2707:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2679:
2678:
2670:
2666:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2611:
2602:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2553:
2541:Concise Oxford
2528:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2516:
2504:
2503:
2491:
2458:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2407:
2404:
2389:
2388:
2377:
2376:
2362:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2345:
2344:
2322:
2321:
2318:
2314:
2311:
2304:
2303:
2295:
2294:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2211:
2202:
2201:
2172:
2169:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2110:
2109:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2028:
1993:
1992:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1966:
1965:
1956:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1936:
1935:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1910:
1909:
1894:
1893:
1865:
1864:
1830:
1829:
1820:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1774:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1729:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1641:
1640:
1625:
1624:
1615:
1614:
1607:
1606:
1598:
1597:
1589:
1588:
1581:
1580:
1571:
1570:
1562:
1561:
1552:
1551:
1543:
1542:
1530:
1529:
1525:
1516:
1515:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1491:
1490:
1482:
1481:
1473:
1472:
1464:
1463:
1455:
1454:
1438:
1437:
1429:
1428:
1419:
1418:
1410:
1409:
1406:
1397:
1396:
1387:
1386:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1340:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1310:
1309:
1280:
1273:Camille Paglia
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1164:
1160:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1043:
1030:
1016:
1015:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
908:
907:
906:
905:
898:
897:
896:
895:
888:
887:
886:
885:
878:
877:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
833:
829:
826:
823:
815:
814:
813:
812:
733:
732:
728:
712:
704:
674:, and perhaps
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
584:
583:
568:
567:
560:Talk:Mithraism
521:
520:
519:
518:
511:
510:
509:
508:
495:
494:
493:
492:
485:
484:
483:
482:
476:
475:
474:
473:
466:
465:
440:
439:
398:
397:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
356:
355:
354:
353:
330:
329:
280:
279:
278:
277:
235:
232:
162:
160:
157:
76:
62:permanent link
27:
16:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4308:
4293:
4290:
4284:
4280:
4276:
4275:
4274:
4271:
4269:
4265:
4261:
4260:
4259:
4256:
4250:
4249:
4248:
4247:
4244:
4242:
4227:
4224:
4219:
4218:
4217:
4216:
4215:
4214:
4211:
4209:
4205:
4199:
4190:
4187:
4182:
4181:
4180:
4179:
4178:
4177:
4168:
4167:
4166:
4165:
4164:
4163:
4158:
4155:
4151:
4147:
4145:
4142:
4137:
4135:
4132:
4127:
4122:
4121:
4120:
4119:
4118:
4117:
4114:
4105:
4104:
4103:
4102:
4101:
4092:
4087:
4086:
4085:
4084:
4083:
4074:
4073:
4072:
4071:
4070:
4061:
4060:
4059:
4058:
4057:
4047:
4043:
4038:
4037:
4036:
4035:
4034:
4024:
4023:
4022:
4021:
4020:
4011:
4010:
4008:
4007:
4006:
4005:
4002:
3991:
3988:
3984:
3980:
3979:
3978:
3977:
3976:
3973:
3971:
3968:
3962:
3958:
3955:
3954:
3948:
3947:
3942:
3939:
3936:
3935:Catholicism.
3932:
3928:
3924:
3921:
3920:
3915:
3906:
3905:
3904:
3903:
3896:
3895:
3894:
3893:
3886:
3885:
3884:
3883:
3877:
3876:
3875:
3874:
3871:
3868:
3866:
3862:
3857:
3853:
3852:
3846:
3843:
3842:64.121.40.153
3839:
3838:
3837:
3836:
3835:
3834:
3831:
3821:
3820:
3819:
3818:
3817:
3809:
3808:
3807:
3806:
3802:
3801:
3795:
3791:
3787:
3783:
3779:
3775:
3771:
3767:
3763:
3759:
3754:
3753:
3752:
3751:
3747:
3743:
3739:
3735:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3720:
3719:
3718:
3717:
3713:
3712:
3705:
3704:
3703:
3702:
3698:
3697:
3690:
3689:
3688:
3687:
3683:
3682:
3675:
3674:
3673:
3672:
3668:
3667:
3666:
3657:
3656:
3655:
3654:
3650:
3649:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3639:
3635:
3634:
3628:
3627:
3626:
3625:
3621:
3620:
3615:historically.
3613:
3612:
3611:
3610:
3609:
3601:
3600:
3599:
3598:
3594:
3593:
3592:
3587:
3584:
3580:
3579:
3578:
3577:
3574:
3572:
3567:
3562:
3561:
3558:
3553:
3540:
3537:
3533:
3532:
3531:
3528:
3524:
3523:
3522:
3521:
3518:
3514:
3490:
3487:
3485:
3481:
3480:
3479:
3474:
3470:
3466:
3465:
3464:
3461:
3459:
3455:
3451:
3450:
3449:
3446:
3444:
3439:
3438:
3437:
3434:
3432:
3428:
3427:
3426:
3421:
3417:
3416:
3415:
3412:
3408:
3404:
3402:
3399:
3397:
3393:
3392:
3391:
3390:
3385:
3373:
3370:
3366:
3365:
3364:
3363:
3360:
3351:
3350:
3349:
3343:
3342:
3341:
3335:
3334:
3333:
3326:
3325:
3324:
3320:
3314:
3311:
3307:
3306:
3305:
3297:
3296:
3295:
3285:
3282:
3277:
3276:
3275:
3274:
3273:
3272:
3265:
3262:
3258:
3254:
3250:
3247:According to
3246:
3245:
3244:
3243:
3242:
3241:
3234:
3231:
3227:
3226:
3225:
3222:
3218:
3213:
3212:
3209:
3205:
3201:
3195:
3194:
3191:
3187:
3181:
3180:
3177:
3173:
3169:
3165:
3161:
3157:
3152:
3151:
3148:
3147:
3146:
3145:
3140:
3137:
3132:
3128:
3127:
3126:
3125:
3120:
3117:
3112:
3111:
3110:
3109:
3106:
3103:
3099:
3095:
3091:
3087:
3084:
3083:
3080:
3077:
3072:
3071:
3066:
3065:
3060:
3059:
3055:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3049:
3047:
3042:
3038:
3035:
3031:
3026:
3022:
3018:
3013:
3010:
3006:
3002:
2992:
2989:
2984:
2980:
2976:
2973:
2970:
2968:persecution).
2966:
2963:
2960:
2957:
2954:
2953:
2952:
2951:
2946:
2943:
2939:
2938:
2937:
2936:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2926:
2923:
2920:
2916:
2912:
2908:
2904:
2901:
2900:
2897:
2894:
2889:
2885:
2884:
2883:
2882:
2879:
2877:
2872:
2870:
2865:
2861:
2859:
2855:
2849:
2848:
2845:
2839:
2838:
2835:
2831:
2827:
2823:
2816:
2813:
2810:
2806:
2802:
2799:
2798:
2795:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2777:
2773:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2763:
2759:
2752:
2748:
2744:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2736:
2735:
2732:
2726:
2722:
2719:
2714:
2706:
2705:
2702:
2698:
2689:
2686:
2685:
2684:
2683:
2682:
2677:
2674:
2671:
2667:
2663:
2662:
2661:
2660:
2657:
2647:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2636:
2635:
2632:
2627:
2623:
2609:
2606:
2603:
2600:
2599:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2594:
2593:
2592:
2591:
2588:
2576:
2573:
2569:
2565:
2560:
2557:
2554:
2551:
2548:
2545:
2544:
2542:
2538:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2523:
2520:
2517:
2513:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2505:
2502:
2499:
2495:
2492:
2490:
2487:
2483:
2479:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2470:
2467:
2463:
2452:
2449:
2444:
2440:
2437:
2433:
2432:
2431:
2428:
2426:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2417:
2413:
2403:
2402:
2399:
2393:
2387:
2384:
2379:
2378:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2367:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2343:
2340:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2329:
2325:
2319:
2315:
2312:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2287:
2286:
2283:
2278:
2277:Mr Objective
2276:
2273:
2269:
2265:
2264:
2261:
2256:
2255:Mr Objective
2254:
2251:
2247:
2243:
2235:
2232:
2228:
2224:
2220:
2215:
2212:
2209:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2200:
2197:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2189:Mr Objective
2188:
2185:
2181:
2177:
2168:
2167:
2164:
2159:
2158:
2155:
2153:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2108:
2105:
2101:
2100:64.121.40.153
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2074:64.121.40.153
2066:
2063:
2060:
2055:
2050:
2046:
2045:
2044:. To quote:
2043:
2040:, especially
2039:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2027:
2024:
2023:64.121.40.153
2020:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2001:
1991:
1988:
1984:
1983:
1978:
1975:
1974:64.121.40.153
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1964:
1961:
1957:
1954:
1953:
1948:
1945:
1944:64.121.40.153
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1934:
1931:
1927:
1926:
1921:
1918:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1908:
1905:
1901:
1896:
1895:
1892:
1889:
1883:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1875:
1872:
1868:
1863:
1860:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1852:
1849:
1845:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1828:
1825:
1821:
1819:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1805:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1795:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1785:
1781:
1766:
1763:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1750:
1746:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1723:
1720:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1707:
1701:
1700:
1697:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1686:64.121.40.153
1683:
1670:
1667:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1639:
1636:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1596:Christianity.
1594:
1593:
1592:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1534:
1526:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1502:
1499:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1407:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1385:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1364:
1363:64.121.40.153
1358:
1356:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1334:
1331:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1318:
1314:
1307:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1281:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1251:64.121.40.153
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1213:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1190:
1187:
1186:64.121.40.153
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1171:
1168:
1165:
1161:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1152:
1151:64.121.40.153
1147:
1144:
1140:
1138:
1133:
1130:
1127:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1085:the Essenes."
1083:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1061:
1058:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1038:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1002:
997:
994:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
983:
980:
979:64.121.40.153
976:
971:
966:
961:
956:
952:
946:
943:
938:
933:
930:
926:
921:
917:
913:
902:
901:
900:
899:
892:
891:
890:
889:
882:
881:
880:
879:
876:
873:
868:
867:
866:
864:
861:
860:64.121.40.153
855:
852:
842:
839:
834:
830:
827:
824:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
810:
807:
806:64.121.40.153
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
774:
768:
766:
763:
762:64.121.40.153
759:
756:
752:
750:
745:
741:
740:
737:
729:
726:
722:
718:
713:
710:
705:
702:
697:
696:
695:
693:
690:
686:
685:
682:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
655:
653:
649:
648:
642:
638:
635:, along with
634:
630:
626:
622:
621:Old Testament
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
582:
579:
575:
570:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
548:
547:
546:
543:
537:
535:
532:
531:64.121.40.153
528:
524:
515:
514:
513:
512:
507:
504:
503:64.121.40.153
499:
498:
497:
496:
489:
488:
487:
486:
480:
479:
478:
477:
470:
469:
468:
467:
464:
461:
456:
455:
454:
453:
450:
446:
438:
435:
434:64.121.40.153
430:
429:
428:
427:
424:
420:
416:
411:
410:
407:
403:
396:
393:
392:64.121.40.153
389:
388:
387:
386:
383:
379:
378:64.121.40.153
369:
366:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
352:
349:
348:64.121.40.153
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
335:64.121.40.153
328:
325:
320:
316:
313:
312:
311:
310:
307:
305:
301:
295:
294:
291:
286:
276:
273:
272:64.121.40.153
269:
265:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
252:
246:
245:
242:
241:64.121.40.153
230:
228:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
156:
155:
154:Template:FAOL
152:
151:Template:FAOL
149:
148:Template:FAOL
146:
143:
140:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
97:
88:
84:
79:
72:
71:
68:
63:
54:
39:
35:
30:
23:
4237:
4200:
4197:
4149:
4139:difficult.
4125:
4111:
4099:
4090:
4080:
4068:
4054:
4041:
4031:
4017:
3997:
3987:69.107.7.138
3974:
3963:
3959:
3956:
3949:
3943:
3940:
3937:
3933:
3929:
3925:
3922:
3916:
3913:
3855:
3827:
3815:
3727:
3664:
3607:
3590:
3565:
3563:
3554:
3550:
3510:
3381:
3356:
3347:
3339:
3330:
3321:
3318:
3302:
3292:
3252:
3204:Christianity
3043:
3039:
3033:
3024:
3004:
2997:
2891:Christians.
2873:
2868:
2866:
2862:
2850:
2840:
2830:anticlerical
2819:
2786:
2760:
2757:
2737:
2727:
2723:
2715:
2712:
2694:
2687:
2680:
2652:
2644:
2637:
2625:
2619:
2583:
2558:
2555:
2549:
2546:
2540:
2536:
2511:
2481:
2477:
2471:Nrgdocadams
2464:
2460:
2416:DJ Clayworth
2409:
2394:
2390:
2366:DJ Clayworth
2363:
2346:
2326:
2323:
2305:
2296:
2288:
2282:DJ Clayworth
2279:
2272:168.224.1.14
2270:
2266:
2260:DJ Clayworth
2257:
2250:168.224.1.14
2248:
2244:
2240:
2226:
2214:168.224.1.14
2184:168.224.1.14
2182:
2178:
2174:
2160:
2139:
2121:
2086:cite sources
2071:
1998:â Preceding
1994:
1917:DJ Clayworth
1899:
1869:
1866:
1846:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1776:
1744:
1735:
1731:
1728:
1702:
1693:
1681:
1679:
1649:
1645:
1642:
1626:
1616:
1608:
1599:
1590:
1582:
1572:
1563:
1553:
1544:
1535:
1531:
1517:
1507:
1483:
1474:
1465:
1456:
1446:
1442:
1439:
1430:
1420:
1411:
1398:
1388:
1359:
1352:
1339:
1315:
1311:
1258:
1248:
1211:
1148:
1141:
1134:
1131:
1128:
1125:
1094:
1082:Essene saint
1081:
1049:
1042:
1041:
1036:
1033:
947:
941:
936:
931:
928:
924:
919:
915:
911:
909:
856:
853:
849:
769:
760:
757:
753:
746:
742:
734:
689:69.107.7.138
687:
681:69.107.7.138
656:
644:
605:Christianity
604:
598:
551:
542:69.107.7.138
538:
529:
525:
522:
444:
441:
412:
399:
376:
331:
318:
299:
296:
284:
281:
263:
247:
237:
229:
163:
137:
22:old revision
19:
18:
3738:Therapeutae
3707:practices."
3299:personally.
2610:Nrgdocadams
2605:Nrgdocadams
2524:Nrgdocadams
2519:Nrgdocadams
2466:Nrgdocadams
1780:ElAmericano
1579:generalize.
1289:Therapeutae
773:Storm Rider
664:Therapeutae
625:Template:Fn
460:Storm Rider
20:This is an
4223:Giovanni33
4186:Giovanni33
4113:Giovanni33
4001:Giovanni33
3778:syncretism
3762:Persephone
3188:Thanks to
3034:really did
3021:Guy Fawkes
2782:ignorance.
1876:Historian
1853:Historian
1762:Giovanni33
1719:Giovanni33
1696:Giovanni33
1371:I found a
1265:Septuagint
802:Jesus-Myth
629:Septuagint
556:Septuagint
77:Giovanni33
28:Giovanni33
3172:Huguenots
3168:Jansenism
2697:Mormonism
2629:Thanks...
2626:very much
2587:Srleffler
2572:Srleffler
2498:Srleffler
2486:Srleffler
2146:, please
2136:vandalism
1691:Giovanni
1453:theology.
1395:version).
1301:Mithraism
1277:Dionysian
1256:Giovanni
1153:Giovanni
1029:articles.
984:Giovanni
865:Giovanni
767:Giovanni
676:Mithraism
652:Dionysian
536:Giovanni
264:purported
3847:Giovanni
3790:Sabazios
3788:such as
3766:Thracian
3746:Dionysus
3742:Gnostics
3441:around?
3253:dimanche
2787:anything
2128:WP:Point
2012:contribs
2000:unsigned
1427:defined.
1297:Dionysus
1293:Gnostics
904:settled.
672:Dionysus
668:Gnostics
609:religion
285:at least
159:Archives
87:contribs
38:contribs
4150:section
3861:WP:NPOV
3856:as fact
3830:Str1977
3786:Phrygia
3774:Maenads
3758:Demeter
3734:Essenes
3557:Str1977
3369:Str1977
3281:Str1977
3230:Str1977
3136:Str1977
3102:Str1977
3093:people.
3085:Sophia,
3074:needed.
2988:Str1977
2955:Sophia,
2919:Str1977
2858:article
2844:Str1977
2812:Str1977
2808:model).
2762:Str1977
2729:turned.
2673:Str1977
2568:WP:NPOV
2448:Str1977
2412:Atheism
2398:Str1977
2328:Str1977
2219:WP:CITE
2208:Str1977
2196:Str1977
2062:Jpers36
1882:WP:CITE
1824:Str1977
1804:Str1977
1666:Str1977
1635:Str1977
1524:Church.
1317:Str1977
1285:Essenes
1167:Str1977
1118:Essene.
1026:WP:CITE
838:Str1977
660:Essenes
637:Judaism
613:Judaism
445:content
415:Str1977
402:Jpers36
365:Jpers36
315:Str1977
290:Str1977
251:Str1977
3794:Orphic
3782:Thrace
3583:Wesley
3527:Jkelly
3517:Jkelly
3411:Jkelly
3359:SOPHIA
3261:Wesley
3221:SOPHIA
3190:Wesley
3116:Wesley
3076:SOPHIA
3003:for a
2978:model.
2942:SOPHIA
2893:SOPHIA
2834:SOPHIA
2822:WP:AGF
2776:WP:AGF
2772:SOPHIA
2731:SOPHIA
2383:SOPHIA
2339:Wesley
2098:Also,
2082:WP:AGF
1745:always
1381:Wesley
1306:Osiris
1057:(talk)
993:Wesley
800:, and
796:, and
792:, and
788:, and
749:Osiris
736:Wesley
725:Wesley
709:Wesley
701:Wesley
617:Tanakh
578:Wesley
564:Wesley
300:before
4154:KHM03
4141:KHM03
4131:KHM03
4046:Arion
3983:MikaM
3972:Mika
3967:MikaM
3456:now.
3353:here.
3309:etc).
3068:page.
3012:cases
2791:KHM03
2701:KHM03
2656:KHM03
2631:KHM03
2478:first
2436:Corax
2231:KHM03
2163:KHM03
2116:(UTC)
2104:KHM03
2090:KHM03
2049:blogs
1987:KHM03
1960:KHM03
1930:KHM03
1904:KHM03
1859:KHM03
1815:KHM03
1794:KHM03
1749:KHM03
1706:KHM03
1514:best.
1498:KHM03
1373:quote
1330:KHM03
1269:Plato
1010:KHM03
872:KHM03
694:Mika
641:Islam
449:KHM03
423:KHM03
406:KHM03
382:KHM03
324:KHM03
268:Jesus
4283:here
4279:here
4268:AnnH
4241:AnnH
4208:AnnH
4204:here
4126:that
3992:Mika
3865:AnnH
3760:and
3571:AnnH
3484:AnnH
3473:Zach
3458:AnnH
3443:AnnH
3431:AnnH
3420:Zach
3396:AnnH
3384:Zach
3170:and
3046:AnnH
3019:and
3001:here
2876:AnnH
2852:the
2570:. --
2556:adj.
2512:were
2496:. --
2152:AnnH
2076:and
2008:talk
1884:. --
1784:talk
1732:most
1528:way.
1377:here
1163:POV.
1054:JHCC
1050:some
1032:2.
1006:here
751:."
645:see
639:and
419:AnnH
304:AnnH
127:diff
121:) |
119:diff
107:diff
83:talk
34:talk
3784:or
3025:few
3009:few
3005:few
2869:had
2537:out
2482:you
2227:any
2140:not
1900:any
1736:way
1044:NO
1024:1.
1008:.
811:Gio
552:not
319:far
43:at
4288:LV
4254:LV
3744:,
3740:,
2547:n.
2130:.
2010:âą
1887:LV
1782:|
1295:,
1291:,
804:.
670:,
666:,
603:,
417:,
226:16
224:,
222:15
220:,
218:14
216:,
214:13
212:,
210:12
208:,
206:11
204:,
202:10
200:,
196:,
192:,
188:,
184:,
180:,
176:,
172:,
168:,
113:|
109:)
85:|
36:|
3736:,
2559:1
2550:1
2006:(
1955:?
1308:.
1287:,
727:\
711:\
703:\
662:,
643:(
623:.
566:\
198:9
194:8
190:7
186:6
182:5
178:4
174:3
170:2
166:1
129:)
125:(
117:(
105:(
100:)
92:(
89:)
81:(
70:.
57:)
49:(
40:)
32:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.