29:
309:. The District Court dismissed his complaint while The Fifth Circuit affirmed on the ground that Reed’s §1983 claim was filed too late, after the applicable 2-year statute of limitations had run. The Fifth Circuit held that the limitations period began to run when the Texas trial court denied Reed’s motion, not when the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied rehearing.
284:
guilty of the murder of Stacey Stites. During the penalty phase several women testified that Reed had raped and assaulted them. He was sentenced to death. In 2014, Reed filed a motion in Texas state court under the state's post-conviction DNA testing law. He requested DNA testing on certain pieces of
134:
When a prisoner pursues state post-conviction DNA testing through the state-provided litigation process, the statute of limitations for a §1983 procedural due process claim begins to run when the state litigation ends, in this case when the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals denied Reed’s motion for
321:. The Supreme Court decided 6-3 that the limitations began when state litigation ended, which was when the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied Reed's motion for rehearing on the DNA testing claim, reversing the Fifth Circuit's decision. It is unclear when Reed's execution will occur.
410:
United States, U.S. Supreme Court (U.S.). Reed v. Goertz. United States
Reports, vol. 598, 19 Apr. 2023. Supreme Court, www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-442_e1p3.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2024.
285:
evidence, including the belt used to strangle Stites. The state court denied Reed's motion, reasoning that the items Reed requested to be tested were not preserved through an adequate
570:
509:
77:
301:
state officials for violating their federally protected rights, claiming that Texas's post-conviction DNA testing law failed to provide procedural
124:
Did the statute of limitations begin to run when Reed's motion was denied or when the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals denied to rehear the trial?
565:
445:
246:
575:
261:
33:
339:
580:
486:
61:
340:"U.S. Supreme Court lets Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed pursue DNA testing in bid to prove innocence"
547:
298:
375:
265:
513:
202:
72:
393:
529:
8:
520:
318:
294:
394:"Determining When A Statute Creates a Federal Right Actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983"
306:
194:
286:
317:
Reed sought review of the Fifth
Circuit decision by the Supreme Court and filed a
190:
170:
158:
431:, caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-5th-circuit/2123999.html. Accessed 26 June 2024.
559:
289:. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals agreed and denied Reed's motion for a
305:. Reed also argued that the law's strict chain of custody requirements was
269:
182:
166:
150:
99:
89:
538:
376:"Many in Bastrop Moved on From the Rodney Reed Trial. One Juror Couldn't"
302:
281:
178:
487:"Not Just Rodney Reed: New Evidence Taints More Death Row Convictions"
290:
219:
Kavanaugh, joined by
Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett, Jackson
28:
446:"Pending proceedings could reshape Rodney Reed death row case"
114:
United States Court of
Appeals, Fifth Circuit No. 19-70022
571:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
472:
www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-442. Accessed 23 Jun. 2024.
557:
419:United States, Fifth Circuit Court (5th Cir.).
293:. Reed then sued in federal court under 42
312:
337:
558:
443:
16:2023 United States Supreme Court case
439:
437:
13:
479:
34:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
592:
566:United States Supreme Court cases
548:Supreme Court (preliminary print)
516:___ (2023) is available from:
498:
434:
338:Asgarian, Roxanna (2023-04-19).
27:
576:2023 in United States case law
462:
413:
404:
398:Congressional Research Service
386:
368:
356:
331:
1:
324:
275:
260:, 598 U.S. 230 (2023), is a
245:US Constitutional Amendment
7:
444:Barer, David (2024-03-06).
262:United States Supreme Court
10:
597:
539:Oyez (oral argument audio)
427:, vol. __, 22 Apr. 2021.
244:
239:
231:
223:
215:
210:
144:
139:
133:
128:
123:
118:
110:
105:
95:
85:
67:
57:
47:
40:
26:
21:
299:allowing citizens to sue
235:Alito, joined by Gorsuch
581:Statutes of limitations
41:Argued October 11, 2022
313:Supreme Court decision
266:statute of limitations
43:Decided April 19, 2023
425:United States Reports
297:§1983, a federal law
249:, 42 U.S. Code § 1983
203:Ketanji Brown Jackson
493:. November 19, 2019.
100:Opinion announcement
96:Opinion announcement
365:, Thomas dissenting
280:A Texas jury found
264:case regarding the
119:Questions presented
491:The New York Times
468:"Reed v. Goertz."
319:writ of certiorari
155:Associate Justices
382:. March 27, 2024.
344:The Texas Tribune
253:
252:
195:Amy Coney Barrett
588:
552:
546:
543:
537:
534:
528:
525:
519:
494:
473:
466:
460:
459:
457:
456:
441:
432:
417:
411:
408:
402:
401:
390:
384:
383:
372:
366:
360:
354:
353:
351:
350:
335:
307:unconstitutional
287:chain of custody
140:Court membership
31:
30:
19:
18:
596:
595:
591:
590:
589:
587:
586:
585:
556:
555:
550:
544:
541:
535:
532:
526:
523:
517:
501:
485:
482:
480:Further reading
477:
476:
467:
463:
454:
452:
442:
435:
418:
414:
409:
405:
392:
391:
387:
374:
373:
369:
361:
357:
348:
346:
336:
332:
327:
315:
278:
193:
191:Brett Kavanaugh
181:
171:Sonia Sotomayor
169:
159:Clarence Thomas
42:
36:
17:
12:
11:
5:
594:
584:
583:
578:
573:
568:
554:
553:
506:Reed v. Goertz
500:
499:External links
497:
496:
495:
481:
478:
475:
474:
461:
433:
421:Reed v. Goertz
412:
403:
385:
367:
363:Reed v. Goertz
355:
329:
328:
326:
323:
314:
311:
277:
274:
257:Reed v. Goertz
251:
250:
242:
241:
237:
236:
233:
229:
228:
225:
221:
220:
217:
213:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
156:
153:
148:
142:
141:
137:
136:
131:
130:
126:
125:
121:
120:
116:
115:
112:
108:
107:
103:
102:
97:
93:
92:
87:
83:
82:
69:
65:
64:
59:
55:
54:
52:Reed v. Goertz
49:
48:Full case name
45:
44:
38:
37:
32:
24:
23:
22:Reed v. Goertz
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
593:
582:
579:
577:
574:
572:
569:
567:
564:
563:
561:
549:
540:
531:
522:
515:
511:
507:
503:
502:
492:
488:
484:
483:
471:
465:
451:
447:
440:
438:
430:
426:
422:
416:
407:
399:
395:
389:
381:
377:
371:
364:
359:
345:
341:
334:
330:
322:
320:
310:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
283:
273:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:
248:
243:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:Case opinions
209:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
152:
149:
147:Chief Justice
146:
145:
143:
138:
132:
127:
122:
117:
113:
109:
104:
101:
98:
94:
91:
90:Oral argument
88:
84:
80:
79:
74:
70:
66:
63:
60:
56:
53:
50:
46:
39:
35:
25:
20:
505:
490:
469:
464:
453:. Retrieved
449:
428:
424:
420:
415:
406:
397:
388:
380:TexasMonthly
379:
370:
362:
358:
347:. Retrieved
343:
333:
316:
279:
270:Section 1983
256:
255:
254:
240:Laws applied
198:
186:
183:Neil Gorsuch
174:
167:Samuel Alito
162:
151:John Roberts
106:Case history
76:
51:
450:KXAN Austin
303:due process
282:Rodney Reed
179:Elena Kagan
560:Categories
455:2024-06-26
349:2024-06-23
325:References
276:Background
135:rehearing.
58:Docket no.
295:U.S. Code
291:rehearing
68:Citations
504:Text of
216:Majority
86:Argument
521:Cornell
429:FindLaw
272:claim.
232:Dissent
224:Dissent
129:Holding
551:
545:
542:
536:
533:
530:Justia
527:
524:
518:
268:for a
227:Thomas
201:
199:·
197:
189:
187:·
185:
177:
175:·
173:
165:
163:·
161:
62:21-442
512:
470:Oyez,
111:Prior
75:230 (
514:U.S.
78:more
73:U.S.
71:598
510:598
562::
508:,
489:.
448:.
436:^
423:.
396:.
378:.
342:.
458:.
400:.
352:.
247:V
81:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.