424:
589:
For evidence to be admissible, it must tend to prove or disprove some fact at issue in the proceeding. However, if the utility of this evidence is outweighed by its tendency to cause the fact finder to disapprove of the party it is introduced against for some unrelated reason, it is not admissible.
625:
has been tested and the methodology with which it has been tested; (2) whether the evidence has been subjected to peer review or publication; (3) whether a potential rate of error is known; and (4) whether the evidence is generally accepted in the scientific community.
614:
from the original author to the present holder. The trial judge performs a "gatekeeping" role in excluding unreliable testimony. The United States
Supreme Court first addressed the reliability requirement for experts in the landmark case
524:, and it must have some indicia of reliability. The general rule in evidence is that all relevant evidence is admissible and all irrelevant evidence is inadmissible, though some countries (such as the
610:
is generally barred for its lack of reliability. If the evidence is documentary, the party proffering the evidence must be able to show that it is authentic, and must be able to demonstrate the
598:
For evidence to be admissible enough to be admitted, the party proffering the evidence must be able to show that the source of the evidence makes it so. If evidence is in the form of
128:
644:
In some non-democratic legal systems, the courts effectively function as organs of those in power, and the rules of evidence are designed to favor their interests.
434:
702:
617:
621:. The Court laid out four non-exclusive factors that trial courts may consider when evaluating scientific expert reliability: (1) whether
569:
405:
716:
628:
553:
516:—to establish or to bolster a point put forth by a party to the proceeding. For evidence to be admissible, it must be
683:
468:
313:
278:
181:
398:
288:
191:
80:
590:
Furthermore, certain public-policy considerations bar the admission of otherwise relevant evidence.
525:
450:
446:
318:
529:
520:
and "not excluded by the rules of evidence", which generally means that it must not be unfairly
573:
558:
521:
273:
133:
95:
75:
736:
442:
391:
254:
244:
148:
118:
113:
497:
229:
214:
157:
70:
65:
50:
636:
analysis to include all expert testimony. It bears an effect on the verdict of the court.
8:
622:
234:
541:
370:
219:
176:
138:
679:
549:
335:
298:
293:
239:
224:
123:
572:
of the petitioners' homes, with incriminating evidence being described inside them.
611:
603:
330:
308:
283:
209:
186:
166:
60:
639:
545:
517:
303:
171:
104:
90:
537:
501:
249:
143:
22:
730:
505:
85:
55:
676:
The people's law dictionary : taking the mystery out of legal language
564:
379:
365:
552:. In the United States, this was effectuated federally in 1914 under the
533:
345:
324:
493:
374:
45:
355:
607:
599:
263:
200:
640:
Issues with admissibility of evidence in non-democratic regimes
509:
485:
513:
360:
568:. Both of these cases involved law enforcement conducting
544:, thereby rendering relevant evidence inadmissible. This
489:
30:
16:
Facts introduced to the fact finder in a court proceeding
562:
and incorporated against the states in 1961 in the case
602:
testimony, the party that introduces the evidence must
728:
606:for the witness's credibility and knowledge.
431:The examples and perspective in this article
399:
703:Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
618:Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
406:
392:
697:
695:
469:Learn how and when to remove this message
674:Hill, Gerald N.; Hill, Kathleen (2002).
673:
729:
692:
417:
667:
13:
717:Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael
629:Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael
14:
748:
422:
709:
654:
593:
1:
647:
584:
504:that may be introduced to a
314:Declaration against interest
182:Self-authenticating document
7:
678:. New York, NY: MJF Books.
579:
445:, discuss the issue on the
10:
753:
536:from exploiting evidence
192:Hague Evidence Convention
81:Eyewitness identification
576:is admissible evidence.
319:Present sense impression
129:Public policy exclusions
720:, 526 U.S. 137 (1999).
574:Consciousness of guilt
559:Weeks v. United States
96:Consciousness of guilt
538:obtained in violation
245:Recorded recollection
706:509 U.S. 579 (1993).
570:warrantless searches
451:create a new article
443:improve this article
433:may not represent a
279:in United States law
632:later extended the
623:scientific evidence
528:and, to an extent,
482:Admissible evidence
119:Laying a foundation
662:Murphy on Evidence
604:lay the groundwork
542:constitutional law
375:trusts and estates
255:Dead Man's Statute
220:Direct examination
177:Best evidence rule
550:exclusionary rule
479:
478:
471:
453:, as appropriate.
416:
415:
336:Implied assertion
299:Dying declaration
294:Excited utterance
240:Proffer agreement
225:Cross-examination
38:Types of evidence
744:
721:
713:
707:
699:
690:
689:
671:
665:
660:Richard Glover,
658:
612:chain of custody
546:rule of evidence
532:) proscribe the
474:
467:
463:
460:
454:
426:
425:
418:
408:
401:
394:
331:Learned treatise
309:Ancient document
289:Business records
187:Ancient document
167:Chain of custody
19:
18:
752:
751:
747:
746:
745:
743:
742:
741:
727:
726:
725:
724:
714:
710:
700:
693:
686:
672:
668:
659:
655:
650:
642:
596:
587:
582:
475:
464:
458:
455:
440:
427:
423:
412:
304:Party admission
172:Judicial notice
114:Burden of proof
56:Real (physical)
17:
12:
11:
5:
750:
740:
739:
723:
722:
708:
691:
684:
666:
664:(2015), p. 29.
652:
651:
649:
646:
641:
638:
595:
592:
586:
583:
581:
578:
548:is called the
500:, or tangible
477:
476:
437:of the subject
435:worldwide view
430:
428:
421:
414:
413:
411:
410:
403:
396:
388:
385:
384:
383:
382:
377:
368:
363:
358:
350:
349:
341:
340:
339:
338:
333:
328:
321:
316:
311:
306:
301:
296:
291:
286:
281:
276:
274:in English law
268:
267:
266:and exceptions
260:
259:
258:
257:
252:
250:Expert witness
247:
242:
237:
232:
227:
222:
217:
212:
204:
203:
197:
196:
195:
194:
189:
184:
179:
174:
169:
161:
160:
158:Authentication
154:
153:
152:
151:
146:
141:
136:
131:
126:
121:
116:
108:
107:
101:
100:
99:
98:
93:
88:
83:
78:
73:
68:
63:
58:
53:
48:
40:
39:
35:
34:
26:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
749:
738:
735:
734:
732:
719:
718:
712:
705:
704:
698:
696:
687:
685:9781567315530
681:
677:
670:
663:
657:
653:
645:
637:
635:
631:
630:
624:
620:
619:
613:
609:
605:
601:
591:
577:
575:
571:
567:
566:
561:
560:
555:
554:Supreme Court
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
526:United States
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
473:
470:
462:
459:December 2010
452:
448:
444:
438:
436:
429:
420:
419:
409:
404:
402:
397:
395:
390:
389:
387:
386:
381:
378:
376:
372:
369:
367:
364:
362:
359:
357:
354:
353:
352:
351:
347:
343:
342:
337:
334:
332:
329:
327:
326:
322:
320:
317:
315:
312:
310:
307:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
287:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
271:
270:
269:
265:
262:
261:
256:
253:
251:
248:
246:
243:
241:
238:
236:
233:
231:
228:
226:
223:
221:
218:
216:
213:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
202:
199:
198:
193:
190:
188:
185:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
170:
168:
165:
164:
163:
162:
159:
156:
155:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
111:
110:
109:
106:
103:
102:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
86:Genetic (DNA)
84:
82:
79:
77:
76:Demonstrative
74:
72:
69:
67:
64:
62:
59:
57:
54:
52:
49:
47:
44:
43:
42:
41:
37:
36:
32:
28:
27:
24:
21:
20:
737:Evidence law
715:
711:
701:
675:
669:
661:
656:
643:
633:
627:
616:
597:
588:
565:Mapp v. Ohio
563:
557:
508:—usually a
481:
480:
465:
456:
432:
380:Criminal law
323:
149:Similar fact
29:Part of the
594:Reliability
534:prosecution
522:prejudicial
498:documentary
494:testimonial
284:Confessions
235:Impeachment
124:Materiality
71:Inculpatory
66:Exculpatory
51:Documentary
648:References
506:factfinder
346:common law
325:Res gestae
210:Competence
134:Spoliation
585:Relevance
530:Australia
492:, is any
447:talk page
215:Privilege
201:Witnesses
139:Character
105:Relevance
46:Testimony
731:Category
580:Criteria
518:relevant
502:evidence
441:You may
366:Property
356:Contract
230:Redirect
23:Evidence
634:Daubert
608:Hearsay
600:witness
484:, in a
264:Hearsay
61:Digital
682:
344:Other
33:series
556:case
510:judge
486:court
449:, or
371:Wills
348:areas
144:Habit
680:ISBN
514:jury
361:Tort
91:Lies
540:of
512:or
490:law
488:of
31:law
733::
694:^
496:,
373:,
688:.
472:)
466:(
461:)
457:(
439:.
407:e
400:t
393:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.