148:– this values the brand as the present value portion of the economic profit attributable to the brand over the rest of its useful life. This has problems in that profits can sometimes be negative, leading to unrealistic brand value, and also that profits can be manipulated so may misrepresent brand value. This method uses qualitative measures to decide the portion of economic profits to be accredited to the brand.
109:
utility, technological specificity and property, considering the asset's perception by the market. Since the market approach relies on comparisons to similar assets, it is most useful when there is substantial data available regarding recent sales of comparable assets. Data on comparable or similar transactions may be accessed through the following sources:
254:
in 2015, said he had previously suggested that "despite the power and prestige of big valuation firms
Interbrand, Millward Brown and Brand Finance, there was a possibility that much of what they do was bollocks". He reported on research which found variation between brand valuations: "The average
154:– this method requires a valuation of each group of intangible assets to calculate the cost of capital of each. The returns for each of these are deducted from the present value of future cash flows and when all other assets have been accounted for, the remaining is used as the value of the brand.
108:
In this approach, the market price is compared. This valuation method relies on the estimation of value based on similar market transactions (e.g. similar license agreements) of comparable brand rights. Given that often the asset undervaluation is unique, the comparison is performed in terms of
170:– Assume theoretically a company does not own the brand it operates under but instead licenses the use from another. The royalty relief method uses available data of similar arrangements in the industry and assigns the value of the brand as the present value of future royalty payments.
99:
This is based on the cost of creating the brand. The fundamental premise of the cost approach is that it should not be worth more than it would cost to build an equivalent. The cost of building a brand minus any expenses is reflective of market value.
128:
This approach measures the value by reference to the present value of the economic benefits received over the rest of the useful life of the brand. There are at least six recognized methods of the income approach, with some authorities listing more.
164:– Identifies the extra cash flow in a branded business when compared to an unbranded, and comparable, business. However, it is rare to find conditions for this method to be used since finding similar unbranded companies can be difficult.
57:
Traditional marketing methods examine the price/value relationship in terms of dollars paid. Some marketers believe customers perceive the value to mean the lowest price. While this may be true for
142:– estimates the value of a brand by the volume premium it generates when compared to a similar but unbranded product or service. This must take into account the price premium method.
136:– estimates the value of a brand by the price premium it generates when compared to a similar but unbranded product or service. This must take into account the volume premium method.
499:"New Branding Trends to Watch: Former Omnicom Vice-Chief Birkin Says PR Trumps Others in Driving Brand Value, Points to Mobile and Experiential Marketing as Future Focus"
718:
498:
267:
that factoring the effects companies have on the environment into brand valuation may support better understanding and addressing of environmental risks.
818:
312:
300:
250:
One research paper states that "many of the methodologies used in practice are not theoretically sound". One critic, Mark Ritson, writing in
466:
844:
749:
559:
634:
64:
Brand valuation emerged in the 1980s. Early pioneers in brand valuations included the
British branding agency, Interbrand, led by
255:
valuation was as likely to overstate a brand's value by more than 500% than it was to get within 20% of the actual price paid".
606:
681:
376:
725:
75:
Both companies maintained "Top 100" lists of companies by valuation. In 1989, Murphy edited a seminal work on the subject:
368:
Methods for
Assessing Brand Value: A Comparison Between the Interbrand Model and the Bbdo's Brand Equity Evaluator Model
644:
592:
533:
332:
65:
775:
885:
72:, which is credited with leading the concept's development. Millward Brown was also a leading brand valuer.
276:
69:
636:
TechnoBrands: How to Create and Use ?Brand
Identity? to Market, Advertise and Sell Technology Products
880:
875:
235:
Financial applications (e.g. mergers and acquisitions, balance sheet valuation, investor relations)
34:
standard specifies six key requirements for the process of valuing brands, which are transparency,
79:
and in 1991, Birkin laid out a brand earnings multiple models of brand valuation in the book,
366:
350:
694:
27:
8:
324:
317:
440:
819:"What is the point of brand valuations if those doing the valuing are so off target?"
743:
640:
611:
588:
444:
420:
372:
328:
241:
Strategic / Business case applications (e.g. brand architecture, brand repositioning)
682:
ISO 10668 and brand valuations: a summary | BVR's IP Management & Valuation Wire
238:
Brand management applications (e.g. brand portfolio management, resource allocation)
432:
35:
39:
482:
251:
869:
226:
The ability to summon resources quickly in a systemic breakdown or apocalypse
42:, sufficiency, objectivity; and financial, behavioral, and legal parameters.
281:
264:
46:
231:
Interbrand classifies these uses of brand valuation in three categories:
30:
exists if those who value a brand were also involved in its creation. The
58:
845:"How can brand valuation help business to account for natural capital?"
529:
436:
348:
Geoffrey Foster (1 October 1989). "There's No
Accounting for Brands".
31:
421:"A taxonomy of brand valuation practice: Methodologies and purposes"
560:"What Coca-Cola's slide down global brand rankings really tells us"
83:. A 2009 paper identified "at least 52" brand valuation companies.
480:
Heather
Farmbrough (16 July 1987). "Birkin's Brand of Ambition".
799:
Rocha, Mike (2014). "Financial applications for brand value".
61:, some branding techniques are moving beyond this evaluation.
23:
22:
is the process of estimating the total financial value of a
666:
91:
There are three main types of brand valuation methods:
116:
Specialized royalty rate databases and publications.
77:
Brand
Valuation – Establishing a true and fair view;
585:
Brand
Valuation – Establishing a true and fair view
534:"Marketers' Methodologies for Valuing Brand Equity"
479:
316:
867:
604:
347:
220:Investor's presentation / Shareholder's report
496:
418:
632:
473:
812:
810:
523:
521:
519:
414:
412:
410:
408:
174:
86:
660:
598:
527:
406:
404:
402:
400:
398:
396:
394:
392:
390:
388:
626:
490:
467:How marketers should use brand valuation
419:Salinas, Gabriella; Ambler, Tim (2009).
371:(Thesis). Diplomica Verlag. p. 14.
301:Campaign for Independent Brand Valuation
842:
836:
807:
516:
364:
341:
868:
816:
748:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (
607:"Infosys Brand Value Up 3.18% In Fy03"
557:
551:
385:
258:
123:
103:
798:
769:
767:
765:
763:
761:
759:
587:. Hutchinson Business Books, London.
358:
311:
187:Business buying and selling decisions
692:
667:Boersma, J. M.; Van Weelden (1991).
94:
695:"What Does "Market Approach" Mean?"
152:Multi-period excess earnings method
119:Court decisions concerning damages.
13:
843:Juniper, Tony (9 September 2013).
756:
497:Frank Zeccola (9 September 2009).
323:. New York: McGraw Hill. pp.
14:
897:
773:
671:. London: Kogan Page. p. 80.
45:Brand valuation is distinct from
211:Taxation planning and compliance
792:
776:"Measuring the Value of Brands"
711:
686:
675:
605:Debjoy Sengupta (23 May 2003).
577:
558:Dailly, Julian (29 July 2016).
365:Soto J., Tatiana (April 2008).
817:Ritson, Mark (22 April 2015).
464:Janet Hull, Marketing Society
458:
305:
294:
52:
1:
287:
277:List of most valuable brands
245:
190:Tracking shareholders' value
158:Incremental cash flow method
7:
583:Murphy, John (ed.) (1989).
425:Journal of Brand Management
270:
10:
902:
639:. iUniverse. p. 211.
263:It has been suggested by
470:Retrieved 16 March 2017
175:Uses of brand valuation
113:Company annual reports.
87:Valuation methodologies
208:Management information
633:Chuck Pettis (2001).
179:Common purposes are:
168:Royalty relief method
140:Volume premium method
16:Marketing measurement
886:Branding terminology
669:Understanding Brands
134:Price premium method
81:Understanding Brands
28:conflict of interest
259:Future developments
146:Income split method
124:The income approach
104:The market approach
437:10.1057/bm.2009.14
217:Litigation support
205:Strategic planning
199:Legal transactions
196:Dispute resolution
693:Fernando, Jason.
612:Business Standard
378:978-3-8366-5872-0
319:The Brand Mindset
95:The cost approach
893:
881:Brand management
860:
859:
857:
855:
840:
834:
833:
831:
829:
814:
805:
804:
796:
790:
789:
787:
785:
780:
771:
754:
753:
747:
739:
737:
736:
730:
724:. Archived from
723:
715:
709:
708:
706:
705:
690:
684:
679:
673:
672:
664:
658:
657:
655:
653:
630:
624:
623:
621:
619:
602:
596:
581:
575:
574:
572:
570:
555:
549:
548:
546:
544:
528:Trent, Lindsey;
525:
514:
513:
511:
509:
503:Bulldog Reporter
494:
488:
487:
477:
471:
462:
456:
455:
453:
451:
416:
383:
382:
362:
356:
355:
351:Management Today
345:
339:
338:
322:
309:
303:
298:
901:
900:
896:
895:
894:
892:
891:
890:
876:Brand valuation
866:
865:
864:
863:
853:
851:
841:
837:
827:
825:
815:
808:
797:
793:
783:
781:
778:
772:
757:
741:
740:
734:
732:
728:
721:
719:"Archived copy"
717:
716:
712:
703:
701:
691:
687:
680:
676:
665:
661:
651:
649:
647:
631:
627:
617:
615:
603:
599:
582:
578:
568:
566:
556:
552:
542:
540:
538:The CPA Journal
526:
517:
507:
505:
495:
491:
483:Financial Times
478:
474:
463:
459:
449:
447:
417:
386:
379:
363:
359:
346:
342:
335:
313:Knapp, Duane E.
310:
306:
299:
295:
290:
273:
261:
248:
229:
184:Value reporting
177:
126:
106:
97:
89:
55:
20:Brand valuation
17:
12:
11:
5:
899:
889:
888:
883:
878:
862:
861:
835:
823:Marketing Week
806:
791:
755:
710:
685:
674:
659:
645:
625:
597:
576:
550:
515:
489:
472:
457:
384:
377:
357:
340:
333:
304:
292:
291:
289:
286:
285:
284:
279:
272:
269:
260:
257:
252:Marketing Week
247:
244:
243:
242:
239:
236:
228:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
176:
173:
172:
171:
165:
155:
149:
143:
137:
125:
122:
121:
120:
117:
114:
105:
102:
96:
93:
88:
85:
70:Michael Birkin
54:
51:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
898:
887:
884:
882:
879:
877:
874:
873:
871:
850:
846:
839:
824:
820:
813:
811:
802:
795:
777:
770:
768:
766:
764:
762:
760:
751:
745:
731:on 2020-09-22
727:
720:
714:
700:
696:
689:
683:
678:
670:
663:
648:
646:9781462099573
642:
638:
637:
629:
614:
613:
608:
601:
594:
593:0-09-174261-7
590:
586:
580:
565:
561:
554:
539:
535:
531:
524:
522:
520:
504:
500:
493:
485:
484:
476:
469:
468:
461:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
415:
413:
411:
409:
407:
405:
403:
401:
399:
397:
395:
393:
391:
389:
380:
374:
370:
369:
361:
353:
352:
344:
336:
334:0-07-134795-X
330:
326:
321:
320:
314:
308:
302:
297:
293:
283:
280:
278:
275:
274:
268:
266:
256:
253:
240:
237:
234:
233:
232:
225:
223:Raising funds
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
182:
180:
169:
166:
163:
162:Excess Margin
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
131:
130:
118:
115:
112:
111:
110:
101:
92:
84:
82:
78:
73:
71:
67:
62:
60:
50:
48:
43:
41:
37:
33:
29:
25:
21:
852:. Retrieved
849:The Guardian
848:
838:
826:. Retrieved
822:
800:
794:
782:. Retrieved
774:Clark, Ray.
733:. Retrieved
726:the original
713:
702:. Retrieved
699:Investopedia
698:
688:
677:
668:
662:
650:. Retrieved
635:
628:
616:. Retrieved
610:
600:
584:
579:
567:. Retrieved
564:The Guardian
563:
553:
541:. Retrieved
537:
506:. Retrieved
502:
492:
481:
475:
465:
460:
448:. Retrieved
431:(1): 39–61.
428:
424:
367:
360:
349:
343:
318:
307:
296:
282:Brand equity
265:Tony Juniper
262:
249:
230:
178:
167:
161:
157:
151:
145:
139:
133:
127:
107:
98:
90:
80:
76:
74:
63:
56:
47:brand equity
44:
19:
18:
784:October 18,
530:Mohr, Jakki
214:Liquidation
66:John Murphy
59:commodities
53:Brand value
40:reliability
870:Categories
854:18 October
828:18 October
801:Interbrand
735:2020-10-19
704:2020-07-14
569:18 October
543:18 October
450:18 October
288:References
202:Accounting
445:167333325
246:Criticism
193:Licensing
32:ISO 10668
744:cite web
532:(2017).
508:16 March
315:(2000).
271:See also
36:validity
652:6 April
618:6 April
643:
591:
443:
375:
331:
779:(PDF)
729:(PDF)
722:(PDF)
441:S2CID
325:24–35
24:brand
856:2020
830:2020
786:2020
750:link
654:2015
641:ISBN
620:2015
589:ISBN
571:2020
545:2020
510:2015
452:2020
373:ISBN
329:ISBN
68:and
26:. A
433:doi
160:or
872::
847:.
821:.
809:^
758:^
746:}}
742:{{
697:.
609:.
562:.
536:.
518:^
501:.
439:.
429:17
427:.
423:.
387:^
327:.
49:.
38:,
858:.
832:.
803:.
788:.
752:)
738:.
707:.
656:.
622:.
595:.
573:.
547:.
512:.
486:.
454:.
435::
381:.
354:.
337:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.