304:
consideration due to these diverse perspectives. Collaboration enables individuals to combine their diverse perspectives, experiences, and areas of expertise. Collaborative writing brings together a diverse array of unique ideas and backgrounds, enriching the creative process. Also, through collaborative writing, tasks of an assignment can be assigned based on individual strengths, skills, and interests, thereby enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the writing process. For example, an individual proficient in research may be assigned to gather information, while another member of the team, skilled in editing, could concentrate on refining the draft. Through task assignment in this manner, every team member can contribute to the project in a manner that optimizes their abilities and interests, resulting in a writing process that is more efficient and effective.
243:
study consisted of 23 total participants: 5 doing individual work and 18 working in pairs. The pairs consisted of two male pairs, four female pairs and three male/female pairs. Post-assignment interviews revealed that the majority of students (16) yielded positive opinions about group work, but two students felt that group work is best reserved for oral activities and discussions rather than writing assignments. The majority of interviewees gave positive reviews, but one argued that group work was difficult when it came to criticizing another's work and another argued that there is a power imbalance when writing is based on ability. The two students who were stark opponents of collaborative writing revealed that it was hard to concentrate on their work and they were embarrassed by their supposedly poor
308:
critical thinking through writing, although it is equally important to equip students with the skills necessary for facilitating productive peer discussions, thereby promoting collaborative learning through writing. Students cannot be expected to achieve a satisfactory outcome in a collaborative writing project without a strong foundational understanding of the subject matter. A strong foundation might involve defining the writing's purpose, identifying the intended audience, conducting thorough research on the topic, and structuring and organizing thoughts and concepts. Given adequate resources and education, the objective is for students to proficiently engage in writing tasks and feel at ease with collaborative efforts.
287:, investigated eight business communication textbooks to test the depth in which they provided students with a knowledge of collaborative writing in the workplace and how to execute those processes. The study found that, generally, textbooks highlighted the role of collaborative writing in the workplace. Textbooks listed the pros of collaborative writing such as saving time, more superior documents due to each individual's strengths and specialized knowledge, a well-crafted message due to team work, balanced abilities, and an interest in accomplishing a common goal.
267:
language of choice and they were learning while discussing ideas, which allowed students to learn from each other. Worksheets tend to focus on language structures, while collaborative writings focuses more on the speech part of language. Collaborative writing also helps students to learn new writing styles such as analyzing writing. According to
Vanderbilt University, "Collaboration gives students practice in analyzing writing. It is easier to see where a classmate's writing is going awry than it is to find flaws in one's own prose" (Vanderbilt University).
177:
263:
forced to share ideas and writing styles with each other. The other thing about collaborative writing is the fact that it can be used in online schooling and in-person schooling, it is better in person though because it's easier to communicate with each other and peer review one another. Collaborative writing can also improve confidence when talking to each other. Studies show that students also feel a sense of motivation when working with their fellow peers. (Veramuthu 2020).
66:
ensure the workload is evenly displaced, all participants work together and interact throughout the writing process, everyone contributes to planning, generating ideas, making structure of text, editing, and the revision process. Other theories of collaborative writing propose a more flexible understanding of the workflow that accounts for varying contribution levels depending on the expertise, interest, and role of participants.
271:
According to
Campbell, "it is helpful to ensure everyone knows their role. Sometimes, a project can get going, but many people do not know exactly who is responsible for what" (Campbell 2023). Students also perform better face-to-face since there is more discussion. It is also discovered that students who are silent still benefit from collaborative writing by observing their peer's writings.
226:
writing skills, regardless of their proficiency level, by allowing them to collaborate and learn from one or more partners and participate in the co-ownership of a written piece. Instructors may utilize this technique to create more student-centered and collaborative learning environments, or they may use it themselves to cross-collaborate with other academics to produce publishable works.
251:
having different areas of expertise, so therefore they had differing understanding of concepts and even the meaning of the same words. While many of the issues resulted from miscommunication, the study found that some nurse consultants resisted change in terms of altering their writing style to fit the understanding or standards of the attorneys.
295:
different areas of expertise, so therefore they had differing understanding of concepts and even the meaning of the same words. While much of the issues resulted from miscommunication, the article claimed that some nurse consultants resisted change in terms of altering their writing style to fit the understanding or standards of the attorneys.
291:
workplace. Much of the activities that featured group work seemed more idealistic rather than based in reality, where the writing process occurred in only controlled and orderly environments. Bremner also found that group work in the classroom also did not properly simulate the power hierarchies present in the workplace.
433:
An author acquires copyright if their work meets certain criteria. In the case of works created by one person, typically, the first owner of a copyright in that work is the person who created the work, i.e. the author. But, when more than one person creates the work in collaboration with one another,
262:
Collaborative writing is an approach to writing that many educators use every day, it helps to improve writing skills by making students team up with one another to handle an assignment. Collaborative writing can make a big difference in students' writing because when working with others they will be
250:
Jason
Palmeri found that when it came to inter-professional collaboration, most of the issues stemmed from miscommunication. In differing disciplines, one person may have a level of expertise and understanding that is foreign to another. Palmeri's study provided the example of a nurse and an attorney
307:
While utilizing collaboration in writing practices can yield numerous advantages, the presence of additional factors, such as the learning environment, also influences the potential for a successful collaborative writing experience. A structured learning environment plays a crucial role in fostering
294:
Jason
Palmeri found that when it came to inter-professional collaboration, most of the issues stemmed from miscommunication. In differing disciplines, one person may have a level of expertise and understanding that is foreign to another. The article gave the example of a nurse and an attorney having
270:
Grouping seems to be very important when it comes to collaborative writing, as larger groups tend to share more ideas whereas smaller groups share fewer ideas and tend to focus on grammar. Another way to have a strong collaborative writing process is to have good communication and division of roles.
159:
The process of collaborative writing involves a couple of different levels. The process of collaborative writing begins with planning and goal setting. The group of two or more individuals meet and begin laying out the goals and steps they are going to take to complete the work. Next, members of the
266:
Research conducted by scholars about collaborative writing in education began in the early 1900s. Research discovered that language exchangers between peers to create these writings were beneficial and they called them language-related episodes. This is due to learners being able to socialize their
65:
Collaborative writing is often the norm, rather than the exception, in many academic and workplace settings. Some theories of collaborative writing suggest that in the writing process, all participants are to have equal responsibilities. In this view, all sections of the text should be split up to
242:
learners in the classroom were overwhelmingly positive. The study compared the nature of collaborative writing of individual work versus that of group work, and Storch found that although paired groups wrote shorter texts, their work was more complex and accurate compared to individual works. The
225:
Another motive for using collaborative writing is to increase the quality of the completed project by combining the expertise of multiple individuals and for allowing feedback from diverse perspectives. Collaborative writing has been proven to be an effective method of improving an individual's
290:
The textbooks examined gave students a basic knowledge of collaboration in the workplace, but they also lacked the information that showed students the realities of collaborative writing in the workplace with few activities presented in the textbooks that mirror collaborative activities in the
274:
Some students still may favor individual writing since the process is easier and less time-consuming. Students' opinions on collaborative writing may also be swayed by their experience, such as if team members delete or add text without discussion with their group, or some instructors are even
37:
of some kind (e.g., academic papers, reports, creative writing, projects, and business proposals). Success in collaborative writing involves a division of labor that apportions particular tasks to those with particular strengths: drafting, providing feedback, editing, sourcing, (reorganizing),
303:
The practice of collaborative writing offers numerous benefits that are accessible to individuals from all types of backgrounds. One of these advantages of collaboration in writing is that it frequently leads to a deeper and more comprehensive examination of the topic or subject matter under
205:
In 2016, Researchers Joy
Robinson, Lisa Dusenberry, and Lawrence M. Halcyon conducted a case study investigating the productivity of a team of writers who utilized the practice of interlaced collaborative writing and found that the team was able to produce a published article, a two-year
895:
Sharples, M., Goodlet, J. S., Beck, E. E., Wood, C. C., Easterbook, S M., & Plowman, L. (1993). Research issues in the study of computer supported collaborative writing. In M. Sharples (ed.) Computer supported collaborative writing. London: Springer,
275:
concerned that group presentations allow weaker students to depend on stronger ones for success (Dartmouth). It is also stated that generally, students with more communication and discussions will have a positive view of collaborative writing.
201:
written by a collective of thirty authors; their work identifies key tools and techniques that would be necessary or useful to the writing process, and to discover, negotiate, and document issues in massively authored scholarship.
164:
and finding information on the topic they are working on. After that, the group will begin outlining and structuring the research into a rough draft. Next, the group will collaborate to create a draft that they will then
46:
Collaborative writing engages two or more persons in the process of producing a written work as a group, where everyone involved is contributing content or decisions on the work being produced.(Vanderbilt
University)
189:
Collaborative writing may be used in instances where a workload would be overwhelming for one person to produce. Therefore, ownership of the text is from the group that produced it and not just one person.
38:
optimizing for tone or house style, etc. Collaborative writing is characteristic of professional as well as educational settings, utilizing the expertise of those involved in the collaboration process.
254:
Obstacles to collaborative work include a writers' inability to find time to meet with the rest of the group, personal preferences for organization and writing process, and a fear of being criticized.
654:
Schindler, Kirsten and Wolfe, Joanna "Beyond single authors: Organizational text production as collaborative writing" Handbook of writing and text production. Berlin: De
Gruyter, Mouton, 2014 p. 160
818:
Lowry, Paul
Benjamin; Curtis, Aaron; Lowry, Michelle René (2004-01-01). "Building a Taxonomy and Nomenclature of Collaborative Writing to Improve Interdisciplinary Research and Practice".
173:
prior to publishing their work. With the draft, edited, proofread, and revised, the group will then publish the work they collaborated to create (UNC Writing Center, 2017; Bremner, 2010).
180:
Collaborative writing may occur in face-to-face settings, when writers gather together in a shared location, or in digital settings when writers are separated by both time and distance.
665:
197:
and colleagues provided the first extensive discussion of the experiential aspects of large-scale collaborative research by documenting the collaborative development process of an
937:
Robinson, Joy; Dusenberry, Lisa; Lawrence, Halcyon M. (October 2016). "Collaborative strategies for distributed teams: Innovation through interlaced collaborative writing".
776:
Sharples, M.; Goodlet, J. S.; Beck, E. E.; Wood, C. C.; Easterbrook, S. M.; Plowman, L. (1993). "Research Issues in the Study of
Computer Supported Collaborative Writing".
86:
progressivism in the early twentieth century. Collaboration and collaborative writing gained traction in these fields in the 1980s especially, as researchers reacted to
910:
58:
Shared power among participants. Everyone included in the project has the power to make decisions and no group member is in charge of all the text produced.
112:. In scholarship, on both academic and business writing, multiple terminologies have been identified for collaborative writing processes, including:
1143:
Palmeri, Jason (2004-01-01). "When
Discourses Collide: A Case Study of Interprofessional Collaborative Writing in a Medically Oriented Law Firm".
1027:
Palmeri, Jason (2004-01-01). "When Discourses Collide: A Case Study of Interprofessional Collaborative Writing in a Medically Oriented Law Firm".
1188:"Collaborative writing of an argumentative synthesis from multiple sources: The role of writing beliefs and strategies to deal with controversy"
239:
1186:
Cuevas, Isabel; Mateos, Mar; MartĂn, Elena; Luna, MarĂa; MartĂn, Ana; Solari, Mariana; González-Lamas, Jara; MartĂnez, Isabel (2016-10-15).
1253:
1346:
691:
244:
725:
606:
918:. 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. Austin, Texas, USA. pp. 11–20.
861:
Hart, Richard L (September 2000). "Co-authorship in the academic library literature: A survey of attitudes and behaviors".
1070:
Jones, Darolyn Lyn; Jones, James W.; Murk, Peter J. (2012). "Writing collaboratively: Priority, practice, and process".
980:"The Effects of Collaborative Writing on Students' Writing Fluency: An Efficient Framework for Collaborative Writing"
954:
793:
752:
1108:
Bremner, Stephen (2010-04-01). "Collaborative writing: Bridging the gap between the textbook and the workplace".
1465:
631:
366:
238:, in a 2005 Australian study, discovered that reflections pertaining to collaborative writing in regards to
284:
155:: group all works on and writes the project at the same time, adjusting and commenting on everyone's work.
744:
Encyclopedia of rhetoric and composition : communication from ancient times to the information age
464:
222:
to allow each team member to edit and add writing to a shared document throughout the writing process.
109:
588:
453:
17:
218:' voice feature for group check-ins, to hold group discussions, and to write as a group. They used
544:
Storch, Neomy (2005-09-01). "Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections".
494:
459:
344:
329:
91:
79:
1449:
1373:
448:
393:
1328:
1236:
692:"Preparing Students for Teamwork through Collaborative Writing and Peer Review Techniques"
8:
1442:
211:
75:
129:: each person adds their task work then passes it on for the next person to edit freely.
1279:
1187:
1168:
1087:
1052:
1009:
960:
843:
569:
499:
489:
479:
87:
1280:"Learning philosophical thinking through collaborative writing in secondary education"
874:
1309:
1217:
1172:
1160:
1125:
1091:
1056:
1044:
1013:
1001:
950:
878:
835:
789:
758:
748:
721:
637:
627:
602:
561:
321:
964:
847:
214:
presentation over the course of three years. The writers used virtual tools such as
1470:
1422:
1299:
1291:
1207:
1199:
1152:
1117:
1079:
1036:
991:
942:
919:
870:
827:
781:
594:
573:
553:
474:
435:
428:
382:
340:
145:: each person plays a role in the composition process of a project due to talents.
1237:""SHAPING THE MULTIMEDIA MINDSET: COLLABORATIVE WRITING IN JOURNALISM EDUCATION""
215:
139:: each person does one part of the whole project and then one member compiles it.
52:
1295:
1203:
785:
557:
523:
Nelson, N., K. Skinner, and E.S. Barrera. (2023). "The Writing-Reading Nexus."
504:
484:
348:
207:
198:
194:
1121:
946:
1459:
1313:
1221:
1164:
1156:
1129:
1083:
1048:
1040:
1005:
996:
979:
882:
839:
831:
565:
103:
923:
762:
641:
55:. Whether it be brainstorming, writing a draft of the project, or reviewing.
1423:"Authorea Nabs $ 610k For Its Bid To Become A 'Google Docs For Scientists'"
598:
235:
170:
1400:
742:
469:
397:
378:
325:
219:
123:: one person is leading, they compile the group ideas and do the writing.
1212:
1304:
780:. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer London. pp. 9–28.
83:
411:
356:
176:
1450:
Singular Texts/plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing
939:
2016 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC)
624:
Singular texts/plural authors: perspectives on collaborative writing
527:
2nd Edition. Rosalind Horowitz, ed. Taylor & Francis, NY: 152-3.
386:
370:
360:
161:
283:
A study conducted by Stephen Bremner, an English professor at the
1351:
1347:"6 Great Self-Publishing Tools for Small Press and Author Co-Ops"
374:
166:
34:
210:, a digital and physical poster, a midterm research report, and
1378:
396:
that allow other users to continue a story's narrative such as
352:
333:
33:
is a procedure in which two or more persons work together on a
1278:
Seuba, Mariona Corcelles; CastellĂł, Montserrat (2015-06-15).
720:. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
415:
401:
61:
The collaborative production of one single and specific text.
525:
The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Writing.
407:
936:
666:"Collaboration, Control, and the Idea of a Writing Center"
718:
Collaborative learning as democratic practice: A history
775:
51:
Interaction between participants throughout the entire
1185:
343:
systems like Team Foundation Version Control (used in
1443:
Paul Benjamin Lowry's papers on collaborative writing
1329:""Coping with the Problems of Collaborative Writing""
912:
Massively distributed authorship of academic papers
320:is a wiki-like git-managed authoring platform from
94:and began theorizing more social views of writing.
1414:
626:. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
889:
1457:
817:
1069:
108:Collaborative writing processes are extremely
1277:
904:
902:
740:
438:can be made provided some criteria are met.
689:
621:
622:Ede, Lisa S.; Lunsford, Andrea A. (1992).
76:rhetoric, composition, and writing studies
1448:Lisa S. Ede, Andrea A. Lunsford (1991). "
1303:
1211:
995:
908:
899:
663:
257:
27:Writing performed by more than one person
1326:
778:Computer Supported Collaborative Writing
699:Teaching English in the Two-Year College
175:
1142:
1107:
1026:
941:. Austin, TX, USA: IEEE. pp. 1–9.
339:For collaborative code-writing, mostly
14:
1458:
1103:
1101:
590:Collaborative Writing in L2 Classrooms
586:
543:
82:in U.S. contexts has been informed by
1420:
1145:The Journal of Business Communication
1029:The Journal of Business Communication
909:Tomlinson, Bill; et al. (2012).
863:The Journal of Academic Librarianship
820:The Journal of Business Communication
813:
811:
809:
807:
805:
1344:
977:
860:
715:
539:
537:
535:
533:
1098:
392:Online platforms mainly focused on
278:
24:
1436:
1401:"GitLab About - Built with GitLab"
1338:
1234:
854:
802:
546:Journal of Second Language Writing
328:web-based Git repository manager (
229:
25:
1482:
1327:Chisholm, Richard (August 1990).
530:
78:, scholars have demonstrated how
978:Pham, Vu Phi Ho (January 2021).
747:. New York: Garland Publishing.
169:. Finally, the group will begin
1393:
1366:
1320:
1271:
1246:
1228:
1179:
1136:
1063:
1020:
971:
930:
769:
690:Singh-Gupta, Vidya (May 1996).
367:Collaborative real-time editors
363:) are used in parallel writing.
734:
709:
683:
657:
648:
615:
580:
517:
13:
1:
1421:Lomas, Natasha (2014-09-22).
1110:English for Specific Purposes
875:10.1016/s0099-1333(00)00140-3
511:
422:
41:
1374:"Getting Started with Atlas"
1345:King, Carla (1 April 2014).
587:Storch, Neomy (2013-07-04).
285:City University of Hong Kong
7:
1296:10.17239/jowr-2015.07.01.07
1284:Journal of Writing Research
1204:10.17239/jowr-2016.08.02.02
1192:Journal of Writing Research
786:10.1007/978-1-4471-2007-0_2
441:
298:
143:Stratified-division writing
10:
1487:
1258:University Writing Program
741:Theresa Enos, ed. (1996).
673:The Writing Center Journal
664:Lundsford, Andrea (1991).
558:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
465:Document management system
426:
101:
69:
1122:10.1016/j.esp.2009.11.001
947:10.1109/IPCC.2016.7740489
454:Content management system
1157:10.1177/0021943603259582
1084:10.1177/1045159512443526
1041:10.1177/0021943603259582
997:10.1177/2158244021998363
832:10.1177/0021943603259363
593:. Multilingual Matters.
311:
97:
1254:"Collaborative Writing"
924:10.1145/2212776.2212779
184:
990:(1): 215824402199836.
599:10.21832/9781847699954
495:Online word processors
460:Document collaboration
345:Team Foundation Server
330:version control system
258:As an educational tool
181:
92:social constructionism
80:collaborative learning
1466:Collaborative writing
449:Collaborative editing
394:collaborative fiction
324:that is based on the
179:
117:Single-author writing
31:Collaborative writing
90:theories related to
716:Holt, Mara (2018).
133:Horizontal-division
500:Project management
490:New Worlds Project
480:Mass collaboration
182:
153:reciprocal writing
127:Sequential writing
727:978-0-8141-0730-0
608:978-1-84769-995-4
160:group will begin
110:context-dependent
88:poststructuralist
16:(Redirected from
1478:
1431:
1430:
1418:
1412:
1411:
1409:
1407:
1397:
1391:
1390:
1388:
1386:
1370:
1364:
1363:
1361:
1359:
1342:
1336:
1335:
1333:
1324:
1318:
1317:
1307:
1275:
1269:
1268:
1266:
1265:
1250:
1244:
1243:
1241:
1235:Perrin, Daniel.
1232:
1226:
1225:
1215:
1183:
1177:
1176:
1140:
1134:
1133:
1105:
1096:
1095:
1067:
1061:
1060:
1024:
1018:
1017:
999:
975:
969:
968:
934:
928:
927:
917:
906:
897:
893:
887:
886:
858:
852:
851:
815:
800:
799:
773:
767:
766:
738:
732:
731:
713:
707:
706:
696:
687:
681:
680:
670:
661:
655:
652:
646:
645:
619:
613:
612:
584:
578:
577:
541:
528:
521:
475:Joint authorship
436:joint authorship
429:Joint authorship
383:Microsoft Office
341:revision control
279:In the workplace
137:parallel writing
21:
1486:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1456:
1455:
1439:
1437:Further reading
1434:
1419:
1415:
1405:
1403:
1399:
1398:
1394:
1384:
1382:
1372:
1371:
1367:
1357:
1355:
1343:
1339:
1331:
1325:
1321:
1276:
1272:
1263:
1261:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1239:
1233:
1229:
1184:
1180:
1141:
1137:
1106:
1099:
1068:
1064:
1025:
1021:
976:
972:
957:
935:
931:
915:
907:
900:
894:
890:
859:
855:
816:
803:
796:
774:
770:
755:
739:
735:
728:
714:
710:
694:
688:
684:
668:
662:
658:
653:
649:
634:
620:
616:
609:
585:
581:
542:
531:
522:
518:
514:
509:
444:
434:then a case of
431:
425:
314:
301:
281:
260:
240:second language
232:
230:Scholarly views
216:Google Hangouts
187:
167:revise and edit
106:
100:
72:
53:writing process
44:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1484:
1474:
1473:
1468:
1454:
1453:
1446:
1438:
1435:
1433:
1432:
1413:
1392:
1365:
1337:
1319:
1290:(1): 157–200.
1270:
1245:
1227:
1198:(2): 205–226.
1178:
1135:
1116:(2): 121–132.
1097:
1072:Adult Learning
1062:
1019:
970:
955:
929:
898:
888:
869:(5): 339–345.
853:
801:
794:
768:
753:
733:
726:
708:
682:
656:
647:
632:
614:
607:
579:
552:(3): 153–173.
529:
515:
513:
510:
508:
507:
505:Real-time text
502:
497:
492:
487:
485:Networked book
482:
477:
472:
467:
462:
457:
451:
445:
443:
440:
424:
421:
420:
419:
405:
390:
364:
337:
322:O'Reilly Media
313:
310:
300:
297:
280:
277:
259:
256:
231:
228:
208:grant proposal
199:academic paper
195:Bill Tomlinson
186:
183:
157:
156:
146:
140:
130:
124:
99:
96:
71:
68:
63:
62:
59:
56:
43:
40:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1483:
1472:
1469:
1467:
1464:
1463:
1461:
1451:
1447:
1444:
1441:
1440:
1428:
1424:
1417:
1402:
1396:
1381:
1380:
1375:
1369:
1354:
1353:
1348:
1341:
1330:
1323:
1315:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1274:
1259:
1255:
1249:
1238:
1231:
1223:
1219:
1214:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1182:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1139:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1104:
1102:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1066:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1023:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
998:
993:
989:
985:
981:
974:
966:
962:
958:
956:9781509017614
952:
948:
944:
940:
933:
925:
921:
914:
913:
905:
903:
892:
884:
880:
876:
872:
868:
864:
857:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
814:
812:
810:
808:
806:
797:
795:9783540197829
791:
787:
783:
779:
772:
764:
760:
756:
754:0-8240-7200-6
750:
746:
745:
737:
729:
723:
719:
712:
704:
700:
693:
686:
678:
674:
667:
660:
651:
643:
639:
635:
629:
625:
618:
610:
604:
600:
596:
592:
591:
583:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
540:
538:
536:
534:
526:
520:
516:
506:
503:
501:
498:
496:
493:
491:
488:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
463:
461:
458:
455:
452:
450:
447:
446:
439:
437:
430:
417:
413:
409:
406:
403:
399:
395:
391:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
365:
362:
359:, GitLab and
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
315:
309:
305:
296:
292:
288:
286:
276:
272:
268:
264:
255:
252:
248:
246:
241:
237:
227:
223:
221:
217:
213:
209:
203:
200:
196:
191:
178:
174:
172:
171:proof-reading
168:
163:
154:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
128:
125:
122:
118:
115:
114:
113:
111:
105:
104:Chain writing
95:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
67:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
48:
39:
36:
32:
19:
1426:
1416:
1404:. Retrieved
1395:
1383:. Retrieved
1377:
1368:
1356:. Retrieved
1350:
1340:
1322:
1287:
1283:
1273:
1262:. Retrieved
1260:. 2023-04-30
1257:
1248:
1230:
1213:10486/679714
1195:
1191:
1181:
1151:(1): 37–65.
1148:
1144:
1138:
1113:
1109:
1078:(2): 90–93.
1075:
1071:
1065:
1035:(1): 37–65.
1032:
1028:
1022:
987:
983:
973:
938:
932:
911:
891:
866:
862:
856:
826:(1): 66–99.
823:
819:
777:
771:
743:
736:
717:
711:
702:
698:
685:
676:
672:
659:
650:
623:
617:
589:
582:
549:
545:
524:
519:
432:
317:
306:
302:
293:
289:
282:
273:
269:
265:
261:
253:
249:
236:Neomy Storch
233:
224:
204:
192:
188:
158:
152:
148:
142:
136:
132:
126:
120:
116:
107:
84:John Dewey's
73:
64:
45:
30:
29:
1305:2072/284346
470:Job sharing
398:Protagonize
379:Google Docs
326:open-source
220:Google Docs
162:researching
1460:Categories
1427:TechCrunch
1264:2024-03-17
705:: 127–136.
679:(1): 3–10.
633:0809317931
512:References
427:See also:
423:Authorship
212:conference
102:See also:
42:Definition
1385:25 August
1314:2294-3307
1222:2294-3307
1173:145397761
1165:0021-9436
1130:0889-4906
1092:141689168
1057:145397761
1049:0021-9436
1014:232484423
1006:2158-2440
984:SAGE Open
883:0099-1333
840:0021-9436
566:1060-3743
412:Knowledge
357:Bitbucket
351:(used in
234:Linguist
193:In 2012,
121:collegial
18:Co-author
965:12405890
848:15241066
763:33276421
642:23768261
442:See also
387:Authorea
371:Etherpad
361:CodePlex
299:Benefits
247:skills.
149:Reactive
1471:Writing
1352:PBS.org
574:1256668
375:Hackpad
245:English
70:History
1406:10 May
1379:GitHub
1358:10 May
1312:
1220:
1171:
1163:
1128:
1090:
1055:
1047:
1012:
1004:
963:
953:
881:
846:
838:
792:
761:
751:
724:
640:
630:
605:
572:
564:
385:, and
353:GitHub
347:) and
334:GitLab
1332:(PDF)
1240:(PDF)
1169:S2CID
1088:S2CID
1053:S2CID
1010:S2CID
961:S2CID
916:(PDF)
896:9–28.
844:S2CID
695:(PDF)
669:(PDF)
570:S2CID
456:(CMS)
416:Wikia
410:like
408:Wikis
402:Ficly
369:like
318:Atlas
312:Tools
98:Types
1408:2015
1387:2018
1360:2015
1310:ISSN
1218:ISSN
1161:ISSN
1126:ISSN
1045:ISSN
1002:ISSN
951:ISBN
879:ISSN
836:ISSN
790:ISBN
759:OCLC
749:ISBN
722:ISBN
638:OCLC
628:ISBN
603:ISBN
562:ISSN
414:and
400:and
185:Uses
35:text
1300:hdl
1292:doi
1208:hdl
1200:doi
1153:doi
1118:doi
1080:doi
1037:doi
992:doi
943:doi
920:doi
871:doi
828:doi
782:doi
595:doi
554:doi
349:Git
332:) "
151:or
135:or
119:or
74:In
1462::
1452:".
1425:.
1376:.
1349:.
1308:.
1298:.
1286:.
1282:.
1256:.
1216:.
1206:.
1194:.
1190:.
1167:.
1159:.
1149:41
1147:.
1124:.
1114:29
1112:.
1100:^
1086:.
1076:23
1074:.
1051:.
1043:.
1033:41
1031:.
1008:.
1000:.
988:11
986:.
982:.
959:.
949:.
901:^
877:.
867:26
865:.
842:.
834:.
824:41
822:.
804:^
788:.
757:.
703:23
701:.
697:.
677:12
675:.
671:.
636:.
601:.
568:.
560:.
550:14
548:.
532:^
381:,
377:,
373:,
355:,
336:".
1445:.
1429:.
1410:.
1389:.
1362:.
1334:.
1316:.
1302::
1294::
1288:7
1267:.
1242:.
1224:.
1210::
1202::
1196:8
1175:.
1155::
1132:.
1120::
1094:.
1082::
1059:.
1039::
1016:.
994::
967:.
945::
926:.
922::
885:.
873::
850:.
830::
798:.
784::
765:.
730:.
644:.
611:.
597::
576:.
556::
418:.
404:.
389:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
