Knowledge

Critical habitat

Source 📝

51:
target species survival. These factors may include things such as food, shelter and breeding sites. Before adoption these areas must include a review that is open to public input from all stakeholders within specific time frames. Unless deemed necessary for the species' continued existence, critical habitat does not include the entire geographical area occupied by a species. Department of Defense (DOD) lands are also exempt from being designated as critical habitat. Both public and private land can be specified as critical habitat.
30:-ESA. Contrary to common belief, designating an area as critical habitat does not preclude that area from development. A critical habitat designation only affects federal agency actions. Such actions include federally funded activities or activities requiring a federal permit that may negatively affect the quality of habitat for a listed species. This law also defines that there may be no " 165: 75:
it. This data is used to guide the selection of critical habitat as inadequate knowledge can cause a poor selection of habitat that may not best provide for the species survival. Effective critical habitat designations require vast scientific knowledge of the target species and compromise between stakeholders that balance the needs of environmental protection and economic needs.
84:
citizens engaged in activities on private land that do not involve a Federal agency. However, if an activity on private property requires an action by a Federal agency (such as a loan, increasing irrigation flows, permits from a federal agency, etc.), then the Federal agency must ensure that the action will not adversely modify the designated critical habitat.
50:
under the Endangered Species Act, with certain specified exceptions. Designations of critical habitats must be based on the best scientific information available and follow the procedure as outlined in the ESA. Areas under consideration must contain biological or physical features necessary for the
74:
In addition to these concerns the process of finding an area to designate as critical habitat, scientific, biological and economic data is needed. This includes detailed population and ecological data. If this information is not readily available then the lead agency must conduct studies to obtain
66:
Before designating critical habitat, careful consideration must be given to the economic impacts, impacts on national security, and other relevant impacts of specifying any particular area as critical habitat. An area may be excluded from critical habitat if the benefits of exclusion outweigh the
54:
A critical habitat designation does not set up a preserve or refuge; it applies only when Federal funding, permits, or projects are involved. Under Section 7 of the ESA, all Federal agencies must ensure that any actions they authorize, fund, or carry out are not likely to jeopardize the continued
83:
Conservation and economic views of land use are often in conflict and are taken into account when designating critical habitat. Activities like mining, logging, and transportation infrastructure can have a large impact on the surrounding habitat. Critical habitat requirements do not apply to
34:" of a listed species from the designated area. This land designation aims to protect vital habitat for endangered species by preserving areas that are able to meet the identified needs for the target species. This is a key feature of conservation as outlined in the ESA. 191:
Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration. (1973, December 21). 87 Stat. 884 - Endangered Species Conservation Act. . U.S. Government Printing Office. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/STATUTE-87/STATUTE-87-Pg884
169: 58:
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service share the responsibility for designating and implementing critical habitat for listed species.
106: 23:, though the area need not actually be occupied by the species at the time it is designated. Critical habitat is a legal designation of land use defined within the 114: 223:
Ahmadi, Mohsen; Farhadinia, Mohammad S.; Cushman, Samuel A.; Hemami, Mahmoud-Reza; Nezami Balouchi, Bagher; Jowkar, Houman; Macdonald, David W. (July 2020).
175: 366: 92: 279: 184: 99: 302: 19:
Critical habitat refers to specific geographic areas essential to the conservation of a listed endangered
356: 361: 263: 126: 209: 225:"Species and space: a combined gap analysis to guide management planning of conservation areas" 55:
existence of a listed species, or destroy or adversely modify its designated critical habitat.
27: 146: 131: 8: 151: 141: 224: 177:
Report for Congress: Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition
47: 43: 346: 322: 318: 283: 244: 303:"Estimate of the Area Affected Ecologically by the Road System in the United States" 351: 314: 275: 236: 136: 240: 31: 340: 326: 287: 248: 24: 264:"The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis" 262:
TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J.; SUCKLING, KIERAN F.; RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J. (2005).
68: 108:
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon v. Babbitt (1995)
67:
benefits of designation, unless excluding the area will result in the
20: 16:
Habitat area essential to the conservation of a listed species
222: 115:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club (2021)
280:
10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:teotes]2.0.co;2
261: 210:"87 Stat. 884 - Endangered Species Conservation Act" 338: 42:Critical habitat must be designated for all 173: 94:Tennessee Valley Authority v Hill (1978) 301:Forman, Richard T. T. (February 2000). 87: 339: 300: 37: 101:Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (1992) 13: 14: 378: 78: 319:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99299.x 168: This article incorporates 163: 294: 255: 216: 202: 185:Congressional Research Service 1: 157: 61: 195: 7: 120: 10: 383: 241:10.1007/s10980-020-01033-5 71:of the species concerned. 367:Environmental terminology 127:Habitat Conservation Plan 170:public domain material 28:Endangered Species Act 147:Habitat fragmentation 307:Conservation Biology 212:. December 28, 1973. 132:Habitat conservation 88:Relevant Court Cases 152:Restoration ecology 142:Habitat destruction 38:Designation process 357:Endangered species 48:endangered species 44:threatened species 362:Environmental law 229:Landscape Ecology 374: 331: 330: 298: 292: 291: 259: 253: 252: 235:(7): 1505–1517. 220: 214: 213: 206: 188: 182: 167: 166: 137:Habitat corridor 382: 381: 377: 376: 375: 373: 372: 371: 337: 336: 335: 334: 299: 295: 260: 256: 221: 217: 208: 207: 203: 198: 180: 174:Jasper Womach. 164: 160: 123: 90: 81: 64: 40: 17: 12: 11: 5: 380: 370: 369: 364: 359: 354: 349: 333: 332: 293: 254: 215: 200: 199: 197: 194: 193: 192: 189: 159: 156: 155: 154: 149: 144: 139: 134: 129: 122: 119: 89: 86: 80: 79:Considerations 77: 63: 60: 39: 36: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 379: 368: 365: 363: 360: 358: 355: 353: 350: 348: 345: 344: 342: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 297: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 258: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 219: 211: 205: 201: 190: 186: 179: 178: 171: 162: 161: 153: 150: 148: 145: 143: 140: 138: 135: 133: 130: 128: 125: 124: 118: 117: 116: 111: 110: 109: 104: 103: 102: 97: 96: 95: 85: 76: 72: 70: 59: 56: 52: 49: 45: 35: 33: 29: 26: 22: 313:(1): 31–35. 310: 306: 296: 271: 267: 257: 232: 228: 218: 204: 176: 113: 112: 107: 105: 100: 98: 93: 91: 82: 73: 65: 57: 53: 41: 18: 341:Categories 274:(4): 360. 268:BioScience 158:References 69:extinction 62:Challenges 327:0888-8892 288:0006-3568 249:0921-2973 196:Footnotes 347:Habitats 121:See also 352:Habitat 21:species 325:  286:  247:  181:(PDF) 172:from 323:ISSN 284:ISSN 245:ISSN 46:and 32:take 25:U.S. 315:doi 276:doi 237:doi 343:: 321:. 311:14 309:. 305:. 282:. 272:55 270:. 266:. 243:. 233:35 231:. 227:. 183:. 329:. 317:: 290:. 278:: 251:. 239:: 187:.

Index

species
U.S.
Endangered Species Act
take
threatened species
endangered species
extinction
Tennessee Valley Authority v Hill (1978)
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (1992)
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon v. Babbitt (1995)
United States Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club (2021)
Habitat Conservation Plan
Habitat conservation
Habitat corridor
Habitat destruction
Habitat fragmentation
Restoration ecology
public domain material
Report for Congress: Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition
Congressional Research Service
"87 Stat. 884 - Endangered Species Conservation Act"
"Species and space: a combined gap analysis to guide management planning of conservation areas"
doi
10.1007/s10980-020-01033-5
ISSN
0921-2973
"The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis"
doi
10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:teotes]2.0.co;2
ISSN

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.